<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-11823-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Heterogeneous photochemistry of imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde:<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical
formation and aerosol growth</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Heterogeneous photochemistry of imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. Gonz\'{a}lez Palacios et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>González Palacios</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Corral Arroyo</surname><given-names>Pablo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Aregahegn</surname><given-names>Kifle Z.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff5 aff8">
          <name><surname>Steimer</surname><given-names>Sarah S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-9467</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Bartels-Rausch</surname><given-names>Thorsten</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-2572</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Nozière</surname><given-names>Barbara</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-1310</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>George</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-7056</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ammann</surname><given-names>Markus</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-9000</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Volkamer</surname><given-names>Rainer</given-names></name>
          <email>rainer.volkamer@colorado.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-1369</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 215 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), 216 UCB, University of Colorado,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Boulder, CO 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, 2012 Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5256, IRCELYON, Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l'environnement de Lyon,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 2 avenue Albert Einstein, 69626 Villeurbanne, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Chemistry Department, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697-202, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Rainer Volkamer (rainer.volkamer@colorado.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>11823</fpage><lpage>11836</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The multiphase chemistry of glyoxal is a source of secondary organic aerosol
(SOA), including its light-absorbing product imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (IC).
IC is a photosensitizer that can contribute to additional aerosol ageing and
growth when its excited triplet state oxidizes hydrocarbons (reactive uptake)
via H-transfer chemistry. We have conducted a series of photochemical
coated-wall flow tube (CWFT) experiments using films of IC and citric acid
(CA), an organic proxy and H donor
in the condensed phase. The formation rate of gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured indirectly by converting gas-phase NO into
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We report on experiments that relied on measurements of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
formation, NO loss and HONO formation. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be a
linear function of (1) the [IC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CA] concentration product and
(2) the photon actinic flux. Additionally, (3) a more complex function of
relative humidity (25 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 %) and of (4) the
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
(15 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 %) was observed, most
likely indicating competing effects of dilution, HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mobility and losses
in the film. The maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed at 25–55 % RH
and at ambient O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals form in the
condensed phase when excited IC triplet states are reduced by H transfer from
a donor, CA in our system, and subsequently react with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to regenerate
IC, leading to a catalytic cycle. OH does not appear to be formed as a
primary product but is produced from the reaction of NO with HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
gas phase. Further, seed aerosols containing IC and ammonium sulfate were
exposed to gas-phase limonene and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in aerosol flow tube experiments,
confirming significant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from aerosol surfaces. Our results
indicate a potentially relevant contribution of triplet state photochemistry
for gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, aerosol growth and ageing in the
atmosphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The sources and sinks of radicals play an important role in the oxidative
capacity of the atmosphere. Radicals and other oxidants initiate the chemical
degradation of various trace gases, which is key in the troposphere (Jacob,
1999). The hydroxyl (OH) and peroxyl (HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals belong to the
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical family and are primarily generated by ultraviolet radiation
photochemical reactions (Calvert and Pitts, 1966), like the reaction of
O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) (from O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O or photolysis of HONO, HCHO,
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or acetone. Some secondary gas-phase sources are the
ozonolysis of alkenes or O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Monks, 2005). The oxidation
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by OH and other oxidants in the presence of NO leads to perturbations
in the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical cycles that affect O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and aerosol formation (Monks, 2005; Sheehy et al., 2010). The kinetics and
photochemical parameters of these reactions are relatively well-known in the
gas phase (Atkinson et al., 2004; Sander et al., 2011). However, this does
not apply to the sources and sinks for HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in atmospheric droplets and
on aerosol surfaces (Ervens et al., 2011). Uptake of OH from the gas phase
and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis in the condensed phase are the primary known
sources for HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the condensed phase. HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly soluble and
the concentrations of OH, the most effective oxidant in the condensed phase,
depend on HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals. Another source of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals is from the
chemical reactions of reduced metal ions and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, known as Fenton
reactions (Fenton, 1894; Deguillaume et al., 2005). Direct photolysis of
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrite, nitrate (Zellner et al., 1990), hydroperoxides (Zhao
et al., 2013) and light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol (SOA) (Badali et
al., 2015) are also sources of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the condensed phase. Other studies
have shown that the photochemistry of iron (III) oxalate and carboxylate
complexes, present in aqueous environments (e.g., wastewater, clouds, fogs,
particles), can initiate a radical chain reaction serving as an aqueous
source of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> can then regenerate OH starting a
new cycle of Fenton reactions (Weller et al., 2013a, b). The temperature-dependent rate constants of OH in the aqueous phase have been studied for a
limited subset of organics (Ervens et al., 2003). However, there is still a
wide gap with respect to understanding the sources, sinks, kinetics and
photochemical reaction pathways of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in the condensed phase
(George et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Our study investigates photosensitizers as an additional HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source that
may be relevant to further modify RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction cycles in
both the condensed and gas phases. It is motivated by the formation of
superoxide in terrestrial aqueous photochemistry (Draper and Crosby, 1983;
Faust, 1999; Schwarzenbach et al., 2002), by more recent observations that
irradiated surfaces containing titanium dioxide generate HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in
the gas phase (Yi et al., 2012) and by the generation of OH from metal oxides
acting as photocatalysts in mineral dust (Dupart et al., 2012). Past studies
have demonstrated the reactivity of glyoxal towards ammonium ions and amines
as a source for light-absorbing brown carbon (Nozière et al., 2009;
Galloway et al., 2009; Shapiro et al., 2009; Kampf et al., 2012). One of
these products is imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (IC; Galloway et al., 2009),
which absorbs light at UV wavelengths (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 330 nm) (Maxut et
al., 2015). Other imidazole-type compounds and light-absorbing products are
formed in minor amounts but can nonetheless impact optical and radiative
properties of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs; Sareen et al., 2010; Trainic et al., 2011). Photochemical
reactions by these species are not typically accounted for in models yet but
have a possible role for SOA formation and aerosol aging mechanisms (Sumner
et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Photosensitizers are light-absorbing compounds that absorb and convert the
energy of photons into chemical energy that can facilitate reactions, e.g.,
at surfaces or within aerosols (George et al., 2015). For example, aerosol
seeds containing humic acid or 4-(benzoyl)benzoic acid (4-BBA), two other
known photosensitizers, can induce the reactive uptake of VOCs when exposed
to light, leading to SOA formation (Monge et
al., 2012). Aregahegn et al. (2013) and Rossignol et al. (2014) suggested a
mechanism for autophotocatalyic aerosol growth, where radicals are produced
from the reaction of an H-donor hydrocarbon species, in this case limonene,
and the triplet state of IC. The condensed-phase citric acid and the
gas-phase limonene are H-atom donors (in this article we refer to them as
H donors) rather than proton donors as in the case of a Brønsted acid. In
particular, the transfer of the H atom leads to the formation of an
alkyl-radical species. The H-atoms transfer thus has the same effect as an
H-atom abstraction reaction by Cl or OH radicals.</p>
      <p>Field measurements on fog water samples confirmed that triplet excited states
of organic compounds upon irradiation can oxidize model samples such as
syringol (a biomass burning phenol) and methyl jasmonate (a green leaf
volatile), accounting for 30–90 % of their loss (Kaur et al., 2014).
There are very few field measurements of imidazoles; a recent study by Teich
et al. (2016) identified five imidazoles (1-butylimidazole, 1-ethylimidazole,
2-ethylimidazole, IC and 4(5)-methylimidazole) in ambient aerosols in
concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 14 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. IC, the molecule of
interest in this study, was measured in its hydrated form in ambient aerosols
in three urban areas with signs of air pollution and biomass burning (Leipzig, Germany; Wuqing and Xianghe, China). The observed quantities of hydrated
IC ranged from 0.9 to 3.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The authors claim that these values
could be a lower limit due to high losses of IC during sample preparation
indicated by low recovery from standard solutions. This suggests that IC and
other imidazole derivatives are present in areas with high pollution and
biomass burning. Field measurements in Cyprus during the CYPHEX campaign in
2014 detected IC and bis-imidazole in ambient aerosol samples (Jacob, 2015).
The IC diurnal cycles showed the highest concentrations at night
(0.02–0.115 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and lower concentrations during the day,
suggesting that ambient concentrations of IC in aerosols are a balance
between photochemical sources and sinks. Imidazoles seem to be widespread in
polluted and remote areas. However, the atmospheric implications of IC as a
photosensitizer, a proxy species of brown carbon light absorption, and as a
radical source in ambient aerosols remains unclear.</p>
      <p>The existence of such photocatalytic cycles could be of atmospheric
significance. Indeed, Canonica et al. (1995) suggested that the initial
carbonyl, triggering the photochemical properties, is regenerated via a
reaction with oxygen-producing HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. To our knowledge, the production of
such radical side products has not been investigated under atmospheric conditions
previously. We therefore report here on the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical production from
IC in the condensed phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sketch of the photochemical flow tube reactor setups at PSI for
<bold>(a)</bold> Setup 1 in 2013 measuring NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generation and
<bold>(b)</bold> for Setup 2 in 2014 measuring NO loss.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental section</title>
      <p>A series of flow tube experiments were conducted to investigate the formation
of gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals from IC photochemistry using two different
coated-wall flow tube (CWFT) reactors (Sect. 2.1). Section 2.2 describes aerosol flow tube
experiments that confirm the photochemical production of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in
the absence of other known gas-phase radical sources in aerosols. All
experiments were performed at atmospheric pressure.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Coated-wall flow tube experiments</title>
      <p>The CWFT experiments were designed to investigate the gas-phase production of
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals from a film containing IC and citric acid (CA) matrix as a
function of UV light intensity, IC concentration in the film, relative
humidity (RH) and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio. Two similar experimental setups were
used as shown in Fig. 1. Some of the differences, not major, consist in the
flow-reactor volume, surface area, flow rates, IC mass loading, NO mixing
ratio, temperature inside the reactor and the connected instrumentation.</p>
      <p>Setup 1. Experiments were conducted in a photochemical flow system equipped
with a Duran glass CWFT (0.40 cm inner radius, 45.2 and 40.0 cm length,
113.6 and 100.4 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inner surface, surface-to-volume ratio (S <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.00 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was housed in a double-jacketed cell coupled to a recirculating water
bath to control the temperature at 298 K; the setup is shown in Fig. 1a. A
thin film of IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA was deposited inside the tubular glass flow tube.
The experimental procedure for the preparation of the films is described in
Sect. 2.1.2. The system consisted of seven ultraviolet lamps (UV-A range,
Philips Cleo Effect 22 W: 300–420 nm, 41 cm, 2.6 cm o.d.) surrounding the
flow tube in a circular arrangement of 10 cm in diameter.</p>
      <p>Setup 2. The second CWFT (CWFT 0.60 cm inner radius, 50 cm length, inner
surface 188.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, S/V <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.33 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactor had a glass
jacket to allow water to circulate and maintain temperature control inside
the tube at 292 K. The coated-wall tubes were snugly fit into the CWFT as
inserts. The CWFT was surrounded by the same seven fluorescent lamps as in
Setup 1. The light passed through different circulating water cooling jackets
for both setups, thus providing a different light path for each setup.</p>
      <p>Setup 1 and 2. The actinic flux in the flow tube reactor, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was measured by actinometry of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Supplement for
description of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements), independently for both
setups. The flows of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, air and NO were set by mass flow
controllers. The RH was set by a humidifier placed after the admission of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gases but before the admission of NO or NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Fig. 1), in which the carrier gas bubbles through liquid water at a given
temperature. The humidifier could also be bypassed to set a RH of near zero.
A typical measurement sequence is described in Sect. 2.1.2.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured for both Setup 1 and 2 using NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
actinometry. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with seven lamps was found to be 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Setup 1 and
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Setup 2 (see Fig. S1 for Setup 1 and
Supplement text for both Setups). These values were compared to direct
actinic flux measurements in the flow tube and thus normalized (see
Sect. 3.1.1).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Flow tube instrumentation</title>
      <p>The following gas-phase products exiting the flow tube were measured by three
different instruments: NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the University of Colorado Light Emitting
Diode Cavity-Enhanced Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy
(LED-CE-DOAS) instrument (Thalman and Volkamer, 2010), HONO by a LOng Path
Absorption Photometer (LOPAP, QuMA GmbH, Heland et al., 2001; Kleffmann et al., 2002) and NO by a
chemiluminescence analyzer (Ecophysics CLD 77 AM, also used for NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Setup 2). HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals were indirectly measured by detecting NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
with the LED-CE-DOAS (Setup 1) and by the loss of NO with the
chemiluminescence detector (Setup 2). The latter was preceded by a molybdenum
converter to transform HONO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO and by an alkaline trap for
HONO. Both trap and converter had a bypass to allow sequential measurements,
thereby obtaining the concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HONO separately. HONO was
measured by the LOPAP during some selected experiments (Kleffmann et al.,
2002, 2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>LED-CE-DOAS</title>
      <p>The LED-CE-DOAS instrument (Thalman and Volkamer, 2010) detects NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption at blue wavelengths. A high-power blue LED light source
(420–490 nm) is coupled to a confocal high-finesse optical cavity
consisting of two highly reflective mirrors (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.999956</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) peaking at
460 nm that are placed about 87.5 cm apart (sample path length of 74 cm).
The absorption path length depends on wavelength, and was about
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 km near peak reflectivity here. A purge flow of dry nitrogen gas
is added to keep the mirrors clean. The light exiting the cavity is projected
onto a quartz optical fiber coupled to a Princeton Instruments Acton SP2156
Czerny-Turner imaging spectrometer with a PIXIS 400B CCD detector. The mirror
reflectivity was calculated by flowing helium and nitrogen gas, exploiting
the difference in the Rayleigh scattering cross sections of both gases as
described in Thalman et al. (2014). The gas exiting the flow tube was
directly injected into the CE-DOAS cavity, and spectra were recorded every 60 s and stored on a computer. For analysis we use broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy (BBCEAS) fitting at
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations exceeding a few parts per billion by volume (Washenfelder et al., 2008) and
DOAS least-squares fitting methods at lower concentrations (Thalman et al.,
2015). The mirror alignment was monitored online as part of every spectrum by
observing the slant-column density of oxygen collision complexes,
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thalman and Volkamer, 2010, 2013). The following
reference spectra were taken from the literature: NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Vandaele et al.,
2002) and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> collision complexes (Thalman and Volkamer, 2013).
The detection limit for NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was 50–100 pptv.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Experimental conditions</title>
      <p>The IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA solutions were prepared by adding IC into a 1 M CA solution
in 18 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm ultrapure water to achieve IC to CA molecular ratios of between 0.026 and 0.127 in the film. The bulk solutions for both setups were
prepared by weighing out 384–400 mg of CA in 2 mL of water and adding
4–20 mg of IC to the solution. The solutions for both setups were freshly
prepared for each experiment, and the masses in the film were calculated at
50 % RH from the CA hygroscopic growth factors reported by Zardini et
al. (2008) for both setups (for Setup 1: 5–18 mg of IC and 44 mg of CA;
for Setup 2: 1–5 mg of IC and 77 mg of CA). The range of concentrations in
the films was between 0.148 and 0.671 M of IC and 5.29 and 6.68 M of CA.</p>
      <p>The IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA solution coatings were produced by depositing
220–250 (Setup 1) and 400 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L (Setup 2) of the desired solution in a
Duran glass tube, which was then dispersed into a thin and viscous film of
3–4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The film was dried with a gentle N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stream humidified
to a RH similar to the experimental RH and room temperature. The film was
rolled and turned upside down to deposit a homogenous film throughout the
entire inner surface of the flow tube. The homogeneity of the film was
confirmed by visual inspection. If a bright clear homogenous amorphous film
from the supercooled solution was not observed, the film was discarded (e.g., observation of a turbid and cracked crystallized appearance). The carrier gas
flows consisted of premixed dry N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (a ratio of 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1
in Setup 1 and a ratio of 2 in Setup 2), and NO was controlled by mass flow
controllers. The total flow rates were 500 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Setup 1 and
1500 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Setup 2. In Setup 1, a dilution flow of
1000 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was added at the end of the flow tube for a total of
1500 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during experiments when HONO was measured along with
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. All experiments were conducted at ambient pressure, leading to gas
residence times of 2.1–2.4 s (depending on flow tube volume, for both
setups) under laminar flow conditions. The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flow rate was varied
between 0 and 110 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to observe the dependence of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> while
keeping the total flow rate constant. A ratio of 4.5 : 1 of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was maintained if any of the other gas flows were changed
(e.g., NO and/or NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Setup 1. For Setup 2, a ratio of 2 : 1 of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also maintained, except for the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
dependence studies. The RH was kept constant at 50 % RH during most
experiments and varied between 10 and 60 % RH to study humidity effects of
the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical production. The concentration of NO was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 ppmv
(Setup 1) and varied between 100 and 500 ppbv (Setup 2). Scavenging of
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was achieved by the following reaction:
              <disp-formula id="R1" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>HO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The lifetime of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 5 ms when 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of NO are present (Setup 1), which ensures
efficient conversion of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules into NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K; Sander et al.,
2011). As shown in Fig. S2, 500 ppbv NO, the concentration used in Setup 2,
was sufficient to efficiently convert HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Sect. 3.1.1. The lifetime of gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to loss to the
organic film is about 0.1 s, based on a similar formula shown in Eq. (S3),
where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (upper limit by Lakey et al., 2015). Note that in
view of the essentially diffusion-controlled loss of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the CWFT and
tubing walls, the chosen scheme for determining the production of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
radicals from the films by fast scavenging with NO is superior to a more
selective detection method, e.g., laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), which would require passing the
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals into a separate setup with substantial losses. For selected
experiments, the films were exposed to UV irradiation for over 6 h which showed only a minor change in the decrease in NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to the conclusion that the reactivity of the films was stable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$J_{\text{IC}}$ calculations}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculations</title>
      <p>The absorption cross section of IC and the calculated photolysis rate are
shown in Fig. S3. The photolysis frequencies of IC were calculated using a
similar procedure as described in Schwarzenbach et al. (2002). The spectral actinic flux in the flow tube, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was converted to the spectral photon flux density that reaches the film in the flow tube, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the photon flux absorbed by IC, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as follows:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn>300</mml:mn><mml:mn>420</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>where</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SA</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has units of Ein L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(1 Ein <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 mole (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.022</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of photons), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has units
of Ein L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the optical path length taken
as the thickness of the film in cm, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration of IC
in the film in units of M, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the IC absorption cross
section. The absorption spectrum of IC in water was based on the measurements
by Kampf et al. (2012) and renormalized to the peak value of
10 205 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2400 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 284 nm (Maxut et al., 2015).
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of the film in cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated from the
deposited mass of CA and the hygroscopic growth factors of CA (Zardini et
al., 2008); SA is the surface area of the film, taken as the geometric area
of the inner surface area of the flow tube in cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
Avogadro's number in molecules mole<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The IC photoexcitation rate
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was about 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (upper limit).</p>
      <p>We have also attempted to calculate an effective quantum yield for the
formation of gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>flow</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate in
mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calculated mean
absorbed photon flux by IC (Eq. 1), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
gas-phase concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> assuming a
1 : 1 ratio to HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion, flow is the volumetric gas flow at the
temperature in the CWFT and atmospheric pressure in cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>film</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is in L.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Aerosol flow-reactor experiments</title>
      <p>A detailed description of the aerosol flow tube (AFT) is reported elsewhere
(Monge et al., 2012; Aregahegn et al., 2013); therefore, only some principles
are given below. The SOA experiments were conducted in a horizontal,
cylindrical Pyrex aerosol flow reactor (13 cm i.d., 152 cm length)
surrounded by seven UV lamps (Philips CLEO, 80W) with a continuous emission
spectrum ranging from 300 to 420 nm (total irradiance of
3.31 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photons cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The flow reactor
consisted of Teflon stoppers and different flow controllers that maintained
the gas–aerosol–UV irradiation contact time between 20 and 50 min. This flow
reactor also consisted of an outer jacket that controlled the temperature at
293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 K by water circulation using a thermostat (Model Huber CC
405).</p>
      <p>Seed aerosols (50 nm) were produced by nebulizing a solution (at pH 6)
containing ammonium sulfate (AS, 0.95 mM) and IC (1.3 mM), size selected by
a DMA and exposed to gas-phase limonene (500 ppbv) in the aerosol flow
reactor. The typical aerosol mass loading in the reactor was
2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 000 particles cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a starting diameter of 50 nm. As
shown by Aregahegn et al. (2013), limonene is an efficient H-donor VOC that
forms SOA via reactive uptake to IC-containing seed aerosol. Due to the
excess of limonene and low seed aerosol surface area, the consumption of
limonene was below the detection limit. The aerosol growth was measured by
means of an ultrafine condensation particle counter (UCPC) and a scanning
mobility particle sizer spectrometer (SMPS; both TSI), and similarly to the
CWFT experiment, a flow of gaseous NO (from a 1 ppmv cylinder, Linde) was
added to the carrier gas, and its conversion to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was monitored by a chemiluminescence detector with a detection limit of 0.05 ppbv (ECO PHYSICS
CLD 88). Due to the long residence time, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is
affected by its photolysis in the AFT. As discussed below, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was calculated, in this case, from the growth of the particle diameter
measured at the exit of the flow tube; the assumption is that growth was due
to reactive uptake of limonene only and that each limonene forms one
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical. At 30 ppbv NO, the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical lifetime is around
2 s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS5">
  <title>Experimental conditions</title>
      <p>The total flow rate in the aerosol flow reactor was between
400–1000 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, ensuring laminar flow conditions. The RH was
varied between 0 and 50 %. The RH of particles in the flow reactor was
controlled by saturating the carrier gas via a bubbler containing ultrapure
water (Milli Q, 18 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm). The RH in the flow-reactor system was varied by
changing the gas flow rates to the bubbler and the temperature of the
circulating water jacket of the bubbler. The RH was measured with a humidity
sensor (Meltec UFT 75-AT, Germany) at the exit of the flow reactor. The
concentrations for the flow tube experiments were the following: 30 ppbv of
NO and 500 ppbv of limonene.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemicals</title>
      <p>The following chemicals were used without further purification for CWFT
studies: IC (97 %, Sigma Aldrich) and CA (Sigma Aldrich). For Setup 1,
the Duran glass tubes were soaked in a
deconex<sup>®</sup> cleaning solution overnight; the
next day they were rinsed with 18 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm water (Milli Q Element
system). These flow tubes were etched with a 5 % hydrofluoric acid
solution after the washing procedure and again rinsed with water before any
experimental use. The Duran flow tubes for Setup 2 were not initially etched
with any acid but stored in a NaOH solution after washing and lastly rinsed
with water; Setup 2 later confirmed that the treatment of flow tube with
acids affects <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by rinsing with HCl and etching with HF
solutions.</p>
      <p>For the aerosol flow-reactor experiments, gas-phase limonene was generated
from commercially available limonene (Aldrich, 97 %) by means of a
permeation tube. The following chemicals were used without further
purification: IC (97 %, Sigma Aldrich) and succinic acid (Sigma Aldrich,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.5 %); 4-benzoylbenzoic acid (4-BBA, Aldrich 99 %) and
adipic acid (AA, Aldrich, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.5 %) were used to expand the CWFT
studies to other photosensitizers.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Coated-wall flow tube</title>
      <p>The following results represent the light-dependent formation of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
indirectly from measurements of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production and NO loss, measured
with Setup 1 and 2, respectively. Figure 2 shows a time series of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured with Setup 1 as a function of UV-A light, which confirms the
light-dependent radical production. This particular film had an IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA
ratio of 0.026 (0.148 M IC and 5.77 M CA in the film). An evident increase
in NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed upon UV irradiation, directly reflecting the
light-mediated release of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Reaction (R1). The NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
signal decreases over time with all seven lamps; this was a common feature
observed in all films and could be due to HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks in the film
increasing with time. Thus, the system only slowly evolves into a steady
state. A small amount of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.5–1.5 ppbv) was observed during
experiments that used only CA in the absence of IC; therefore, the data in
Fig. 2 and all data reported below have been corrected for this NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
background, measured routinely in between experiments. Figure 2 also
indicates a strong correlation with light intensity, which is further
discussed in the context of Fig. 4. For irradiation, humidity and oxygen
dependence experiments, each data point represents a separate experiment
using a freshly prepared coated film in the flow tube. The uncertainty for
experiments was based on the standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the number of
experiments. The total uncertainty was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6–27 % (propagated error for
normalization was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7–29 %) for the IC mass loading experiments in
Setup 1 and up to a factor of 2 for the light dependence experiments. The
uncertainty in Setup 2 was 10–50 %. As discussed earlier, the lifetime
of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the system was about 3 orders of magnitude less than the
residence time in the flow tube, therefore suggesting that most, if not all,
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reacted with NO to produce the observed NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Reaction R1).
Theoretically, the system was clean of other oxidants such as O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (and
thus NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The uptake of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the film was too small to further
produce any nitrate radicals, and the photolysis of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
experiments to produce O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was insignificant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %). The
recombination of NO and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributes a negligible (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 %)
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source under our experimental conditions. RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generation from
the reaction between CA and OH from HONO photolysis was also ruled out since
it is approximated to account for only 1 % of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production if
we assume every OH from the photolysis reacts with CA. To our knowledge, the
direct photolysis of CA to produce any RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals has not been
observed. Therefore, we believe that HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the essential oxidant for NO
and refer to the measured NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile for a 0.025 M IC bulk solution, whose
concentration increases to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 M of IC in the film due to the citric
acid hygroscopic properties. The gray shaded areas indicate periods where NO
was exposed in the dark. The yellow shaded areas indicates the period of
irradiation; the decrease in the intensity of yellow represents
2.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
1.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
3.94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photons cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for seven, five,
three and one lamp, respectively. This time series clearly indicates the
light dependence production of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals from the photosensitization
of IC in a CA film.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 3 shows that the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production fluxes, in
molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, increased with IC mass loading. The CA
concentration was kept constant, and results are shown as the product between
[IC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CA], since we expect that the production rate of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
proportional to the concentration of IC, at constant illumination, and to that
of the potential H donor, CA. For Setup 1, the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were measured
as NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and calculated using the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Fluxes</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>flow</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SA</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The description of these parameters has been previously explained (see
Sect. 2.1.3). For Setup 2, the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux was calculated similarly, but
only about half of the observed NO loss was considered to account for the
loss of NO via the reaction with OH (see Reaction R1 in Supplement), meaning
that for each HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scavenged, two NO molecules were lost. In Fig. 3, the
data from Setup 1 are represented by the black squares and the data from
Setup 2 are represented by the gray circles. Setup 1 measurements were taken
at about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % RH and at room temperature. Setup 2 measurements
were taken at 45 % RH and at 292 K. Temperature has an effect on the
observed gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> release from the film and thus needs to be
accounted for, which is not done in Fig. 3, but it is described in
detail in Sect. 3.1.1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>A linear correlation of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of IC concentration.
The left <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents the values for Setup 1, while the right <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis
represents the values for Setup 2 (an order of magnitude difference for both
scales). The Setup 2 data fall between a factor of 2 and 3 from Setup 1
after accounting for differences between Setup 1 and 2; see Sect. 3.1.1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 4 shows that the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production exhibited a linear dependence on
the actinic flux for various [IC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CA] molar products. From
Sect. 2.1.3, we estimated an experimental <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, reflecting other probable, unknown quenching
processes in our system. Figure 4 also shows the formation of HONO from three
different IC mass loadings. In all three cases, the HONO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, confirming HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a primary product and OH as a secondary
product.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of
actinic flux for a 300–420 nm range (solid symbols). The data are plotted as
a concentration product of [IC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CA] (shown in the legend), which
shows the photochemical reaction between IC and CA in H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O matrix and
gaseous NO. HONO for 2.441 ([IC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CA]) is plotted on the right
axis (open circles), showing a ratio of HONO : NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, which
suggests OH as a secondary product.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 5 shows the dependence of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production observed via the loss of
NO (Setup 2) on relative humidity (0–65 %). Water partial pressure is an
important parameter in the atmosphere, and it also seems to have an important
effect on the photochemical reactions studied here. At RH below
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %, and at high RH above <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 %, the yield of
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals decreases. The maximum HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical production is
observed at moderate RH (20–55 %). This is probably due to a combination
of factors. In particular, at low RH the film may become more viscous,
reducing mobility and thus the energy transfer within the film. This may
decrease the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yield as shown in Fig. 5. Hinks et al. (2016) observed
that the movement of molecules in a viscous film at a low RH is hindered and
thus decreases the photochemical reaction rate of secondary organic material.
The reduced diffusivity of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may also increase the residence time in
the film and facilitate the self-reaction in the bulk phase: the diffusivity
of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in citric acid is in the range of
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 % RH. If the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
diffusivity is between a factor of 10 and 100 lower than that of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O due
to its larger size (10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the first-order loss rate
coefficient for diffusion out of the film (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
denoting the film thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm)) becomes about
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. From the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
steady-state concentration is then about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M. The loss rate coefficient
due to HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> self-reaction in the condensed phase
(7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at this concentration would
become nearly 0.1 s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, somewhat higher than that for diffusional loss.
Of course these estimates carry a high uncertainty but indicate that at
lower humidity, diffusivity gets low enough to effectively reduce the
diffusional loss of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the gas phase and favor its loss by
self-reaction in the condensed phase. The potential presence of condensed
phase sinks, such as RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, formed from secondary chemistry of oxidized
citric acid, may add to this uncertainty. Figure S4 shows that bulk diffusion
can be neglected since any HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produced below the first couple of
micrometers at the top of the film is likely lost to self-reaction in the
condensed phase. This supplementary experiment studied the thickness
dependence of the films keeping the IC : CA ratio constant. The results show
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases linearly with thickness up to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; however, after this thickness the film saturates,
showing that this must happen in our films that are between 3 and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
thick. At high RH (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 %), the amount of water associated with CA
dilutes the reactants, and the quenching of the excited IC triplet states gains
in relative importance, consistent with findings in other studies (Stemmler
et al., 2006, 2007; Jammoul et al., 2008). The RH effect can decrease the
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production by a factor of 3, compared to the plateau of maximum
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production between 20 and 55 % RH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>The indirect flux of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
measured by NO loss and normalized to the film surface area as a function of
relative humidity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 6 shows the dependence of the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production based on the
observed NO loss on the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio (Setup 2). The HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production varied by about 20 % over the range of conditions
investigated. A decrease below 15 % O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to be significant
compared to the maximum HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
indicating that O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is needed for HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Sufficient O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dissolves in the aqueous phase to produce HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals efficiently at
atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios. We assume that at 55 % O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
quenching of excited IC triplet states by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has an effect on HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production. This effect may decrease <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on our results
being qualitatively consistent with the observations of decreasing aerosol
growth at high O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the autophotocatalytic aerosol growth described in
Aregahegn et al. (2013). However, the experimental focus of this study was
based on atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing rations, and thus we cannot draw conclusions about
the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production at high O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>The flux of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured
by NO loss, above a film composed of IC and CA normalized to the film surface
area as a function of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In order to test the possibility for excited IC triplet states to react with
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface of the film, experiments were conducted with
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. While we did observe that the uptake of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on irradiated
surfaces scaled with light intensity (see Fig. S5), the reactive uptake
coefficient of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce HONO at the surface is rather small
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and is thus neither a significant loss of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nor a
significant source of HONO. The primary fate of the nitrogen-containing
aromatic alkoxy IC radical under atmospheric conditions is reaction with
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, we have not tested alternative quenching reactions of the
triplet state or other pathways of the reduced ketyl radical that do not
result in the formation of HONO.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Comparison of data sets</title>
      <p>The experimental conditions probed differ in the actinic flux, NO
concentration, temperature and acidity. Here, we use the dependencies
established in Sect. 3.1 to compare results from both setups. The data from
Setup 2 were normalized to conditions of Setup 1. The difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to multiplying results from Setup 2 with a
factor of 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1. HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured indirectly by reacting it
with NO, and Fig. S2 indicates that the minimum NO concentration needed to
efficiently scavenge all gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 460 ppbv of NO,
indicating efficient conversion for Setup 1 and a conversion efficiency of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 for Setup 2. The data from Setup 2 were multiplied by
1.66 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 to normalize for the NO conversion efficiency (Fig. S2)
and by an additional factor of 1.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 to match temperatures. We
observed some limited variability depending on whether HF or HCl were used to
clean the flow tube prior to experiments. A higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
observed when cleaning with HF (Setup 1) compared to storing in NaOH and
either rinsing with water or HCl (Setup 2); this is accounted for by multiplying
data from Setup 2 with a factor of 1.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30. Notably, the error of
the correction for the cleaning procedure that is propagated here is larger
than the correction factor. The effect of the pretreatment of the flow tubes
was not systematically studied and thus remains a primary uncertainty in the
comparison. No further correction was applied for slight differences in RH.
The overall correction factor amounts to 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4, with the error
reflecting the propagated uncertainty. This explains most of the difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between both setups. The normalized results agree within a
factor of 2, which is a reasonably good agreement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Extension to other photosensitizers</title>
      <p>A limited number of experiments were performed using the CWFT approach, using
4-BBA as a photosensitizer, in the presence of 790 ppbv of gaseous limonene (a
possible H donor) and NO. The organic thin film contained an organic acid
matrix made of 4-BBA with and without adipic acid (AA). A substantial conversion of NO into NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also observed in this system (see Fig. S6). That
4-BBA behaves similar to the IC system demonstrates that the chemistry
discussed above can occur on different excited carbonyls. It is interesting
to note that this photoinduced conversion, and HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, was
observed to be sustained over long times, i.e., more than 15 h, probably due to
the catalytic nature of the underlying chemical cycles. However, a fraction
of the IC did get consumed by photolysis reactions that do not form the
excited triplet state (observed during overnight experiments). The HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
flux for the 4-BBA system was estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> making the same assumption that
each HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule reacts with NO to generate an NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule. The
calculation is based on Eq. (3), where it depends on the concentration of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the surface area and residence time.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Aerosol flow tube</title>
      <p>The aerosol flow tube experiments were conducted similarly to the study by
Aregahegn et al. (2013), i.e., who demonstrated that in the absence of NO and
known gas-phase oxidants, seed particles containing IC can initiate SOA
growth in the presence of a gaseous H donor (limonene). Figure 7 shows the
results from similar experiments when NO was added to the system. No
conversion of NO to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed prior to the injection of limonene
into the flow tube. The presence of a gaseous H donor and light clearly
initiated a series of photochemical processes, leading to SOA growth and
gaseous NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production. However, the quantitative interpretation of
these experiments is not straightforward due to efficient radical cycling in
the VOC–NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–light photochemical system and the lack of a blank
experiment that did not contain IC as part of the seed particles. Limitations
arise from the much longer residence time, which allows NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be
significantly photolyzed. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and corresponds to a photolysis
lifetime of 2.5 min, which is smaller than the actual residence time in the
flow tube (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 min). Secondary chemistry can lead, among others, to
ozone production (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime at 500 ppbv limonene is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 min) and secondary OH radical formation from the ozonolysis of limonene. Notably,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is not consumed in Fig. 7. The overall effect of this secondary
chemistry is an increased SOA growth compared to an experiment without added
NO (Aregahegn et al., 2013). As a consequence, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yield cannot be
used directly to assess <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the presence of NO.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Aerosol flow tube experiments show rapid conversion of NO (solid
black line) into NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed black line) only after the time when
limonene (gaseous H donor) is added into the flow tube (vertical dashed line).
The gray shaded areas represent the experiment in the dark, and the yellow shaded
area represents the experiment under light exposure. The blue line represents
the growth of aerosols (right axis).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>However, in the absence of NO these secondary processes can largely be
avoided and are reduced to a level at which they cannot be identified
(Aregahegn et al., 2013). Under such conditions, the particle growth rates
presumably carry information about the photosensitizer cycling and subsequent
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production. If we assume one molecule of limonene reacts to produce
one HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the volume change of aerosols is proportional to the overall
number of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produced. For example, a growth of
15 000 particles cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from diameter 51.4 to 68.5 nm in 40 min
(residence time) is equal to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This should be interpreted as an
upper limit for the actual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because water uptake may also
be contributing to the volume growth. However, compared to the CWFT
experiments the much higher surface-to-volume ratio of nanoparticles is
expected to enhance the chemical coupling of a gas-phase H donor and the
excited IC triplet state at the aerosol surface. This is at least in part
deemed responsible for the 2 orders of magnitude higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the aerosol flow tube compared to the CWFT experiments. Notably, even if
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aerosol flow tube was 2 orders of magnitude
higher than in the CWFT, it is still significantly smaller than unity.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Primary HO${}_{{2}}$ formation from IC}?><title>Primary HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation from IC</title>
      <p>One of the main advantages of the CWFT is that it operates at a much shorter
residence time. From Setup 1, we derive a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This corresponds to
2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> once normalized by
aerosol surface area (1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aerosol flow tube. Such a primary radical flux is
equivalent to the OH radical production rate resulting from photolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 pptv of HONO in the aerosol flow tube. Conversely, a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is equivalent to the OH
radical production rate from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 pptv HONO in the aerosol flow tube.
We conclude that seed particles containing IC contribute significantly
(equivalent to 1–100 pptv HONO) to the primary HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical production
rate in the aerosol flow tube experiments in the presence of NO (Fig. 7).
Primary HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals formed from IC-containing seed particles react
rapidly with NO to form OH radicals under the conditions shown in Fig. 7. The
H-donor species is further expected to form primary RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals. These
primary HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals add directly to the conversion of NO
into NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and indirectly by driving secondary NO-to-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion
from the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical chain. The aerosol flow tube experiments
thus qualitatively confirm the results obtained from macroscopic surfaces
and highlight the potentially important role of surface-to-volume ratio and
gaseous H donors to enhance the relevance of H-donor photochemistry as
sources for HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and SOA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Proposed mechanism</title>
      <p>A mechanism that can describe the results from the CWFT experiments is shown
in Fig. 8. It follows the mechanism first proposed by Canonica et al. (1995).
The primary product in our system is the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical, which forms from
the reaction between a nitrogen-containing aromatic alkoxy IC radical and a
ground-state oxygen molecule, recycling the IC molecule. The aromatic alkoxy
radicals form from the excited triplet state of IC via transfer of an H atom
from an H donor (in our case likely to be CA or the CA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
matrix). While a fraction of the IC will get consumed by photolysis reactions
that do not form the excited triplet state (see Sect. 3.1.2.), IC is also
continuously produced from multiphase reactions, e.g., of glyoxal (Yu et al.,
2011; Kampf et al., 2012; Maxut et al., 2015). Another conclusion is that OH
is a secondary product. If OH was a first-generation product, we would have
expected HONO : NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios larger than 1 : 1. A smaller ratio was
observed, as shown in Fig. 4, indicating that there was no direct evidence
for primary formation of OH radicals. Interestingly, the H-donor species
becomes activated as a result of H abstraction and can react further to
produce organic peroxy radicals, as evidenced by the aerosol flow tube
results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Proposed mechanism, modified and expanded to photosensitization of
IC based on Canonica et al. (1995), George et al. (2005) and Aregahegn et
al. (2013). The reaction in the white square represents the gas-phase, and
the blue square represents the aqueous phase. DH is an H donor (e.g., CA,
another IC, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA matrix to be determined from flash photolysis).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/11823/2016/acp-16-11823-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Atmospheric relevance</title>
      <p>The atmospheric relevance of our findings consists of the possible effect of
heterogeneous radical sources to modify atmospheric HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical
concentrations and facilitate aerosol growth and ageing by adding a radical
source within aerosol particles. The production of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from IC
photosensitized heterogeneous chemistry is a possible source of gas-phase
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in ambient air. In order to estimate the possible relevance
for HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical concentrations in urban air, we assume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, Setup 1) as a lower limit and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (IC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, aerosol
flow tube) as an upper limit and typical conditions in Mexico City (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at noontime in Mexico City,
aerosol surface area <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Volkamer et al., 2007).
The normalized <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during noontime in Mexico City ranges from
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This corresponds to a rate of
new HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical production of 4 to 400 pptv h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> HONO around solar
noon in Mexico City (Li et al., 2010), where other radical sources produce
about 5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at solar noon
(Volkamer et al., 2010). The upper range value suggests that aerosol surfaces
can be a significant source of gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in places like Mexico City.
However, the IC molar ratios used here are likely an upper limit compared to
ambient aerosols, yet, in principle other brown carbon molecules (i.e., HULIS
and/or other imidazole derivatives) may form additional gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The heterogeneous HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical source could further be relatively more
important in unpolluted regions under biogenic influences, where gas-phase
radical production rates are lower. Hence a more comprehensive
characterization of the heterogeneous HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source effect on gas-phase
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical concentrations deserves further investigation.</p>
      <p>OH radical uptake from the gas phase is a primary OH source in aerosols
(Ervens and Volkamer, 2010). Assuming a gas-phase OH concentration of
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 15 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol surface area
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of unity, the rate of OH uptake is approximately
2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The above estimated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a result from H transfer to form organic peroxy
radicals, which is comparable to the rate of OH uptake. The two similar
estimates of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> suggest that IC is a significant source of radicals in
the condensed phase of particles. This is a lower limit due to the unknown
radical losses of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the condensed phase, which have the potential
to raise the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source by up to a factor of 10 000
if limited by the IC excitation rate. The unknown amount of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that
remains in the condensed phase is a further source of OH in the same phase;
this OH, in the presence of reduced metals, can trigger a cycle of Fenton
reactions or other oxidizing pathways that can further age the aerosol.</p>
      <p>These results show that IC, and other aromatic carbonyl photosensitizers,
are likely a relevant radical source in aerosol particles. Photoinduced
radical generation in condensed phases is currently not represented in
atmospheric models that describe aerosol ageing and warrants further study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Three different experimental setups consistently show that HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals
are produced from the photochemistry of IC in a CA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O matrix and
in seed aerosols containing ammonium sulfate (in the presence of a gas-phase
H donor, limonene). The linear correlations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with
[IC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CA] and irradiation) yielded maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under
atmospherically relevant irradiation, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH but also revealed a
complex role of film viscosity and possibly acidity effects (a systematic
study of the effect of pH on the IC and CA absorption cross sections and the
product yields from the IC photochemistry is desirable). If the H-donor
species is in the condensed phase, significant amounts of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reach the
gas phase only for moderately high RH (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–55 % RH) that
facilitates H transfer and allows molecules (IC, HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to move freely
towards the surface of the film. When the film is too dry, this mobility is
inhibited due to enhanced viscosity and significantly decreases the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At RH and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than 55 %, we observe a
decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> probably due to dilution by water and competing
quenching reactions in the film. We know from Zardini et al. (2008) that pure
citric acid does not efflorescence, and thus the film remains homogenous in
its aqueous phase under all RH conditions. This supports our conclusion that
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is RH dependent since it is partially controlled by the
diffusivity in the film. On the contrary, if the H-donor species is in the
gas phase, significant HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production is also observed under dry
conditions. The primary fate of the IC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-OH radical at the surface is
reaction with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to form HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions do not appear to
form HONO at the surface. Our results suggest that the radical source from
photosensitizers such as IC can help jump-start the photochemistry of VOCs. The
effect on the gas-phase HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical concentration increases for higher
surface-to-volume ratio of aerosols and in the presence of gas-phase
H donors. The autophotocatalytic growth of aerosols containing
photosensitizers via H-donor chemistry is an SOA source also in the presence
of NO and adds oxidative capacity inside aerosol particles. Further research
on other types of H donors and photosensitizers is necessary to compare
different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and rates of aerosol growth from the reactive uptake
of VOC that could potentially have a significant atmospheric relevance for
SOA formation and heterogeneous aerosol ageing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data shown in the graphs are available in digital format (xlsx file) as
part of the Supplement related to this article.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11823-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-16-11823-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Markus Ammann and Rainer Volkamer designed the experiments at PSI and Christian George and Barbara Nozière those at
IRCELYON. Laura González Palacios, Pablo Corral Arroyo and
Kifle Z. Aregahegn conducted the measurements, analyzed data and contributed
equally to this work. Sarah S. Steimer and Thorsten Bartels-Rausch helped
during the experiments, and all coauthors contributed to the data
interpretation. Laura González Palacios and Rainer Volkamer prepared the
manuscript with contributions from all coauthors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation under awards
ATM-847793 and AGS-1452317. Laura González Palacios is the recipient of a
Chateaubriand Fellowship. Markus Ammann and Christian George appreciate the
contribution by the EU project PEGASOS (EU–FP7 project under grant agreement
no. 265307). This study has been supported by the Swiss National Science
Foundation (grant 163074).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: D. Heard<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aregahegn, K. Z., Nozière, B., and George, C.: Organic aerosol formation
photo-enhanced by the formation of secondary photosensitizers in aerosols,
Faraday Discuss., 165, 123–134, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00044C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3FD00044C</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F.,
Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic
and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I – gas phase
reactions of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
1461–1738, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Badali, K. M., Zhou, S., Aljawhary, D., Antiñolo, M., Chen, W. J., Lok,
A., Mungall, E., Wong, J. P. S., Zhao, R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Formation of
hydroxyl radicals from photolysis of secondary organic aerosol material,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7831–7840, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G. and Pitts, J. N.: Photochemistry, Wiley, New York, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Canonica, S., Jans, U., Stemmler, K., and Hoigne, J.: Transformation Kinetics
of Phenols in Water: Photosensitization by Dissolved Natural Organic Material
and Aromatic Ketones, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 1822–1831,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00007a020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00007a020</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Deguillaume, L., Leriche, M., Desboeufs, K., Mailhot, G., George, C., and
Chaumerliac, N.: Transition metals in atmospheric liquid phases: sources,
reactivity, and sensitive parameters, Chem. Rev., 105, 3388–3431,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr040649c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr040649c</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Draper, W. M. and Crosby, D. G.: Photochemical generation of superoxide
radical anion in water, J. Agr. Food Chem., 31, 734–737,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00118a014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jf00118a014</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Dupart, Y., King, S. M., Nekat, B., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Herrmann,
H., David, G., Thomas, B., Miffre, A., Rairoux, P., D'Anna, B., and George,
C.: Mineral dust photochemistry induces nucleation events in the presence of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 20842–20847,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212297109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1212297109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B. and Volkamer, R.: Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase
chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol
formation in aqueous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8219–8244,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Gligorovski, S., and Herrmann, H.: Temperature-dependent rate
constants for hydroxyl radical reactions with organic compounds in aqueous
solutions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 1811–1824, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b300072a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b300072a</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Faust, B. C.: Aquatic Photochemical Reactions in Atmospheric, Surface, and
Marine Waters: Influences on Oxidant Formation and Pollutant Degradation, in:
Environmental Photochemistry, edited by: Boule, D. P., 101–122, Springer,
Berlin Heidelberg, available at:
<uri>http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-69044-3_4</uri> (last
access: 7 December 2015), 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fenton, H. J. H.: LXXIII. Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron, J.
Chem. Soc. Trans., 65, 899, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ct8946500899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/ct8946500899</ext-link>, 1894.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>George, C., Strekowski, R. S., Kleffmann, J., Stemmler, K., and Ammann, M.:
Photoenhanced uptake of gaseous NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on solid organic compounds: a
photochemical source of HONO?, Faraday Discuss., 130, 195–210, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>George, C., Ammann, M., D'Anna, B., Donaldson, D. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Heterogeneous Photochemistry in the Atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 115, 4218–4258,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500648z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Heland, J., Kleffmann, J., Kurtenbach R., and Wiesen, P.: A new instrument to
measure gaseous nitrous acid (HONO) in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Amp
Technol., 35, 3207–3212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es000303t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es000303t</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hinks, M. L., Brady, M. V., Lignell, H., Song, M., Grayson, J. W., Bertram,
A. K., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Effect of
viscosity on photodegradation rates in complex secondary organic aerosol
materials, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 8785–8793, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05226B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP05226B</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D.: Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, N.J., 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, R.: Entwicklung von chiralen- sowie RP-HPLC- Methoden in Verbindung
mit hochaufloesender MS und deren Anwendung zur Analyse sekundaerer
organischer Aerosole in der Atmosphaere, Doktor der Naturwissenchaften,
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Jammoul, A., Gligorovski, S., George, C., and D'Anna, B.: Photosensitized
Heterogeneous Chemistry of Ozone on Organic Films, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112,
1268–1276, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp074348t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp074348t</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Kampf, C. J., Jakob, R., and Hoffmann, T.: Identification and
characterization of aging products in the glyoxal/ammonium sulfate system –
implications for light-absorbing material in atmospheric aerosols, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 6323–6333, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kaur, R., Anastasio, C., Valsaraj, K. T., Vempati, H. S., and Vaitilingom,
M.: Photoformation of Triplet Excited States and Other Oxidants in Fog Waters
and Their Impact on Fog Processing of Organic Compounds, AGU Fall Meet.
Abstr., 53, 07, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kleffmann, J., Heland, J., Kurtenbach, R., Lörzer, J. C., and Wiesen, P.:
A new instrument (LOPAP) for the detection of nitrous acid (HONO), Environ.
Sci. Pollut. Res., 9, 48–54, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kleffmann, J., Lörzer, J. C., Wiesen, P., Kern, C., Trick, S., Volkamer,
R., Rodenas, M., and Wirtz, K.: Intercomparison of the DOAS and LOPAP
techniques for the detection of nitrous acid (HONO), Atmos. Environ., 40,
3640–3652, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.027</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lakey, P. S. J., George, I. J., Whalley, L. K., Baeza-Romero, M. T., and
Heard, D. E.: Measurements of the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Uptake Coefficients onto Single
Component Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4878–4885,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00948</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Lei, W., Zavala, M., Volkamer, R., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P., and
Molina, L. T.: Impacts of HONO sources on the photochemistry in Mexico City
during the MCMA-2006/MILAGO Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6551–6567,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Maxut, A., Noziere, B., Fenet, B., and Mechakra, H.: Formation Mechanism and
yield of small Imidazoles from Reactions of Glyoxal with NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in water at
neutral pH, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 20416–20424,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP03113C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP03113C</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Monge, M. E., Rosenørn, T., Favez, O., Müller, M., Adler, G., Riziq,
A. A., Rudich, Y., Herrmann, H., George, C., and D'Anna, B.: Alternative
pathway for atmospheric particles growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109,
6840–6844, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120593109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1120593109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Monks, P. S.: Gas-phase radical chemistry in the troposphere, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 34, 376–395, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B307982C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B307982C</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Nozière, B., Dziedzic, P., and Córdova, A.: Products and Kinetics of
the Liquid-Phase Reaction of Glyoxal Catalyzed by Ammonium Ions (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 231–237, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp8078293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp8078293</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Rossignol, S., Aregahegn, K. Z., Tinel, L., Fine, L., Nozière, B., and
George, C.: Glyoxal induced atmospheric photosensitized chemistry leading to
organic aerosol growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 3218–3227,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es405581g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es405581g</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Burkholder, J. B., Friedl, R. R.,
Golden, D. M., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Moortgat, G. K.,
Orkin, V. L., and Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for
Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 17, JPL Publ. 10-6, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, available at: <uri>http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov</uri>
(last access: 8 August 2016) 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sareen, N., Schwier, A. N., Shapiro, E. L., Mitroo, D., and McNeill, V. F.:
Secondary organic material formed by methylglyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 997–1016, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-997-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-997-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarzenbach, R. P., Gschwend, P. M., and Imboden, D. M.: Environmental
Organic Chemistry, 2nd Edn., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and
McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal
in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Sheehy, P. M., Volkamer, R., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Oxidative
capacity of the Mexico City atmosphere – Part 2: A RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical cycling
perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6993–7008,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6993-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6993-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Stemmler, K., Ammann, M., Donders, C., Kleffmann, J., and George, C.:
Photosensitized reduction of nitrogen dioxide on humic acid as a source of
nitrous acid, Nature, 440, 195–198, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04603</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Stemmler, K., Ndour, M., Elshorbany, Y., Kleffmann, J., D'Anna, B., George,
C., Bohn, B., and Ammann, M.: Light induced conversion of nitrogen dioxide
into nitrous acid on submicron humic acid aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
4237–4248, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4237-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4237-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Sumner, A. J., Woo, J. L., and McNeill, V. F.: Model Analysis of Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation by Glyoxal in Laboratory Studies: The Case for
Photoenhanced Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11919–11925,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502020j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502020j</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Teich, M., van Pinxteren, D., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., and Herrmann, H.: First
Quantification of Imidazoles in Ambient Aerosol Particles: Potential
Photosensitizers, Brown Carbon Constituents, and Hazardous Components,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1166–1173, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05474" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b05474</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Inherent calibration of a blue LED-CE-DOAS
instrument to measure iodine oxide, glyoxal, methyl glyoxal, nitrogen
dioxide, water vapour and aerosol extinction in open cavity mode, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 3, 1797–1814, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections
of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at
atmospherically relevant pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 15371–15381,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50968K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3CP50968K</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R., Zarzana, K. J., Tolbert, M. A., and Volkamer, R.: Rayleigh
scattering cross-section measurements of nitrogen, argon, oxygen and air, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 147, 171–177, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.05.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.05.030</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Ball, S. M., Borrás, E., Daniels, M. J.
S., Goodall, I. C. A., Henry, S. B., Karl, T., Keutsch, F. N., Kim, S., Mak,
J., Monks, P. S., Muñoz, A., Orlando, J., Peppe, S., Rickard, A. R.,
Ródenas, M., Sánchez, P., Seco, R., Su, L., Tyndall, G., Vázquez,
M., Vera, T., Waxman, E., and Volkamer, R.: Instrument intercomparison of
glyoxal, methyl glyoxal and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under simulated atmospheric conditions,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1835–1862, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1835-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1835-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Trainic, M., Abo Riziq, A., Lavi, A., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: The
optical, physical and chemical properties of the products of glyoxal uptake
on ammonium sulfate seed aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9697–9707,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9697-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9697-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Fally, S., Carleer, M., Colin, R.,
Mérienne, M.-F., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: High-resolution Fourier
transform measurement of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> visible and near-infrared absorption
cross sections: Temperature and pressure effects, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 4348, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000971</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., San Martini, F., Molina, L. T., Salcedo, D., Jimenez, J. L.,
and Molina, M. J.: A missing sink for gas-phase glyoxal in Mexico City:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19807,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030752</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Sheehy, P., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Oxidative
capacity of the Mexico City atmosphere – Part 1: A radical source
perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6969–6991,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6969-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6969-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Langford, A. O., Fuchs, H., and Brown, S. S.:
Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced
absorption spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7779–7793,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Weller, C., Horn, S., and Herrmann, H.: Effects of Fe(III)-concentration,
speciation, excitation-wavelength and light intensity on the quantum yield of
iron(III)-oxalato complex photolysis, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem., 255,
41–49, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.01.014</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Weller, C., Horn, S., and Herrmann, H.: Photolysis of Fe(III) carboxylato
complexes: Fe(II) quantum yields and reaction mechanisms, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. Chem., 268, 24–36, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.06.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.06.022</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Yi, J., Bahrini, C., Schoemaecker, C., Fittschen, C. and Choi, W.:
Photocatalytic Decomposition of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on Different TiO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Surfaces
Along with the Concurrent Generation of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radicals Monitored Using
Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 10090–10097,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp301405e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp301405e</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate Solutions: Products,
Kinetics and Hydration Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es200989n</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Zardini, A. A., Sjogren, S., Marcolli, C., Krieger, U. K., Gysel, M.,
Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Peter, T.: A combined particle
trap/HTDMA hygroscopicity study of mixed inorganic/organic aerosol particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5589–5601, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5589-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5589-2008</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zellner, R., Exner, M., and Herrmann, H.: Absolute OH quantum yields in the
laser photolysis of nitrate, nitrite and dissolved H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 308 and
351 nm in the temperature range 278–353 K, J. Atmos. Chem., 10, 411–425,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Soong, R., Simpson, A. J., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Formation of aqueous-phase <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-hydroxyhydroperoxides (a-HHP): potential
atmospheric impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5857–5872,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5857-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5857-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Heterogeneous photochemistry of imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde: HO<sub>2</sub> radical
formation and aerosol growth</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The multiphase chemistry of glyoxal is a source of secondary organic aerosol
(SOA), including its light-absorbing product imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (IC).
IC is a photosensitizer that can contribute to additional aerosol ageing and
growth when its excited triplet state oxidizes hydrocarbons (reactive uptake)
via H-transfer chemistry. We have conducted a series of photochemical
coated-wall flow tube (CWFT) experiments using films of IC and citric acid
(CA), an organic proxy and H donor
in the condensed phase. The formation rate of gas-phase HO<sub>2</sub> radicals
(<i>P</i><sub>HO<sub>2</sub></sub>) was measured indirectly by converting gas-phase NO into
NO<sub>2</sub>. We report on experiments that relied on measurements of NO<sub>2</sub>
formation, NO loss and HONO formation. <i>P</i><sub>HO<sub>2</sub></sub> was found to be a
linear function of (1) the [IC]  ×  [CA] concentration product and
(2) the photon actinic flux. Additionally, (3) a more complex function of
relative humidity (25 %  &lt;  RH  &lt;  63 %) and of (4) the
O<sub>2</sub> ∕ N<sub>2</sub> ratio
(15 %  &lt;  O<sub>2</sub> ∕ N<sub>2</sub>  &lt;  56 %) was observed, most
likely indicating competing effects of dilution, HO<sub>2</sub> mobility and losses
in the film. The maximum <i>P</i><sub>HO<sub>2</sub></sub> was observed at 25–55 % RH
and at ambient O<sub>2</sub> ∕ N<sub>2</sub>. The HO<sub>2</sub> radicals form in the
condensed phase when excited IC triplet states are reduced by H transfer from
a donor, CA in our system, and subsequently react with O<sub>2</sub> to regenerate
IC, leading to a catalytic cycle. OH does not appear to be formed as a
primary product but is produced from the reaction of NO with HO<sub>2</sub> in the
gas phase. Further, seed aerosols containing IC and ammonium sulfate were
exposed to gas-phase limonene and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in aerosol flow tube experiments,
confirming significant <i>P</i><sub>HO<sub>2</sub></sub> from aerosol surfaces. Our results
indicate a potentially relevant contribution of triplet state photochemistry
for gas-phase HO<sub>2</sub> production, aerosol growth and ageing in the
atmosphere.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aregahegn, K. Z., Nozière, B., and George, C.: Organic aerosol formation
photo-enhanced by the formation of secondary photosensitizers in aerosols,
Faraday Discuss., 165, 123–134, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00044C" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C3FD00044C</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F.,
Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic
and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I – gas phase
reactions of O<sub><i>x</i></sub>, HO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub><i>x</i></sub> species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
1461–1738, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Badali, K. M., Zhou, S., Aljawhary, D., Antiñolo, M., Chen, W. J., Lok,
A., Mungall, E., Wong, J. P. S., Zhao, R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Formation of
hydroxyl radicals from photolysis of secondary organic aerosol material,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7831–7840, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7831-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G. and Pitts, J. N.: Photochemistry, Wiley, New York, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Canonica, S., Jans, U., Stemmler, K., and Hoigne, J.: Transformation Kinetics
of Phenols in Water: Photosensitization by Dissolved Natural Organic Material
and Aromatic Ketones, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 1822–1831,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00007a020" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es00007a020</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Deguillaume, L., Leriche, M., Desboeufs, K., Mailhot, G., George, C., and
Chaumerliac, N.: Transition metals in atmospheric liquid phases: sources,
reactivity, and sensitive parameters, Chem. Rev., 105, 3388–3431,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr040649c" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr040649c</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Draper, W. M. and Crosby, D. G.: Photochemical generation of superoxide
radical anion in water, J. Agr. Food Chem., 31, 734–737,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00118a014" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jf00118a014</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dupart, Y., King, S. M., Nekat, B., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Herrmann,
H., David, G., Thomas, B., Miffre, A., Rairoux, P., D'Anna, B., and George,
C.: Mineral dust photochemistry induces nucleation events in the presence of
SO<sub>2</sub>, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 20842–20847,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212297109" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1212297109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B. and Volkamer, R.: Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase
chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol
formation in aqueous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8219–8244,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Gligorovski, S., and Herrmann, H.: Temperature-dependent rate
constants for hydroxyl radical reactions with organic compounds in aqueous
solutions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 1811–1824, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b300072a" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/b300072a</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Faust, B. C.: Aquatic Photochemical Reactions in Atmospheric, Surface, and
Marine Waters: Influences on Oxidant Formation and Pollutant Degradation, in:
Environmental Photochemistry, edited by: Boule, D. P., 101–122, Springer,
Berlin Heidelberg, available at:
<a href="http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-69044-3_4" target="_blank">http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-69044-3_4</a> (last
access: 7 December 2015), 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fenton, H. J. H.: LXXIII. Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron, J.
Chem. Soc. Trans., 65, 899, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ct8946500899" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/ct8946500899</a>, 1894.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
George, C., Strekowski, R. S., Kleffmann, J., Stemmler, K., and Ammann, M.:
Photoenhanced uptake of gaseous NO<sub>2</sub> on solid organic compounds: a
photochemical source of HONO?, Faraday Discuss., 130, 195–210, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
George, C., Ammann, M., D'Anna, B., Donaldson, D. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Heterogeneous Photochemistry in the Atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 115, 4218–4258,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr500648z</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Heland, J., Kleffmann, J., Kurtenbach R., and Wiesen, P.: A new instrument to
measure gaseous nitrous acid (HONO) in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Amp
Technol., 35, 3207–3212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es000303t" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es000303t</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hinks, M. L., Brady, M. V., Lignell, H., Song, M., Grayson, J. W., Bertram,
A. K., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Effect of
viscosity on photodegradation rates in complex secondary organic aerosol
materials, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 8785–8793, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05226B" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C5CP05226B</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D.: Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, N.J., 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, R.: Entwicklung von chiralen- sowie RP-HPLC- Methoden in Verbindung
mit hochaufloesender MS und deren Anwendung zur Analyse sekundaerer
organischer Aerosole in der Atmosphaere, Doktor der Naturwissenchaften,
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Jammoul, A., Gligorovski, S., George, C., and D'Anna, B.: Photosensitized
Heterogeneous Chemistry of Ozone on Organic Films, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112,
1268–1276, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp074348t" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp074348t</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Kampf, C. J., Jakob, R., and Hoffmann, T.: Identification and
characterization of aging products in the glyoxal/ammonium sulfate system –
implications for light-absorbing material in atmospheric aerosols, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 6323–6333, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kaur, R., Anastasio, C., Valsaraj, K. T., Vempati, H. S., and Vaitilingom,
M.: Photoformation of Triplet Excited States and Other Oxidants in Fog Waters
and Their Impact on Fog Processing of Organic Compounds, AGU Fall Meet.
Abstr., 53, 07, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kleffmann, J., Heland, J., Kurtenbach, R., Lörzer, J. C., and Wiesen, P.:
A new instrument (LOPAP) for the detection of nitrous acid (HONO), Environ.
Sci. Pollut. Res., 9, 48–54, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kleffmann, J., Lörzer, J. C., Wiesen, P., Kern, C., Trick, S., Volkamer,
R., Rodenas, M., and Wirtz, K.: Intercomparison of the DOAS and LOPAP
techniques for the detection of nitrous acid (HONO), Atmos. Environ., 40,
3640–3652, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.027" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.027</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lakey, P. S. J., George, I. J., Whalley, L. K., Baeza-Romero, M. T., and
Heard, D. E.: Measurements of the HO<sub>2</sub> Uptake Coefficients onto Single
Component Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4878–4885,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00948" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00948</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Lei, W., Zavala, M., Volkamer, R., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P., and
Molina, L. T.: Impacts of HONO sources on the photochemistry in Mexico City
during the MCMA-2006/MILAGO Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6551–6567,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Maxut, A., Noziere, B., Fenet, B., and Mechakra, H.: Formation Mechanism and
yield of small Imidazoles from Reactions of Glyoxal with NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in water at
neutral pH, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 20416–20424,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP03113C" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C5CP03113C</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Monge, M. E., Rosenørn, T., Favez, O., Müller, M., Adler, G., Riziq,
A. A., Rudich, Y., Herrmann, H., George, C., and D'Anna, B.: Alternative
pathway for atmospheric particles growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109,
6840–6844, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120593109" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1120593109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Monks, P. S.: Gas-phase radical chemistry in the troposphere, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 34, 376–395, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B307982C" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/B307982C</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Nozière, B., Dziedzic, P., and Córdova, A.: Products and Kinetics of
the Liquid-Phase Reaction of Glyoxal Catalyzed by Ammonium Ions (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>),
J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 231–237, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp8078293" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp8078293</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Rossignol, S., Aregahegn, K. Z., Tinel, L., Fine, L., Nozière, B., and
George, C.: Glyoxal induced atmospheric photosensitized chemistry leading to
organic aerosol growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 3218–3227,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es405581g" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es405581g</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Burkholder, J. B., Friedl, R. R.,
Golden, D. M., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Moortgat, G. K.,
Orkin, V. L., and Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for
Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 17, JPL Publ. 10-6, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, available at: <a href="http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov" target="_blank">http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov</a>
(last access: 8 August 2016) 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sareen, N., Schwier, A. N., Shapiro, E. L., Mitroo, D., and McNeill, V. F.:
Secondary organic material formed by methylglyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 997–1016, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-997-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-997-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarzenbach, R. P., Gschwend, P. M., and Imboden, D. M.: Environmental
Organic Chemistry, 2nd Edn., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and
McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal
in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Sheehy, P. M., Volkamer, R., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Oxidative
capacity of the Mexico City atmosphere – Part 2: A RO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical cycling
perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6993–7008,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6993-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-6993-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmler, K., Ammann, M., Donders, C., Kleffmann, J., and George, C.:
Photosensitized reduction of nitrogen dioxide on humic acid as a source of
nitrous acid, Nature, 440, 195–198, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04603" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature04603</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmler, K., Ndour, M., Elshorbany, Y., Kleffmann, J., D'Anna, B., George,
C., Bohn, B., and Ammann, M.: Light induced conversion of nitrogen dioxide
into nitrous acid on submicron humic acid aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
4237–4248, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4237-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-4237-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Sumner, A. J., Woo, J. L., and McNeill, V. F.: Model Analysis of Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation by Glyoxal in Laboratory Studies: The Case for
Photoenhanced Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11919–11925,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502020j" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es502020j</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Teich, M., van Pinxteren, D., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., and Herrmann, H.: First
Quantification of Imidazoles in Ambient Aerosol Particles: Potential
Photosensitizers, Brown Carbon Constituents, and Hazardous Components,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1166–1173, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05474" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05474</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Inherent calibration of a blue LED-CE-DOAS
instrument to measure iodine oxide, glyoxal, methyl glyoxal, nitrogen
dioxide, water vapour and aerosol extinction in open cavity mode, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 3, 1797–1814, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-3-1797-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections
of O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at
atmospherically relevant pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 15371–15381,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50968K" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C3CP50968K</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R., Zarzana, K. J., Tolbert, M. A., and Volkamer, R.: Rayleigh
scattering cross-section measurements of nitrogen, argon, oxygen and air, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 147, 171–177, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.05.030" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.05.030</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Ball, S. M., Borrás, E., Daniels, M. J.
S., Goodall, I. C. A., Henry, S. B., Karl, T., Keutsch, F. N., Kim, S., Mak,
J., Monks, P. S., Muñoz, A., Orlando, J., Peppe, S., Rickard, A. R.,
Ródenas, M., Sánchez, P., Seco, R., Su, L., Tyndall, G., Vázquez,
M., Vera, T., Waxman, E., and Volkamer, R.: Instrument intercomparison of
glyoxal, methyl glyoxal and NO<sub>2</sub> under simulated atmospheric conditions,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1835–1862, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1835-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-8-1835-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Trainic, M., Abo Riziq, A., Lavi, A., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: The
optical, physical and chemical properties of the products of glyoxal uptake
on ammonium sulfate seed aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9697–9707,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9697-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-9697-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Fally, S., Carleer, M., Colin, R.,
Mérienne, M.-F., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: High-resolution Fourier
transform measurement of the NO<sub>2</sub> visible and near-infrared absorption
cross sections: Temperature and pressure effects, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 4348, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000971" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JD000971</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., San Martini, F., Molina, L. T., Salcedo, D., Jimenez, J. L.,
and Molina, M. J.: A missing sink for gas-phase glyoxal in Mexico City:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19807,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030752" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL030752</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Sheehy, P., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Oxidative
capacity of the Mexico City atmosphere – Part 1: A radical source
perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6969–6991,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6969-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-6969-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Langford, A. O., Fuchs, H., and Brown, S. S.:
Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced
absorption spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7779–7793,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-7779-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Weller, C., Horn, S., and Herrmann, H.: Effects of Fe(III)-concentration,
speciation, excitation-wavelength and light intensity on the quantum yield of
iron(III)-oxalato complex photolysis, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem., 255,
41–49, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.01.014" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.01.014</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Weller, C., Horn, S., and Herrmann, H.: Photolysis of Fe(III) carboxylato
complexes: Fe(II) quantum yields and reaction mechanisms, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. Chem., 268, 24–36, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.06.022" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.06.022</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Yi, J., Bahrini, C., Schoemaecker, C., Fittschen, C. and Choi, W.:
Photocatalytic Decomposition of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> on Different TiO<sub>2</sub> Surfaces
Along with the Concurrent Generation of HO<sub>2</sub> Radicals Monitored Using
Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 10090–10097,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp301405e" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp301405e</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate Solutions: Products,
Kinetics and Hydration Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es200989n</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zardini, A. A., Sjogren, S., Marcolli, C., Krieger, U. K., Gysel, M.,
Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Peter, T.: A combined particle
trap/HTDMA hygroscopicity study of mixed inorganic/organic aerosol particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5589–5601, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5589-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-5589-2008</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Zellner, R., Exner, M., and Herrmann, H.: Absolute OH quantum yields in the
laser photolysis of nitrate, nitrite and dissolved H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> at 308 and
351 nm in the temperature range 278–353 K, J. Atmos. Chem., 10, 411–425,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Soong, R., Simpson, A. J., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Formation of aqueous-phase <i>α</i>-hydroxyhydroperoxides (a-HHP): potential
atmospheric impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5857–5872,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5857-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-5857-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
