<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-9143-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Transport of Antarctic stratospheric strongly dehydrated air into the troposphere observed during the HALO-ESMVal campaign 2012</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Transport of Antarctic dehydrated air into the troposphere}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Rolf et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rolf</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          <email>c.rolf@fz-juelich.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-0054</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Afchine</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-8295</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bozem</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-9864</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Buchholz</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ebert</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1394-3097</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Guggenmoser</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hoor</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-6864</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Konopka</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kretschmer</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8923-5516</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Schlager</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Spelten</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Sumińska-Ebersoldt</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ungermann</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9095-8332</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zahn</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Krämer</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-1722</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Forschungszentrum Jülich, IEK-7, 52457 Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), IMK-ASF, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, IPA, 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>a</label><institution>now at: European Space Agency, Noordwijk, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">C. Rolf (c.rolf@fz-juelich.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>9143</fpage><lpage>9158</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Dehydration in the Antarctic winter stratosphere is a well-known phenomenon
that is annually observed by satellites and occasionally observed by
balloon-borne measurements. However, in situ measurements of dehydrated air
masses in the Antarctic vortex are very rare. Here, we present detailed
observations with the in situ and GLORIA remote sensing instrument payload
aboard the German aircraft HALO. Strongly dehydrated air masses down to
1.6 ppmv of water vapor were observed as far north as 47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in
an altitude between 12 and 13 km in the lowermost stratosphere. The
dehydration can be traced back to individual ice formation events above the
Antarctic Peninsula and Plateau, where ice crystals sedimented out and water
vapor was irreversibly removed. Within these dehydrated stratospheric air
masses, filaments of moister air reaching down to the tropopause are detected
with the high-resolution limb sounder, GLORIA. Furthermore, dehydrated air
masses are observed with GLORIA in the Antarctic lowermost stratosphere down
to 7 km. With the help of a backward trajectory analysis, a midlatitude
origin of the moist filaments in the vortex can be identified, while the dry
air masses down to 7 km have stratospheric origins. Antarctic
stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) and transport of dehydrated air
masses into the troposphere are investigated. Further, it is shown that the
exchange process can be attributed to several successive Rossby wave events
in combination with an isentropic exchange of air masses across the thermal
tropopause. The transport into the troposphere is caused by air masses that
are detached from the potential vorticity (PV) structure by Rossby wave breaking events and
subsequently transported diabatically across the dynamical tropopause. Once
transported to the troposphere, air masses with stratospheric origin can
reach near-surface levels within several days.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Antarctic stratospheric dehydration occurs regularly every winter and
spring in the very isolated and very cold southern hemispheric polar vortex
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The reason is that the temperatures in the Antarctic
stratosphere are regularly sufficiently low for ice particles to form. These ice
particles will sediment at a rate of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on their size and will thus transport
water to lower altitudes. If dehydration extends down to the
tropopause, water is removed from the stratosphere and changes the
stratospheric water vapor budget of the lower Antarctic vortex drastically. After
the break-up of the Antarctic vortex, redistribution and exchange
between vortex air and air masses outside the vortex lead to a return
to typical stratospheric background water vapor mixing ratios of about
4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.2"/>. Rehydration with
redistribution of water from the solid phase into the gas phase occurs at
lower altitudes where ice crystals sublimate caused by subsaturation of water vapor
at higher temperatures.  In the Arctic region, stratospheric dehydration
is also possible but much less frequent than in the Southern Hemisphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>Dehydration of Antarctic vortex air masses is observed frequently by satellite
measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, satellite measurements in the lower
stratosphere and upper troposphere (UT/LS) do not offer the necessary
horizontal and vertical resolution to be suitable for process studies
in the tropopause region. Balloon-borne measurements launched from the
Antarctic continent also observed dehydration and the corresponding
rehydration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Beside these balloon
soundings, only three aircraft campaigns have been conducted where
Antarctic stratospheric air masses were probed in situ: two US
campaigns with the ER-2 aircraft (AAOE in 1987; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.6"/>,
and ASHOE in 1994; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.7"/>) and one European campaign with
the Geophysica aircraft (APE-GAIA in 1999;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="altparen.8"/>). Airborne in situ measurements in the Antarctic
vortex are very rare, since the flight range of research aircraft is
limited. This paper focuses on one measurement flight directly into
the Antarctic vortex that was performed as part of the ESMVal (Earth
System Model Validation; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="altparen.9"/>) campaign in
September 2012 with the German research aircraft HALO (High Altitude and
LOng Range; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="altparen.10"/>). The ESMVal campaign was
embedded in the TACTS (Transport And Composition in the Upper
Troposphere/Lowermost Stratosphere; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.11"/>) campaign,
which took place just before and after the ESMVal flights in August
and the end of September 2012. A mutual scientific objective of both
campaigns was to investigate the transition region between the
troposphere and stratosphere. HALO was
equipped with in situ instruments as well as the high-resolution limb
sounder GLORIA (Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the
Atmosphere). This combination of high-precision in situ measurements
together with sophisticated remote sensing observations in the UT/LS
is an outstanding attribute of both campaigns. Another objective of
the ESMVal flights was to obtain a full meridional cross section of
atmospheric measurements for global chemistry model evaluation.
The Antarctica flight was performed in an effort to penetrate as far south
as possible and reach the stratospheric vortex. During this flight,
dehydrated air masses were measured in situ far north up to
45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S between 12 and 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, Aura-MLS and
POAM 3 satellite measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.12"/> do not show dehydrated air masses as far north (not
beyond 57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) and as low in the stratosphere and upper
troposphere as was observed during this ESMVal flight. This is mostly caused
by the poor spatial resolution of satellites in the UT/LS region.</p>
      <p>In general, the process of dehydration is well understood. Relatively
little is known about the fate of the dehydrated air masses at the bottom
of the stable vortex. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.13"/> found out that dehydrated air masses descend downwards
through the bottom of the vortex down to the thermal tropopause.
Normally, the air within the Antarctic polar vortex is highly isolated with a weak
exchange of trace gases across the vortex edge driven by stratospheric
planetary Rossby waves propagating from the troposphere and Rossby
wave breaking (RWB) events. However, the RWB events mainly disturb the bottom
of the polar vortex, where the vortex edge barely exists as an isolating mechanism.
Mixing and transport of dehydrated air masses from the Antarctic
lower stratosphere towards midlatitudes is also indicated by a previous aircraft mission with the ER-2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.14"/>.
Thus, the Antarctic lowermost stratosphere consists of dehydrated air masses
frequently mixed with moist midlatitude air <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.15"/>.
The vortex edge in the Southern Hemisphere is typically less strongly
disturbed than in the Arctic due to less wave activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.16"/>.
For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.17"/> presented a case study where dehydration
was observed in the Northern Hemisphere midlatitude in connection with a
polar filament.</p>
      <p>Nevertheless, Antarctic stratospheric air masses can also be exchanged with tropospheric
air masses (stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE)) and can be transported
deep into the troposphere creating a dry tongue reaching down to the Earth's surface.
This air is rich in ozone and reactive nitrogen due to the stratospheric
origin and can influence the chemical composition of the Antarctic
troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.18"/>.
The thermal tropopause, for instance, is characterized by a low temperature lapse
rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and coincides with a change in the static stability.
Thus, the thermal tropopause separates the unstable troposphere from the stable stratosphere.
However, the thermal tropopause in the Antarctic region is formed under unique
climate conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.19"/>. The upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere are generally very cold with a very weak vertical
temperature gradient during winter and spring. Therefore, the thermal
tropopause in the Antarctic region is rather poorly defined
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.20"/>. As a consequence, transport across the thermal tropopause
can be either along isentropes crossing the thermal tropopause or diabatic with
reduction in potential temperature. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.21"/> showed that the definition of
the thermal tropopause in the Antarctic winter is not very meaningful
in contrast to the potential vorticity (PV)-based tropopause definition.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.22"/> identify two general processes that transport stratospheric air masses
down to near-surface levels. The first process might involve katabatic
winds at the surface over the Antarctic Plateau caused by the high topography that
create a general downwelling above the Antarctic continent as suggested
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.23"/>. The second process is driven by midlatitude
cyclones on the poleward side of the jet stream that support RWB
events and a corresponding stratospheric intrusion as reported by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.24"/>. Downward transport could be either very fast
along tilted isentropes on timescales of 1–5 days <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.25"/> or slower
by radiative cooling and reduction in potential temperature.
In the latter case, air masses can potentially descend from the thermal tropopause to near-surface heights
within 10 days (descent rate of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or longer as reported by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.26"/>. Rossby wave-induced stratospheric intrusions,
such as tropopause folds, occur more often further north and in the
midlatitudes than directly above the Antarctic continent
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.27"/>. However, the frequency, the seasonality, and the
process behind tropopause folds and stratospheric intrusions in the
Antarctic region are still under debate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.28"/>.</p>
      <p>The following research questions will be answered, based on the observations
of the ESMVal flight (13 September 2012): (1) can we confirm dehydration
in the lowermost stratosphere and at the bottom of the Antarctic vortex?
(2) How deep do dehydrated air masses from the vortex descend into the
troposphere? (3) Where and how have Antarctic dehydrated stratospheric air
masses been transported?</p>
      <p>To answer the questions above, the  study presented here is structured as follows: in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, a brief overview of the different
instruments and data used is given. The in situ and remote sensing
measurements across the Antarctic polar vortex are described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>. Furthermore, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>
includes an extensive trajectory case study. First,
dehydration in the in the Antarctic lowermost stratosphere
is analyzed. Second, the transport of dehydrated air masses and
the question how deep below the thermal tropopause dehydrated air masses
can be found is investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Instrumentation and meteorological data</title>
      <p>The German research aircraft HALO, deployed during TACTS and ESMVal, has
a long flight endurance of up to 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This allows air masses in the
Antarctic vortex to be sampled from Cape Town without intermediate landing in
Antarctica. Altogether, a set of nine in situ instruments for measuring
trace gases and one remote sensing instrument were installed aboard
HALO. For the study presented here, we use the water vapor data of
FISH and HAI as well as measurements from TRIHOP for methane and FAIRO
for ozone. The remote sensing instrument GLORIA provides
cross sections of trace gases that are approximately parallel to the flight
track of the aircraft. GLORIA's high vertical resolution makes it
particularly suited for the investigation of small-scale structures.
In addition to the aircraft measurements, satellite observations from
CALIPSO and meteorological reanalysis data from ECMWF are used for further
interpretation of the observed situation. The instruments and
meteorological data are described in the following subsections.
The thermal tropopause definition in this study is based on the WMO definition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.29"/> using the lowest height at which the temperature lapse rate decreases to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and remains below this value for a range of at least 2 km.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{FISH  --  total water measurements (in~situ H${}_{2}$O)}?><title>FISH  –  total water measurements (in situ H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)</title>
      <p>The airborne Lyman-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> photofragment fluorescence hygrometer FISH
(Fast In-situ Stratospheric Hygrometer) is a well-established
closed-path instrument for measuring water vapor in the range of 1 to
1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.30"/>. FISH is specially designed for
measuring the low water vapor mixing ratios prevailing in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere. It is regularly calibrated on the
ground to a reference frost point hygrometer (MBW DP30) and had an
accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the TACTS and ESMVal
campaigns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.31"/>). The air supply for the measuring
cell is provided by a forward-facing inlet, which also samples ice
crystals if present (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>cond</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Together, the
evaporated crystals and the gas-phase water
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>gas</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) sum up to a total water measurement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{HAI  --  total water measurements (in~situ H${}_{2}$O)}?><title>HAI  –  total water measurements (in situ H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)</title>
      <p>The Hygrometer for Atmospheric Investigation (HAI)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.32"/> is a fast, airborne, in situ hygrometer capable
of multi-phase water detection that employs direct tunable-diode laser
absorption spectroscopy (dTDLAS) in combination with a special data
retrieval method which allows absolute water vapor measurements
without any sensor calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.33"/>. This data
retrieval was recently successfully validated via a direct side-by-side comparison with the German metrological water vapor scale
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.34"/>. HAI is a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, multi-channel TDLAS
spectrometer which realizes, in a unique concept, a simultaneous gas-phase and total water measurement via parallel water detection in an
open-path cell, outside the aircraft fuselage, and in extractive
(i.e., gas sampling) closed-path cells inside the aircraft. To enlarge
the dynamic range to 1–40 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, both cell types are
simultaneously probed by two laser wavelengths, at 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
for the lower to mid-troposphere and at 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m for the
upper troposphere and the stratosphere. The ranges of the
1.4 and 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m spectrometer channels overlap
and therefore provide a redundant, independent detection between 10
and about 5000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The metrologically calculated
spectrometer uncertainties are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. In this study, data from the two closed-path
spectrometers are used, i.e., total water measurements similar to FISH.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{TRIHOP  --  methane measurement (in~situ CH${}_{4}$)}?><title>TRIHOP  –  methane measurement (in situ CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p>The TRIHOP instrument is a three-channel quantum cascade laser
infrared absorption spectrometer capable of the subsequent measurement
of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During TACTS/ESMVal
the instrument was calibrated in situ against secondary standards of
compressed ambient air which are traceable against NOAA
standards. Integration time for each species was 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
a duty cycle of 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which finally limits the temporal
resolution of the measurements. For the ESMVal flight on 13 September 2012,
TRIHOP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data achieved a precision (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and accuracy of 13.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
without any corrections applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{FAIRO  --  ozone measurement (in~situ O${}_{3}$)}?><title>FAIRO  –  ozone measurement (in situ O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p>FAIRO is a new accurate ozone instrument developed for use onboard
the HALO aircraft. It combines two techniques, the UV photometry
(light absorption of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–260 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with high accuracy and chemiluminescence detection with high
measurement frequency. A UV-LED is used as a light source for the UV
photometer, which can be controlled well (in contrast to Hg lamps) for
constant light emission. The 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> precision is 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
a measurement frequency of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a cuvette pressure of
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bar</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the total uncertainty is 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
chemiluminescence detector shows a measurement frequency of
12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a high precision of 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (at
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> absolute, a measurement frequency of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
a pressure of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bar</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>GLORIA (aircraft remote sensing)</title>
      <p>The Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere
(GLORIA) combines a two-dimensional focal plane detector array with
a Fourier transform spectrometer to capture about 6000 infrared limb
spectra simultaneously. This enables remote sensing observations with
high vertical and horizontal resolution to resolve small-scale
structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.36"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. The spectral sampling can be
switched between 0.625 and 0.0625 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the cost of an
increased acquisition time in the case of higher spectral resolution
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.37"/>. The gimbal mount and inertial altitude
control system allows GLORIA to maintain a steady pointing on a moving
aircraft; it can also be used to point the instrument at a range of
azimuth angles with respect to the aircraft, covering about
70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This allows for tomographic measurement patterns and
3-D reconstruction of fine-scale filamentary structures
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.38"/>. The vertical location of
retrieved quantities approximately follows the tangent points of the
measurement geometry (parabola curve through the atmosphere). Thus,
while the location of quantities retrieved at flight level lies in the
vicinity of the aircraft, the locations of quantities at lower
altitudes are horizontally several tens to hundreds of kilometers away
from the flight path. Assuming a flight altitude of 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the water vapor observation at 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is horizontally 113 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
away from the aircraft, while at 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> it is already 250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Concerning the water vapor product used in this
paper, GLORIA achieved a vertical and horizontal resolution of about
500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The water
vapor precision and total error (accuracy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> precision) amounts to
about 0.2 and 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the stratosphere.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.39"/> showed that GLORIA water vapor at flight level agrees fairly well with
the in situ FISH measurements, within error bars. The deviations to
FISH during the ESMVal/TACTS flights are mostly less than
0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Dynamical situation with color-coded PV from ECMWF data on
13 September 2012 at 12:00 UTC on two different potential temperature
levels: <bold>(a)</bold> 350 K and <bold>(b)</bold> 310 K. The black arrows depict the
wind vectors. The blue line represents the vortex edge at 350 K
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.40"/> and the green line the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 PVU isoline at the 310 K
level. The region of the ESMVal flight is marked by a white box.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>CALIPSO (satellite remote sensing)</title>
      <p>The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation
(CALIPSO) satellite is one of five satellites in the NASA A-train
constellation. CALIPSO completes 14.55 orbits per day with an
inclination of 98.2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus delivers good coverage above the
polar regions. In addition to one wide-field camera and an imaging infrared
radiometer, the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization
(CALIOP) is aboard CALIPSO. The lidar operates with two wavelengths
(532 and 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with additional polarization sensitivity,
providing high-resolution vertical backscatter profiles of aerosols
and clouds. In this study we use the CALIPSO Lidar Level 2 Polar
Stratospheric Cloud (PSC) data product, which is described in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="text.41"/>. This data product provides
a PSC composition scheme on a daily basis for all nighttime orbits
with a resolution of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontally by 180 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
vertically.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>ECMWF (meteorological data)</title>
      <p>Global meteorological reanalysis ERA-Interim data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.42"/> of
the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) are
used to interpret the observations. The
meteorological fields have a resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
with 60 vertical levels from the surface (1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) up to
0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Every 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a full global data set is
available. The trajectories used in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> are based
on the horizontal wind fields and diabatic heating rates; additional
parameters such as temperature and pressure are added to the
trajectories from the ERA-Interim data (for details see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>ESMVal flight on 13 September 2012</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Meteorological situation/flight pattern</title>
      <p>The general dynamical situation of the Antarctic vortex is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a. High PV values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denote
the Antarctic vortex at the 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> isentrope, which corresponds approximately
to the flight level. The vortex edge is marked with a blue line according to the
definition of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.43"/>. The vortex itself is shifted about
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> towards Africa, indicating a wave-one pattern caused by Rossby wave activity.
This results in high PV values up to 47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, where the aircraft in situ measurements
confirm the presence of Antarctic vortex air as will be shown later (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). In the lowermost
stratosphere below the vortex, represented by the 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
isentrope (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b), the PV structure with high PV values around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is more jagged but mostly connected. Here, a strong Rossby wave activity
is visible and also RWB events associated with isolated PV structures are discernible.
A blob with high PV at 60 to 47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 10
to 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E indicates an ongoing RWB event. These air masses were probed during the
ESMVal flight on 13 September 2012. The flight was performed from Cape Town
(South Africa) heading towards Antarctica until 65<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at an
altitude of 12–13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). After a dive from
12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> down to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to sample the transition from the
polar stratosphere to the troposphere, the return flight took place at
12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and rose up to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shortly before descending
back to Cape Town. A hexagonal flight pattern was included in the
flight path back to Cape Town to enable the tomographic study of trace
gases with GLORIA. The ECMWF wind field (black lines), as well as the
strongly increasing potential vorticity (PV; see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), shows that the vortex edge (yellow
dots, determined with the Nash criterion) was far north, up to 47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S down to the 340 K level.
The color code in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a represents the
in situ-measured water vapor mixing ratios from FISH along the flight
path. Directly south of the vortex edge the water vapor mixing ratios
decrease rapidly to below 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (purple dots along the
flight path).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Flight pattern of the ESMVal flight on 13 September 2012. The black
contours illustrate the horizontal westerly wind from ECMWF data. Yellow dots
represent the vortex edge derived from the Nash criterion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.44"/>
based on ECMWF data. <bold>(a)</bold> Horizontal map of water vapor mixing ratios
measured by FISH (5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged data) is color-coded on the flight
path (gray indicates data gaps due to the dive).
<bold>(b)</bold> Meridional cross section of PV along the flight path (orange
line) calculated from ECMWF data. Cyan dots represent the ECMWF thermal
tropopause.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The latitudinal cross section of PV from ECMWF along the flight path is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b. The thermal tropopause
(cyan dots) stays almost constant at around 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
rises up to 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> further poleward. The
PV and also the equivalent latitude (not shown) reveal high values within the vortex and thus clearly mark
the vortex air masses. However, high PV values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
show up far below the thermal tropopause down to
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude in the latitude range from
60 to 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.
The difference compared to a tropopause fold at the midlatitude jet is
that the air masses directly originate from the Antarctic vortex and were strongly dehydrated.
Thus, the air masses have a different chemical composition than the
“normal” air masses in the midlatitude lowermost stratosphere. This indicates that these air masses originate
from higher altitudes and were transported
through the thermal tropopause and form a stratospheric intrusion with a low PV-based tropopause.
Interestingly, the isentropes between 310 and 320 K intersect the thermal tropopause on the poleward side of the jet
core. Therefore, air masses can be potentially transported along these
tilted isentropes to the low altitudes across the thermal tropopause into the low PV structure.
The flight path
crosses the air masses with high PV in the
stratosphere before and after the dive. The dive down to
3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude was performed on the poleward side of the air masses with high
PV below the thermal tropopause.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Observations</title>
      <p>The time series of the in situ measurements are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, where the measurements of the water vapor
instruments are visible in the upper panel and the measurements of the
tracers for defining stratospheric/vortex air masses are shown in the lower
panel. After the ascent of HALO near Cape Town, the water vapor mixing ratio
decreases to the typical stratospheric value of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 06:30
until 08:15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UTC</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. During this time, ozone and PV (i.e., the
stratospheric tracers with low values in the troposphere) show an increase
compared to the values before 06:30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UTC</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while methane (tropospheric
tracer with low values in the stratosphere) shows a slight decrease from 1790
to 1740 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both indicate that the aircraft entered the
stratosphere. Thereafter, methane and water vapor further decrease to
1650 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, on the same flight level
starting at 08:15 UTC, and simultaneously ozone and PV further increase.
This is the time when HALO penetrated the Antarctic vortex (marked in blue in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). After ascending to a higher flight level
(08:35 UTC), water vapor decreases to slightly above 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
stays there until the southernmost point was reached and the dive started
at 11:00 UTC. This low water vapor in the time between 08:15 and 11:00 UTC
coincides well with high PV values (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b). Subsequently, the strong
increase in methane and decrease in ozone and PV indicate the penetration of
the aircraft into the Antarctic troposphere at 11:00 UTC. After returning to
the previous flight level (11:45 UTC), the vortex signatures with low values
of water vapor and methane as well as high values of ozone and PV show up
again. However, at this point (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:30 UTC) the water vapor mixing
ratio reaches the lowest value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> together with
a strong maximum in ozone and PV. The low water vapor below 4 and even below
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates strongly dehydrated air masses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of ESMVal Antarctica flight on 13 September 2012: the
upper panel shows FISH (blue), HAI (green) and GLORIA (red) water vapor
measurements, water vapor saturation mixing ratio with respect to ice (cyan,
derived from HALO temperature), pressure (black), and altitude (gray) at
flight level. The lower panel shows the tracer observation ozone (red),
methane (blue) and interpolated ECMWF PV values (orange). Time ranges within
the vortex are marked with light-blue shadows according to the tracer
measurements. Time ranges leg one and leg two are marked for hygrometer
intercomparison of FISH and HAI (see text).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The saturation mixing ratio with respect to ice within the vortex is
3 to 4 times larger than the measured water vapor mixing
ratio. Thus, the sampled air masses were clearly subsaturated with
relative humidities of 25–33 % and it is unlikely that
ice particles remained in the probed air masses. In addition, HAI and
FISH show no peaks in the total water vapor time series (based on
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data), which would indicate the presence of ice particles
on the flight level. In particular, the water vapor mixing ratios around
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during the stratospheric flight legs (06:30 to 11:00
and 11:45 to 15:45 UTC) are very smooth and show no
significant variations. Thus, both water vapor instruments, FISH and
HAI, measured only gas-phase water vapor, and no cloud particles were
present in the vortex air. Both FISH and HAI observed these low water
vapor mixing ratios independently.</p>
      <p>In order to show the fairly good agreement of both FISH and HAI based on 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data at the observed
low water vapor values, we choose two flight legs for the comparison
(leg one: 09:45–10:45 UTC; leg two:
13:00–14:00 UTC). During flight leg one, both hygrometers
have an absolute difference of 0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mean relative
difference of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.5 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). During flight leg two, a difference of 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and a mean relative difference of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is found. These rather small
differences are consistent with the uncertainties of both hygrometers,
which are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
level for FISH and HAI, respectively. The HAI data measured before
09:10 UTC (marked with gray in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) are influenced by an untypical
memory effect of the measurement cell during ascent, caused by a valve
which was opened too late, but only when flying in the upper
troposphere. As a result, the “wet” measurement cells were not
sufficiently dried off with the high mass flows during take-off and
ascent. This also explains the asymmetry in the deviations to FISH
before and after the dive. In addition, the agreement of GLORIA water
vapor observations at flight level with the two in situ instruments,
FISH and HAI, is remarkably good, considering that GLORIA is a remote
sensing instrument.</p>
      <p>The GLORIA instrument measures quasi-vertical profiles along the
flight path by viewing the atmosphere on the right side of HALO. Here,
we focus on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval product, which is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. We consider only the times from
08:00 to 14:00 UTC to focus on a time period when GLORIA observed
vortex air (the whole data set is from 06:30 to
15:30 UTC). The dive is noticeable as the white area between
11:00 and 12:00 UTC, where GLORIA did not measure in order to
prevent condensation of tropospheric water vapor on the cold
instrument. The dry vortex air masses are clearly visible between
08:00 and 13:00 UTC at flight level (black solid line in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) but also below, down to altitudes
of 7 km. As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>, the
quantities retrieved from GLORIA are approximately placed on
a parabola following the tangent points through the atmosphere
(e.g., 250 km horizontal distance to flight path at
9 km altitude). The dry region just before the dive was
measured by GLORIA west of the flight path on the
way towards Antarctica, while the air masses after the dive are
measured east of the flight path on the way back to Cape Town. Thus,
the dehydrated air masses below the thermal tropopause cover
a large region, with a dimension of at least 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
horizontally at 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude.</p>
      <p>The thermal tropopause is also derived from the GLORIA-retrieved
temperature profiles and is marked with black dots. Interestingly, low
water vapor mixing ratios around and below 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed
beneath the thermal tropopause. Especially in the time range from
09:00 to 10:30 UTC and from 12:00 to 13:30 UTC, very
dry air masses with water vapor mixing ratios of 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be found far below the thermal tropopause, down to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
indicates that dehydrated stratospheric air masses could have been
transported through the thermal tropopause. The
dynamic tropopause, which is between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 PVU isoline, is
somewhat lower than the thermal tropopause at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the time range from 12:00 to 13:30 UTC and indicates
a proceeding stratospheric intrusion. In
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>, we analyze this transport
process with the help of air mass backward trajectories. In addition,
no water vapor values less than 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are found below the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 PVU isoline in ECMWF data (not shown here). This shows, at least
for this situation, that the transport process of dry stratospheric
air masses to these low altitudes we observed here is not captured by the ECMWF
meteorological analysis (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>).</p>
      <p>Embedded in the dry vortex air masses, small filaments (marked in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> with red boxes) of enhanced water
vapor are visible. These filaments may indicate rehydration layers,
where sedimented ice particles from upper layers have sublimated and
resulted in layers of enhanced water vapor as described in, for
example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.45"/> for the Arctic. However, trajectory
reverse domain filling (RDF)
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>) showed that these air
masses could not be attributed to rehydration. Also, the in situ
measurements of FISH/HAI showed no evidence of a rehydration layer
during the dive from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and back. We have
analyzed these somewhat moister air masses in more detail, as
discussed in the next section.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>GLORIA time series of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval product
(13 September 2012). The solid black line and the black dots represent the
flight path and thermal tropopause derived from the GLORIA temperature
measurements, respectively. The dashed gray lines and the solid lines mark
isolines of potential temperature (290–370 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and PV (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 PVU), respectively. The red boxes marks
filaments (1–7) with slightly enhanced water vapor mixing ratios in or below
the vortex.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Trajectory-based case study of 13 September 2012</title>
      <p>Detailed investigation of the observed Antarctic dehydration is
performed using air mass trajectories calculated with the tool
CLaMS-traj, which is part of the Chemical Lagrangian Model for the
Stratosphere (CLaMS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.46"/>. The
trajectories are driven by the ERA-Interim reanalysis horizontal winds
and diabatic heating rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.47"/>.
To resolve transport processes in the troposphere influenced
by the orography and transport processes in the stratosphere where
adiabatic horizontal transport dominates, the hybrid <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.48"/>.
Therefore, in the stratosphere and in the UT/LS, potential temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is employed as the vertical coordinate of the model and the
cross-isentropic velocity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is deduced from the
ERA-Interim forecast total diabatic heating rates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, including the
effects of all-sky radiative heating, latent
heat release and diffusive heating as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.49"/>.
In the tropospheric region defined by the condition <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the vertical model coordinate smoothly transforms into an
orography-following <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – pressure; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
– surface pressure), with the vertical velocity transforming into the
corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.50"/>.
Besides temperature, pressure, and humidity along the trajectories, the
potential vorticity (PV) and thermal tropopause height (WMO, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lapse rate
criterion) are derived from the ECMWF meteorological fields. The
temperatures from ECMWF along the flight path agree very well with the
measured temperatures from the HALO aircraft (not shown here). The
mean deviation on each flight level is mostly around 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the temperatures in ECMWF are slightly lower than the measured
temperatures.</p>
      <p>In the following we will use the trajectory analysis to investigate the
timescale and location of potential dehydration events. In a second step
we will analyze the trajectory data for possible exchange into the Antarctic troposphere.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>History of dehydrated air masses along flight path</title>
      <p>In this section, we investigate the history of the  in situ-measured
dehydrated air masses. For that purpose, the trajectories are
calculated every 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the flight path, each reaching
50 days backwards in time. For further analysis, we selected
all trajectories between 12:20 and 12:29 UTC (in total 54), when
the lowest water vapor mixing ratios were measured. However, the other
trajectories with measured low water vapor mixing ratios between 2 and
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> show a very similar
history. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the
median saturation mixing ratio with respect to ice (orange line) and
the frequency distribution (grayscale color code) of every
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trajectory time step of all trajectories calculated by
ClaMS along the 50 days back in time. The trajectories show
the same history in saturation mixing ratio from 13 September until
14 August, when the trajectories start to diverge. This indicates
that the trajectories have the same path with the same temperature
history for at least 30 days. After this time, the
trajectories split up into two branches, indicating a bifurcation
point and associated mixing on 14 August. The trajectories within the
branch with lower saturation mixing ratios of 2 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
below the median line stay together on the same path until the
beginning of August. The trajectories before 1 August have
different saturation mixing ratios indicating the dispersion of air
masses, which limits the interpretation of the trajectory
calculations.</p>
      <p>To show the presence of ice particles and subsequent dehydration,
CALIPSO data (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>) are used. A distance
criterion is used to match the air mass trajectories with the CALIPSO
data. Every trajectory at a specific time which coincides with the
CALIPSO orbit inside a square of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
longitude is checked for the presence of ice in an
altitude range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. If more than 50 % of
all trajectories at one time coincide with a CALIPSO ice observation,
the corresponding time periods are marked with a blue bar (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> illustrates the
coincidence of low saturation mixing ratios along the trajectories
with observed ice formation (CALIPSO) in the considered air
masses. The trajectories pass several cold regions associated with low
saturation mixing ratio where ice formation is initiated. If the ice
cloud and supersaturation exist long enough (typically around
0.5–1 days; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.51"/>) to allow the ice particles to grow to
sizes of several micrometers (diameter of 10 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m),
sedimentation of these ice particles begins and causes irreversible
dehydration. The sedimented ice particles with these sizes fall with
velocities of around 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="altparen.52"/>)
until warmer temperatures in lower regions causes them to
evaporate. With each pass of a cold region, more and more water vapor
is removed from the air mass. As stated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.53"/>, air
masses must undergo several periods with dehydration before reaching
the 1 to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio level, which is typically
observed by satellites within the vortex in the Antarctic spring. This
periodic behavior is confirmed by
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, where trajectories
undergo four events with low saturation mixing ratios and simultaneous
ice cloud observations by CALIPSO. The first and the second period (1
and 9 August) reveal rather high saturation mixing ratios of around
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In every later period, colder temperatures and lower
saturation mixing ratios are necessary to initiate additional ice
formation and dehydration. This is the case during the third and the fourth period on 16
and 29 August, when CALIPSO observed ice show lower saturation mixing
ratios of 1.5 and 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The last two events
will have dried out the air masses to the final state of about
1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is observed by the FISH and HAI
instruments. After this strong dehydration, the temperatures became
warmer in the late Antarctic spring and summer and no additional
dehydration took place according to the simulations.</p>
      <p>The recurring low saturation mixing ratios and corresponding low
temperatures are primarily caused by gravity waves, which are induced
by the high topography of the Antarctic continent
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.54"/>. In particular, the first three ice formation events
occurred just as the trajectories passed the Antarctic Peninsula
(northernmost part), which is a strong source of gravity waves
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Only the last freezing event
with the lowest supersaturation occurs above the Antarctic Plateau
(central part) in the northeast of the continent.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Calculated frequency distribution (number, gray shadow) and median
(orange line) of ice saturation mixing ratio along trajectories 50 days back
in time starting at the flight path on 13 September 2012 (12:20 to
12:29 UTC, 54 trajectories in total). If more than 50 % of trajectories
have a corresponding CALIPSO observations of ice or no ice, the time is
marked with blue or white, respectively. Otherwise, it is marked in black,
indicating no CALIPSO match.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>After freezing, the ice particles can even reach the troposphere due
to sedimentation, especially if dehydration takes place at low
altitudes (11.5–12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as revealed by the trajectories.
The lack of rehydration signatures in the
GLORIA measurements (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) also
indicates the permanent removal of water vapor from the stratosphere,
as will be further discussed in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>. The air masses from which
the ice particles originate and the air masses where they potentially
sublimate in the troposphere behave very differently in dynamical
perspective (not shown). Due to the length of
time since the last dehydration on 28 August (16 days before
measurement) it is very unlikely that rehydrated air masses would
still be found below the observed dehydrated air masses in the
troposphere. In addition, the in situ measurements taken during the
dive confirm the absence of any observed rehydration features.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>History of air masses observed by GLORIA</title>
      <p>The trajectories for analyzing the transport of dehydrated air masses
observed by GLORIA are calculated 70 days backward in time
from each tangent point (in total 30 000 single trajectories). In
addition, the trajectories are also calculated 14 days forward
to show where the air masses are further transported. With this set of
trajectories, the GLORIA measurements can be interpreted and the
associated transport pathways can be investigated.</p>
      <p>In the first subsection hereafter, the dehydrated air masses observed with the
in situ instruments and GLORIA in the lowermost
stratosphere are analyzed and the origin of moist filaments is investigated.
The second subsection contains the trajectory analysis of dry
air masses found to be below the thermal tropopause and investigates
the further transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The time each GLORIA tangent point trajectory has spent in the
vortex before the measurement. The green boxes mark two of the filaments (6,
7) observed by GLORIA (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). The flight
path, tropopause height, potential temperature, and PV isolines are the same
as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Vortex air masses</title>
      <p>From the in situ ozone and methane measurements, it is visible that
the HALO aircraft has penetrated the Antarctic vortex (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). The identification of vortex air masses
in the GLORIA trace gas cross sections is performed using the tangent
point trajectories. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the
amount of time that the trajectory for each GLORIA tangent point
stayed within the vortex before the measurement took place. To
calculate this so-called vortex indicator, the vortex border needs to
be determined at each trajectory time step with the Nash criterion
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.56"/>. Then, the time that each individual trajectory
remains within the vortex border is counted backwards from the time of
measurement. This procedure is limited to the preceding
50 days. The blue coloring in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>
shows the trajectories that stay in the vortex for at least the last
50 days. In contrast, air masses that were never in the vortex
are indicated by a deep red color. This includes not only tropospheric air but
also stratospheric air masses north of 48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. Interestingly,
strong gradients between former vortex air (blue) and extra-vortex air
(red) are evident between 09:00 and 11:00 UTC and also between 11:45 and
12:20 UTC, which exactly follows the measured thermal
tropopause (black dots). Here, the lower vortex boundary defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.57"/>
along the trajectories coincide well with the WMO thermal tropopause.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>RDF (reverse domain filling) of each GLORIA tangent point trajectory
with ECMWF water vapor of 5 days prior to the measurement time. Red boxes
show the location of the observed filaments. The flight path, tropopause
height, potential temperature, and PV isolines are the same as in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The color code denotes the time since trajectories passed the
thermal tropopause from stratosphere to troposphere. Bluish colors denote
trajectories which recently passed the thermal tropopause, reddish colors
indicate tropopause crossings longer ago. The green-framed areas mark the
trajectories where GLORIA observations show water vapor below 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The flight path, tropopause height, potential temperature, and PV isolines
are the same as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In contrast, the air masses that spent between 5 and 40 days
in the vortex (marked by light-blue and reddish colors) indicate
mixing of midlatitude air into the vortex. Even at the vortex edge and in
the core of the vortex itself, small filaments are apparent. As
indicated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, some filaments with
elevated amounts of water vapor were also observed with GLORIA. Two of
these filaments observed around 13:00 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UTC</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 10 and
12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude can be found with this Nash PV criterion
showing vortex residence times of 5 days (filament 6) and
35 days (filament 7). This shows that these
filaments are likely freshly mixed in from outside the vortex and thus
could potentially contain higher water vapor content compared to the
dehydrated vortex air and therefore weaken the hypothesis of
rehydration signatures.</p>
      <p>To show that all observed filaments (red boxes in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) are caused by mixing, RDF is applied to all trajectories, as already stated
in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre">similar as in</named-content></xref>. For the RDF calculation, only advection and no
mixing along the trajectories is assumed. In each time step of the RDF
method, the ECMWF water vapor field is interpolated onto the locations
of the trajectories and then projected onto the observed time–altitude
grid of the GLORIA observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Air parcel properties based on trajectory analyses for all
green-framed trajectories from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> for the period
of 2 weeks before to 2 weeks after the measurement. On 3 September the median
of all 1400 trajectories is represented by the blue line with the respective
standard deviation as gray shadow. At RWB event 1 a subset of
250 trajectories (green line, median) is separated from the rest (from that
moment on the blue line represents 1150 trajectories). At RWB event 2 a
subset of 200 trajectories (red line, median) is separated from the rest
(from that moment on the blue line represents 950 trajectories):
<bold>(a)</bold> median of potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> median
altitude above mean sea level, <bold>(c)</bold> median latitude, and
<bold>(d)</bold> median equivalent latitude. The gray, green and red shaded areas
marks the respective SD of the trajectories.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9143/2015/acp-15-9143-2015-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows ECMWF water vapor mixing ratios 5 days
prior to the measurement time as projected by the trajectories. The
red boxes highlight the position of the water vapor filaments observed
by GLORIA (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). With some small
deviations in time and altitude, almost all of the observed filaments
in the vortex can be reproduced by the RDF method. Note that the RDF
method cannot produce the effect of rehydration. This indicates that
the water vapor filaments observed by GLORIA were not generated by
rehydration but are likely the signatures of moister midlatitude air masses that
were mixed into the vortex during the preceding
5 days. Continuing the RDF method further back in time, the
filament 7 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 13:00 UTC emerges
35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> before observation and indicates the origin to be
another mixing event. The time of in-mixing of the filament 7 was
already visible in our analysis in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. Thus, it seems that these
filaments originate from several mixing events, not from a single
mixing event only. Furthermore, very dry air masses observed in the
time between 09:00 and 10:30 UTC and 12:00 and 13:30 UTC down to
7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>) can also be partly
reproduced with the RDF method, indicating that transport is the main
reason for the occurrence of dry air below the thermal tropopause. The
origin of these air masses and the transport mechanism are analyzed
and discussed in the next subsection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Transport of dehydrated air masses across the thermal tropopause</title>
      <p>The weak vertical temperature gradient and the poor definition of
the thermal tropopause is implied by the tropopause heights
derived from GLORIA, which have a broad scatter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
at some places. In addition, the PV gradient along isentropes (i.e., isentropes
following the PV isolines) as well as the vertical gradient at the transition between troposphere and
stratosphere within the vortex (08:30–13:30 UTC) is
small. The PV isolines (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2) in the vortex have a larger
spacing than at the edge (jet region), where the vertical distance
between the isolines decreases (08:15 and 13:30 UTC in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). As a consequence, the weak isentropic PV
gradient along the sloping isentropes facilitate transport to lower
altitudes below the location of the thermal tropopause. Subsequent
diabatic processes may lead to STE and irreversible exchange with
tropospheric air. Especially in the case of planetary wave
breaking events that produce stratospheric intrusions, large amounts
of air can be transported into the troposphere across the tropopause.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows the time difference between
the trajectory initialization time and the first thermal tropopause
crossing. This time is determined by counting the trajectory time steps backward in
time to wherever the difference in altitude between current tropopause
and trajectory is positive. Air parcels having stayed for the last
70 days below the thermal tropopause (dark-red colors) can clearly
be assumed to be tropospheric nature. In addition, low PV wave-one pattern values (indicator of
tropospheric air masses) can be attributed to these air masses as discernible
from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b.</p>
      <p>The stratospheric and vortex air masses did not cross the thermal tropopause
(dark blue colors). The air masses below the measured thermal tropopause are
obviously more patchy and contain more trajectories originating from
the troposphere (reddish colors). However, some freshly transported
stratospheric air masses are also discernible below the thermal
tropopause (light-blue colors), down to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The green-framed
areas in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> mark all the trajectories
having tropopause crossing times between 0 and 70 days and
where GLORIA observations reveal a water vapor content of less than
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed, there is a very good correlation between the
light-blue air masses, which crossed the thermal tropopause between 2 and
6 days before, and the green-framed areas marking the
dehydrated air masses. In addition to the low water vapor content in
the green-framed areas, higher values of ozone were also observed by
GLORIA, which corroborates the stratospheric origin of these air masses
(not shown here).</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the median
altitude (a), PV (b), latitude (c) and equivalent latitude (d) distributions
of all trajectories within the green-framed areas from
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> for the period of 2 weeks preceding
and the 2 weeks following the observation. In addition, two RWB events
are marked where subsets of air masses (green and red line) are detached
and separated from the rest (blue line). The strong Rossby wave activity is made visible by comparing the
median latitude and equivalent latitude just a few days before the
observation (8 to 17 September) as seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c and d. The latitude is
oscillating from near 70 down to 80<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, up to 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
and then back to 70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, while the equivalent latitude in this
time frame stays constant at around 70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. This implies no PV
change and only an isentropic latitudinal displacement due to
planetary Rossby waves.</p>
      <p>On 10 September, on the point furthest south at
latitudes around 80<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c), the back
trajectories split up into two different branches, indicating
a bifurcation point caused by partly breaking the Rossby wave. Later, at the point
of most northward displacement (around 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) a second RWB event is
identifiable; from then on, parts of the air masses are separated from the rest.
The air masses associated with the first RWB event (green line) stay at a
similar altitude and PV level for at least up to 14 September. At this day the PV starts
to increase further to more tropospheric values, while the altitude starts to decrease later from 17 September
on rapidly within 4 days to an altitude of less than 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a
simultaneous decrease in latitude to 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The previous PV change before
the altitude change indicates the point in time where air masses detach the lowermost
stratosphere and become more tropospheric.
The trajectories associated with the second RWB event (red line) show a similar behavior but shifted by about 3 days.
Thus it is not possible to match one specific event to the transport of all air masses which were
observed below the thermal tropopause with low water vapor content
(green-framed areas in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). This implies that one Rossby wave event
is not the sole reason for the downward transport. Parts of the air masses (950 trajectories)
within the stratospheric intrusion did not leave the lowermost stratosphere within the 2 weeks. Indeed,
if one looks into the following weeks, additional Rossby wave and RWB events
occurred, bringing more parts of the remaining air masses (950 trajectories) into the troposphere.</p>
      <p>Thus, RWB events drive the
mixing process together with isentropic  transport through the thermal
tropopause. Additionally, RWB events detach air masses from the PV structure and can facilitate
a wave-driven, secondary circulation that transports warmer air masses
from around the vortex edge to the colder inner vortex. The change in PV is most likely
not caused by cloud processes due to the dryness of these air masses. However, despite the
dryness, the slight enhancement of ozone and the
residual water vapor enable radiative cooling and a reduction in
potential temperature, i.e., descent of air masses.
Once transported into the troposphere, air masses will be
transported down to near-surface level within few days as already suggested by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.59"/>.</p>
      <p>The vortex becomes more and more unstable  during the Antarctic spring,
and one may assume that this mixing event is already a first sign
of the vortex break-up. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.60"/> reported about recent
Antarctic final warming events occurring between the beginning of
December and late January at the 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> level. Therefore, the
observed in-mixing of vortex air masses occurs long (at least 2
months) before the final warming and break-up of the vortex. It is
therefore independent of the final warming event to a certain extent and
seems to be a frequently occurring process in the Antarctic winter and spring.</p>
      <p>Finally, the reason for the large downward transport is a mixture of
strong Rossby wave activity, the presence of a permeable thermal
tropopause, RWB events and the additional radiative cooling with
corresponding subsidence of the air masses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Detailed observations of dehydration and STE in the Antarctic UT/LS are very
rare. In this study, we used high-resolution in situ and remote sensing
measurements taken from aboard the HALO aircraft in combination with an extensive
trajectory case study to answer the following questions:</p>
      <p><list list-type="order">
          <list-item>
            <p>Can we confirm dehydration in the lowermost stratosphere and at the bottom
of the Antarctic vortex? We observed strongly dehydrated air in the lower
vortex at potential temperatures of 350 to 360 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12–13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the hygrometers FISH and HAI. The final
dehydration can be traced back to several ice formation events occurring at
350 to 370 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in a time frame of several weeks, where water is
sedimented out of the observed air masses. Finally, dehydration occurs
directly in the lower vortex and in the lowermost stratosphere below the
vortex.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>How deep do dehydrated air masses from the vortex descend into the troposphere?
Dehydrated air masses are also observed with the high-resolution remote
sensing instrument GLORIA down to the thermal tropopause, as well as below
this point, down to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in altitude. We confirm that dehydrated air
masses with a water vapor mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cover large
regions of the Antarctic lowermost stratosphere down to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
isoline and thus dominate at least for this observed case the transition
region between the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. But besides
that, small filaments of enhanced water vapor are observed by GLORIA in the
vortex air and the lowermost stratosphere at 330 to 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). These filaments can be clearly assigned to
in-mixing of moister air masses into the dry vortex at several points in
time, indicating that this transport process occurs frequently.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>Where and how have Antarctic dehydrated stratospheric air masses been transported?
With an extensive trajectory case study, dry air masses below the thermal
tropopause in the southern hemispheric polar and midlatitude region are
determined to have stratospheric origin. The enhanced permeability of the
Antarctic thermal tropopause in winter and spring allowing isentropic
downward transport is confirmed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. It is shown that parts of these dry air masses are
transported further down to near-surface levels within a few days. This
transport into the troposphere is caused by several RWB
events, where they detach air masses from the PV structure. Once the air
masses have been transported into the Antarctic troposphere, most likely
radiative cooling causes their subsidence to near-surface levels.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Sincere thanks go to the whole CLaMS team and in particular to
Jens-Uwe Grooß for supporting the trajectory calculations. We
acknowledge the NASA Langley Research Atmospheric Science Data Center
for providing the CALIPSO data. In addition, we acknowledge the
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts for meteorological
reanalysis data support. The development and application of the HAI
instrument was financially supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG). We thank all members of the GLORIA instrument team for their
great efforts in developing the first IR limb imager. The GLORIA
hardware was mainly funded by the Helmholtz Association of German
Research Centres through several large investment funds. Great thanks
go to the coordinators of the TACTS campaign, Andreas Engel and
Harald Bönisch, and of course to the whole HALO community for the great work
during both campaigns. We thank Jens-Uwe Grooß for assisting the flight planning by CLaMS
model forecasts supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG)
through the project LASSO (HALO-SPP 1294/GR 3786). Special thanks go to Anna Luebke for
language revision. Finally, we greatly acknowledge the two reviewers, Heini Wernli
and Howard Roscoe, as well as Adrian Tuck, who provided constructive and fruitful
comments leading to an improvement of the study.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
publication were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the
Helmholtz Association. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: F. Khosrawi</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Beuermann et al.(2002)Beuermann, Konopka, Brunner, Bujok, Günther,
McKenna, Lelieveld, Müller, and Schiller</label><mixed-citation>Beuermann, R., Konopka, P., Brunner, D., Bujok, O., Günther, G.,
McKenna, D. S., Lelieveld, J., Müller, R., and Schiller, C.:
High-resolution measurements and simulation of stratospheric and tropospheric
intrusions in the vicinity of the polar jet stream, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29,
1577,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014162">10.1029/2001GL014162</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Buchholz(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Buchholz, B.: Entwicklung, Primärvalidierung und Feldeinsatz neuartiger,
kalibrierungsfreier Laser-Hygrometer für Forschungsflugzeuge, Dissertation,
Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Buchholz et al.(2013)Buchholz, Kühnreich, Smit, and Ebert</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, B., Kühnreich, B., Smit, H. G. J., and Ebert, V.: Validation of
an extractive, airborne, compact TDL spectrometer for atmospheric humidity
sensing by blind intercomparison, Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O., 110, 249–262,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-012-5143-1">10.1007/s00340-012-5143-1</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Buchholz et al.(2014)Buchholz, Böse, and Ebert</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, B., Böse, N., and Ebert, V.: Absolute validation of a diode
laser hygrometer via intercomparison with the German national primary water
vapor standard, Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O., 116, 883–899,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-014-5775-4">10.1007/s00340-014-5775-4</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Dee et al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi,
Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van de Berg, Bidlot, Bormann,
Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach, Holm, Isaksen, Kallberg,
Koehler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz, Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de Rosnay, Tavolato, Thepaut, and Vitart</label><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L.,
Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Holm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kallberg, P.,
Koehler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M.,
Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C.,
Thepaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and
performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137,
553–597, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.828">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Engel et al.(2013)Engel, Bönisch, and TACTS-Team</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Bönisch, H., and TACTS-Team: An overview on the TACTS mission
using the new German research aircraft HALO in summer 2012, EGU General
Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 7–12 April 2013, EGU2013-25 9191, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Ern et al.(2011)Ern, Preusse, Gille, Hepplewhite, Mlynczak, Russell, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Ern, M., Preusse, P., Gille, J. C., Hepplewhite, C. L., Mlynczak, M. G.,
Russell III, J. M., and Riese, M.: Implications for atmospheric dynamics
derived from global observations of gravity wave momentum flux in
stratosphere and mesosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D19107,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015821">10.1029/2011JD015821</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Evtushevsky et al.(2011)Evtushevsky, Klekociuk, Grytsai, Milinevsky, and Lozitsky</label><mixed-citation>Evtushevsky, O., Klekociuk, A., Grytsai, A., Milinevsky, G., and
Lozitsky, V.: Troposphere and stratosphere influence on tropopause in the
polar regions during winter and spring, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 3153–3164,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541515">10.1080/01431161.2010.541515</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Friedl-Vallon et al.(2014)Friedl-Vallon, Gulde, Hase, Kleinert,
Kulessa, Maucher, Neubert, Olschewski, Piesch, Preusse, Rongen, Sartorius,
Schneider, Schönfeld, Tan, Bayer, Blank, Dapp, Ebersoldt, Fischer, Graf,
Guggenmoser, Höpfner, Kaufmann, Kretschmer, Latzko, Nordmeyer, Oelhaf, Orphal,
Riese, Schardt, Schillings, Sha, Suminska-Ebersoldt, and Ungermann</label><mixed-citation>Friedl-Vallon, F., Gulde, T., Hase, F., Kleinert, A., Kulessa, T.,
Maucher, G., Neubert, T., Olschewski, F., Piesch, C., Preusse, P.,
Rongen, H., Sartorius, C., Schneider, H., Schönfeld, A., Tan, V.,
Bayer, N., Blank, J., Dapp, R., Ebersoldt, A., Fischer, H., Graf, F.,
Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Kaufmann, M., Kretschmer, E., Latzko, T.,
Nordmeyer, H., Oelhaf, H., Orphal, J., Riese, M., Schardt, G.,
Schillings, J., Sha, M. K., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., and Ungermann, J.:
Instrument concept of the imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3565–3577,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3565-2014">10.5194/amt-7-3565-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Giovanelli et al.(2005)Giovanelli, Bortoli, Petritoli, Castelli, Kostadinov, Ravegnani, Redaelli, Volk, Cortesi, Bianchini, and Carli</label><mixed-citation>Giovanelli, G., Bortoli, D., Petritoli, A., Castelli, E., Kostadinov, I.,
Ravegnani, F., Redaelli, G., Volk, C. M., Cortesi, U., Bianchini, G., and
Carli, B.: Stratospheric minor gas distribution over the Antarctic Peninsula
during the APE-GAIA campaign, Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 3343–3360,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160500076210">10.1080/01431160500076210</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Haigh and Roscoe(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Haigh, J. D. and Roscoe, H. K.: The final warming date of the Antarctic polar
vortex and influences on its interannual variability, J. Climate, 22,
5809–5819,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2865.1">10.1175/2009JCLI2865.1</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2013)Hoffmann, Xue, and Alexander</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, L., Xue, X., and Alexander, M. J.: A global view of stratospheric
gravity wave hotspots located with Atmospheric Infrared Sounder observations,
J. Geophys. Res., 118, 416–434,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018658">10.1029/2012JD018658</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Jimenez et al.(2006)Jimenez, Pumphrey, MacKenzie, Manney, Santee, Schwartz, Harwood, and Waters</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, C., Pumphrey, H. C., MacKenzie, I. A., Manney, G. L., Santee, M. L.,
Schwartz, M. J., Harwood, R. S., and Waters, J. W.: EOS MLS observations of
dehydration in the 2004–2005 polar winters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16806,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025926">10.1029/2006GL025926</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Kaufmann et al.(2015)Kaufmann, Blank, Guggenmoser, Ungermann, Engel,
Ern, Friedl-Vallon, Gerber, Grooß, Günther, Höpfner, Kleinert, Latzko,
Maucher, Neubert, Nordmeyer, Oelhaf, Olschewski, Orphal, Preusse, Schlager, Schneider,
Schuettemeyer, Stroh, Suminska-Ebersoldt, Vogel, Volk, Woiwode, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Kaufmann, M., Blank, J., Guggenmoser, T., Ungermann, J., Engel, A., Ern, M.,
Friedl-Vallon, F., Gerber, D., Grooß, J. U., Günther, G.,
Höpfner, M., Kleinert, A., Kretschmer, E., Latzko, Th., Maucher, G.,
Neubert, T., Nordmeyer, H., Oelhaf, H., Olschewski, F., Orphal, J.,
Preusse, P., Schlager, H., Schneider, H., Schuettemeyer, D., Stroh, F.,
Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Vogel, B., Volk, M. C., Woiwode, W., and Riese, M.:
Retrieval of three-dimensional small-scale structures in
upper-tropospheric/lower-stratospheric composition as measured by GLORIA,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 81–95,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-81-2015">10.5194/amt-8-81-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Kelly et al.(1989)Kelly, Tuck, Murphy, Proffitt, Fahey, Jones, McKenna,
Loewenstein, Podolske, Strahan, Ferry, Chan, Vedder, Gregory, Hypes, McCormick, Browell, and Heidt</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, K. K., Tuck, A. F., Murphy, D. M., Proffitt, M. H., Fahey, D. W.,
Jones, R. L., McKenna, D. S., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R.,
Strahan, S. E., Ferry, G. V., Chan, K. R., Vedder, J. F., Gregory, G. L.,
Hypes, W. D., McCormick, M. P., Browell, E. V., and Heidt, L. E.: Dehydration
in the lower Antarctic stratosphere during late winter and early spring,
1987, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 11317–11357,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD09p11317">10.1029/JD094iD09p11317</ext-link>,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Khaykin et al.(2013)Khaykin, Engel, Voemel, Formanyuk, Kivi, Korshunov,
Kraemer, Lykov, Meier, Naebert, Pitts, Santee, Spelten, Wienhold, Yushkov, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Khaykin, S. M., Engel, I., Vömel, H., Formanyuk, I. M., Kivi, R.,
Korshunov, L. I., Krämer, M., Lykov, A. D., Meier, S., Naebert, T.,
Pitts, M. C., Santee, M. L., Spelten, N., Wienhold, F. G., Yushkov, V. A.,
and Peter, T.: Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 1: Unprecedented
observation of vertical redistribution of water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
11503–11517,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11503-2013">10.5194/acp-13-11503-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Khosrawi et al.(2006)Khosrawi, Müller, Beuermann, Konopka, and Schiller</label><mixed-citation>Khosrawi, F., Müller, R., Beuermann, J., Konopka, P., and Schiller, C.:
Dehydration in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude tropopause region
observed during STREAM 1998, Tellus B, 58, 206–217,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00182.x">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00182.x</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Konopka et al.(2007)Konopka, Günther, Müller, dos Santos, Schiller, Ravegnani, Ulanovsky, Schlager, Volk, Viciani, Pan, McKenna, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Günther, G., Müller, R., dos Santos, F. H. S.,
Schiller, C., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Volk, C. M.,
Viciani, S., Pan, L. L., McKenna, D.-S., and Riese, M.: Contribution of
mixing to upward transport across the tropical tropopause layer (TTL), Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 3285–3308,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007">10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Krautstrunk and Giez(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Krautstrunk, M. and Giez, A.: The transition from FALCON to HALO era airborne
atmospheric research, in: Atmospheric Physics, edited by: Schumann, U.,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 609–624, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Lee et al.(2002)Lee, Jones, Kilbane-Dawe and  Pyle</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A. M., Jones, R. L., Kilbane-Dawe, I., and Pyle, J. A.: Diagnosing ozone
loss in the extratropical lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4110,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000538">10.1029/2001JD000538</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Mahowald et al.(2002)Mahowald, Plumb, Rasch, Corral-Dawe, Sassi, and Heres</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Plumb, R. A., Rasch, P. J., del Corral, J., Sassi, F., and
Heres, W.: Stratospheric transport in a three-dimensional isentropic
coordinate model, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH3.1–ACH3.14,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001313">10.1029/2001JD001313</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>McKenna et al.(2002)McKenna, Konopka, Grooß, Günther, Müller, Spang, Offermann, and Orsolini</label><mixed-citation>McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J. U., Günther, G., Müller, R.,
Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model
of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) – 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 4309,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114">10.1029/2000JD000114</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Meyer et al.(2015)Meyer, Rolf, Schiller, Rohs, Spelten, Zöger, Sitnikov, Buchholz, Ebert, Mackrodt, Bozoki, Tatrai, Möhler, Saathoff, Rosenlof, and Krämer</label><mixed-citation>Meyer, J., Rolf, C., Schiller, C., Rohs, S., Spelten, N., Afchine, A.,
Zöger, M., Sitnikov, N., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Bozóki,
Z., Tátrai, D., Ebert, V., Kühnreich, B., Mackrodt, P., Möhler,
O., Saathoff, H., Rosenlof, K. H., and Krämer, M.: Two decades of water
vapor measurements with the FISH fluorescence hygrometer: a review, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 8521–8538, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8521-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8521-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Mihalikova and Kirkwood(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Mihalikova, M. and Kirkwood, S.: Tropopause fold occurrence rates over the
Antarctic station Troll (72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Ann. Geophys., 31,
591–598,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-591-2013">10.5194/angeo-31-591-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Müller and Peter(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, R. and Peter, T.: The Numerical Modeling of the Sedimentation of
Polar Stratospheric Cloud Particles, Berichte der
Bunsen-Gesellschaft-Physik Chemie, 96, 353–361, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Nash et al.(1996)Nash, Newman, Rosenfield, and Schoeberl</label><mixed-citation>Nash, E. R., Newman, P. A., Rosenfield, J. E., and Schoeberl, M. R.: An
objective determination of the polar vortex using Ertel's potential
vorticity, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 9471–9478,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD00066">10.1029/96JD00066</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Ndarana et al.(2012)Ndarana, Waugh, Polvani, Correa, and Gerber</label><mixed-citation>Ndarana, T., Waugh, D. W., Polvani, L. M., Correa, G. J. P., and
Gerber, E. P.: Antarctic ozone depletion and trends in tropopause Rossby wave
breaking, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 13, 164–168,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl.384">10.1002/asl.384</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Nedoluha et al.(2002)Nedoluha, Bevilacqua, and Hoppel</label><mixed-citation>Nedoluha, G. E., Bevilacqua, R. M., and Hoppel, K. W.: POAM III measurements
of dehydration in the Antarctic and comparisons with the Arctic, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 8290,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001184">10.1029/2001JD001184</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Nedoluha et al.(2007)Nedoluha, Benson, Hoppel, Alfred, Bevilacqua, and Drdla</label><mixed-citation>Nedoluha, G. E., Benson, C. M., Hoppel, K. W., Alfred, J., Bevilacqua, R. M.,
and Drdla, K.: Antarctic dehydration 1998–2003: Polar ozone and aerosol
measurement III (POAM) measurements and integrated microphysics and aerosol
chemistry on trajectories (IMPACT) results with four meteorological models,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, D07305,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007414">10.1029/2006JD007414</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Pitts et al.(2009)Pitts, Poole, and Thomason</label><mixed-citation>Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., and Thomason, L. W.: CALIPSO polar stratospheric
cloud observations: second-generation detection algorithm and composition
discrimination, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7577–7589,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7577-2009">10.5194/acp-9-7577-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Pitts et al.(2011)Pitts, Poole, Doernbrack, and Thomason</label><mixed-citation>Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., Dörnbrack, A., and Thomason, L. W.: The
2009–2010 Arctic polar stratospheric cloud season: a CALIPSO perspective,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2161–2177,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2161-2011">10.5194/acp-11-2161-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Ploeger et al.(2010)Ploeger, Konopka, Günther, Grooß, and Müller</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Günther, G., Grooß, J.-U., and Müller, R.:
Impact of the vertical velocity scheme on modeling transport in the tropical
tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D03301,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012023">10.1029/2009JD012023</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Riese et al.(2014)Riese, Oelhaf, Preusse, Blank, Ern, Friedl-Vallon, Fischer,
Guggenmoser, Hoepfner, Hoor, Kaufmann, Orphal, Ploeger, Spang, Suminska-Ebersoldt, Ungermann, Vogel, and Woiwode</label><mixed-citation>Riese, M., Oelhaf, H., Preusse, P., Blank, J., Ern, M., Friedl-Vallon, F.,
Fischer, H., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Hoor, P., Kaufmann, M.,
Orphal, J., Plöger, F., Spang, R., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Ungermann, J.,
Vogel, B., and Woiwode, W.: Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of
the Atmosphere (GLORIA) scientific objectives, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7,
1915–1928,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014">10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Pommrich et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Pommrich, R., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Konopka, P., Ploeger, F.,
Vogel, B., Tao, M., Hoppe, C. M., Günther, G., Spelten, N., Hoffmann, L.,
Pumphrey, H.-C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Volk, C. M., Hoor, P., Schlager,
H., and Riese, M.: Tropical troposphere to stratosphere transport of carbon
monoxide and long-lived trace species in the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the
Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2895–2916,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014">10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Roscoe(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Roscoe, H. K.: Possible descent across the “Tropopause” in Antarctic winter, Adv. Space Res., 33, 1048–1052,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00587-8">10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00587-8</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Schiller et al.(2002)Schiller, Bauer, Cairo, Deshler, Dornbrack, Elkins,
Engel, Flentje, Larsen, Levin, Müller, Oltmans, Ovarlez, Ovarlez, Schreiner, Stroh, Voigt, and Vömel</label><mixed-citation>Schiller, C., Bauer, R., Cairo, F., Deshler, T., Dornbrack, A., Elkins, J.,
Engel, A., Flentje, H., Larsen, N., Levin, I., Müller, M., Oltmans, S.,
Ovarlez, H., Ovarlez, J., Schreiner, J., Stroh, F., Voigt, C., and
Vömel, H.: Dehydration in the Arctic stratosphere during the
SOLVE/THESEO-2000 campaigns, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8293,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000463">10.1029/2001JD000463</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Schlager(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Schlager, H.: ESMval (Earth System Model Validation), available at:
<uri>http://www.pa.op.dlr.de/ESMVal</uri>, last access: 18 July 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Schoeberl and Dessler(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R. and Dessler, A. E.: Dehydration of the stratosphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 8433–8446,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8433-2011">10.5194/acp-11-8433-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Schoeberl et al.(1992)Schoeberl, Lait, Newman, and Rosenfield</label><mixed-citation>
Schoeberl, M. R., Lait, L. R., Newman, P. A., and Rosenfield, J. E.: The
structure of the polar vortex, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7859–7882, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Škerlak et al.(2014)Škerlak, Sprenger, and Wernli</label><mixed-citation>Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: A global climatology of
stratosphere–troposphere exchange using the ERA-Interim data set from 1979
to 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 913-937,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-913-2014">10.5194/acp-14-913-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Sprenger et al.(2003)Sprenger, Maspoli, and Wernli</label><mixed-citation>Sprenger, M., Maspoli, M. C., and Wernli, H.: Tropopause folds and
cross-tropopause exchange: A global investigation based upon ECMWF analyses
for the time period March 2000 to February 2001, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8518,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002587">10.1029/2002JD002587</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Stohl and Sodemann(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A. and Sodemann, H.: Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Antarctic troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D02305,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012536">10.1029/2009JD012536</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Tuck(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Tuck, A. F.: Synoptic and Chemical Evolution of the Antarctic Vortex In Late
Winter and Early Spring 1987, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 11687–11737, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Tuck et al.(1989)Tuck, Watson, Condon, Margitan, and Toon</label><mixed-citation>Tuck, A. F., Watson, R. T., Condon, E. P., Margitan, J. J., and Toon, O. B.:
The planning and execution of ER-2 and DC-8 aircraft flights over Antarctica,
August and September 1987, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 11181–11222,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD09p11181">10.1029/JD094iD09p11181</ext-link>,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Tuck et al.(1997a)Tuck, Brune, and Hipskind</label><mixed-citation>Tuck, A. F., Brune, W. H., and Hipskind, R. S.: Airborne Southern Hemisphere
Ozone Experiment Measurements for Assessing the Effects of Stratospheric
Aircraft (ASHOE/MAESA): a road map, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 3901–3904,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD02745">10.1029/96JD02745</ext-link>, 1997a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Tuck et al.(1997b)Tuck</label><mixed-citation>
Tuck, A. F., Baumgardner, D., Chan, K. R., Dye, J. E., Elkins, J. W., Hovde,
S. J., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Margitan, J. J., May, R. D., Podolske,
J. R., Proffitt, M. H., Rosenlof, K. H., Smith, W. L., Webster, C. R., and
Wilson, J. C.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation in the light of high altitude in
situ aircraft observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 1–69, 1997b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Ungermann et al.(2011)Ungermann, Blank, Lotz, Leppkes, Hoffmann, Guggenmoser, Kaufmann, Preusse, Naumann, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Ungermann, J., Blank, J., Lotz, J., Leppkes, K., Hoffmann, L.,
Guggenmoser, T., Kaufmann, M., Preusse, P., Naumann, U., and Riese, M.: A 3-D
tomographic retrieval approach with advection compensation for the air-borne
limb-imager GLORIA, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2509–2529,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2509-2011">10.5194/amt-4-2509-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Ungermann et al.(2015)Ungermann, Blank, Dick, Ebersoldt,
Friedl-Vallon, Giez, Guggenmoser, Höpfner, Jurkat, Kaufmann,
Kaufmann, Kleinert, Krämer, Latzko, Oelhaf, Olchewski, Preusse, Rolf,
Schillings, Suminska-Ebersoldt, Tan, Thomas, Voigt, Zahn, Zöger, and
Riese</label><mixed-citation>Ungermann, J., Blank, J., Dick, M., Ebersoldt, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Giez,
A., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, M., Kaufmann, S.,
Kleinert, A., Krämer, M., Latzko, T., Oelhaf, H., Olchewski, F., Preusse,
P., Rolf, C., Schillings, J., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Tan, V., Thomas, N.,
Voigt, C., Zahn, A., Zöger, M., and Riese, M.: Level 2 processing for the
imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA: derivation and validation of
temperature and trace gas volume mixing ratios from calibrated dynamics mode
spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2473–2489, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015</ext-link>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>van de Berg et al.(2007)van de Berg, van den Broeke, and van Meijgaard</label><mixed-citation>van de Berg, W. J., van den Broeke, M. R., and van Meijgaard, E.: Heat budget
of the East Antarctic lower atmosphere derived from a regional atmospheric
climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D23101,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008613">10.1029/2007JD008613</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Vömel et al.(1995)Vömel, Oltmans, Hofmann, Deshler, and Rosen</label><mixed-citation>Vömel, H., Oltmans, S. J., Hofmann, D. J., Deshler, T., and Rosen, J. M.:
The evolution of the dehydration in the Antarctic stratospheric vortex, J.
Geophys. Res., 100, 13919–13926,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JD01000">10.1029/95JD01000</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>WMO(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meteorological Organization): Meteorology Three-Dimensional
Science: Second Session of the Commission for Aerology, WMO Bulletin IV(4),
WMO, Geneva, 134–138, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Zahn et al.(2012)Zahn, Weppner, Widmann, Schlote-Holubek, Burger, Kühner, and Franke</label><mixed-citation>Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B.,
Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone
detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5,
363–375,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012">10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Zängl and Hoinka(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Zängl, G. and Hoinka, K. P.: The tropopause in the polar regions, J.
Climate, 14, 3117–3139, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Zöger et al.(1999)Zöger, Afchine, Eicke, Gerhards, Klein, McKenna, Morschel, Schmidt, Tan, Tuitjer, Woyke, and Schiller</label><mixed-citation>Zöger, M., Afchine, A., Eicke, N., Gerhards, M. T., Klein, E.,
McKenna, D. S., Morschel, U., Schmidt, U., Tan, V., Tuitjer, F., Woyke, T.,
and Schiller, C.: Fast in situ stratospheric hygrometers: A new family of
balloon-borne and airborne Lyman alpha photofragment fluorescence
hygrometers, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 1807–1816,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100025">10.1029/1998JD100025</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
