<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-6867-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chlorine isotope composition in chlorofluorocarbons CFC-11, CFC-12
and CFC-113 in firn, stratospheric and tropospheric air</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Chlorine isotope composition in atmospheric CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. J. Allin et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Allin</surname><given-names>S. J.</given-names></name>
          <email>s.allin@uea.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Laube</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-5931</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Witrant</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kaiser</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-4043</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>McKenna</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dennis</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0307-4406</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mulvaney</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Capron</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0784-1884</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Martinerie</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-2296</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Röckmann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-8968</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Blunier</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-7747</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Schwander</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Fraser</surname><given-names>P. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Langenfelds</surname><given-names>R. L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sturges</surname><given-names>W. T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental
Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Grenoble Image Parole Signal Automatique, Université Joseph
Fourier/CNRS, Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council,
Cambridge, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>CNRS/Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38041, Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht
University, Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Centre for Ice and Climate, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Oceans and
Atmosphere Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organisation, Aspendale, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">S. J. Allin (s.allin@uea.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>6867</fpage><lpage>6877</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>03</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The stratospheric degradation of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) releases
chlorine, which is a major contributor to the destruction of stratospheric
ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A recent study reported strong chlorine isotope
fractionation during the breakdown of the most abundant CFC (CFC-12,
CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Laube et al., 2010a), similar to effects seen in nitrous
oxide (N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O). Using air archives to obtain a long-term record of chlorine
isotope ratios in CFCs could help to identify and quantify their sources and
sinks. We analyse the three most abundant CFCs and show that CFC-11
(CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F) and CFC-113 (CClF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F) exhibit significant
stratospheric chlorine isotope fractionation, in common with CFC-12. The
apparent isotope fractionation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mid- and
high-latitude stratospheric samples are respectively <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 (0.5) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 (0.4) ‰ for CFC-11,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.2 (1.6) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8 (0.8) ‰ for CFC-12 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.5 (1.5) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3 (1.2) ‰ for CFC-113, where the number in parentheses
is the numerical value of the standard uncertainty expressed in per mil. Assuming a constant isotope
composition of emissions, we calculate the expected trends in the
tropospheric isotope signature of these gases based on their stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl enrichment and stratosphere–troposphere exchange. We compare these
projections to the long-term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) trends of all three CFCs,
measured on background tropospheric samples from the Cape Grim air archive
(Tasmania, 1978–2010) and tropospheric firn air samples from Greenland
(North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling (NEEM) site) and Antarctica (Fletcher
Promontory site). From 1970 to the present day, projected trends agree with
tropospheric measurements, suggesting that within analytical uncertainties, a
constant average emission isotope delta (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a compatible scenario.
The measurement uncertainty is too high to determine whether the average
emission isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has been affected by changes in CFC manufacturing
processes or not. Our study increases the suite of trace gases amenable to
direct isotope ratio measurements in small air volumes (approximately
200 mL), using a single-detector gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
(GC–MS) system.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>CFC-11 (CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F), CFC-12 (CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFC-113
(CClF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F) are the most abundant chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in
the atmosphere (Table 1). They are very stable and are not flammable or
toxic, making them suitable as refrigerants, aerosol propellants and foam
blowing agents. Measurements performed on air from porous firn (the top part
of the polar ice sheet consisting of consolidated snow, progressively
transforming into ice) show that they were absent from the atmosphere before
the middle of the 20th century (e.g. Butler et al., 1999; Sturrock et al.,
2002; Buizert et al., 2012). This suggests that they have no natural sources.
CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 first appeared in the mid-1900s (Sturrock et al.,
2002; Martinerie et al., 2009), which coincides with the start of their
widespread anthropogenic production and consumption.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Key atmospheric characteristics of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Compound </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CFC-11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CFC-12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CFC-113</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>2009 mole fraction/pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">243</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">535</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Atmospheric lifetime/years</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">102</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ozone depletion potential (ODP)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NOAA/AGAGE mean values taken from Montzka et
al. (2011) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> data from SPARC (2013).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>Atmospheric removal occurs in the stratosphere, where sink processes are
dominated by photodissociation (Reaction R1) and reaction with O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D)
(Reaction R2), i.e.
<?xmltex \hack{\def\theequation{R\arabic{equation}}}?>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CCl</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CClF</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Cl</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CCl</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CClF</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ClO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Cl and ClO released in these reactions catalyse the destruction of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Molina and Rowland, 1974). Following the identification of a strong
decrease in O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over Antarctica (Farman et al., 1985), swift
international action worked to phase-out the production and consumption of
CFCs under the Montreal Protocol and its subsequent amendments.</p>
      <p>Measuring isotope ratios in atmospheric trace gases provides additional
information regarding their sources and sinks as well as the ways in which
they contribute to biogeochemical cycles (Brenninkmeijer et al., 2003;
Goldstein and Shaw, 2003). Long-term studies have investigated a range of
species, for example, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Etheridge et al., 1998), CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Francey
et al., 1999; Rubino et al., 2013) and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Röckmann et al., 2003;
Kaiser et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>Of particular relevance to this work is N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, a much-studied gas with
similar sinks and a comparable lifetime to CFC-12. Various studies have used
firn and ice core samples (Sowers et al., 2002; Röckmann et al., 2003;
Bernard et al., 2006; Ishijima et al., 2007) as well as direct atmospheric
samples (Yoshida and Toyoda, 2000; Kaiser et al., 2006) to investigate large-scale N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O isotope and abundance changes. Source inputs depleted in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O are thought to have caused the concurrent tropospheric
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O abundance increase and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O)
decrease over the last century, while sink processes enrich stratospheric
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in heavy isotopes (Röckmann et al., 2003). Altitude and
latitude dependence has also been observed, with the isotopic fractionation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing with altitude and as the sampling point moves
towards the equator (Kaiser et al., 2006). Firn air studies are limited in
their temporal resolution because diffusion processes smooth interannual and
seasonal variations. Direct atmospheric air samples have been used to study
these shorter-scale changes (Nevison et al., 2005, 2011; Röckmann and Levin,
2005; Park et al., 2012). The seasonality observed in
isotope and mole fraction measurements has not been fully explained, but a
potential contributor is the movement of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O-depleted air with a
correspondingly enriched isotopic composition from the stratosphere to the
surface (Park et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>In contrast to N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, CFCs, which are much less abundant, are poorly
characterised because very few studies have investigated their isotope
ratios. Redeker et al. (2007) measured tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) values
for 37 hydrocarbons and halocarbons, including CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113,
over the course of a year. They found no diurnal or seasonal trends outside
their analytical uncertainties. Zuiderweg et al. (2012) measured the stable
carbon isotope fractionation of CFC-11 and CFC-12 by simulating stratospheric
conditions during UV photolysis experiments. They found a fractionation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.0 ‰ for CFC-11, compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55.3 ‰ for CFC-12 (at 233 K). Zuiderweg et al. (2013) measured
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, CFC-12) on North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling (NEEM) firn air and reported a relative
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C enrichment of up to 80 ‰ from 1950 to the
present day.</p>
      <p>The only chlorine isotope ratio study of atmospheric CFCs measured the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) of CFC-12 in the tropical stratosphere (Laube et al.,
2010a). Enrichment with altitude, to a maximum of 27 ‰, was
attributed to sink reactions (Reactions R1 and R2) occurring more readily
with the lighter isotopologue. Assuming a Rayleigh-type fractionation
mechanism, the apparent stratospheric isotope fractionation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated to be
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.1 (1.7) ‰. Laube et al. (2010a) highlighted the large
effect of sink reactions on the isotopic composition of CFC-12 in the
stratosphere. It is expected that this will lead to a relative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl
enrichment of tropospheric CFC-12 with respect to the average source isotope
ratio through stratosphere–troposphere air exchange, similar to observations
made on other gases, such as CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (McCarthy et al., 2001), H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Batenburg et al., 2012) and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Röckmann et al., 2003).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Details of the samples used in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="128.037402pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sampling location</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sampling dates</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ca. year of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>origin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Further details</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Free tropospheric air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cape Grim,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Tasmania</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1978–2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1978–2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Sampling procedure previously reported (e.g Langenfelds et al., 1996)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropospheric firn air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fletcher Promontory,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Antarctica</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1970–2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Drilling and firn air pumping operations conducted by the British Antarctic Survey</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropospheric firn air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Northern Greenland</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">July 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1950–2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Drilling and firn air pumping operations during the NEEM field campaign</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stratospheric air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mid-latitude samples <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(48.1–53.4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">M55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> research aircraft, take off from Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stratospheric air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High-latitude samples <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(66.3–76.2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">M55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> research aircraft, take off from Kiruna, Sweden</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The strong stratospheric chlorine isotope fractionation of CFC-12 (Laube et
al., 2010a) and the substantial change inferred from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
measurements (Zuiderweg at al., 2013) motivated us to conduct a more
complete investigation of the chlorine isotope history of this species. This
type of study has the potential to better constrain global sources and sinks
(Röckmann et al., 2003). Here we use new measurements on stratospheric
samples to quantify the apparent stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl isotope
fractionation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of chlorine not only in CFC-12, but
also in CFC-11 and CFC-113. Alongside these values, stratosphere–troposphere
exchange estimates are used to predict the tropospheric chlorine isotope
history of these species. We then present new tropospheric measurements on
samples from the Cape Grim air archive, as well as firn air from NEEM and
Fletcher Promontory. These are compared to the model projections, leading to
an evaluation of long-term chlorine isotope ratio changes in the three most
abundant CFCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>Table 2 gives details of the samples used in this study (further details can
be found in Tables S5–S9 in the Supplement). Mid- and high-latitude
stratospheric air was collected on an M55 <italic>Geophysica</italic> research aircraft, as
part of the European Union's FP7 project RECONCILE (von Hobe et al., 2013).
Background tropospheric samples were sourced from Cape Grim (Tasmania) and
firn air was sampled at the NEEM field
campaign and Fletcher Promontory.</p>
      <p>Firn air was recovered from the NEEM ice core site in Greenland (NEEM
Community Members, 2013) and from the Fletcher Promontory ice core site in
Antarctica (Mulvaney et al., 2014). In each case, shallow ice core drills
progressively penetrated the firn column, stopping every few metres to allow
recovery of the firn air. The firn air extraction technique (Schwander et
al., 1993) uses a bladder inflated at the bottom of the borehole to seal off
ambient air from above. Gas pumps draw sample air from the firn surrounding
the lowest level of the borehole through continuous Dekabon tubes (internal
diameter 1/4 in.) passing through the bladder and its end caps, compressing
the air into sample flasks at the surface. An infrared analyser (LI-COR
LI-7000) continuously monitors the sample line CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and samples are only
taken when the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drops to a stable reading lower than modern ambient
levels, indicating that uncontaminated air is being extracted from the
borehole.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sample preparation and analysis</title>
      <p>A gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) system, designed to make high
precision measurements of pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> level compounds in small air
samples, was used for this work. A pre-concentration system with an Agilent
6890 GC was coupled to a VG/Waters EBE tri-sector mass spectrometer. Details
of previous work conducted using this system can be found in Laube et
al. (2010b) and Sturges et al. (2012).</p>
      <p>Magnesium perchlorate (Mg(ClO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to dry the air introduced
to the GC-MS system. Trace gases from 0.2 L (293 K, 1 bar) of air were
pre-concentrated on Hayesep D (80/100 mesh), which was cooled to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>78 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C by immersion in a dry ice/ethanol mixture. The sample was
then trapped on a 49 m GS-GasPro column (internal diameter 0.32 mm) at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 min. Heating to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
released the trapped compounds to the MS according to their retention
strength.</p>
      <p>The MS was operated in EI-SIR (electron impact-selected ion recording) mode
at a mass resolution of 1000. The fragment ions measured were
C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 101), C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>ClF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 103) and C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 105).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Data processing</title><?xmltex \hack{\def\theequation{\arabic{equation}}}?>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\setcounter{equation}{0}}?>In this study, isotope deltas (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, expressed in per mill (‰),
are used to denote the relative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl ratio difference of CFCs
in sample air with respect to a standard,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">standard</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl abundance ratio of a standard or
sample. There is no internationally recognised isotope standard for these
measurements. For this reason, all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in this study are
relative to a laboratory standard (AAL-071170). This is a background air
sample collected in 2006 at Niwot Ridge, Colorado, by the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).</p>
      <p>This study considers isotopologue current ratios of the CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
fragment, rather than directly measuring Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions. Equation (2)
describes how the C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 101),
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>ClF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 103) and C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 105) fragments can be used to calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl
isotope ratio from the CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F measurements,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ClF</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ClF</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the abundance of a given fragment. The
C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment was included in the analysis of 172 out of
448 samples. In all cases, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated using ratios derived from
Eq. (2) agreed within 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated directly
from C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>ClF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
(without the inclusion of the C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment). We use the
linear regression slope of the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>ClF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against the
C(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion current over the duration of the peak to derive
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and, based on this, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 1). Typically, two sample measurements
were made between standard runs, allowing instrumental drift to be quantified
and corrected for.</p>
      <p>No chromatographic interferences were found for these ions at the retention
times corresponding to CFC-11 and CFC-12. However, CFC-113a has grown to a
current atmospheric abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> since its
emergence in the 1960s (Laube et al., 2014) and partially co-elutes with
CFC-113. Interference from CFC-113a can be detected above the surrounding
noise in one sample. This peak was manually excluded from the linear
regression slope and a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value calculated using Eq. (1). Within
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, this value is the same as the original <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value calculated,
without removing the CFC-113a interference.</p>
      <p>Poor-quality measurements were defined as a measurement with an
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation (from repeat measurements) of more than
3 times the average standard deviation of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
during an analysis period. Less than 1 % of the measurements were
rejected as poor quality. Measurements were also rejected if there was
uncertainty regarding the integrity of the sample; small system leaks can be
identified through the analysis of other trace compounds (e.g. sulfur
hexafluoride, SF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two percent were excluded due to a suspected lack of
sample integrity.</p>
      <p>A static dilution series was prepared by diluting background air with
research-grade nitrogen. These samples were used to quantify the response
behaviour of the analytical system. Nonlinear isotope ratio responses were
found at small mole fractions and were corrected (details in the Supplement).
Ninety-nine percent of the measurements were unaffected by this nonlinearity and did
not have to be corrected. The smallest peaks measured for each species define
the effective detection limit for this study. One CFC-113 sample was below
this limit and rejected.</p>
      <p>The stratospheric samples were used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
each species. This was done by assuming a Rayleigh-type mechanism and
applying this linear relationship to the data (Kaiser et al., 2006):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the stratospheric and tropospheric mole
fractions, respectively.</p>
      <p>A statistical “bootstrap” analysis technique was used to determine
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and their uncertainties (Volk et al., 1997).
In this technique, a data pool is created by describing each sample with
three values (the measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value and this value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
bootstrap tool draws 500 random samplings from the complete stratospheric
data pool (including the possibility of drawing the same value repeatedly) to
produce an overall <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value and a robust associated
uncertainty range. Anomalous stratospheric samples were omitted using an
iterative least squares method, reducing the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
standard error in all cases. Any sample more than 2 times the standard
error of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate away from the linear regression of
the Rayleigh fractionation plot was removed. This process was repeated until
all data points fell within 2 times the standard error of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate. Of the measurements, 21 % (CFC-11), 10 % (CFC-12) and 7 %
(CFC-113) were rejected using this method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Emissions and transport modelling</title>
      <p>Following Kaiser (2002) and Röckmann et al. (2003), a two-box model of
the atmosphere is used to project the changing tropospheric isotope
signature. The following mass balance equations hold for the model
atmosphere, partitioned into a stratosphere (index S) and a
troposphere/lowermost stratosphere (index T), where chemical loss only occurs
in the stratosphere

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ST</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ST</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The symbols have the following meaning: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – amount of air (in mol), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> –
mole fraction (in mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – bulk air flux between troposphere and stratosphere and
vice versa (in mol a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – CFC flux from troposphere to
stratosphere (in mol a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ST</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – CFC flux from stratosphere
to troposphere (in mol a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – trace gas emissions (in
mol a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – trace gas loss (in mol a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – loss rate
coefficient (in a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The global average lifetime is calculated as the ratio of total burden and
total loss:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are taken from
Holton (1990), Trenberth and Guillemot (1994) and Appenzeller et al. (1996).
Using the tropospheric mole fraction history <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Velders and
Daniel, 2014) and an estimate of the global average lifetime <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Eqs. (4), (5) and (6) can be solved for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
practice, we adjust <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> so that the average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the years 1999 to
2008 equals the lifetime estimates as per SPARC (2013), and we use a fixed value
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all model years.</p>
      <p>To derive the corresponding isotope budget, we write Eqs. (4) and (5) for
another isotopologue (primed quantities):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which can be written in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> notation (relative to an arbitrary
reference material). We have <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Substituting this into Eq. (7) gives Eq. (8):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Together with Eq. (4) this gives the tropospheric isotope budget:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The equivalent equation for the stratosphere is

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the photochemical isotope fractionation is
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the loss rate coefficient for the isotope in the numerator of
the isotope ratio (here, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl).</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not known, so again following the analogue of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Röckmann et al., 2003), we use the observed apparent Rayleigh
isotope fractionation in the stratosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to
solve the isotope-specific part of the budget. Based on this apparent
Rayleigh isotope fractionation, the relative isotope ratio difference between
the stratosphere and the troposphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ST</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated
according to

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the apparent stratospheric isotope fractionation,
which is empirically determined for the years 1999 to 2008 (reflecting the
time of stratospheric sample collection and the age of stratospheric air). It
depends on both chemistry and transport (Kaiser et al., 2006), which may have
changed over the period of CFC emissions. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a model
parameter that is tuned to give <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
corresponding model years. It has no immediate physical interpretation and is
only meaningful in the context of the chosen two-box model. We adjust
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> so that the average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for the
years 1999 to 2008 equals our stratospheric observations and derive the
projected atmospheric history of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
Eqs. (10) and (12), assuming a constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value that results
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2006</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to the year our tropospheric
air standard was filled.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Rayleigh fractionation plots of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 chlorine
isotope signatures, derived from mid-latitude (black diamonds) and
high-latitude (orange triangles) stratospheric samples. Trend lines
correspond to apparent fractionations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 (0.5) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 (0.4) ‰ (CFC-11),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.2 (1.6) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8 (0.8) ‰ (CFC-12) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.5 (1.5) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3 (1.2) ‰ (CFC-113) for mid-
and high latitudes, respectively. The standard error of the gradient is
quoted for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The average repeatability for
individual samples was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 ‰ (CFC-11), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 ‰
(CFC-12) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 ‰ (CFC-113). 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation
error bars are shown and rejected measurements are not included.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6867/2015/acp-15-6867-2015-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Trace gas transport in firn</title>
      <p>The migration of gases from the atmosphere through firn is largely controlled
by diffusional and gravitational effects, such that less diffusive gases move
through the firn more slowly than more diffusive gases and heavier gases and
isotopologues are enriched at depth relative to lighter gases and
isotopologues. Consequently, there is no unique “age-of-air” at a given
depth in the firn, rather an age distribution is calculated for a specific
gas or isotopologue. Also, a gas can undergo significant isotope
fractionation during its movement through the firn. A model of gas transport
in firn must therefore include both diffusive transport and gravitational
separation to reconstruct changes in atmospheric abundances and isotope
ratios over time. These reconstructions have been accomplished here using the
model developed at the Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de
l'Environnement (LGGE) and Grenoble Image Parole Signal Automatique
(GISPA-lab). The physical basis of the model is described in Witrant et
al. (2012). The model has been further refined to provide a new and more
robust definition of the optimal solution, and a more rigorous treatment of
isotopes based on a forward firn model written in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(Witrant and Martinerie, 2013). The diffusive behaviour of gases is
initialised for each firn column by using a set of gases with well-known
atmospheric histories (Witrant et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>More details on the firn modelling are given in the Supplement. The dates
shown here for the firn data are based on median ages for each gas. The age
spectrum associated with these median ages is also discussed in the
Supplement. When plotting mole fractions and isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> against median
age, it is necessary to correct for gravitational and diffusive
fractionation. In the case of mole fractions, gravitational settling is
calculated as the difference between normal model runs and runs in which
gravity is set to zero. For within-firn isotope fractionation, a correction
(of 1–2 ‰) is calculated using the reconstructed scenario of the
gas mole fraction and assuming a constant atmospheric isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. After
these corrections, any discrepancies between projected and measured firn
isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflect changes in atmospheric isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over time.</p>
      <p>Thermal diffusion was not included in the model, despite an observed gradient
of 2 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the firn column at NEEM, due to recent local warming
in northwest Greenland (Carr et al., 2013). This is because although the
thermal diffusion effect on the CFC mole fractions is on the order of
0.2 % at NEEM, the effect on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) is estimated to be less
than 0.02 ‰ (Leuenberger and Lang, 2002).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Stratospheric data</title>
      <p>After outlier correction (Sect. 2.2), a total of 31 and 28 (CFC-11), 33 and
54 (CFC-12) and 36 and 54 (CFC-113) measurements remain, for samples
collected in the mid- and high-latitude stratosphere, respectively.</p>
      <p>Negative apparent isotope fractionations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been
calculated for all three species (Fig. 1). This indicates that sink reactions
discriminate against heavier isotopes, in other words, the heavier
isotopologue is broken down more slowly, causing the observed enrichment in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl. Trend lines in Fig. 1 correspond to apparent fractionations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 (0.5) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 (0.4) ‰ (CFC-11), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.2 (1.6) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8 (0.8) ‰ (CFC-12) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.5 (1.5) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3 (1.2) ‰ (CFC-113) for mid- and high latitudes,
respectively. As the sampling point moves from mid- to high latitudes, the
absolute CFC-12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value decreases. This effect is
qualitatively the same for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Kaiser et al., 2006). CFC-11 and CFC-113
both show mid- and high-latitude <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that are
indistinguishable within 1 standard deviation. It could be that the latitude
dependence seen in CFC-12 and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O also exists in these compounds, but is
obscured by the size of analytical uncertainties, compared to the relatively
small isotope changes being tracked.</p>
      <p>Laube et al. (2010a) calculated the tropical CFC-12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.1 (1.7) ‰, which agrees with the mid-latitude
value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.2 (1.5) ‰ presented here. Given the lower
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value calculated from high-latitude samples, a
difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at mid-latitudes and the
tropics might be expected. The relative difference between
mid-latitude/tropical and polar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much larger for
CFC-12 than for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Due to the similar atmospheric lifetimes of CFC-12
and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, this is unlikely to be due to dynamic effects as suggested for
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Kaiser et al., 2006) and is at present unexplained. In the absence
of globally representative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, we use the
mid-latitude values to project the tropospheric isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes over
time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Emissions and transport modelling</title>
      <p>Based on historical and predicted atmospheric mole fractions (Velders and
Daniel, 2014), our two-box approach estimates global emissions for CFC-11,
CFC-12 and CFC-113 from 1950 to 2050. Figure 2 shows good agreement between
these values and previously published estimates (Velders and Daniel, 2014).
The proliferation of CFC production and consumption caused an initial sharp
increase in emissions, followed by sustained high emissions during the 1970s
and 1980s. The Montreal Protocol and its subsequent amendments ensured a
significant reduction in CFC production, causing the concurrent decrease in
emissions of all three species at the end of the 1980s.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Emissions estimates for CFC-11 (blue), CFC-12 (green) and
CFC-113 (orange), based on global tropospheric mole fractions (SPARC, 2013).
Each species is represented by three lines. The two emissions estimates from
this study (solid lines) are produced using the stratosphere–troposphere
exchange flux calculations of Holton (1990) and Appenzeller et al. (1996),
with the latter giving slightly higher emissions. These are compared to
values from Velders and Daniel (2014) (dashed lines).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6867/2015/acp-15-6867-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) measurements, compared to model
predictions. Black diamonds (NEEM firn air), green diamonds (Fletcher
Promontory firn air) and red diamonds (Cape Grim air archive) represent the
tropospheric chlorine isotope history of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113. The
average repeatability for individual samples was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 ‰
(CFC-11), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 ‰ (CFC-12) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8 ‰ (CFC-113).
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation error bars are shown. Open symbols indicate
that the measurement was subject to a small correction, based on instrumental
nonlinearities (see Supplement). White trend lines represent model estimates
of the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) values. Two lines are
displayed per species, one for each stratosphere–troposphere exchange flux
estimate (Holton, 1990; Appenzeller et al., 1996). Blue (CFC-11), green
(CFC-12) and orange (CFC-113) shading indicates the model uncertainty
envelopes. These uncertainties are based on two independent sources of error:
(1) the 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values; (2) the
range of most likely lifetime values from SPARC (2013). All <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
are relative to an air sample collected in 2006 and the model output has been
adjusted so that it passes through 0 ‰ at 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6867/2015/acp-15-6867-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 3 shows how the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) of these three
compounds would have changed with time, assuming no source variations. From
their first release until the present day, tropospheric CFC-11, CFC-12 and
CFC-113 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) values are predicted to have increased by 1, 3 and
1 ‰, respectively. Maximum rates of increase are predicted to have
occurred since 1990, which coincide with the sharp reduction in CFC emissions
due to the introduction of legislation phasing out their production and
consumption (Montzka et al., 2011). A drop in the anthropogenic input means
that the existing atmospheric pool will become increasingly enriched, as
demonstrated by the predicted acceleration of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl)
increase after 1990.</p>
      <p>The shading in Fig. 3 represents the uncertainty envelope. Approximately
equal contributions to the uncertainty arise from (1) the differing
reference interfaces for stratosphere–troposphere exchange used by
Holton (1990) and Appenzeller et al. (1996), namely the 100 mbar and the
380 K isentrope, respectively; (2) the 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values; (3) the range of “most likely” lifetime
values from SPARC (2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Tropospheric data</title>
      <p>Using the GC-MS instrument discussed in this work, Laube et al. (2010a)
verified that their isotope ratio measurements were not biased by the
response behaviour of the analytical system. They measured CFC-12 to a
minimum of 77 pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The present study covers a wider range of
CFC-12 mole fractions and also includes CFC-11 and CFC-113, meaning that a
more extensive effort was necessary to remove the possibility of a bias in
this work (details in the Supplement).</p>
      <p>From three independent data sets, a total of 44 (CFC-11), 74 (CFC-12) and 48
(CFC-113) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) measurements are presented, covering the last
60, 50 and 45 years, respectively (Fig. 3). In general, there is good
agreement between the Cape Grim and firn air measurements. This agreement is
in line with expectations from these well-mixed gases. The predicted trends
for all three species are small (Fig. 3), with the largest isotope changes
expected to have occurred in the last 2 decades. From 1970 to the
present day, the projected changes can be accounted for within analytical
uncertainties (Fig. 3). This means that for these three CFCs, our observations
are consistent with an isotopically invariant source signature, but the high
measurement uncertainty does not allow us to preclude the possibility that it
has changed over time. Despite the noted parallels in atmospheric chemical
behaviour between CFC-12 and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, their atmospheric isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
histories differ because N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O has been present in the atmosphere for at
least 800 000 years longer than CFC-12 (Spahni et al., 2005; Schilt et al.,
2010). When anthropogenic emissions began, atmospheric N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O isotope
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were perturbed from a near steady-state source-sink system, whereas
the industrial release of CFC-12 was not preceded by any atmospheric burden.
This has caused <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)
to decrease over the last century (Röckmann et al., 2003), while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl, CFC-12) is predicted to have increased slightly (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>Before 1970, there were two (CFC-11), one (CFC-12) and two (CFC-113) measurements
between 5 and 10 ‰ higher than expected, which could represent
source <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) changes. Emissions of these gases earlier in the
record represent a larger proportion of the total atmospheric load, meaning
that our measurements are more sensitive to source <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) changes
at this time. As the oldest samples, these five measurements contain the lowest
CFC mole fractions, producing higher-than-average analytical uncertainties.
Also, a small correction was applied to four of them, introducing an additional
error (details in the Supplement). The limited number and precision of these
measurements make it premature at this stage to report a source <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) change in these gases.</p>
      <p>Zuiderweg et al. (2013) describe how the manufacturing processes used to
synthesise chlorofluorocarbons have altered through industrial advances in
the 20th century. The most significant change occurred in the production of
the main feedstock (CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Traditionally it was synthesised through the
chlorination of CS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but in the last 50 years CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been used in
this chlorination. Zuiderweg et al. (2013) cite these methodological changes
as the most likely cause of the significant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C enrichment of CFC-12,
but there is no direct evidence to confirm that changes in production
processes have changed the isotope signature of the resultant CFCs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Samples from the Cape Grim air archive (Tasmania, 1978–2010) and firn air
samples from NEEM (Greenland) and Fletcher Promontory (Antarctica) have been
used to infer an atmospheric history of chlorine isotopes in the three most
abundant CFCs. These measurements cover the last 60 (CFC-11), 50 (CFC-12) and
45 (CFC-113) years. All three species are isotopically enriched in the
stratosphere by destruction processes, leading to negative apparent isotope
fractionations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This measured stratospheric
isotope dependence and an assumed constant source <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) were
used to reconstruct the long-term changes in their tropospheric isotope
signatures. The predicted trends are small due to the long atmospheric
lifetimes of the species and can largely be accounted for in our tropospheric
measurements, although the high measurement uncertainty does not allow us to
preclude the possibility that the average emission isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has changed
over time. Across all species, five pre-1970 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) values are
higher than predicted. A source <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) change could explain this
offset, but at present the available data are too limited in number and
precision to confirm this.</p>
      <p>Laube et al. (2010a) suggested that a more complete understanding of CFC-12
chlorine isotope changes could lead to better O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery predictions
and the identification of individual sources from their isotope signatures.
Given the significant CFC-12 carbon isotope changes reported by Zuiderweg et
al. (2013), it seemed likely that a characterisation of CFC chlorine isotopes
would help to achieve these goals. However, this study reveals only small
long-term changes, with current analytical precisions not allowing for such
an analysis. Measuring CFCs at their point of release (e.g. old refrigeration
units) and improving measurement precision would help confirm whether there
have been any source-driven chlorine isotope changes.</p>
      <p>The instrument used in this work has the capacity to measure chlorine
isotope ratios in other trace gases (e.g. CFC-115). Also, less abundant
fragment ions can be measured (e.g. fragments containing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C),
extending this pool of isotopic information to stable carbon isotopes.
Finally, the high sensitivity of this instrument opens up the possibility of
isotopically analysing the small air samples extracted from ice cores.
Therefore, gases with both anthropogenic and natural sources can be
investigated (e.g. carbonyl sulfide and methyl chloride).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6867-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-6867-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the UK Natural Environment Research Council (grant nos.
NE/K500896/1, NE/F015585/1 &amp; NE/I021918/1, the National Centre for
Atmospheric Science) and the European Commission (INFRA-2011-1.1.11-284274)
for funding. We thank the staff at the Cape Grim station and at CSIRO GASLAB
Aspendale for collecting and maintaining the Cape Grim air archive and
preparing the UEA flasks and sub-samples. We also acknowledge CSIRO and the
Bureau of Meteorology for funding these activities. NEEM is directed and
organised by the Centre for Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute and
US NSF, Office of Polar Programs. It is supported by funding agencies and
institutions in Belgium (FNRS-CFB and FWO), Canada (GSC), China (CAS),
Denmark (FIST), France (IPEV, CNRS/INSU, CEA and ANR), Germany (AWI), Iceland
(RannIs), Japan (NIPR), Korea (KOPRI), the Netherlands (NWO/ALW), Sweden
(VR), Switzerland (SNF), United Kingdom (NERC) and the USA (US NSF, Office of
Polar Programs). The <italic>Geophysica</italic> flights from Oberpfaffenhofen were funded by
ESA under the PremieEx project and by Forschungszentrum Jülich. The
Fletcher air pumping campaign was made possible with the support of BAS
operations and logistics and funded by the Natural Environment Research
Council. The <italic>Geophysica</italic> flights from Kiruna were funded by the European Commission as part of
the FP7 project RECONCILE (grant no. RECONCILE-226365-FP7-ENV-2008-1).
Air sampling during these campaigns was funded by the Dutch Science
Foundation (NWO, grant no. 865.07.001). In addition we are grateful for
contributions from Michel Bolder and the Geophysica team (sample collection
and campaign organisation).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
J. B. Burkholder</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Appenzeller, C., Holton, J. R., and Rosenlof, K. H.: Seasonal variation of
mass transport across the tropopause, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 15071–15078,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD00821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD00821</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Batenburg, A. M., Schuck, T. J., Baker, A. K., Zahn, A., Brenninkmeijer, C.
A. M., and Röckmann, T.: The stable isotopic composition of molecular
hydrogen in the tropopause region probed by the CARIBIC aircraft, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 4633–4646, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4633-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4633-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bernard, S., Röckmann, T., Kaiser, J., Barnola, J.-M., Fischer, H.,
Blunier, T., and Chappellaz, J.: Constraints on N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O budget changes since
pre-industrial time from new firn air and ice core isotope measurements,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 493–503, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-493-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-493-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Janssen, C., Kaiser, J., Röckmann, T., Rhee,
T. S., and Assonov, S. S.: Isotope effects in the chemistry of atmospheric
trace gases, Chem. Rev., 103, 5125–5162, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr020644k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr020644k</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Buizert, C., Martinerie, P., Petrenko, V. V., Severinghaus, J. P., Trudinger,
C. M., Witrant, E., Rosen, J. L., Orsi, A. J., Rubino, M., Etheridge, D. M.,
Steele, L. P., Hogan, C., Laube, J. C., Sturges, W. T., Levchenko, V. A.,
Smith, A. M., Levin, I., Conway, T. J., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M.,
Kawamura, K., Jenk, T. M., White, J. W. C., Sowers, T., Schwander, J., and
Blunier, T.: Gas transport in firn: multiple-tracer characterisation and
model intercomparison for NEEM, Northern Greenland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
4259–4277, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4259-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4259-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Butler, J. H., Battle, M., Bender, M. L., Monzka, S. A., Clarke, A. D.,
Saltzman, E. S., Sucher, C. M., Severinghaus, J. P., and Elkins, J. W.: A
record of atmospheric halocarbons during the twentieth century from polar
firn air, Nature, 399, 749–755, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/21586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/21586</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Carr, J. R., Vieli, A., and Stokes, C.: Influence of sea ice decline,
atmospheric warming, and glacier width on marine-terminating outlet glacier
behavior in northwest Greenland at seasonal to interannual timescales, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118, 1210–1226, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrf.20088</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Etheridge, D. M., Steele, L. P., Francey, R. J., and Langenfelds, R. L.:
Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: Evidence of anthropogenic
emissions and climatic variability, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 15979–15993,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JD00923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD00923</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., and Shanklin, J. D.: Large losses of total
ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> interaction, Nature,
315, 207–210, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/315207a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/315207a0</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Francey, R. J., Allison, C. E., Etheridge, D. M., Trudinger, C. M., Enting,
I. G., Leuenberger, M., Langenfelds, R. L., Michel, E., and Steele, L. P.: A
1000-year high precision record of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Tellus B, 51, 170–193, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-1-00005.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-1-00005.x</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Goldstein, A. H. and Shaw, S. L.: Isotopes of volatile organic compounds: an
emerging approach for studying atmospheric budgets and chemistry, Chem. Rev.,
103, 5025–5048, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr0206566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr0206566</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Holton, J. R.: On the global exchange of mass between the stratosphere and
troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 392–395,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047&lt;0392:OTGEOM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047&lt;0392:OTGEOM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ishijima, K., Sugawara, S., Kawamura, K., Hashida, G., Morimoto, S.,
Murayama, S., Aoki, S., and Nakazawa, T.: Temporal variations of the
atmospheric nitrous oxide concentration and its <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O for the latter half of the 20th century reconstructed from
firn air analyses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D03305,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007208</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J.: Stable isotope investigations of atmospheric nitrous oxide,
available at:
<uri>http://archimed.uni-mainz.de/pub/2003/0004/</uri> (last access: 4 June 2015), PhD thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J., Engel, A., Borchers, R., and Röckmann, T.: Probing stratospheric
transport and chemistry with new balloon and aircraft observations of the
meridional and vertical N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O isotope distribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3535–3556, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3535-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3535-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Langenfelds, R. J., Fraser, P. J., Francey, R. J., Steele, L. P., Porter, L.
W., and Allison, C. E.: The Cape Grim air archive: The first seventeen years,
in: Baseline 94–95, edited by: Francey, R. J., Dick, A. L., and Derek, N.,
53–70, Bur. Meteorol. and CSIRO Atmos. Res., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Laube, J. C., Kaiser, J., Sturges, W. T., Bönisch, H., and Engel, A.:
Chlorine Isotope Fractionation in the Stratosphere, Science, 329, 1167,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1191809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1191809</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Laube, J. C., Martinerie, P., Witrant, E., Blunier, T., Schwander, J.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Schuck, T. J., Bolder, M., Röckmann, T., van
der Veen, C., Bönisch, H., Engel, A., Mills, G. P., Newland, M. J., Oram,
D. E., Reeves, C. E., and Sturges, W. T.: Accelerating growth of HFC-227ea
(1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane) in the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
5903–5910, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5903-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5903-2010</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Laube, J. C., Newland, M. J., Hogan, C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Fraser, P.
J., Martinerie, P., Oram, D. E., Reeves, C. E., Röckmann, T., Schwander,
J., Witrant, E., and Sturges, W. T.: Newly detected ozone-depleting
substances in the atmosphere, Nat. Geosci., 7, 266–269,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2109</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Leuenberger, M. and Lang, C.: Thermal diffusion: An important aspect in
studies of static air columns such as firn air, sand dunes, and soil air, in:
Isotope aided studies of atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases – Phase II, IAEA, Vienna, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Martinerie, P., Nourtier-Mazauric, E., Barnola, J.-M., Sturges, W. T.,
Worton, D. R., Atlas, E., Gohar, L. K., Shine, K. P., and Brasseur, G. P.:
Long-lived halocarbon trends and budgets from atmospheric chemistry modelling
constrained with measurements in polar firn, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
3911–3934, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3911-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3911-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy, M. C., Connell, P., and Boering, K. A.: Isotopic fractionation of
methane in the stratosphere and its effect on free tropospheric isotopic
compositions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3657–3660, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013159</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Molina, M. J. and Rowland, F. S.: Stratospheric sink for
chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atomc-atalysed destruction of ozone, Nature,
249, 810–812, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/249810a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/249810a0</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Montzka, S. A., Reimann, S., Engel, A., Krueger, K., O'Doherty, S., and
Sturges, W. T.: Ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) and related chemicals, in:
Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, Chapter 1, World Meteorological
Organization, Geneva, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Mulvaney, R., Triest, J., and Alemany, O.: The James Ross Island and the
Fletcher Promontory ice-core drilling projects, Ann. Glaciol., 55, 179–188,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG68A044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014AoG68A044</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>NEEM Community Members: Eemian interglacial reconstructed from a Greenland
folded ice core, Nature, 493, 489–494, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11789</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Nevison, C. D., Keeling, R. F., Weiss, R. F., Popp, B. N., Fraser, P. J.,
Porter, L. W., and Hess, P. G.: Southern Ocean ventilation inferred from
seasonal cycles of atmospheric N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at Cape Grim,
Tasmania, Tellus B, 57, 218–229, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00143.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00143.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Nevison, C. D., Dlugokencky, E., Dutton, G., Elkins, J. W., Fraser, P., Hall,
B., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Steele,
L. P., and Weiss, R. F.: Exploring causes of interannual variability in the
seasonal cycles of tropospheric nitrous oxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
3713–3730, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3713-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3713-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Park, S., Croteau, P., Boering, K. A., Etheridge, D. M., Ferretti, D.,
Fraser, P. J., Kim, K. R., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., van Ommen, T.
D., Steele, L. P., and Trudinger, C. M.: Trends and seasonal cycles in the
isotopic composition of nitrous oxide since 1940, Nat. Geosci., 5, 261–265,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1421" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1421</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Redeker, K. R., Davis, S., and Kalin, R. M.: Isotope values of atmospheric
halocarbons and hydrocarbons from Irish urban, rural, and marine locations,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007784</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Röckmann, T. and Levin, I.: High-precision determination of the changing
isotopic composition of atmospheric N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O from 1990–2002, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D21304, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006066</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Röckmann, T., Kaiser, J., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: The isotopic
fingerprint of the pre-industrial and the anthropogenic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O source, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 3, 315–323, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-315-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-315-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Rubino, M., Etheridge, D. M., Trudinger, C. M., Allison, C. E., Battle, M.
O., Langenfelds, R. L., Steele, L. P., Curran, M., Bender, M., White, J. W.
C., Jenk, T. M., Blunier, T., and Francey, R. J.: A revised 1000 year
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> record from Law Dome and South Pole,
Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 8482–8499, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50668" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50668</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Schilt, A., Baumgartner, M., Blunier, T., Schwander, J., Spahni, R., Fischer,
H., and Stocker, T. F.: Glacial–interglacial and millennial-scale variations
in the atmospheric nitrous oxide concentration during the last 800,000 years,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 182–192, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.03.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.03.011</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Schwander, J., Barnola, J. M., Andrie, C., Leuenberger, M., Ludin, A.,
Raynaud, D., and Stauffer, B.: The age of the air in the firn and the ice at
Summit, Greenland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 2831–2838,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/92JD02383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD02383</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Sowers, T., Rodebaugh, A., Yoshida, N., and Toyoda, S.: Extending records of
the isotopic composition of the atmospheric N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O back to 1800 AD from air
trapped in snow at the South Pole and the Greenland Ice Sheet Project II ice
core, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1129, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GB001911</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Spahni, R., Chappellaz, J., Stocker, T. F., Loulergue, L., Hausammann, G.,
Kawamura, K., Flückiger, J., Schwander, J., Raynaud, D., Masson-Delmotte,
V., and Jouzel, J.: Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide of the late
pleistocene from Antarctic ice cores, Science, 310, 1317–1321,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1120132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1120132</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
SPARC: Report on the lifetimes of stratospheric ozone-depleting substances,
their replacements, and related species, edited by: Ko, M., Newman, P.,
Reimann, S., and Strahan, S., SPARC Report No. 6, WCRP-15, Zurich,
Switzerland, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Sturges, W. T., Oram, D. E., Laube, J. C., Reeves, C. E., Newland, M. J.,
Hogan, C., Martinerie, P., Witrant, E., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Schuck, T.
J., and Fraser, P. J.: Emissions halted of the potent greenhouse gas
SF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3653–3658,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3653-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3653-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Sturrock, G. A., Etheridge, D. M., Trudinger, C. M., Fraser, P. J., and
Smith, A. M.: Atmospheric histories of halocarbons from analysis of Antarctic
firn air: Major Montreal Protocol species, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
4765, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002548</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E. and Guillemot, C. J.: The total mass of the atmosphere, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 23079–23088, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JD02043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD02043</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Velders, G. J. M. and Daniel, J. S.: Uncertainty analysis of projections of
ozone-depleting substances: mixing ratios, EESC, ODPs, and GWPs, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 2757–2776, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2757-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2757-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Volk, C. M., Elkins, J. W., Fahey, D. W., Sutton, G. S., Gilligan, J. M.,
Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R., Chan, K. R., and Gunson, M. R.: Evaluation
of source gas lifetimes from stratospheric observations, J. Geophys. Res.,
102, 25543–25564, 1997.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>von Hobe, M., Bekki, S., Borrmann, S., Cairo, F., D'Amato, F., Di
Donfrancesco, G., Dörnbrack, A., Ebersoldt, A., Ebert, M., Emde, C., Engel,
I., Ern, M., Frey, W., Genco, S., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Gulde,
T., Günther, G., Hösen, E., Hoffmann, L., Homonnai, V., Hoyle, C. R.,
Isaksen, I. S. A., Jackson, D. R., Jánosi, I. M., Jones, R. L., Kandler, K.,
Kalicinsky, C., Keil, A., Khaykin, S. M., Khosrawi, F., Kivi, R.,
Kuttippurath, J., Laube, J. C., Lefèvre, F., Lehmann, R., Ludmann, S., Luo,
B. P., Marchand, M., Meyer, J., Mitev, V., Molleker, S., Müller, R., Oelhaf,
H., Olschewski, F., Orsolini, Y., Peter, T., Pfeilsticker, K., Piesch, C.,
Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., Pope, F. D., Ravegnani, F., Rex, M., Riese, M.,
Röckmann, T., Rognerud, B., Roiger, A., Rolf, C., Santee, M. L., Scheibe,
M., Schiller, C., Schlager, H., Siciliani de Cumis, M., Sitnikov, N.,
Søvde, O. A., Spang, R., Spelten, N., Stordal, F., Sumińska-Ebersoldt,
O., Ulanovski, A., Ungermann, J., Viciani, S., Volk, C. M., vom Scheidt, M.,
von der Gathen, P., Walker, K., Wegner, T., Weigel, R., Weinbruch, S.,
Wetzel, G., Wienhold, F. G., Wohltmann, I., Woiwode, W., Young, I. A. K.,
Yushkov, V., Zobrist, B., and Stroh, F.: Reconciliation of essential process
parameters for an enhanced predictability of Arctic stratospheric ozone loss
and its climate interactions (RECONCILE): activities and results, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 9233–9268, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9233-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9233-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Witrant, E. and Martinerie, P.: Input Estimation from Sparse Measurements in
LPV Systems and Isotopic Ratios in Polar Firns, in: Proc. of the IFAC Joint
Symposium on SSSC, TDS and FDA, 659–664, The International Federation of
Automatic Control, Grenoble, France, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3182/20130204-3-FR-2033.00201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3182/20130204-3-FR-2033.00201</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Witrant, E., Martinerie, P., Hogan, C., Laube, J. C., Kawamura, K., Capron,
E., Montzka, S. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etheridge, D., Blunier, T., and
Sturges, W. T.: A new multi-gas constrained model of trace gas
non-homogeneous transport in firn: evaluation and behaviour at eleven polar
sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11465–11483, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11465-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11465-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Yoshida, N. and Toyoda, S.: Constraining the atmospheric N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O budget from
intramolecular site preference in N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O isotopomers, Nature, 405,
330–334, 6784, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35012558" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35012558</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Zuiderweg, A., Kaiser, J., Laube, J. C., Röckmann, T., and Holzinger, R.:
Stable carbon isotope fractionation in the UV photolysis of CFC-11 and
CFC-12, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4379–4385, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4379-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4379-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Zuiderweg, A., Holzinger, R., Martinerie, P., Schneider, R., Kaiser, J.,
Witrant, E., Etheridge, D., Petrenko, V., Blunier, T., and Röckmann, T.:
Extreme <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C depletion of CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in firn air samples from NEEM,
Greenland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 599–609, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-599-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-599-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
