<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-8781-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal variation of secondary organic aerosol tracers  in<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Central
Tibetan Plateau</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal variation of secondary organic aerosol tracers}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.-Q.~Shen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>R.-Q.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          <email>xiangd@gig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-1879</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Q.-F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-8206</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Cong</surname><given-names>Z.-Y.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7545-5611</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Q.-Q.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.-M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0928</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of
Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land Surface
Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100085, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">X. Ding (xiangd@gig.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>8781</fpage><lpage>8793</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) affects the earth's radiation balance and
global climate. High-elevation areas are sensitive to global climate change.
However, at present, SOA origins and seasonal variations are understudied in
remote high-elevation areas. In this study, particulate samples were
collected from July 2012 to July 2013 at the remote Nam Co (NC) site,
Central Tibetan Plateau and analyzed for SOA tracers from biogenic
(isoprene, monoterpenes and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene) and anthropogenic
(aromatics) precursors. Among these compounds, isoprene SOA (SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers represented the majority (26.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed
by monoterpene SOA (SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (0.97 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
aromatic SOA (SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer (2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxopentanoic acid, DHOPA,
0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene SOA tracer (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid, 0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers
exhibited high concentrations in the summer and low levels in the winter.
The similar temperature dependence of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers and isoprene
emission suggested that the seasonal variation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers at the
NC site was mainly influenced by the isoprene emission. The ratio of
high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (2-methylglyceric acid to
2-methyltetrols) was highest in the winter and lowest in the summer,
due to the influence of temperature and relative humidity. The seasonal
variation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers was impacted by monoterpenes emission and
gas-particle partitioning. During the summer to the fall, temperature effect
on partitioning was the dominant process influencing SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers'
variation; while the temperature effect on emission was the dominant process
influencing SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers' variation during the winter to the spring.
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer levels did not elevate with increased temperature in the
summer, probably resulting from the counteraction of temperature effects on
emission and partitioning. The concentrations of DHOPA were 1–2 orders of
magnitude lower than those reported in the urban regions of the world. Due
to the transport of air pollutants from the adjacent Bangladesh and
northeastern India, DHOPA presented relatively higher levels in the summer.
In the winter when air masses mainly came from northwestern India, mass
fractions of DHOPA in total tracers increased, although its concentrations
declined. The SOA-tracer method was applied to estimate secondary organic
carbon (SOC) from these four precursors. The annual average of SOC was 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
with the biogenic SOC (sum of isoprene,
monoterpenes and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene) accounting for 75 %. In the
summer, isoprene was the major precursor with its SOC contributions of
81 %. In the winter when the emission of biogenic precursors largely
dropped, the contributions of aromatic SOC increased. Our study implies that
anthropogenic pollutants emitted in the Indian subcontinent could be
transported to the TP and have an impact on SOC over the remote NC.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Organic aerosol affects the earth's radiation balance and global climate. As
a large fraction of organic aerosol, secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is
produced by homogenous (Claeys   et al.,  2004) and heterogeneous (Jang  et al., 2002) reactions
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as well as aging of organic aerosol
(Robinson  et al., 2007; Donahue  et al., 2012). The global emissions of biogenic VOCs (BVOCs),
such as isoprene and monoterpenes (Guenther  et al., 1995) were estimated to be one
order of magnitude higher than those of anthropogenic sources (Piccot  et al., 1992).
Thus, global SOA is believed to be largely from BVOCs.</p>
      <p>SOA tracers from specific VOCs can provide an insight into processes and sources
influencing SOA formation and spatiotemporal distribution. The
identification of the isoprene SOA (SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers, 2-methyltetrols
(Claeys  et al., 2004) revealed the importance of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in global SOA burden. Further studies in high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products of isoprene intermediates
(e.g. methacrylic acid epoxide and isoprene epoxydiols) provided more
details in the mechanisms of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation under the influence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Paulot  et al., 2009; Froyd  et al., 2010; Surratt  et al., 2010; Lin  et al., 2013). The identification of
tracers from aromatic SOA (SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Offenberg  et al., 2007) offered a way to
directly evaluate the variation of anthropogenic SOA, particularly in urban
regions. In addition, specific tracers have been determined in monoterpene
SOA (SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jaoui  et al., 2005; Claeys  et al., 2007) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene SOA
(SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jaoui  et al., 2007; van Eijck  et al., 2013). Based on these SOA tracers,
Kleindienst and coworkers further developed an SOA tracer method to
attribute SOA sources in the ambient air. Since it is difficult to directly
measure SOA, the SOA-tracer method provides a valuable technique to estimate
SOA in the ambient air, and it has been widely used around the world
(Hu  et al., 2008; von Schneidemesser  et al., 2009; Guo  et al., 2012; Lewandowski  et al., 2013; Ding  et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>High-elevation areas are sensitive to global climate change (Xua  et al., 2009).
Observation of aerosol concentrations and compositions at high-elevation
sites can provide insight into the influence of natural and anthropogenic
aerosols on global climate. The Tibetan Plateau (TP), the largest and
highest plateau, is at the juncture of large desert areas and the densely
populated Indian subcontinent. Previous studies found the northwesterly winds
could bring dust from the western deserts to the TP and lead to high levels
of geological aerosols at a site on the southeast TP (Zhao  et al., 2013). Moreover,
anthropogenic pollutants (e.g. sulfate, nitrate, potassium, element carbon,
and heavy metals) emitted in the developing countries in South Asia could be
transported to the TP by the southerly and southwesterly winds, especially
during the summer monsoon season (Cong  et al., 2007; Ming  et al., 2010; Li  et al., 2013; Zhao  et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The observation at the remote central TP site, Nam Co (NC) discovered that
the mean ratio of organic carbon (OC) to element carbon (EC) was 31.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31.1
during July 2006 to January 2007, implying the significant SOA
contribution to OC (Ming  et al., 2010) in the TP. However, there are only three
studies in SOA compositions within the TP. Li et al. (2013) reported
biogenic SOA (BSOA) tracers during the summer of 2010 at Qinghai Lake in the
northeastern part of the TP. Stone  et al. (2012) measured BSOA tracers from
August to October 2005 on the south slope of Himalayas in the southwestern
part of the TP. Due to the limited samples, it was difficult to examine the
seasonal variation of these BSOA tracers in the TP. Moreover, due to the
lack of anthropogenic SOA tracers, it was not possible to examine
anthropogenic SOA in the TP, although above discussions have demonstrated
that air pollutants from South Asia could be transported to the TP. Our
recent study provided a snapshot of SOA tracers over China (including the NC
and Linzhi sites in the TP) during the summer of 2012 (Ding  et al., 2014). In this
study, the observation at the remote NC site extended to 1 year. Seasonal
trends of SOA tracers from isoprene, monoterpene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene and
aromatics were determined in the TP. Furthermore, secondary organic carbon
(SOC) was estimated by the SOA-tracer method to check the variations of SOA
origins at the NC site. To our knowledge, it is the first time that the
seasonal trends of SOA tracers and origins are studied in the remote TP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Field sampling</title>
      <p>Samples were collected at a remote site (4730 m above sea level) at the
southeastern shore of Nam Co Lake in the central TP (Fig. 1). Nam Co Lake
(90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 91<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) is located in the Nyainqen Tanglha
Mountain Range with a total area of 2017 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhou  et al., 2013). The major
vegetation in the Nam Co Lake Basin is the high cold alpine meadow.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Nam Co site in the Tibetan Plateau, China.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Sampling was undertaken from July 2012 to July 2013. An Anderson sampler
equipped with nine-stage cascade impactors and pre-baked quartz fiber filters
(Whatman, baked at 450 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 8 h) was used to get
size-segregated particle samples at an air flow rate of 28.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The 50 % cutoff sizes are &lt; 0.4, 0.4–0.7, 0.7–1.1, 1.1–2.1,
2.1–3.3, 3.3–4.7, 4.7–5.8, 5.8–9.0, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
respectively. The flow rate was calibrated before and after each sampling
episode using an airflow meter to ensure the sampler operated at the
specified flow rate. One set of nine size-fractionated filters were collected
for 72 h every 2 weeks. Additionally, four sets of field blanks were
collected in the same way as the ambient samples for 5 min when the
sampler was turned off. All samples were wrapped with aluminum foil and
stored at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before analysis.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemical analysis</title>
      <p>Each set of nine filters were combined together as one sample to meet the
analysis requirement. Detailed information on the SOA tracer analysis is
described elsewhere (Ding  et al., 2014). Prior to solvent extraction,
isotope-labeled standard mixtures were spiked into samples as internal
standards. Samples were extracted twice by sonication with the mixed solvent
dichloride methane (DCM)/hexane (1 : 1, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), then three times with the mixed
solvent DCM/methanol (1 : 1, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The extracts of each sample were combined,
filtered and concentrated to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mL. Then, the concentrated
solution was divided into two parts for methylation and silylation,
respectively.</p>
      <p>The samples were analyzed by a gas chromatography/mass spectrometer
detector (GC/MSD, Agilent 7890/5975C) in the selected ion monitoring (SIM)
mode with a 30 m HP-5 MS capillary column (i.d. 0.25 mm, 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m film
thickness). Splitless injection of a 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L sample was performed. The GC
temperature was initiated at 65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, held for 2 min, then
increased to 290 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
held for 20 min. Thirteen SOA tracers were quantified by the GC/MSD coupled
with an electron impact (EI) ionization source, including five SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers (<italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid, pinic acid, 3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid,
3-hydroxyglutaric acid and 3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethylglutaric acid), six
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (2-methylthreitol, 2-methylerythritol, 2-methylglyceric
acid, <italic>cis</italic>-2-methyl-1,3,4-trihydroxy-1-butene,
<italic>trans</italic>-2-methyl-1,3,4-trihydroxy-1-butene and 3-methyl-2,3,4-trihydroxy-1-butene),
one SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid) and one SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer
(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxopentanoic acid, DHOPA). Figure S1 in the Supplement presents the
total ion chromatogram (TIC) of these SOA tracers.
<italic>cis</italic>-Pinonic acid and pinic acid were quantified by authentic standards. Due to
the lack of standards, the SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers were quantified using
erythritol (Claeys  et al., 2004; Ding  et al., 2008). The other SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers were
quantified using <italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Caryophyllenic acid and DHOPA were
quantified using octadecanoic acid and azelaic acid, respectively (Ding  et al., 2012). The EI
spectrum of each SOA tracer is shown in Figs. S2–S4. The
method detection limits (MDLs) for <italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid, pinic acid, erythritol,
octadecanoic acid and azelaic acid were 0.03, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03 and 0.07 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, at a total volume of 122 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Quality assurance and quality control</title>
      <p>Field and laboratory blanks were analyzed in the same manner as the field
samples. These SOA tracers were not detected in the field or laboratory
blanks. To evaluate the recoveries of the analytical method, six spiked
samples (authentic standards spiked into solvent with pre-baked quartz
filters) were analyzed. The recoveries were 101 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 % for
<italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid, 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % for pinic acid, 65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 % for
erythritol, 83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % for octadecanoic acid, and 89 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 %
for azelaic acid. The relative differences for target compounds in samples
collected in parallel (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6) were all below 15 %.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that ketopinic acid was used as the surrogate for the
quantification of all SOA tracers by Kleindienst et al. (2007); while
different surrogates were used to quantify different SOA tracers in this
study. The response factors of internal standard calibration for the five
surrogates ranged from 0.98 (azelaic acid) to 1.78 (pinic acid), with the
average of 1.38 and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 23 %. The
response factor of ketopinic acid was also calculated in this study. Its
value (1.27) was consistent with the average of the five surrogates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Estimation of measurement uncertainty</title>
      <p>Since there is no commercial standard available for most SOA tracers (except
<italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid and pinic acid), the use of surrogate standards for
quantification introduces additional error to measurement. Error in analyte
measurement (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is propagated from the standard deviation of the field
blank (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, error in spike recovery (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the error from
surrogate quantification (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Since SOA tracers were not detected in the field blanks, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0 in
this study. The spike recoveries of surrogate standards were used to
estimate the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of tracers which ranged from 1 % (<italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid) to
35 % (erythritol). Stone  et al. (2012) developed an empirical approach to
estimate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on homologous series of atmospherically relevant
compounds. The relative error introduced by each carbon atom (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
estimated to be 15 %, each oxygenated functional group (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be
10 % and alkenes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be 60 %. The errors introduced from
surrogate quantification are treated as additive and are calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference in carbon atom number between a surrogate
and an analyte, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference in oxygen-containing functional
group between a surrogate and an analyte, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference in
alkene functionality between a surrogate and an analyte.</p>
      <p>Table S1 shows the estimated uncertainties in tracer measurement. The errors
from surrogate quantification (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 15 % (2-methyltetrols)
to 155 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid) in this study. Propagated with the
error in recovery, the uncertainties in analyte measurement (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
estimated in the range of 38  to 156 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Backward trajectories</title>
      <p>The air masses' transport during each sampling episode was investigated
using Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model (HYSPLIT
V4.9). Five-day backward trajectories (BTs) were analyzed during each
sampling episode with 6 h step at the height of 500 m above ground level.
Cluster analysis was then performed to present the mean trajectory of each
cluster, based on all the trajectories during our campaign.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Seasonal variations of SOA tracers</title>
      <p>Since the NC site is located in the high-elevation TP, the annual
temperature was only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
in January to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July (Table 1). The annual relative
humidity (RH) was 58 % with the peak in July (84 %) and the lowest in
January (30 %). The sum of all tracers ranged from 0.78 to 185 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Among these compounds, SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (26.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represented the majority, followed by SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (0.97 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
DHOPA (0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid (0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the summer
(July–September 2012 and June–July 2013), SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers presented the
majority (&gt; 95 %). The mass fractions of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers in
all compounds increased during the cold period (October 2012 to May 2013).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOA tracers at the NC site (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Month</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temp.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col8" align="center">SOA tracers </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">%<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Isoprene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Monoterpenes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Caryophyllene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Aromatics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Sum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jul 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aug 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">67.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sep 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 118</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">102 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 118</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oct. 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nov 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.04 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.99 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dec 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feb 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mar 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.56 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Apr 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">May 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jul 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.97 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Temperature and RH are monthly
averages;<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> one standard deviation; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> “nd” means not
detected.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOA tracers in remote places on the global range (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.8}[.8]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">Locations </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Seasons</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">References</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col8" align="center">SOA tracers </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Isoprene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Monoterpenes<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Caryophyllene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Aromatics</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tibetan Plateau</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nam Co Lake</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Whole year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">This study</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.6(0.36–184)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.97(0.11–2.39)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09(nd–0.40)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.25(nd–0.61)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Qianghai Lake</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Li  et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.50(0.13–7.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.95(0.30–10.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.87(0.05–2.41)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Himalayas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer–autumn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Stone  et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.7(5.5–105)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2(5.6–31.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6(1.1–2.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Arctic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Alert</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter–Summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fu  et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3(0.08–0.567)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.6(0.138–5.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12(0.01–0.372)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global oceans</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Arctic Ocean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fu  et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0(0.16–31.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.8(0.44–24.1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.017(0.005–0.048)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low- to mid-latitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fall–Spring</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fu  et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.6(0.11–22)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7(0.02–15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.32(0–2.5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Antarctic to Arctic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hu  et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.5(0.018–36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0(0.05–20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Pacific and Arctic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ding  et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.62(0.12–1.45)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06(0.01–0.25)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.002(nd–0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">nd<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.8}[.8]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Compositions are different in different studies. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> data range in
brackets. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> “NA” means not available. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> “nd” means not
detected.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Isoprene SOA tracers</title>
      <p>The total concentrations of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (sum of six tracers) ranged
from 0.36–184 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The levels of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers were 1–2
orders of magnitude higher than those over the global oceans and the Arctic
(Table 2). Among the SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> traces, 2-methyltetrols (sum of
2-methylthreitol and 2-methylerythritol, MTLs) were the major components
(72 %), with an annual average of 23.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.18 to
165 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The 2-methylglyceric acid (MGA) averaged
1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.92 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkenetriols (sum of
<italic>cis</italic>-2-methyl-1,3,4-trihydroxy-1-butene,
<italic>trans</italic>-2-methyl-1,3,4-trihydroxy-1-butene, and 3-methyl-2,3,4-trihydroxy-1-butene)
averaged 0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.39 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. MTLs are produced through the
particle-phase uptake of the epoxydiols that formed in the gas-phase
photo-oxidation of isoprene under low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> free conditions
(Paulot  et al., 2009; Surratt  et al., 2010). Since the remote TP is a low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> environment, it is
expected that the low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products, MTLs dominated over other SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers. The majority of MTLs at the NC site was consistent with those
observed within the TP (Stone  et al., 2012; Li  et al., 2013) and over most global oceans
(Fu  et al., 2011; Hu  et al., 2013), but different from those over the North Pacific Ocean
and the Arctic where MGA was the major SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer due to the
significant influence of Siberian fires (Fu  et al., 2011; Ding  et al., 2013). The two MTL
isomers exhibited a strong correlation with each other throughout the year
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.996, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001) with a slope of 3.7, indicating that the
two isomers shared similar formation pathways.</p>
      <p>Figure 2a presents a typical seasonal trend of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers that high
concentrations all existed in the summer. From October 2012 to April 2013,
temperature was below zero, the levels of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers dramatically
decreased as low as 0.38 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in January.</p>
      <p>Isoprene emission rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on light and temperature (Guenther  et al., 1993):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where EF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal emission rate at 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C leaf
temperature and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> PAR. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the factors representing the influences of light and temperature,
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Then the natural logarithm of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ln</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.314 J K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 000 J mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 000 J mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 303 K, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 314 K, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the leaf temperature (Guenther  et al., 1993). Under the condition of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the latter part in Eq. (5) is close to zero, and Ln
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is linearly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Figure 3a presents a negative correlation between the natural logarithm of
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer levels and the reciprocal of temperature in Kelvin
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, the temperature dependence of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers was similar to that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers exhibited a
significant positive correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during our sampling at the NC
site (Fig. 3b). These results indicated that the seasonal variation of
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers at the NC site was mainly influenced by the isoprene
emission. Considering the short lifetime (several hours) of isoprene in the
air, SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> should be mainly formed from local precursor. In summer, high
temperature and intense light could enhance isoprene emission and
photo-reactions. Moreover, high temperature in summer could enhance the
heterogeneous reactions of isoprene-derived epoxides on particles which play key roles in SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Lin  et al.,  2013; Paulot  et al.,
2009). All of these interpreted the high levels of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers in the
summer at the NC site. In the winter, isoprene emission significantly
dropped due to the extremely low temperature. Thus, the tracers were only in
trace amount at the NC site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Monthly variations of SOA tracers.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Correlations of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers with temperature
<bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>It is worth noting that the ratio of MGA to MTLs (MGA/MTLs) was negatively
correlated with temperature (Fig. 4a) and RH (Fig. 4b). Based on chamber
results, the formation mechanisms of MGA and MTLs are quite different. MGA
is produced under high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, while MTLs are mainly formed
under low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-free conditions (Surratt  et al., 2010). Moreover, low
RH (15–40 %) could enhance the formation of MGA in the particulate
phase but not of MTLs (Zhang  et al., 2011). In addition, high particle acidity would
favor the formation of MTLs instead of MGA (Surratt  et al., 2007). Although there
are few data available in the TP, the aerosols are expected to be neutral at
the remote NC site. Thus, the influence of acidity on MGA/MTLs should not be
significant. Isoprene emission is apparently high in summer due to high
temperature and light intensity, which could enhance the ratio of isoprene
to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and favor MTLs formation at the NC site. Moreover, high RH
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) in the summer (Table 1) could not favor MGA
formation. Thus, MGA/MTLs exhibited the lowest values (less than 0.1) in the
summer samples (Fig. 4). In the winter, both temperature and RH dropped to
the lowest of the whole year. Low temperature reduced isoprene emission and
low RH favored MGA formation. Thus, MGA/MTLs increased up to 0.8 in the
winter samples (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Correlations of MGA/MTL with temperature <bold>(a)</bold> and relative
humidity <bold>(b)</bold>. Summer is from July to September 2012 and from June to
July 2013, fall is from October to November 2012, winter is from December
2012 to February 2013, and spring is from March to May 2013.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Terpene SOA tracers</title>
      <p>The total concentrations of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (sum of five tracers) ranged
from 0.11–2.39 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The levels of the SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers were
consistent with those over the global oceans and the Arctic (Table 2). Among
these traces, <italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid was the major compound (54 %), with an annual
average of 0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by pinic acid (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid (0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
3-hydroxyglutaric acid (0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethylglutaric acid (below MDL in the most
samples).</p>
      <p>The monthly variation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers did not fully follow that of
temperature (Fig. 2b). From July to November 2012 (period 1), temperature
decreased to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; while SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer levels
increased as high as 1.99 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. After that, both temperature and
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers dropped to the lowest values in January 2013, and
increased concurrently until April 2013 (period 2). During May to July 2013
(period 3), SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer levels exhibited slight variation,
although the temperature kept increasing.</p>
      <p>The seasonal variation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers could be influenced by
monoterpenes emission and gas-particle partitioning. Monoterpenes emission
rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often assumed to be solely dependent on temperature
(Guenther  et al., 1993):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where EF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is monoterpenes emission rate at a standard temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (303 K), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the activity factor by temperature,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an empirical coefficient usually taken to be 0.09 K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Guenther  et al., 1993), T is the leaf temperature.</p>
      <p>SOA yield (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of precursors could be expressed using an empirical
relationship based on gas-particle partitioning of two semi-volatile
products (Odum  et al.,  1996):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total concentration of absorbing
organic material, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass stoichiometric coefficients of
the product <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature-dependent
partitioning coefficient of the semi-volatile compound <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming a
constant activity coefficient and mean molecular weight, the partitioning
coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a certain temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) could be estimated as
(Sheehan and Bowman, 2001)
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an experimentally determined partitioning
coefficient at a reference temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
vaporization enthalpy, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas constant. To model the
temperature-dependent absorptive partitioning, three parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are required for each condensable product.</p>
      <p>Table S2 lists all the parameters for two-product model of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
SOA which were also used to estimate the temperature effect on SOA
partitioning by Sheehan and Bowman (2001). The available data of OC at the
NC site were reported in the range of 1.18 to 2.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during
July 2006 to January 2007 with an average of 1.66 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Ming  et al.,  2010). Thus, M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as 2.32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by the
average OC multiplying 1.4. Figure S5 shows the temperature dependence of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene emission rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOA yield within the
temperature range at the NC site (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.7 to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).
Obviously, decreasing temperature could reduce the emission but enhance the
gas to particle partitioning and SOA yield.</p>
      <p>From July to November 2012 (period 1), high values of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers and
SOA yield existed under low temperature, and SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers were
positively correlated with SOA yield (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.647, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, Fig. 5a).
These suggested that the temperature effect on partitioning was the
dominant process influencing SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers' variation during the period
1. From December 2012 to April 2013 (period 2), high values of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers and activity factor (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> existed under high
temperature, and SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers were positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.741, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, Fig. 5b). These suggested that the
temperature effect on emission was the dominant process influencing
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers' variation during the period 2. The increase of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracer concentrations during spring was also observed in the southeastern
United States (Ding  et al., 2008), resulting from the enhancement of monoterpenes
emission in spring (Kim, 2001). From May to July 2013 (period 3), SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracer concentrations were relative stable, and there was no correlation of
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or SOA yield (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.05).
These might result from the counteraction of temperature effects on emission
and partitioning during the summer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Correlation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers with SOA yield in period 1 <bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in period 2 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Previous study proposed that <italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid and pinic acid (P) were the
first-generation products of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and only formed under low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions (Eddingsaas et al., 2012). The dominance of <italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid and
pinic acid among SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers at the remote NC site indicated that
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> there was mainly formed under low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Moreover,
<italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid and pinic acid could be further photo-degraded to
high-generation products, e.g. 3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid (M)
(Glasius et al., 2000; Jaoui et al., 2005; Szmigielski  et al.,  2007). And the
ratio of <italic>cis</italic>-pinonic acid plus pinic acid to 3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic
acid (P / M) could be applied to trace the aging of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ding  et al.,
2011; Gómez-González  et al.,  2012). In the fresh chamber-produced
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA samples, the ratios of P / M were reported in the range
of 1.51 to 3.21 (Offenberg   et al.,  2007). In this study, the ratio of P / M
averaged 16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.9. Thus, SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was generally fresh at the NC
site and should be mainly formed from local precursors. Figure 6 presents a
negative correlation between P / M and temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.560, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008).
Higher P / M ratios were observed in the fall and the winter, and lower P / M
ratios occurred in the spring and the summer. Since temperature has positive
influence on photo-reaction rates, the higher temperature during the summer
could accelerate the photochemistry in the air and result in P to M
conversion being more efficient. Thus, SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the summer was more aged
than that in the winter.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Negative correlation between P / M ratio and temperature.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The levels of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid were in the
range of below MDL to 0.40 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As Fig. 2c shows, the levels
elevated from July to November 2012 and dropped to below MDL in December
2012. Then, the concentrations increased from January to March 2013 and
decreased from April to June 2013. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Caryophyllenic acid was
positively correlated with SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025), indicating that
the seasonal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid was similar with that
of the SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Aromatic SOA tracer</title>
      <p>The levels of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer, DHOPA were in the range of below MDL to
0.61 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This anthropogenic tracer was not detected or reported in
global remote areas (Table 2). Due to little human activity at the remote NC
site, the highest concentration of DHOPA was 1–2 orders of magnitude lower
than those (up to 52 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported in the urban regions of the United
States (Lewandowski  et al., 2013) and China (Ding  et al., 2014). DHOPA exhibited the higher
concentrations in the summer and the lower levels in the winter (Fig. 2d).</p>
      <p>Besides urban emissions from solvent and fossil fuel use, biomass burning is
an important source of aromatics in many parts of the world (Lewis et al.,
2013). The local dung or biomass burning (Duo et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2015)
may be potential sources of aromatics in the TP. Hence, DHOPA may come from
the processing of biomass burning emission. Figure 7 exhibits the monthly
variation of biomass burning tracer, levoglucosan during our sampling. The
concentrations of levoglucosan ranged from 0.82 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (October 2012)
to 4.55 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (April 2013) with a mean of 1.87 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.14 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Apparently, the monthly variation trend of levoglucosan was quite
different from that of DHOPA. And there was no correlation between DHOPA and
levoglucosan (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.05) (Fig. S6). These indicated that DHOPA at
the NC site was not mainly from the processing of biomass burning emission.
Since there were few anthropogenic sources near the remote NC site, the
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer should be not locally formed but mainly transported from
upwind regions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Monthly variation of biomass burning tracer, levoglucosan.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>To check the potential source areas of anthropogenic emissions, the
satellite data of population density
(<uri>http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/theme/population</uri>), aerosol optical
thickness (AOT, <uri>http://neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>), tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
vertical column densities (VCD, <uri>http://avdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>), and surface CO
(<uri>https://www2.acd.ucar.edu/mopitt</uri>) were analysis on the global scale. As
shown in Fig. S7a, the northern Indian subcontinent was the most populated
region of the world, with a population density of more than 1000 persons per
km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, the plots of global AOT, tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCD, and
surface CO (Fig. S7b–d) all illustrated that the northern Indian
subcontinent, including Bangladesh, Nepal, northeastern India, and
northwestern India were the global hotspots of these anthropogenic
pollutants. Compared with the northern Indian subcontinent, the TP exhibited
extremely low population density and low levels of AOT, surface CO, and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCD (Fig. 8a–d). Besides these satellite data, a recent study
at a site in northwestern India (Indo-Gangetic plain) witnessed
extremely high levels (up to 2065 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons which were mainly formed from anthropogenic combustion
processes (Dubey  et al.,  2015). All of these demonstrated that there were high
anthropogenic emissions in the northern Indian subcontinent.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of population density in 2000 <bold>(a)</bold>, AOT
<bold>(b)</bold>, surface CO <bold>(c)</bold>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCD <bold>(d)</bold> in May
2013 over the Indian subcontinent and the TP.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f08.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The TP features a monsoon climate (Cong  et al., 2007; Ming  et al., 2010;
Zhao  et al., 2013). Figure 9a presents the average trajectory of each cluster during our sampling in
the whole year. The air masses over the NC were primarily from Bangladesh,
Nepal and northeastern India (cluster 1, 32 %), northwestern India
(Indo-Gangetic basin) (clusters 3–6, 55 %), and the Taklimakan Desert
(cluster 2, 13 %) during the sampling period. In the summer, the
prevailing southerly winds (cluster 1, Fig. 9b) passed through the heavily
polluted areas in Bangladesh and northeastern India, and could bring
anthropogenic pollutants into the TP. Previous studies in the TP have
witnessed the enrichment of anthropogenic metals (Cong  et al., 2007) and the
enhancement of carbonaceous aerosols (Ming  et al., 2010; Zhao  et al., 2013) under the
influence of summer monsoon. Thus, the increase of DHOPA levels at the NC
site in the summer was mainly due to the transport of air pollutants from
the upwind Bangladesh and northeastern India.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Cluster analyses of air masses at the NC site <bold>(a)</bold> and
seasonal variations of clusters <bold>(b)</bold>, based on 5-day backward
trajectories during the sampling period. Summer 1 is from July to September
2012, fall is from October to November 2012, winter is from December 2012 to
February 2013, spring is from March to May 2013, summer 2 is from June to
July 2013.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In the winter, the air masses over the NC site mainly originated from
northwestern India (Indo-Gangetic basin) by the westerly winds (Fig. 9b).
Compared with the summer samples, the winter samples underwent
longer distance transport. Moreover, extremely low temperature in the winter
could reduce DHOPA formation. Therefore, the levels of DHOPA were lower in
the winter. It is worth noting that the mass fractions of DHOPA in all
tracers significantly elevated in the winter (less than 2 % in the summer
but up to 10 % in January, Fig. 2d), although its levels reduced. As
described in Eqs. (3) and (6), temperature is an important factor
controlling BVOCs emission. The drop of temperature from the summer (up to
10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) to the winter (low to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
at the NC site would lead to the emission of isoprene and monoterpenes
decreasing by 98 and 90 %, respectively. The elevated fractions of
DHOPA in the winter samples suggested that the SOA contributions from
aromatics would increase in the winter when BVOCs emission largely
decreased.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Source apportionment</title>
      <p>The SOA-tracer method developed by Kleindienst and co-workers was applied to
attribute SOC at the NC site. The researchers performed chamber experiments
to obtain the mass fraction of the tracers in SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual
precursor:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tri</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>[tri] is the total concentrations of the tracers for a
certain precursor. [SOC] is the mass concentration of SOC. With these
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and the measured SOA tracers in the ambient air, SOC from
different precursors can be estimated in the atmosphere, with the assumption
that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the chamber are the same as those in the ambient
air. There is some degree of uncertainty in the SOA-tracer method due to the
quantification with a single surrogate calibration standard (ketopinic acid)
and the simplification of applying SOA tracers and conversion factors to
calculate SOC in the ambient samples (Kleindienst  et al., 2007). However, this
method has been widely applied to attribute SOC from different precursors
and proven to be able to provide reasonable results in the United States
(Kleindienst  et al., 2007; Stone  et al., 2009; Lewandowski  et al., 2013)
and China (Hu  et al., 2008; Guo  et al., 2012; Peng  et al., 2013; Ding  et al., 2014). Lewandowski et al. (2008) found that the
measured OC in the midwestern United States could be fully explained by
primary OC from the chemical mass balance (CMB) model plus SOC from the
SOA-tracer method, suggesting that the secondary organic tracer technique
could be a valuable method for SOC estimation. Kleindienst et al. (2010)
further compared the estimated SOC by the SOA-tracer method and other four
independent methods (multiple regressions, CMB, carbon isotope and
EC-tracer) in the southeastern United States, and found that these five
methods matched well. Our previous study in the Pearl River Delta found SOC
levels estimated by the SOA-tracer method were not only consistent with but
also correlated well with those by EC-tracer method in summer (Ding  et al.,
2012). The SOC apportionment results were also comparable between the
SOA-tracer method and the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model in Hong Kong
(Hu et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were reported as 0.155 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.039,
0.023 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0046 and 0.00797 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0026 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for isoprene (SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene (SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aromatics (SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Kleindienst  et al., 2007). In
this study, the same set of SOA tracers as reported by Kleindienst et al. (2007) were used for SOC estimation, including MGA and MTLs for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllenic acid for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DHOPA for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
monoterpene SOC (SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nine tracers were involved in the source
profile (Kleindienst  et al., 2007). However, only five of the nine SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers
were measured in the current study. Wang et al. (2013) compared the results
from model prediction with field observation in the Pearl River Delta and
pointed out that the SOA-tracer method would underestimate SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
probably due to the mismatch of tracer compositions in the field and the
source profile (Ding  et al., 2014). To minimize the uncertainty caused by the
mismatch in tracer compositions, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the same five SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers (0.059 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was computed using the chamber data
from another study by the same research group (Offenberg  et al., 2007). The same
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also applied to estimate SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in our
previous study over China (Ding  et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Seasonal variations of estimated SOC. OC data at the NC site during
July 2006 to January 2007 were reported by Ming et al. (2010) and the error
bar means one standard deviation in each month.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8781/2015/acp-15-8781-2015-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The uncertainty in the SOA-tracer method is induced from the analysis of
organic tracers and the determination of the conversion factors. Based on
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in Table S1, the uncertainties in the tracer analyses
were within 40 % for SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (only MGA and MTLs involved for SOC
estimation), 95 % for SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 156 % for SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 91 % for
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were reported to be 25 % for
isoprene, 48 % for monoterpenes, 22 % for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene and
33 % for aromatics (Kleindienst  et al., 2007; Lewandowski  et al., 2013). Considering these
factors, the uncertainties of SOC apportionment were calculated through
error propagation. The RSD were 47 % for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 106 % for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
157 % for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 96 % for SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. On average, the RSD of the
reconstructed SOC (sum of the four precursors) was 51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 %.</p>
      <p>Figure 10 presents the monthly variations of the reconstructed SOC. SOC was
high in summer 2012 and declined from October to December. After that,
it kept increasing from January to June. The total concentrations of SOC
ranged from 0.02 to 0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an annual
average of 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The available data of OC in
total suspended particles at the NC site were reported in the range of 1.18
to 2.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during July 2006 to January 2007 (Ming  et al., 2010).
Since we did not measure OC in our size-segregated samples, the OC data
reported by Ming et al. (2010) were used to calculate SOC fraction in OC
(SOC/OC) from July to January. The calculated SOC / OC was on average 38 % in
the summer and up to 58 % in September, suggesting that SOC was an
important contributor to OC at the NC site during the summer (Ming  et al., 2010).
However, from the fall to the winter, the elevated OC and decreased SOC led to
SOC/OC declining from 11 % (in October) to 1 % (in January), indicating
that SOA from the four precursors had minor contributions to the elevated
OC. Since the air masses during the fall to the winter mostly
originated from Indo-Gangetic basin (clusters 3–6 in Fig. 9),
primary pollutants emitted there could transport to the TP and have a
significant impact on the air at the NC site. In addition, SOA from
aqueous-phase reactions and primary OA aging could not be captured by the
SOA-tracer method. Thus, the current results might underestimate the total
amount of SOC, which partly explained the low OC shares of SOC at the NC
site during the fall to the winter.</p>
      <p>Biogenic SOC (sum of SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominated over
SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the NC site, on average accounting for 75 % of the estimated
SOC. In the summer, SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was the major contributor with the SOC shares
of 81 %. From the fall to the spring, SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> became the major
contributor, on average contributing 38 % to SOC. Although SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
reduced in the winter, SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions elevated as high as 53 % in
January 2013. The elevated OC and the higher SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions in the
winter samples (Fig. 10) implied that the transport of anthropogenic
pollutants from the Indian subcontinent might have a significant influence on
carbonaceous aerosols over the remote NC during winter.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Seasonal trends of SOA tracers and origins were studied in the remote TP for
the first time. SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers represented the majority among these
compounds. The significant temperature dependence of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers
suggested that the seasonal variation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers at the NC site
was mainly influenced by the isoprene emission. Due to the influence of
temperature and relative humidity, the ratio of high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products
of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (MGA/MTLs) was the highest in the winter and the lowest in the
summer. The seasonal variation of SOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers was impacted by
monoterpenes emission and gas-particle partitioning. Due to the transport of
air pollutants from the Indian subcontinent, DHOPA presented relatively
higher concentrations in the summer and increased mass fractions in the
winter. The SOA-tracer method was applied to estimated SOC from these four
precursors. The annual average of SOC was 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the biogenic SOC accounting for 75 %. In the summer,
isoprene was the major precursor with its SOC shares of 81 %. In the
winter when the emissions of biogenic precursors largely declined, the
contributions of SOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased. At present, SOA origins and their
seasonal variations are unclear in the remote high-elevation TP. The remote
TP is connected to the densely populated Indian subcontinent. Our study
implies that anthropogenic pollutants emitted there could be transported to
the TP and influence SOC over the remote NC.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8781-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-8781-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of
the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (XDA05100104/XDB05010200/XDA05100105),
the National Science Foundation of China (41273116/41473099), and Youth
Innovation Promotion Association, CAS.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: X. Xu</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173–1176, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Szmigielski, R., Kourtchev, I., Van der Veken, P., Vermeylen,
R., Maenhaut, W., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg,
J. H., and Edney, E. O.: Hydroxydicarboxylic acids: Markers for secondary
organic aerosol from the photooxidation of alpha-pinene, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 1628–1634, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cong, Z. Y., Kang, S. C., Liu, X. D., and Wang, G. F.: Elemental composition
of aerosol in the Nam Co region, Tibetan Plateau, during summer monsoon
season, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1180–1187, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Zheng, M., Yu, L. P., Zhang, X. L., Weber, R. J., Yan, B.,
Russell, A. G., Edgerton, E. S., and Wang, X. M.: Spatial and seasonal
trends in biogenic secondary organic aerosol tracers and water-soluble
organic carbon in the southeastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
42, 5171–5176, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Wang, X., and Zheng, M.: The influence of temperature and aerosol
acidity on biogenic secondary organic aerosol tracers: Observations at a
rural site in the central Pearl River Delta region, South China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 1303–1311, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., Wang, X. M., Gao, B., Fu, X. X., He, Q. F., Zhao, X. Y., Yu, J.
Z., and Zheng, M.: Tracer-based estimation of secondary organic carbon in
the Pearl River Delta, south China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05313,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd016596</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Wang, X. M., Xie, Z. Q., Zhang, Z., and Sun, L. G.: Impacts of
Siberian biomass burning on organic aerosols over the North Pacific Ocean
and the Arctic: Primary and secondary organic tracers, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3149–3157, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial
distributions of secondary organic aerosols from isoprene, monoterpenes,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene, and aromatics over China during summer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 11877–11891, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Henry, K. M., Mentel, T. F., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Spindler,
C., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Dorn, H. P., Fuchs, H., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A.,
Saathoff, H., Naumann, K.-H., Moehler, O., Leisner, T., Mueller, L.,
Reinnig, M.-C., Hoffmann, T., Salo, K., Hallquist, M., Frosch, M., Bilde,
M., Tritscher, T., Barmet, P., Praplan, A. P., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J.,
Prevot, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Aging of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol via gas-phase OH radical reactions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
109, 13503–13508, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dubey, J., Maharaj Kumari, K., and Lakhani, A.: Chemical characteristics and
mutagenic activity of PM2.5 at a site in the Indo-Gangetic plain, India,
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe, 114, 75–83, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Duo, B., Zhang, Y., Kong, L., Fu, H., Hu, Y., Chen, J., Li, L., and Qiong,
A.: Individual particle analysis of aerosols collected at Lhasa City in the
Tibetan Plateau, J. Environ. Sci., 29, 165–177, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Eddingsaas, N. C., Loza, C. L., Yee, L. D., Chan, M., Schilling, K. A.,
Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: a-pinene photooxidation
under controlled chemical conditions – Part 2: SOA yield and composition in
low- and high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
7413–7427, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7413-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7413-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Froyd, K. D., Murphy, S. M., Murphy, D. M., de Gouw, J. A., Eddingsaas, N.
C., and Wennberg, P. O.: Contribution of isoprene-derived organosulfates to
free tropospheric aerosol mass, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21360–21365,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P. Q., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., and Barrie, L. A.: Isoprene, monoterpene,
and sesquiterpene oxidation products in the high Arctic aerosols during late
winter to early summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4022–4028, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fu, P. Q., Kawamura, K., and Miura, K.: Molecular characterization of marine
organic aerosols collected during a round-the-world cruise, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D13302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd015604</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fu, P. Q., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Charrière, B., and Sempéré, R.:
Organic molecular composition of marine aerosols over the Arctic Ocean in
summer: contributions of primary emission and secondary aerosol formation,
Biogeosciences, 10, 653–667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-653-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-653-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Glasius, M., Lahaniati, M., Calogirou, A., Di Bella, D., Jensen, N. R.,
Hjorth, J., Kotzias, D., and Larsen, B. R.: Carboxylic acids in secondary
aerosols from oxidation of cyclic monoterpenes by ozone, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 34, 1001–1010, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gómez-González, Y., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Chi, X., Neirynck, J.,
Janssens, I. A., Maenhaut, W., and Claeys, M.: Chemical characterisation of
atmospheric aerosols during a 2007 summer field campaign at Brasschaat,
Belgium: sources and source processes of biogenic secondary organic aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 125–138, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-125-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-125-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A
global-model of natural volatile organic-compound emissions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 100, 8873–8892, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., Harley, P. C., Monson, R. K., and Fall,
R.: Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability – Model evaluations
and sensitivity analyses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 12609–12617, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Guo, Q., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Zheng, J., Chang, C. C.,
Schauer, J. J., and Zhang, R.: Primary sources and secondary formation of
organic aerosols in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9846–9853,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hu, D., Bian, Q., Li, T. W. Y., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Contributions
of isoprene, monoterpenes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene, and toluene to secondary
organic aerosols in Hong Kong during the summer of 2006, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D22206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010437</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hu, D., Bian, Q., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Source apportioning of
primary and secondary organic carbon in summer PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Hong Kong using
positive matrix factorization of secondary and primary organic tracer data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D16204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012498" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012498</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hu, Q. H., Xie, Z. Q., Wang, X. M., Kang, H., He, Q. F., and Zhang, P.:
Secondary organic aerosols over oceans via oxidation of isoprene and
monoterpenes from Arctic to Antarctic, Sci. Rep., 3, 2280,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep02280</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, M. S., Czoschke, N. M., Lee, S., and Kamens, R. M.: Heterogeneous
atmospheric aerosol production by acid-catalyzed particle-phase reactions,
Science, 298, 814–817, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., and Edney,
E. O.: Identification and quantification of aerosol polar oxygenated
compounds bearing carboxylic or hydroxyl groups. 2. Organic tracer compounds
from monoterpenes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 5661–5673, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., and Edney,
E. O.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Caryophyllinic acid: An atmospheric tracer for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L05816,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl028827</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J.-C.: Factors controlling natural VOC emissions in a southeastern US
pine forest, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3279–3292, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Lewis, C.
W., Bhave, P. V., and Edney, E. O.: Estimates of the contributions of
biogenic and anthropogenic hydrocarbons to secondary organic aerosol at a
southeastern US location, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8288–8300, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Edney, E. O., Jaoui,
M., Zheng, M., Ding, X., and Edgerton, E. S.: Contribution of primary and
secondary sources to organic aerosol and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at SEARCH network sites,
J. Air Waste Manage., 60, 1388–1399, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E.
O., Sheesley, R. J., and Schauer, J. J.: Primary and secondary contributions
to ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the midwestern United States, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 3303–3309, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lewandowski, M., Piletic, I. R., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H.,
Beaver, M. R., Jaoui, M., Docherty, K. S., and Edney, E. O.: Secondary
organic aerosol characterisation at field sites across the United States
during the spring-summer period, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 93,
1084–1103, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, A. C., Evans, M. J., Hopkins, J. R., Punjabi, S., Read, K. A., Purvis,
R. M., Andrews, S. J., Moller, S. J., Carpenter, L. J., Lee, J. D., Rickard,
A. R., Palmer, P. I., and Parrington, M.: The influence of biomass burning on
the global distribution of selected non-methane organic compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 851–867, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-851-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-851-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Li, J. J., Wang, G. H., Wang, X. M., Cao, J. J., Sun, T., Cheng, C. L., Meng,
J. J., Hu, T. F., and Liu, S. X.: Abundance, composition and source of
atmospheric PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at a remote site in the Tibetan Plateau, China, Tellus
B, 65, 20281, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20281" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20281</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y. H., Zhang, H. F., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z. F., Marth, W. J., Park,
S., Arashiro, M., Cui, T. Q., Budisulistiorini, H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete,
W., Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic
aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen
oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ming, J., Xiao, C. D., Sun, J. Y., Kang, S. C., and Bonasoni, P.:
Carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere and precipitation of the Nam Co
region, central Tibet, J. Environ. Sci., 22, 1748–1756, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/particle partitioning and secondary organic aerosol
yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Offenberg, J. H., Lewis, C. W., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T.
E., and Edney, E. O.: Contributions of toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene to SOA
formed in an irradiated toluene/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene/NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/ air mixture:
Comparison of results using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content and SOA organic tracer methods,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3972–3976, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kurten, A., St Clair, J. M.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Unexpected epoxide formation in the
gas-phase photooxidation of isoprene, Science, 325, 730–733, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, J. L., Li, M., Zhang, P., Gong, S. Y., Zhong, M. A., Wu, M. H., Zheng,
M., Chen, C. H., Wang, H. L., and Lou, S. R.: Investigation of the sources
and seasonal variations of secondary organic aerosols in PM2.5 in Shanghai
with organic tracers, Atmos. Environ., 79, 614–622, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Piccot, S. D., Watson, J. J., and Jones, J. W.: A global inventory of
volatile organic-compound emissions from anthropogenic sources, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 97, 9897–9912, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Sheehan, P. E. and Bowman, F. M.: Estimated effects of temperature on
secondary organic aerosol concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35,
2129–2135, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Stone, E. A., Zhou, J., Snyder, D. C., Rutter, A. P., Mieritz, M., and
Schauer, J. J.: A comparison of summertime secondary organic aerosol source
contributions at contrasting urban locations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
3448–3454, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Stone, E. A., Nguyen, T. T., Pradhan, B. B., and Dangol, P. M.: Assessment of
biogenic secondary organic aerosol in the Himalayas, Environ. Chem., 9,
263–272, 2012.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T.
E., Edney, E. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of acidity on secondary organic
aerosol formation from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5363–5369,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M. N., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Szmigielski, R., Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Veken, P. V. d.,
Kourtchev, I., Vermeylen, R., Blockhuys, F., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Edney, E. O., Seinfeld, J. H., Maenhaut,
W., and Claeys, M.: 3-Methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid: An atmospheric
tracer for terpene secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L24811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031338</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
van Eijck, A., Opatz, T., Taraborrelli, D., Sander, R., and Hoffmann, T.: New
tracer compounds for secondary organic aerosol formation from
beta-caryophyllene oxidation, Atmos. Environ., 80, 122–130, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
von Schneidemesser, E., Schauer, J. J., Hagler, G. S. W., and Bergin, M. H.:
Concentrations and sources of carbonaceous aerosol in the atmosphere of
Summit, Greenland, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4155–4162, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S. Y., Wu, D. W., Wang, X. M., Fung, J. C. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Relative
contributions of secondary organic aerosol formation from toluene, xylenes,
isoprene, and monoterpenes in Hong Kong and Guangzhou in the Pearl River
Delta, China: an emission-based box modeling study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 507–519, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, Q., Saikawa, E., Yokelson, R. J., Chen, P., Li, C., and Kang, S.:
Indoor air pollution from burning yak dung as a household fuel in Tibet,
Atmos. Environ., 102, 406–412, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Xua, B., Cao, J., Hansen, J., Yao, T., Joswia, D. R., Wang, N., Wu, G., Wang,
M., Zhao, H., Yang, W., Liu, X., and He, J.: Black soot and the survival of
Tibetan glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 22114–22118, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Surratt, J. D., Lin, Y. H., Bapat, J., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect
of relative humidity on SOA formation from isoprene/NO photooxidation:
enhancement of 2-methylglyceric acid and its corresponding oligoesters under
dry conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6411–6424,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Z. Z., Cao, J. J., Shen, Z. X., Xu, B. Q., Zhu, C. S., Chen, L. W. A.,
Su, X. L., Liu, S. X., Han, Y. M., Wang, G. H., and Ho, K. F.: Aerosol
particles at a high-altitude site on the Southeast Tibetan Plateau, China:
Implications for pollution transport from South Asia, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 11360–11375, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S. Q., Kang, S. C., Chen, F., and Joswiak, D. R.: Water balance
observations reveal significant subsurface water seepage from Lake Nam Co,
south-central Tibetan Plateau, J. Hydrol., 491, 89–99, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
