<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-6455-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Survival and ice nucleation activity of bacteria as aerosols in a
cloud simulation chamber</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Survival and ice nucleation activity of bacteria}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~Amato et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Amato</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          <email>pierre.amato@univ-bpclermont.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Joly</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7060-9618</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Schaupp</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Attard</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Möhler</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-9814</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Morris</surname><given-names>C. E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9135-1812</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Brunet</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Delort</surname><given-names>A.-M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CNRS, UMR 6296, ICCF, BP 80026, 63171 Aubière, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Clermont University, Blaise Pascal University, Institute of Chemistry of Clermont-Ferrand (ICCF), BP 10448,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Clermont University, Blaise Pascal University, Observatory of Physics of the Globe of Clermont-Ferrand (OPGC), Laboratory of Physical Meteorology (LaMP), BP 10448, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>CNRS, UMR 6016, LaMP/OPGC, BP 80026, 63171 Aubière, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>INRA, UR 407 Plant Pathology Research Unit, 84143 Montfavet, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>INRA, UMR 1391, ISPA, CS 20032, F-33882 Villenave d'Ornon CEDEX, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>*</label><institution>now at: Equipe Environnement et Microbiologie, UMR CNRS-IPREM 5254, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, IBEAS, BP 1155, 64013 Pau CEDEX, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">P. Amato (pierre.amato@univ-bpclermont.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>6455</fpage><lpage>6465</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The residence time of bacterial cells in the atmosphere is predictable by
numerical models. However, estimations of their aerial dispersion as living
entities are limited by a lack of information concerning survival rates and
behavior in relation to atmospheric water. Here we investigate the viability
and ice nucleation (IN) activity of typical atmospheric ice nucleation
active bacteria (<italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic>) when airborne in a cloud simulation chamber (AIDA,
Karlsruhe, Germany). Cell suspensions were sprayed into the chamber and
aerosol samples were collected by impingement at designated times over a
total duration of up to 18 h, and at some occasions after dissipation of
a cloud formed by depressurization. Aerosol concentration was monitored
simultaneously by online instruments. The cultivability of airborne cells
decreased exponentially over time with a half-life time of 250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 min (about 3.5 to 4.5 h). In contrast, IN activity remained unchanged
for several hours after aerosolization, demonstrating that IN activity was
maintained after cell death. Interestingly, the relative abundance of IN
active cells still airborne in the chamber was strongly decreased after
cloud formation and dissipation. This illustrates the preferential
precipitation of IN active cells by wet processes. Our results indicate that
from 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cells aerosolized from a surface, one would survive the
average duration of its atmospheric journey estimated at 3.4 days.
Statistically, this corresponds to the emission of 1 cell that achieves
dissemination every <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33 min m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
cultivated crops fields, a strong source of airborne bacteria. Based on the
observed survival rates, depending on wind speed, the trajectory endpoint
could be situated several hundreds to thousands of kilometers from the
emission source. These results should improve the representation of the
aerial dissemination of bacteria in numeric models.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Microorganisms are known to be dispersed into the atmosphere and
disseminated over long distances (e.g., Bovallius et al., 1978; Brodie et
al., 2007; Griffin et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2013, and review by Morris et
al., 2013). This has obvious implications for human, animal and plant
epidemiology as well as microbial ecology (Monteil et al., 2014; Morris et
al., 2007, 2008; Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2013). Moreover, some particular
bacteria notably found in the atmosphere and clouds can induce heterogeneous
ice formation (Cochet and Widehem, 2000; Joly et al., 2013; Lindemann et
al., 1982), which probably affects cloud physics and potentially triggers
precipitation (Möhler et al., 2007). All of these aspects motivated the
development of numerical models intended to describe and predict the aerial
dispersion of microorganisms. For instance, Burrows et al. (2009a, b)
constrained a general atmospheric circulation model using data from the
literature and estimates of concentrations and vertical fluxes of airborne
microorganisms. They estimated that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bacteria are
emitted into the atmosphere each year at the global scale, with a residence
time aloft between 2 and 10 days (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 days on average)
depending on emission sources and on meteorological conditions. Such a time
span should allow microbial cells (i.e. particles of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to travel over hundreds or thousands of kilometers. However, it is not
clear what fraction of the aerosolized microorganisms survive over this timescale, and if they maintain properties allowing interactions with
atmospheric water.</p>
      <p>Most studies aiming at predicting the death rate of airborne bacteria were
carried out in the late 1960's and early 70's, with particular emphasis on
the influence of temperature and relative humidity (Cox and Goldberg, 1972;
Ehrlich et al., 1970; Lighthart, 1973; Wright et al., 1969). The ability of
bacteria to survive as aerosols and the influence of abiotic parameters on
survival were shown to strongly depend on the microorganism (Marthi et al.,
1990). In experiments at constant temperature ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
to 49 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the survival rate of <italic>Mycoplasma</italic> <italic>pneumoniae</italic>, <italic>Serratia marcescens</italic> and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> decreased with increasing
temperature, while this had little or no effect on the survival of <italic>Bacillus subtilis </italic>(Ehrlich
et al., 1970; Wright et al., 1969). The highest survival rates were
invariably observed at extreme low and high levels of humidity (Cox and
Goldberg, 1972; Wright et al., 1969). Finally, carbon monoxide concentration
was shown to have variable impacts on the viability of airborne bacteria,
with protective or deleterious effects depending on humidity and on the
species (Lighthart, 1973). Lighthart (1989) compiled these data and others
to build statistical models describing the death rate of airborne bacteria
based on aerosol age, temperature, Gram reaction and humidity. Survival rate
was resolved by aerosol age, i.e. time after aerosolization, at more than
90 %.</p>
      <p>In a scientific context motivated by interrogations about cloud-microbes
interactions, we studied bacteria originating from atmospheric samples and
selected for their relevance to atmospheric questions, <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic>. Indeed, these
bacteria are among the most frequent species recovered from natural clouds
(Vaïtilingom et al., 2012), some strains are known plant pathogens
(Berge et al., 2014) and some, including those investigated here, are ice
nucleation (IN) active and have potential impacts on cloud microphysics and
precipitation (e.g., Attard et al., 2012; Cochet and Widehem, 2000; Joly et
al., 2013; Möhler et al., 2007; Sands et al., 1982). IN active bacteria
were shown earlier to induce the formation of ice crystals within simulated
clouds (Maki and Willoughby, 1978; Möhler et al., 2008). Here we aimed
at examining the survival and IN activity of such typical bacterial aerosols
in the atmosphere, using the AIDA (Aerosol Interactions and Dynamics in the
Atmosphere) cloud chamber. Cell suspensions were sprayed in the chamber and
the concentrations of airborne micron-sized particles, total and cultivable
cells and ice nucleating particles (INP) were measured over time for up to
several hours after aerosolization. The influence of cloud formation, and
the presence of sulfates as surrogates for the presence of anthropogenic
aerosols were briefly approached and seemed to deeply alter cell survival
and IN activity. The data presented could be used for improving the
parameterization of numerical models describing the atmospheric dispersion
of bacteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Experimental setup and particle concentration measurements</title>
      <p>The AIDA 84-m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> chamber at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology was
used in this study both as a static aerosol chamber in order to store and
age the bacterial cell aerosols, and as an expansion cloud chamber in order
to simulate cloud activation events and investigate the impact of fresh and
aged IN active bacterial aerosols on cloud microphysics. The experiments
were conducted during the BIO06 campaign in May 2011. Cell suspensions (see
Sect. 2.2) were sprayed into the chamber at the beginning of the
experiments. The initial relative humidity inside the chamber was around
90 to 95 % with respect to ice, thus the sprayed droplets quickly
evaporated upon entering the chamber. The dried bacterial cell aerosols were
then aged for up to 18 h at the given chamber pressure, temperature and
relative humidity, as summarized in Table 1. Aerosol samples were
collected (see Sect. 2.3) during this step of aerosol ageing in
order to measure the airborne concentrations of total cells, the cultivable
cell number fraction (Sect. 2.4), and the IN activity of the
material collected (Sect. 2.5). Samples were systematically taken
30 min after spraying, and also after 120 min (2 h), 300 min (5 h), 420 min
(7 h), 1020 min (17 h), and 1080 min (18 h).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Detailed cell concentrations and cultivability for the
different experiments carried out in the chamber, expressed as the mean of
triplicate analyses <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error from the mean whenever available.
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Exp #</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AIDA BIO-06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Strain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col6" align="center">Initial characteristics<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Time after</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Initial temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col12" align="center">Airborne in the cloud chamber<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exp #</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">% cultivable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">spraying</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">and conditions</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">% cultivable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(min)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">of experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">684 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3522 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">515 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 316 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">123 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">530 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1091 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 169</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">206 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">173</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">279 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 232</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">328 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">118 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 13b-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">474 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">694 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 172</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">147 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">216</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">382 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">314 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 13b-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">474 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">694 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 172</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">147 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">204</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">448 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">217 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">49 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CGina-01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">217 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1339 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">616 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 108 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">269</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">361 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">249 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">491 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13591 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13980</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2770 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2884 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">180</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">387 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">227 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">491 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13591 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13980</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2770 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2884 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">178</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">306 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">195 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">437 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">754 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">173 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">214</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">436 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">128 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">184</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">291 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">155</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">171 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">420</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">141</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">143 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">525 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1349 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 326</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">257 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">185</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">349 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">237 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">68 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ND</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">261 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">128 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">49 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ND</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">185 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">420</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">139</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">154 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">473 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1567 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 757</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">332 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 172 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">172</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">451 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">276 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">101 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CGina-01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">303 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12584</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3529 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4158 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, no cloud</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">289</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">321 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">242 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1080</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">121</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CGina-01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">217 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1339 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">616 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 108 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, before cloud formed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">186</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">282 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">After cloud dissipation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ND</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">221 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">529 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 103</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13026 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2464 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2339 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, before cloud formed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">158</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">258 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">124 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">After cloud dissipation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ND</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">139 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">340 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11161 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10312</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3285 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3207 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, in the presence of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ND</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">318 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">ammonium sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> As inferred from the cell suspensions
sprayed.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> As measured by aerosol particle sizer and from impinger
samples.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Experiments intended to investigate the impact of fresh IN
active bacterial aerosols on the microphysics of clouds generated in the AIDA
chamber by expansion cooling; no sample for microbiological analyses was
collected after<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>cloud dissipation.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Experiments intended to investigate the impact
of ageing on the survival and IN activity of bacteria as aerosols; clouds
were generated afterward for investigating their impacts on microphysics; no
sample for microbiological analyses<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>was collected after cloud dissipation.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Experiments intended to investigate the impact of clouds
or sulfate coating on the survival and IN activity of bacterial aerosols.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>During three experiments, aerosol samples for microbiological analyses were
also taken after a cloud activation and evaporation cycle in the AIDA
chamber. Such a cloud cycle in AIDA is initiated by reducing the chamber
pressure within a few minutes from about 1000 to 800 hPa by strong
pumping. This pressure change simulates the conditions of an air parcel
rising in the atmosphere at a vertical updraft velocity of up to a few m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which induces a respective cooling of the air and an increase
in the relative humidity. The expansion run starts at a relative humidity of
about 90 to 95 % with respect to ice, so that at start temperatures below
0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C the air in the cloud chamber first exceeds saturation with
respect to ice, and then saturation with respect to liquid water. Depending
on the temperature and the ice nucleation activity of the bacterial cells,
some ice particles may already be formed in the regime between ice and water
saturation. In all the experiments discussed here, water saturation was
exceeded, so all bacterial cells acted as cloud condensation nuclei and were
first immersed in supercooled cloud droplets before eventually targeting
ice formation. After the pumping stopped at a pressure of about 800 hPa, the
temperature started to increase due to heat flow from the warmer chamber
walls, and the cloud droplets started to evaporate. After full evaporation
of the cloud droplets, the chamber was re-pressurized using particle free
synthetic air to atmospheric pressure. Aerosol samples were collected once
the pressure inside the chamber was returned to ambient pressure. In one of
the three experiments during which aerosol samples were collected for
microbiological analyses after cloud evaporation, bacteria were sprayed as a
suspension in (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (50 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or 0.38 M) (Exp. 12,
Table 1), rather than deionized water, in order to generate sulfate
aerosols and examine competition effects between sulfates and bacteria on
cloud formation and ice nucleation. This also produced preliminary results
about the potential impact of anthropogenic aerosols on the survival of
airborne bacteria.</p>
      <p>After each experiment, the chamber was cleaned by deep depressurization, and
refilled with particle free air, so that the chamber was particle free at
the beginning of the next experiment.</p>
      <p>Aerosol concentration and size in the chamber were monitored during the
experiments using a combination of a Scanning Mobility Particle Spectrometer
(SMPS) and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS), both from TSI Incorporated,
USA. The concentration of particles in the size mode around 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m to
about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m is referred to here as Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; it
corresponds to single intact bacterial cells and small agglomerates of
cells.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Bacterial strains and preparation of cell suspensions</title>
      <p>The following bacterial strains were used: <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> 13b-2 and <italic>P. syringae</italic> 32b-74, both isolated
from cloud water samples collected from the puy de Dôme Mountain in
France (GenBank accession numbers of the 16S rRNA gene sequences: DQ512785
and HQ256872, respectively; Amato et al., 2007; Vaïtilingom et al.,
2012), and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> CGina-01 isolated from Cotton Glacier in Antarctica (GenBank
accession number FJ152549; Foreman et al., 2013). These were all
previously demonstrated to be IN active by droplet-freezing assays (Attard
et al., 2012; Joly et al., 2013). <italic>P. syringae</italic> 32b-74 in suspension in deionized water
at the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cells mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleated
ice at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; the frequency of IN active cells was &gt; 2 % at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and &gt; 4 % at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which
ranks this strain among the most efficient IN active bacteria described so
far. The onset freezing temperature of <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> CGina-01 at similar cell
concentration was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, with a frequency of IN active cells 3 to
4 orders of magnitude lower than that of 32b-74. <italic>P. syringae</italic> 13b-2 nucleated ice at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, with a much lower activity
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IN active cells per cell at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p>
      <p>Bacteria from stock suspensions were grown on King's medium B agar (King et
al., 1954) for two days at ambient room temperature (i.e. 22–25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Cells were then scrapped off agar using sterile plastic
loops, suspended in sterile deionized water at a concentration of
approximatively <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and incubated overnight
at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In one experiment, cells were suspended in a solution of
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (50 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or 0.38 M) in order to examine the
influence of sulfate coating. In each experiment, a volume of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 mL of the cell suspension was sprayed into the cloud
simulation chamber (for details see Möhler et al., 2008). The actual
cell concentration in the initial suspensions was later determined by flow
cytometry (total cells) and standard dilution platting (colony forming
units; CFU), as described in Sect. 2.4. These were used for
inferring the initial concentrations of total and cultivable cells airborne
in the AIDA chamber, considering a volume of 84 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; these are referred
to as Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Sampling from the cloud simulation chamber for microbiological analyses</title>
      <p>Sampling for microbiological analyses was performed using an ethanol-washed
impinger (SKC Biosampler; Lin et al., 1999) rinsed several times with
sterile deionized water and filled with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 mL of sterile
deionized water just prior to use. Unexposed aliquots of the water used as
the impingement liquid served as negative controls for ice nucleation assays
and cell counts. In those controls, no ice nucleation event was detected
within the temperature range investigated, and cell count was &lt; 0.005 % of the cell counts in samples. Sampling operations were performed
at a constant air flow of 12.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 10 min periods using a
membrane vacuum pump (KFC), with the inlet of the impinger connected to the
inside of the chamber via a stainless steel sampling tube of 4 mm inner
diameter. The exact volume of water contained in the sampler
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 mL) before and after sampling was determined by
weighting. It was used to relate the total and cultivable cell
concentrations in the impingement liquid to their respective concentrations
in the air in the AIDA chamber when equilibrated with atmospheric pressure,
considering the volume of the impingement liquid and the sampling rate and
time, and assuming 100 % collection efficiency (Jensen et al., 1992).
These are referred to as Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Total cells and colony counts</title>
      <p>The concentrations of cultivable and total cells in the impingement liquid
were determined by two complementary methods. Cultivable cells were counted
as colony forming units (CFU). Twenty <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 10-fold serial dilutions
of the impingement liquid were spread on R2A medium (Reasoner and Geldreich,
1985) and incubated at 22–25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 to 3 days before counting
the colonies formed. Total cells were counted by flow cytometry on
triplicate samples of 450 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the impingement liquid mixed with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 5 % glutaraldehyde (Sigma) (0.5 % final concentration) and
stored at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. These were then mixed with one volume (500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L) of Tris-EDTA buffer at pH 8.0 (10 mM Tris; 1 mM EDTA, final
concentrations) and diluted in deionized water to a range of cell
concentrations compatible with the analysis. Finally, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the
DNA specific fluorochrome SYBR-Green (100X concentration; Invitrogen) were
added to the samples before incubation in the dark for at least 20 min then
injected into the flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson FACScalibur). Particles
fluorescing at 530 nm when excited at 488 nm, i.e. labeled with SYBR-Green, were
detected and counted by the cytometer. Counts were performed for 2 min or
100 000 events at a flow rate of about 90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The exact
flow rate was then measured for each series of measurements by weighting a
water sample before and after a 20 to 30 min run in the instrument. All
solutions used for flow cytometry analyses were freshly filtered through
polycarbonate syringe filters (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity, Whatman) before use
in order to prevent the presence of contaminating particles. In each sample,
a population of particles unambiguously attributed to bacterial cells based
on their intensity of fluorescence and side-scattering was detected.
Finally, cultivability was calculated as the ratio between CFU and total
cells counts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>IN assays</title>
      <p>The concentration of ice nucleating particles (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">INP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the collection
liquid was assayed by the drop-freezing method described previously (Vali,
1971). A series of sixteen 0.2 mL microtubes containing 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the
impingement liquid, undiluted or diluted 10-fold in distilled water, were
placed in a cooling bath (Ecoline Staredition Lauda E200) and exposed to
decreasing temperatures from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C steps. The number of tubes containing aliquots still in the
liquid phase was counted after exposition for 8 min at each temperature
step, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">INP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated as:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">INP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liquid</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of tubes tested in a given dilution
series (16), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liquid</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the corresponding number of tubes still liquid
after 8 min at temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the volume of liquid in each tube (0.02 mL)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the dilution factor (1 or 10). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">INP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were finally normalized
to the corresponding total cell concentrations measured by flow cytometry.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Data analyses</title>
      <p>Exponential regression curves of the type <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bt</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were fitted to
the data. As all the data were normalized to the first time point measured
in the corresponding experiment (i.e. 30 min after spraying, time set as
the time zero for data analysis), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was equal to 1 and the concentration
had its maximum value at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being expressed in minutes). The
time constant of this first-order decay equation is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being
the decay rate constant, and the half-life time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at which the
concentration has decreased to half the start value, can be calculated as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>All statistical analyses were performed using PAST version 2.04 (Hammer et
al., 2001).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Initial total and cultivable airborne cell concentrations</title>
      <p>A total of nine, three and two experiments were carried out in the cloud simulation
chamber with the strains <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> 32b-74, <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> CGina-01 and <italic>P. syringae</italic> 13b-2, respectively. The
initial airborne total and cultivable cell concentrations inferred from in
the initial cell suspensions (SUSP subscript), and the concentrations
measured with the APS (APS subscript) and from impinger samples (IMP
subscript) 30 min and up to 1080 min (18 h) after aerosolization are
presented in Table 1. Fifty mL of cell suspensions at
concentrations ranging from 3.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cells mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were sprayed in the chamber, corresponding to
theoretical initial total airborne cell concentrations (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
217 to 684 cells cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 84 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-chamber. The concentrations
actually measured 30 min later by the APS (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and from
impinger samples (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were both significantly lower (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ranged in
average between 138 and 289 cells cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and between 258 and 451 cells cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. At this time point, Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly
higher than Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by a factor of 1.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40 in average
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating the presence of cell
aggregates in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m aerosol population (it
extended to about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m at the beginning of the experiments). These
were disrupted in the impinger during sampling and counted later as
individual cells by flow cytometry (Terzieva et al., 1996). The presence of
aggregates was also evidenced in the suspensions sprayed by the fact that
the concentration of cultivable cell (CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded that of total
cells (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with
particularly large deviations on CFU counts between technical replicates,
and resulting in cultivability &gt; 100 %, and at some occasions
&gt; 1000 % (see Table 1). Cell suspensions were prepared
by scratching colonies from the surface of agar plates. Even though care was
taken for homogenizing them, some heterogeneity probably persisted and
resulted in the presence of cell clusters. However, it unintentionally
mimicked bacterial aerosols in natural context, as most cultivable bacteria
in the atmosphere were found associated with particles (Shaffer and
Lighthart, 1997).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Survival rate time dependence</title>
      <p>With the intention to take only into account cells already airborne and
avoid any possible impact of the spraying process on cultivability, data
analysis was restricted to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 min after aerosolization and data
were normalized to the values measured at this experimental time point. This
normalization also allowed the data to be cleaned by avoiding the large
deviations on cultivable cell concentration and on cultivability rate in the
initial suspensions (CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SUSP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each individual absolute value of
cultivability (i.e. not normalized by the cultivability measured at this time
point) is plotted in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. The normalized temporal decay of
airborne micron-sized particles (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), total cells (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and cultivable cells (CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations was determined from
experiments #7, #8, #10 and #11 (Fig. 1). The
concentration of particles in the 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m-mode (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreased
exponentially over time with a time constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1260 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 min (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.992</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The concentration of airborne
cells (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased faster with a time constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 min (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.937</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The upper bound
diameter of the Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size mode, extending to approximately 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
at the beginning of the experiments, decreased to around 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m after 7 h, and the cell-to-particle
ratio (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased from 1.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These indicated that the cell clusters were progressively
removed from the aerosol population by sedimentation. Cultivable cell
concentration (CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreased with a time constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 min (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.990</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This concentration
therefore decreased about twice as fast as that of the concentration of
total cells Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to additional temporal loss of cultivability.
The decay rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for cultivability was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28 % min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a time constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 360 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 min
and a half-life <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 min (3.5 to 4.5 h) (Pearson's
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.911</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 2). This has to be regarded as
the most conservative estimate (lower bound) for viability, as viable but
non cultivable (VBNC) state is common in aerosolized cells (Heidelberg et
al., 1997).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Temporal evolution of total airborne cell concentration
measured with the APS (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, open symbols) and total and cultivable
cells concentrations measured from impinger samples (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, black
symbols, and CFU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, grey symbols, respectively) of <italic>P. syringae</italic> 32b-74 and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic>
CGina-01 in the chamber, relative to the concentrations measured 30 min
after spraying cell suspensions. Error bars are standard deviations from the
mean of triplicate samples. The curves show fitted exponential temporal
decays. For total particles: Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.992</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; for total cells:
Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.937</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; for cultivable cells: Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.990</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Corresponding calculated time constants (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and half-life times
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are indicated on the right of the figure (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard
deviation).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6455/2015/acp-15-6455-2015-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Despite the fact that the bacteria investigated here are non-spore-formers,
they lost cultivability only 1.5 to 3 times faster than spores of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> within
the same temperature range, which decayed at rates of 0.19 % and 0.10 % min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively
(Ehrlich et al., 1970). Lighthart (1989) proposed a general time-dependent
model of biological decay (decrease of survival rate) for airborne bacteria
by mixing experimental data from several bacterial strains, including
<italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species (Fig. 2). This fits our data with a Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of only
0.517 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and we observed a much higher cultivability than what would
have been expected from this model, at least for the first 10 h
following aerosolization. This implies that the <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains investigated here,
which were originally isolated from atmospheric samples, are more resistant
as airborne than the average bacterium considered in this model; it
could indicate that these strains are to some extent adapted to atmospheric
transport (e.g., Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Implications for airborne bacteria dissemination</title>
      <p>Assuming that bacteria have an aerodynamic diameter of about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
they have a low sedimentation velocity on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Malcolm and Raupach, 1991). In addition, such particles fall
into the so-called “scavenging gap”, and they have a particularly long
residence time in the atmosphere (Hobbs, 1993). Indeed, residence time was
estimated to be 2.3 to 9.6 days in the case of single bacterial cells
depending on the source ecosystem, with a global mean of 3.4 days (Burrows
et al., 2009a). Under our conditions, after 1 day airborne, 1.7 % of the
cells would still be cultivable. Based on these extreme and mean residence
times, between 0.009 and 1.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> % of aerosolized
cells (0.0001 % in average, i.e. 1/10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) would survive the duration of
their atmospheric journey until deposition. Statistically, this implies that
the emission of at least 11 000 cells is necessary, 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average, to
assure that one survives the residence time and arrives at its endpoint by
atmospheric dissemination.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Temporal evolution after aerosolization of the proportion of
cultivable cells (cultivability) in impinger samples in <italic>P. syringae</italic>
32b-74 and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> CGina-01, relative to the cultivability
measured 30 min after spraying cell suspensions, in the absence of cloud
(black symbols) or after cloud formation and dissipation (open symbols).
Error bars are standard deviations from the mean of triplicate samples. The
black dashed curve shows fitted exponential temporal decay of cultivability
in the absence of a cloud (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.911</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The corresponding
calculated time constant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and half-life time (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are
indicated on the right of the figure (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation). Data
using the Eq. (5) from Lighthart (1989) are also plotted for comparison
(dashed grey line); this model valid for an “average” bacterial strain fits
our data with a Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.517 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6455/2015/acp-15-6455-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Aerosolization, i.e. the transfer of cells from a solid surface or from a liquid
to the air, is a critical step. In nature, the drag forces created by wind
on surfaces generate aerosols by saltation/blasting phenomena (Grini et al.,
2002) and result in increased amounts of airborne microorganisms during high
wind speed events (e.g., Lindemann and Upper, 1985). Splashing raindrops on
surfaces colonized by microorganisms like plant leaves also lead to the
aerosolization of living bacteria (Graham et al., 1977). From liquids, a
well-known process of aerosolization is bubble-bursting (Blanchard and
Syzdek, 1982). This is actually a phenomenon by which certain types of cells
in a community are preferentially aerosolized, thus adding a new layer of
complexity in the process of bacterial aerosolization as it results in
dissimilarities between the microbial composition in the bulk liquid source
and in the air above (Agogué et al., 2005; Fahlgren et al., 2015). The
complexity of this phenomenon was probably not reflected in our experimental
setup, with bacterial cells being sprayed from liquid suspensions. However,
the results presented here only considered bacteria already aerosolized and
avoided taking into account the aerosolization step. Hence, considering that
the process of aerosolization did not affect subsequent survival rates as
aerosol, we can place our results in natural atmospheric context. Plants are
among the strongest natural sources of airborne bacteria identified, with
emission fluxes around 500 CFU m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured above bean and
alfalfa fields (Lindemann et al., 1982). At such a rate, each m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
crop field would emit 1 cell capable of surviving its atmospheric transport
every 33 min. In other words, 1 cell capable of disseminating alive
would be emitted every second by a field of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Proportion of cultivable airborne cells associated with
the distance reached from their emission source for typical horizontal wind
velocities (2. 5. 10 and 30 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. 7.2, 18, 36 and 108 km h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively), relative to the respective initial cultivability, as inferred
from the data presented in Fig. 2. The proportion of 0.0001 %
is reached in 3.4 days, the mean residence time of bacteria in the
atmosphere estimated by Burrows et al. (2009a).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6455/2015/acp-15-6455-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Once airborne, as a first approximation bacteria are passively transported
horizontally at the speed of horizontal wind. So, for typical horizontal
winds in the troposphere, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(not considering extreme events such as storms or cyclones), at the survival
rate measured here, 50 % of the cells emitted alive from a source would be
transported about 30 to 600 km away, and 1 % would reach the ground up to
4000 km away (Fig. 3). There are indeed many observations of such
long distance transport of living bacteria between distant ecosystems in
nature (Bovallius et al., 1978; Hervàs et al., 2009; Hervàs and
Casamayor, 2009; Comte et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Impact of cloud processing</title>
      <p>The conditions investigated here (temperature between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 and
0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and absence of light) can be considered relatively close to
the conditions encountered in the high atmosphere during the night. It is
probable that in nature, during the day, UV light has deleterious effect and
increases mortality rates (Tong and Lighthart, 1997). In addition, cloud
formation can alter viability, as shown in samples collected after expansion
cooling (i.e. depressurization) experiments (experiments #6 and #9). Even
though it is not statistically testable here, we noticed a strong decrease
in the cultivability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 32b-74 and CGina-01 cells exposed to a cloud (see
Table 1, Figs. 2 and S1). Fractions of only about
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % of the cells cultivable
before expansion cooling remained cultivable after cloud dissipation for
32b-74 and CGina-01, respectively, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % when
the pressure was maintained constant. For cloud formation in the AIDA
chamber, pressure was typically decreased at rates of 30 to 50 hPa min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during expansion, and the associated cooling rates were typically
2 K min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the beginning of an expansion and below 0.5 K min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
towards the end of the expansion. Considering pressure and temperature
changes with altitude of 10 hPa and 1 K every 100 m, these roughly
correspond to uplifts of air masses of around 100 to 500 m min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.7
to 8.3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which falls within the range of observations for
convective precipitating clouds (Balsley et al., 1988). Our results suggest
that the shifts in environmental conditions encountered by living cells
transported upward, along with the osmotic shock and free radicals generated
by water condensation and freezing (e.g., Stead and Park, 2000; Tanghe et
al., 2003) probably alter airborne cell survival in clouds to a larger
extent compared with non-convective situations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Ice nucleation activity</title>
      <p>Figure 4 shows freezing profiles of air samples collected by
impingement from the cloud chamber at different times after injection of <italic>P. syringae</italic>
32b-74 suspensions. Thirty minutes after aerosolization, there were
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> INP cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (1 INP every <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 000 cells)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> INP cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (1 INP every <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 333 cells) on a per-total-cells (Cells<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> basis. This is about one
tenth the IN activity of cells in suspension for this strain (Joly et al.,
2013). Decreased IN activity in airborne bacteria compared with suspension
was expected from previous observations in cloud simulation chamber
involving <italic>P. syringae</italic> (Maki and Willoughby, 1978). No further significant loss of
activity over time was observed at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
aerosolized cells (ANOVA, 5 % confidence level), i.e. the frequency of INP cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> did not vary with time after aerosolization. This confirmed that
non-viable cells retained IN activity, as previously reported (Kozloff et
al., 1991).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Cumulative frequencies of INP per airborne cell in <italic>P. syringae</italic>
32b-74 within the AIDA chamber 30 min, 7 h and 17 h after aerosolization in
the absence of cloud (black symbols), 30 min after aerosolization in the
presence of ammonium sulfate (grey symbols), and when the pressure inside
the chamber was returned to ambient after cloud formation by expansion
cooling (open triangles). Error bars are standard deviations from the mean
of independent experiments, when available.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/6455/2015/acp-15-6455-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In the natural atmosphere, phenomena such as coating may affect bacterial IN
activity. For example coating with sulfate was reported to decrease the IN
activity of soot or Arizona Test Dust particles, a material widely used in
laboratory ice nucleation studies as a surrogate for natural mineral
aerosols (Cziczo et al., 2009; Möhler et al., 2005). However, sulfate
coating had no detectable impact on the IN activity of the commercial powder
of lyophilized IN active <italic>P. syringae</italic> cells Snomax (Chernoff and Bertram, 2010). In
order to further investigate the influence of sulfate coating, cells were
suspended in a solution of ammonium sulfate instead of water before being
sprayed into the chamber (experiment #12, Table 1). Thirty
minutes after spraying, we found that the frequency of INP per cell had
decreased markedly compared to cells sprayed from water suspensions,
especially at the warmest temperatures of activity: the frequency of INP per
cell was decreased by about 98.5, 91 and 34 % at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively (Fig. 4). In
this particular bacterial strain, pH at values typical for cloud water
influenced by anthropogenic emissions (pH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4) were also shown
to be responsible for a significant decrease in INA (Attard et al., 2012).
Such observations show that the IN activity of bacteria is clearly modulated
by abiotic factors, and this must be kept in mind when replacing
experimentations into environmental context.</p>
      <p>The capacity of cells of nucleating ice in the atmosphere is particularly
relevant where condensed water is present, i.e. in clouds. Using the AIDA
chamber, it was shown previously that some strains of <italic>P. viridiflava</italic> and <italic>P. syringae</italic> can act as INP
in clouds at temperatures around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the immersion-freezing
mode (Möhler et al., 2008). Here, clouds were formed in the chamber by
expansion cooling in two experiments (experiments #6 and #9), and
aerosol samples were collected by impingement after cloud dissipation, when
the pressure inside the chamber was back to ambient pressure (Table 1). The onset ice formation temperature of the impingement liquid was
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in samples not exposed to
cloud, and the frequency of INP per cell was decreased by three orders of
magnitude (Fig. 4). A possible deactivation effect of the IN
activity of bacteria was already suggested from equivalent experiments
(Möhler et al., 2008). However, our results expressed on a per-cell
basis suggest that, more likely, IN active cells among a population of
airborne bacteria were more efficiently precipitated than others. This could
explain the observed distribution of IN active bacteria in natural air,
clouds and precipitation: Stephanie and Waturangi (2011) observed that the proportion of IN active bacterial strains was higher
in falling rain water than in the air at the same location. In addition,
whereas only 50 % of the <italic>P. syringae</italic> strains isolated from non-precipitating cloud
water were IN active (eight strains) (Joly et al., 2013), those isolated from
freshly fallen snow by Morris et al. (2008) all had this
capacity (47 strains).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this work, we observed that the concentration and cultivability of cells
aerosolized in the AIDA cloud chamber decreased exponentially over time at
constant rates. Aggregation seemed to favor cell survival, but this was of
course at the cost of the time span as airborne and so, in nature, of the
potential distance of dispersion. Hence, for bacteria, aerial dissemination
is clearly a compromise between the distance traveled (which decreases for
large aggregates) and the chances of successful dissemination (which
increases for large aggregates).</p>
      <p>The survival rate determined here should provide a basis to the existing
numerical models describing the aerial dispersion of bacteria (Burrows et
al., 2009a; Sesartic et al., 2012), in order to better predict their
atmospheric transport as living entities. By focusing on time as the only
explicative variable, we were able to explain quite well (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.911</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the decrease of cultivability observed for <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> in the AIDA
chamber, although adjustments of the predictions in an environmental context
could be made by integrating viability parameters as needed, like
temperature, humidity, UV, or phenotypic traits. Some work in this direction
has already been carried out (Attard et al., 2012; Lighthart, 1973;
Lighthart et al., 1971; Smith et al., 2011; Tong and Lighthart, 1997), but
more experiments would help build a more mechanistic viability model. In
addition, these models are still weakened by the large uncertainties that
remain concerning the input to be used, as there are still very few data
available about the sources of airborne bacteria and the associated emission
fluxes (e.g. Lindemann et al., 1982). These need to be documented for
different surface types and meteorological situations.</p>
      <p>Numerical simulations demonstrated that the impact of IN active bacteria on
precipitation is probably negligible at the scale of the planet (Hoose et
al., 2010; Sesartic et al., 2012). However, precipitation patterns at
regional scales have important socio-economic impacts and the underlying
processes still need to be elucidated. We observed that the IN activity of
airborne bacteria did not change over time for at least several hours after
aerosolization. In nature, this is enough time for an IN active cell to be
transported to high altitudes and get incorporated into a cloud. Then, as
suggested by others (Constantinidou et al., 1990; Möhler et al., 2008;
Morris et al., 2008, 2014), they can induce freezing of supercooled
droplets, trigger precipitation and thus selectively prime their own
redeposition. For a complete and accurate description of the transport of
bacteria in the atmosphere, the partitioning of cells and in particular of
IN active cells, between air, clouds and precipitation should be determined.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6455-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-6455-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was funded by the joint DFG-CNRS project “BIOCLOUDS” (DFG
contract MO 668/2-1) and by the international program EUROCHAMP (Integration
of European Simulation Chambers for Investigating Atmospheric Processes). We
particularly thank Martine Sancelme, Catherine Glaux, and Jonathan Colombet
for technical assistance with microbiology and flow cytometry. E. Attard
acknowledges Blaise Pascal University and CNRS for postdoctoral fellowships.
M. Joly is grateful to the Auvergne Region for PhD scholarship. Continuous
support by the AIDA technical team is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank
Thomas Schwartz from the KIT Institute for Functional Surfaces for kind
material support to microbiological manipulations. The AIDA part is also
funded by the Helmholtz Association through its program “Atmosphere and
Climate (ATMO)”.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: B. Ervens</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Agogué, H., Joux, F., Obernosterer, I., and Lebaron, P.: Resistance of
marine bacterioneuston to solar radiation, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71,
5282–5289, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5282-5289.2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/AEM.71.9.5282-5289.2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Amato, P., Parazols, M., Sancelme, M., Laj, P., Mailhot, G., and Delort,
A.-M.: Microorganisms isolated from the water phase of tropospheric clouds
at the Puy de Dôme: major groups and growth abilities at low
temperatures, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 59, 242–254,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00199.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00199.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Attard, E., Yang, H., Delort, A.-M., Amato, P., Pöschl, U., Glaux, C.,
Koop, T., and Morris, C. E.: Effects of atmospheric conditions on ice
nucleation activity of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10667–10677, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10667-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10667-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Balsley, B. B., Ecklund, W. L., Carter, D. A., Riddle, A. C., and Gage, K.
S.: Average vertical motions in the tropical atmosphere observed by a radar
wind profiler on Pohnpei (7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N latitude, 157 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>E longitude),
J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 396–405,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045&lt;0396:AVMITT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045&lt;0396:AVMITT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Berge, O., Monteil, C. L., Bartoli, C., Chandeysson, C., Guilbaud, C., Sands,
D. C., and Morris, C. E.: A user's guide to a data base of the diversity of
<italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and its application to classifying strains in
this phylogenetic complex, PLoS ONE, 9, e105547,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0105547</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Blanchard, D. C. and Syzdek, L. D.: Water-to-Air transfer and enrichment of
bacteria in drops from bursting bubbles, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 43,
1001–1005, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bovallius, A., Bucht, B., Roffey, R., and Anas, P.: Long-range air
transmission of bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 35, 1231–1232, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Brodie, E. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Parker, J. P. M., Zubietta, I. X., Piceno, Y.
M., and Andersen, G. L.: Urban aerosols harbor diverse and dynamic bacterial
populations, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 104, 299–304, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608255104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0608255104</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Burrows, S. M., Butler, T., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kerkweg, A.,
Pöschl, U., and Lawrence, M. G.: Bacteria in the global atmosphere –
Part 2: Modeling of emissions and transport between different ecosystems,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9281–9297, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9281-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9281-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Burrows, S. M., Elbert, W., Lawrence, M. G., and Pöschl, U.: Bacteria in
the global atmosphere – Part 1: Review and synthesis of literature data for
different ecosystems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9263–9280,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9263-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9263-2009</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chernoff, D. I. and Bertram, A. K.: Effects of sulfate coatings on the ice
nucleation properties of a biological ice nucleus and several types of
minerals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,  D20205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014254" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014254</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cochet, N. and Widehem, P.: Ice crystallization by <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 54, 153–161, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Comte, J., Lindström, E. S., Eiler, A., and Langenheder, S.: Can marine
bacteria be recruited from freshwater sources and the air?, ISME J., 8,
2423–2430, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.89" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2014.89</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Constantinidou, H. A., Hirano, S. S., Baker, L. S., and Upper, C. D.:
Atmospheric dispersal of ice nucleation-active bacteria: the role of rain,
Phytopathology, 80, 934–937, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cox, C. S. and Goldberg, L. J.: Aerosol survival of <italic>Pasteurella tularensis</italic> and the influence of relative humidity, Appl. Microbiol., 23,
1–3, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Gallavardin, S. J., Moehler, O., Benz, S.,
Saathoff, H., and Murphy, D. M.: Deactivation of ice nuclei due to
atmospherically relevant surface coatings, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044013,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044013</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ehrlich, R., Miller, S., and Walker, R. L.: Relationship between atmospheric
temperature and survival of airborne bacteria, Appl. Microbiol., 19,
245–249, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Fahlgren, C., Gómez-Consarnau, L., Zábori, J., Lindh, M. V., Krejci,
R., Mårtensson, E. M., Nilsson, D., and Pinhassi, J.: Seawater mesocosm
experiments in the Arctic uncover differential transfer of marine bacteria to
aerosols, Environ. Microbiol. Rep., 460–470, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1758-2229.12273</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Foreman, C. M., Cory, R. M., Morris, C. E., SanClements, M. D., Smith, H. J.,
Lisle, J. T., Miller, P. L., Chin, Y.-P., and <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>McKnight<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, D. M.: Microbial
growth under humic-free conditions in a supraglacial stream system on the
Cotton Glacier, Antarctica, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 035022,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035022</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Graham, D. C., Quinn, C. E., and Bradley, L. F.: Quantitative studies on the
generation of aerosols of <italic>Erwinia</italic> <italic>carotovora</italic> var.
<italic>atroseptica</italic> by simulated raindrop impaction on blackleg-infected
potato stems, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 43, 413–424,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00768.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00768.x</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Griffin, D. W., Garrison, V. H., Herman, J. R., and Shinn, E. A.: African
desert dust in the Caribbean atmosphere: Microbiology and public health,
Aerobiologia, 17, 203–213, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011868218901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1011868218901</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Grini, A., Zender, C. S., and Colarco, P. R.: Saltation Sandblasting behavior
during mineral dust aerosol production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1868,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015248</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hammer, Ø., Ryan, P., and Harper, D.: PAST: Paleontological Statistics
software package for education and data analysis, Palaeontol. Electron.,
4, 9, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Heidelberg, J. F., Shahamat, M., Levin, M., Rahman, I., Stelma, G., Grim, C.,
and Colwell, R. R.: Effect of aerosolization on culturability and viability
of Gram-negative bacteria., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63, 3585–3588, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hervas, A. and Casamayor, E. O.: High similarity between bacterioneuston and
airborne bacterial community compositions in a high mountain lake area, FEMS
Microbiol. Ecol., 67, 219–228, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00617.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00617.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hervàs, A., Camarero, L., Reche, I., and Casamayor, E. O.: Viability and
potential for immigration of airborne bacteria from Africa that reach high
mountain lakes in Europe, Environ. Microbiol., 11, 1612–1623,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01926.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01926.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbs, P. V.: Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions Vol. 54, Academic Press, San
Diego, 235 pp., 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., and Burrows, S. M.: How important is
biological ice nucleation in clouds on a global scale?, Environ. Res. Lett.,
5, 024009, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, P. A., Todd, W. F., Davis, G. N., and Scarpino, P. V.: Evaluation of
Eight Bioaerosol Samplers Challenged with Aerosols of Free Bacteria, Am. Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. J., 53, 660–667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298669291360319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/15298669291360319</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Joly, M., Attard, E., Sancelme, M., Deguillaume, L., Guilbaud, C., Morris, C.
E., Amato, P., and Delort, A.-M.: Ice nucleation activity of bacteria
isolated from cloud water, Atmos. Environ., 70, 392–400,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.027</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
King, E. O., Ward, M. K., and Raney, D. E.: Two simple media for the
demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 44, 301–307,
1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kozloff, L. M., Turner, M. A., and Arellano, F.: Formation of bacterial
membrane ice-nucleating lipoglycoprotein complexes, J. Bacteriol., 173,
6528–6536, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lighthart, B.: Survival of airborne bacteria in a high urban concentration of
carbon monoxide, Appl. Microbiol., 25, 86–91, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lighthart, B.: A statistical model of laboratory death rate measurements for
airborne bacteria, Aerobiologia, 5, 138–144, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02486511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02486511</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lighthart, B., Hiatt, V. E., and Rossano Jr., A. T.: The survival of airborne
Serratia marcescens in urban concentrations of sulfur dioxide, J. Air Pollut.
Control Assoc., 21, 639–642, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Lin, X., A. Reponen, T., Willeke, K., Grinshpun, S. A., Foarde, K. K., and
Ensor, D. S.: Long-term sampling of airborne bacteria and fungi into a
non-evaporating liquid, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4291–4298,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00169-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00169-7</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lindemann, J. and Upper, C. D.: Aerial dispersal of epiphytic bacteria over
bean plants, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 50, 1229–1232, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lindemann, J., Constantinidou, H. A., Barchet, W. R., and Upper, C. D.:
Plants as sources of airborne bacteria, including ice nucleation-active
bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 44, 1059–1063, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Maki, L. R. and Willoughby, K. J.: Bacteria as biogenic sources of freezing
nuclei., J. Appl. Meteorol., 17, 1049–1053, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Malcolm, L. P. and Raupach, M. R.: Measurements in an air settling tube of
the terminal velocity distribution of soil material, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
96, 15275–15286, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91JD01198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JD01198</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Marthi, B., Fieland, V. P., Walter, M., and Seidler, R. J.: Survival of
bacteria during aerosolization., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 3463–3467,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Büttner, S., Linke, C., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H.,
Stetzer, O., Wagner, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., Ebert, V., and
Schurath, U.: Effect of sulfuric acid coating on heterogeneous ice nucleation
by soot aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D11210,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005169</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., DeMott, P. J., Vali, G., and Levin, Z.: Microbiology and
atmospheric processes: the role of biological particles in cloud physics,
Biogeosciences, 4, 1059–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1059-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-1059-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Georgakopoulos, D. G., Morris, C. E., Benz, S., Ebert, V.,
Hunsmann, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., and Wagner, R.: Heterogeneous ice
nucleation activity of bacteria: new laboratory experiments at simulated
cloud conditions, Biogeosciences, 5, 1425–1435, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1425-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-1425-2008</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Monteil, C. L., Bardin, M., and Morris, C. E.: Features of air masses
associated with the deposition of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> and
<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> by rain and snowfall, ISME J., 8, 2290–2304,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.55" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2014.55</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Morris, C. E., Kinkel, L. L., Xiao, K., Prior, P., and Sands, D. C.:
Surprising niche for the plant pathogen <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>,
Infect. Genet. Evol., 7, 84–92, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2006.05.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.meegid.2006.05.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Morris, C. E., Sands, D. C., Vinatzer, B. A., Glaux, C., Guilbaud, C.,
Buffière, A., Yan, S., Dominguez, H., and Thompson, B. M.: The life
history of the plant pathogen <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> is linked to the
water cycle, ISME J., 2, 321–334, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2007.113</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Morris, C. E., Conen, F., Huffman, J. A., Phillips, V., Pöschl, U., and
Sands, D. C.: Bioprecipitation: a feedback cycle linking Earth history,
ecosystem dynamics and land use through biological ice nucleators in the
atmosphere, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 341–351, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12447</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Morris, C. E., Leyronas, C. and Nicot, P. C.: Movement of Bioaerosols in the
Atmosphere and the Consequences for Climate and Microbial Evolution, in
Aerosol Science, edited by: Colbeck, I. and Lazaridis, M., 393–415, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118682555.ch16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781118682555.ch16</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Reasoner, D. J. and Geldreich, E. E.: A new medium for the enumeration and
subculture of bacteria from potable water., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 49,
1–7, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Sands, D. C., Langhans, V. E., Scharen, A. L., and de Smet, G.: The
association between bacteria and rain and possible resultant meteorological
implications, Journal of the Hungarian Meteorology Service, 86, 148–152,
1982.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Šantl-Temkiv, T., Finster, K., Hansen, B. M., Nielsen, N. W., and
Karlson, U. G.: The microbial diversity of a storm cloud as assessed by
hailstones, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 81, 684–695, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Šantl-Temkiv, T., Finster, K., Dittmar, T., Hansen, B. M., Thyrhaug, R.,
Nielsen, N. W., and Karlson, U. G.: Hailstones: A window into the microbial
and chemical inventory of a storm cloud, PloS one, 8, e53550, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0053550</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Sesartic, A., Lohmann, U., and Storelvmo, T.: Bacteria in the ECHAM5-HAM
global climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8645–8661,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8645-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8645-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Shaffer, B. T. and Lighthart, B.: Survey of culturable airborne bacteria at
four diverse locations in Oregon: urban, rural, forest, and coastal, Microb.
Ecol., 34, 167–177, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. J., Griffin, D. W., McPeters, R. D., Ward, P. D., and Schuerger, A.
C.: Microbial survival in the stratosphere and implications for global
dispersal, Aerobiologia, 27, 319–332, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-011-9203-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10453-011-9203-5</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. J., Timonen, H. J., Jaffe, D. A., Griffin, D. W., Birmele, M. N.,
Perry, K. D., Ward, P. D., and Roberts, M. S.: Intercontinental dispersal of
Bacteria and Archaea by transpacific winds, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79,
1134–1139, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03029-12" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/AEM.03029-12</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Stead, D. and Park, S. F.: Roles of Fe superoxide dismutase and catalase in
resistance of <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> to freeze-thaw stress, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol., 66, 3110–3112, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Stephanie and Waturangi, D. E.:
Distribution of ice nucleation-active (INA) bacteria from rain-water and air,
J. Biosciences, 18, 108, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4308/hjb.18.3.108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4308/hjb.18.3.108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Tanghe, A., Van Dijck, P., and Thevelein, J. M.: Determinants of freeze
tolerance in microorganisms, physiological importance, and biotechnological
applications, Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 53, 129–176, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Terzieva, S., Donnelly, J., Ulevicius, V., Grinshpun, S. A., Willeke, K.,
Stelma, G. N., and Brenner, K. P.: Comparison of methods for detection and
enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement.,
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 2264–2272, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Tong, Y. and Lighthart, B.: Solar radiation has a lethal effect on natural
populations of culturable outdoor atmospheric bacteria, Atmos. Environ., 31,
897–900, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Vaïtilingom, M., Attard, E., Gaiani, N., Sancelme, M., Deguillaume, L.,
Flossmann, A. I., Amato, P., and Delort, A.-M.: Long-term features of cloud
microbiology at the puy de Dôme (France), Atmos. Environ., 56, 88–100,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.072</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G.: Quantitative Evaluation of Experimental Results on the
Heterogeneous Freezing Nucleation of Supercooled Liquids, J. Atmos. Sci.,
28, 402–409, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wright, D. N., Bailey, G. D., and Goldberg, L. J.: Effect of Temperature on
Survival of Airborne <italic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</italic>, J. Bacteriol., 99,
491–495, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
