<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vskip 6mm}?>Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation at the
SORPES station in Nanjing, China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X.~Huang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-5014</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Luxi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Aijun</given-names></name>
          <email>dingaj@nju.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-5386</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Ximeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Nie</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Minghuai</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9179-228X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chi</surname><given-names>Xuguang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Petäjä</surname><given-names>Tuukka</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-9044</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kerminen</surname><given-names>Veli-Matti</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-669X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Roldin</surname><given-names>Pontus</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Rusanen</surname><given-names>Anton</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-9889</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kulmala</surname><given-names>Markku</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7825</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Boy</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences and  School of
Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change, Nanjing, Jiangsu
Province, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Helsinki University Centre for Environment, P.O. Box 65, 00014
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Aijun Ding (dingaj@nju.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2477</fpage><lpage>2492</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>New particle formation (NPF) has been investigated intensively during the
last 2 decades because of its influence on aerosol population and the
possible contribution to cloud condensation nuclei. However, intensive
measurements and modelling activities on this topic in urban metropolitan
areas in China with frequent high-pollution episodes are still very limited.
This study provides results from a comprehensive modelling study on the
occurrence of NPF events in the western part of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD)
region, China. The comprehensive modelling system, which combines the
WRF-Chem (the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry)
regional chemical transport model and the MALTE-BOX sectional box model (the
model to predict new aerosol formation in the lower troposphere), was shown
to be capable of simulating atmospheric nucleation and subsequent growth.
Here we present a detailed discussion of three typical NPF days, during which
the measured air masses were notably influenced by either anthropogenic
activities, biogenic emissions, or mixed ocean and continental sources.
Overall, simulated NPF events were generally in good agreement with the
corresponding measurements, enabling us to get further insights into NPF
processes in the YRD region. Based on the simulations, we conclude that
biogenic organic compounds, particularly monoterpenes, play an essential role
in the initial condensational growth of newly formed clusters through their
low-volatility oxidation products. Although some uncertainties remain in this
modelling system, this method provides a possibility to better understand
particle formation and growth processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Ambient aerosols affect human health adversely, degrade visibility, and play
an important role in climate change through directly scattering/absorbing
solar radiation or indirectly modifying microphysical properties of clouds
(Eidels-Dubovoi, 2002; Davidson et al., 2005; Lohmann and Feichter, 2005;
Myhre et al., 2013). Atmospheric new particle formation (NPF), characterized
by a sharp increase in number concentration of nucleation-mode aerosol, has
been observed under a wide variety of circumstances and has been shown as a
significant source of atmospheric fine particles (O'Dowd et al., 2002;
Kulmala and Kerminen, 2008; Gao et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2012; Guo et al.,
2014; Wang et al., 2014). As the newly formed particles and their following
growth may lead several-fold increases in aerosol number concentrations,
atmospheric NPF could substantially contribute to the global CCN (cloud
condensation nuclei) budget and its subsequent cooling effect (Lihavainen et
al., 2003; Merikanto et al., 2009; Yu and Luo, 2009; Wang and Penner, 2009;
Kerminen et al., 2012; Makkonen et al., 2012; Scott et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>NPF has been extensively and intensively studied globally during the last 2
decades. It is well known that particle formation in the atmosphere is
strongly dependent on the abundance of sulfuric acid (Weber et al., 1999;
Kulmala et al., 2004b; Sipila et al., 2010). Meanwhile, other compounds in
the atmosphere may be responsible for NPF occurrence in different
environments. Iodine-containing vapours were identified as the precursors for
marine NPF (O'Dowd et al., 2002). Observations in Pittsburgh imply that
ammonia could considerably enhance the atmospheric particle formation
(Q. Zhang et al., 2004). In the boreal forest, oxidation products of
monoterpenes together with sulfuric acid were very likely to lead to NPF
(Schobesberger et al., 2013) and new findings indicate that organic amines
(e.g. dimethylamine) can enhance water–sulfuric acid particle formation
rates more than 1000-fold compared to ammonia (Almeida et al., 2013). In
addition to direct in situ observations of NPF events, model simulation has
been serving as a useful tool for analysing NPF dynamics since the 1990s
(Kulmala et al., 1995; Kerminen and Wexler, 1996; Korhonen et al., 1999). In
recent years, the MALTE model has been successfully utilized in NPF analysis
– for instance, reproducing OH radical and gaseous sulfuric acid levels
(Petäjä et al., 2009), validating various plausible nucleation mechanisms
and particle growth (Boy et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2013b), and identifying
important factors influencing NPF occurrence (Boy et al., 2006, 2008a; Ortega
et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>As one of the most economically invigorating and densely populated countries,
China features simultaneous high aerosol loadings and NPF rates (S. Liu et
al., 2008; Gao et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2012; Qi et al., 2015). Moreover,
the condensational growth of nucleation-mode particles has been indicated as
a plausible cause of regional haze events (Guo et al., 2014). Since the
2000s, several field campaigns as well as long-term measurements have been
conducted in several regions such as Beijing, the Pearl River Delta as well
as the Yangtze River Delta, showing high occurrence frequencies and formation
rates across China (S. Liu et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2009; Yue et al., 2010;
Herrmann et al., 2014; Qi et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2015). However,
modelling studies that provide a further insight into the processes of
atmospheric aerosol formation, are still very limited in China. Numerical
simulations of formation and growth processes usually require detailed and
high time-resolving measurements of the relevant compounds – however, hardly
any field campaign or in situ measurement station in China meets this
requirement. The novel combination of a regional chemical transport model and
a zero-dimensional box model with detailed aerosol dynamics makes it possible
to accomplish NPF modelling studies without direct measurements of all
specific chemical species. Here, we present a comprehensive modelling study
targeted at reproducing observed NPF events under distinct conditions at the
Station for Observing Regional Processes of the Earth System (SORPES) at
Nanjing University in Nanjing, China (Ding et al., 2013a). This is the first
attempt to integrate the regional model, box model and in situ measurements
to investigate NPF events in China, enabling us to gain more insights into
NPF mechanism in the YRD region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>In situ measurements</title>
      <p>The SORPES site is located in the Xianlin campus of Nanjing University in the
suburban area northeast of Nanjing, which is about 20 km east from the
downtown area (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>118</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>57</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>14</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
40 m a.s.l. as shown in Fig. 1 in Ding et al., 2013a). This site, with few
local emission sources around it, is generally upwind of downtown Nanjing and
also downwind of the city clusters of the YRD region. Hence it can be
regarded as a regional background station (Ding et al., 2013a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>WRF-Chem model domain and topographic field (in metres). The yellow
dot marks the location of the SORPES station.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>On-line and high time-resolving measurements of trace gases, aerosol
characteristics, and relevant meteorological parameters have been conducted
since the summer of 2011. Ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, total reactive nitrogen
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, carbon monoxide (CO) and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(fine particulates less
than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter) are routinely measured by Thermo
Instruments (TEI 49i, 43i, 42i, 42iY and 48i) and MARGA (Monitor for
Aerosols  and Gases in Ambient Air) (Ding et al., 2013a, b). The Differential
Mobility Particle Sizer (DMPS) coupling a differential mobility analyser
with two different flow rates and a condensation particle counter are used
to measure number distributions of atmospheric particles from 6 to 800 nm
(Herrmann et al., 2014; Qi et al., 2015). More thorough information on the
instruments at the SORPES site is elaborated in detail in Ding et al. (2013a, b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Model description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>MALTE-BOX model</title>
      <p>MALTE is a one-dimensional model comprised of boundary layer meteorology,
biogenic emission of volatile organic compounds, gas-phase chemistry and
aerosol dynamics in order to predict particle formation and growth processes
under atmospheric conditions (Boy et al., 2006). Here, we apply the
zero-dimensional version, namely the MALTE-BOX model, to simulate NPF events at
the SORPES station. In the MALTE-BOX model, boundary layer meteorology and
biogenic emission modules are switched off; instead, the biogenic and
anthropogenic VOC emissions and their following transport and dispersion are
calculated by the regional chemical transport model WRF-Chem. Concentration
of various organic compounds at the SORPES station predicted by WRF-Chem
model are input  into MALTE-BOX model every 10 min (Table 1 provides
the compounds calculated by WRF-Chem as input to MALTE-BOX). Likewise,
measured concentrations of trace gases including CO, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the same temporal resolution, are also included as input
fields. In addition to gas phase precursors, the inputs also include an
initial particle number size distribution at 00:00 LT on each day, ambient
temperature, relative humidity and the condensation sink of sulfuric acid
(as defined in Sect. 2.3).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Chemical species from WRF-Chem input  to MALTE-BOX.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WRF-Chem</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MALTE-BOX</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acetaldehyde (CCHO)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CHO</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acetone (ACET)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>COCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Methanol (MEOH)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Methyl Vinyl Ketone (MVK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MVK</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Isoprene (ISOPRENE)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Terpenes (TERP)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">alpha-pinene <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>beta-pinene <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>camphene <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>myrcene <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>carene <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>limonene</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In the MALTE-BOX model, particles are assumed to be spherical. A fixed
sectional approach with 40 size bins ranging from 1.4 to 2000 nm in diameter
is used in the present study. The aerosol dynamics has all basic aerosol
processes, including nucleation, condensation, coagulation and deposition.
The new particle formation rates of newly formed clusters are estimated by
the kinetic nucleation theory of sulfuric acid (Sihto et al., 2006), which
is related to the sulfuric acid concentration as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinetic coefficient that includes both the collision
frequency and the probability of forming a stable cluster after the
collision. Kinetic nucleation theory has been shown to have good performance
in simulating cluster formation in various environments including both clean
continental area and polluted urban site (Wang et al., 2013b; Zhou et al.,
2014). The nucleated particles were added to the first size bin in the
model.</p>
      <p>We conducted a set of sensitivity simulations to establish a suitable value
for the nucleation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After comparing the simulations and
DMPS measurements, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to
6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/# for 10 July and 22 August, and
2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/# for 22 June. These values were
similar to those we commonly used in the simulations for NPF at other
stations (Boy et al., 2008a; Paasonen et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2015). The
high value on 22 June might imply that other low-volatility vapours – most
probably from anthropogenic origin – are involved and play a crucial role in
the particle formation process at this site. Moreover, being limited by the
detectable size of the DMPS (we can monitor particles larger than 6 nm in
diameter), means that the observed formation process could be steered by the
condensational growth of the smallest clusters to the detection limit.</p>
      <p>We included relevant chemical reactions of the MCM (Master Chemical
Mechanism) in this model, as described in Boy et al. (2013). The chemistry
scheme included the full MCM chemical paths for the following parent
molecules: methane, methanol, formaldehyde, acetone, acetaldehyde,
2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol (MBO), isoprene, alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, limonene
and beta-caryophyllene. The Kinetic PreProcessor (KPP) was applied to
numerical solving for the concentrations of each individual compound (Damian
et al., 2002), except for those species whose concentrations were manually
input from direct measurements and the WRF-Chem model. Apart from sulfuric
acid, about 20 low-volatility organic compounds (ELVOCs) and seven selected
semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) are regarded as condensing vapours,
following the simplified chemical mechanism presented by Ehn et al. (2014).
Specifically, seven representative SVOCs (MCM-nomenclature: C719OOH,
LIMALOOH, C924OOH, NORLIMOOH, C811OOH, C818OOH and C819OOH) with vapour
pressures estimated to range from 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(using the group contribution method described by Nannoolal et al., 2008) and
recently detected ELVOCs (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with vapour
pressures between 10 and 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are included as
condensing vapours in the model. <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>WRF-Chem</title>
      <p>The WRF-Chem version 3.6 was used here to estimate concentrations of various
organic vapours from anthropogenic and biogenic emissions as there was no VOC
measurement at the SORPES site during the study period. WRF-Chem is an online
three-dimensional, Eulerian chemical transport model that considers the
complex physical and chemical processes, such as emission and deposition of
pollutants, advection and diffusion, gaseous and aqueous chemical
transformation, aerosol chemistry and dynamics (Grell et al., 2005). It is
capable of simulating atmospheric chemistry on a regional scale and has been
successfully applied in several of our previous studies (Huang et al., 2014,
2015). In this study, the model domain covered East China and its surrounding
area, centred at 32.0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 119.0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E with a
20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 km grid resolution, as demonstrated in Fig. 1. There are
24 vertical layers from the ground level to the top pressure of 50 hPa, in
which 10 layers are placed under 1 km to better resolve the boundary layer
processes. The 6-hourly final operational global analysis (FNL) data with a
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution produced by the National
Centres for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) was used as initial and boundary
conditions of meteorological fields. The simulations were conducted for June
to August 2013 when NPF events were frequently detected (Qi et al., 2015).
During the simulation period, each run covered 60 h, in which the first
12 h were just for model spin-up and the last 48 h results were adopted for
following analysis and box modelling. The outputs of compound concentrations
from the preceding run were treated as the initial conditions for the next
run. Key physical parameterization options for the WRF-Chem modelling are the
Noah land surface scheme to describe the land–atmosphere interactions (Ek et
al., 2003), the Lin microphysics scheme (Lin et al., 1983) with the Grell
cumulus parametrization to reproduce the cloud and precipitation processes
(Grell and Devenyi, 2002), the YSU boundary layer scheme (Hong, 2010), and
the RRTMG short- and long-wave radiation scheme (Mlawer et al., 1997).</p>
      <p>Anthropogenic emissions from power plants, residential combustion, industrial
processes, on-road mobile sources and agricultural activities were derived
from the MEIC database (Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China, see
<uri>www.meicmodel.org</uri>). Emissions of major pollutants, such as carbon
monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and speciated VOCs are all
included in this emission inventory database. The MEGAN (Model of Emissions
of Gases and Aerosols from Nature, version 2) module embedded in WRF-Chem is
used to calculate biogenic emissions online (Guenther et al., 2006). It
estimates the net emission rates of isoprene, monoterpene and other biogenic
VOCs from terrestrial ecosystems into the above-canopy atmosphere. Gas-phase
chemistry is explicitly represented by the model through the SAPRC
photochemistry scheme (Carter, 1999), which includes 225 gas-phase reactions
among 81 chemical species in the model. We mapped some predicted organic
species in WRF-Chem to the MALTE-BOX following the correspondence denoted in
Table 1. Regarding the monoterpenes (alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, camphene,
myrcene, carene and limonene) used in MALTE-BOX chemistry (details in Boy et
al., 2013), the distribution was performed equally because no VOC-measurement
were available at the SORPES station during the study period.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
      <p>The calculations of particle growth and formation rates are conducted
following the procedures outlined by Kulmala et al. (2012). The formation
rate is obtained from the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Coag</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>losses</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the particle formation rate of diameter dp and the first
term on the right-hand side is the time evolution of the particle number
concentration with size ranging from dp to dp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>dp. The second term
derives the coagulation loss by the product of coagulation sink
(CoagS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the number concentration in the size range [dp, dp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>dp]. The
third term is the growth out of the considered size range, in which GR means
measured growth rate. The last term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>losses</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents additional
losses, which were not considered in this study.</p>
      <p>The growth rate of particles during the NPF events can be expressed as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p1</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the representative of the diameter of
nucleated particles at the times <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. For
calculation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p1</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then defined as the central size of each
bin and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the moments when the concentration of this
size bin peaks.</p>
      <p>The condensation sink determines how rapidly condensable vapour molecules
will condense onto pre-existing aerosols. It can be derived by DMPS-measured
particle number size distribution according to the following method (Kulmala
et al., 2001):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>m,dp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion coefficient of the condensing vapour, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is a transition-regime correction, dp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the discrete diameter and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>dp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle number concentration in respective size bin.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
      <p>This section is divided into two parts. The first part provides
discussion of measured particle size distributions on three typical NPF
days. Air mass transport pathways and parameters that favour the formation
of new particles at the SORPES site will be investigated. The second
part focuses on the numerical simulation of observed NPF events. A
further detailed analysis of particle formation and following growth will be
presented.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Observations and data analysis</title>
      <p>Summer marks the season with frequent NPF events at the SORPES site,
especially in the year of 2013 (Qi et al., 2015). From June to August 2013,
50 NPF events were detected during the 76-day measurement period when DMPS
functioned normally, resulting in  particle formation probability of
66 %. Among the observed NPF events, three representative cases were
identified according to the retroplumes calculated based on the Lagrangian
dispersion model HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated
Trajectory Model) following the method developed by Ding et al. (2013c).
These selected NPF days are 22 June, 10 July and 22 August 2013, when the
site was dominantly influenced by air masses from the YRD region, South
China, and mixed ocean and continental areas, respectively (Fig. 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Retroplume (footprint residence time) showing transport pathways
of air masses measured at the SORPES site for 22 June <bold>(a)</bold>, 10 July <bold>(b)</bold> and
22 August <bold>(c)</bold>. Spatial distributions of anthropogenic SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold>, primary
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(e)</bold> and biogenic monoterpene <bold>(f)</bold> emission rates.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>On 22 June 2013, a clear banana-shaped particle size distribution was
captured by the DMPS in the morning (09:00–11:00 LT, Fig. 3). According to
the DMPS observations, the number concentration of particles with diameter
ranging from 6 to 30 nm reached up to 10 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around 10:00 LT.
The formation rate of 6 nm particles, namely <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated following
Eq. (2), was 7.6 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. It was generally comparable to those
typically observed elsewhere in China, for instance, 0.97–10.2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Hong Kong (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>5.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Guo et al., 2012). The diurnal variations
of measured number size distribution and relevant trace gases are
demonstrated in Fig. 3. This NPF event featured a large background particle
loading with PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration exceeding 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
because the air mass was lingering over city clusters in the YRD region
before approaching the SORPES station, as shown in Fig. 2a. Dense particle
emissions from the rapidly urbanized and industrialized YRD region (Fig. 2e)
corresponded to a high condensation sink of 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, close to those typically observed in other urban areas in China
(Gao et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2015). For the same reason, influenced by
the emissions in the YRD region (Fig. 2d), SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was
observed to be 20–30 ppb, considerably higher than the normally observed
level at the site, which is less than 10 ppb during summertime (Ding et al.,
2013a). High concentration of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and increasing radiation intensity
were indicative of active ozone photolysis, and production of OH radicals,
rapid gas-phase oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by OH radical and accumulation of
gaseous sulfuric acid are expected, leading to the onset of NPF despite the
high level of condensation sink. The subsequent growth was fast, with a
GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (growth rate from 6 to 30 nm) of 12.6 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Accumulating
sulfuric acid with increasing ozone concentration might be one contributor.
In addition, the presence of aromatic-related oxidation products from
residential and industrial combustion in the YRD region could also
substantially enhance particle formation and subsequent growth by absorption
or heterogeneous reactions (R. Y. Zhang et al., 2004; Y. Liu et al., 2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Measured diurnal variations of particle size distributions (upper
panel), concentrations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (middle panel), and
meteorological conditions and condensation sink (bottom panel) during the
three NPF days. Grey boxes show the time span of NPF events.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Formation rate of 6 nm particles (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and particle growth
rates from 6 to 30 nm (GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and condensation sink (CS) of three NPF
events based on DMPS measurements and numeric
modelling<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(nm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 June 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.6 (9.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.6 (6.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 July 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2 (1.6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.5 (10.7)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 August 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.4 (10.0)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.7 (2.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Values out of  parentheses are observations and those in
parentheses represent the corresponding model results.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>On 10 July when the air masses mostly came from the densely wooded area in
South China, NPF had a much lower  rate than on 22 June, yet a slightly faster particle growth rate (Table 2). Previous
investigations have revealed that overall GR is correlated with the rate of
terpenes reactions with atmospheric photochemical oxidants, highlighting the
importance of biogenic VOCs in the particle growth process (e.g. Boy et al.,
2003; Kulmala et al., 2004a). During the QUEST (Quantification of Aerosol
Nucleation in the European Boundary Layer) field campaign in
Hyytiälä, Finland, recorded particle growth rates during NPF events
correlated notably with gas-phase monoterpene concentrations, indicating
that the oxidation products from biogenic VOCs may dominate particle growth
(Laaksonen et al., 2008; Yli-Juuti et al., 2011). The positive correlation
between freshly formed particle growth rates and monoterpenes and their
oxidation rates by ozone was also verified in Hong Kong, China (Guo et al.,
2012). Figure 2f presents the spatial distribution of monoterpene emission
rates during summertime across China calculated by the MEGAN model (Li et
al., 2012). It is obvious that monoterpene emission is overwhelmingly
intensive in South China, which is covered by large areas of broadleaf
forests and shrubs. It is plausible that air masses passed over biogenic
VOC-rich regions were saturated with sufficiently low-volatility oxidation
products, which enhanced the observed particle growth. The simulation
results from the WRF-Chem model supported this view. Modelled isoprene and
terpene concentrations were 1.2 and 0.15 ppb at the SORPES site during NPF
on 10 July, 150 and 50 % higher than the corresponding values on 22 June. Besides, lower pre-existing particle loading is another cause of
faster growth due to less particle surface area for vapour condensation.</p>
      <p>Another NPF event, characterized by mixed marine and continental air masses,
occurred on 22 August. Because of relatively clean air from the ocean and
high wind speed of around 8 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were unusually low, only 11.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
2.8 ppb when the NPF event took place. Accordingly, the condensation sink
fell to 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Existing measurements and
analysis concluded that the main obstacle for the initial onset of NPF at the
SORPES site is condensation sink, since SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is always high
and there tends to be enough solar radiation as well (Herrmann et al., 2014).
So, even though the SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was
fairly low during that day, a fairly small condensation sink could trigger
the onset of this NPF event. The nuclei growth rate, GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, was
estimated to be 15.7 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the one hand, humid air mass transported
from the ocean might have favoured the particle growth due to that high
humidity could enhance the uptake and oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and also
facilitate the transformation of gaseous nitric acid to particulate ammonium
nitrate (Hildemann et al., 1984; Rattigan et al., 2000). As displayed in
Fig. 3, the measured relative humidity (RH) was over 80 % when the NPF
began. On the other hand, the sampling site was also partly influenced by
the air masses from the YRD region (Fig. 2c), which means that
anthropogenic VOCs and oxidation products with low volatility might also
exert a notable impact on particle growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Simulations of NPF events</title>
      <p>To shed further light on NPF processes at the SORPES station, comprehensive
simulations were performed by combining the WRF-Chem regional atmospheric
transport model and the MALTE-BOX model. Measurements of meteorological
fields, trace gases and aerosol characteristics from the SORPES station are
input to the box model. In the meantime, input also includes the
concentrations of gaseous organic compounds from the WRF-Chem regional model
(see Table 1). The simulations were conducted for the aforementioned three
NPF days.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Evaluation of simulations by WRF-Chem model</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Statistical analysis of the simulated hourly 2 m temperature and
10 m wind speed versus the ground observations at the SORPES station.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Index<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 m temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 m wind speed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">22 June</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10 July</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">22 August</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> MB and RMSE refer to mean bias and root mean square error
respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Meteorological conditions play an important role in transport, diffusion and
chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Simulated hourly 2 m temperature and
10 m wind speed were evaluated using hourly temperature and relative
humidity observations at the SORPES station. Statistical analysis of model
performance for the three NPF days are listed in Table 3, including mean bias
(MB) and root mean square error (RMSE). Generally, the model reproduced the
observed 2 m temperature and 10 m wind. As mentioned, modelled VOC
concentrations, which are vital for NPF simulation, are included as an input
field in the MALTE-BOX model. Although there was no VOC measurement during
the summer of 2013, the SORPES site and the Environmental Monitoring Centre
of Jiangsu Province (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>118</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>47</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N) were
equipped with GC/MS (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) in the summer of
2014. In order to evaluate the model's performance in simulating VOC
concentrations, we conducted another WRF-Chem run for the August of 2014 and
then compared the model results with corresponding observations. The
comparison of alkene, aromatic and isoprene concentrations in Fig. 4a–c
illustrates that WRF-Chem is capable of reproducing the magnitude and
temporal variations of VOC concentration originating from both anthropogenic
and biogenic sources. Specifically, modelled results tend to underestimate
alkene concentration but overpredict aromatic level with normalized mean bias
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 and 20 %, similar to previous simulations for Shanghai (Tie et
al., 2013). There still exist substantial uncertainties in China's
anthropogenic VOC emission inventory, particularly speciated estimations,
which was ascribed to uncertainties in the activity data, limited direct
experiments on emission factors and source profiles (Wei et al., 2008; Zheng
et al., 2009). Large biases in model-predicted aromatic level are expectable
since it is mainly emitted from petrochemical plants, gasoline vehicle and
biomass burning with greater uncertainties in activity level estimation (Liu
et al., 2008). In terms of biogenic VOCs, simplification in vegetation
classification and numerical descriptions, limited understanding of
controlling factors could introduce biases in modelled levels of BVOCs
(Guenther, 2013). Given these uncertainties, the gaps between simulation and
observations in Fig. 4a–c are acceptable. As for simulated biogenic
terpenes, whose oxidation products have low vapour pressures similar to
sulfuric acid and condense onto aerosol surfaces, the spatial patterns in the
morning of the aforementioned three NPF days showed great differences
(Fig. 4d–f). During the first and third NPF cases, prevailing easterly winds
did not bring much biogenic VOCs since biogenic emissions are most intensive
in the southern part of China. By contrast, on 10 July when the air
temperature was getting higher and southwesterly winds dominated, enhanced
biogenic emissions and the shift in wind direction led to the fact that the
modelled terpene concentrations at the SORPES station were almost two times
those in the other two NPF days.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatter plots of observed and simulated alkene <bold>(a)</bold> aromatic <bold>(b)</bold>
and isoprene <bold>(c)</bold> concentrations (NMB represents the normalized mean bias) in
August 2014. The solid <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines and dashed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines are shown for
reference. Spatial distributions of terpene concentrations at 09:00 LT on 22 June <bold>(d)</bold>, 10 July <bold>(e)</bold> and 22 August<bold> (f)</bold>, 2013. The 2 m temperature is
marked by red lines. The black dot marks the location of the SORPES station.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f04.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>MALTE-BOX simulations</title>
      <p>Figure 5 shows the variations of modelled particle number size distributions
during the three NPF days. The model system does reproduce the occurrence of
these three NPF events although they were under distinct meteorological
conditions and affected by entirely different potential source regions. On
22 June when measured air masses originated from the urbanized YRD region,
the calculated onset of activation of freshly formed cluster to grow above
the 6 nm line appeared around 08:30 LT. According to the diurnal pattern of
simulated concentrations of gaseous compounds illustrated in Fig. 6, the OH
radical level increased rapidly from 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> just after sunrise, promoting the gaseous
oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere and subsequent accumulation of
sulfuric acid from nearly zero to around 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Simultaneously, the pre-existing particle concentration dropped due to the
boundary layer evolution (Fig. 3). The continuously growing sulfuric acid
concentration and decreasing condensation sink jointly led to this fast NPF
event. Simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 9.3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, slightly higher than
the observed value of 7.6 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Among different kinds of
condensing vapours, sulfuric acid contributed most to the growth of newly
formed particles. As demonstrated in Fig. 7, while considering the growth of
particles less than 10 nm in diameter, sulfuric acid's contribution
accounted for more than 50 %. The reason is that, influenced by air mass
from the emission-intensive YRD region, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was reaching up to 20 ppb
and the contribution of sulfuric acid on this day was much higher compared
with the other 2 days and those published in earlier studies (Boy et al.,
2003, 2008b). GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was simulated to be 6.9 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, about half
of that derived from measurements. Overestimated newly formed clusters might
be one reason for smaller simulated GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Another, as described
before, is that condensing vapours in the box model only included biogenic
low-volatility compounds. However, aromatic-related oxidation products have
been suspected of contributing to particle growth, especially in polluted
area like China (Zhang et al., 2004; Yue et al., 2010). Failing to
characterize condensing vapour originating from anthropogenic organic
compounds might be another cause of the underpredicted growth rate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Modelled pattern of particle size distributions (left panel) and
number concentrations of particles ranging from 6 to 10 nm during these three NPF days (right panel).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>During the second NPF case, the OH radical concentration was mostly less
than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The production of sulfuric acid
was expected to be relatively slow due to the simultaneous lower
concentrations of both SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH radical. As demonstrated in Fig. 6,
the concentration of sulfuric acid was approximately 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> just when the NPF started, about one-tenth and
one-seventh of the corresponding values on 22 June and 22 August,
respectively. Nonetheless, prevailing southwesterly winds brought along
terpene-rich air masses. Some of the terpenes, such as alpha-pinene and
limonene, feature significantly high yields of ELVOCs as well as SVOCs while
reacting with ozone or OH radicals (Ehn et al., 2014; Jokinen et al., 2015).
Such dense low-volatility oxidation products substantially enhanced the
condensational growth of newly formed particles. The individual
contributions from sulfuric acid, SVOCs and ELVOCs to growth of newly formed
particles were quantified in Fig. 7, which indicated that biogenic low-volatility compounds overwhelmingly dominated in the very initial stage of
cluster growth with contribution as high as 95 %, demonstrating a vital
role of ELVOCs and SVOCs in this NPF event (Ehn et al., 2014). During this
event, SVOC-induced condensational growth of small clusters was especially
higher, which might be attributed to the fact that modelled SVOC
concentrations increased dramatically shortly after the nucleation started
and was almost ten times higher than those during the other two events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of several gas concentrations (cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during
the three selected NPF days. Sulfuric acid, OH radical, SVOCs and ELVOCs
are marked in grey area, red, green and blue lines, respectively. Dashed
lines show the onset time of NPF according to DMPS measurements for
reference.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Unlike during the first two NPF cases, the level of pre-existing particles
was unusually low during the third event because a strong wind from the
ocean swept over East China. The clean air mass reduced the condensation
sink (see Table 2), much lower than the values typically observed at the
SORPES site before (Herrmann et al., 2014). Even though SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were pretty low, sulfuric acid accumulated remarkably and
probably initiated this NPF event. As listed in Table 2, during Case 3 when
the air mass originated partly over the Shanghai and surrounding city
clusters, the model underpredicted the growth rate by nearly a factor of 7
and overestimated the particle formation rate by a factor of 3. This means that
most probably anthropogenic low-volatility compounds not included in the model
were contributing to the growth and decreased the surviving probability of
the newly formed clusters in the model. It is completely opposite for Case 2
when the air mass did not originate from strongly anthropogenic-influenced areas
and the model outcome was in good agreement with the measurements.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Contributions from three kinds of condensing vapours to growth of
particle less than 10 nm during NPF events on 22 June (Case 1), 10 July
(Case 2) and 22 August (Case 3). Sulfuric acid, SVOCs and ELVOCs are marked
in red, green and blue bars, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Discussions and uncertainties</title>
      <p>Though the model succeeded in the prediction of DMPS-measured NPF
occurrence, the simulated activation of NPF was about 1 hour later than
the observations. Considering the number concentration in the size range
6–10 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the newly formed particles, the model shows a distinct
underestimation at the beginning of the NPF events (Fig. 5). As mentioned in
Sect. 2, we assumed the kinetic mechanism in the MALTE-BOX. Nonetheless,
chamber and in situ experiments suggested that monoterpene oxidation
products could cluster directly with a single sulfuric acid molecule under
ambient conditions and that the interaction between organic and sulfuric
acids likely leads to a reduced nucleation barrier (R. Y. Zhang et al.,
2004; Schobesberger et al., 2013). Furthermore, according to the
simulation, the production of ELVOCs and SVOCs was mainly initialized by the
reactions between monoterpene and ozone. It has been recognized that NPF
events tend to be strongly associated with the monoterpene oxidation
products by ozone in both remote and urban environments (Laaksonen et al.,
2008; Guo et al., 2012). Thus, there was a good chance that the ELVOCs
played an important part in the NPF processes considered here. As presented
in Fig. 6, a considerable amount of ELVOCs accumulated before the modelled NPF
occurred and during the observed NPF events. The time shifts of the starting
times is consistent with the hypothesis that organic vapours may play a key
role in the particle formation process (Paasonen et al., 2009; Metzger et
al., 2010). Figure 8a shows the dependence of measurement-derived <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
modelled gaseous sulfuric acid and ELVOC concentrations; 6 nm NPF rates, even under the same sulfuric acid concentration, were
substantially enhanced by the presence of ELVOCs. It is noteworthy that
formation rates of 6 nm particles, not nucleation rates, are available here
due to the limitation of instruments. It is hard to identify which process
is most promoted by ELVOCs,  the particle formation or the early
condensational growth. Metzger et al. (2010) attempted to disentangle the
influence of organic oxidation products in particle formation and suggested
an overall dependency on the formation rate of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic
oxidation products with the lowest volatility (NucOrg) as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NucORG</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is new particle formation rate of 1.5 nm cluster; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents a pre-factor which is recommended to be 7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Metzger et al. (2010); [H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] and
[NucOrg] refer to the concentration of sulfuric acid and low-volatility
organic oxidation products that can participate in the particle formation
process, respectively. By assuming that NucOrg is part of the ELVOCs in the
present work, we examined the relationships between measured particle
formation rate with [H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>[ELVOCs]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and compared
it with [H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 8b–c. The better representation
and correlation of the latter provides further evidence for an involvement
of ELVOCs in the formation and condensational growth of particles up to 6 nm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlations of estimated new particle formation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from DMPS measurements with modelled gaseous sulfuric acid and ELVOC
concentrations for event days between 06:00 and 16:00 <bold>(a)</bold>. Scatter plots of
new particle formation rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated from measurements with
modelled sulfuric acid and ELVOC concentrations <bold>(b–c)</bold>, in which red, blue
and green markers refer to 22 June, 10 July and 22 August, respectively. The
square of correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are labelled in <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>.
Black solid lines denote <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dashed lines show
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(right) for reference in <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/2477/2016/acp-16-2477-2016-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In terms of the condensational growth of freshly formed particles, ambient
low-volatility compounds are predominant contributors – in particular, with
semi-volatile and possibly non-volatile organic matters generating from a
complex series of photochemical reactions (Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008). In the
present work, the model notably underestimates the nuclei condensational
growth (GR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Case 1 and Case 3 compared with the corresponding
observations, whereas the observation and simulation were comparable for
Case 2 (Table 2). These differences could partly be due to the fact that
here we only took oxidation products for certain selected organic compounds
into account as sources of condensable vapours. When the experimental site
was substantially influenced by intensive industrial activities and vehicle
emissions from the YRD region in Case 1 and Case 3, reactive uptake and
condensable secondary organic products from anthropogenic VOCs, which can
accelerate particle growth (R. Y. Zhang et al., 2004b; Kroll et al., 2005;
Volkamer et al., 2006), were partly missing in the present model. Regarding
the impacts of biogenic VOCs, we found that ELVOCs and SVOCs remarkably
contributed to particle condensational growth. Modelled contributions from
ELVOCs, SVOCs and sulfuric acid demonstrated that, during these three NPF
days, condensation of ELVOCs and SVOCs played an important role in the
initial growth of particles less than 10 nm. In particular, the contribution
increased to over 90 % on 10 July when the terpenes-rich air mass
influenced the SORPES site.</p>
      <p>The comprehensive modelling study on the observed NPF makes it possible to
better understand NPF processes at the SORPES station. However, there remain
many uncertainties in this modelling system, which need to be addressed in
future work. Given the expensive computational cost, reactions of VOCs are
represented by the lumped mechanism in the regional-scale WRF-Chem model.
Relevant parameters cannot be precisely determined for one lumped class,
while the MALTE-BOX model provides accurate information for each specific
organic compound. The gaps between the two models concerning VOC
classification would introduce uncertainties. Moreover, in the MALTE-BOX
model, sulfuric acid tends to be underpredicted, which was demonstrated in
both polluted urban environment and clean rural environment (Wang et al.,
2013a; Zhou et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2015). There are multiple reasons
behind the systematic underestimation. It has been shown by field
measurements, laboratory experiments and numeric simulation that Crigee
Intermediates (CIs) or other derivatives are capable of accelerating the
oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hatakeyama and Akimoto, 1994; Kurten et
al., 2011; Boy et al., 2013). These reactions have been incorporated in the
MALTE-BOX model but would need further investigations concerning the
reactions rates and other important reaction parameters (e.g. thermal
lifetimes of CIs, pressure dependency). In addition, owing to the
significantly incomplete knowledge of HONO sources, in particular during
daytime, it has not yet been possible to simulate realistic HONO levels using
current models (Elshorbany et al., 2014; Czader et al., 2015). The lack of
HONO measurement input to the model might also result in an underestimation
of sulfuric acid, especially with dramatically increasing traffic emissions
during the rush hours (Wang et al., 2013b). For instance, in the first case,
the air masses were carrying on more anthropogenic pollutants from the
emissions-intensive YRD region, and the sulfuric acid concentrations and
particle formation rates are more likely to be underpredicted. Last but not
least, we adopted a mandatory value for the kinetic coefficient, which
includes the probability that a collision of two molecules results in the
formation of a stable critical cluster, as well as all other important
details concerning the particle formation process such as temperature and
humidity. This condition-dependent coefficient needs to be resolved in
further modelling work on the basis of more in situ and laboratory
experiments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study combines the regional chemical transport model and box model to
investigate atmospheric NPF and the subsequent nuclei
condensational growth at the SORPES site in Nanjing, China. This combination
makes it possible to simulate chemical and aerosol dynamical processes.
Three NPF cases, during which entirely different potential source regions
influenced the experimental site, were successfully reproduced by the
modelling system. When the site was predominately influenced by air masses
from city clusters in the YRD region on 22 June 2013, despite a high
condensation sink, the NPF event featured a fast NPF rate
due to the continuously accumulating sulfuric acid. Under the circumstance
that biogenic VOC-rich air masses dominated, rapid growth of freshly formed
particles was detected on 10 July 2013, which was predominately attributed
to the low-volatility oxidation products of terpenes. Air masses from marine
origin could lead to the relatively low condensation sink on 22 August 2013, thereby facilitating the occurrence of NPF event. On the basis of
measurements and the corresponding modelling, we infer the controlling
factors of the selected three NPF events, and these were mostly associated
with sulfuric acid accumulation and low condensation sink. The comparison
with the observations suggested that low-volatility organic compounds,
including both SVOCs and ELVOCs, played a substantial role in the initial
condensational growth of newly formed particles, particularly when the
station was influenced by air masses originating from  South China. In
addition, anthropogenic VOCs and the following photochemical oxidation
produce a considerable amount of condensable compounds, exerting a
significant impact on particle growth in the emission-intensive YRD region.
Although some inadequacies still remain, such as the inclusion of
anthropogenic non-volatile organic compounds as condensable vapours, the
comprehensive modelling work provides a better insight of NPF processes.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(D0512/41422504, D0510/41505109, D0512/91544231 and D512/41305123), the
National Key Technology Research and Development Program (2014BAC22B02) and
the Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province
(SBE2014070928). Part of this work was supported by the Jiangsu Provincial
Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars awarded to A. J. Ding (No.
BK20140021) and by the Academy of Finland projects (1118615, 139656) and the
European Commission via ERC Advanced Grant ATM-NUCLE. We also acknowledge
financial support from the Helsinki University Centre for Environment
(HENVI). The numerical calculations in this paper have been done on the Blade
cluster system in the High Performance Computing &amp; Massive Data Center
(HPC&amp;MDC) of the School of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing
University.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: S. M. Noe</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kurten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Maatta,
O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M.,
David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J.,
Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A.,
Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M.,
Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurten, T., Kvashin, A. N.,
Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppa, J., Loukonen, V.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T.,
Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Riccobono, F., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo,
L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer,
R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F.,
Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y.,
Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H.,
Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P. L., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S.,
Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamaki, H.,
and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid-amine particle
nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature12663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Nature12663</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Rannik, U., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Tarvainen, V., Hakola, H., and
Kulmala, M.: Nucleation events in the continental boundary layer: Long-term
statistical analyses of aerosol relevant characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.
Atmos., 108,  4667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003838</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Hellmuth, O., Korhonen, H., Nilsson, E. D., ReVelle, D., Turnipseed, A., Arnold, F., and Kulmala, M.: MALTE – model to predict new aerosol formation
in the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4499–4517, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Bonn, B., Kazil, J., Lovejoy, N., Turnipseed, A., Greenberg, J.,
Karl, T., Mauldin, L., Kusciuch, E., and Smith, J.: Relevance of several
nucleation theories in different environments, in: Nucleation and
Atmospheric Aerosols, Springer, 87–91, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Kazil, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Guenther, A., and Kulmala, M.: Relevance
of ion-induced nucleation of sulfuric acid and water in the lower
troposphere over the boreal forest at northern latitudes, Atmos. Res., 90,
151–158, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Karl, T., Turnipseed, A., Mauldin, R. L., Kosciuch, E., Greenberg, J., Rathbone, J., Smith, J., Held, A., Barsanti, K., Wehner, B., Bauer, S., Wiedensohler, A., Bonn, B., Kulmala, M., and Guenther, A.:
New particle formation in the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1577–1590, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Mogensen, D., Smolander, S., Zhou, L., Nieminen, T., Paasonen, P., Plass-Dülmer, C.,
Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T., Mauldin, L., Berresheim, H., and Kulmala, M.: Oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by stabilized
Criegee intermediate (sCI) radicals as a crucial source for atmospheric sulfuric acid concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3865–3879, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3865-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3865-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W. P. L.: Documentation of the SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism for VOC
reactivity assessment, University of California, Riverside, CA, 446 pp.,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Czader, B. H., Choi, Y., Li, X., Alvarez, S., and Lefer, B.: Impact of
updated traffic emissions on HONO mixing ratios simulated for urban site in
Houston, Texas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1253–1263,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1253-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Damian, V., Sandu, A., Damian, M., Potra, F., and Carmichael, G. R.: The
kinetic preprocessor KPP – a software environment for solving chemical
kinetics, Comput. Chem. Eng., 26, 1567–1579, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Davidson, C. I., Phalen, R. F., and Solomon, P. A.: Airborne particulate
matter and human health: A review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 737–749,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500191348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500191348</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Zheng, L. F., Xie, Y. N.,
Herrmann, E., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.:
Ozone and fine particle in the western Yangtze River Delta: an overview of 1
yr data at the SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5813–5830,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5813-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5813-2013</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Wang, T., Xie, Y., Herrmann, E., Zheng, L. F., Nie, W., Liu, Q., Wei, X. L.,
and Kulmala, M.: Intense atmospheric pollution modifies weather: a case of
mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion pollution in eastern China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10545–10554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ding, A. J., Wang, T., and Fu, C. B.: Transport characteristics and origins
of carbon monoxide and ozone in Hong Kong, South China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 9475–9488, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50714</ext-link>, 2013c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen,
I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F.,
Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S.,
Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B.,
Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T.,
Petaja, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt,
J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic
aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Eidels-Dubovoi, S.: Aerosol impacts on visible light extinction in the
atmosphere of Mexico City, Sci. Total. Environ., 287, 213–220,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00983-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00983-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 8851,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd003296</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Elshorbany, Y. F., Crutzen, P. J., Steil, B., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and
Lelieveld, J.: Global and regional impacts of HONO on the chemical
composition of clouds and aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1167–1184,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1167-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1167-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J., Wang, T., Zhou, X. H., Wu, W. S., and Wang, W. X.: Measurement of
aerosol number size distributions in the Yangtze River delta in China:
Formation and growth of particles under polluted conditions, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 829–836, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.046</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J., Chai, F. H., Wang, T., and Wang, W. X.: Particle number size
distribution and new particle formation (NPF) in Lanzhou, Western China,
Particuology, 9, 611–618, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.partic.2011.06.008</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J., Chai, F. H., Wang, T., Wang, S. L., and Wang, W. X.: Particle
number size distribution and new particle formation: New characteristics
during the special pollution control period in Beijing, J. Environ.
Sci.-China, 24, 14–21, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60725-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60725-0</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A. and Devenyi, D.: A generalized approach to parameterizing
convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 1693, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002gl015311</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the
WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A.: Biological and chemical diversity of biogenic volatile organic
emissions into the atmosphere, ISRN Atmos. Sci.,   786290, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/786290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2013/786290</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Wang, D. W., Cheung, K., Ling, Z. H., Chan, C. K., and Yao, X. H.:
Observation of aerosol size distribution and new particle formation at a
mountain site in subtropical Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9923–9939,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9923-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9923-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J. F., Shang, D. J., Zheng, J., Du, Z.
F., Wu, Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.:
Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 17373–17378, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1419604111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hatakeyama, S.  and Akimoto, H.: Reactions of Criegee Intermediates in the
Gas-Phase, Res. Chem. Intermediat., 20, 503–524,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856794x00432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1163/156856794x00432</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Herrmann, E., Ding, A. J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petää, T., Yang, X. Q., Sun,
J. N., Qi, X. M., Manninen, H., Hakala, J., Nieminen, T., Aalto, P. P.,
Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Aerosols and nucleation in eastern China: first
insights from the new SORPES-NJU station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2169–2183,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2169-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2169-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hildemann, L. M., Russell, A. G., and Cass, G. R.: Ammonia and nitric-acid
concentrations in equilibrium with atmospheric aerosols – experiment vs
theory, Atmos. Environ., 18, 1737–1750, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S. Y.: A new stable boundary-layer mixing scheme and its impact on the
simulated East Asian summer monsoon, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 136,
1481–1496, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Qj.665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/Qj.665</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, C., Li, M. M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.
Y.: Pathways of sulfate enhancement by natural and anthropogenic mineral
aerosols in China, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 14165–14179,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022301</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, C., Cai, X. H., Zhang, H. S., and Zhu, T.: Direct
Radiative Effect by Multicomponent Aerosol over China, J. Climate, 28,
3472–3495, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/Jcli-D-14-00365.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/Jcli-D-14-00365.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, R., Kerminen, V. M., Junninen, H.,
Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A. B., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipila, M.: Production of extremely low volatile
organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric
implications, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1423977112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V. M.  and Wexler, A. S.: The occurrence of sulfuric acid-water
nucleation in plumes: Urban environment, Tellus B, 48, 65–82,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1996.00007.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.1996.00007.x</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V.-M., Paramonov, M., Anttila, T., Riipinen, I., Fountoukis, C.,
Korhonen, H., Asmi, E., Laakso, L., Lihavainen, H., Swietlicki, E.,
Svenningsson, B., Asmi, A., Pandis, S. N., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.:
Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation:
a synthesis based on existing literature and new results, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 12037–12059, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Korhonen, P., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Viisanen, Y., McGraw, R., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Ternary nucleation of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in the
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 104, 26349–26353,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jd900784</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Varutbangkul, V., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Chamber studies of secondary organic aerosol growth by
reactive uptake of simple carbonyl compounds, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 110,
D23207, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006004</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H.  and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M.  and Kerminen, V. M.: On the formation and growth of atmospheric
nanoparticles, Atmos. Res., 90, 132–150, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.01.005</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Laaksonen, A.: Simulations on the effect
of sulphuric acid formation on atmospheric aerosol concentrations, Atmos.
Environ., 29, 377–382, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Makela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Vakeva, M., Aalto,
P., Miikkulainen, P., Hameri, K., and O'Dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth
and composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus B, 53, 479–490,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Suni, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Dal Maso, M., Boy, M., Reissell,
A., Rannik, Ü., Aalto, P., Keronen, P., Hakola, H., Bäck, J., Hoffmann,
T., Vesala, T., and Hari, P.: A new feedback mechanism linking forests,
aerosols, and climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 557–562,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-557-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-557-2004</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Vehkamaki, H., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen,
V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates of
ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol. Sci.,
35, 143–176, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</ext-link>, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petaja, T., Nieminen, T., Sipila, M., Manninen, H. E.,
Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P.,
Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V. M.:
Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc.,
7, 1651–1667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nprot.2012.091</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kurten, T., Lane, J. R., Jorgensen, S., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: A
Computational Study of the Oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by Gas-Phase Organic
Oxidants, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 8669–8681, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Jp203907d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Jp203907d</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., O'Dowd, C. D., Joutsensaari, J., Vaattovaara, P.,
Mikkonen, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Sogacheva, L., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P.,
Petäjä, T., Sogachev, A., Yoon, Y. J., Lihavainen, H., Nilsson, D.,
Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Fuzzi, S., Hoffmann, T., Arnold, F., Hanke, M.,
Sellegri, K., Umann, B., Junkermann, W., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Worsnop, D. R., Riekkola, M.-L., Hyötyläinen, T., and Viisanen, Y.:
The role of VOC oxidation products in continental new particle formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2657–2665, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2657-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2657-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Huang, X., Li, J., and Song, Y.: Estimation of biogenic volatile
organic compound (BVOC) emissions from the terrestrial ecosystem in China
using real-time remote sensing data, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12,
6551–6592, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-6551-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acpd-12-6551-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Lihavainen, H., Kerminen, V. M., Komppula, M., Hatakka, J., Aaltonen, V.,
Kulmala, M., and Viisanen, Y.: Production of “potential” cloud condensation
nuclei associated with atmospheric new-particle formation in northern
Finland, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 4782, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003887</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. L., Farley, R. D., and Orville, H. D.: Bulk Parameterization of the
Snow Field in a Cloud Model, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1065–1092,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022&lt;1065:Bpotsf&gt;2.0.Co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022&lt;1065:Bpotsf&gt;2.0.Co;2</ext-link>,
1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Wehner, B., Wiedensohler, A., and Cheng, Y. F.:
Aerosol number size distribution and new particle formation at a
rural/coastal site in Pearl River Delta (PRD) of China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
6275–6283, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.063</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Shao, M., Fu, L. L., Lu, S. H., Zeng, L. M., and Tang, D. G.:
Source profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: Part
I, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6247–6260, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Hari, P., and
Kulmala, M.: Air pollution control and decreasing new particle formation lead
to strong climate warming, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1515–1524,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw,
K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S.,
and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle
formation under atmospheric conditions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6646–6651, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911330107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.
A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 102,
16663–16682, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97jd00237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97jd00237</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T.
K., Bian, H., Bellouin, N., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Feichter, J.,
Ghan, S. J., Hauglustaine, D., Iversen, T., Kinne, S., Kirkevåg, A.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Lund, M. T., Luo, G., Ma, X., van Noije,
T., Penner, J. E., Rasch, P. J., Ruiz, A., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Xu, L., Yu, H.,
Yu, F., Yoon, J.-H., Zhang, K., Zhang, H., and Zhou, C.: Radiative forcing of
the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 1853–1877, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties – Part 3. Estimation of the vapor pressure of non-electrolyte
organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase
Equilib., 269, 117–133, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Bahreini, R., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Hameri, K., Pirjola, L., Kulmala, M., Jennings, S. G., and Hoffmann, T.:
Marine aerosol formation from biogenic iodine emissions, Nature, 417,
632–636, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature00775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Nature00775</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, I. K., Suni, T., Boy, M., Gronholm, T., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen,
T., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Hakola, H., Hellen, H., Valmari, T., Arvela, H.,
Zegelin, S., Hughes, D., Kitchen, M., Cleugh, H., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala,
M., and Kerminen, V. M.: New insights into nocturnal nucleation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 4297–4312, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Paasonen, P., Sihto, S. L., Nieminen, T., Vuollekoski, H., Riipinen, I.,
Plass-Dulmer, C., Berresheim, H., Birmili, W., and Kulmala, M.: Connection
between new particle formation and sulphuric acid at Hohenpeissenberg
(Germany) including the influence of organic compounds, Boreal Environ. Res.,
14, 616–629, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Paasonen, P., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Manninen, H. E., Petäj”a, T.,
Plass-Dülmer, C., Flentje, H., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Hõrrak, U.,
Metzger, A., Hamed, A., Laaksonen, A., Facchini, M. C., Kerminen, V.-M., and
Kulmala, M.: On the roles of sulphuric acid and low-volatility organic
vapours in the initial steps of atmospheric new particle formation, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 11223–11242, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11223-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11223-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Petäjä, T., Mauldin, III, R. L., Kosciuch, E., McGrath, J., Nieminen, T.,
Paasonen, P., Boy, M., Adamov, A., Kotiaho, T., and Kulmala, M.: Sulfuric
acid and OH concentrations in a boreal forest site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
7435–7448, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7435-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7435-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Qi, X. M., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Herrmann, E., Xie, Y. N., Zheng, L. F., Manninen, H., Aalto, P., Sun, J. N.,
Xu, Z. N., Chi, X. G., Huang, X., Boy, M., Virkkula, A., Yang, X.-Q., Fu, C.
B., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in
the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2 years of measurements at the
SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12445–12464,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Rattigan, O., Boniface, J., Swartz, E., Davidovits, P., Jayne, J., Kolb, C.,
and Worsnop, D.: Uptake of gas-phase SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in aqueous sulfuric acid:
Oxidation by H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HONO, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 105, 29065–29078,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Schobesberger, S., Junninen, H., Bianchi, F., Lonn, G., Ehn, M., Lehtipalo,
K., Dommen, J., Ehrhart, S., Ortega, I. K., Franchin, A., Nieminen, T.,
Riccobono, F., Hutterli, M., Duplissy, J., Almeida, J., Amorim, A.,
Breitenlechner, M., Downard, A. J., Dunne, E. M., Flagan, R. C., Kajos, M.,
Keskinen, H., Kirkby, J., Kupc, A., Kurten, A., Kurten, T., Laaksonen, A.,
Mathot, S., Onnela, A., Praplan, A. P., Rondo, L., Santos, F. D., Schallhart,
S., Schnitzhofer, R., Sipila, M., Tome, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vehkamaki, H.,
Wimmer, D., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Hansel, A.,
Petaja, T., Kulmala, M., Donahue, N. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Molecular
understanding of atmospheric particle formation from sulfuric acid and large
oxidized organic molecules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 17223–17228,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306973110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1306973110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Scott, C. E., Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Forster, P. M., Carslaw, K. S.,
Mann, G. W., Pringle, K. J., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen, H., and
Tunved, P.: The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 447–470,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-447-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-447-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sihto, S.-L., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T.,
Riipinen, I., Korhonen, H., Arnold, F., Janson, R., Boy, M., Laaksonen, A.,
and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Atmospheric sulphuric acid and aerosol formation:
implications from atmospheric measurements for nucleation and early growth
mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4079–4091, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4079-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4079-2006</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sipila, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T., Brus, D., Vanhanen, J., Stratmann, F.,
Patokoski, J., Mauldin, R. L., Hyvarinen, A. P., Lihavainen, H., and Kulmala,
M.: The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric Nucleation, Science, 327,
1243–1246, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180315</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Tie, X., Geng, F., Guenther, A., Cao, J., Greenberg, J., Zhang, R., Apel, E.,
Li, G., Weinheimer, A., Chen, J., and Cai, C.: Megacity impacts on regional
ozone formation: observations and WRF-Chem modeling for the MIRAGE-Shanghai
field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5655–5669,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5655-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5655-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Dzepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl026899</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H. L., Zhu, B., Shen, L. J., An, J. L., Yin, Y., and Kang, H. Q.:
Number size distribution of aerosols at Mt. Huang and Nanjing in the Yangtze
River Delta, China: Effects of air masses and characteristics of new particle
formation, Atmos. Res., 150, 42–56, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.020</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with
particle nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 239–260,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-239-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-239-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., Pei, X.
Y., Paasonen, P., Dal Maso, M., Boy, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Investigation
of the connections between atmospheric new particle formation and organics at
an urban site of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 13, 3419–3450,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-3419-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acpd-13-3419-2013</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Mogensen, D., Yue, D. L., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., Liu,
Y., Yuan, B., Li, X., Shao, M., Zhou, L., Wu, Z. J., Wiedensohler, A., and
Boy, M.: The simulations of sulfuric acid concentration and new particle
formation in an urban atmosphere in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
11157–11167, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11157-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11157-2013</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R. J., McMurry, P. H., Mauldin, R. L., Tanner, D. J., Eisele, F. L.,
Clarke, A. D., and Kapustin, V. N.: New particle formation in the remote
troposphere: A comparison of observations at various sites, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 26, 307–310, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998gl900308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998gl900308</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wei, W., Wang, S. X., Chatani, S., Klimont, Z., Cofala, J., and Hao, J. M.:
Emission and speciation of non-methane volatile organic compounds from
anthropogenic sources in China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 4976–4988,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.044</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, S., Wang, M. Y., Yao, L., Kulmala, M., Zhou, B., Yang, X., Chen, J. M.,
Wang, D. F., Fu, Q. Y., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Strong atmospheric new
particle formation in winter in urban Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 1769–1781, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Hirsikko, A., Aalto, P. P., Asmi, E., Hõrrak,
U., Manninen, H. E., Patokoski, J., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Rinne, J.,
Kulmala, M., and Riipinen, I.: Growth rates of nucleation mode particles in
Hyytiälä during 2003–2009: variation with particle size, season, data
analysis method and ambient conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12865–12886,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global
aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Yue, D. L., Hu, M., Zhang, R. Y., Wang, Z. B., Zheng, J., Wu, Z. J.,
Wiedensohler, A., He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., and Zhu, T.: The roles of sulfuric
acid in new particle formation and growth in the mega-city of Beijing, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 4953–4960, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4953-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4953-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Stanier, C. O., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R.,
Pandis, S. N., and Jimenez, J. L.: Insights into the chemistry of new
particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4797–4809, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es035417u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es035417u</ext-link>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. Y., Suh, I., Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Fortner, E. C., Tie, X. X.,
Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Atmospheric new particle formation enhanced
by organic acids, Science, 304, 1487–1490, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1095139</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, J. Y., Zhang, L. J., Che, W. W., Zheng, Z. Y., and Yin, S. S.: A
highly resolved temporal and spatial air pollutant emission inventory for the
Pearl River Delta region, China and its uncertainty assessment, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 5112–5122, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.060</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L., Gierens, R., Sogachev, A., Mogensen, D., Ortega, J., Smith, J. N.,
Harley, P. C., Prenni, A. J., Levin, E. J. T., Turnipseed, A., Rusanen, A.,
Smolander, S., Guenther, A. B., Kulmala, M., Karl, T., and Boy, M.:
Contribution from biogenic organic compounds to particle growth during the
2010 BEACHON-ROCS campaign in a Colorado temperate needleleaf forest, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 8643–8656, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8643-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8643-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L. X., Nieminen, T., Mogensen, D., Smolander, S., Rusanen, A.,
Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: SOSAA – a new model to simulate the concentrations
of organic vapours, sulphuric acid and aerosols inside the ABL – Part 2:
Aerosol dynamics and one case study at a boreal forest site, Boreal Environ.
Res., 19, 237–256, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation at the
SORPES station in Nanjing, China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">New particle formation (NPF) has been investigated intensively during the
last 2 decades because of its influence on aerosol population and the
possible contribution to cloud condensation nuclei. However, intensive
measurements and modelling activities on this topic in urban metropolitan
areas in China with frequent high-pollution episodes are still very limited.
This study provides results from a comprehensive modelling study on the
occurrence of NPF events in the western part of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD)
region, China. The comprehensive modelling system, which combines the
WRF-Chem (the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry)
regional chemical transport model and the MALTE-BOX sectional box model (the
model to predict new aerosol formation in the lower troposphere), was shown
to be capable of simulating atmospheric nucleation and subsequent growth.
Here we present a detailed discussion of three typical NPF days, during which
the measured air masses were notably influenced by either anthropogenic
activities, biogenic emissions, or mixed ocean and continental sources.
Overall, simulated NPF events were generally in good agreement with the
corresponding measurements, enabling us to get further insights into NPF
processes in the YRD region. Based on the simulations, we conclude that
biogenic organic compounds, particularly monoterpenes, play an essential role
in the initial condensational growth of newly formed clusters through their
low-volatility oxidation products. Although some uncertainties remain in this
modelling system, this method provides a possibility to better understand
particle formation and growth processes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kurten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Maatta,
O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M.,
David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J.,
Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A.,
Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M.,
Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurten, T., Kvashin, A. N.,
Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppa, J., Loukonen, V.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T.,
Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Riccobono, F., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo,
L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer,
R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F.,
Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y.,
Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H.,
Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P. L., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S.,
Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamaki, H.,
and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid-amine particle
nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature12663" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/Nature12663</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Rannik, U., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Tarvainen, V., Hakola, H., and
Kulmala, M.: Nucleation events in the continental boundary layer: Long-term
statistical analyses of aerosol relevant characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.
Atmos., 108,  4667, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003838" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003jd003838</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Boy, M., Hellmuth, O., Korhonen, H., Nilsson, E. D., ReVelle, D., Turnipseed, A., Arnold, F., and Kulmala, M.: MALTE – model to predict new aerosol formation
in the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4499–4517, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Bonn, B., Kazil, J., Lovejoy, N., Turnipseed, A., Greenberg, J.,
Karl, T., Mauldin, L., Kusciuch, E., and Smith, J.: Relevance of several
nucleation theories in different environments, in: Nucleation and
Atmospheric Aerosols, Springer, 87–91, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Kazil, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Guenther, A., and Kulmala, M.: Relevance
of ion-induced nucleation of sulfuric acid and water in the lower
troposphere over the boreal forest at northern latitudes, Atmos. Res., 90,
151–158, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Boy, M., Karl, T., Turnipseed, A., Mauldin, R. L., Kosciuch, E., Greenberg, J., Rathbone, J., Smith, J., Held, A., Barsanti, K., Wehner, B., Bauer, S., Wiedensohler, A., Bonn, B., Kulmala, M., and Guenther, A.:
New particle formation in the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1577–1590, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-1577-2008</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boy, M., Mogensen, D., Smolander, S., Zhou, L., Nieminen, T., Paasonen, P., Plass-Dülmer, C.,
Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T., Mauldin, L., Berresheim, H., and Kulmala, M.: Oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by stabilized
Criegee intermediate (sCI) radicals as a crucial source for atmospheric sulfuric acid concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3865–3879, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3865-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-3865-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W. P. L.: Documentation of the SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism for VOC
reactivity assessment, University of California, Riverside, CA, 446 pp.,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Czader, B. H., Choi, Y., Li, X., Alvarez, S., and Lefer, B.: Impact of
updated traffic emissions on HONO mixing ratios simulated for urban site in
Houston, Texas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1253–1263,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1253-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1253-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Damian, V., Sandu, A., Damian, M., Potra, F., and Carmichael, G. R.: The
kinetic preprocessor KPP – a software environment for solving chemical
kinetics, Comput. Chem. Eng., 26, 1567–1579, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Davidson, C. I., Phalen, R. F., and Solomon, P. A.: Airborne particulate
matter and human health: A review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 737–749,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500191348" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820500191348</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Zheng, L. F., Xie, Y. N.,
Herrmann, E., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.:
Ozone and fine particle in the western Yangtze River Delta: an overview of 1
yr data at the SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5813–5830,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5813-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-5813-2013</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Wang, T., Xie, Y., Herrmann, E., Zheng, L. F., Nie, W., Liu, Q., Wei, X. L.,
and Kulmala, M.: Intense atmospheric pollution modifies weather: a case of
mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion pollution in eastern China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10545–10554, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ding, A. J., Wang, T., and Fu, C. B.: Transport characteristics and origins
of carbon monoxide and ozone in Hong Kong, South China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 9475–9488, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50714" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50714</a>, 2013c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen,
I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F.,
Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S.,
Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B.,
Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T.,
Petaja, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt,
J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic
aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature13032" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/Nature13032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Eidels-Dubovoi, S.: Aerosol impacts on visible light extinction in the
atmosphere of Mexico City, Sci. Total. Environ., 287, 213–220,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00983-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00983-4</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 8851,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003296" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002jd003296</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Elshorbany, Y. F., Crutzen, P. J., Steil, B., Pozzer, A., Tost, H., and
Lelieveld, J.: Global and regional impacts of HONO on the chemical
composition of clouds and aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1167–1184,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1167-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-1167-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J., Wang, T., Zhou, X. H., Wu, W. S., and Wang, W. X.: Measurement of
aerosol number size distributions in the Yangtze River delta in China:
Formation and growth of particles under polluted conditions, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 829–836, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.046" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.046</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J., Chai, F. H., Wang, T., and Wang, W. X.: Particle number size
distribution and new particle formation (NPF) in Lanzhou, Western China,
Particuology, 9, 611–618, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.06.008" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.partic.2011.06.008</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J., Chai, F. H., Wang, T., Wang, S. L., and Wang, W. X.: Particle
number size distribution and new particle formation: New characteristics
during the special pollution control period in Beijing, J. Environ.
Sci.-China, 24, 14–21, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60725-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60725-0</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A. and Devenyi, D.: A generalized approach to parameterizing
convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 1693, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015311" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002gl015311</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the
WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A.: Biological and chemical diversity of biogenic volatile organic
emissions into the atmosphere, ISRN Atmos. Sci.,   786290, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/786290" target="_blank">doi:10.1155/2013/786290</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, H., Wang, D. W., Cheung, K., Ling, Z. H., Chan, C. K., and Yao, X. H.:
Observation of aerosol size distribution and new particle formation at a
mountain site in subtropical Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9923–9939,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9923-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-9923-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J. F., Shang, D. J., Zheng, J., Du, Z.
F., Wu, Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.:
Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 17373–17378, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1419604111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hatakeyama, S.  and Akimoto, H.: Reactions of Criegee Intermediates in the
Gas-Phase, Res. Chem. Intermediat., 20, 503–524,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856794x00432" target="_blank">doi:10.1163/156856794x00432</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, E., Ding, A. J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petää, T., Yang, X. Q., Sun,
J. N., Qi, X. M., Manninen, H., Hakala, J., Nieminen, T., Aalto, P. P.,
Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Aerosols and nucleation in eastern China: first
insights from the new SORPES-NJU station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2169–2183,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2169-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-2169-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hildemann, L. M., Russell, A. G., and Cass, G. R.: Ammonia and nitric-acid
concentrations in equilibrium with atmospheric aerosols – experiment vs
theory, Atmos. Environ., 18, 1737–1750, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S. Y.: A new stable boundary-layer mixing scheme and its impact on the
simulated East Asian summer monsoon, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 136,
1481–1496, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Qj.665" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/Qj.665</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, C., Li, M. M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.
Y.: Pathways of sulfate enhancement by natural and anthropogenic mineral
aerosols in China, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 14165–14179,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022301" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014jd022301</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, C., Cai, X. H., Zhang, H. S., and Zhu, T.: Direct
Radiative Effect by Multicomponent Aerosol over China, J. Climate, 28,
3472–3495, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/Jcli-D-14-00365.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/Jcli-D-14-00365.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, R., Kerminen, V. M., Junninen, H.,
Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A. B., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipila, M.: Production of extremely low volatile
organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric
implications, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1423977112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V. M.  and Wexler, A. S.: The occurrence of sulfuric acid-water
nucleation in plumes: Urban environment, Tellus B, 48, 65–82,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1996.00007.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.1996.00007.x</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kerminen, V.-M., Paramonov, M., Anttila, T., Riipinen, I., Fountoukis, C.,
Korhonen, H., Asmi, E., Laakso, L., Lihavainen, H., Swietlicki, E.,
Svenningsson, B., Asmi, A., Pandis, S. N., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.:
Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation:
a synthesis based on existing literature and new results, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 12037–12059, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Korhonen, P., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Viisanen, Y., McGraw, R., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Ternary nucleation of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and H<sub>2</sub>O in the
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 104, 26349–26353,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900784" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1999jd900784</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Varutbangkul, V., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Chamber studies of secondary organic aerosol growth by
reactive uptake of simple carbonyl compounds, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 110,
D23207, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006004" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005jd006004</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H.  and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M.  and Kerminen, V. M.: On the formation and growth of atmospheric
nanoparticles, Atmos. Res., 90, 132–150, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.01.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.01.005</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Laaksonen, A.: Simulations on the effect
of sulphuric acid formation on atmospheric aerosol concentrations, Atmos.
Environ., 29, 377–382, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Makela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Vakeva, M., Aalto,
P., Miikkulainen, P., Hameri, K., and O'Dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth
and composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus B, 53, 479–490,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Suni, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Dal Maso, M., Boy, M., Reissell,
A., Rannik, Ü., Aalto, P., Keronen, P., Hakola, H., Bäck, J., Hoffmann,
T., Vesala, T., and Hari, P.: A new feedback mechanism linking forests,
aerosols, and climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 557–562,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-557-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-4-557-2004</a>, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Vehkamaki, H., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen,
V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates of
ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol. Sci.,
35, 143–176, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</a>, 2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petaja, T., Nieminen, T., Sipila, M., Manninen, H. E.,
Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P.,
Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V. M.:
Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc.,
7, 1651–1667, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.091</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kurten, T., Lane, J. R., Jorgensen, S., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: A
Computational Study of the Oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> to SO<sub>3</sub> by Gas-Phase Organic
Oxidants, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 8669–8681, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Jp203907d" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Jp203907d</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., O'Dowd, C. D., Joutsensaari, J., Vaattovaara, P.,
Mikkonen, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Sogacheva, L., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P.,
Petäjä, T., Sogachev, A., Yoon, Y. J., Lihavainen, H., Nilsson, D.,
Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Fuzzi, S., Hoffmann, T., Arnold, F., Hanke, M.,
Sellegri, K., Umann, B., Junkermann, W., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Worsnop, D. R., Riekkola, M.-L., Hyötyläinen, T., and Viisanen, Y.:
The role of VOC oxidation products in continental new particle formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2657–2665, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2657-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2657-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Li, M., Huang, X., Li, J., and Song, Y.: Estimation of biogenic volatile
organic compound (BVOC) emissions from the terrestrial ecosystem in China
using real-time remote sensing data, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12,
6551–6592, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-6551-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acpd-12-6551-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Lihavainen, H., Kerminen, V. M., Komppula, M., Hatakka, J., Aaltonen, V.,
Kulmala, M., and Viisanen, Y.: Production of “potential” cloud condensation
nuclei associated with atmospheric new-particle formation in northern
Finland, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 4782, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003887" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003jd003887</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. L., Farley, R. D., and Orville, H. D.: Bulk Parameterization of the
Snow Field in a Cloud Model, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1065–1092,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022&lt;1065:Bpotsf&gt;2.0.Co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022&lt;1065:Bpotsf&gt;2.0.Co;2</a>,
1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Wehner, B., Wiedensohler, A., and Cheng, Y. F.:
Aerosol number size distribution and new particle formation at a
rural/coastal site in Pearl River Delta (PRD) of China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
6275–6283, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.063" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.063</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Shao, M., Fu, L. L., Lu, S. H., Zeng, L. M., and Tang, D. G.:
Source profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: Part
I, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6247–6260, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Hari, P., and
Kulmala, M.: Air pollution control and decreasing new particle formation lead
to strong climate warming, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1515–1524,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw,
K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S.,
and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle
formation under atmospheric conditions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6646–6651, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0911330107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.
A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 102,
16663–16682, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97jd00237" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/97jd00237</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T.
K., Bian, H., Bellouin, N., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Feichter, J.,
Ghan, S. J., Hauglustaine, D., Iversen, T., Kinne, S., Kirkevåg, A.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Lund, M. T., Luo, G., Ma, X., van Noije,
T., Penner, J. E., Rasch, P. J., Ruiz, A., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Xu, L., Yu, H.,
Yu, F., Yoon, J.-H., Zhang, K., Zhang, H., and Zhou, C.: Radiative forcing of
the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 1853–1877, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties – Part 3. Estimation of the vapor pressure of non-electrolyte
organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase
Equilib., 269, 117–133, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Bahreini, R., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Hameri, K., Pirjola, L., Kulmala, M., Jennings, S. G., and Hoffmann, T.:
Marine aerosol formation from biogenic iodine emissions, Nature, 417,
632–636, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nature00775" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/Nature00775</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, I. K., Suni, T., Boy, M., Gronholm, T., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen,
T., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Hakola, H., Hellen, H., Valmari, T., Arvela, H.,
Zegelin, S., Hughes, D., Kitchen, M., Cleugh, H., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala,
M., and Kerminen, V. M.: New insights into nocturnal nucleation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 4297–4312, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Paasonen, P., Sihto, S. L., Nieminen, T., Vuollekoski, H., Riipinen, I.,
Plass-Dulmer, C., Berresheim, H., Birmili, W., and Kulmala, M.: Connection
between new particle formation and sulphuric acid at Hohenpeissenberg
(Germany) including the influence of organic compounds, Boreal Environ. Res.,
14, 616–629, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Paasonen, P., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Manninen, H. E., Petäj”a, T.,
Plass-Dülmer, C., Flentje, H., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Hõrrak, U.,
Metzger, A., Hamed, A., Laaksonen, A., Facchini, M. C., Kerminen, V.-M., and
Kulmala, M.: On the roles of sulphuric acid and low-volatility organic
vapours in the initial steps of atmospheric new particle formation, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 11223–11242, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11223-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-11223-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Petäjä, T., Mauldin, III, R. L., Kosciuch, E., McGrath, J., Nieminen, T.,
Paasonen, P., Boy, M., Adamov, A., Kotiaho, T., and Kulmala, M.: Sulfuric
acid and OH concentrations in a boreal forest site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
7435–7448, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7435-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-7435-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Qi, X. M., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Herrmann, E., Xie, Y. N., Zheng, L. F., Manninen, H., Aalto, P., Sun, J. N.,
Xu, Z. N., Chi, X. G., Huang, X., Boy, M., Virkkula, A., Yang, X.-Q., Fu, C.
B., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in
the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2 years of measurements at the
SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12445–12464,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Rattigan, O., Boniface, J., Swartz, E., Davidovits, P., Jayne, J., Kolb, C.,
and Worsnop, D.: Uptake of gas-phase SO<sub>2</sub> in aqueous sulfuric acid:
Oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and HONO, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 105, 29065–29078,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Schobesberger, S., Junninen, H., Bianchi, F., Lonn, G., Ehn, M., Lehtipalo,
K., Dommen, J., Ehrhart, S., Ortega, I. K., Franchin, A., Nieminen, T.,
Riccobono, F., Hutterli, M., Duplissy, J., Almeida, J., Amorim, A.,
Breitenlechner, M., Downard, A. J., Dunne, E. M., Flagan, R. C., Kajos, M.,
Keskinen, H., Kirkby, J., Kupc, A., Kurten, A., Kurten, T., Laaksonen, A.,
Mathot, S., Onnela, A., Praplan, A. P., Rondo, L., Santos, F. D., Schallhart,
S., Schnitzhofer, R., Sipila, M., Tome, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vehkamaki, H.,
Wimmer, D., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Hansel, A.,
Petaja, T., Kulmala, M., Donahue, N. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Molecular
understanding of atmospheric particle formation from sulfuric acid and large
oxidized organic molecules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 17223–17228,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306973110" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1306973110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Scott, C. E., Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Forster, P. M., Carslaw, K. S.,
Mann, G. W., Pringle, K. J., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen, H., and
Tunved, P.: The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 447–470,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-447-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-447-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sihto, S.-L., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T.,
Riipinen, I., Korhonen, H., Arnold, F., Janson, R., Boy, M., Laaksonen, A.,
and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Atmospheric sulphuric acid and aerosol formation:
implications from atmospheric measurements for nucleation and early growth
mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4079–4091, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4079-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-4079-2006</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sipila, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T., Brus, D., Vanhanen, J., Stratmann, F.,
Patokoski, J., Mauldin, R. L., Hyvarinen, A. P., Lihavainen, H., and Kulmala,
M.: The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric Nucleation, Science, 327,
1243–1246, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180315" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1180315</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Tie, X., Geng, F., Guenther, A., Cao, J., Greenberg, J., Zhang, R., Apel, E.,
Li, G., Weinheimer, A., Chen, J., and Cai, C.: Megacity impacts on regional
ozone formation: observations and WRF-Chem modeling for the MIRAGE-Shanghai
field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5655–5669,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5655-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-5655-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Dzepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006gl026899</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H. L., Zhu, B., Shen, L. J., An, J. L., Yin, Y., and Kang, H. Q.:
Number size distribution of aerosols at Mt. Huang and Nanjing in the Yangtze
River Delta, China: Effects of air masses and characteristics of new particle
formation, Atmos. Res., 150, 42–56, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.020" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.020</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with
particle nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 239–260,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-239-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-239-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., Pei, X.
Y., Paasonen, P., Dal Maso, M., Boy, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Investigation
of the connections between atmospheric new particle formation and organics at
an urban site of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 13, 3419–3450,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-3419-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acpd-13-3419-2013</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Mogensen, D., Yue, D. L., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., Liu,
Y., Yuan, B., Li, X., Shao, M., Zhou, L., Wu, Z. J., Wiedensohler, A., and
Boy, M.: The simulations of sulfuric acid concentration and new particle
formation in an urban atmosphere in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
11157–11167, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11157-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-11157-2013</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R. J., McMurry, P. H., Mauldin, R. L., Tanner, D. J., Eisele, F. L.,
Clarke, A. D., and Kapustin, V. N.: New particle formation in the remote
troposphere: A comparison of observations at various sites, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 26, 307–310, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998gl900308" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1998gl900308</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wei, W., Wang, S. X., Chatani, S., Klimont, Z., Cofala, J., and Hao, J. M.:
Emission and speciation of non-methane volatile organic compounds from
anthropogenic sources in China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 4976–4988,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.044" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.044</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, S., Wang, M. Y., Yao, L., Kulmala, M., Zhou, B., Yang, X., Chen, J. M.,
Wang, D. F., Fu, Q. Y., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Strong atmospheric new
particle formation in winter in urban Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 1769–1781, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Hirsikko, A., Aalto, P. P., Asmi, E., Hõrrak,
U., Manninen, H. E., Patokoski, J., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Rinne, J.,
Kulmala, M., and Riipinen, I.: Growth rates of nucleation mode particles in
Hyytiälä during 2003–2009: variation with particle size, season, data
analysis method and ambient conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12865–12886,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-12865-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global
aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Yue, D. L., Hu, M., Zhang, R. Y., Wang, Z. B., Zheng, J., Wu, Z. J.,
Wiedensohler, A., He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., and Zhu, T.: The roles of sulfuric
acid in new particle formation and growth in the mega-city of Beijing, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 4953–4960, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4953-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-4953-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Stanier, C. O., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R.,
Pandis, S. N., and Jimenez, J. L.: Insights into the chemistry of new
particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4797–4809, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es035417u" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es035417u</a>,
2004.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. Y., Suh, I., Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Fortner, E. C., Tie, X. X.,
Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Atmospheric new particle formation enhanced
by organic acids, Science, 304, 1487–1490, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1095139</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, J. Y., Zhang, L. J., Che, W. W., Zheng, Z. Y., and Yin, S. S.: A
highly resolved temporal and spatial air pollutant emission inventory for the
Pearl River Delta region, China and its uncertainty assessment, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 5112–5122, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.060" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.060</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L., Gierens, R., Sogachev, A., Mogensen, D., Ortega, J., Smith, J. N.,
Harley, P. C., Prenni, A. J., Levin, E. J. T., Turnipseed, A., Rusanen, A.,
Smolander, S., Guenther, A. B., Kulmala, M., Karl, T., and Boy, M.:
Contribution from biogenic organic compounds to particle growth during the
2010 BEACHON-ROCS campaign in a Colorado temperate needleleaf forest, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 8643–8656, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8643-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-8643-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L. X., Nieminen, T., Mogensen, D., Smolander, S., Rusanen, A.,
Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: SOSAA – a new model to simulate the concentrations
of organic vapours, sulphuric acid and aerosols inside the ABL – Part 2:
Aerosol dynamics and one case study at a boreal forest site, Boreal Environ.
Res., 19, 237–256, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
