<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Phase, composition, and growth mechanism for secondary organic aerosol from
the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Phase, composition, and growth mechanism for SOA}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Zhao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yue</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1157-5101</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wingen</surname><given-names>Lisa M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-9913</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Perraud</surname><given-names>Véronique</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Finlayson-Pitts</surname><given-names>Barbara J.</given-names></name>
          <email>bjfinlay@uci.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of California,
Irvine, CA 92697, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Barbara J. Finlayson-Pitts (bjfinlay@uci.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>3245</fpage><lpage>3264</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Sesquiterpenes are an important class of biogenic volatile organic compounds
(BVOCs) and have a high secondary organic aerosol (SOA) forming potential.
However, SOA formation from sesquiterpene oxidation has received less
attention compared to other BVOCs such as monoterpenes, and the underlying
mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we present a comprehensive
experimental investigation of the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene both in a
glass flow reactor (27–44 s reaction times) and in static Teflon chambers
(30–60 min reaction times). The SOA was collected by impaction or filters,
followed by analysis using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry (ESI-MS), or measured online using direct analysis in
real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) and aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS). The slow evaporation of
2-ethylhexyl nitrate that was incorporated into the SOA during its formation
and growth gives an estimated diffusion coefficient of
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and shows that SOA is a highly
viscous semisolid. Possible structures of four newly observed low molecular
weight (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 Da) reaction products with higher oxygen content
than those previously reported were identified. High molecular weight (HMW)
products formed in the early stages of the oxidation have structures
consistent with aldol condensation products, peroxyhemiacetals, and esters.
The size-dependent distributions of HMW products in the SOA, as well as the
effects of stabilized Criegee intermediate (SCI) scavengers on HMW products
and particle formation, confirm that HMW products and reactions of SCI play a crucial role in early stages of particle formation. Our
studies provide new insights into mechanisms of SOA formation and growth in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis and the important role of sesquiterpenes in new
particle formation as suggested by field measurements.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Organic aerosol is ubiquitous in the atmosphere and has an important
influence on air quality (Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000; Seinfeld and
Pandis, 2006; R. Y. Zhang et al., 2015), climate (Kanakidou et al., 2005; IPCC,
2013), and human health (Mauderly and Chow, 2008; Shiraiwa et al., 2012).
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formed from the oxidation of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) contributes a substantial fraction (up to 90 %) of
organic aerosol (Zhang et al., 2007). Biogenic VOCs (BVOCs) such as isoprene
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, monoterpenes (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and sesquiterpenes
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> account for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % of global VOC emissions
(Guenther et al., 1995; Goldstein and Galbally, 2007) and are the dominant
contributors to global SOA formation upon reaction with oxidants that are
mainly anthropogenically derived (Kanakidou et al., 2005; Hallquist et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p>Sesquiterpenes are an important class of BVOCs, with emissions being
estimated as 9–29 % of those of monoterpenes (Helmig et al., 2007;
Sakulyanontvittaya et al., 2008a). A variety of sesquiterpenes have been
detected in the atmosphere, including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-humulene, longifolene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-farnesene, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene (Helmig
et al., 2007; Sakulyanontvittaya et al., 2008a; Duhl et al., 2008;
Bouvier-Brown et al., 2009). Sesquiterpenes have a high SOA-forming potential
because of their large molecular sizes and, for many of them, the endocyclic
double bond structure, which favors the formation of low-volatility oxidation
products. The results of laboratory chamber studies show high aerosol mass
yields (defined as the mass of organic aerosol formed per mass of precursor
VOC reacted) from sesquiterpene oxidation (Hoffmann et al., 1997; Lee et al.,
2006; Ng et al., 2006; Winterhalter et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2012; Jaoui et
al., 2013; Yao et al., 2014; Tasoglou and Pandis, 2015). For example, an
average 53 % aerosol mass yield was reported for ozonolysis and 55 %
for photooxidation (Jaoui et al., 2013). Field and model studies have shown
that sesquiterpene SOA comprises a significant fraction (6–32 %) of
ambient organic aerosol from local to regional scales (Sakulyanontvittaya et
al., 2008b; Hu et al., 2008; Bouvier-Brown et al., 2009; Ding et al., 2014;
Ying et al., 2015), with its contribution comparable to that of monoterpene
SOA in a variety of environments including rural, suburban, and urban areas
(Hu et al., 2008; Ding et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Although sesquiterpene oxidation contributes substantially to SOA, the
underlying mechanisms of SOA formation and growth are not well understood.
Previous studies of sesquiterpene oxidation have mainly focused on aerosol
mass yields, the identities and formation mechanisms of first-, second-, and
higher-generation low molecular weight (LMW) oxidation products, and their
contributions to the formation of SOA (Hoffmann et al., 1997; Jaoui et al.,
2004, 2013; Lee et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2006; Kanawati et al., 2008; Reinnig
et al., 2009; Winterhalter et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2011;
Chen et al., 2012; Alfarra et al., 2012; Yao et al., 2014). A few studies
have suggested that sesquiterpenes play an important role in new particle
formation. For instance, field observations show that in new particle
formation events, sesquiterpene oxidation products significantly contribute
to initial nucleation and growth (Boy et al., 2008; Bonn et al., 2008). In
addition, Bonn and Moortgat (2003) suggested that the formation of oligomers
was potentially important for nucleation. Lastly, laboratory studies of the
ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene have reported a
negative influence on particle nucleation of species that can scavenge
stabilized Criegee intermediate (SCI), supporting a key role for
sesquiterpene SCI in forming new particles (Bonn and Moortgat, 2003; Yao et
al., 2014).</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Cedrene (Fig. 1) is found in air (Duhl et al., 2008), reacts
rapidly with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Richters et al., 2015), and is also an ideal compound
for the study of sesquiterpene oxidation because (1) the single C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C
bond in its structure helps to simplify the oxidation chemistry and the
product distribution and (2) its resemblance to other sesquiterpenes such as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-humulene in the endocyclic double bond
structure (with a methyl group at one end) may enable, to some degree, the
generalization of SOA formation mechanisms for this class of compounds.
Previous studies of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene oxidation identified a number of
products with molecular masses below 300 Da in both the gas and particle
phases and proposed reaction mechanisms based on known ozone chemistry
(Jaoui et al., 2004, 2013; Reinnig et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2014).
Preliminary results from our lab (Zhao et al., 2015) subsequently identified
higher molecular weight products in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis for the
first time, and the SOA composition suggested that the major mechanisms for
particle formation are likely different than that for the small alkenes
(Sadezky et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The structure of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>There have been very few measurements of the phase state of sesquiterpene
SOA. The phase state of SOA has an important influence on a number of
physical and chemical processes of aerosols, such as formation and growth
(Koop et al., 2011; Perraud et al., 2012; Shiraiwa and Seinfeld, 2012;
Renbaum-Wolff et al., 2013), chemical aging (Renbaum and Smith, 2009;
Shiraiwa et al., 2011; Lignell et al., 2014; Chan et al., 2014; Slade and
Knopf, 2014), and water uptake (Mikhailov et al., 2009; Koop et al., 2011;
Bones et al., 2012; Hodas et al., 2015; Pajunoja et al., 2015) and thus
affects their environmental and climate impacts. There is ample evidence that
in many cases, SOA may not be a low-viscosity liquid but rather a highly
viscous semisolid (Virtanen et al., 2010; Cappa and Wilson, 2011; Koop et
al., 2011; Vaden et al., 2011; Saukko et al., 2012; Perraud et al., 2012;
Abramson et al., 2013; Renbaum-Wolff et al., 2013; Kidd et al., 2014a, b;
Bateman et al., 2015). Recently, Saukko et al. (2012) and Pajunoja et
al. (2015) examined the phase state of SOA particles formed from OH and
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of longifolene based on particle bounce measurements and
found that longifolene SOA is solid or semisolid over a wide range of
relative humidities. To better understand the phase state of sesquiterpene
SOA and its implications for various atmospheric processes, more particle
phase state measurements are needed.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of different types of flow reactor and chamber experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exp</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[VOC]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[HCOOH] or</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reaction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Particle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Particle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Particle</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">type<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(ppb)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ppm)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[2-EHN]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">time</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">size</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">mass conc.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">number conc.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(nm)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d, e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR1 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR2 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">71 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR3 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR4 (5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR5 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">275</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">180 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR6 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR7 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 ppm HCOOH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FR8 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 ppm HCOOH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 s</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH1 (4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">66 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">73 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH2 (4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">66 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH3 (3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">111 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">363 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH4 (3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">215</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">none</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">140 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">984 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 186</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH5 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">215</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">400 ppb 2-EHN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">127 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">663 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> FR and CH represent flow reactor and chamber experiments,
respectively. The numbers in parentheses after the labels represent the number of times an experiment was repeated.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The concentrations were calculated from the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene liquid injected into the flow reactor and chamber and the total
gas flow. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> High O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is needed to get enough reaction to form
particles in less than 1 min in FR experiments.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Geometric mean diameter; the size distributions of SOA formed in the
flow reactor are given in Figs. S1 and 11.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> All the data are given as average value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> one standard
deviation. SOA mass concentrations are obtained using a particle density
of 1.1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yao et al., 2014). The chamber SOA data are given for
30 or 60 min reaction times and were not corrected for the wall loss.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>In the present study, we report the results of a more comprehensive
experimental investigation of ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene. The phase
state and mechanisms of growth of SOA are examined by probing the evaporation
of a tracer molecule, 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (2-EHN), incorporated into the SOA
during ozonolysis. The structures and formation mechanisms of high molecular
weight (HMW) products, as well as their roles in particle formation and
growth, are elucidated in light of their fragmentation mass spectra, accurate
mass data, size-dependent SOA composition, and the effects of water vapor and
SCI scavenger. The identity and formation mechanisms of some newly observed
LMW (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 Da) oxidation products are also explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
      <p>Experiments on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis were carried out both in a glass
flow reactor and in static Teflon chambers in the absence and presence of
water vapor or SCI scavengers at 295 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 K. No seed particles or OH
scavengers were used in any of these experiments. Table 1 and Fig. S1 in the
Supplement summarize the conditions and particle characteristics for various
types of flow reactor and chamber experiments.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Flow reactor experiments</title>
      <p>The flow reactor (4.6 cm i.d. and 85 cm long) used in this study has been
described in detail previously (Zhao et al., 2015). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Cedrene was
added to the flow reactor by injecting the pure liquid (Sigma-Aldrich and
Extrasynthese, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98 %) into a flow of 1.76–2.96 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
clean, dry air (Praxair, ultra zero air) using an automated syringe pump
(Pump Systems Inc., model NE-1000). Ozone was generated by passing a flow of
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Praxair, Ultra High Purity, 99.993 %) at 0.24 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
through a pen-ray mercury lamp (model 11SC-2) and subsequently added to the
flow reactor downstream of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene inlet. The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, determined using a UV-VIS spectrometer (Ocean Optics, HR4000),
was adjusted by changing the UV exposure of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> via a movable metal
cover surrounding the lamp. The total flow rate in the reactor was 2.0, 2.9,
or 3.2 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a residence time of 44, 30, or 27 s,
respectively. Some of the experiments were carried out in the presence of
water vapor or formic acid, both of which can act as SCI scavengers. Water
vapor was added by bubbling a flow of clean air through nanopure water
(18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) into the flow reactor. The relative humidity of the
airflow (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % relative humidity (RH)) in the reactor was measured using a humidity
probe (Vaisala, HMT234). Formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 %) was
added to the reactor using the same method as for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene.</p>
      <p>The particle size distributions were measured at the outlet of the reactor
using a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, TSI), which is equipped with
an electrostatic classifier (model 3080), a long differential mobility
analyzer (model 3081), and a condensation particle counter (model 3776). When
the size distribution of SOA was stable, the polydisperse particles were
collected onto a 47 mm PTFE filter (Millipore Fluoropore, 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
pore size) at a flow rate of 1.9, 2.8, or 3.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with venting of
the remaining 0.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol flow to the hood. In order to obtain
sufficient particle mass for the analysis, the collection lasted 3–15 h,
depending on the particle mass concentrations. Excellent collection
efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 %) was obtained for particles of all diameters as
established by SMPS measurements downstream of the filter. The filter samples
were extracted immediately with a 2 mL mixture (5 : 3 in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
methanol (OmniSolv; liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
(LC-MS) grade) and hexanes (a mixture of hexane isomers;
Fisher Scientific; 99.9 %) under ultrasonication in an ice bath for
30 min. The extracts were then purged gently using a flow of dry N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
room temperature to evaporate down to 1 mL. As hexanes are more volatile than
methanol, the remaining solvent in the extracts would be primarily methanol.
The resulting extracts were either analyzed directly using an LCT Premier
electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ESI-ToF-MS, Waters)
or diluted with water (OmniSolv; LC-MS grade) to yield a final 50 : 50
water : methanol mixed solution, followed by analysis with a Xevo TQS
electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (ESI-TQ-MS,
Waters). In order to verify that the sonication has no significant impact on
SOA measurements, filter extraction was performed instead, in some
experiments, in the mixture of methanol and hexanes by shaking for 30 min. No
significant difference in product distribution was observed in ESI mass
spectra of the SOA extracted with and without sonication. In separate
experiments, the chemical composition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA was also
measured in real time using direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry
(DART-MS).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chamber experiments</title>
      <p>Chamber experiments were carried out in 450 L Teflon chambers. Two types of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis experiments were conducted: (i) under dry or
humid (72 % RH) conditions and (ii) in the absence or presence of gas
phase 2-EHN, which was incorporated into SOA during
ozonolysis and used as a tracer molecule to probe the viscosity of SOA. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene was added using an automated syringe pump to inject a
defined volume of pure liquid into a flow of clean, dry air, which was
directed into the chamber. Water vapor was added by bubbling air through
nanopure water into the chamber. 2-EHN (Sigma-Aldrich, 97 %) was added by
injecting a known volume of liquid into the chamber. After 10 min to allow
for mixing of the gases (or 2 h for the evaporation of the 2-EHN),
ozonolysis was initiated by adding O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generated by a commercial ozone
generator (Polymetrics, Model T-816) to the chamber.</p>
      <p>For experiments CH1–CH3 (Table 1), SOA composition was examined online by a
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS;
Aerodyne Research Inc.) or by collection onto a PTFE filter at a flow rate of
12 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Filter sampling started after 30 min reaction time and
lasted about 30 min. Because of the small volume of the chamber (450 L) and
relatively low SOA mass loading in most experiments (see Table 1), in each
experiment the SOA was sampled onto one filter to ensure enough mass for
ESI-MS analysis. The filter was extracted using the same method as for SOA
samples obtained in flow reactor experiments, followed by ESI-MS analysis.
For experiments CH4 and CH5, SOA formed without or with added 2-EHN
at a 60 min reaction time was collected onto a germanium (Ge) attenuated
total reflectance (ATR) crystal using a custom-designed impactor (Kidd et
al., 2014b) at a flow rate of 30 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The SOA impacted on the ATR
crystal was subsequently probed using attenuated total reflectance Fourier
transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy.</p>
      <p>Most experiments were performed with excess O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In order to evaluate the
influence of excess O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which could lead to secondary oxidation of
first-generation products, some experiments were performed with excess
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene (Table 1, experiment CH3). The ESI mass spectra of SOA
formed in the presence of excess O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or excess <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene are very
similar, suggesting that the excess O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has no observable influence on
SOA formation. In addition, no significant difference was observed in ESI
mass spectra of SOA formed with or without added 2-EHN, suggesting that the
incorporation of 2-EHN into the SOA does not change its overall composition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>SOA characterization</title>
      <p>In both flow reactor and chamber experiments, aerosol samples were directed
through a 10 cm monolith extruded carbon denuder
(Novacarb<sup>™</sup>; Mast Carbon, Ltd.) to remove the
gas phase species prior to particle collection on the filter. No significant
difference in particle size distribution was observed with or without the
denuder. Blank experiments were also carried out under the same experimental
conditions as the ozonolysis experiments but without adding O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the
flow reactor or the chamber.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>ATR-FTIR measurements</title>
      <p>The ATR crystal with impacted SOA was placed immediately into an ATR cell
(volume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> located in the sampling compartment of a Nicolet
6700 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). A flow of dry synthetic air at
100 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> passed over the sample on the crystal. In some
experiments, this flow first passed through a pen-ray mercury lamp, producing
8 ppm O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in order to probe the possibility of secondary oxidation of
SOA components by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Single-beam spectra at a resolution of
4 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (128 scans) were collected before and after impaction of SOA.
The absorbance spectra of SOA on the crystal were derived from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the single-beam
spectra of the clean and SOA-covered crystal, respectively. The infrared (IR) spectra of
SOA were obtained over 20 h of air or O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure to study the
evolution and evaporation of the impacted SOA during this period. In
experiments performed in the presence of 2-EHN, the signal at 1280 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
was followed over time to investigate the evaporation of 2-EHN and determine
its diffusion coefficient throughout the SOA matrix.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>ESI-MS measurements</title>
      <p>Extracts of both SOA and blank samples were analyzed by ESI-ToF-MS operated
in either positive or negative ion mode. The operating conditions of this
mass spectrometer were described previously (Zhao et al., 2015). Mass spectra
were acquired in the 200–1000 Da mass range. Although ESI often forms
multiply charged ions, the major ions observed throughout the mass spectra
are in the singly charged state, as indicated by the unity spacing of the
isotope peaks (Greaves and Roboz, 2013). Sodium adducts [M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
were the primary ions observed in the positive ion mode (ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
deprotonated ions [M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the negative ion mode (ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mass
spectra of blanks, in which the peaks are mainly attributed to the impurities
in the solvent and filter and have intensities of 10–30 % of SOA peaks,
were subtracted from those of SOA samples. Accurate mass measurements were
performed using sodium formate, polyethylene glycol, and polyethylene glycol
monomethyl ether as mass calibration standards. In addition, SOA extracts
were analyzed using ESI-TQ-MS to record the fragmentation spectra (MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of selected ions, from which typical structures of reasonable products based
on likely mechanisms were tentatively assigned. The parent ions selected by
the first quadrupole (Q1) enter the collision cell (Q2), where they fragment
via collision-induced dissociation (CID) with argon as the collision gas at
collision energies of 20–30 eV, and the resulting fragment ions are
monitored by the third quadrupole (Q3). In this case, the ESI source was
operated in the positive ion mode under optimized conditions as follows:
capillary voltage 3.2 kV; desolvation gas flow 1000 L h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
desolvation gas temperature 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; nebulizer gas pressure 7 bar.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>AMS measurements</title>
      <p>An Aerodyne HR-ToF-AMS was used to analyze the chemical composition and to
examine O : C ratios of polydisperse SOA formed in the chamber. Due to the
small sizes of the SOA formed in the flow reactor, it was impossible to
measure them with the AMS, and thus all AMS results presented hereafter are
exclusively from the chamber studies. A detailed description of this
instrument has been given elsewhere (DeCarlo et al., 2006). The SOA sampled
into the instrument was vaporized at 600 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. High-resolution MS data
were collected in both V mode and W mode and analyzed using the
“Improved-Ambient” method (Canagaratna et al., 2015). Measurements with a
particle filter were carried out before each experiment to aid in
quantification of the CHO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 29, which has interference
from gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NN and can significantly affect elemental analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>DART-MS measurements</title>
      <p>Direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) is an atmospheric
pressure soft ionization method used to examine chemical composition of solid
and liquid samples after thermal desorption. A more detailed description of
this mass spectrometric technique is given elsewhere (Cody et al., 2005; Nah
et al., 2013). In this work, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed in the flow reactor
under dry conditions was measured in real time using a Xevo TQS triple
quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters) equipped with a commercial DART ion
source (IonSense, DART SVP with Vapur<sup>®</sup>
Interface). As DART-MS is a surface-sensitive technique, to ensure that the
bulk of particles can be effectively probed, the aerosol stream exiting the
flow reactor, in which the gas phase species were removed using a denuder,
was heated to 160 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before entering into the ionization region. The
DART ion source was operated in either positive or negative ion modes with He
as the reagent gas under the following conditions: He gas flow
3.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; He gas temperature 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; grid electrode
voltage 350 V. The configuration of the DART ion source interfaced to the MS
is shown in Fig. S2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Panel <bold>(a)</bold>: a typical ATR-FTIR spectrum of SOA from
ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the chamber (experiment CH4, Table 1).
This spectrum is obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
single-beam spectrum of the clean crystal and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is that of the
SOA-covered crystal recorded immediately following impaction. Panel
<bold>(b, c)</bold>: typical difference spectra of SOA after 20 h of exposure to
a flow of clean air or 8 ppm O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing air, respectively. These
spectra are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the single-beam
spectrum of SOA-covered crystal collected immediately following impaction and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is that after 20 h of air or O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure. The positive and
negative peaks in the difference spectra represent an increase and decrease,
respectively, of the functional groups in SOA over 20 h of exposure.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>ATR-FTIR measurements</title>
      <p>Figure 2a is a typical ATR-FTIR spectrum recorded immediately following
impaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed in the chamber in the absence of
2-EHN. The strong C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O band at 1706 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that aldehydes and
ketones are important SOA components. A shoulder at 1762 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> may
indicate the presence of carboxylic acids, esters, or other species
containing C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O groups, with a more electronegative atom such as
oxygen being attached to the carbonyl carbon (Socrates, 2001; Kidd et al.,
2014a).</p>
      <p>Figure 2b is a difference spectrum showing the changes in SOA after exposure
to a flow of clean dry air for 20 h. The positive and negative peaks in the
spectrum represent an increase or decrease, respectively, in the functional
groups in SOA due to air exposure. There is a decrease in peaks at 3416,
1762, 1371, and 1076 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and an increase in peaks at 1735, 1706, 1410,
and in the 1100–1350 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> region. Note that there is no obvious change
in the C-H peaks around 2957 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that evaporation of
organic species from SOA during air exposure is not important. Therefore, the
changes in SOA as indicated by the difference spectrum are due to chemistry
occurring in SOA during air exposure. One of the possible processes is the
decomposition of oligomers that comprise a significant fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA as discussed later. For example, decomposition of
peroxyhemiacetals and aldol condensation products to their precursors can
lead to the loss of O-H groups and concomitant formation of ketone and
aldehyde C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O groups. The decomposition of oligomers in SOA was supported by
ESI-MS measurements of SOA collected on Teflon filters and then exposed to a
flow of clean dry air; the relative ion intensity of oligomers to LMW
products in the mass spectrum of SOA extracted after 20 h of air exposure is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % lower compared to that of SOA extracted immediately
following collection. The difference spectrum of the SOA film exposed to
clean humid air at 89 % RH for 40 min (Fig. S3) shows a broad band
centered at 3426 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a narrow band at 1640 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting
from the stretching and bending vibration of adsorbed water, respectively,
with relative strength of stretching vs. bending of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2. The absence of
a negative peak at 1640 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the difference spectrum after dry air
exposure as shown in Fig. 2b, therefore, suggests that the contribution of
water to the loss in the O-H band at 3416 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is minor, and the
decrease in this region must be due to a change in SOA components.</p>
      <p>Figure 2c shows the difference spectrum of SOA upon exposure to 8 ppm
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 20 h, which is very similar to the difference spectrum of SOA
after 20 h of exposure to clean air (Fig. 2b). This shows that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA oxidation products are not reactive toward O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, at least as
detectable by changes in the infrared spectrum.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Viscosity and phase state of SOA</title>
      <p>In order to probe the phase state of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA, a relatively
volatile organic species, 2-EHN (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atm at 295 K; Pankow and Asher, 2008), was
included in one type of experiment (CH5, Table 1) so that it could be
incorporated into the SOA as it is formed in the chamber. The evaporation of
2-EHN from the SOA impacted onto the ATR crystal upon exposure to a flow of
clean dry air was followed with time to probe the phase state of SOA.</p>
      <p>Figure 3a shows a digital photograph of a typical impaction pattern on the
ATR crystal of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed in the chamber in the presence of
gas phase 2-EHN. The SOA impacts and adheres to the crystal, forming a narrow
film <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 mm in width at the centerline. Similar impaction patterns
were also observed for the SOA formed without added 2-EHN. Figure 3b shows
the SOA number and mass size distributions after 60 min reaction time in the
chamber, as well as the collection efficiency of the impactor as a function
of particle diameter (Kidd et al., 2014b). By dividing the particles into a
number of 10 nm size bins and applying the average particle collection
efficiency at each bin, the SOA mass collected on the crystal is estimated to
be 42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
particle mass and average particle collection efficiency at each size bin,
respectively. Since the particle wall loss in the chamber during impaction
was not considered, this mass should be an upper limit. Assuming a particle
density of 1.1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yao et al., 2014), the maximum average
thickness of the SOA film on the ATR crystal is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. This estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relies on the assumption that SOA
impacted on the crystal forms a uniform narrow film. This may underestimate
the film thickness by as much as a factor of 2 if, rather than forming a
thin film, the SOA is collected in separate columns immediately below the
impactor holes. An additional, smaller uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> results from
variation in the collection efficiency of the impactor over the particle size
range of interest (see Fig. 3b). We estimate the combination of these two to
give an uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of about a factor of 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Panel <bold>(a)</bold>: digital photograph of a typical impaction
pattern of SOA formed by ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the presence of
2-EHN in the chamber (experiment CH5, Table 1). The photograph shows a
1 cm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 cm section of the crystal. The impacted SOA forms a
narrow film <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 mm in width along the centerline of the crystal. Panel
<bold>(b)</bold>: the number (blue triangles) and mass (red squares) weighted
size distribution of chamber <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed in the presence of
2-EHN. Also shown is the collection efficiency of the impactor as a function
of particle diameter (black circle) measured using carboxylate-modified latex
(CML) spheres in a previous study (Kidd et al., 2014b).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The refractive index of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA is not known, but a value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 is reasonable based on literature values for SOA from other
biogenic organic oxidations (Lambe et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2014). The depth
of penetration of the IR beam at 1280 and 1635 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, peaks which
correspond to the absorption bands of organic nitrate as discussed below, is
then calculated to be 0.52 and 0.41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Harrick, 1967),
respectively, for SOA on a Ge crystal. This suggests that the entire depth of
the SOA film on the ATR crystal can be probed reasonably well by the IR beam
in the region of interest.</p>
      <p>Figure 4a is a typical ATR-FTIR spectrum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed in
the presence of 2-EHN in the chamber under dry conditions. The spectrum is
essentially the same as that of SOA formed without 2-EHN (Fig. 2a) except
that there are two new bands at 1635 and 1280 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from the
vibrations of the nitrate functional group (Socrates, 2001; Bruns et al.,
2010; Perraud et al., 2012) when 2-EHN is present. Figure 4b shows the
difference spectrum of SOA after exposure to a flow of clean dry air for
20 h. In addition to the spectral features similar to the difference
spectrum of 2-EHN-free SOA (Fig. 2b), there is a small loss of nitrate peaks
at 1635 and 1280 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating some evaporation of 2-EHN from SOA
during air exposure. Figure 5 shows the temporal evolution of the integrated
area of the nitrate peak at 1280 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 20 h of air exposure. It
can be seen that after 20 h of air exposure, only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 % of 2-EHN
evaporated from the SOA. This slow evaporation indicates that 2-EHN is
incorporated in the bulk of the SOA and that the SOA must be a high-viscosity
semisolid rather than a liquid where diffusion would be much more rapid
(Shiraiwa et al., 2011; Koop et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Panel <bold>(a)</bold>: a typical ATR-FTIR spectrum of SOA from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the presence of gas phase 2-EHN in the chamber (experiment CH5,
Table 1). This spectrum is obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the single-beam spectra of the clean crystal and SOA-covered crystal recorded immediately following impaction. Panel <bold>(b)</bold>: a typical
difference spectrum of SOA after 20 h of exposure to a flow of clean dry
air. This spectrum is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the single-beam spectra of SOA-covered crystal recorded
immediately following impaction and after 20 h of air exposure. The
positive and negative peaks in the spectra represent an increase and
decrease in the functional groups over 20 h of air exposure,
respectively. Panel <bold>(c)</bold>: ATR-FTIR spectrum of SOA formed without 2-EHN following
exposure to a flow of dry air containing 20 ppm 2-EHN for 1 h. This
spectrum is derived from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the single-beam spectra of the clean crystal and SOA-covered
crystal exposed to 20 ppm 2-EHN for 1 h, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The incorporation of high-volatility 2-EHN into the bulk of high-viscosity
SOA is consistent with a condensation particle growth mechanism
(Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006; Riipinen et al.,
2011; Perraud et al., 2012), for which organic species condense kinetically
onto the surface of pre-existing particles and become buried and incorporated
into the bulk by incoming low-volatility organics. It is important to note
that in the ATR-FTIR spectrum (Fig. 4c) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed
without added 2-EHN in the chamber and then exposed to 20 ppm 2-EHN in the
ATR cell for 1 h, the absorption bands associated with organic nitrate
at 1635 and 1280 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are negligible. This observation suggests that
the uptake of 2-EHN into or onto previously formed SOA is not important.</p>
      <p>Assuming that the evaporation of 2-EHN is determined only by its diffusion in
the film of SOA impacted on the ATR crystal and that the diffusion follows
Fick's Law, for a film with uniform 2-EHN concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and zero concentration at the surface for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the total fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
of 2-EHN remaining in the film at time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as (Crank, 1975;
Mehrer, 2007)

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mtext>   .</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In Eq. (1), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion coefficient of 2-EHN in the SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the thickness of the SOA film on the ATR crystal. A best fit of the
evaporation data of 2-EHN in Fig. 5 to Eq. (1) gives <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. With the SOA film thickness <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
estimated above, the diffusion coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2-EHN in SOA is
calculated to be 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent
with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the order of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
predicted from the timescale for evaporation combined with the estimated
thickness of the SOA layer (Shiraiwa et al., 2011; Koop et al., 2011). The
uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of about a factor of 2 described above translates into
an uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of about a factor of 4. However, this value for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is within the range of diffusion coefficients that would be expected in a
highly viscous semisolid matrix, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shiraiwa et al., 2011; Koop et
al., 2011), confirming that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA is a high-viscosity
semisolid. However, because of their small sizes, these particles do not
have enough momentum to bounce as they impact on the ATR crystal, as seen for
larger SOA from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene oxidation in earlier studies (Kidd et al.,
2014a, b). Recently, Saukko et al. (2012) and Pajunoja et al. (2015) reported
the formation of semisolid SOA from the oxidation of the sesquiterpene
longifolene based on particle bounce measurements. However, to our knowledge,
the present work shows the first measurement of the diffusion coefficient of
an organic species in sesquiterpene SOA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>The normalized integrated area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak at 1280 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
as a function of time over 20 h of clean, dry air exposure.
The red line is a best fit (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.976) of the evaporation data to
Eq. (1). Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>ESI mass spectra of SOA formed from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene
in the flow reactor (experiment FR4, Table 1) in <bold>(a)</bold> positive and
<bold>(b)</bold> negative ion modes. Black and red labels indicate the previously reported
(Jaoui et al., 2004, 2013; Reinnig et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2014) and newly
observed products, respectively. P1 represents the low molecular weight
products, and P2, P3, and P4 denote higher molecular weight products formed
by combinations of two, three, or four of the P1 products, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>SOA composition</title>
      <p>Figure 6 shows typical ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra of SOA formed from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis in the flow reactor at 30 s reaction time. Ions
in the mass range <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 220–350 correspond to LMW products derived directly
from oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene and retaining much of the structure of
the parent compound (hereafter termed P1 products). Those with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 420 correspond to HMW products formed using two, three, or four
P1 products (hereafter termed P2, P3, and P4 products, respectively) as
building blocks. We try to avoid using the terms “dimer”, “trimer”, etc.
which may imply simple combinations of smaller species whereas P2, P3, etc.
are clearly complex combinations of different LMW products. As discussed
above, there is no evidence that any of these peaks arise from multiple
charging of higher molecular weight species. The data presented in Fig. 6
suggest that P1 and P2 products comprise a dominant fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA. Compared to the ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum, the corresponding ions in the
ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum are generally 24 Da lower in mass. This is consistent with
the fact that the ions observed in the ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mode are primarily sodium
adducts, while those in the ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mode are deprotonated ions with a
predominant contribution from carboxylic acids.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra of polydisperse SOA with geometric mean diameter
of <bold>(a)</bold> 15 nm and <bold>(b)</bold> 23 nm formed from ozonolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the flow reactor at 27 and 44 s reaction times,
respectively, under dry conditions (experiments FR1 and FR2, Table 1). The
size distributions of SOA are shown in Fig. S1a. Note that these experiments
were conducted as a separate series from other experiments. Because ESI-MS
sensitivity changes over long periods (1 month or more), the intensity ratios
of oligomer to P1 products in the mass spectra shown here cannot be directly
compared with other mass spectra obtained in this work. However, those ratios
in the above mass spectra are comparable with each other as they were
acquired on the timescale of days, over which ESI-MS sensitivity is
essentially constant.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=332.897244pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 7 shows the ESI mass spectra of polydisperse <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA
(size distributions are given in Fig. S1a) with geometric mean diameters of
15 and 23 nm formed in the flow reactor at the same concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but different reaction times (27 and 44 s)
under dry conditions (Table 1, experiments FR1–FR2). Among P2 products, those
at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 481–543 are the most abundant ones in the flow reactor SOA and
they have a greater contribution to the smaller particles formed at shorter
reaction times (Fig. 7a). Conversely, P1 products contribute more to larger
particles formed at longer reaction times (Fig. 7b). Figure S4 shows
additional ESI mass spectra of polydisperse <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA particles
of different geometric mean diameters (13, 18, and 26 nm) formed in the flow
reactor at the same reaction time (30 s) but different concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene under dry conditions (Table 1, experiments FR3–FR5). A
similar size-dependent distribution of P1 and P2 products is observed. These
results suggest that P2 products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 481–543 may play an important
role in initial particle formation, while P1 products contribute
significantly to particle growth.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>ESI mass spectra of SOA formed from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene
in the chamber (experiment CH1, Table 1) in <bold>(a)</bold> positive and <bold>(b)</bold> negative
ion modes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 8 shows typical ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene
SOA formed in the chamber. The chamber SOA has a geometric mean diameter of
66 nm, larger than those formed in the flow reactor (13–26 nm, depending
on the experimental conditions) due to the longer reaction times and hence
greater extents of reaction. Figure 8 shows that the chamber particles also
have relatively more P1 products, in agreement with the important role of P1
products in particle growth. In addition, the subset of P2 products with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 543 in the positive ion mode accounts for a greater fraction of
total P2 products in the chamber SOA than in the flow reactor SOA (Figs. 6a
and 7). This suggests that these larger P2 products (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 543)
are mainly formed at longer reaction times in the chamber and contribute
mainly to particle growth.</p>
      <p>It is known that P1 products may undergo ion–molecule reactions to form
noncovalently bound clusters in the ESI source (Müller et al., 2009; Gao
et al., 2010), and the formation of such clusters, if it occurs, is expected
to be positively correlated with the abundance of P1 products. However, as
shown in Figs. 7 and S4, the signal intensity ratio of P2 to P1 products is
inversely dependent on the size of SOA. This suggests that the P2 products
observed in ESI mass spectra are unlikely to be artifacts of in-source
clustering. In addition, HMW products in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA are also
detected in real time by DART-MS, which employs a different ionization
method. Figure S5 shows typical DART<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (positive ion mode) and DART<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
(negative ion mode) mass spectra of flow reactor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA, which
was heated to 160 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before introduction into the ionization region.
The masses of P1 and P2 products in the DART<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectrum are generally
22–24 Da lower than those in the ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectrum (Fig. 6), consistent
with the ions detected by DART-MS in the positive mode being primarily
[M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and [M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cody et al., 2005; Nah et
al., 2013). In contrast, essentially the same masses for P1 and P2 products
were observed in DART<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra, in both of which the ions
are predominantly [M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. There are some differences between ESI
and DART mass spectra that are likely due to the heating of the incoming
aerosol stream for DART-MS and the higher DART source temperature. Overall,
DART-MS measurements further confirm that the P2 products observed by ESI-MS
are not artifacts from the ion source.</p>
      <p>Previous studies have reported an OH yield of 62–67 % from ozonolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene (Shu and Atkinson, 1994; Yao et al., 2014). Therefore,
reaction with OH could play a role in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene oxidation in the
absence of an OH scavenger. We reported in a previous study (Zhao et al.,
2015) ESI-MS spectra in the absence and presence of cyclohexane, which showed
that the relative intensity of P2–P4 peaks in the presence of cyclohexane is
smaller. This suggests that OH oxidation may contribute to the formation of
HMW species.</p>
      <p>Possible structures and formation mechanisms of typical P1 and P2 products
(as labeled in Fig. 6) were explored based on their fragmentation mass
spectra (MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accurate mass data, previously identified P1 products
(Jaoui et al., 2004, 2013; Reinnig et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2014), and
likely reaction mechanisms of terpene ozonolysis. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first detailed examination of HMW products initially
reported (Zhao et al., 2015) in this system.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Accurate mass and elemental formulae for P1 and P2 products formed
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis measured by ESI-ToF-MS.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Product<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center">ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mode ([M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col12" align="center">ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mode ([M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Observed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elemental</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Calculated</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Absolute</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Relative</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Observed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Elemental</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Calculated</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Absolute</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Relative</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">accurate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">formula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">exact</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">mass error</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">mass error</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">accurate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">formula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">exact mass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">mass error</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">mass error</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mass (Da)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mass (Da)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(mDa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(ppm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">mass (Da)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(Da)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(mDa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(ppm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-245</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">245.1525</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">245.1517</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-247</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">247.1326</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">247.1310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">223.1341</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">223.1334</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-259</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">259.1681</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">259.1674</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-261</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">237.1494</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">237.1491</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-275</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">275.1628</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">275.1623</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">251.1646</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">251.1647</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-277</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">277.1422</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">277.1416</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">253.1447</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">253.1440</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-289</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">289.1431</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">289.1416</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">265.1476</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">265.1440</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">13.6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-291</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">291.1577</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">291.1572</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">267.1607</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">267.1596</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-305</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">305.1370</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">305.1365</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-307</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">307.1516</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">307.1521</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">283.1554</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">283.1545</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-321</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">321.1308</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">321.1314</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">297.1345</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">297.1338</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1-323</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">323.1465</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">323.1471</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">299.1492</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">299.1495</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2-481</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">481.3298</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">481.3294</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2-497</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">497.3262</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">497.3243</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">473.3271</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>45</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">473.3267</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2-511<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">511.3337</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>48</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">511.3399</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">487.3086</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">487.3060</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2-513</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">513.3203</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">513.3192</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">489.3215</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>45</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">489.3216</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2-527</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">527.3317</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>48</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">527.3348</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">503.3387</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>47</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">503.3372</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2-543</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">543.3309</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>48</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">543.3298</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">519.3320</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>47</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">519.3322</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Labels “P1-xxx” and “P2-xxx” denote P1 and P2 products having a
nominal mass of xxx for their sodiated ions, respectively.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Accurate mass was not measured because of the very low ion
intensity or the strong interference from other ions such as impurities.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Different formulae for P2-511 were identified in ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
modes, which correspond, respectively, to aldol condensation products
(P2-511-3 and P2-511-4) and esters (P2-511-1 and P2-511-2) as shown in Fig. 10c.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The relatively large mass errors likely result from unknown
interferences for P1-289 in ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mode and P2-511 in ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mode. The given
formulae are the closest to the observed masses but may not be correct
because of the interferences.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>P1 products</title>
      <p>The characterization of the molecular structures and formation mechanisms of
P1 products from the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene has been the emphasis of
earlier studies (Jaoui et al., 2004, 2013; Reinnig et al., 2009; Yao et al.,
2014). A number of multifunctional P1 products were tentatively identified
using different mass spectrometric and derivatization techniques in those
studies. Figure S6 shows the MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra (ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as the proposed
structures of the products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 245–291 measured in the current
experiments. As reported by Tolocka et al. (2004), fragmentation of sodium
adducts is difficult, so the product ion intensities are relatively weak.
However, fragmentation is seen to occur mainly via loss of 18 Da (H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
indicating the presence of an aldehyde, carboxylic, or hydroxyl group), loss
of 30 Da (CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, indicating the presence of a formyl group), loss of
32 Da (CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, indicating the presence of a hydroxymethyl group), loss of
44 Da (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, indicating a carboxylic or acetyl
group), and loss of 46 Da (CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating a carboxylic group).
The fragmentation pathways of the functional groups as shown here generally
agree with those reported in the literature (Tolocka et al., 2004; Hall and
Johnston, 2012), where ESI-MS in positive ion mode was used to characterize
the structure of reaction products from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene. The
structures assigned to the products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 245–291 are consistent with
those reported in the previous studies (Jaoui et al., 2004, 2013; Reinnig et
al., 2009; Yao et al., 2014). In many cases, the MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra can be due
to multiple isomeric structures. Table 2 shows accurate mass data for these
P1 products. Their measured accurate masses are for the most part in
excellent agreement with the elemental formulae for their proposed
structures, the exception being P1-289 in the negative ion mode.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The proposed potential structures of the newly observed products
corresponding to the [M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 305, 307, 321, and 323.
Label “P1-xxx” represents a P1 product, the sodiated ion of which has a
nominal mass of xxx. Labels “P1-xxx-1” and “P1-xxx-2” indicate different
isomeric structures for the product “P1-xxx”. MW: molecular weight. Note
that there may be additional isomeric structures for these products.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In addition to the products reported previously (Jaoui et al., 2004, 2013;
Reinnig et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2014), some products corresponding to the
[M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 305–323 not previously identified were detected
by ESI-MS. Figure S7 shows the parent ion spectra of these sodiated ions at a
collision gas energy (CE) of 6 eV that is equivalent to the CE for the MS
scan. These spectra show negligible contributions from higher molecular
weight ions at low CE. This strongly suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 305–323 ions are
molecular ions rather than fragments from larger products. However, as shown
in the insets of Fig. S7, significant parents are observed for these ions
when the CE is increased to 20 eV. This is reasonable since these P1
products can be precursors to HMW products, which are expected to fragment
readily back to the precursors at higher CEs. In addition, it is likely that
the fragmentation of HMW products formed from other P1 products gives
fragments with the same <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 305–323. These P1 products were also
observed by DART-MS in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 281–301 region primarily as
[M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with some contribution from [M]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the positive ion
mode or [M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions in the negative ion mode (Fig. S5), consistent
with DART-MS studies of single compounds (Nah et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Figure 9 shows the potential structures of these newly observed P1 products
proposed based on their ESI-MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra (Fig. S8). The fragments
resulting from the loss of water and multiple oxygenated functional groups
such as carboxylic, carbonyl, and hydroxyl groups were observed. It was found
in our previous study that the formation of the products corresponding to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 305–323 ions continues in the presence of cyclohexane as an OH
scavenger (Zhao et al., 2015). This suggests that the newly observed products
are not formed by OH oxidation but rather by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation. Figure S9
illustrates some potential formation mechanisms for these newly observed
products. The Criegee intermediates (CIs) form peroxy (RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals via
the vinyl hydroperoxide (VHP) channel. The conversion of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to alkoxy
(RO) radicals and the subsequent intramolecular H abstraction and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
addition lead again to RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, which can further undergo similar
reactions to form RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with higher oxygen content. Termination
reactions with RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals lead to the formation of the
newly observed products.</p>
      <p>While accurate mass data for these products (Table 2) agree well with the
proposed structures, there may be additional structures and reaction pathways
in the formation of the P1 products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 305–323 via the VHP channel of
CIs that contribute to these peaks. For example, because of their large
carbon skeleton, RO radicals may have multiple isomerization pathways to form
different structures with the same elemental composition.</p>
      <p>Secondary ozonides formed through intramolecular reactions of SCI were
observed as the major gas phase products from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene
(Yao et al., 2014) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene (Winterhalter et al., 2009),
with their formation being significantly suppressed by the addition of water
vapor. In the present study, although a sodiated ion with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 275 and
elemental composition of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Na, consistent with the mass
and formula of the intramolecularly formed secondary ozonide (SOZ), was
observed in ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA, as will be
discussed in Sect. 3.4, the relative intensity of this ion in the mass
spectra does not decrease at all at 75 % RH and is still pronounced with
high concentrations of formic acid (15 ppm) added as an SCI scavenger. This
indicates that the ion at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 275 is unlikely to be the SOZ. Similarly,
Yao et al. (2014) did not observe the SOZ in the particle phase using
high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A possible explanation is that the
intramolecularly formed SOZ has a relatively high vapor pressure
(1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atm at 295 K) and therefore a low potential to
partition to the particle phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The potential structures for the P2 products corresponding to the
[M <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 481, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 497, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  511, <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 513,
<bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 527, and <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 543 formed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis. Label
“P2-xxx” represents a P2 product, the sodiated ion of which has a nominal
mass of xxx. Label “P2-xxx-n” (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4) indicates different potential
structures for the product “P2-xxx”. Note that there may be additional
isomeric structures for these products.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>P2 products</title>
      <p>Table 2 gives the accurate masses and elemental formulae of the most abundant
P2 products as labeled in the ESI mass spectra (Fig. 6a). Figure 10 shows
proposed potential structures of these products based on their accurate mass
data and ESI-MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra (Fig. S10) (see Supplement for the detailed
discussion). These structures include aldol condensation products (formed
from the reaction of two carbonyl compounds; Reaction R1), peroxyhemiacetals
(formed from the reaction of a carbonyl compound and an organic
hydroperoxide; Reaction R2), and esters (formed from the reaction of a
carboxylic acid with an alcohol; Reaction R3), with the building blocks being
the P1 products typically observed in the SOA. <?xmltex \hack{\addtocounter{equation}{-1}}?><?xmltex \hack{\def\theequation{R\arabic{equation}}}?>

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><mml:mstyle background="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-g01.pdf"/></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><mml:mstyle background="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-g02.pdf"/></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><mml:mstyle background="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-g03.pdf"/></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <?xmltex \hack{\def\theequation{\arabic{equation}}}?><?xmltex \hack{\setcounter{equation}{0}}?></p>
      <p>Aldol condensation products and peroxyhemiacetals are the most commonly
identified structures. Of 17 proposed structures for these P2 products, 10
are aldol condensation products and 5 are peroxyhemiacetals. Except for
products P2-481 and P2-497, which are identified as aldol condensation
products, other P2 products may have contributions from multiple structures.
For example, product P2-511 may have contributions from both aldol
condensation products and esters, and products P2-513, P2-527, and P2-543 may
have contributions from both aldol condensation products and
peroxyhemiacetals. Although no detailed data concerning the formation of such
HMW products during sesquiterpene ozonolysis are available in the literature,
a number of laboratory and field studies have found that aldol condensation
products, peroxyhemiacetals, and esters are the major HMW products detected
in the SOA formed from ozonolysis of monoterpenes (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene) (Hoffmann et al., 1998; Tolocka et al., 2004; Docherty et
al., 2005; Müller et al., 2008, 2009; Heaton et al., 2009; Gao et al.,
2010; Yasmeen et al., 2010; Hall and Johnston, 2012; Kristensen et al., 2013,
2014; Witkowski and Gierczak, 2014; X. Zhang et al., 2015). Formation of such
products has traditionally been thought to occur via acid-catalyzed reactions
(Reactions R1–R3) in the condensed phase (Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008;
Hallquist et al., 2009; Yasmeen et al., 2010; Ziemann and Atkinson, 2012).
However, some recent studies suggested that such a process is not favored for
esterification in SOA (Birdsall et al., 2013; DePalma et al., 2013;
Kristensen et al., 2014; X. Zhang et al., 2015) and that gas phase formation
followed by rapid gas to particle conversion and condensed phase
rearrangement of labile HMW diacyl peroxides may potentially explain the
formation of esters observed in SOA (X. Zhang et al., 2015). Formation of
peroxyhemiacetals has also been suggested to be thermodynamically favorable
in the gas phase (DePalma et al., 2013), although whether the kinetics are
sufficiently fast is not known. It is noted that there may be some
decomposition of HMW products over time, for example, over 20 h of exposure
to clean air as discussed earlier.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>The effects of water vapor and SCI scavenger</title>
      <p>The reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene with ozone has a very high SCI yield
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88 %) (Yao et al., 2014). If SCI reactions are key to SOA formation
in this system, the addition of SCI scavengers such as water vapor and formic
acid should have significant influence on the formation of SOA.</p>
      <p>Figure 11 shows the size distributions of SOA formed from ozonolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the flow reactor under dry conditions, at 75 % RH,
or in the presence of 15 ppm formic acid. SOA with very similar number
concentrations is formed with or without added water vapor, while
significantly fewer, but larger, particles are formed in the presence of
formic acid. Recent kinetics measurements of the CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OO CI reaction with
water vapor (monomer and dimer) give rate constants of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dimer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (4.0–6.5) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Chao et al., 2015; Lewis et al., 2015) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>monomer</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Berndt et al., 2015). The rate constant for the reaction of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OO with
formic acid is much larger,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HCOOH</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Welz et al., 2014). The reactivity of Criegee intermediates has been shown
to depend on structure for a number of reasons, including different extents
of pressure stabilization of excited CI, different reactivities for the
<italic>syn</italic>- and <italic>anti</italic>-forms, and different natures of the groups
attached to the central CI carbon (Ryzhkov and Ariya, 2004; Anglada et al.,
2011; Donahue et al., 2011; Vereecken et al., 2012; Taatjes et al., 2013;
Welz et al., 2014). While the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene CI is clearly very different
than CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OO, if the rate constants for the latter are representative in a
relative sense, the ratio of the rates for reaction of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene
CI with formic acid and water dimer relative to water monomer are
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240 : 18 : 1 under our experimental conditions
(3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> HCOOH cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on a water
equilibrium constant of 0.0536 atm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ruscic, 2013). Thus, it is not
surprising that formic acid has a much greater impact than water.
Furthermore, the large effects of formic acid further support the importance
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene CI in SOA formation. These impacts of water and
formic acid are in agreement with those reported by Yao et al. (2014), who
reported a similar quenching effect of added acetic acid on particle
formation in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis but relatively little impact
of water vapor.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>The size distributions of SOA formed from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the flow reactor under dry conditions (purple squares,
experiment FR4), at 75 % RH (green triangles, experiment FR6), or in the
presence of 15 ppm formic acid (red diamonds, experiment FR8). Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>ESI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra of polydisperse SOA formed from ozonolysis
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene in the flow reactor <bold>(a)</bold> under dry conditions
(experiment FR4), <bold>(b)</bold> at 75 % RH (experiment FR6), and <bold>(c)</bold> with 15 ppm
formic acid (experiment FR8).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 12a and b show the ESI mass spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA formed in
the flow reactor without and with added water vapor, respectively. There are
no significant differences in product distribution with and without added
water vapor. In addition, ESI-MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements show that typical P1 and
P2 products as labeled in both mass spectra have very similar MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
spectra, suggesting that the product composition is not impacted by the
presence of water. Measurements of the chamber SOA by AMS (see Fig. S11) also
did not show significant differences in the particle mass spectra upon water
addition. On the other hand, Fig. 12c shows the ESI mass spectra of SOA
formed in the presence of 15 ppm formic acid. The formation of HMW products
is significantly reduced as are the number of peaks in the P1 product region.
However, P1 products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 259, 275, and 291, as well as P2 products, for
example, at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 527, 543, and 559, are still evident. All of these P1
products have very similar MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra (and thus likely similar
structures) to those formed in the absence of formic acid. In contrast, P2
products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 527 and 543 show significantly different MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra
compared to those obtained without added formic acid.</p>
      <p>Yao et al. (2014) reported an increase in the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedronaldehyde in the presence of acetic acid, consistent with an increase
in the present study in the relative abundance of the P1 product at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 259 assigned to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedronaldehyde when formic acid was added
(Fig. 12c). The reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SCI with formic acid is
expected to form <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-formyloxy hydroperoxide (MW 298 Da), which is
believed to contribute to SOA growth. While the corresponding sodium adduct
at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 321 is not observed in the mass spectrum, this is not surprising as
hydroperoxides are likely to undergo decomposition during SOA sampling and
analysis (Witkowski and Gierczak, 2013).</p>
      <p>Comparison of Fig. 12c to a shows that HMW products (P2–P4) formed with
added formic acid are less important than those produced in the absence of
formic acid. Combined with the smaller number concentration (Fig. 11), the
data suggest that HMW products must be important in new particle formation.
As fewer particles are formed with the addition of formic acid, more P1
products are available for each particle to grow to larger sizes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Mechanisms</title>
      <p>The size-dependent composition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA and the effect of SCI
scavengers on particle formation suggest that HMW products (P2–P4) play an
important role in the initial stages of particle formation. This is
consistent with earlier suggestions in simpler systems that higher molecular
weight products of alkene ozonolysis are primarily responsible for
nucleation, while many different products from low to high molecular weight
can contribute to growth (Lee and Kamens, 2005; Sadezky et al., 2008; Winkler
et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2013; Ehn et al., 2014; Kidd et al., 2014a; Zhao
et al., 2015; X. Zhang et al., 2015). Bonn and Moortgat (2003) estimated an
upper limit for the saturated vapor pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of nucleating
species produced from sesquiterpene ozonolysis to be
1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atm. Donahue et al. (2013) also suggested that
organic vapors with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atm may contribute to
particle nucleation. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of typical P1 products, as well as
the P2 products (e.g., ester and peroxyhemiacetal) are estimated by averaging
the predictions (see Table S1 in the Supplement) from two group contribution
methods – SIMPOL.1 (Pankow and Asher, 2008) and EVAPORATION (Compernolle et
al., 2011) – and are shown in Fig. 13. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the P2 products are
3–6 orders of magnitude lower than the suggested nucleation threshold,
consistent with their important contributions to initial particle formation.
The newly observed products (P1-321 and P1-323) also have vapor pressures
lower than the nucleation threshold and thus may in principle also contribute
to nucleation. This is also expected to be the case for the HMW P3 and P4
products. However, without information on their chemical composition and
structures, data on P3 and P4 could not be included in Fig. 13. In contrast,
the smaller, more volatile P1 products will mainly contribute to particle
growth, as suggested by their relatively larger abundance in ESI mass spectra
of larger particles (Figs. 7 and S4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>Saturated vapor pressures of typical P1 and P2 products in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene SOA estimated by taking the average of the predictions from
SIMPOL.1 and EVAPORATION. The dashed line indicates the upper limit of
saturated organic vapor pressure for nucleation (Bonn and Moortgat, 2003; Donahue et al., 2013).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/3245/2016/acp-16-3245-2016-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Compared to P2 products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 481–543, those with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 543 are
significantly less important in the flow reactor SOA (geometric mean diameter
13–26 nm) but contribute a greater fraction to total P2 products in the
chamber SOA (geometric mean diameter 66 nm). This suggests that these larger
P2 products (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 543) play an important role in particle growth
and may be formed mainly via condensed phase reactions of P1 products in the
SOA.</p>
      <p>Elemental analysis of SOA from chamber experiments using AMS results in an
average O : C ratio of 0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 (1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an H : C ratio
of 1.51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02. These values are within the range given for P1 products
detected by ESI-MS (Table 2) and are consistent with our observation that P1
products predominantly contribute to particle growth. Along with the
potential mechanisms discussed above to explain the formation of observed P1
and P2 products and their contribution to particle formation and growth,
another mechanism considered for particle formation and growth is the
production of extremely low-volatility organic compounds (ELVOCs), which was
proposed to occur via sequential intramolecular hydrogen abstraction and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
addition of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals (Vereecken et al., 2007; Crounse et al., 2013;
Ehn et al., 2014; Rissanen et al., 2015) and shown to play an important role
in particle formation and growth from monoterpene oxidation (Zhao et al.,
2013; Ehn et al., 2014; Jokinen et al., 2015). Because of the high oxygen
content in ELVOCs, particles formed from these compounds are expected to have
high O : C ratios. The ELVOC mechanism cannot be ruled out as being
involved in initial particle formation during <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene ozonolysis.
However, based on the O : C ratios measured for chamber SOA, it is
unlikely to be a dominant contributor to total particle mass in this system.
Measurements by AMS are not possible for the flow reactor experiments as the
particles are too small to be efficiently transmitted into the AMS.</p>
      <p>It is clear from the impact of formic acid on particle formation that the SCI
plays a key role in forming the HMW products and new particles. In the case
of the <italic>trans</italic>-3-hexene ozonolysis (Sadezky et al., 2008; Zhao et al.,
2015), the composition of the SOA clearly showed evidence for oligomer
formation from the sequential reaction of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with SCI, leading
to ESI mass spectra that showed the repeat unit of oligomers corresponding to
SCI. A search for similar products in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene reaction was not
successful, indicating that while this may contribute, other mechanisms are
more important (Zhao et al., 2015). This is not surprising, given the number
of potential reaction paths for the SCI from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene (e.g., Fig. S9)
and the large number of low-volatility products that can quickly contribute
to growth and the SOA composition once nucleation has occurred.</p>
      <p>The incorporation of 2-EHN into SOA and its very slow evaporation back out
(Figs. 4 and 5) are consistent with a condensation type of growth mechanism
(Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006) in which organic
species are irreversibly taken up by the particle surface and thus their
incorporation into particles depends on the collision frequency of the gas
with the particle surface, and the magnitude of the uptake coefficient
(Perraud et al., 2012). Such a growth mechanism is characteristic of highly
viscous SOA, in which incorporated organic species undergo very slow
evaporation because of the diffusion limitation, in contrast to an
equilibrium mechanism that applies for low-viscosity liquid particles. This
result also suggests that growth will occur not only via low-volatility
products but also via uptake of higher-volatility species such as the smaller
P1 products identified here.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p>The present study examines the phase state, composition, and mechanisms of
formation and growth of SOA from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene. The SOA is
characterized to be a high-viscosity semisolid, with an estimated diffusion
coefficient of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2-EHN which
was incorporated into the SOA during ozonolysis. High molecular weight
products, tentatively identified mainly as aldol condensation products,
peroxyhemiacetals, and esters, comprise a significant fraction of SOA. The
size-dependent distribution of these products in the SOA as well as their
positive correlation with new particle formation suggests that at least some
of them are responsible for initial particle formation. In contrast, lower
molecular weight (P1) products mainly contribute to particle growth via a
kinetic condensation mechanism.</p>
      <p>Bonn and Moortgat (2003) have suggested that sesquiterpene ozonolysis could
be one source of new particle formation in the boreal forest. Evidence for
the role of sesquiterpenes in atmospheric new particle formation has been
recently presented by field observations in the boreal forest in Finland
(Bonn et al., 2008) and in the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains
(Boy et al., 2008). These studies have proposed possible nucleation
mechanisms involving low-volatility products such as intermolecularly formed
SOZ and organosulfates from sesquiterpene oxidation. The results of the
present study suggest that the formation of HMW products during ozonolysis
may serve as an important mechanism for such new particle formation.</p>
      <p>Mechanisms of ozonolysis of alkenes and, in particular, the pathways that lead
to SOA formation are highly dependent on the size and structure of the parent
alkene. However, in all cases stabilized Criegee intermediates play a key
role. For example, SOA generated from ozonolysis of small alkenes such as
<italic>trans</italic>-3-hexene is primarily composed of oligomers formed from the
sequential addition of SCI to RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals (Sadezky et al., 2008; Zhao
et al., 2015). For larger alkenes, such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene, the SCIs react
via multiple pathways, leading to a variety of low-volatility products (e.g.,
P2 and newly observed P1 products) that can nucleate on their own to form new
particles. There is yet a third group of alkenes with intermediate molecular
sizes such as monoterpenes, for which the major first-generation ozonolysis
products do not have low enough volatilities to nucleate on their own
(Hallquist et al., 2009), and therefore the ELVOC mechanism, despite the small
yields (a few percent, Jokinen et al., 2015), may play a more dominant role
(Zhao et al., 2013; Ehn et al., 2014). The dependence of phase, composition,
and mechanisms for particle formation and growth should be taken into account
in atmospheric models of the formation and impacts of SOA on visibility,
human health, and climate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant
no. 1207112) and the NSF Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) program (Grant
no. 0923323 and 1337080). The authors are grateful to John Greaves,
Beniam Berhane, and Shirin Sorooshian for their help with accurate mass
measurements.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: R. McLaren</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abramson, E., Imre, D., Beranek, J., Wilson, J., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Experimental determination of chemical diffusion within secondary organic
aerosol particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 2983–2991,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2cp44013j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2cp44013j</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Hamilton, J. F., Wyche, K. P., Good, N., Ward, M. W., Carr,
T., Barley, M. H., Monks, P. S., Jenkin, M. E., Lewis, A. C., and McFiggans,
G. B.: The effect of photochemical ageing and initial precursor concentration
on the composition and hygroscopic properties of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene
secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6417–6436,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Anglada, J. M., Gonzalez, J., and Torrent-Sucarrat, M.: Effects of the
substituents on the reactivity of carbonyl oxides. A theoretical study on the
reaction of substituted carbonyl oxides with water, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
13, 13034–13045, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cp20872a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c1cp20872a</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bateman, A. P., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Hygroscopic Influence on
the Semisolid-to-Liquid Transition of Secondary Organic Materials, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 4386–4395, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp508521c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp508521c</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Kaethner, R., Voigtlander, J., Stratmann, F., Pfeifle, M.,
Reichle, P., Sipila, M., Kulmala, M., and Olzmann, M.: Kinetics of the
unimolecular reaction of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OO and the bimolecular reactions with the
water monomer, acetaldehyde and acetone under atmospheric conditions, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 19862–19873, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5cp02224j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5cp02224j</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Birdsall, A. W., Zentner, C. A., and Elrod, M. J.: Study of the kinetics and
equilibria of the oligomerization reactions of 2-methylglyceric acid, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 3097–3109, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3097-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3097-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bones, D. L., Reid, J. P., Lienhard, D. M., and Krieger, U. K.: Comparing the
mechanism of water condensation and evaporation in glassy aerosol, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 11613–11618, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bonn, B. and Moortgat, G. K.: Sesquiterpene ozonolysis: Origin of atmospheric
new particle formation from biogenic hydrocarbons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30,
1585, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017000</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bonn, B., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Sihto, S. L., and Ruuskanen, T. M.: How
biogenic terpenes govern the correlation between sulfuric acid concentrations
and new particle formation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12209,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009327</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bouvier-Brown, N. C., Goldstein, A. H., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., and de
Gouw, J. A.: In-situ ambient quantification of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes,
and related oxygenated compounds during BEARPEX 2007: implications for gas-
and particle-phase chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5505–5518,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5505-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5505-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Karl, T., Turnipseed, A., Mauldin, R. L., Kosciuch, E., Greenberg,
J., Rathbone, J., Smith, J., Held, A., Barsanti, K., Wehner, B., Bauer, S.,
Wiedensohler, A., Bonn, B., Kulmala, M., and Guenther, A.: New particle
formation in the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 1577–1590, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., Perraud, V., Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu,
Y., Imre, D., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and Alexander, M. L.: Comparison of
FTIR and particle mass spectrometry for the measurement of particulate
organic nitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1056–1061,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es9029864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es9029864</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D. and Wilson, K. R.: Evolution of organic aerosol mass spectra
upon heating: implications for OA phase and partitioning behavior, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 1895–1911, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1895-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1895-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chan, M. N., Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Schilling, K., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Edney, E. O., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Edgerton, E.
S., Tanner, R. L., Shaw, S. L., Zheng, M., Knipping, E. M., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Influence of aerosol acidity on the chemical composition of secondary
organic aerosol from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1735–1751, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1735-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1735-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Chan, M. N., Zhang, H. F., Goldstein, A. H., and Wilson, K. R.: Role of water
and phase in the heterogeneous oxidation of solid and aqueous succinic acid
aerosol by hydroxyl radicals, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 28978–28992,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5012022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Chao, W., Hsieh, J. T., Chang, C. H., and Lin, J. J. M.: Direct kinetic
measurement of the reaction of the simplest Criegee intermediate with water
vapor, Science, 347, 751–754, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1261549</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Li, Y. L., McKinney, K. A., Kuwata, M., and Martin, S. T.: Particle
mass yield from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3165–3179, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3165-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3165-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Cody, R. B., Laramee, J. A., and Durst, H. D.: Versatile new ion source for
the analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions, Anal. Chem.,
77, 2297–2302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac050162j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac050162j</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Compernolle, S., Ceulemans, K., and Müller, J.-F.: EVAPORATION: a new
vapour pressure estimation methodfor organic molecules including
non-additivity and intramolecular interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
9431–9450, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Crank, J.: The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd Edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford,
1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Crounse, J. D., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Autoxidation of organic compounds in the atmosphere, J.
Phys. Chem. Lett., 4, 3513–3520, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
DePalma, J. W., Horan, A. J., Hall, W. A., and Johnston, M. V.:
Thermodynamics of oligomer formation: implications for secondary organic
aerosol formation and reactivity, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 6935–6944,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., He, Q. F., Shen, R. Q., Yu, Q. Q., and Wang, X. M.: Spatial
distributions of secondary organic aerosols from isoprene, monoterpenes,
beta-caryophyllene, and aromatics over China during summer, J. Geophys. Res.,
119, 11877–11891, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021748" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021748</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Docherty, K. S., Wu, W., Lim, Y. B., and Ziemann, P. J.: Contributions of
organic peroxides to secondary aerosol formed from reactions of monoterpenes
with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4049–4059, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Drozd, G. T., Epstein, S. A., Presto, A. A., and Kroll, J.
H.: Adventures in ozoneland: down the rabbit-hole, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
13, 10848–10857, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02564j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c0cp02564j</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Ortega, I. K., Chuang, W., Riipinen, I., Riccobono, F.,
Schobesberger, S., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D.
R., and Vehkamaki, H.: How do organic vapors contribute to new-particle
formation?, Faraday Discuss., 165, 91–104, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00046j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3fd00046j</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Duhl, T. R., Helmig, D., and Guenther, A.: Sesquiterpene emissions from
vegetation: a review, Biogeosciences, 5, 761–777, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-761-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-761-2008</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres,
S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma,
J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T.,
Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol,
Nature, 506, 476–479, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N.: Chemistry of the upper and lower
atmosphere: theory, experiments, and applications, Academic Press, San Diego,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y. Q., Hall, W. A., and Johnston, M. V.: Molecular composition of
monoterpene secondary organic aerosol at low mss loading, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 44, 7897–7902, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es101861k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es101861k</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Goldstein, A. H. and Galbally, I. E.: Known and unexplored organic
constituents in the earth's atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
1514–1521, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es072476p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es072476p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Greaves, J. and Roboz, J.: Mass spectrometry for the novice, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, F. L., USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A
global-model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, 8873–8892, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94jd02950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94jd02950</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, W. A. and Johnston, M. V.: Oligomer formation pathways in secondary
organic aerosol from MS and MS/MS measurements with high mass accuracy and
resolving power, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 23, 1097–1108, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Harrick, N. J.: Internal reflection spectroscopy, Interscience Publishers,
New York, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Heaton, K. J., Sleighter, R. L., Hatcher, P. G., Hall, W. A., and Johnston,
M. V.: Composition domains in monoterpene secondary organic aerosol, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 7797–7802, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Helmig, D., Ortega, J., Duhl, T., Tanner, D., Guenther, A., Harley, P.,
Wiedinmyer, C., Milford, J., and Sakulyanontvittaya, T.: Sesquiterpene
emissions from pine trees – Identifications, emission rates and flux
estimates for the contiguous United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
1545–1553, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es0618907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es0618907</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Hodas, N., Zuend, A., Mui, W., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence
of particle-phase state on the hygroscopic behavior of mixed
organic–inorganic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5027–5045,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5027-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5027-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, T., Odum, J. R., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Klockow, D., Flagan, R.
C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation of organic aerosols from the oxidation of
biogenic hydrocarbons, J. Atmos. Chem., 26, 189–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005734301837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1005734301837</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, T., Bandur, R., Marggraf, U., and Linscheid, M.: Molecular
composition of organic aerosols formed in the alpha-pinene/O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction:
Implications for new particle formation processes, J. Geophys. Res., 103,
25569–25578, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Hu, D., Bian, Q., Li, T. W. Y., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Contributions
of isoprene, monoterpenes, beta-caryophyllene, and toluene to secondary
organic aerosols in Hong Kong during the summer of 2006, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D22206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010437</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoui, M., Sexton, K. G., and Kamens, R. M.: Reaction of alpha-cedrene with
ozone: mechanism, gas and particulate products distribution, Atmos. Environ.,
38, 2709–2725, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Docherty, K. S., Lewandowski, M., and
Offenberg, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of a
series of sesquiterpenes: alpha-cedrene, beta-caryophyllene, alpha-humulene
and alpha-farnesene with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, Environ. Chem.,
10, 178–193, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/En13025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/En13025</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, R., Kerminen, V. M., Junninen, H.,
Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A. B., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipila, M.: Production of extremely low volatile
organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric
implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1423977112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Kanawati, B., Herrmann, F., Joniec, S., Winterhalter, R., and Moortgat, G.
K.: Mass spectrometric characterization of beta-caryophyllene ozonolysis
products in the aerosol studied using an electrospray triple quadrupole and
time-of-flight analyzer hybrid system and density functional theory, Rapid
Commun. Mass Sp., 22, 165–186, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.3340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/Rcm.3340</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kidd, C., Perraud, V., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: New insights into
secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of alpha-pinene from combined
infrared spectroscopy and mass spectrometry measurements, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 16, 22706–22716, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kidd, C., Perraud, V., Wingen, L. M., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Integrating
phase and composition of secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of
alpha-pinene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 7552–7557, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Liu, S., Russell, L. M., and Paulson, S. E.: Dependence of real
refractive indices on O : C, H : C and mass fragments of secondary
organic aerosol generated from ozonolysis and photooxidation of limonene and
alpha-pinene, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 498–507,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.893278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.893278</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition
and phase state of organic compounds: dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 13, 19238–19255, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Kristensen, K., Enggrob, K. L., King, S. M., Worton, D. R., Platt, S. M.,
Mortensen, R., Rosenoern, T., Surratt, J. D., Bilde, M., Goldstein, A. H.,
and Glasius, M.: Formation and occurrence of dimer esters of pinene oxidation
products in atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3763–3776,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3763-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3763-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Kristensen, K., Cui, T., Zhang, H., Gold, A., Glasius, M., and Surratt, J.
D.: Dimers in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosol: effect of hydroxyl
radical, ozone, relative humidity and aerosol acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 4201–4218, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4201-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4201-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A., Goldstein, A. H., Keywood, M. D., Gao, S., Varutbangkul, V.,
Bahreini, R., Ng, N. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-phase
products and secondary aerosol yields from the ozonolysis of ten different
terpenes, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006437</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Lee, C. T. and Kamens, R. M.: Particle nucleation from the reaction of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>pinene and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6822–6832, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, T. R., Blitz, M. A., Heard, D. E., and Seakins, P. W.: Direct evidence
for a substantive reaction between the Criegee intermediate, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OO, and
the water vapour dimer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 4859–4863,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp04750h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c4cp04750h</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Chen, Q., Guzman, M. I., Chan, C. K., and Martin, S. T.:
Second-generation products contribute substantially to the particle-phase
organic material produced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 121–132, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-121-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-121-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Lignell, H., Hinks, M. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Exploring matrix effects on
photochemistry of organic aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
13780–13785, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Mauderly, J. L. and Chow, J. C.: Health effects of organic aerosols, Inhal.
Toxicol., 20, 257–288, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08958370701866008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/08958370701866008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrer, H.: Diffusion in solids: fundamentals, methods, materials,
diffusion-controlled processes, Springer Series, solid state science, 155,
Springer, Berlin, New York, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Martin, S. T., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.:
Amorphous and crystalline aerosol particles interacting with water vapor:
conceptual framework and experimental evidence for restructuring, phase
transitions and kinetic limitations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9491–9522,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9491-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9491-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Müller, L., Reinnig, M.-C., Warnke, J., and Hoffmann, Th.: Unambiguous
identification of esters as oligomers in secondary organic aerosol formed
from cyclohexene and cyclohexene/a-pinene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
1423–1433, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1423-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1423-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, L., Reinnig, M. C., Hayen, H., and Hoffmann, T.: Characterization of
oligomeric compounds in secondary organic aerosol using liquid chromatography
coupled to electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance
mass spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 23, 971–979, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Nah, T., Chan, M., Leone, S. R., and Wilson, K. R.: Real time in situ
chemical characterization of submicrometer organic particles using direct
analysis in real time-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 85, 2087–2095,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac302560c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac302560c</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Keywood, M. D., Bahreini, R., Varutbangkul, V.,
Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee, A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Contribution
of first- versus second-generation products to secondary organic aerosols
formed in the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40,
2283–2297, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es052269u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es052269u</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Pajunoja, A., Lambe, A. T., Hakala, J., Rastak, N., Cummings, M. J., Brogan,
J. F., Hao, L. Q., Paramonov, M., Hong, J., Prisle, N. L., Malila, J.,
Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., Massoli,
P., Onasch, T. B., Donahue, N. M., Riipinen, I., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D.
R., Petaja, T., and Virtanen, A.: Adsorptive uptake of water by semisolid
secondary organic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3063–3068,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063142</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method
for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of
multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander,
M. L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 2836–2841, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Reinnig, M. C., Warnke, J., and Hoffmann, T.: Identification of organic
hydroperoxides and hydroperoxy acids in secondary organic aerosol formed
during the ozonolysis of different monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes by on-line
analysis using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization ion trap mass
spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 23, 1735–1741, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.4065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/Rcm.4065</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Renbaum, L. H. and Smith, G. D.: The importance of phase in the
radical-initiated oxidation of model organic aerosols: reactions of solid and
liquid brassidic acid particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 2441–2451,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b816799k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b816799k</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Renbaum-Wolff, L., Grayson, J. W., Bateman, A. P., Kuwata, M., Sellier, M.,
Murray, B. J., Shilling, J. E., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.: Viscosity
of alpha-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle
growth and reactivity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 8014–8019, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Richters, S., Herrmann, H., and Berndt, T.: Gas-phase rate coefficients of
the reaction of ozone with four sesquiterpenes at 295 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 K, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 11658–11669, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp05542j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c4cp05542j</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S.,
Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang,
R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D.
R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a
vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Rissanen, M. P., Kurten, T., Sipila, M., Thornton, J. A., Kausiala, O.,
Garmash, O., Kjaergaard, H. G., Petaja, T., Worsnop, D. R., Ehn, M., and
Kulmala, M.: Effects of chemical complexity on the autoxidation mechanisms of
endocyclic alkene ozonolysis products: from methylcyclohexenes toward
understanding alpha-pinene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4633–4650,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp510966g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp510966g</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Ruscic, B.: Active thermochemical tables: water and water dimer, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 117, 11940–11953, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp403197t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp403197t</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Ryzhkov, A. B. and Ariya, P. A.: A theoretical study of the reactions of
parent and substituted Criegee intermediates with water and the water dimer,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 5042–5050, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b408414d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b408414d</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Sadezky, A., Winterhalter, R., Kanawati, B., Römpp, A., Spengler, B.,
Mellouki, A., Le Bras, G., Chaimbault, P., and Moortgat, G. K.: Oligomer
formation during gas-phase ozonolysis of small alkenes and enol ethers: new
evidence for the central role of the Criegee Intermediate as oligomer chain
unit, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2667–2699, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Wiedinmyer, C., Helmig, D., Matsunaga, S.,
Potosnak, M., Milford, J., and Guenther, A.: Monoterpene and sesquiterpene
emission estimates for the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
1623–1629, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es702274e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es702274e</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Guenther, A., Helmig, D., Milford, J., and
Wiedinmyer, C.: Secondary organic aerosol from sesquiterpene and monoterpene
emissions in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8784–8790,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es800817r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es800817r</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Saukko, E., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Koop, T., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D.
R., Pedernera, D. A., Onasch, T. B., Laaksonen, A., Davidovits, P., Worsnop,
D. R., and Virtanen, A.: Humidity-dependent phase state of SOA particles from
biogenic and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7517–7529,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7517-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7517-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, 2nd Edn., J. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Equilibration timescale of atmospheric
secondary organic aerosol partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24801,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL054008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Poschl, U.: Gas uptake and chemical
aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
11003–11008, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Selzle, K., and Pöschl, U.: Hazardous components and health
effects of atmospheric aerosol particles: reactive oxygen species, soot,
polycyclic aromatic compounds and allergenic proteins, Free Radical Res., 46,
927–939, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2012.663084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3109/10715762.2012.663084</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Shu, Y. G. and Atkinson, R.: Rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with a series of terpenes and OH radical formation from the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
reactions with sesquiterpenes at 296 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 K, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 26,
1193–1205, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL060582</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Socrates, G.: Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and
charts, 3rd Edn., Wiley, Chichester, New York, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Taatjes, C. A., Welz, O., Eskola, A. J., Savee, J. D., Scheer, A. M.,
Shallcross, D. E., Rotavera, B., Lee, E. P. F., Dyke, J. M., Mok, D. K. W.,
Osborn, D. L., and Percival, C. J.: Direct measurements of
conformer-dependent reactivity of the criegee intermediate CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CHOO,
Science, 340, 177–180, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Tasoglou, A. and Pandis, S. N.: Formation and chemical aging of secondary
organic aerosol during the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene oxidation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6035–6046, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6035-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6035-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Tolocka, M. P., Jang, M., Ginter, J. M., Cox, F. J., Kamens, R. M., and
Johnston, M. V.: Formation of oligomers in secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1428–1434, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Vaden, T. D., Imre, D., Beranek, J., Shrivastava, M., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic
aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 2190–2195, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Vereecken, L., Muller, J. F., and Peeters, J.: Low-volatility poly-oxygenates
in the OH-initiated atmospheric oxidation of alpha-pinene: impact of
non-traditional peroxyl radical chemistry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9,
5241–5248, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Vereecken, L., Harder, H., and Novelli, A.: The reaction of Criegee
intermediates with NO, RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and their fate in the
atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 14, 14682–14695, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirila, P.,
Leskinen, J., Makela, J. M., Holopainen, J. K., Poschl, U., Kulmala, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467, 824–827,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09455</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Welz, O., Eskola, A. J., Sheps, L., Rotavera, B., Savee, J. D., Scheer, A.
M., Osborn, D. L., Lowe, D., Booth, A. M., Xiao, P., Khan, M. A. H.,
Percival, C. J., Shallcross, D. E., and Taatjes, C. A.: Rate coefficients of
C1 and C2 Criegee intermediate reactions with formic and acetic acid near the
collision limit: direct kinetics measurements and atmospheric implications,
Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed., 53, 4547–4550, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Winkler, P. M., Ortega, J., Karl, T., Cappellin, L., Friedli, H. R.,
Barsanti, K., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Identification of the
biogenic compounds responsible for size-dependent nanoparticle growth,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20815, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012gl053253</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Winterhalter, R., Herrmann, F., Kanawati, B., Nguyen, T. L., Peeters, J.,
Vereecken, L., and Moortgat, G. K.: The gas-phase ozonolysis of
beta-caryophyllene (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Part I: an experimental study, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 4152–4172, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B817824k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B817824k</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Witkowski, B. and Gierczak, T.: Analysis of alpha-acyloxyhydroperoxy
aldehydes with electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry
(ESI-MS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Mass Spectrom., 48, 79–88, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.3130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jms.3130</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Witkowski, B. and Gierczak, T.: Early stage composition of SOA produced by
alpha-pinene/ozone reaction: alpha-Acyloxyhydroperoxy aldehydes and acidic
dimers, Atmos. Environ., 95, 59–70, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Yao, L., Ma, Y., Wang, L., Zheng, J., Khalizov, A., Chen, M. D., Zhou, Y. Y.,
Qi, L., and Cui, F. P.: Role of stabilized Criegee intermediate in secondary
organic aerosol formation from the ozonolysis of alpha-cedrene, Atmos.
Environ., 94, 448–457, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Yasmeen, F., Vermeylen, R., Szmigielski, R., Iinuma, Y., Boge, O., Herrmann,
H., Maenhaut, W., and Claeys, M.: Terpenylic acid and related compounds:
precursors for dimers in secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of
alpha- and beta-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9383–9392, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Ying, Q., Li, J. Y., and Kota S. H.: Significant contributions of isoprene to
summertime secondary organic aerosol in eastern United States, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 49, 7834–7842, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl029979</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. Y., Wang, G. H., Guo, S., Zarnora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang,
W. G., Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of urban fine particulate matter,
Chem. Rev., 115, 3803–3855, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., McVay, R. C., Huang, D. D., Dalleska, N. F., Aumont, B., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation and evolution of molecular products in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
14168–14173, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517742112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1517742112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, J., Ortega, J., Chen, M., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Dependence
of particle nucleation and growth on high-molecular-weight gas-phase products
during ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7631–7644,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7631-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7631-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Wingen, L. M., Perraud, V., Greaves, J., and Finlayson-Pitts, B.
J.: Role of the reaction of stabilized Criegee intermediates with peroxy
radicals in particle formation and growth in air, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
17, 12500–12514, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5cp01171j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5cp01171j</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemann, P. J. and Atkinson, R.: Kinetics, products, and mechanisms of
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6582–6605, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Phase, composition, and growth mechanism for secondary organic aerosol from
the ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-cedrene</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Sesquiterpenes are an important class of biogenic volatile organic compounds
(BVOCs) and have a high secondary organic aerosol (SOA) forming potential.
However, SOA formation from sesquiterpene oxidation has received less
attention compared to other BVOCs such as monoterpenes, and the underlying
mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we present a comprehensive
experimental investigation of the ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-cedrene both in a
glass flow reactor (27–44 s reaction times) and in static Teflon chambers
(30–60 min reaction times). The SOA was collected by impaction or filters,
followed by analysis using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry (ESI-MS), or measured online using direct analysis in
real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) and aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS). The slow evaporation of
2-ethylhexyl nitrate that was incorporated into the SOA during its formation
and growth gives an estimated diffusion coefficient of
3  ×  10<sup>−15</sup> cm<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> and shows that SOA is a highly
viscous semisolid. Possible structures of four newly observed low molecular
weight (MW  ≤  300 Da) reaction products with higher oxygen content
than those previously reported were identified. High molecular weight (HMW)
products formed in the early stages of the oxidation have structures
consistent with aldol condensation products, peroxyhemiacetals, and esters.
The size-dependent distributions of HMW products in the SOA, as well as the
effects of stabilized Criegee intermediate (SCI) scavengers on HMW products
and particle formation, confirm that HMW products and reactions of SCI play a crucial role in early stages of particle formation. Our
studies provide new insights into mechanisms of SOA formation and growth in
<i>α</i>-cedrene ozonolysis and the important role of sesquiterpenes in new
particle formation as suggested by field measurements.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abramson, E., Imre, D., Beranek, J., Wilson, J., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Experimental determination of chemical diffusion within secondary organic
aerosol particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 2983–2991,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2cp44013j" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C2cp44013j</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Hamilton, J. F., Wyche, K. P., Good, N., Ward, M. W., Carr,
T., Barley, M. H., Monks, P. S., Jenkin, M. E., Lewis, A. C., and McFiggans,
G. B.: The effect of photochemical ageing and initial precursor concentration
on the composition and hygroscopic properties of <i>β</i>-caryophyllene
secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6417–6436,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6417-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Anglada, J. M., Gonzalez, J., and Torrent-Sucarrat, M.: Effects of the
substituents on the reactivity of carbonyl oxides. A theoretical study on the
reaction of substituted carbonyl oxides with water, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
13, 13034–13045, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cp20872a" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c1cp20872a</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bateman, A. P., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Hygroscopic Influence on
the Semisolid-to-Liquid Transition of Secondary Organic Materials, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 4386–4395, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp508521c" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp508521c</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berndt, T., Kaethner, R., Voigtlander, J., Stratmann, F., Pfeifle, M.,
Reichle, P., Sipila, M., Kulmala, M., and Olzmann, M.: Kinetics of the
unimolecular reaction of CH<sub>2</sub>OO and the bimolecular reactions with the
water monomer, acetaldehyde and acetone under atmospheric conditions, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 19862–19873, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5cp02224j" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c5cp02224j</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Birdsall, A. W., Zentner, C. A., and Elrod, M. J.: Study of the kinetics and
equilibria of the oligomerization reactions of 2-methylglyceric acid, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 3097–3109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3097-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-3097-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bones, D. L., Reid, J. P., Lienhard, D. M., and Krieger, U. K.: Comparing the
mechanism of water condensation and evaporation in glassy aerosol, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 11613–11618, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bonn, B. and Moortgat, G. K.: Sesquiterpene ozonolysis: Origin of atmospheric
new particle formation from biogenic hydrocarbons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30,
1585, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017000" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003GL017000</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bonn, B., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Sihto, S. L., and Ruuskanen, T. M.: How
biogenic terpenes govern the correlation between sulfuric acid concentrations
and new particle formation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12209,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009327" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007jd009327</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bouvier-Brown, N. C., Goldstein, A. H., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., and de
Gouw, J. A.: In-situ ambient quantification of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes,
and related oxygenated compounds during BEARPEX 2007: implications for gas-
and particle-phase chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5505–5518,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5505-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5505-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Boy, M., Karl, T., Turnipseed, A., Mauldin, R. L., Kosciuch, E., Greenberg,
J., Rathbone, J., Smith, J., Held, A., Barsanti, K., Wehner, B., Bauer, S.,
Wiedensohler, A., Bonn, B., Kulmala, M., and Guenther, A.: New particle
formation in the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 1577–1590, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bruns, E. A., Perraud, V., Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu,
Y., Imre, D., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and Alexander, M. L.: Comparison of
FTIR and particle mass spectrometry for the measurement of particulate
organic nitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1056–1061,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es9029864" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es9029864</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D. and Wilson, K. R.: Evolution of organic aerosol mass spectra
upon heating: implications for OA phase and partitioning behavior, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 1895–1911, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1895-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-1895-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, M. N., Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Schilling, K., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Edney, E. O., Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Edgerton, E.
S., Tanner, R. L., Shaw, S. L., Zheng, M., Knipping, E. M., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Influence of aerosol acidity on the chemical composition of secondary
organic aerosol from <i>β</i>-caryophyllene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1735–1751, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1735-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-1735-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, M. N., Zhang, H. F., Goldstein, A. H., and Wilson, K. R.: Role of water
and phase in the heterogeneous oxidation of solid and aqueous succinic acid
aerosol by hydroxyl radicals, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 28978–28992,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp5012022</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chao, W., Hsieh, J. T., Chang, C. H., and Lin, J. J. M.: Direct kinetic
measurement of the reaction of the simplest Criegee intermediate with water
vapor, Science, 347, 751–754, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261549" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1261549</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Li, Y. L., McKinney, K. A., Kuwata, M., and Martin, S. T.: Particle
mass yield from <i>β</i>-caryophyllene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3165–3179, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3165-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-3165-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cody, R. B., Laramee, J. A., and Durst, H. D.: Versatile new ion source for
the analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions, Anal. Chem.,
77, 2297–2302, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac050162j" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac050162j</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Compernolle, S., Ceulemans, K., and Müller, J.-F.: EVAPORATION: a new
vapour pressure estimation methodfor organic molecules including
non-additivity and intramolecular interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
9431–9450, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Crank, J.: The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd Edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford,
1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Crounse, J. D., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Autoxidation of organic compounds in the atmosphere, J.
Phys. Chem. Lett., 4, 3513–3520, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
DePalma, J. W., Horan, A. J., Hall, W. A., and Johnston, M. V.:
Thermodynamics of oligomer formation: implications for secondary organic
aerosol formation and reactivity, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 6935–6944,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., He, Q. F., Shen, R. Q., Yu, Q. Q., and Wang, X. M.: Spatial
distributions of secondary organic aerosols from isoprene, monoterpenes,
beta-caryophyllene, and aromatics over China during summer, J. Geophys. Res.,
119, 11877–11891, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021748" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014jd021748</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Docherty, K. S., Wu, W., Lim, Y. B., and Ziemann, P. J.: Contributions of
organic peroxides to secondary aerosol formed from reactions of monoterpenes
with O<sub>3</sub>, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4049–4059, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Drozd, G. T., Epstein, S. A., Presto, A. A., and Kroll, J.
H.: Adventures in ozoneland: down the rabbit-hole, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
13, 10848–10857, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02564j" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c0cp02564j</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Ortega, I. K., Chuang, W., Riipinen, I., Riccobono, F.,
Schobesberger, S., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D.
R., and Vehkamaki, H.: How do organic vapors contribute to new-particle
formation?, Faraday Discuss., 165, 91–104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00046j" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c3fd00046j</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Duhl, T. R., Helmig, D., and Guenther, A.: Sesquiterpene emissions from
vegetation: a review, Biogeosciences, 5, 761–777, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-761-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-5-761-2008</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres,
S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma,
J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T.,
Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol,
Nature, 506, 476–479, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N.: Chemistry of the upper and lower
atmosphere: theory, experiments, and applications, Academic Press, San Diego,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y. Q., Hall, W. A., and Johnston, M. V.: Molecular composition of
monoterpene secondary organic aerosol at low mss loading, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 44, 7897–7902, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es101861k" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es101861k</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Goldstein, A. H. and Galbally, I. E.: Known and unexplored organic
constituents in the earth's atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
1514–1521, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es072476p" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es072476p</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Greaves, J. and Roboz, J.: Mass spectrometry for the novice, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, F. L., USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A
global-model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, 8873–8892, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94jd02950" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/94jd02950</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, W. A. and Johnston, M. V.: Oligomer formation pathways in secondary
organic aerosol from MS and MS/MS measurements with high mass accuracy and
resolving power, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 23, 1097–1108, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Harrick, N. J.: Internal reflection spectroscopy, Interscience Publishers,
New York, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Heaton, K. J., Sleighter, R. L., Hatcher, P. G., Hall, W. A., and Johnston,
M. V.: Composition domains in monoterpene secondary organic aerosol, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 7797–7802, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Helmig, D., Ortega, J., Duhl, T., Tanner, D., Guenther, A., Harley, P.,
Wiedinmyer, C., Milford, J., and Sakulyanontvittaya, T.: Sesquiterpene
emissions from pine trees – Identifications, emission rates and flux
estimates for the contiguous United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
1545–1553, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es0618907" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es0618907</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hodas, N., Zuend, A., Mui, W., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence
of particle-phase state on the hygroscopic behavior of mixed
organic–inorganic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5027–5045,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5027-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-5027-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, T., Odum, J. R., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Klockow, D., Flagan, R.
C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation of organic aerosols from the oxidation of
biogenic hydrocarbons, J. Atmos. Chem., 26, 189–222,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005734301837" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/A:1005734301837</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, T., Bandur, R., Marggraf, U., and Linscheid, M.: Molecular
composition of organic aerosols formed in the alpha-pinene/O<sub>3</sub> reaction:
Implications for new particle formation processes, J. Geophys. Res., 103,
25569–25578, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, D., Bian, Q., Li, T. W. Y., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Contributions
of isoprene, monoterpenes, beta-caryophyllene, and toluene to secondary
organic aerosols in Hong Kong during the summer of 2006, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D22206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010437" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd010437</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoui, M., Sexton, K. G., and Kamens, R. M.: Reaction of alpha-cedrene with
ozone: mechanism, gas and particulate products distribution, Atmos. Environ.,
38, 2709–2725, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Docherty, K. S., Lewandowski, M., and
Offenberg, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of a
series of sesquiterpenes: alpha-cedrene, beta-caryophyllene, alpha-humulene
and alpha-farnesene with O<sub>3</sub>, OH and NO<sub>3</sub> radicals, Environ. Chem.,
10, 178–193, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/En13025" target="_blank">doi:10.1071/En13025</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, R., Kerminen, V. M., Junninen, H.,
Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A. B., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipila, M.: Production of extremely low volatile
organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric
implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1423977112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Kanawati, B., Herrmann, F., Joniec, S., Winterhalter, R., and Moortgat, G.
K.: Mass spectrometric characterization of beta-caryophyllene ozonolysis
products in the aerosol studied using an electrospray triple quadrupole and
time-of-flight analyzer hybrid system and density functional theory, Rapid
Commun. Mass Sp., 22, 165–186, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.3340" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/Rcm.3340</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kidd, C., Perraud, V., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: New insights into
secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of alpha-pinene from combined
infrared spectroscopy and mass spectrometry measurements, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 16, 22706–22716, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kidd, C., Perraud, V., Wingen, L. M., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Integrating
phase and composition of secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of
alpha-pinene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 7552–7557, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H., Liu, S., Russell, L. M., and Paulson, S. E.: Dependence of real
refractive indices on O : C, H : C and mass fragments of secondary
organic aerosol generated from ozonolysis and photooxidation of limonene and
alpha-pinene, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 498–507,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.893278" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2014.893278</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition
and phase state of organic compounds: dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 13, 19238–19255, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, K., Enggrob, K. L., King, S. M., Worton, D. R., Platt, S. M.,
Mortensen, R., Rosenoern, T., Surratt, J. D., Bilde, M., Goldstein, A. H.,
and Glasius, M.: Formation and occurrence of dimer esters of pinene oxidation
products in atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3763–3776,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3763-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-3763-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, K., Cui, T., Zhang, H., Gold, A., Glasius, M., and Surratt, J.
D.: Dimers in <i>α</i>-pinene secondary organic aerosol: effect of hydroxyl
radical, ozone, relative humidity and aerosol acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 4201–4218, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4201-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-4201-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, A., Goldstein, A. H., Keywood, M. D., Gao, S., Varutbangkul, V.,
Bahreini, R., Ng, N. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-phase
products and secondary aerosol yields from the ozonolysis of ten different
terpenes, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07302, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006437" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006437</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C. T. and Kamens, R. M.: Particle nucleation from the reaction of
<i>α</i>−pinene and O<sub>3</sub>, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6822–6832, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, T. R., Blitz, M. A., Heard, D. E., and Seakins, P. W.: Direct evidence
for a substantive reaction between the Criegee intermediate, CH<sub>2</sub>OO, and
the water vapour dimer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 4859–4863,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp04750h" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c4cp04750h</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Chen, Q., Guzman, M. I., Chan, C. K., and Martin, S. T.:
Second-generation products contribute substantially to the particle-phase
organic material produced by <i>β</i>-caryophyllene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 121–132, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-121-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-121-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Lignell, H., Hinks, M. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Exploring matrix effects on
photochemistry of organic aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
13780–13785, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Mauderly, J. L. and Chow, J. C.: Health effects of organic aerosols, Inhal.
Toxicol., 20, 257–288, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08958370701866008" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/08958370701866008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrer, H.: Diffusion in solids: fundamentals, methods, materials,
diffusion-controlled processes, Springer Series, solid state science, 155,
Springer, Berlin, New York, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Martin, S. T., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.:
Amorphous and crystalline aerosol particles interacting with water vapor:
conceptual framework and experimental evidence for restructuring, phase
transitions and kinetic limitations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9491–9522,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9491-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-9491-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, L., Reinnig, M.-C., Warnke, J., and Hoffmann, Th.: Unambiguous
identification of esters as oligomers in secondary organic aerosol formed
from cyclohexene and cyclohexene/a-pinene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
1423–1433, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1423-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-1423-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, L., Reinnig, M. C., Hayen, H., and Hoffmann, T.: Characterization of
oligomeric compounds in secondary organic aerosol using liquid chromatography
coupled to electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance
mass spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 23, 971–979, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Nah, T., Chan, M., Leone, S. R., and Wilson, K. R.: Real time in situ
chemical characterization of submicrometer organic particles using direct
analysis in real time-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 85, 2087–2095,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac302560c" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac302560c</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Keywood, M. D., Bahreini, R., Varutbangkul, V.,
Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee, A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Contribution
of first- versus second-generation products to secondary organic aerosols
formed in the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40,
2283–2297, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es052269u" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es052269u</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Pajunoja, A., Lambe, A. T., Hakala, J., Rastak, N., Cummings, M. J., Brogan,
J. F., Hao, L. Q., Paramonov, M., Hong, J., Prisle, N. L., Malila, J.,
Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., Massoli,
P., Onasch, T. B., Donahue, N. M., Riipinen, I., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D.
R., Petaja, T., and Virtanen, A.: Adsorptive uptake of water by semisolid
secondary organic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3063–3068,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015GL063142</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method
for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of
multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander,
M. L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 2836–2841, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Reinnig, M. C., Warnke, J., and Hoffmann, T.: Identification of organic
hydroperoxides and hydroperoxy acids in secondary organic aerosol formed
during the ozonolysis of different monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes by on-line
analysis using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization ion trap mass
spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 23, 1735–1741, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.4065" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/Rcm.4065</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Renbaum, L. H. and Smith, G. D.: The importance of phase in the
radical-initiated oxidation of model organic aerosols: reactions of solid and
liquid brassidic acid particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 2441–2451,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b816799k" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/b816799k</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Renbaum-Wolff, L., Grayson, J. W., Bateman, A. P., Kuwata, M., Sellier, M.,
Murray, B. J., Shilling, J. E., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.: Viscosity
of alpha-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle
growth and reactivity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 8014–8019, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Richters, S., Herrmann, H., and Berndt, T.: Gas-phase rate coefficients of
the reaction of ozone with four sesquiterpenes at 295 ± 2 K, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 11658–11669, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp05542j" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c4cp05542j</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S.,
Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang,
R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D.
R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a
vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Rissanen, M. P., Kurten, T., Sipila, M., Thornton, J. A., Kausiala, O.,
Garmash, O., Kjaergaard, H. G., Petaja, T., Worsnop, D. R., Ehn, M., and
Kulmala, M.: Effects of chemical complexity on the autoxidation mechanisms of
endocyclic alkene ozonolysis products: from methylcyclohexenes toward
understanding alpha-pinene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4633–4650,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp510966g" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp510966g</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Ruscic, B.: Active thermochemical tables: water and water dimer, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 117, 11940–11953, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp403197t" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp403197t</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Ryzhkov, A. B. and Ariya, P. A.: A theoretical study of the reactions of
parent and substituted Criegee intermediates with water and the water dimer,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 5042–5050, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b408414d" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/b408414d</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Sadezky, A., Winterhalter, R., Kanawati, B., Römpp, A., Spengler, B.,
Mellouki, A., Le Bras, G., Chaimbault, P., and Moortgat, G. K.: Oligomer
formation during gas-phase ozonolysis of small alkenes and enol ethers: new
evidence for the central role of the Criegee Intermediate as oligomer chain
unit, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2667–2699, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Wiedinmyer, C., Helmig, D., Matsunaga, S.,
Potosnak, M., Milford, J., and Guenther, A.: Monoterpene and sesquiterpene
emission estimates for the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
1623–1629, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es702274e" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es702274e</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Guenther, A., Helmig, D., Milford, J., and
Wiedinmyer, C.: Secondary organic aerosol from sesquiterpene and monoterpene
emissions in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8784–8790,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es800817r" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es800817r</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Saukko, E., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Koop, T., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D.
R., Pedernera, D. A., Onasch, T. B., Laaksonen, A., Davidovits, P., Worsnop,
D. R., and Virtanen, A.: Humidity-dependent phase state of SOA particles from
biogenic and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7517–7529,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7517-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-7517-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, 2nd Edn., J. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Equilibration timescale of atmospheric
secondary organic aerosol partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24801,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054008" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012GL054008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Poschl, U.: Gas uptake and chemical
aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
11003–11008, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Selzle, K., and Pöschl, U.: Hazardous components and health
effects of atmospheric aerosol particles: reactive oxygen species, soot,
polycyclic aromatic compounds and allergenic proteins, Free Radical Res., 46,
927–939, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2012.663084" target="_blank">doi:10.3109/10715762.2012.663084</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Shu, Y. G. and Atkinson, R.: Rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of
O<sub>3</sub> with a series of terpenes and OH radical formation from the O<sub>3</sub>
reactions with sesquiterpenes at 296 ± 2 K, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 26,
1193–1205, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060582" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014GL060582</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Socrates, G.: Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and
charts, 3rd Edn., Wiley, Chichester, New York, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Taatjes, C. A., Welz, O., Eskola, A. J., Savee, J. D., Scheer, A. M.,
Shallcross, D. E., Rotavera, B., Lee, E. P. F., Dyke, J. M., Mok, D. K. W.,
Osborn, D. L., and Percival, C. J.: Direct measurements of
conformer-dependent reactivity of the criegee intermediate CH<sub>3</sub>CHOO,
Science, 340, 177–180, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Tasoglou, A. and Pandis, S. N.: Formation and chemical aging of secondary
organic aerosol during the <i>β</i>-caryophyllene oxidation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6035–6046, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6035-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-6035-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Tolocka, M. P., Jang, M., Ginter, J. M., Cox, F. J., Kamens, R. M., and
Johnston, M. V.: Formation of oligomers in secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1428–1434, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Vaden, T. D., Imre, D., Beranek, J., Shrivastava, M., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic
aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 2190–2195, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Vereecken, L., Muller, J. F., and Peeters, J.: Low-volatility poly-oxygenates
in the OH-initiated atmospheric oxidation of alpha-pinene: impact of
non-traditional peroxyl radical chemistry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9,
5241–5248, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Vereecken, L., Harder, H., and Novelli, A.: The reaction of Criegee
intermediates with NO, RO<sub>2</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub>, and their fate in the
atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 14, 14682–14695, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirila, P.,
Leskinen, J., Makela, J. M., Holopainen, J. K., Poschl, U., Kulmala, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467, 824–827,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09455" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature09455</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Welz, O., Eskola, A. J., Sheps, L., Rotavera, B., Savee, J. D., Scheer, A.
M., Osborn, D. L., Lowe, D., Booth, A. M., Xiao, P., Khan, M. A. H.,
Percival, C. J., Shallcross, D. E., and Taatjes, C. A.: Rate coefficients of
C1 and C2 Criegee intermediate reactions with formic and acetic acid near the
collision limit: direct kinetics measurements and atmospheric implications,
Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed., 53, 4547–4550, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Winkler, P. M., Ortega, J., Karl, T., Cappellin, L., Friedli, H. R.,
Barsanti, K., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Identification of the
biogenic compounds responsible for size-dependent nanoparticle growth,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20815, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053253" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012gl053253</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Winterhalter, R., Herrmann, F., Kanawati, B., Nguyen, T. L., Peeters, J.,
Vereecken, L., and Moortgat, G. K.: The gas-phase ozonolysis of
beta-caryophyllene (C<sub>15</sub>H<sub>24</sub>). Part I: an experimental study, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 4152–4172, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B817824k" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/B817824k</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Witkowski, B. and Gierczak, T.: Analysis of alpha-acyloxyhydroperoxy
aldehydes with electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry
(ESI-MS<sup><i>n</i></sup>), J. Mass Spectrom., 48, 79–88, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.3130" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jms.3130</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Witkowski, B. and Gierczak, T.: Early stage composition of SOA produced by
alpha-pinene/ozone reaction: alpha-Acyloxyhydroperoxy aldehydes and acidic
dimers, Atmos. Environ., 95, 59–70, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Yao, L., Ma, Y., Wang, L., Zheng, J., Khalizov, A., Chen, M. D., Zhou, Y. Y.,
Qi, L., and Cui, F. P.: Role of stabilized Criegee intermediate in secondary
organic aerosol formation from the ozonolysis of alpha-cedrene, Atmos.
Environ., 94, 448–457, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Yasmeen, F., Vermeylen, R., Szmigielski, R., Iinuma, Y., Boge, O., Herrmann,
H., Maenhaut, W., and Claeys, M.: Terpenylic acid and related compounds:
precursors for dimers in secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of
alpha- and beta-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9383–9392, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Ying, Q., Li, J. Y., and Kota S. H.: Significant contributions of isoprene to
summertime secondary organic aerosol in eastern United States, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 49, 7834–7842, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007gl029979</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R. Y., Wang, G. H., Guo, S., Zarnora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang,
W. G., Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of urban fine particulate matter,
Chem. Rev., 115, 3803–3855, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., McVay, R. C., Huang, D. D., Dalleska, N. F., Aumont, B., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation and evolution of molecular products in
<i>α</i>-pinene secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
14168–14173, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517742112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1517742112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Ortega, J., Chen, M., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Dependence
of particle nucleation and growth on high-molecular-weight gas-phase products
during ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7631–7644,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7631-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-7631-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Wingen, L. M., Perraud, V., Greaves, J., and Finlayson-Pitts, B.
J.: Role of the reaction of stabilized Criegee intermediates with peroxy
radicals in particle formation and growth in air, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
17, 12500–12514, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5cp01171j" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C5cp01171j</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemann, P. J. and Atkinson, R.: Kinetics, products, and mechanisms of
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6582–6605, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
