<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-9983-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vskip 4mm}?>Diesel-related hydrocarbons can dominate gas phase reactive carbon in megacities</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Diesel-related hydrocarbons can dominate gas phase reactive carbon in megacities}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Dunmore et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dunmore</surname><given-names>R. E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-1823</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hopkins</surname><given-names>J. R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-2633</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lidster</surname><given-names>R. T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J. D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2872</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4775-032X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Rickard</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-3471</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hamilton</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>York, YO10 5DD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. Hamilton (jacqui.hamilton@york.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>17</issue>
      <fpage>9983</fpage><lpage>9996</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Hydrocarbons are key precursors to two priority air pollutants, ozone
and particulate matter. Those with two to seven carbons have
historically been straightforward to observe and have been
successfully reduced in many developed cities through air quality
policy interventions. Longer chain hydrocarbons released from diesel
vehicles are not considered explicitly as part of air quality
strategies and there are few direct measurements of their gaseous
abundance in the atmosphere. This study describes the chemically
comprehensive and continuous measurements of organic compounds in
a developed megacity (London), which demonstrate that on a seasonal
median basis, diesel-related hydrocarbons represent only
20–30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total hydrocarbon mixing ratio but comprise
more than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the atmospheric hydrocarbon mass and are
a dominant local source of secondary organic aerosols. This study
shows for the first time that 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the winter primary
hydrocarbon hydroxyl radical reactivity is from diesel-related
hydrocarbons and using the maximum incremental reactivity scale, we
predict that they contribute up to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the ozone
production potential in London. Comparing real-world urban composition
with regulatory emissions inventories in the UK and US highlights
a previously unaccounted for, but very significant, under-reporting of
diesel-related hydrocarbons; an underestimation of a factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species rising to a factor of over 70 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during winter. These observations show that hydrocarbons from diesel
vehicles can dominate gas phase reactive carbon in cities with high
diesel fleet fractions. Future control of urban particulate matter and
ozone in such locations requires a shift in policy focus onto gas
phase hydrocarbons released from diesels as this vehicle type
continues to displace gasoline world-wide.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>With an increasing proportion of the world's population living in
cities, rising from only 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 1800's to over
47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by the end of the 20th Century
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.1"/>, the impact of urban air pollution has become
a significant factor in global health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.2"/>. The
costs of air pollution are high even in those locations that have seen
considerable improvements in air quality over the past decades
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.3"/>; in the UK exposure to particulate matter (PM) alone is
estimated to reduce life expectancy on average by around 7–8 months,
with a cost to society estimated at up to GBP 20 billion per
year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p>Primary urban air pollution emissions are dominated by PM, nitrogen
oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). Many of these species can react in the atmosphere to
create secondary pollutants, such as ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), oxygenated
VOCs (OVOCs), peroxy acyl nitrates (PANs) and condensed materials in
the form of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), which add to the overall
PM load <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.5"/>.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
Air quality in London has been controlled and monitored for over
60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, making it in theory one of the better understood
atmospheres of the world's megacities. Current measurements in London
focus on assessing national compliance with legally prescribed air
quality standards, and this includes the hydrocarbons 1,3-butadiene
and benzene. However, compliance measurements in themselves are
insufficient to fully describe the chemical and physical processes
occurring in the urban atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.6"/>, and
a particular weakness lies in speciating the many different classes of
carbon compounds in urban air.</p>
      <p>The past 2 decades have seen declining concentrations of most
smaller hydrocarbons in European and US cities, a result of tighter
regulation of sources such as vehicle exhaust, evaporation and
solvents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.7"/>, better control of
natural gas leakage and an overall switch from gasoline to diesel
powered vehicles. Current national emissions estimates suggest that
the bulk of organic emissions to air are associated with smaller
hydrocarbons, and this has driven policy, regulation and
observation strategies for
compliance. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows
Government-estimated emissions for the UK (left) and US (right),
categorised into the dominant emission sources. It is clear that based
on current emission inventories, gaseous organic emissions from diesel
appear to represent a negligible fraction of reactive carbon released
into the atmosphere.  The demand for diesel fuel is expected to
increase by 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2010 and 2040 and by 2020 it is
expected to overtake gasoline as the number one transport fuel used
worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.8"/>. The environmental impacts of this
change are evaluated in part based on the national emission
inventories that underpin Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Total mass by carbon number and functionality from UK 2012 (left)
and US 2011 (right) emission inventories. The carbon number and functionality
of emissions have been estimated by applying the speciated inventory of
emission sources of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.9"/> to the most recent estimates of
non-methane hydrocarbon source apportionment for each country (full details
can be found in the Supplement).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The efficiency with which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOA can be formed from diesel
or gasoline emissions is dependent on the mass of available organic
carbon, and the reactivity and volatility of that material
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.10"/>. To quantify this requires individual speciation
of VOCs in order that each property can be properly estimated. The key
urban sources of organic compounds include combustion products,
unburnt fuels and evaporative emissions of fuels and solvents, all of
which are highly complex, often propagating the original complexity of
fossil fuels into the air. Whilst each VOC has a unique set of
reaction mechanisms, in general terms, as the carbon number increases,
the relative complexity of reactions and yields of SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
also increase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.11"/>. The organic mixture in air is
complicated further by the presence of secondary oxygenated products. This requires a combined approach to investigate VOC composition, such as using two different gas chromatography systems.</p>
      <p>Several recent field studies have investigated the relative importance
of gasoline, diesel and biogenic emissions in generating SOA
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.12"/>. These
have been carried out predominately in the US, particularly in
California, where current diesel usage is rather low by global
standards.  The US diesel fleet is dominated by heavy-duty vehicles,
leading to a difference in the source strength of diesel and gasoline
engines between weekdays and the weekend.  In contrast, this trend is
not observed in London (see Supplement and Fig. S1), which has
a different vehicle fleet composition, with 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diesel fuel
use, and a large number of diesel buses operating at similar times to
domestic vehicles. It is also important to consider that London and
Los Angeles (arguably the world's most well-studied city for air
pollution) have significant differences in terms of urban geography,
population density, commuting patterns, amount of green space/trees
and upwind sources (expanded in the Supplement and Table S1). Specifically, the
high population density in central London, and the fact that many
vehicle journeys both begin and end in central London (rather than
radial vehicle commuting); resulting in the central London atmosphere
experiencing both cold and warm start vehicle emissions. Also worth
noting is that there is no large upwind source of BVOCs in London,
rather the natural emissions are distributed rather homogeneously
across the city (Fig. S2).</p>
      <p>This work uses high-resolution VOC measurements to investigate the
abundance and trends of diesel-related hydrocarbons in the atmosphere
at a typical urban background site in London. By comparison to the
emission inventories, we highlight a severe underestimation in the
impact of gaseous VOC emissions from diesel on urban air quality that
is likely replicated across Europe and other cities globally where
diesel vehicle use is high.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Clean air for London campaign</title>
      <p>Two 5-week campaigns were conducted as part of the National
Environment Research Council (NERC) funded Clean Air for London
(ClearfLo) project in January/February and July/August 2012 at an
urban background site (see Fig. S3) based at Sion Manning School in
North Kensington, London. For more information about this site and the
ClearfLo project refer to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.13"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.14"/> respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Gas chromatography measurements</title>
      <p>Two gas chromatography (GC) instruments were used during the ClearfLo
campaign, a dual channel GC-flame ionisation detector (DC-GC-FID) and
a comprehensive two dimensional GC (GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID). Outside air was
sampled from a manifold at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ground through
a condensation finger in an ethylene glycol bath held at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to remove any moisture from the sample. See
Supplement for details about calibrations.</p>
      <p>The DC-GC-FID was operated by the National Centre for Atmospheric
Science (NCAS) Facility for Ground Atmospheric Measurements (FGAM)
with the instrument set up and calibration described in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.15"/>. In brief, the system has three GC columns
that operate in parallel, where after sampling and desorption the flow
is split <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; one column is an aluminium oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
Porous Layer Open Tubular (PLOT, 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> id) for
non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) analysis; and the other column is
actually two LOWOX columns in series (10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> id) for OVOC analysis.</p>
      <p>The GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID is comprised of a Markes TT24-7 thermal
desorption (TD) unit with an air server attachment (Markes
International, Llantrisant, UK) and an Agilent 7890 GC (Agilent
Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with an FID operating at
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The TD unit sampled at a rate of
100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, giving a total sample
volume of 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The trap temperature was set to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, held for 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, then on injection
heated at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to ensure all analytes of interest were desorbed.</p>
      <p>The GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID system first dimension column was a BPX-5
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> df), at 50 psi,
combined with a second dimension column of a BP-20 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> df), at 23 psi (SGE, Australia),
with column pressures controlled using the Agilent 7890 EPC. The total
transfer flow valve modulator
incorporated a 6-port, 2-way diaphragm valve (Valco Instruments, Houston, TX, USA), with actuation achieved
using a solenoid valve, controlled by software written “in house”. The
modulator was held at 120 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the run and
had a modulation period of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with 4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sample and
0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> injection times. The chromatographic and modulation
configuration of the GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID system is detailed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.16"/>. During the injection of sample, liquid
carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was sprayed onto the first 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
portion at the head of the first dimension column for 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to
re-focus the sample.</p>
      <p>An oven temperature programme was developed which optimised separation
and resolution of compounds of interest. The initial oven temperature
was 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, held for 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, ramped at
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 130 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, held for
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> then ramped at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and held for 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; giving a total run
time of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This, combined with the TD run time, gave
a total analysis time of 55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>During the summer campaign, some parameters had to be changed. Ambient
temperatures were higher in comparison to the winter, meaning the oven
temperature programme had to be altered to allow the oven to reach its
minimum temperature. The initial oven temperature was changed to
35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> held for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the final temperature
of 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was held for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All other oven
parameters were kept the same. Due to a sensitivity drop, the TD
sampling rate was increased to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, to give a total sample volume of 11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Supporting measurements</title>
      <p>Measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were made using a single channel,
chemiluminescence instrument (Air Quality Design Inc., USA), which has
a wide linear range (1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to
500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.17"/> Ozone measurements were made
using a UV Absorption TEI 49C and 49i (Thermo Scientific) with
a limit of detection of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Observations of hydrocarbons in urban air</title>
      <p>The two GC instruments individually quantified 78 VOCs (36 aliphatics,
19 monoaromatics, 21 oxygenated and 2 halogenated), as well as many
hundreds more included in a lumped carbon number assessment from 2667
samples (1352 winter and 1315 summer). The DC-GC instrument measured
volatile VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrocarbons and a selection of
OVOCs, with effective saturation concentrations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.18"/> ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID instrument measured the less volatile VOC
fraction (effective saturation concentration range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with
hydrocarbons from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, plus a large group of
OVOCs (from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onwards). There was some overlap in species
measured by both instruments, with good agreement seen (e.g. benzene
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.92, slope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.070</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.013</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> see Fig. S4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Typical GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID chromatogram from 25 July 2012,
demonstrating the grouping of compounds. The retentions on the first and
second columns are the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis respectively, with the intensity of
the compound shown by the coloured contours. Labelled peaks and groups are
identified as follows, with the dashed and solid lines indicating compounds
that were identified individually and as a group respectively; (1–8)
aliphatic groups from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (9) benzene, (10) toluene,
(11) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted monoaromatics, (12) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted
monoaromatics, (13) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted monoaromatics, (14) naphthalene,
and (15) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monoterpenes with * corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
which is the start of that group. The remaining compounds, not enclosed in a
box contain hetero-atoms, primarily oxygenates. The grouping of compounds was
accomplished using the lasso technique in Zoex GC image software (Zoex, USA).
This technique allows the software to calculate the area of all peaks
included in the lasso.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The number of possible structural isomers increases exponentially with
carbon number <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.19"/> and beyond around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
it becomes impossible to accurately identify the structure of every
hydrocarbon present in air. Using the retention behaviour of each
compound on chromatographic columns it is however possible to assign
individual species to particular chemical classes and
functionalities. Here we group according to carbon number and basic
functionality, an example of which can be seen in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volatility range contains both primary hydrocarbon
emissions, with isomers quantified individually, along with several
oxygenated compounds. Between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a wide
range of hydrocarbon and OVOC species, including the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, limonene, monoaromatics with up
to 3 substituents and naphthalene were quantified individually (see
Fig. S5 and  Table S2).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Grouping of unresolved complex mixtures</title>
      <p>In previous studies using GC-FID, the larger hydrocarbon fraction, where
diesel VOC emissions are predominately found, is part of an unresolved
complex mixture (UCM). One method used to estimate the relative amounts of
VOCs in this region, is to identify the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane (which is often observed
as a well-defined peak above a raised baseline) and then integrate the area
above the blank baseline between two consecutive linear alkanes (using an
FID) or to use the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 fragment ion to represent primary intermediate
VOC (IVOC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.20"/>. In reality, this gives an estimate of the
total or alkyl containing IVOC loading within this volatility range and will
not only include the hydrocarbon fraction with that specific carbon number
but other compounds as well (i.e. lower carbon number aromatics, OVOCs). This
study details the improved resolution of VOCs using GC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>GC to allow for
a more stringent grouping of the UCM by carbon number and functionality,
rather than by volatility.</p>
      <p>Higher carbon number aliphatic compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
predominantly alkanes with some alkenes and cycloalkanes), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
substituted monoaromatics and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monoterpenes have been grouped
together and the combined class abundance estimated using a response ratio to
the corresponding straight-chained <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane, 1,3-diethyl benzene and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene respectively. The group boundaries are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, where for example, box 7 corresponds to the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatic group and encompasses alkanes, cyclic alkanes and
alkenes. Only the material within the box is integrated within this retention
window. This is a clear improvement over the 1-D case, as there are a
considerable number of peaks, with a higher 2nd dimension retention time, in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> that would co-elute with the aliphatic group if the
entire retention window was co-sampled (i.e. aromatics, oxygenates and other
hetero atom containing species). The number of individual isomer peaks that
could be isolated in the aliphatics grouping increased from 9 for the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group to 40 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, black squares). A full table of the observed
isomer peaks and group mass concentrations is provided in Table S3.</p>
      <p>Unfortunately, the separation of the linear alkanes, branched alkanes, cyclic
aliphatic and alkenes on the GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC chromatogram is not sufficient
at higher carbon numbers to allow them to be more fully resolved. This is a
direct consequence of the use of the cryogen free and field deployable valve
modulator, which when used in total transfer mode, where the flow in the
first column slows during the modulation pulse, imposes restrictions on the
column dimensions and internal diameters that can be used
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.21"/>. Also, given the temperature constraints on this
instrument, it is likely that the GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC not only misses a fraction
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatic group but   may also be under-reporting the
number of isomers in the higher carbon number groups. This would explain why
the number of isomers decreases after <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatics, rather than
increases as would be expected. The aliphatic groups have diurnal behaviour
(discussed in the next section) that indicate a dominant traffic-related
source. Fuel composition measurements suggest there is unlikely to be
significant quantities of alkenes from traffic related sources; gasoline
contains around 3–4 wt C% of alkenes, and diesel contains negligible
quantities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Diurnal behaviour</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Diurnal profiles of selected urban pollutants in winter (left-hand
side of each plot) and summer (right-hand side of each plot). Winter and
summer are plotted on the same <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes to show seasonal differences, with
insets allowing the profile to be easily seen. (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>)
Ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2915</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2880; winter and summer, respectively), (<bold>c</bold>
and <bold>d</bold>) nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2915</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2880), (<bold>e</bold> and
<bold>f</bold>) ethane (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 681), (<bold>g</bold> and <bold>h</bold>) toluene
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 680), (<bold>i</bold> and <bold>j</bold>) isoprene (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
681), (<bold>k</bold> and <bold>l</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>691</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 634),
(<bold>m</bold> and <bold>n</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatics (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">n</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>692</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
632), (<bold>o</bold> and <bold>p</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted monoaromatics (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>692</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 563). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> was constructed using the OpenAir
project for R where the solid line represents the mean daily concentration
and the shaded regions shows the 95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> confidence intervals
surrounding the mean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.23"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The average diurnal behaviour of a selection of VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. VOCs with an
anthropogenic source (e.g. ethane, toluene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted
monoaromatics and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatics) have higher mixing ratios
in winter, consistent with reduced rates of photochemical removal in
the northern European winter and a lower boundary layer
height. Toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are strong indicators of traffic
related emissions, and both have diurnal profiles with rush hour
peaks, commonly observed in urban areas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.24"/>. The profiles
of the higher carbon number species, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted
monoaromatics and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatics, show similar
traffic-related profiles, strongly indicative that this is their major
source. Those species with a dominant biogenic source (e.g. isoprene
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene) are higher in summer, due to increased
emission. The winter profiles of isoprene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene show
possible anthropogenic sources, traffic and cleaning products
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Reactivity and mass calculations of grouped compounds</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Seasonal median values for hydrocarbon mixing ratio, mass
concentration and primary hydrocarbon OH reactivity in London air grouped by
carbon number and potential emission source.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the relative emission source
contributions of compounds to the total hydrocarbon mixing ratio
(top), mass concentration (middle) and primary hydrocarbon hydroxyl
radical (OH) reactivity (bottom), calculated by carbon number, and
split according to emission source. For each sample, the mass
concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and primary hydrocarbon OH
reactivity (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Supplement Sect. S1.7 for explicit details on the calculation of OH reactivity) were calculated and a seasonal median
calculated using the mixing ratios of the individual components and
the summation of all further unidentified species within the ten class
groups, not including the OVOCs. OH reactivity is defined as the total pseudo
first order rate coefficient for loss of OH when reacting with VOCs in the
atmosphere. This is important in urban atmospheres that are VOC limited, such
as London, as the reaction of VOCs with the OH radical is the driving force
for the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other secondary pollutants.</p>
      <p>The Passant (2002) speciated
emissions inventory was used to determine the
main emission sources for each compound. For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the main source is either natural gas usage or leakage, followed by
road transport use. From <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onwards, the main emission source
was classified as road transport or other fuel usage categories
(i.e. filling of petrol stations). To determine the
percentage contributions from diesel or gasoline fuel usage, the
detailed fuel characterisation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.25"/> was used
with a value of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diesel use in the UK
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.26"/>.</p>
      <p>Although the summer data have been shown throughout the remainder of the
article, care should be taken when interpreting the impacts. It is likely
that the summer observations are made up of “residual” VOCs remaining after
transport from emission source and subsequent photochemical reactions. This
could lead to a small overestimation of the contribution of diesel-related
hydrocarbons and an underestimation of some species, particularly the OVOCs.</p>
      <p>The winter has generally higher abundances of hydrocarbons, with
summer showing a marked increase in the biogenic source compounds. In
both winter and summer, in mixing ratio terms, the distribution is
dominated by high-volatility species (over 85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total)
primarily from natural gas and gasoline sources. When viewed in terms
of mass concentration, however, the distribution of combined natural
gas and gasoline vs. diesel is closer to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>70</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
in winter and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>77</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer, the latter due
to the increased loss rates for reactive species in summer
disproportionately removing larger hydrocarbons.</p>
      <p>In order to calculate primary hydrocarbon OH reactivity of diesel
emissions, rate constants have to be estimated as each individual
species is not uniquely identified and because the rate constants (and
subsequent chemistry) are un-measured in the majority of cases for
hydrocarbons larger than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The nearest straight-chain alkane
rate constant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.27"/> is applied to all carbon in
that aliphatic grouping. This will lead to a conservative estimate of
reactivity since cycloalkanes and alkenes would be expected to react
faster (i.e. the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the reaction of
<italic>n</italic>-dodecane is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecule</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to that of
1-dodecene which is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecule</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.28"/>, for further details see Supplement Sect. S1.7 and
Table S4). For the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substituted monoaromatic and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monoterpene groups, the rate constants of 1,3 diethyl
benzene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene respectively were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Calculation of unmeasured diesel emissions</title>
      <p>The GC measurements stop at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, however diesel typically
has a range of hydrocarbons from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that
peaks with <italic>n</italic>-hexadecane as the most abundant
compound. Using the observed distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
allows for an estimate to be made of the remaining,
<italic>unobserved</italic> NMHC fraction of gaseous diesel emissions in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, using the fuel composition-based emission
factors for the gas phase compounds from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.29"/>.
Assuming no atmospheric loss, a reasonable approximation in winter, it
is estimated that the GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID technique observes around
25–30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total gaseous hydrocarbon emissions from
diesel sources. It is then possible to estimate a seasonal average
unmeasured gas phase NMHC mass concentration from diesel sources in
London as 76.1–97.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter and
26.8–34.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer. These values can be
compared to typical primary organic aerosol measurements of
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.30"/>,
indicating that, in ambient air, diesel-related emission of
hydrocarbons are overwhelmingly (a factor of 100) to the gas phase,
consistent with laboratory and tail pipe studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.31"/>. In contrast, using gasoline liquid fuel
speciation, the combined GC approach can observe approximately over
98 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the mass of gasoline.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Contributions of emission source to total mixing ratio, mass and OH
reactivity for winter and summer. Diesel is the summation of measured and
calculated, with error bars indicating the uncertainty of the unobserved
diesel NMHC fraction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The impact of the unobserved diesel emissions on primary hydrocarbon
OH reactivity was estimated using the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dodecane rate
constant as a proxy. The percentage contributions to mixing ratio
(top), mass concentration (middle) and primary hydrocarbon OH
reactivity (bottom), divided by emission source, including the
unmeasured diesel emissions and OVOCs, are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. It is clear that diesel plays an
important role in the composition of NMHCs and their subsequent
reactivity. The total (measured + calculated) diesel emissions
contribute 5.1 and 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to OH reactivity in winter and
summer respectively compared to 1.7 and 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
gasoline compounds; increasing the contribution of diesel-related
hydrocarbons to calculated VOC OH reactivity from 23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using
the measured VOCs to 61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> including the unmeasured I/VOCs in
winter and from 8 to 34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer (full details can be
found in Table S5).  In summer, the primary emissions have undergone
a degree of loss due to photochemical ageing and so the values are an
underestimate of the fuel sources.  These diesel-related hydrocarbons
may be partly responsible for the “missing” OH reactivity observed
between measurements of OH lifetime vs. the value calculated from
observed sinks in many studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.32"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Comparison to emissions inventories</title>
      <p>Assuming that the winter observations are made “at source” (hence
atmospheric losses and lifetime differences can be neglected), the
measurement location is representative of an urban setting, and the UK
inventory correctly estimates the emission for toluene (based on
direct flux comparisons made in London by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="altparen.33"/>),
there appears to be a significant inventory under-reporting for the
higher carbon number species. When normalising to toluene, the UK
national emissions inventory, which is believed to use best-practice
international reporting methodologies, under-reports by a factor of 4.6
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species, rising to a factor of 74 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compounds (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Given the clear
traffic diurnal profiles of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species (seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>m for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatics), which
essentially encompasses only diesel fuel, the most likely source of
these species is gaseous emissions from the diesel vehicle fleet,
either evaporative, tailpipe or a combination of the two. These
observations provide the first direct evidence of significant diesel
hydrocarbons in London's ambient air, something that could previously
only be inferred from liquid fuel measurements and exhaust studies.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Winter emissions inventory underestimation (left axis and blue
columns) and the number of isomers included in each grouped set of compounds
(right axis and black squares). Grey line shows a factor of 1, i.e., inventory
emission estimation is consistent with the observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Ozone formation potentials</title>
      <p>At present, there is insufficient kinetic and mechanistic data to
allow for the accurate modelling of the impact diesel hydrocarbons
will have on photochemical ozone. Unlike Los Angeles, which is
typically impacted by intense single-day episodic photochemical ozone
events, in London (and NW Europe), higher ozone levels are usually the
result of regional-scale multi-day formation. Therefore, different
control strategies and reactivity scales, which take into account
trans-boundary transport, have been developed and applied in
Europe. Photochemical ozone creation potentials (POCPs,
e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.34"/>) have been derived using idealised
5-day photochemical trajectory model runs over Europe,
incorporating detailed chemical degradation schemes of the emitted
VOCs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.35"/>. Individual POCP values depend upon
emissions along the trajectory, the reactivity of the VOC and its
propensity to form ozone, i.e. the number of C-C and C-H bonds in the
reactive species. Calvert et al., (2008), using the Master
Chemical Mechanism (MCMv3.1, <uri>http://mcm.leeds.ac.uk/MCM</uri>) and
speciated emission inventories (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.36"/>), with
little speciation of alkanes above <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, found that alkanes
dominated POCP-weighted emissions (33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the regional
scale in Europe, accounting for slightly more than the aromatics
(29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and significantly more than the alkenes
(20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and oxygenates (17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.37"/>. They also note that this is in marked
contrast with that found on the urban scale in Los Angeles, where
alkanes contribute little to the intense episodic ozone formation
observed. The work presented here shows that emission inventories
severely underestimate the amount of alkanes emitted from diesel
sources, hence these have not been included in previous studies on
ozone formation. Based on the POCP results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.38"/> for shorter chain alkanes, and
considering the high OH reactivity of larger hydrocarbons,
incorporating the diesel-related aliphatics into future calculations
is likely to have a significant impact on regional ozone formation in
Europe, and likely elsewhere.</p>
      <p>However, despite the lack of chemical information available, we can
make an assessment of the effects that the new diesel VOC observations
have on local ozone productivity by calculating the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
Formation Potential (OFP) of each emission source using a Maximum
Incremental Reactivity (MIR) scale, as determined by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.39"/> using the SAPRC-07 mechanism. The MIR scale is
based upon 1-day photochemical simulations in a box moving over an
urban basin and subject to ozone precursor emissions. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are adjusted so that the final ozone concentration in
a simulation showed the maximum sensitivity to changes in emissions of
organic compounds; these conditions give the MIR. MIRs represent
relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, often experienced in US
cities, where control of the emissions of VOCs is the most effective
means of reducing ozone formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.40"/>.</p>
      <p>MIR values for a range of important VOC emission classes (alkanes,
alkenes, aromatics, oxygenates) compare well to POCP values calculated
using detailed MCMv3.1 chemistry in a 1 day US urban photochemical
trajectory model, giving us confidence in the tuned SAPRC-07 chemistry
for predicting photochemical ozone formation under typical 1-day
high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, high ozone conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.41"/>. However, caution must be observed when
applying MIR scales to other conditions (i.e. NW Europe), as
previously discussed.</p>
      <p>For those species included in one of the carbon number and
functionality VOC groups, a weighted MIR value has been calculated
assuming a composition of 95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> branched alkane and
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> alkene. The calculated, unobserved diesel emissions were
given an MIR value based on the weighted contributions of the
different compound classes from the diesel fuel gaseous emission
speciation in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.42"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Contribution of emission sources to ozone formation potential, where
diesel is representative of total diesel emissions and the error bars show
the uncertainty of the unobserved diesel fraction calculation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The calculated OFP values for summer and winter are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, with a clear seasonal difference in the
importance of different emission sources. The winter is dominated by
emissions from diesel (over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). In contrast, the summer
shows a marked increase in contribution from oxygenated species,
rising from 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
summer. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.43"/> concluded that gasoline emissions
contributed the majority of potential <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, however
given that gasoline is the primary fuel used in the US (quoted at
73–90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of total fuel use; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.44"/>) this
is not surprising. Whereas in the UK, diesel fuel accounts for an
average of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of total fuel use and as such would be
expected to contribute a larger percent towards <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Potential SOA mass estimates. Upper: mean VOC mass concentration
[VOC] shown by black columns, and the corresponding SOA yields (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the
VOC precursors in blue circles. Lower: potential SOA mass concentration
[SOA], calculated as the product of mean VOC mass and SOA yields. Winter
shown on left and summer shown on right hand side panels.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9983/2015/acp-15-9983-2015-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Given that many of the higher carbon number species, likely emitted
from the combustion of diesel, are not currently included in emissions
inventory and as such are missing from many model chemical mechanisms
(e.g. MCMv3.3.1), a more rigorous reactivity analysis is not possible
(e.g. POCPs discussed previously). It is possible to infer from this
analysis however, that as winter diesel emissions contribute nearly
50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the OFP and over 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of primary hydrocarbon
OH reactivity, it is likely that they would have a large impact on the
overall reactivity and chemistry of the urban atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Potential impacts on SOA formation</title>
      <p>Over the last few years, there has been robust debate in the
literature over the relative importance of diesel vs. gasoline for SOA
production, arising in part because of the difficulties of measuring
diesel hydrocarbon emissions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.45"/>. Recent
studies have shown the unspeciated emissions from combustion sources
lead to significantly more SOA production than those that can be
speciated by conventional instrumentation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.46"/>,
used simulation chamber data and source-specific SOA yield
parameterisations for these unspeciated emissions to estimate that, in
the US, 90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOA was from biomass burning and gasoline
sources, with 85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the SOA coming from unspeciated organic
emissions.</p>
      <p>There is a clear need to improve measurements of larger hydrocarbons
that represent a large part of what is referred to in other studies as
unspeciated chemicals. In this study, the uncertainty in the
unspeciated fraction has been reduced by grouping ambient observations
of VOCs by carbon number and functionality.  The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatic groups are dominated by diesel
emissions at this location and so the SOA source strength can be more
accurately determined. The potential contributions of the higher
hydrocarbons to SOA formation has been estimated by multiplying the
median measured VOC mass concentration (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, top panel,
black columns) by the corresponding SOA yield (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, top
panel, blue circles) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.47"/>. The yields applied were
measured in high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chamber studies
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VOC</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.5) with an
organic aerosol mass <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, representative of urban areas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.48"/>. Here it is assumed that NMHCs
with less than six carbons and aqueous chemistry of water soluble
oxidation products, such as glyoxal, do not contribute to SOA mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.49"/>. In
both winter and summer, the observed levels of aliphatic compounds
from diesel sources have the potential to form significant quantities
of SOA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, bottom panel, red columns).  If a diesel
SOA yield of 0.15 is applied to the total diesel emissions (as
calculated previously), then gas phase emissions from diesel engines
represent the dominant traffic related precursor source of urban SOA
in a European megacity such as London, where the use of diesel fuel is
prevalent, in line with previous studies in the US
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.50"/>. Each cubic metre of air contains sufficient
gas phase hydrocarbons to potentially produce 14.4–17.6 and
4.9–6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOA in winter and summer following
atmospheric oxidation.</p>
      <p>Recent simulation chamber studies indicate that modern engines fitted
with diesel particle filters, such as EURO5 emissions control, have
greatly reduced VOC tailpipe emission and form little SOA under
chamber conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.51"/>. However,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.52"/> have recently shown that when vehicles are
driven under real-world urban conditions (i.e.
different engines loads cause variable catalyst temperatures which can lead
to limited effectiveness, as opposed to dynamometer tests where the catalyst
is held at optimum operating conditions), the emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
from diesel engines have not been reduced as expected given the new
technologies implemented. It is possible to infer that if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions are higher than expected, the VOC emissions are also likely
to be higher. In this study we have shown that there is a significant
diesel vehicle source emitting sufficient VOCs to impact ozone and SOA
formation in the urban atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>From the results presented, it is possible to conclude that current
inventories and emissions estimates do not adequately represent
emissions of gas phase higher carbon number species from the diesel
fleet under real-world conditions and in a developed urban
environment. The calculated impact of these species is significant,
particularly in terms of OH reactivity, ozone formation potential and
SOA production.</p>
      <p>In the last decade, there has been a steady shift in fuel use in many
locations. For example, in the UK diesel fuel use as a fraction of
total fuel has risen from 52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2005 to 62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2011 (see Fig. S7 and Table S7) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.53"/>. Although
the UK may be considered typical of Europe (where diesel use varies
between 45–80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.54"/>, the average US value
was around 29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diesel use <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.55"/> in 2013, with the
understanding of other geographical regions currently being poor.</p>
      <p>This shift to an increasingly diesel-powered fleet in many developed
cities, as a response to energy efficiency drivers, has therefore
shifted the balance of hydrocarbons in urban air from short to long
chain compounds, and these observations provide direct atmospheric
evidence of this effect in London. Previous air quality assessments of
diesel-related hydrocarbons in the atmosphere are few in number, and as
discussed previously, have been made only in the US where geographic
characteristics and vehicle fleet composition are very different to London,
and Europe more widely. In many cities the impact of diesel hydrocarbons
remains to be determined, but this work demonstrates that it will likely be
significant in locations with substantial diesel fleets. An improvement in
measurement infrastructure appears to be essential if this source is to be
quantified more widely or the impacts of policy evaluated.</p>
      <p>Understanding the impact of this change is
significantly hindered however by a lack of appropriate
physico-chemical data for individual longer chain hydrocarbons. There
are already very significant policy challenges for many developed
cities relating to the control of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from modern diesel
vehicles, and this study indicates that there may also be a similar,
but currently un-recognised, policy challenge to control reactive
carbon emissions and their contributions to secondary
pollutants.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9983-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-9983-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>R. E. Dunmore and J. R. Hopkins  analysed the GC data and J. D. Lee  made the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. R. T. Lidster and J. F. Hamilton developed the
GC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GC-FID instrument. A. R. Rickard provided insight into the
kinetics and photochemical ozone creation potentials. R. E. Dunmore,
J. F. Hamilton, A. C. Lewis and M. J. Evans wrote the paper. All authors
contributed towards the final version of the paper.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>R. E. Dunmore would like to thank NERC (NE/J500197/1) for PhD funding and to
acknowledge David Carslaw for his assistance using Openair and
Richard Derwent for assistance with the NAEI. All authors would like to
acknowledge NERC for funding the Clearflo project (NE/H002112/1), and the
efforts of all participants in the field experiment in supporting these
measurements. We would like to acknowledge Stephen Belcher for project
co-ordination.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: F. Keutsch</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aschmann and Atkinson(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Aschmann, S. and Atkinson, R.: Rate constants for the gas-phase reactions of
OH radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-7-tetradecene, 2-methyl-1-tridecene and the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1-alkenes at 295 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 K, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 10, 4159–4164,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B803527J">10.1039/B803527J</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Atkinson and Arey(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic
compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420">10.1021/cr0206420</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bahreini et al.(2012)Bahreini, Middlebrook, de Gouw, Warneke, Trainer, Brock,
Stark, Brown, Dube, Gilman, Hall, Holloway, Kuster, Perring, Prévôt, Schwarz, Spackman, Szidat, Wagner, Weber, Zotter, and Parrish</label><mixed-citation>Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Trainer, M.,
Brock, C., Stark, H., Brown, S., Dube, W., Gilman, J., Hall, K.,
Holloway, J., Kuster, W., Perring, A., Prévôt, A., Schwarz, J.,
Spackman, J., Szidat, S., Wagner, N., Weber, R., Zotter, P., and Parrish, D.:
Gasoline emissions dominate over diesel in formation of secondary organic
aerosol mass, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06805,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050718">10.1029/2011GL050718</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bigi and Harrison(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Bigi, A. and Harrison, R.: Analysis of the air pollution climate at a central
urban background site, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2004–2012,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.028">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.028</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bohnenstengel et al.(2014)Bohnenstengel, Belcher, Aiken, Allan, Allen, Bacak, Bannan, Barlow, Beddows, Bloss,
Booth, Chemel, Coceal, Di Marco, Dubey, Faloon, Fleming, Furger, Gietl, Graves, Green, Grimmond, Halios, Hamilton, Harrison,
Heal, Heard, Helfter, Herndon, Holmes, Hopkins, Jones, Kelly, Kotthaus, Langford, Lee, Leigh, Lewis, Lidster, Lopez-Hilfiker, McQuaid,
Mohr, Monks, Nemitz, Ng, Percival, Prévôt, Ricketts, Sokhi, Stone, Thornton, Tremper, Valach, Visser, Whalley, Williams, Xu, Young, and Zotter</label><mixed-citation>Bohnenstengel, S. I., Belcher, S. E., Aiken, A., Allan, J. D., Allen, G.,
Bacak, A., Bannan, T. J., Barlow, J., Beddows, D. C. S., Bloss, W. J.,
Booth, A. M., Chemel, C., Coceal, O., Di Marco, C. F., Dubey, M. K.,
Faloon, K. H., Fleming, Z. L., Furger, M., Gietl, J. K., Graves, R. R.,
Green, D. C., Grimmond, C. S. B., Halios, C. H., Hamilton, J. F.,
Harrison, R. M., Heal, M. R., Heard, D. E., Helfter, C., Herndon, S. C.,
Holmes, R. E., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, A. M., Kelly, F. J., Kotthaus, S.,
Langford, B., Lee, J. D., Leigh, R. J., Lewis, A. C., Lidster, R. T.,
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., McQuaid, J. B., Mohr, C., Monks, P. S., Nemitz, E.,
Ng, N. L., Percival, C. J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ricketts, H. M. A.,
Sokhi, R., Stone, D., Thornton, J. A., Tremper, A. H., Valach, A. C.,
Visser, S., Whalley, L. K., Williams, L. R., Xu, L., Young, D. E. E., and
Zotter, P.: Meteorology, air quality, and health in London: the ClearfLo
project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., online first,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-12-00245.1">10.1175/bams-d-12-00245.1</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Borbon et al.(2001)Borbon, Fontaine, Veillerot, Locoge, Galloo, and Guillermo</label><mixed-citation>Borbon, A., Fontaine, H., Veillerot, M., Locoge, N., Galloo, J., and
Guillermo, R.: An investigation into the traffic-related fraction of isoprene
at an urban location, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3749–3760,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00170-4">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00170-4</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Calvert et al.(2000)Calvert, Derwent, Orlando, Tyndall, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G., Derwent, R. G., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., and
Wallington, T. J.: Mechanisms of Atmospheric Oxidation of the Alkenes, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Carslaw and Rhys-Tyler(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, D. and Rhys-Tyler, G.: New insights from comprehensive on-road
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from vehicle
emission remote sensing in London, UK, Atmos. Environ., 81, 339–347,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.026">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.026</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Carslaw and Ropkins(2012a)</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, D. and Ropkins, K.: openair – an R package for air quality data
analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008">10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008</ext-link>,
2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Carslaw and Ropkins(2012b)</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, D. and Ropkins, K.: openair – data analysis tools for the Air
Quality Community, The R Journal, 4, 20–29, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Carter(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W.: SAPRC-07 Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanisms and VOC Reactivity Scales,
available at: <uri>http://www.engr.ucr.edu/~carter/SAPRC/</uri> (last access: 10 February 2015), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Chameides et al.(1992)Chameides, Fehsenfeld, Rodgers, Cardelino, Martinez, Parrish, Lonneman, Lawson, Rasmussen, Zimmerman, Greenberg, Middleton, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Chameides, W., Fehsenfeld, F., Rodgers, M., Cardelino, C., Martinez, J.,
Parrish, D., Lonneman, W., Lawson, D., Rasmussen, R., Zimmerman, P.,
Greenberg, J., Middleton, P., and Wang, T.: Ozone precursor relationships in
the ambient atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 6037–6055,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91JD03014">10.1029/91JD03014</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Department of Energy and Climate Change(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Department of Energy and Climate Change: Road transport energy consumption
at regional and local authority level, available at:
<ext-link xlink:href="www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/road-transport-energy-consumption-at-regional-and-local-authority-level">www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/road-transport-energy-consumption-at-regional-and-local-authority-level</ext-link>(last access: 10 February 2015),
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Derwent et al.(1998)Derwent, Jenkin, Saunders, and Pilling</label><mixed-citation>Derwent, R., Jenkin, M., Saunders, S., and Pilling, M.: Photochemical ozone
creation potentials for organic compounds in northwest Europe calculated with
a master chemical mechanism, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2429–2441,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00053-3">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00053-3</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Derwent et al.(2010)Derwent, Jenkin, Pilling, Carter, and Kaduwela</label><mixed-citation>Derwent, R., Jenkin, M., Pilling, M., Carter, W., and Kaduwela, A.:
Reactivity scales as comparative tools for chemical mechanisms, J. Air Waste
Manage., 60, 914–924,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.8.914">10.3155/1047-3289.60.8.914</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Donahue et al.(2012)Donahue, Kroll, Pandis, and Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.:
A two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012">10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Ensberg et al.(2014)Ensberg, Hayes, Jimenez, Gilman, Kuster, de Gouw, Holloway, Gordon, Jathar, Robinson, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Ensberg, J., Hayes, P., Jimenez, J., Gilman, J., Kuster, W., de Gouw, J., Holloway, J., Gordon, T., Jathar, S., Robinson, A., and Seinfeld, J.:
Emission factor ratios, SOA mass yields, and the impact of vehicular emissions on SOA formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2383–2397,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2383-2014">10.5194/acp-14-2383-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>European Commission(2012)</label><mixed-citation>European Commission: EU Transport in Figures, available at:
<uri>http://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/statistics/doc/2012/pocketbook2012.pdf</uri> (last access: 10 February 2015),
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Exxon Mobil(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Exxon Mobil: The Outlook for Energy: A view to 2040, Tech. rep., Exxon Mobil
Corporation, Texas,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Gaffney and Marley(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Gaffney, J. and Marley, N.: The impacts of combustion emissions on air
quality and climate – from coal to biofuels and beyond, Atmos. Environ., 43,
23–36,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gaffron(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Gaffron, P.: Urban transport, environmental justice and human daily activity
patterns, Transport Policy, 20, 116–129, 12th World Conference on Transport
Research (WCTR)/14th World Conference of the Air-Transport-Research-Society
(ATRS), Lisbon, Portugal, 11–15 July 2010, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Gentner et al.(2012)Gentner, Isaacman, Worton, Chan, Dallmann, Davis, Liu, Day, Russell, Wilson, Weber, Guha, Harley, and Goldstein</label><mixed-citation>Gentner, D., Isaacman, G., Worton, D., Chan, A., Dallmann, T., Davis, L.,
Liu, S., Day, D., Russell, L., Wilson, K., Weber, R., Guha, A., Harley, R.,
and Goldstein, A.: Elucidating secondary organic aerosol from diesel and
gasoline vehicles through detailed characterization of organic carbon
emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 18318–23,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212272109">10.1073/pnas.1212272109</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Gentner et al.(2013)Gentner, Worton, Isaacman, Davis, Dallmann, Wood, Herndon, Goldstein, and Harley</label><mixed-citation>Gentner, D., Worton, D., Isaacman, G., Davis, L., Dallmann, T., Wood, E.,
Herndon, S., Goldstein, A., and Harley, R.: Chemical composition of gas-phase
organic carbon emissions from motor vehicles and implications for ozone
production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11837–11848,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es401470e">10.1021/es401470e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Goldstein and Galbally(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Goldstein, A. and Galbally, I.: Known and unexplored organic constituents in
the Earth's atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 1514–1521,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es072476p">10.1021/es072476p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Gordon et al.(2013)Gordon, Tkacik, Presto, Zhang, Jathar, Nguyen, Massetti, Truong, Cicero-Fernandez, Maddox, Rieger, Chattopadhyay, Maldonado, Maricq, and Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, T., Tkacik, D., Presto, A., Zhang, M., Jathar, S., Nguyen, N.,
Massetti, J., Truong, T., Cicero-Fernandez, P., Maddox, C., Rieger, P.,
Chattopadhyay, S., Maldonado, H., Maricq, M. M., and Robinson, A.: Primary
gas- and particle-phase emissions and secondary organic aerosol production
from gasoline and diesel off-road engines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
14137–14146,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es403556e">10.1021/es403556e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Gordon et al.(2014a)Gordon, Presto, May, Nguyen, Lipsky, Donahue, Gutierrez, Zhang, Maddox, Rieger, Chattopadhyay, Maldonado, Maricq, and Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, T. D., Presto, A. A., May, A. A., Nguyen, N. T., Lipsky, E. M.,
Donahue, N. M., Gutierrez, A., Zhang, M., Maddox, C., Rieger, P.,
Chattopadhyay, S., Maldonado, H., Maricq, M. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation exceeds primary particulate matter
emissions for light-duty gasoline vehicles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
4661–4678,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4661-2014">10.5194/acp-14-4661-2014</ext-link>,
2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Gordon et al.(2014b)Gordon, Presto, Nguyen, Robertson, Na, Sahay, Zhang, Maddox, Rieger, Chattopadhyay, Maldonado, Maricq, and Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, T. D., Presto, A. A., Nguyen, N. T., Robertson, W. H., Na, K.,
Sahay, K. N., Zhang, M., Maddox, C., Rieger, P., Chattopadhyay, S.,
Maldonado, H., Maricq, M. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Secondary organic aerosol
production from diesel vehicle exhaust: impact of aftertreatment, fuel
chemistry and driving cycle, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4643–4659,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4643-2014">10.5194/acp-14-4643-2014</ext-link>,
2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Gros et al.(2007)Gros, Sciare, and Yu</label><mixed-citation>Gros, V., Sciare, J., and Yu, T.: Air-quality measurements in megacities:
focus on gaseous organic and particulate pollutants and comparison between
two contrasted cities, Paris and Beijing, CR Geosci., 339, 764–774,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.007">10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Hamilton and Lewis(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Hamilton, J. and Lewis, A.: Monoaromatic complexity in urban air and gasoline
assessed using comprehensive GC and fast GC-TOF/MS, Atmos. Environ., 37,
589–602,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00930-5">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00930-5</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Harrison et al.(2012)Harrison, Dall'Osto, Beddows, Thorpe, Bloss, Allan, Coe, Dorsey, Gallagher, Martin, Whitehead, Williams, Jones, Langridge, Benton, Ball, Langford, Hewitt, Davison, Martin, Petersson, Henshaw, White, Shallcross, Barlow, Dunbar, Davies, Nemitz, Phillips, Helfter, Di Marco, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>Harrison, R. M., Dall'Osto, M., Beddows, D. C. S., Thorpe, A. J.,
Bloss, W. J., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Dorsey, J. R., Gallagher, M.,
Martin, C., Whitehead, J., Williams, P. I., Jones, R. L., Langridge, J. M.,
Benton, A. K., Ball, S. M., Langford, B., Hewitt, C. N., Davison, B.,
Martin, D., Petersson, K. F., Henshaw, S. J., White, I. R.,
Shallcross, D. E., Barlow, J. F., Dunbar, T., Davies, F., Nemitz, E.,
Phillips, G. J., Helfter, C., Di Marco, C. F., and Smith, S.: Atmospheric
chemistry and physics in the atmosphere of a developed megacity (London): an
overview of the REPARTEE experiment and its conclusions, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 3065–3114,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3065-2012">10.5194/acp-12-3065-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hopkins et al.(2003)Hopkins, Lewis, and Read</label><mixed-citation>Hopkins, J., Lewis, A., and Read, K.: A two-column method for long-term
monitoring of non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and oxygenated volatile
organic compounds (OVOCs), J. Environ. Monitor., 5, 8–13,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b202798d">10.1039/b202798d</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee: Air Quality: A Follow-up
Report, Ninth Report, Tech. rep., House of Commons, London, The Stationery Office Limited, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Jathar et al.(2014)Jathar, Gordon, Hennigan, Pye, Pouliot, Adams, Donahue, and Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Jathar, S., Gordon, T., Hennigan, C., Pye, H. T., Pouliot, G., Adams, P.,
Donahue, N., and Robinson, A.: Unspeciated organic emissions from combustion
sources and their influence on the secondary organic aerosol budget in the
United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 10473–10478,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111">10.1073/pnas.1323740111</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)Jimenez, Canagaratna, Donahue, Prevot, Zhang, Kroll, DeCarlo, Allan, Coe, Ng, Aiken, Docherty, Ulbrich, Grieshop, Robinson, Duplissy, Smith, Wilson, Lanz, Hueglin, Sun, Tian, Laaksonen, Raatikainen, Rautiainen, Vaattovaara, Ehn, Kulmala, Tomlinson, Collins, Cubison, Dunlea, Huffman, Onasch, Alfarra, Williams, Bower, Kondo, Schneider, Drewnick, Borrmann, Weimer, Demerjian, Salcedo, Cottrell, Griffin, Takami, Miyoshi, Hatakeyama, Shimono, Sun, Zhang, Dzepina, Kimmel, Sueper, Jayne, Herndon, Trimborn, Williams, Wood, Middlebrook, Kolb, Baltensperger, and Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Zhang, Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L.,
Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P.,
Robinson, A. L., Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A.,
Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T.,
Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M.,
Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J. E., Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B.,
Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J.,
Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D.,
Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S.,
Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R.,
Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R.,
Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science,
326, 1525–1529,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Knote et al.(2014)Knote, Hodzic, Jimenez, Volkamer, Orlando, Baidar, Brioude, Fast, Gentner, Goldstein, Hayes, Knighton, Oetjen, Setyan, Stark, Thalman, Tyndall, Washenfelder, Waxman, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Knote, C., Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Volkamer, R., Orlando, J. J.,
Baidar, S., Brioude, J., Fast, J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hayes, P. L., Knighton, W. B., Oetjen, H., Setyan, A., Stark, H.,
Thalman, R., Tyndall, G., Washenfelder, R., Waxman, E., and Zhang, Q.:
Simulation of semi-explicit mechanisms of SOA formation from glyoxal in
aerosol in a 3-D model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6213–6239,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014">10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Langford et al.(2010)Langford, Nemitz, House, Phillips,
Famulari, Davison, Hopkins, Lewis, and Hewitt</label><mixed-citation>Langford, B., Nemitz, E., House, E., Phillips, G. J., Famulari, D.,
Davison, B., Hopkins, J. R., Lewis, A. C., and Hewitt, C. N.: Fluxes and
concentrations of volatile organic compounds above central London, UK, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 627–645,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-627-2010">10.5194/acp-10-627-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Lee et al.(2009)Lee, Moller, Read, Lewis, Mendes, and Carpenter</label><mixed-citation>Lee, J. D., Moller, S. J., Read, K. A., Lewis, A. C., Mendes, L., and
Carpenter, L. J.: Year-round measurements of nitrogen oxides and ozone in the
tropical North Atlantic marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114,
D21302,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011878">10.1029/2009JD011878</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lidster et al.(2011)Lidster, Hamilton, and Lewis</label><mixed-citation>Lidster, R., Hamilton, J., and Lewis, A.: The application of two total
transfer valve modulators for comprehensive two-dimensional gas
chromatography of volatile organic compounds, J. Sep. Sci., 34, 812–821,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201000710">10.1002/jssc.201000710</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>McMeeking et al.(2012)McMeeking, Bart, Chazette, Haywood, Hopkins, McQuaid, Morgan, Raut, Ryder, Savage, Turnbull, and Coe</label><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Bart, M., Chazette, P., Haywood, J. M., Hopkins, J. R., McQuaid, J. B.,
Morgan, W. T., Raut, J.-C., Ryder, C. L., Savage, N., Turnbull, K., and
Coe, H.: Airborne measurements of trace gases and aerosols over the London
metropolitan region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5163–5187,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5163-2012">10.5194/acp-12-5163-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Nannoolal et al.(2004)Nannoolal, Rarey, Ramjugernath, and Cordes</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., Ramjugernath, D., and Cordes, W.: Estimation of
pure component properties: Part 1. Estimation of the normal boiling point of
non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group
interactions, Fluid Phase Equilibr., 226, 45–63,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.001">10.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.001</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Nannoolal et al.(2008)Nannoolal, Rarey, and Ramjugernath</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties: Part 3. Estimation of the vapor pressure of non-electrolyte
organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase
Equilibr., 269, 117–133,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020">10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Odum et al.(1997)Odum, Jungkamp, Griffin, Forstner, Flagan, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Jungkamp, T. P. W., Griffin, R. J., Forstner, H. J. L.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Aromatics, reformulated gasoline, and
atmospheric organic aerosol formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31,
1890–1897,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es960535l">10.1021/es960535l</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Parrish et al.(2009)Parrish, Kuster, Shao, Yokouchi, Kondo, Goldan,
de Gouw, Koike, and Shirai</label><mixed-citation>Parrish, D., Kuster, W., Shao, M., Yokouchi, Y., Kondo, Y., Goldan, P. D.,
de Gouw, J., Koike, M., and Shirai, T.: Comparison of air pollutant
emissions among mega-cities, Atmos. Environ., 43, 6435–6441,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.024">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.024</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Passant(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Passant, N.: Speciation of UK emissions of non-methane volatile organic
compounds, Tech. rep., AEA Technology Report ENV-05452002, Culham, Abingdon,
UK, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Platt et al.(2013)Platt, El Haddad, Zardini, Clairotte, Astorga, Wolf, Slowik, Temime-Roussel, Marchand, Ježek, Drinovec, Močnik, Möhler, Richter, Barmet, Bianchi, Baltensperger, and Prévôt</label><mixed-citation>Platt, S. M., El Haddad, I., Zardini, A. A., Clairotte, M., Astorga, C.,
Wolf, R., Slowik, J. G., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Ježek, I.,
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Möhler, O., Richter, R., Barmet, P.,
Bianchi, F., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from gasoline vehicle emissions in a new mobile
environmental reaction chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9141–9158,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9141-2013">10.5194/acp-13-9141-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Presto et al.(2010)Presto, Miracolo, Donahue, and
Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Presto, A., Miracolo, M., Donahue, N., and Robinson, A.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photo-oxidation of low volatility
precursors: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
2029–2034,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es903712r">10.1021/es903712r</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>R Development Core Team(2012)</label><mixed-citation>R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical  Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
available at: <uri>http://www.R-project.org/</uri> (last access: 19 June 2014), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Robinson et al.(2007)Robinson, Donahue, Shrivastava, Weitkamp, Sage, Grieshop, Lane, Pierce and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A., Donahue, N., Shrivastava, M., Weitkamp, E., Sage, A.,
Grieshop, A., Lane, T., Pierce, J., and Pandis, S.: Rethinking Organic
Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging, Science, 315,
1259–1262
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Saunders et al.(2003)Saunders, Jenkin, Derwent, and Pilling</label><mixed-citation>Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol
for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A):
tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003">10.5194/acp-3-161-2003</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>US Energy Information Administration(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
US Energy Information Administration: Petroleum and Other Liquids, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>von Schneidemesser et al.(2010)von Schneidemesser, Monks, and
Plass-Duelmer</label><mixed-citation>von Schneidemesser, E., Monks, P., and Plass-Duelmer, C.: Global comparison of
VOC and CO observations in urban areas, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5053–5064,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.010">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Warneke et al.(2012)Warneke, de Gouw, Holloway, Peischl, Ryerson,
Atlas, Blake, Trainer, and Parrish</label><mixed-citation>Warneke, C., de Gouw, J., Holloway, J., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T., Atlas, E.,
Blake, D., Trainer, M., and Parrish, D.: Multiyear trends in volatile
organic compounds in Los Angeles, California: five decades of decreasing
emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V17,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017899">10.1029/2012JD017899</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Yoshino et al.(2006)Yoshino, Sadanaga, Watanabe, Kato, Miyakawa,
Matsumoto, and Kajii</label><mixed-citation>Yoshino, A., Sadanaga, Y., Watanabe, K., Kato, S., Miyakawa, Y., Matsumoto, J.,
and Kajii, Y.: Measurement of total OH reactivity by laser-induced pump and
probe technique – comprehensive observations in the urban atmosphere of
Tokyo, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7869–7881,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.023">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.023</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Yoshino et al.(2012)Yoshino, Nakashima, Miyazaki, Kato, Suthawaree,
Shimo, Matsunaga, Chatani, Apel, Greenberg, Guenther, Ueno, Sasaki, Hoshi,
Yokota, Ishii, and Kajii</label><mixed-citation>Yoshino, A., Nakashima, Y., Miyazaki, K., Kato, S., Suthawaree, J., Shimo, N.,
Matsunaga, S., Chatani, S., Apel, E., Greenberg, J., Guenther, A., Ueno, H.,
Sasaki, H., Hoshi, J., Yokota, H., Ishii, K., and Kajii, Y.: Air quality
diagnosis from comprehensive observations of total OH reactivity and reactive
trace species in urban central Tokyo, Atmos. Environ., 49, 51–59,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.029">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.029</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Young et al.(2015)Young, Allan, Williams, Green, Flynn, Harrison, Yin, Gallagher, and Coe</label><mixed-citation>Young, D. E., Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Green, D. C., Flynn, M. J.,
Harrison, R. M., Yin, J., Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.: Investigating the
annual behaviour of submicron secondary inorganic and organic aerosols in
London, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6351–6366,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6351-2015">10.5194/acp-15-6351-2015</ext-link>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Zhang et al.(2011)Zhang, Jimenez, Canagaratna, Ulbrich, Ng, Worsnop,
and Sun</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J., Canagaratna, M., Ulbrich, I., Ng, N., Worsnop, D., and
Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via factor analysis of
aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y">10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Cappa, Jathar, McVay, Ensberg, Kleeman, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Cappa, C., Jathar, S., McVay, R., Ensberg, J., Kleeman, M., and
Seinfeld, J.: Influence of vapor wall loss in laboratory chambers on yields
of secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 5802–5807,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111">10.1073/pnas.1404727111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Zhao et al.(2014)Zhao, Hennigan, May, Tkacik, de Gouw, Gilman, Kuster, Borbon, and Robinson</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Hennigan, C., May, A., Tkacik, D., de Gouw, J., Gilman, J.,
Kuster, W., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A.: Intermediate-Volatility Organic
Compounds: A large source of Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 48, 13743–137,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es5035188">10.1021/es5035188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
