<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-9253-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Organic photolysis reactions in tropospheric aerosols: effect on
secondary organic aerosol formation and lifetime</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Organic photolysis reactions in tropospheric aerosols}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Hodzic et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hodzic</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          <email>alma@ucar.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Madronich</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kasibhatla</surname><given-names>P. S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-3737</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tyndall</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0695-5241</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Aumont</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-0877</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Jimenez</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-1847</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lee-Taylor</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Orlando</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>LISA UMR CNRS 7583, Université Paris Est Créteil et Université Paris   Diderot, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">A. Hodzic (alma@ucar.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>9253</fpage><lpage>9269</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>This study presents the first modeling estimates of the potential effect of
gas- and particle-phase organic photolysis reactions on the formation and
lifetime of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). Typically only photolysis of
smaller organic molecules (e.g., formaldehyde) for which explicit data exist
is included in chemistry–climate models. Here, we specifically examine the
photolysis of larger molecules that actively partition between the gas and
particle phases. The chemical mechanism generator GECKO-A is used to
explicitly model SOA formation from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane reactions with OH at low and high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Simulations are conducted for typical mid-latitude conditions and a solar
zenith angle of 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (permanent daylight). The results show that
after 4 days of chemical aging under those conditions (equivalent to
8 days in the summer mid-latitudes), gas-phase photolysis leads to a
moderate decrease in SOA yields, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % (low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 % (high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % for toluene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane. The small effect of gas-phase
photolysis on low-volatility <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes such as C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane is due to the
rapid partitioning of early-generation products to the particle phase, where
they are protected from gas-phase photolysis. Minor changes are found in the
volatility distribution of organic products and in oxygen to carbon ratios.
The decrease in SOA mass is increasingly more important after a day of
chemical processing, suggesting that most laboratory experiments are likely
too short to quantify the effect of gas-phase photolysis on SOA yields. Our
results also suggest that many molecules containing chromophores are
preferentially partitioned into the particle phase before they can be
photolyzed in the gas phase. Given the growing experimental evidence that
these molecules can undergo in-particle photolysis, we performed sensitivity
simulations using an empirically estimated SOA photolysis rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Modeling results indicate that
this photolytic loss rate would decrease SOA mass by 40–60 % for most
species after 10 days of equivalent atmospheric aging at mid-latitudes in
the summer. It should be noted that in our simulations we do not consider
in-particle or aqueous-phase reactions which could modify the chemical
composition of the particle and thus the quantity of photolabile species. The
atmospheric implications of our results are significant for both the SOA
global distribution and lifetime. GEOS-Chem global model results suggest
that particle-phase photolytic reactions could be an important loss process
for SOA in the atmosphere, removing aerosols from the troposphere on
timescales of less than 7 days that are comparable to wet deposition.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) are ubiquitous atmospheric constituents
formed by photochemical oxidation of anthropogenic and biogenic hydrocarbons
that can lead to adverse health effects (Fann et al., 2012) and radiative forcing of climate
(Boucher et al., 2013). Their atmospheric burden and lifetime are highly uncertain due to our
limited understanding of processes controlling their formation, aging and
removal in the atmosphere. SOA yields and the volatility distribution of
intermediate oxidation products greatly depend on the competitive chemistry
of peroxy radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed from oxidation of parent hydrocarbons,
which can react with nitrogen oxides (NO), hydroperoxy radicals (HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
or other RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ziemann and Atkinson, 2012). The resulting oxygenated molecules contain carbonyl,
peroxide or nitrate chromophores, and are potentially sensitive to
photolysis during their lifetime in the atmosphere (Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 2000). Photolysis can occur
in the gas phase and in the condensed phase as particles containing
photolabile compounds efficiently absorb light at actinic wavelengths (e.g., Lambe et al., 2013; Wong et al., 2014).
Unlike OH reactions that mainly lead to addition of more functional groups,
photolysis mainly fragments molecules into smaller and more volatile
compounds, thus significantly modifying SOA composition and properties during
atmospheric aging.</p>
      <p>Evidence that photolysis modulates SOA formation and lifetime in the
atmosphere is supported by a growing number of laboratory experiments, which
showed that exposure to UV lights can suppress SOA formation or even cause
substantial loss of biogenic SOA. Presto et al. (2005) observed a 20–40 %
decrease in aerosol yields during <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis experiments
conducted under UV lights. Zhang et al. (2006) found similar sensitivity to UV
exposure for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-limonene ozonolysis SOA, with a mass yield decrease of 60 %
for compounds with saturation concentration of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In both
cases, the SOA decrease was attributed to the photolysis of gas-phase
intermediates during the active growth phase and changes in their volatility
distribution. Specific SOA aging experiments were also performed to isolate
the effect of photolysis from other processes (e.g., Tritscher et al., 2011;
Salo et al., 2011; Henry and Donahue, 2012; Donahue et al., 2012). In those experiments, SOA
was first formed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis in the dark, and then the
products were irradiated (with UV lamps or solar lights), which allowed
separation of the aging by OH-radical oxidation and photolysis from the
initial condensation of primary products. Henry and Donahue (2012) reported a
strong photolytic loss of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the formed SOA
mass upon UV 360 nm black-light exposure with lower OH levels
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
photolysis. In additional experiments reported by Donahue et al. (2012), where
OH was formed via HONO photolysis, an initial increase in SOA concentrations
was first observed, followed by their strong decrease as OH concentrations
dropped from 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The authors
attributed this SOA loss to photolysis in the gas phase followed by
particle-to-gas re-equilibration, under the assumption that particle-phase
quantum yields of photodissociation are small due to quenching and cage
effects from neighboring molecules. However, recent studies that were able
to decouple gas-phase and condensed-phase processes seem to suggest a rapid
photolytic loss of SOA in the condensed phase. Epstein et al. (2014) irradiated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis SOA denuded from gas-phase oxidants and organic
vapors, and concluded that condensed-phase photolysis was responsible for a
significant decrease in SOA mass caused by the photochemical loss of
particle-bound peroxide species (a 50 % loss over 1 equivalent week in the
atmosphere). Wong et al. (2014) also reported a substantial photolytic loss of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA mass (generated by re-atomization after sampling into
filters) under UVB lights with loss rates of 7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
under dry conditions and a 2-fold faster loss (1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under higher relative humidities.</p>
      <p>During photochemical aging in the atmosphere, SOA can be both generated by
oxidative functionalization with OH and destroyed by photolysis. As these
processes are occurring simultaneously and during the entire organic aerosol
(OA) life cycle in the atmosphere (typically a week), it is currently
challenging to quantify separately the effect of photolysis on SOA yields
and aging from laboratory experiments, and to describe their effect in the
models. To our knowledge, photolysis of oxygenated organic molecules in the
gas or condensed phase is ignored in most current chemistry–climate models,
which could result in substantial errors in SOA predictions. In addition,
the experimental quantification of SOA photolytic loss could be
significantly biased due to SOA evaporation caused by heating inside the
chamber upon UV light exposure (Denjean et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The objective of the present study is to examine the effect of both gas- and
condensed-phase photolysis on SOA formation and lifetime using process and
global modeling. First, we study the multi-day growth of SOA from four
typical precursors (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and semi-volatile and
intermediate volatility <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes) under idealized conditions (constant
fixed daylight, temperature, OH, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and preexisting OA) to assess
the maximum potential impact of photolysis on SOA formation. The mechanism
generator GECKO-A is used to create explicit oxidation schemes for these
precursors, which are then run within a box model to assess the effect of
photolysis on SOA yields under a range of conditions. The effect of
gas-phase photolysis is explicitly quantified in the box model, whereas the
potential role of in-particle photolysis is empirically estimated and
discussed based on sensitivity simulations. We then include a simplified
parameterization of photolysis reactions within a global chemistry model to
estimate the potential effect of photolysis on ambient SOA under realistic
conditions involving spatial and temporal variability in SOA precursor
emissions and chemistry, and in the presence of other competing SOA loss
processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Modeling framework</title>
      <p>The mechanism self-generator GECKO-A (Generator of Explicit Chemistry and
Kinetics of Organics in the Atmosphere) was used in this study to create the
detailed gas-phase oxidation mechanisms for individual SOA precursors
including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes.
The chemical mechanisms are created using a prescribed set of rules
determining reaction pathways and rate coefficients, based on laboratory
kinetic data, and structure–activity relationships as described by Aumont et
al. (2005). The protocol currently implemented in GECKO-A allows the generation
of chemical mechanisms for aliphatic species only. For aromatic species (i.e,
toluene in this study), the mechanism is taken from the Master Chemical
Mechanism (MCM) (Jenkin et al., 2003) up to the formation of ring-opening products, where
mechanism generation by GECKO-A is next used. Rate coefficients for reaction
of OH with organics are based on structure–reactivity rules of Kwok and
Atkinson (1995) and subsequent updates. In this study, we have updated the rate
constants for H-atom abstraction from carbon atoms containing a
hydroperoxide functionality (e.g., RC–H(OOH)R). Kinetic data for OH/hydroperoxide reactions are sparse in the literature, and previous versions
of GECKO-A assumed an activation factor (i.e., an enhancement of the rate
constant due to the presence of the functional group) of 14 on the basis of
data for the OH/CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OOH reaction. That is, the presence of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OOH
group was assumed to increase the reactivity of the adjacent C–H bond(s) by
this factor. We have changed this factor to 3.5, similar to that for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH
(R. Atkinson, personal communication, 2014), and discuss its effect on our results
in Sect. 3.1. The choice of a lower activation factor is supported by
measurements of gas-phase dodecyl hydroperoxides in the work of Yee et al. (2012), who found that the loss of these peroxides was much too fast when using
the MCM value based on a large value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OOH). For the gas–particle
partitioning, instantaneous equilibrium is assumed, and the Nannoolal et al. (2008) approach is used to estimate the saturation vapor pressure for
non-radical species. The fraction that is partitioned to the particle phase
can be determined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aerosol</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol
mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
is an effective saturation mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
gas–particle equilibrium and the composition of SOA are constantly modified
as the gas-phase oxidation progresses during the atmospheric aging.
Condensed-phase reactions are not considered, nor are potential diffusion
limitations to SOA partitioning. Gas-phase photolytic reactions are included
for molecules containing carbonyl, hydroperoxide or nitrate chromophores.
For species containing several functional groups, each chromophore is
treated independently, except for conjugated carbonyls. The photolysis of
nitroaromatic compounds is not included. To determine the associated
photolysis rates, each molecular structure predicted by GECKO-A is assigned
a reference compound with its associated cross sections and quantum yields
as described by Aumont et al. (2005; see Table 4). Table S1 in the Supplement summarizes the
photolysis rates for chromophores and molecular structures that are
considered in GECKO-A. Particle-phase photolysis is not explicitly
calculated in the default model, and sensitivity simulations will be
performed in this study to quantify its effects as discussed in Sect. 3.2.</p>
      <p>In this study simulations are performed in a box model with the prescribed
conditions representative of ambient air as in the study by Hodzic et al. (2014) to quantify the effect of photolysis on SOA formation and yields. In
these runs, temperature is set to 298 K, photolysis frequencies are
calculated for mid-latitudes at a solar zenith angle of
45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which corresponds to constant daylight), NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are held at 0.01 ppb
for low and 10 ppb for high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, ozone is set at 40 ppb, and
OH is kept constant at 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
preexisting OA concentration is 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, typical of moderately
polluted conditions. Sensitivity simulations with higher OH values
(8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or lower preexisting OA (1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are also performed. The initial hydrocarbon mixing ratio is
fixed to an arbitrary low value of 1 ppt, so that the amount of aerosol
produced from the given precursor is negligible compared to preexisting OA
prescribed in the study and will not impact the gas–particle partitioning,
nor the overall photochemical reactivity. Under these conditions, SOA yields
are independent of the amount of initial precursor as discussed by Hodzic et
al. (2014). SOA yields and volatility distribution of intermediate products
depend to a large extent on the relative rates of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (minor) vs. RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO reactions. We calculated
that 8 % of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions proceed with NO under “low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” conditions vs.
99.9 % under “high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” conditions considered in this study.</p>
      <p>We define the photolysis age in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equivalent days (Table 1) as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
exposure of the simulated SOA during our simulations normalized to a 1-day
average summer (or winter) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure: photolysis
age <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">time</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">average</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
where “time” is the duration of the simulation in days. Photolysis
age values are reported in Table 1 for our experiments. Typically, our 1-week simulations performed under constant light at mid-latitudes and a
solar zenith angle of 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are equivalent to about 2 equivalent weeks of exposure
in the atmosphere at mid-latitudes during summer, or about 38 equivalent
days during winter.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Photolysis rate coefficients and photolytic lifetimes for typical
atmospheric conditions and for our simulations. Typical ozone overhead values
are used at different locations based on Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer
data (<uri>http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/acdisc/TOMS</uri>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{0.85}[0.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Typical conditions </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boulder, CO, summer solstice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, sea level, 21 June, </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 310 DU, 10 % ground albedo </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">no aerosols, no clouds </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boulder, CO,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, sea level, 21 Dec </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">winter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 330 DU, 10 % ground albedo </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">solstice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">no aerosols, no clouds </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Equator,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">Sea level, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 260 DU, 5 % ground </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">21 June</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">albedo, no aerosols, no clouds </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Equator,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">Sea level, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 258 DU, 5 % ground </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">21 March</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">albedo, no aerosols, no clouds </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hyytiälä,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">61<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, June 21, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 355 DU, 5 % ground </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">summer solstice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">albedo, no aerosols, no clouds </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hyytiälä,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">61<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 21 Dec, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">col</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 355 DU, 90 % ground </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">winter solstice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">albedo, no aerosols, no clouds </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Model simulation </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Photolysis age in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">equivalent days </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Boulder, CO,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Boulder, CO,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">summer solstice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">winter solstice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GECKO-A 1 week</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> solar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14 eq. days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38 eq. days</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">simulations (Table 2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">zenith angle, 7 days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GECKO-A <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Black lights,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15 eq. days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.42 eq. days</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ozonolysis SOA (Fig. 6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(3.7 eq. hours)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(10 eq. hours)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Henry and</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Black lights,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15 eq. days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.42 eq. days</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Donahue (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(3.7 eq. hours)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(10 eq. hours)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Importance of gas-phase photolysis of organics </title>
      <p>To investigate the role of gas-phase photolysis on SOA formation and yields,
we compared experiments with photolysis on and off for four typical SOA
precursors including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (Table 2). In the “photolysis-off” experiment, photolysis of all
organic species (except for formaldehyde and methyl hydroperoxide) is turned
off, whereas all inorganic compounds (i.e., O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HONO, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> still undergo photolysis. Figure 1
shows the results for two different levels of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.01 and 10 ppb), OH
(2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and background OA
(1 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Base case simulations (BASE) with and without
photolysis of organics are shown in black. The results indicate that in a
week of chemical aging with constant daylight or two weeks of equivalent
atmospheric summertime exposure (representative of Boulder, 40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
with the solar zenith angle of 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the gas-phase photolysis
leads to a 10 to 45 % decrease in SOA concentrations depending on the
precursor. Most of the decrease occurs in the first 4 days of the simulation
(8 equivalent atmospheric days). For a given species, the sensitivity to
gas-phase photolysis is comparable under low- and high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions,
except for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, which seems to be more sensitive under
high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Our results also suggest that, for most species, the resulting
loss of SOA due to gas-phase photolysis is increasingly more important as
the chemical processing time is increased during the first week atmospheric
exposure (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Description of GECKO-A simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">Experiments for SOA formed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gas-phase photolysis</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Particle-phase</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OH (molecules</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OA background</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">of organics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">photolysis</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BASE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">on/off</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">off</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SENS_OA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">on/off</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">off</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SENS_OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">on/off</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">off</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">on</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on as gas-phase <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mac</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">on</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on as 0.04 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Radical species that are produced by photolysis inside the
particle are assumed to be permanently lost to the gas phase.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The largest effect on yields (Table 3) is predicted for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
SOA, with a reduction of 16 % under low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 47 % under high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during the entire experiment. The reduction is relatively small during the
initial 10 h, which is a typical duration of laboratory experiments,
with a 2 % decrease at low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 % high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and reaches
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % (20 %) after 1 day, or 12 % (42 %) after 1
week of equivalent atmospheric ageing. For toluene oxidation, the effect of
photolysis is more limited, and does not exceed 15 % for either low- or
high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. We note, however, that the effect could be underestimated
as the photolysis of nitroaromatic compounds, which are strong absorbers, is
currently not represented in GECKO-A. For products of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, the
relative decrease in SOA yields is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–30 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane. The
sensitivity to gas-phase photolysis is more important for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane, due to the fact that products of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane are
partitioned to the particle phase in a much greater fraction after one
generation of chemistry, where they are protected from gas-phase photolysis,
whereas it takes several generations to produce substantial SOA from shorter-chain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (Aumont et al., 2012).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Predicted reduction in SOA yields due to gas-phase photolysis, and
corresponding first-order loss rates and lifetimes. The results are from the
GECKO-A BASE case simulation, and yields values are taken at the maximum of
the SOA formation from each precursor. The loss rate coefficients were
estimated by numerically fitting the first-order decay of SOA due to
photolysis occurring over 1 week of processing under constant light
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Low (0.01 ppb) and high (10 ppb) NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations are shown.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Considered</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Reduction in SOA yields by </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Estimated loss  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Estimated lifetime (days, under </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">system</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">gas-phase photolysis </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">rate (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">simulation conditions*) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">High NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">High NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Toluene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> To derive equivalent atmospheric loss rates (lifetimes) at
mid-latitudes, values should be divided (multiplied) by a factor of 2 in summer and 5.4 in
winter, which is the ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used in our experiment and the
typical atmospheric values.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The efficiency of the gas-phase photolysis will depend on the residence time
of organic vapors in the gas phase, which can be significantly modified by
the chemical environment. For instance, an increase in the OA mass available
for the gas–particle partitioning is expected to enhance the partitioning of
organics to the condensed phase, where they will be protected from gas-phase
photolysis. Similarly, a faster gas-phase oxidation rate (higher OH) is
expected to lead to more rapid generation of the low-volatility organic
species which can condense into the particle phase, thus making them less
vulnerable to the gas-phase photolysis. Sensitivity simulations with 4-fold
higher OH concentrations (SENS_OH) and 10-fold lower
background OA (SENS_OA) are performed to evaluate these
effects (Fig. 1). As expected, SOA formation occurs more rapidly when a
4-fold increase in OH is considered. The decrease by an order of magnitude
in the amount of the preexisting OA (and thus reduced gas–particle
partitioning) also affects the amount of SOA formed. A large
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 %) decrease in SOA production is observed for toluene
because a significant fraction of the predicted oxidation products have
effective saturation mass concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the 1–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
range (Fig. 4; see also Hodzic et al., 2014). The effect is more
limited for SOA produced from other precursors (up to 30 %). For all
precursor species, the sensitivity to photolytic reactions remains
qualitatively similar (within 10 %) regardless of the OH and OA background
values (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). As expected, a decrease in background OA
concentrations leads in most cases to an enhancement of the SOA photolytic
loss, whereas an increase in OH levels tends to result in a reduced SOA
photolytic removal. We also note that the sensitivity to gas-phase
photolysis is not significantly modified when diurnally variable photolysis
rates are considered instead of fixed constant daylight conditions (see
Fig. S3 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOA formation from the oxidation by OH of 1 ppt of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes at low (0.01 ppb) and
high (10 ppb) NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. Plots compare GECKO-A simulations with
(dashed lines) and without (solid lines) gas-phase photolysis of organics at
the solar zenith angle of 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mid-latitudes) under constant daylight.
To derive equivalent atmospheric summertime exposure of our experiment, the
time axes should be multiplied by a factor of 2 (see Table 1). The reference
simulation (BASE) is shown in black, and is compared to two sensitivity
simulations testing for higher OH levels (SENS_OH in orange) and lower
absorbing organic aerosol mass (SENS_OA in blue). See Table 2 for the
description of various runs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 2 shows the major functional groups in SOA molecules from various
precursors. Fifteen families of functional groups are considered and they
account for 54 to 65 % of the total SOA mass for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene,
94 to 99 % for toluene, and for 70 to 90 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes. Positional isomers are lumped into the same family of
compounds. Ketone (K) and alcohol (O) moieties are present in the majority of
the molecules, while hydroperoxides (H) are seen mainly at low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
nitrates (N) mainly at high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Gas-phase photolysis leads to a
decrease in most species, which seems to be particularly important for
highly functionalized compounds containing multiple carbonyl and nitrate
groups (e.g., HKKKK, HHKK, HHKKK, HKKK, NNKK, NNKO, where HHKK, for example, refers to
a molecule that contains two hydroperoxide and two ketone groups). These
species are formed by several generations of chemistry and are mainly found
in the particle phase. Thus their decrease is more likely related to
reductions in their precursor species due to photodegradation than to their
direct loss by gas-phase photolysis. Some molecules containing alcohol
groups (e.g., HHO, HKKO, HHKO) see an increase in their concentrations due to
gas-phase photolysis (see also Fig. S2 in the Supplement). This increase can be explained
by photolysis of hydroperoxides, which can lead to the formation of alkoxy
radicals that can isomerize to form alcohols. Thus photolysis can
contribute to SOA loss and to a lesser extent to its formation. Typically,
photolysis of carbonyl compounds (ketone and aldehydes) tends to break the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-carbon bond on either side of the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O group, leading to smaller
more volatile fragments that are less likely to partition to the
particle phase. On the other hand, photolysis of hydroperoxides and nitrates
leads to elimination of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to alkoxy radicals, and
potentially further functionalization of the carbon skeleton favoring
formation of less volatile organic compounds that can partition more
readily to the particle.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Particle-phase dominant functional groups in the top 15 SOA
constituents shown at the maximum of the SOA yield. The BASE case simulations
with (red bars) and without (blue bars) photolysis of organic compounds are
compared. The carbon atom ratio indicates the ratio of the carbon atoms in
the condensed phase to the initial carbon load included in the parent
backbone. The sum of the shown particle-phase constituents is lower than 1
as the rest of the carbon mass is in the gas phase.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>One of the highly uncertain factors that can influence the composition of
SOA at low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the choice of the rate for abstracting the H atoms
from the carbon atom that is adjacent to the hydroperoxide (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OOH) group. As
discussed in Sect. 2, in this paper we have used a lower activation factor
of 3.5 for estimating the rate constant of that process, instead of the
GECKO-A default value of 14 (Aumont et al., 2005). As shown in Fig. S4 in the Supplement this change does not
affect the SOA production when the gas-phase photolysis of organics is
turned off (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane).
However, the composition of SOA formed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes is significantly
modified, as is the effect of gas-phase photolysis on SOA yields
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2-fold smaller when the value of 3.5 is considered). The main
difference is found for HKKKK and HKKK molecules, which are much more
abundant when the value of 14 is used. These molecules originate typically
from the successive OH reaction, leading to hydroperoxide moieties under
low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and their subsequent fast oxidation to a ketone
moiety due to a the large activation factor used. Reducing this factor to
3.5 forces the OH to react away from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OOH group. When the carbon
backbone is sparsely functionalized, this increases the rate of production
of multifunctional species, in particular multifunctional peroxides (e.g.,
HHO and HHK). However, when the carbon backbone is highly functionalized,
this leads to more fragmentation, because in most cases the OH attack is now
next to other functional moieties (e.g., multifunctional ketones).</p>
      <p>Figure 3 shows the effect of gas-phase photolysis on oxygen to carbon (O / C)
ratios of particles for the BASE run. For all cases, changes in O / C ratios
(&lt; 0.05) are minor. Slightly higher O / C ratios at low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
found in the presence of gas-phase photolysis as photolyzed fragments are
typically smaller and more volatile carbon chains that need to undergo
further oxidation to condense into particles. Our results are consistent
with chamber studies by Wong et al. (2014) that observed small changes in O / C
with an increase in more oxidized compounds (high O / C) in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
SOA due to fast photodegradation of less oxidized particulate organics such
as carbonyls. Changes in SOA composition due to gas-phase photolysis can
also affect the volatility distribution of oxidized organic compounds.
Figure 4 does not show a clear shift in volatility due to gas-phase
photolysis but rather suggests that the SOA reduction is happening across a
wide range of volatility bins.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Oxygen to carbon (O / C) ratios as predicted by the BASE case
simulation with (dashed lines) and without (solid lines) gas-phase photolysis
of organics.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Distribution of products of OH oxidation of 1 ppt of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes at low (0.01 ppb) and
high (10 ppb) NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels according to their volatility. The volatility
is expressed in terms of the effective saturation concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Predictions represent values at the maximum SOA yield based on the BASE case
simulation with (red) and without (blue) gas-phase photolysis of organics.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Our explicit modeling results suggest that gas-phase photolysis leads in
some cases to moderate changes in SOA yields (&lt; 25 % for most
precursors; &lt; 45 % for high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene), and small
changes in volatility distribution and O / C ratios over 1 equivalent week of
chemical aging in the mid-latitude atmosphere in summer or 2.5 weeks in
winter. The implication in terms of SOA atmospheric lifetime is that
gas-phase photolysis is a possible sink of intermediate organic vapors and
thus SOA, although a smaller sink compared to dry deposition of these
gaseous species (Hodzic et al., 2014; Knote et al., 2015). Indeed, the estimated summertime atmospheric lifetimes
against photolysis of the SOA from the four precursors considered in our
study range from about 10 days for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene under high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions (unlikely case) to more than a month for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene under
low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions or for long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane species. These lifetimes
are considerably longer than values reported by laboratory studies (e.g., Henry and Donahue, 2012).
Current 3-D models typically represent the oxidation products as lumped
surrogate species based on their volatility that can further age by OH
oxidation but cannot photolyze due to the undefined chemical structure of
those intermediate species. Our results suggest that omitting their
gas-phase photolysis will likely result in reasonably small biases in SOA
predictions over urban scales. However, errors could be significant at the
global scale, in particular in the upper troposphere, where models have the
tendency to accumulate SOA due to a less efficient wet removal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Importance of in-particle photolysis of organics </title>
      <p>In the GECKO-A simulations described above, once the organic molecules are
partitioned to SOA they are protected from gas-phase photolysis. However,
these molecules still contain numerous chromophores (Fig. 2) that absorb
solar radiation and could undergo photolysis inside the particle. Optical
absorption is also likely to be modified by the heterogeneous formation of
high molecular weight compounds inside the particle (Graber and Rudich, 2006). As GECKO-A does not
include condensed-phase photochemical reactions (or heterogeneous
chemistry), the effect of particle-phase photolysis on SOA cannot be
calculated directly. In this section, we consider a simple alternative
empirical approach to examine the potential effect of particle-phase
photolysis within GECKO-A.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Predicted effect of photolysis on SOA concentrations from the
oxidation of 1 ppt of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes at low (0.01 ppb) and high (10 ppb) NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. Plots
compare GECKO-A simulations for the BASE no-photolysis run (black), BASE run
with gas-phase photolysis (red), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mac</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (gray). To derive equivalent atmospheric summertime exposure
of our experiments, times should be multiplied by a factor of 2 (Table 1).
See Table 2 for the description of various runs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We base our estimates of condensed-phase photolysis on the measured SOA mass
absorption coefficient (MAC). Organic particles containing photolabile
compounds have been shown to efficiently absorb light at actinic
wavelengths. Recently measured MAC values range from 0.03 to 0.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for laboratory data (Lambe et al., 2013) or from 0.1 to 10 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for ambient urban measurements (e.g., Barnard et al., 2008) in the 300–400 nm
wavelength interval. We use those measurements to estimate the
condensed-phase photolysis of SOA. We represent the photolytic SOA loss as a
first-order reaction, with effective reaction rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AF</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mc</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">QY</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where AF is the actinic flux (photons m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC is the SOA mass
absorption coefficient (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mc is the mass of one carbon atom
(g) and QY is the quantum yield or the probability that absorbed photons will
lead to bond cleavage and the loss of some mass from the particle. We assume
that if each absorbed photon leads to the loss of one C atom, the quantum
yield is equal to 1. We can scale Eq. (1) to known NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close=""><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AF</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="/" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mc</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">QY</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The photolysis model TUV (v5.1; Madronich et al., 1993) was used to estimate the UV actinic flux
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photons m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
photolysis (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over 280–400 nm at 1 km
altitude and overhead sun, which combined with [mc] gives <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close=""><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AF</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="/"><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mc</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photons g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus the resulting SOA
photolysis rate can be written as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">QY</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          To estimate the plausible range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, we use the combinations
of [MAC] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [QY] reported in the literature. Here we use MAC of 0.1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
as a lower limit for ambient aerosols. We note that for the
chosen MAC value the light can penetrate the whole volume of the particle
without being significantly attenuated by the absorbers (light attenuation
was estimated to be less than 2–3 %; see discussion in Supplement Annex IV). QY has only
been measured for a handful of species. Calvert and Pitts (1966) reported values
of 0.01 (or 1 %) for photolysis of aldehydes in the aqueous phase. Lignell
et al. (2013) reported values of 0.5 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinonic acid, which is one of the
constituents of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, whereas Wong et al. (2014) estimated an
effective quantum yield of 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 for the loss of organics in the
case of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA photolysis. Given the range of values, here we
use a conservative value of 0.01 (or 1 %) for QY. Thus our best estimate for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.04 % of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is applied as a
first-order removal rate for each photolabile species in the particle phase.
The photo-fragments are no longer considered and the condensed-phase
photolysis is considered here as an irreversible loss of one carbon atom. We
note that this calculated value is 1–2 orders of magnitude lower that those
reported by Henry and Donahue (2012), who estimated the photolytic loss of SOA as
2 % of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (total value of both particle and gas-phase photolysis
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In their experiments,
Henry and Donahue (2012) argued that photolysis is more efficient (higher QY) in
the gas phase than in the particle phase, where quenching and caging are more
likely to occur and could cause rapid recombination of fragments. Therefore
a lower QY may be expected in the particles, although it is unclear whether
similar molecules are involved in photolysis in the two phases. We also note
that photolysis of SOA is assumed to not occur at visible wavelengths (i.e.,
QY <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 400 nm).</p>
      <p>Figure 5 shows that considering the above estimated condensed-phase
photolytic loss of SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
lifetime of 7 days at
equivalent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric exposure; see Table 1) in GECKO-A
simulations leads to a 40–60 % decrease in SOA mass after 10 days of
equivalent atmospheric aging for most species (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mac</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> run, Figs. 5 and
S1 in the Supplement). A more limited decrease (15 %) is found for the high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> toluene
SOA because the photolytic loss of nitroaromatic compounds, which are
predicted to be the major SOA constituents (RVVO in Fig. 2), is not
included.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>GECKO-A simulation of a typical SOA aging experiment. SOA is first
made in the dark in 2 h from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis in the conditions
where the formation of hydroperoxides dominates (through RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
reactions). After the second hour the initial precursor has been consumed,
and the SOA mixture is exposed to various conditions: (REF, black) UV black
lights and OH of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">off</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red) only
OH oxidation with OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and photolysis are
turned off for organic compounds, (OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">off</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, cyan blue) only UV
black lights, and (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, orange) similar to the REF case but
with the photolysis of organic molecules also performed in the condensed
phase. The UV lamp is that of Presto et al. (2005), with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; during the ageing
simulations, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are kept at 0.01 ppb, ozone levels are set at
50 ppb, and HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are predicted to range between
1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">off</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (REF). SOA loss rates reported in
the experiments are also shown in shaded purple areas with slopes
corresponding to (1) Henry and Donahue (2012)
(6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), (2) Wong et al. (2014) for dry conditions
(7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and (3) Wong et al. (2014) for humid
conditions (1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For comparison, the effect of applying the gaseous photolysis rates for the
corresponding species in the condensed phase is shown in Fig. 5
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similar to the simulations above based on MAC, the
photolysis here is again considered as an irreversible loss of organic
carbon. The comparison between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mac</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a fairly
similar (within 20 %) reduction in SOA mass for most precursors. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> run considers that chromophores and quantum yields are similar
in their gas- and particle-phase absorption, which is a crude assumption
neglecting possible effects form oligomerization, caging and quenching. In
the absence of particle-phase chemistry, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be viewed as an
upper limit to photolysis effects, but changes in absorption with particle
aging complicate this simple interpretation as both enhancement and decrease
in absorption have been reported (e.g., Shapiro et al., 2009; Bones et al., 2010;
Updyke et al., 2012; Zhong and Jang, 2014). In-particle reactions are likely
to modify the chemical composition of the particle and therefore change the
quantity of photolabile species. For example, the works of Yee et al. (2012) and
Schilling-Fahnestock et al. (2014) indicate extensive formation of
peroxyhemiacetals in the SOA from dodecane oxidation at low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, the precursor molecules are third- and fourth-generation products,
which contain additional, unfunctionalized ketone groups, which would still
be susceptible to photolysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>GEOS-Chem simulation for 2009 showing <bold>(a)</bold> the SOA
concentrations within the lower troposphere (below 5 km) and the absolute
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) reductions in SOA concentrations due to gas-phase
<bold>(b)</bold> and particle-phase <bold>(c, d)</bold> photolysis. Gas-phase
photolysis is applied to semi-volatile organic compounds using the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime of 20 days as estimated in Table 3. Two in-particle
photolysis rates are considered, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.04 %
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.4 %
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold></p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f07.pdf"/>

          <p>.</p>
        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relative reductions (%) in SOA concentrations due to
particle-phase photolysis in the lower <bold>(a, c)</bold> and upper <bold>(b, d)</bold> troposphere. Two in-particle photolysis rates are considered, i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.04 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left side) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.4 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (right side).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9253/2015/acp-15-9253-2015-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The overall SOA loss rate due to the combined effect of gas- and
particle-phase photolysis (and ongoing OH chemistry) in GECKO-A runs was
estimated for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mac</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations (see Table 4). Values range between
3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
translates to equivalent atmospheric SOA lifetimes of 4 to 8 days with
regard to photolysis in the summer, except for high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> toluene SOA
with a lifetime of 20 equivalent summer days, for which the effect of
photolysis is likely underestimated in our simulations as discussed above.
The estimated SOA lifetime with regard to photolysis is comparable to or even
shorter than the typical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1-week aerosol atmospheric lifetime,
which suggests that photolysis may be an important removal mechanism for
atmospheric SOA. Atmospheric implications of our findings are further
investigated in Sect. 3.3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Estimated loss rates and lifetimes due to gas-phase and in-particle
phase photolysis as predicted by GECKO-A for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mac</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulation over 1
week of aging under constant light (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Considered</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Estimated loss  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Estimated lifetime (days, </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">system</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">rate (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">under simulation conditions*) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">High NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Toluene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> To derive equivalent atmospheric loss rates (lifetimes) at
mid-latitudes,
values should be divided (multiplied) by a factor of 2 in summer and 5.4 in
winter, which is the ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used in our experiment and the
typical atmospheric values.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The above estimates for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA photolytic loss rate cannot
be directly compared with those of Henry and Donahue (2012) and Wong et al. (2014)
due to several factors: for example, (i) the differences in the chemical
composition of particles as the experiments typically use the SOA
pre-generated by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis for short (a few hours) exposure,
whereas in our simulations the SOA is generated mainly by OH oxidation, and
over a much longer time period (&gt; 1 week); (ii) the possible
evaporation of SOA in the laboratory experiments due to chamber heating
under the UV lamps, which was not quantified in those experiments and which
does not occur in our model simulations; and (iii) in-particle chemistry that
could modify the composition and absorption properties of the SOA and which
is not included in our model, and is generally not well understood.</p>
      <p>For comparison with previous laboratory work, we ran the model under
conditions similar to Henry and Donahue (2012), in which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene was
oxidized by ozone in the dark in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, and then
the mixture was exposed to UV black lights as in Presto et al. (2005) and/or to
OH oxidation. Figure 6 shows the sensitivity of the aerosol mass to assumed
photolysis rates for these conditions. The experiment is performed for 5 h
at the constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
corresponds to 4 h of equivalent summertime atmospheric exposure (Table 1). Our results show that when exposed to only OH reactions (photolysis of
organics was turned off), SOA concentrations increase by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 % in 5 h
of aging. On the other hand, SOAs exposed to only
photolytic reactions (no OH) decrease by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % over the
simulation period. The combined effect of both photolytic and OH reactions
is therefore an overall increase in SOA concentrations by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %. As done previously, we also performed a sensitivity simulation in
which all molecules can photolyze in both gas and particle phases at the
gas-phase rate. Figure 6 shows that, with those reactions, the SOA
concentrations are decreased by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecmax</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 5 h.
These results suggest that most of the photolabile molecules are
partitioned to the particle phase, where they are protected from gas-phase
photolysis. The corresponding loss rate due to the combined effect of gas-
and particle-phase photolysis and OH oxidation, is 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is within a factor of 2–3 of the values reported by Henry
and Donahue (2012) and Wong et al. (2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Potential effect of photolysis on global SOA budget and lifetime</title>
      <p>We implement the estimated SOA gas-phase and in-particle photolytic loss
rates within the GEOS-Chem global chemistry model (Bey et al., 2001) to investigate the
regional and global effect of photolytic reactions on SOA concentrations.
The GEOS-Chem model configuration used in this study is described in detail
by Jo et al. (2013). In particular, SOA is modeled using volatility basis set
approach with aging in which oxygenated semi-volatile organic compounds
(SVOCs) formed by the gas-phase reaction of nine lumped hydrocarbon species
(representing monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, isoprene, and aromatic
compounds) with OH, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are partitioned between gas and
particle phases using six volatility bins (with saturation vapor pressures
ranging from 0.01 to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 300 K). Chemical aging of
anthropogenic SVOCs with OH (with a rate constant of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is assumed to reduce the vapor pressure of the
products by 1 order of magnitude. Model simulations are performed for year
2009.</p>
      <p>Figure 7 shows the annual mean SOA concentrations predicted by the default
GEOS-Chem run within the lower troposphere (below 5 km). The predicted
continental background levels of SOA typically vary between 0.2 and 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the highest concentrations (&gt; 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are found over tropical forest regions of Africa and South
America. Industrialized and urban areas in China, Europe and the USA
feature SOA values significantly larger (0.5–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the
background. These SOA values and spatial distribution are consistent with
previous studies (e.g., Spracklen et al., 2011; Jo et al., 2013). Our results (Fig. 7b) suggest that gas-phase
photolysis of intermediate semi-volatile organic compounds leads to a very
small (&lt; 4 %) reduction in SOA concentrations under ambient
conditions. A much larger impact on SOA concentrations is predicted for
in-particle photolysis. When the previously estimated photolytic loss of
0.04 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is applied within the GEOS-Chem model, the annual mean
SOA concentrations in the lower troposphere are decreased by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20–30 % over source regions, and up to 60 % over remote regions (Fig. 8a).
The absolute decrease is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
land and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over oceans, with the
highest absolute decrease of 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> coinciding with the
maximum predicted SOA concentrations over Africa (Fig. 7c). As the quantum
yield of the particle-phase photolysis and mass absorption coefficients are
highly uncertain, here we also consider an order of magnitude higher
photolytic loss rate of 0.4 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown in Fig. 8c, this
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in a larger reduction of SOA concentrations in
the lower troposphere reaching 50–70 % over land surfaces, and up to
70–90 % over water surfaces. In both cases, a strong spatial gradient is
found between land and water surfaces, with larger relative reductions in
SOA concentrations over oceans. This gradient is due to the continuous
photolytic losses, the effect of which accumulates further away from source
regions. Model results show that the relative decrease in SOA concentrations
is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20–30 % stronger in the upper troposphere compared to
the lower troposphere (Fig. 8b, d).</p>
      <p>Our results suggest that photolysis of SOA, which is currently ignored in
chemistry–climate and air quality models, could be an efficient removal
process for organic particles. The diagnosed SOA tropospheric lifetime
against photolytic removal (annual-average tropospheric mass burden divided
by the annual tropospheric loss due to photolysis) ranges from 1 day for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 7 days for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and is comparable to the lifetime associated with the SOA wet deposition,
which ranges from 3.5 to 5.5 days in these model runs. This photolytic loss
pathway is expected to play a particularly important role in regions where
wet deposition is not very efficient such as the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of SOA formation and aging in
the atmosphere to gas-phase and in-particle photolysis reactions of organic
compounds that actively partition between gas and particle phases. We apply
the explicit chemistry model GECKO-A to simulate SOA formation from OH
oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, toluene, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane
precursors, and to explore the sensitivity of this formation to gas-phase
photolysis explicitly calculated in the model. Our simulations are conducted
for typical mid-latitude conditions (Boulder, CO) and a solar zenith angle
of 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under a week of permanent daylight. The results suggest
that photolysis of intermediate organic compounds in the gas phase leads to
a moderate decrease in SOA yields, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % (low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 % (high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % for toluene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane during 8 days of equivalent
atmospheric exposure in the summer or 3 weeks in winter. This decrease
depends on the aerosol chemical composition under various NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels,
as well as on the quantity of photolabile molecules. SOA formed from precursors
considered here contained a substantial quantity of photolabile molecules, many
of which were partitioned to the particle phase before they could undergo
gas-phase photolysis.</p>
      <p>We performed sensitivity studies to estimate the potential effect of
condensed-phase photolysis on SOA formation by applying an empirical
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
formed particles. Our results suggest that condensed-phase photolysis might
have a substantial effect on SOA formation and subsequent aging, with a
decrease of 40–60 % in SOA yields over 10 days of equivalent atmospheric
aging at mid-latitudes in the summer.</p>
      <p>Explicit modeling of a typical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis SOA aging
experiment was also performed using GECKO-A. The results show a minor
decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %) in SOA concentrations in 5 h of the
aging experiment due to gas-phase photolysis of organic vapors under black
UV lights. The SOA decrease is much more pronounced (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %)
during the experiment when particle-phase photolysis was added using the
gas-phase rates. The corresponding loss rate due to the combined effect of
gas- and particle-phase photolysis is 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is within a factor of 2–3 of the values reported by Henry and Donahue
(2012) and Wong et al. (2014).</p>
      <p>These photolysis processes were parameterized in a global chemistry model,
and the results suggest that condensed-phase photolytic reactions of organic
aerosols could be an important loss process in the atmosphere, removing SOA
from the troposphere on timescales of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 days, which is
comparable to those timescales for wet deposition. In comparison, the gas-phase
photolysis of semi-volatile organic compounds had a much smaller effect on
SOA concentrations. We recognize that processes occurring inside the
particle phase (e.g., oligomerization), which were not included in our study,
can modify the chemical composition and properties of those chromophores,
thus enhancing or reducing their ability to absorb radiation and undergo
photolysis. These reactions are still not well characterized (Atkinson and Ziemann, 2012) and are
beyond the scope of this paper.</p>
      <p>We note that the absorption by organic gases and/or particles is not
expected to substantially affect the radiation field itself. Even in highly
polluted conditions, aerosol optical depth (AOD) rarely exceeds 2, and only
a fraction (1 minus the single-scattering albedo (SSA)) is absorbed, for
example
AOD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2, and SSA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 gives an absorption optical depth of 0.2,
corresponding to about 20 % reduction in radiation. This is a significant
but not overwhelming reduction, so that even under these highly polluted
conditions the photochemistry is expected to proceed vigorously. Regional
and global effects are expected to be smaller.</p>
      <p>The implications of our results in terms of SOA modeling are twofold: (i)
gas-phase photolysis of intermediate organic vapors, which are currently
ignored in most models, are likely to have a moderate impact on SOA yields
over typical aerosol lifetimes in the atmosphere, and (ii) in-particle
photolysis could be a major sink for SOA if the quantum yields are
substantial, and these need to be better constrained from measurements and
included in 3-D models. It is also worth noting that a substantial sink due
to in-particle photolysis would imply that our current estimates of SOA
formation rates would have to be revised upwards to be consistent with
observed atmospheric SOA burdens. Finally, we note that a fuller
understanding of ambient SOA formation rates will require a better
understanding of SOA formation from other condensed-phase processes such as
oligomerization and aqueous-phase chemistry.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9253-2015-supplement" xlink:title="zip">doi:10.5194/acp-15-9253-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Andrew Conley (NCAR) for help with mathematical fitting,
Albert Presto (CMU) for providing the UV lamp spectrum, and Duseong Jo and
Rokjin Park (Seoul National University) for providing the GEOS-Chem model
code and for their assistance in developing the photolysis module for the
model. This research was supported by the National Center for Atmospheric
Research, which is operated by the University Corporation for Atmospheric
Research on behalf of the National Science Foundation, and by DOE
(BER/ASR) through grant DE-SC0006711. We would like to acknowledge high-performance computing
support from Yellowstone provided by NCAR's Computational and Information
Systems Laboratory. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. J. L. Jimenez
was partially supported by DOE (BER/ASR)
DE-SC0011105.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: M. Kanakidou</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aumont, B., Szopa, S., and Madronich, S.: Modelling the evolution of organic
carbon during its gas-phase tropospheric oxidation: development of an
explicit model based on a self generating approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5,
2497–2517, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aumont, B., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., Camredon, M., Lee-Taylor, J.,
and Madronich, S.: Modeling SOA formation from the oxidation of intermediate
volatility n-alkanes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7577–7589,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7577-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7577-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barnard, J. C., Volkamer, R., and Kassianov, E. I.: Estimation of the mass
absorption cross section of the organic carbon component of aerosols in the
Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6665–6679,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B., Fiore, A.
M., Li, Q., Liu, H., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M.: Global modeling of
tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and
evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23096, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bones, D. L., Henricksen, D. K., Mang, S. A., Gonsior, M., Bateman, A. P.,
Nguyen, T. B., Cooper, W. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Appearance of strong
absorbers and fluorophores in limonene-O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> secondary organic aerosol due
to NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-mediated chemical aging over long time scales, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 115, D05203, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012864</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Chang, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor,
M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.
M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY,
USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Camredon, M., Pangui, E.,
Zapf, P., Katrib, Y., Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Temime-Roussel, B., Monod, A.,
Aumont, B., and Doussin, J. F.: Aging of secondary organic aerosol generated
from the ozonolysis of a-pinene: effects of ozone, light and temperature,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 883–897, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-883-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-883-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Henry, K. M., Mentel, T. F., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Spindler,
C., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Dorn, H. P., Fuchs, H., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A.,
Saathoff, H., Naumann, K. H., Möhler, O., Leisner, T., Müller, L.,
Reinnig, M. C., Hoffmann, T., Salo, K., Hallquist, M., Frosch, M., Bilde, M.,
Tritscher, T., Barmet, P., Praplan, A. P., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J.,
Prévôt, A. S., and Baltensperger, U.: Aging of biogenic secondary
organic aerosol via gas-phase OH radical reactions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 21,
13503–13508, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115186109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1115186109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Epstein, S. A., Blair, S. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Direct Photolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene Ozonolysis Secondary Organic Aerosol: Effect on Particle
Mass and Peroxide Content, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11251–11258,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502350u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502350u</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fann, N., Lamson, A. D., Anenberg, S. C., Wesson, K., Risley D., and Hubbell, B. J.: Estimating the national public health burden associated with
exposure to ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and ozone, Risk Anal., 32, 81–95, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N.: Chemistry of the upper and lower
atmosphere: theory, experiments, and applications, Academic Press, San Diego,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A
comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Henry, K. M. and Donahue, N. M.: Photochemical Aging of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene
Secondary Organic Aerosol: Effects of OH Radical Sources and Photolysis, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 116, 5932–5940, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Aumont, B., Knote, C., Lee-Taylor, J., Madronich, S., and
Tyndall, G.: Volatility dependence of Henry's law constants of condensable
organics: Application to estimate depositional loss of secondary organic
aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4795–4804, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL060649</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., Wagner, V., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol for
the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part B):
tropospheric degradation of aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 3, 181–193, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-181-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-181-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., and Spracklen, D. V.: Effects of chemical
aging on global secondary organic aerosol using the volatility basis set
approach, Atmos. Environ., 81, 230–244, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Knote, C., Hodzic, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: The effect of dry and wet
deposition of condensable vapors on secondary organic aerosols concentrations
over the continental US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1–18,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Kwok, E. S. C. and Atkinson, R.: Estimation of hydroxyl radical reaction rate
constants for gas-phase organic compounds using a structure-reactivity
relationship: an update, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1685–1695, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, E. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lignell, H., Epstein, S. A., Marvin, M. R., Shemesh, D., Gerber, B., and
Nizkorodov, S.: Experimental and theoretical study of aqueous cis-pinonic
acid photolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 12930–12945, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Madronich, S.: The atmosphere and UV-B radiation at ground level,
Environmental UV Photobiology, Plenum Press, 1–39, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties: Part 3. Estimation of the vapor pressure of non-electrolyte
organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase
Equilibr., 269, 117–133, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Presto, A. A., Huff Hartz, K. E., and Donahue, N. M.: Secondary Organic
Aerosol Production from Terpene Ozonolysis 1. Effect of UV Radiation,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 7036–7045, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Salo, K., Hallquist, M., Jonsson, Å. M., Saathoff, H., Naumann, K.-H.,
Spindler, C., Tillmann, R., Fuchs, H., Bohn, B., Rubach, F., Mentel, Th. F.,
Müller, L., Reinnig, M., Hoffmann, T., and Donahue, N. M.: Volatility of
secondary organic aerosol during OH radical induced ageing, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 11055–11067, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11055-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11055-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Schilling-Fahnestock, K. A., Yee, L. D., Loza, C. L., Coggon, M. M.,
Schwantes, R., Zhang, X., Dalleska, N. F., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary
Organic Aerosol Composition from C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Alkanes, J. Phys. Chem. A,
119, 4281–4297, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp501779w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp501779w</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and
McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal
in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Jimenez, J. L., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Evans, M.
J., Mann, G. W., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J., Coe, H.,
McFiggans, G., Rap, A., and Forster, P.: Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint
on the global secondary organic aerosol budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12109–12136, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12109-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12109-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Tritscher, T., Dommen, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Gysel, M., Barmet, P. B., Praplan,
A. P., Weingartner, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Riipinen, I., Donahue, N.
M., and Baltensperger, U.: Volatility and hygroscopicity of aging secondary
organic aerosol in a smog chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11477–11496,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11477-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11477-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Updyke, K. M., Nguyen, T. B., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Formation of brown
carbon via reactions of ammonia with secondary organic aerosols from biogenic
and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Environ., 63, 22–31, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S, Zhou, S., and Abbatt, P. D.: Changes in Secondary Organic
Aerosol Composition and Mass due to Photolysis: Relative Humidity Dependence,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4309–4316,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp506898c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp506898c</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Yee, L. D., Craven, J. S., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Ng, N. L.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Ziemann, P. J., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photooxidation of
dodecane: Evolution of multigeneration gas-phase chemistry and aerosol
composition, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6211–6230, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp211531h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp211531h</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Hartz, K. E. H., Pandis, S. N., and Dohanue, N. M.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from limonene ozonolysis: Homogeneous and
heterogeneous influences as a function of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110,
11053–11063, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, M. and Jang, M.: Dynamic light absorption of biomass-burning organic
carbon photochemically aged under natural sunlight, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1517–1525, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemann, P. J. and Atkinson, R.: Kinetics, Products, and Mechanism of
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6582–6605, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
