<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Secondary organic aerosol formation from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system: effect of humidity and peroxy radical
fate</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Secondary organic aerosol formation from the $\boldsymbol{\beta}$-pinene$+$NO${}_{{3}}$ system}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~M.~Boyd et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Boyd</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sanchez</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-9876</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Eugene</surname><given-names>A. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nah</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tuet</surname><given-names>W. Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Guzman</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-7766</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>N. L.</given-names></name>
          <email>ng@chbe.gatech.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-4765</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">N. L. Ng (ng@chbe.gatech.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>7497</fpage><lpage>7522</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the oxidation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene via nitrate radicals is investigated in the Georgia Tech Environmental Chamber (GTEC) facility. Aerosol yields are determined for
experiments performed under both dry (relative humidity (RH) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %) and humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %
and RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) conditions. To probe the effects of peroxy radical
(RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fate on aerosol formation, “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments are performed. Gas-phase
organic nitrate species (with molecular weights of 215, 229, 231, and 245 amu, which likely correspond to molecular formulas of
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) are
detected by chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) and their formation
mechanisms are proposed. The NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30) and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 46) ions contribute about 11 % to the combined organics and
nitrate signals in the typical aerosol mass spectrum, with the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio ranging from 4.8 to 10.2 in all experiments
conducted. The SOA yields in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments are comparable. For a wide
range of organic mass loadings (5.1–216.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the aerosol
mass yield is calculated to be 27.0–104.1 %. Although humidity does not
appear to affect SOA yields, there is evidence of particle-phase hydrolysis
of organic nitrates, which are estimated to compose 45–74 % of the organic
aerosol. The extent of organic nitrate hydrolysis is significantly lower
than that observed in previous studies on photooxidation of volatile organic
compounds in the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is estimated that about 90 and
10 % of the organic nitrates formed from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
reaction are primary organic nitrates and tertiary organic nitrates,
respectively. While the primary organic nitrates do not appear to hydrolyze,
the tertiary organic nitrates undergo hydrolysis with a lifetime of 3–4.5 h. Results from this laboratory chamber study provide the fundamental
data to evaluate the contributions of monoterpene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction to
ambient organic aerosol measured in the southeastern United States,
including the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) and the Southeastern Center for Air Pollution and Epidemiology (SCAPE) study.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Owing to their high emissions and high reactivity with the major atmospheric
oxidants (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) emitted by vegetation, such as isoprene (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
monoterpenes (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and sesquiterpenes (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
believed to be the dominant contributor to global secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) formation (e.g., Kanakidou et
al., 2005). While this is supported by the observation that ambient organic
aerosol is predominantly “modern” and therefore biogenic in origin
(Lewis et al., 2004; Schichtel et al., 2008; Marley et al., 2009), there
exists an apparent contradiction because ambient organic aerosol is
well correlated with anthropogenic tracers  (de Gouw et al., 2005; Weber
et al., 2007). This apparent discrepancy could be reconciled if
anthropogenic pollution influences the atmospheric oxidation of BVOCs and
their aerosol formation pathways. The oxidation of BVOCs by nitrate radicals
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, formed from the reaction of ozone with NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, provides a
direct link between anthropogenic pollution and the abundance of biogenic
carbon in atmospheric aerosol.</p>
      <p>Biogenic hydrocarbons react rapidly with nitrate radicals    (Atkinson
and Arey, 2003a) and the SOA yields are
generally higher than in photooxidation and ozonolysis (e.g.,  Griffin et
al., 1999; Hallquist et al., 1999; Spittler et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2008;
Fry et al., 2009, 2011, 2014; Rollins et al., 2009).
As monoterpene emissions are not entirely light dependent, they are emitted
during the day and at night  (Fuentes et al., 2000; Guenther et al., 2012)
and can contribute substantially to ambient organic aerosol. Monoterpenes
have also been found to make up as much as 28 % of non-methane organic
carbon emissions from biomass burning in both field and laboratory studies
(Akagi et al., 2013; Hatch et al., 2015; Stockwell et al., 2015). Fires
from biomass burning are more likely to smolder at night and are therefore
more likely to emit monoterpenes, which can then react with nitrate radicals
(Akagi et al., 2013). Results from
previous field studies provided evidence of aerosol formation from nitrate
radical oxidation of BVOCs during both daytime and nighttime  (McLaren et
al., 2004; Iinuma et al., 2007; Fuentes et al., 2007; Brown et al., 2009, 2013;
Rastogi et al., 2011; Rollins et al., 2012;  Rollins et
al., 2013). Specifically, many of these studies found a significant increase
in the amount of monoterpene organic aerosol and oxidation products at
night, which could be attributed to nighttime monoterpene oxidation by
nitrate radicals  (McLaren et al., 2004; Iinuma et al., 2007; Rastogi et
al., 2011). Results from recent flight measurements in Houston, TX, also
showed that organic aerosol was enhanced in the nocturnal boundary layer at
levels in excess of those attributable to primary emissions, implying a
source of SOA from the BVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction
(Brown et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Global modeling studies showed large variations in the total SOA burden that
can be attributed to the oxidation of BVOCs by nitrate radicals, ranging
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 21 %  (Hoyle et al., 2007; Pye et al., 2010).
Specifically, Pye et al. (2010) showed that the inclusion of nitrate radical
oxidation reaction doubled the total amount of terpene (monoterpenes and
sesquiterpenes) aerosol, pointing to the significant contribution of this
chemistry to total organic aerosol burden. In these modeling studies, all
aerosol formation from the nitrate radical oxidation of terpenes was
calculated based on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA yields obtained in
Griffin et al. (1999). A recent modeling study by Russell and Allen
(2005) determined that as much as 20 % of all nighttime SOA is from the
reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the significance of
nitrate radical oxidation pathways in SOA formation, it is important that the
SOA yields for BVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and especially that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are well constrained from fundamental laboratory
studies and accurately represented in models.</p>
      <p>The majority of the previous laboratory studies of the BVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
chemistry were performed under dry conditions  (Berndt and Boge, 1997a, b;
Wängberg et al., 1997; Griffin et al., 1999; Hallquist et al., 1999;
Bonn and Moorgat, 2002; Spittler et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2008; Rollins et
al., 2009; Fry et al., 2009, 2011, 2014; Perraud et al., 2010;  Kwan et
al., 2012; Jaoui et al., 2013). The effect of relative
humidity on SOA formation, however, could potentially be important for
nighttime (where NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals dominate) and early morning chemistry
as the ambient relative humidity (RH) is typically higher at these times. Several recent studies
have investigated the effect of water on SOA formation from the nitrate
radical oxidation pathways but the results are inconclusive. For instance,
Spittler et al. (2006) found that the SOA yield is lower
at 20 % RH compared to dry conditions, suggesting that water vapor may
alter the gas-phase oxidation mechanism and/or partitioning into the
particle phase, thus shifting the equilibrium partitioning of organic
compounds. However, other studies showed that the presence of water vapor
did not affect particle size distributions and SOA formation  (Bonn and
Moorgat, 2002; Fry et al., 2009). Thus, the role of water in SOA formation
from nitrate radical oxidation of BVOCs is still unclear.</p>
      <p>Another important parameter in SOA formation from BVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
fate of peroxy radicals, which directly determines the oxidation products,
SOA yields, and aerosol chemical and physical properties  (Kroll and
Seinfeld, 2008; Orlando and Tyndall, 2012; Ziemann and Atkinson, 2012).
Previous studies regarding the effects of peroxy radical fates on SOA
formation from BVOCs typically focused on photooxidation and ozonolysis
systems (e.g.,  Presto et al., 2005; Kroll et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2007a;
Eddingsaas et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2014) and isoprene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry
(Kwan et al., 2012; Ng et al., 2008; Nguyen et al., 2014). To our
knowledge, the effects of differing peroxy radical branching on SOA
formation from nitrate radical oxidation of monoterpenes have not been
investigated. The relative importance of different peroxy radical reaction
channels concerning BVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry in the atmosphere is not well
established  (Brown and Stutz, 2012). While earlier studies by
Kirchner and Stockwell (1996) suggested that RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
more important in the nighttime atmosphere, a recent study by
Mao et al. (2012) showed
that the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are often on the order of 10 ppt at night.
It is therefore possible that RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways could be
important pathways in nighttime oxidation of BVOCs.</p>
      <p>Nitrate radical chemistry is expected to produce a substantial amount of
organic nitrate compounds, owing to direct addition of nitrate radical via
reaction with a double bond. Organic nitrates have been observed to form a
substantial portion of atmospheric aerosol in field studies  (Brown et
al., 2009; Day et al., 2010; Zaveri et al., 2010; Beaver et al., 2012;
Rollins et al., 2012, 2013; Fry et al., 2013;  Brown et al.,
2013; Xu et al., 2015a). Organic nitrate formation has a significant impact
on total NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime, especially in NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regions where
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime is sensitive to the formation rates of organic nitrates
(Browne and Cohen, 2012). Ambient organic nitrates can be formed
through photooxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Chen et al.,
1998; Arey et al., 2001; Yu et al., 2008) and through nitrate radical
addition  (Spittler et al., 2006; Perring et al., 2009; Rollins et al.,
2009; Kwan et al., 2012). One removal mechanism for atmospheric organic
nitrates is hydrolysis in the particle phase (e.g.,  Sato, 2008;
Szmigielski et al., 2010; Darer et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2011; Liu et al.,
2012; Rindelaub et al., 2015). Modeling studies have assumed that the
majority (75 %) of the organic nitrates formed in the day are composed of
tertiary nitrates based on results from the photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Browne et
al., 2013). However, the organic nitrates formed from photooxidation and
nitrate radical oxidation could have different chemical structures (primary,
secondary, and tertiary) and need to be investigated to better constrain the
fates of organic nitrates (e.g., hydrolysis lifetime) in the atmosphere over
their entire life cycle (both day and night).</p>
      <p>The goal of this study is to determine the aerosol yields and characterize
the mechanisms and chemical composition of SOA formation from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Laboratory chamber experiments are performed in
the dark under dry and humid conditions. To investigate the effects of
peroxy radical fates on SOA yields and chemical composition, the experiments
are designed to probe the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” vs.
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” reaction pathways. Aerosol yields are obtained over
a wide range of initial <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene mixing ratios. Based on the measured
gas-phase and particle-phase oxidation products, mechanisms for SOA
formation from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are proposed. Results from this
study are used to evaluate the contributions of nitrate radical oxidation of
monoterpenes to ambient organic aerosol measured in the southeastern United
States (US), including the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) and the
Southeastern Center for Air Pollution and Epidemiology (SCAPE) study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Laboratory chamber experiments</title>
      <p>All experiments are performed in the Georgia Tech Environmental Chamber (GTEC) facility, which consists of two 12 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> flexible Teflon
(FEP 2 mil) chambers suspended in a 21 ft. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 ft. temperature-controlled
enclosure. The full operational temperature range of the facility is 4–40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. A schematic of the chamber facility is shown in Fig. 1.
Each of the chambers has three Teflon manifolds with multiple sampling
ports. Ports allow for the introduction of clean air, gas-phase reagents,
seed aerosol, and for measurements of RH, temperature, gas-phase
composition, and particle-phase composition. The chambers are surrounded by
black lights (Sylvania, 24922) with output predominately in the ultraviolet
region between 300 and 400 nm, with a maximum at 354 nm. The black lights
are supplemented by natural sunshine fluorescent lights (Sylvania, 24477),
which have wavelengths between 300 and 900 nm. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
chamber facility is 0.28 min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when all of the black lights are turned
on.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Schematic of the Georgia Tech Environmental Chamber (GTEC) facility.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experimental conditions and aerosol mass yields for all
experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RH (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Condition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Seed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mass yield (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">61.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">44.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">83.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">96.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">138.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">134.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">97.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">138.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">114.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">82.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">51.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">57.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">43.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">65.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">79.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">76.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">92.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">68.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">73.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">50.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">76.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">50.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">75.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">132.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">125.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">95.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">132.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">132.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">100.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">70.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">92.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">74.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">80.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">49.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">71.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">96.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">71.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">73.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">207.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">216.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">104.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">198.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">147.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">61.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">76.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">72.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">61.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">44.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">67.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">27.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">27.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">70.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">44.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">67.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Experiments with seed concentrations greater than the typical seed
concentrations for investigating vapor wall loss effects.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Seed.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Seed.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Uncertainties in hydrocarbon concentration are calculated from an
8 % uncertainty in chamber volume and 5 % uncertainty in hydrocarbon
mass.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Uncertainties in aerosol mass loading are calculated from 1 standard deviation of aerosol volume as measured by the SMPS.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> “–” denotes experiments where there is no SMPS data.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Experimental conditions are summarized in Table 1. Prior to each experiment,
the chambers are cleaned by flowing pure air (generated from AADCO, 747-14)
for at least 24 h at a rate of 40 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or equivalent to 0.2 chamber
volumes per hour. This ensures that the ozone, NO, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are less than 1 ppb and the particle concentration is lower
than 10 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Experiments are performed in the dark under either dry
(RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %) or humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50, 70 %) conditions. The air is
humidified by passing pure air through bubblers prior to introduction into
the chamber. The temperature and humidity inside each Teflon chamber are
measured using a hygro-thermometer (Vaisala, HMP110). Seed aerosol is
generated by atomizing an ammonium sulfate solution (8 mM) or an ammonium
sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfuric acid mixture ([(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; molar ratio) into the chamber. The seed number and mass
concentrations prior to typical experiments are approximately 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The pH of the
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed and
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % is about
4.6 and 2.4, respectively, based on calculations from prior studies
(Gao et al., 2004). Nucleation experiments are performed
under both dry and humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50, 70 %) conditions to determine
organic aerosol density and characterize vapor wall loss effects on SOA
yields. All experiments are performed at 298 K.</p>
      <p>Experiments are designed to probe the effects of peroxy radical chemistry
(RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on SOA formation from the
reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene with nitrate radicals. The procedure for
chemical injection depends on the desired fate of the peroxy radicals in the
experiments. To enhance the branching ratio of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
chamber experiments, formaldehyde is first added to the chamber
(Nguyen et al., 2014). Formalin
solution (Sigma-Aldrich, 37 % HCHO) is injected into a glass bulb and
clean air is passed over the solution until it evaporates. After this, seed
aerosol, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Matheson, 500 ppm), and ozone (generated by passing
zero air through a UV radiation cell, Jelight 610, 80 ppm) are injected into
the chamber. NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are chosen
([NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to ensure that 99 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene reacts with nitrate radicals instead of ozone. The NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> react to form nitrate radicals and subsequently N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
through the following reactions:


                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Formaldehyde then reacts with nitrate radicals to form HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals via
the following reaction:
            <disp-formula id="R1" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Enough formaldehyde (3–22 ppm) is added to the chamber to ensure that the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical branching ratio is an order of magnitude higher
than the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways (Supplement).
The chamber content is allowed to mix for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 min, after
which a desired amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene is injected into a glass bulb,
where it is introduced into the chamber by passing clean air through the
glass bulb. Introduction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene into the chamber marks the
beginning of the experiment. We refer to this set of experiments as
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments.</p>
      <p>For “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments, seed aerosol is first
introduced into the chamber, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene injection. After
allowing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 min for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene concentration to
stabilize, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is injected into the chamber. To generate
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a mixture of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is pre-reacted in a flow
tube (flow rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; residence time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 71 s) before entering the
chamber. The N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is estimated by modeling the
reaction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the flow tube. For this set of
experiments, the introduction of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> marks the beginning of the
experiment. We aim for an initial N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is noted that the ozone concentration in the chamber
is sufficiently low that at least 99 % of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene reacts with
nitrate radicals. N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> continuously dissociates to form NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and nitrate radicals during the experiment to re-establish equilibrium as the
nitrate radicals react with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene. The high initial N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and nitrate radical concentrations relative to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene favor
the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathway.</p>
      <p>For all experiments except “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments
conducted under humid conditions (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50, 70 %), a Gas Chromatography Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID; Agilent 6780A) measures a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene concentration of zero (below detection limit) within the
first scan (scan time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.7 min) after the experiment begins. This
suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene is completely consumed within 11.7 min of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> injection for the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments and that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene is fully reacted away before being
detected by the GC-FID in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments
under dry conditions. The concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene is calculated
from the mass of the hydrocarbon injected and the volume of the chamber. The
chamber volume is determined to be approximately 12 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by injecting a
known volume of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> standard (Matheson, 500 ppm) into the chamber and
measuring the resulting NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration inside the chamber.</p>
      <p>Ozone and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are monitored with an O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer
(Teledyne T400) and an ultrasensitive chemiluminescence NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> monitor
(Teledyne 200EU), respectively. Total aerosol volume and size distributions
are measured with a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS; TSI). The SMPS
consists of a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) (TSI 3040) and
condensation particle counter (CPC) (TSI 3775). Bulk particle chemical
composition is measured with an Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS). The working principle and operation
of the HR-ToF-AMS are described in detail elsewhere (DeCarlo et
al., 2006). The HR-ToF-AMS provides quantitative measurements of organics,
nitrate, sulfate, ammonium, and chloride. Elemental analysis is performed on
the data to determine elemental composition (e.g., O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios) of the
bulk aerosol  (Canagaratna et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>A suite of gas-phase oxidation products and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are measured
using a quadrupole chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) with I<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as the reagent ion, which has high selectivity towards reactive nitrogen
species, peroxides, and carboxylic acids  (Huey, 2007; McNeill et al.,
2007; Zhao et al., 2012). The CIMS uses methyl iodide to produce I<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
ions that ionize gas-phase products through association  (Slusher et al.,
2004; Zheng et al., 2011). It has been shown that I<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> addition to
gas-phase molecules provides a molecule–iodide adduct that preserves the
original species of the compounds being sampled. The gas-phase species are
detected as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 127. Masses with specific <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are selected for detection
using a quadrupole mass filter. These species are then detected by an
electron multiplier which amplifies incident charge through secondary
electron emission to produce a measurable current that scales with gas-phase
concentration. Due to unavailability of standards for the oxidation
products, the instrument is not calibrated for these compounds and
concentrations are not reported. However, the CIMS data allow for
identification and comparison of the abundance of specific gas-phase
oxidation products formed in different experimental conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Analysis of particle-phase products</title>
      <p>Aerosol samples are collected on Teflon filters (Pall Corp. R2PL047,
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size and 47 mm diameter) during the SOA experiments (Experiments 9,
10, 22, 23, 32, 33 in Table 1) and for a series of blank/control
experiments. These blank experiments are (1) clean chamber (no aerosol) at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %, (2)
clean chamber (no aerosol) at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %, (3) clean
chamber at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % with only N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> injected, and (4) clean
chamber at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % with only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene injected. All
filters collected during the chamber experiments and controls are stored at
a temperature below <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before sample extraction and
preparation for chromatographic analysis.</p>
      <p>Each filter is extracted twice by sonication (Branson 3510) for 15 min in
2.50 mL acetonitrile (Fisher Optima, LC-MS grade). After combining both
aliquots, each extracted sample is blown dry under a gentle stream of
nitrogen (Scott-Gross, UHP), reconstituted with 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L acetonitrile,
and transferred to a chromatographic vial. Samples are analyzed with an
Accela (Thermo Fisher Scientific) ultra-high-performance liquid chromatographer (UHPLC) equipped with a 1250 quaternary delivery pump, a
photodiode array detector (PDA) with a 5 cm LightPipe flow cell, and a mass
spectrometry (MS) detector (Thermo MSQ Plus). Samples are injected (50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L) with an Accela autosampler into the reversed-phase chromatographic
column (Hypersil gold C18, 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 mm, 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size,
Thermo Scientific). Excalibur software is used to control the UHPLC-PDA-MS
system. Chromatographic separation at a constant flow rate of 800 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0 to 1 min is isocratic with 90 % (A) 0.10 mM formic acid
(Fisher Optima, LC-MS grade) in ultrapure water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm Purelab
Flex, Veolia) and 10 % (B) 0.10 mM formic acid in acetonitrile. Gradient
elution from 1 to 8 min reaches a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of solvents A <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B and
remains
isocratic from 8 to 10 min. Selected chromatograms utilize 0.4–1.0 mM acetic
acid (Acros, glacial ACS, 100.0 % by assay) instead of 0.1 mM formic acid
in the mobile phase. After the PDA registered the UV–visible spectra from
190 to 700 nm, the flow is interfaced with an electrospray ionization (ESI)
probe (1.9 kV needle voltage, 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C probe temperature, and 70 psi
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nebulizing gas) to the MS detector set to detect negative ions in
the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 to 650 amu. Selected samples are analyzed under variable
cone voltage (10–100 V) to register the fragmentation pattern of the peaks
and gain structural information of the products. The extraction method shows
an efficient 98.8 % recovery, when 98.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g of 4-nitrophenol (Acros,
98.0 %) are spiked onto a blank filter.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>Gas-phase oxidation and aerosol growth is observed to be a rapid process in
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction. Peak aerosol growth is typically
observed within 10–15 min for all reaction conditions except in humid
(RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50, 70 %) “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments, where
aerosol reaches peak growth in about 30 min. Figure S1 in the Supplement shows a typical
mass spectrum for the CIMS data. Specifically, the major gas-phase products
are detected at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 342, 356, 358, and 372 (which correspond to MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 215,
229, 231, 245 amu, respectively). These compounds likely correspond
to organic nitrate species with molecular assignments of
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Figure 2
shows the time series of these species and the aerosol growth over the
course of a typical “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiment in dry
conditions. The products at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356 and 358 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 229 and 231 amu)
decrease over the course of the experiment. While this can be attributed to
vapor phase wall loss, it is also possible that these gas-phase compounds
undergo further reaction. This is further supported by the increase in the
species at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu). The proposed gas-phase oxidation mechanism
and formation of compounds at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 from compounds at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356 will be discussed
further in Sect. 4.1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Time series of the gas-phase organic nitrate species measured by the
CIMS and the corresponding aerosol formation measured by HR-ToF-AMS (organics
mass) and SMPS (aerosol volume) (Experiment 30 in Table 1). The gas-phase
species at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356 decreases over the course of the experiment while the
species at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 increases steadily.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Although all the above gas-phase species are observed under all reaction
conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 358 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu) is significantly higher in the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments than in the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments (Fig. S2), which is indicative
of differences in the gas-phase chemistry depending on the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fate.
Under both “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” conditions, experiments conducted under dry conditions have
significantly higher N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations than humid conditions
(by at least a factor of 2) as measured by CIMS. This is likely due to
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (loss) on the wet chamber surfaces and/or seed
aerosol. The relative abundance of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under different
experimental conditions is important in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene reaction
rate and aging of aerosol, which are discussed in Sect. 4.2.2 and 4.4,
respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Aerosol mass yield as a function of organic mass loading for the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction under “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
conditions. The aerosol mass yields obtained in this study are compared to
those measured in previous chamber studies by Griffin et al. (1999) and Fry
et al. (2009). The aerosol mass yields obtained in this study are fitted
using the two-product model proposed previously by Odum et al. (1996). The
yield parameters obtained in this study and those from Griffin et al. (1999)
are shown in Table 2. In order to better compare the aerosol mass yields
obtained in this study to that by Griffin et al. (1999), measurements by
Griffin et al. (1999) are adjusted to a temperature of 298 K and density of
1.41 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis error bars represent 1 standard deviation
of volume measured by SMPS at peak growth. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis error bars represent
uncertainty in yield calculated by an 8 % uncertainty in chamber volume,
5 % uncertainty in hydrocarbon injection, and 1 standard deviation of the
aerosol volume measured by SMPS at peak growth.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Aerosol mass yield as a function of organic mass loading for the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction under “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
conditions. These aerosol mass yields are compared to the yield curve (solid
line) for the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene reaction under “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” conditions. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis error bars represent 1 standard
deviation of volume measured by SMPS at peak growth. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis error bars
represent uncertainty in yield calculated by an 8 % uncertainty in chamber
volume, 5 % uncertainty in hydrocarbon injection, and 1 standard
deviation of the aerosol volume measured by SMPS at peak growth.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>All SOA growth data are corrected for particle wall loss by applying
size-dependent coefficients determined from wall loss experiments at GTEC
following the methodology described in  Keywood et al. (2004). The
size-dependent particle wall loss rates calculated for both chambers at GTEC
are shown in Fig. S3. Figures 3 and 4 show the SOA yields for
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments over a wide range of aerosol mass loadings (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1–216.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The SOA yields lie in the range of
27.0–104.1 % over the conditions studied. Aerosol mass yield (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
defined as the aerosol mass concentration produced (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
divided by the mass concentration of hydrocarbon reacted (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HC), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HC  (Odum et al., 1996; Bowman et al., 1997;
Odum et al., 1997a, b). For all experiments, aerosol mass
concentration is obtained from the SMPS aerosol volume concentration
(averaged over 30 min at peak growth) and the calculated aerosol density.
The aerosol density is calculated from the SMPS volume distribution and the
HR-ToF-AMS mass distribution in the nucleation experiments
(Bahreini et al., 2005). The densities of the
organic aerosol generated in nucleation experiments under dry and humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50, 70 %) conditions are determined to be 1.41 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
1.45 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments and
1.54 and 1.61 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments.</p>
      <p>It can be seen from Fig. 3 that the aerosol yields in the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments under dry vs. humid conditions
in the presence of (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed are similar. The presence
of the more acidic (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed does not
appear to enhance SOA production in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments (Fig. S4). Therefore, we fit the Odum two-product model  (Odum
et al., 1996, 1997a) to all of our experimental data shown in
Fig. 3 to obtain a single yield curve. The SOA yield parameters are given in
Table 2. Shown in Fig. 4 are the aerosol yields from “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments under dry vs. humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) conditions. The
SOA yield curve (solid red line) for the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments is also shown for comparison.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Fit parameters for two-product model proposed by Odum et
al. (1996).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (this study)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.187</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004546</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.496</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.880</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Griffin et al. (1999)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.464</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0158</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>For comparison, SOA yields from previous <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
laboratory chamber studies  (Griffin et al., 1999; Fry et al., 2009) are
also shown in Fig. 3. Without adding HCHO as an additional HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source, it is likely that the experiments in Griffin et al. (1999) and Fry
et al. (2009) are more similar to our “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments. Specifically, Fry et al. (2009) noted that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction likely does not produce significant
concentrations of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and therefore has a low
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. As    Griffin et al. (1999) assumed an
aerosol density of 1.0 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the experimental data from
Griffin et al. (1999) shown in Fig. 3 have been multiplied by
the density calculated in our study for “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments under dry conditions (i.e., 1.41 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The data shown in
Fig. 3 from Fry et al. (2009) have also
incorporated a particle density of 1.6 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>calculated in their
study. In addition to correcting for density, the equilibrium partitioning
coefficient, K, from Griffin et al. (1999) has been adjusted from 306 to
298 K using an enthalpy of vaporization of 42 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for comparison
to results from our study      (Chung and Seinfeld, 2002). It is
noted that the SOA yields obtained in the current study are higher than
those in     Griffin et al. (1999) and
Fry et al. (2009), particularly at lower
aerosol mass loadings that are more relevant to ambient environments. These
results are discussed in more detail in Sect. 4.2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>High-resolution aerosol mass spectrum of the SOA formed from the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction under dry, ammonium sulfate seed, and
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” conditions (Experiment 5 in Table 1). The mass
spectrum is colored by the ion type to indicate the contribution of each ion
type to the mass spectrum. Only ions up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 160 are shown as the
signals beyond <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 160 are minimal. Ions that contribute significantly to
the total signal are also labeled.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Bulk aerosol composition from the experiments is characterized by the
HR-ToF-AMS. A typical high-resolution mass spectrum for aerosol formed under
dry conditions where the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathway is dominant (Experiment
5 in Table 1) is shown in Fig. 5. A key feature of the mass spectrum is the
high intensity of the nitrate ions at NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
make up about 11 % of the combined organics and nitrate signals. The majority (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %) of the nitrogen atoms are detected at these
two ions with the remaining nitrogen-containing ions detected at higher
masses as C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N. The mass spectra for the aerosol generated
in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments are similar. One notable difference between the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments is the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for the organic
nitrates (R-ON), which ranges from 4.8 to 10.2 in all experiments. While the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio averages 6.5 for “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments, it averages 8.6 for “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments. Since the values of R-ON may depend on the instrument, we
normalize the R-ON to the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of ammonium nitrate
(R-AN), which is expected to be a better metric (Farmer
et al., 2010). In our study, multiple measurements of R-AN are obtained from
the ionization efficiency (IE) calibrations and the average value is 1.8
(range of 1.2–2.7). Applying the R-AN that is measured closest in time to
each chamber experiment, we calculate the average R-ON <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> R-AN ratio to be 3.2
for “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments and 4.8 for
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments.</p>
      <p>For both types of experiments, there is a negligible difference in the mass
spectrum of the aerosol produced in dry or high humidity (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50,
70 %) conditions. In Fig. 5, nitrate and organic ions are each assigned a
different color to indicate an individual AMS HR ion family. There are a few
notable ions in the aerosol mass spectrum. The signals at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 67
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while not significant
in the high-resolution mass spectra of several biogenic SOA systems  (Ng
et al., 2008; Chhabra et al., 2010), are relatively large for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA. These ions also make up a larger fraction of the
HR-ToF-AMS signal for SOA formed from the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene     (Chen et al., 2015)
when compared to other biogenic SOA. Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 67 (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could potentially serve as useful indicators
for SOA formed from monoterpene/sesquiterpene oxidation in ambient aerosol
mass spectra. However, more studies of SOA formed from the oxidation of
biogenic VOCs are necessary to apportion ambient organic aerosol (OA) based on these
fragments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Time series of mass concentrations of the major organic families
(normalized to the sulfate mass concentration) as measured by the HR-ToF-AMS
at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % under “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” conditions (Experiment
5 in Table 1). The least oxidized organic species (i.e., CH Family) decreases
rapidly at the start of the experiment and has the largest decrease among the
three major organic families.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 6 shows the time evolution of the major organic families relative to
sulfate measured by the HR-ToF-AMS for a typical dry “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiment (Experiment 5 in Table 1). Sulfate is used to
normalize the decay of the organic families because it is non-volatile and
any decrease in sulfate is reflective of particle wall loss and changes in
aerosol collection efficiency (CE) in the HR-ToF-AMS    (Henry and
Donahue, 2012). Any change of each organic family relative to sulfate is
therefore interpreted as a change in organic mass unrelated to particle wall
loss or CE. Non-oxidized fragments (CH Family in green) decrease more
rapidly relative to sulfate than the more oxidized fragments (CHO1 Family in
purple; CHOgt1 (fragments with greater than 1 oxygen atom) Family in
pink). The change in mass for each organic family is determined over a 2.5 h period following peak aerosol growth (at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 min) in
each “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiment (dry and humid). We find
that the CHOgt1 Family increases by 4 % in dry experiments and remains
relatively constant in humid experiments. This is consistent with a larger
extent of aerosol aging in the dry experiments and is further discussed in
Sect. 4.4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>The AMS nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org ratio of humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %)
experiments normalized to the corresponding dry experiments with same initial
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene mixing ratio, 5 min averaged, for “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments. This ratio is referred to as
(nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the main text. For comparison purposes,
all data are normalized to the highest (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 7 shows the time evolution of HR-ToF-AMS nitrate-to-organics ratio in
the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % normalized
by that in the corresponding dry experiments with the same initial
hydrocarbon concentration. For simplicity, we refer to this ratio as
(nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Normalizing the nitrate-to-organics ratio obtained
from the humid experiments to the dry experiments allows for determining the
extent of possible organic nitrate hydrolysis under humid conditions. Since
only the relative change in the (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is important
for comparison purposes, the maximum (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement for
each experiment is set to be unity. Nitrate mass is defined here as the sum
of the mass of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions. This does not account
for the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>N fragments, but these fragments only account
for less than 10 % (by mass) of the nitrate functional groups detected by
HR-ToF-AMS. As the experiment progresses, the (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
decreases and stabilizes at a value of about 0.9, indicating that there is
no further decrease in the mass of nitrate relative to the mass of organics
beyond this point. From our particle wall loss experiments, we establish
that the particles are lost to the chamber wall with comparable rates under
dry and humid conditions, suggesting that the observed decrease in the
(nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is not a result of differing particle wall loss
in dry and humid experiments. Instead, the decrease under humid conditions
is attributed to hydrolysis of organic nitrate compounds in the particle
phase. This is further discussed in Sect. 4.3.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Proposed mechanisms</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Generation of gas-phase species with molecular weights (MW) of 215,
229, and 231 amu detected by CIMS (red font), aerosol species with
MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu in filters analyzed by UHPLC-MS (blue font).
Reaction numbers are given in green font and reaction with generic radical
<bold>Q<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold> (e.g., NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is used to symbolize
any species abstracting hydrogen atoms. Reactions which can be accomplished
by any of the radicals present (RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, etc.) are
symbolized by reaction with generic radical <bold>L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold>. Reactions
enhanced in the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant pathway are highlighted in
purple.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 8 shows the proposed scheme for the generation of species observed by
CIMS and UHPLC-PDA-MS analyses from the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene with
nitrate radicals. The oxidation process starts with Reaction (R1) for the
sterically preferred addition of nitrate radical to the primary carbon
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the double bond of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
(Wayne et al., 1991). The tertiary alkyl radical
formed on C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can undergo (1) addition of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to form a peroxy
radical via Reaction (R2)    (Atkinson and Arey, 2003b), (2) a
1,5-CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shift indicated by Reaction (R3)   (Miller, 2003) and, (3) rearrangement via Reaction (R4)  (Stolle et al., 2009; Schröder et
al., 2010). Reaction (R4) is thought to be a favorable pathway because it
relieves the ring strain from the cyclobutane while generating a tertiary
alkyl radical with a new reactive double bond. In the presence of oxygen,
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combines with the alkyl radical to make a peroxy radical, which is
then converted to an alkoxy radical via Reaction (R5) (denoted as R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O
here)  (Atkinson and Arey, 2003b; Vereecken and Peeters, 2012). Reactions
which can be accomplished by any of the radicals present (RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, etc.) are symbolized by reaction with generic
radical <bold>L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold>, while hydrogen abstractions are symbolized by reaction
with generic radical <bold>Q<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold> (e.g., NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O can
undergo intramolecular addition to the less substituted C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the newly
formed double bond via Reaction (R6), generating a cyclic ether alkyl
radical  (Vereecken and Peeters, 2004, 2012). Alternatively, R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O can
undergo hydrogen abstraction from another species via Reaction (R7) to form
a hydroxynitrate of MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 215 amu (R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>OH), a gas-phase species detected
by CIMS. The cyclic ether alkyl radical generated by Reaction (R6) combines
with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to make peroxy radical <bold>U</bold> by Reaction (R8). The fate of
radical <bold>U</bold> is to produce a cyclic ether hydroxynitrate with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu via Reaction (R9)        (Russell, 1957; Atkinson and
Arey, 2003b). A compound with the same molecular weight as this species is
detected by CIMS.</p>
      <p>The alkyl radical formed in Reaction (R1) can also undergo a 1,5-CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
shift as indicated by Reaction (R3), which forms a tertiary alkyl radical
that then combines with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by Reaction (R10). Reaction (R10) produces a
hydroxynitrate (R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>OH) with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 215 amu, an isomer that could also
correspond to the species observed by CIMS. Further functionalization of
R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>OH continues after hydrogen abstraction by Reaction (R11), which
bond strength calculations predict occurs preferentially at the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
position (Vereecken and Peeters, 2012). The resulting
secondary alkyl radical from Reaction (R11) reacts with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to form
peroxy radical <bold>S</bold> via Reaction (R12). The reaction <bold>S</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold>
forms either a hydroxycarbonyl nitrate with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 229 amu by Reaction (R13), or a dihydroxynitrate with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu by Reaction (R14)
(Russell, 1957; Atkinson and Arey, 2003b). Both are
gas-phase species detected by CIMS.</p>
      <p>The peroxy radical formed in Reaction (R2) can be converted to a
hydroperoxide with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu (observed in CIMS) by reaction with an
HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical (R15). Since Reaction (R15) is only associated with the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> channel, the signal corresponding to the species with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu is expected be higher in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments. Figure S2 shows the CIMS signal at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>358</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu)
normalized to Br<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity for each type of experiment
(“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”; dry
and humid conditions). The higher signal in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments supports the formation of more ROOH species in the
gas phase under this reaction condition.</p>
      <p>The peroxy radical formed from Reaction (R2) can also be converted into an
alkoxy radical, R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O, via Reaction (R16). Hydrogen abstraction by the
alkoxy radical R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O can form a third hydroxynitrate isomer with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 215 amu by Reaction (R17). Alternatively, R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O can undergo a 1,5-H
shift from a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> group by Reaction (R18) to form an alkyl radical at
one of the terminal carbons  (Carter et al., 1976; Eberhard et al., 1995;
Atkinson, 1997; Dibble, 2001). The alkyl radical then reacts with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
form a peroxy radical and subsequently forms an aldehyde with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 229 amu
by the overall Reaction (R19)        (Russell, 1957; Atkinson
and Arey, 2003b). The aldehydic hydrogen is especially susceptible to
undergoing hydrogen abstraction  (Miller, 2003), followed by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
addition to form a peroxy acid radical, and final conversion to a carboxylic
acid        (Russell, 1957; Atkinson and Arey, 2003b).
R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>COOH with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu is produced by Reaction (R20), a species
registered as an anion by UHPLC-MS at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 244 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu) (Fig. S5). CIMS
data also support the pathways via Reaction (R20) (Fig. 2). The
Br<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-normalized CIMS signal for species at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 229 amu)
decreases with a subsequent increase in species at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu) in
the gas phase over the course of the experiment. Due to the lower vapor
pressure of carboxylic acid species compared to carbonyl species
(Pankow and Asher, 2008), the majority of carboxylic acid formed
from this channel is expected to partition into the particle phase. In
addition to Reaction (R20), R<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>COOH can also be formed through a more
direct route by addition of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the alkyl radical product and then
subsequent reaction of the peroxy radical with HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> via the sequence
of Reactions (R18) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (R21) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (R22) (Ziemann and Atkinson, 2012).</p>
      <p>The hydroxynitrate formed by Reaction (R17) can also undergo hydrogen
abstraction at the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> position, as indicated by Reaction (R23).
(Vereecken and Peeters, 2012). Reaction (R24) shows how
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> addition to the resulting secondary alkyl radical gives peroxy
radical <bold>T</bold>, which can either react with <bold>L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold> to form a
dihydroxynitrate with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu via Reaction (R25) or form a
hydroxycarbonyl nitrate with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 229 amu via Reaction (R26)
(Russell, 1957; Atkinson and Arey, 2003b). In the
absence of hydrogen atoms in the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> position, hydrogen abstraction
occurs from C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the hydroxycarbonyl nitrate species via Reaction 
(R27)       (Vereecken and Peeters, 2012), which then forms a
peroxy radical <bold>V</bold> by Reaction (R28)    (Atkinson and Arey, 2003b).
Reaction (R29), <bold>V</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></bold>, yields a dihydroxycarbonyl nitrate
with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu        (Russell, 1957; Atkinson and Arey,
2003b). This dihydroxycarbonyl nitrate is not expected to be the species
appearing in the UHPLC-MS chromatogram (Fig. S5) at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 244 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu)
because it lacks a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COOH group and likely has a higher vapor pressure than
the carboxylic acid species with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu. Instead, it is likely that
the dihydroxycarbonyl nitrate is the species observed by CIMS at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu). A third possible isomer (not shown in Fig. 8) with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu and containing a non-carboxylic C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O group, could be similarly formed
from the product of Reaction (R13). Likewise, other isomers to those
generated after Reaction (R26) can be formed from each possible structure
with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 229 amu, providing a wide array of precursors to form heavier MW
products. The confirmation that several isomers with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu are
present in the filter extracts is revealed from the extracted ion chromatograph (EIC), which shows closely eluting peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 244 (MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 amu) when substituting formic acid for acetic acid (Li et al.,
2011) as the modifier in the mobile phase (Fig. S5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Aerosol yields</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>SOA yields over a wide range of organic mass loadings</title>
      <p>The SOA yields obtained from this study are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. In
recent years, it has been suggested that the loss of organic vapors to the
chamber wall could affect SOA yields  (Matsunaga and Ziemann, 2010; Loza
et al., 2010; Yeh and Ziemann, 2014; Zhang et al., 2014, 2015). Specifically,  Zhang et al. (2014) demonstrated that vapor wall
loss could lead to an underestimation of SOA yields by as much as a factor
of 4. To evaluate the potential effect of organic vapor wall loss on SOA
yields in our study, experiments without seed are carried out at different
conditions (dry and humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50, 70 %); “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” conditions). The yields from
the nucleation experiments are reported in Fig. S9 along with the yield
curve obtained from seeded experiments. The similar yields for
nucleation/seeded “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments (dry and
humid) in our study suggest that vapor wall loss has a negligible effect on
aerosol yields in these experiments. It is likely that rapid reaction of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene with nitrate radicals in this study mitigates the effect of
organic vapor wall loss on SOA yields. Based on the rapid SOA growth (peak
growth typically achieved within 10–15 min) for these experiments, it is
estimated that the effective reaction rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in our
experiments is an order of magnitude higher than the rates reported in
Zhang et al. (2014). Although the aerosol mass yields for the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” nucleation experiments are lower than the
corresponding seeded experiments, further increase in the seed concentration
does not have a significant effect on yield. Zhang et al. (2014) determined
that if vapor phase wall loss is significant in chamber experiments, the
addition of more seed particles will lead to an increase in SOA yield.
Therefore, it is likely vapor phase wall loss is also negligible in our
seeded “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. It is unclear at this
time why nucleation experiments have lower SOA yield only for the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. One possibility is that the
chamber wall uptake of ROOH species (which is likely higher in
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments as measured by CIMS; Fig. 2)
is more rapid than other gas-phase species.</p>
      <p>A comparison of aerosol yields obtained for the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
with nitrate radicals is also shown in Fig. 3. Griffin et al. (1999)
performed the first comprehensive study of SOA formation from nitrate
radical oxidation of BVOCs. The aerosol yield curve reported for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by Griffin et al. (1999) is shown next to our yield
curve in Fig. 3. The yield curve in Griffin et al. (1999) was generated from
chamber experiments with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–660 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and extrapolated
down to lower loadings. The yield curve generated in the current study,
however, includes measurements at mass loadings <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and does not require any extrapolation beyond the bounds of the
data to include lower, atmospherically relevant aerosol loadings. As shown
in Fig. 3, while the SOA yields from this study are consistent with Griffin
et al. (1999) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
yields from this study are as much as a factor of 4 higher than those
reported by Griffin et al. (1999) at lower mass loadings.</p>
      <p>Instances where the measured yields at low mass loading do not match those
extrapolated from higher loadings have been observed for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
ozonolysis    (Presto and Donahue, 2006). We attribute this result
to limitations of the two-product model, which bins all compounds into only
two semi-volatile products of differing vapor pressures, to cover the entire
spectrum of volatilities for all chemical products. At higher mass loadings,
semi-volatile and volatile compounds can condense onto the particle phase
and can potentially make up the majority of the aerosol. When a two-product
yield curve is fit to high mass loadings only, the parameters are likely to
be biased by the semi-volatile and high volatility products. Therefore, a
yield curve fit using data from only high mass loadings will not account for
the low-volatility products, which might be the minority products at high
organic mass loadings. The two-product fit using high mass loadings
therefore cannot be used to predict yields at low mass loadings, where the
SOA is mostly comprised of low-volatility products. Since the yield curve
generated as part of this study spans a wide range of organic mass loadings,
the fitting parameters account for both the low-volatility products and the
higher volatility products.</p>
      <p>Fitting yield data to the volatility basis set described in  Donahue et
al. (2006) illustrates how higher volatility bins (products) are favored at
higher aerosol mass loadings. The fit coefficients for the volatility basis
set are shown in Table 3 for the aerosol yields of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from this study and that of   Griffin et al. (1999). It is noted that the data from   Griffin et al. (1999)
have been adjusted to a temperature of 298 K and density of 1.41 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for comparison to results from our study. As seen in Table 3, the
stoichiometric coefficients for the fit of     Griffin et al. (1999) are weighted towards higher volatility products while the
coefficients fit to the data collected in this study are distributed among
lower and higher volatility products.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Coefficients for the volatility basis set proposed by Donahue et
al. (2006).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">Saturation vapor pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (this study)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.373</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.941</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Griffin et al. (1999)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.301</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.204</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Fry et al. (2009) conducted a pair of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chamber experiments under dry and humid (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 %)
conditions. Their results are also shown in Fig. 3. The yields from
Fry et al. (2009) are about 20 % lower
than the current study. A more recent study by Fry et
al. (2014) reported aerosol mass yields in the range of 33–44 % for the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system at an organic mass loading of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in a continuous flow chamber under dry conditions. This is
approximately 10–30 % lower than the yield reported at a similar mass
loading in this study. While various experimental conditions can contribute
to the difference in aerosol mass yields, we note that the aerosol formation
rate in  Fry et al. (2009, 2014)  is slower than this study, which is
likely caused by lower oxidant concentrations in
Fry et al. (2009, 2014) compared to this study. Slower
reaction times could allow more time for the gas-phase species to partition
onto the chamber walls and reduce the amount that partitions onto aerosol
(Ng et al., 2007b; Zhang et al., 2014). Thus, organic vapor wall loss
might play a role in the lower yields observed in
Fry et al. (2009, 2014). There is a substantial difference
between our <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA yield and that from
Hallquist et al. (1999), which reported an aerosol mass
yield of 10 % for a mass loading of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A possible
explanation for this is that the mass of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene reacted was not
directly measured in  Hallquist et al. (1999), instead, it
was assumed that the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene reacted was equivalent
to the concentration of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reacted. If there were other loss
processes for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the experiments conducted by
Hallquist et al. (1999), the yield reported in their study
could be substantially lower than the actual aerosol yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Effects of RH and acidity on SOA yields</title>
      <p>For the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments, the yields between
experiments conducted at dry conditions with ammonium sulfate seed are
similar to experiments conducted under high humidity (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % and RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) (Fig. 3). Our results indicate that the relative humidity does
not have appreciable effects on the aerosol mass yield. These results are
consistent with previous humidity effects studies on photooxidation
(Nguyen et al., 2011) and nitrate radical chemistry  (Bonn
and Moorgat, 2002; Fry et al., 2009). However, these results are
inconsistent to the study performed by      Spittler et al. (2006), where lower SOA yields were obtained for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system under humid conditions (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %).   Spittler et al. (2006) proposed that either the presence
of water vapor altered the gas-phase chemistry or that the aerosol water on
seed particles prevented gas-phase partitioning. These do not seem to be the
case in our study. Similar gas-phase oxidation products are detected by CIMS
under both dry and humid conditions and the organics size distribution
measured by HR-ToF-AMS overlaps that of the seed aerosol, indicating that
the oxidation products are condensing onto the seed particles.</p>
      <p>The presence of aerosol water can potentially affect SOA formation through
hydrolysis of organic nitrates. It has been observed in previous studies
that organic nitrates in aqueous filter extract can undergo hydrolysis to
form alcohols and nitric acid     (Sato, 2008). The change from
nitrate to hydroxyl functional groups could affect gas-particle partitioning
and aerosol yields if the organic nitrates and alcohols have different vapor
pressures. However, previous studies have shown that hydroxyl groups lower
the vapor pressure of an organic compound to the same extent as organic
nitrate groups     (Pankow and Asher, 2008). In this study,
hydrolysis does not appear to be a major reaction pathway for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA under humid conditions. As shown in Sect. 4.4,
only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % of OA undergoes hydrolysis. Thus, even if there is a
difference in the vapor pressures between organic nitrates and their
hydrolysis products, it is unlikely that this would affect aerosol yields in
our case.</p>
      <p>Aerosol water can also enhance SOA yields by providing a medium for
water-soluble species (e.g., glyoxal) to dissolve into the particulate
aqueous phase   (Ervens et al., 2011). Nitrate radical addition
is predicted to add predominantly to a double bond instead of cleaving
carbon to carbon bonds (Wayne et al., 1991) and hence
fragmentation to small carbon compounds is unlikely. As shown in Fig. 8, the
proposed mechanism does not involve carbon cleaving reactions which could
result in small, water-soluble compounds. This is further supported by the
similarities in SOA yields between dry and humid conditions. If these carbon
cleaving reactions dominate and form small, water-soluble species, the
yields should be much higher for the humid conditions than the dry
conditions.</p>
      <p>We find that aerosol acidity has a negligible effect on the SOA yield for
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system (Fig. S4). This is opposite to some
previous studies where increases in aerosol yields have been found under
acidic conditions for other SOA systems (using the same seeds as in our
study), such as ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and photooxidation of
isoprene (e.g.,  Gao et al., 2004; Surratt et al., 2007). Acid-catalyzed
particle-phase reaction such as oligomerization has been proposed for such
“acid effects”. Although aerosol produced by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction can potentially undergo oligomerization as
well, it appears that the aerosol products are of low enough volatility that
further particle-phase reactions (if any) do not enhance SOA yields. This
indicates that the “acid effect” is likely different for different SOA
systems, which would depend on the parent hydrocarbon, oxidant (ozone, OH,
nitrate radicals), and other reaction conditions. In general, the SOA yields
for nitrate radical oxidation of BVOCs are higher than corresponding yields
in ozonolysis or OH radical oxidation (e.g., Griffin et al., 1999),
suggesting that no further particle-phase reaction is needed to make the
oxidation products more non-volatile and the “acid effect” could be
limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effects of RO${}_{{2}}+$\,NO${}_{{3}}$ vs. RO${}_{{2}}+$HO${}_{{2}}$ chemistry on SOA yields}?><title>Effects of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry on SOA yields</title>
      <p>Previous studies have shown that the fate of peroxy radicals can have a
substantial effect on SOA formation  (Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008; Ziemann
and Atkinson, 2012). For instance, it has been shown in laboratory chamber
studies that the aerosol yields can differ by a factor of 2 depending on the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fate for the isoprene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system
(Ng et al., 2008). Although studies have
proposed that RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the major nighttime RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fate in
the ambient environments   (Kirchner and Stockwell, 1996), results
from recent field studies suggested that HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals are abundant at
night     (Mao et al., 2012).
The high HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical concentration could result in the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction becoming the dominant RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical fate in
the nighttime atmosphere. In our study, the experimental protocols are
designed to promote the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” or “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>”
reaction channel. These two scenarios would be representative of nitrate
radical oxidation in environments with varying levels of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. To our
knowledge, this is the first study in which the fate of peroxy radicals is
considered in SOA formation from nitrate radical oxidation of monoterpenes.
A simple kinetic model based on MCMv3.2  (Saunders et al.,
2003) is developed to simulate the gas-phase chemistry for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction. The simulation results suggest that in both
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments, the cross-reactions of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals are not a significant
reaction pathway (Fig. S10). Figure 4 shows that the SOA yields from the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments are similar to the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. The similar yields under these
different reaction conditions could arise from a comparable suite of
reaction products between the two reaction pathways. The reaction of
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produces an RO radical (Fig. 8, Reaction R16) which can
undergo decomposition or isomerization  (Orlando and Tyndall, 2012;
Ziemann and Atkinson, 2012). Typically, it is expected that the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction will lead to the formation of peroxides
(Orlando and Tyndall, 2012; Ziemann and Atkinson, 2012). However, a
recent study by  Hasson et al. (2012) showed that for highly
substituted peroxy radicals, the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction favors the
formation of RO radicals. Additionally, several previous studies showed that
as carbon chain length increases (C2–C4), the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction
becomes less likely to form the ROOH product and more likely to form the RO
product  (Jenkin et al., 2007; Dillon and Crowley, 2008; Hasson et al.,
2012). In the case of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals are
expected to form on the tertiary carbon as the nitrate radicals tend to
attack the least substituted carbon of a double bond, leading to the
formation of tertiary peroxy radicals  (Wayne et al.,
1991) (Fig. 8). Given <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene is a C10 compound and forms a highly
substituted peroxy radical, we hypothesize that the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
reaction pathway in our study forms RO radicals as suggested by Hasson et
al. (2012), leading to a similar peroxy radical fate as in the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. We note that the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction still leads to formation of ROOH as measured by
CIMS (Fig. S2). Thus, it appears that the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> channel does
not exclusively produce RO radicals in our case. Nevertheless, based on the
similar SOA yields in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments, we propose that either the RO
radical is the dominant product of the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction pathway,
or that ROOH has a similar volatility to the products formed from the RO
radicals in the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Ratio of the total areas integrated under UV–visible chromatograms
collected at 235 nm (gray bars; ROOR and ROOH) and 270 nm (teal bars;
-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O and -ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to 205 nm for experiments dominated by
(left-hand side panel) RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction and (right-hand side panel)
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction under both humid and dry conditions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>SOA is collected on filters for several experiments and analyzed using UHPLC
in order to characterize the particle composition. Figure 9 shows the ratios
of the total areas under the UV–visible chromatograms for
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments, under both humid and dry conditions. Chromatograms collected at
205, 235, and 270 nm are integrated to get the total area at each wavelength
and the standard deviation from two measurements. Total areas are normalized
by the estimated organic mass loading on the corresponding filters. The
wavelengths chosen represent a good proxy for certain functional groups that
absorb in these regions. More specifically, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm
corresponds to a region of strong absorption by ROOR and ROOH  (Farmer et
al., 1943; Turrà et al., 2010; Ouchi et al., 2013), while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 270 nm is a compromise wavelength that represents both carbonyl and alkyl
nitrate functional groups     (Xu et al., 1993; Pavia et al.,
2008). Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 205 nm is chosen as the normalization
wavelength because practically all organic matter present in the sample
absorbs in this UV region. Figure 9 shows the ratio of total areas at 235 nm
and 270 nm relative to the value at 205 nm, which provides a qualitative
comparison of the samples. By comparing the amounts (areas) of the 235 and
270 nm absorbing species, the effect of humidity on each branching pathway
(RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be assessed. How much
-ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, -C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O, ROOR, and ROOH is produced under each humidity level
determines the relative reactivity between the humid vs. dry conditions of
each branching pathway. The relative reactivity for both reaction channels
is similar within 1 standard deviation for all humidity conditions
studied, indicating that each condition may have a similar product
distribution. A comparison between the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways cannot be made in this manner because NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are different. The seemingly smaller areas for species
produced in the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> panel could simply be due to a larger amount of
non-nitrated organic matter being produced that absorbs at the normalization
wavelength. However, one slight difference is the enhancement in the
production of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 244, an RCOOH species) in the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments, which increases by 2 and 7
times under dry and humid conditions, respectively, relative to the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. This observation indicates
that in the presence of additional HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the oxidation is directed
toward the synthesis of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 244) more efficiently.
This can be explained by an enhancement of the reaction sequence R21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> R22
in Fig. 8, which is enhanced at high HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical concentrations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Particulate organic nitrate formation and hydrolysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Organic nitrate formation </title>
      <p>The mass spectrum in Fig. 5 indicates the presence of a large fraction
(11 %) of nitrate in the aerosol formed from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction. Approximately 90 % of the N atoms in the
spectrum are found on the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments. Most of the
nitrate signal is assumed to be from organic species (i.e., organic
nitrates) as N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake to the particles is negligible and the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is high. In humid experiments, the
heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could lead to the formation of
inorganic nitrates (e.g., HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To evaluate the contribution of
inorganic nitrates to the total NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions measured by
the HR-ToF-AMS, we perform two characterization experiments (RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %)
in which only N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (the maximum amount of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> used in
our aerosol experiments) and seed aerosol ((NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed or
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed) are injected into the
chambers. In both cases, using a relative ionization efficiency (RIE) of 1.1
for nitrate results in a nitrate growth of less than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
detected by the HR-ToF-AMS  (Rollins et al.,
2009). The uptake of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is even less likely in the SOA yield
experiments. It has been shown that when comparing to inorganic seed only,
the presence of organic matter decreased N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by 80 %
(Gaston et al., 2014). Therefore, the contribution of
inorganic nitrates to the total nitrate signals measured by the HR-ToF-AMS
in our experiments is negligible.</p>
      <p>It has been shown previously that the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the
HR-ToF-AMS mass spectrum can be used to infer the presence of particle-phase
organic nitrates (Farmer et al., 2010). Specifically,
Farmer et al. (2010) suggested that the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is much higher for organic nitrates (ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–15) than inorganic nitrates (ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7), and therefore
aerosol with a high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>:NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio likely also has a high
concentration of organic nitrates. Figure 5 shows that approximately only
two-thirds of the signal at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 is from NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the remaining signal
is from organic CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment. At peak aerosol growth under dry
and humid conditions, we determine from the high-resolution AMS data that
the average R-ON value for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol is 6.5 in
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments and an average of 8.6 in
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. Previous studies  (Fry et
al., 2009; Bruns et al., 2010) on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction
suggested that the R-ON for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA is on the order
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, higher that the values determined in this study. One possible
explanation for the difference in R-ON between this study and previous
literature is instrument bias. Different instruments may have different R-ON
values. One way to circumvent this bias is to compare the R-ON <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> R-AN ratio.
The average R-ON <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> R-AN for all experiments is 3.9, which is in agreement with
values calculated by Fry et al. (2009) and Bruns et al. (2010) (range
3.7–4.2). Another explanation for this difference is the close proximity of
the CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion to the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion in the aerosol mass spectrum,
which may result in a small bias in the calculated R-ON. Specifically, if we
were to include the contribution of the organic CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 46 (in addition to
contribution from NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively, the
corresponding NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios would be higher, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” experiments. Therefore, when using the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio to estimate organic nitrate contribution in
ambient OA, it is imperative that one excludes the organic contribution (if
any) at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 when calculating the ratio.</p>
      <p>One possible way to estimate the molar fraction of organic nitrates in the
aerosol from the HR-ToF-AMS data is to use the N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio   (calculated by including contributions from nitrate fragments) of the aerosol
formed in the experiments. Since <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene is a monoterpene, we assume
its oxidation products have approximately 10 carbon atoms. This is a
reasonable assumption based on the gas-phase oxidation products detected by
CIMS (Fig. 8). The dominant reaction pathway of nitrate radicals is addition
via attack of the double bond, adding one nitrate group to the primary
carbon and forming a peroxy radical. With one nitrate group and 10 carbons
from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene precursor, the organic nitrate products are
expected to have an N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio of about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If 100 % of the SOA formed is
composed of organic nitrates, the HR-ToF-AMS data should have an N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio
of 0.1. The average N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio for all experiments measured by the HR-ToF-AMS
is approximately 0.074 for SOA formed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
peak growth. Thus, as an upper bound, it is approximated that the molar
fraction of organic nitrates in the aerosol is 74 %. Even if there is
fragmentation, the organic nitrate fraction in the aerosol would remain
fairly high. For instance, if the organic nitrate species only has nine
carbons, the upper-bound molar organic nitrate fraction is approximately
67 %. If we assume the organic nitrate and non-organic nitrate species
have the same molecular weight, the molar organic nitrate fraction in the
aerosol is equal to the fraction of aerosol mass composed of organic
nitrates. In addition to N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, the HR-ToF-AMS nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org mass ratio can also
be used to estimate the particle organic nitrate fraction. The average
nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org mass ratio measured by the HR-ToF-AMS for all experiments is
about 0.16. We assume the organic nitrate compound has an average molecular
weight between 200 and 300 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the predicted products
(Fig. 8), where 62 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>is attributed to the nitrate group while
the remaining mass is from the organic mass. Using both the nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org mass
ratio and the assumed range of molecular weights for the organic nitrate
species, the fraction of aerosol mass composed of organic nitrates is
estimated to be 45–68 %. We estimate that the fraction of aerosol mass
composed of organic nitrates is 60 %, based on the average value of the
extremes of the two estimates. This is comparable to the fraction of aerosol
mass composed of organic nitrates estimated by Fry et al. (2014) (56 %)
but higher than that reported by Fry et al. (2009) (30–40 %). The
different experimental conditions in our study vs. those in Fry et al. (2009) may have contributed to the difference in the fraction of aerosol
mass composed of organic nitrates. For example, the ratio of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> used to make NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in Fry et al. (2009) is lower than
this study, which may have led to differing branching ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Hydrolysis and organic nitrate fate</title>
      <p>As shown in Fig. 7, for experiments with the same initial hydrocarbon
concentration, the AMS nitrate-to-organics ratio of the humid experiments
normalized by the dry experiments stabilize at a ratio of about 0.9. The
nitrate radical addition at the double bond of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene can lead to
the formation of either primary or tertiary nitrates. Previous studies of
organic nitrate hydrolysis in bulk solutions showed that while saturated
primary nitrates hydrolyze on the order of months, tertiary nitrates
hydrolyze on the order of minutes  (Darer et al., 2011). Primary
organic nitrates with double bonds can hydrolyze on the order of minutes
(Jacobs et al., 2014), but oxidation products from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction are likely saturated compounds due to the lone
double bond of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (Fig. 8). Therefore, the point at which
nitrate mass stops decreasing is interpreted as when all tertiary nitrates
have hydrolyzed. As the oxidation products typically contain only one
nitrate group (Fig. 8), we infer that, within experimental error,
approximately 90 % of the organic nitrates formed from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction are primary nitrates. These results are
consistent with findings that a nitrate radical is more likely to attack the
less substituted carbon, which, in the case for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, is the
terminal carbon (Wayne et al., 1991). Since the nitrate addition is the
first reaction step, any subsequent differences in peroxy radical fate
(e.g., RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will not affect the
relative amount of primary vs. tertiary nitrates in our systems.</p>
      <p>Based on the decay rate of (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the hydrolysis lifetime
of the tertiary nitrates formed in the reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene with
nitrate radicals is calculated to be approximately 3–4.5 h. This is on the
same order of magnitude as the hydrolysis lifetime (6 h) of the proposed
tertiary organic nitrates formed from photooxidation of trimethyl benzene in
the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Liu et al., 2012). Results from our
study therefore do not suggest that nitrate radical chemistry produces
organic nitrates with different hydrolysis rates than what is previously
known for primary or tertiary organic nitrates. Instead, this study proposes
that the fraction of tertiary organic nitrates produced from nitrate radical
chemistry is much lower than SOA produced from photooxidation in the
presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. While we directly demonstrate this to be true in the
case of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system, this can also be applied to
commonly emitted terpenes, including those with internal double bonds. From
the list of terpenes in   Guenther et al. (2012), all unsaturated terpenes have at least one double bond with a
secondary or primary carbon. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene contains an
internal double bond connecting a tertiary carbon to a secondary carbon. The
nitrate radical is more likely to attack the less substituted carbon (i.e.,
the secondary carbon) and form a secondary organic nitrate. As
primary/secondary and tertiary organic nitrates have drastically different
hydrolysis rates, it is imperative that their relative contribution be
accurately represented in models when determining the fate of ambient
organic nitrates. A recent study by  Browne et al. (2013) modeled the
hydrolysis of organic nitrates in a forested region by assuming that 75 %
of atmospheric organic nitrates formed in the day are composed of tertiary
organic nitrates, based on the average fraction of tertiary organic nitrates
from the photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in the
presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This has implications not only on the organic nitrate
fate, but also on the formation of nitric acid, a byproduct of organic
nitrate hydrolysis     (Sato, 2008). With this, Browne et al. (2013)
predicted that hydrolysis of organic nitrates produced in the daytime could
account for as much as a third to half of all nitric acid production.
However, when considering organic nitrates formed both in the day and at
night, the fraction of tertiary organic nitrates in ambient organic nitrates
is likely lower than that used by  Browne et al. (2013). This is
especially true in areas where nitrate radical oxidation is the dominant
source of organic nitrates (e.g., NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppt in forested
regions as noted in  Browne et al., 2014). It is
recommended that future modeling studies of organic nitrate fates should
consider organic nitrates formed both in the day and at night in order to
take into account the large contribution of primary organic nitrates (which
do not hydrolyze appreciably) formed from nitrate radical oxidation of
monoterpenes.</p>
      <p>Previous studies suggested that hydrolysis of organic nitrates can be an
acid-catalyzed process in both solution (Szmigielski et al.,
2010) and directly in the particle phase (Rindelaub et al.,
2015). However, it has been found that primary and secondary organic
nitrates are stable unless the aerosol is very acidic (pH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0)
(Darer et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2011). We calculate the corresponding
change in the (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for the experiments where
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed is used (data not shown in
Fig. 7). We find that for these experiments, the (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio also becomes constant at around 0.9, similar to that of the
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed experiments. However, the experiments using
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed have a more rapid rate of
decrease in the (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. This suggests that while
hydrolysis of tertiary nitrates is accelerated under more acidic conditions,
primary organic nitrates do not hydrolyze at an observable rate for the pH
conditions employed in this study. As the majority of the particulate
organic nitrates formed in our experiments are primary nitrates, we infer
that particle acidity may not have a significant impact on the hydrolysis of
organic nitrates formed in the BVOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction, except in the
cases where the double bond on the BVOCs connects two tertiary carbons, such
as terpinolene.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Aerosol aging in the dark</title>
      <p>While the aging of SOA has been extensively investigated in multiple
photooxidation studies and shown to affect aerosol mass (e.g.,  Donahue et
al., 2012; Henry and Donahue, 2012), little is known regarding aerosol aging
by nitrate radicals (Qi et al., 2012). A number of theoretical
(Kerdouci et al., 2010, 2014; Rayez et al., 2014) and experimental
studies  (Atkinson, 1991; Wayne et al., 1991) suggested that hydrogen
abstraction by nitrate radicals occurs, especially for hydrogen atoms
attached to aldehyde groups. As shown in Fig. 8, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction can lead to the formation of compounds with
carbonyl groups, allowing for potential nighttime aging of SOA by nitrate
radicals. We focus our aerosol aging discussion on the “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments, where the oxidant (nitrate radicals) concentrations
are higher.</p>
      <p>As aerosol ages, first-generation products either functionalize, which
decreases volatility, or fragment, which can lead to an overall increase in
volatility  (Kroll et al., 2009). If fragmentation is the dominant
pathway, a decrease in organic mass is expected as products become more
volatile and re-partition back to the gas phase. We use the AMS org : sulfate
ratio as a proxy to examine the effect of aerosol aging on organics mass in
our experiments. As wall loss of particles will lead to a decrease in
organic loading, normalizing the organic loadings by sulfate allows us to
examine the net change in the organics mass over the course of the
experiments. The use of org <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate is a good proxy for aerosol aging when
the organics only condense onto existing ammonium sulfate particles. A study
by Loza et al. (2012) has demonstrated that in the
case of rapid condensation of organic species, the timescale of
condensation is less than the timescale of diffusion to existing seed
particle. When in this “diffusion-limited growth” regime, the organic mass
partially nucleates to form new particles. Since the nucleated particles are
smaller than those particles in which ammonium sulfate acted as a seed for
condensation, organics contained in these nucleated particles will be lost
to the chamber walls more rapidly than the existing seed particles (Fig. S3). This could lead to an overall decrease in the org <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate ratio. In our
study, the org <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate ratio decreases after SOA reaches peak growth (Fig. 6). It is possible that this decrease is caused by wall loss of organic
particles formed in the diffusion-limited growth regime. It is also possible
that fragmentation of aerosol components is the dominant aging pathway,
resulting in a decrease in the org : sulfate ratio. Regardless, there is
still evidence of increased functionalization over the course of the
experiments. Rapid loss of organics due to particle wall loss or
fragmentation of SOA would cause all AMS organic families to either decrease
or remain constant relative to sulfate. However, Fig. 6 shows that the
highly oxidized fragments (CHOgt1, fragments with greater than 1 oxygen
atom) increase slightly relative to sulfate while the non-oxidized fragments
(CH) are lost at nearly twice the rate as the slightly oxidized fragments
(CHO1). Since non-oxidized fragments are lost more quickly than
less-oxidized fragments, it is possible that further particle-phase
reactions are leading to the formation of highly oxidized compounds.</p>
      <p>For the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction, carboxylic acids can be formed
from the abstraction of hydrogen from aldehydes and subsequent oxidation
(Fig. 8). The observed ions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 in CIMS likely correspond to a
hydroxy carbonyl nitrate and carboxylic acid, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356 decreases over the course of the experiment while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 372 increases.
The possible conversion of aldehydes to carboxylic acids is also noticeable
in the aerosol chemical composition. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment in
the HR-ToF-AMS data likely arise from thermal decomposition of carboxylic
acids (Duplissy et al., 2011) and is
commonly used to infer the extent of aerosol aging (Ng
et al., 2011). Although the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn>44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (fraction of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion to total
organics) in the typical mass spectrum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA is
low (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %), there is a noticeable and continued increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn>44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after peak aerosol growth (Fig. 6). Specifically, during the 2.5 h following peak growth, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn>44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by as much as 30 % under
dry conditions. Under humid conditions, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn>44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only
6 %. These correspond to an 18 and 6 % increase in the O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio (calculated without contributions from nitrate fragments) of the aerosol under dry (O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ranging from 0.33 to 0.39 for all
experiments) and humid conditions (O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ranging from 0.33 to 0.35), respectively. The lower
degree of aging in humid experiments is consistent with the observation that
the CIMS N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signals, while not quantified, are clearly lower (by
at least a factor of 2) in the humid “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments when compared to dry experiments. This is likely due to the
uptake of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to wet chamber and/or aerosol surfaces
(Thornton et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>It is unlikely that the observed decrease in organic species relative to
sulfate and the decrease in gas phase species are due to differences in
vapor phase wall loss.     Matsunaga and Ziemann (2010) determined
that highly oxidized gaseous organic compounds are lost to the chamber walls
faster than compounds that have a lower degree of oxidation. Additionally,
the gas wall partitioning coefficient for a specific compound has also been
shown to increase with decreasing vapor pressure     (Yeh and
Ziemann, 2014), with highly oxidized species typically having lower vapor
pressures than less oxidized species    (Pankow and Asher, 2008). If
vapor-phase wall loss is the driving factor for the decrease of organics in
this study, it would be expected that oxidized compounds would be lost to
the walls more rapidly. Subsequently, these highly oxidized compounds would
re-partition back to the gas phase in order to re-establish particle-gas
equilibrium. The decrease in organics shown in Fig. 6, however, indicates
more rapid losses of non-oxidized fragments compared to oxidized fragments.
The less oxidized species measured by CIMS (lower molecular weight) as shown
in Fig. 2 also decrease more rapidly than the more oxidized species.
Therefore, the change in chemical composition and decrease in vapor phase
species is more likely attributable to aerosol aging than to vapor wall
partitioning.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Relevance to ambient measurements</title>
      <p>Results from this study provide the fundamental information to evaluate the
extent to which nitrate radical oxidation of monoterpenes contributes to
ambient organic aerosol. This reaction provides a direct mechanism for
linking anthropogenic and biogenic emissions, and is likely substantial in
the southeastern United States, where both types of emissions are high. A
recent field campaign,  SOAS,
took place in Centreville, Alabama, from 01 June to 15 July 2013 to investigate the effects of anthropogenic pollution in a region with
large natural emissions. Based on positive matrix factorization (PMF)
analysis of the HR-ToF-AMS data obtained in SOAS,     Xu et al. (2015b) identified an OA subtype termed as less-oxidized oxygenated organic aerosol (LO-OOA), which accounted for 32 % of the total OA at Centreville.
LO-OOA peaks at night and is well correlated with particle-phase organic
nitrates. These suggest that LO-OOA is produced predominantly from nighttime
monoterpene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry, especially from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene has a high nighttime concentration (Xu et
al., 2015b). Results from the current laboratory chamber study provide the
relevant fundamental data for estimating the amount of aerosol produced from
monoterpene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in SOAS. The campaign-averaged loading of
non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in SOAS is about 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and it has
been determined that the aerosol is highly acidic (pH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59)
and contains a large amount of particulate water (5.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Cerully et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2015). At night, the RH can
reach up to 90 % during the SOAS measuring period
(Guo et al., 2015). The current
chamber study is designed to probe SOA formation from nitrate radical
oxidation under atmospherically relevant loadings, under high humidity, and
in the presence of seed aerosol of different acidity. The fates of peroxy
radicals at night are highly uncertain, which mainly arises from the lack of
constraints on the reaction rates of the peroxy radicals with other species,
such as RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Brown and Stutz, 2012). In our study, the
experiments are conducted under both “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” regimes to explore the effects of peroxy
radial fates on SOA formation. Using a SOA yield of 50 % (for a mass
loading of 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from the yield curve) in the presence
of acidic seed at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % obtained from “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” experiments,     Xu et al. (2015b) estimated that about
50 % of nighttime OA production could be due to the reaction of
monoterpenes with nitrate radicals in SOAS, a large fraction of which is
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction.</p>
      <p>It is noted that the LO-OOA factor is also resolved at both rural and urban
sites around the greater Atlanta area in all seasons, where HR-ToF-AMS
measurements were conducted as part of the
SCAPE  (Verma et al., 2014; Xu et al.,
2015a, b). It is found that LO-OOA made up 18–36 % of the total OA in
rural and urban areas, suggesting that a fairly large fraction of total OA
in the southeastern United States could arise from nitrate radical oxidation
of monoterpenes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>A comparison of mass spectra obtained from this work and the LO-OOA
factor identified from PMF analysis of the HR-ToF-AMS data from the SOAS
field campaign. <bold>(a)</bold> Mass spectrum of the SOA formed from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction at RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70  % under “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominant” conditions and (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seed
(Experiment 34 in Table 1). <bold>(b)</bold> Mass spectrum for the LO-OOA factor
identified from PMF analysis of the SOAS HR-ToF-AMS data (Xu et al., 2015b).
The mass spectra are colored by the ion type to indicate their contribution
to the mass spectra. Ions C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 67) and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91) are distinctive for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene mass
spectrum (Sect. 5 of main text). To facilitate comparison, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50
have been multiplied by a factor of 3 in the LO-OOA spectrum.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/7497/2015/acp-15-7497-2015-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 10 shows a comparison of the aerosol mass spectrum from a typical
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiment from this study and the LO-OOA factor
obtained from SOAS data. As LO-OOA could have other sources in addition to
monoterpene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the two spectra are not in perfect agreement but
they do show similar features above <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60. Most noticeable of these are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 67
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a ratio of these
two ions (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 2.9 (ranging
from 2.5 to 3.6 in other experiments). The mass spectra for the other
SOA-forming systems predicted to be of importance at SOAS, namely, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis (Chhabra et al., 2010), isoprene
photooxidation (Chhabra et al., 2010), and nitrate radical-initiated isoprene chemistry  (Ng et al.,
2008), do not show significant intensities at either of these two ions.
Therefore, it is likely that high signals at C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ambient aerosol mass spectrum could be indicative of
the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction products. We note that
the average NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for aerosol measured at SOAS is
7.1, consistent with the high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio from the SOA
formed from nitrate radical oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in this study.</p>
      <p>The gas-phase oxidation products detected by the CIMS in this study can also
be used to help interpret ambient data to evaluate the possible contribution
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction. For instance, a significant amount
of gas-phase organic nitrate species with MW of 215 amu and 231 amu have
been observed during the Biosphere Effects of Aerosols and Photochemistry Experiment (BEARPEX) campaign in fall 2009
(Beaver et al., 2012). As these species
exhibited a nighttime peak,  Beaver et al. (2012) suggested that they could arise from nighttime oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene by nitrate radicals. The proposed mechanism for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8) show multiple reaction pathways to form
species with MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 215 amu and MW <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 231 amu. Therefore, the oxidation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene by nitrate radicals represents one possible pathway for the
formation of the species detected by  Beaver
et al. (2012). As the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction has shown to be
important at SOAS (Xu et al., 2015b), it is expected that the
gas-phase compounds observed in this chamber study could help explain some
of the species detected by the multiple CIMS deployed during the SOAS study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Atmospheric implications</title>
      <p>Although photooxidation is expected to be the major oxidation pathway for
atmospheric VOCs, nitrate radical oxidation can account for as much as
20 % of global BVOC oxidation and is predicted to lead to an aerosol mass
increase by as much as 45 % when compared to the modeled case where this
chemistry is excluded (Pye et al., 2010). Due
to high SOA yields, evaluating the mass of aerosol produced by nitrate
radical-initiated chemistry is essential to estimate the total organic
aerosol burden, both on regional and global scales. Currently, the aerosol
yields from nitrate radical oxidation of monoterpenes in most models are
assumed to be the same as those determined from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions in Griffin et al. (1999) (Pye et
al., 2010). In this study, we systematically investigate SOA formation from
the nitrate radical oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene under various reaction
conditions (dry, humid, differing radical fate) and a wide range of initial
hydrocarbon concentrations that are atmospherically relevant. We determine
that the SOA yields from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systems are
consistent with Griffin et al. (1999) for mass loadings <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, but as much as a factor of 4 higher than those reported in
Griffin et al. (1999) for lower mass loadings. The lower SOA yields reported
in Griffin et al. (1999) could arise from uncertainties in extrapolating
data from higher mass loadings to lower mass loadings in that study, as well
as
from slower reaction rates and vapor wall loss effects  (Zhang et al.,
2014). While it is likely that the SOA yields from the nitrate radical
oxidation of various monoterpenes are different (Fry et
al., 2014), updating SOA formation from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
the new yield parameters in future modeling studies would lead to a more
accurate prediction of the amount of aerosol formed from this reaction
pathway.</p>
      <p>Currently, the fate of peroxy radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, etc.) in the nighttime atmosphere is still highly
uncertain   (Brown and Stutz, 2012), though recent studies showed that
the HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio is often on the order of 10 ppt
(Mao et al., 2012). Thus,
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could be the dominant nighttime fate of peroxy radicals.
In this study, we examine the effect of RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fate on aerosol yields for
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Although more ROOH species are
produced through the RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> channel, the SOA yields in the
“RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant” and “RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant”
experiments are comparable. This indicates that for this system, the overall
product chemical composition and volatility distribution may not be very
different for the different peroxy radical fates. This is in contrast to
results from nitrate radical oxidation of smaller biogenic species, such as
isoprene, which have large differences in SOA yields depending on the
RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fate  (Ng et al., 2008). This
suggests that the fates of peroxy radicals in nitrate radical experiments
for larger BVOCs (such as monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes) may not be as
important as it is for small compounds (such as isoprene) and in
photooxidation and ozonolysis experiments (e.g.,  Presto et al., 2005;
Kroll et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2007a; Eddingsaas et al., 2012; Xu et al.,
2014); this warrants further studies.</p>
      <p>The results from this study provide the first insight for the specific
organic nitrate branching ratio on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system. We
determine that about 90 and 10 % of the organic nitrates formed from the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction are primary organic nitrates and
tertiary organic nitrates, respectively. As primary and tertiary organic
nitrates hydrolyze at drastically different rates, the relative contribution
of primary vs. tertiary organic nitrates determined in this work would allow
for improved constraints regarding the fates of organic nitrates in the
atmosphere. Specifically, we find that the primary organic nitrates do not
appear to hydrolyze and the tertiary organic nitrates undergo hydrolysis
with a lifetime of 3–4.5 h. Updating the branching ratio (primary vs.
tertiary) with organic nitrates formed by the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-initiated oxidation
of BVOCs will improve model predictions of hydrolysis of organic nitrates.
Hydrolysis of organic nitrates has the potential to create a long-term sink
for atmospheric nitrogen in the form of nitric acid. Organic nitrates that
do not hydrolyze, however, can potentially be photolyzed or oxidized by OH
radicals to release NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> back into the atmosphere
(Suarez-Bertoa et al., 2012) or lost by dry or wet
deposition.</p>
      <p>Results from this chamber study are used to evaluate the contributions from
the nitrate radical oxidation of BVOCs to ambient OA in the southeastern
United States, where this chemistry is expected to be substantial owing to
high natural and anthropogenic emissions in the area. Factor analysis of
HR-ToF-AMS data from SOAS and SCAPE field measurements identified an OA
subtype (LO-OOA) at these sites which is highly correlated with organic
nitrates  (Xu et al., 2015a, b). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA yields
obtained under reaction conditions relevant to these field studies are
directly utilized to estimate the amount of ambient OA formed from this
reaction pathway (Xu et al., 2015b). Specifically, it is
estimated that 50 % of nighttime OA production occurs through the reaction
of monoterpenes with nitrate radicals in SOAS (Xu et al.,
2015b). Using the average R-ON <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> R-AN ratio obtained from this study and prior
literature values, Xu et al. (2015a) estimated that organic nitrates
contribute 5–12 % of total organic aerosol in the southeastern United
States in summer, indicating organic nitrates are important components in
ambient aerosol. Results from this study and     Xu et al. (2015a, b) illustrate the substantial insights one can gain into aerosol formation
chemistry and ambient aerosol source apportionment through coordinated
fundamental laboratory studies and field measurement studies. Further,
multiple gas-phase organic nitrate species are identified in this chamber
study, which could be used to help interpret ambient gas-phase composition
data obtained from the large suite of gas-phase measurements in SOAS. Owing
to difficulties in measuring complex atmospheric processes, laboratory
studies are critical in generating fundamental data to understand and
predict SOA formation regionally and globally. In this regard, it is
imperative not to view laboratory studies as isolated efforts, but instead
to make them essential and integrated parts of research activities in the
wider atmospheric chemistry community (e.g., field campaigns).
</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was funded by US Environmental Protection Agency STAR grant
(Early Career) RD-83540301. L. Xu is in part supported by NSF grant 1242258
and US EPA STAR grant R834799. W. Y. Tuet is in part supported by the Health
Effects Institute under research agreement no. 4943-RFA13-2/14-4. This
publication's contents are solely the responsibility of the grantee and do
not necessarily represent the official views of the US EPA. Further, US EPA
does not endorse the purchase of any commercial products or services
mentioned in the publication. M. I. Guzman wishes to acknowledge
support from NSF CAREER award (CHE-1255290). The authors would like to thank
X. X. Liu, D. X.  Chen, D. J. Tanner, and H. G. Huey for use and aid with
their chemical ionization mass spectrometer, and to E. C. Wood for helpful
discussions on the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> injection flow tube
design.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:  A. Kiendler-Scharr</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Burling, I. R., Meinardi, S., Simpson, I.,
Blake, D. R., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, A., Lee, T., Kreidenweis, S.,
Urbanski, S., Reardon, J., Griffith, D. W. T., Johnson, T. J., and Weise, D.
R.: Measurements of reactive trace gases and variable O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation rates
in some South Carolina biomass burning plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1141–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1141-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1141-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arey, J., Aschmann, S. M., Kwok, E. S. C., and Atkinson, R.: Alkyl Nitrate,
Hydroxyalkyl Nitrate, and Hydroxycarbonyl Formation from the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-Air
Photooxidations of C5-C8 n-Alkanes, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 1020–1027,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp003292z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp003292z</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R.: Kinetics and mechanisms of the gas-phase reactions of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
radical with organic-compounds, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 20, 459–507, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R.: Atmospheric Reactions of Alkoxy and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Hydroxyalkoxy
Radicals, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 29, 99–111,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1997)29:2&lt;99::AID-KIN3&gt;3.0.CO;2-F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1997)29:2&lt;99::AID-KIN3&gt;3.0.CO;2-F</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic
compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Gas-phase Tropospheric Chemistry of Biogenic
Volatile Organic Compounds: A Review, Atmos. Environ., 37, 197–219, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bahreini, R., Keywood, M. D., Ng, N. L., Varutbangkul, V., Gao, S., Flagan,
R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Measurements of
Secondary Organic Aerosol from Oxidation of Cycloalkenes, Terpenes, and
m-Xylene Using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
39, 5674–5688, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es048061a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es048061a</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Beaver, M. R., Clair, J. M. St., Paulot, F., Spencer, K. M., Crounse, J. D.,
LaFranchi, B. W., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Schade, G.
W., Park, C., Cohen, R. C., and Wennberg, P. O.: Importance of biogenic
precursors to the budget of organic nitrates: observations of multifunctional
organic nitrates by CIMS and TD-LIF during BEARPEX 2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 5773–5785, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5773-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5773-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T.  and Boge, O.: Gas-phase reaction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with isoprene:
A kinetic and mechanistic study, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 29, 755–765,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4601(1997)29:10&lt;755::aid-kin4&gt;3.0.co;2-l" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(sici)1097-4601(1997)29:10&lt;755::aid-kin4&gt;3.0.co;2-l</ext-link>,
1997a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T. and Boge, O.: Products and mechanism of the gas-phase reaction
of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with alpha-pinene, J. Chem. Soc.-Faraday Trans., 93,
3021–3027, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a702364b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/a702364b</ext-link>, 1997b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bonn, B. and Moorgat, G. K.: New particle formation during <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene oxidation by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the influence of water
vapour: particle size distribution studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2, 183–196,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-183-2002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2-183-2002</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bowman, F. M., Odum, J. R., Seinfeld, J. H., and Pandis, S. N.: Mathematical
model for gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosols, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 3921–3931, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00245-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00245-8</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S.  and Stutz, J.: Nighttime radical observations and chemistry,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6405–6447, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35181a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35181a</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S., deGouw, J. A., Warneke, C., Ryerson, T. B., Dubé, W. P., Atlas,
E., Weber, R. J., Peltier, R. E., Neuman, J. A., Roberts, J. M., Swanson, A.,
Flocke, F., McKeen, S. A., Brioude, J., Sommariva, R., Trainer, M.,
Fehsenfeld, F. C., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Nocturnal isoprene oxidation over
the Northeast United States in summer and its impact on reactive nitrogen
partitioning and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
3027–3042, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3027-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3027-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S., Dubé, W. P., Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Brock, C. A.,
Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Atlas, E., Peischl, J.,
Ryerson, T. B., Holloway, J. S., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, R., Trainer, M.,
Parrish, D. D., Fehshenfeld, F. C., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Biogenic VOC
oxidation and organic aerosol formation in an urban nocturnal boundary layer:
aircraft vertical profiles in Houston, TX, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
11317–11337, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11317-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11317-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Browne, E. C. and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of biogenic nitrate chemistry on the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime in remote continental regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
11917–11932, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11917-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11917-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Browne, E. C., Min, K.-E., Wooldridge, P. J., Apel, E., Blake, D. R., Brune,
W. H., Cantrell, C. A., Cubison, M. J., Diskin, G. S., Jimenez, J. L.,
Weinheimer, A. J., Wennberg, P. O., Wisthaler, A., and Cohen, R. C.:
Observations of total <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the boreal forest: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4543–4562,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4543-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4543-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Browne, E. C., Wooldridge, P. J., Min, K.-E., and Cohen, R. C.: On the role
of monoterpene chemistry in the remote continental boundary layer, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 1225–1238, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1225-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1225-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., Perraud, V., Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu,
Y., Imre, D., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and Alexander, M. L.: Comparison of
FTIR and Particle Mass Spectrometry for the Measurement of Particulate
Organic Nitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1056–1061,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9029864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es9029864</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W. P. L., Darnall, K. R., Lloyd, A. C., Winer, A. M., and Pitts Jr,
J. N.: Evidence for Alkoxy Radical Isomerization in Photooxidations of
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Alkanes under Simulated Atmospheric Conditions, Chem. Phys.
Lett., 42, 22–27, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(76)80543-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-2614(76)80543-X</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cerully, K. M., Bougiatioti, A., Hite Jr., J. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L.,
Weber, R., and Nenes, A.: On the link between hygroscopicity, volatility, and
oxidation state of ambient and water-soluble aerosol in the Southeastern
United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 30835–30877,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-30835-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acpd-14-30835-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Farmer, D. K., Rizzo, L. V., Pauliquevis, T., Kuwata, M., Karl, T. G., Guenther, A., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., and Martin, S. T.:
Submicron particle mass concentrations and sources in the Amazonian wet season (AMAZE-08), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3687–3701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3687-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3687-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Hulbert, D., and Shepson, P. B.: Measurement of the organic
nitrate yield from OH reaction with isoprene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103,
25563–25568, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JD01483" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD01483</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Elemental analysis of
chamber organic aerosol using an aerodyne high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4111–4131,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4111-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4111-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Chung, S. H.  and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global distribution and climate forcing
of carbonaceous aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4407,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001397</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.:
Formation and Stability of Atmospherically Relevant Isoprene-Derived
Organosulfates and Organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103797z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Day, D. A., Liu, S., Russell, L. M., and Ziemann, P. J.: Organonitrate group
concentrations in submicron particles with high nitrate and organic fractions
in coastal southern California, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1970–1979,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.045</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac061249n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>de Gouw, J. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Warneke, C., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W.
C., Roberts, J. M., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Pszenny, A. A. P., Keene, W. C., Marchewka, M., Bertman, S. B., and Bates, T.
S.: Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the New
England Air Quality Study in 2002, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D16305,
doi:16310.11029/12004JD005623, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Dibble, T. S.: Reactions of the alkoxy radicals formed following OH-addition
to alpha-pinene and beta-pinene, C-C bond scission reactions, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 123, 4228–4234, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja003553i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja003553i</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Dillon, T. J. and Crowley, J. N.: Direct detection of OH formation in the
reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other substituted peroxy
radicals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4877–4889, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4877-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4877-2008</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Henry, K. M., Mentel, T. F., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Spindler,
C., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Dorn, H. P., Fuchs, H., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A.,
Saathoff, H., Naumann, K.-H., Moehler, O., Leisner, T., Mueller, L., Reinnig,
M.-C., Hoffmann, T., Salo, K., Hallquist, M., Frosch, M., Bilde, M.,
Tritscher, T., Barmet, P., Praplan, A. P., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J.,
Prevot, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Aging of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol via gas-phase OH radical reactions, Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. USA, 109,
13503–13508, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115186109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1115186109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A.,
Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M.,
Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D.
R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and
composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1155–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Eberhard, J., Muller, C., Stocker, D. W., and Kerr, J. A.: Isomerization of
Alkoxy Radicals under Atmospheric Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29,
232–241, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00001a600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00001a600</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Eddingsaas, N. C., Loza, C. L., Yee, L. D., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P.
O.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene photooxidation under controlled chemical conditions –
Part 1: Gas-phase composition in low- and high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> environments,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6489–6504, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6489-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6489-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912340107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0912340107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Farmer, E. H., Koch, H. P., and Sutton, D. A.: The Course of Autoxidation
Reactions in Polyisoprenes and Allied Compounds. Part VII. Rearrangement of
Double Bonds During Autoxidation, J. Chem. Soc., 541–547,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/JR9430000541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/JR9430000541</ext-link>, 1943.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Rollins, A. W., Wooldridge, P. J., Brown, S.
S., Fuchs, H., Dubé, W., Mensah, A., dal Maso, M., Tillmann, R., Dorn,
H.-P., Brauers, T., and Cohen, R. C.: Organic nitrate and secondary organic
aerosol yield from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene evaluated using a
gas-phase kinetics/aerosol partitioning model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1431–1449, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Rollins, A. W., Brauers, T., Brown, S. S.,
Dorn, H.-P., Dubé, W. P., Fuchs, H., Mensah, A., Rohrer, F., Tillmann, R.,
Wahner, A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: SOA from limonene: role of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in its generation and degradation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
3879–3894, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3879-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3879-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Draper, D. C., Zarzana, K. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A.,
Jimenez, J. L., Brown, S. S., Cohen, R. C., Kaser, L., Hansel, A., Cappellin,
L., Karl, T., Hodzic Roux, A., Turnipseed, A., Cantrell, C., Lefer, B. L.,
and Grossberg, N.: Observations of gas- and aerosol-phase organic nitrates at
BEACHON-RoMBAS 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8585–8605,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8585-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8585-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Draper, D. C., Barsanti, K. C., Smith, J. N., Ortega, J.,
Winkler, P. M., Lawler, M. J., Brown, S. S., Edwards, P. M., Cohen, R. C.,
and Lee, L.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation and Organic Nitrate Yield
from NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Oxidation of Biogenic Hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11944–11953, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502204x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502204x</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes, J., Wang, D., Bowling, D., Potosnak, M., Monson, R., Goliff, W.,
and Stockwell, W.: Biogenic Hydrocarbon Chemistry within and Above a Mixed
Deciduous Forest, J. Atmos. Chem., 56, 165–185,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9048-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-006-9048-4</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes, J. D., Lerdau, M., Atkinson, R., Baldocchi, D., Bottenheim, J. W.,
Ciccioli, P., Lamb, B., Geron, C., Gu, L., Guenther, A., Sharkey, T. D., and
Stockwell, W.: Biogenic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric boundary layer: A
review, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 1537–1575,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081&lt;1537:bhitab&gt;2.3.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081&lt;1537:bhitab&gt;2.3.co;2</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Gao, S., Ng, N. L., Keywood, M., Varutbangkul, V., Bahreini, R., Nenes, A.,
He, J., Yoo, K. Y., Beauchamp, J. L., Hodyss, R. P., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Particle Phase Acidity and Oligomer Formation in Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 6582–6589,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049125k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es049125k</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Gaston, C. J., Thornton, J. A., and Ng, N. L.: Reactive uptake of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to internally mixed inorganic and organic particles: the role
of organic carbon oxidation state and inferred organic phase separations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5693–5707, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5693-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5693-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Griffin, R. J., Cocker, D. R., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organic
aerosol formation from the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 104, 3555–3567, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998jd100049</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T.,
Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols
from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for
modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J. R., Carlton, A. G., Lee,
S.-H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wangberg, I., Ljungstrom, E., Barnes, I., and Becker, K. H.:
Aerosol and product yields from NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical-initiated oxidation of
selected monoterpenes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 553–559,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es980292s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es980292s</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Hasson, A. S., Tyndall, G. S., Orlando, J. J., Singh, S., Hernandez, S. Q.,
Campbell, S., and Ibarra, Y.: Branching Ratios for the Reaction of Selected
Carbonyl-Containing Peroxy Radicals with Hydroperoxy Radicals, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 116, 6264–6281, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp211799c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp211799c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Hatch, L. E., Luo, W., Pankow, J. F., Yokelson, R. J., Stockwell, C. E., and
Barsanti, K. C.: Identification and quantification of gaseous organic
compounds emitted from biomass burning using two-dimensional gas
chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
1865–1899, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1865-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1865-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Henry, K. M.  and Donahue, N. M.: Photochemical Aging of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene
Secondary Organic Aerosol: Effects of OH Radical Sources and Photolysis, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 116, 5932–5940, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp210288s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp210288s</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Hoyle, C. R., Berntsen, T., Myhre, G., and Isaksen, I. S. A.: Secondary
organic aerosol in the global aerosol – chemical transport model Oslo CTM2,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5675–5694, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5675-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5675-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Hu, K. S., Darer, A. I., and Elrod, M. J.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of the
hydrolysis of atmospherically relevant organonitrates and organosulfates,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8307–8320, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8307-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8307-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Huey, L. G.: Measurement of trace atmospheric species by chemical ionization
mass spectrometry: Speciation of reactive nitrogen and future directions,
Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 166–184, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mas.20118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mas.20118</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Muller, C., Berndt, T., Boge, O., Claeys, M., and Herrmann, H.:
Evidence for the existence of organosulfates from beta-pinene ozonolysis in
ambient secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6678–6683,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es070938t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070938t</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Jacobs, M. I., Burke, W. J., and Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics of the reactions of
isoprene-derived hydroxynitrates: gas phase epoxide formation and solution
phase hydrolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8933–8946,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Docherty, K. S., Lewandowski, M., and
Offenberg, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of a
series of sesquiterpenes: alpha-cedrene, beta-caryophyllene, alpha-humulene
and alpha-farnesene with O-3, OH and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, Environ. Chem., 10,
178–193, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/en13025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/en13025</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Hurley, M. D., and Wallington, T. J.: Investigation of the
radical product channel of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction in
the gas phase, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 3149–3162, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B702757E" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B702757E</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Kerdouci, J., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J. F.: Prediction of Rate
Constants for Gas-Phase Reactions of Nitrate Radical with Organic Compounds:
A New Structure-Activity Relationship, Chem. Phys. Chem., 11, 3909–3920,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cphc.201000673</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Kerdouci, J., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J. F.: Structure-activity
relationship for the gas-phase reactions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical with organic
compounds: Update and extension to aldehydes, Atmos. Environ., 84, 363–372,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.024</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Keywood, M. D., Varutbangkul, V., Bahreini, R., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the ozonolysis of
cycloalkenes and related compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4157–4164,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es035363o" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es035363o</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Kirchner, F.  and Stockwell, W. R.: Effect of peroxy radical reactions on
the predicted concentrations of ozone, nitrogenous compounds, and radicals,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 21007–21022, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD01519" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD01519</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H.  and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene Photooxidation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 1869–1877, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0524301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0524301</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Kessler, S. H., Worsnop, D. R., and
Wilson, K. R.: Measurement of fragmentation and functionalization pathways in
the heterogeneous oxidation of oxidized organic aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8005–8014, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b905289e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b905289e</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Kwan, A. J., Chan, A. W. H., Ng, N. L., Kjaergaard, H. G., Seinfeld, J. H.,
and Wennberg, P. O.: Peroxy radical chemistry and OH radical production
during the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-initiated oxidation of isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 7499–7515, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7499-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7499-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, C. W., Klouda, G. A., and Ellenson, W. D.: Radiocarbon measurement of
the biogenic contribution to summertime PM-2.5 ambient aerosol in Nashville,
TN, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6053–6061, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.011</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Chen, Q., Guzman, M. I., Chan, C. K., and Martin, S. T.:
Second-generation products contribute substantially to the particle-phase
organic material produced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene ozonolysis, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 121–132, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-121-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-121-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Shilling, J. E., Song, C., Hiranuma, N., Zaveri, R. A., and
Russell, L. M.: Hydrolysis of Organonitrate Functional Groups in Aerosol
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 1359–1369,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.716175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.716175</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Loza, C. L., Chan, A. W. H., Galloway, M. M., Keutsch, F. N., Flagan, R. C.,
and Seinfeld, J. H.: Characterization of Vapor Wall Loss in Laboratory
Chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5074–5078, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es100727v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es100727v</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Loza, C. L., Chhabra, P. S., Yee, L. D., Craven, J. S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemical aging of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene
secondary organic aerosol: laboratory chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 151–167, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-151-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-151-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Ren, X., Zhang, L., Van Duin, D. M., Cohen, R. C., Park, J.-H.,
Goldstein, A. H., Paulot, F., Beaver, M. R., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O.,
DiGangi, J. P., Henry, S. B., Keutsch, F. N., Park, C., Schade, G. W., Wolfe,
G. M., Thornton, J. A., and Brune, W. H.: Insights into hydroxyl measurements
and atmospheric oxidation in a California forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8009–8020, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8009-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8009-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Marley, N. A., Gaffney, J. S., Tackett, M., Sturchio, N. C., Heraty, L.,
Martinez, N., Hardy, K. D., Marchany-Rivera, A., Guilderson, T., MacMillan,
A., and Steelman, K.: The impact of biogenic carbon sources on aerosol
absorption in Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1537–1549,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1537-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1537-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Matsunaga, A.  and Ziemann, P. J.: Yields of beta-hydroxynitrates,
dihydroxynitrates, and trihydroxynitrates formed from OH radical-initiated
reactions of 2-methyl-1-alkenes, Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. USA, 107, 6664–6669,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910585107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910585107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>McLaren, R., Salmon, R. A., Liggio, J., Hayden, K. L., Anlauf, K. G., and
Leaitch, W. R.: Nighttime chemistry at a rural site in the Lower Fraser
Valley, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5837–5848, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.074</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>McNeill, V. F., Wolfe, G. M., and Thornton, J. A.: The Oxidation of Oleate
in Submicron Aqueous Salt Aerosols:? Evidence of a Surface Process, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 111, 1073–1083, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp066233f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp066233f</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Miller, B.: Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions and Mechanisms,
2nd Edn., Pearson/Prentice Hall, Lebanon, IN, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H.,
Kwan, A. J., McCabe, D. C., Wennberg, P. O., Sorooshian, A., Murphy, S. M.,
Dalleska, N. F., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of NOx level on
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from the photooxidation of
terpenes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5159–5174, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5159-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5159-2007</ext-link>,
2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene,
toluene, and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kwan, A. J., Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S.,
Sorooshian, A., Pye, H. O. T., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R.
C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from
reaction of isoprene with nitrate radicals (NO3), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
4117–4140, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4117-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4117-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Teng, A. P., Bates, K. H.,
Zhang, X., St. Clair, J. M., Brune, W. H., Tyndall, G. S., Keutsch, F. N.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Overview of the Focused Isoprene
eXperiment at the California Institute of Technology (FIXCIT): mechanistic
chamber studies on the oxidation of biogenic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 13531–13549, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13531-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13531-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol
Yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es950943+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es950943+</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Jungkamp, T. P. W., Griffin, R. J., Forstner, H. J. L., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Aromatics, reformulated gasoline, and atmospheric
organic aerosol formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1890–1897,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es960535l" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es960535l</ext-link>, 1997a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Jungkamp, T. P. W., Griffin, R. J., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: The atmospheric aerosol-forming potential of whole gasoline
vapor, Science, 276, 96–99, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.96" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.276.5309.96</ext-link>, 1997b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Orlando, J. J.  and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy
radical chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric
significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6294–6317, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CS35166H</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Ouchi, A., Liu, C., Kaneda, M., and Hyugano, T.: Photochemical C–C Bond
Formation between Alcohols and Olefins by an Environmentally Benign Radical
Reaction, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 3807–3816, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201300115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ejoc.201300115</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method
for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of
multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Pavia, D., Lampman, G., Kriz, G., and Vyvyan, J.: Introduction to
spectroscopy, Cengage Learning, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Greaves, J., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Identification of Organic Nitrates in the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
Radical Initiated Oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene by Atmospheric Pressure
Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
5887–5893, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es1005658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es1005658</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Perring, A. E., Wisthaler, A., Graus, M., Wooldridge, P. J., Lockwood, A. L.,
Mielke, L. H., Shepson, P. B., Hansel, A., and Cohen, R. C.: A product study
of the isoprene+<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4945–4956,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4945-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4945-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Presto, A. A.  and Donahue, N. M.: Investigation of alpha-pinene plus ozone
secondary organic aerosol formation at low total aerosol mass, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40, 3536–3543, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es052203z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052203z</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Presto, A. A., Huff Hartz, K. E., and Donahue, N. M.: Secondary Organic
Aerosol Production from Terpene Ozonolysis. 2. Effect of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
Concentration, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 7046–7054, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es050400s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es050400s</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global
modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Qi, L., Nakao, S., and Cocker III, D. R.: Aging of secondary organic
aerosol from alpha-pinene ozonolysis: Roles of hydroxyl and nitrate radicals,
J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 62, 1359–1369,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.712082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2012.712082</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Rastogi, N., Zhang, X. L., Edgerton, E. S., Ingall, E., and Weber, R. J.:
Filterable water-soluble organic nitrogen in fine particles over the
southeastern USA during summer, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6040–6047,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.045</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Rayez, M.-T., Rayez, J.-C., Kerdouci, J., and Picquet-Varrault, B.:
Theoretical Study of the Gas-Phase Reactions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radical with a Series
of trans-2-Unsaturated Aldehydes: From Acrolein to trans-2-Octenal, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 118, 5149–5155, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp503619d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp503619d</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Rindelaub, J. D., McAvey, K. M., and Shepson, P. B.: The photochemical
production of organic nitrates from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and loss via
acid-dependent particle phase hydrolysis, Atmos. Environ., 100, 193–201,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.010</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Rollins, A. W., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Fry, J. L., Brauers, T., Brown, S. S.,
Dorn, H.-P., Dubé, W. P., Fuchs, H., Mensah, A., Mentel, T. F., Rohrer, F.,
Tillmann, R., Wegener, R., Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: Isoprene
oxidation by nitrate radical: alkyl nitrate and secondary organic aerosol
yields, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6685–6703, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6685-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6685-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J.,
Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., and
Cohen, R. C.: Evidence for NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Control over Nighttime SOA Formation,
Science, 337, 1210–1212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1221520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1221520</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Rollins, A. W., Pusede, S., Wooldridge, P., Min, K. E., Gentner, D. R.,
Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., Rubitschun, C. L.,
Surratt, J. D., and Cohen, R. C.: Gas/particle partitioning of total alkyl
nitrates observed with TD-LIF in Bakersfield, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
6651–6662, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50522</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Russell, G. A.: Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl
Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals, J. Am. Cgem.
Soc., 79, 3871–3877, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01571a068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja01571a068</ext-link>, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Russell, M.  and Allen, D. T.: Predicting secondary organic aerosol
formation rates in southeast Texas, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D07S17,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004722</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Sato, K.: Detection of nitrooxypolyols in secondary organic aerosol formed
from the photooxidation of conjugated dienes under high-NOx conditions,
Atmos. Environ., 42, 6851–6861, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.010</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol
for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A):
tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-161-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., Bench, G., Fallon, S., McDade, C. E., Chow,
J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Fossil and contemporary fine particulate carbon
fractions at 12 rural and urban sites in the United States, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D02311, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008605</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Schröder, K., Junge, K., Spannenberg, A., and Beller, M.: Design of a
bio-inspired imidazole-based iron catalyst for epoxidation of olefins:
Mechanistic insights, Catalysis Today, 157, 364–370,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.04.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cattod.2010.04.034</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Slusher, D. L., Huey, L. G., Tanner, D. J., Flocke, F. M., and Roberts, J.
M.: A thermal dissociation–chemical ionization mass spectrometry (TD-CIMS)
technique for the simultaneous measurement of peroxyacyl nitrates and
dinitrogen pentoxide, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D19315,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004670</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Spittler, M., Barnes, I., Bejan, I., Brockmann, K. J., Benter, T., and
Wirtz, K.: Reactions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with limonene and alpha-pinene:
Product and SOA formation, Atmos. Environ., 40, S116–S127,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.093</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Williams, J., and Yokelson, R. J.:
Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop
residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 845–865,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-845-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Stolle, A., Ondruschka, B., and Hopf, H.: Thermal Rearrangements of
Monoterpenes and Monoterpenoids, Helvetica Chimica Acta, 92, 1673–1719,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hlca.200900041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hlca.200900041</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Suarez-Bertoa, R., Picquet-Varrault, B., Tamas, W., Pangui, E., and Doussin,
J. F.: Atmospheric Fate of a Series of Carbonyl Nitrates: Photolysis
Frequencies and OH-Oxidation Rate Constants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
12502–12509, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es302613x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302613x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst,
T. E., Edney, E. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of Acidity on Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
5363–5369, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0704176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0704176</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>Szmigielski, R., Vermeylen, R., Dommen, J., Metzger, A., Maenhaut, W.,
Baltensperger, U., and Claeys, M.: The acid effect in the formation of
2-methyltetrols from the photooxidation of isoprene in the presence of NOx,
Atmos. Res., 98, 183–189, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.02.012</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Thornton, J. A., Braban, C. F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis on
sub-micron organic aerosols: the effect of relative humidity, particle phase,
and particle size, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 4593–4603,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B307498F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B307498F</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Turrà, N., Neuenschwander, U., Baiker, A., Peeters, J., and Hermans, I.:
Mechanism of the Catalytic Deperoxidation of tert-Butylhydroperoxide with
Cobalt(II) Acetylacetonate, Chem.-Eur. J., 16, 13226–13235,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201000489" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/chem.201000489</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Vereecken, L.  and Peeters, J.: Nontraditional (Per)oxy Ring-Closure Paths
in the Atmospheric Oxidation of Isoprene and Monoterpenes, J. Phys. Chem. A,
108, 5197–5204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp049219g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp049219g</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Vereecken, L.  and Peeters, J.: A Theoretical Study of the OH-initiated
Gas-phase Oxidation Mechanism of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: First
Generation Products, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 14, 3802–3815,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2CP23711C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CP23711C</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Verma, V., Fang, T., Guo, H., King, L., Bates, J. T., Peltier, R. E.,
Edgerton, E., Russell, A. G., and Weber, R. J.: Reactive oxygen species
associated with water-soluble PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the southeastern United States:
spatiotemporal trends and source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
12915–12930, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12915-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12915-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Wängberg, I., Barnes, I., and Becker, K. H.: Product and Mechanistic
Study of the Reaction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 31, 2130–2135, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es960958n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es960958n</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Wayne, R. P., Barnes, I., Biggs, P., Burrows, J. P., Canosamas, C. E.,
Hjorth, J., Lebras, G., Moortgat, G. K., Perner, D., Poulet, G., Restelli,
G., and Sidebottom, H.: The nitrate radical – physics, chemistry, and the
atmosphere, Atmos. Environ. Part a, 25, 1–203,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(91)90192-a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(91)90192-a</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R. J., Sullivan, A. P., Peltier, R. E., Russell, A., Yan, B., Zheng,
M., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Brock, C., Holloway, J. S., Atlas, E. L., and
Edgerton, E.: A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the
anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D13302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11029/12007JD008408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.11029/12007JD008408</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>Xu, H., Wentworth, P. J., Howell, N. W., and Joens, J. A.: Temperature
Dependent Near-UV Molar Absorptivities of Aliphatic Aldehydes and Ketones in
Aqueous Solution, Spectrochim. Acta A, 49, 1171–1178,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0584-8539(93)80076-M" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0584-8539(93)80076-M</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Kollman, M. S., Song, C., Shilling, J. E., and Ng, N. L.: Effects of
NOx on the Volatility of Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Photooxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 2253–2262,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es404842g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es404842g</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial
and seasonal variation of aerosol composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7307–7336, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Guo, H., Boyd, C. M., Klein, M., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M.,
Hite, J. R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Kreisberg, N. M., Knote, C., Olson, K.,
Koss, A., Goldstein, A. H., Hering, S. V., de Gouw, J., Baumann, K., Lee,
S.-H., Nenes, A., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Effects of anthropogenic
emissions on aerosol formation from isoprene and monoterpenes in the
southeastern United States, Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. USA, 112, 37–42,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417609112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1417609112</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>Yeh, G. K.  and Ziemann, P. J.: Alkyl Nitrate Formation from the Reactions
of C8–C14 n-Alkanes with OH Radicals in the Presence of NOx: Measured Yields
with Essential Corrections for Gas–Wall Partitioning, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118,
8147–8157, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp500631v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp500631v</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Y., Ezell, M. J., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Alexander, L., Ortega, J.,
D'Anna, B., Harmon, C. W., Johnson, S. N., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.:
Photooxidation of alpha-pinene at high relative humidity in the presence of
increasing concentrations of NOx, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5044–5060,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.026</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Berkowitz, C. M., Brechtel, F. J., Gilles, M. K., Hubbe, J.
M., Jayne, J. T., Kleinman, L. I., Laskin, A., Madronich, S., Onasch, T. B.,
Pekour, M. S., Springston, S. R., Thornton, J. A., Tivanski, A. V., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Nighttime chemical evolution of aerosol and trace gases in a
power plant plume: Implications for secondary organic nitrate and
organosulfate aerosol formation, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical chemistry, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
heterogeneous hydrolysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D12304,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013250</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman, M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in
laboratory chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, Proc. Natl. Aca.
Sci USA, 111, 5802-5807, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1404727111</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Vapor wall deposition in Teflon chambers,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4197–4214, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Investigation of
Aqueous-Phase Photooxidation of Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal by Aerosol Chemical
Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Observation of Hydroxyhydroperoxide Formation,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6253–6263, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp211528d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp211528d</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, W., Flocke, F. M., Tyndall, G. S., Swanson, A., Orlando, J. J.,
Roberts, J. M., Huey, L. G., and Tanner, D. J.: Characterization of a thermal
decomposition chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the measurement of
peroxy acyl nitrates (PANs) in the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
6529–6547, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6529-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6529-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>Ziemann, P. J.  and Atkinson, R.: Kinetics, products, and mechanisms of
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6582–6605,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35122f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35122f</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
