<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-2611-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Understanding cirrus ice crystal number variability for different heterogeneous ice nucleation spectra</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. C. Sullivan et al.}?><?xmltex \runningtitle{Understanding $N_{\text{i}}$ variability for different INP
spectra}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sullivan</surname><given-names>Sylvia C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Morales Betancourt</surname><given-names>Ricardo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5475-8605</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Barahona</surname><given-names>Donifan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5786-1344</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4 aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Nenes</surname><given-names>Athanasios</given-names></name>
          <email>athanasios.nenes@gatech.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-9970</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>ICE-HT, Foundation for Research and Technology, Hellas, 26504 Patras, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, Palea Penteli, 15236, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Athanasios Nenes (athanasios.nenes@gatech.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2611</fpage><lpage>2629</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Along with minimizing parameter uncertainty,
understanding the cause of temporal and spatial variability of the nucleated ice
crystal number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is key to improving the representation of
cirrus clouds in climate models. To this end, sensitivities of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to input variables like aerosol number and diameter provide valuable
information about nucleation regime and efficiency for a given model
formulation. Here we use the adjoint model of the adjoint of a cirrus formation parameterization
(Barahona and Nenes, 2009b) to understand <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability for various ice-nucleating particle (INP)
spectra. Inputs are generated with the Community Atmosphere Model version 5,
and simulations are done with a theoretically derived spectrum, an empirical
lab-based spectrum and two field-based empirical spectra that differ in the
nucleation threshold for black carbon particles and in the active site
density for dust. The magnitude and sign of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to
insoluble aerosol number can be directly linked to nucleation regime and
efficiency of various INP. The lab-based spectrum calculates much higher INP
efficiencies than field-based ones, which reveals a disparity in aerosol
surface properties. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to temperature tends to be low,
due to the compensating effects of temperature on INP spectrum parameters;
this low temperature sensitivity regime has been experimentally reported
before but never deconstructed as done here.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Aerosol–cloud interactions remain the largest source of uncertainty in
projections of anthropogenic climate change, and aerosol–ice interactions, in
particular, are poorly understood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.1"/>). Atmospheric aerosol
may modulate the properties of pure ice clouds by providing particles upon
which new ice crystals form. Cirrus clouds control moisture transfer into the
lower stratosphere and can have a net warming effect (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.2"/>).</p>
      <p>Ice crystals within cirrus clouds can be formed in a variety of ways.
Heterogeneous nucleation refers to the formation of ice on an aerosol
surface, and the portion of aerosol upon which ice forms this way are called
ice-nucleating particles (INP). There are several modes of heterogeneous
freezing: in deposition nucleation, vapor deposits directly onto an aerosol;
in condensation freezing, the aerosol acts first as a cloud condensation
nucleus and then immediately as an INP; and in immersion freezing, an aerosol
submerged for some time in supercooled liquid eventually initiates ice
formation. Ice crystals may also form directly from an aqueous phase through
homogeneous nucleation, typically at temperatures below about 235 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="altparen.3"/>). Aircraft measurements of relative humidity and ice crystal
number concentrations indicate that heterogeneous nucleation is dominant for
synoptic cirrus over North and Central America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="altparen.4"/>). But both
mechanisms can be active in cirrus clouds, and the competition for water
vapor between homogeneous and heterogeneous ice nucleation must be included
in cirrus formation parameterizations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.5"/>).</p>
      <p>Much effort has been devoted to studying heterogeneous ice nucleation on a
fundamental level (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.6"/>). Ice nucleation
can be understood as the formation of an ice germ in the vicinity of an
active site. The nature of active sites is unknown, but current understanding
suggests that they promote ordering of the water molecule layers near the
particle surface. The active site density refers to the number of these sites
per unit of aerosol surface area. A particle with more surface area will tend
to have more active sites and nucleate at higher temperatures (or lower
supersaturations); however, each active site varies in its efficiency, so
that contact angle or site density distributions are necessary
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.7"/>).</p>
      <p>While Köhler theory is the accepted framework to describe droplet
activation, nothing analogous exists for ice. Two conceptual paradigms are
currently in use: stochastic and singular freezing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx74" id="altparen.8"/>).
In the stochastic paradigm, water molecules fluctuate randomly to and from a
particle surface with some probability of reaching a critical, stable germ
size that initiates formation of the new phase; homogeneous nucleation within
a supercooled droplet is understood this way. In the singular paradigm,
nucleation is determined solely by particle surface morphology; once a
characteristic threshold temperature or supersaturation is acquired, ice
nucleates.</p>
      <p>Parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation calculate the
heterogeneously formed ice crystal number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a function of
thermodynamic conditions and precursor aerosol properties. These
parameterizations, termed INP spectra hereafter, may be empirically or
theoretically based. Empirical spectra use lab or field data to calculate an
active site density. Theoretically based spectra use classical nucleation
theory (CNT) and calculate a nucleation rate proportional to the aerosol surface
area (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.9"/>). The surface
heterogeneity should also be considered and has recently been represented as
a distribution of contact angles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx75" id="altparen.10"/>). But ice
nucleation data is geographically or thermodynamically limited, taken only
in localized regions or over a narrow range of temperatures and pressures.
And classical nucleation theory is approximate and requires unknown or
variable surface property data. As a result, the output of INP spectra has
remained uncertain, with up to 3 orders of magnitude difference in
calculated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.11"/>).</p>
      <p>Early published INP spectra expressed active site density as a function of
only temperature or supersaturation and neglected the aerosol composition and
size. For example, Fletcher 1969 proposed a parameterization based solely on
temperature, valid down to about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.12"/> INP
spectrum describes deposition and condensation nucleation as a function of
supersaturation only, with data from a continuous-flow diffusion chamber.
They observed a logarithmic increase in the number of ice-nucleating aerosol
with supersaturation with respect to ice, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>More recently published INP spectra consider the effects of size distribution
and composition of ice-nucleating particles. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="author.13"/>
(PDA08) calculates the active site density for mineral dust, black carbon
and hydrophobic organics, constrained with data from the First and Second Ice
Nuclei Spectroscopy Studies (INSPECT-1 and -2) and the Cirrus Regional Study
of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers – Florida-Area Cirrus Experiment
(CRYSTAL-FACE) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.14"/>). Updates have been made in the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="author.15"/> spectrum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="altparen.16"/>; PDA13). PDA08 and PDA13 are
based on the singular paradigm, in which each aerosol type nucleates ice at
threshold temperatures and supersaturations. Several other studies have
parameterized nucleation efficiency of mineral dusts or illite powders, using
cloud chamber data or optical microscopy (e.g.,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx59" id="altparen.17"/>).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="author.18"/> have also developed an INP spectrum at
cirrus-relevant temperatures, using the Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in
the Atmosphere (AIDA) cloud chamber data for hematite particles
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.19"/>). This study uses the three aforementioned spectra to
describe deposition nucleation. Other empirical spectra and recent
heterogeneous ice nucleation experiments are further discussed in the review
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.20"/>.</p>
      <p>Numerous studies have examined the impact of INP spectrum on nucleated ice
crystal number. Using the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM),
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="author.21"/> evaluated how predicted cloud type, cloud properties and
radiative balance change based on the INP spectrum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="altparen.22"/>). The
study uses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.23"/> as a default spectrum compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.24"/>,
a spectrum which links <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the aerosol number of diameter
larger than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The DeMott spectrum
calculated a much lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and hence a higher liquid water path
and lower ice water path for Arctic mixed-phase clouds. Curry and
Khvorostyanov have also run <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.25"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.26"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.27"/>, and their own theoretical
INP spectra with parcel model simulations over a range of thermodynamic
conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.28"/>). The authors emphasize the importance of
applying empirical spectra only in their regions of validity and note that
low nucleating efficiencies in PDA08 may underestimate ice crystal number.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="author.29"/> noted that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.30"/> significantly overpredicted
ice water content in coupled models if aerosol were not depleted after
nucleation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="altparen.31"/>). When INP depletion was included, the
predictions of water and ice in mixed-phase clouds improved considerably.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="author.32"/> compared the output crystal number between PDA08,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.33"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.34"/> and the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.35"/> CNT spectrum
for both monodisperse and polydisperse aerosol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.36"/>). They
found that ice nucleation occurred more often in the competitive regime for
the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.37"/> spectrum, yielding smaller crystal numbers; however, PDA08
predicted higher crystal numbers with ice nucleation most frequently in the
homogeneous regime. Similar results have also been reported for mixed-phase
cloud conditions (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="altparen.38"/>).</p>
      <p>In this work, we extend the adjoint of a cirrus formation parameterization
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="altparen.39"/>) to perform sensitivity analysis for several
heterogeneous INP spectra. Adjoints can calculate the sensitivity of a given
output to all inputs more efficiently and accurately than finite difference
runs, but at the expense of code development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.40"/>).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="author.41"/> have constructed the adjoint model of a liquid droplet
parameterization, and others have used adjoints for data assimilation, for
example in the Community Multiscale Air Quality and ISORROPIA models
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.42"/>). Here we use the adjoint approach to
address the following: how and why <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its sensitivities change
with the INP spectrum used and how sensitivities can elucidate nucleation
regime and efficiency. Our focus is on spatial and temporal output
variability, distinct from output uncertainty. The development of
heterogeneous ice nucleation spectra reduces parameter uncertainty; once a
spectrum is chosen, the question of how input variables contribute to output
variability remains. We consider the latter here. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>
provides an overview of the nucleation parameterization, model inputs and
four INP spectra used. Crystal number fields and aerosol acting as INP are
presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.
Sensitivities of different spectra are discussed in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> to <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS6"/>, and
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> summarizes the work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>BN parameterization</title>
      <p>We use the Barahona and Nenes cirrus formation parameterization (BN09)
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.43"/>) and its adjoint (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="altparen.44"/>). BN09
describes the competition for water vapor between heterogeneous and
homogeneous nucleation; the number of heterogeneously formed crystals,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated from any of a variety of nucleation spectra,
and homogeneously formed number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated with an
approximate solution to the coupled mass and energy balances of a cirrus
cloud parcel. Then the total ice crystal number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is the sum of
the heterogeneous and homogeneous contributions (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). When
the temperature is greater than about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, homogeneous
nucleation ceases because it is kinetically unfavorable. Homogeneous
nucleation is also suppressed when the number of INP exceeds a certain
threshold, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the maximum supersaturation that develops
within the cloud parcel, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is less than the threshold for
homogeneous nucleation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must be
numerically calculated from the growth and supersaturation evolution
equations.</p>
      <p><disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" class="cases" columnalign="left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The BN parameterization make two principal assumptions: first, ice crystal
growth occurs mostly in the free growth regime where new nucleation does not
significantly change the parcel supersaturation; second, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
calculated at the maximum supersaturation rather than a supersaturation later
in the freezing pulse. These assumptions lead to overestimation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at lower temperatures and higher updraft velocities and
underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at lower updrafts, when the freezing pulse is
longer. For a wide range of cirrus formation conditions, however, the
parameterization output matches that of a detailed parcel model to within
5 %. These points are discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.45"/>.</p>
      <p>As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.46"/>, the TAPENADE automatic differentiation tool was used
to create an adjoint model of BN09 (ABN15 hereafter) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.47"/>).
For the finite series of operations that link <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the inputs in
BN09, TAPENADE uses the chain rule to propagate a perturbation in the output,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, back to differentials in the input variables. Once
developed, the adjoint model saves significant computational time, relative
to a finite difference method, and avoids both approximation and truncation
errors. ABN15 differentiates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to 13 input variables:
temperature; updraft velocity; accumulation- and coarse-mode dust numbers and
diameters; organic aerosol number and diameter; black carbon number and
diameter; sulfate number and diameter; and water vapor deposition
coefficient. All derivatives, along with the typical output of BN09, are
evaluated at the input model state for each grid cell and time step of a
GCM (global climate model) run. ABN15 is verified with centered finite difference approximations, using
perturbations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 % around each input for simulation-relevant
thermodynamic and aerosol conditions. Such finite difference calculations
require two runs for each variable, so for 13 input variables, the adjoint
model saves 25 executions of the parameterization relative to typical
sensitivity calculations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Simulation setup and spectra</title>
      <p>Simulation inputs are generated from the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model,
version 5 (CAM5) at the 232 hPa pressure level with 2-year spin-up and
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.88<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. The input updraft velocity from
CAM 5.1 is calculated from the turbulent kinetic energy in the moist
turbulence scheme of Bretherton and Park 2009 as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>TKE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The probability distribution of these values
is compared to 2 years' worth of millimeter cloud radar measurements (MMCR) in
Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement with all
values at the same latitude, longitude and altitude. Measurements are shown
after Doppler velocity decomposition, as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.48"/>.</p>
      <p>The distribution of hourly averaged measurements has a lower maximum and
decays to smaller values than that of the hourly averaged simulation inputs.
Comparing updraft distribution from aircraft and ground-based MMCR,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.49"/> note similar behavior in which the MMCR velocities were
repeatedly smaller than the in situ ones; however, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.50"/> saw
that lower resolution models tend to decay to even smaller values than the
MMCR observations because they do not resolve the gravity wave contribution.
This difference is probably due to the filtering of deep convective systems
within the MMCR data but no analogous filter for simulated updrafts in this
case.</p>
      <p>We use daily averaged updraft values for which the distribution agrees better
with the observed values. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from CAM are used as the
standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a Gaussian updraft velocity
distribution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both
output ice crystal numbers and sensitivities are weighted over this
distribution to account for sub-grid variability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx51" id="altparen.51"/>):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Adjustable parameters for ABN15 simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Citation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pressure level</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">232 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ISCCP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Deposition coefficient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.52"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Width of BC SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.53"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Width of dust SDs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx25" id="text.54"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Width of organic SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.55"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Width of sulfate SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sulf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.56"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Liquid mixing ratio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.57"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface polarity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.58"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organic coating</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.59"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Threshold supersaturation for dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.60"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Threshold supersaturation for black</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.61"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum nucleation efficiency of dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.62"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Effective contact angle for dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.63"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum nucleation efficiency of black carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.64"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Effective contact angle for black carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.65"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>This integration is performed numerically with a six-point Legendre–Gauss
quadrature method, with weights and abscissae chosen over an interval from
minimum to maximum velocity, which are taken as 4 standard deviations below
and above <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An upper bound of 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, unlike that
of 0.2 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.66"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.67"/>, and a lower
bound of 0.001 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are enforced.</p>
      <p>The altitude examined is in the middle of the cirrus cloud classification from the International Cloud Climatology Project (pressures between 440 and 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and represents pure ice
cloud formation. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="author.68"/> emissions inventory
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="altparen.69"/>) and MAM3 module were used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.70"/>). Lognormal
size distributions are assumed for all aerosol types with geometric standard
deviations, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, assumed to be constant and listed below in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and total aerosol mass are used
to determine geometric mean diameter for each mode. Total aerosol number is
scaled by mass fraction to determine aerosol number concentrations in each
mode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="altparen.71"/>). For calculations of ice crystal number
concentrations and sensitivities, BN09 and ABN15 were run over a year with
four heterogeneous INP spectra and daily averaged values of CAM output.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Phillips et al. (2008, 2013) empirical spectra</title>
      <p>PDA08 uses the exponential correlation of crystal number and supersaturation
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.72"/> as a reference spectrum, extending the applicable ranges of
temperature and supersaturation and incorporating characteristics of the
precursor aerosol. The number of ice-nucleating particles, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in aerosol group <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (dust and metallics – DM, black carbon – BC, or
organics – O) is calculated with a sum over the aerosol size distribution
weighted by a freezing fraction:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number of ice embryos forming per aerosol and is the
product of the active site density and aerosol surface area
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="altparen.73"/>):
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the INP number from a reference activity
spectrum; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a reference aerosol surface area, which acts as a
normalization factor for the size distribution; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the portion of
aerosol number belonging to group <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol size distribution; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a threshold
function that reduces INP concentrations at conditions subsaturated with
respect to water and warm sub-zero temperatures in agreement with
observations. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equals unity at water saturation and steps at certain
threshold temperatures, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and supersaturations, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
for the different aerosol groups. Finally <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diminishes heterogeneous
nucleation at warm sub-zero temperatures.</p>
      <p>Both PDA08 and PDA13 adopt the mathematical framework of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), but PDA13 employs more extensive field
campaign data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="altparen.74"/>). The organic classification in PDA13 is also
split into primary biological material and glassy organics, following recent
observations of distinct ice-nucleating activity for these particle types. In
this study, sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to biological INP is not considered,
as CAM5 does not currently output a biological particle number.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Classical nucleation theory spectrum</title>
      <p>We also use the classical nucleation spectrum developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="author.75"/>
and presented in conjunction with the parameterization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.76"/>):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the nucleation efficiency of aerosol group <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the threshold supersaturation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the aerosol size distribution, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the INP-ice contact angle, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a parameter related to the homogeneous nucleation
threshold. Dust and black carbon groups are included with parameters listed
in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>; contact angles come from the laboratory data of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.77"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar to that in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.78"/>. The
stochastic component of the nucleation efficiency through heterogeneous
nucleation rate coefficient is assumed to be negligible, and the singular paradigm
also underlies this spectrum. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is potentially a function of temperature
and the aerosol profile, but here it is taken from literature and assumed
to be constant throughout the simulation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Nucleation regimes of cirrus in the log-log INP-ice
crystal number space. At low INP numbers, nucleation is predominantly
homogeneous. At intermediate INP numbers, nucleation is competitive between
homogeneous and heterogeneous. Beyond the threshold INP number,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nucleation is purely heterogeneous; <bold>(b)</bold> threshold
supersaturations for homogeneous nucleation and heterogeneous nucleation on
mineral dust and BC with different organic coatings, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
190 and 240 K for the PDA08 and PDA13 nucleation spectra. Both use the same
correlation for dust.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Hiranuma et al. (2014) spectrum</title>
      <p>The nucleation efficiency of hematite particles was measured at the AIDA
chamber from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>78 up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and parameterized
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.79"/>). The third-order polynomial fit for active site
density (in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) as a function
of temperature and saturation ratio of ice. Isolines from AIDA expansion
cooling experiments are interpolated over the temperature-supersaturation
space, assuming a hematite baseline surface area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.777</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.818</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.252</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.598</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.952</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.111</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.966</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.135</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.729</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.438</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.80"/>, we use this active site parameterization in the
framework of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) to calculate nucleated crystal
number:</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Hereafter, we refer to this formulation as the AIDA spectrum.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Measurement–model comparison of probability distributions in ice
crystal number concentrations. Data distributions come from the Video Ice
Particle Sampler (VIPS) and the two-dimensional stereo (2DS) probe during
April 2011 of the MACPEX campaign and the Forward-Scattering Spectrometer
(FSSP) during January 2010 of the SPARTICUS campaigns. Only measurements from
the 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m bin of the VIPS; the 5–15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m bin of the
2DS; and the 0.89, 1.90, 3.80, 5.85, 8.30, 11.45, 14.25, 17.15 and
20.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m-centered bins of the 2DS are used, as approximations to
the newly nucleated ice crystal number. Measurements are also filtered for
altitudes of 232 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 hPa and for uniformity, lasting at least 45 s.
Distributions of simulation output, i.e. of the annually averaged output
nucleated ice crystal number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>,
are shown using the <bold>(a)</bold> PDA08, <bold>(b)</bold> PDA13, <bold>(c)</bold> CNT
and <bold>(d)</bold> AIDA nucleation spectra. Different independent axes are used
in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>Homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation can be active in cirrus clouds, and
their relative influence can be conceptually understood along an
INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx3" id="altparen.81"/>). When INP concentration is low, nucleation is
predominantly homogeneous. The slope or sensitivity here, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is slightly negative because the
addition of an insoluble particle slightly decreases the number of nucleated
ice crystals by competing for water vapor and decreasing supersaturation. As
the INP concentration increases, homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation
compete more strongly for water vapor. Water vapor preferentially deposits on
the additional INP surface and depresses the number of newly nucleated
crystals, so <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in
magnitude. Eventually, INP increases beyond the threshold number,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and further depletion of supersaturation inhibits homogeneous
nucleation altogether. Addition of another INP increases the ice crystal
number, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes positive.
While all nucleation for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is competitive, we use
the term “competitive nucleation” below to refer to the case when both
homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation have a significant contribution,
greater than 10 %, to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These three regimes have been explained
in terms of INP number, but they can also be understood in terms of INP
diameter: increasing INP surface area leads to more vapor depletion by
heterogeneous nucleation and decreased crystal number in the competitive
regime.</p>
      <p>This conceptual framework is used to understand the simulation results.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Crystal number</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows a comparison of the in situ crystal number
measurements, taken from the NASA MACPEX (Mid-latitude Cirrus Properties
Experiment) and the DOE SPARTICUS (Small Particles In Cirrus) aircraft
campaigns. Data are used from the Video Ice Particle Sampler (VIPS) and
two-dimensional stereo (2DS) probe during April 2011 of MACPEX and from the
Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP) during January 2010 of
SPARTICUS. Using simultaneous Meteorological Measurement System (MMS)
pressure values, only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements taken within 20 hPa of the
simulated pressure level of 232 hPa are used. Because the newly nucleated
ice crystal number concentration is simulated, we use only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
the smallest size bins of each instrument (see caption of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Finally, the same criterion for significant samples
as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.82"/> is employed: samples must continuously span at least
45 s. These MACPEX and SPARTICUS measurements, taken with shatter-resistant
probes and analyzed with an inter-arrival time algorithm, are more reliable
than older ones, especially for the smallest size bins that we consider
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.83"/>).</p>
      <p>Simulated and measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agree best for the PDA13 spectrum,
followed by the PDA08 and then the AIDA spectra. The CNT spectrum
overestimates the frequencies of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than about 10 L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
by more than 1 order of magnitude and predicts no number concentrations less
than 1 L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Measurements show, instead, that most of the smallest
crystals occur at lower number concentrations, below about 5 L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
very high frequency of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is missed by the other spectra as
well, and all except PDA13 show slower decays in the frequency of high
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those in the measurements.</p>
      <p>Model overestimate of high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the coldest temperatures has been
often noted (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.84"/>). Along with this
“ice nucleation puzzle” of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at low temperature
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="altparen.85"/>), model–measurement discrepancy may be explained by
in-cloud processes after nucleation: nucleated crystal number will tend to be
higher than in-cloud crystal number, even when looking only at the smallest
size bins. Preexisting ice crystals can inhibit ice nucleation
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx69" id="altparen.86"/>), while sedimentation can significantly reduce
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.87"/> have termed the latter “sedimentation
induced quenching of nucleation”, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.88"/> found that omission
of sedimentation by setting crystal fall speed to 0 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted in
higher frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 1000 L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a through d show the annually averaged potential
nucleated ice crystal number for each grid cell, given the vertical velocity
and aerosol profile. The spatial variability in these fields is notable and
reflects the large, documented spatial variability in INP concentrations
(e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.89"/>). Including additional microphysics after
nucleation will tend to reduce this spatial variability. Some common features
are still observed between fields: over the Himalayas and Rockies,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is higher because orographic lifting generates stronger updrafts
and more supersaturation; the Saharan and Gobi desert outflows enhance
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and for INP spectra considering black carbon (all except
the AIDA spectrum), higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs in regions of biomass
burning (e.g., sub-Saharan Africa and the Amazon). In the Southern
Hemisphere, especially over Antarctica, heterogeneous nucleation is rare, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stays high because aerosol number concentrations are low and
active site density decreases with temperature.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Range of predicted ice-nucleating particle numbers and abundances
for different nucleation spectra.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spectrum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">INP Range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Median INP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Interquartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Interquartile</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">range of INP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">range of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">number [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PDA08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.047–5.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0070–11.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PDA13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.57–28.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.67–49.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.94–1270.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">169.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.97–7220.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AIDA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.60–855.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">190.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.02–4549.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annually averaged output nucleated ice crystal number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the cirrus formation parameterization for <bold>(a)</bold> PDA08,
<bold>(b)</bold> PDA13, <bold>(c)</bold> CNT, <bold>(d)</bold> AIDA nucleation spectra.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Elsewhere, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly variable and sensitive to the INP spectrum.
For example, all spectra except PDA08 see higher crystal number in the
Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere. In agreement with previous studies,
PDA08 predicts the lowest INP number, between 0.047 and 5.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) and the highest maximum supersaturations
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx53" id="altparen.90"/>). When the input aerosol number is
sufficiently high in the Northern Hemisphere, stronger competitive nucleation
results in lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the Southern Hemisphere remains
dominated by homogeneous nucleation and higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
heterogeneously formed fraction field in Fig. S3 also
illustrates these regions of competitive and homogeneous nucleation in the Northern Hemisphere
(NH) and the Southern Hemisphere (SH), respectively. Updraft velocity and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are well-correlated;
both have higher values around the equator for PDA08.</p>
      <p>Compared to PDA08, PDA13 predicts about 1 order of magnitude higher INP
number, between 0.57 and 28.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and more frequent inhibition of
homogeneous nucleation, as shown in Fig. S3, where the
heterogeneously formed fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much higher. In localized
regions of purely heterogeneous nucleation, however, PDA08 may still predict
higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be understood in terms of an INP abundance,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the ratio of
available INP to the limiting number to inhibit homogeneous nucleation.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with decreasing maximum supersaturation,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can outweigh the increase in INP number so that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> actually decreases within PDA13.</p>
      <p>Higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PDA08 can also be understood in terms of threshold
supersaturations for nucleation, when calculated supersaturations are similar
between PDA08 and PDA13. When these thresholds are less stringent, the
competitive nucleation cusp of the INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace becomes steeper and
extends to lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Where nucleation is competitive, then,
as in PDA13 around the equator, very low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is possible.</p>
      <p>Compared to PDA13, INP numbers in the CNT and AIDA spectra are about 10-fold
higher, with median values of 50.38 and 52.51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
High INP numbers result in almost purely heterogeneous nucleation everywhere
for the CNT spectrum, as shown in Fig. S3c. The highest crystal
numbers in any of the fields occur for this spectrum in Saharan outflows
because of the high dust nucleation efficiency and the dependence on aerosol
number concentration rather than surface area here. Large accumulation-mode
dust numbers can yield large <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is on the order
of 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> here, larger than any of the in situ measurements
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. An overestimate of INP by CNT-based spectra
has been reported elsewhere (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="altparen.91"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annually averaged contributions of dust and BC to
heterogeneously formed ice crystal number. <bold>(a)</bold> Dust contribution in
PDA08; <bold>(b)</bold> dust contribution in PDA13; <bold>(c)</bold> black carbon
contribution in PDA08; and <bold>(d)</bold> black carbon contribution in PDA13.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For the AIDA spectrum, mostly heterogeneous nucleation occurs in the Northern
Hemisphere, while competitive nucleation occurs in the Southern Hemisphere.
INP increases lead to frequent inhibition of homogeneous ice nucleation for
these last two spectra. Again, higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are due to higher
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; here, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing
supersaturation is not enough to outweigh the higher INP numbers.</p>
      <p>A final point can be made about the strong temperature dependence of the
threshold supersaturation for homogeneous nucleation. Within the CNT
spectrum, the heterogeneously formed fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> actually
increases in the SH (Fig. S3) because at the coldest
temperatures, the threshold supersaturation for homogeneous nucleation
significantly increases, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b. A
fewer number of INP are needed to depress the supersaturation enough to
inhibit homogeneous nucleation; the dust INP in the CNT simulations are
efficient enough to shut down homogeneous nucleation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Nucleating aerosol</title>
      <p>We consider next which aerosol groups act as INP in the regions of purely
heterogeneous nucleation. For PDA08 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a and c,
both dust and black carbon play a role. Gradients in input temperature and BC
contribution both appear around 40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S because the BC threshold
supersaturation is a quadratic function of temperature in this spectrum
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="altparen.92"/>). Below
60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, the BC contribution is 40 % or higher for PDA08. This is
unexpected because black carbon sources tend to be continental and
anthropogenic, while land coverage and population density are lower in the
SH.</p>
      <p>For PDA13, dust is by far the primary contributor to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outside
of a very localized region of deep convection around the Equator. The
correlation for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains the same between PDA08 and
PDA13 and decreases with decreasing temperature because observations show
that nucleation on dust generally becomes more efficient at colder
temperatures (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx25" id="altparen.93"/>). PDA13 also uses an updated
correlation for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, expressed in terms of surface
polarity and organic coating:</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a baseline supersaturation of 30 %, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is a cubic interpolation over organic coating, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, between lower
and upper bounds of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx16" id="altparen.94"/>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the saturation
ratio of vapor with respect to ice at exact water saturation, since minimal
nucleation has been observed at water-subsaturated conditions for
heavily coated black carbon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.95"/>). Surface polarity expresses
hydrophilicity and is operationally defined as the number of water monolayers
adsorbed to the aerosol surface at 50 % relative humidity, while the
organic coating indicates the fraction of BC surface covered in insoluble
organics. These parameters are source-dependent and difficult to determine,
but this study assumes a high surface polarity of two monolayers and a low
organic coating of 10 % to maximize any impact of black carbon
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.96"/> have also shown that these
values describe aircraft engine combustion emissions, which would be relevant
at this altitude.</p>
      <p>The different aerosol contributing to INP concentrations, despite the same
framework, can be understood by analyzing the expression for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Given
that the same aerosol size and number distributions have been used in both
runs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), the difference is in the active site
density parameterization. The observationally based terms making up the
active site density are a threshold for water-subsaturated conditions, a
threshold for warm sub-zero temperatures, a background aerosol number, and a
baseline surface area mixing ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.97"/>):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Between PDA08 and PDA13, the portion of aerosol belonging to the BC group,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, has increased by 3 %, while our input temperatures are
too low for the warm sub-zero temperature threshold, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to affect
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculations. The water-subsaturated threshold, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, would
completely suppress BC nucleation if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were taken to be 100 %;
experimental evidence has shown that BC nucleation may only occur at water
saturation when coating is significant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.98"/>). But we have
used <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 10 % and the threshold supersaturation has actually
decreased for PDA13, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b. These
factors alone actually yield a higher active site density for BC than for
dust.</p>
      <p>The difference in contributions, then, is the result of changing baseline
surface area mixing ratios, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A lower active site density is
needed to obtain the same freezing fraction when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is higher.
Between PDA08 and PDA13, this parameter decreases 4-fold from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust and increases
about 3-fold from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BC. As a result, the freezing fraction of
BC is much lower, even if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is somewhat higher. Dust becomes
the primary INP for PDA13 because its freezing fraction has increased.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from PDA13 is lower in the NH because the large dust numbers
there depress <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and
S3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annually averaged accumulation-mode dust number sensitivities for
<bold>(a)</bold> PDA08, <bold>(b)</bold> PDA13, <bold>(c)</bold> CNT and
<bold>(d)</bold> AIDA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Surface polarity and organic coating parameters are prescribed in these
simulations and may be highly variable in the atmosphere. We have chosen a
high polarity and low organic coating, so that BC contribution calculations
represent an upper bound. For simulations with higher organic coatings, any
INP contribution from BC disappears completely. But polarity and coating
change with morphology and porosity, which change with source
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="altparen.99"/>). A more detailed consideration of the BC emissions
inventory would be needed to more accurately determine these parameters and
BC contribution to crystal number. Uncertainty also exists within the BC
emissions inventory itself, and this, along with the coating and polarity
parameters, will translate to uncertainty in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Nucleation regime</title>
      <p>The sign and magnitude of the insoluble aerosol number sensitivities,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be used to elucidate the
active nucleation regime. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> gives an example with
the annually averaged sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to accumulation-mode dust
number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for all spectra. In
the Southern Hemisphere, sensitivities for PDA08 are of small magnitude
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and negative, as homogeneous nucleation dominates.
There are localized regions of strong competitive nucleation in sub-Saharan
Africa and northern South America, where sensitivities are of larger
magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and negative. Sensitivities throughout
most of the Northern Hemisphere are of moderate magnitude and negative,
indicating weaker competitive nucleation.</p>
      <p>The CNT field exhibits positive sensitivities throughout most of the Northern
Hemisphere, delineated in white and indicating purely heterogeneous
nucleation. PDA13 also contains regions of purely heterogeneous nucleation
but around the Equator in regions of lower updraft and higher INP. When
updraft velocity increases significantly – in the region of deep convection
over Indonesia or over the Himalayas or Rockies due to orographic lifting –
a sufficiently high supersaturation may be generated to exceed the threshold
for homogeneous nucleation and induce competitive nucleation. For both the
PDA13 and AIDA spectra, regions of large and negative sensitivities, or
strong competitive nucleation, appear south of 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. INP numbers
are considerably lower than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> here, but the threshold
supersaturation for homogeneous nucleation has also increased at these cold
temperatures.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of accumulation-mode dust number sensitivities (green,
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and input updraft velocities (blue, in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
over Indonesia at 2.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 135<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E for <bold>(a)</bold> PDA08 and
<bold>(b)</bold> PDA13; and over South America at 0.95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N ,
64<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W for <bold>(c)</bold> PDA08 and <bold>(d)</bold> PDA13.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The magnitude of negative sensitivities during competitive nucleation reflect
the threshold conditions assigned to a given aerosol group. The lower the
threshold supersaturation for an aerosol group, the more readily it nucleates
and the more effectively it depletes water vapor; this corresponds to larger
magnitude <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surpasses <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and purely heterogeneous nucleation
begins. PDA13 sensitivities to BC number are of larger magnitude than PDA08
values because <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower for the polarity and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values used here. The cusp of the INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace
becomes steeper, and the competition for water vapor is stronger in this
case.</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is of large magnitude
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and positive for the AIDA spectrum due to larger
predicted INP numbers. These sensitivities decrease in magnitude over the
Antarctic because the active site density parameterization has a strong
supersaturation dependence at cold temperatures (Fig. S5). If the
temperature decreases by 5 K for a constant supersaturation, the active site
density can drop by as much as 25 %. The effect of this active site density
parameterization on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is discussed further in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
also decreases in magnitude over Indonesia because the large updrafts here
generate enough supersaturation that competitive nucleation occurs often and
reduces the annually averaged magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Along with these spatial sensitivity patterns, we look at sensitivity time
series without temporal averaging, which show the frequency of occurrence of
different nucleation regimes. Infrequent but large magnitude sensitivities
can have an important influence on the annual average (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="altparen.100"/>).
Distributions of both accumulation-mode dust number sensitivities and input
updraft velocities are presented at (2.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 135<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) over
Indonesia and (0.95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 64<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) over northern South America
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. These points are denoted by diamonds in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Their annually averaged sensitivities differ
significantly, despite their being in the same latitudinal band with similar
aerosol loadings.</p>
      <p>The location over Indonesia experiences high updraft more frequently, and the
additional supersaturation generation translates to more competitive
nucleation and larger magnitude sensitivities in PDA13, almost down to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In PDA08, more supersaturation generation
translates to more frequent homogeneous nucleation and smaller magnitude,
less variable sensitivities, on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> L L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
location over South America has fewer instances of high updraft, so for
PDA13, the system cannot always overcome the threshold supersaturation for
homogeneous nucleation. Purely heterogeneous nucleation occurs more
frequently: Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d has primarily positive
sensitivities of small magnitude with an occasional large spike in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which always corresponds to a large
updraft. Relative to PDA13, PDA08 exhibits stronger water vapor competition:
the peaks in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c are about 4 times as large as
those in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a. This behavior can be understood in
terms of a transition along the INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respond differently to supersaturation
generation based on how many INP the nucleation spectrum predicts.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Log-space distributions of a random sampling of
<bold>(a)</bold> accumulation- and coarse-mode dust number and <bold>(b)</bold> dust
diameter for PDA08, PDA13 and AIDA spectra during purely heterogeneous
nucleation. The box is constructed with 25th percentile, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; median,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and 75th percentile, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Outlying points are marked with crosses if
they fall outside [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>].</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2611/2016/acp-16-2611-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>INP nucleation efficiency</title>
      <p>The positive values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for which
nucleation is purely heterogeneous, can be understood as nucleation
efficiencies: those aerosol which act as efficient INP generate a large
increase in crystal number for a given increase in aerosol number. Rather
than an inherent nucleation efficiency of a certain aerosol group, the
sensitivity reflects an INP efficiency given the particular model state.
Accumulation-mode dust has a mean efficiency of 0.0012 %
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)) in PDA08 and 0.079 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %))
in PDA13, while coarse-mode dust has a mean efficiency of 0.61 % in PDA08
and 0.078 % in PDA13. AIDA calculates considerably higher mean efficiency
of 1.4 % for the accumulation mode and 52 % for the coarse mode. Black
carbon in PDA08 is 0.03 % efficient on average, 1 order of magnitude
higher than the accumulation-mode dust. In PDA13, on the other hand, black
carbon efficiency is an order lower than accumulation-mode dust and skewed
toward lower values (not shown). Efficiency of organic aerosol is negligible,
on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> % and skewed to values as low as 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p>
      <p>From Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) during purely heterogeneous nucleation,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          As the number of embryos per aerosol particle becomes large, the
nucleation-active fraction of the aerosol population, which is equivalent to
the positive aerosol number sensitivity or the nucleation efficiency,
approaches unity. This occurs because the product of active site density and
aerosol surface area becomes large enough that an ice embryo should always
form on the INP surface. Shifts in the number sensitivities reflect changing
contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To illustrate, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a shows
the distribution of a random sample of 5000 daily averaged dust number
sensitivities, when ice nucleation is purely heterogeneous, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The coarse-mode dust number sensitivity
is higher, and the accumulation-mode dust sensitivity is lower for PDA08 than
PDA13 because BC nucleation has been suppressed in the latter. The active
site density of PDA08 BC is larger than that of dust under certain conditions
(Fig. S5), meaning that BC efficiencies are higher than the
accumulation-mode dust efficiencies because aerosol diameter for the two
groups is assumed to be the same. The coarse-mode sensitivities or
efficiencies are even higher because their surface area is 2 orders of
magnitude larger and outweighs a lower active site density.</p>
      <p>The PDA08 distributions also have many more outliers because of the greater
competition for water vapor between aerosol groups. The adjoint sensitivities
are local in space and time, and in model grid cells without BC, dust in both
modes is able to nucleate much more efficiently. In grid cells with more BC,
the dust nucleation efficiency is significantly reduced because of the
competition for water vapor between the two INP groups. The narrower range of
AIDA efficiencies reinforces this point: this spectrum describes nucleation
by dust in idealized conditions, and no other aerosols compete for water vapor.
Its active site parameterization also contains no threshold functions that
abruptly reduce nucleation. For application in global models, it may be more
effective to use parameterizations from experiments with multiple nucleating
aerosol types.</p>
      <p>Once an aerosol population has reached its maximum active fraction or
efficiency, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes less sensitive to the number of these
aerosol. In PDA13, the coarse-mode dust population reaches an upper bound in
its efficiency, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to coarse-mode number decreases
to a value comparable to the accumulation-mode number. For low active
fractions, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) can be linearized so that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Given that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) in
the coarse mode (Fig. S5), the maximum active fraction is expected
to be on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is indeed the value seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Size sensitivity and the active site density</title>
      <p>Diameter sensitivities can also be understood in terms of nucleation regime.
When nucleation is purely heterogeneous, diameter sensitivity is positive;
increasing aerosol diameter increases crystal number because for a given
active site density, more surface area increases the number of ice embryos
per aerosol. During competitive nucleation, diameter sensitivity becomes
negative, as more available surface area for heterogeneous nucleation reduces
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As with number sensitivity, the magnitude
of negative diameter sensitivities reflects how intensely a certain aerosol
group can deplete water vapor. The magnitude of positive diameter
sensitivities is larger for coarse mode than accumulation-mode dust in all
spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>); an incremental increase in diameter generates
more surface area for larger particles than for smaller particles.</p>
      <p>The magnitude of positive diameter sensitivities also reflect active site
density. From Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), during purely heterogeneous
nucleation,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which shows that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
magnitude of diameter sensitivity first increases, then decreases, with
diameter. The larger the diameter, the faster the sensitivity decreases after
its maximum and the larger that maximum sensitivity. Again for active site
density, the magnitude of diameter sensitivity first increases then decreases
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. And the larger the active site density, the faster the
sensitivity decreases after reaching its maximum value. The first effect is
stronger because <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is proportional to active
site density but to the square of diameter.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b is constructed again from a random sample of 5000
daily averaged dust diameter sensitivities in the purely heterogeneous
regime, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum
coarse-mode diameter sensitivity is smaller than that of the accumulation-mode diameter sensitivity for PDA13 and CNT because the higher number of
accumulation-mode dust particles outweighs the larger coarse-mode surface
area. The AIDA and PDA13 spectra tend to reach the same maximum diameter
sensitivities (10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the coarse mode) as both
have reached their maximum active fraction. These features do not
characterize the PDA08 distributions because of competition for water vapor
with black carbon. Given the higher active site density and equal surface
area of black carbon relative to accumulation-mode dust, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than in the other spectra.
The surface area increase from the addition of a coarse-mode dust particle
outweighs the higher BC active site density and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PDA08 is comparable to the values in the other spectra.
In summary, spectra with large active site densities will be highly sensitive
to aerosol diameter over a limited range of these diameters, while spectra
with lower active site densities will be less sensitive to aerosol diameter
but over a larger range of these diameters. These trends may be convoluted by
competition for water vapor with other aerosol species.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Sensitivity of $N_{\text{i}}$ to temperature and sulfate aerosol}?><title>Sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to temperature and sulfate aerosol</title>
      <p>The above discussion has focused on insoluble aerosol sensitivities. Soluble
aerosol sensitivities, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sulf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are
always positive because the addition of these soluble particles enhances
homogeneous nucleation and crystal number, regardless of the insoluble INP
profile. When purely heterogeneous nucleation occurs, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sulf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is zero. Sulfate sensitivities are
generally on the order of 0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but can be as large
as 0.025 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the coldest temperatures in the SH. This
field does not change in magnitude between spectra because the treatment of
homogeneous nucleation is identical in all cases. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sulf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller and less influential than the
updraft sensitivity fields, similar to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.101"/>, for
which the aerosol size distribution did not strongly affect the number of
nucleated ice crystals.</p>
      <p>Temperature sensitivities, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are generally
negative because colder temperatures tend to facilitate ice nucleation. An
increase in temperature may exceed the threshold temperature for a certain
aerosol group, deactivating it, and allowing homogeneous nucleation to
generate a larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This phenomenon can be observed in both the
PDA08 and PDA13 fields, in which positive sensitivities fall exclusively at
the outflow of Saharan dust around the equator where input temperature is
between 225 and 230 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These temperatures are in the range at which
the water-subsaturated threshold function for dust drops (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), so that the primary
contributor to heterogeneous nucleation depletes less water vapor and
homogeneous nucleation yields higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than expected
from classical nucleation theory, probably due to counterbalancing effects.
For example, as temperature increases so does water vapor diffusivity, which
enhances crystal growth and reduces crystal number. But latent heat of sublimation
also increases as temperature drops, which slows the crystal growth rate. The
homogeneous nucleation coefficient increases by 1 order of magnitude with
only a 30 K drop in temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="altparen.102"/>). The threshold
supersaturation for dust, however, also goes down, so that deposition
nucleation can more easily inhibit homogeneous nucleation. These various
temperature dependencies may cancel out and lead to lower temperature
sensitivities within the model. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.103"/> have noted an intermediate
regime in nucleation experiments for which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isolines are independent of
temperature and change primarily with supersaturation. Similar compensating
effects, which cause low temperature sensitivity in the parameterization
runs, might also explain this experimentally observed,
temperature-independent regime.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p>Thorough understanding of nucleated ice crystal variability in global
simulations will help improve model representation of cirrus clouds and their
radiative forcing. Towards this end, adjoint sensitivity analysis provides a
powerful and efficient means of quantifying the prevalent ice nucleation
regime, active site density and inputs driving temporal and spatial
variability in the model output. From analysis of a single GCM simulation for
each nucleation spectrum, using CAM 5.1 and current day emissions, we have
shown the following results:</p>
      <p><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p><italic>Nucleation regime is determined by INP, but</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>is determined by threshold conditions and INP abundance.</italic>
During a simulation, the number of ice-nucleating particles predicted by a
nucleation spectrum determines its nucleation regime, or equivalently where
the system “sits” along the INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace. Threshold
supersaturation and the number of INP relative to the limiting number
determine the nucleated ice crystal number. Lower ice crystal numbers can be
calculated in spite of higher INP, if certain aerosols have less stringent
threshold supersaturations, because <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affects the steepness
and depth of the competitive cusp on the INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace. At the
coldest temperatures, strong supersaturation dependence of active site
parameterizations may also reduce <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, the number of
INP only dictates ice crystal number relative to the limiting number to
prevent homogeneous nucleation in this framework. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
calculated in one spectrum is lower relative to another, this spectrum may
still calculate higher crystal number with fewer ice-nucleating particles.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p><italic>The baseline surface area mixing ratio,</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>, strongly affects which INP contribute to</italic>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>. The suppression of certain INP groups manifests as a shift in the aerosol number sensitivity distributions.</italic> Dust contribution to
heterogeneously formed number dominates on a global scale for PDA13 runs.
Deconstructing the active site density parameterization shows that this
suppression is due to a 4-fold decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
3-fold increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which increases the freezing
fraction of dust significantly. Although the surface polarity and organic
coating parameters remain unconstrained, we have chosen values which would
maximize the black carbon ice-nucleating activity. The model predicts that
black carbon contribution is negligible to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at this pressure
level, if the PDA13 treatment is not too conservative.</p>
            <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
            <p>Differing aerosol contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> manifest in the number
sensitivity distributions. When black carbon does not act as an INP and there
is no competition for water vapor between aerosol types, the sensitivity to
accumulation-mode dust number increases and the sensitivity to coarse-mode
dust number decreases. Glassy aerosol has a small, but regionally important
and seasonally dependent contribution in PDA13 (Fig. S4).</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
      <p><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p><italic>The sign of ice crystal number sensitivity to insoluble aerosol number or diameter indicates nucleation regime.</italic>
When insoluble aerosol number or diameter sensitivities are small and
negative, nucleation is predominantly homogeneous. When these values become
large and negative, competitive nucleation has initiated, and when the values
become positive, nucleation is purely heterogeneous. The spatial
distributions of insoluble aerosol number sensitivity, as in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, can help explain those of crystal number in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Temporal distributions of sensitivity can also be
used to understand regime shifts along the INP-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trace. Spectra
that predict different INP numbers may respond differently to additional
supersaturation generation.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p><italic>The magnitude of positive aerosol number sensitivity reflects heterogeneous nucleation efficiency. The sensitivity of positive diameter sensitivity reflects active site density.</italic> When nucleation is purely
heterogeneous, the magnitude of aerosol number sensitivity can be understood
as a nucleation efficiency. The range of efficiencies is limited when there
is no competition for water vapor between aerosol groups. Crystal number is
more sensitive to the aerosol species with higher associated surface areas,
until those species reach their maximum active fractions. In the same vein,
crystal number is more sensitive to the size of larger aerosol, until the
maximum active fraction is obtained. An incremental increase in the diameter
of a large particle yield greater surface area but exhausts the active site
density more quickly.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p><italic>Temperature sensitivities are of smaller magnitude than expected with classical nucleation theory because of compensating temperature dependencies.</italic> Limited sensitivities to temperature reflect the empirically
observed “intermediate temperature regime”, where supersaturation is more
influential regarding nucleation.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title/>
      <p><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BN09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.104"/> cirrus formation parameterization</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Heterogeneously formed ice crystal number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">INP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ice-nucleating particles</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Supersaturation of water vapor with respect to ice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PDA08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.105"/> INP spectrum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PDA13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.106"/> INP spectrum, updated from 2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AIDA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Heterogeneous INP spectra derived from Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"> cloud chamber data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,het</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of heterogeneously nucleated ice crystals</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i,hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of homogeneously nucleated ice crystals</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lim</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Limiting number of INP to prevent homogeneous nucleation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum supersaturation which develops within the cloud parcel</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hom</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Threshold supersaturation for homogeneous nucleation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Saturation ratio of water vapor with respect to ice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of ice embryos per aerosol surface</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nucleated ice crystal number sensitivity to coarse-mode dust diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nucleated ice crystal number sensitivity to accumulation-mode dust diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nucleated ice crystal number sensitivity to coarse-mode dust number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dust,a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nucleated ice crystal number sensitivity to accumulation-mode dust number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2611-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-16-2611-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was made possible through support from DOE EaSM. S. C. Sullivan
gratefully acknowledges support from a National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Earth and Space Science Fellowship. We would like to thank two
anonymous reviewers for their thorough and insightful feedback, in particular
for suggestions about measurement–model comparison. Data in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> comes from Andrew Heymsfield's VIPS and Paul Lawson's
TDS measurements aboard the WB57 during MACPEX and from Paul Lawson's F-FSSP
measurements aboard the SPEC Learjet during SPARTICUS. Thanks also to
Heike Kalesse for the use of processed vertical motion data from
SPARTICUS.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: J. Quaas</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Barahona(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D.: On the ice nucleation spectrum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3733–3752, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3733-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3733-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation in
large-scale models: Homogeneous nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11211,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009355</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterizing the competition between
homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing in cirrus cloud formation –
monodisperse ice nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 369–381,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-369-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-369-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterizing the competition between
homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing in ice cloud formation – polydisperse
ice nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5933–5948, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5933-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5933-2009</ext-link>,
2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Dynamical states of low temperature cirrus,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3757–3771, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3757-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3757-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Barahona et al.(2010)Barahona, Rodriguez, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D., Rodriguez, J., and Nenes, A.: Sensitivity of the global
distribution of cirrus ice crystal concentration to heterogeneous freezing,
J. Geoph. Res., 115, D23213, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014273</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Barahona et al.(2014)Barahona, Molod, Bacmeister, Nenes, Gettleman,
Morrison, Phillips, and Eichmann</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D., Molod, A., Bacmeister, J., Nenes, A., Gettelman, A., Morrison,
H., Phillips, V., and Eichmann, A.: Development of two-moment cloud
microphysics for liquid and ice within the NASA Goddard Earth Observing
System Model (GEOS-5), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1733–1766,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1733-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1733-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Sathessh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Sathessh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brewer(1949)</label><mixed-citation>Brewer, J.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of
helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 75, 351–363, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49707532603</ext-link>, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Broadley et al.(2012)Broadley, Murray, Herbert, Atkinson, Dobbie,
Malkin, Condliffe, and Neve</label><mixed-citation>Broadley, S. L., Murray, B. J., Herbert, R. J., Atkinson, J. D., Dobbie, S.,
Malkin, T. L., Condliffe, E., and Neve, L.: Immersion mode heterogeneous ice
nucleation by an illite rich powder representative of atmospheric mineral
dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 287–307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-287-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-287-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Capps et al.(2012)Capps, Henze, Hakami, Russell, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>Capps, S. L., Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.:
ANISORROPIA: the adjoint of the aerosol thermodynamic model ISORROPIA, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 527–543, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-527-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-527-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Chen et al.(2008)Chen, Hazra, and Levin</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J.-P., Hazra, A., and Levin, Z.: Parameterizing ice nucleation rates
using contact angle and activation energy derived from laboratory data,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7431–7449, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7431-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-7431-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chen et al.(2000)Chen, Rossow, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Chen, T., Rossow, W. B., and Zhang, Y.: Radiative effects of cloud-type
variations, J. Climate, 13, 264–286,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:REOCTV&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:REOCTV&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Connolly et al.(2009)Connolly, Möhler, Field, Saathoff, Burgess,
Choularton, and Gallagher</label><mixed-citation>Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R.,
Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.: Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three
different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Cox et al.(2015)Cox, Kathmann, Slater, and Michaelides</label><mixed-citation>Cox, S. J., Kathmann, S. M., Slater, B., and Michaelides, A.: Molecular
simulations of heterogeneous ice nucleation. I. Controlling ice
nucleation through surface hydrophilicity, J. Chem. Phys., 142, 184704,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4919714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4919714</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Crawford et al.(2011)Crawford, Möhler, Schnaiter, Saathoff, Liu,
McMeeking, Linke, Flynn, Bower, Connolly, Gallagher, and Coe</label><mixed-citation>Crawford, I., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H., Liu, D.,
McMeeking, G., Linke, C., Flynn, M., Bower, K. N., Connolly, P. J.,
Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.: Studies of propane flame soot acting as
heterogeneous ice nuclei in conjunction with single particle soot photometer
measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9549–9561,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9549-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9549-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Curry and Khvorostyanov(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Curry, J. A. and Khvorostyanov, V. I.: Assessment of some parameterizations
of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 1151–1172, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1151-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1151-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cziczo et al.(2013)Cziczo, Froyd, Hoose, Jensen, Diao, Zondlo, Smith,
Twohy, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D., Froyd, K., Hoose, C., Jensen, E., Diao, M., Zondlo, M., Smith,
J., Twohy, C., and Murphy, D.: Clarifying the dominant sources and mechanisms
of cirrus cloud formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1234145</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>d'Almeida(1987)</label><mixed-citation>d'Almeida, G.: On the variability of desert aerosol radiative
characteristics, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3017–3026,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD03p03017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD092iD03p03017</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>DeMott et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Rogers, D. C., Kreidenweis, S. M., Chen, Y., Twohy, C. H., Baumgardner, D.,
Heymsfield A. J., and Chan, K. R.: The role of heterogeneous freezing nucleation in upper
tropospheric clouds: Inferences from SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1387–1390, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>DeMott et al.(1999)DeMott, Chen, Kreidenweis, Rogers, and
Sherman</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P., Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S., Rogers, D., and Sherman, D.: Ice
formation by black carbon particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2429–2432,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL900580</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>DeMott et al.(2010)DeMott, Prenni, Liu, Kreidenweis, Petters, Twohy,
Richardson, Eidhammer, and Rogers</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107, 11217–11222, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910818107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Dentener et al.(2006)Dentener, Kinne, Bond, Boucher, Cofala,
Generoso, Ginoux, Gong, Hoelzemann, Ito, Marelli, Penner, Putaud, Textor,
Schulz, van der Werf, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S.,
Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E.,
Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.:
Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750
prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Errico(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Errico, R. M.: What is an adjoint model?, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., 78,
2577–2591, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)&lt;2577:WIAAM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1997)&lt;2577:WIAAM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Field et al.(2006)Field, Möhler, Connolly, Krämer, Cotton,
Heymsfield, Saathoff, and Schnaiter</label><mixed-citation>Field, P. R., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., Krämer, M., Cotton, R.,
Heymsfield, A. J., Saathoff, H., and Schnaiter, M.: Some ice nucleation
characteristics of Asian and Saharan desert dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
2991–3006, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2991-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2991-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Giering and Kaminski(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Giering, R. and Kaminski, T.: Recipes for Adjoint Code Construction, ACM
Trans.
Mathematical Software, 24, 437–474, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/293686.293695" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1145/293686.293695</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Guo et al.(2008)Guo, Liu, Daum, Senum, and Tao</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Liu, Y., Daum, P., Senum, G., and Tao, W.-K.: Characteristics of
vertical velocity in marine stratocumulus: comparison of large eddy
simulations with observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045020,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045020</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hakami et al.(2007)Hakami, Henze, Seinfeld, Singh, Sandu, Kim, Byun,
and Li</label><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Henze, D., Seinfeld, J., Singh, K., Sandu, A., Kim, S., Byun, D.,
and Li, Q.: The Adjoint of CMAQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7807–7817,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es070944p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070944p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Hascoët and Pascual(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Hascoët, L. and Pascual, V.: TAPENADE 2.1 user's guide, INRIA Technical
Report RT-0300, p. 78, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Hiranuma et al.(2014)Hiranuma, Hoffmann, Kiselev, Dreyer, Zhang,
Kulkarni, Koop, and Möhler</label><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Hoffmann, N., Kiselev, A., Dreyer, A., Zhang, K., Kulkarni, G.,
Koop, T., and Möhler, O.: Influence of surface morphology on the
immersion mode ice nucleation efficiency of hematite particles, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 2315–2324, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2315-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2315-2014</ext-link>, 2014..</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric
aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Jensen et al.(1994)Jensen, Kinne, and Toon</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Kinne, S., and Toon, O. B.: Tropical cirrus cloud radiative
forcing – sensitivity studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2023–2026,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94GL01358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL01358</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Jensen et al.(2010)Jensen, Pfister, Bui, Lawson, and
Baumgardner</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Pfister, L., Bui, T.-P., Lawson, P., and Baumgardner, D.: Ice
nucleation and cloud microphysical properties in tropical tropopause layer
cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1369–1384, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1369-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1369-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Jensen et al.(2013)Jensen, Lawson, Bergman, Pfister, Bui, and
Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Lawson, R. P., Bergman, J. W., Pfister, L., Bui, T. P., and
Schmitt, C. G.: Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in
synoptically forced, midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5348–5360,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50421" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50421</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kalesse and Kollias(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Kalesse, H. and Kollias, P.: Climatology of high cloud dynamics using
profiling
ARM Doppler Radar observations, J. Climate, 26, 6340–6359,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00695.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00695.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Karcher and Lohmann(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Karcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Homogeneous freezing including effects of aerosol size, J. Geophys. Res.,
107, 4698, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001429</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Karydis et al.(2012)Karydis, Capps, Russell, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>Karydis, V. A., Capps, S. L., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.: Adjoint
sensitivity of global cloud droplet number to aerosol and dynamical
parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9041–9055, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Köhler et al.(2009)Köhler, DeMott, Kreidenweis, Popovicheva,
Petters, Carrico, Kireeva, Khokhlova, and Shonija</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, K. A., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Popovicheva, O. B.,
Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kireeva, E. D., Khokhlova, T. D., and
Shonija, N. K.: Cloud condensation nuclei and ice nucleation activity of
hydrophobic and hydrophilic soot particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11,
7906–7920, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B905334B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B905334B</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the
determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35020537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35020537</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Krämer et al.(2009)Krämer, Schiller, Afchine, Bauer, Gensch,
Mangold, Schlicht, Spelten, Sitnikov, Borrmann, de Reus, and
Spichtinger</label><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold,
A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and
Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Kulkarni et al.(2012)Kulkarni, Fan, Comstock, Liu, and
Ovchinnikov</label><mixed-citation>Kulkarni, G., Fan, J., Comstock, J. M., Liu, X., and Ovchinnikov, M.:
Laboratory measurements and model sensitivity studies of dust deposition ice
nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7295–7308, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7295-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7295-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)Lamarque, Bond, Eyring, Granier, Heil, Klimont,
Lee, Liousse, Mieville, Owen, Schultz, Shindell, Smith, Stehfest,
Van Aardenne, Cooper, Kainuma, Mahowald, McConnell, Naik, Riahi, and van
Vuuren</label><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Lin et al.(2005)Lin, Starr, Reichardt, and DeMott</label><mixed-citation>Lin, R.-F., Starr, D. O., Reichardt, J., and DeMott, P. J.: Nucleation in
synoptically forced cirrostratus, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08208,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005362" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005362</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Liu and Penner(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X. and Penner, J.: Ice nucleation parameterization for global models,
Met. Zeit., 14, 499–514, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Liu et al.(2012a)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi,
Lamarque, Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt, Conley, Park, Neale, Hannay, Ekman,
Hess, Mahowald, Collins, Iacono, Bretherton, Flanner, and Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S.,
Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W.,
Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a
minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and
evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5,
709-739, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Liu et al.(2012b)Liu, Shi, Zhang, Jensen, Gettelman,
Barahona, Nenes, and Lawson</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Jensen, E. J., Gettelman, A., Barahona, D.,
Nenes, A., and Lawson, P.: Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on
cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 12061–12079, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Lupi et al.(2014)Lupi, Hudait, and Molinero</label><mixed-citation>Lupi, L., Hudait, A., and Molinero, V.: Heterogeneous Nucleation of Ice on
Carbon Surfaces, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 3156–3164,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja411507a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja411507a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Marcolli et al.(2007)Marcolli, Gedamke, Peter, and
Zobrist</label><mixed-citation>Marcolli, C., Gedamke, S., Peter, T., and Zobrist, B.: Efficiency of
immersion mode ice nucleation on surrogates of mineral dust, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 5081–5091, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Meyers et al.(1992)Meyers, DeMott, and Cotton</label><mixed-citation>Meyers, M., DeMott, P., and Cotton, R.: New primary ice-nucleation
parameterization in an explicit cloud model, J. Appl. Meteorol., 31,
708–721, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;0708:NPINPI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;0708:NPINPI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Möhler et al.(2006)Möhler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krämer, Mangold, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H.,
Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and
Heymsfield, A. J.: Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on
mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</ext-link>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Morales and Nenes(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Morales, R. and Nenes, A.: Characteristic updrafts for computing
distribution-averaged cloud droplet number and stratocumulus cloud
properties, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18220, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013233</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Morales Betancourt and Nenes(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Morales Betancourt, R. and Nenes, A.: Understanding the contributions of
aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number
variability in a global climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4809–4826,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Morales Betancourt et al.(2012)Morales-Betancourt, Lee, Oreopoulos,
Sud, Barahona, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>Morales Betancourt, R., Lee, D., Oreopoulos, L., Sud, Y. C., Barahona, D.,
and Nenes, A.: Sensitivity of cirrus and mixed-phase clouds to the ice nuclei
spectra in McRAS-AC: single column model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10679–10692, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10679-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10679-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Muhlbauer et al.(2014)Muhlbauer, Kalesse, and Kollias</label><mixed-citation>Muhlbauer, A., Kalesse, H., and Kollias, P.: Vertical velocities and
turbulence
in midlatitude anvil cirrus: A comparison between in situ aircraft
measurements and ground-based Doppler cloud radar retrievals, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 7814–7821, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062279</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Muhlbauer et al.(2015)Muhlbauer, Ackerman, Lawson, Xie, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Muhlbauer, A., Ackerman, T. P., Lawson, R. P., Xie, S., and Zhang, Y.:
Evaluation of cloud-resolving model simulations of midlatitude cirrus with
ARM and A-train observations, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 6597–6618,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022570" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022570</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Murray et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur S. M. R. K., Möhler, O.,
Schnaiter M., Wagner R., Benz S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert, V., Wagner, S.,
and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosol under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Murray et al.(2012)Murary, O'Sullivan, Atkinson, and Webb</label><mixed-citation>Murray, B., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J., and Webb, M.: Ice nucleation by
particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41,
6519–6554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35200a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35200a</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Niedermeier et al.(2010)Niedermeier, Hartmann, Shaw, Covert, Mentel,
Schneider, Poulain, Reitz, Spindler, Clauss, Kiselev, Hallbauer, Wex,
Mildenberger, and Stratmann</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Shaw, R. A., Covert, D., Mentel, T. F.,
Schneider, J., Poulain, L., Reitz, P., Spindler, C., Clauss, T., Kiselev, A.,
Hallbauer, E., Wex, H., Mildenberger, K., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous
freezing of droplets with immersed mineral dust particles – measurements and
parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3601–3614,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3601-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3601-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Niemand et al.(2012)Niemand, Möhler, Vogel, Vogel, and
Hoose</label><mixed-citation>Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., and Hoose, C.: A
particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert
dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Phillips et al.(2008)Phillips, DeMott, and Andronache</label><mixed-citation>Phillips, V., DeMott, P., and Andronache, C.: An empirical parameterization
of
heterogeneous ice nucleation for multiple chemical species of aerosol, J.
Atmos. Sci., 65, 2757–2783, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2546.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JAS2546.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Phillips et al.(2013)Phillips, DeMott, Andronache, Pratt, Prather,
Subramanian, and Twohy</label><mixed-citation>Phillips, V., DeMott, P., Andronache, C., Pratt, K., Prather, K.,
Subramanian,
R., and Twohy, C.: Improvements to an empirical parameterization of
heterogeneous ice nucleation and its comparison with observations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 70, 378–409, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-080.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-12-080.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Popovicheva et al.(2007)Popovicheva, Persiantseva, Shonija, DeMott,
Koehler, Petters, Kreidenweis, Tishkova, Demirdjian, and
Suzanne</label><mixed-citation>Popovicheva, O., Persiantseva, N., Shonija, N., DeMott, P., Koehler, K.,
Petters, M., Kreidenweis, S., Tishkova, V., Demirdjian, B., and Suzanne, J.:
Water interaction with hydrophobic and hydrophilic soot particles, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 2332–2344, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b718944n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b718944n</ext-link>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Prenni et al.(2007)Prenni, Harrington, Tjernström, DeMott,
Avramov, Long, Kreidenweis, Olsson, and Verlinde</label><mixed-citation>Prenni, A., Harrington, J., Tjernström, M., DeMott, P., Avramov, A.,
Long,
C., Kreidenweis, S., Olsson, P., and Verlinde, J.: Can Ice-Nucleating
Aerosols Affect Arctic Seasonal Climate?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88,
541–550, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-4-541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-88-4-541</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Pruppacher and Klett(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Pruppacher, H. and Klett, J.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, 2nd
Edn., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Reinhardt and Doye(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Reinhardt, A. and Doye, J. P. K.: Effects of surface interactions on
heterogeneous ice nucleation for a monatomic water model, J. Chem. Phys.,
141, 084501, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4892804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4892804</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Ren and MacKenzie(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Ren, C. and MacKenzie, A.: Cirrus parameterization and the role of ice
nuclei,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1585–1605, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.04.126</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Savre et al.(2013)Savre, Ekman, Svensson, and
Tjernström</label><mixed-citation>Savre, J., Ekman, A., Svensson, G., and Tjernström, M.: Parameterizing
ice
nucleation ability of mineral dust particles in the deposition mode:
numerical investigations using large eddy simulation, AIP Proceedings, 1527, 922,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4803422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4803422</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Sheyko et al.(2015)Sheyko, Sullivan, Morales-Betancourt, Capps,
Barahona, Shi, Liu, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>Sheyko, B., Sullivan, S. C., Morales-Betancourt, R., Capps, S., Barahona, D.,
Shi, X., Liu, X., and Nenes, A.: Quantifying sensitivities of ice crystal
number and sources of ice crystal number variability in CAM 5.1 using the
adjoint of a physically based cirrus formation parameterization, J. Geophys.
Res., 120, 2834–2854, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022457</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Shi et al.(2015)Shi, Liu, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Shi, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, K.: Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on
cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation
parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 1503–1520, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Skrotzki et al.(2013)Skrotzki, Connolly, Schnaiter, Saathoff,
Möhler, Wagner, Niemand, Ebert, and Leisner</label><mixed-citation>Skrotzki, J., Connolly, P., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H., Möhler, O.,
Wagner, R., Niemand, M., Ebert, V., and Leisner, T.: The accommodation
coefficient of water molecules on ice – cirrus cloud studies at the AIDA
simulation chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4451–4466,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4451-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4451-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Spichtinger and Gierens(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 1b:
Structuring cirrus clouds by dynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 707–719,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-707-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-707-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Spichtinger and Krämer(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P. and Krämer, M.: Tropical tropopause ice clouds: a dynamic
approach to the mystery of low crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
9801–9818, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9801-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9801-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Steinke et al.(2015)Steinke, Hoose, Möhler, Connolly, and
Leisner</label><mixed-citation>Steinke, I., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., and Leisner, T.: A new
temperature- and humidity-dependent surface site density approach for
deposition ice nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3703–3717,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3703-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3703-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Vali(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Vali, G.: Interpretation of freezing nucleation experiments: singular and
stochastic; sites and surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5271–5294,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Liu, Hoose, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Liu, X., Hoose, C., and Wang, B.: Different contact angle
distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric
Model version 5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10411–10430,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Whitby(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Whitby, K.: The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols, Atmos. Environ.,
41, 25–49, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90196-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(78)90196-8</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Xie et al.(2013)Xie, Liu, Zhao, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Xie, S., Liu, X., Zhao, C., and Zhang, Y.: Sensitivity of CAM5-simulated
Arctic clouds and radiation to nucleation parameterization, J. Climate, 26,
5981–5999, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00517.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00517.1</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)Zhang, Liu, Wang, Comstock, Mitchell, Mishra, and
Mace</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Liu, X., Wang, M., Comstock, J. M., Mitchell, D. L., Mishra, S.,
and Mace, G. G.: Evaluating and constraining ice cloud parameterizations in
CAM5 using aircraft measurements from the SPARTICUS campaign, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 4963–4982, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Zuberi et al.(2002)Zuberi, Bertram, Cassa, Molina, and
Molina</label><mixed-citation>Zuberi, B., Bertram, A., Cassa, C., Molina, L., and Molina, M.: Heterogeneous
nucleation of ice in ammonium sulfate-water particles with mineral dust
immersions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 142.1–142.4, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014289" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL014289</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Understanding cirrus ice crystal number variability for different heterogeneous ice nucleation spectra</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Along with minimizing parameter uncertainty,
understanding the cause of temporal and spatial variability of the nucleated ice
crystal number, <i>N</i><sub>i</sub>, is key to improving the representation of
cirrus clouds in climate models. To this end, sensitivities of <i>N</i><sub>i</sub>
to input variables like aerosol number and diameter provide valuable
information about nucleation regime and efficiency for a given model
formulation. Here we use the adjoint model of the adjoint of a cirrus formation parameterization
(Barahona and Nenes, 2009b) to understand <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> variability for various ice-nucleating particle (INP)
spectra. Inputs are generated with the Community Atmosphere Model version 5,
and simulations are done with a theoretically derived spectrum, an empirical
lab-based spectrum and two field-based empirical spectra that differ in the
nucleation threshold for black carbon particles and in the active site
density for dust. The magnitude and sign of <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> sensitivity to
insoluble aerosol number can be directly linked to nucleation regime and
efficiency of various INP. The lab-based spectrum calculates much higher INP
efficiencies than field-based ones, which reveals a disparity in aerosol
surface properties. <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> sensitivity to temperature tends to be low,
due to the compensating effects of temperature on INP spectrum parameters;
this low temperature sensitivity regime has been experimentally reported
before but never deconstructed as done here.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Barahona(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D.: On the ice nucleation spectrum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3733–3752, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3733-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-3733-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation in
large-scale models: Homogeneous nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11211,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009355" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009355</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterizing the competition between
homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing in cirrus cloud formation –
monodisperse ice nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 369–381,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-369-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-369-2009</a>, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterizing the competition between
homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing in ice cloud formation – polydisperse
ice nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5933–5948, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5933-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5933-2009</a>,
2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Dynamical states of low temperature cirrus,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3757–3771, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3757-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-3757-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Barahona et al.(2010)Barahona, Rodriguez, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D., Rodriguez, J., and Nenes, A.: Sensitivity of the global
distribution of cirrus ice crystal concentration to heterogeneous freezing,
J. Geoph. Res., 115, D23213, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014273" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JD014273</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Barahona et al.(2014)Barahona, Molod, Bacmeister, Nenes, Gettleman,
Morrison, Phillips, and Eichmann</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D., Molod, A., Bacmeister, J., Nenes, A., Gettelman, A., Morrison,
H., Phillips, V., and Eichmann, A.: Development of two-moment cloud
microphysics for liquid and ice within the NASA Goddard Earth Observing
System Model (GEOS-5), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1733–1766,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1733-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1733-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Sathessh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Sathessh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brewer(1949)</label><mixed-citation>
Brewer, J.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of
helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 75, 351–363, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/qj.49707532603</a>, 1949.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Broadley et al.(2012)Broadley, Murray, Herbert, Atkinson, Dobbie,
Malkin, Condliffe, and Neve</label><mixed-citation>
Broadley, S. L., Murray, B. J., Herbert, R. J., Atkinson, J. D., Dobbie, S.,
Malkin, T. L., Condliffe, E., and Neve, L.: Immersion mode heterogeneous ice
nucleation by an illite rich powder representative of atmospheric mineral
dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 287–307, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-287-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-287-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Capps et al.(2012)Capps, Henze, Hakami, Russell, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
Capps, S. L., Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.:
ANISORROPIA: the adjoint of the aerosol thermodynamic model ISORROPIA, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 527–543, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-527-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-527-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Chen et al.(2008)Chen, Hazra, and Levin</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J.-P., Hazra, A., and Levin, Z.: Parameterizing ice nucleation rates
using contact angle and activation energy derived from laboratory data,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7431–7449, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7431-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-7431-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Chen et al.(2000)Chen, Rossow, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, T., Rossow, W. B., and Zhang, Y.: Radiative effects of cloud-type
variations, J. Climate, 13, 264–286,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:REOCTV&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:REOCTV&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Connolly et al.(2009)Connolly, Möhler, Field, Saathoff, Burgess,
Choularton, and Gallagher</label><mixed-citation>
Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R.,
Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.: Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three
different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cox et al.(2015)Cox, Kathmann, Slater, and Michaelides</label><mixed-citation>
Cox, S. J., Kathmann, S. M., Slater, B., and Michaelides, A.: Molecular
simulations of heterogeneous ice nucleation. I. Controlling ice
nucleation through surface hydrophilicity, J. Chem. Phys., 142, 184704,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4919714" target="_blank">doi:10.1063/1.4919714</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Crawford et al.(2011)Crawford, Möhler, Schnaiter, Saathoff, Liu,
McMeeking, Linke, Flynn, Bower, Connolly, Gallagher, and Coe</label><mixed-citation>
Crawford, I., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H., Liu, D.,
McMeeking, G., Linke, C., Flynn, M., Bower, K. N., Connolly, P. J.,
Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.: Studies of propane flame soot acting as
heterogeneous ice nuclei in conjunction with single particle soot photometer
measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9549–9561,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9549-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-9549-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Curry and Khvorostyanov(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Curry, J. A. and Khvorostyanov, V. I.: Assessment of some parameterizations
of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 1151–1172, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1151-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1151-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cziczo et al.(2013)Cziczo, Froyd, Hoose, Jensen, Diao, Zondlo, Smith,
Twohy, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D., Froyd, K., Hoose, C., Jensen, E., Diao, M., Zondlo, M., Smith,
J., Twohy, C., and Murphy, D.: Clarifying the dominant sources and mechanisms
of cirrus cloud formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1234145</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>d'Almeida(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
d'Almeida, G.: On the variability of desert aerosol radiative
characteristics, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3017–3026,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD03p03017" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/JD092iD03p03017</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>DeMott et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Rogers, D. C., Kreidenweis, S. M., Chen, Y., Twohy, C. H., Baumgardner, D.,
Heymsfield A. J., and Chan, K. R.: The role of heterogeneous freezing nucleation in upper
tropospheric clouds: Inferences from SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1387–1390, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>DeMott et al.(1999)DeMott, Chen, Kreidenweis, Rogers, and
Sherman</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P., Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S., Rogers, D., and Sherman, D.: Ice
formation by black carbon particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2429–2432,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900580" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1999GL900580</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>DeMott et al.(2010)DeMott, Prenni, Liu, Kreidenweis, Petters, Twohy,
Richardson, Eidhammer, and Rogers</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107, 11217–11222, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0910818107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Dentener et al.(2006)Dentener, Kinne, Bond, Boucher, Cofala,
Generoso, Ginoux, Gong, Hoelzemann, Ito, Marelli, Penner, Putaud, Textor,
Schulz, van der Werf, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S.,
Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E.,
Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.:
Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750
prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Errico(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Errico, R. M.: What is an adjoint model?, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., 78,
2577–2591, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)&lt;2577:WIAAM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)&lt;2577:WIAAM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Field et al.(2006)Field, Möhler, Connolly, Krämer, Cotton,
Heymsfield, Saathoff, and Schnaiter</label><mixed-citation>
Field, P. R., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., Krämer, M., Cotton, R.,
Heymsfield, A. J., Saathoff, H., and Schnaiter, M.: Some ice nucleation
characteristics of Asian and Saharan desert dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
2991–3006, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2991-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-2991-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Giering and Kaminski(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Giering, R. and Kaminski, T.: Recipes for Adjoint Code Construction, ACM
Trans.
Mathematical Software, 24, 437–474, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/293686.293695" target="_blank">doi:10.1145/293686.293695</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Guo et al.(2008)Guo, Liu, Daum, Senum, and Tao</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, H., Liu, Y., Daum, P., Senum, G., and Tao, W.-K.: Characteristics of
vertical velocity in marine stratocumulus: comparison of large eddy
simulations with observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045020,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045020" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045020</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hakami et al.(2007)Hakami, Henze, Seinfeld, Singh, Sandu, Kim, Byun,
and Li</label><mixed-citation>
Hakami, A., Henze, D., Seinfeld, J., Singh, K., Sandu, A., Kim, S., Byun, D.,
and Li, Q.: The Adjoint of CMAQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7807–7817,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es070944p" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es070944p</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Hascoët and Pascual(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Hascoët, L. and Pascual, V.: TAPENADE 2.1 user's guide, INRIA Technical
Report RT-0300, p. 78, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Hiranuma et al.(2014)Hiranuma, Hoffmann, Kiselev, Dreyer, Zhang,
Kulkarni, Koop, and Möhler</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Hoffmann, N., Kiselev, A., Dreyer, A., Zhang, K., Kulkarni, G.,
Koop, T., and Möhler, O.: Influence of surface morphology on the
immersion mode ice nucleation efficiency of hematite particles, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 2315–2324, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2315-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-2315-2014</a>, 2014..
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric
aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Jensen et al.(1994)Jensen, Kinne, and Toon</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Kinne, S., and Toon, O. B.: Tropical cirrus cloud radiative
forcing – sensitivity studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2023–2026,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94GL01358" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/94GL01358</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Jensen et al.(2010)Jensen, Pfister, Bui, Lawson, and
Baumgardner</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Pfister, L., Bui, T.-P., Lawson, P., and Baumgardner, D.: Ice
nucleation and cloud microphysical properties in tropical tropopause layer
cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1369–1384, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1369-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1369-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Jensen et al.(2013)Jensen, Lawson, Bergman, Pfister, Bui, and
Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Lawson, R. P., Bergman, J. W., Pfister, L., Bui, T. P., and
Schmitt, C. G.: Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in
synoptically forced, midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5348–5360,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50421" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50421</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kalesse and Kollias(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kalesse, H. and Kollias, P.: Climatology of high cloud dynamics using
profiling
ARM Doppler Radar observations, J. Climate, 26, 6340–6359,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00695.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00695.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Karcher and Lohmann(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Karcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Homogeneous freezing including effects of aerosol size, J. Geophys. Res.,
107, 4698, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001429" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JD001429</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Karydis et al.(2012)Karydis, Capps, Russell, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
Karydis, V. A., Capps, S. L., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.: Adjoint
sensitivity of global cloud droplet number to aerosol and dynamical
parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9041–9055, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Köhler et al.(2009)Köhler, DeMott, Kreidenweis, Popovicheva,
Petters, Carrico, Kireeva, Khokhlova, and Shonija</label><mixed-citation>
Köhler, K. A., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Popovicheva, O. B.,
Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kireeva, E. D., Khokhlova, T. D., and
Shonija, N. K.: Cloud condensation nuclei and ice nucleation activity of
hydrophobic and hydrophilic soot particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11,
7906–7920, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B905334B" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/B905334B</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the
determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35020537" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/35020537</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Krämer et al.(2009)Krämer, Schiller, Afchine, Bauer, Gensch,
Mangold, Schlicht, Spelten, Sitnikov, Borrmann, de Reus, and
Spichtinger</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold,
A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and
Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kulkarni et al.(2012)Kulkarni, Fan, Comstock, Liu, and
Ovchinnikov</label><mixed-citation>
Kulkarni, G., Fan, J., Comstock, J. M., Liu, X., and Ovchinnikov, M.:
Laboratory measurements and model sensitivity studies of dust deposition ice
nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7295–7308, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7295-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-7295-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)Lamarque, Bond, Eyring, Granier, Heil, Klimont,
Lee, Liousse, Mieville, Owen, Schultz, Shindell, Smith, Stehfest,
Van Aardenne, Cooper, Kainuma, Mahowald, McConnell, Naik, Riahi, and van
Vuuren</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Lin et al.(2005)Lin, Starr, Reichardt, and DeMott</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, R.-F., Starr, D. O., Reichardt, J., and DeMott, P. J.: Nucleation in
synoptically forced cirrostratus, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08208,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005362" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005362</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Liu and Penner(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. and Penner, J.: Ice nucleation parameterization for global models,
Met. Zeit., 14, 499–514, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059" target="_blank">doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Liu et al.(2012a)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi,
Lamarque, Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt, Conley, Park, Neale, Hannay, Ekman,
Hess, Mahowald, Collins, Iacono, Bretherton, Flanner, and Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S.,
Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W.,
Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a
minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and
evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5,
709-739, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Liu et al.(2012b)Liu, Shi, Zhang, Jensen, Gettelman,
Barahona, Nenes, and Lawson</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Jensen, E. J., Gettelman, A., Barahona, D.,
Nenes, A., and Lawson, P.: Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on
cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 12061–12079, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Lupi et al.(2014)Lupi, Hudait, and Molinero</label><mixed-citation>
Lupi, L., Hudait, A., and Molinero, V.: Heterogeneous Nucleation of Ice on
Carbon Surfaces, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 3156–3164,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja411507a" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ja411507a</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Marcolli et al.(2007)Marcolli, Gedamke, Peter, and
Zobrist</label><mixed-citation>
Marcolli, C., Gedamke, S., Peter, T., and Zobrist, B.: Efficiency of
immersion mode ice nucleation on surrogates of mineral dust, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 5081–5091, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-5081-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Meyers et al.(1992)Meyers, DeMott, and Cotton</label><mixed-citation>
Meyers, M., DeMott, P., and Cotton, R.: New primary ice-nucleation
parameterization in an explicit cloud model, J. Appl. Meteorol., 31,
708–721, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;0708:NPINPI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;0708:NPINPI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Möhler et al.(2006)Möhler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krämer, Mangold, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>
Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H.,
Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and
Heymsfield, A. J.: Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on
mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</a>, 2006.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Morales and Nenes(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Morales, R. and Nenes, A.: Characteristic updrafts for computing
distribution-averaged cloud droplet number and stratocumulus cloud
properties, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18220, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013233" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD013233</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Morales Betancourt and Nenes(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Morales Betancourt, R. and Nenes, A.: Understanding the contributions of
aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number
variability in a global climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4809–4826,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Morales Betancourt et al.(2012)Morales-Betancourt, Lee, Oreopoulos,
Sud, Barahona, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
Morales Betancourt, R., Lee, D., Oreopoulos, L., Sud, Y. C., Barahona, D.,
and Nenes, A.: Sensitivity of cirrus and mixed-phase clouds to the ice nuclei
spectra in McRAS-AC: single column model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10679–10692, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10679-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10679-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Muhlbauer et al.(2014)Muhlbauer, Kalesse, and Kollias</label><mixed-citation>
Muhlbauer, A., Kalesse, H., and Kollias, P.: Vertical velocities and
turbulence
in midlatitude anvil cirrus: A comparison between in situ aircraft
measurements and ground-based Doppler cloud radar retrievals, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 7814–7821, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062279" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014GL062279</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Muhlbauer et al.(2015)Muhlbauer, Ackerman, Lawson, Xie, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Muhlbauer, A., Ackerman, T. P., Lawson, R. P., Xie, S., and Zhang, Y.:
Evaluation of cloud-resolving model simulations of midlatitude cirrus with
ARM and A-train observations, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 6597–6618,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022570" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD022570</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Murray et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur S. M. R. K., Möhler, O.,
Schnaiter M., Wagner R., Benz S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert, V., Wagner, S.,
and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosol under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Murray et al.(2012)Murary, O'Sullivan, Atkinson, and Webb</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, B., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J., and Webb, M.: Ice nucleation by
particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41,
6519–6554, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35200a" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c2cs35200a</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Niedermeier et al.(2010)Niedermeier, Hartmann, Shaw, Covert, Mentel,
Schneider, Poulain, Reitz, Spindler, Clauss, Kiselev, Hallbauer, Wex,
Mildenberger, and Stratmann</label><mixed-citation>
Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Shaw, R. A., Covert, D., Mentel, T. F.,
Schneider, J., Poulain, L., Reitz, P., Spindler, C., Clauss, T., Kiselev, A.,
Hallbauer, E., Wex, H., Mildenberger, K., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous
freezing of droplets with immersed mineral dust particles – measurements and
parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3601–3614,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3601-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-3601-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Niemand et al.(2012)Niemand, Möhler, Vogel, Vogel, and
Hoose</label><mixed-citation>
Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., and Hoose, C.: A
particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert
dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Phillips et al.(2008)Phillips, DeMott, and Andronache</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, V., DeMott, P., and Andronache, C.: An empirical parameterization
of
heterogeneous ice nucleation for multiple chemical species of aerosol, J.
Atmos. Sci., 65, 2757–2783, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2546.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2007JAS2546.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Phillips et al.(2013)Phillips, DeMott, Andronache, Pratt, Prather,
Subramanian, and Twohy</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, V., DeMott, P., Andronache, C., Pratt, K., Prather, K.,
Subramanian,
R., and Twohy, C.: Improvements to an empirical parameterization of
heterogeneous ice nucleation and its comparison with observations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 70, 378–409, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-080.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-080.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Popovicheva et al.(2007)Popovicheva, Persiantseva, Shonija, DeMott,
Koehler, Petters, Kreidenweis, Tishkova, Demirdjian, and
Suzanne</label><mixed-citation>
Popovicheva, O., Persiantseva, N., Shonija, N., DeMott, P., Koehler, K.,
Petters, M., Kreidenweis, S., Tishkova, V., Demirdjian, B., and Suzanne, J.:
Water interaction with hydrophobic and hydrophilic soot particles, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 2332–2344, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b718944n" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/b718944n</a>, 2007.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Prenni et al.(2007)Prenni, Harrington, Tjernström, DeMott,
Avramov, Long, Kreidenweis, Olsson, and Verlinde</label><mixed-citation>
Prenni, A., Harrington, J., Tjernström, M., DeMott, P., Avramov, A.,
Long,
C., Kreidenweis, S., Olsson, P., and Verlinde, J.: Can Ice-Nucleating
Aerosols Affect Arctic Seasonal Climate?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88,
541–550, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-4-541" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-4-541</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Pruppacher and Klett(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Pruppacher, H. and Klett, J.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, 2nd
Edn., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Reinhardt and Doye(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Reinhardt, A. and Doye, J. P. K.: Effects of surface interactions on
heterogeneous ice nucleation for a monatomic water model, J. Chem. Phys.,
141, 084501, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4892804" target="_blank">doi:10.1063/1.4892804</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Ren and MacKenzie(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Ren, C. and MacKenzie, A.: Cirrus parameterization and the role of ice
nuclei,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1585–1605, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.126" target="_blank">doi:10.1256/qj.04.126</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Savre et al.(2013)Savre, Ekman, Svensson, and
Tjernström</label><mixed-citation>
Savre, J., Ekman, A., Svensson, G., and Tjernström, M.: Parameterizing
ice
nucleation ability of mineral dust particles in the deposition mode:
numerical investigations using large eddy simulation, AIP Proceedings, 1527, 922,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4803422" target="_blank">doi:10.1063/1.4803422</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Sheyko et al.(2015)Sheyko, Sullivan, Morales-Betancourt, Capps,
Barahona, Shi, Liu, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
Sheyko, B., Sullivan, S. C., Morales-Betancourt, R., Capps, S., Barahona, D.,
Shi, X., Liu, X., and Nenes, A.: Quantifying sensitivities of ice crystal
number and sources of ice crystal number variability in CAM 5.1 using the
adjoint of a physically based cirrus formation parameterization, J. Geophys.
Res., 120, 2834–2854, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022457" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD022457</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Shi et al.(2015)Shi, Liu, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, K.: Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on
cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation
parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 1503–1520, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Skrotzki et al.(2013)Skrotzki, Connolly, Schnaiter, Saathoff,
Möhler, Wagner, Niemand, Ebert, and Leisner</label><mixed-citation>
Skrotzki, J., Connolly, P., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H., Möhler, O.,
Wagner, R., Niemand, M., Ebert, V., and Leisner, T.: The accommodation
coefficient of water molecules on ice – cirrus cloud studies at the AIDA
simulation chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4451–4466,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4451-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4451-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Spichtinger and Gierens(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 1b:
Structuring cirrus clouds by dynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 707–719,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-707-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-707-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Spichtinger and Krämer(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Spichtinger, P. and Krämer, M.: Tropical tropopause ice clouds: a dynamic
approach to the mystery of low crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
9801–9818, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9801-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-9801-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Steinke et al.(2015)Steinke, Hoose, Möhler, Connolly, and
Leisner</label><mixed-citation>
Steinke, I., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., and Leisner, T.: A new
temperature- and humidity-dependent surface site density approach for
deposition ice nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3703–3717,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3703-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-3703-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Vali(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G.: Interpretation of freezing nucleation experiments: singular and
stochastic; sites and surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5271–5294,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Liu, Hoose, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Liu, X., Hoose, C., and Wang, B.: Different contact angle
distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric
Model version 5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10411–10430,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Whitby(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Whitby, K.: The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols, Atmos. Environ.,
41, 25–49, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90196-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0004-6981(78)90196-8</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Xie et al.(2013)Xie, Liu, Zhao, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, S., Liu, X., Zhao, C., and Zhang, Y.: Sensitivity of CAM5-simulated
Arctic clouds and radiation to nucleation parameterization, J. Climate, 26,
5981–5999, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00517.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00517.1</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)Zhang, Liu, Wang, Comstock, Mitchell, Mishra, and
Mace</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Liu, X., Wang, M., Comstock, J. M., Mitchell, D. L., Mishra, S.,
and Mace, G. G.: Evaluating and constraining ice cloud parameterizations in
CAM5 using aircraft measurements from the SPARTICUS campaign, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 4963–4982, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4963-2013</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Zuberi et al.(2002)Zuberi, Bertram, Cassa, Molina, and
Molina</label><mixed-citation>
Zuberi, B., Bertram, A., Cassa, C., Molina, L., and Molina, M.: Heterogeneous
nucleation of ice in ammonium sulfate-water particles with mineral dust
immersions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 142.1–142.4, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014289" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GL014289</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
