<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal
variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>a review</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Mao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>Huiting</given-names></name>
          <email>hmao@esf.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Irene</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Leiming</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-5412</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, State University of New York College of
Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> NY 13210, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Air Quality Research Division, Science and Technology Branch,
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> M3H 5T4, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Huiting Mao (hmao@esf.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>12897</fpage><lpage>12924</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Atmospheric mercury (Hg) is a global pollutant and thought to be the main source
of mercury in oceanic and remote terrestrial systems, where it becomes
methylated and bioavailable; hence, atmospheric mercury pollution has
global consequences for both human and ecosystem health. Understanding of
spatial and temporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury can advance
our knowledge of mercury cycling in various environments. This review
summarized spatiotemporal variations of total gaseous mercury or gaseous
elemental mercury (TGM/GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), and
particulate-bound mercury (PBM) in various environments including oceans,
continents, high elevation, the free troposphere, and low to high latitudes.
In the marine boundary layer (MBL), the oxidation of GEM was generally
thought to drive the diurnal and seasonal variations of TGM/GEM and GOM in
most oceanic regions, leading to lower GEM and higher GOM from noon to
afternoon and higher GEM during winter and higher GOM during spring–summer.
At continental sites, the driving mechanisms of TGM/GEM diurnal patterns
included surface and local emissions, boundary layer dynamics, GEM
oxidation, and for high-elevation sites mountain–valley winds, while
oxidation of GEM and entrainment of free tropospheric air appeared to
control the diurnal patterns of GOM. No pronounced diurnal variation was
found for Tekran measured PBM at MBL and continental sites. Seasonal
variations in TGM/GEM at continental sites were attributed to increased
winter combustion and summertime surface emissions, and monsoons in Asia,
while those in GOM were controlled by GEM oxidation, free tropospheric transport,
anthropogenic emissions, and wet deposition. Increased PBM at continental
sites during winter was primarily due to local/regional coal and wood
combustion emissions. Long-term TGM measurements from the MBL and
continental sites indicated an overall declining trend. Limited measurements
suggested TGM/GEM increasing from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) to the Northern Hemisphere (NH) due
largely to the vast majority of mercury emissions in the NH, and the latitudinal
gradient was insignificant in summer probably as a result of stronger
meridional mixing. Aircraft measurements showed no significant vertical
variation in GEM over the field campaign regions; however, depletion of GEM
was observed in stratospherically influenced air masses. In examining the
remaining questions and issues, recommendations for future research needs
were provided, and among them is the most imminent need for GOM speciation
measurements and fundamental understanding of multiphase redox kinetics.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Atmospheric mercury (Hg) is a pervasive toxic with comparable natural and
anthropogenic sources (UNEP, 2013). It is operationally defined in three
forms, gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), and
particulate-bound mercury (PBM). In most environments GEM comprises
&gt; 95 % of total gaseous mercury (TGM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>GOM) with
lifetime of 0.5–1 year (Driscoll et al., 2013). Besides emissions, GOM
and PBM are largely formed from oxidation of GEM, with lifetimes of hours to
weeks (Cole et al., 2014). They are highly soluble, and their wet and dry
deposition is a major input of Hg to ecosystems and oceans followed by
bioaccumulation, where Hg can enter human bodies through the food chain. To
ultimately regulate anthropogenic emissions of Hg in order to control the
ambient atmospheric concentration of Hg, it is imperative to understand Hg
cycling between the atmosphere, ecosystems, and oceans.</p>
      <p>The pathways of Hg cycling include chemical transformation and transport via
air and water in various systems as illustrated in Subir et al. (2011).
Mercury can be chemically transformed from one species to another through
oxidation/reduction reactions, complex formation, phase transitions,
biodegradation, and surface and heterogeneous interactions with aerosols,
clouds, snow, and ice. Mercury can also be redistributed between geographic
locations and spheres through physical processes such as wind, water runoff,
dry and wet deposition, and volatilization. In addition, natural and
anthropogenic sources of Hg are distributed vastly unevenly as a result of
anthropogenic activities and land surface types. The eventual effect of all
these processes, some of which are in fact sinks and sources, is manifested
in the great heterogeneity of temporal and spatial variations of atmospheric
Hg concentrations observed in numerous studies (Sprovieri et al., 2010b,
references therein; references in Tables S1–S7 in the Supplement).
Characterization and intercomparison of such variations for different
geographic and chemical environments can provide a gateway to our
understanding of Hg cycling.</p>
      <p>Numerous measurement studies in the literature have shown distinctly
different spatiotemporal variations of GEM, GOM, and PBM in the following
environments, owing to their respective atmospheric chemical composition, sources, and
meteorological conditions:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>marine boundary layer (MBL);</p></list-item><list-item><p>land: urban, rural, and remote;</p></list-item><list-item><p>high elevation, high altitude;</p></list-item><list-item><p>low, mid-, and high latitudes.</p></list-item></list>
Such differences were attributed to natural and
anthropogenic sources of not only Hg but also other reactive chemical
compounds that are involved in Hg cycling, meteorological conditions, and
chemistry, all of which were highly dependent on geographic locations and
surrounding land surface types. Therefore, it is highly complex to delineate
the effects of controlling factors determining observed spatiotemporal
variations of Hg concentrations.</p>
      <p>Sprovieri et al. (2010b) reviewed the state of global mercury measurements
focusing on instrumentation and techniques, and ranges of concentration
levels in studies from different continents and oceanic regions up to 2009.
Atmospheric Hg research has since continued to flourish, and in particular
longer datasets accumulated in several regions have become available for
temporal variability characterization, as to understand the driving
mechanisms for such variabilities. Also of importance is the efficacy of
emission reductions that have been implemented in North America and Europe
for nearly 2 decades and over shorter periods in East Asia. This paper,
different from Sprovieri et al. (2010b), aimed to provide a global picture of
spatiotemporal variations of speciated Hg using measurement-based studies in
the literature over ocean, over land, by altitude, and by latitude, and
further glean insight on important factors that could potentially contribute
to the observed variations.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that units were converted for a
standard atmosphere for comparison. One more cautionary note is that Hg
data in earlier studies had coarser temporal resolution than in more recent
studies, and hence the comparisons should be viewed with this caveat in
mind. Though the earlier studies tended to have orders of magnitude larger
concentrations, suggesting at higher temporal resolution those
concentrations would have been even larger.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Marine boundary layer</title>
      <p>Measured TGM/GEM, GOM, and PBM concentrations in the MBL globally were
summarized in Tables S1–S3 of the Supplement. Spatiotemporal variations in
speciated Hg were summarized with respect to their ambient concentration
levels, continental (including anthropogenic) influence, hemispheric
gradient, diurnal to annual cycles, and long-term trends, accompanied by
discussions on potential causal mechanisms.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>TGM/GEM</title>
      <p>TGM and GEM in the MBL have been measured since the late 1960s.
Near the surface in most environments, except polar springtime and Dead Sea
mercury depletion events (MDEs) when strong GEM oxidation occurs, the
difference between TGM and GEM was small to negligible (e.g., Temme et al.,
2003a; Mao and Talbot, 2012). Concentrations were generally higher in
near-coastal regions due largely to anthropogenic influence, which under
certain meteorological conditions could extend to even open oceans. Natural
emissions including biomass burning, volcanic, and oceanic emissions were
suggested to be of influence in some studies. It was also found that
meteorological conditions could play important roles in determining ambient
concentrations of TGM/GEM via transport, planetary boundary layer (PBL) dynamics, and solar radiation,
especially in regions nearing emission sources such as the Mediterranean and
in springtime polar regions. Long-term trends have varied over different
time periods, speculated to be associated with changing anthropogenic
emissions, legacy emissions, and photooxidation.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Concentration metrics</title>
      <p>The mean concentrations of TGM/GEM observed over varying time periods
reported from the literature ranged from 1.05 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
Antarctic Ocean to 2.34 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the western Pacific seas, as shown
in Table S1 (references therein). The concentration averaged for each oceanic
region calculated using the values reported from all the studies was the
lowest at 1.53 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Antarctic Ocean and the largest at
2.36 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the western Pacific seas (Fig. 1a). The range of
0.05–29 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Atlantic (Fig. 1a), obtained from individual
studies, appeared to be the largest, although the maximum concentration was
from a single event influenced by forest fires in Québec, Canada, at a
long-term site in the MBL 20 km from the coast of southern New Hampshire,
USA (Mao and Talbot, 2012). With that single event removed, the TGM/GEM
concentrations were much more variable in the MBL of the Mediterranean Sea
and its nearby seas (Table S1; references therein).</p>
      <p>Atmospheric Hg over the Atlantic Ocean has been studied most extensively compared to
other oceans, largely via shipboard measurements. Concentrations of TGM/GEM
ranged from 0.05 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (15 min average) in Cape Point, South Africa
(Brunke et al., 2010), to 29 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (5 min average) near the shore of
southern New Hampshire, USA (Mao and Talbot, 2012). In the earliest
shipboard global study of atmospheric Hg, Seiler et al. (1980) found highly
variable TGM concentrations (1–10 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2–4 h average) averaged at
2.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between Hamburg (54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and Santo
Domingo (20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 67<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) across the Atlantic Ocean over 11
October–1 November 1973. It should be noted that early studies used very
different measurement techniques and hence the magnitude needs to be
considered with discretion. During the following 40 years, most studies
reported TGM/GEM ranging from below the limit of detection (LOD) to a few ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher
concentrations in near-coastal regions (Table S1; references therein). The
first measurements of Hg species was a 1 month shipboard study over the South Atlantic Ocean
during polar summer (February) 2001 by Temme et al. (2003b). Their
measurements (5–15 min average data) during the cruise from Neumayer
to Punta Arenas exhibited very small variation with TGM averaged at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and no significant difference between TGM and
GEM. Relatively homogeneous distributions of TGM/GEM were observed over open
waters in the South Atlantic with mean values hovering around 1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard
deviation &lt; 0.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to larger mean values (1.3–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the North Atlantic.</p>
      <p>Over the Pacific Ocean, 1 to 15 min TGM/GEM concentrations measured over the
North and South Pacific Ocean ranged from 0.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
40–45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in July–September 2008 (Kang and Xie, 2011) to 7.21 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Port of Los Angeles on 27 May 2010 (Weiss-Penzias et al.,
2013), with generally higher concentrations near coasts and lower ones over
open oceans (Table S1; reference therein). The distribution of TGM/GEM over
the South Pacific appeared to be quite heterogeneous, where Xia et al. (2010)
measured TGM averaged at 2.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a factor of 2 higher
than those in Soerensen et al. (2010), who measured a mean of 1.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Over the South China Sea, the Yellow Sea, and other neighboring seas, located on the eastern Asian
continental margin in the tropical–subtropical western North Pacific,
elevated concentrations of TGM/GEM were observed with mean values varying
over 2.08–2.62 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fu et al., 2010b; Nguyen et al., 2011; Ci et
al., 2011) (Table S1). TGM concentrations over the Mediterranean Sea, Adriatic Sea, Dead Sea, Augusta Basin, and Baltic Sea
ranged from 0.4 to 11 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S1; references therein).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Means and ranges of TGM/GEM <bold>(a)</bold>, GOM <bold>(b)</bold>, and PBM <bold>(c)</bold>
concentrations, estimated from the values in the literature as shown in
Tables S1–S3, over the Atlantic, Indian, Pacific, seas over the western
Pacific (denoted as Pacific-Seas, only TGM/GEM in this category), seas in
the Mediterranean region (denoted as Mediterranean), Arctic, and Antarctica
Ocean. The solid black squares represent the mean value and the lowest
whisker the minimum and the largest the maximum concentration in the region.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016-f01.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>A few studies on Hg over the Indian Ocean (Soerensen et al., 2010; Xia et al.,
2010; Witt et al., 2010a; Angot et al., 2014) reported a concentration
gradient of TGM with increasing concentrations at more northern locations
closer to the inter-tropical convergence zone (ITCZ), with a mean
concentration of 1.24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 9–21<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S latitudes (Witt et al., 2010a).</p>
      <p>Studies on TGM/GEM over the Arctic Ocean showed fairly constant concentrations in
January and August–December and reported MDEs in spring and summertime
annual maximums (Lindberg et al., 2002; Aspmo et al., 2006; Sommar et al.,
2010; Steffen et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2014). During the 1998–2001 Barrow
Atmospheric Mercury Study (BAMS), daily average GEM concentrations ranged
from &lt; 0.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged between 1.5 and 2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in January and mid-August–December (Lindberg et al.,
2002). The means and ranges measured in summer 2004, 2005, and 2012 (Aspmo
et al., 2006; Sommar et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2014) were well within the
1999 summertime range of Lindberg et al. (2002) (Table S1). Different
concentrations of GEM over sea ice–covered (1.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vs. sea ice-free (1.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Arctic Ocean waters were
measured by Sommar et al. (2010) in summer 2005. In spring 2009 (14–26
March) a mean 5 min GEM concentration of 0.59 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured with
a range of 0.01–1.51 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over sea ice on the Beaufort Sea near
Barrow, Alaska, which appeared to be depleted compared to annual Arctic
ambient boundary layer concentrations (Steffen et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>In Antarctica, the first study, conducted by de More et al. (1993), reported
a mean TGM concentration of 0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a range of
0.02–1.85 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (24–48 h) at Ross Island during 1987–1989. Over
November 2000–January 2001, Sprovieri et al. (2002) reported a similar range
but a mean of 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, twice as large than that of de
More (1993) a decade earlier. Similar means and ranges of TGM/GEM
concentrations were measured by Ebinghaus et al. (2002b), Temme et
al. (2003b), Soerensen et al. (2010), and Xia at al. (2010). Similar mean
values but a much wider range (0.02–3.07 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were found in the
multi-year dataset in Pfaffhuber et al. (2012) (Table S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Hemispheric difference</title>
      <p>Hemispheric gradient over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans has been reported since the 1980s,
with higher concentrations in the North Atlantic attributed to anthropogenic
and biomass burning emissions (Seiler et al., 1980; Slemr et al., 1981, 1985,
1995; Slemr and Langer, 1992; Fitzgerald et al., 1996; Lamborg et al., 1999;
Temme et al., 2003a; Chand et al., 2008; Xia et al., 2010; Soerensen et al.,
2010; Müller et al., 2012). An average gradient of 0.37 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
TGM was measured in October–November 1973 (Seiler et al., 1980).
Measurements from the same cruise paths from Hamburg (54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) to
Buenos Aires (35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) in 1977, 1978–1980, 1992, and 1994
consistently showed TGM hemispheric difference, 1.56 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32 and
1.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Hemisphere (SH), respectively, in 1977,
increased to 2.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41 and 1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1992
followed by significant decreases to 1.79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41 and
1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1994 (Slemr et al., 1981, 1985, 1995; Slemr and Langer,
1992). The hemispheric difference from a NH average of 1.32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer 2006 and 2.61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring 2007, and
a SH average of 1.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by Soerensen et al. (2010) was close to the 1978–1980
hemispheric gradient in Slemr et al. (1985) but lower than the 1990 value in Slemr and Langer (1992).</p>
      <p>Over the Pacific a hemispheric gradient of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
found in early studies by Seiler et al. (1980) and Fitzgerald et al. (1984).
Higher concentrations but similar magnitude of hemispheric difference of TGM
was measured in December 2007 by Xia et al. (2010) with a mean of
1.746 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.513 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the North Pacific and 1.471 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.842 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
over the southern Indian Ocean (note: their cruise passed through the southern Indian Ocean instead
the South Pacific). Around the same time, Soerensen et al. (2010) measured
nearly twice lower concentrations over the South Pacific (1.11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
along the Chilean Coast and up to 1.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> near East
Australia) than the North Atlantic concentrations (mean values of 2.26 and 2.86 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 23–59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; no measurements over the
North Pacific in the study) from the same study.</p>
      <p>Studies found higher TGM concentrations up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
the equatorial Pacific in October 1980, markedly higher (&gt; 0.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those outside this region (Fitzgerald et al., 1984; Kim and
Fitzgerald, 1988). However, Wang et al. (2014) found no sustained high-GEM
concentrations indicative of persistently enhanced biotic mercury evasion
from the upwelling region over the Galápagos Islands in the equatorial
Pacific during February–October 2011. They found GEM concentrations
averaged at 1.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 times lower than the earlier ones.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Temporal variations from diurnal cycle to long-term trend</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p>Early studies on TGM over the Atlantic Ocean showed 1 order of magnitude larger
diurnal amplitude than that in more recent studies, with daily peaks of 5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at noon and amplitude of 2–3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across the North and South
Atlantic in Seiler et al. (1980). Yet none was observed by Slemr et al. (1981, 1985) and Slemr and Langer (1992). Measurements of TGM at Cape Point,
South Africa (Brunke et al., 2010) and GEM at Appledore Island, Maine, USA
(Mao and Talbot, 2012), exhibited pronounced diurnal variation in summer with
daily peaks (minimums) before sunrise (in the late afternoon) and amplitudes
of 0.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 ppqv (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the two sites, respectively.</p>
      <p>The opposite diurnal pattern with significant amplitude was observed over
the Pacific (Fitzgerald et al., 1984; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2003, 2013; Kang and
Xie, 2011; Tseng et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014) with daily peaks ranging
from 0.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (5 min) over the Japan Sea (Kang and Xie, 2011) to
2.25 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (unknown time resolution) in the equatorial region (Fitzgerald
et al., 1984). The most pronounced diurnal variation in TGM was reported in
Fitzgerald et al. (1984) with daily amplitude of 0.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
equatorial region (4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). A similar pattern and
magnitude of GEM diurnal variation was observed by Tseng et al. (2012) over
the South China Sea during May 2003–December 2005, especially in warm seasons. Opposite
patterns were observed in Weiss-Penzias et al. (2003, 2013). Laurier et al. (2003) found no diurnal variation during a cruise from Osaka, Japan, to
Honolulu, Hawaii, over 1 May 2002–4 June 2002.</p>
      <p>Over the Arctic diurnal variation of GEM was observed by Lindberg et al. (2002)
with noontime minimums in spring and summer, diurnal amplitude
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on a typical day in January–June. On the
other hand, the shipboard measurements from Sommar et al. (2010) suggested
very small near-zero diurnal variation. Similarly, no diurnal variation was
found over the Antarctica (Pfaffhuber et al., 2012), except one case with influence of
in situ human activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal to annual variation</title>
      <p>Annual cycles of TGM/GEM were reported over the Atlantic in both hemispheres. Annual
cycles with an annual maximum in austral summer and a minimum in austral
winter and average amplitude of 0.134 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed at Cape
Point, South Africa (Slemr et al., 2008; Brunke et al., 2010). Opposite
annual variation with higher (lower) concentrations in winter (summer) was
measured over the North Atlantic, such as Mace Head (amplitude 0.097 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a
remote site on the west coast of Ireland adjacent to the North Atlantic
(Ebinghaus et al., 2002a) and the Appledore Island (25 ppqv, i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> site in Mao and Talbot (2012). Similarly,
significant seasonal variation in NH with an annual minimum in July and
maximum in January–March and amplitude of 0.3–0.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
measured in a global cruise (Soerensen et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Average seasonal difference of 0.19 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GEM concentrations over the
Pacific were observed by Wang et al. (2014) with the highest and most variable
concentrations over February–May 2011 and the lowest and least variable
in October over the Galápagos Islands during 12 November 2011–11
December 2011. In contrast, a lack of seasonal variation in GEM was reported by
Weiss-Penzias et al. (2003) using a subset of data of marine origin
extracted from 1 year speciated Hg data (May 2001–May 2002) at the
Cheeka Peak Observatory on the east coast of the Pacific. This was
uncharacteristic of midlatitudinal NH sites, but significant interannual
variation was noted in this study.</p>
      <p>Distinct annual variation in GEM over the South China Sea was observed in the cruise study
by Tseng et al. (2012) over May 2003–December 2005. The winter maximum
was 5.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and summer minimum 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2–3 times higher than global background levels. Difference of
0.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in seasonal average GEM was quantified with higher
concentrations in the summer than in the fall over the Adriatic Sea (Sprovieri et al.,
2010) and less than a factor of 2 over the Augusta Basin (Bagnato et al., 2013). The study
by Obrist et al. (2011) was the first to show the occurrence of MDEs in midlatitudes with GEM down to 22 ppqv (0.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
most frequently in summer in the boundary layer of the Dead Sea, as
opposed to MDEs, as commonly known, occurring in the springtime Arctic and
Antarctic only.</p>
      <p>Annual variation of GEM over the Indian Ocean was reported in Angot et al. (2014)
with higher concentrations in winter (1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
lower in summer (1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, opposite of those at Cape
Point (Slemr et al., 2008) and Galapagos Islands (Wang et al., 2014) with
annual amplitude an order of magnitude smaller.</p>
      <p>Annual maximum concentrations of GEM occurred in summer over the Arctic Ocean and
frequent MDEs with GEM depleted to near zero in spring (Lindberg et al.,
2002; Aspmo et al., 2006; Cole et al., 2013; Moore et al., 2013). Lindberg
et al. (2002) observed GEM concentrations up to 4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in June 2000
compared to 1.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer 2004 (Aspmo et al., 2006)
and 1.23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer 2012 (Yu et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Seasonal variation in Antarctic Hg suggested large variation in TGM/GEM in spring due
to the occurrence of MDEs. The longest continuous data record in the
Antarctic started in February 2007 at the Norwegian Antarctic Troll Research
Station (TRS) in Queen Maud Land near the Antarctic coast (Pfaffhuber et
al., 2012). Concentrations were fairly constant hovering at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in late fall through winter and highly variable
ranging from 0.02 to 3.04 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of 0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring and summer (Pfaffhuber et al., 2012), close to the values
from 6 years earlier in Sprovieri et al. (2002) and Temme et al. (2003b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Long-term trends</title>
      <p>Long-term trends in TGM over the Atlantic varied during different time periods of
the past decades. TGM concentrations averaged over latitudes from Hamburg,
Germany, to Punta Arenas, Chile, were increasing at a rate of 1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1970 to 1990 (Slemr and Langer, 1992) followed by a
22 % decrease from 1990 to 1994 (Slemr et al., 1995). In similar
latitudinal coverage but over a wider longitudinal span during three cruises
in September–November 1996, December 1999–March 2000, and February
2001, TGM concentrations were averaged at 1.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Temme
et al., 2003a), comparable to the 1977–1980 (Slemr et al., 1985) and 1994
concentrations (Slemr et al., 1995) but lower than the 1990 ones (Slemr et
al., 1992). Over September 1995–December 2001, a slight increase (4 %)
in TGM was observed at Mace Head (Ebinghaus et al., 2002a). In the South Atlantic at Cape
Point a small but significant decrease was reported in TGM annual median
from 1.29 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1996 to 1.19 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2004 (Slemr et al.,
2008), and at an about 3 times faster decreasing rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.034 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over 1996–2008 (Slemr et al., 2011). A
statistically significant decreasing trend of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.028 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6–2.0 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in TGM over the North
Atlantic was reported for the same time period at Mace Head, Ireland (Ebinghaus et
al., 2011). In an updated study, Weigelt et al. (2015) presented a
relatively smaller decreasing trend of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in monthly median marine GEM concentrations over 1996–2013. In
Soerensen et al. (2012) a steep 1990–2009 decline of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.046 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.010 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found in TGM over the North Atlantic (steeper
than at NH land sites) but no significant decline over the South Atlantic. A recent
comparison by Slemr et al. (2015) found smaller trends during shorter time
periods and a possible increasing trend at Cape Point for the period
2007–2013, qualitatively consistent with the trend changes observed at Mace
Head (Weigelt et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Over the Arctic Ocean, weak or insignificant declines in TGM at rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.019 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.003 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were found
at Alert and Zeppelin, respectively, during 2000–2009, significantly
smaller than the trends at midlatitude sites (Ebinghaus et al., 2011; Slemr
et al., 2011; Soerensen et al., 2012; Cole et al., 2013; Berg et al., 2013;
Weigelt et al., 2015). TGM/GEM concentrations over the Antarctic Ocean appeared to
have increased from the 1980s to the 2000s (Ebinghaus et al., 2002b; Temme
et al., 2003b; Soerensen et al., 2010; Xia et al., 2010; Pfaffhuber et al.,
2012), and no significant trend was detected over 2007–2013 (Slemr et
al., 2015).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Mechanisms driving the observed temporal variabilities</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Causes for episodic higher concentrations</title>
      <p>It has been hypothesized that anthropogenic, biomass burning, and volcanic
emissions caused higher concentrations over open waters and near-coastal
regions in many cases. Such influences on the atmospheric concentration of
Hg was demonstrated using backward trajectories and correlations of TGM/GEM
with carbon monoxide (CO), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn, black carbon, sulfur dioxide
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and dimethylsulfide (DMS) (Williston, 1968; Seiler et al., 1980;
Fitzgerald et al., 1984; Kim and Fitzgerald, 1988;
Slemr et al., 1981, 1985; Slemr and Langer, 1992; Slemr, 1996;
Lamborg et al., 1999; Sheu and Mason, 2001; Laurier and Mason, 2007;
Soerensen et al., 2010; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Müller et al., 2012; Xia
et al., 2010; Chand et al., 2008; Kang and Xie, 2011; Weiss-Penzias et al.,
2013; Fu et al., 2010b; Nguyen et al., 2011; Ci et al., 2011; Bagnato et al.,
2013; Kotnik et al., 2014). Some studies also suggested that oceanic evasion
was an important source contributing to higher concentrations (Seiler et
al., 1980; Pirrone et al., 2003; Sigler et al., 2009b), while others thought
otherwise (Slemr et al., 1981, 1985; Slemr and Langer, 1992). Strong
photoreduction could have caused higher TGM/GEM concentrations under sunny,
warm and dry conditions with lower amounts of precipitation in the
Mediterranean Sea region (Pirrone et al., 2003; Sprovieri et al., 2003;
Sprovieri and Pirrone, 2008). These influences often occurred in multitude
simultaneously leading to elevated ambient Hg concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p>In nearly all studies, diurnal variation over the Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic was found to be most
pronounced in warm seasons, i.e., spring and/or summer. Different
combinations of oceanic emissions, photooxidation, biological production,
and meteorology were suggested to work together shaping the observed
patterns in different oceanic regions. The pattern with daytime peaks was
attributed to oceanic emissions and biological production in sea water
(Seiler et al., 1980; Fitzgerald et al., 1984; Tseng et al., 2012; Wang et
al., 2014), which was supported by the concurrent measurements of dissolved
elemental Hg (Tseng et al., 2012). The opposite pattern with daytime
minimums was associated with photooxidation of GEM by abundant halogen
radicals and meteorological conditions (Lindberg et al., 2002; Brunke et
al., 2010; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2003, 2013). The most
pronounced diurnal variation in TGM in the equatorial area (4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) was demonstrated to be caused by biological production
(Fitzgerald et al., 1984).</p>
      <p>However, Mao et al. (2012) suggested that the predominant effect of oceanic
evasion on ambient GEM concentrations was episodic, not necessarily diurnal,
because they found, among all physical parameters, the only significant
correlation GEM had was with wind speed exceeding 15 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at a marine
location, which occurred rather sparsely. This was corroborated by Sigler et al. (2009b)
suggesting enhanced oceanic evasion at a rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 ppqv h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.063 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leading to 30–50 ppqv
(0.27–0.45 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in coastal and inland GEM concentrations in southern New
Hampshire, USA, during the April 2007 nor'easter.</p>
      <p>In the study by Laurier et al. (2003) the lack of diurnal variation over the
Pacific was speculated to be caused by continuous evasion from surface water. Over
the Arctic, unlike the distinctive diurnal pattern with noontime peaks in the
study by Lindberg et al. (2002), very small near-zero diurnal variation in
GEM was manifested in the shipboard measurements of Sommar et al. (2010) and
was speculated to result from low in situ oxidation of GEM. No diurnal
variation was found over the Antarctica due possibly to lack of diurnally varying
sources and sinks (Pfaffhuber et al., 2012), except one case with in situ
human activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx6" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal to annual variation</title>
      <p>Annual cycles of TGM/GEM in the MBL differed between various oceanic regions
and were suggested to be driven predominantly by oceanic evasion, biomass
burning, anthropogenic emissions, interhemispheric flux, and/or
meteorological conditions (Slemr et al., 2008; Ebinghaus et al., 2002a, b;
Sigler et al., 2009a; Brunke et al., 2010; Soerensen et al., 2010; Mao and
Talbot, 2012; Angot et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014). Annual cycles of
TGM/GEM with an annual maximum in summer and a minimum in winter observed at
Cape Point, South Africa, in the South Atlantic MBL was hypothesized to be driven
predominantly by oceanic emissions, biomass burning, and anthropogenic
activities (Brunke et al., 2010), and interhemispheric flux (Slemr et al.,
2008; Brunke et al., 2010). Higher concentrations of GEM in the summer over
the Adriatic Sea (Sprovieri et al., 2010a) and over the Augusta Basin (Bagnato et al., 2013) were
suggested to be caused by stagnant meteorological conditions in the former
study and enhanced evasion from sea water in the latter. Opposite annual variation with higher
(lower) concentrations in winter (summer) was proposed to be determined
largely by meteorology (Ebinghaus et al., 2002a, 2011) and photochemical
oxidation of GEM (Mao and Talbot, 2012). The same annual cycle over the
Indian Ocean was speculated to be a result of long-range transport of air masses
originated from southern Africa biomass burning during the winter months
(July–September), and low GEM associated with southerly polar and marine
air masses from the remote southern Indian Ocean (Angot et al., 2014).
Frequent MDEs in the summertime Dead Sea MBL were observed to be often
concurrent with varying concentrations of bromine oxide (BrO) and high
temperatures up to 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Obrist et al., 2011). Such high
temperatures seemed to be contradictory to the general understanding that
Br-initiated GEM oxidation tends to go forward under very cold conditions at
temperature &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Despite that, the authors suggested
that Br species were the major oxidants of GEM during depletion events, even
when constantly high temperatures were accompanied by sometimes low-BrO
concentrations.</p>
      <p>Springtime large variation in Arctic and Antarctic TGM/GEM was caused by the occurrence of
MDEs. Polar MDEs have been generally linked to reactive Br-initiated GEM
oxidation in spring when Br explosion occurs producing abundant reactive Br
(Schroeder et al., 1998; Ebinghaus et al., 2002b; Lindberg et al., 2002;
Temme et al., 2003b; Mao et al., 2010; Steffen et al., 2013; Moore et al.,
2014). For Antarctic MDEs, Ebinghaus et al. (2002b) found a strong positive
correlation between TGM and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over August–October, accompanied by
enhanced Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) column BrO. Compared to
Arctic MDEs, the first Antarctic MDE occurred about 1–2 months earlier,
probably due to the lower latitude of the monitoring site and sea ice, the
former allowing earlier sunrise and the latter conducive to Br <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BrO
formation. Temme et al. (2003b) found that the air masses reaching the
station during MDEs had a maximum contact with sea ice (coverage
&gt; 40 %) over the South Atlantic Ocean, which was speculated to
contain abundant reactive Br released from sea salt associated with sea ice
or sea salt aerosols.</p>
      <p>Summertime annual maximums of GEM over the Arctic and Antarctic oceans were generally
associated with enhanced evasion of GEM and from GOM reduction in snow
resulting from maximum exposed sea water after snow/ice melt (Lindberg et
al., 2002; Aspmo et al., 2006; Soerensen et al., 2010; Cole et al., 2013;
Moore et al., 2014), which was also suggested using model simulations by
Dastoor and Durnford (2014). A different mechanism of riverine contribution
was hypothesized in Fischer et al. (2012) using an atmosphere–ocean coupled
model. Yu et al. (2014) observed high-TGM concentrations concurrent with low
salinity, CO, and high chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) over the
ice-covered central Arctic Ocean and speculated that the relatively high-CDOM concentrations associated with river runoff could enhance Hg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction. Moreover, they related the summer monthly variability in TGM
concentrations to less chemical loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx7" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Long-term trends</title>
      <p>Four hypotheses were made to explain the observed decreasing trends in TGM/GEM during
the past decades. First, the global decreasing trend was caused by decreased
re-emission of legacy mercury as a result of a substantial shift in the
biogeochemical cycle of Hg through the atmospheric, oceans, and soil
reservoirs, although exactly what may have caused this shift remained
unexamined (Slemr et al., 2011). Second, the decreasing trend was linked to
increasing tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ebinghaus et al., 2011). However, this
speculation was negated by the plausibility of GEM oxidation by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the atmosphere. Third, based on atmosphere–ocean coupled model simulations,
the decreasing trend in TGM over the North Atlantic was caused by decreasing
North Atlantic oceanic evasion driven by declining subsurface water Hg
concentrations resulting from reduced Hg inputs from rivers and wastewater
and from changes in the oxidant chemistry of the atmospheric MBL (Soerensen
et al., 2012). However, Amos et al. (2014) suggested that the decrease in
riverine input was too small to affect Hg concentrations in the open ocean
let alone the declining trend in North Atlantic sea water Hg concentrations.
Last, a 20 % decrease in total Hg emissions and 30 % in anthropogenic
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were estimated for the period of 1990–2010,
leading to the observed decreasing trends in TGM/GEM, as suggested by a most
recent modeling study (Zhang et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>GOM and PBM</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Concentration metrics</title>
      <p>The mean concentrations of GOM from individual studies varied from below LOD
in several studies to 4018 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 h) in the Dead Sea MBL (Obrist et al.,
2011; Moore et al., 2013) (Table S2; references therein). The GOM
concentration averaged for each oceanic region based on values from the
literature varied from 3 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Atlantic Ocean to 40 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
Antarctica, and the largest range 0.1–4018 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was over the Mediterranean Sea and its
neighboring seas (Fig. 1b). Note that the small ranges in other oceanic MBL
did not necessarily indicate less variability in GOM but merely a result of
limited measurement data available (Table S2; references therein).</p>
      <p>The mean concentrations of PBM from individual studies varied from below LOD
in several regions to 394 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 h) over the Beaufort Sea (Steffen et al.,
2013) (Table S3; references therein). The PBM concentration averaged for
each oceanic region based on values in the literature varied from 0.6 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
over the Indian to 394 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Arctic Ocean (Fig. 1c). No ranges
were provided for the Arctic, Antarctic, and Indian Ocean MBL due to limited numbers of studies there. The
few studies available indicated that PBM concentrations were in most cases
smaller and less variable than GOM.</p>
      <p>The earliest shipboard measurements of GOM showed dimethyl mercury (DMM)
concentrations orders of magnitude larger (Slemr et al., 1981, 1985) than
the total GOM concentration measured in the recent two to 3 decades. Due
to the use of very different techniques in early studies, those
concentrations were listed in Table S2 (references therein) but were not
used for comparison with more recent studies (Table S2; references therein).</p>
      <p>Same as GEM, GOM concentrations tended to be higher over the North than the
South Atlantic and in near-coastal regions than open waters (Temme et al., 2003b;
Mason et al., 2001; Sheu and Mason, 2001; Mason and Sheu, 2002; Aspmo et
al., 2006; Laurier and Mason, 2007; Sigler et al., 2009b; Mao and Talbot,
2012). Hourly GOM concentrations of 1–30 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the South Atlantic Ocean
from Neumayer to Punta Arenas in February 2001 (Temme et al., 2003b) were 1–2 orders of magnitude smaller than the concentrations
(1.38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.30 pmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 280 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near Bermuda
in September and December 1999 and March 2000 (Mason et al., 2001). However,
at around the same time average values almost an order of magnitude smaller
were reported at Bermuda (50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a few pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
128 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mason and Sheu, 2002) and at a US mid-Atlantic coastal site
(40 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sheu and Mason, 2001). In comparison, GOM concentrations
were an order of magnitude smaller over the open water and at higher
latitude (Aspmo et al., 2006; Laurier and Mason, 2007), comparable to those
over the South Atlantic. Similar magnitude of GOM concentrations were measured at a North Atlantic near-coastal MBL site with an average of 0.4 ppqv (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0–22 ppqv, i.e., 0–196 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 h) during 2007–2010
(Sigler et al., 2009b; Mao and Talbot, 2012).</p>
      <p>PBM concentrations (Table S3; references therein) were measured with an
average of 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the May–June 1996 South and
equatorial Atlantic cruise (Lamborg et al., 1999) and 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (&lt; 0.5 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (LOD) to 5.2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Bermuda, 30–40 times smaller
than the concurrent weekly averaged GOM concentrations (Mason and Sheu,
2002; Sheu, 2001). At higher North Atlantic latitudes, PBM concentrations were averaged at
2.4 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, very close to the concurrent average GOM concentrations but
a factor of 4 smaller varying from &lt; LOD to 6.3 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
summer 2004 (Aspmo et al., 2006). Mao and Talbot (2012) reported PBM
concentrations varying from 0.09 ppqv (0.8 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter 2010 to
0.52 ppqv (4.6 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer 2010.</p>
      <p>During the 2000s, concentrations of GOM over the Pacific decreased by around
a factor of 2 from 9.5 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over open waters in 2002 (Laurier et al.,
2003) to around 4 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at a remote Japanese site downwind of major
Asian source regions in spring 2004 (Chand et al., 2008) and in the
equatorial region in 2011 (Wang et al., 2014) (Table S2; references
therein). The maximum concentration from a decade of studies was 700 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (3 h) measured in air masses originated from upper air over the
Pacific (Timonen et al., 2013), about 2 orders of magnitude larger than what
Chand et al. (2008) and Laurier et al. (2003) reported. PBM concentrations
over the Pacific reached up to 17 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, comparable to GOM, and on average
were 3 times larger downwind of East Asia (3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
than in the equatorial Pacific MBL (Chand et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2014) (Table S3).</p>
      <p>In the southern Indian Ocean, very low GOM and PBM concentrations were observed,
averaged at 0.34 (&lt; LOD (0.28–0.42 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4.07 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.67 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (&lt; LOD – 12.67 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, over 2 years from a remote location, Amsterdam Island (Angot
et al., 2014). These concentrations were at the lower end of the range of
Atlantic and the Pacific MBL measurements.</p>
      <p>Measurements over the Mediterranean Sea and its neighboring seas generally showed much higher
concentration levels than over the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Ocean, with GOM ranging from
0.1 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Adriatic (Sprovieri and Pirrone, 2008) to 4018 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
the Dead Sea (Obrist et al., 2011) (Tables S2 and S3; references therein).
Frequency distributions of 24 h average GOM and PBM concentrations from a
site situated in the Mediterranean MBL exhibited log-normal distributions
with the maximum frequency at around 59 and 48 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively
(Pirrone et al., 2003). One of the major findings from Sprovieri et al. (2003)
was constant presence of GOM averaged at 7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the MBL over a 6000 km long cruise path around the Mediterranean Sea. In
a 1 year dataset from 2008, Beldowska et al. (2012) showed 24 h PBM
concentrations varied over 2–142 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with 93 % on average in the coarse fraction
(&gt; 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) over the southern Baltic Sea.</p>
      <p>In springtime Arctic, the highest concentrations of GOM at 900–950 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
were observed during the 1998–2001 BAMS. Very high springtime PBM concentrations (mean 394 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 47–900 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1 h)
were reported over Beaufort Sea sea ice by Steffen et al. (2013). This was an order of magnitude higher than concurrent GOM
concentrations (mean 30 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3.5–104.5 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and even
larger than those in temperate regions, where particle concentrations tended
to be large. In comparison, Sommar et al. (2010) found very low GOM and PBM
over the summertime Arctic Ocean.</p>
      <p>Over the Antarctica, 2 h GOM concentrations ranged over 10.5–334 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
averaged at 116.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 77.8 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Terra Nova Bay during spring–summer 2000 (Sprovieri et al., 2002), and a similar range was also observed
by Temme et al. (2003b) at the Neumayer Station in summer 2001 (Table S2). A
range of 30–140 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (80 min) was reported for peaks of GOM in
summer 2007 (Soerensen et al., 2010). Concentrations of 1 h PBM from Temme
et al. (2003b) varied over 15–120 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a range a factor of 3
smaller than that of concurrent GOM, tracking GOM well only at a lower
level. Different from the Arctic, summertime GOM concentrations over the
Antarctic were orders of magnitude larger.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Hemispheric difference</title>
      <p>Hemispheric gradient has been measured in both GOM and PBM since the early
1980s (Slemr et al., 1985; Soerensen et al., 2010). In the first shipboard
study by Slemr et al. (1985), PBM concentrations of 0.013 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.018 and
0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the North and South Atlantic Ocean,
respectively, were derived from Hg concentrations in rain water. About 3
decades later Soerensen et al. (2010) reported hemispheric difference of GOM
with a NH average of 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer and 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring, and a seasonally invariable SH average of 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Temporal variations from diurnal to long-term trend</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p>While some studies found a lack of diurnal variation in GOM (Sheu and Mason,
2001; Aspmo et al., 2006; Temme et al., 2003b), many reported distinct
diurnal variation with noon-afternoon peaks and nighttime minimums in
various oceanic regions (Mason et al., 2001; Mason and Sheu, 2002; Lindberg
et al., 2002; Laurier et al., 2003; Sprovieri et al., 2003, 2010; Laurier
and Mason, 2007; Mao et al., 2008; Chand et al., 2008; Sigler et al., 2009b;
Soerensen et al., 2010; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Wang et al., 2014). Over the
Atlantic amplitude values varied from 0.27 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter 2010 near the coast
of southern New Hampshire, USA (Mao and Talbot, 2012), to &gt; 80 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the cruise from Barbados via Bermuda to Baltimore, Maryland, USA
(Mason and Sheu, 2002; Laurier and Mason, 2007). Over the Pacific amplitude values
exceeded 80 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Laurier et al., 2003; Chand et al., 2008; Wang et
al., 2014). Over the Mediterranean Sea and its neighboring seas, diurnal amplitude reached
up to 35 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sprovieri et al., 2003, 2010). The
most pronounced diurnal variation was observed in the springtime Arctic with
noontime peaks up to 900–950 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and near-zero concentrations at
night (Lindberg et al., 2002).</p>
      <p>The diurnal pattern of PBM concentrations, measured using a Tekran
speciation unit, at a midlatitude North Atlantic near-coastal MBL site was in general
not consistent between seasons and years with seasonally averaged daily
peaks 0.2–0.7 ppqv (1.7–6.2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at varying time of a day (Mao
and Talbot, 2012). The Tekran PBM instrument measures PBM on particles
&lt; 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Using a 10-stage impactor, Feddersen et al. (2012),
perhaps the first to study the size distribution of PBM in MBL, reported PBM
concentrations (up to 0.25 ppqv, i.e., 2.2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, in 3.3–4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in 10 size fractions (&lt; 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m to &gt; 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
at the same MBL location from Mao and Talbot (2012), and found a diurnal
cycle with daily maximums at around 16:00 UTC (noon local time) and minimums
around sunrise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal to annual variation</title>
      <p>Studies reported distinct seasonal variation in GOM with higher
concentrations in warmer months and lower in colder months (Mason et al.,
2001; Mason and Sheu, 2002; Pirrone et al., 2003; Laurier and Mason, 2007;
Sigler et al., 2009a; Sprovieri et al., 2010; Soerensen et al., 2010; Mao
and Talbot, 2012; Obrist et al., 2011; Moore et al., 2013; Wang et al.,
2014; Angot et al., 2014). A fairly flat baseline with negligible annual
variation in GOM was observed at a midlatitude North Atlantic MBL site near southern
New Hampshire, USA, in a 3 year dataset, with more variability in higher
mixing ratios and seasonal median values ranging from 0.03 ppqv
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter 2010 to 0.55 ppqv
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer 2007 (Mao and Talbot, 2012).
Over the Mediterranean, the fall 2004 campaign experienced no production of GOM, whereas
the summer 2005 campaign saw very high concentrations varying over 21–40 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sprovieri et al., 2010a). In the Dead Sea MBL, AMDEs resulting in 1 h
GOM up to 700 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred more frequently in the
summer than in winter (Obrist et al., 2011; Moore et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>In the Arctic MBL, several hundreds of pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GOM concentrations were
observed in spring (Lindberg et al., 2002; Steffen et al., 2013) and very
low GOM and PBM concentrations in summer (Sommar et al., 2010). Quite
differently, summertime GOM concentrations over the Antarctic seemed to be orders of
magnitude larger (Sprovieri et al., 2002; Temme et al., 2003b; Soerensen et
al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Some studies observed seasonal variation in PBM. Sprovieri et al. (2010a)
found PBM concentrations on average were more than a factor of 2 higher
during high-Hg episodes in the fall than during the summertime ones over the
Mediterranean Sea. Beldowska et al. (2012) measured an average 24 h PBM of 15 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and a 3–67 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range in the non-heating season compared to an
average of 24 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a range of 2–142 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the heating
season. The PBM measurements at a North Atlantic coastal site using a 10-stage impactor
showed distinct seasonal variation with 50–60 % of PBM in coarse
fractions, 1.1–5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, composed largely of sea salt aerosols at both
sites in summer and 65 % in fine fractions in winter (Feddersen et al.,
2012). Over the Indian Ocean significantly higher concentrations were observed in
winter than in summer (2.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.56 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 1.79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.15 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Angot et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Mechanisms driving the observed temporal variabilities</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Factors causing episodic high and low concentrations</title>
      <p>Long-range transport of air masses of terrestrial origin with high-PBM
concentrations was evidenced in elevated crustal enrichment factors in the
PBM samples (Lamborg et al., 1999). An episode of high-GOM concentrations
coincided with a passing hurricane was linked to downward mixing of air
aloft with higher GOM (Prestbo, 1997; Mason and Sheu, 2002). Low-GOM
concentrations were found to be concurrent with high humidity (e.g., fog)
and rainfall but the highest concentrations on the day after such events if
temperatures were elevated (Mason and Sheu, 2002). High nighttime
concentrations of GOM in the Mediterranean Basin were observed in
anthropogenic plumes identified using backward trajectories (Sprovieri et
al., 2010a). The GOM concentrations in air masses of marine origin at a site
on the East Pacific coast were unusually high ranging over 200–700 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Timonen et al., 2013). The high-GOM concentrations were thought to
be partitioned back from the PBM that was accumulated on aqueous
super-micron sea salt aerosols in the MBL when being lofted above the MBL,
and an anticorrelation between GOM and GEM was found in air masses of marine
origin indicating strong in situ oxidation of GEM.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p>The lack of GOM diurnal variation was speculated to result from diverse air
masses with different concentrations converging at the location leading to
the removal of diurnal variation in GOM (Sheu and Mason, 2001), and from low
solar radiation (&lt; 200 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at higher latitudes (Aspmo et
al., 2006). The majority of the studies reporting significant diurnal
variation in GOM attributed it to photooxidation, loss via dry deposition,
and oceanic evasion, which was backed up by modeling studies (Hedgecock et
al., 2003, 2005; Laurier et al., 2003; Selin et al., 2007; Strode et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p>It was generally found that GOM concentrations were positively correlated
with solar radiation flux and anticorrelated with relative humidity and at
times with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mason and Sheu, 2002; Laurier and Mason, 2007; Soerensen
et al., 2010; Mao et al., 2012). The correlation between GOM and UV
radiation flux indicated photochemical processes, and the anticorrelation
between GOM and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was caused by processes destroying O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
producing GOM (Mason and Sheu, 2002; Laurier and Mason, 2007), especially
the oxidation reactions in the presence of deliquescent sea salt aerosols
(Sheu and Mason, 2004). The fact that GOM daytime peaks over the Pacific increased
with lower wind speeds and stronger UV radiation suggested that GOM was
produced in situ via photochemically driven oxidation (Laurier et al., 2003;
Chand et al., 2008). Chand et al. (2008) estimated the magnitude of GOM
close to the amount produced from the reaction of GEM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH alone. Mao and
Talbot (2012) suspected that unknown production mechanism(s) of GOM in the
nighttime MBL kept the levels above the LOD. Positive correlation between
GOM/PBM and temperature indicated possible temperature dependence of certain
oxidation reactions and gas-particle partitioning, whereas the
anticorrelation between GOM/PBM and wind speed indicated enhanced loss via
deposition caused by faster wind speed over water (Mao et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>No consistent diurnal variation in PBM measured using a Tekran speciation
unit suggested more complicated processes than photochemistry involved in
PBM budgets (Mao et al., 2012). However, Feddersen et al. (2012) found
diurnal variation in 10-stage impactor PBM measurement data and speculated
that GEM oxidation drove the PBM daytime maximum at around 16:00 UTC (noon
local time) and depositional loss at night without replenishment led to the
minimum around sunrise. In the same study, the large peaks of PBM appeared
to be of continental origin.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal to annual variation</title>
      <p>Larger concentrations of GOM in spring and/or summer were generally
associated with stronger photo oxidation, biological activity, biomass
burning, oceanic, and anthropogenic emissions, whereas low concentrations
with wet deposition (Lindberg et al., 2002; Mason and Sheu, 2002; Temme et
al., 2003b; Pirrone et al., 2003; Sprovieri et al., 2003; Hedgecock et al.,
2004; Laurier and Mason, 2007; Sprovieri and Pirrone, 2008; Sprovieri et
al., 2010; Soerensen et al., 2010; Obrist et al., 2011; Mao et al., 2012;
Angot et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014). The positive correlation between GOM
concentration and solar radiation was used to explain warm season maximums
of GOM based on the same line of reasoning that was used to explain daytime
peaks of GOM (Mason and Sheu, 2002; Pirrone et al., 2003; Mao et al., 2012).
Observed seasonal variation in PBM was attributed to anthropogenic influence
and gas-particle partitioning as well as condensation and coagulation of
fine particles (Sprovieri et al., 2010a; Beldowska et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Over the Mediterranean Sea and its neighboring seas, it was generally thought that
meteorological conditions combined with anthropogenic, oceanic, and biomass
emissions caused GOM and PBM seasonal variation (e. g. Pirrone et al., 2003;
Sprovieri et al., 2003; Hedgecock et al., 2004; Sprovieri and Pirrone,
2008). A case in point is the seasonal contrast of no production and little
variation in GOM due likely to strong removal under the wet conditions in
fall 2004 and very high concentrations due to strong oxidation under dry,
sunny conditions in summer 2005 (Sprovieri et al., 2010). Sensitivity box
model simulations suggested that the Hg <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br controlled the production
rate of GOM without contributions from the oxidation reactions by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and OH and that HgBr was quickly converted to GOM. In the same study it was
brought to attention that biomass burning and ship emissions in the region
were not included in the emission inventory but could be important to
ambient concentrations (Sprovieri et al., 2010). The authors suggested that
ship emissions could become a more important source of contaminants as
emissions from other sources were being more stringently controlled, and
also the Mediterranean was a place where busy shipping routes ran close to
population centers. However, no studies have demonstrated that ship
emissions were an important source of Hg.</p>
      <p>In the Dead Sea MBL, frequent occurrences of MDEs in the summer were linked to
higher BrO concentrations indicative of Br-initiated oxidation of GEM
despite high temperature and sometimes low-BrO concentrations (Obrist et
al., 2011). There is apparent discrepancy between our theoretical
understanding of the conditions required for Br-initiated GEM oxidation and
the real atmospheric conditions in the summertime Dead Sea MBL.</p>
      <p>Wang et al. (2014) proposed iodine in a two-step mercury oxidation
mechanism, where BrHgI was hypothetically formed, helped to reconcile the
modeled GOM with the observed annual maximum GOM in October over the
equatorial Pacific. The authors mentioned that HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregation with HgBr
from Dibble et al. (2012) could be another possibility and further suggested
that a major process in representing Hg oxidation is missing in current
models.</p>
      <p>Lindberg et al. (2002) found that springtime Arctic maximum concentrations of GOM
at 900–950 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponded to open leads over sea ice and an
extensive area of elevated BrO concentrations under the calmest conditions
and strongest UV radiation. Low GOM and unusually large PBM concentrations
over Beaufort Sea sea ice in spring 2009 were speculated to be caused by low
temperatures and GOM formation followed by adsorption onto available sea
salt and sulfate aerosols, as well as ice crystals around the sea ice
(Steffen et al., 2013). In contrast, very low summertime Arctic GOM and PBM
were due possibly to low in situ oxidation of GEM and enhanced physical
scavenging as a result of low visibility and high relative humidity (Sommar
et al., 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Median and range in TGM/GEM, GOM and PBM by site category <bold>(a)</bold> and
by geographical region <bold>(b)</bold>. Bar graph represents the median and error bar
represents the maximum, estimated from the values in the literature as shown
in Tables S4–S6.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Higher concentrations of GOM over the Antarctic Ocean were first proposed by
Sprovieri et al. (2002) to be produced from gas-phase oxidation of GEM by
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OH together with favorable physical conditions
such as PBL height. Temme et al. (2003b) found that the highest
concentrations of GOM corresponding to the lowest concentration of GEM
falling below the LOD (1.1 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during MDEs in summer were
associated with the air masses having a maximum contact with sea ice
(coverage &gt; 40 %) over the South Atlantic Ocean, which was speculated to
contain abundant reactive Br, released from sea salt associated with sea
ice. Summertime GOM was found to be correlated with GEM due probably to in
situ oxidation and buildup (Soerensen et al., 2010) and was also observed
to be anticorrelated with GEM due solely to oxidation (Temme et al., 2003b;
Sprovieri et al., 2002).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Continental boundary layer</title>
      <p>In this section, continental sites are defined as inland sites located in
non-polar regions and exclude locations impacted by the MBL, e.g., coastal
sites and oceans.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>TGM/GEM</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Concentration metrics</title>
      <p>Field measurements of TGM/GEM at continental sites were conducted mainly in
Asia, Canada, Europe, and USA. Very few TGM/GEM measurements have been made
at inland sites in the SH. Of all the four regions, the median
concentrations of TGM or GEM were 1.6 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at remote and rural
surface (low elevation) sites, 2.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban surface sites, and
1.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at high-elevation sites (Fig. 2a). TGM/GEM ranged over
0.1–11.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at remote sites, 0.2–18.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at rural sites,
0.2–702 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban sites, and 0.6–106 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at high-elevation sites. Overall these statistics indicate that TGM/GEM at
continental urban sites were higher and had larger variability than rural
and remote surface sites and high-elevation sites in the NH. By geographical
region (Fig. 2b), the median TGM/GEM in Asia, comprising of sites
predominantly in China and a few sites in Korea and Japan, were higher by
26–55 % than those in Europe, Canada, and USA in this respective order.
Although a higher median TGM/GEM was found in Asia, the maximum single 5 min
concentration was recorded in the USA (324 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Engle et al., 2010).
The 5 min maximum TGM/GEM among the four regions was the lowest in Europe
(23 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Witt et al., 2010b). It is important to note that most urban
sites in the literature are located in North America and Europe, and hence
the higher TGM/GEM at continental urban sites as shown in Fig. 2b were
predominantly driven by measurements at those sites (instead of Asian
sites). A summary of the mean and the range of TGM/GEM as well as the
distribution of mean TGM/GEM at individual continental sites can be found in
Fig. S1 and Table S4. Statistics from studies prior to 2009 are referred to
in Sprovieri et al. (2010b).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of predominant temporal patterns of speciated atmospheric
mercury at continental sites in the Northern Hemisphere.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="170.716535pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="170.716535pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Diurnal variation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Seasonal variation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TGM/GEM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rural</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Daytime maximum, nighttime minimum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter–spring maximum and summer–fall minimum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Urban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nighttime maximum, daytime minimum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No predominant pattern</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High elevation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Daytime maximum, nighttime minimum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter–spring maximum and summer–fall minimum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GOM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rural</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Midday to late afternoon maximum, nighttime minimum <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Exception: nighttime maximum at urban and elevated sites</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No predominant pattern</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Urban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring or summer maximum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High elevation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No predominant pattern</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PBM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rural</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No predominant pattern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Maximum during heating season</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Urban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No predominant pattern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Maximum during heating season <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Exception: summer maximum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High elevation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No predominant pattern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Maximum during heating season</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Temporal variations from diurnal cycle to long-term trends</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p>At remote surface locations, the diurnal variation of TGM/GEM is characterized by
a daytime increase reaching a maximum concentration in the afternoon and
nighttime decrease (Manolopoulos et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2012). At
rural surface and high-elevation sites, several different diurnal patterns have been reported.
The first pattern, similar to remote surface locations, is an early morning
minimum, followed by midday to afternoon maximum and decrease at night
(Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Yatavelli et al., 2006; Choi et al., 2008,
2013; Fu et al., 2008, 2009, 2010a, 2012b; Lyman and Gustin, 2008; Mao et
al., 2008; Obrist et al., 2008; Faïn et al., 2009; Sigler et al., 2009;
Mazur et al., 2009; Nair et al., 2012; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Eckley et al.,
2013; Parsons et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014; Brown et al., 2015; Zhang et
al., 2015). The second diurnal pattern typically observed is a higher
nighttime TGM/GEM than daytime. This tends to occur in Asia and more
polluted sites outside of Asia, e.g., abandoned Hg mines and cement plants
(Lyman and Gustin, 2008; Wan et al., 2009a; Rothenberg et al., 2010; Li et
al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2011; Fu et al., 2012a; Gratz et al., 2013; Zhang
et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014). The third pattern found at rural surface
and elevated sites is a weak or lack of diurnal pattern in TGM/GEM (Choi et
al., 2008, 2013; Mao et al., 2008; Sigler et al., 2009; Engle et al., 2010;
Rothenberg et al., 2010; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Zhang et al., 2013; Han et
al., 2014).</p>
      <p>At urban surface sites, the predominant diurnal pattern is an increase in TGM/GEM
throughout the night that leads to a maximum in the early morning and a
decrease in TGM/GEM in the afternoon (Stamenkovic et al., 2007; Li et al.,
2008; Choi et al., 2009; Lyman and Gustin, 2009; Song et al., 2009; Liu et
al., 2010; Witt et al., 2010b; Nguyen et al., 2011; Nair et al., 2012; Zhu et
al., 2012; Gratz et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2013; Civerolo et al., 2014; Cole
et al., 2014; Han et al., 2014; Lan et al., 2012, 2014; Xu et al., 2014, 2015). The diurnal amplitude tends to be higher during summer compared
to other seasons (Stamenkovic et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2009; Civerolo
et al., 2014; Lan et al., 2012, 2014; Xu et al., 2014). Diurnal variations with
daytime maximum and early morning minimum have also been observed at urban
surface sites (Fostier and Michelazzo, 2006; Rothenberg et al., 2010; Witt
et al., 2010b; Jiang et al., 2013; Han et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal variation</title>
      <p>The seasonal variation in TGM/GEM at some continental remote surface sites can be
characterized by a winter to early-spring maximum and lower summer/fall
concentrations (Manolopoulos et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2012). At other
remote sites, a completely opposite seasonal pattern was found with higher
summer/fall concentrations than winter/spring (Abbott et al., 2008; Cole et
al., 2014). The predominant seasonal TGM/GEM trend at rural surface and
elevated sites is the winter to spring maximum and summer/fall minimum (Zielonka et
al., 2005; Yatavelli et al., 2006; Choi et al., 2008; Fu et al., 2008, 2009,
2010a; Mao et al., 2008; Sigler et al., 2009a; Mazur et al., 2009; Engle et
al., 2010; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Nair et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013;
Parson et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014; Marumoto et al., 2015). Other
studies conducted in rural sites and elevated sites found higher TGM/GEM during warm
seasons (spring/summer) than in the winter (Weiss-Penzias et al., 2007;
Obrist et al., 2008; Nguyen et al., 2011; Eckley et al., 2013; Zhang et al.,
2013, 2015).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The seasonal patterns at continental urban surface sites can be vastly different
from each other. Five major seasonal patterns have been identified including
(1) a winter to spring maximum (Fostier and Michelazzo, 2006; Stamenkovich
et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2009; Peterson et al., 2009; Civerolo et al.,
2014; Xu et al., 2015), (2) a summer TGM/GEM maximum (Xu and Akhtar, 2010;
Jiang et al., 2013), (3) higher TGM during both winter and summer (Xu et
al., 2014), (4) higher TGM/GEM during spring/summer (Liu et al., 2007, 2010;
Song et al., 2009; Nair et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2012; Hall et al., 2014),
and (5) an absence of a clear seasonal trend (Kim et al., 2013; Civerolo et
al., 2014; Marumoto et al., 2015). Table 1 summarizes the predominant
diurnal and seasonal patterns observed at rural, urban, and high-elevation continental sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Long-term trends</title>
      <p>At rural sites across Canada, TGM decreased at a rate of 0.9–3.3 % per year
between 1995 and 2011, which was determined using 5–15 years of TGM data
depending on the location (Cole et al., 2014). A GEM decrease of 0.056 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2005 to 2010 was found at an elevated site in New Hampshire
(Mao and Talbot, 2012). Widespread declines in GEM across North America
between 1997 and 2007 have also been reported (Weiss-Penzias et al., 2016);
however, the trends were not determined separately for rural and urban
sites. No significant trends in TGM were found at urban/industrial sites in the UK from
2003–2013 (Brown et al., 2015) and at another urban site in Seoul, Korea,
from 2004 to 2011 (Kim et al., 2013). However, a short-term annual TGM decrease
from 2.0 to 1.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was recorded at an urban site in Windsor,
Canada,
from 2007 to 2009 (Xu et al., 2014). At a chlor-alkali site in the UK, TGM
declined by 1.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2003 to 2012 (Brown et
al., 2015). Weigelt et al. (2015) determined annual TGM trends for different
air masses arriving at Mace Head, Ireland, between 1996 and 2013.
Specifically for continental airflows, TGM decreased by 0.0240 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0025 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for polluted air masses from Europe, which
was a slightly faster decline compared to marine airflows from the North
Atlantic Ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0209 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0019 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the SH
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0161 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0020 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In certain months, the TGM
decreases associated with local and European airflows (0.047–0.051 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were greater than other months (Weigelt et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Mechanisms driving the observed temporal variabilities</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation of TGM/GEM</title>
      <p>TGM/GEM was higher during daytime than nighttime and often declined to a
minimum in the early morning at remote, rural, high elevation, and some urban surface sites (Table 1). One of the
mechanisms driving this diurnal pattern involved meteorological parameters,
such as temperature, the increase of which enhances TGM/GEM volatilization
(Manolopoulos et al., 2007; Mao et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2013; Han et
al., 2014). Surface emissions of TGM can occur during daytime from soil and
snow as temperature and solar radiation increases (Mao et al., 2012; Cole et al., 2014). Solar radiation minimizes the activation energy required for Hg
emissions (Zhu et al., 2012) and increases Hg photoreduction in soil and
snow (Steffen et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2012; Hall et al., 2014; Xu et al.,
2014, 2015). This process appeared to be especially relevant at
sites with elevated Hg in soil (Lyman and Gustin, 2008; Brown et al., 2015)
because of a larger flux gradient. Dry deposition of GEM in the night might
have
also played a role since deposition was typically observed in nighttime in
contrast to emission during daytime (Zhang et al., 2009). Fog or dew
formation occurring in the late summer was believed to have caused GEM
depletion in the early morning hours by capturing GEM in fog or dew water
(Manolopoulos et al., 2007; Mao and Talbot, 2012). Another driving mechanism
of this TGM/GEM diurnal pattern was the change in the boundary layer mixing
height. Lower TGM/GEM during nighttime is due to TGM/GEM deposition as the
nocturnal inversion layer forms. In the morning, the nocturnal inversion
breaks down and mixes with TGM/GEM-rich air in the residual layer and
subsequently leads to increasing TGM/GEM during the day (Yatavelli et al.,
2006; Mao et al., 2008; Mazur et al., 2009; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Nair et al., 2012; Choi et al., 2008, 2013; Jiang et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014).
At elevated sites, there was a transition from the sampling of boundary layer during
daytime to free troposphere air at night, which was driven by mountain–valley
atmospheric patterns (Obrist et al., 2008). During daytime, mountain breeze
causes moist air to ascended from the surface to higher altitudes carrying
with it GEM from the boundary layer (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Obrist et
al., 2008; Fu et al., 2010a, 2012b; Zhang et al., 2015). At night, drier free
tropospheric air impacted the elevated site leading to lower GEM and water
vapor and higher GOM and ozone (Obrist et al., 2008). A lack of diurnal
variability was also reported at some rural surface locations, although the
driving mechanism is not quite clear. At an elevated site, the sampling of
air above the nocturnal boundary layer and lack of anthropogenic sources or
GEM oxidants near the site led to constant GEM during most of the time
except in the summer (Mao et al., 2008; Sigler et al., 2009a; Mao and
Talbot, 2012). Thus, this differed from other mountain sites, which were
affected by surface emissions and local/regional transport of GEM from the
boundary layer during daytime.</p>
      <p>At most urban sites and some elevated and polluted rural sites, the nighttime TGM
concentrations were higher than daytime, and the maximum concentration
typically occurred in the early morning before sunrise (Table 1). This type
of diurnal variation was driven by nighttime accumulation of TGM/GEM near
the surface due to a shallow nocturnal boundary layer and dilution during
the day initiated by convective mixing with cleaner air aloft as the mixing
layer increases (Stamenkovic et al., 2007; Li et al., 2008; Lyman and
Gustin, 2008, 2009; Choi et al., 2009; Wan et al., 2009a; Rothenberg et al.,
2010; Witt et al., 2010b; Li et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2011; Fu et al.,
2012a; Nair et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2012; Gratz et al., 2013; Kim et al.,
2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014; Lan et al., 2012, 2014; Xu et al.,
2014). The shallow nocturnal boundary layer was often associated with high
TGM coinciding with low wind speeds at night (Li et al., 2008; Fu et al.,
2012a; Lan et al., 2014). Increases in nighttime concentrations could also
be driven by nighttime sources, such as emissions from mercury mining
regions (Lyman and Gustin, 2008) and local emissions occurring at night
(Song et al., 2009; Wan et al., 2009a; Rothenberg et al., 2010; Gratz et
al., 2013; Kim et al., 2013). At urban surface sites, studies suggested the
driving mechanisms for the morning maximum were surface emissions (Zhu et
al., 2012; Hall et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014, 2015),
volatilization of Hg from dew (Zhu et al., 2012), and vehicular traffic
emissions evident by correlations between TGM/GEM and CO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhu
et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2015). However, there is little research suggesting
significant amounts of Hg from vehicular emissions (Conaway et al., 2005;
Landis et al., 2007; Won et al., 2007). The general view is that the global
contribution from petroleum fuel combustion represented 0.00013 % of the
total anthropogenic emissions and thus can be neglected in global assessment
of Hg emissions (Pirrone et al., 2010). The lower TGM/GEM observed in the
afternoon was driven by GEM oxidation (Stamenkovic et al., 2007; Choi et
al., 2009; Lyman and Gustin, 2009; Li et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2011; Kim
et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2014, 2015).</p>
      <p>Many studies conducted in urban areas found a larger diurnal amplitude during
summer than other seasons. The major driving mechanism for this larger
amplitude originated from higher solar radiation and temperature, which
increased the boundary layer mixing height in the summer (Civerolo et al.,
2014; Xu et al., 2014). Higher solar radiation during summer also increased
photochemical reactions, like GEM oxidation. The larger diurnal variation
was also attributed to increases in uptake and re-emissions by vegetation
and power plant emissions from air conditioner use during summer nights (Xu
et al., 2014). The shift in the timing of the TGM/GEM maximum varied with
season at some urban sites. During spring in Windsor, Canada, the decrease
in TGM earlier in the afternoon was thought to be due to increase
photochemical processes resulting from higher solar radiation and lower GEM
emissions due to less vegetation coverage in the spring (Xu et al., 2014).
In Nanjing, China, the peak concentration occurring later in the morning
during spring was driven by prolonged sunlight hours (Zhu et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Site characteristics may have different impacts on the diurnal variation.
During nighttime, GEM at an urban site was significantly higher than a rural site
suggesting higher GEM fluxes from buildings and pavement than vegetation and
soil (Liu et al., 2010), but may be simply caused by stronger and more
anthropogenic sources in urban areas. The diurnal amplitude at an urban site was
greater than a suburban site in one study; however, the reason was not known
(Civerolo et al., 2014). In the same study, nighttime GEM was 25–30 %
higher than daytime for the urban site close to the Atlantic Ocean, whereas
the GEM difference between night and day was only 10 % at an inland
suburban site (Civerolo et al., 2014). The study suggested that the higher
halogen concentrations in marine environments increased GEM oxidation and
subsequently, the loss of GEM in the afternoon leading to larger diurnal
variation. At a different coastal-urban location, nighttime GEM was only
slightly higher than daytime because of the cleaner air transported from the
marine environment (Nguyen et al., 2011). These studies suggested that MBL
influence could lead to very different diurnal patterns. Sites continuously
impacted by Hg point sources likely contributed to the large short-term
fluctuations in the diurnal patterns at some urban sites (Rutter et al.,
2008; Engle et al., 2010; Witt et al., 2010b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal variation of TGM/GEM</title>
      <p>The seasonal variation exhibiting a winter to spring maximum in remote,
rural, urban and high-elevation environments (Table 1) was suggested to be
driven by multiple mechanisms, including anthropogenic emissions for winter
heating (coal and wood combustion), reduced atmospheric mixing, decreased
GEM oxidation, less scavenging, and emissions from soil, vegetation, and
melting snow in the spring (Stamenkovic et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2008; Mao
et al., 2008; Sigler et al., 2009a; Peterson et al., 2009; Wan et al.,
2009a; Cheng et al., 2012; Mao and Talbot, 2012; Civerolo et al., 2014; Cole
et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015). The lower TGM/GEM during summer has been
attributed to increased GEM oxidation, uptake by vegetation, and higher wet
deposition of GOM (Yatavelli et al., 2006; Fu et al., 2008, 2009; Engle et
al., 2010; Xu et al., 2015). While these were the predominant driving
mechanisms of the seasonal variations in the NH, the seasonal patterns could
also be influenced by changes in the prevailing wind patterns (Fostier and
Michelazzo, 2006; Fu et al., 2010a, 2015; Sheu et al., 2010; Chen et al.,
2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Hall et al., 2014). The impact of combustion
emissions from winter heating was ruled out at a subtropical site in the
Pearl River Delta region of China; instead, the elevated TGM in the spring
was attributed to monsoons, which advected southerly marine air masses during
summer and northeasterly winds from Siberia during winter. The transition from cold dry air to warm moist air often led to
strong temperature inversion and haze in the spring, which in turn inhibits
pollutant dispersion. Summer and spring maxima in TGM/GEM have also been
found at remote, rural, and urban atmospheres. This pattern was
predominantly driven by meteorology. Higher solar radiation and temperature
during summer increased GEM emissions from Hg contaminated soil (Zhu et al.,
2012; Eckley et al., 2013), from vegetation at a forested agricultural site
(Nguyen et al., 2011), and from urban surfaces such as soil and pavement in
Windsor, Canada (Xu and Akhtar, 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx6" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Long-term trends of TGM/GEM</title>
      <p>Long-term trends of TGM/GEM over continental regions indicated a declining
trend at some sites and no significant trend at others, particularly at
urban sites. Previous studies partly attributed the long-term TGM trends to
anthropogenic Hg emissions reductions. There has been a 60–70 % decrease
in anthropogenic Hg emissions from USA and Canada; however, only up to 15 %
of those emissions reductions impacted TGM at Canadian sites (Cole et al.,
2014). The more rapid decline in TGM measured at Mace Head, Ireland, for
local and European air masses compared to marine air masses was thought to
be driven by Hg emissions reductions in Europe (Weigelt et al., 2015). The
baseline TGM at Mace Head decreased at a larger rate in November than other
months suggesting that it is related to lower Hg emissions from residential
heating in Europe. The 21 % decline in TGM from 2006 to 2012 in
urban/industrial areas of the UK was also consistent with the 0.21 Mg yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (24 %) reduction in Hg emissions from the UK, even though the
TGM trend from the 2003 to 2013 period was not statistically significant (Brown
et al., 2015). In Seoul, Korea, no significant trend in TGM was found from
2004 to 2011, consistent with the slight decrease (1 %) in coal consumption
in Seoul over the same time frame (Kim et al., 2013). While TGM/GEM trends
appear to be aligned with local/regional Hg emission trends, a discrepancy
exists when the trend was compared to the increasing global anthropogenic Hg
emissions (Sprovieri et al., 2010b; Ebinghaus et al., 2011; Cole et al.,
2014). Alternative reasons for the decline in TGM could be due to faster
cycling of Hg as O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other oxidants have been increasing or lower
emissions of previously deposited Hg (Sprovieri et al., 2010b; Ebinghaus et
al., 2011). Modeling studies indicated global Hg emissions inventory have
not accounted for the changes in Hg speciation emission profiles from coal
combustion and reduced emissions from products containing Hg (Zhang et al.,
2016).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>GOM and PBM</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Concentration metrics</title>
      <p>The highest median GOM and PBM were found at high-elevation sites, while the lowest
concentrations were found at rural surface sites. The median GOM from all
locations were 12.1 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at elevated sites, 9.9 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at urban sites, 3.8 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at remote sites, and 2.8 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at rural sites (Fig. 2a), and
correspondingly the median PBM concentration was 11.0, 10.0, 6.9, and 4.6 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The variabilities in GOM and PBM were greatest at urban
locations;
2–3 h GOM concentrations ranged from &lt; LOD-880 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
elevated sites, &lt; LOD-8160 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban sites, &lt; LOD-224 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at remote sites, and &lt; LOD-462 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
rural sites (see individual site statistics and the map of mean
concentrations at all sites in Fig. S1 and Table S5). Moreover, 2–3 hour PBM
concentrations ranged from &lt; LOD-1001 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at elevated sites,
&lt; LOD-11 600 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban sites, &lt; LOD-404 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at remote sites, and &lt; LOD-205 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at rural sites
(Table S6). By geographical region, the median GOM in Asia was a factor of
1.4–5.1 higher than those in Canada and USA (Fig. 2b). Similarly, the median
PBM in Asia was 1.8–8.1 times higher than those in Canada, Europe, and USA.
This was potentially because one-third of the elevated sites were in China.
The GOM and PBM maxima of 8160 and 11 600 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, were both observed at an urban site in Illinois, USA (Engle et
al., 2010; Tables S5 and S6).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Temporal variations from diurnal cycle to seasonal trends</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variation</title>
      <p>The predominant diurnal pattern of GOM at remote, rural, urban, and elevated sites was an increase in the
morning leading to a maximum sometime between midday to late afternoon and
eventually decreasing at night (Yatavelli et al., 2006; Manolopoulos et al., 2007; Abbott et al., 2008; Lyman and Gustin, 2008; Faïn et al., 2009;
Rothenberg et al., 2010; Cheng et al., 2012; Fu et al., 2012a; Nair et al.,
2012; Eckley et al., 2013; Gratz et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014; Civerolo
et al., 2014; Marumoto et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). Late evening
increases in GOM were observed at some urban and elevated sites (Lynam and Keeler, 2005;
Song et al., 2009; Gratz et al., 2013). The average GOM was 18–60 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between midnight and early morning at two elevated sites, whereas the
average daytime GOM was 9.2–39 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(Swartzendruber et al., 2006;
Sheu et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>No predominant diurnal pattern was found for PBM, which was mostly measured
using the Tekran speciation unit (2537-1135-1130). At rural and urban sites, the types
of diurnal patterns include, daytime/afternoon peak (Yatavelli et al., 2006;
Choi et al., 2008; Rothenberg et al., 2010; Cole et al., 2014), increasing
during daytime leading to a nighttime peak (Nair et al., 2012; Zhang et al.,
2013), or lack of variation (Cobbett and Van Heyst, 2007; Choi et al., 2008;
Rothenberg et al., 2010; Cole et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal variation</title>
      <p>No predominant seasonal pattern in GOM was found at remote, rural, urban, and elevated sites. At remote sites,
some studies observed a winter to early-spring maximum and lower
concentrations during summer/fall (Manolopoulos et al., 2007; Cheng et al.,
2012), whereas higher summer/fall than winter/spring concentrations were
also reported (Abbott et al., 2008). In rural and elevated sites, the maximum
concentration occurred in different seasons. At urban sites, the maximum GOM
typically occurred in warmer seasons, e.g., spring or summer (Song et al.,
2009; Liu et al., 2010; Choi et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Gratz et al.,
2013; Civerolo et al., 2014; Han et al., 2014; Marumoto et al., 2015; Xu et
al., 2015). Higher PBM and total particulate Hg (TPM) during colder seasons
than summer was a highly ubiquitous trend for remote, rural, urban, and elevated sites (Zielonka et al.,
2005; Choi et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2009b; Liu et al., 2010; Kim et al.,
2012; Gratz et al., 2013; Beldowska et al., 2012; Marumoto et al., 2015;
Schleicher et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). However, increases in PBM also
occurred during summer in a few studies (Song et al., 2009; Huang et al.,
2010; Cheng et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Mechanisms driving the observed temporal variabilities</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diurnal variations of GOM and PBM</title>
      <p>The widespread observation of a midday to late afternoon peak in GOM at
continental sites (Table 1) often coincided with meteorological parameters,
such as solar radiation and temperature, and/or ozone (Yatavelli et al.,
2006; Abbott et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2009a; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2009;
Nair et al., 2012; Mao et al., 2012; Gratz et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013;
Civerolo et al., 2014; Cole et al., 2014; Marumoto et al., 2015). At high-elevation sites,
GOM was also inversely correlated with relative humidity, water vapor, or
dew point temperature (Swartzendruber et al., 2006; Lyman and Gustin, 2008,
2009; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2009), and in some cases GOM was not correlated
with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lyman and Gustin, 2009; Peterson et al., 2009; Xu et al.,
2015). These diurnal trends indicated daytime in situ photochemical production of
GOM or entrainment of GOM from the free troposphere due to convective
mixing. Increases in GOM during daytime at a rural site was attributed to
local transport from urban areas as indicated by similarities in diurnal
patterns between GOM, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and a delay in the timing of the
GOM maximum likely resulting from emissions transport (Rothenberg et al.,
2010). Short-term fluctuations in the diurnal pattern of GOM also suggested
the influence of point sources (Rutter et al., 2008; Engle et al., 2010).
Dry deposition and scavenging of GOM by dew played a role in decreasing GOM
during nighttime (Liu et al., 2007; Wan et al., 2009b; Weiss-Penzias et al.,
2009; Nair et al., 2012; Choi et al., 2013; Civerolo et al., 2014). The
stronger diurnal amplitude during the spring/summer coincided with stronger
correlations between GOM, solar radiation, temperature, and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Yatavelli et al., 2006; Mao et al., 2012; Gratz et al., 2013; Zhang et al.,
2013), which suggested that increased photochemical processes led to higher
GOM. Large diurnal variation during summer was also potentially driven by
high pressure, drier, and cloud-free conditions that are conducive to the
buildup of GOM in the free troposphere (Lyman and Gustin, 2009).</p>
      <p>Nighttime increases in GOM seen exclusively at urban and elevated sites (Table 1)
appeared to be driven by anthropogenic emissions and the free troposphere.
Nocturnal emissions and local/regional transport within the boundary layer
(Lynam and Keeler, 2005; Song et al., 2009) and reduced vertical mixing in
the stable nocturnal boundary layer led to higher GOM at night in urban areas
(Gratz et al., 2013). At high-elevation sites, katabatic winds entrained GOM from the free
troposphere. In one study, GOM from the free troposphere was believed to
originate from in situ photochemical processes due to a strong inverse GEM-GOM
correlation and a GOM/GEM slope near unity during an elevated GOM episode
(Swartzendruber et al., 2006). While an anticorrelation between GEM and GOM
was also found at another elevated site, Sheu et al. (2010) did not observe
a complete photochemical conversion of GEM to GOM. The difference between
these two elevated sites suggested different sources of GOM in the free troposphere.
Timonen et al. (2013) found that in one type of free troposphere air mass,
GEM oxidation occurred in anthropogenic plumes transported from Asia to Mt.
Bachelor Observatory, USA, and converted 20 % of the GEM to GOM. A second
type of air mass traveling over the Pacific Ocean resulted in 100 % GEM
conversion to GOM likely because of GEM oxidation by bromine.</p>
      <p>The driving mechanisms behind the diurnal pattern of PBM were better
explored for urban sites than other site categories. Frequent spikes in hourly
concentrations during daytime were attributed to point sources (Rutter et
al., 2008; Civerolo et al., 2014). At a valley urban site, higher PBM and GEM
during daytime suggested similar emission sources from Hg enriched areas
(Lyman and Gustin, 2009). Higher PBM during daytime in the summer could also
be initiated by photochemical production of GOM followed by absorption on
secondary organic aerosols (Choi et al., 2013). Diurnal patterns exhibiting
nighttime increases in PBM in urban areas could be due to multiple
mechanisms and sources, such as nocturnal emissions and local/regional
transport within the boundary layer (Song et al., 2009), reduced vertical
mixing in the stable nocturnal boundary layer (Gratz et al., 2013; Xu et
al., 2015), vehicular emissions in China (Xu et al., 2015), and nighttime
street food vending in Beijing (Schleicher et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Seasonal variations of GOM and PBM</title>
      <p>The seasonal variation characterized by higher GOM in the warm seasons
(Table 1) was primarily driven by photochemical production due to increased
solar radiation, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and likely other atmospheric oxidants (Liu et al.,
2010; Choi et al., 2013; Civerolo et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015).
Alternative reasons could be attributed to anthropogenic emissions leading
to higher GOM in the summer at urban sites (Song et al., 2009; Gratz et al.,
2013). Atmospheric mercury depletion events occurring at higher latitude continental sites
led to higher GOM during spring (Cole et al., 2014). Free troposphere
transport was a major driving mechanism for higher reactive Hg at three
high-elevation western US sites (Weiss-Penzias et al., 2015). At elevated sites in China, the
occurrence of higher GOM between fall and spring were attributed to coal and
biofuel burning (Wan et al., 2009b) and changes in the prevailing winds that
advected GOM from polluted regions (Fu et al., 2012a; Zhang et al., 2015).
Lower GOM during summer was due to wet deposition (Wan et al., 2009b; Sheu
et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Several mechanisms contributed to the increase in PBM or TPM during colder
seasons (Table 1) including, local/regional coal combustion and wood burning
emissions, lower mixing height, less oxidation, and increased gas-particle
partitioning (Song et al., 2009; Xiu et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2010; Cheng
et al., 2012; Fu et al., 2012a; Kim et al., 2012; Choi et al., 2013; Gratz
et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Civerolo et al., 2014; Cole et al., 2014;
Schleicher et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015). Oxidized Hg tended to partition
to particles during colder seasons because of lower temperatures (Rutter et
al., 2007), higher relative humidity (Kim et al., 2012), and reduced
volatilization of gaseous Hg (Choi et al., 2013). Similar to GOM, decreases
in PBM during summer at many sites in China were due to wet deposition (Wan
et al., 2009b; Schleicher et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015)
and a shift to cleaner marine airflows during summer (Kim et al., 2012).
Higher PBM during warm seasons may be driven by forest fire emissions
(Eckley et al., 2013) and increased PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> available for GOM absorption
at urban sites (Song et al., 2009; Schleicher et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Latitudinal variation</title>
      <p>There are a few shipboard and airborne studies that surveyed latitudinal
variation of TGM/GEM (Slemr et al., 1981, 1985, 1995; Slemr and Langer,
1992; Fitzgerald et al., 1984; Lamborg et al., 1999; Temme et al., 2003a;
Aspmo et al., 2006; Soerensen et al., 2010). Bagnato et al. (2013) compiled
a latitudinal distribution of TGM/GEM using measurement data from a number
of shipboard measurement studies spanning the time period of 1980–2012
(Fig. 3) and showed a small but discernible interhemispheric gradient, with
the highest concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in NH
midlatitudes and the lowest in SH latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting from greater emissions of Hg in the more industrialized
NH.</p>
      <p>Tropospheric airborne measurements from INTEX-B (Talbot et al., 2007, 2008)
and ARCTAS (Mao et al., 2010), spanning near the surface to 12 km altitude,
suggested distinct seasonal variation in GEM concentrations and latitudinal
gradient. On average there was an increase of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 ppqv
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from lower latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20–30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) to higher (60–90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) latitudes in spring
while negligible latitudinal variation in summer (Fig. 4). It was speculated
that smaller latitudinal gradient of temperature in summer likely enhanced
meridional circulation resulting in smaller latitudinal variation in GEM
concentration in the troposphere.</p>
      <p>A small gradient was measured in atmospheric GEM concentrations over the
Pacific from 1.32 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 14–20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitudes to 1.15 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1–15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S latitudes in October 2011 (Soerensen et al.,
2014). Atmospheric GEM elevated in the northern part of the ITCZ was
temporarily influenced by the northeastern trade wind that enhanced oceanic
evasion, consistent with the largest evasion flux in that region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Altitude variation</title>
      <p>Airborne measurements of TGM, GEM, and/or GOM have been conducted since 1977
(Seiler et al., 1980) extending from near the surface to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 km altitude at several geographic locations (Table S7; references therein).
More recent studies showed GEM concentrations remaining nearly constant vertically,
slightly decreasing with altitude (Banic et al., 2003; Radke et al., 2007;
Talbot et al., 2007, 2008; Mao et al., 2010). Seasonal variation was observed from surface to
7 km over Canada with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer, 1.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter, 1.7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
&gt; 1 km altitude and 1.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> below 1 km due to widespread MDEs over the sea ice in the
springtime Arctic (Banic et al., 2003). During ARCTAS, Mao et al. (2010)
found that the vertical extent of springtime Arctic MDEs varied from meters
to 1 km depending on the thickness of the surface inversion layer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Compiled values for several marine/oceanic environmental systems.
(Based on the figure from
Bagnato et al., 2013.)</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Observation of low GEM in stratospherically influenced air led to the
hypothesis that the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) was a Hg
sink region (Radke et al., 2007). With repeated measurements of depleted GEM
in stratospherically influenced air coupled with enrichment of PBM in lower stratospheric aerosols (Murphy et al., 1998, 2006),
Talbot et al. (2007) hypothesized that stratospheric GEM depletion was
caused by fast oxidation of GEM by abundant halogen radicals and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
estimated a lifetime of 2 and 0.5 days for 100 ppqv GEM oxidized by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and Br, respectively. Talbot et al. (2007) suggested that stratospheric
intrusion could be a source of tropospheric Hg if PBM was to be transformed
back to gaseous Hg.</p>
      <p>A 1–2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range of upper tropospheric GEM was reported by
Ebinghaus et al. (2007) and elevated GEM concentrations in biomass burning
plumes from the same study suggested biomass burning representing a major
mercury source. In the atmosphere of East Asia, Friedli et al. (2004) was
the first to report GEM concentrations from sea level to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 km altitude under the influence of continental export from East China,
showing concentrations at all altitudes higher than the global background,
with the largest 6.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in an industrial plume mostly from coal
combustion and at times from other sources including dust storms, biomass
burning, and volcanic eruption. On a relevant note, Swartzendruber et al. (2008) suggested that long-range transport of Asian pollution contributed to
the higher GEM concentrations above 2.5 km, which increased with altitude
from 1.30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.084 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 0–0.5 km altitude to 1.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.182 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the highest layer 5.5–6.5 km altitude over the
Pacific Northwest over 13 April–16 May 2006.</p>
      <p>Upper air GOM concentrations were first measured in spring by Lindberg et al. (2002) at 1000 and 100 m altitude immediately northeast of Point
Barrow. Six aircraft surveys consistently showed that GOM concentrations
decreased from an average of 70 to 20 to 2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 5 to 100 to
1000 m altitude, supporting the hypothesis that the Hg oxidation reactions
occurred in the near-surface boundary layer driven by halogen compounds
derived from sea-salt aerosols. In recent years, more studies attributed
higher GOM concentrations in higher altitudes to lack of depositional loss,
lower temperature, and/or more abundant Br radicals (Sillman et al., 2007;
Lyman and Jaffe, 2011; Brooks et al., 2014; Gratz et al., 2015; Shah et al.,
2016). Sillman et al. (2007) reported GOM concentrations measured in Florida
increasing with height from 10 to 230 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was reproduced
using CMAQ model (Bullock and Brehme, 2002) with gas-phase oxidation
reactions GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH, the latter being dominant. Lyman and
Jaffe (2011) found enhanced GOM concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and depleted GEM in one stratospheric intrusion case and further
speculated that the stratosphere was depleted in total Hg and enriched in
GOM, and suggested that stratospheric intrusion could be a source of GOM to
the troposphere. Near Tullahoma, TN, USA, the highest GOM concentrations (200–500 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from flights over a year were observed always at 2–4.5 km altitude with a strong seasonal variation with a wintertime minimum and a summertime
maximum (Brooks et al., 2014). In the same study, limited PBM measurements
exhibited similar levels to GOM at all altitudes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>GEM (ppqv) from the INTEX-B in spring 2006 and ARCTAS in spring
and summer 2008 (Data sources: Talbot et al., 2007, 2008; Mao et al., 2010).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/12897/2016/acp-16-12897-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In a most recent field campaign NOMADSS, the highest Hg(II) concentrations
of 300–680 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed in dry (RH &lt; 35 %) and clean
air masses during two flights over Texas at 5–7 km altitude and off the
North Carolina coast at 1–3 km altitude (Gratz et al., 2015; Shah et al.,
2016). Gratz et al. (2015) found, using back trajectories, that a segment of
air masses with elevated GOM averaged at 0.266 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.038 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
ranging over 0.182–0.347 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 7 km altitude over Texas
originated from the upper troposphere of the Pacific High. It was speculated
that the stable, dry conditions of large-scale anticyclones resulted in a
lack of GOM removal by wet deposition or in-cloud reduction and were thus
ideal for GOM accumulation. They demonstrated that elevated BrOx could
persist and that sufficient GOM could be produced during long-range
transport in the Pacific upper troposphere. Their sensitivity analysis
suggested a range of 8–13 days required to produce the observed GOM. Shah
et al. (2016), using the GEOS-Chem model with tripled bromine radical
concentrations or a faster oxidation rate constant for GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Br, increased
modeled Hg(II) concentrations by a factor of 1.5–2 improving agreement
with the observations, and suggested that the subtropical anticyclones were
significant global sources of Hg(II).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and recommendations</title>
      <p>This review summarized the general characteristics in GEM, GOM, and PBM
concentrations in the MBL, over land, from low to high latitudes, and from
the surface to the upper troposphere, and further the factors driving such
variabilities based on a great wealth of research in the literature. The Key
points are summarized below.</p>
      <p>For MBL TGM/GEM, diurnal variation in most oceanic regions featured noon to
afternoon minimums due probably to in situ oxidation of GEM, while a few
studies showed the opposite pattern over the Atlantic and the equatorial Pacific Ocean, attributed to
enhanced oceanic evasion linked to enhanced photoreduction and biological
activity. Seasonal to annual variation was generally characterized as higher
(lower) concentrations in colder (warmer) months, which was largely thought
to be caused by less (more) loss via oxidation in colder (warmer) months.
Long-term trends have been identified at locations in Mace Head, Ireland,
midlatitudinal Canada, and Cape Point, South Africa, and varied over
different time periods, which was speculated to be associated with changing
anthropogenic and legacy emissions, and redox chemistry.</p>
      <p>For MBL GOM, diurnal variation was generally characterized with noon to
afternoon peaks and nighttime low values and seasonal variation with higher
concentrations in spring and summer and lower in fall and winter, largely
attributed to GEM photooxidation as often supported by correlation of GOM
with solar radiation and BrO. In one study springtime maximums were also
linked to biological activity and in a few studies annual minimums were
associated with scavenging by precipitation. No long-term trends have been
reported for oceanic regions.</p>
      <p>For MBL PBM, no consistent diurnal and seasonal variation has been
identified in most studies, and only two studies reported seasonal variation
with higher concentrations in fall/winter associated with anthropogenic
emissions. One study showed no consistent diurnal variation in Tekran
measurements but a clear diurnal cycle with maximums at noon and minimums
before sunrise using 10-stage impactor measurements.</p>
      <p>For continental TGM/GEM, higher concentrations were found at urban sites
than remote, rural, and elevated sites. This result is unbiased by elevated
TGM/GEM from Asian sites. The predominant diurnal pattern was an early
morning minimum and afternoon maximum, opposite to that at urban sites.
Diurnal patterns at surface sites were thought to be driven by surface and
local emissions, boundary layer dynamics, Hg photochemistry, dry deposition,
and sequestering by dew. At elevated sites, mountain–valley winds appeared
to be important drivers of the diurnal cycle. Seasonal variations were
influenced by fossil fuel emissions for winter heating, surface emissions,
and monsoons in Asia. At background sites, long-term declines in TGM were
partially attributed to anthropogenic Hg emission reductions.</p>
      <p>For continental GOM, concentrations were higher at elevated sites. However,
this result may be biased by a large proportion of high-elevation studies
from China where speciated atmospheric mercury are typically elevated. The
predominant diurnal pattern was a noon to mid-afternoon maximum and
nighttime minimum, except for nighttime increases at urban and elevated
sites. The driving mechanisms of the diurnal variations were suggested to
include in situ photochemical production, dry deposition, and scavenging by
dew. Entrainment of GOM from the free troposphere was believed to contribute
to nighttime increases at some elevated sites. No predominant seasonal
pattern in GOM was found, except for higher concentrations in the
spring/summer at urban sites. Photochemical production driven by strong
solar radiation and atmospheric oxidants, free tropospheric transport,
anthropogenic emissions, and increased wet deposition during summer appeared
to affect GOM seasonal variation.</p>
      <p>For continental PBM or TPM, no predominant diurnal pattern was found.
Increases in PBM or TPM were prevalent during colder seasons and were driven
by local/regional coal combustion and wood burning emissions, lower mixing
height, reduced oxidation, and increased gas-particle partitioning.</p>
      <p>TGM/GEM over the ocean surface decreased from the NH to the SH with the
highest concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in NH midlatitudes
and the lowest in SH (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
interhemispheric gradient was believed to suggest the majority of Hg
emissions in NH, contradicting the hypothesis of large oceanic sources of Hg
by previous work. However, in other studies the largest oceanic source was
found in the equatorial region. Airborne measurements of TGM suggested
distinct seasonal variation in latitudinal distributions, a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 ppqv (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in GEM concentrations
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0–30 to 60–90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitudes in spring and negligible latitudinal variation
in summer. It was speculated that smaller latitudinal gradient of
temperature in summer likely enhanced meridional circulation resulting in
smaller latitudinal variation in GEM concentration in the troposphere.</p>
      <p>GEM concentrations remained nearly constant, slightly decreasing with
altitude over the several airborne field campaign regions, and depleted GEM
was found in stratospherically influenced air masses. Abundant GOM has been
suggested, but only very few studies have conducted measurements of free
tropospheric GOM showing concentrations of hundreds of pg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
particularly in the area of Pacific High.</p>
      <p>Over 2 decades of extensive measurements have advanced our knowledge of
the spatiotemporal variation of TGM/GEM, GOM, and PBM in numerous
continental and oceanic environments. However, measurement data, especially
those of PBM, remain scarce in the SH, MBL, and upper air. In oceanic
regions most observations, obtained via shipboard measurements of TGM/GEM
with a few exceptions as ground-based on islands, suggested composite
instead of instantaneous variation. Moreover, there are hardly
size-fractionated PBM measurements. The current Tekran speciation unit could
only measure PBM &lt; 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, and Tekran PBM measurement data from
a limited number of MBL and continental monitoring locations exhibited no
definitive diurnal patterns in PBM concentrations. However, impactor
measurements of total PBM in the MBL showed clearly defined diurnal
variation with daily maximums at around noon and minimums before sunrise.
These existing problems impede our gaining full knowledge of global
distributions and temporal variations of speciated Hg.</p>
      <p>GEM oxidation is one of the main driving mechanisms of diurnal and seasonal
variations of TGM/GEM and GOM. However, the oxidants that are involved in
the photochemical reactions driving the diurnal and seasonal variations of
GOM remain largely unknown/uncertain, due to the lack of speciated GOM and
upper air measurements. This is largely a result of inadequate technologies
and a nebulous understanding of chemical reactions in atmospheric Hg
transformation. Studies such as Chand et al. (2008) estimated GOM
concentrations using the reaction of GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH alone, and Sillman et al. (2007) reproduced observed GOM concentrations over Florida using CMAQ with
gas-phase oxidation of GEM by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH only. However, the reactions of
GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GEM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH have been subject to debate between
theoretical and experimental studies, as no mechanism consistent with
thermochemistry has been proposed (Pal and Ariya, 2004; Calvert and
Lindberg, 2005; Subir et al., 2011; Ariya et al., 2015). It was speculated
that GEM oxidation in the MBL and the upper troposphere was possibly largely
Br-initiated (Holmes et al., 2009; Gratz et al., 2015; Shah et al., 2016).
This indicated that even if a model reproduced observed concentrations of
GOM, the chemistry in the model was not necessarily correct. So far, most
chemical transport models have rarely focused on diurnal variation of
speciated Hg; instead, they mostly focused on reproducing annual and monthly
variations in TGM/GEM (Lei et al., 2013; Song et al., 2015), with large
discrepancies between model simulations and surface measurements of GOM and
PBM (Zhang et al., 2012; Kos et al., 2013). There are too many
misrepresentations of Hg science and confounding issues in current models to
gain a full understanding of the driving mechanisms for the observed diurnal
to decadal variation in speciated Hg.</p>
      <p>In examining these unresolved questions and issues, the following
recommendations for future research were hence suggested:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Global tropospheric distributions need to be mapped out for TGM/GEM, GOM,
and PBM. Long-term monitoring of atmospheric Hg will need to be continued in
time and space, particularly over oceans and at high altitudes utilizing
innovative platforms, which undoubtedly demands technological breakthroughs
in instrumentation.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Future research is warranted on GOM speciation measurements and multiphase
redox kinetics. Field measurement studies need to include more oxidants
besides ozone (and BrO in limited number of studies) in the analysis of
diurnal variation.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Monitoring of long-term trends in TGM/GEM needs to continue, and more work
is needed to unravel the causes responsible for the observed trends. Current
hypotheses need to be validated using more extensive, longer datasets and a
modeling system that includes realistic representation of dynamical,
physical, and chemical processes in Hg cycling not only in the atmosphere
but also in the ocean and between the two systems.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Size-fractionated PBM measurements are needed, including Hg concentrations
on particles of all sizes, in space and time concurrent with TGM/GEM and GOM
measurements.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>This is a review paper. All data are from the literature.  Hence, we did not provide access to the data.
All data used in the figures are provided in the tables.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the field technicians, students and/or researchers
for collection of speciated atmospheric mercury data that are summarized and
discussed in this review paper. Part of this work was funded by the
Environmental Protection Agency grant agreement no. 83521501. We thank
Y. Zhou for her help with Fig. S1.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: R. Ebinghaus<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abbott, M. L., Lin, C. J., Martian, P., and Einerson, J. J.: Atmospheric
mercury near Salmon Falls creek reservoir in southern Idaho, Appl. Geochem.,
23, 438–453, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Kocman, D., Horowitz, H. M., Zhang, Y., Dutkiewicz,
S., Horvat, M., Corbitt, E. S., Krabbenhoft, D. P., and Sunderland, E. M.:
Global biogeochemical implications of mercury discharges from rivers and
sediment burial, M., Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
9514–9522, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502134t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502134t</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Angot, H., Barret, M., Magand, O., Ramonet, M., and Dommergue, A.: A 2-year
record of atmospheric mercury species at a background Southern Hemisphere
station on Amsterdam Island, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11461–11473,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Ariya, P. A., Amyot, M., Dastoor, A., Deeds, D., Feinberg, A., Kos, G.,
Poulain, A., Ryjkov, A., Semeniuk, K., Subir, M., and Toyota, K.: Mercury
physicochemical and biogeochemical transformation in the atmosphere and at
atmospheric interfaces: a review and future directions, Chem. Rev., 115,
3760–3802, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500667e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500667e</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aspmo, K., Temme, C., Berg, T., Ferrari, C., Gauchard, P.-A., Fain, X., and
Wibetoe, G.: Mercury in the atmosphere, snow, and melt water ponds in the North
Atlantic Ocean during Arctic Summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4083–4089,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bagnato, E., Sproverie, M., and Barra, M.: The sea–air exchange of mercury
(Hg) in the marine boundary layer of the Augusta basin (southern Italy):
Concentrations and evasion flux, Chemosphere, 93, 2024–2032, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Banic, C. M., Beauchamp, S. T., Tordon, R. J., Schroeder, W. H., Steffen, A., Anlauf, K.
A., and Wong, H. K. T.: Vertical distribution of gaseous elemental
mercury in Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4264, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002116</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Beldowska, M., Saniewska, D., Falkowska, L., and Lewandowska, A.: Mercury in
particulate matter over Polish zone of the southern Baltic Sea, Atmos.
Environ., 46, 397–404, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Berg, T., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Cole, A. S., Engelsen, O., and Steffen, A.:
Ten-year trends in atmospheric mercury concentrations, meteorological effects
and climate variables at Zeppelin, Ny-Ålesund, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
6575–6586, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6575-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6575-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Brooks, S., Ren, X., Cohen, M., Luke, W. T., Kelley, P., Artz, R., Hynes, A.,
Landing, W., and Martos, B.: Airborne Vertical Profiling of Mercury Speciation
near Tullahoma, TN, USA, Atmos., 5, 557–574, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos5030557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos5030557</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, R. J., Goddard, S. L., Butterfield, D. M., Brown, A. S., Robins, C.,
Mustoe, C. L., and McGhee, E. A.: Ten years of mercury measurement at urban
and industrial air quality monitoring stations in the UK, Atmos. Environ.,
109, 1–8, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., and Slemr, F.:
Gaseous elemental mercury depletion events observed at Cape Point during
2007–2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1121–1131, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1121-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1121-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bullock, O. R. and Brehme, K. A.: Atmospheric mercury simulation using the
CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 2135–2146, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G. and Lindberg, S. E.: Mechanisms of mercury removal by O3 and
OH in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3355–3367, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chand, D., Jaffe, D., Prestbo, E., Swartzendruber, P. C., Hafner, W., Weiss-Penzias, P., Kato, S., Takami, A., Hatakeyama, S., and Kajii, Y.: Reactive and
particulate mercury in the Asian marine boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 28,
7988–7996, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.048</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, L., Liu, M., Xu, Z., Fan, R., Tao, J., Chen, D., Zhang, D., Xie, D. and
Sun, J.: Variation trends and influencing factors of total gaseous mercury in
the Pearl River Delta – A highly industrialised region in South China
influenced by seasonal monsoons, Atmos. Environ., 77, 757–766, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, I., Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Graydon, J. A., and Louis, V. L. St.:
Source-receptor relationships for speciated atmospheric mercury at the remote
Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 1903–1922, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1903-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1903-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, E. M., Kim, S. H., Holsen, T. M., and Yi, S. M.: Total gaseous
concentrations in mercury in Seoul, Korea: local sources compared to
long-range transport from China and Japan, Environ. Pollut., 157, 816–822,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, H. D., Holsen, T. M., and Hopke, P. K.: Atmospheric mercury (Hg) in the
Adirondacks: Concentrations and sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
5644–5653, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, H. D., Huang, J., Mondal, S., and Holsen, T. M.: Variation in
concentrations of three mercury (Hg) forms at a rural and a suburban site in
New York State, Sci. Total Environ., 448, 96–106, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Ci, Z. J., Zhang, X. S., Wang, Z. W., Niu, Z. C., Diao, X. Y., and Wang, S.
W.: Distribution and air-sea exchange of mercury (Hg) in the Yellow Sea,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2881–2892, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2881-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2881-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Civerolo, K. L., Rattigan, O. V., Felton, H. D., Hirsch, M. J., and DeSantis,
S.: Mercury wet deposition and speciated air concentrations from two urban
sites in New York State: Temporal patterns and regional context, Aerosol Air
Qual. Res., 14, 1822–1837, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cobbett, F. D. and Van Heyst, B. J.: Measurements of GEM fluxes and
atmospheric mercury concentrations (GEM, RGM and Hgp) from an agricultural
field amended with biosolids in Southern Ont., Canada (October 2004–November
2004), Atmos. Environ., 41, 2270–2282, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Cole, A. S., Steffen, A., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Berg, T., Pilote, M., Poissant,
L., Tordon, R., and Hung, H.: Ten-year trends of atmospheric mercury in the
high Arctic compared to Canadian sub-Arctic and mid-latitude sites, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 1535–1545, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1535-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1535-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, A. S., Steffen, A., Eckley, C. S., Narayan, J., Pilote, M., Tordon, R.,
Graydon, J. A., St. Louis, V.L., Xu, X., and Branfireun, B. A.: A survey of
mercury in air and precipitation across Canada: patterns and trends,
Atmosphere, 5, 635–668, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Conaway, C. H., Mason, R. P., Steding, D. J., and Flegal, A. R.: Estimate of
mercury emission from gasoline and diesel fuel consumption, San Francisco
Bay area, California, Atmos. Environ., 39, 101–105, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Dastoor, A. P. and Durnford, D. A.: Arctic Ocean: is it a sink of a source of
atmospheric mercury?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 1707–1717, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
De More, S. J., Patterson, J. E., and Bibby, D. M.: Baseline atmospheric
mercury studies at Ross Island, Antarctica, Antarctic Sci., 5, 323–326,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Dibble, T. S., Zelie, M. J., and Mao, H.: Thermodynamics of reactions of ClHg
and BrHg radicals with atmospherically abundant free radicals, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10271–10279, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Driscoll, C. T., Mason, R. P., Chan, H. M., Jacob, D. J., and Pirrone, N.:
Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effect, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 4967–4983, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R. and Slemr, F.: Aircraft measurements of atmospheric mercury
over southern and eastern Germany, Atmos. Environ., 34, 895–903, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Coggin, A. M., Spain, T. G., Jennings, S. G., and
Temme, C.: Long term measurements of atmospheric mercury at Mace Head, Irish
west coast, between 1995 and 2001, Atmos. Environ., 36, 5267–5276, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Temme, C., Einax, J. W., Löwe, A. G.,
Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., and Schroeder, W. H.: Antarctic springtime
depletion of atmospheric mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1238–1244,
2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Ebinghaus, R., Slemr, F., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., van Velthoven, P., Zahn,
A., Hermann, M., O'Sullivan, D. A., and Oram, D. E.: Emissions of gaseous
mercury from biomass burning in South America in 2005 observed during CARIBIC
flights, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08813, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028866" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028866</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Jennings, S. G., Kock, H. H., Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. J.,
and Spain, T. G.: Decreasing trends in total gaseous mercury observations in
baseline air at Mace Head, Ireland from 1996 to 2009, Atmos. Environ., 45,
3475–3480, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Eckley, C. S., Parsons, M. T., Mintz, R., Lapalme, M., Mazur, M., Tordon, R.,
Elleman, R., Graydon, J. A., Blanchard, P., and St. Louis, V.: Impact of
closing Canada's largest point-source of mercury emissions on local
atmospheric mercury concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10339–10348,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Engle, M. A., Tate, M. T., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Schauer, J. J., Kolker, A.,
Shanley, J. B., and Bothner, M. H.: Comparison of atmospheric mercury
speciation and deposition at nine sites across central and eastern North
America, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014064</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Faïn, X., Obrist, D., Hallar, A. G., Mccubbin, I., and Rahn, T.: High
levels of reactive gaseous mercury observed at a high elevation research
laboratory in the Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8049–8060,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8049-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8049-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Feddersen, D. M., Talbot, R., Mao, H., and Sive, B. C.: Size distribution of
particulate mercury in marine and coastal atmospheres, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 10899–10909, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10899-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10899-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W. F.: Is mercury increasing in the atmosphere? The need for an
atmospheric mercury network (AMNET), Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 245–254,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W. F. and Mason, R. P.: The global mercury cycle: oceanic and
anthropogenic aspects, in: Global and Regional Mercury Cycles: Sources,
Fluxes and Mass Balances, edited by: Baeyens, W., Ebinghaus, R., and
Vasiliev, O., NATO ASI Series 2. Environment, vol. 21. Kluwer Ac. Pub.,
Dordrecht, 85–108, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W. F., Gill, G. A., and Kim, J. P.: An Equatorial Paci”c source
of atmospheric ercury, Science, 224, 597–599, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Fostier, A. H. and Michelazzo, P. A.: Gaseous and particulate atmospheric
mercury concentrations in the Campinas Metropolitan Region (Sao Paulo State,
Brazil), J. Brazilian Chem. Soc., 17, 886–894, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Friedli, H. R., Radke, L. F., Prescott, R., Li, P., Woo, J.-H., and
Carmichael, G. R.: Mercury in the atmosphere around Japan, Korea, and China
as observed during the 2001 ACE-Asia field campaign: Measurements,
distributions, sources, and implications, J. Geophys. Res., 28, D19S25,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004244</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Feng, X., Zhu, W., Wang, S., and Lu, J.: Total gaseous mercury
concentrations in ambient air in the eastern slope of Mt. Gongga,
South-Eastern fringe of the Tibetan plateau, China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
970–979, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Feng, X., Wang, S., Rothenberg, S., Shang, L., Li, Z., and Qiu, G.:
Temporal and spatial distributions of total gaseous mercury concentrations in
ambient air in a mountainous area in southwestern China: Implications for
industrial and domestic mercury emissions in remote areas in China, Sci.
Total Environ., 407, 2306–2314, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Dong, Z. Q., Yin, R. S., Wang, J. X., Yang, Z. R., and
Zhang, H.: Atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) concentrations and
mercury depositions at a high-altitude mountain peak in south China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 2425–2437, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2425-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2425-2010</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X., Feng, X., Zhang, G., Xu, W., Li, X., Yao, H., Liang, P., Li, J.,
Sommar, J., Yin, R., and Liu, N.: Mercury in the marine boundary layer and
seawater of the South China Sea: Concentrations, sea/air flux, and
implication for land outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D06303,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012958</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Liang, P., Deliger, Zhang, H., Ji, J., and Liu, P.:
Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW
station, Northwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1951–1964,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., and Zhang, H.: Two years of
measurements of atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) at a remote site in
Mt. Changbai area, Northeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4215–4226,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X. B.:
Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 9455–9476, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Gratz, L. E., Keeler, G. J., Marsik, F. J., Barres, J. A., and Dvonch, J. T.:
Atmospheric transport of speciated mercury across southern Lake Michigan:
Influence from emission sources in the Chicago/Gary urban area, Sci. Total
Environ., 448, 84–95, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Stutz,
J., Festa, J., Spolaor, M., Tsai, C., Selin, N. E., and Song, S: Oxidation of
mercury by bromine in the subtropical Pacific free troposphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 10494–10502, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066645</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, C.B., Mao, H., Ye, Z., Talbot, R., Ding, A., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Wang,
T., Lin, C. J., Fu, C., and Yang, X.: Sources and Dynamic Processes
Controlling Background and Peak Concentrations of TGM in Nanjing, China,
Atmosphere, 5, 124–155, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Han, Y. J., Kim, J. E., Kim, P. R., Kim, W. J., Yi, S. M., Seo, Y. S., and
Kim, S. H.: General trends of atmospheric mercury concentrations in urban and
rural areas in Korea and characteristics of high-concentration events, Atmos.
Environ., 94, 754–764, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock I. M. and Pirrone, N.: Chasing quicksilver: modeling the
atmospheric lifetime of Hg0 (g) in the marine boundary layer at various
latitudes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 69–76, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock, I. M., Pirrone, N., Sprovieri, F., and Pesenti, E.: Reactive
gaseous mercury in the marine boundary layer: Modelling and experimental
evidence of its formation in the Mediterranean region, Atmos. Environ., 37,
suppl. 1, S41–S49, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock, I. M., Trunfio, G. A., Pirrone, N., and Sprovieri, F.: Mercury
chemistry in the MBL: Mediterranean case and sensitivity studies using the
AMCOTS (Atmospheric Mercury Chemistry over the Sea) model, Atmos. Environ.,
39, 7217–7230, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, J., Choi, H. D., Hopke, P. K., and Holsen, T. M.: Ambient mercury
sources in Rochester, NY: results from principle components analysis (PCA) of
mercury monitoring network data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8441–8445,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Mason, R. P., and Jaffe, D. A.: Sources and
deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 2278–2285, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Y., Cizdziel, J. V., and Lu, D.: Temporal patterns of atmospheric
mercury species in northern Mississippi during 2011–2012: Influence of
sudden population swings, Chemosphere, 93, 1694–1700, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, H. and Xie, Z.: Atmospheric mercury over the marine boundary layer
observed during the third China Arctic Research Expedition, J. Environ. Sci.,
23, 1424–1430, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J. and Fitzgerald, W.: Gaseous mercury profiles in the tropical Pacific
Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 40–43, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, K. H., Yoon, H. O., Brown, R. J., Jeon, E. C., Sohn, J. R., Jung, K.,
Park, C. G., and Kim, I. S.: Simultaneous monitoring of total gaseous mercury
at four urban monitoring stations in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Res., 132,
199–208, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, P. R., Han, Y. J., Holsen, T. M., and Yi, S. M.: Atmospheric particulate
mercury: Concentrations and size distributions, Atmos. Environ., 61, 94–102,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Kos, G., Ryzhkov, A., Dastoor, A., Narayan, J., Steffen, A., Ariya, P. A.,
and Zhang, L.: Evaluation of discrepancy between measured and modelled
oxidized mercury species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4839–4863,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4839-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4839-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Kotnik, J., Sprovieri, F., Ogrinc, N., Horvat, M., and Pirrone, N.: Mercury
in the Mediterranean, part I: spatial and temporal trends, Environ. Sci.
Pollut. Res., 21, 4063–4080, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Lamborg, C. H., Rolfhus, K. R., and Fitzgerald, W. F.: The atmospheric
cycling and air-sea exchange of mercury species in the south and equatorial
Atlantic Ocean, Deep Sea Res. Part II, 46, 957–977, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Lan, X., Talbot, R., Castro, M., Perry, K., and Luke, W.: Seasonal and
diurnal variations of atmospheric mercury across the US determined from AMNet
monitoring data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10569–10582,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10569-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10569-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, X., Talbot, R., Laine, P., Lefer, B., Flynn, J., and Torres, A.:
Seasonal and diurnal variations of total gaseous mercury in urban Houston,
TX, USA, Atmosphere, 5, 399–419, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Landis, M. S., Lewis, C. W., Stevens, R. K., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T.,
and Tremblay, R. T.: Ft. McHenry tunnel study: Source profiles and mercury
emissions from diesel and gasoline powered vehicles, Atmos. Environ., 41,
8711–8724, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Laurier, F. and Mason, R.: Mercury concentration and speciation in the
coastal and open ocean boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D06302,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007320" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007320</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Laurier, F. J. G., Mason, R. P., Whalin, L., and Kato, S.: Reactive gaseous
mercury formation in the North Pacific Ocean's marine boundary layer: A
potential role of halogen chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4529,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003625" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003625</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Lei, H., Liang, X.-Z., Wuebbles, D. J., and Tao, Z.: Model analyses of
atmospheric mercury: present air quality and effects of transpacific
transport on the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10807–10825,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10807-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10807-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Sommar, J., Wängberg, I., Lindqvist, O., and Wei, S. Q.:
Short-time variation of mercury speciation in the urban of Göteborg
during GÖTE-2005, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8382–8388, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Xia, C., Wang, X., Xiang, Y., and Xie, Z.: Total gaseous mercury in
Pearl River Delta region, China during 2008 winter period, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 834–838, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Lindberg, S. E., Brooks, S., Lin, C.-J., Scott, K. J., Landis, M. S., Stevens, R. K., Goodsite, M., and Richter, A.: Dynamic
oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise,
Environ. Sci. Tech., 36, 1245–1256, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, B., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T., Barres, J. A., Lynam, M. M., Marsik,
F. J., and Morgan, J. T.: Temporal variability of mercury speciation in urban
air, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1911–1923, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, B., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T., Barres, J. A., Lynam, M. M., Marsik,
F. J., and Morgan, J. T.: Urban–rural differences in atmospheric mercury
speciation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2013–2023, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Lyman, S. N. and Gustin, M. S.: Speciation of atmospheric mercury at two
sites in northern Nevada, USA, Atmos. Environ., 42, 927–939, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Lyman, S. N. and Gustin, M. S.: Determinants of atmospheric mercury
concentrations in Reno, Nevada, USA, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 431–438,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Lyman, S. N. and Jaffe, D. A.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in the
upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nature Geosci., 5, 114–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1353</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Lynam, M. M. and Keeler, G. J.: Automated
speciated mercury measurements in Michigan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39,
9253–9262, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Manolopoulos, H., Schauer, J. J., Purcell, M. D., Rudolph, T. M., Olson, M.
L., Rodger, B., and Krabbenhoft, D. P.: Local and regional factors affecting
atmospheric mercury speciation at a remote location, J. Environ. Eng. Sci.,
6, 491–501, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Mao, H. and Talbot, R.: Speciated mercury at marine, coastal, and inland
sites in New England – Part 1: Temporal variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
5099–5112, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5099-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5099-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Mao, H., Talbot, R. W., Sigler, J. M., Sive, B. C., and Hegarty, J. D.:
Seasonal and diurnal variations of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over New England, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 1403–1421, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1403-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1403-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, H., Talbot, R. W., Sive, B. C., Kim, S. Y., Blake, D. R., and
Weinheimer, A. J.: Arctic mercury depletion and its quantitative link with
halogens, J. Atmos. Chem., 65, 145–170, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Mao, H., Talbot, R., Hegarty, J., and Koermer, J.: Speciated mercury at
marine, coastal, and inland sites in New England – Part 2: Relationships
with atmospheric physical parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4181–4206,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4181-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4181-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Marumoto, K., Hayashi, M., and Takami, A.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations
at two sites in the Kyushu Islands, Japan, and evidence of long-range
transport from East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 117, 147–155, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Mason, R. P. and Sheu, G.-R.: Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1093, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001440</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, R. P., Lawson, N. M., and Sheu, G.-R.: Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean:
factors controlling air-sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the
upper waters, Deep-Sea Res. II, 48, 2829–2853, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Mazur, M., Mintz, R., Lapalme, M., and Wiens, B.: Ambient air total gaseous
mercury concentrations in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants in Alberta,
Canada, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 373–381, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, C., Obrist, D., and Luria, M.: Atmospheric mercury depletion events at
the Dead Sea: Spatial and temporal aspects, Atmos. Environ., 69, 231–239,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Moore, C. W., Obrist, D., Steffen, A., Staebler, R. M., Douglas, T. A., Richter, A., and Nghiem, S. V.:
Convective forcing ofmercury and ozone in the Arctic boundary layer induced by leads in sea ice, Nature, 506, 81–85, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12924" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12924</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Müller, D., Wip, D., Warneke, T., Holmes, C. D., Dastoor, A., and Notholt,
J.: Sources of atmospheric mercury in the tropics: continuous observations at
a coastal site in Suriname, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7391–7397,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7391-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7391-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Mahoney, M. J.: In situ measurements of
organics, meteoritic material, mercury, and other elements in aerosols at 5
to 19 kilometers, Science, 282, 1664–1669, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Sheridan, P. J., and Wilson, J.
C.: Observations of mercury-containing aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
40, 3163–3167, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, U. S., Wu, Y., Walters, J., Jansen, J., and Edgerton, E. S.: Diurnal
and seasonal variation of mercury species at coastal-suburban, urban, and
rural sites in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 47, 499–508,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, D. L., Kim, J. Y., Shim, S. G., and Zhang, X. S.: Ground and
shipboard measurements of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury over the
Yellow Sea region during 2007–2008, Atmos. Environ., 45, 253–260, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Obrist, D., Hallar, A. G., McCubbin, I., Stephens, B. B., and Rahn, T.:
Atmospheric mercury concentrations at Storm Peak Laboratory in the Rocky
Mountains: Evidence for long-range transport from Asia, boundary layer
contributions, and plant mercury uptake, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7579–7589,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Obrist, D., Tas, E., Peleg, M., Matveev, V., Faïn, X., Asaf, D., and
Lur, M.: Bromine-induced oxidation of mercury in the mid-latitude atmosphere,
Nature Geosci., 4, 22–26, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Pal, B. and Ariya, P. A.: Gas-phase HO-initiated reactions of elemental
mercury: kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric implications, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 38, 5555–5566, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Parsons, M. T., McLennan, D., Lapalme, M., Mooney, C., Watt, C., and Mintz,
R.: Total gaseous mercury concentration measurements at Fort McMurray,
Alberta, Canada, Atmosphere, 4, 472–493, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, C., Gustin, M., and Lyman, S.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations
and speciation measured from 2004 to 2007 in Reno, Nevada, USA, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 4646–4654, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Pfaffhuber, K. A., Berg, T., Hirdman, D., and Stohl, A.: Atmospheric mercury
observations from Antarctica: seasonal variation and source and sink region
calculations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3241–3251,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3241-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3241-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Pirrone, N., Ferrara, R., Hedgecock, I. M., Kallos, G., Mamane, Y., Munthe,
J., Pacyna, J. M., Pytharoulis, I., Sprovieri, F., Voudouri, A., and
Wangberg, I.: Dynamic processes of atmospheric mercury over the Mediterranean
region, Atmos. Environ., 37, 21–40, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R.,
Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and
Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and
natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Prestbo, E. M.: Mercury speciation in the boundary layer and free troposphere
advected to South Florida: Phase I – Reconnaissance, Report to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Frontier Geosciences,
Seattle, WA, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Radke, L. F., Friedli, H. R., and Heikes, B. G.: Atmospheric mercury over the
NE Pacific during spring 2002: Gradients, residence time, upper troposphere
lower stratosphere loss, and long-range transport, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D19305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD005828</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Rothenberg, S. E., McKee, L., Gilbreath, A., Yee, D., Connor, M., and Fu, X.:
Evidence for short-range transport of atmospheric mercury to a rural, inland
site, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1263–1273, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, A. P. and Schauer, J. J.: The effect of temperature on the
gas–particle partitioning of reactive mercury in atmospheric aerosols,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 8647–8657, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, A. P., Schauer, J. J., Lough, G. C., Snyder, D. C., Kolb, C. J., Von
Klooster, S., Rudolf, T., Manolopoulos, H., and Olson, M. L.: A comparison of
speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural
location, J. Environ. Monit., 10, 102–108, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Schleicher, N. J., Schafer, J., Blanc, G., Chen, Y., Chai, F., Cen, K., and Norra, S.: Atmospheric
particulate mercury in the megacity Beijing: Spatiotemporal variations and source apportionment, Atmos. Environ., 109, 251–261, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J.: Atmospheric mercury – an overview, Atmos.
Environ., 32, 809–822, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L. A., Lu, J. Y., Steffen, A.,
Schneeberger, D. R., and Berg, T.: Arctic springtime depletion of mercury,
Nature, 394, 331–332, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Seiler, W., Eberling, C., and Slemr, G.: Global distribution of gaseous
mercury in the troposphere, Pageoph, 118, 964–974, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S. A.,
Jaegle, L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric
mercury: Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02308,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007450</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Selin, N.
E., Song, S., Campos, T. L., Flocke, F. M., Reeves, M., Stechman, D., Stell,
M., Festa, J., Stutz, J., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D.,
Tyndall, G. S., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A. J., Riemer, D. D.,
Blake, N. J., Cantrell, C. A., and Mauldin III, R. L.: Origin of oxidized
mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 1511–1530, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G.-R.: Speciation and distribution of atmospheric mercury: Significance
of reactive gaseous mercury in the global mercury cycle, Ph.D. thesis, 170
pp., Univ. of Md., College Park, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G.-R. and Mason, R. P.: An examination of methods for the measurements
of reactive gaseous mercury in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35,
1209–1216, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G.-R. and Mason, R. P.: An examination of the oxidation of elemental
mercury in the presence of halide surfaces, J. Atmos. Chem., 48, 107–130,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G. R., Lin, N. H., Wang, J. L., Lee, C. T., Yang, C. F. O., and Wang,
S. H.: Temporal distribution and potential sources of atmospheric mercury
measured at a high-elevation background station in Taiwan, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 2393–2400, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Sigler, J. M., Mao, H., and Talbot, R.: Gaseous elemental and reactive
mercury in Southern New Hampshire, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1929–1942,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1929-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1929-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Sigler, J. M., Mao, H., Sive, B. C., and Talbot, R.: Oceanic influence on
atmospheric mercury at coastal and inland sites: a springtime noreaster in
New England, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4023–4030, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4023-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4023-2009</ext-link>,
2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Sillman, S., Marsik, F. J., Al-Wali, K. I., Keeler, G. J., and Landis, M. S.:
Reactive mercury in the troposphere: Model formation and results for Florida,
the northeastern United States, and the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D23305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008227</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F.: Trends in atmospheric mercury concentrations over the Atlantic
ocean and the Wank summit, and the resulting constraints on the budget of
atmospheric mercury, in: Global and Regional Mercury Cycles: Sources, Fluxes
and Mass Balances, edited by: Bayyens, W., Ebinghaus, R., and Vasiliev, O.,
NATO-ASI-Series, Vol. 21, 33–84, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the
Netherlands, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F. and Langer, E.: Increase in global atmospheric concentrations of
mercury inferred from measurements over the Atlantic Ocean, Nature 355,
434–437, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Seiler, W., and Schuster, G.: Latitudinal distribution of mercury
over the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1159–1166, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Schuster, G., and Seiler, W.: Distribution, speciation, and budget
of atmospheric mercury, J. Atmos. Chem., 3, 407–434, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Junkermann, R. W., Schmidt, W. H., and
Sladkovic, R.: Indication of change in global and regional trends of
atmospheric mercury concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2143–2146,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., and Ebinghaus, R.: Total gaseous
mercury concentrations at the Cape Point GAW station and their seasonality,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11807, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033741" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033741</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Brunke, E.-G., Ebinghaus, R., and Kuss, J.: Worldwide trend of
atmospheric mercury since 1995, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4779–4787,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4779-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4779-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Angot, H., Dommergue, A., Magand, O., Barret, M., Weigelt, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Brunke, E.-G., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Edwards, G., Howard, D.,
Powell, J., Keywood, M., and Wang, F.: Comparison of mercury concentrations
measured at several sites in the Southern Hemisphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
3125–3133, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>Soerensen, A. L., Skov, H., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, B. T., and Johnson, M.
S.: Global Concentrations of Gaseous Elemental Mercury and Reactive Gaseous
Mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7425–7430,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es903839n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es903839n</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>Soerensen, A. L., Jacob, D. J., Streets, D. G., Witt, M. L. I., Ebinghaus,
R., Mason, R. P., Andersson, M., and Sunderland, E. M.: Multi-decadal decline
of mercury in the North Atlantic atmosphere explained by changing subsurface
seawater concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21810,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053736" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053736</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P.,  Balcom, P. H., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Kuss, J., and Sunderland, E. M.: Elemental Mercury Concentrations
and Fluxes in the Tropical Atmosphere and Ocean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11312–11319,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es503109p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es503109p</ext-link>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>Sommar, J., Andersson, M. E., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Circumpolar measurements of
speciated mercury, ozone and carbon monoxide in the boundary layer of the
Arctic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5031–5045,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5031-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5031-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>Song, S., Selin, N. E., Soerensen, A. L., Angot, H., Artz, R., Brooks, S.,
Brunke, E.-G., Conley, G., Dommergue, A., Ebinghaus, R., Holsen, T. M.,
Jaffe, D. A., Kang, S., Kelley, P., Luke, W. T., Magand, O., Marumoto, K.,
Pfaffhuber, K. A., Ren, X., Sheu, G.-R., Slemr, F., Warneke, T., Weigelt, A.,
Weiss-Penzias, P., Wip, D. C., and Zhang, Q.: Top-down constraints on
atmospheric mercury emissions and implications for global biogeochemical
cycling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7103–7125, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>
Song, X., Cheng, I., and Lu, J.: Annual atmospheric mercury species in
downtown Toronto, Canada, J. Environ. Monit., 11, 660–669, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>Sprovieri, F. and Pirrone, N., Spatial and temporal distribution of
atmospheric mercury species over the Adriatic Sea, Environ. Fluid Mech., 8,
117–128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9045-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10652-007-9045-4</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Hedgecock, I. M., Landis, M. S., and Stevens, R.
K.: Intensive atmospheric mercury measurements at Terra Nova Bay in
Antarctica during November and December 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4722,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002057</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Gärfeldt, K., and Sommar, J.: Mercury
measurements in the marine boundary layer along a 6000 km cruise path around
the Mediterranean Sea, Atmos. Environ., 37 suppl., S63–S71, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>Sprovieri, F., Hedgecock, I. M., and Pirrone, N.: An investigation of the
origins of reactive gaseous mercury in the Mediterranean marine boundary
layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3985–3997, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3985-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3985-2010</ext-link>,
2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H., and Dommergue, A.: A
review of worldwide atmospheric mercury measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8245–8265, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8245-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8245-2010</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>
Stamenkovic, J., Lyman, S., and Gustin, M. S.: Seasonal and diel variation of
atmospheric mercury concentrations in the Reno (Nevada, USA) airshed, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 6662–6672, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>Steffen, A., Douglas, T., Amyot, M., Ariya, P., Aspmo, K., Berg, T.,
Bottenheim, J., Brooks, S., Cobbett, F., Dastoor, A., Dommergue, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Ferrari, C., Gardfeldt, K., Goodsite, M. E., Lean, D.,
Poulain, A. J., Scherz, C., Skov, H., Sommar, J., and Temme, C.: A synthesis
of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1445–1482, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>Steffen, A., Bottenheim, J., Cole, A., Douglas, T. A., Ebinghaus, R., Friess,
U., Netcheva, S., Nghiem, S., Sihler, H., and Staebler, R.: Atmospheric
mercury over sea ice during the OASIS-2009 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7007–7021, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7007-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7007-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Jaegle, L., Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca,
R. M., Mason, R. P., and Slemr, F.: Air-sea exchange in the global mercury
cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1017, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002766</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>
Subir, M., Ariya, P. A., and Dastoor, A. P.: A review of uncertainties in
atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing
kinetic parameters – fundamental limitations and the importance of
heterogeneous chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5664–5676, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>Swartzendruber, P. C., Jaffe, D. A., Prestbo, E. M., Weiss-Penzias, P.,
Selin, N. E., Park, R., Jacob, D. J., Strode, S., and Jaegle, L.:
Observations of reactive gaseous mercury in the free troposphere at the Mount
Bachelor Observatory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D24301,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007415</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>Swartzendruber, P. C., Chand, D., Jaffe, D. A., Smith, J., Reidmiller, D.,
Gratz, L., Keeler, J., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., and Talbot, R.: Vertical
distribution of mercury, CO, ozone, and aerosol scattering coefficient in the
Pacific Northwest during the spring 2006 INTEX-B campaign, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D10305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009579</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, R., Mao, H., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., and Avery, M.: Total Depletion of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Upper Troposphere –  Lower Stratosphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L23804, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031366</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, R., Mao, H., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Avery, M., Browell, E., Sachse,
G., Vay, S., Blake, D., Huey, G., and Fuelberg, H.: Factors influencing the
large-scale distribution of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Mexico City area and over the
North Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2103–2114,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2103-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2103-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>
Temme, C., Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., and Einax, J. W.: Distribution of
mercury over the Atlantic Ocean in 1996 and 1999–2001, Atmos. Environ., 37,
1889–1897, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>
Temme, C., Einax, J. W., Ebinghaus, R., and Schroeder, W. H.: Measurements of
mercury species at a coastal site in the Antarctic and over the South
Atlantic Ocean in the polar summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 22–31,
2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>Timonen, H., Ambrose, J. L., and Jaffe, D. A.: Oxidation of elemental Hg in
anthropogenic and marine airmasses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2827–2836,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2827-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2827-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>Tseng, C. M., Liu, C. S., and Lamborg, C.: Seasonal changes in gaseous
elemental mercury in relation to monsoon cycling over the northern South
China Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7341–7350, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7341-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7341-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>
UNEP, Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, Emissions, Releases and
Environmental Transport, UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Han, S., and Xu, H.:
Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China I. The
seasonal distribution pattern of total gaseous mercury and its potential
sources, Environ. Res., 109, 201–206, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Li, P., Han, S., and Xu, H.:
Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China II. The
distribution of reactive gaseous mercury and particulate mercury and mercury
deposition fluxes, Environ. Res., 109, 721–727, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>Wang, F., Saiz-Lopez, A., Mahajan, A. S., Gómez Martín, J. C.,
Armstrong, D., Lemes, M., Hay, T., and Prados-Roman, C.: Enhanced production
of oxidised mercury over the tropical Pacific Ocean: a key missing oxidation
pathway, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1323–1335, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Huang, J., Hopke, P. K., Rattigan, O. V., Chalupa, D. C., Utell, M.
J., and Holsen, T. M.: Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power
plant on ambient mercury species, Chemosphere, 92, 360–367, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>
Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Manning, A. J., Derwent, R. G., Simmonds, P. G.,
Spain, T. G., Jennings, S. G., and Slemr, F.: Analysis and interpretation of
18 years of mercury observations since 1996 at Mace Head at the Atlantic
Ocean coast of Ireland, Atmos. Environ., 100, 85–93, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D. A., McClintick, A., Presbo, E. M., and Landis,
M. S.: Gaseous elemental mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer: Evidence for
rapid removal in anthropogenic pollution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37,
3755–3763, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>Weiss-Penzias, P. S., Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Bates, T. S., Gaston,
C., Prather, K., Vlasenko, A., and Li, S. M.: Shipboard measurements of
gaseous elemental mercury along the coast of Central and Southern California,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 208–219, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018463</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D., Swartzendruber, P., Hafner, W., Chand, D., and
Prestbo, E.: Quantifying Asian and biomass burning sources of mercury using
the Hg/CO ratio in pollution plumes observed at the Mount Bachelor
Observatory, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4366–4379, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>Weiss-Penzias, P., Gustin, M. S., and Lyman, S. N.: Observations of speciated
atmospheric mercury at three sites in Nevada: Evidence for a free
tropospheric source of reactive gaseous mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011607</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>Weiss-Penzias, P., Amos, H. M., Selin, N. E., Gustin, M. S., Jaffe, D. A.,
Obrist, D., Sheu, G.-R., and Giang, A.: Use of a global model to understand
speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high-elevation sites,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1161–1173, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>Weiss-Penzias, P. S., Gay, D. A., Brigham, M. E., Parsons, M. T., Gustin, M.
S., and ter Schure, A.: Trends in mercury wet deposition and mercury air
concentrations across the US and Canada, Sci. Total Environ.,  568, 546–556, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.061</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>Williston, S. H.: Mercury in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 73,
7051–7055, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB073i022p07051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB073i022p07051</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>
Witt, M. L. I., Mather, T. A., Baker, A. R., De Hoog, J. C. M., and Pyle, D.
M.: Atmospheric trace metals over the south-west Indian Ocean: total gaseous
mercury, aerosol trace metal concentrations and lead isotope ratios, Mar.
Chem., 121, 2–16, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>
Witt, M. L. I., Meheran, N., Mather, T. A., De Hoog, J. C. M., and Pyle, D.
M.: Aerosol trace metals, particle morphology and total gaseous mercury in
the atmosphere of Oxford, UK, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1524–1538, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>
Won, J. H., Park, J. Y., and Lee, T. G., Mercury emissions from automobiles
using gasoline, diesel, and LPG, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7547–7552, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>
Xia, C., Xie, Z., and Sun, L.: Atmospheric mercury in the marine boundary
layer along a cruise path from Shanghai, China to Prydz Bay, Antarctica,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 1815–1821, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation>
Xiu, G., Cai, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, D., Büeler, A., Lee, S., Shen, Y.,
Xu, L., Huang, X., and Zhang, P.: Speciated mercury in size-fractionated
particles in Shanghai ambient air, Atmos. Environ., 43, 3145–3154, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Chen, J., Yang, L., Niu, Z., Tong, L., Yin, L., and Chen, Y.:
Characteristics and sources of atmospheric mercury speciation in a coastal
city, Xiamen, China, Chemosphere, 119, 530–539, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X. and Akhtar, U. S.: Identification of potential regional sources of
atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Windsor, Ontario, Canada using hybrid
receptor modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7073–7083,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7073-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7073-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib178"><label>178</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Akhtar, U., Clark, K., and Wang, X.: Temporal variability of
atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Windsor, ON, Canada, Atmosphere, 5,
536–556, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib179"><label>179</label><mixed-citation>
Yatavelli, R. L., Fahrni, J. K., Kim, M., Crist, K. C., Vickers, C. D.,
Winter, S. E., and Connell, D. P.: Mercury, PM 2.5 and gaseous co-pollutants
in the Ohio River Valley region: Preliminary results from the Athens
supersite, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6650–6665, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib180"><label>180</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J., Xie, Z., Kang, H., Li, Z., Sun, C., Bian, L., and Zhang, P.: High variability of
atmospheric mercury in the summertime boundary layer through the central
Arctic Ocean, Scientific Reports, 4, 6091, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep06091</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib181"><label>181</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Fu, X. W., Lin, C.-J., Wang, X., and Feng, X. B.: Observation and
analysis of speciated atmospheric mercury in Shangri-La, Tibetan Plateau,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 653–665, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-653-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-653-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib182"><label>182</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Wright L. P., and Blanchard P.: A review of current knowledge
concerning dry deposition of atmospheric mercury, Atmos. Environ., 43,
5853–5864, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib183"><label>183</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Johnson, D., Dastoor, A., Ryzhkov, A., Lin, C.-J.,
Vijayaraghavan, K., Gay, D., Holsen, T. M., Huang, J., Graydon, J. A., St.
Louis, V. L., Castro, M. S., Miller, E. K., Marsik, F., Lu, J., Poissant, L.,
Pilote, M., and Zhang, K. M.: Assessment of modelled mercury deposition over
the Great Lakes region, Environ. Pollut., 161, 272–283, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib184"><label>184</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Wang, S. X., Wang, L., and Hao, J. M.: Atmospheric mercury
concentration and chemical speciation at a rural site in Beijing, China:
implications of mercury emission sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
10505–10516, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib185"><label>185</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Chen, L., Amos, H. M., Krabbenhoft,
D. P., Slemr, F., St. Louis, V. L., and Sunderland, E. M.: Observed decrease
in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic
emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 526–531, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib186"><label>186</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, J., Wang, T., Talbot, R., Mao, H., Hall, C. B., Yang, X., Fu, C.,
Zhuang, B., Li, S., Han, Y., and Huang, X.: Characteristics of atmospheric
Total Gaseous Mercury (TGM) observed in urban Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 12103–12118, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib187"><label>187</label><mixed-citation>
Zielonka, U., Hlawiczka, S., Fudala, J., Wängberg, I., and Munthe, J.:
Seasonal mercury concentrations measured in rural air in Southern Poland:
Contribution from local and regional coal combustion, Atmos. Environ., 39,
7580–7586, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal
variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Atmospheric mercury (Hg) is a global pollutant and thought to be the main source
of mercury in oceanic and remote terrestrial systems, where it becomes
methylated and bioavailable; hence, atmospheric mercury pollution has
global consequences for both human and ecosystem health. Understanding of
spatial and temporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury can advance
our knowledge of mercury cycling in various environments. This review
summarized spatiotemporal variations of total gaseous mercury or gaseous
elemental mercury (TGM/GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), and
particulate-bound mercury (PBM) in various environments including oceans,
continents, high elevation, the free troposphere, and low to high latitudes.
In the marine boundary layer (MBL), the oxidation of GEM was generally
thought to drive the diurnal and seasonal variations of TGM/GEM and GOM in
most oceanic regions, leading to lower GEM and higher GOM from noon to
afternoon and higher GEM during winter and higher GOM during spring–summer.
At continental sites, the driving mechanisms of TGM/GEM diurnal patterns
included surface and local emissions, boundary layer dynamics, GEM
oxidation, and for high-elevation sites mountain–valley winds, while
oxidation of GEM and entrainment of free tropospheric air appeared to
control the diurnal patterns of GOM. No pronounced diurnal variation was
found for Tekran measured PBM at MBL and continental sites. Seasonal
variations in TGM/GEM at continental sites were attributed to increased
winter combustion and summertime surface emissions, and monsoons in Asia,
while those in GOM were controlled by GEM oxidation, free tropospheric transport,
anthropogenic emissions, and wet deposition. Increased PBM at continental
sites during winter was primarily due to local/regional coal and wood
combustion emissions. Long-term TGM measurements from the MBL and
continental sites indicated an overall declining trend. Limited measurements
suggested TGM/GEM increasing from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) to the Northern Hemisphere (NH) due
largely to the vast majority of mercury emissions in the NH, and the latitudinal
gradient was insignificant in summer probably as a result of stronger
meridional mixing. Aircraft measurements showed no significant vertical
variation in GEM over the field campaign regions; however, depletion of GEM
was observed in stratospherically influenced air masses. In examining the
remaining questions and issues, recommendations for future research needs
were provided, and among them is the most imminent need for GOM speciation
measurements and fundamental understanding of multiphase redox kinetics.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abbott, M. L., Lin, C. J., Martian, P., and Einerson, J. J.: Atmospheric
mercury near Salmon Falls creek reservoir in southern Idaho, Appl. Geochem.,
23, 438–453, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Kocman, D., Horowitz, H. M., Zhang, Y., Dutkiewicz,
S., Horvat, M., Corbitt, E. S., Krabbenhoft, D. P., and Sunderland, E. M.:
Global biogeochemical implications of mercury discharges from rivers and
sediment burial, M., Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
9514–9522, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502134t" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es502134t</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Angot, H., Barret, M., Magand, O., Ramonet, M., and Dommergue, A.: A 2-year
record of atmospheric mercury species at a background Southern Hemisphere
station on Amsterdam Island, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11461–11473,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ariya, P. A., Amyot, M., Dastoor, A., Deeds, D., Feinberg, A., Kos, G.,
Poulain, A., Ryjkov, A., Semeniuk, K., Subir, M., and Toyota, K.: Mercury
physicochemical and biogeochemical transformation in the atmosphere and at
atmospheric interfaces: a review and future directions, Chem. Rev., 115,
3760–3802, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500667e" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr500667e</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aspmo, K., Temme, C., Berg, T., Ferrari, C., Gauchard, P.-A., Fain, X., and
Wibetoe, G.: Mercury in the atmosphere, snow, and melt water ponds in the North
Atlantic Ocean during Arctic Summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4083–4089,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bagnato, E., Sproverie, M., and Barra, M.: The sea–air exchange of mercury
(Hg) in the marine boundary layer of the Augusta basin (southern Italy):
Concentrations and evasion flux, Chemosphere, 93, 2024–2032, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Banic, C. M., Beauchamp, S. T., Tordon, R. J., Schroeder, W. H., Steffen, A., Anlauf, K.
A., and Wong, H. K. T.: Vertical distribution of gaseous elemental
mercury in Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4264, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002116" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002116</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Beldowska, M., Saniewska, D., Falkowska, L., and Lewandowska, A.: Mercury in
particulate matter over Polish zone of the southern Baltic Sea, Atmos.
Environ., 46, 397–404, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Berg, T., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Cole, A. S., Engelsen, O., and Steffen, A.:
Ten-year trends in atmospheric mercury concentrations, meteorological effects
and climate variables at Zeppelin, Ny-Ålesund, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
6575–6586, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6575-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-6575-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Brooks, S., Ren, X., Cohen, M., Luke, W. T., Kelley, P., Artz, R., Hynes, A.,
Landing, W., and Martos, B.: Airborne Vertical Profiling of Mercury Speciation
near Tullahoma, TN, USA, Atmos., 5, 557–574, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos5030557" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/atmos5030557</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, R. J., Goddard, S. L., Butterfield, D. M., Brown, A. S., Robins, C.,
Mustoe, C. L., and McGhee, E. A.: Ten years of mercury measurement at urban
and industrial air quality monitoring stations in the UK, Atmos. Environ.,
109, 1–8, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., and Slemr, F.:
Gaseous elemental mercury depletion events observed at Cape Point during
2007–2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1121–1131, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1121-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1121-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bullock, O. R. and Brehme, K. A.: Atmospheric mercury simulation using the
CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 2135–2146, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G. and Lindberg, S. E.: Mechanisms of mercury removal by O3 and
OH in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3355–3367, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chand, D., Jaffe, D., Prestbo, E., Swartzendruber, P. C., Hafner, W., Weiss-Penzias, P., Kato, S., Takami, A., Hatakeyama, S., and Kajii, Y.: Reactive and
particulate mercury in the Asian marine boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 28,
7988–7996, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.048" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.048</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, L., Liu, M., Xu, Z., Fan, R., Tao, J., Chen, D., Zhang, D., Xie, D. and
Sun, J.: Variation trends and influencing factors of total gaseous mercury in
the Pearl River Delta – A highly industrialised region in South China
influenced by seasonal monsoons, Atmos. Environ., 77, 757–766, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, I., Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Graydon, J. A., and Louis, V. L. St.:
Source-receptor relationships for speciated atmospheric mercury at the remote
Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 1903–1922, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1903-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1903-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, E. M., Kim, S. H., Holsen, T. M., and Yi, S. M.: Total gaseous
concentrations in mercury in Seoul, Korea: local sources compared to
long-range transport from China and Japan, Environ. Pollut., 157, 816–822,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, H. D., Holsen, T. M., and Hopke, P. K.: Atmospheric mercury (Hg) in the
Adirondacks: Concentrations and sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
5644–5653, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, H. D., Huang, J., Mondal, S., and Holsen, T. M.: Variation in
concentrations of three mercury (Hg) forms at a rural and a suburban site in
New York State, Sci. Total Environ., 448, 96–106, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Ci, Z. J., Zhang, X. S., Wang, Z. W., Niu, Z. C., Diao, X. Y., and Wang, S.
W.: Distribution and air-sea exchange of mercury (Hg) in the Yellow Sea,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2881–2892, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2881-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-2881-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Civerolo, K. L., Rattigan, O. V., Felton, H. D., Hirsch, M. J., and DeSantis,
S.: Mercury wet deposition and speciated air concentrations from two urban
sites in New York State: Temporal patterns and regional context, Aerosol Air
Qual. Res., 14, 1822–1837, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cobbett, F. D. and Van Heyst, B. J.: Measurements of GEM fluxes and
atmospheric mercury concentrations (GEM, RGM and Hgp) from an agricultural
field amended with biosolids in Southern Ont., Canada (October 2004–November
2004), Atmos. Environ., 41, 2270–2282, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, A. S., Steffen, A., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Berg, T., Pilote, M., Poissant,
L., Tordon, R., and Hung, H.: Ten-year trends of atmospheric mercury in the
high Arctic compared to Canadian sub-Arctic and mid-latitude sites, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 1535–1545, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1535-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-1535-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, A. S., Steffen, A., Eckley, C. S., Narayan, J., Pilote, M., Tordon, R.,
Graydon, J. A., St. Louis, V.L., Xu, X., and Branfireun, B. A.: A survey of
mercury in air and precipitation across Canada: patterns and trends,
Atmosphere, 5, 635–668, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Conaway, C. H., Mason, R. P., Steding, D. J., and Flegal, A. R.: Estimate of
mercury emission from gasoline and diesel fuel consumption, San Francisco
Bay area, California, Atmos. Environ., 39, 101–105, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Dastoor, A. P. and Durnford, D. A.: Arctic Ocean: is it a sink of a source of
atmospheric mercury?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 1707–1717, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
De More, S. J., Patterson, J. E., and Bibby, D. M.: Baseline atmospheric
mercury studies at Ross Island, Antarctica, Antarctic Sci., 5, 323–326,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Dibble, T. S., Zelie, M. J., and Mao, H.: Thermodynamics of reactions of ClHg
and BrHg radicals with atmospherically abundant free radicals, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10271–10279, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Driscoll, C. T., Mason, R. P., Chan, H. M., Jacob, D. J., and Pirrone, N.:
Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effect, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 4967–4983, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R. and Slemr, F.: Aircraft measurements of atmospheric mercury
over southern and eastern Germany, Atmos. Environ., 34, 895–903, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Coggin, A. M., Spain, T. G., Jennings, S. G., and
Temme, C.: Long term measurements of atmospheric mercury at Mace Head, Irish
west coast, between 1995 and 2001, Atmos. Environ., 36, 5267–5276, 2002a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Temme, C., Einax, J. W., Löwe, A. G.,
Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., and Schroeder, W. H.: Antarctic springtime
depletion of atmospheric mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1238–1244,
2002b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Slemr, F., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., van Velthoven, P., Zahn,
A., Hermann, M., O'Sullivan, D. A., and Oram, D. E.: Emissions of gaseous
mercury from biomass burning in South America in 2005 observed during CARIBIC
flights, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08813, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028866" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL028866</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ebinghaus, R., Jennings, S. G., Kock, H. H., Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. J.,
and Spain, T. G.: Decreasing trends in total gaseous mercury observations in
baseline air at Mace Head, Ireland from 1996 to 2009, Atmos. Environ., 45,
3475–3480, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Eckley, C. S., Parsons, M. T., Mintz, R., Lapalme, M., Mazur, M., Tordon, R.,
Elleman, R., Graydon, J. A., Blanchard, P., and St. Louis, V.: Impact of
closing Canada's largest point-source of mercury emissions on local
atmospheric mercury concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10339–10348,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Engle, M. A., Tate, M. T., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Schauer, J. J., Kolker, A.,
Shanley, J. B., and Bothner, M. H.: Comparison of atmospheric mercury
speciation and deposition at nine sites across central and eastern North
America, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014064" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JD014064</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Faïn, X., Obrist, D., Hallar, A. G., Mccubbin, I., and Rahn, T.: High
levels of reactive gaseous mercury observed at a high elevation research
laboratory in the Rocky Mountains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8049–8060,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8049-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-8049-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Feddersen, D. M., Talbot, R., Mao, H., and Sive, B. C.: Size distribution of
particulate mercury in marine and coastal atmospheres, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 10899–10909, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10899-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10899-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W. F.: Is mercury increasing in the atmosphere? The need for an
atmospheric mercury network (AMNET), Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 245–254,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W. F. and Mason, R. P.: The global mercury cycle: oceanic and
anthropogenic aspects, in: Global and Regional Mercury Cycles: Sources,
Fluxes and Mass Balances, edited by: Baeyens, W., Ebinghaus, R., and
Vasiliev, O., NATO ASI Series 2. Environment, vol. 21. Kluwer Ac. Pub.,
Dordrecht, 85–108, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W. F., Gill, G. A., and Kim, J. P.: An Equatorial Paci”c source
of atmospheric ercury, Science, 224, 597–599, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Fostier, A. H. and Michelazzo, P. A.: Gaseous and particulate atmospheric
mercury concentrations in the Campinas Metropolitan Region (Sao Paulo State,
Brazil), J. Brazilian Chem. Soc., 17, 886–894, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Friedli, H. R., Radke, L. F., Prescott, R., Li, P., Woo, J.-H., and
Carmichael, G. R.: Mercury in the atmosphere around Japan, Korea, and China
as observed during the 2001 ACE-Asia field campaign: Measurements,
distributions, sources, and implications, J. Geophys. Res., 28, D19S25,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004244" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD004244</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Feng, X., Zhu, W., Wang, S., and Lu, J.: Total gaseous mercury
concentrations in ambient air in the eastern slope of Mt. Gongga,
South-Eastern fringe of the Tibetan plateau, China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
970–979, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Feng, X., Wang, S., Rothenberg, S., Shang, L., Li, Z., and Qiu, G.:
Temporal and spatial distributions of total gaseous mercury concentrations in
ambient air in a mountainous area in southwestern China: Implications for
industrial and domestic mercury emissions in remote areas in China, Sci.
Total Environ., 407, 2306–2314, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Dong, Z. Q., Yin, R. S., Wang, J. X., Yang, Z. R., and
Zhang, H.: Atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) concentrations and
mercury depositions at a high-altitude mountain peak in south China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 2425–2437, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2425-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-2425-2010</a>, 2010a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Feng, X., Zhang, G., Xu, W., Li, X., Yao, H., Liang, P., Li, J.,
Sommar, J., Yin, R., and Liu, N.: Mercury in the marine boundary layer and
seawater of the South China Sea: Concentrations, sea/air flux, and
implication for land outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D06303,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012958" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD012958</a>, 2010b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Liang, P., Deliger, Zhang, H., Ji, J., and Liu, P.:
Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW
station, Northwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1951–1964,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., and Zhang, H.: Two years of
measurements of atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) at a remote site in
Mt. Changbai area, Northeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4215–4226,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X. B.:
Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 9455–9476, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Gratz, L. E., Keeler, G. J., Marsik, F. J., Barres, J. A., and Dvonch, J. T.:
Atmospheric transport of speciated mercury across southern Lake Michigan:
Influence from emission sources in the Chicago/Gary urban area, Sci. Total
Environ., 448, 84–95, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Stutz,
J., Festa, J., Spolaor, M., Tsai, C., Selin, N. E., and Song, S: Oxidation of
mercury by bromine in the subtropical Pacific free troposphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 10494–10502, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066645" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015GL066645</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, C.B., Mao, H., Ye, Z., Talbot, R., Ding, A., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Wang,
T., Lin, C. J., Fu, C., and Yang, X.: Sources and Dynamic Processes
Controlling Background and Peak Concentrations of TGM in Nanjing, China,
Atmosphere, 5, 124–155, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Han, Y. J., Kim, J. E., Kim, P. R., Kim, W. J., Yi, S. M., Seo, Y. S., and
Kim, S. H.: General trends of atmospheric mercury concentrations in urban and
rural areas in Korea and characteristics of high-concentration events, Atmos.
Environ., 94, 754–764, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock I. M. and Pirrone, N.: Chasing quicksilver: modeling the
atmospheric lifetime of Hg0 (g) in the marine boundary layer at various
latitudes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 69–76, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock, I. M., Pirrone, N., Sprovieri, F., and Pesenti, E.: Reactive
gaseous mercury in the marine boundary layer: Modelling and experimental
evidence of its formation in the Mediterranean region, Atmos. Environ., 37,
suppl. 1, S41–S49, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock, I. M., Trunfio, G. A., Pirrone, N., and Sprovieri, F.: Mercury
chemistry in the MBL: Mediterranean case and sensitivity studies using the
AMCOTS (Atmospheric Mercury Chemistry over the Sea) model, Atmos. Environ.,
39, 7217–7230, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, J., Choi, H. D., Hopke, P. K., and Holsen, T. M.: Ambient mercury
sources in Rochester, NY: results from principle components analysis (PCA) of
mercury monitoring network data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8441–8445,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Mason, R. P., and Jaffe, D. A.: Sources and
deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 2278–2285, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Y., Cizdziel, J. V., and Lu, D.: Temporal patterns of atmospheric
mercury species in northern Mississippi during 2011–2012: Influence of
sudden population swings, Chemosphere, 93, 1694–1700, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, H. and Xie, Z.: Atmospheric mercury over the marine boundary layer
observed during the third China Arctic Research Expedition, J. Environ. Sci.,
23, 1424–1430, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J. and Fitzgerald, W.: Gaseous mercury profiles in the tropical Pacific
Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 40–43, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, K. H., Yoon, H. O., Brown, R. J., Jeon, E. C., Sohn, J. R., Jung, K.,
Park, C. G., and Kim, I. S.: Simultaneous monitoring of total gaseous mercury
at four urban monitoring stations in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Res., 132,
199–208, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, P. R., Han, Y. J., Holsen, T. M., and Yi, S. M.: Atmospheric particulate
mercury: Concentrations and size distributions, Atmos. Environ., 61, 94–102,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Kos, G., Ryzhkov, A., Dastoor, A., Narayan, J., Steffen, A., Ariya, P. A.,
and Zhang, L.: Evaluation of discrepancy between measured and modelled
oxidized mercury species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4839–4863,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4839-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4839-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Kotnik, J., Sprovieri, F., Ogrinc, N., Horvat, M., and Pirrone, N.: Mercury
in the Mediterranean, part I: spatial and temporal trends, Environ. Sci.
Pollut. Res., 21, 4063–4080, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Lamborg, C. H., Rolfhus, K. R., and Fitzgerald, W. F.: The atmospheric
cycling and air-sea exchange of mercury species in the south and equatorial
Atlantic Ocean, Deep Sea Res. Part II, 46, 957–977, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, X., Talbot, R., Castro, M., Perry, K., and Luke, W.: Seasonal and
diurnal variations of atmospheric mercury across the US determined from AMNet
monitoring data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10569–10582,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10569-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10569-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, X., Talbot, R., Laine, P., Lefer, B., Flynn, J., and Torres, A.:
Seasonal and diurnal variations of total gaseous mercury in urban Houston,
TX, USA, Atmosphere, 5, 399–419, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Landis, M. S., Lewis, C. W., Stevens, R. K., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T.,
and Tremblay, R. T.: Ft. McHenry tunnel study: Source profiles and mercury
emissions from diesel and gasoline powered vehicles, Atmos. Environ., 41,
8711–8724, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Laurier, F. and Mason, R.: Mercury concentration and speciation in the
coastal and open ocean boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D06302,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007320" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007320</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Laurier, F. J. G., Mason, R. P., Whalin, L., and Kato, S.: Reactive gaseous
mercury formation in the North Pacific Ocean's marine boundary layer: A
potential role of halogen chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4529,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003625" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD003625</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Lei, H., Liang, X.-Z., Wuebbles, D. J., and Tao, Z.: Model analyses of
atmospheric mercury: present air quality and effects of transpacific
transport on the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10807–10825,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10807-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-10807-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Sommar, J., Wängberg, I., Lindqvist, O., and Wei, S. Q.:
Short-time variation of mercury speciation in the urban of Göteborg
during GÖTE-2005, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8382–8388, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Xia, C., Wang, X., Xiang, Y., and Xie, Z.: Total gaseous mercury in
Pearl River Delta region, China during 2008 winter period, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 834–838, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Lindberg, S. E., Brooks, S., Lin, C.-J., Scott, K. J., Landis, M. S., Stevens, R. K., Goodsite, M., and Richter, A.: Dynamic
oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise,
Environ. Sci. Tech., 36, 1245–1256, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, B., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T., Barres, J. A., Lynam, M. M., Marsik,
F. J., and Morgan, J. T.: Temporal variability of mercury speciation in urban
air, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1911–1923, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, B., Keeler, G. J., Dvonch, J. T., Barres, J. A., Lynam, M. M., Marsik,
F. J., and Morgan, J. T.: Urban–rural differences in atmospheric mercury
speciation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2013–2023, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Lyman, S. N. and Gustin, M. S.: Speciation of atmospheric mercury at two
sites in northern Nevada, USA, Atmos. Environ., 42, 927–939, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Lyman, S. N. and Gustin, M. S.: Determinants of atmospheric mercury
concentrations in Reno, Nevada, USA, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 431–438,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Lyman, S. N. and Jaffe, D. A.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in the
upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nature Geosci., 5, 114–117,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1353" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/NGEO1353</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Lynam, M. M. and Keeler, G. J.: Automated
speciated mercury measurements in Michigan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39,
9253–9262, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Manolopoulos, H., Schauer, J. J., Purcell, M. D., Rudolph, T. M., Olson, M.
L., Rodger, B., and Krabbenhoft, D. P.: Local and regional factors affecting
atmospheric mercury speciation at a remote location, J. Environ. Eng. Sci.,
6, 491–501, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, H. and Talbot, R.: Speciated mercury at marine, coastal, and inland
sites in New England – Part 1: Temporal variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
5099–5112, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5099-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-5099-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, H., Talbot, R. W., Sigler, J. M., Sive, B. C., and Hegarty, J. D.:
Seasonal and diurnal variations of Hg° over New England, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 1403–1421, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1403-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-1403-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, H., Talbot, R. W., Sive, B. C., Kim, S. Y., Blake, D. R., and
Weinheimer, A. J.: Arctic mercury depletion and its quantitative link with
halogens, J. Atmos. Chem., 65, 145–170, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, H., Talbot, R., Hegarty, J., and Koermer, J.: Speciated mercury at
marine, coastal, and inland sites in New England – Part 2: Relationships
with atmospheric physical parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4181–4206,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4181-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-4181-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Marumoto, K., Hayashi, M., and Takami, A.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations
at two sites in the Kyushu Islands, Japan, and evidence of long-range
transport from East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 117, 147–155, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, R. P. and Sheu, G.-R.: Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1093, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001440" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GB001440</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, R. P., Lawson, N. M., and Sheu, G.-R.: Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean:
factors controlling air-sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the
upper waters, Deep-Sea Res. II, 48, 2829–2853, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Mazur, M., Mintz, R., Lapalme, M., and Wiens, B.: Ambient air total gaseous
mercury concentrations in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants in Alberta,
Canada, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 373–381, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, C., Obrist, D., and Luria, M.: Atmospheric mercury depletion events at
the Dead Sea: Spatial and temporal aspects, Atmos. Environ., 69, 231–239,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, C. W., Obrist, D., Steffen, A., Staebler, R. M., Douglas, T. A., Richter, A., and Nghiem, S. V.:
Convective forcing ofmercury and ozone in the Arctic boundary layer induced by leads in sea ice, Nature, 506, 81–85, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12924" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature12924</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, D., Wip, D., Warneke, T., Holmes, C. D., Dastoor, A., and Notholt,
J.: Sources of atmospheric mercury in the tropics: continuous observations at
a coastal site in Suriname, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7391–7397,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7391-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-7391-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Mahoney, M. J.: In situ measurements of
organics, meteoritic material, mercury, and other elements in aerosols at 5
to 19 kilometers, Science, 282, 1664–1669, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Sheridan, P. J., and Wilson, J.
C.: Observations of mercury-containing aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
40, 3163–3167, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, U. S., Wu, Y., Walters, J., Jansen, J., and Edgerton, E. S.: Diurnal
and seasonal variation of mercury species at coastal-suburban, urban, and
rural sites in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 47, 499–508,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, D. L., Kim, J. Y., Shim, S. G., and Zhang, X. S.: Ground and
shipboard measurements of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury over the
Yellow Sea region during 2007–2008, Atmos. Environ., 45, 253–260, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Obrist, D., Hallar, A. G., McCubbin, I., Stephens, B. B., and Rahn, T.:
Atmospheric mercury concentrations at Storm Peak Laboratory in the Rocky
Mountains: Evidence for long-range transport from Asia, boundary layer
contributions, and plant mercury uptake, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7579–7589,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Obrist, D., Tas, E., Peleg, M., Matveev, V., Faïn, X., Asaf, D., and
Lur, M.: Bromine-induced oxidation of mercury in the mid-latitude atmosphere,
Nature Geosci., 4, 22–26, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Pal, B. and Ariya, P. A.: Gas-phase HO-initiated reactions of elemental
mercury: kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric implications, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 38, 5555–5566, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Parsons, M. T., McLennan, D., Lapalme, M., Mooney, C., Watt, C., and Mintz,
R.: Total gaseous mercury concentration measurements at Fort McMurray,
Alberta, Canada, Atmosphere, 4, 472–493, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, C., Gustin, M., and Lyman, S.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations
and speciation measured from 2004 to 2007 in Reno, Nevada, USA, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 4646–4654, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Pfaffhuber, K. A., Berg, T., Hirdman, D., and Stohl, A.: Atmospheric mercury
observations from Antarctica: seasonal variation and source and sink region
calculations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3241–3251,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3241-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-3241-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Pirrone, N., Ferrara, R., Hedgecock, I. M., Kallos, G., Mamane, Y., Munthe,
J., Pacyna, J. M., Pytharoulis, I., Sprovieri, F., Voudouri, A., and
Wangberg, I.: Dynamic processes of atmospheric mercury over the Mediterranean
region, Atmos. Environ., 37, 21–40, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R.,
Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and
Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and
natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Prestbo, E. M.: Mercury speciation in the boundary layer and free troposphere
advected to South Florida: Phase I – Reconnaissance, Report to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Frontier Geosciences,
Seattle, WA, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Radke, L. F., Friedli, H. R., and Heikes, B. G.: Atmospheric mercury over the
NE Pacific during spring 2002: Gradients, residence time, upper troposphere
lower stratosphere loss, and long-range transport, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D19305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005828" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD005828</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Rothenberg, S. E., McKee, L., Gilbreath, A., Yee, D., Connor, M., and Fu, X.:
Evidence for short-range transport of atmospheric mercury to a rural, inland
site, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1263–1273, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, A. P. and Schauer, J. J.: The effect of temperature on the
gas–particle partitioning of reactive mercury in atmospheric aerosols,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 8647–8657, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, A. P., Schauer, J. J., Lough, G. C., Snyder, D. C., Kolb, C. J., Von
Klooster, S., Rudolf, T., Manolopoulos, H., and Olson, M. L.: A comparison of
speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural
location, J. Environ. Monit., 10, 102–108, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Schleicher, N. J., Schafer, J., Blanc, G., Chen, Y., Chai, F., Cen, K., and Norra, S.: Atmospheric
particulate mercury in the megacity Beijing: Spatiotemporal variations and source apportionment, Atmos. Environ., 109, 251–261, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J.: Atmospheric mercury – an overview, Atmos.
Environ., 32, 809–822, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L. A., Lu, J. Y., Steffen, A.,
Schneeberger, D. R., and Berg, T.: Arctic springtime depletion of mercury,
Nature, 394, 331–332, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Seiler, W., Eberling, C., and Slemr, G.: Global distribution of gaseous
mercury in the troposphere, Pageoph, 118, 964–974, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S. A.,
Jaegle, L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric
mercury: Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02308,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007450" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007450</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Selin, N.
E., Song, S., Campos, T. L., Flocke, F. M., Reeves, M., Stechman, D., Stell,
M., Festa, J., Stutz, J., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D.,
Tyndall, G. S., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A. J., Riemer, D. D.,
Blake, N. J., Cantrell, C. A., and Mauldin III, R. L.: Origin of oxidized
mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 1511–1530, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G.-R.: Speciation and distribution of atmospheric mercury: Significance
of reactive gaseous mercury in the global mercury cycle, Ph.D. thesis, 170
pp., Univ. of Md., College Park, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G.-R. and Mason, R. P.: An examination of methods for the measurements
of reactive gaseous mercury in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35,
1209–1216, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G.-R. and Mason, R. P.: An examination of the oxidation of elemental
mercury in the presence of halide surfaces, J. Atmos. Chem., 48, 107–130,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G. R., Lin, N. H., Wang, J. L., Lee, C. T., Yang, C. F. O., and Wang,
S. H.: Temporal distribution and potential sources of atmospheric mercury
measured at a high-elevation background station in Taiwan, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 2393–2400, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Sigler, J. M., Mao, H., and Talbot, R.: Gaseous elemental and reactive
mercury in Southern New Hampshire, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1929–1942,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1929-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-1929-2009</a>, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Sigler, J. M., Mao, H., Sive, B. C., and Talbot, R.: Oceanic influence on
atmospheric mercury at coastal and inland sites: a springtime noreaster in
New England, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4023–4030, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4023-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-4023-2009</a>,
2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Sillman, S., Marsik, F. J., Al-Wali, K. I., Keeler, G. J., and Landis, M. S.:
Reactive mercury in the troposphere: Model formation and results for Florida,
the northeastern United States, and the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D23305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008227" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD008227</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F.: Trends in atmospheric mercury concentrations over the Atlantic
ocean and the Wank summit, and the resulting constraints on the budget of
atmospheric mercury, in: Global and Regional Mercury Cycles: Sources, Fluxes
and Mass Balances, edited by: Bayyens, W., Ebinghaus, R., and Vasiliev, O.,
NATO-ASI-Series, Vol. 21, 33–84, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the
Netherlands, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F. and Langer, E.: Increase in global atmospheric concentrations of
mercury inferred from measurements over the Atlantic Ocean, Nature 355,
434–437, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Seiler, W., and Schuster, G.: Latitudinal distribution of mercury
over the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1159–1166, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Schuster, G., and Seiler, W.: Distribution, speciation, and budget
of atmospheric mercury, J. Atmos. Chem., 3, 407–434, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Junkermann, R. W., Schmidt, W. H., and
Sladkovic, R.: Indication of change in global and regional trends of
atmospheric mercury concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2143–2146,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., and Ebinghaus, R.: Total gaseous
mercury concentrations at the Cape Point GAW station and their seasonality,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11807, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033741" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GL033741</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Brunke, E.-G., Ebinghaus, R., and Kuss, J.: Worldwide trend of
atmospheric mercury since 1995, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4779–4787,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4779-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-4779-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Angot, H., Dommergue, A., Magand, O., Barret, M., Weigelt, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Brunke, E.-G., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Edwards, G., Howard, D.,
Powell, J., Keywood, M., and Wang, F.: Comparison of mercury concentrations
measured at several sites in the Southern Hemisphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
3125–3133, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>
Soerensen, A. L., Skov, H., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, B. T., and Johnson, M.
S.: Global Concentrations of Gaseous Elemental Mercury and Reactive Gaseous
Mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7425–7430,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es903839n" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es903839n</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>
Soerensen, A. L., Jacob, D. J., Streets, D. G., Witt, M. L. I., Ebinghaus,
R., Mason, R. P., Andersson, M., and Sunderland, E. M.: Multi-decadal decline
of mercury in the North Atlantic atmosphere explained by changing subsurface
seawater concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21810,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053736" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012GL053736</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>
Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P.,  Balcom, P. H., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Kuss, J., and Sunderland, E. M.: Elemental Mercury Concentrations
and Fluxes in the Tropical Atmosphere and Ocean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11312–11319,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es503109p" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es503109p</a>,  2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>
Sommar, J., Andersson, M. E., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Circumpolar measurements of
speciated mercury, ozone and carbon monoxide in the boundary layer of the
Arctic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5031–5045,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5031-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-5031-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>
Song, S., Selin, N. E., Soerensen, A. L., Angot, H., Artz, R., Brooks, S.,
Brunke, E.-G., Conley, G., Dommergue, A., Ebinghaus, R., Holsen, T. M.,
Jaffe, D. A., Kang, S., Kelley, P., Luke, W. T., Magand, O., Marumoto, K.,
Pfaffhuber, K. A., Ren, X., Sheu, G.-R., Slemr, F., Warneke, T., Weigelt, A.,
Weiss-Penzias, P., Wip, D. C., and Zhang, Q.: Top-down constraints on
atmospheric mercury emissions and implications for global biogeochemical
cycling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7103–7125, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>
Song, X., Cheng, I., and Lu, J.: Annual atmospheric mercury species in
downtown Toronto, Canada, J. Environ. Monit., 11, 660–669, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>
Sprovieri, F. and Pirrone, N., Spatial and temporal distribution of
atmospheric mercury species over the Adriatic Sea, Environ. Fluid Mech., 8,
117–128, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9045-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10652-007-9045-4</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>
Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Hedgecock, I. M., Landis, M. S., and Stevens, R.
K.: Intensive atmospheric mercury measurements at Terra Nova Bay in
Antarctica during November and December 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4722,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002057" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002057</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Gärfeldt, K., and Sommar, J.: Mercury
measurements in the marine boundary layer along a 6000 km cruise path around
the Mediterranean Sea, Atmos. Environ., 37 suppl., S63–S71, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>
Sprovieri, F., Hedgecock, I. M., and Pirrone, N.: An investigation of the
origins of reactive gaseous mercury in the Mediterranean marine boundary
layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3985–3997, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3985-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-3985-2010</a>,
2010a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>
Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H., and Dommergue, A.: A
review of worldwide atmospheric mercury measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8245–8265, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8245-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-8245-2010</a>, 2010b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>
Stamenkovic, J., Lyman, S., and Gustin, M. S.: Seasonal and diel variation of
atmospheric mercury concentrations in the Reno (Nevada, USA) airshed, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 6662–6672, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>
Steffen, A., Douglas, T., Amyot, M., Ariya, P., Aspmo, K., Berg, T.,
Bottenheim, J., Brooks, S., Cobbett, F., Dastoor, A., Dommergue, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Ferrari, C., Gardfeldt, K., Goodsite, M. E., Lean, D.,
Poulain, A. J., Scherz, C., Skov, H., Sommar, J., and Temme, C.: A synthesis
of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1445–1482, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>
Steffen, A., Bottenheim, J., Cole, A., Douglas, T. A., Ebinghaus, R., Friess,
U., Netcheva, S., Nghiem, S., Sihler, H., and Staebler, R.: Atmospheric
mercury over sea ice during the OASIS-2009 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7007–7021, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7007-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-7007-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>
Strode, S. A., Jaegle, L., Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca,
R. M., Mason, R. P., and Slemr, F.: Air-sea exchange in the global mercury
cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1017, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002766" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GB002766</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>
Subir, M., Ariya, P. A., and Dastoor, A. P.: A review of uncertainties in
atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing
kinetic parameters – fundamental limitations and the importance of
heterogeneous chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5664–5676, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>
Swartzendruber, P. C., Jaffe, D. A., Prestbo, E. M., Weiss-Penzias, P.,
Selin, N. E., Park, R., Jacob, D. J., Strode, S., and Jaegle, L.:
Observations of reactive gaseous mercury in the free troposphere at the Mount
Bachelor Observatory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D24301,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007415" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007415</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>
Swartzendruber, P. C., Chand, D., Jaffe, D. A., Smith, J., Reidmiller, D.,
Gratz, L., Keeler, J., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., and Talbot, R.: Vertical
distribution of mercury, CO, ozone, and aerosol scattering coefficient in the
Pacific Northwest during the spring 2006 INTEX-B campaign, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D10305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009579" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009579</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>
Talbot, R., Mao, H., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., and Avery, M.: Total Depletion of
Hg° in the Upper Troposphere –  Lower Stratosphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L23804, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031366" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL031366</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>
Talbot, R., Mao, H., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Avery, M., Browell, E., Sachse,
G., Vay, S., Blake, D., Huey, G., and Fuelberg, H.: Factors influencing the
large-scale distribution of Hg° in the Mexico City area and over the
North Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2103–2114,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2103-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2103-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>
Temme, C., Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., and Einax, J. W.: Distribution of
mercury over the Atlantic Ocean in 1996 and 1999–2001, Atmos. Environ., 37,
1889–1897, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>
Temme, C., Einax, J. W., Ebinghaus, R., and Schroeder, W. H.: Measurements of
mercury species at a coastal site in the Antarctic and over the South
Atlantic Ocean in the polar summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 22–31,
2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>
Timonen, H., Ambrose, J. L., and Jaffe, D. A.: Oxidation of elemental Hg in
anthropogenic and marine airmasses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2827–2836,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2827-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-2827-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>
Tseng, C. M., Liu, C. S., and Lamborg, C.: Seasonal changes in gaseous
elemental mercury in relation to monsoon cycling over the northern South
China Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7341–7350, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7341-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-7341-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>
UNEP, Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, Emissions, Releases and
Environmental Transport, UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Han, S., and Xu, H.:
Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China I. The
seasonal distribution pattern of total gaseous mercury and its potential
sources, Environ. Res., 109, 201–206, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Li, P., Han, S., and Xu, H.:
Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China II. The
distribution of reactive gaseous mercury and particulate mercury and mercury
deposition fluxes, Environ. Res., 109, 721–727, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, F., Saiz-Lopez, A., Mahajan, A. S., Gómez Martín, J. C.,
Armstrong, D., Lemes, M., Hay, T., and Prados-Roman, C.: Enhanced production
of oxidised mercury over the tropical Pacific Ocean: a key missing oxidation
pathway, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1323–1335, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Huang, J., Hopke, P. K., Rattigan, O. V., Chalupa, D. C., Utell, M.
J., and Holsen, T. M.: Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power
plant on ambient mercury species, Chemosphere, 92, 360–367, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>
Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Manning, A. J., Derwent, R. G., Simmonds, P. G.,
Spain, T. G., Jennings, S. G., and Slemr, F.: Analysis and interpretation of
18 years of mercury observations since 1996 at Mace Head at the Atlantic
Ocean coast of Ireland, Atmos. Environ., 100, 85–93, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D. A., McClintick, A., Presbo, E. M., and Landis,
M. S.: Gaseous elemental mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer: Evidence for
rapid removal in anthropogenic pollution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37,
3755–3763, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P. S., Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Bates, T. S., Gaston,
C., Prather, K., Vlasenko, A., and Li, S. M.: Shipboard measurements of
gaseous elemental mercury along the coast of Central and Southern California,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 208–219, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018463" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JD018463</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D., Swartzendruber, P., Hafner, W., Chand, D., and
Prestbo, E.: Quantifying Asian and biomass burning sources of mercury using
the Hg/CO ratio in pollution plumes observed at the Mount Bachelor
Observatory, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4366–4379, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Gustin, M. S., and Lyman, S. N.: Observations of speciated
atmospheric mercury at three sites in Nevada: Evidence for a free
tropospheric source of reactive gaseous mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011607" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD011607</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Amos, H. M., Selin, N. E., Gustin, M. S., Jaffe, D. A.,
Obrist, D., Sheu, G.-R., and Giang, A.: Use of a global model to understand
speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high-elevation sites,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1161–1173, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P. S., Gay, D. A., Brigham, M. E., Parsons, M. T., Gustin, M.
S., and ter Schure, A.: Trends in mercury wet deposition and mercury air
concentrations across the US and Canada, Sci. Total Environ.,  568, 546–556, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.061" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.061</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>
Williston, S. H.: Mercury in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 73,
7051–7055, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB073i022p07051" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/JB073i022p07051</a>, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>
Witt, M. L. I., Mather, T. A., Baker, A. R., De Hoog, J. C. M., and Pyle, D.
M.: Atmospheric trace metals over the south-west Indian Ocean: total gaseous
mercury, aerosol trace metal concentrations and lead isotope ratios, Mar.
Chem., 121, 2–16, 2010a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>
Witt, M. L. I., Meheran, N., Mather, T. A., De Hoog, J. C. M., and Pyle, D.
M.: Aerosol trace metals, particle morphology and total gaseous mercury in
the atmosphere of Oxford, UK, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1524–1538, 2010b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>
Won, J. H., Park, J. Y., and Lee, T. G., Mercury emissions from automobiles
using gasoline, diesel, and LPG, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7547–7552, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>
Xia, C., Xie, Z., and Sun, L.: Atmospheric mercury in the marine boundary
layer along a cruise path from Shanghai, China to Prydz Bay, Antarctica,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 1815–1821, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation>
Xiu, G., Cai, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, D., Büeler, A., Lee, S., Shen, Y.,
Xu, L., Huang, X., and Zhang, P.: Speciated mercury in size-fractionated
particles in Shanghai ambient air, Atmos. Environ., 43, 3145–3154, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Chen, J., Yang, L., Niu, Z., Tong, L., Yin, L., and Chen, Y.:
Characteristics and sources of atmospheric mercury speciation in a coastal
city, Xiamen, China, Chemosphere, 119, 530–539, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X. and Akhtar, U. S.: Identification of potential regional sources of
atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Windsor, Ontario, Canada using hybrid
receptor modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7073–7083,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7073-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7073-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib178"><label>178</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Akhtar, U., Clark, K., and Wang, X.: Temporal variability of
atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Windsor, ON, Canada, Atmosphere, 5,
536–556, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib179"><label>179</label><mixed-citation>
Yatavelli, R. L., Fahrni, J. K., Kim, M., Crist, K. C., Vickers, C. D.,
Winter, S. E., and Connell, D. P.: Mercury, PM 2.5 and gaseous co-pollutants
in the Ohio River Valley region: Preliminary results from the Athens
supersite, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6650–6665, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib180"><label>180</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J., Xie, Z., Kang, H., Li, Z., Sun, C., Bian, L., and Zhang, P.: High variability of
atmospheric mercury in the summertime boundary layer through the central
Arctic Ocean, Scientific Reports, 4, 6091, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06091" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep06091</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib181"><label>181</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Fu, X. W., Lin, C.-J., Wang, X., and Feng, X. B.: Observation and
analysis of speciated atmospheric mercury in Shangri-La, Tibetan Plateau,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 653–665, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-653-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-653-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib182"><label>182</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Wright L. P., and Blanchard P.: A review of current knowledge
concerning dry deposition of atmospheric mercury, Atmos. Environ., 43,
5853–5864, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib183"><label>183</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Johnson, D., Dastoor, A., Ryzhkov, A., Lin, C.-J.,
Vijayaraghavan, K., Gay, D., Holsen, T. M., Huang, J., Graydon, J. A., St.
Louis, V. L., Castro, M. S., Miller, E. K., Marsik, F., Lu, J., Poissant, L.,
Pilote, M., and Zhang, K. M.: Assessment of modelled mercury deposition over
the Great Lakes region, Environ. Pollut., 161, 272–283, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib184"><label>184</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Wang, S. X., Wang, L., and Hao, J. M.: Atmospheric mercury
concentration and chemical speciation at a rural site in Beijing, China:
implications of mercury emission sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
10505–10516, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-10505-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib185"><label>185</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Chen, L., Amos, H. M., Krabbenhoft,
D. P., Slemr, F., St. Louis, V. L., and Sunderland, E. M.: Observed decrease
in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic
emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 526–531, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib186"><label>186</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, J., Wang, T., Talbot, R., Mao, H., Hall, C. B., Yang, X., Fu, C.,
Zhuang, B., Li, S., Han, Y., and Huang, X.: Characteristics of atmospheric
Total Gaseous Mercury (TGM) observed in urban Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 12103–12118, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-12103-2012</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib187"><label>187</label><mixed-citation>
Zielonka, U., Hlawiczka, S., Fudala, J., Wängberg, I., and Munthe, J.:
Seasonal mercury concentrations measured in rural air in Southern Poland:
Contribution from local and regional coal combustion, Atmos. Environ., 39,
7580–7586, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
