<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-5947-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Technical Note: Optical properties of desert aerosol with non-spherical mineral particles:
data incorporated to OPAC</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Data incorporated to OPAC}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P. Koepke et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Koepke</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          <email>peter.koepke@lmu.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gasteiger</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-0118</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hess</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>L-M-University Munich, Meteorological Institute, Theresienstr. 37, 80333
Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>DLR – German Aerospace Center, Remote-Sensing Technology Institute,
Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Weßling, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>RASCIN, Thalkirchner Str. 284, 81371 Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">P. Koepke (peter.koepke@lmu.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>5947</fpage><lpage>5956</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Mineral particles, in general, are not spheres and so the assumption
of spherical particles, instead of more realistic
shapes, has significant effects on modeled optical
properties and therefore on remote-sensing
procedures for desert aerosol and the derived radiative forcing. Thus, in a
new version of the database OPAC (Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds;
Hess et al., 1998), the optical properties of the mineral particles are
modeled describing the particles as spheroids with size dependent aspect
ratio distributions, but with the size distributions and the spectral
refractive indices not changed against the previous version of OPAC. The
spheroid assumption is known to substantially improve the scattering
functions but pays regard to the limited knowledge on particle shapes in an
actual case. The relative deviations of the optical properties of
non-spherical mineral particles from those of spherical particles are for the
phase function in the solar spectral range up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 % at scattering
angles of about 130<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 % in the backscatter region,
but less than 2 % for the asymmetry parameter. The deviations are
generally small in the thermal infrared and for optical properties that are
independent of the scattering angle. The improved version of OPAC (4.0) is
freely available at <uri>www.rascin.net</uri>.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The optical properties of aerosol particles are the basis for modeling their
direct radiative forcing (Lacis and Mishchenko, 1995; Haywood and Boucher,
2000; Yi et al., 2011) and correspondingly for their effect on climate
(McCormick and Ludwig, 1967; Myhre et al., 2013). Moreover, the optical
properties are necessary for all inversion techniques used for aerosol remote
sensing (Koepke and Quenzel, 1979; Kaufmann, 1993; Kalashnikova and Sokolik,
2002; Nousiainen, 2009). Thus, for an easy availability of spectral optical
properties of aerosol particles, the software package OPAC (Optical
Properties of Aerosols and Clouds) had been created (Hess et al., 1998).</p>
      <p>The optical properties of aerosol particles in general are modeled using the
size distribution and the spectral refractive indices of the particles. In
the past, the assumption has commonly been made that the particles are
spheres using Mie theory (Mie, 1908). This has different reasons: on the one
hand, the assumption of spherical particles is reasonable in many cases,
especially for water-soluble aerosol types under typical meteorological
conditions with relative humidity higher than 50 %. On the other hand,
the shape of individual particles is known only for a limited number of
examples because it needs electron microscopy measurements. Thus, for actual
conditions and for practical use, the shape of particles, particularly as
function of size, is not available. But even if the particle shape were available, the problem remains that modeling of
non-spherical particles would be complex and time consuming (Mishchenko et
al., 2000; Kahnert, 2003). Thus, the use of Mie theory is often a good
assumption (or the only possible assumption) and it has also been used in
OPAC.</p>
      <p>Desert aerosol, besides sea salt, forms the largest fraction of the
atmospheric particles (d'Almeida et al., 1991; Kinne et al., 2006). Thus,
desert aerosol is very important for the radiation budget and consequently
for the climate, especially because it is distributed, often with high
optical depth, over large areas. Since its amount shows very strong spatial
and temporal variations (Sokolik et al., 2001), remote-sensing methods are
important for desert aerosol research. However, remote-sensing is always
based on the assumed particle characteristics.</p>
      <p>Especially for mineral particles the optical properties modeled under the
assumption of spherical shapes are questionable, since these particles are
generated by mechanical processes which give rise to highly irregular
particle shapes, as to be seen by electron micrographs (Falkovich et al.,
2001; Kandler et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>In comparison to spherical particles, the phase function of irregular
particles generally shows increased sideward but reduced backward
scattering if the particles are relatively large in comparison to the
wavelength (Zerull et al., 1980; Koepke and Hess, 1988; Nousiainen, 2009; and
see Fig. 1). Thus, if radiation data measured at short wavelengths are used
to derive aerosol properties, the assumption of spheres may lead to wrong
results. This holds also for particle properties derived from
backscatter-lidar measurements (Gobbi et al., 2002; Wiegner et al., 2009;
Sakai et al., 2014), since, amongst others, they are influenced by the lidar
ratio, which combines backward scattering with the extinction coefficient.
For passive remote-sensing from a satellite, an assumed wrong phase function of
the particles can introduce significant retrieval errors and for
consideration of the radiation budget of mineral particles in the solar
spectral range, the assumption of spheres is a major source of error
(Nousiainen, 2009). The amount of solar radiation scattered back to a
radiometer at a satellite depends on the scattering angle, i.e. the angles of
Sun and satellite, on the aerosol optical thickness, and on the reflectance
at the ground. Thus the error in the case of assuming spherical particles is
highly variable, and it is essential to use the appropriate scattering
function (Horvath et al., 2006). The particle shape effect can cause up to
30 % difference in dust forcing             at the top of the atmosphere (Yi et al.,
2011).</p>
      <p>These aspects are the reason for accounting for the
non-sphericity of mineral particles in OPAC (Hess et al., 1998) and therefore
improving this algorithm. The user-friendly database
and software package OPAC presents the single-scattering properties of 10
aerosol components that are given with size distribution and spectral
refractive indices for a spectral range from ultraviolet to far-infrared.
These components can be easily combined by the user to individual mixtures,
i.e. to variable aerosol types, for which phase functions and other optical
and microphysical parameters are modeled after user request.</p>
      <p>If a particle is no longer assumed to be spherical, the possible variability
of the particle shape is increased dramatically, and can range from spheres
over spheroids and cubes to highly irregular
particles (Cheng, 1980). Thus, if the shape of particles will be
taken into account for general modeling of the optical parameters, it is
necessary to decide for simplifications. Moreover, a model is necessary that
allows one to consider reasonable shapes of
non-spherical particles. In this paper the non-spherical mineral particles
are approximated as spheroids, since this substantially improves the
agreement between modeled and measured optical properties (Mishchenko et al.,
1997; Kahnert et al., 2005) and an appropriate theory exists, the T-matrix
method (TMM) (Waterman, 1971).</p>
      <p>In the new version of OPAC the optical properties of the mineral components
are modeled as spheroids with the TMM code provided by Mishchenko and
Travis (1998), with the aspect ratio distributions
of the used spheroids varied with the particle size, as found by electron
microscope investigations. The other microphysical properties of the
components, the size distribution and the spectral refractive indices, have
not been changed against the old OPAC. During the Saharan Mineral Dust
Experiment field campaign (SAMUM-1), which was located close to the Sahara
and its mineral sources and used a lot of different aerosol measurement
systems (Heintzenberg, 2009), desert aerosol size distributions have been
measured both in situ on an airplane (Weinzierl et al., 2009) and inferred by
the AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) inversion
algorithm from ground-based photometer measurements. The results differ
considerably (Müller et al., 2010), but the OPAC size distributions are
in-between. Moreover, photometer measurements in the solar aureole (where the
non-sphericity has no influence) and values modeled with OPAC type “desert”
agree very well (Gasteiger, 2011). Also, optical properties of Saharan dust
measured by aircraft in 1999 compare very favorably
with OPAC results (Haywood et al., 2001) for radiative properties that are
independent of the scattering angle, like asymmetry parameter, single
scattering albedo, and specific extinction coefficient, for which the
non-sphericity has negligible influence. Thus, the OPAC size distributions
for desert aerosol are assumed to be adequate for a combination with the
information on particle shape from SAMUM.</p>
      <p>Also not changed against the old OPAC is the possibility of the flexible
mixing of the components and of the outcome of OPAC, like optical properties
depending on relative humidity and available for a large wavelength range.
In the new version of OPAC (4.0), which is freely available for
non-commercial use,  the optical properties modeled for non-spherical
mineral particles are taken into account directly for practical
application.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Non-spherical particle scattering</title>
      <p>The most suitable method to model the optical properties of mineral aerosol
particles on a systematic basis (Wiegner et al., 2009) is TMM. It provides a solution of Maxwell's equations for the
interaction of radiation with arbitrarily-shaped particles (Waterman, 1971)
and is most efficient for rotationally symmetric particles. In our model the
mineral particles are given as spheroids, originating from rotation of
ellipses around one of their axes. Thus, an additional microphysical parameter
that has to be taken into account is the aspect ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is the ratio between the longest and the shortest axis (Dubovik et al.,
2006). Moreover, the particles can be prolate (cigar-like) and oblate (disk-like) spheroids.</p>
      <p>For the results in this paper and the new version of OPAC, the
state-of-the-art TMM code from Mishchenko and Travis (1998) for randomly
oriented particles has been used for the mineral components. The T-matrix
calculations are supplemented by geometric optics calculations with the code
of Yang et al. (2007) for large particles not covered by the TMM code.
Wiegner et al. (2009) show the size coverage of the TMM code, which can model
dust spheroids up to size parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, around 110–120
for aspect ratio 1.6 and smaller. For aspect ratio 3.0 the maximum size
parameter of TMM is around 25. These codes have been used to create a data
set of single particle scattering properties of spheroids covering a wide
range of particle sizes, aspect ratios, and refractive indices. The grid of
particle parameters in this data set is given in Gasteiger et al. (2011). The
optical properties of the OPAC mineral components were calculated from this
data set according to their microphysical properties described below. For the
selection of the adequate aspect ratio distributions depending on particle
size, measurements of the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiments (SAMUM I and
SAMUM II) have been used (Kandler et al., 2009, 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Particle properties</title>
      <p>This paper presents an improvement of OPAC, by modifying the shape of
mineral particles. The other microphysical parameters used in OPAC, such as, the
particle size distribution and the spectral refractive indices, have been
left unchanged.</p>
      <p>In OPAC the aerosol particles are given as components (Shettle and Fenn,
1979; Deepak and Gerber, 1983) resulting from an internal mixture of
particles of a certain origin. The particles of a component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have a
log-normal size distribution (Eq. 1).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mod</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of particles of the component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per cubic
centimeter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the particle radius, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mod</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the mode radius of
component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the particle number, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures
the width of the distribution. The radius <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of each spheroid is assumed to
be the radius of a sphere with the orientation-averaged geometric cross
section of the spheroid. The relative optical properties do not depend on
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus they are given always for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For absolute values of optical
properties, e.g. for actual or individual conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must be chosen
adequately for each component that will be taken into account.</p>
      <p>The mineral dust is described in OPAC with three components as given in
Table 1: mineral nucleation mode (MINM), mineral accumulation mode (MIAM),
and mineral coarse mode (MICM), with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mod</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the data of
the size distributions, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the borders that have
been taken into account for modeling the optical properties.</p>
      <p>These mineral components can be mixed externally, also together with other
components, to form individual aerosol types. In general, both over deserts
and for other aerosol conditions with a dominant mass of mineral particles,
water-soluble particles (WASO) are also present. These particles can be
assumed to be spherical. Their amount is usually small with respect to their
mass per volume, but since the particles are small their numbers per volume
may be large.</p>
      <p>In OPAC the aerosol type “desert” is a mixture of more than
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral particles and only
4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> water soluble particles (WASO), resulting in
2000 particles per cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of WASO, and 300 per cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of mineral
particles belonging to their three components. A small amount of WASO is
generally taken into account in the following results, which show optical
properties of mixtures of mineral particles.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Microphysical properties of mineral components.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Component</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mod</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIneral</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nucleation Mode</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MINM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Accumulation Mode</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MIAM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse Mode</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MICM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The refractive indices of the components are wavelength-dependent (d'Almeida
et al., 1991; Koepke et al., 1997). The particles of the mineral components
all have the same refractive indices, since they are assumed to result from
the same sources at the surface. The refractive index is given with an
imaginary part that is responsible for the absorption properties of the
particles.</p>
      <p>To describe the shape properties of mineral particles of different size, for
each of the three mineral components, the data of the “reference” case of
SAMUM-1 have been used (Wiegner et al., 2009). The reference case was a
situation with a very homogeneous desert aerosol layer up to 5 km above sea
level which was very stable in time. The aspect ratio distribution of the
particles was measured using electron microscopy and is given depending on
particle size intervals by Kandler et al. (2009). For modeling the optical
properties of mineral particles these wide aspect ratio distributions are
applied to account for the large variety of the natural dust particle
shapes. The belonging modeling results, compared to measured phase functions,
are remarkably better than results when using only a single aspect ratio
(Mishchenko et al., 1997; Nousiainen and Vermeulen, 2003). Moreover, all
mineral particles are assumed to be prolate because this gives better
agreement with measured scattering matrix elements of dust particles than
using oblate or mixtures of prolate and oblate spheroids (Nousiainen and
Vermeulen, 2003).</p>
      <p>It is worth mentioning that the aspect ratio distribution of mineral
particles did not vary significantly during SAMUM-1 and also not during the
SAMUM-2 campaign, which was conducted further away from the dust source
Sahara (Kandler et al., 2009, 2011). Thus, the selected aspect ratio
distribution might be regarded as representative of Saharan dust.</p>
      <p>The aspect ratio distributions depend on the size of the particles. For the
reference case the relative frequency of particles with a given aspect ratio
is available for 6 ranges of particle size (Kandler et al., 2009; Wiegner et
al., 2009). Some of them have similar aspect ratio distributions so that only
three radius ranges must be differentiated: for particles with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m the frequency decreases strongly with increasing
aspect ratio. For particles with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m the shape
distributions for all analyzed size intervals are similar, with a small
maximum for the aspect ratio of about 1.5. Between these two regimes the
particles between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m have an
aspect ratio distribution that gives a transition between the other two
regimes (see Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Aspect ratio distributions as function of particle radius interval
discretized from measurement data of Kandler et al. (2009). The first line covers
the measurement data from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 1.3, the last line covers <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 and the other values cover <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-intervals of
0.2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.535</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.225</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.103</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.289</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.212</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.234</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.108</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.156</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.218</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.157</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.075</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.101</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.054</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.065</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.039</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.041</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.028</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.079</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.036</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Phase functions at 0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m for the mixture of the mineral
components after the aerosol type “desert”, under the assumption of
spherical mineral particles and for mineral particles with various aspect
ratio distributions (see text for details).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Each OPAC mineral component contains particles in all radius ranges given in
Table 2, with proportions that are varying according to the size distribution
of the components (Table 1). To check the shape effects, as a first test
(Kandler A) each mineral component is divided into the three radius ranges of
Table 2 and the belonging aspect ratio distribution of each range is applied.
This test is the most exact approach based on the available aspect ratio
data. As a second test – with respect to the idea of OPAC to keep things
easy – for all particles of each of the three OPAC mineral components a
fixed aspect ratio distribution has been used: the distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m for MINM,
0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m for MIAM, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m for MICM (Kandler B). This test setup seems
appropriate since the mode radii of the three components (Table 1) fall into
these three radius intervals used to separate the aspect ratio distributions
(Table 2). As a third test (Kandler C), the second test is modified by
assuming also for all particles of the accumulation mode (MIAM) the aspect
ratio distribution that has been measured for particles with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. This use of the aspect ratio distribution
measured for the larger particles also for MIAM was tested, since the maximum
of the surface area distribution of MIAM is close to a radius of
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Finally a further association of radius and aspect ratio
distribution has been tested: Dubovik et al. (2006) has derived aspect ratio
distributions by analyzing measured phase functions, with the assumption that
they are independent of the particle size. These are investigated as a forth
test (Dubovik) for the particle shape effects.</p>
      <p>As an example for the different considerations of the aspect ratio
distributions, in Fig. 1 the phase functions are shown under the assumption
of spherical particles and for non-spherical particles after the four tested
radius dependent aspect ratio distributions. The phase functions are given
for a wavelength 0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (however the results at other wavelengths
are similar, see Fig. 2), and as size distribution the combination of the
three mineral components of the aerosol type “desert” after OPAC, including
WASO at 0 % relative humidity, has been used.</p>
      <p>In Fig. 1 the increased sideward and reduced backward scattering is
to be seen clearly which holds for all phase functions resulting from particles with
non-spherical shape. The phase function after Dubovik is noticeably separated
against those after Kandler A to C. But this result is not astonishing, since
the direct electron microscopic investigations show that the aspect ratio
distributions are size dependent, in contrast to the size-independent
assumption by Dubovik. The phase functions after Kandler A (exact approach)
and Kandler C are nearly identical, which means that the simpler assumptions
in Kandler C give already correct results. Thus, for all optical property
modeling of non-spherical mineral particles, both for the results shown in
the following and for the new OPAC, the size dependent aspect ratio
distribution after Kandler C is used.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>The effects of the particle shape are different for different optical
properties which is shown in this paragraph for a variation of the optical
properties available from OPAC. Examples are presented for the deviations
between optical properties caused by mineral particles that are assumed as
spheres and those assumed as spheroids with the aspect
ratio distributions after Kandler C.</p>
      <p>The phase function is very important for remote-sensing of desert aerosol
and for its radiative forcing, and moreover, as mentioned above, for this
optical quantity the effect due to non-sphericity is large, especially in
the solar spectral range.</p>
      <p>Thus, Fig. 2a shows the phase function for the two particle shape
assumptions, for the mixture “desert” (Hess et al., 1998) and for different
wavelengths. The assumed shape variation (spherical or non-spherical) is
modeled only for the mineral particles: MINM 269.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; MIAM
30.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, MICM 0.142 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The 2000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> WASO are always
assumed as spherical.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Phase functions of desert aerosol for different
wavelengths, assuming spherical and spheroidal mineral particles with a size-
dependent aspect ratio distribution after Kandler C. For details see text.
The scale of the phase functions for the different wavelengths is shifted by
a factor 10 in each case. <bold>(b)</bold> Relative deviations (%) of phase
functions assuming spheroidal mineral particles from phase functions of
spherical particles, for desert aerosol and the conditions shown in
<bold>(a)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The phase functions show the known strong forward peak of aerosol particles,
which is not influenced by the particle shape. It is increasing with
increasing size parameter, and thus decreasing with wavelength. The particle
shape effect is to be seen clearly in Fig. 2a in the backward scattering
region, but more pronounced in Fig. 2b, where the belonging percentage
deviations between the phase functions for particles with size dependent
aspect ratio distributions and for spherical particles are shown.</p>
      <p>The effect of the particle shape is up to almost <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 % at scattering
angles around 130<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 % around 170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
backscatter region. The effect decreases with increasing wavelength and is
nearly negligible at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, as also shown. The reason is that the
shape properties of the particles become less relevant if the wavelength of
the radiation becomes larger relative to the particle size. In contrary, the
effect of the particle shape is relatively low at 350 nm, but this results
from the strong absorption of the mineral particles at this wavelength, which
reduces the scattering effects in general and thus is dominant in comparison to the shape
effect. The effect of the particle shape is strongest in the
solar wavelength range, which is often used for aerosol remote-sensing and
which is essential for radiative forcing and thus for climate effects. This
documents again the need to take the non-spherical shape of mineral particles
into account for remote-sensing or climate studies.</p>
      <p>As mentioned, the aspect ratio distribution depends on the particle size.
Thus, size distributions with different amounts of small and large particles
may result in different variations of the phase function compared to that
under the assumption of spheres. Since the life time of big particles in the
atmosphere is less than that of smaller particles, in a dust storm not only
the total amount of mineral particles in the air is high, but also the
relative amount of large particles. During the transport, i.e. the time
after the dust generation, the particle amount will be reduced due to
sedimentation, but this effect can be stronger for larger particles. Finally,
for background conditions, the total amount of mineral particles is low, and
has
the lowest amount of large particles (d'Almeida, 1987; Longtin et al., 1988;
Tanré et al., 1988). The relative increasing amount of large particles
with increasing turbidity that we assume to test the effect of non-sphericity
with respect to particle size distribution is shown in Eqs. (2)–(4)
(d'Almeida, 1987; Koepke et al., 1997). Given are correlations between the
total number of mineral dust particles and the belonging numbers for the
three mineral components.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MINM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.104</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.963</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MIAM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.29</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MICM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.06</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>In Fig.  3, for desert aerosol with different turbidity, implemented with
different total particle numbers, resulting in a different number of
particles of the three mineral components, the phase functions for
non-spherical desert particles are shown. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gives the total
number of mineral particles. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 stands for
“background desert” conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 for average
“desert” and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1200 for “dust storm”. It can be
seen that the general effect of the non-spherical particle shape is always
given, but does not differ considerably for the different size distributions,
as a result of different total particle numbers. The effect of varying size
distribution is more pronounced in the forward peak and the sideward
scattering.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Phase functions of desert aerosol at 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, with a
mixture of the non-spherical mineral components MINM, MIAM and MICM after the
Eqs. (2)–(4), using the total number of mineral particle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
given in the figure. In each case 2000 WASO particles assuming 0 % RH are
included.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>As mentioned, the WASO particles are spheres, with the consequence that the
variation of their amount changes the phase function of the mixture. This is
shown in Fig. 4 for “desert” with different amounts of WASO on the one
hand, and for an average amount of 2000 WASO particles, but in combination with
mineral particles for “background” and for “dust storm” conditions on
the other hand.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Relative deviations (%) of phase functions at 0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
assuming spheroidal mineral particles, from phase functions of spherical
particles, for different combinations of the components WASO, MINM, MIAM and
MICM (for details see text).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 4 shows that the effects due to the particle shape increase from
background over desert to dust storm if the number of WASO is fixed, simply
due to the increasing amount of non-spherical mineral particles. On the
contrary, the effect due to non-spherical shape is reduced, to be seen for
the type “desert”, if the amount of spherical WASO particles is increased.
But it should be mentioned that the effect due to doubling or omitting WASO
for the relative deviations of the phase function is less than the effect
due to the variation of the amount of the mineral particles.</p>
      <p>For the determination of the height dependent aerosol extinction
coefficients, often backscatter lidar systems or ceilometers are used,
because they are cheaper than higher sophisticated lidar instruments (Mona et
al., 2012; Wiegner et al., 2014). However, for these instruments the measured
signal is a result of both the extinction coefficient and the phase function at
180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, to get the interesting height dependent extinction
coefficient, it is necessary to use a quantity “lidar ratio”, which depends
on the phase function and thus on the particle shape.</p>
      <p>Figure 5 shows the lidar ratio for the aerosol type “desert”, both under
the assumption of non-spherical and spherical mineral particles. The values
are given for a wavelength range up to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, although no lidar
instruments are available for wavelength larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.
Moreover, for the large wavelengths, the particles behave more and more like
spheres, as already seen in Fig. 2b. For the interesting wavelength
range around and below 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, however, the consideration of
non-sphericity is essential. With respect to independently measured lidar
ratios, the agreement with modeled values is much better under the assumption
of spheroids than of spheres (Gobbi et al., 2002). The lidar ratios to be
seen in Fig. 5 are in good agreement with measured values from SAMUM
(Groß et al., 2011). This is also generally valid for all
lidar-wavelengths that have been used during SAMUM, but here the agreement
between measured and modeled lidar ratios was reduced for the wavelength 355 nm, probably
due to wrong assumptions with respect to the refractive index (Wiegner et
al., 2009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Modeled values of the lidar ratio for “desert” aerosol under the
assumption of spherical and non-spherical particles.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Optical quantities that are independent of the scattering angle or given as
ratio between wavelengths are expected to be less sensitive with respect to
the particle shape. To investigate this aspect, in Fig. 6 relative
differences between spherical and non-spherical desert particles are
presented for the spectral scattering-, absorption- and
extinction-coefficients and for the asymmetry parameter. For all these
quantities the deviations are less than 6 % and even less than 4 % in
the part of the solar spectrum that is most relevant for climate effects. The
same low dependency on the particle shape also holds for the single
scattering albedo and the Ångström coefficient, not shown in a figure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>New version: OPAC (4.0)</title>
      <p>The main improvement of the new version of OPAC is the consideration of the
non-sphericity of mineral particles. In OPAC for all optical quantities the
large wavelength range between 0.25 and 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m is
respected, with the consequence that the improved
particle shape of mineral particles works both in the solar and in the
infrared spectral region. Additionally, new in OPAC (4.0) is the possibility
to model the particle mass for different cut-off radii,
e.g. as used for PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, the
component “mineral-transported”, MITR, is no longer considered. This
component had been used to describe desert aerosol under very remote
conditions, as part of aerosol in polar regions. However, the amount of
mineral dust particles should be reduced continuously on its way from the
source, depending on their life time. This is possible with the remaining
mineral components (e.g. using Eqs. 2–4), instead of switching to MITR.
Thus, the aerosol type “Antarctic” in OPAC has been modified.</p>
      <p>As discussed in the paper, the shape of the mineral particles has been
improved. To avoid mistakes, the new mineral components are named in the new
OPAC version with an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end, standing for non-spherical. The change
from spheres to spheroids was made on the basis of cross section equivalence,
resulting in a small reduction of the particle volume and thus the particle
mass, resulting in the reduction factors shown in Table 3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Deviation (%), between spherical and non-spherical “desert”
aerosol for different optical quantities.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/5947/2015/acp-15-5947-2015-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Reduction factors for particle volume and mass for the non-spherical
mineral components, compared to the old components.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MINM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MINN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9754</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIAM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MIAN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9273</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MICM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MICN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9273</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>All the other microphysical aerosol properties are unchanged against the
previous version of OPAC. Also the new version of OPAC gives the possibility
to combine different aerosol components, in each case with individually
decided particle number density for each component.</p>
      <p>Results of OPAC (4.0) are a large number of optical properties (like phase
function, scattering- absorption- and extinction coefficient, asymmetry
parameter, single scattering albedo, Ångström coefficient, lidar ratio
and visibility) and particle mass per volume. All properties can be modeled
for different relative humidity and the optical properties are available as
spectral values for the wide wavelength range of 0.25 to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and
spectrally weighted for the solar and terrestrial range. For non-commercial
use OPAC (4.0) is freely available at <uri>www.rascin.net</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Aerosol particles are one of the main gaps in the present knowledge of
radiative forcing (Myhre et al., 2013), and mineral particles are especially
essential due to their large amount and temporal and spatial variability.
Since mineral particles in general are not spheres, Mie theory may lead to
wrong values, both, if their optical properties are modeled based on size
distribution and refractive index, and if remote-sensing data
are used to get aerosol properties. Thus, the optical properties of mineral
particles in the new version of OPAC are derived using TMM for
spheroids. As described in this paper the non-sphericity is given by typical
size dependent aspect ratio distributions of spheroids, which have been
derived from measurements at observation campaigns. The predefined
components in OPAC, now also for non-spherical mineral particles, are a big
convenience, because users do not need to decide for individual single
particle properties, as available from various studies and databases
(Nousiainen, 2009; Meng et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The differences between spherical and non-spherical mineral particles are
shown for a wide range of optical properties of desert aerosols. They are
small, nearly negligible in the case of angular-independent optical
quantities, like extinction-, scattering- and absorption-coefficients,
asymmetry factor, single scattering albedo, and Ångström coefficient.
However, the differences between spherical and non-spherical particles are
large, up to 60 %, in the sideward and backward scattering regions of the
phase functions in the solar spectral range. As a consequence, the deviations
are also large in the lidar ratio, a parameter required to get height
dependent extinction values from often used backscatter lidar measurements.
The effect of the particle shape decreases with wavelength, since at
wavelengths that are rather large with respect to the particle size, the
particle shape is of less relevance.</p>
      <p>It should be born in mind that the size distribution and the complex
refractive index of the aerosol particles are very important for their
optical properties. For the radiative properties in the thermal infrared the
uncertainty in the refractive index will outperform the shape effect, which
moreover depends on the absorption of the particles (Legrand et al., 2014).
However, in this article only the aspect of the shape of mineral particle is
discussed, and in the new version of OPAC the shape of the mineral particles
has been improved, but the assumed size distributions and spectral
refractive indices have not been changed. This will be done in the future,
where it is planned also to add a stronger absorbing mineral component that
allows for a larger variability of mixtures to describe desert aerosol.</p>
      <p>Since the solar spectral range is often used for remote-sensing of aerosol
particles and relevant for aerosol radiative forcing, the consideration of the phase functions of non-spherical
mineral particles is a real improvement of OPAC, now available as version 4.0.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This publication was partly funded by LMU Munich's Institutional Strategy
LMUexcellent within the framework of the German Excellence Initiative.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: P. Formenti</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>d'Almeida, G. A.: On the variability of desert aerosol radiative
characteristics, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3017–3026, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>d'Almeida, G. A., Koepke, P., and Shettle, E. P.: Atmospheric aerosols, A.
Deepak Publ. Hampton, Virginia, USA, 561 pp., 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, R. J.: Physical properties of atmospheric particulates, in: Light
scattering by irregularly shaped particles, edited by: Schuerman, D. W., Plenum
Press, New York, USA, 69–78, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Deepak, A. and Gerber, H. E.: Report of the experts meeting on aerosols and
their climatic effects, WCP-55, World Meteorolog. Org., Geneva, Switzerland,
107 pp., 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Sinyuk, A., Lapyonok, T., Holben, B. N., Mishchenko, M. I., Yang,
P., Eck, T. F., Volten, H., Munoz, O., Veihelmann, B., van der Zande, W. J.,
Leon, J. F., Sorokin, M., and Slutsker, I.: Application of spheroid models to
account for aerosol particle non-sphericity in remote sensing of desert
dust, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D11208, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006619</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Falkovich, A. H., Gomez, E., Lewin, Z., Formenti, P., and Rudich, Y.:
Analysis of individual dust particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
18029–18036, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Gasteiger, J., Groß, S., Freudenthaler, V., and Wiegner, M.: Volcanic ash
from Iceland over Munich: mass concentration retrieved from ground-based
remote sensing measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2209–2223,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2209-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2209-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Gasteiger, J. K.: Retrieval of  microphysical properties of desert dust and
volcanic ash aeosols from ground-based remote sensing, Diss. Univ.
Muenchen, 124 pp., 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Gobbi, G. P., Barnaba, F., Blumthaler, M., Labow, G., and Herman, J. R.:
Observed effects of particles non-sphericity on the retrieval of marine and
desert dust aerosol optical depth by lidar, Atmos. Res., 61, 1–14, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Groß, S., Tesche, M., Freudenthaler, V., Toledano, C., Wiegner, M.,
Ansmann, A., Althausen, D., and Seefeldner, M.: Characterization of Saharan
dust, marine aerosols and mixtures of biomass-burning aerosols and dust by
means of multi-wavelength depolarization and Raman lidar measurements during
SAMUM 2, Tellus B, 63, 706–724, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M. and Boucher, O.: Estimates of direct and indirect radiative
forcing due to tropospheric aerosol: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M., Francis, P. N., Glew, M. D., and Taylor, J. P.: Optical
properties and direct radiative effect of Saharan dust: A case study of two
Saharan dust outbreaks using aircraft data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
18417–18430., 2001</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Heintzenberg, J.: The SAMUM-1 experiment over Southern Morocco: overview and
introduction, Tellus B, 61, 2–11, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical properties of aerosols and
clouds: The software package OPAC, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 831–844, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Horvath, H., Kasahara, M., Tohno, S., and Kocifaj, M.: Angular scattering of
the Gobi desert aerosol and its influence on radiative forcing, J. Aerosol
Sci., 37, 1287–1302, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kalashnikova, O. V. and Sokolik, I. N.: Importance of shapes and compositions
of wind-blown dust particles for remote sensing at solar wavelengths,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 38.1–38.4, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kahnert, F. M.: Numerical methods in electromagnetic scattering theory, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 79, 775–824, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Kahnert, M., Nousiainen, T., and Veihelmann, B.: Spherical and spheroidal
model particles as an error source in aerosol climate forcing and radiance
computations: A case study for feldspar aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D18S13, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005558" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005558</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Schütz, L., Deutscher, C., Ebert, M., Hofmann, H.,
Jäckel, S., Jaenicke, R., Knippertz, P., Lieke, K., Massling, A.,
Petzold, A., Schladitz, A., Weinzierl, B., Wiedensohler, A., Zorn, S., and
Weinbruch, S.: Size distributions, mass concentrations, chemical and
mineralogical composition, and derived optical parameters of the boundary
layer aerosol at Tinfou, Morocco, during SAMUM 2006, Tellus B, 61, 32–50,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Lieke, K., Benker, N., Emmel, C., Küpper, M.,
Müller-Ebert, D., Scheuvens, D., Schladitz, A., Schütz, L., and
Weinbruch, S.: Electron microscopy of particles collected at Praia, Cap
Verde, during the Saharan mineral dust experiment: particle chemistry, shape,
mixing state and complex refractive indices, Tellus B, 63, 457–496, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kaufmann, Y. J.: Measurements of the optical thickness and the path radiance
– Implications on aerosol remote sensing and atmospheric corrections, J.
Geophys. Res., 98, 2677–2692, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E.,
Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener,
F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P.,
Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I.,
Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E.,
Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U.,
Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: An AeroCom initial assessment –
optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 1815–1834, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Koepke, P. and Hess, M.: Scattering functions of tropospheric aerosols: the
effects of non-spherical particles, Appl. Optics, 27, 2422–2430, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Koepke, P. and Quenzel, H.: Turbidity of the atmosphere determined from
satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 7847–7856, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Koepke, P., Hess, M., Schult, I., and  Shettle, E. P.: Global Aerosol Data Set,
Report No. 243, MPI Hamburg, Germany, 44 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lacis, A. A. and Mishchenko, M. I.: Climate forcing, climate sensitivity, and
climate response: a radiative modeling perspective on atmospheric aerosols,
in: Aerosol forcing of climate, edited by: Charlson, R. J. and Heintzenberg,
J., John Wiley &amp; Sons, 11–42, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Legrand, M., Dubovik, O., Lapyonok, T., and Derimian, Y.: Accounting for
particle non-sphericity in modeling mineral dust radiative properties in the
thermal infrared, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 149, 219–240, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Longtin, D. R., Shettle, E. P., Hummel, J. R., and Pryce, J. D.: A desert
aerosol model for radiative transfer studies, in: Aerosols and climate,
edited by: Hobbs, P. V. and McCormick, M. P., A. Deepak Publ., Hampton
Virginia, USA, 261–269, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>McCormick, R. A. and Ludwig, J. H.: Climate modification by atmospheric
aerosols, Science, 156, 1358–1359, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Meng, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Bi, L., Liou, K. N., and Laszlo, I.:
Single-scattering properties of tri-axial ellipsoidal mineral dust aerosols:
A database for application to radiative transfer calculations, J. Aerosol
Sci., 41, 501–512, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Mie, G.: Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler
Metallösungen, Ann. Physik, 25, 377–445, 1908.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I. and Travis, L. D.: Capabilities and limitations of a current
Fortran implementation of the T-Matrix method for randomly oriented,
rotationally symmetric scatterers, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 60, 309–324,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., Kahn, R. A., and West, R. A.: Modeling phase
functions for dust-like tropospheric aerosols using a shape mixture of
randomly oriented polydisperse spheroids, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
13543–13553, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D. (Eds): Light scattering
by nonspherical particles: Theory, measurements, and applications, Academic
Press, San Diego, USA, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Mona, L., Liu, Z., Müller, D., Omar, A., Papayannis, A., Pappalardo, G.,
Sugimoto, N., and Vaughan, M.: Lidar measurements for desert dust
characterization: An Overview, Adv. Meteorol., 2012, ID356265, 36 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Müller, D., Weinzierl, B., Petzold, A., Kandler, K., Ansmann, A.,
Müller, T., Tesche, M., Freudenthaler, V., Esselborn, M., Heese, B.,
Althausen, D., Schaditz, A., Otto, S., and Knippertzt, P.: Mineral dust
observed with AERONET Sun photometer, Raman lidar, and in situ instruments
during SAMUM 2006: Shape-independent particle properties, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 115, D07202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012520</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J.,
Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T.,
Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhanh, H.: Anthropogenic and
natural radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2013, edited by: Stocker, T.
F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels,
A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambrige,
UK, and New York, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Nousiainen, T.: Optical modeling of mineral dust particles: A review, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 1261–1279, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Nousiainen, T. and Vermeulen, K.: Comparison of measured single-scattering
matrix of feldspar with T-matrix simulations using spheroids, J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 79, 1031–1042, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Sakai, T., Orikasa, N., Nagai, T., Murakami, M., Tajiri, T., Saito, A.,
Yamashita, K., and Hashimoto, A.: Balloon-borne and Raman lidar observations
of Asian dust and cirrus cloud properties over Tsukuba, Japan, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 3295–3308, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Shettle, E. P. and Fenn, R. W.: Models for the aerosols of the lower
atmosphere and the effects of humidity variations on their optical
properties, Report AFGL-TR-79-0214, AFGL, Hanscom AFB, Mass, USA, 94 pp.,
1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sokolik, I. N., Winker, D. M., Bergametti, G., Gilette, D. A., Carmichel, G.,
Kaufmann, Y. J., Gomes, L., Schmetz, L., and Penner, J. E.: Introduction to
special section: outstanding problems in quantifying the radiative impacts of
mineral dust, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 18015–18027, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Tanré, D., Devaux, C., Herman, M., and Santer, R.: Radiative properties
of desert aerosols by optical ground-based measurements at solar wavelengths,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 14223–14231, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Waterman, P.: Symmetry, unitarity, and geometry in electromagnetic
scattering, Phys. Rev., 3, 825–839, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Weinzierl, B., Petzold, A., Esselborn, M., Wirth, M., Rasp, K., Kandler, K.,
Schütz, L., Koepke, P., and Fiebig, M.: Airborne measurements of dust
layer properties, particle size distribution and mixing state of Saharan dust
during SAMUM 2006, Tellus B, 61, 96–117, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Wiegner, M., Gasteiger, J., Kandler, K., Weinzierl, B., Rasp, K., Esselborn,
M., Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Toledano, C., Tesche, M., and Althausen,
D.: Numerical simulations of optical properties of Saharan dust aerosols with
emphasis on lidar applications, Tellus B, 61, 180–194, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Wiegner, M., Madonna, F., Binietoglou, I., Forkel, R., Gasteiger, J.,
Geiß, A., Pappalardo, G., Schäfer, K., and Thomas, W.: What is the
benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1979–1997, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1979-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1979-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Feng, Q., Hong, G., Kattawar, G. W., Wiscombe, W. J., Mishchenko,
M. I., Dubovik, O., Laszlo, I., and Sokolik, I. N.: Modeling of the
scattering and radiative properties of nonspherical dust-like aerosols, J.
Aerosol Sci., 38, 995–1014, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Yi, B., Hsu, C. N., Yang, P., and Tsay, S.-C.: Radiative transfer simulation
of dust-like aerosols: Uncertainties from particle shape and refractive
index, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 631–644, 2011.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Zerull, R. H., Giese, R. H., Schwill, S., and Weiss, K.: Scattering by
particles of nonspherical shape, in: Light scattering by irregularly shaped
particles, edited by: Schuerman, D. W., Plenum Press, New York, USA,
273–282, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
