<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-7961-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Primary marine aerosol emissions from the Mediterranean Sea during pre-bloom and oligotrophic conditions: correlations to seawater chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from a mesocosm study</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Primary marine aerosol emissions from the Mediterranean Sea}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~N.~Schwier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schwier</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-221X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Asmi</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-2360</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ebling</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Landing</surname><given-names>W. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Marro</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Pedrotti</surname><given-names>M.-L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9963-0402</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Sallon</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Iuculano</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Agusti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0536-7293</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Tsiola</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Pitta</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Louis</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Guieu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-8326</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Gazeau</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sellegri</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          <email>k.sellegri@opgc.univ-bpclermont.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique CNRS UMR6016,
Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise
Pascal, 63171 Aubière, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State
University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4520, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), CNRS UMR7093,
Observatoire océanologique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-mer, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR7093, LOV,
Observatoire océanologique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-mer, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (IMEDEA CSIC-UIB),
07190 Esporles, Mallorca, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>The UWA Oceans Institute and School of Plant Biology, University of
Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), P.O. Box 2214, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101, Helsinki,
Finland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">K. Sellegri (k.sellegri@opgc.univ-bpclermont.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>7961</fpage><lpage>7976</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>July</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The effect of ocean acidification and changing water conditions on primary
(and secondary) marine aerosol emissions is not well understood on a regional
or a global scale. To investigate this effect as well as the indirect effect
on aerosol that changing biogeochemical parameters can have,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pelagic mesocosms were deployed for several weeks in
the Mediterranean Sea during both winter pre-bloom and summer oligotrophic
conditions and were subjected to various levels of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to simulate the
conditions foreseen in this region for the coming decades. After seawater
sampling, primary bubble-bursting aerosol experiments were performed using a
plunging water jet system to test both chemical and physical aerosol
parameters (10–400 nm). Comparing results obtained during pre-bloom and
oligotrophic conditions, we find the same four log-normal modal diameters
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>37.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>91.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>260</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 nm)
describing the aerosol size distribution during both campaigns, yet pre-bloom
conditions significantly increased the number fraction of the second (Aitken)
mode, with an amplitude correlated to virus-like particles, heterotrophic
prokaryotes, TEPs (transparent exopolymeric particles), chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
other pigments. Organic fractions determined from kappa closure calculations for
the diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 nm, were much larger during the
pre-bloom period (64 %) than during the oligotrophic period (38 %),
and the organic fraction decreased as the particle size increased. Combining
data from both campaigns together, strong positive correlations were found
between the organic fraction of the aerosol and chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria abundance, and
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations. As a consequence of the
changes in the organic fraction and the size distributions between pre-bloom
and oligotrophic periods, we find that the ratio of cloud condensation nuclei
(CCN) to condensation nuclei (CN) slightly decreased during the pre-bloom
period. The enrichment of the seawater samples with microlayer samples did
not have any effect on the size distribution, organic content or the CCN
activity of the generated primary aerosol. Partial pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, perturbations had little effect on the physical or chemical
parameters of the aerosol emissions, with larger effects observed due to the
differences between a pre-bloom and oligotrophic environment.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>With oceans covering 71 % of the Earth's surface, sea spray
aerosol comprises a large portion of the natural aerosol emissions, with an
estimated contribution between 2000 and 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
aerosols with diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gantt and
Meskhidze, 2013). Marine aerosol can be produced from primary processes (e.g.
sea spray aerosol from breaking waves) and secondary processes (i.e.
formation via chemical processing or gas-to-particle conversion). These
aerosols can then have a large impact upon the Earth's radiative budget
through both direct effects, such as light scattering, and indirect effects,
by becoming cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and affecting cloud formation and
cloud properties (Novakov and Corrigan, 1996; Novakov and Penner, 1993). Due
to the large flux of marine aerosol into the atmosphere, it is critical to
better understand and determine the physical and chemical properties of
marine aerosol as a function of changing marine environment water conditions.</p>
      <p>At wind speeds greater than 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, primary marine aerosol is
primarily formed via bubble bursting from breaking waves; three main types of
drops, film, spume and jet drops, are produced depending on the mechanism
(Lewis and Schwartz, 2004). Based on the size of aerosol formed, the chemical
composition ranges from primarily inorganic sea spray particles to particles
rich in organic material, yet different studies have shown differing
compositions over the same size range. Typically, particles of diameter
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been found to be largely sea salt,
whereas smaller particles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contain
increasing concentrations of organics with decreasing diameter (Ault et
al., 2013; Facchini et al., 2008; Keene et al., 2007; O'Dowd et al., 2004;
Prather et al., 2013). For particles in the size range relevant to cloud
formation (50–150 nm), some have found an absence of hygroscopic salts in
particles below 200 nm (Bigg and Leck, 2008), while other studies have shown
the presence of sea salt and other inorganic elements (Ault et al., 2013;
Clarke et al., 2006; Murphy et al., 1998; Quinn and Bates, 2011). Marine
organic species remain largely uncharacterized (Benner, 2002), and organic
concentrations can vary drastically throughout the water column, both
temporally and spatially (Russell et al., 2010). Primary emissions can gain
organics either as bubbles traverse through the water column or at the ocean
surface from the organic rich microlayer (Barger and Garrett, 1970; Bigg and
Leck, 2008; Blanchard, 1964; Blanchard and Woodcock, 1957; Garrett, 1967;
Lion and Leckie, 1981; Matrai et al., 2008). The sea surface microlayer has
been shown to exhibit physical, chemical and biological differences from
oceanic subsurface water (Cunliffe et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The primary marine aerosol emission flux is characterized by different source
functions, the number of aerosols by particle size by area by time (Lewis and
Schwartz, 2004). These source functions are dependent on a number of physical
parameters, dominated by wind speed and sea surface temperature, but are also
affected by the sea state (wave height, shape, etc.) and salinity (Grythe et
al., 2014). Aerosol emissions are also dependent on the chemical composition
of the seawater due to the presence of a rich and varied mixture of organic
material. These organics can affect the waters' ability to form whitecaps
(Callaghan et al., 2012) and change bubble lifetime (Garrett, 1967).
Large-scale marine aerosol source functions used in models have started to
include seawater composition (Langmann et al., 2008; Spracklen et al., 2008;
Vignati et al., 2010) by focusing on parameterizations of the correlation
between surface water chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (chla) concentrations and aerosol
organic fractions (O'Dowd et al., 2008; Rinaldi et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Previous studies have indicated changing size distribution with increasing
organic material (Fuentes et al., 2010b; King et al., 2012; Sellegri et
al., 2006). Sellegri et al. (2006) saw a log-normal mode amplitude shift
towards smaller diameters with the addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
to artificial seawater; Fuentes et al. (2010b) observed similar behavior in
tests with artificial seawater and biogenic exudates, while King et
al. (2012) saw an additional lognormal mode at 200 nm with the addition of
organic material to artificial seawater. Water temperature has also shown an
effect on aerosol size distribution and number concentration, though
different groups have seen varying trends. Mårtensson et al. (2003) saw
increasing number concentrations for particles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 nm and decreasing
concentrations for particles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 nm with increasing water temperature in
measurements of synthetic seawater. For all diameters in between, there was
no clear trend. Sellegri et al. (2006) compared artificial seawater at 4 and
23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and found that the lognormal modal diameters all decreased
with decreasing water temperature. Zábori et al. (2012b) measured the
size distribution of NaCl and succinic acid/NaCl aerosol produced from an
impinging water jet over a temperature range from 0 to 16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
found that the temperature did not influence the size distribution, yet it
did influence the magnitude of aerosols produced (increasing temperatures led
to decreased aerosol production). The dominance of small particles (dry
diameter 10–250 nm) decreased with increasing water temperature over the
range 0–10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, total number concentrations
were stable regardless of the temperature. Similar results were found testing
winter Arctic Ocean water (Zábori et al., 2012a) and Baltic seawater
(Hultin et al., 2011), though for the Baltic seawater, the number
concentration continued to drop until a water temperature of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>Concentrations of marine organic aerosol seem to be highly dependent on the
biological productivity at the ocean surface, following a seasonal bloom
cycle. Studies performed at Mace Head in the North Atlantic Ocean and
Amsterdam Island in the southern Indian Ocean determined that the organic
concentrations as well as the organic : sea salt ratios were highest in the
spring/summer and the lowest in the winter (Sciare et al., 2000, 2009; Yoon
et al., 2007). Phytoplankton blooms lead to increased levels of organic
material (OM), both dissolved and particulate (Ducklow et al., 1995), with
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations often greater than
80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under bloom conditions (Hansell et al., 2009). Different
studies have linked the total submicron organic mass fraction of sea spray
aerosol to chla levels observed by satellite (Albert et al., 2012; O'Dowd et
al., 2008; Rinaldi et al., 2013; Vignati et al., 2010); other studies have
shown that the organic mass fraction was correlated with dimethylsulfide
(DMS) (Bates et al., 2012) or heterotrophic bacteria abundance (Prather et
al., 2013) instead. Hultin et al. (2010) measured seawater at depths of 2 m
during an ocean cruise west of Ireland and did not observe a correlation
between chla and sea spray production, instead finding a relationship with
dissolved oxygen. Rinaldi et al. (2013) found that the correlation between
chla and OM at Mace Head was higher than the correlation of colored dissolved
organic material or seawater particulate organic carbon; however, the optimum
correlation between chla and OM was observed with an 8-day time lag for chla,
indicating a complex, indirect relationship between biological processes and
transferable organic matter. Various studies have shown linear correlations
between chla concentrations and organic fraction (O'Dowd et al., 2008;
Rinaldi et al., 2013); others have observed an exponential fitting correlation (Gantt et al., 2011), a power fit
correlation (Fuentes et al., 2011), or a Langmuir functional relationship
correlation (Long et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>The CCN activity of marine aerosol has been tested in various laboratory
experiments. Fuentes et al. (2010a) determined a plunging water jet system to
be the bubble generation method most representative of ambient marine
aerosol. In a separate study, Fuentes et al. (2010b) collected seawater
samples from the west African coast for CCN measurements with phytoplankton
exudates and saw a shift towards higher number concentrations and smaller
diameters in samples with high biological material. They found a variable
relationship between chla concentrations and OM production, stating that
organic enrichment might also be dependent on specific conditions of algal
blooms. The same data set showed an increase in critical supersaturation of
5–24 % for the samples with high biological material compared to
artificial seawater (Fuentes et al., 2011). Moore et al. (2011) performed
laboratory experiments with NaCl or artificial seawater in combination with
SDS, <italic>Synechococcus</italic>, <italic>Ostreococcus</italic> or oleic acid and found
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the normal organic concentration still did not affect the
CCN activity or cloud formation properties. King et al. (2012) tested
artificial seawater with different organics (palmitic acid, sodium laurate,
fructose, mannose, SDS) and found that the number concentration decreased
with the presence of stronger surfactants, most likely due to surface layer
stabilization. The CCN activity was dependent on the contribution of the
varying salts in the particle phase rather than the organics. In recent wave
channel experiments with natural seawater, Prather et al. (2013) saw the
activation diameter augment from 63 to 118 nm after a 5-fold increase in
bacteria abundance; the size distributions remained essentially unchanged (as
did phytoplankton, chla and total organic carbon (TOC) abundances and
concentrations), leading to the notion that a change in the sea spray
chemical composition (the number fraction mode) must have affected the
activation diameter. During the same campaign, Collins et al. (2013) observed
the hygroscopicity parameter kappa,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, reduce by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % over the same time period as the
bacterial increase.</p>
      <p>The production of organic matter in oceanic surface water is expected to be
substantially modified in the coming decades as a consequence of climate
change and ocean acidification (Doney et al., 2012). Ocean acidification is
defined as the increase in ocean acidity and associated changes in seawater
chemistry, due to the absorbance of a very significant amount of
anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the oceans (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Gt C or
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26.3 % of anthropogenic emissions, Le Quéré et
al., 2015). Since the beginning of the industrial era, the pH in ocean
surface waters has already decreased by 0.1 units, on average, equivalent to
an increased acidity of 26 %. Further acidification is expected by 2100,
ranging from 0.06 to 0.32 units, equivalent to an increased acidity of
15–110 %, depending on the considered CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission scenario (Ciais et
al., 2013). Although it is well established that ocean acidification has the
potential to significantly impact marine biological processes (see Riebesell
and Tortell, 2011 and Weinbauer et al., 2011 for a comprehensive review), it
is still unclear how these changing biogeochemical water conditions will
affect the properties and production of marine aerosols. Furthermore, the
effect of such an acidification and consequently the resulting feedback on
Mediterranean marine aerosol and the regional climate remains unknown.</p>
      <p>Mesocosms are defined as experimental enclosures from one to several
thousands of liters that maintain natural communities under close-to-natural
conditions (Riebesell et al., 2013). They have been increasingly used in both
aquatic and terrestrial ecology (Stewart et al., 2013), especially on the
effects of environmental and/or anthropogenic disturbances on a large variety
of chemical and biological processes. In the context of ocean acidification,
mesocosms have been used on several occasions for experimental time periods
spanning from a few days to a few weeks, and were found to be efficient in
studying the effects of this driver over such short time scales (Riebesell et
al., 2008, 2013). Archer et al. (2013) recently showed, during a mesocosm
experiment in the Arctic, that with seawater acidification and increased
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, average concentrations of DMS decreased by up to
60 % at the lowest pH. Inversely, concentrations of dimethylsulfoniopropionate
(DMSP), the precursor to DMS, increased by up to 50 %. In the remote
ocean, DMS was predicted by modeling studies to be one of the main precursors
for CCN in the marine boundary layer, and studies have shown that regional
DMS emission changes could affect CCN sensitivity (Cameron-Smith et
al., 2011; Woodhouse et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Many past mesocosm experiments which focused on the effects of ocean
acidification have been performed in relatively eutrophic conditions or with
nutrient addition initially or during the experiment. However, about 60 %
of the ocean surface is associated with low productivity, termed oligotrophic
areas. Decreased nutrient availability and the expansion of low-productivity
regions are projected with increasing CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, as enhanced
thermal stratification is expected to lead to surface layer nutrient
depletion (Irwin and Oliver, 2009; Polovina et al., 2008). Nutrient
availability also might have strong effects on the community response to
ocean acidification (Hare et al., 2007), so there is a clear need to evaluate
the sensitivity of oligotrophic marine environments to this anthropogenic
effect. The Mediterranean Sea is one of the most nutrient-poor waters in the
world with maximum open sea area chlorophyll concentrations of
2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Its trophic status varies from
oligotrophic-mesotrophic in the northwestern basin to extremely oligotrophic
in the eastern basin (Moutin and Raimbault, 2002; The MerMex Group, 2011).
High biological activity occurs annually in parts of the western
Mediterranean, including coastal France in the late winter and early spring
(D'Ortenzio and Ribera d'Alcalà, 2009; Siokou-Frangou et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>In this work, we collected water from three mesocosms deployed in the
Northwestern Mediterranean Sea over two campaigns during different seasons as
part of the European Mediterranean Sea Acidification in a changing climate
(MedSeA; <uri>http://medsea-project.eu</uri>) and the
Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean
Experiment (ChArMEx) projects to test the effects of ocean acidification and
changes in the biogeochemistry of the seawater on the physical and chemical
properties of primary marine aerosol including size distributions and CCN
activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Measurement sites and campaigns</title>
      <p>Mesocosm experiments were performed during two intensive campaigns: the
first, during summer oligotrophic conditions (hereafter referred to as
non-bloom conditions), occurred from 22 June to 10 July 2012 at the Station
de Recherches Sous-marines et Océanographiques in the Bay of Calvi (BC),
Corsica; the second, performed during winter pre-bloom conditions, took place
from 21 February to 5 March 2013 in the Bay of Villefranche (BV), France. The
two bays share many similarities in term of temperature, salinity, phosphate
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrite (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and silicate (Si)
seasonal variations, and they both show typical bloom conditions in
winter-spring and oligotrophic conditions in the summer, corresponding to a
stratified water column. Pre-bloom conditions are also observed at both
locations (Gazeau et al., 2015). The presence of pre-bloom and non-bloom
conditions was confirmed by the order-of-magnitude difference in the average
seawater chla concentrations (chla<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>BC, avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.069</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.009 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, chla<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>BV, avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.005</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Detailed site and experimental information for
both campaigns that legitimize the comparison to test in these two locations
at different seasons can be found in Gazeau et al. (2015).</p>
      <p>Briefly, the mesocosms used in this study (volume of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
were fully described in Guieu et al. (2014). The mesocosms consisted of large
bags made of two 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick films of polyethylene mixed with
vinyl acetate (EVA, 19 %) with nylon meshing in between to allow maximum
resistance and light penetration (Haikonene KY, Finland). Natural
seawater was filtered through a mesh grid to remove large debris when
deploying the mesocosms. In order to avoid actual atmospheric deposition, the
mesocosms were covered with UV-transparent ethylene
tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) roofs, except
during periods of sampling. In this way, transfer of rainwater/deposition was
prevented, while preserving the sunlight irradiance of the mesocosms. The
covers were elevated to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm above the top of the mesocosms,
allowing air to circulate to avoid a confinement effect in the trapped water.
Among nine deployed mesocosms, three remained unmodified as controls and six
were modified in terms of partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels used were slightly different between the two
campaigns, as a consequence of different ambient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (i.e.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 vs. 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BC and BV, respectively). In the Bay
of Calvi, the six targeted elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were 550, 650, 750,
850, 1000 and 1250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the Bay of Villefranche, the levels
were 450, 550, 750, 850, 1000 and 1250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These elevated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were reached by adding varying volumes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturated seawater to the mesocosms. At both sites, seawater was pumped from
near the mesocosms and sieved onto a 5 mm mesh sieve in order to remove
large organisms. Pure <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was actively bubbled through the water for
several minutes in order to achieve saturation; the water was then
transferred to 25 L plastic containers for addition to the mesocosms.
Depending on the targeted <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level, 50L to more than 500 L were
added. A diffusing system was used to ensure a perfect mixing of this
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturated seawater inside the mesocosms. In order to minimize the
stress induced by the addition of large quantities of acidified water, the
acidification of the mesocosms was performed over 4 days, and the experiments
started when the targeted <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were reached. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels were chosen in order to cover the range of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations projected for the end of the century following various
scenarios (RCP 2.6 to RCP 8.5; IPCC, 2013).</p>
      <p>For the experiments described here, every morning approximately 5 L of
surface water (taken within a 15 cm depth from the surface) was pumped from
each mesocosm using a perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA) pump (Saint-Gobain
Performance Plastics) activated by the pressurized air from a diving tank and
connected to braided PVC tubing (Holzelock-Tricoflex, I.D. 9.5 mm). The
water pump was flushed with seawater from the respective mesocosm prior to
sampling. Samples were stored in large brown glass bottles outside (avoiding
direct sunlight) until the experiments were performed that same day. During
the BV campaign, the pump could not be used on 3 March 2013 due to unsafe sea
conditions; water was instead manually sampled from the mesocosms with 2.5 L
glass bottles while wearing long gloves. Additionally, due to dangerous wind
and wave conditions, sampling was not performed on 5 March 2013 during the BV
campaign. Instrumental failures occurred on 4 and 10 July 2012 at BC and on
28 February–1 March 2013 at BV.</p>
      <p>For both campaigns, the mesocosms were located offshore in pelagic waters
in order to measure primary marine aerosol properties and biogeochemical
parameters of the water while minimizing contamination from anthropogenic
sources. The mesocosms were reached via ocean kayak or boat. For both
campaigns, sampling operations were performed from a mobile plastic platform
that was moved via a rope network. The water temperature variances between
BC and BV are quite drastic, given the time of year the experiments took
place. From conductivity, temperature and depth (CTD) measurements, at BC
the water temperature measured nearest to the surface varied from
21.8 to 25.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; at BV, the temperatures ranged from
13.0 to 13.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>For the experiments described here, we focused on three different mesocosms:
control mesocosm C3, and acidified mesocosms P3 and P6. Mesocosm P6 was the
most acidified of all mesocosms
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and P3 was acidified to an
intermediate level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 750 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This allowed
a range of acidification effects to be analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Experimental methods</title>
      <p>Bubble-bursting experiments were performed using a square glass tank
(20 l <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 w <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), filled with 3.6 L of
seawater (water depth of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm), sealed with a stainless steel lid
and continuously flushed with particle-free air (11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
tank was constantly slightly over-pressured with particle-free air to ensure
the absence of ambient room air. Aerosols were generated by splashing
mesocosm seawater through plunging water jets, separated into eight jets via
a flow distributor. The mesocosm seawater was re-circulated using a
peristaltic pump; to minimize an increasing temperature of the seawater
caused by constant re-circulation, a stainless steel heat exchanger was used
on the seawater exiting the pump. The temperature of the water was recorded
with a temperature sensor at the beginning and end of each experiment (for
the BV campaign). Since no measurements of the bubble size distribution could
be performed in such a small device, all water flow characteristics were
performed according to the Fuentes et al. (2010a) settings, to reproduce the
same bubble size distribution. The water flow rate was set to
1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the height of the jets above the water surface was
9 cm and the penetration depth of the jets was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5 cm.
Particle-free air was blown over the seawater (using a j-shaped tube
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 cm above the water surface) to mimic the wind blowing effect on
the bubble-bursting process. Some of the water samples were also enriched by
the addition of an organic rich microlayer from the same mesocosms (average
100 mL, range 50–170 mL). The enriched mesocosm samples were tested after
the un-enriched sample to compare the effect of additional organic species.</p>
      <p>Blank measurements were performed during the first 10 min of each experiment
by verifying the aerosol concentration was zero in the particle-free air
flushed tank. Between each water sample testing, the aquarium and tubing were
rinsed with ultrapure water
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm), and
clean water was re-circulated throughout the experimental setup for
10–15 min. Experiments were performed on the mesocosm water in different
orders each day to make sure there were no experimental biases.</p>
      <p>The aerosol flow was passed through a diffusion drier and was sent through a
neutralizer into a differential mobility particle sizer (DMPS) and miniature
continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient CCN chamber (CCNc) (Roberts and
Nenes, 2005) to determine particle CCN activation properties. The neutralizer
used was a variable-amplitude corona discharge which charges particles to the
equilibrium charge distribution (Stommel and Riebel, 2004, 2005). For the BC
experiments, the neutralizer voltage was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 kV and for BV,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 kV.</p>
      <p>For the CCNc-DMPS system, aerosol flow passed first through a TSI-type DMA
(length 44 cm) selecting particle sizes in 26 channels ranging from 10 to
400 nm by stepping the voltage over an integration time of about 8.5 min.
Immediately after the DMA, the aerosol flow was split between the CCNc and a
TSI CPC model 3010. The DMA sheath flow rate was 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
the sample flow rate was 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in BC; 7.5 and
1.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used in BV. For the BV campaign, the aerosol
flow was split 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the CPC and 0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to the CCNc. In the CCNc, a total aerosol flow rate of 100 sccm with a
sheath-to-aerosol flow ratio of 5 was used. The CCNc operated at specific
temperature gradient (dT) settings, testing two different supersaturations
(SSs). For the BC campaign, a temperature gradient of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (dT6) was
used in the column and the top temperature of the column varied as the
ambient temperature changed (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>amb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C);
in BV, dT6 and a temperature gradient of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (dT3) were tested and
the top temperature of the column was always set at 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The data
are plotted as activated fraction vs. particle diameter and fit with a
sigmoid curve, from which we obtain the activation diameter at each dT (see
Asmi et al., 2012 for more details). The CCNc system was calibrated with
atomized (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NaCl solutions at the beginning,
end and throughout each campaign. The activation diameter of the calibration
was then used to calculate the corresponding supersaturation; this
supersaturation was then used for all mesocosm experiments. The activation
diameters and corresponding supersaturations for each dT for both campaigns
are shown in Table 1 (dT6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % SS, dT3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %). The
range of SS values used in this work is typical of those reported in natural
clouds. Anttila et al. (2009) found cloud SS values from 0.18 to 0.26 %
for low-level clouds in northern Finland, Hegg et al. (2009) obtained a SS
range from 0.2 to 0.3 % for clouds over the California coast, and Asmi et
al. (2012) found SS values from 0.1 to 0.3 % at the puy-de-Dôme
station in central France.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Seawater parameters</title>
      <p>Every day at 8:30 (LT), depth-integrated sampling (0–10 m) was performed in
each mesocosm using 5 L Hydro-Bios integrated water samplers. Samples for
pigment analyses were filtered (2 L) onto GF/F. Filters were directly frozen
with liquid nitrogen and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Measurements were
performed on an HPLC from filters extracted in 100 % methanol, disrupted
by sonication and clarified by filtration (GF/F Whatman). Samples for
microbial diversity (2 mL) were fixed with 0.5 % final concentration
glutaraldehyde, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then transferred to a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C freezer. Virus-like particles, heterotrophic and
autotrophic prokaryotes abundances were measured with the use of Flow
Cytometry (Beckton Dickinson FACS Calibur model). Total organic carbon (TOC)
was measured instead of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in order to avoid
contamination during filtration. However, the TOC measurement is referred to
hereafter as DOC, due to the low concentration of particulate organic carbon
in both sites (averaged over all mesocosms and all sampling times, BC:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BV: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was typically less than 10 % of TOC). DOC concentrations were
determined on 20 mL samples by high temperature oxidation with a Shimadzu
5000A TOC Analyzer. Transparent exopolymeric particle (TEP) concentrations
were measured spectrophotometrically according to a dye-binding assay (Engel,
2009). Samples (250 mL) were filtered onto 0.4 mm pore size polycarbonate
filters under low vacuum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), stained with 1 mL of
Alcian blue solution (0.02 g Alcian blue in 100 mL of acetic acid solution
of pH2.5) and rinsed with 1 mL of distillate water. Filters were then soaked
for 3 h in 6 mL of 80 % sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to dissolve the
dye, and the absorbance of the solution was measured at 787 nm, using acidic
polysaccharide xanthan gum as a standard.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Calibration information at varying temperature gradients for NaCl
(35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in tank.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Activation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Supersaturation,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">gradient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">diameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SS (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(nm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">dT6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>42.497</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">dT3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>122.915</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>In studying the effects of ocean acidification, it was necessary to observe
whether changes with biogeochemical processes affected primary marine aerosol
emissions and chemical and physical aerosol properties. For many of the
parameters studied (e.g. chla concentrations, total prokaryotic cells and
virus-like particles abundances), there were no strong discernible
differences between the control, C3, or the acidified mesocosms, P3 and
P6, along the course of the experiments; however, there were often large
differences between the two campaigns due to the pre-bloom and non-bloom
conditions. While several studies have shown the effects of ocean
acidification on biogeochemical parameters in eutrophic waters (Galgani et
al., 2014; Schulz et al., 2013), observations from the MedSea experiment
showed no effect of ocean acidification on most of the biogeochemical
parameters in these oligo- to mesotrophic areas. These results are discussed
more fully in Gazeau et al. (2015). As a consequence, we did not expect any
impact on the primary marine aerosol physical aerosol properties. In the
following sections, we will relate trends observed with different
biogeochemical parameters to those observed in the primary marine aerosol.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Modal diameter (nm) and number fraction averages from the size
distributions for both campaigns, including data from both supersaturations
and microlayer enriched experiments. Lognormal modal diameters and number
fractions from Fuentes et al. (2010a) are also shown.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3">BC </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col6">BV </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9">Artificial sea water </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3">(SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % and enriched) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6">(SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 % and enriched) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9">Fuentes et al. (2010a) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Diameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Diameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Diameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Fraction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mode 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mode 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mode 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">124</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mode 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>260</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>260</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">334</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Average size distributions for each campaign (Bay of Calvi, BC, and
Bay of Villefranche, BV) fit with four lognormal modes. Each campaign average is
taken from the supersaturations (SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 % and 0.39 %) used for
all three mesocosms and includes all enriched samples as well.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Aerosol size distributions and number concentration</title>
      <p>The marine aerosol size distributions remained fairly stable during a given
experiment, which lasted around 1 h for each water sample. The aerosol size
distribution also remained stable throughout the course of each campaign,
with a similar distribution shape. Four lognormal modes were fit to the
average size distributions of each campaign, with results summarized in
Fig. 1 and Table 2. The average size distributions were taken from 214 size
distributions for BC and 182 size distributions for BV, and size envelopes
are also included within Fig. 1. In order to investigate the size of the
aerosol independently of the concentration, the size distributions were
normalized using the total aerosol number concentration. We found that the
primary marine aerosol size distributions were best described using the three
expected modes: nucleation mode (around 20 nm), Aitken mode (around 40 nm),
and accumulation mode (around 100 nm); and an additional fourth mode around
260 nm. Using only three modes for the fitting procedure could not
satisfactorily represent the primary marine aerosol size distribution. A mode
at around 300 nm was also found by Sellegri et al. (2006) during bubbling
experiments for which the effect of wind on the surface breaking bubbles was
simulated in a similar experiment set-up. The 300 nm mode was interpreted by
the authors as the result of a thicker bubble film where the bubbles are
forced to break by the wind instead of reaching a natural breaking thickness.
The four average lognormal modal diameters determined (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>37.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>91.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>260</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 nm) were present in both BC
and BV. The lognormal mode fitting was also used to determine the particle
number fraction at each lognormal modal diameter. Looking at the number
fractions on a daily temporal scale for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %, the lognormal
mode number fractions remained relatively constant throughout both campaigns,
though differences were noted between the campaigns (Fig. 2, Table 2).
Throughout the campaign in BC, the fractions of Modes 1–3 were approximately
equal in magnitude (0.297), whereas in BV, the magnitude of the Mode 2 (the
Aitken mode) fraction relative to the other modes was dominant (0.48). These
same trends were observed for all experiments using SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08% and all
the enriched mesocosm samples (Figs. 3, 4). When augmenting the bacterial
abundance in seawater, Collins et al. (2013) observed an increased particle
fraction of the smallest lognormal mode diameter with no change to the shape
or magnitude of the size distribution; this was attributed to the replacement
of internally mixed salt/organic particle types by insoluble organic type
particles. Previous studies have also indicated changing size distributions
or mode number fractions with increasing organic material (Fuentes et
al., 2010b; Sellegri et al., 2006). In the present study, we will examine
which chemical component is linked to the increase of the Aitken mode
particles in Sect. 3.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Number fraction of DMPS lognormal modes from all mesocosms
(SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %) at BC and BV.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Number fraction of DMPS lognormal modes from microlayer enriched
samples (SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %) at BC and BV.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Number fraction of DMPS lognormal modes tested at
SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 % for mesocosms C3 and P6 at BV.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Many other studies have found different lognormal mode distributions of both
artificial and natural seawater samples, though many have similar modal
sizes. Differences in the size distribution of laboratory generated primary
marine aerosol found in the literature seem to depend on the method used to
generate them. Fuentes et al. (2010a) observed four modes (modal sizes 14, 48,
124, 334 nm) generated from plunging-water jet experiments with artificial
seawater. Mode 4 was believed to be linked to splashing water from the jet
mechanism. Plunging-water jet experiments were found to most closely mimic
the size distribution of ambient primary marine aerosol (Fuentes et
al., 2010a) while generating sufficient aerosol for characterization
measurements. In a separate study (Fuentes et al., 2010b), four modes
represented both artificial and natural seawater (modal sizes 15, 45, 125,
340 nm) well. Similar to our findings, increasing organic content was found
to increase the number fraction of Mode 2 while decreasing the relative
fractions of the other modes. In similar experiments with Baltic seawater
collected between May and September, Hultin et al. (2011) observed either two
lognormal modes (site: Askö, 86, 180 nm) or three lognormal modes (site:
Garpen, 93, 193, 577 nm). Sellegri et al. (2006) tested synthetic sea salt
with a weir and observed three lognormal modes (4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C: 30, 85, 200 nm;
23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C: 45, 110, 300 nm). After adding SDS, they noticed an increase
in the fraction of particles at the smallest lognormal diameter. In synthetic
seawater experiments with sintered glass filters, Mårtensson et
al. (2003) observed one submicron lognormal mode (100 nm); Tyree et
al. (2007) observed a lognormal mode at the same diameter using artificial
and natural seawater with pore diffusers. The Mårtensson et al. (2003)
and Tyree et al. (2007) studies using sintered glass filters or pore
diffusers report relatively different size distributions compared to those
obtained by plunging jet experiments, likely due to the bubble formation
processes. Collins et al. (2013) observed three lognormal modes in seawater
wave channel experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90, 220, 1000 nm), with changing number
fractions as described in the above paragraph.</p>
      <p>Temperature has also been shown to affect size distributions and aerosol
number concentrations (Hultin et al., 2011; Mårtensson et al., 2003;
Zábori et al., 2012a). The initial and final water temperatures were
measured over the course of an experiment (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 h, BV only); the water
temperature was found to increase by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
on average due to the constant water recirculation through the peristaltic
pump and an insufficient heat exchange system (encompassing all experiments,
water temperatures ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.7–26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from the
initial to final measurement). This increase is 2–5 times higher than the
1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature increase measured by Zábori
et al. (2012a). Even with this large temperature range, we did not observe
that the increase in the water temperature affected the shape of the size
distribution. We were not able to make qualitative statements about the
relationship between the number concentration and temperature, with the level
of uncertainty in the wind flow stability within these experiments.
Acidification had no effect on the aerosol size distribution, as no clear
differences were found between mesocosms C3, P3, and P6 within a given field
campaign.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Activation diameter</title>
      <p>By testing two temperature gradients, it is possible to look at the
hygroscopic properties of different size particles based on the different
supersaturations at which they are activated. The activation diameter time
series measured at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % (dT6) is shown in Fig. 5. In BC, there
is little variation temporally between the control and acidified mesocosms
tested (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p, 50, avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>46.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88 nm), indicating that
acidification does not have a large direct effect on CCN activity.
Additionally, the enriched samples showed similar behavior to the
non-enriched waters, indicating that the addition of the organic-rich
microlayer had little effect on the water uptake for the aerosols. For the
experiments incorporating the enriched microlayer, the entire organic-rich
volume was added a few minutes before starting the water jet system, rather
than being continuously introduced to the tank throughout the entire
experiment. This could have led to microlayer depletion over the course of an
experiment, explaining why no visible difference was seen between the
enriched and un-enriched samples. However, no clear difference was seen
between the first (when the microlayer was present) and subsequent size
distributions during a given microlayer enriched experiment. In past
experiments, the addition of organics to bubbling experiments have shown
changes in the size distribution (Sellegri et al., 2006), particle number
concentration (Fuentes et al., 2010b; King et al., 2012; Tyree et al., 2007),
and CCN activity (Collins et al., 2013; Fuentes et al., 2011). Other
experiments have shown no visible change (Moore et al., 2011) from the
addition of organics, similar to the experiments performed in this study. In
some studies, the concentrations and/or nature of some of the organic
surfactants were unrealistic (King et al., 2012; Moore et al., 2011; Sellegri
et al., 2006). At BV, the average activation diameter for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %
over the course of the experiments was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p, 50, avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>59.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 nm (Fig. 5), while at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08% the average
activation diameter was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p, 50, avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>141.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8 nm
(Fig. 6). Activation diameters larger than the corresponding salt standards
(here, shown as NaCl), indicating higher organic presence, are observed more
at BV than BC for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % due to the organic pre-bloom
conditions, whereas the non-bloom water conditions were very stable at BC.
For SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %, the activation diameters are very similar to the
NaCl standard, which signifies a lower organic fraction for larger particles.
Activation diameters for individual mesocosms in both campaigns are shown in
Table 3.</p>
      <p>There is an anti-correlation of the activation diameter at
SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % with the ambient average air temperature in BV (Fig. 5),
though no correlation exists with SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 % (Fig. 6), or in BC
(Fig. 5). However, more daily temperature variance was observed in BV than
BC, based on the time of year of the campaigns. This anti-correlation could
indicate an additional temperature impact on the emission of small particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 nm) and their chemical composition, though this effect is
unclear and undocumented in the literature.</p>
      <p>We investigated if the observed differences in the activation diameters from
BC and BV could be linked to the different operating techniques used for the
campaigns. As indicated previously, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in BC was variable,
changing as the ambient temperature changed. As the ambient temperature
changed throughout the day, the temperature in the column would also change,
leading to possible temperature instabilities throughout the course of an
experiment. On the contrary, in BV, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was fixed at
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, a temperature higher than the daily temperature variability.
In this way, temperature fluctuations in the column were avoided. However, in
observing the measured temperatures throughout the column for both campaigns
and all the experiments, the temperatures of the column remained quite stable
for both methods of operation, so we believe that these effects are very
minor. Additionally, it has been shown that organics can volatilize in the
CCN column due to the temperature gradient (Asa-Awuku et al., 2009), biasing
observed CCN activity. It is possible that this occurred for both campaigns
based on the relatively high measured operating temperatures observed in the
column; if organic material was volatilized, the activation diameters would
increase from those shown here.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Activation diameter and ambient air temperatures for BC and BV. Data
are shown for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % (dT6), including the microlayer enriched
experiments. The shaded bar indicates the NaCl activation diameter.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Activation diameter and ambient air temperatures for BV. Data are
shown for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 % (dT3). The shaded bar indicates the NaCl
activation diameter.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average activation diameters, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values and organic fractions
for both campaigns and supersaturations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mesocosm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Activation diameter (nm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Organic fraction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>47.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>46.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>45.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P3, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>48.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>45.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P6, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>46.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>61.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>51.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>61.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>59.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P6, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>53.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Outside</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>54.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Outside, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>55.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>146.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3, enriched</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>148.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 37.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>137.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Kappa and organic fraction</title>
      <p>The hygroscopicity of the aerosol was determined using kappa-Köhler
theory (Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007) following Asmi et al. (2012). Using
the activation diameter and numerical iteration, the kappa value was
determined when the maximum of the saturation curve was equal to the
supersaturation in the CCNc, following,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p, 50</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p, 50</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the supersaturation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diameter of the
droplet, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p, 50</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas constant, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is temperature, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the surface tension, molecular weight and density of
water, respectively. Lower kappa values correspond to more hydrophobic, or
organic-like, particles. In BC, the average mesocosm kappa value at
SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg, BC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17, In BV, the
average mesocosm kappa values for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 and 0.08 % are
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg, BV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14, respectively.
This indicates that the smaller particles (measured at the higher SS) were
higher in organic material. The kappa values obtained at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %
are more representative of the kappa that would be obtained for a bulk
chemical composition, as most of the aerosol mass is comprised in the
accumulation mode for submicron particles. Our value then falls well into the
suggested range of the kappa average of marine aerosol, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>marine</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 (Pringle et al., 2010). Little variance was seen between the
control and acidified mesocosms.</p>
      <p>Using the calculated kappa values, we determined the organic fraction using
a kappa closure equation,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bulk volume fraction of organic
material and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kappa of the organic or inorganic material.
Following Collins et al. (2013), we used <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25, a good
proxy for seawater, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006. In BC, the organic fraction
ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.21 to 0.46 (average, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14) for
SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %. For BV, the organic fraction ranged from 0.43 to 0.80
(average, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11) for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % and from 0.19 to 0.55
(average, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11) for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %. Previous studies have
also found mass organic fractions ranging from 30 to 80 % in sea spray
aerosol studies of water from the North Atlantic, Sargasso Sea near
Bermuda, and Pacific water near La Jolla, California (Collins et al., 2013;
Facchini et al., 2008; Keene et al., 2007). Negative organic fractions were
calculated during the BC campaign due to the sensitivity of Eq. (2) to the
value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We show results here
using a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value supported by literature rather than
determine non-realistic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to provide positive
organic fractions. Therefore, the values shown in this work can be considered
low estimates of the organic fraction. Table 3 shows average kappa and
organic fraction values of each mesocosm for both campaigns.</p>
      <p>The organic fraction of the Aitken mode particles (obtained from measurements
performed at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %) is significantly increased during the BV
experiment compared to the BC experiment. This indicates that the Mode 2
fraction increase observed in the size distribution is due to the presence of
organic matter, in agreement with the observations of Collins et al. (2013).</p>
      <p>The ratio of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) to condensation nuclei (CN)
decreased slightly during the pre-bloom period for SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %: at
BC, CCN <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>average</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, whereas at BV,
CCN <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>average</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07. The change between CCN <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CN
during the oligotrophic and pre-bloom conditions was likely due to the
combined effects of a higher organic fraction and higher Mode 2 to Mode 1
ratio during pre-bloom conditions, likely caused by the increasing organic
content of the water due to the pre-bloom. For SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 % measured
at BV, CCN <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>average</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Organic fraction calculated from kappa (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25) at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % vs. total
chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for all three mesocosms during
both BC and BV, fit with published parameterizations of the organic
fraction-chla relationship.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Organic fraction calculated from kappa (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25) at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % vs. chlorophyll
c1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c2 <bold>(a)</bold>, 19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin <bold>(b)</bold>,
alloxanthin <bold>(c)</bold>, sum carotenes <bold>(d)</bold> and
19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin <bold>(e)</bold> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for all three mesocosms during both BC and BV. Linear fits with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
are shown for all figures, and sigmoid fits with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are shown
for all panels except for <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Correlations with biological parameters</title>
      <p>In a recent study, Rinaldi et al. (2013) showed that chla was the best
biological surrogate for predicting organic enrichment in sea spray. Chla
parameterizations are currently being used in models to account for the
organic content of seawater. We find a strong linear correlation with
same-day measurements of organic fraction (from SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 %) and
total chla concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.781, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001) shown in log–log
scale in Fig. 7, following

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Organic fraction</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>42.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">chla</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>22.98.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Similar correlations were also found with a number of pigments: chlorophyll
c1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c2 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.783, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001), 19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.711, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001), alloxanthin (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.699, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001),
sum carotenes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.773, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001) and
19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.736, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001) (Fig. 8).
Various studies have found linear correlations between the organic fraction
of aerosols measured at a receptor site and chla concentrations observed by
satellite along the back trajectory (Langmann et al., 2008; O'Dowd et
al., 2008; Rinaldi et al., 2013; Vignati et al., 2010); others have found
exponential fittings (Gantt et al., 2011) with the same methodology or a
Langmuir functional relationship (Long et al., 2011) using a model with
experimental data from Facchini et al. (2008) and Keene et al. (2007).
Figure 7 shows many of the existing chla-organic fraction parameterizations
in the literature, including this work. It is clear that many of the
parameterizations from the North Atlantic Ocean also describe the
correlation in the Mediterranean Sea fairly well, even though the
methodologies for most of them are very different from the one used in this
study. The parameterization derived in this work lays at higher organic
content when compared to the other parameterizations, even though it does not
include secondary organic contributions as do many of the satellite-receptor
site studies. This is likely due to the size dependence of the organic
fraction that we observed in the BV data. Our parameterization is applicable
for Aitken mode type aerosols and would probably shift towards lower organic
content for accumulation mode particles. It is also possible that organic
components in Mediterranean primary marine aerosol are of multiple origins
and not solely linked linearly to chla-rich species. Bacteria have also been
observed to affect the organic material in seawater (Gruber et al., 2006;
Jiao et al., 2010; Ogawa et al., 2001). We find a correlation with
heterotrophic prokaryotes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.476, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
virus-like particles (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.161, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025), autotrophic prokaryotes
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.499, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00001) and <italic>Synechococcus</italic> abundance (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.143, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.033), shown in Fig. 9a–d. In a wave channel experiment
on natural seawater doped with Zobell growth medium, bacteria and
phytoplankton (<italic>Dunaliella tertiolecta</italic>) cultures, Prather et
al. (2013) also observed a link between heterotrophic bacteria and organic
fraction while no correlation with chla was found, highlighting the necessity
to study complex systems of all biological material (phytoplankton,
prokaryotes, organic matter) for marine aerosol. Most likely, the observed
differences between Prather et al. (2013) and this work have to do with the
localized biogeochemical nature of the different experiments, causing
variance in the chemical composition and organic fraction of the marine
aerosol. An additional correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.477, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
exists with TEPs (Fig. 9e), a surface-active complex, variable mixture of
organics (Filella, 2014; Passow, 2012). During BC, there is also a sigmoidal
correlation between organic fraction and DOC concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.411, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00003); data are unavailable for BV (Fig. 9f). Sigmoid fits
are also shown in Figs. 8 and 9 for all biological parameters where they
could be determined. Sigmoid fits might be more appropriate to use in many
cases, to conceptually constrain the organic fraction of the primary marine
aerosol to one regardless of the chla concentration. We have included both
linear and sigmoid fits, with their respective <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for
completeness.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Organic fraction calculated from kappa (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inorg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25) at SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % vs. heterotrophic
prokaryotes <bold>(a)</bold>, virus-like particles <bold>(b)</bold>, autotrophic
prokaryotes <bold>(c)</bold>, and <italic>Synechococcus</italic> <bold>(d)</bold> abundances,
and TEP equivalent (xanthan gum) <bold>(e)</bold>, and DOC <bold>(f)</bold>
concentrations for all three mesocosms during both BC and BV. Linear fits with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are shown for all figures except for <bold>(f)</bold>, and sigmoid
fits with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are shown for all panels except for <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/7961/2015/acp-15-7961-2015-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We also wanted to see if correlations existed between different
biogeochemical parameters and the temporal relative mode fractions shown in
Fig. 2. Relative fractions of Modes 3 and 4 (91.5 and 260 nm, respectively)
showed no clear correlations to any parameter. However, strong
anti-correlations were observed between the Mode 1 (18.5 nm) relative
fraction and the abundances and concentrations of virus-like particles,
heterotrophic prokaryotes and all pigments previously discussed, except for
alloxanthin, which had a positive correlation (correlations not shown). The
relative fraction of Mode 2 (37.5 nm) showed strong positive correlations
with the abundances and concentrations of virus-like particles, heterotrophic
prokaryotes, TEPs and all the pigments discussed, except for alloxanthin,
where no correlation was observed (correlations not shown). This further
supports the idea of an increase in the Mode 2 (Aitken mode) relative
fraction during periods of high biological activity due to the higher
concentrations of organic material, at the expense of Mode 1.</p>
      <p>The control and acidified mesocosms showed no significant differences in
terms of correlations between organic fraction and different biogeochemical
parameters. For studies of marine aerosol, this indicates that any
acidification effects on these biological parameters impacts the physical and
chemical parameters of the aerosol much less than the natural variances
caused by organic pre-bloom and bloom periods. It is not yet clear whether
this observation can extend beyond the western Mediterranean Sea. However, it
is important to note that due to the oligotrophic nature of the
Mediterranean, even during the pre-bloom conditions at BV, the chla
concentrations and abundances of other parameters are still much lower than
could occur in places like the North Atlantic Ocean.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>By performing marine aerosol bubble-bursting experiments over two
large-scale campaigns, we were able to compare the effects of ocean
acidification during pre-bloom and oligotrophic conditions on physical and
chemical properties of Mediterranean Sea aerosol. It is important to note
that there are additional effects, such as wind speed, precipitation levels,
and temperatures, that could change with future climate change and that
these were not included within this analysis; instead, we focused on ocean
acidification effects on Mediterranean Sea plankton communities and
subsequent effects on primary marine aerosol. Future studies will need to
incorporate additional parameters to determine further effects on primary
marine aerosol. Ocean acidification had no direct effect on the physical
parameters (size distribution, mode diameter and number fraction) measured
in either campaign, with similar trends seen for all three differently
acidified mesocosms. Additionally, experiments including the enriched sea
surface microlayer, which increased organic concentrations, showed no marked
difference from the un-enriched mesocosm samples, indicating that enrichment
did not influence the water uptake of the primary aerosol at the
thermodynamic equilibrium reached in the CCN chamber.</p>
      <p>Pre-bloom conditions at BV showed marked increases in the activation
diameters and organic fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64%) for all the mesocosms at
SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 % compared to non-bloom conditions at BC
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 %). At BV, larger particles (SS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %) had smaller
organic fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 %). The organic fraction was strongly
correlated with chla and additional pigment concentrations, with weaker
correlations observed for heterotrophic and autotrophic prokaryotes,
virus-like particles, and <italic>Synechococcus</italic> abundances, and TEPs and DOC
concentrations. Many of these correlations corresponded specifically with the
increase in Mode 2 (the Aitken mode) and were anti-correlated with Mode 1
during the pre-bloom period. The CCN <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>average</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio also
decreased during the pre-bloom period at BV as a probable consequence of the
increased organic content during a pre-bloom period. The parameterization of
the primary marine aerosol organic fraction as a function of chla derived in
the present work is a high estimate compared to the gathered
parameterizations from the literature (with a higher organic fraction for a
given chla content), which may confirm that species other than chla-rich
species contribute to the organic content of marine aerosols in the
Mediterranean atmosphere.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>K. Sellegri, F. Gazeau, C. Guieu designed the experiments
and A. N. Schwier, C. Rose, E. Asmi, K. Sellegri carried them out. Enriched
microlayer data were provided by A. M. Ebling and W. M. Landing; pigment data
were provided by A. Sallon and F. Gazeau; TEPs data were provided by
S. Marro, M.-L. Pedrotti, F. Iuculano, and S. Agusti; bacteria and virus data
were provided by S. Marro, M.-L. Pedrotti, A. Tsiola, and P. Pitta; and DOC
data were provided by J. Louis and C. Guieu. A. N. Schwier and K. Sellegri
prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the MISTRALS/ChArMEx project and by the EC FP7
project “Mediterranean Sea Acidification in a changing climate” (MedSeA;
grant agreement 265103). <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: C. Reeves</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Albert, M. F. M. A., Schaap, M., Manders, A. M. M., Scannell, C., O'Dowd,
C. D., and de Leeuw, G.: Uncertainties in the determination of global
sub-micron marine organic matter emissions, Atmos. Environ., 57, 289–300,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anttila, T., Vaattovaara, P., Komppula, M., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Lihavainen,
H., Kerminen, V.-M., and Laaksonen, A.: Size-dependent activation of aerosols
into cloud droplets at a subarctic background site during the second Pallas
Cloud Experiment (2nd PaCE): method development and data evaluation, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 4841–4854, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4841-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4841-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Archer, S. D., Kimmance, S. A., Stephens, J. A., Hopkins, F. E., Bellerby,
R. G. J., Schulz, K. G., Piontek, J., and Engel, A.: Contrasting responses of
DMS and DMSP to ocean acidification in Arctic waters, Biogeosciences, 10,
1893–1908, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1893-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1893-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Asa-Awuku, A., Engelhart, G. J., Lee, B. H., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.:
Relating CCN activity, volatility, and droplet growth kinetics of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
795–812, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-795-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-795-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Asmi, E., Freney, E., Hervo, M., Picard, D., Rose, C., Colomb, A., and
Sellegri, K.: Aerosol cloud activation in summer and winter at
puy-de-Dôme high altitude site in France, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
11589–11607, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11589-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11589-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Ault, A. P., Moffet, R. C., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Ruppel, M. J.,
Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Zhao, D., Guasco, T. L., Ebben, C. J., Geiger,
F. M., Bertram, T. H., Prather, K. A., and Grassian, V. H.: Size-dependent
changes in sea spray aerosol composition and properties with different
seawater conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5603–5612, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Barger, W. R. and Garrett, W. D.: Surface Active Organic Material in the
Marine Atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4561–4566, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Hakala, J.,
Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Covert, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Li, S.-M.,
Hayden, K. L., Nuaaman, I., Mclaren, R., Massoli, P., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Keene, W. C.: Measurements of
ocean derived aerosol off the coast of California, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V15, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017588</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Benner, R.: Chemical composition and reactivity, in: Biogeochemistry of
Marine Dissolved Organic Matter, edited by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson,
C. A., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 59–90, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bigg, E. K. and Leck, C.: The composition of fragments of bubbles bursting at
the ocean surface, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11209, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009078</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Blanchard, D. C.: Sea-to-air transport surface active material, Science, 146,
396–397, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Blanchard, D. C. and Woodcock, A. H.: Bubble formation and modification in
the sea and its meteorological significance, Tellus, 9, 145–158, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J. G.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, B. D., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY,
USA, Cambridge University Press, 465–570, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Callaghan, A. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M. D., and Ward, B.: Observed
variation in the decay time of oceanic whitecap foam, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
C09015, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008147" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008147</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cameron-Smith, P., Elliott, S., Maltrud, M., Erickson, D., and Wingenter, O.:
Changes in dimethyl sulfide oceanic distribution due to climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L07704, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047069</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Owens, S. R., and Zhou, J.: An ultrafine sea-salt flux from
breaking waves: implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote
marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006565</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, D. B., Ault, A. P., Moffet, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Cuadra-Rodriguez,
L. A., Guasco, T. L., Corrigan, C. E., Pedler, B. E., Azam, F., Aluwihare,
L. I., Bertram, T. H., Roberts, G. C., Grassian, V. H., and Prather, K. A.:
Impact of marine biogeochemistry on the chemical mixing state and cloud
forming ability of nascent sea spray aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
8553–8565, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., Gašparović, B., Guitart, C.,
Murrell, J. C., Salter, M., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R., and Wurl, O.:
Sea surface microlayers: A unified physicochemical and biological perspective
of the air–ocean interface, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 104–116, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Doney, S. C., Ruckelshaus, M., Duffy, J. E., Barry, J. P., Chan, F., English,
C. A., Galindo, H. M., Grebmeier, J. M., Hollowed, A. B., Knowlton, N.,
Polovina, J., Rabalais, N. N., Sydeman, W. J., and Talley, L. D.: Climate
Change Impacts on Marine Ecosystems, Annual Review of Marine Science, 4,
11–37, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>D'Ortenzio, F. and Ribera d'Alcalà, M.: On the trophic regimes of the
Mediterranean Sea: a satellite analysis, Biogeosciences, 6, 139–148,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-139-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-139-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Ducklow, H. W., Carlson, C. A., Bates, N. R., Knap, A. H., Michaels, A. F.,
Jickells, T., Le, P. J., Williams, B., and McCave, I. N.: Dissolved Organic
Carbon as a Component of the Biological Pump in the North Atlantic Ocean,
Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 348, 161–167, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Determination of marine gel particles, in: Practical Guidelines
for the Analysis of Seawater, edited by: Wurl, O., CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Florida, 125–142, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Mircea,
M., Fuzzi, S., Ceburnis, D., Flanagan, R., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G.,
Martino, M., Woeltjen, J., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Primary submicron marine
aerosol dominated by insoluble organic colloids and aggregates, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L17814, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034210</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Filella, M.: Understanding what we are measuring: standards and
quantification of natural organic matter, Water Res., 50, 287–293, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., de Leeuw, G., and McFiggans, G.:
Laboratory-generated primary marine aerosol via bubble-bursting and
atomization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 141–162, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-141-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-141-2010</ext-link>,
2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., de Leeuw, G., and McFiggans, G.: On the
impacts of phytoplankton-derived organic matter on the properties of the
primary marine aerosol – Part 1: Source fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9295–9317, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9295-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9295-2010</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., and McFiggans, G.: On the impacts of
phytoplankton-derived organic matter on the properties of the primary marine
aerosol – Part 2: Composition, hygroscopicity and cloud condensation
activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2585–2602, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2585-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2585-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Galgani, L., Stolle, C., Endres, S., Schulz, K. G., and Engel, A.: Effects of
ocean acidification on the biogenic composition of the sea-surface
microlayer: Results from a mesocosm study, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119,
7911–7924, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Gantt, B. and Meskhidze, N.: The physical and chemical characteristics of
marine primary organic aerosol: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3979–3996,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3979-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3979-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Gantt, B., Meskhidze, N., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Ceburnis, D., and
O'Dowd, C. D.: Wind speed dependent size-resolved parameterization for the
organic mass fraction of sea spray aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8777–8790, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Garrett, W. D.: The organic chemical composition of the ocean surface,
Deep-Sea Res., 14 , 221–227, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gazeau, F., Ziveri, P., Sallon, A., Lejeune, P., Gobert, S., Maugendre, L.,
Louis, J., Alliouane, S., Taillandier, V., Louis, F., Obolensky, G., Grisoni,
J.-M., Delissanti, W., Luquet, D., Robin, D., Hesse, B., and Guieu, C.: First
mesocosm experiments to study the impacts of ocean acidification on the
plankton communities in the NW Mediterranean Sea (MedSeA project), submitted,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, D. F., Simjouw, J.-P., Seitzinger, S. P., and Taghon, G. L.: Dynamics
and characterization of refractory dissolved organic matter produced by
a pure bacterial culture in an experimental predator-prey system, Appl.
Environ. Microb., 72, 4184–4191, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Grythe, H., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Quinn, P., and Stohl, A.: A review of
sea-spray aerosol source functions using a large global set of sea salt
aerosol concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1277–1297,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Guieu, C., Dulac, F., Ridame, C., and Pondaven, P.: Introduction to project
DUNE, a DUst experiment in a low Nutrient, low chlorophyll Ecosystem,
Biogeosciences, 11, 425–442, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-425-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-425-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hansell, D. A., Carlson, C. A., Repeta, D. J., and Schlitzer, R.: Dissolved
organic matter in the ocean, Oceanography, 22, 202–211, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Hare, C. E., Leblanc, K., DiTullio, G. R., Kudela, R. M., Zhang, Y., Lee,
P. A., Riseman, S., and Hutchins, D. A.: Consequences of increased
temperature and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for phytoplankton community structure in the Bering
Sea, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 352, 9–16, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hegg, D. A., Covert, D. S., Jonsson, H. H., and Woods, R.: Differentiating
natural and anthropogenic cloud condensation nuclei in the California coastal
zone, Tellus B, 61, 669–676, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00435.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00435.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hultin, K., Nilsson, E. D., Krejci, R., Mårtensson, E. M., Ehn, M.,
Hagström, Å., and de Leeuw, G.: In situ laboratory sea spray
production during the Marine Aerosol Production 2006 cruise on the
northeastern Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D06201,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012522</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hultin, K., Krejci, R., Pinhassi, J., Gomez-Consarnau, L., Mårtensson,
E. M., Hagström, Å., and Nilsson, E. D.: Aerosol and bacterial
emissions from Baltic Seawater, Atmos. Res., 99 , 1–14, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, in: Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and
Midgley, P. M., Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge
University Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Irwin, A. J. and Oliver, M. J.: Are ocean deserts getting larger?, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 36, L18609, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL039883</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Jiao, N., Herndl, G. J., Hansell, D. A., Benner, R., Kattner, G., Wilhelm,
S. W., Kirchman, D. L., Weinbauer, M. G., Luo, T., Chen, F., and Azam, F.:
Microbial production of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter: long-term
carbon storage in the global ocean, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 8, 593–599, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Maring, H., Maben, J. R., Kieber, D. J., Pszenny, A. A. P.,
Dahl, E. E., Izaguirre, M. A., Davis, A. J., Long, M. S., Zhou, X., Smoydzin,
L., and Sander, R.: Chemical and physical characteristics of nascent aerosols
produced by bursting bubbles at a model air-sea interface, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D21202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008464</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
King, S. M., Butcher, A. C., Rosenoern, T., Coz, E., Lieke, K. I., de Leeuw,
G., Nilsson, E. D., and Bilde, M.: Investigating primary marine aerosol
properties: CCN activity of sea salt and mixed inorganic-organic particles,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 10405–10412, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Langmann, B., Scannell, C., and O'Dowd, C.: New directions: organic matter
contribution to marine aerosols and cloud condensation nuclei, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 7821–7822, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Moriarty, R., Andrew, R. M., Peters, G.`P., Ciais, P.,
Friedlingstein, P., Jones, S. D., Sitch, S., Tans, P., Arneth, A., Boden,
T. A., Bopp, L., Bozec, Y., Canadell, J. G., Chini, L. P., Chevallier, F.,
Cosca, C. E., Harris, I., Hoppema, M., Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Jain,
A. K., Johannessen, T., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Kitidis, V., Klein
Goldewijk, K., Koven, C., Landa, C. S., Landschützer, P., Lenton, A.,
Lima, I. D., Marland, G., Mathis, J. T., Metzl, N., Nojiri, Y., Olsen, A.,
Ono, T., Peng, S., Peters, W., Pfeil, B., Poulter, B., Raupach, M. R.,
Regnier, P., Rödenbeck, C., Saito, S., Salisbury, J. E., Schuster, U.,
Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Segschneider, J., Steinhoff, T.,
Stocker, B. D., Sutton, A. J., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook, B., van der Werf,
G. R., Viovy, N., Wang, Y.-P., Wanninkhof, R., Wiltshire, A., and Zeng, N.:
Global carbon budget 2014, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 47–85,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-7-47-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, S. and Schwartz, R.: Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods,
Measurements, and Models – A Critical Review, American Geophysical Union,
Washington, DC, 1–413, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lion, L. W. and Leckie, J. O.: The biogeochemistry of the air-sea interface,
Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 9, 449–486, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Long, M. S., Keene, W. C., Kieber, D. J., Erickson, D. J., and Maring, H.: A
sea-state based source function for size- and composition-resolved marine
aerosol production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1203–1216,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1203-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1203-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Mårtensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L. H., and
Hansson, H.-C.: Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary
marine aerosol production, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4297,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002263</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
The MerMex Group: Marine ecosystems responses to climatic and anthropogenic
forcings in the Mediterranean, Prog. Oceanogr., 91, 97–166, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Matrai, P. A., Tranvik, L., Leck, C., and Knulst, J. C.: Are high Arctic
surface microlayers a potential source of aerosol organic precursors?, Mar.
Chem., 108, 109–122, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, M. J. K., Furutani, H., Roberts, G. C., Moffet, R. C., Gilles, M. K.,
Palenik, B., and Prather, K. A.: Effect of organic compounds on cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN) activity of sea spray aerosol produced by bubble
bursting, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7462–7469, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Moutin, T. and Raimbault, P.: Primary production, carbon export and nutrients
availability in western and eastern Mediterranean Sea in early summer 1996
(MINOS cruise), J. Marine Syst., 33–34, 273–288, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel,
F. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Pósfai, M., Thomson,
D. S., and Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative
properties in the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Novakov, T. and Corrigan, C. E.: Cloud condensation nucleus activity of the
organic component of biomass smoke particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,
2141–2144, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96GL01971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GL01971</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Novakov, T. and Penner, J. E.: Large contribution of organic aerosols to
cloud-condensation-nuclei concentrations, Nature, 365, 823–826,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/365823a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/365823a0</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
O'Dowd, C. D., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M.,
Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y. J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Biogenically driven
organic contribution to marine aerosol, Nature, 431, 676–680, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Langmann, B., Varghese, S., Scannell, C., Ceburnis, D., and
Facchini, M. C.: A combined organic-inorganic sea-spray source function,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01801, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030331</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Ogawa, H., Amagai, Y., Koike, I., Kaiser, K., and Benner, R.: Production of
refractory dissolved organic matter by bacteria, Science, 292, 917–920,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: The abiotic formation of TEP under different ocean acidification
scenarios, Mar. Chem., 128–129, 72–80, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of
hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Polovina, J. J., Howell, E. A., and Abecassis, M.: Ocean's least productive
waters are expanding, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L03618,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031745" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031745</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Prather, K. A., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M. D.,
Demott, P. J., Aluwihare, L. I., Palenik, B. P., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Moffet, R. C., Molina, M. J., Cappa, C. D., Geiger, F. M., Roberts, G. C.,
Russell, L. M., Ault, A. P., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Corrigan,
C. E., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Ebben, C. J., Forestieri, S. D., Guasco,
T. L., Hersey, S. P., Kim, M. J., Lambert, W. F., Modini, R. L., Mui, W.,
Pedler, B. E., Ruppel, M. J., Ryder, O. S., Schoepp, N. G., Sullivan, R. C.,
and Zhao, D.: Bringing the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical
complexity of sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Pöschl, U., and Lelieveld, J.:
Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN
activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5241–5255,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K. and Bates, T. S.: The case against climate regulation via
oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Riebesell, U. and Tortell, P. D.: Effects of ocean acidification on pelagic
organisms and ecosystems, in: Ocean Acidification, edited by: Gattuso, J. P.
and Hansson, L., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 99–121, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Riebesell, U., Bellerby, R. G. J., Grossart, H.-P., and Thingstad, F.:
Mesocosm CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbation studies: from organism to community level,
Biogeosciences, 5, 1157–1164, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1157-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-1157-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Riebesell, U., Czerny, J., von Bröckel, K., Boxhammer, T.,
Büdenbender, J., Deckelnick, M., Fischer, M., Hoffmann, D., Krug, S. A.,
Lentz, U., Ludwig, A., Muche, R., and Schulz, K. G.: Technical Note: A mobile
sea-going mesocosm system – new opportunities for ocean change research,
Biogeosciences, 10, 1835–1847, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1835-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1835-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Rinaldi, M., Fuzzi, S., Decesari, S., Marullo, S., Santoleri, R., Provenzale,
A., von Hardenberg, J., Ceburnis, D., Vaishya, A., O'Dowd, C. D., and
Facchini, M. C.: Is chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the best surrogate for organic matter
enrichment in submicron primary marine aerosol?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 4964–4973, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient
CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 206–221,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, L. M., Hawkins, L. N., Frossard, A., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.:
Carbohydrate-like composition of submicron atmospheric particles and their
production from ocean bubble bursting, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6652–6657, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Schulz, K. G., Bellerby, R. G. J., Brussaard, C. P. D., Büdenbender, J.,
Czerny, J., Engel, A., Fischer, M., Koch-Klavsen, S., Krug, S. A., Lischka,
S., Ludwig, A., Meyerhöfer, M., Nondal, G., Silyakova, A., Stuhr, A., and
Riebesell, U.: Temporal biomass dynamics of an Arctic plankton bloom in
response to increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, Biogeosciences,
10, 161–180, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-161-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-161-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Sciare, J., Mihalopoulos, N., and Dentener, F. J.: Interannual variability of
atmospheric dimethylsulfide in the southern Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.,
105, 26369–26377, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Sciare, J., Favez, O., Sarda-Estève, R., Oikonomou, K., Cachier, H., and
Kazan, V.: Long-term observations of carbonaceous aerosols in the Austral
Ocean atmosphere: evidence of a biogenic marine organic source, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, D15302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011998</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., O'Dowd, C. D., Yoon, Y. J., Jennings, S. G., and de Leeuw, G.:
Surfactants and submicron sea spray generation, J. Geophys. Res., 111,
D22215, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006658</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Siokou-Frangou, I., Christaki, U., Mazzocchi, M. G., Montresor, M., Ribera
d'Alcalá, M., Vaqué, D., and Zingone, A.: Plankton in the open
Mediterranean Sea: a review, Biogeosciences, 7, 1543–1586,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1543-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1543-2010</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Arnold, S. R., Sciare, J., Carslaw, K. S., and Pio, C.:
Globally significant oceanic source of organic carbon aerosol, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L12811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033359</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L.,
Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., Suttle, B.,
Thompson, R., Trimmer, M., and Woodward, G.: Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool
for Ecological Climate-Change Research, in: Global Change in Multispecies
Systems, Part 3., edited by: Woodward, G. and O'Gorman, E. J., Advances in
Ecological research, Elsevier, 71–181, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Stommel, Y. G. and Riebel, U.: A new corona discharge-based aerosol charger
for submicron particles with low initial charge, J. Aerosol Sci., 35,
1051–1069, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Stommel, Y. G. and Riebel, U.: A corona-discharge-based aerosol neutralizer
designed for use with the SMPS-system, J. Electrostat., 63, 917–921, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Tyree, C. A., Hellion, V. M., Alexandrova, O. A., and Allen, J. O.: Foam
droplets generated from natural and artificial seawaters, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D12204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007729" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007729</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Vignati, E., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Scannell, C., Ceburnis, D.,
Sciare, J., Kanakidou, M., Myriokefalitakis, S., Dentener, F., and O'Dowd,
C. D.: Global scale emission and distribution of sea-spray aerosol: sea-salt
and organic enrichment, Atmos. Environ., 44, 670–677, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Weinbauer, M. G., Mari, X., and Gattuso, J.-P.: Effect of ocean acidification
on the diversity and activity of heterotrophic marine microorganisms, in:
Ocean Acidification, edited by: Gattuso, J.-P. and Hansson, L., Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 83–98, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Woodhouse, M. T., Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., and Boucher, O.: Sensitivity
of cloud condensation nuclei to regional changes in dimethyl-sulphide
emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2723–2733,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2723-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2723-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Yoon, Y. J., Ceburnis, D., Cavalli, F., Jourdan, O., Putaud, J. P., Facchini,
M. C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Sellegri, K., Jennings, S. G., and O'Dowd,
C. D.: Seasonal characteristics of the physicochemical properties of North
Atlantic marine atmospheric aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D04206,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD007044</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zábori, J., Krejci, R., Ekman, A. M. L., Mårtensson, E. M.,
Ström, J., de Leeuw, G., and Nilsson, E. D.: Wintertime Arctic Ocean sea
water properties and primary marine aerosol concentrations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10405–10421, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zábori, J., Matis<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>ns, M., Krejci, R., Nilsson, E. D.,
and Ström, J.: Artificial primary marine aerosol production: a laboratory
study with varying water temperature, salinity, and succinic acid
concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10709–10724,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
