<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Changing shapes and implied viscosities of suspended<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> submicron particles</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Changing shapes and implied viscosities of suspended submicron particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Zhang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sanchez</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Douet</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bateman</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Kuwata</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Renbaum-Wolff</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>B. B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>P. F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7280-9720</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Bertram</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-2323</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Geiger</surname><given-names>F. M.</given-names></name>
          <email>geigerf@chem.northwestern.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff9">
          <name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>S. T.</given-names></name>
          <email>scot_martin@harvard.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemical Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Applied Science of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Earth Observatory of Singapore, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, College of Sciences, Nanyang Technological University,  Singapore, Singapore</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">S. T. Martin (scot_martin@harvard.edu) and F. M. Geiger (geigerf@chem.northwestern.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>7819</fpage><lpage>7829</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The change in shape of atmospherically relevant organic particles is
used to estimate the viscosity of the particle material without the
need for removal from aerosol suspension. The dynamic shape factors
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of particles produced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis in a flow
tube reactor, under conditions of particle coagulation, were
measured while altering the relative humidity (RH) downstream of the
flow tube. As relative humidity was increased, the results showed
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> could change from 1.27 to 1.02, corresponding to a
transition from aspherical to nearly spherical shapes. The shape
change could occur at elevated RH because the organic material had
decreased viscosity and was therefore able to flow to form spherical
shapes, as favored by the minimization of surface area. Numerical
modeling was used to estimate the particle viscosity associated with
this flow. Based on particle diameter and RH exposure time, the
viscosity dropped from 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s (two sigma) for an increase in RH from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 58 % at 293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These results imply that the
equilibration of the chemical composition of the particle phase with
the gas phase can shift from hours at mid-range RH to days at low
RH.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Volatile organic compounds emitted by the biosphere, as well as from
anthropogenic activities, react in the atmosphere with oxidants to produce
secondary, oxygenated species (Fehsenfeld et al., 1992; Hallquist et al.,
2009). Some of these products ultimately contribute to the mass concentration
of the atmospheric particle population, as so-called secondary organic
material (SOM) (Hallquist et al., 2009). Atmospheric particles have important
effects on both climate and human health, among other topics (Seinfeld and
Pandis, 2006), although the mechanisms of action remain incompletely
understood both qualitatively and quantitatively. Recently, the viscosity and
the diffusivity of SOM have emerged as important topics (Vaden et al., 2010;
Virtanen et al., 2010; Abramson et al., 2013; Hosny et al., 2013; Pajunoja
et al., 2013; Power et al., 2013; Renbaum-Wolff et al., 2013; Bateman et al.,
2015; Kidd et al., 2014; Wang et at., 2014). These properties influence
whether gases and the dynamic interplay between atmospheric particles are
confined to the surface region of a particle or alternatively can proceed to
the interior (Shiraiwa et al., 2013a, 2014), with potential important
consequences for the growth, the reactivity, and ultimately the fate of
atmospheric organic particles. Diffusivity of a species and the viscosity of
the host matrix are typically quantitatively related to one another, often
through the Stokes–Einstein relationship (Lindsay, 2009).</p>
      <p>Until recently, SOM was modeled as a low-viscosity liquid into which
gas-phase species from the surrounding environment diffuse quickly and for
which the chemical gas–particle equilibrium is rapidly reached (Donahue
et al., 2006; Hallquist et al., 2009). More recent work, however, has
indicated that viscosities are higher and diffusion coefficients are lower
than would be consistent with a liquid material (Vaden et al., 2010; Virtanen
et al., 2010; Cappa and Wilson, 2011; Perraud et al., 2012; Abramson et al.,
2013; Renbaum-Wolff et al., 2013; Kidd et al., 2014; Wang et at., 2014; Price
et al., 2015). An underestimated viscosity and hence overestimated diffusion
coefficient can result in an overprediction of particle mass concentrations
as well as an underprediction of gas-phase concentrations (Shiraiwa and
Seinfeld, 2012). Particle reactivity (Shiraiwa et al., 2011; Kuwata and
Martin, 2012a; Zelenyuk et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2013; Slade and Knopf,
2014), number concentrations (Riipinen et al., 2011), and diameters (Shiraiwa
et al., 2013b) can also be influenced by viscosities and diffusion rates, in
turn influencing model predictions related to air quality and climate.</p>
      <p>A challenge in the study of SOM is that properties can change upon removal of
the SOM from particle suspension, whether by deposition on a substrate,
extraction in water, study in vacuum, or a combination of all three, because
of the semivolatile nature of SOM. Another further challenge for studying and
understanding SOM is that it has a dynamic hygroscopic response to relative
humidity, meaning that water is taken up and released with cycles in RH
(Varutbangkul et al., 2006). The properties of organic particles, including
viscosity, change with the fractional water content in the material (Zobrist
et al., 2011; Renbaum-Wolff et al., 2013; Shrestha et al., 2014; Wang et al.,
2014). Even so, advances on these challenges are needed because SOM in the
atmosphere occurs in the aerosol form, and the surrounding environment in the
planetary boundary layer regularly undergoes cycling between low and high RH,
implying a dynamic state in the viscosity of SOM that is not well
understood or quantified at present.</p>
      <p>The present study estimates the viscosity of SOM in aerosol form as suspended
submicron particles. By comparison, the diffusivity of SOM in aerosol form
has been studied by the uptake or release of tracer species into suspended
SOM particles (Kuwata and Martin, 2012a; Abramson et al., 2013; Loza et al.,
2013; Robinson et al., 2013; Saleh et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2013). The
experimental strategy of the present study is to first evolve a particle
population by self-coagulation, second, to select a small subset
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 %) of highly aspherical particles from the overall population,
and third, to observe the tendency of the aspherical particles to adjust to
spherical shapes as a function of RH and exposure time. Viscosity is inferred from
the rate of shape change. Particle shape is quantitatively defined by
aerodynamic behavior. The dynamic shape factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of the
drag force on an actual particle divided by the drag force experienced by
a volume-equivalent sphere (Wang et al., 2010). Shape factors of nearly
spherical particles approach unity whereas highly aspherical particles have
significantly larger shape factors, with an exception not applicable to the
present study in the case of aerodynamic design such as bullets oriented
parallel to flow streamlines. As the viscosity of the particle material
decreases upon exposure to elevated RH, flow occurs and the particle shapes
approach sphericicity in order to minimize surface area. A numerical
simulation, using the tools of computational fluid dynamics and taking into
account particle size and exposure time to elevated RH, is used to determine
the material viscosity that is required to bring closure between modeled and
observed RH-dependent changes in shape factor, by optimization. The
numerical simulation extends in several ways, introduced by Renbaum-Wolff
et al. (2013), who modeled the flow of substrate-supported particles. In
addition to the results presented here, it is expected that the general method
can be applied more broadly across other disciplines which seek to determine
the viscosity of material bodies in the key size ranges of nanotechnologies
and biological sciences (i.e., from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> up to several
microns).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of experimental conditions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col7">Flow tube SOM generation </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Relative humidity<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4">Precursor conditions<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7">Particle conditions<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ozone</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mode diam-</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ppb)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ppb)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">conc. (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">eter (10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mid. concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>14.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mid. concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>66</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6–100<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mid. concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>24.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4–82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mid. concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>30.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4–82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>111</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4–54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AMS experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>500</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4–94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">#7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mid. concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>14.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4–58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations at inlet of flow tube reactor.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations in the outflow of the reactor, as measured by
SMPS. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Range of relative humidities studied in stepwise
fashion in series of experiments. The overall RH cycle was (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH)
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (RH value from within range shown in table) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH).
Uncertainties correspond to one sigma. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> For 100 % RH,
a flask of water was slightly heated until condensation was apparent on the
walls.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Flow tube reactor</title>
      <p>The production of SOM particles in the flow tube reactor largely
followed the procedures described in Shrestha et al. (2013).
Additional information on materials and methods is presented in
Sect. S2 of the Supplement. Briefly, because particles were produced
from the homogeneous nucleation of supersaturated organic vapors,
a temperature control of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>293.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across 12 to
24 h for individual experiments was necessary for reproducible
particle number–diameter distributions. The flow tube and the
associated gas-flow systems were therefore housed in
a temperature-controlled, double-walled, water-jacketed stainless
steel box (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). Ozone and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
concentrations of the different experiments are listed in Table 1.
The relative humidity was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %. The aerosol flowing out of
the reactor was passed through an ozone diffusion scrubber, which
reduced ozone concentrations sufficiently to curtail further SOM
production and thus to provide a well-defined reaction time. The
aerosol subsequently flowed into either a 0.9 or 6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> flask
for an average residence time of 45 or 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
during which additional particle coagulation took place at various
RH. The aerosol flow continued into a region of RH control. The
apparatus for adjusting RH, including exposure time, consisted of
a Nafion RH conditioner (Perma Pure, Model PD-200T-12) to set the RH
of the aerosol flow, followed by a 0.9 or 6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> flask to
serve as a plenum for RH exposure (i.e., 45 or 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively), followed by two diffusion dryers and a second Nafion
RH conditioner to reset RH to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Particle mobility diameter and particle mass</title>
      <p>Exiting the RH control system, the aerosol flow was divided into two streams (Fig. S2 in the Supplement).
The first stream was sampled by a Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA) (TSI
model 3081) (Knutson and Whitby, 1975). The DMA outflow consisted of
a subpopulation of particles with a central electric mobility diameter. The
central diameters of the different experiments are listed in Table 1. The DMA
outflow was sampled by an Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer (APM) (APM-3600,
KANOMAX Inc.) (Ehara et al., 1996), and the particle number concentration in
the APM outflow was measured by a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC; TSI
model 3022a) (Agarwal and Sem, 1980). The APM voltage was scanned at fixed
rotation speed to measure the number–mass distribution of the particle
population (Kuwata and Kondo, 2009). The second flow stream from the reactor
outflow was sampled by a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS; TSI, model
3071A; CPC; TSI, model 3772) to characterize the number–diameter distribution
of the produced particle population (Hoppel, 1978). The DMA, APM, and SMPS
were regularly calibrated using aerosol particles of polystyrene latex (PSL)
or ammonium sulfate, both of which were produced by nebulization (Model 3076,
TSI Corporation) (Biskos et al., 2008).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Coagulation and dynamic shape factors</title>
      <p>An aerosol population of SOM particles was produced in a flow tube using 500,
700, and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and 12 to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of ozone for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The number concentrations and
mode diameters are listed in Table 1 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH. Because the
concentrations were high in the flow tube, coagulation occurred. Depending on
the number–diameter distribution and the reactor residence time, this resulted in several
types of coagulated particles being formed. Scanning electron micrographs are
shown in Fig. 1 (cf. column 1). The smallest features apparent in the images
of column 1 are on order of 5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and represent the primary
nucleated particles in the flow tube. These nanoparticles coagulated in the
flow tube to larger particles on order of 20 to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that then exit the
flow tube. Each of these particles is referred to as a monomer and is
represented by a red circle in the images in Fig. 1. After the flow tube,
there was a retention volume in which additional coagulation of the monomers
occurred. Dimers, trimers, and high-order agglomerates formed from monomer
coagulation (images A1, B1, and C1, respectively). The dimers and trimers,
having aspherical shapes at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH and making up <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 % of
the total particle population (cf. Fig. S1), constituted the core of the
experimental strategy.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>SEM images of the particles obtained from 700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and sampled for a central mobility diameter of
180.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aerosol particles were collected on the silica
substrate for 12 h and then coated with 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pt</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The voltage for the electron beam was 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the working distance was 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Column 1 shows dimer, trimer,
and higher-order agglomerates of the granular monomers for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH.
Red circles identify the monomers. Column 2 shows nearly spherical particles
that were collected after exposure to 80 % RH followed by drying to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7819/2015/acp-15-7819-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The instrumental approach for characterizing the shapes of the suspended
particles consisted of a DMA (Knutson and Whitby, 1975) coupled to an APM
(Ehara et al., 1996) (Fig. S2). The DMA was used to select a subpopulation of
controlled mobility diameters from the overall particle population. The
number–mass distribution of this subpopulation was then measured using the
APM. The dimensionless dynamic shape factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was then calculated as
follows (Sect. S1) (Kuwata and Kondo, 2009):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          for particle mass <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mobility diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
material density <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. A material density of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used. The Cunningham slip correction factor is
given by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were taken as the central values of the DMA setting and the
APM measurement, respectively. Instrument calibration and employed material
densities are discussed in Sects. S2 and S3. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of spheres is
unity whereas that of submicron dimer and trimer particles ranges from 1.03
to 1.16 and 1.12 to 1.28, respectively, in the transition regime (i.e.,
Knudsen number from 0.1 to 10) (Hochrainer and Hanel, 1975; Hansson and
Ahlberg, 1985; Kousaka et al., 1996; Zelenyuk et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>Examples of the number–mass distributions recorded in three replicate
experiments are shown in Fig. 2. The DMA was set to select only the
large-diameter particles in the tail of number–diameter distribution of the
particle population (cf. Fig. S1). The selected particle subpopulation had
a central mobility diameter of 126.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to a mode diameter
of 52.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the original population, which had 0.1 and 99.9 %
diameter intervals of 20.2 and 151.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (cf. Fig. S1).
Contributions from monomers, as well as from dimers of disparate monomer
sizes (e.g., one large <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> one small) and other higher-order agglomerates,
were therefore absent in the analyzed data sets. Although doubly charged
particles were present in the outflow of the DMA, the mass range covered in
Fig. 2 corresponds only to singly charged particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>An example of the number–mass distribution, as measured using the
DMA-APM system. Results of three replicate experiments are shown to
demonstrate reproducibility. Two-sigma uncertainty is represented by the
error bars, which are approximately the same size as the data markers. The
lines represent fits of a normal distribution to the data. The abscissa is
calculated based on the APM rotation speed and the voltage applied between
the walls of the APM cylinders. Dynamic shape factors calculated by
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated by
the vertical lines. The particles shown in the plot were produced from
700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and 14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ozone. A central mobility
diameter of 126.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was selected by the DMA. The width of the
DMA-APM instrument train is represented by the dashed lines.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7819/2015/acp-15-7819-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As a result of these filtering strategies, the subpopulation represented in
Fig. 2 consisted of singly charged dimer, trimer, and higher-order
agglomerates. By use of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), the dynamic shape factor of
particles at the central value of the number–mass distribution was 1.18.
Examples of the intrinsic width of the DMA-APM instrument train are denoted
by the three dashed curves. The data are seen to be wider than the
instrumental width. The subpopulation, therefore, consisted of particles
having a quasi-monodisperse mobility diameter yet a range of dynamic shape
factors, corresponding to a variety of different types of coagulated
aspherical particles. Vertical lines are shown for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 1.10 and
1.29, in addition to the central value of 1.18 as well as a reference value
of 1.0. Diagram representations of some examples of the types of particles
that may be associated with the shape factors are represented as insets in
the figure. Section S4 presents additional data concerning the dependence of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the variability of synthesis conditions of the agglomerate
particles as well as on the DMA-selected mobility diameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Effects of relative humidity</title>
      <p>The particle populations of dimer, trimer, and higher-order agglomerates
produced at low RH were subsequently exposed to elevated RH for a controlled
residence time. At sufficiently high RH, the particle material flowed. The
micrographs of column 2 in Fig. 1 show that nearly spherical particles
resulted from exposure to sufficiently high RH. Correspondingly, this resulted in spherical
particles of unity shape factor. The complete processing of the
particle population was thus primary production, secondary coagulation for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH, exposure of agglomerates to an elevated variable RH for
a controlled time period, and instrumental characterization of shape factors
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH. The final RH adjustment to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH removed
water from the particles, both serving to simplify interpretation of the
sizing data of the DMA-APM and to freeze the particle shape after a
controlled time period of possible material flow at elevated RH. This
approach assumed that the particle shape did not change with rapid removal of
water, as was reasonable considering the overall scenario of quick drying
times relative to the slow material flow rates and the absolute water content
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % by volume.</p>
      <p>Figure 3 represents the experimental strategy and expected
results of the RH-dependent experiments in a diagram. For specific conditions (Fig. 3a),
the production of dimer and trimer agglomerates of large shape factors was
favored (leftmost to middle column). For non-optimized conditions, Fig. 3b
shows that coagulation events became sufficiently numerous that higher-order
agglomerates were produced, resulting in particles of polyhedral shape and of
correspondingly smaller shape factors. The middle-to-rightmost columns show
the transition from aspherical to spherical particles after exposure to
elevated RH for a sufficiently long time period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Diagram representing changes in particle shape due to coagulation
and to elevated relative humidity. <bold>(a)</bold> Scenario for an experiment
using a medium concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in which
two similarly sized particles collide to form dimer and trimer agglomerates,
leading to relatively larger dynamic shape factors (rightmost to middle
column). They constitute <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 % of the total particle population.
They become nearly spherical after exposure to an elevated RH (middle to
leftmost column). The elevated RH decreases viscosity and allows material
flow. <bold>(b)</bold> Scenario for an experiment using a high concentration of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), in which several particles collide to
form larger agglomerates having relatively smaller dynamic shape factors. At
elevated RH, these particles also flow and become spherical.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7819/2015/acp-15-7819-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In a series of RH-dependent experiments, aerosol particles produced from
700 pbb of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene at ozone concentrations ranging from 14 to
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were exposed stepwise to up to 80 % RH in a retention
volume having an average residence time of 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aerosol then
flowed into a region of reduced RH (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
selected diameter fractions were determined. Figure 4a shows the dependence
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on RH for particle subpopulations having central mobility
diameters of 126.0, 175.0, and 195.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The respective <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH were <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (one-sigma uncertainty), suggesting that the particle populations were
composed largely of dimers and trimers in the first case and of higher-order
agglomerates for the latter two cases. The uncertainty estimate is based on
repeated measurements. As the RH was increased, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased for all
three populations, reaching a final value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 35 % RH
and corresponding within uncertainty to spherical particles. The monotonic
decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for increasing relative humidity implied a likewise
monotonic decrease in viscosity. An alternative hypothesis of reactive
chemistry with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for changing RH was not supported because the
organic portion of the particle mass spectrum did not change upon exposure to
elevated RH (Sect. S4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Dynamic shape factor for increasing relative humidity.
<bold>(a)</bold> Particles produced from 700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and 14,
25, and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ozone for particle populations having central mobility
diameters of 126.0, 175.0, and 190.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The exposure
time to relative humidity was 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Exposure up to
100 % RH for 45 or 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. SOM was produced from 700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and 14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ozone at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH. The error bars
in each panel represent two sigma of standard deviation. The lines represent
empirical fits to the data to guide the eye.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7819/2015/acp-15-7819-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Given that the extent of flow and hence the extent of shape change are expected to be
tightly coupled to exposure time at elevated RH, experiments were conducted
to investigate the effect of exposure time on the observations. Figure 4b
shows results for a humidification time of 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to that of
310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For an exposure time of 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the
selected 126-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particles, which were identified by SEM as dimers (cf.
Supplement, Sect. S4), decreased to unity by 35 % RH. By comparison, for
an exposure time of 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the selected
165-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particles, which were identified by SEM as trimers, remained
unchanged for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 20 % RH, decreasing to nearly unity only at
50 % RH. The two curves were offset by approximately 20 % RH. This
result is consistent with the explanation that the shape change arose from
material flow and that the flow required a finite amount of time to complete
the full transformation to nearly spherical particles. A corollary is that
the same extent of shape change at a shorter exposure time implies
a decreased viscosity, all other factors being equal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Viscosity estimate</title>
      <p>The experimental results show a conversion from an aspherical to a nearly
spherical shape within a specific time period, implying a rate of material
flow and hence viscosity. The viscosity can therefore be estimated from the
experimental results. To do so, a model was constructed using a commercial
software package for numerical solutions to fluid flows (cf. Sect. S5). An
example of the model simulation is shown in Fig. 5. A dimer consisting of two
90-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter spheres having an overlap of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the
spheres was modeled for an exposure of 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to elevated RH (cf.
Fig. S3). The two panels of Fig. 5 show the initial and final particle shapes
(cf. film clip S1 in the Supplement). In 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the dimer transformed to
a sphere for a viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s, as obtained
by numerical optimization. Please note that even though the RH was measured
up to 100 % in the experiment (cf. Fig. 4), the highest RH that could be
studied (58 %) was limited by the full transformation to a spherical
particle within the fastest experimental residence time (45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). An
analytical result described in Frenkel (1945) for the full transformation of
a dimer into a sphere leads to an estimated viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s, which is in good agreement with the numerical result. The
numerical approach has the advantage that it can also be applied to partial
transformations. The uncertainty estimate on the optimized value was based on
a sensitivity analysis of the modeling results. A range of surface tensions,
particle shapes (including extent of monomer overlap), and other factors was
investigated (Sect. S6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Flow simulation for the transformation of a dimer agglomerate into
a spherical particle. <bold>(a)</bold> shows the initialization for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two monomers having a diameter of 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and overlapping
by 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown. The coloring represents the instantaneous flow
velocity. <bold>(b)</bold> shows the end of the simulation at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>310</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The full time series is shown in film clip S1. The viscosity
and its standard deviation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s, were
optimized in the simulation so that the transformation from a dimer
in <bold>(a)</bold> to a sphere in <bold>(b)</bold> was complete after 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(cf. data of Fig. 4b and see also main text). In <bold>(b)</bold>, the black
lines represent the original shape of the particle (i.e., <bold>a</bold>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7819/2015/acp-15-7819-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The example of Fig. 5 corresponds to the experimental results of Fig. 4b
showing the full transformation from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.21 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.02 for 35 % RH in 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Viscosities for other RH
values were obtained by using the other data points of Fig. 4b, which
corresponded to partial transformations. The results plotted in Fig. 6 show
that the viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM corresponded to a semisolid rather
than a liquid to at least 58 % RH. Part I represents data for changes in
the shape factor data for a residence time of 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Part II represents
data for 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for which a linear trimer consisting of 90-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
spheres was modeled, again with an overlap of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between spheres.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Summary of the RH-dependent viscosity obtained from this
study for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic material for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to
58 % RH. The secondary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis shows the mixing time of low
volatility molecules with an 100-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle. Part 1
represents data for changes in the shape factor for residence time
of 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (cf. Fig. 4b). Part 2 represents data for
45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The secondary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis shows the characteristic mixing
time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of low-volatility organic molecules due to bulk
diffusion in 100-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particles of the same viscosity. Results
from literature are also plotted for comparison. A breakdown of the
factors contributing to the uncertainty bars is presented in
Fig. S13. Parts I and II also represent particle populations
dominantly composed of dimer and trimer agglomerates, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7819/2015/acp-15-7819-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>For comparison, results from other experimental studies are also plotted in
Fig. 6. The estimated viscosity for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % RH agrees well with that
of Abramson et al. (2013) and lies within the uncertainty of that of Pajunoja
et al. (2013). Abramson et al. (2013) estimated the viscosity of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM based on the evaporation rate of co-incorporated pyrene
from the particles at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH. Pajunoja et al. (2013) observed the
shape of substrate-supported, submicron particles in vacuum by scanning
electron microscopy and used the relaxation time of particle coalescence for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % RH to estimate viscosity. Kidd et al. (2014) estimated the
viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM by examining the deposition patterns of
impacted particles at 87 % RH. Bateman et al. (2015) observed
a transition at 70 % RH from rebounding to non-rebounding particles of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM and calibrated this response as a transition in viscosity
from 100 to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., semisolid to liquid) based on the
rebound behavior of sucrose particles of known viscosity. For comparison to
the latter two studies of Kidd et al. and Bateman et al., the RH range of the
present study was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 58 % RH. Renbaum-Wolff et al. (2013)
measured the RH dependence of the viscosity of the water-soluble component of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM by using optical microscopy to track the movement of
small beads. The central values of the estimated viscosities of the present
study are lower for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % RH and higher for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % RH,
implying a reduced sensitivity of viscosity to RH for the present study
compared to that reported for Renbaum-Wolff. These differences could relate
to differences in sample preparation. Renbaum-Wolff et al. (2013) studied
supermicron particles reconstituted from the water-soluble portion of SOM,
which can be compared to the present experiments that studied whole SOM in
aerosol form without post-processing. Given the differences in hygroscopicity
and hence the volume fraction of water that can act as a plasticizer, the
viscosity of the water-soluble portion of SOM can be expected to have greater
sensitivity to RH than that of whole SOM.</p>
      <p>The model used in the present study to estimate viscosity has several
embedded assumptions. A surface tension of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to obtain local stress from local shape
(Wex et al., 2009). This value is the average of 83 organic compounds (Korosi
and Kovats, 1981). Diameter changes because of hygroscopic growth were taken
as negligible for the studied RH range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 58 % RH. A uniform
value of viscosity throughout the particle was assumed, requiring that the
uptake and diffusion of water throughout the particle was fast
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to the exposure times of 45 and 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This assumption is justified by observations of water uptake showing that
submicron particles of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM equilibrate with surrounding
gas-phase water in less than 1 sec (Smith et al., 2011). The diffusion
coefficient of water in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM for low to middle RH is above
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Price et al., 2015), hence leading to
a characteristic diffusion time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout a 100-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shiraiwa et al., 2011). The model also assumed a specific
exposure time (i.e., 45 or 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to elevated RH, whereas it was expected that the actual
residence times of individual particles in the exposure flask had
a distribution which approaches that of Poisson statistics at the limit
of a continuously mixed flow reactor (Kuwata and Martin, 2012b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Implications</title>
      <p>Under the assumption that the concentration of a species in the gas phase
maintains rapid equilibrium with its concentration in surface layer of
a particle and in the absence of chemical reaction, the characteristic time
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to obtain a well-mixed particle by molecular diffusion is as follows
(Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          for particle diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and molecular diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Use of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) assumes that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is uniform throughout the particle. With
some limits to applicability (Price et al., 2014), the Stokes–Einstein
equation relates the diffusion coefficient of a molecule within a host matrix
of viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as follows (Lindsay, 2009):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          for Boltzmann constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and effective radius
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the diffusing species. Combining Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) leads to the following expression for the characteristic mixing
time:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>For a case study, Table 2 lists mixing times obtained for a typical
atmospheric particle diameter of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and for the viscosities of
the present study for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 and 58 % RH at 293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Molecules
such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>19</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>28</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which correspond to a family of
low-volatility molecules produced during <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis, are
considered for the case study (Ehn et al., 2014). The effective radius of
this family is on order 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mixing times listed in Table 2
and Fig. 6 range from 5.0 h to 11.5 days for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 58 % RH,
respectively. The SOM particles considered in the case study are, therefore,
expected to reach equilibrium with the chemical composition of the gas phase
rather slowly in some cases, especially in light of typical atmospheric
residence times of 7 to 10 days. For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % RH, the characteristic
mixing time can be more than a week, supporting the suggestion that chemical
transport models significantly overestimate SOM particle mass concentration
and underestimate gas-phase concentrations by assuming instantaneous chemical
equilibrium between the two phases (Riipinen et al., 2011; Perraud et al.,
2012). At 58 % RH, the characteristic mixing time can approach several
hours. The implication is that smaller molecules like ozone or water
that diffuse faster in an SOM matrix than predicted by the Stokes–Einstein
relationship might penetrate deeply into the particles, whereas organic
molecules exchanged with the gas phase might be confined to the outer layer
of the particle, thereby setting up a gradient in chemical composition and
hence reactivity within the particle. The molecules at the surface in many
cases might be kinetically determined rather than thermodynamically
controlled, implying many non-surfactants at the surface.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Viscosities of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived secondary organic material at
the lower and upper relative humidities of this study. Also shown are the
characteristic mixing times for a diffusing species in a spherical SOM
particle of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. An effective radius of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used.
See main text for further explanation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Viscosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Characteristic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">humidity (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Pa s)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mixing time (day)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (11.5 days)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.0 h)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The results of the present study can improve model estimates of gas
uptake into particles and thereby improve model accuracy of particle
growth rates and reactive processes. For low and intermediate RH and
in the absence of a fast reaction, small molecules like <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
or NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are expected to diffuse rapidly to the center of
atmospheric SOM particles, at least those in the Aiken and
accumulation diameter modes and those represented well by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOM. Larger organic molecules, however, are expected to
remain in the surface region of the particles for one or more days.
Even so, the range of experimental conditions of a single study is
necessarily limited, and future additional studies to track the
variability of viscosity at higher RH and both warmer and cooler
temperatures are well motivated. The viscosity of SOM generated from
volatile organic compounds other than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, as well as
mixed chemical systems, also merits further investigation.</p>
      <p>The scope of applicability of the approach introduced herein to determine
viscosity of submicron particles in aerosol form can be considered. The lower
limit for the RH that can be probed is related to the first discernible
detection of shape change within the exposure time to elevated RH. In the
present study, for 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of exposure, the lower limit of RH was
20 %. For 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lower limit was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %. The upper
limit is related to the full transformation to a spherical particle within
the exposure time to elevated RH. In the present study, for 45 s of
exposure, the upper limit of RH was 58 %. For 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the upper limit was
25 %. The lower and upper limits for the viscosities that can be probed
are related both to the particle diameter and the time for material flow
(i.e., corresponding to the exposure time to elevated RH). For 100-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
particles, viscosities as low as 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s and as high as 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s for exposure times on order of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, can be inferred by flow modeling to match shape changes. This
viscosity range corresponds to varying degrees of semi-solidity. A future
apparatus design for shorter residence times and larger particle diameters is
an ongoing effort so that viscosity values can be probed at the transition
point from semi-solidity to liquid. There might also be a limit on how small
the non-liquid monomers can be, which were 20 to 40 nm in the present study
and were coagulated to make the larger non-spherical particles; Cheng et
al. (2015) have suggested that monomers on order 20 nm and smaller might be
liquid.</p>
      <p>In summary, the changing shapes of suspended submicron organic particles were
monitored for RH exposures ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 58 % RH at
293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the characteristic times of the shape changes were used to
estimate the RH-dependent viscosities of the constituent organic material.
The viscosities decrease from 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa s
(two-sigma) as RH increases from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 58 % at 293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
methodology developed in the present study of using the DMA-APM system to
estimate viscosity for particles in situ as an aerosol, rather than being
collected on a substrate for subsequent analysis, can avoid several potential
artifacts specific to the semivolatile nature of SOM. If deployed for field
measurements, the approach also has the promise of providing sufficient time
resolution to track atmospheric variability.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015-supplement" xlink:title="zip">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
Foundation. We acknowledge Mona Shrestha, Yingjun Liu, and
Irina Herdlinger-Blatt for useful discussions and assistance with the
experiments.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: H. Su</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abramson, E., Imre, D., Beranek, J., Wilson, J., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Experimental determination of chemical diffusion within secondary organic
aerosol particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 2983–2991,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2CP44013J">10.1039/C2CP44013J</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Agarwal, J. K. and Sem, G. J.: Continuous flow, single-particle-counting
condensation nucleus counter, J. Aerosol Sci., 11, 343–357,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(80)90042-7">10.1016/0021-8502(80)90042-7</ext-link>,
1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bateman, A. P., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Hygroscopic influence on
the semisolid-to-liquid transition of secondary organic materials, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 4386–4395,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp508521c">10.1021/jp508521c</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Biskos, G., Vons, V., Yurteri, C. U., and Schmidt-Ott, A.: Generation and
sizing of particles for aerosol-based nanotechnology, KONA, 26, 13–35,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14356/kona.26.2008006">10.14356/kona.26.2008006</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D. and Wilson, K. R.: Evolution of organic aerosol mass spectra
upon heating: implications for OA phase and partitioning behavior, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 1895–1911, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1895-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1895-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Su, H., Koop, T., Mikhailov, E., and Pöschl, U.: Size
dependence of phase transitions in aerosol nanoparticles, Nat. Commun., 6,
5923, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6923">10.1038/ncomms6923</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.:
Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es052297c">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ehara, K., Hagwood, C., and Coakley, K. J.: Novel method to classify aerosol
particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio – aerosol particle mass
analyser, J. Aerosol Sci., 27, 217–234,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(95)00562-5">10.1016/0021-8502(95)00562-5</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F.,
Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S.,
Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B.,
Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T.,
Petaja, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R.,
Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary
organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13032">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fehsenfeld, F., Calvert, J., Fall, R., Goldan, P., Guenther, A. B.,
Hewitt, C. N., Lamb, B., Liu, S., Trainer, M., Westberg, H., and
Zimmerman, P.: Emissions of volatile organic compounds from vegetation and
the implications for atmospheric chemistry, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 6,
389–430, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/92GB02125">10.1029/92GB02125</ext-link>,
1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Frenkel, J.: Viscous flow of crystalline bodies under the action of surface tension, J. Phys. USSR, 9, 385–391,
1945.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hansson, H.-C. and Ahlberg, M. S.: Dynamic shape factors of sphere aggregates
in an electric field and their dependence on the Knudsen number, J. Aerosol
Sci., 16, 69–79,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(85)90021-7">10.1016/0021-8502(85)90021-7</ext-link>,
1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hochrainer, D. and Hanel, G.: Der dynamische formfaktor
nicht-kugelförmiger teilchen als funktion des luftdrucks, J. Aerosol
Sci., 6, 97–103, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A.: Determination of the aerosol size distribution from the
mobility distribution of the charged fraction of aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci.,
9, 41–54,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(78)90062-9">10.1016/0021-8502(78)90062-9</ext-link>,
1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hosny, N. A., Mohamedi, G., Rademeyer, P., Owen, J., Wu, Y., Tang, M.-X.,
Eckersley, R. J., Stride, E., and Kuimova, M. K.: Mapping microbubble
viscosity using fluorescence lifetime imaging of molecular rotors, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 9225–9230,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301479110">10.1073/pnas.1301479110</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kidd, C., Perraud, V., Wingen, L. M., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Integrating
phase and composition of secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 7552–7557,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322558111">10.1073/pnas.1322558111</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Knutson, E. O. and Whitby, K. T.: Aerosol classification by electric
mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications, J. Aerosol Sci., 6, 443–451,
1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Korosi, G. and Kovats, E. S.: Density and surface tension of 83 organic
liquids, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 26, 323–332,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je00025a032">10.1021/je00025a032</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kousaka, Y., Endo, Y., Ichitsubo, H., and Alonso, M.: Orientation-specific
dynamic shape factors for doublets and triplets of spheres in the transition
regime, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 24, 36–44,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965350">10.1080/02786829608965350</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M. and Kondo, Y.: Measurements of particle masses of inorganic salt
particles for calibration of cloud condensation nuclei counters, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 5921–5932,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5921-2009">10.5194/acp-9-5921-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M. and Martin, S. T.: Phase of atmospheric secondary organic material affects its reactivity,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 17354–17359,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209071109">10.1073/pnas.1209071109</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M. and Martin, S. T.: Particle size distributions following
condensational growth in continuous flow aerosol reactors as derived from
residence time distributions: theoretical development and application to
secondary organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 937–949,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.683204">10.1080/02786826.2012.683204</ext-link>,
2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Lindsay, S. M.: Introduction to Nanoscience, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 472 pp., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Loza, C. L., Coggon, M. M., Nguyen, T. B., Zuend, A., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: On the mixing and evaporation of secondary organic aerosol
components, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6173–6180,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es400979k">10.1021/es400979k</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Pajunoja, A., Malila, J., Hao, L., Joutsensaari, J., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Virtanen, A.: Estimating the viscosity
range of SOA particles based on their coalescence time, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, i–iv,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.870325">10.1080/02786826.2013.870325</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander, M. L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D.,
Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 2836–2841,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109">10.1073/pnas.1119909109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Power, R. M., Simpson, S. H., Reid, J. P., and Hudson, A. J.: The transition from liquid to solid-like behaviour in
ultrahigh viscosity aerosol particles, Chem. Sci., 4, 2597–2604,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3SC50682G">10.1039/C3SC50682G</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Price, H. C., Murray, B. J., Mattsson, J., O'Sullivan, D., Wilson, T. W., Baustian, K. J., and Benning, L. G.:
Quantifying water diffusion in high-viscosity and glassy aqueous solutions using a Raman isotope tracer method,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3817–3830,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3817-2014">10.5194/acp-14-3817-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Price, H. C., Mattsson, J., Zhang, Y., Bertram, A., Davies, J. F.,
Grayson, J. W., Martin, S. T., O'Sullivan, D., Reid, J. P.,
Rickards, A. M. J., and Murray, B. J.: Water diffusion in atmospherically
relevant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic material, Chemical Science,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5SC00685F">10.1039/C5SC00685F</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Renbaum-Wolff, L., Grayson, J. W., Bateman, A. P., Kuwata, M.,
Sellier, M., Murray, B. J., Shilling, J. E., Martin, S. T., and
Bertram, A. K.: Viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic material and
implications for particle growth and reactivity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
110, 8014–8019,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219548110">10.1073/pnas.1219548110</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S.,
Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang,
R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D.
R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a
vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, E. S., Saleh, R., and Donahue, N. M.: Organic aerosol mixing
observed by single-particle mass spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117,
13935–13945,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp405789t">10.1021/jp405789t</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Time scales for gas-particle
partitioning equilibration of secondary organic aerosol formed from
alpha-pinene ozonolysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5588–5594,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es400078d">10.1021/es400078d</ext-link>, 2013</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry Physics,
John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Equilibration timescale of atmospheric
secondary organic aerosol partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24801,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054008">10.1029/2012GL054008</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and
chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 108, 11003–11008,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108">10.1073/pnas.1103045108</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Bertram, A. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-particle
partitioning of atmospheric aerosols: interplay of physical state, non-ideal
mixing and morphology, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 11441–11453,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H">10.1039/C3CP51595H</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Yee, L. D., Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Craven, J. S.,
Zuend, A., Ziemann, P. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Size distribution dynamics
reveal particle-phase chemistry in organic aerosol formation, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 110, 11746–11750,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307501110">10.1073/pnas.1307501110</ext-link>,
2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Berkemeier, T., Schilling-Fahnestock, K. A., Seinfeld, J. H.,
and Pöschl, U.: Molecular corridors and kinetic regimes in the multiphase
chemical evolution of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
8323–8341,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8323-2014">10.5194/acp-14-8323-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Shrestha, M., Zhang, Y., Ebben, C. J., Martin, S. T., and Geiger, F. M.:
Vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy of secondary organic
material produced by condensational growth from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
ozonolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 8427–8436,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp405065d">10.1021/jp405065d</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Shrestha, M., Zhang, Y., Upshur, M. A., Liu, P., Blair, S. L., Wang, H.,
Nizkorodov, S. A., Thomson, R. J., Martin, S. T., and Geiger, F. M.: On
surface order and disorder of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived secondary organic
material, J. Phys. Chem. A,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp510780e">10.1021/jp510780e</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H., and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: the role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060582">10.1002/2014GL060582</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Smith, M. L., Kuwata, M., and Martin, S. T.: Secondary organic material
produced by the dark ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene minimally affects the
deliquescence and efflorescence of ammonium sulfate, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45,
244–261,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.532178">10.1080/02786826.2010.532178</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Vaden, T. D., Song, C., Zaveri, R. A., Imre, D., and Zelenyuk, A.: Morphology
of mixed primary and secondary organic particles and the adsorption of
spectator organic gases during aerosol formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
107, 6658–6663,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911206107">10.1073/pnas.0911206107</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Varutbangkul, V., Brechtel, F. J., Bahreini, R., Ng, N. L., Keywood, M. D.,
Kroll, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee, A., and Goldstein, A. H.:
Hygroscopicity of secondary organic aerosols formed by oxidation of
cycloalkenes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and related compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 2367–2388, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2367-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2367-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirila, P., Leskinen, J., Makela, J. M.,
Holopainen, J. K., Poschl, U., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic secondary
organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467, 824–827,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09455">10.1038/nature09455</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wang, B., O'Brien, R. E., Kelly, S. T., Shilling, J. E., Moffet, R. C.,
Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Reactivity of liquid and semisolid secondary
organic carbon with chloride and nitrate in atmospheric aerosols, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 4498–4508,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp510336q">10.1021/jp510336q</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., King, S. M., Freney, E., Rosenoern, T., Smith, M. L., Chen, Q.,
Kuwata, M., Lewis, E. R., Pöschl, U., Wang, W., Buseck, P. R., and
Martin, S. T.: The dynamic shape factor of sodium chloride nanoparticles as
regulated by drying rate, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 939–953,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.503204">10.1080/02786826.2010.503204</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wex, H., Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Hallbauer, E., Massling, A.,
McMeeking, G. R., Poulain, L., Wu, Z., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Stratmann, F.:
Towards closing the gap between hygroscopic growth and activation for
secondary organic aerosol: Part 1 – Evidence from measurements, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 3987–3997, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A., Cai, Y., and Imre, D.: From agglomerates of spheres to irregularly shaped particles: determination of
dynamic shape factors from measurements of mobility and vacuum aerodynamic diameters, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 197–217,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500529406">10.1080/02786820500529406</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Beránek, J., Abramson, E., Wilson, J., and Shrivastava, M.: Synergy between secondary
organic aerosols and long-range transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 12459–12466,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es302743z">10.1021/es302743z</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Shiraiwa, M., McWhinney, R. D., Pöschl, U., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Kinetic limitations in gas-particle
reactions arising from slow diffusion in secondary organic aerosol, Faraday Discuss., 165, 391–406,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00030C">10.1039/C3FD00030C</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Zobrist, B., Soonsin, V., Luo, B. P., Krieger, U. K., Marcolli, C.,
Peter, T., and Koop, T.: Ultra-slow water diffusion in aqueous sucrose
glasses, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 3514–3526,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0CP01273D">10.1039/C0CP01273D</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
