<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-1303-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Observed high-altitude warming and snow cover retreat over Tibet and the
Himalayas enhanced by black carbon aerosols</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Observed high-altitude warming and snow cover retreat due to black carbon}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y.~Xu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          <email>yangyang@ucar.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7173-7761</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ramanathan</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Washington</surname><given-names>W. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder,
CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of
California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Y. Xu (yangyang@ucar.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1303</fpage><lpage>1315</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Himalayan mountain glaciers and the snowpack over the Tibetan Plateau provide
the headwater of several major rivers in Asia. In situ observations of snow
cover extent since the 1960s suggest that the snowpack in the region have
retreated significantly, accompanied by a surface warming of
2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C observed over the peak altitudes (5000 m). Using a
high-resolution ocean–atmosphere global climate model and an observationally
constrained black carbon (BC) aerosol forcing, we attribute the observed
altitude dependence of the warming trends as well as the spatial pattern of
reductions in snow depths and snow cover extent to various anthropogenic
factors. At the Tibetan Plateau altitudes, the increase in atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration exerted a warming of 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, BC
1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C where as cooling aerosols cause about 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
cooling, bringing the net simulated warming consistent with the anomalously
large observed warming. We therefore conclude that BC together with CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
has contributed to the snow retreat trends. In particular, BC increase is the
major factor in the strong elevation dependence of the observed surface
warming. The atmospheric warming by BC as well as its surface darkening of
snow is coupled with the positive snow albedo feedbacks to account for the
disproportionately large role of BC in high-elevation regions. These findings
reveal that BC impact needs to be properly accounted for in future regional
climate projections, in particular on high-altitude cryosphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Himalayan mountain glaciers and snowpacks have a major impact on the water
systems of major rivers throughout Asia and the people living in the river
basins. Recent observations suggest a continuing decline in Himalayan
mountain glaciers and snow cover. Bajracharya et al. (2008) observed that the
Himalayan glaciers are retreating at rates ranging from 10 to 60 m per year,
and many small glaciers have disappeared. Gardner et al. (2013) also showed
with satellite observations the steady reduction of western China glaciers
with the most rapid decline observed in the Himalayan mountain regions.
Changes in the cryosphere are accompanied by documented surface warming
trends over Tibet, which reveals a strong altitude dependence of surface
warming with peak warming trends of 2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 5000 m from 1961
to 2006 (Liu et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>The last few decades also witnessed rapid growth in human population and
economic activities, causing intense air pollution over the Asian region.
Among the many air pollutants, black carbon (BC) aerosols have been shown to
have a significant impact on global and regional climate change (Ramanathan
and Carmichael, 2008). Many previous studies have linked Asian aerosols
(including sulfates and BC) with monsoon systems and have demonstrated the
aerosol impact on the summer rainfall (Ramanathan et al., 2005; Lau et al.,
2006; Lau and Kim, 2006; Meehl et al., 2008). The BC aerosols have also been
shown to have an impact on warming trends over the Himalaya–Tibet region
(Ramanathan et al., 2007), on the retreat of Himalayan glaciers (Menon et
al., 2010; Qian et al., 2011), and on Eurasian snow cover (Flanner et al.,
2009). Observationally, using ice-core samples to reconstruct historical BC
content over Tibet, Xu et al. (2009) suggested that BC is a significant
contributing factor in causing the glacier change.</p>
      <p>To date global climate models forced by historical radiative forcing
scenarios (such as those in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5,
CMIP5) have difficulty in simulating the observed record surface warming
(You et al., 2015) or its anomalously strong altitude dependence in the
Tibet–Himalaya region. One possible explanation as we will investigate here
is that few of these earlier studies of the Himalayan and Tibetan climate
change have considered the combined effects of all the following factors: BC
direct heating of the atmosphere, the heating of snowpacks and glaciers by
BC darkening the snow and ice, the greenhouse effect of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
surface cooling effects by aerosols other than BC.</p>
      <p>In this study, we used a state-of-the-art global climate model to conduct a
suite of model experiments to understand BC's role in the cryosphere change
over the Himalaya and Tibetan region. A unique feature of the present study,
compared with earlier studies, is that BC radiative forcing is constrained
with multiple sources of observations (satellite observed aerosol optical
depths and ground network of spectral sun photometer measurements). We also
used a newly developed method to separate the BC contribution to solar
absorption from other aerosols (sulfates, organics, and brown carbon) and
calculate its direct radiative forcing (Bahadur et al., 2012; Xu et al.,
2013). Previous studies (Ramanathan et al., 2007; Lau et al., 2010; Menon et
al., 2010; Qian et al., 2011) included the effects of BC on the atmosphere
and the cryosphere, but the simulated BC radiative forcing by these
“standard” models used in CMIP5 is strongly biased to low values (Bond et
al., 2013) due to emission inventory biases and missing physical treatments
(Jacobson, 2012). As shown in Bond et al. (2013), current models are
underestimating BC solar absorption over South Asia by a factor of 2 to
5. In this study, we scaled the simulated BC forcing in the climate model
by factors ranging from 2 to 4 to bring the simulated values closer to
the observationally constrained values (Xu, 2014). Another improvement in
this study is that the simulations were conducted using a fully coupled
ocean–atmosphere–land model at a high resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
in which a new land snow module is adopted (Lawrence et al., 2011) to account
for BC deposition effect on snow and ice.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The global climate model</title>
      <p>CESM1 (Community Earth System Model 1) is a coupled
ocean–atmosphere–land–sea-ice model. CESM1 climate simulations have been
documented extensively (Meehl et al., 2013). The CESM1 (CAM5) used in this
study is a version with a finite-volume nominal 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal
resolution (0.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 1.25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 30-level vertical resolution.
The highest model level is about 36 km (4 hPa) in the stratosphere, and
lower levels close to surface (boundary layers) have vertical resolutions of
about 100–200 m.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>CESM1 (CAM5) includes forcings from greenhouse gases (GHGs) as well as
concentrations of tropospheric ozone and stratospheric ozone (Lamarque et
al., 2010). The concentrations of various gases were calculated offline and
prescribed into model simulations, unlike the aerosol loading calculated
online from the emissions. The three-mode modal aerosol scheme (MAM3) has
been implemented (Liu et al., 2012) and provides internally mixed
representations of number concentrations and mass for Aitken, accumulation,
and coarse modes of various aerosol species (sulfates (SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BC,
organic carbons, dust, sea salt). The new cloud microphysics scheme
(Morrison and Gettelman, 2008) allows the number concentration of cloud
drops and ice crystals to be affected by aerosol concentrations and
therefore accounts for the “indirect radiative forcing” of aerosols.</p>
      <p>The land model (Community Land Model, CLM4) also includes major updates,
making it more versatile in simulating snowpacks (Lawrence et al., 2011).
The sub-grid processes including melting, metamorphism, deposition, and
redistribution are considered in a snow cover fraction parameterization (Niu
and Yang, 2007). Other parameterizations include snow compaction (Lawrence
and Slater, 2010) and the albedo calculations for snow on or around
vegetation (Wang and Zeng, 2009). Compared to the previous model versions, the albedo contrast between
snow-covered and non-snow-covered area is more consistent with observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>BC treatment in the model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>BC effects on surface albedo</title>
      <p>The deposition
of BC particles, due to gravity or rainfall removal, is a mechanism to remove
aerosols from the atmosphere, and therefore a sink term for the atmospheric
BC mass balance. BC particles deposited onto the surface of high-albedo snow or
ice would reduce surface albedo. The snow model of CLM4 is significantly
modified via the incorporation of SNICAR (snow and ice aerosol radiation)
module, which represents the effect of aerosol deposition (BC, organic carbon
and dust) on albedo, introduces a grain-size-dependent snow-aging
parameterization, and permits vertically resolved snowpack heating (Flanner
et al., 2007). This new module considers the albedo change by counting the
surface concentration of BC and it calculates the surface radiative energy
flux at multiple wavelengths. The surface albedo change will consequently
alter the energy balance at the surface and in the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>BC atmospheric radiative forcing</title>
      <p>The present-day BC emission is adjusted from the standard model emission
inventory (Lamarque et al., 2010) to account for the potential model
underestimation of BC forcing. Emissions over East Asia regions are increased
by a factor of 2 and South Asia regions by 4. The emissions are adjusted
by the same ratio in all economic sectors (energy, industrial, etc.) and all
seasons by the same ratio. Our previous analysis showed that such a
correction would improve model-simulated radiative forcing compared with
direct observations (Xu et al., 2013; Xu, 2014). Without the observationally
constrained values, the modeled forcing and simulated temperature change
would be lower by about a factor of 2 to 4.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Model experiments</title>
      <p>To isolate the climate impact of individual forcing agents, we contrasted the
perturbed model simulations with present-day forcing (Sect. 2.3.2) to the
long-term preindustrial control simulations (Sect. 2.3.1). The approach is
similar to the classical instantaneous CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> doubling experiment (Manabe
and Wetherald, 1975). Additionally we conducted a fixed-SST (sea surface temperature) experiment for
radiative forcing diagnostics (Sect. 2.3.3) and the 20th century transient
runs to better attribute the observational changes (Sect. 2.3.4). The details
of these simulations are given below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Control simulation for preindustrial climate</title>
      <p>We have a 319-year-long preindustrial control run, and extended it with an
additional 75-year run to test whether there was any discernible drift in the mean
climate state. The Northern Hemisphere temperature does not show any
statistically significant drift. Therefore, we lay the foundation for our
analysis by employing the original 319-year run and the extended 75-year run
(394 years in total) as a control case. Natural variability of the climate
system can be examined from the unforced 394-year preindustrial simulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Four sets of perturbed simulations with instantaneously imposed
present-day forcing: BC, SO${}_{{4}}$, CO${}_{{2}}$, and all three forcings combined}?><title>Four sets of perturbed simulations with instantaneously imposed
present-day forcing: BC, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and all three forcings combined</title>
      <p>The forcings were imposed by instantaneously increasing the emissions of BC,
or the emission of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>'s precursor, sulfur dioxide, or by increasing
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration to present-day level (400 ppm). Except for the
adjusted BC present-day emission as detailed in Sect. 2.2.2, all other
emissions are from the standard inventory adopted by CMIP5 models, as
described in Lamarque et al. (2010). We run the perturbed simulations in
fully coupled mode for 75 years, starting from the end of the 319th year of
the control simulation. The difference between the last 60 years (allowing
the first 15 years for model spin-up) and the long-term control simulation
provides the response signal due to the imposed forcing. With the concern that
BC signal is potentially small compared with natural variability, five
ensemble members of BC forced simulations are conducted to increase
signal-to-noise ratio. Each model year costs about 2000 processor hours in a
high-performance computing system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Three sets of perturbed simulations but with fixed SST</title>
      <p>These are also forced by the instantaneous increase in BC, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, separately, but the model runs in atmosphere and land only mode
with SST fixed at preindustrial level. These simulations
are used only for diagnosing the radiative forcing due to various species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>The 20th century transient single-forcing simulations</title>
      <p>The simulations as part of CMIP5 experiments were conducted using the same
model configuration as above, except with time-evolving transient forcing of
individual species (all forcing, GHGs, aerosols, and BC). Three ensemble
members are available for each single-forcing run. In addition to the
standard BC runs, we also conducted a new BC single-forcing simulation with
adjusted BC emission factor as described in Sect. 2.2.2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Observations</title>
      <p>The key model output in this high-altitude region to be compared with
observations is surface temperature and snow cover. For temperature trend, we
adopted both in situ data recorded at meteorological sites as reported in
previous studies (Sect. 2.4.1) and a high-resolution temperature reanalysis
data set (Sect. 2.4.2). For snow cover, we adopted a long-term data set
(Sect. 2.4.3) as well as the direct satellite measurement but only dated back
to 2000s (Sect. 2.4.4). The details of these observational data sets are below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Ground-based temperature record</title>
      <p>Monthly mean daily-minimum temperatures from 116 weather stations in the
eastern Tibetan Plateau and its vicinity (with elevations ranging from 300 to
5000 m) during 1961–2006 are reported in Liu et al. (2009). Liu et
al. (2009) only analyzed daily-minimum temperature because a well-recognized
feature associated with climatic warming is less warming observed in maximum
temperatures and substantially more warming in minimum temperatures
(Easterling et al., 1997). Previous studies also show such asymmetric changes
in maximum and minimum temperatures are particularly true for Tibet (Liu
et al., 2006) and the Alps (Weber et al., 1997).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Surface temperature reanalysis data set</title>
      <p>Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) data set provides high-resolution (0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) global land surface temperature records from 1948 to near present (Fan and van den Dool, 2008). The data set uses a
combination of two large individual data sets of station observations
collected from the GHCN version 2 and the
Climate Anomaly Monitoring System. Data are downloaded from
<uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>NOAA climate data record of snow cover extent (Robinson et al.,
2012)</title>
      <p>Prior to 1999 the NH snow cover extent is based on satellite-derived
maps produced weekly by trained NOAA meteorologists. After 1999 NOAA NH snow
cover extent maps were replaced by output from the Interactive Multi-sensor
Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) processed at Rutgers University. Data are
downloaded from
<uri>http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/docs.php?target=datareq</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS4">
  <title>Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) snow cover
observations</title>
      <p>The MOD10CM product is a climate modeling grid product at a 0.05<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution with
global coverage and monthly availability. Pixel values depict the percentage
of snow cover (Hall et al., 2006). For the period March 2000 to
December 2006, the algorithm version 4 is used and after that version 5 of
the algorithm is used. Snow cover products derived from MODIS are based on a
spectral ratioing of MODIS band 4 (green) (0.545–0.565 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and band 6
(near infrared) (1.628–1.652 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Data are downloaded from
<uri>http://nsidc.org/data/MOD10CM</uri>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Observed snow cover reduction linked with BC</title>
      <p>The observations (Robinson et al., 2012) show that the snow cover extent over
the Himalayan mountain range has declined at a rate of more than 10 % per
decade since the 1960s (Fig. 1). The snow cover retreat along the Himalayan
mountain range is greater than in Eurasia during the same period. In situ
studies on regional glaciers and snowpack also reported strong declining
trends. For example, Ma and Qin (2012) used 754 stations in China to document
statistically significant declining trends of spring snow for the
Qinghai–Tibet Plateau for the 1951–2009 period. Consistently, permafrost
degradation has been reported on the Tibetan Plateau (Cheng and Wu, 2007; Li et
al., 2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Observed snow cover extent change (% per decade) from 1967 to
2012. The trend is calculated based on snow cover extent data in the entire
period. Insignificant changes (confidence interval <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % calculated
from a Student <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) are not shown.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1303/2016/acp-16-1303-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Left: <bold>(a)</bold> simulated change in snow fraction (%) due to
present-day BC (versus its preindustrial level), <bold>(b)</bold> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<bold>(c)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Middle: same as left, but for surface albedo (%).
Right: same as middle, but for snow depth (water equivalent, cm). The
regionally averaged statistics are shown in Table 2.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1303/2016/acp-16-1303-2016-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Several satellite observations since the year of 2001 provided additional
record in snow cover extent. The observed trend over this shorter period
(2001–2012) is less significant (Fig. S1a in the Supplement) and negative
trends are only found along some portion of the Himalayan range. Consistently, the
5 km MODIS data set (Fig. S1b) also shows that the snow cover extent averaged
over the entire Tibet region only has a slight decrease. But as other studies
have pointed out (Pu et al., 2007; Pu and Xu, 2009), the highest altitudes of
5750–6000 m exhibit larger negative trends
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 % decade<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). We
note that at a shorter timescale (10 years), the snow cover trend is heavily
influenced by natural variability and less significant. For example, during
1980–1991 (Fig. S1c) or 1990–2001 as shown in Fig. 5 of Menon et
al. (2010), the declining trends are much larger. Nevertheless, the declining
trend in the 40–50 year timescale (Fig. 1) is more robust and warrants
further investigation of its causes, which is the main objective of this
study.</p>
      <p>To understand the causes of the observed trends of snow reduction over the
multi-decadal timescale, we conducted global climate model simulations, in
which BC emissions, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration or SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are
increased instantaneously from preindustrial to present-day levels. Figure 2
(left column) shows the simulated change in snow fraction due to the increase
in BC, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols. The pattern of snow cover decline in
the BC model simulation captures the broad features of the observed decline
(Fig. 1), with the largest snow reduction along the mountain range. The
Tibetan Plateau on average showed a reduction in snow fraction of 1.9 %
due to BC. The snow fraction shrinks by 2.9 % due to present-day
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Along the Himalayan mountain range, where the near-permanent snow
cover exists, the reduction of snow fraction exceeds 10 % in both BC and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cases.</p>
      <p>Menon et al. (2010) attempted to simulate the snow reduction trends during
the 1990s but the spatial distribution of the observed trend was not well
captured mainly due to the coarse resolution of the model. Qian et al. (2011)
also acknowledged their model's limitation in representing the snow cover
climatology and therefore may have biases in estimating BC impact on snow. It
is well known that global models tend to overestimate the snow cover of the
Tibetan Plateau, and one potential reason is that the blocking effect for the
moisture transport crossing the Himalayas is too small due to the coarse
resolution of the global models and too much snowfall is simulated
(Ménégoz et al., 2013). This limitation can partly be overcome with
models using higher spatial resolutions. The modeling work presented here is
a major step forward in terms of spatial resolution (about 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), as opposed to earlier studies (2.8<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Flanner et al., 2009, and Qian et al., 2011; 4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Menon et al., 2010), which helps to better resolve the complex topography in
this region. As a result of increased spatial resolution and also the
improved land scheme, the biases in snow cover simulation is significantly
reduced from its earlier model versions (Lawrence et al., 2011; also contrast
Fig. S2c with Fig. 2 of Qian et al., 2011). However, we note that the
precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau is still overestimated (Fig. S2b), and
future studies, especially using regional climate models with even higher
resolutions, are needed to improve the fidelity of model simulations of snowpack and glaciers over this topography-complicated region.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> TOA (top-of-atmosphere) radiative forcing (W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
shortwave <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> longwave) due to BC (direct radiative forcing;
preindustrial to present day; not including snow albedo effect), CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(preindustrial to 400 ppm), and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (direct and indirect effect,
so-called “adjusted forcing”; preindustrial to present day). The radiative
forcing is calculated by running the atmospheric model with fixed sea-surface
temperature for 5 years. The domain of the Tibetan Plateau is 30 to
40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 80 to 100<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. <bold>(b)</bold> Surface temperature
change (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in response to different forcings in <bold>(a)</bold>.
Surface temperature change is calculated by averaging the last 60 years of a
75-year coupled model simulation. The values in parentheses are temperature
change in the 20th century time-dependent forcing simulations (1960–2005).
The linear trend (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C decade<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is first calculated and then
multiplied by 4.5 to obtain the change with 45-year time frame. BC responses
include the range of using “standard” and adjusted emissions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(a)</bold> TOA net forcing (W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tibet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(b)</bold> Surface temperature change (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21 (0.04–0.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2 (1.0)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.29 (0.06–0.21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3 (1.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tibet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.84 (0.22–0.69)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 (1.0)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>One consequence of the snow cover reduction is the decrease in surface
albedo, which provides a positive feedback mechanism to localized warming.
Such a surface albedo change in response to sea-ice loss has been
observationally detected (Kay and L'Ecuyer, 2013; Pistone et al., 2014) and
is important in explaining amplified Arctic warming. Flanner et al. (2011)
also used observations during recent decades to calculate the surface albedo
feedback in Northern Hemisphere large-scale snow-covered regions. Our
simulations show that surface albedo over the Tibet region decreased by over
2 % (Fig. 2, right column) in response to BC. The maximum reduction
occurs right along the Himalayan mountain range and part of the Tibet–Sichuan
mountain regions.</p>
      <p>The surface albedo decrease due to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shares a similar spatial pattern
with BC (Fig. 2, right column) but with a smaller magnitude (Table 2b).
Moreover, the snow depth reduction in response to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is only 30 %
of that due to BC (Table 2c and Fig. 2), and this highlights the larger
effect of BC in causing the regional cryospheric change over the Himalayas
and Tibet. Not surprisingly, in the simulations the snow cover and surface
albedo are increasing in response to cooling aerosols like SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2),
but in a smaller magnitude than that of the decreases due to BC and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Snow fraction (%), <bold>(b)</bold> surface albedo
(%), and <bold>(c)</bold> snow depth over land (water equivalent, cm) change in
response to different forcings. The relative change as a percentage is shown
in parentheses next to the absolute change.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(a)</bold> Snow fraction (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.13 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.35 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.14 (2 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.67 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.36 (4 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tibet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.65 (5 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(b)</bold> Surface albedo change (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.68 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28 (2 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.79 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44 (3 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tibet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1 (2 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(c)</bold> Snow depth (cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 (3 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.28 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2 (10 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tibet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Left: globally zonal averaged radiative heating rate
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of altitude and latitude due to
<bold>(a)</bold> BC, <bold>(b)</bold> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated
from the 5-year fixed-SST simulations using the instantaneous radiative
diagnostic procedure. Shortwave fluxes are shown for BC and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
longwave flux for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Right: the temperature response (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) due
to <bold>(a)</bold> BC, <bold>(b)</bold> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
calculated as the difference of the last 60 years of 75-year perturbed
simulation and the 319-year long-term control. Figure S3 shows the normalized
heating rate and temperature profile averaged just over the Tibetan Plateau.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1303/2016/acp-16-1303-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Warming at high altitudes enhanced by BC</title>
      <p>The Tibet region has witnessed increasing surface temperature by
0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per decade – more than twice the global average (Wang et
al., 2008). One feature of the surface-warming trend over Tibet is that the
warming magnitude increases significantly with altitude (Liu et al., 2009).
To understand this anomalous feature, we show in Fig. 3 the tropospheric
temperature responses (as a function of altitude and latitude) to BC as well
as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. BC-induced heating rate (Fig. 3a) is more
concentrated over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) due to larger emissions there
from industrial activities, consistent with radiative forcing distribution
(Table 1). The notable feature of BC response is the elevated warming at
altitudes of 4000 to 8000 m and 30 to 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Fig. 3b), in
particular over the Tibetan Plateau. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> warming pattern (Fig. 3b)
features an amplified warming at the surface of the Arctic and in the upper
tropical troposphere. CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced warming in the upper atmosphere
(500 hPa) over Tibet is 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, larger than BC-induced warming of
0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, but the vertical gradient is much smaller (Fig. S3).
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cooling features an even stronger north–south asymmetry (north
cooling; south slightly warming) but is more confined to the surface
(Fig. S3). The temperature response in the troposphere is associated with
strong meridional circulation change. The mechanisms behind the free-atmosphere circulation change, especially for the SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case that does not
have strong atmospheric forcing, are discussed in detail in Xu and
Xie (2015).</p>
      <p>Ground-based observations have shown that the last three decades were subject
to a factor of 2 greater warming in the high-altitude interior of the
Tibetan Plateau than at the edge of the plateau and at lower altitudes. The
observations in Liu et al. (2009) were made between 1965 and 2006 from ground
meteorological stations on the Tibetan Plateau region, and they revealed
clear altitude dependence in the daily-minimum surface temperature (purple
line in Fig. 4). The vertical profile of temperature change based on
daily-average measurement from another reanalysis data set (Fig. 5) also
reveals similar altitude dependence. What is driving the larger warming at
high-altitude regions?</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>The change of daily-minimum temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) as a function
of elevation (km). The observation from 1961 to 2006 are from of Liu et
al. (2006). The simulated temperature responses due to instantaneous increase
in forcings (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC) are calculated from model grid cells
over the Tibetan Plateau and its vanity region (20–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
70–110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) including low-lying regions and high-altitude regions.
The standard deviation due to spatial variation of temperature response is
shown as error bars. The sum of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BC responses are shown
in black triangles.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1303/2016/acp-16-1303-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 4 shows the model-simulated change of the daily-minimum surface
temperature as a function of elevation due to three different forcing agents
(CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC). The surface temperature responses are calculated
from all of the model grid cells over the Tibetan Plateau and the surrounding
region (20–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 70–110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) to capture the altitude
variation in this region. As shown in Fig. 4, the altitude dependence of the
surface warming is mostly determined by the response to BC forcing (red
dots). At altitudes below 1000 m the warming is minimal, but with increasing
altitudes the magnitude of the warming increases up to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at
5000 m. The dependence of the surface warming on altitude is much smaller in
the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case, which only increased from 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warming at low
altitudes to 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warming at higher altitudes (yellow dots).</p>
      <p>The combined temperature response (black triangles in Fig. 4) by adding the
individual trends due to BC, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is largely consistent with
the observed trend. To test the additivity of the temperature response, we
conducted another simulation in which all of the three forcings were imposed
simultaneously. The warming profile simulated by the combined anthropogenic
forcing experiment largely agrees with the sum of the individual responses
within 30 % (Fig. 5). Some non-linearity is expected as discussed in
other modeling studies (Ming and Ramaswamy, 2009). The agreement of the
simulated and the observed warming profiles provides a qualitative estimate
of the relative contributions of BC, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Over the entire
Tibetan Plateau, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced surface warming is 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
compared to the BC-induced warming of 0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Table 1b). Almost
half of the surface warming at the highest altitudes (around 5000 m) is due
to BC.</p>
      <p>A potential complexity arises due to the internal variability of the climate
systems, which has been shown to be important in determining decadal trends
over individual regions (Deser et al., 2012). To examine the role of natural
variability, we calculated the temperature trend from all 350 consecutive
45-year periods out of 394 years of simulation (i.e. year 1–45, year 2–46,..., year 350–394). The 80 % (10th to 90th
percentile) probability range of temperature change is shown in Fig. 5
(light-blue shading). The magnitude of the warming rarely exceeds 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
any 45-year period in the long-term preindustrial control simulations
without any external forcing. Therefore we infer that the vertical gradient
of the temperature trend found in the simulations is very unlikely due to
natural variability. One further concern is that the internal variability
deduced from the long-term preindustrial control simulation can be model
dependent. However, comparing a 30-member ensemble of CESM1 simulation (the
same spatial resolution and configuration as in our control simulation) with
the 38-member CMIP5, Kay et al. (2015) found that the ensemble spread in the
30-year trend of surface temperature in CESM1 ensemble is statistically the
same with the spread in trends within CMIP5.</p>
      <p>Note that the climate simulations shown in Figs. 4 and 5 are driven by the
instantaneous increase in present-day forcing. Since the real forcing trends
were time dependent, we further analyzed a set of 20th century transient
simulation output from the same model (Fig. 6), as part of CMIP5. The
relative contributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the simulated warming are
consistent between the two sets of simulations (the instantaneous forcing and
transient forcing). But the trends estimated from the 20th century transient
forcing simulations are smaller than the quasi-equilibrium response to
instantaneous forcing (parentheses in Table 1b). The reason is that only
70 % of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> forcing and about 60 % of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> forcing in the
transient simulation were applied after 1960. The standard BC forcing (red
solid line in Fig. 6) only lead to a weak warming, not exceeding the range of
natural variability. As a result, the combined all-forcing responses (black
triangles) did not capture the altitude dependence in observations very well.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Similar to Fig. 4, but with the following differences:
(1) daily-mean surface temperature, not daily-minimum temperature, are shown;
(2) the spread of five-ensemble member of BC simulations are shown in red
lines; (3) the observations are from GHCN data set (1961 to 2006); (4) the
range of temperature change found in unforced preindustrial control
simulations is shown in blue shading; and (5) the all-forcing simulation
(black line) is shown in comparison with the sum of individual responses
(black triangles).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1303/2016/acp-16-1303-2016-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Only when we adjusted historical BC forcing using the same scaling factors
constrained by present-day observations, transient BC forcing induced a
robust warming and amplification over high altitudes (red dots in Fig. 6),
similar to what is shown in the instantaneous forcing experiment. However, note
that the historical time dependence of the BC forcing is more uncertain, and
we were also only able to produce one ensemble of adjusted BC simulation that
was more subject to the influence of decadal variability. Therefore, the response
to the instantaneous present-day BC forcing seems a more reliable indicator
of the BC effects. While the absolute values of the warming profile need more
model tests, our inference regarding the relative role of BC and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the observed decrease in snow cover as well as the major role of BC on the
altitude dependence of the warming trends is robust.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Physical mechanisms of elevated warming due to BC</title>
      <p>Both CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC contribute to the elevated warming at 5 km as shown in
Fig. 4. However, BC is mostly responsible for the vertical gradient of the
simulated warming trend. Most of the BC aerosols in the region are emitted
over India and China and subsequently transported to the Tibetan Plateau and
the Himalayan mountain range. The physical mechanisms for the amplified
warming at higher altitude due to BC are at least threefold.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Direct heating in the atmosphere</title>
      <p>BC absorbs a
significant amount of solar radiation, as much as 25 % in typical
pollution events as directly measured by multiple unmanned aircrafts over the
northern Indian Ocean (Ramanathan et al., 2007). The BC layer placed at
higher altitude is even more efficient in absorbing solar radiation than at
sea level, due to stronger solar radiation and the brighter underlying cloud
surface. In our model simulation, the BC atmospheric heating rate is
concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere (maximum at 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N),
coincident with the location of the maximum temperature change (Fig. 3). The
elevated BC layer, due to the topography of the Tibetan Plateau and the
Himalayan mountain range, contributes to the elevated heating which is more
than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and about 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
4 km (Fig. S3a). Such anomalous heating in the atmosphere over the elevated
regions will contribute to the loss of ice and snow in two ways: (a) it will
increase melting of the glaciers and snowpack, and (b) more of the
precipitation will fall as rain instead of snow. CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase also
induces longwave heating of the atmosphere (Fig. 3c), but it is well known
that warming enhancement at the upper tropical troposphere is mostly due to
moist convection processes (Manabe and Wetherald, 1975), and the warming
enhancement at high altitudes is not showing a sharp gradient as in the BC case
(Figs. S3b and 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Similar to Fig. 5 but showing results from the 20th century
transient simulations (three ensemble members for each single-forcing run). Note
that the “standard” BC single-forcing simulation used smaller BC emissions
as in other CMIP5 models (red solid line). An additional simulation with
adjusted larger BC emissions is shown (red dotted line, one ensemble member
only).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1303/2016/acp-16-1303-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Surface darkening by BC deposition</title>
      <p>Snow and ice have a high surface albedo and reflect as much as 50 to 90 %
of incoming solar radiation. Transported BC aerosols over the Himalayas and
the Tibetan Plateau are removed from the atmosphere due to precipitation.
When BC aerosols are deposited over the snow and ice, they increase the
absorption of solar radiation and cause surface warming (Wiscombe and Warren,
1980; Chýlek et al., 1983). Recent studies have also suggested the
influence of BC aerosols over regions like the Alps (Painter et al., 2013)
and Eurasian land (Flanner et al., 2009). Menon et al. (2010) found that when
the model includes snow albedo change due to BC the snow cover reduction is
twice as large as the simulation with BC atmospheric heating effect only.
Flanner et al. (2009) also suggested that BC surface albedo darkening effects
are important in causing Eurasian springtime snow cover decline and are
comparable to that of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The surface radiative forcing due to BC deposition over Tibet in this model
is estimated to be 4.6 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the 5-year fixed-SST simulation (Fig. S4b). Because of this strong
positive surface forcing associated with surface darkening, the shortwave
forcing due to BC at the surface increased from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(initially due to BC dimming effect) to a positive value of 3.1 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This positive forcing imposed directly at the surface is even larger than the
adjusted atmospheric heating due to BC over Tibet (1.6 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A
recent modeling study by Ménégoz et al. (2014) also examined the role
of BC deposition over snow in this region (with smaller forcing estimates of
1 to 3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), but their study did not estimate the atmospheric
heating effect of BC.</p>
      <p>However, we note that model estimates of radiative forcing due to BC
deposition on snow have large uncertainty. Using the same atmospheric and
land model (but driven by realistic meteorological field in the year of
2000), Zhang et al. (2015) showed that simulated BC concentration in snow is
biased high with respect to in situ sampling. Although the large spatial
variations in BC deposition can affect the representativeness of BC-in-snow
measurements for the model evaluation purposes, this potential model bias
should be kept in mind. In addition to the uncertainty in BC loading, the
forcing magnitude is also sensitive to model parameterization (Yasunari et
al., 2013), as well as the simulated background snow cover because wrongly
simulated melting dates of the snowpack can lead to an incorrect radiative
forcing (Jacobi et al., 2015). Therefore, both in situ (Ming et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013;
Zhao et al., 2014) and laboratory measurements (Hadley and Kirchstetter,
2012) are needed to constrain model representation of BC in snow.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Snow albedo feedback</title>
      <p>The melting snow in response to the two initial heating mechanisms discussed
above will further decrease surface albedo and increase solar absorption at
the surface. The results based on the 60-year coupled model simulation
suggest that the surface albedo will further decrease by 1.4 % and
effectively impose an additional 3.2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> shortwave forcing at the
surface. In summary, the elevated heating and surface darkening due to BC are
simultaneously causing local warming and snow melting. The snow cover
reduction further reduces surface albedo and then provides a positive
feedback. A look at the seasonality of snow depth change suggests the early
spring melting is important for this feedback. The net result of such a
positive loop is an amplification factor of 4 for BC-induced Tibet warming
from the global average values and significant snow and ice retreat.</p>
      <p>Beyond the three main factors as we have discussed above, the changes in
water vapor and clouds are also possible mechanisms contributing to the
elevation-dependent warming in the mountain regions. As shown in the
schematic of a recent review paper (Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working
Group, 2015), in a warmer and moister atmosphere, the latent heat release at
the cloud condensation level may induce larger warming at high altitudes
(cloud feedback) and the downward longwave radiation increase particularly
fast in a higher and drier atmosphere (water vapor feedback). It is difficult
to identify or separate the contribution of these individual feedbacks from
our current experiment setup. However, we note that these feedback
mechanisms are operating regardless of forcing agents and therefore cannot
explain the particularly large elevated warming in response to BC.</p>
      <p>Lastly, it is also worth commenting on the role of other snow impurities. In
this study we used BC, a strong solar radiation absorber, to understand the
climate response and the mechanisms due to absorbing aerosols that also
include dust (Painter, et al., 2007; Di Mauro et al., 2015; Gabbi et al.,
2015) and organic aerosols (Qian et al., 2015). Similarly, we used SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to characterize all other reflecting aerosols. Any changes in dust and
organics may induce changes to the snow cover, as their atmospheric heating
and surface deposition are readily captured by this model, although the
magnitude of response might be smaller since they are partially reflecting
as well.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The observed surface warming over the Tibetan and Himalayan region of about
0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at sea level to about 2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 5000 m (from
1961 to 2006) has been an outstanding feature of climate trends. The more
than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warming is close to the peak warming trend observed
anywhere on the planet. For comparison, the Arctic warming associated with
large sea-ice retreat during this period is 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>The high-resolution coupled ocean–atmosphere model in this study was able to
attribute the observed warming trends and their high-altitude enhancement to
imposed increases in CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, BC, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols. The simulated
changes with all forcing imposed were consistent with the observations. The
key to the success is that we obtained the BC forcing from the
reconstruction of ground-based and satellite-based observations. The imposed
BC forcing was about 2 to 4 times (depending on the regions) larger
than that simulated by the models using bottom-up emission inventories. The
analysis of model simulations highlights that the high-altitude warming due
to BC is as large as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> warming over the Tibetan Plateau and the
elevated warming profile is unique in BC responses.</p>
      <p>The observed record warming is accompanied by retreat of glaciers and snow
cover as well as thinning of the snowpacks. In response to the
preindustrial to the present-day increase in BC emissions, the annual
averaged snow fraction over the Tibetan Plateau is reduced by more than
6 % (relatively), and the snow depth by approximately 19 %. The
surface albedo decreases by more than 5 % along the Himalayan mountain
range and 1.4 % over the entire Tibet region, providing a positive local
feedback to the enhanced local warming. In stark contrast, despite having
5 times larger effect in global mean temperature than BC, over Tibet
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> impact is only 1.5 times stronger in snow cover decrease, and only
one-third in snow depth decrease. We conclude that BC is instrumental in
causing snow retreat and its effects are manifested simultaneously through a
threefold process: (i) direct atmospheric heating, (ii) darkening of the
snow surface, and (iii) the snow albedo feedback. It is important to note
that, without the scaling factor we applied to bring the model BC forcing to
the observationally constrained values, the impact of BC on the observed
temperature trends would have been marginal. This perhaps explains why the
models used in IPCC assessments have not simulated the role of BC in the
large warming trend over the Himalayas.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1303-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-16-1303-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF, ATM07-21142)
and by the Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program (RGCM) of the
US Department of Energy's Office of Science (BER), Cooperative Agreement
DE-FC02-97ER62402. Y. Xu is also supported by the postdoctoral fellowship
from the Advanced Study Program (ASP) of National Center for Atmospheric
Research (NCAR). Computing resources (ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc) were provided by
the Climate Simulation Laboratory at NCAR's Computational and Information
Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and
other agencies. NCAR is funded by the NSF.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: F. Fierli</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bahadur, R., Praveen, P. S., Xu, Y., and Ramanathan, V.: Solar absorption by
elemental and brown carbon determined from spectral observations, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci., 109, 17366–17371, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1205910109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bajracharya S. R., Pradeep K. M., and Basanta R. S.: Global climate change
and melting of Himalayan glaciers. Melting glaciers and rising sea levels:
Impacts and implications, edited by: Ranade, P. S., The Icfai's University
Press, Punjagutta, India, 28–46, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
Deangelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, G. and Wu, T.: Responses of permafrost to climate change and their
environmental significance, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
112, F02S03, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JF000631</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chýlek, P., Ramaswamy, V., and Srivastava, V.: Albedo of
soot-contaminated snow, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 10837–10843,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC15p10837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC088iC15p10837</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Deser, C., Knutti, R., Solomon, S., and Phillips, A. S.: Communication of the
role of natural variability in future North American climate, Nature Climate
Change, 2, 775–779, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1562</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Di Mauro, B., Fava, F., Ferrero, L., Garzonio, R., Baccolo, G., Delmonte, B.,
and Colombo, R.: Mineral dust impact on snow radiative properties in the
European Alps combining ground, UAV, and satellite observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 6080–6097, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023287</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Easterling, D. R., Horton, B., Jones, P. D., Peterson, T. C., Karl, T. R.,
Parker, D. E., Salinger, M. J., Razuvayev, V., Plummer, N., Jamason, P., and
Folland, C. K.: Maximum and Minimum Temperature Trends for the Globe,
Science, 277, 364–367, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5324.364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.277.5324.364</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fan, Y. and van den Dool, H.: A global monthly land surface air temperature
analysis for 1948–present, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D01103,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008470</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T., and Rasch, P. J.:
Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Hess, P. G., Mahowald, N. M., Painter, T. H.,
Ramanathan, V., and Rasch, P. J.: Springtime warming and reduced snow cover
from carbonaceous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2481–2497,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Shell, K. M., Barlage, M., Perovich, D. K., and Tschudi, M.
A.: Radiative forcing and albedo feedback from the Northern Hemisphere
cryosphere between 1979 and 2008, Nat. Geosci, 4, 151–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1062</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Cogley, J. G., Wouters, B., Arendt, A. A., Wahr,
J., Berthier, E., Hock, R., Pfeffer, W. T., Kaser, G., Ligtenberg, S. R. M.,
Bolch, T., Sharp, M. J., Hagen, J. O., van den Broeke, M. R., and Paul, F.: A
Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009,
Science, 340, 852–857, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1234532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1234532</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gabbi, J., Huss, M., Bauder, A., Cao, F., and Schwikowski, M.: The impact of
Saharan dust and black carbon on albedo and long-term mass balance of an
Alpine glacier, The Cryosphere, 9, 1385–1400, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1385-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1385-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hadley, O. L. and Kirchstetter, T. W.: Black-carbon reduction of snow albedo,
Nature Climate Change, 2, 437–440, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1433" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1433</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, D. K., Salomonson, V. V., and Riggs, G. A.: MODIS/Terra Snow Cover
Monthly L3 Global 0.05 Deg CMG. Version 5. Boulder, Colorado USA: National
Snow and Ice Data Center, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Jacobi, H.-W., Lim, S., Ménégoz, M., Ginot, P., Laj, P., Bonasoni,
P., Stocchi, P., Marinoni, A., and Arnaud, Y.: Black carbon in snow in the
upper Himalayan Khumbu Valley, Nepal: observations and modeling of the impact
on snow albedo, melting, and radiative forcing, The Cryosphere, 9,
1685–1699, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1685-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1685-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Investigating cloud absorption effects: Global absorption
properties of black carbon, tar balls, and soil dust in clouds and aerosols,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–25, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017218</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kay, J. E. and L'Ecuyer, T.: Observational constraints on Arctic Ocean clouds
and radiative fluxes during the early 21st century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 7219–7236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50489" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50489</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kay, J. E., Deser, C., Phillips, A., Mai, A., Hannay, C., Strand, G.,
Arblaster, J. M., Bates, S. C., Danabasoglu, G., Edwards, J., Holland, M.,
Kushner, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Lawrence, D., Lindsay, K., Middleton, A.,
Munoz, E., Neale, R., Oleson, K., Polvani, L., and Vertenstein, M.: The
Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble Project: A Community
Resource for Studying Climate Change in the Presence of Internal Climate
Variability, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1333–1349,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Lau, K. M. and Kim, K. M.: Observational relationships between aerosol and
Asian monsoon rainfall, and circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 1–5,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027546</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Lau, K. M., Kim, M. K., and Kim, K. M.: Asian summer monsoon anomalies
induced by aerosol direct forcing: The role of the Tibetan Plateau, Clim.
Dynam., 26, 855–864, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Lau, W. K. M., Kim, M.-K., Kim, K.-M., and Lee, W.-S.: Enhanced surface
warming and accelerated snow melt in the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau
induced by absorbing aerosols, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 25204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025204</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. and Slater, A.: The contribution of snow condition trends to
future ground climate, Clim. Dynam., 34, 969–981,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0537-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-009-0537-4</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan,
G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and
structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Syst., 3, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011MS000045</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Cheng, G., Jin, H., Kang, E., Che, T., Jin, R., Wu, L., Nan, Z.,
Wang, J., and Shen, Y.: Cryospheric change in China, Glob. Planet. Change,
62, 210–218, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.02.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Cheng, Z., Yan, L., and Yin, Z. Y.: Elevation dependency of recent
and future minimum surface air temperature trends in the Tibetan Plateau and
its surroundings, Global Planet. Change, 68, 164–174,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.017</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Yin, Z.-Y., Shao, X., and Qin, N.: Temporal trends and variability
of daily maximum and minimum, extreme temperature events, and growing season
length over the eastern and central Tibetan Plateau during 1961–2003, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D19109, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006915</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S.,
Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W.,
Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a
minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and
evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5,
709–739, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, L. and Qin, D.: Temporal-spatial characteristics of observed key
parameters of snow cover in China during 1957–2009, Sci. Cold Arid. Reg., 4,
384–393, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T.: The Effects of Doubling the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
Concentration on the climate of a General Circulation Model, J. Atmos. Sci.,
32, 3–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032&lt;0003:TEODTC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032&lt;0003:TEODTC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., and Collins, W. D.: Effects of black carbon
aerosols on the Indian monsoon, J. Climate, 21, 2869–2882,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1777.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JCLI1777.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M., Arblaster, J. M., Hu, A., Teng, H., Kay, J.
E., Gettelman, A., Lawrence, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., and Strand, W. G.:
Climate change projections in CESM1(CAM5) compared to CCSM4, J. Climate, 26,
6287–6308, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Ménégoz, M., Gallée, H., and Jacobi, H. W.: Precipitation and
snow cover in the Himalaya: from reanalysis to regional climate simulations,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3921–3936, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3921-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-3921-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Cozic, A., Lim,
S., Ginot, P., Laj, P., Gallée, H., Wagnon, P., Marinoni, A., and Jacobi,
H. W.: Snow cover sensitivity to black carbon deposition in the Himalayas:
from atmospheric and ice core measurements to regional climate simulations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4237–4249, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Menon, S., Koch, D., Beig, G., Sahu, S., Fasullo, J., and Orlikowski, D.:
Black carbon aerosols and the third polar ice cap, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
4559–4571, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Du, Z., Xiao, C., Xu, X., and Zhang, D.: Darkening of the
mid-Himalaya glaciers since 2000 and the potential causes, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014021, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Ming, Y. and Ramaswamy, V.: Nonlinear climate and hydrological responses to
aerosol effects, J. Climate, 22, 1329–1339, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2362.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2362.1</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Morrison, H. and Gettelman, A.: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud
microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3).
Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21, 3642–3659,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group: Elevation-dependent warming
in mountain regions of the world, Natute Climate Change, 5, 424–430,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2563</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Niu, G.-Y. and Yang, Z.-L.: An observation-based formulation of snow cover
fraction and its evaluation over large North American river basins, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D21101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008674</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P.,
Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed
desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L12502, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030284</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Flanner, M. G., Kaser, G., Marzeion, B., VanCuren, R. A., and
Abdalati, W.: End of the Little Ice Age in the Alps forced by industrial
black carbon, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 15216–15221,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302570110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1302570110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Pistone, K., Eisenman, I., and Ramanathan, V.: Observational determination of
albedo decrease caused by vanishing Arctic sea ice, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 3322–3326, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318201111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1318201111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pu, Z. and Xu, L.: MODIS/Terra observed snow cover over the Tibet Plateau:
Distribution, variation and possible connection with the East Asian Summer
Monsoon (EASM), Theor. Appl. Climatol., 97, 265–278,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0074-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-008-0074-9</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Pu, Z., Xu, L., and Salomonson, V. V.: MODIS/Terra observed seasonal
variations of snow cover over the Tibetan Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029262" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029262</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Flanner, M. G., Leung, L. R., and Wang, W.: Sensitivity studies on
the impacts of Tibetan Plateau snowpack pollution on the Asian hydrological
cycle and monsoon climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1929–1948,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Yasunari, T. J., Doherty, S. J., Flanner, M. G., Lau, W. K. M.,
Jing, M., Wang, H., Wang, M., Warren, S. G., and Zhang, R.: Light-absorbing
Particles in Snow and Ice: Measurement and Modeling of Climatic and
Hydrological impact, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 64–91,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due to
black carbon, Nat. Geosci., 1, 221–227, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo156</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Chung, C., Kim, D., Bettge, T., Buja, L., Kiehl, J. T.,
Washington, W. M., Fu, Q., Sikka, D. R., and Wild, M.: Atmospheric brown
clouds: impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 102, 5326–5333, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500656102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0500656102</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Ramana, M. V., Roberts, G., Kim, D., Corrigan, C., Chung, C.,
and Winker, D.: Warming trends in Asia amplified by brown cloud solar
absorption, Nature, 448, 575–578, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06019</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D. A., Estilow, T. W., and NOAA CDR Program: NOAA Climate Date
Record (CDR) of Northern Hemisphere (NH) Snow Cover Extent (SCE), Version 1,
NOAA National Climatic Data Center, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7289/V5N014G9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7289/V5N014G9</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Wang, A. and Zeng, X.: Improving the treatment of the vertical snow burial
fraction over short vegetation in the NCAR CLM3, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 877–886, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-8098-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-009-8098-3</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Wang, B., Bao, Q., Hoskins, B., Wu, G., and Liu, Y.: Tibetan Plateau warming
and precipitation changes in East Asia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 0–4,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034330</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Doherty, S. J., and Huang, J.: Black carbon and other
light-absorbing impurities in snow across Northern China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 1471–1492, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018291</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R., Talkner, P., Auer, I., Böhm, R., Gajić-Čapka, M.,
Zaninović, K., Brázdil, R., and Faško, P.: 20th-century changes
of temperature in the mountain regions of Central Europe, Climatic Change,
36, 327–344, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005378702066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1005378702066</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Wiscombe, W. J. and Warren, S. G.: A Model for the Spectral Albedo of Snow.
I: Pure Snow, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2712–2733, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:AMFTSA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:AMFTSA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Xu, B., Cao, J., Hansen, J., Yao, T., Joswia, D. R., Wang, N., Wu, G., Wang,
M., Zhao, H., Yang, W., Liu, X., and He, J.: Black soot and the survival of
Tibetan glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 22114–22118,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910444106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910444106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, Y: Climate effects of black carbon and the emission reduction for
mitigating climate change, PhD thesis, UC San Diego, 2014, 208 pp., 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Y. and Xie, S.-P.: Ocean mediation of tropospheric response to reflecting
and absorbing aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5827–5833,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5827-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5827-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Y., Bahadur, R., Zhao, C., and Ruby Leung, L.: Estimating the radiative
forcing of carbonaceous aerosols over California based on satellite and
ground observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11148–11160,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50835" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50835</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Yasunari, T. J., Tan, Q., Lau, K. M., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., Laj, P.,
Ménégoz, M., Takemura, T., and Chin, M.: Estimated range of black
carbon dry deposition and the related snow albedo reduction over Himalayan
glaciers during dry pre-monsoon periods, Atmos. Environ., 78, 259–267,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.031</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>You, Q., Min, J., and Kang, S.: Rapid warming in the Tibetan Plateau from
observations and CMIP5 models in recent decades, Int. J. Climatol.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4520</ext-link>, online first, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Wang, H., Qian, Y., Rasch, P. J., Easter, R. C., Ma, P.-L., Singh,
B., Huang, J., and Fu, Q.: Quantifying sources, transport, deposition, and
radiative forcing of black carbon over the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6205–6223, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6205-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6205-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, C., Hu, Z., Qian, Y., Ruby Leung, L., Huang, J., Huang, M., Jin, J.,
Flanner, M. G., Zhang, R., Wang, H., Yan, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.:
Simulating black carbon and dust and their radiative forcing in seasonal
snow: a case study over North China with field campaign measurements, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 11475–11491, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11475-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11475-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Observed high-altitude warming and snow cover retreat over Tibet and the
Himalayas enhanced by black carbon aerosols</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Himalayan mountain glaciers and the snowpack over the Tibetan Plateau provide
the headwater of several major rivers in Asia. In situ observations of snow
cover extent since the 1960s suggest that the snowpack in the region have
retreated significantly, accompanied by a surface warming of
2–2.5 °C observed over the peak altitudes (5000 m). Using a
high-resolution ocean–atmosphere global climate model and an observationally
constrained black carbon (BC) aerosol forcing, we attribute the observed
altitude dependence of the warming trends as well as the spatial pattern of
reductions in snow depths and snow cover extent to various anthropogenic
factors. At the Tibetan Plateau altitudes, the increase in atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> concentration exerted a warming of 1.7 °C, BC
1.3 °C where as cooling aerosols cause about 0.7 °C
cooling, bringing the net simulated warming consistent with the anomalously
large observed warming. We therefore conclude that BC together with CO<sub>2</sub>
has contributed to the snow retreat trends. In particular, BC increase is the
major factor in the strong elevation dependence of the observed surface
warming. The atmospheric warming by BC as well as its surface darkening of
snow is coupled with the positive snow albedo feedbacks to account for the
disproportionately large role of BC in high-elevation regions. These findings
reveal that BC impact needs to be properly accounted for in future regional
climate projections, in particular on high-altitude cryosphere.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bahadur, R., Praveen, P. S., Xu, Y., and Ramanathan, V.: Solar absorption by
elemental and brown carbon determined from spectral observations, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci., 109, 17366–17371, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1205910109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bajracharya S. R., Pradeep K. M., and Basanta R. S.: Global climate change
and melting of Himalayan glaciers. Melting glaciers and rising sea levels:
Impacts and implications, edited by: Ranade, P. S., The Icfai's University
Press, Punjagutta, India, 28–46, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
Deangelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, G. and Wu, T.: Responses of permafrost to climate change and their
environmental significance, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
112, F02S03, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000631" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JF000631</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chýlek, P., Ramaswamy, V., and Srivastava, V.: Albedo of
soot-contaminated snow, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 10837–10843,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC15p10837" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/JC088iC15p10837</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Deser, C., Knutti, R., Solomon, S., and Phillips, A. S.: Communication of the
role of natural variability in future North American climate, Nature Climate
Change, 2, 775–779, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1562" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nclimate1562</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Di Mauro, B., Fava, F., Ferrero, L., Garzonio, R., Baccolo, G., Delmonte, B.,
and Colombo, R.: Mineral dust impact on snow radiative properties in the
European Alps combining ground, UAV, and satellite observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 6080–6097, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023287" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD023287</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Easterling, D. R., Horton, B., Jones, P. D., Peterson, T. C., Karl, T. R.,
Parker, D. E., Salinger, M. J., Razuvayev, V., Plummer, N., Jamason, P., and
Folland, C. K.: Maximum and Minimum Temperature Trends for the Globe,
Science, 277, 364–367, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5324.364" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.364</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, Y. and van den Dool, H.: A global monthly land surface air temperature
analysis for 1948–present, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D01103,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008470" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008470</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T., and Rasch, P. J.:
Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD008003</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Hess, P. G., Mahowald, N. M., Painter, T. H.,
Ramanathan, V., and Rasch, P. J.: Springtime warming and reduced snow cover
from carbonaceous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2481–2497,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Flanner, M. G., Shell, K. M., Barlage, M., Perovich, D. K., and Tschudi, M.
A.: Radiative forcing and albedo feedback from the Northern Hemisphere
cryosphere between 1979 and 2008, Nat. Geosci, 4, 151–155,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1062" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1062</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Cogley, J. G., Wouters, B., Arendt, A. A., Wahr,
J., Berthier, E., Hock, R., Pfeffer, W. T., Kaser, G., Ligtenberg, S. R. M.,
Bolch, T., Sharp, M. J., Hagen, J. O., van den Broeke, M. R., and Paul, F.: A
Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009,
Science, 340, 852–857, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1234532" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1234532</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gabbi, J., Huss, M., Bauder, A., Cao, F., and Schwikowski, M.: The impact of
Saharan dust and black carbon on albedo and long-term mass balance of an
Alpine glacier, The Cryosphere, 9, 1385–1400, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1385-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-9-1385-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hadley, O. L. and Kirchstetter, T. W.: Black-carbon reduction of snow albedo,
Nature Climate Change, 2, 437–440, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1433" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nclimate1433</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, D. K., Salomonson, V. V., and Riggs, G. A.: MODIS/Terra Snow Cover
Monthly L3 Global 0.05 Deg CMG. Version 5. Boulder, Colorado USA: National
Snow and Ice Data Center, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobi, H.-W., Lim, S., Ménégoz, M., Ginot, P., Laj, P., Bonasoni,
P., Stocchi, P., Marinoni, A., and Arnaud, Y.: Black carbon in snow in the
upper Himalayan Khumbu Valley, Nepal: observations and modeling of the impact
on snow albedo, melting, and radiative forcing, The Cryosphere, 9,
1685–1699, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1685-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-9-1685-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Investigating cloud absorption effects: Global absorption
properties of black carbon, tar balls, and soil dust in clouds and aerosols,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–25, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JD017218</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kay, J. E. and L'Ecuyer, T.: Observational constraints on Arctic Ocean clouds
and radiative fluxes during the early 21st century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 7219–7236, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50489" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50489</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Kay, J. E., Deser, C., Phillips, A., Mai, A., Hannay, C., Strand, G.,
Arblaster, J. M., Bates, S. C., Danabasoglu, G., Edwards, J., Holland, M.,
Kushner, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Lawrence, D., Lindsay, K., Middleton, A.,
Munoz, E., Neale, R., Oleson, K., Polvani, L., and Vertenstein, M.: The
Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble Project: A Community
Resource for Studying Climate Change in the Presence of Internal Climate
Variability, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1333–1349,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Lau, K. M. and Kim, K. M.: Observational relationships between aerosol and
Asian monsoon rainfall, and circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 1–5,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027546" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL027546</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Lau, K. M., Kim, M. K., and Kim, K. M.: Asian summer monsoon anomalies
induced by aerosol direct forcing: The role of the Tibetan Plateau, Clim.
Dynam., 26, 855–864, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Lau, W. K. M., Kim, M.-K., Kim, K.-M., and Lee, W.-S.: Enhanced surface
warming and accelerated snow melt in the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau
induced by absorbing aerosols, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 25204,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025204" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025204</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, D. and Slater, A.: The contribution of snow condition trends to
future ground climate, Clim. Dynam., 34, 969–981,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0537-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0537-4</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan,
G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and
structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Syst., 3, 1–27, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000045" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011MS000045</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Cheng, G., Jin, H., Kang, E., Che, T., Jin, R., Wu, L., Nan, Z.,
Wang, J., and Shen, Y.: Cryospheric change in China, Glob. Planet. Change,
62, 210–218, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.02.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.02.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Cheng, Z., Yan, L., and Yin, Z. Y.: Elevation dependency of recent
and future minimum surface air temperature trends in the Tibetan Plateau and
its surroundings, Global Planet. Change, 68, 164–174,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.017" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.017</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Yin, Z.-Y., Shao, X., and Qin, N.: Temporal trends and variability
of daily maximum and minimum, extreme temperature events, and growing season
length over the eastern and central Tibetan Plateau during 1961–2003, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D19109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006915" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006915</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S.,
Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W.,
Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a
minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and
evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5,
709–739, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, L. and Qin, D.: Temporal-spatial characteristics of observed key
parameters of snow cover in China during 1957–2009, Sci. Cold Arid. Reg., 4,
384–393, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T.: The Effects of Doubling the CO<sub>2</sub>
Concentration on the climate of a General Circulation Model, J. Atmos. Sci.,
32, 3–15,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032&lt;0003:TEODTC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032&lt;0003:TEODTC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., and Collins, W. D.: Effects of black carbon
aerosols on the Indian monsoon, J. Climate, 21, 2869–2882,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1777.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1777.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M., Arblaster, J. M., Hu, A., Teng, H., Kay, J.
E., Gettelman, A., Lawrence, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., and Strand, W. G.:
Climate change projections in CESM1(CAM5) compared to CCSM4, J. Climate, 26,
6287–6308, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ménégoz, M., Gallée, H., and Jacobi, H. W.: Precipitation and
snow cover in the Himalaya: from reanalysis to regional climate simulations,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3921–3936, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3921-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-17-3921-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Cozic, A., Lim,
S., Ginot, P., Laj, P., Gallée, H., Wagnon, P., Marinoni, A., and Jacobi,
H. W.: Snow cover sensitivity to black carbon deposition in the Himalayas:
from atmospheric and ice core measurements to regional climate simulations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4237–4249, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Menon, S., Koch, D., Beig, G., Sahu, S., Fasullo, J., and Orlikowski, D.:
Black carbon aerosols and the third polar ice cap, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
4559–4571, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ming, J., Du, Z., Xiao, C., Xu, X., and Zhang, D.: Darkening of the
mid-Himalaya glaciers since 2000 and the potential causes, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014021, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ming, Y. and Ramaswamy, V.: Nonlinear climate and hydrological responses to
aerosol effects, J. Climate, 22, 1329–1339, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2362.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2362.1</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Morrison, H. and Gettelman, A.: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud
microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3).
Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21, 3642–3659,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group: Elevation-dependent warming
in mountain regions of the world, Natute Climate Change, 5, 424–430,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2563" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nclimate2563</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Niu, G.-Y. and Yang, Z.-L.: An observation-based formulation of snow cover
fraction and its evaluation over large North American river basins, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D21101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008674" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008674</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P.,
Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed
desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L12502, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030284" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL030284</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Flanner, M. G., Kaser, G., Marzeion, B., VanCuren, R. A., and
Abdalati, W.: End of the Little Ice Age in the Alps forced by industrial
black carbon, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 15216–15221,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302570110" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1302570110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Pistone, K., Eisenman, I., and Ramanathan, V.: Observational determination of
albedo decrease caused by vanishing Arctic sea ice, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 3322–3326, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318201111" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1318201111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pu, Z. and Xu, L.: MODIS/Terra observed snow cover over the Tibet Plateau:
Distribution, variation and possible connection with the East Asian Summer
Monsoon (EASM), Theor. Appl. Climatol., 97, 265–278,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0074-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0074-9</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Pu, Z., Xu, L., and Salomonson, V. V.: MODIS/Terra observed seasonal
variations of snow cover over the Tibetan Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
1–6, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029262" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL029262</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Qian, Y., Flanner, M. G., Leung, L. R., and Wang, W.: Sensitivity studies on
the impacts of Tibetan Plateau snowpack pollution on the Asian hydrological
cycle and monsoon climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1929–1948,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Qian, Y., Yasunari, T. J., Doherty, S. J., Flanner, M. G., Lau, W. K. M.,
Jing, M., Wang, H., Wang, M., Warren, S. G., and Zhang, R.: Light-absorbing
Particles in Snow and Ice: Measurement and Modeling of Climatic and
Hydrological impact, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 64–91,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due to
black carbon, Nat. Geosci., 1, 221–227, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo156</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Chung, C., Kim, D., Bettge, T., Buja, L., Kiehl, J. T.,
Washington, W. M., Fu, Q., Sikka, D. R., and Wild, M.: Atmospheric brown
clouds: impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 102, 5326–5333, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500656102" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0500656102</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Ramana, M. V., Roberts, G., Kim, D., Corrigan, C., Chung, C.,
and Winker, D.: Warming trends in Asia amplified by brown cloud solar
absorption, Nature, 448, 575–578, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06019" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature06019</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, D. A., Estilow, T. W., and NOAA CDR Program: NOAA Climate Date
Record (CDR) of Northern Hemisphere (NH) Snow Cover Extent (SCE), Version 1,
NOAA National Climatic Data Center, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7289/V5N014G9" target="_blank">doi:10.7289/V5N014G9</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, A. and Zeng, X.: Improving the treatment of the vertical snow burial
fraction over short vegetation in the NCAR CLM3, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 877–886, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-8098-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00376-009-8098-3</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, B., Bao, Q., Hoskins, B., Wu, G., and Liu, Y.: Tibetan Plateau warming
and precipitation changes in East Asia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 0–4,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034330" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GL034330</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Doherty, S. J., and Huang, J.: Black carbon and other
light-absorbing impurities in snow across Northern China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 1471–1492, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018291" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JD018291</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, R., Talkner, P., Auer, I., Böhm, R., Gajić-Čapka, M.,
Zaninović, K., Brázdil, R., and Faško, P.: 20th-century changes
of temperature in the mountain regions of Central Europe, Climatic Change,
36, 327–344, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005378702066" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/A:1005378702066</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wiscombe, W. J. and Warren, S. G.: A Model for the Spectral Albedo of Snow.
I: Pure Snow, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2712–2733, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:AMFTSA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:AMFTSA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, B., Cao, J., Hansen, J., Yao, T., Joswia, D. R., Wang, N., Wu, G., Wang,
M., Zhao, H., Yang, W., Liu, X., and He, J.: Black soot and the survival of
Tibetan glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 22114–22118,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910444106" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0910444106</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, Y: Climate effects of black carbon and the emission reduction for
mitigating climate change, PhD thesis, UC San Diego, 2014, 208 pp., 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, Y. and Xie, S.-P.: Ocean mediation of tropospheric response to reflecting
and absorbing aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5827–5833,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5827-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-5827-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, Y., Bahadur, R., Zhao, C., and Ruby Leung, L.: Estimating the radiative
forcing of carbonaceous aerosols over California based on satellite and
ground observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11148–11160,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50835" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50835</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Yasunari, T. J., Tan, Q., Lau, K. M., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., Laj, P.,
Ménégoz, M., Takemura, T., and Chin, M.: Estimated range of black
carbon dry deposition and the related snow albedo reduction over Himalayan
glaciers during dry pre-monsoon periods, Atmos. Environ., 78, 259–267,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.031" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.031</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
You, Q., Min, J., and Kang, S.: Rapid warming in the Tibetan Plateau from
observations and CMIP5 models in recent decades, Int. J. Climatol.,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4520" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/joc.4520</a>, online first, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Wang, H., Qian, Y., Rasch, P. J., Easter, R. C., Ma, P.-L., Singh,
B., Huang, J., and Fu, Q.: Quantifying sources, transport, deposition, and
radiative forcing of black carbon over the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6205–6223, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6205-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-6205-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, C., Hu, Z., Qian, Y., Ruby Leung, L., Huang, J., Huang, M., Jin, J.,
Flanner, M. G., Zhang, R., Wang, H., Yan, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.:
Simulating black carbon and dust and their radiative forcing in seasonal
snow: a case study over North China with field campaign measurements, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 11475–11491, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11475-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-11475-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
