<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characteristics and formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China: a case
study during the autumn of 2014 in the North China Plain</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Characteristics and formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. R.~Yang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y. R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X. G.</given-names></name>
          <email>liuxingang@bnu.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-4924</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name>
          <email>yhzhang@pku.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Z. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-601X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>W. Q.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Q. X.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of
Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and
Eco-Restoration, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China
Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking
University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal
University, Beijing 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">X. G. Liu (liuxingang@bnu.edu.cn) and Y. H. Zhang (yhzhang@pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>8165</fpage><lpage>8178</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Four extreme haze episodes occurred in October 2014 in the
North China Plain (NCP). To clarify the formation mechanism of hazes in
autumn, strengthened observations were conducted in Beijing from 5 October
to 2 November. The meteorological parameters, satellite data, chemical
compositions and optical properties of aerosols were obtained. The hazes
originated from the NCP, developing in the southwest and northeast directions,
with the highest concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 469 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing. The NCP was dominated by a weak high pressure system during
the haze episode, which resulted in low surface wind speed and relatively
stagnant weather. Moreover, the wind slowed down around Beijing city. The
secondary aerosols NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was always higher than that of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which indicated the motor vehicles played a more important
part in the hazes in October 2014, even though the oxidation rate from
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was faster than that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sudden increases of the concentrations of organic matter,
Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC (black carbon) before each haze episode implied that
regional transport of pollutants by biomass burning was important for haze
formation during autumn. A satellite map of fire points and the backward
trajectories of the air masses also indicated this pollution source. The
distinct decrease in the PBL (planetary boundary layer) height during four
haze episodes restrained the vertical dispersion of the air pollutants.
Water vapor also played a vital role in the formation of hazes by
accelerating the chemical transformation of secondary pollutants, leading to
hygroscopic growth of aerosols and altering the thermal balance of the
atmosphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Haze is an atmospheric phenomenon composed of smog, dust, and vapor
suspended in air, with a horizontal visibility lower than 10 km and an RH
lower than 90 % (Watson, 2002; Wu et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2013a).
Haze events are attracting increasing attention because of their close
relationship with human diseases (Miller et al., 2007; Araujo et al.,
2008) and the alteration of the radiation budget in the atmosphere, leading
to climate changes on Earth (Cahill, 1996; Jacobson, 2001).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observation sites in Beijing. All the data was obtained at BNU
site except for gaseous pollutants, which were measured at the Olympic Sports
Center by the National Environmental Bureau.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In recent years, hazes occurred frequently in China, especially in the North
China Plain (NCP), which is one of the most populated and economically
developed regions in China. Particulate matter was the primary pollutant
during haze episodes; it occupied 85–90 % of the primary
pollutants in most Chinese cities throughout the year (Wang et al., 2014).
Three widespread and persistent haze episodes were recorded in China in
January 2013 (Yang et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2014), October 2013 and
February 2014. Two of these episodes seriously influenced the NCP (one in
January 2013, and the other in February 2014), which were characterized by
long durations, large regions of influence and high concentrations of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal or less
than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (Yang et al., 2015). The rapid increase of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was seldom reported before, confused many researchers. Most studies
explained that this phenomenon was due to the intense secondary formation
(e.g., heterogeneous transform of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2013b; Ji et al., 2014) and the huge
regional transport of pollutants (Wang et al., 2014). In addition,
stationary meteorological conditions and large local emission (e.g., coal
combustion in winter) were also considered to be major factors leading to
such severe hazes (Liu et al., 2013b; Sun et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Due to the heating supply in northern China during the winter (Ma et al.,
2011) and the violent photoreaction during the summer (Liao et al., 2014),
most studies concerning haze events in the NCP were performed in the winter
and summer. Comparatively, haze formation in autumn has been investigated
less often. Liu et al. (2013b) reported a case study on haze in September
2011 in Beijing and clarified that the key factors resulting in the
formation and evolution of haze episodes were stable anti-cyclone synoptic
conditions at the surface, the decreasing height of the PBL (planetary
boundary layer), heavy pollution emissions from urban areas, the number and
size evolution of aerosols, and hygroscopic growth for aerosol scattering.
In Beijing city, the RH in autumn is high (Zhao et al., 2011), and biomass
burning in the vicinity is prevalent due to autumn harvest (Wang et al.,
2014). These special conditions may result in different formation mechanisms
of haze in autumn.</p>
      <p>In October 2014, four serious haze events occurred, which were some of the
severest hazes in the NCP in the autumn period. The haze mainly influenced
the NCP and the northeast China region, covering an area of 560 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
largest concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 741 and 508 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were recorded in Shijiazhuang, the capital of
Hebei province. Until now, few studies have reported on this haze episode
and its distinctive formation mechanism. In this study, comprehensive
measurements were conducted from 5 October to 2 November in Beijing to
investigate the characteristics and specific mechanism of continuous extreme
hazes in the autumn.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Experiment site</title>
      <p>Beijing is the capital of the People's Republic of China and the national
center for politics, economics and culture. The GDP (gross domestic product)
of Beijing in 2013 was 3.15 trillion dollars with a growth rate of 7.7 %.
The population of Beijing was 21.15 million with a population density of
1289 people per km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of 2013
(<uri>http://www.bjstats.gov.cn/nj/main/2014-tjnj/CH/index.htm</uri>). There were 5.4
million cars, with a growth of 0.237 million cars in Beijing as of 2013
(<uri>http://zhengwu.beijing.gov.cn/tjxx/tjgb/t1340447.htm</uri>). High population and
economic levels have led to heavy emissions of air pollutants in Beijing.</p>
      <p>Field measurements from 5 October to 2 January 2014 were performed at the
urban atmospheric environment monitoring superstation (39.96<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
116.36<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) on the campus of Beijing Normal University (BNU). This
site was located at the northern part of Beijing. The third ring road, one
of the main traffic lines of Beijing, was approximately 300 m to the north
of the measurement site. The observation site was on the roof of a 6-story
building (approximately 20 m above ground level); all of the instruments
except the visibility sensor were installed in an air-conditioned room. Mass
concentration of gases was measured by the National Environmental Bureau on the
Olympic Sports Center site (39.98<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.39<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Measurement and method</title>
      <p>The mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured by TEOM (tapered element
oscillating microbalance, RP1405F) at the BNU site, whereas the mass
concentration of gases (SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was monitored by
the National Environmental Bureau, and the data were gathered from the
Internet (<uri>http://www.pm25.in/</uri>). We chose the data from the Olympic Sports Center
site, since it was nearest to BNU site. Atmospheric visibility with range
from 10 m to 80 km was measured by the visibility sensor (Belfort 6000) at
the wavelength of 880 nm (Liu et al., 2013b), which consisted of a
transmitter, a receiver, and a controller. The atmospheric extinction
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (RH) at 550 nm in units of inverse megameter
(Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by Eq. (1) from the visibility data
(Koschmieder, 1924):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.912</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Vis</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn>880</mml:mn><mml:mn>550</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The BC (black carbon) in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured using an Aethalometer
(Model AE33, Magee Scientific Corporation) with seven wavelengths from 370 nm (UV) to 950 nm (IR) and a time resolution of 5 min. The aerosol
absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated using Eq. (2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>550</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The aerosol scattering coefficient at dry condition, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(dry), was
measured by integrating a nephelometer (Model Aurora 3000, Ecotech,
Australia) with a desiccant before the inlet.</p>
      <p>Thus, the aerosol scattering coefficient under ambient condition
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) was calculated using Eq. (3):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated using the experiential equation
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hodkinson, 1966) with the unit of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being ppbv, and the
scattering coefficient by gas, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was assumed to be constant at a
value of 10 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2008, 2013a).</p>
      <p>The hygroscopic growth of aerosol scattering <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was
widely used as the ratio of the aerosol scattering coefficient under wet
conditions to that under dry conditions. It was calculated using Eq. (4)
(Liu et al., 2008):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The single scattering albedo (SSA) is the ratio of the aerosol scattering
coefficient over the aerosol extinction coefficient at a given wavelength.
In this study, SSA was calculated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via Eq. (5):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The meteorological station (Vaisala, Finland) monitored solar radiation,
wind direction, wind speed and relative humidity. The height of the PBL, the
wind field graph and atmospheric back trajectories were obtained from the
ARL (Air Resources Laboratory) at the NOAA website
(<uri>http://www.arl.noaa.gov/index.php</uri>). Meteorological data from the GDAS
(Global Data Assimilation System) was used for the model calculation.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Overview of the instruments involved in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Manufacturer <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TEOM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Thermo. Electron., <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>RP1405F</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Visibility meter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Visibility</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Belfort 6000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aethalometer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AE33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Integrating nephelometer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol scattering coefficient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ecotech, Aurora 3000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind speed/Temperature/RH sensor</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wind speed, Temperature, RH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vaisala <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>GMT220 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>HMP45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACSM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Time series of observed PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH,
temperature and solar radiation in Beijing from 5 October to 2 November
2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (non-refractory submicron aerosol) species, including
organics, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were
measured in situ using an ACSM (aerosol chemical speciation monitor) with an
air flow of 0.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a time resolution of 15 min. More detailed
operations and calibrations of the ACSM can be found in the work of Sun et
al. (2013). The instruments involved in this study were listed in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Characteristics of the haze episodes</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Overall description</title>
      <p>As illustrated in Fig. 2, there were four haze episodes during the field
measurement in Beijing, which were 7 to 11 October, 17 to 20 October,
22 to 26 October, and 29 October to 1 November.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Time series of observed gaseous pollutants
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> , NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Beijing from 5 October to 2 November 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The highest concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred at 18:00 on 25 October (the
third episode), with a value of 469 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although
the haze was severe, the peak value was much lower than that (900 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the haze in January 2013 (Zhang et al.,
2014). Before the peak, increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were observed.
The four episodes had similar accumulation and dispersion patterns, in which
the increasing slopes for the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in four episodes resembled
each other, and the pollutants were dispersed within a few hours. The rates of
increase of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were represented by the slope of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, were calculated. To reduce the influence of the diurnal
variation of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the first and last peak values in each haze episode
were chosen in the calculation. Thus, the slope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hour</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The results were shown in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The slopes of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during
the four haze episodes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Episode 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Episode 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Episode 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Episode 4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In the four haze episodes, the rates of increase of the concentration of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 4.03, 4.44, 4.16 and 2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The first three hazes had similar rates of
increase, and in the last haze episode, the concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased at half the rate of the other three hazes. Gaseous pollutants
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>also showed obvious increases during
haze episodes, except for O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fourth episode (Fig. 3). Because a
heat supply was unavailable in October in Beijing, the emission of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was mainly from coal combustion, was much less than the emission of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was mainly from vehicle exhaust. The average mass
concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was 73.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was
much higher than that of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
result may not represent all the cities in the NCP, since large emission of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could be found in heavy industry cities like Tangshan and Handan
(Hu et al., 2014). O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was a product of the photochemical reaction
between nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). High
concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted in a high concentration of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> remained at a low level during the fourth episode,
especially on 30 and 31 October, whereas PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other gaseous
pollutants reached their peaks at this time, which indicated that the
photochemical reaction during the fourth episode was not strong and that
heterogeneous reactions played a major role in the haze formation in the
fourth episode. All of the gaseous pollutants showed daily variation and
reached a maximum on 18 October. These were also related to the variance in
the height of the PBL, which will be discussed in Sect. 3.2.4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration over China from 5:00 a.m. 9 October to 5:00 a.m. 10 October
(from China Meteorological Administration,
<uri>http://www.nmc.gov.cn/publish/observations/environmental.htm</uri>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Time series of the atmospheric extinction coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, absorption by NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, aerosol absorption coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ambient aerosol scattering coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH), and single scattering albedo (SSA) in Beijing
from 5 October to 2 November 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Like the other severe hazes (Tao et al., 2014a, b) in last 2 years,
the haze in October 2014 also influenced China to a large extent (Fig. 4).
According to the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial distribution over China, the haze
originated from the North China Plain (NCP) and developed in the
southwest and northeast directions. A similar situation occurred in
September 2011, when the haze originated from Beijing and developed in the
same directions (Liu et al., 2013b). Moreover, the haze influenced a large
area of middle China and northeastern China; for example, the concentration of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Harbin, which is a large city in northeastern China, peaked at
664 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the third haze episode.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Temporal variation of the mass concentration of each aerosol
species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> temporal variation of the mass
fraction of each aerosol species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> mass
fraction of each aerosol species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
non-haze and haze episodes from 15 October to 2 November 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Optical properties</title>
      <p>The temporal variation of the aerosol scattering coefficient at ambient
environment <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH), the absorption coefficient by NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the aerosol absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the atmospheric extinction
coefficient at ambient environment <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) and the SSA were shown in
Fig. 5. Data for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) were complete for the whole observation
period, whereas the other three parameters were not available until 15
October. With clear diurnal variation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased day by day during the haze episodes and decreased sharply at the
end of these haze episodes. Because <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) was calculated using
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was relatively small compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) had nearly the same temporal variation as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 5611 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 22:00 on 25 October,
and the average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached 1069 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both data were much higher
than those of other studies (Garland et al., 2008; Jung et al., 2009). The
SSA in Fig. 5 was calculated with the aerosol extinction at ambient
environment coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH). Aerosol representing fresh emission
always has a low SSA, whereas aged aerosol has a higher SSA (Garland et
al., 2008). As a result, the SSA showed an increasing trend during the haze
episodes. Four sudden decreases in the SSA were observed during the dawn of
16, 22, and 26 October and 1 November. The first two decreases occurred at
the beginning of haze episodes, which represented large quantities of
freshly emitted aerosol. Since local emissions in Beijing showed a steadier
pattern, the sudden change in SSA indicated pollutant transport from the
vicinity of Beijing (discussed in Sect. 3.2.2). The other two decreases
occurred at the end of haze episodes when strong winds blew over Beijing, and
the pollutants were largely removed (discussed in Sect. 3.2.3). Aged
aerosol was cleared and new aerosols increased in a short time (Guo et
al., 2014). Thus, SSA decreased sharply.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Formation mechanism of haze episodes</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Secondary transformation of aerosols</title>
      <p>Water-soluble ions are a primary component of aerosols and play a major role
in the hygroscopic growth of aerosols. The temporal variations of major
components (organic matter, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and black carbon (BC)) in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were shown in Fig. 6. Organic
matter contributed most to the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BC and Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mass concentration of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was always higher than that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially in
the winter time, when the heat supply was prevalent in northern China (Zhao
et al., 2013). Although Beijing was replacing coal with natural gas for a
heat supply, the influence from the vicinity was still enormous. However, in
this study, the mass concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was always higher than
that of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was
primarily transferred from NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, represented the contribution of motor
vehicle sources. The heat supply was not available during October in the NCP,
and the motor vehicles remained at a similar level throughout the year,
which implied that motor vehicles played a more important part in the hazes
during autumn. During the haze periods, the percentage of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased, whereas the percentage of organic matter continued
to decrease. When strong wind blew pollutants away, the percentage of
organic matter increased sharply. On the contrary, the percentage of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased in a short time and did not return for a certain
time. SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied similarly to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but in a much
milder pattern. After the strong wind, even the concentration of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased, and the return time was much shorter than
that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This indicated that even though the concentration of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower than that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the oxidation rate
from SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was faster. It has been reported that the
existence of high levels of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> might accelerate the reaction from
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (He et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Even though all of the components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased during the haze
events, the accumulation pattern might be different for each component.
Comparatively, the increasing pattern of SNA (sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium) was likely from local emissions. Diurnal
variation of the concentration of SNA also existed, but it was not as
significant as that of organic matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC. There was also no
sudden increase in the concentrations of SNA. They were more likely to
accumulate stably with high RH and a stagnant atmosphere. When the RH was
high and the atmosphere was stable, gases such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
transform to SNA at a fast rate. A clear increase in the SNA percentage
could be seen in the pie charts in Fig. 6. The values for SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 8.48,
20.55 and 9.46 % in the non-haze period to 12.7, 27.5 and
12.14 % in the haze episode, respectively. Continuous increasing of SNA
indicated that the formation of new SNA during the haze episodes contributed
most of the formation of the haze. During the hazes in January 2013, high
conversions from the gas phase of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the particle
phase of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were found, and heterogeneous
formations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were considered to be
important, especially during low visibility episodes (Quan et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>SOR (sulfur oxidation ratios) and NOR (nitrogen oxidation ratios) were important factors, showing that gaseous species would be
oxidized to secondary aerosols in the atmosphere (Sun et al., 2006). They
were widely used in the analysis of the secondary transformation of
aerosols. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOR, NOR were highly related. As we found in the
Fig. S1 in the Supplement, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was well fitted with SOR and NOR. The correlation
coefficient was 0.62 between PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOR and 0.79 between PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NOR. It meant SOR and NOR could be higher with higher concentration of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The temporal variations of SOR and NOR were shown in Fig. 7. SOR
was mostly higher than 0.2, and NOR was mostly higher than 0.1, indicating
intense secondary formation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fu et
al., 2008). SOR and NOR increased during the haze episodes with accumulated
pollutants. Furthermore, SOR increased more quickly than NOR. To compare the
rate of increase of SOR and NOR, the slope of the SOR and NOR in the
observed haze were calculated. To reduce the influence of the diurnal
variation of SOR and NOR, the first and last peak values in the figure were
chosen in the calculation. Thus, the slope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hour</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NOR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NOR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hour</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The results were shown in Table 3.</p>
      <p>In the three observed haze episodes, r(SOR) was 3.4, 1.6, and 4.2 times of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(NOR), which indicated faster production of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, even though
the concentration of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower than that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Meanwhile, after the strong wind, which decreased SOR and NOR sharply, low
SOR still existed, whereas NOR was nearly 0. These findings explained the
shorter return time of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the haze episodes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Time series of SOR (sulfate oxidation rate) and NOR (nitrate
oxidation rate) from 15 October to 2 November 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Fire points of straw burning over China on 6 October 2014, <bold>(b)</bold>
Backward trajectories from Beijing for Episode 1.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f08.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Combustion of biomass and regional transport</title>
      <p>Biomass burning became prevalent in the NCP during the autumn harvest. The
combustion was primarily conducted in the open field. Pollutants, such as BC
and CO, were emitted on a large scale and influenced the air quality not
only in the emission region but also in the downstream city. Hence, biomass
burning in the surrounding provinces was an important cause of the hazes in
the autumn in Beijing. Fire points in China, based on data from MODIS Terra
and Aqua satellites, on 6 October were shown in Fig. 8a. On 6 October, 267
fire points were found in China, among which 29, 163 and 30 fire points were
found in Hebei, Henan and Shandong provinces, respectively. In total, 1957
fire points, which were caused by biomass burning in the whole of October,
were found in China, among which 54, 26 and 57 fire points were found in
Hebei, Henan and Shandong provinces, respectively. Although the fire points
were more strictly controlled in 2014 compared to 2013, the influence of
biomass burning still could not be neglected.</p>
      <p>The backward trajectories of Beijing during the first haze episode reflected
how the biomass burning influenced Beijing (Fig. 8b). A total of nine backward
trajectories of 48 h were drawn with the HYSPLIT model online version.
The backward trajectories started from 17:00 (LST) on 11 October and
restarted a new trajectory every 12 h. The air mass during the first
haze episode mainly came from the south and southeast, originating from
Hebei, Henan, Shandong and even Anhui Province. The pollutants from biomass
burning in these provinces were transported to Beijing. Once the
meteorological conditions were stagnant, haze formed and was aggravated in
this region. A similar situation occurred in the haze in 2007 (Li et al.,
2010). Therefore, biomass burning was a tough challenge for air pollution
control in the autumn.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>The slopes of SOR and NOR during three haze episodes.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Episode 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Episode 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Episode 4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(SOR)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(NOR)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Based on the temporal variation of each component in Fig. 6, the organic
matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC had similar variation patterns. In addition to clear
diurnal variations, which were caused by the diurnal development of the PBL, a
sudden increase before each haze period was found for the concentration of
organic matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC. On 18 October, the height of the PBL
(468.7 m) was 21.1 % higher than that on 17 October (386.9 m), but the
concentrations of organic matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC were 6, 6 and 4 times the
values of the day before. Organic matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC were emitted from
biomass burning; abnormal high values and a sudden increase in organic
matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC indicated spatial transport of pollutants from
straw burning. Consequently, regional pollutant transport was important for
haze formation in October 2014, and straw burning was a significant
pollution source. However, the concentrations of organic matter, BC and
Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in haze period were found lower than those in nonhaze period. It
was because the increase of organic matter, BC and Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was obvious in
the beginning part of haze, after which the increase of new SNA were
predominant.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Surface pressure on the surface at <bold>(a)</bold> 02:00 LST 7 October, <bold>(b)</bold>
02:00 LST 8 October, <bold>(c)</bold> 02:00 LST 9 October, and <bold>(d)</bold> 02:00 LST 10 October.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f09.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Wind field graphs of the NCP at <bold>(a)</bold> 02:00 LST 10 October, <bold>(b)</bold> 02:00
LST 20 October, <bold>(c)</bold> 02:00 LST 24 October, and <bold>(d)</bold> 02:00 LST 31 October;
black star denotes Beijing city, the color bar represents wind vectors.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f10.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Stationary synoptic condition</title>
      <p>Pressure systems can influence the wind and precipitation of a region.
Surface weather maps of East Asia at 02:00 (LST) on 7–10
October during the first haze episode were shown in Fig. 9. The NCP was
dominated by a weak high-pressure system on 7 October, which lasted for the
following 2 days. The weak high-pressure system resulted in low surface wind
and relatively stagnant weather, which was unfavorable for the dispersion of
air pollutants. The high-pressure system slowly moved towards the northeast.
Meanwhile, the Mongolia anticyclone (a low-pressure system) moved towards
and encountered the high-pressure system on 9 October, which brought wind
and caused a small decrease in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the dawn of 9 October. However,
the weak high-pressure system dominated the NCP on 10 October, and the
weather became stagnant again until 11 October, when another strong Mongolia
anticyclone moved to the NCP, and the first haze episode ended.</p>
      <p>The wind fields at 02:00 on 10, 20, 24, and 31 October in the NCP region were
shown in Fig. 10, representing typical days in the four haze episodes.
Generally, the wind speeds were slow during the haze episodes. In addition,
the wind slowed sharply around Beijing city in all four figures. For
example, on 31 October, the wind over the NCP came from the east, from the Bohai Sea.
The wind separated into two directions when it encountered Beijing, one
blowing to the north and the other blowing to the south. The wind over
Beijing maintained a low speed. A similar phenomenon was observed in January
2013 when a severe haze occurred in Beijing (Tao et al., 2014b). Moreover,
the wind on 10 October was smooth, blowing from the southeast of Beijing and
then turning to the northeast. The wind around Beijing was clearly slowed
and became strong after blowing over Beijing. The city acted as a large
obstacle for the wind, slowing the wind speed, disturbing the wind direction
and affecting other properties of the wind (Miao et al., 2009). The wind on 20 October was more complex. Winds from the southwest
and the northwest blew toward and converged at Beijing. The winds from the two
directions weakened each other, creating stagnant conditions in Beijing. The
pollutants in the vicinity were brought to Beijing, accumulating and
reacting further (Zhao et al., 2013). On 24 October, the wind was similar
to that on 10 October, with the exception of the disordered directions
around Beijing city.</p>
      <p>Changes in wind pattern influenced the near-surface aerosol concentration
(Pal et al, 2014). The wind rose diagram overlaid with the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations from 5 October to 2 November were shown in Fig. 11. The winds
blew mainly from three directions: northwest, northeast, and southwest. In
each direction, the higher the wind speeds were, the lower the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were. The average wind speed was 1.1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was slightly higher than that (0.9 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in September
2011, when another haze episode occurred (Liu et al., 2013b). Furthermore,
the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were relatively high within the wind speed
limit: 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind from the northwest, 1.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind from the
northeast and 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind from the southwest. For
example, when the wind was from the northeast and the wind speed was lower
than 1.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, nearly all of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
exceeded 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (the national secondary standard
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and vice versa. Nevertheless, when the wind blew northwest,
with wind directions concentrating between 270 to
315<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the wind speed limit decreased to 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, with similar wind speeds, the concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was lower. Zhang et al. (2015) made a research on relationships of evolution
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and meteorological conditions. In Beijing city,
winds from the northeast and southwest would result in higher concentration of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and winds from the northeast would lead to the lowest recorded concentration of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn and winter. It could also be clearly found in the haze
during January 2013 in Beijing (Yang et al., 2015). However, winds in
January 2013 distributed more equally in every direction, while winds in
October 2014 were concentrated in a specific direction. Differences between every
wind direction were less in January 2013. High concentration (over 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could also be found at wind speeds
over 2 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when wind blowing northwest.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Wind rose diagrams of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing in
October 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Variance of the PBL height</title>
      <p>The development of the PBL, which is mainly influenced by air temperature
and dynamics, affects the vertical dispersion of pollutants (Pal et al.,
2015). When the PBL height is low, the pollutants stay at the surface layer
and maintain a higher level. This can easily lead to haze formation on the
ground. As depicted in Fig. 12, the heights of the PBL between the two haze
episodes were relatively high, and distinct descents of the PBL height were
found during the four haze episodes. The lowest PBL at noon was 384 m on 17
October. It was only 14 % of the PBL height before the haze (2718 m on 15
October). Because it was difficult to break through the PBL, the local
pollutants were compressed and accumulated near the surface, leading to a
high concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This was not similar to cases reported in
other haze episodes (Yang et al., 2015). The temperature during each haze
episode in October 2014 maintained a constant level or even increased (Fig. 2). Normally, a higher temperature, which will enhance the PBL development,
is conducive to higher PBL. However, the formation of hazes in October 2014
was influenced by many factors. The dynamics of the atmosphere is another
important factor from the local perspective. The deficiency of horizontal
movement of the atmosphere affected the vertical development of the PBL. The
highest PBL occurred on 16 October, when a cold and fast wind blew over
Beijing. The cold and fast air mass from Mongolia was an effective removal
mechanism of the haze not only in the horizontal direction but also in the
vertical direction. Once the cold air from the northwest blew over the
NCP, it not only promoted the horizontal dispersion of pollutants but also
accelerated the vertical diffusion of pollutants because the height of the
PBL was rapidly increased.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>Time series of the PBL (planetary boundary layer) from 5
October to 2 November 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Impact of the relative humidity on haze</title>
      <p>Four haze episodes in October 2014 were characterized by higher RH. The RH
was over 90 % during the severest haze period, and it sometimes reached
100 % in October 2014. The high RH aggravated the haze.</p>
      <p>The relationships between RH and SOR and between RH and NOR were illustrated
in Fig. 13. SOR and NOR were highly correlated with RH. The correlation
coefficients of SOR and NOR with RH were 0.79 and 0.55, respectively, which
were much higher than those in a previous study (Han et al., 2014),
indicating the particularly high importance of RH during the haze episodes
in this study. SOR reached a minimum when RH was approximately 40 %. When
RH was &gt; 40 %, SOR increased with increasing RH, whereas SOR
decreased with increasing RH when RH was &lt; 40 %. The conversion
from SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> requires water vapor as a reactant. Hence,
when RH was &gt; 40 %, the high RH became a major factor
accelerating the production of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The conversion is an
endothermic reaction, which indicates that high temperature can promote the
conversion. RH and temperature have an inverse correlation. When the RH was
lower than 40 %, water was not adequate to accelerate the conversion. As a
result, the temperature became the most important factor in the reaction.
Therefore, when the RH was lower than 40 %, SOR decreased with decreasing
temperature but not with increasing RH. The formation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
more complex than that of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, so the correlation of NOR and RH
was much weaker than that of SOR and RH. However, a clear positive
correlation was still observed. No minimum value was found for NOR, and high
RH can promote NOR.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>Relationship between RH (%) and SOR and between RH (%)
and NOR during the haze episodes in October 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><caption><p>Hygroscopic growth for aerosol scattering <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of RH with curve fitting. Scattered
dots are the measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
and the line is the empirical fitting curve.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at ambient RH during the observed
period were depicted in Fig. 14. The curve was similar to those of other
studies, indicating an increasing tendency of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
increasing RH. Usually, the exponential relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH can be fitted by an empirical function: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study, the curve-fitting parameters
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were 3.79 and 6.10, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at an
RH of 80 %, which had an average value of 1.97 in this study, were
extracted for comparison with other studies. When the RH was 80 %, the
aerosol particulate scattering coefficient was nearly 2 times of that in dry
conditions, which was relatively large compared with other studies (Liu et
al., 2013a). Consequently, the RH contributed much more to aerosol
extinctions in October 2014, leading to more severe hazes.</p>
      <p>Visibility dependences on the mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at different
RH intervals were shown in Fig. 15. Overall, the visibility decreased
rapidly with increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. In addition, with
increasing RH, the visibility decreased faster. For example, when the RH was
less than 30 %, and the mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower than
85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, all of the visibilities were over 10 km.
However, when the RH was greater than 90 %, no visibility was more than
10 km in this observation. To quantify the relationship between visibility, the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and RH, Eq. (9) was used:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ag</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>34</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were the mass scattering and absorbing
efficiency, which were the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The average values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study were
3.10 and 0.42 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Curves of the dependence of visibility on the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at
different RH intervals were shown in Fig. 15. The calculated curves showed
the same trend as the dotted figure: the higher the RH was, the faster the
visibility decreased as the concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased. When the
concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reached 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (the
national secondary standard of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the visibility surpassed 10 km
only when the RH was lower than 60 %. To control haze, keeping PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
under the national second standard alone was sufficient.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><caption><p>Variation of visibility at different RH values and different
concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, observed (dots) and simulated
(lines).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In previous studies, a temperature decrease was often reported (Liu et
al., 2013b). It not only deprived the dynamics of the PBL development, but
also resulted in less heat turbulence, which was unfavorable for pollutant
dispersion. Moreover, negative aerosol radiation forcing (ARF) was always
recorded, indicating the feedback mechanism between radiation and aerosol
loading (Quan et al., 2014). However, in this study, even though the solar
radiation was reduced during the haze episodes, the temperature was steady
or even increasing over a longer temporal range (several days). Water vapor,
a greenhouse gas, had a vital effect on the atmospheric thermal balance. The
short-wave radiation from the sun was not absorbed by water vapor, but the
long-wave radiation from the Earth can be largely absorbed by it. As a
result, even less solar radiation reached the Earth's surface, and the
radiation from the Earth supplied increasing heat to the atmosphere with
increasing RH. Increasing temperature accelerated the chemical reaction rate
of aerosols and aggravated the haze. This situation could also be found in
the haze in January 2013, but little research has focused on the temperature
variation. Figure 16 depicted how RH influenced the haze formation. Water
vapor in the atmosphere played a vital role in the formation of haze, which
could not only accelerate the chemical transformation of secondary
pollutants but also lead to hygroscopic growth of aerosols. Furthermore, as
an important greenhouse gas, it absorbed surface radiation, altering the
thermal balance of the atmosphere, which finally affected haze formation. RH
in autumn was much higher than winter (Dong et al., 2013). It highly
increased the rate of secondary reaction and hygroscopic growth. Thus, when
only considering RH, with the same level of emission haze in autumn would be
more severe. However, in reality a larger quantity of emissions and increasing RH
in last decade in winter (Cheng et al., 2015) resulted in heavier haze in the
winter season.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Most studies concerning haze events in the NCP were performed in the winter
and summer, concluding that intense secondary formation, huge regional
transport of pollutants, stationary meteorological conditions and large
local emissions were most considered to be major factors leading to severe
hazes. Formation of hazes in autumn, during which biomass burning and
movement of wind based on large scale topography was important, was less
reported. Moreover, overall analysis on the role of humidity was always
missing in case studies, while humidity would impact the formation process
from many aspects.</p>
      <p>Comprehensive measurements were conducted during the haze episode from
5 October to 2 November  2014. To clarify the formation mechanism of haze in
Beijing, the physical and chemical characteristics of aerosol and the
relevant meteorology parameters were analyzed. Particularly, comprehensive
influence of humidity on haze formation was presented. At last, three major
ways how humidity worked on formation mechanism of hazes were put forward.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><caption><p>The mechanism of how RH influenced haze formation.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/8165/2015/acp-15-8165-2015-f16.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The major conclusions were as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>Four distinct haze episodes occurred in October 2014 in Beijing, China.
The increasing rate of the concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was seldom
mentioned before, was used to analyze the formation progress of hazes. The
highest concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was 469 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Beijing. The highest increasing rate of the concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, was
4.44 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The haze originated
from the North China Plain (NCP), developing in the southwest and
northeast directions.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The concentration of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower than that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, The increasing rate of the SOR and NOR was introduced into this
research, showing the oxidation rate of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was faster
than that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sharp increases in the SNA fraction in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the haze episode indicated that new formation of SNA contributed
most to the formation of haze.</p></list-item><list-item><p>In total, 54, 26 and 57 fire points were found in Hebei, Henan and Shandong
provinces, respectively. The air mass during the first haze episodes mainly
came from the south and southeast, originating from these provinces. The
sudden increase in the concentration of organic matter, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC
before each haze period indicated the importance of biomass burning and
transport in the beginning of haze in October 2014, after which the increase
of new SNA were predominant in haze formation.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The NCP was dominated by a weak high-pressure system during haze episodes.
Beijing city slowed the wind speed and disturbed the wind direction. Overall,
the winds blew from the northwest, northeast, and southwest. The PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were relatively high within the wind speed boundary: 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind from the northwest, 1.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for wind from the northeast and 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind from the
southwest.</p></list-item><list-item><p>A distinct decrease in the PBL height was observed during the four haze
periods, compressing the local pollutants closer to the surface.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The four haze episodes in October 2014 were characterized by higher RH.
High RH influenced the haze formation in three ways: accelerating the
chemical transformation of secondary pollutants, leading to hygroscopic
growth of aerosols and altering the thermal balance of the atmosphere.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(No. 41175018 and No. 41475113) and by special fund of State Key Joint
Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (No. 14L02ESPC).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: V.-M. Kerminen</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Araujo, J. A., Barajas, B., Kleinman, M., Wang, X., Bennett, B. J., Gong,
K. W., Navab, M., Harkema, J., Sioutas, C., Lusis, A. J., and Nel, A. E.:
Ambient particulate pollutants in the ultrafine range promote early
atherosclerosis and systemic oxidative stress, Circ. Res., 102, 589–596, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Cahill, T. A.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols: the role for
PIXE, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interact. Mater., B 109,
402–406, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K. B., Du, Z. Y., Zheng, M., Duan, F. K., and Ma, Y. L.:
Humidity plays an important role in the PM2.5 pollution in Beijing, Environ.
Pollut., 197, 68–95, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Dong, X. L., Liu, D. M., Gao, S. P.: Seasonal variations of atmospheric
heterocyclic aromatic amines in Beijing, China, Atmos. Res., 120–121, 287–297, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, Q., Zhuang, G., Wang, J., Xu, C., Huang, K., Li, J., Hou, B., Lu, T.,
and Streets, D. G.: Mechanism of formation of the heaviest pollution
episode ever recorded in the Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
2023–2036, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Schmid, O., Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P.,
Wiedensohler, A., Takegawa, N., Kita, K., Miyazaki, Y., Kondo, Y., Hu, M.,
Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Zhang, Y. H., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.:
Aerosol optical properties in a rural environment near the mega-city
Guangzhou, China: implications for regional air pollution, radiative forcing
and remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5161–5186,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5161-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5161-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du Z, Wu, Z.,
Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe urban
haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Han, T., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Qu, Y., Gu, J., Ma, Q., Lu, K., Tian, H., Chen,
J., Zeng, L., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.: Characteristics of Aerosol Optical
Properties and Their Chemical Apportionments during CAREBeijing 2006, Aerosol
Air Qual. Res., 14, 1431–1442, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>He, H., Wang, Y., Ma, Q., Ma, J., Chu, B., Ji, D., Tang, G., Liu, C., Zhang,
H., and Hao, J.: Mineral dust and NOx promote the conversion of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
sulfate in heavy pollution days, Sci. Rep., 4, 4172, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep04172</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Hodkinson, J. R.: Calculation of colour and visibility in urban atmospheres
polluted by gaseous NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Air Water Pollut., 10, 137–144, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, J. L., Wang, Y. G., Ying, Q., and Zhang, H. L.: Spatial and temporal
variability of PM2.5 and PM10 over the North China plain and the Yangtze
River delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 95, 598–609, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Wang, Q., Fu, J. S., Lin, Y., Liu, T., Han, L., and
Deng, C.: Extreme haze pollution in Beijing during January 2013: chemical
characteristics, formation mechanism and role of fog processing, Atmos. Chem.
Phys. Discuss., 14, 7517–7556, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-7517-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acpd-14-7517-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black
carbon in atmospheric aerosols, Nature, 409, 695–697, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ji, D., Li, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Cheng, M., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, L.,
Tang, G., Hu, B., Chao, N., Wen, T., and Miao, H.: The heaviest particulate
air-pollution episodes occurred in northern China in January, 2013: Insights
gained from observation, Atmos. Environ., 92, 546–556, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, J., Lee, H., Kim, Y. J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Gu, J., and Fan, S.:
Aerosol chemistry and the effect of aerosol water content on visibility
impairment and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 Pearl River
Delta campaign, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 3231–3244, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Koschmieder, H.: Theorie der horizontalen Sichtweite, Beiträge zur Physik
der freien Atmosphäre, 33–53, 1924.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Li, W. J., Shao, L. Y., and Buseck, P. R.: Haze types in Beijing and the
influence of agricultural biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8119–8130, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8119-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8119-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Liao, X. N., Zhang, X. L., Wang, Y. C., Liu, W. D., Du, J., and Zhao, L. H.:
Comparative analysis on meteorological condition for persistent haze cases in
summer and winter in Beijing (With abstract in English), Environ. Sci., 35,
2031–2044, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. G., Cheng, Y. F., Zhang, Y. H., Jung, J. S., Sugimoto, N., Chang, S.
Y., Kim, Y. J., Fan, S. J., and Zeng, L. M.: Influences of relative humidity
and particle chemical composition on aerosol scattering properties during the
2006 PRD campaign, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1525–1536, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. G., Zhang, Y. H., Gu, J. W., Li, Y. P., Cheng, Y. F., Qu, Y., Han, T.
T., Wang, J. L., Tian, H. Z., Chen, J., and Zhang, Y. H.: Increase of aerosol
scattering by hygroscopic growth: Observation, modeling, and implications on
visibility, Atmos. Res., 132–133, 91–101, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X. G., Li, J., Qu, Y., Han, T., Hou, L., Gu, J., Chen, C., Yang, Y.,
Liu, X., Yang, T., Zhang, Y., Tian, H., and Hu, M.: Formation and evolution
mechanism of regional haze: a case study in the megacity Beijing, China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4501–4514, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4501-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4501-2013</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Ma, N., Zhao, C. S., Nowak, A., Müller, T., Pfeifer, S., Cheng, Y. F.,
Deng, Z.Z., Liu, P. F., Xu, W. Y., Ran, L., Yan, P., Göbel, T., Hallbauer,
E., Mildenberger, K., Henning, S., Yu, J., Chen, L. L., Zhou, X. J.,
Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Aerosol optical properties in the North
China Plain during HaChi campaign: an in-situ optical closure study, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 5959–5973, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5959-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5959-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Miao, S., Chen, F., LeMone, M. A., Tewari, M., Li, Q., and Wang, Y.: An
Observational and Modeling Study of Characteristics of Urban Heat Island and
Boundary Layer Structures in Beijing, J. Appl. Meterol. Clim., 48, 484–501,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, K. A., Siscovick, D. S., Sheppard, L., Shepherd, K., Sullivan, J. H.,
Anderson, G. L., and Kaufman, J. D.: Long-term exposure to air pollution and
incidence of cardiovascular events in women, N. Engl. J. Med., 356, 447–458,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Quan, J., Tie, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Li, X., Gao, Y., and Zhao, D.:
Characteristics of heavy aerosol pollution during the 2012–2013 winter in
Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 88, 83–89, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Pal, S., Lee, T. R., Phelps, S., De Wekker, S. F. J.: Impact of atmospheric
boundary layer depth variability and wind reversal on the diurnal variability
of aerosol concentration at a valley site, Sci. Total Environ., 496,
424–434, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Pal, S., Lopez, M., Schmidt, M., Ramonet, M., Gibert, F., Xueref Remy, I.,
and Ciais, P.: Investigation of the atmospheric boundary layer depth
variability and its impact on the 222Rn concentration at a rural site in
France, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 623–643, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Zhuang, G., Tang, A. A., Wang, Y., and An, Z.: Chemical
characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 in haze-fog episodes in Beijing, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 3148–3155, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, M., Chen, L., Wang, Z., Ma, P., Tao, J., and Jia, S.: A study of urban
pollution and haze clouds over northern China during the dusty season based
on satellite and surface observations, Atmos. Environ., 82, 183–192, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Tao, M., Chen, L., Xiong, X., Zhang, M., Ma, P., Tao, J., and Wang, Z.:
Formation process of the widespread extreme haze pollution over northern
China in January 2013: Implications for regional air quality and climate,
Atmos. Environ., 98, 417–425, 2014b.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Xu, J., Zhang, M., Yang, Y., Shen, X., Wang, Y., Chen, D., and Guo,
J.: A study of the meteorological causes of a prolonged and severe haze
episode in January 2013 over central-eastern China, Atmos. Environ., 98,
146–157, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, W., Maenhaut, W., Yang, W., Liu, X., Bai, Z., Zhang, T., Claeys, M.,
Cachier, H., Dong, S., and Wang, Y.: One-year aerosol characterization study
for PM2.5 and PM10 in Beijing, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 5, 554, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G.: Visibility: Science and regulation, J. Air Waste Manage., 52,
628–713, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D., Bi, X., Deng, X., Li, F., Tan, H., Liao, G., and Huang, J.: Effect of
Atmospheric Haze on the Deterioration of Visibility over the Pearl River
Delta, Acta Meteorol. Sin., 21, 215, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, J., Griffith, S. M., Yu, X., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Effect of
nitrate and sulfate relative abundance in PM2.5 on liquid water content
explored through half-hourly observations of inorganic soluble aerosols at a
polluted receptor site, Atmos. Environ., 99, 24–31, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., Liu, X., Qu, Y., Wang, J., An, J., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, F.:
Formation mechanism of continuous extreme haze episodes in the megacity
Beijing, China, in January 2013, Atmos. Res., 155, 192–203, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang, Y.
S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious
pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z. Y., Zhang, X. L., Gong, D. Y., Quan, W. J., Zhao, X. J., Ma, Z. Q.,
and Kim, S. J.: Evolution of surface O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM2.5 concentrations and their
relationships with meteorological conditions over the last decade in Beijing,
Atmos. Environ., 108, 67–75, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, P., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., and Xu, X.: Long-term visibility trends and
characteristics in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China, Atmos.
Res., 101, 711–718, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
