<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing in current models to
explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during the January 2013 haze
episode in North China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Heterogeneous chemistry}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~Zheng et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-3445</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
          <email>qiangzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3 aff5">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>K. B.</given-names></name>
          <email>hekb@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>G. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>F. K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5501-6048</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Kimoto</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-6466</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and
Pollution Control,  School of Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Tsinghua University, Beijing,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System
Modeling,  Center for Earth System Science, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Tsinghua University, Beijing,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources
and Control of Air Pollution Complex,Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional
Environmental Quality, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Kimoto Electric Co., Ltd, 3-1 Funahashi-cho Tennoji-ku
Osaka, 543-0024, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Q. Zhang (qiangzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn) and K. B. He (hekb@tsinghua.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2031</fpage><lpage>2049</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>May</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Severe regional haze pollution events occurred in eastern and central China
in January 2013, which had adverse effects on the environment and public
health. Extremely high levels of particulate matter with aerodynamic
diameter of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m or less (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with dominant components of
sulfate and nitrate are responsible for the haze pollution. Although
heterogeneous chemistry is thought to play an important role in the
production of sulfate and nitrate during haze episodes, few studies have
comprehensively evaluated the effect of heterogeneous chemistry on haze
formation in China by using the 3-D models due to of a lack of treatments for
heterogeneous reactions in most climate and chemical transport models. In
this work, the WRF-CMAQ model with newly added heterogeneous reactions is
applied to East Asia to evaluate the impacts of heterogeneous chemistry and
the meteorological anomaly during January 2013 on regional haze formation.
As the parameterization of heterogeneous reactions on different types of
particles is not well established yet, we arbitrarily selected the uptake
coefficients from reactions on dust particles and then conducted several
sensitivity runs to find the value that can best match observations. The
revised CMAQ with heterogeneous chemistry not only captures the magnitude
and temporal variation of sulfate and nitrate, but also reproduces the
enhancement of relative contribution of sulfate and nitrate to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mass from clean days to polluted haze days. These results indicate the
significant role of heterogeneous chemistry in regional haze formation and
improve the understanding of the haze formation mechanisms during the
January 2013 episode.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Regional haze pollution is an atmospheric phenomenon characterized by
significant growth in the concentration of aerosol particles and sharp
reduction of visibility. In addition to the adverse effects on visibility,
haze pollution also affects the air quality, public health  and climate. By
scattering and absorbing solar radiation, aerosol particles suspended within
haze can decrease the fluxes of solar radiation reaching the Earth's
surface, significantly altering the Earth's energy budget and climate
(Seinfeld et al., 2004; Mercado et al., 2009). Sulfate and nitrate aerosols
can increase soil acidity through acid deposition, which has a negative
impact on the ecosystem (Zhao et al., 2009). Because of their small sizes,
aerosol particles can penetrate deeply into human lungs, causing respiratory
diseases, decreased lung function, and increased risk of cancer and
mortality (American Lung Association, 2006).</p>
      <p>Haze pollution in China is of significant concern because of its increased
frequency of occurrence in recent years. The number of haze days has shown
an increasing trend since the 1990s and visibility during the haze events
has decreased rapidly (Zhao et al., 2011; Ding and Liu, 2014). Aerosol
loadings during haze days can be extremely high with maximum hourly
concentrations of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m or less (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 200–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sun et al., 2006;
Wang et al., 2006, 2014b, c; Zhao et al., 2013b), which can reduce surface solar radiation by more than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Li et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>Most parts of central and eastern China experienced a persistent episode of
haze pollution during January 2013, which is one of the most severe air
pollution episodes in China during the last decade (He et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014c, d; Zhang et al., 2014a, b). Widespread haze clouds covered the entire North China
Plain (NCP) (Yang et al., 2013) and the instantaneous concentration of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within these clouds exceeded 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at some urban
observational sites (Wang et al., 2014c). The characteristics and
formation mechanisms of this haze event attract considerable attention from
the scientific community.</p>
      <p>High emission intensity, adverse meteorological conditions, and the
formation of substantial amounts of secondary aerosols are generally
regarded as the principal factors underlying the formation of the severe
haze pollution in January 2013. Central and eastern China are the most
important source regions of anthropogenic emissions in China (Zhang et al.,
2009), which can provide sufficient precursors for haze formation. Adverse
meteorological conditions in January 2013 conducive to haze formation
include weak surface winds, low mixing layers, a thick temperature inversion
layer  and anomalous southerly winds in the middle and lower troposphere
that transport large amounts of water vapor and pollutants (Wang et al., 2014c; Zhang et al., 2014b). Under weather conditions of high
humidity and reduced advection and vertical mixing, large amounts of
secondary aerosols (both organic and inorganic) can be generated. In
particular, greater amounts of secondary inorganic aerosols comprising
sulfate, nitrate  and ammonium (SNA) were produced during the haze days of
the January 2013 episode than during clean days. The contribution of sulfate
and nitrate to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 10.3–13.4 % and 6.6–14 % in
clean days to 25.1  % and 17.5–20.6 % in haze days, respectively (Zhang et al., 2014a; Quan et al., 2014). The total contribution of SNA
reached about 60 % during the most severe haze days from 12–15 January (Zhang et al., 2014a; Quan et al., 2014), which indicates
that the significant production of SNA is a principal driving force that
leads to the sharp increase in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p>Many studies on aerosols have revealed that SNA are the most abundant
component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during haze pollution events in China, and that the
processes and evolution of haze pollution are characterized by the formation
of substantial amounts of sulfate and nitrate (Sun et al., 2006; Wang et
al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2013b). The formation mechanisms are difficult
to be explained by traditional gas-phase or aqueous-phase chemistry (i.e.,
gas-phase oxidation by hydroxyl radical (OH) and in-cloud oxidation by
dissolved ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hydrogen peroxide (H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given the
adverse atmospheric conditions (i.e., low or even zero O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, dim days with low solar radiations and few precipitating
clouds) (Zhao et al., 2013b; Quan et al., 2014). Besides the gas-phase
and aqueous-phase chemistry, heterogeneous chemistry is considered as
alternative pathways of sulfate and nitrate formation in the atmosphere
(Ravishankara, 1997). The ambient measurement has verified the existence of
heterogeneous reactions associated with sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrogen
pentoxide (N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nitric acid (HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Usher et al., 2003;
Lammel and Leip, 2005; McNaughton et al., 2009; Chang et al., 2011). Field
studies during haze days in China proposed that the large amount of sulfate
and nitrate were more likely generated via heterogeneous chemistry than
gas-phase and aqueous-phase chemistry (Wang et al., 2006; Li and Shao, 2009,
2010; Li et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012c, 2014c; Zhao et al., 2013b). Modeling studies have used 0-D to 3-D air quality models to
research on the role of heterogeneous reactions in sulfate and nitrate
formation on the surface of mineral particles (Zhang et al., 1994; Dentener
et al., 1996; Zhang and Carmichael, 1999; Wang et al., 2012a). However,
few studies have comprehensively evaluated the effect of heterogeneous
chemistry on haze formation in China by using the 3-D models because of a
lack of treatments for heterogeneous reactions in most climate and chemical
transport models.</p>
      <p>In this work, we use the CMAQ model to investigate the impact of
heterogeneous chemistry on the severe regional haze formation in January
2013. The officially released version of CMAQ (hereafter the original CMAQ)
and revised CMAQ with updated treatments for heterogeneous chemistry by
adding a number of reactions (hereafter the revised CMAQ) are applied to
simulate the January 2013 severe regional haze pollution episode over East
Asia. Our objectives are to improve the model's capability in reproducing
the observed high PM concentrations and provide better understanding of the
effects of heterogeneous reactions on the production of sulfate and nitrate
during the haze event.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model description and methodology</title>
      <p>In this work, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model v3.5.1
(<uri>http://www.wrf-model.org/</uri>) and CMAQ v5.0.1 (<uri>http://www.cmascenter.org/cmaq/</uri>) are applied to simulate the severe haze
episode in January 2013 over East Asia. WRF is a new-generation mesoscale
numerical weather prediction system designed to serve a wide range of
meteorological applications from meters to thousands of kilometers
(<uri>http://www.wrf-model.org/</uri>). WRF v3.5.1 is the most recent
major WRF release in September 2013 and is used to generate meteorological
fields to drive CMAQ. CMAQ is a 3-D Eulerian atmospheric chemistry and
transport modeling system that simulates multi-pollutants throughout the
troposphere across spatial scales ranging from local to hemispheric. CMAQ
v5.0.1 is the most up-to-date release in July 2012. It contains the updated
carbon bond gas-phase mechanism with new toluene chemistry (Whitten et al.,
2010), a new aerosol module (AERO6)  and ISORROPIA v2.1 inorganic chemistry
(Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007). The existing formation mechanisms for SNA
included in the original CMAQ and new heterogeneous reactions added in the
revised CMAQ that form additional SNA are described below.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Main reactions contributing to sulfate and nitrate production in
original CMAQ and heterogeneous reactions newly added in revised CMAQ.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="113.811024pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction #.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reaction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Contributions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>original CMAQ</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas-phase chemistry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(All species in gas phase)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NTR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> VOCs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aqueous-phase kinetic chemistry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>+ H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(All species in aqueous phase)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MHP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PAA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III)/Mn(II) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Heterogeneous</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (aq) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">chemistry<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (aq) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HONO (aq) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>revised CMAQ</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Newly added</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Affect R7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">heterogeneous chemistry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Renoxification</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Affect R4 and R7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Affect R10–R12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OH (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Affect R1–R2, R5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NTR: organic nitrate.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> VOCs: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde and higher
aldehydes, cresol and higher molecular weight phenols, nitro cresol,
aromatic ring open products, and isoprene oxidation products.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> MHP: methylhydroperoxide.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> PAA: peroxyacetic acid.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> R14 and R15 were removed after R16-R24 were added into the model.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The formation mechanisms of SNA in the original CMAQ</title>
      <p>Table 1 summarizes major mechanisms for sulfate and nitrate formation
currently treated in the original CMAQ v5.0.1 (R1–R15) in a highly
simplified manner. In the gas phase (R1–R6), sulfuric acid
(H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are generated mainly through the oxidation
of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and nitrogen oxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by OH. Additional HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
formed through subsequent reactions involving reactive nitrogen species such
as nitrogen trioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NTR and OH,
hydroperoxyl radical (HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O as well as the nighttime
oxidation reaction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can condense on the surface of pre-existing
aerosol, forming sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
in-cloud chemistry (R7–R13), the original CMAQ includes the dissolution
equilibria of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrous acid (HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, peroxynitric
acid (HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and several oxidants such as OH, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the dissociation equilibria of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, bisulfite
(HSO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
and five aqueous-phase kinetic reactions to produce S (VI) through the
oxidation of S (IV) (dissolved SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HSO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfite
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, methylhydroperoxide (MHP),
peroxyacetic acid (PAA), O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> catalyzed by ferric
iron (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and manganese ion (Mn<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Once clouds dissipate,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed in the aqueous phase becomes part of aerosol. The
original CMAQ only includes two heterogeneous reactions (R14–R15) to
produce HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, one involving N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and the other
involving nitrogen dioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. The mechanism of
heterogeneous chemistry is much more complex than the homogeneous gas- and
aqueous-phase mechanisms. It involves many processes including water
condensation onto the particle surfaces, adsorption and accommodation of
gases into the liquid–gas interface, diffusion, and surface reactions (Reid
and Sayer, 2003). Heterogeneous reaction rates are dependent on relative
humidity (RH) (Dentener et al., 1996; Henson et al., 1996; Stutz et al.,
2004) because of the significant role of the water film on the aerosol
surface in the gas uptake. The formation of ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
closely related to that of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as   it
results from the neutralization of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
dissolved NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the particulate phase through aerosol equilibrium
treated in ISORROPIA II of Fountoukis and Nenes (2007).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Observed concentrations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during January
2013 in Beijing.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Missing heterogeneous reactions and their implementation into original
CMAQ</title>
      <p>Heterogeneous chemistry might have played a significant role in the January
2013 haze episode for three reasons. First, the total amount of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed through gas- and aqueous-phase chemistry is too low
to explain the observed abrupt increases in the concentrations of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 70–130 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> within a few hours during the
haze episode. The observed concentrations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are in the range of
10–216 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1). The gas-phase oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by OH
radicals can convert SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at a maximum rate of 2 % h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
under sunny conditions, leading to 0.2–5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (which is equivalent to
0.2–5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aqueous-phase chemistry as shown in Table 1 can
enhance SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in precipitating clouds, which did not
occur frequently during the episode. Only two precipitations are recorded in
central China, on 20–21 and 30–31 January, which contribute
92 % of the total precipitation  in January (data derived from <uri>http://cdc.cma.gov.cn</uri>). Meanwhile the weak photochemical activity during
dim haze days, characterized by extremely low or even zero O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (He et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014c), does not support
that gas- and aqueous-phase chemistry are dominant pathways for sulfate and
nitrate production. As shown in Table 1, the original CMAQ only includes two
heterogeneous reactions to produce HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and does not include any
heterogeneous reactions to produce SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The original model
evaluation against ground-based measurements (as shown in Sect. 4.2.1) shows
significant underpredictions of SNA (e.g., normalized mean biases (NMBs) of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 %). These data analysis and modeling results indicate
that the heterogeneous chemistry probably have played a significant role to
produce high SNA during the haze pollution. Second, there exist strong
correlations between RH and sulfur and nitrogen oxidation ratios (SOR and
NOR) during haze in January 2013 (Sun et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014c;
Zheng et al., 2014b), which resemble the RH-dependence of heterogeneous
chemistry. Third, transmission electron microscopy studies have shown that
the particles sampled during haze days in the NCP are mostly combined with
obvious coatings containing significant sulfur and nitrogen elements,
probably generated via some reactions on the particle surfaces (Li and Shao,
2009, 2010; Li et al., 2011). This suggests that surface reactions, probably
caused by heterogeneous chemistry, play a significant role in haze
formation. Based on the above three reasons, heterogeneous chemistry is
regarded as the most important missing reaction pathway and nine new
heterogeneous reactions (R16–R24) were therefore incorporated into CMAQ to
improve its capability in reproducing the high SNA concentrations observed
during the haze episode through increasing sulfate and nitrate formation.
Simulations from the original and the revised CMAQ are compared to study the
role of heterogeneous chemistry in producing sulfate and nitrate during this
haze episode, as presented in Sects. 4.2 and 4.3.</p>
      <p>As shown in Table 1, following the work of Wang et al. (2012a), nine
heterogeneous reactions involving H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH  and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (R16–R24)
have been incorporated into the original CMAQ. These reactions are assumed to
occur on the surface of aerosols. Heterogeneous chemistry is commonly
parameterized using a pseudo-first-order rate constant and is assumed to be
irreversible (Zhang and Carmichael, 1999; Jacob, 2000). The rate constant
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for heterogeneous loss of gaseous pollutants is determined by
(Jacob, 2000; Wang et al., 2012a)

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the reactant for heterogeneous reactions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
effective diameter of the particles (m), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas-phase molecular
diffusion coefficient for reactant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean
molecular speed of reactant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the gas phase, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the uptake
coefficient for reactant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (dimensionless), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol surface
area per unit volume of air (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated in CMAQ, and the parameter
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined for different reactants based on laboratory
measurements reported in the literature, as presented below.</p>
      <p>The values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for different gaseous pollutants may vary by several
orders of magnitude, because of different surface properties, particle
compositions, temperature, RH, and laboratory conditions. For a specific
combination of particle and gaseous pollutants, the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
highly dependent on RH and increases rapidly as a function of RH (Dentener
et al., 1996; Henson et al., 1996; Stutz et al., 2004). For example, Mogili
et al. (2006) found that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by a
factor of 4 as RH increased in an environmental aerosol chamber. Liu et al. (2008) reported that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on calcium carbonate was
enhanced in laboratory experiments by a factor of 15 over a wide range of
RHs (from 20–80 %). Enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing RH
have also been reported on many types of particles including oxides, clay
and dust. Considering the significant effect of RH on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, some
modeling studies used RH-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Song and Carmichael, 2001;
Wei, 2010). For example, Song and Carmichael (2001) used a value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.005 for SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> when the RH was lower than 50 % and of 0.05
when RH was higher than 50 %.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>for heterogeneous reactions used in this work are determined
mainly based on the work of Wang et al. (2012a), which used lower and
upper limits to represent a range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values reported in the
laboratory measurement. On the basis of the lower and upper limits, we then
use a piecewise function to represent the RH-dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Field
measurements during the January 2013 haze episode in Beijing indicate that
the SOR and NOR are highly dependent on RH. They are relatively stable when
RH is lower than 40–50 % and rapidly increase when RH is higher. The RH
value of 50 % is close to the deliquescence point of particles for a
mixture of organic compounds and ammonium sulfate (Peckhaus et al., 2012),
which constitute about 80 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in China (Yang et al., 2011). In
this work, we assume the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be the lower limit for RH
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % and that it increases linearly to the upper limit as RH
increases to RH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which approximates the correlation between RH and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the reactions contributing to sulfate and
nitrate (R19–R21, R24) are calculated as the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" class="cases" columnalign="left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>low</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>low</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>high</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>low</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>high</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the reactant for heterogeneous reactions, RH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the RH value at which the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches the upper limit, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>low</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>high</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the lower and upper limits of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values taken from Table 2 of Wang et al. (2012a) with one exception for
R24.</p>
      <p>In situ observations have found significant enhancement of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation rates under wet conditions, indicating possible missing
heterogeneous reactions on deliquescent particles (Zheng et al., 2014b). However, the coefficients of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by aerosols (R24) are
only established for ice surfaces and mineral dust particles (Kolb et al.,
2010). As the parameterization of heterogeneous reaction of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on
soot, organics  and SNA aerosols are not well established yet, we first
arbitrarily selected the uptake coefficients from Wang et al. (2012a) and
conducted four sensitivity runs  (S1, S2, S3 and S4) by adjusting the uptake
coefficients with a successive approximation approach. The parameters and
evaluations of the four sensitivity runs are presented in the Supplement (Table S1 and Fig. S1). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the lower and
upper limits of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recommended by Wang et al. (2012a) are
1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
whereas other works recommended lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – e.g.,
4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Crowley et al. (2010), 1.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Shang et al. (2010), and 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
2.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Wu et al. (2011). We found that using the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Wang et al. (2012a) for R24 (sensitivity run S1)   produced unreasonably
high sulfate for this haze episode. We finally chose the value from S3 in
our work, which can best match observations.</p>
      <p>We assume the RH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of sulfate-related heterogeneous reaction (R24) to
be 100 %, and that of nitrate-related heterogeneous reactions (R19–R21)
to be 70 %. This assumption is made on the basis of the observational
result that the SOR increases when the RH rises from 50 to 100 % and
the NOR increases when the RH rises from 50 to 70 % and then stays
stable when the RH continues to increase. The similar relationship between
sulfur (nitrogen) conversion ratios and RH has also been reported in another
pollution episode that occurred in the winter of 2011 in Beijing (Sun et
al., 2013). For other heterogeneous reactions, we use the mean of lower and
upper limit values in the model and assume that they remain constant under
different RHs.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Domain, configurations  and major physical options used in WRF
v3.5.1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dec 2012 and Jan 2013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">East Asia (columns: 178, rows: 133) with three extra grids in</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">each boundary of Domain 1 (columns: 172, rows: 127)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal resolution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical resolution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 sigma levels from surface to tropopause (about 100 mb)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteorological IC and BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reanalysis data from the National Centers for Environmental</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prediction Final Analysis (NCEP-FNL)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shortwave radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">New Goddard scheme (Chou et al., 1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longwave radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The rapid radiative transfer model (RRTM) (Mlawer et al., 1997)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Land surface model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The USGS 24-category land use data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface layer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pleim–Xiu land surface scheme (Xiu and Pleim, 2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Planetary boundary layer model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ACM2 PBL scheme (Pleim, 2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cumulus parameterization</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kain–Fritsch cumulus scheme (Kain, 2004)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cloud microphysics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSM6 (Hong and Lim, 2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Analysis nudging</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temperature and water vapor mixing (above PBL); wind</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(in and above PBL)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observational nudging</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temperature, water vapor mixing and wind (in and above PBL)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil nudging</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Include soil moisture and temperature</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FDDA data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NCEP Automated Data Processing (ADP) surface (ds461.0)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">and upper (ds351.0) air data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Model configurations, simulation design and evaluation protocol</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Model configurations and simulation design</title>
      <p>WRF/CMAQ simulations are performed over East Asia at a horizontal resolution
of 36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 km (see Fig. 2). The simulation period is from 1 to 31
January 2013 with an additional 7 days used as a spin-up period to minimize the
influence of initial conditions.</p>
      <p>The physics options selected for the WRF simulation are summarized in Table
2. They are selected based on a number of initial simulations with different
option combinations to ensure the best performance for meteorological
predictions against observations during this episode. The meteorological
initial and boundary conditions (ICs and BCs) are based on the National
Centers for Environmental Prediction Final Analysis (NCEP-FNL) reanalysis
data. The surface roughness is corrected by increasing the friction velocity
by 1.5 times only in the boundary layer scheme to reduce the high biases in
wind speed (Mass and Ovens, 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simulation domain (Domain 1) and the monitoring stations. Gray
circles are meteorological stations included in the NCDC data set and red
circles are monitoring stations included in the CNEMC data set. Green star is
the monitoring station at THU. Background in the enlarged map is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission inventory of January 2013 at a horizontal resolution of 1 km.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Domain, configurations  and options used in CMAQ v5.0.1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 Dec 2012 to 31 Jan 2013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Domain 1 (columns: 172, rows: 127)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal resolution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical resolution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14 sigma levels from surface to tropopause. The values of sigma levels are 1.000, 0.995, 0.988,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.980, 0.970, 0.956, 0.938, 0.893, 0.839, 0.777, 0.702, 0.582, 0.400, 0.200  and 0.000.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IC and BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GEOS-Chem 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> global simulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas-phase mechanism</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CB05 gas-phase mechanism with active chlorine chemistry and updated toluene mechanism of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Whitten et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aqueous-phase mechanism</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The updated mechanism of the RADM model (Walcek and Taylor, 1986; Chang et al., 1987)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol module</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERO6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Photolytic rate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Calculate photolytic rates in-line using simulated aerosols and ozone concentrations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cloud module</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ACM cloud processor that uses the ACM methodology to compute convective mixing for AERO6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Windblown dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The physical-based dust emission algorithm FENGSHA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<uri>http://www.airqualitymodeling.org/cmaqwiki/index.php?title=CMAQv5.0_Windblown_Dust</uri>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lightning <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Not included, due to extremely low flash rates over the East Asia in winter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Schumann and Huntrieser, 2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The configurations and options used in the CMAQ model are summarized in
Table 3. The gas-phase mechanism module is the CB05 gas-phase mechanism with
active chlorine chemistry and updated toluene mechanism of Whitten et al. (2010). The aqueous-phase chemistry is based on the updated mechanism of the
Regional Acid Deposition Model (RADM) model (Walcek and Taylor, 1986; Chang
et al., 1987). The aerosol mechanism applied in this study is the AERO6
aerosol module. The photolytic rates are calculated in-line using simulated
aerosols and ozone concentrations. The ICs and BCs are generated from the
GEOS-Chem model (Bey et al., 2001).</p>
      <p>Anthropogenic emissions for China in 2013 used in this work are derived from
the MEIC model (Multi-resolution Emission Inventory of China,
<uri>http://www.meicmodel.org</uri>). The MEIC model is a dynamic and technology-based
emission model developed by Tsinghua University which estimates
anthropogenic emissions for about 700 emitting sources over China with
unified methodology (Zhang et al., 2007, 2009; Lei et al., 2011a). The MEIC
model is an update of the bottom-up emission inventory developed by the same
group (Zhang et al., 2007, 2009; Lei et al., 2011a) with several updates
such as unit-based emission data for power plants (Wang et al., 2012b)
and cement plants (Lei et al., 2011b), high-resolution vehicle emission
inventory at county level (Zheng et al., 2014a), and new NMVOC mapping
approach for different chemical mechanisms (Li et al., 2014). In the MEIC
model, the latest available emission data with real statistics at provincial
level is for 2012. In this work, emissions for the year of 2013 are used
from the extrapolation of the 2012 estimates and updated based on brief
statistics at country level.</p>
      <p>Anthropogenic emissions from the other Asian countries and biomass burning
emissions are taken from the MIX emission inventory prepared for the Model
Inter-comparison Study Asia Phase III (MICS-ASIA III). Biogenic emissions
are calculated by the MEGAN v2.1 (Guenther et al., 2012). Sea salt emission
and dust emission are calculated online on the basis of the algorithms
developed by Gong (2003) and a physical-based dust emission algorithm
FENGSHA
(<uri>http://www.airqualitymodeling.org/cmaqwiki/index.php?title=CMAQv5.0_Windblown_Dust</uri>), respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observed and simulated meteorological variables at THU site: <bold>(a)</bold>
hourly T2; <bold>(b)</bold> hourly RH2; <bold>(c)</bold> hourly WS10; <bold>(d)</bold> hourly WD10; <bold>(e)</bold> daily
Precip.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Using the WRF/CMAQ modeling system, the impacts of heterogeneous chemistry
and the meteorological anomaly of 2013 on the significant production of
sulfate and nitrate aerosols during the January 2013 haze episode are
investigated with three simulations, as shown in Table 4. The simulation
Original CMAQ uses the officially released version of CMAQ v5.0.1. In the
simulation Revised CMAQ, nine important heterogeneous reactions are
implemented in the model to explore the effects of heterogeneous chemistry.
To further evaluate the impacts of the 2013 meteorological anomaly on
sulfate and nitrate production, another simulation with revised CMAQ is
designed to use the same 2013 emissions but with the WRF meteorological
predictions for 2012 (Revised CMAQ with 2013Emis&amp;2012Met). The uptake
coefficients of heterogeneous chemistry used in the latter two simulations
are presented in Table S2 of the Supplement.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simulation design.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="113.811024pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="128.037402pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run index</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Emission</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Meteorology</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Model configuration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Purpose</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Original  CMAQ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">original CMAQ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Examine the capability and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>limitation of the original  model <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>to study severe haze pollution</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Revised  CMAQ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">revised CMAQ with<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>heterogeneous chemistry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Evaluate the role of heterogeneous <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>chemistry in haze pollution</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Revised CMAQ <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>with 2013Emis&amp;2012Met</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jan 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">revised CMAQ with <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>heterogeneous chemistry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Evaluate the impact of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>meteorological anomaly of 2013 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>on sulfate and nitrate production</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Evaluation protocol</title>
      <p>The model evaluation is performed in terms of domain-wide performance
statistics and site-specific temporal variations. The performance statistics
are conducted following the evaluation protocol of Zhang et al. (2006,
2011). The statistical parameters include correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), mean
bias (MB), root mean square error (RMSE), NMB  and normalized mean error
(NME).</p>
      <p>Table 5 summarizes the observational data sets used for model evaluation in
this study. Three observational data sets are used including the
meteorological data from the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), the
real-time gaseous and particulate concentrations in 74 cities from the China
National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC), and hourly concentrations
of chemical species of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ground-based measurement at the
Tsinghua University site (THU) located in   northwestern Beijing. A
detailed description of these data sets can be found in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Evaluation of meteorological predictions</title>
      <p>Table 6 presents the statistical performances of the meteorological
predictions, including temperature at 2 m (T2), RH at 2 m (RH2), wind speed
at 10 m (WS10), wind direction at 10 m (WD10), and daily mean precipitation
(Precip). The near-surface temperature agrees reasonably well with
observations with MBs of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Simulated RH2 agrees well
with observations across most of China with an NMB of 9.9 % and an MB of
6.7 %. WS10 is overpredicted slightly with an NMB of 9.5 % and an MB of
0.3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 36 km domain. The MB of Precip is 1.1 mm and the NMB
is 58.8 % with a relatively poor performance compared with other
meteorological variables. Precip is usually predicted with large biases by
meteorological models (Zhang et al., 2011, 2012; Wang et al., 2014b),
indicating the limited capability of a model to accurately reproduce the
precipitating processes. The simulated meteorological variables show
generally good agreement with observations, and the overall performances are
consistent with similar work conducted for China using the Fifth-Generation
Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) or WRF models (Liu et al., 2010;
Wang et al., 2010, 2014b; Zhang et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012a; Fu et
al., 2014). The simulated meteorological variables agree well with
observations in terms of temporal variations and magnitudes at the THU site
(as shown in Fig. 3), confirming the reliability of meteorological
prediction at location with SNA observation data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Chemical predictions of the original CMAQ at THU site</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Sulfate, nitrate and ammonium</title>
      <p>Figure 4 compares the temporal variations of aerosol compositions in January
2013 simulated by the original CMAQ with observation at the THU site, and
the statistical performance of the model is summarized in Table 7.
Although the original CMAQ model only underpredicts PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentration by 21.9 %, it significantly underpredicts SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration with NMBs of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54.2 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40.0 %  and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58.1 %, respectively. The modeled hourly PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration shows good agreement with the observations when the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration is below 450 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the model failed to
predict SNA variations during the polluted days, leading to a large
underprediction of total PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration during the heavy haze
episodes when SNA are dominant compositions in total PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass. Figure
5a illustrates the enhancement of SNA in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in haze days in January
2013 at the THU site. The contribution of SNA to total PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass increased
from 29.3 to 50.3 % from clean days to heavily polluted days due to
the increased conversion rates of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the haze
condition (Sun et al., 2013, 2014), while the original CMAQ model could not
reproduce the dominant contribution of SNA to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for those episodes,
indicating that some mechanisms that might have significant impacts on
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation during haze episodes are
absent in the original CMAQ model.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observational data for model evaluation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data set</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Variable<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Frequency</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Site</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Time period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sources</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NCDC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Meteorology</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">T2, RH2,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Every 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1–31 Jan</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><ext-link xlink:href="ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/noaa/">ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/noaa/</ext-link></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WS10,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">or 3 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WD10 and</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Precip</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CNEMC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gaseous and</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hourly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">496</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1–31 Jan</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><ext-link xlink:href="http://113.108.142.147:20035/emcpublish/">http://113.108.142.147:20035/emcpublish/</ext-link></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">particulate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">THU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particulate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hourly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1–31 Jan</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Zheng et al. (2014b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, EC and OC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NCDC: meteorological data obtained from the National Climate Data
Center.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CNEMC: gaseous and particulate concentrations obtained from the China
National Environmental Monitoring Center.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> THU: particulate species concentration measured at Tsinghua
University.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> T2: temperature at 2 m; RH2: relative humidity at 2 m; WS10: wind
speed at 10 m; WD10: wind direction at 10 m; Precip: daily precipitation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observed and simulated hourly aerosol compositions from the
original and revised CMAQ at the THU site: <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold>
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(c)</bold> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(e)</bold> OC; <bold>(f)</bold> EC.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>As discussed in Sect. 2.2, we believe that heterogeneous chemistry played a
key role in sulfate and nitrate production under the haze condition. Nine
heterogeneous reactions have been incorporated into the original CMAQ model
to improve the model capability in reproducing the observed high
concentrations of sulfate and nitrate and study the role of these reactions
in the haze pollution. The simulation results from the revised CMAQ with
these heterogeneous reactions are described in Sect. 4.3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Carbonaceous aerosols</title>
      <p>As shown in Fig. 4, the original CMAQ model can generally capture the
temporal variation of element carbon at the THU site but has a positive bias of
196.2 % in monthly mean concentration, implying large overestimation of
element carbon emissions in the MEIC inventory for the urban Beijing area. The
MEIC inventory used in this work is first calculated by province and then
allocated to grids by uniformed spatial proxies across provinces, which may
induce significant bias for specific locations. Coal boilers and stoves have
been phased out from Beijing urban areas and diesel trucks are also
prohibited from entering the urban center of Beijing during daytime. These
local policies are not considered in MEIC emission inventory, which may lead
to the overestimation of element carbon emissions in Beijing urban areas.
For organic carbon, the large bias only exists during haze days with mass
concentrations larger than 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the secondary organic
aerosol  (SOA) module used in CMAQ does not include the formation pathways
of heterogeneous reactions involving VOCs and SVOCs, and oligomerization
during the haze events and multi-generations of gas-phase oxidations of
semi-VOCs (SVOCs), the underestimation is probably caused by the
underpredictions in SOA.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Performance statistics of WRF simulation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">T2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RH2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">WS10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">WD10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Precip<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data pairs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">385753</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">385103</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">385165</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">336507</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">488</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MeanObs<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">227.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MeanSim<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">205.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MB<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>21.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">177.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NMB (%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>389.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">58.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NME (%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1211.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">57.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">41.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">145</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Definitions of these variables can be found in the footnotes of Table
5. The units of T2, RH2, WS10, WD10  and Precip are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, %, m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, degree  and mm day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The T2, RH2, WS10 and
WD10 are evaluated using hourly data and the Precip is evaluated using daily
data.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Data pairs: the number of observed and simulated data pairs; MeanObs:
mean observational data; MeanSim: mean simulation results; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: correlation
coefficient; MB: mean bias; RMSE: root mean square error; NMB: normalized
mean bias; NME: normalized mean error.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Improvements of SNA predictions by the revised CMAQ with heterogeneous
chemistry</title>
      <p>Figure 4 compares the temporal variations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC  and EC at the THU site simulated by the
original and revised CMAQ with observations. The sulfate and nitrate
simulations with heterogeneous chemistry are improved significantly in terms
of both magnitude and temporal variation. In particular, the significant
discrepancies in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the observed and simulated concentrations during
severely polluted days are improved, although a couple of observed peak
values are still not captured well. The synergic improvement of SNA
predictions illustrates the significant role heterogeneous chemistry plays
in the haze pollution events. The revised CMAQ shows better performance with
NMBs of 0.4, 6.3, 5.7  and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.1 %, for PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The MBs
of sulfate and nitrate are reduced, changing from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.8 to 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.3 to 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. As
expected, the simulated level of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is also improved with MBs
changing from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40.8 to 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that the revised CMAQ model still significantly
underestimated the peak PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on 13 January 2013. Zheng
et al. (2014b) argued that the abrupt increase of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on
13 January  represented rapid recovery from an interruption to the continuous
pollution accumulation over the region rather than local chemical
production. Our model also failed to predict the high PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration on 13 January  over the polluted region (e.g., Langfang and
Shijiazhuang, see Supplement), but agreed well with
observation in upwind cities (e.g., Chengde). In this case, the model may
have underestimated the regional transport in polluted areas given the fact
that the wind speed was underestimated at the THU site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Percentile compositions of major components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived
from <bold>(a)</bold> Observation; <bold>(b)</bold> Original CMAQ; <bold>(c)</bold> Revised CMAQ with enhanced
heterogeneous chemistry. The pollution is classified into four types: clean
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, slightly polluted
(35 &lt; PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 115 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, polluted (115 &lt; PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and heavily polluted (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on the China's Air Quality Index (AQI) level
definition
(<uri>http://kjs.mep.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/dqhjbh/jcgfffbz/201203/W020120410332725219541.pdf</uri>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Performance statistics of the original and revised CMAQ model at
the THU site.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">OC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Obs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">186.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">47.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Original CMAQ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MeanSim</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">145.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">35.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>40.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>17.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">102.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NMB (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>21.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>54.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>40.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>58.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">196.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>25.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NME (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">57.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">59.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">196.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Revised CMAQ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MeanSim</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">186.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">34.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">83.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">21.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NMB (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">183.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NME (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">183.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The units of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC  and EC are all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distributions of monthly (January 2013) mean
concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfate, nitrate  and ammonium simulated by
the Original CMAQ (left), Revised CMAQ (middle)  and the differences between
the Revised and Original CMAQ (right).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The revised CMAQ can capture the enhancement of relative contribution of SNA
from clean days to polluted days, as shown in Fig. 5. Observations show that
the fractions of SNA increase rapidly to 42.2 % and 50.3 % on polluted
and heavily polluted days, which are well reproduced by the revised CMAQ
with fractions of 49.0 % and 52.6 %. For comparison, the original CMAQ
gives SNA fractions of 32.1 % and 30.8 %, which are considerably lower.
During polluted and heavily polluted days, there exist significant
discrepancies in SNA percentage contributions between the original and
revised CMAQ, indicating the important role of heterogeneous chemistry in
haze pollution. It should be noted that the good agreement between the
revised CMAQ and observations is highly dependent on the selections of
uptake coefficients, as discussed in Sect. 2.2. However, all sensitivity
runs can reproduce the enhancement of relative contribution of sulfate in
haze days (Fig. S1), implying the importance of heterogeneous chemistry.
Laboratory measurements of uptake coefficients on the surfaces of mixed and
deliquescent aerosols will help to confirm our findings in the future.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Comparison of predicted SNA from Original and Revised CMAQ for
<bold>(b)</bold> NP, <bold>(c)</bold> NCP, <bold>(d)</bold> MLYP, <bold>(e)</bold> PRD and <bold>(f)</bold> SB.   <bold>(a)</bold> Emission
map of NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in January 2013 at a horizontal resolution of 36 km (source:
MEIC model).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The evolution patterns of SNA simulated by the revised CMAQ are also
generally consistent with other field observations on haze episodes in
China, which confirmed the significance of heterogeneous chemistry in the haze
formation process over China. The enhanced SNA contribution in haze days
compared to clean days were also observed in other field campaigns, where
the heterogeneous chemistry was attributed as the most probable pathway of
observed abrupt increases in SNA aerosols as the oxidation rates of
gas-phase and aqueous-phase chemistry were too slow (Zhao et al., 2013b; Ji et al., 2014; Quan et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014c). Strong
correlations between RH and sulfur and nitrogen oxidation ratios (SOR and
NOR) were found during haze episodes (Wang et al., 2012c, 2014c; Sun et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2014b) with sharp increase
of SOR and NOR when RH exceeds 50 %, lending support to our assumptions in
the revised CMAQ.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distributions of the monthly (January 2013) mean
temperature, RH  and concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfate  and nitrate
simulated by the revised CMAQ model with meteorological fields of 2012
(left) and 2013 (middle), and the differences between these two simulations
(right).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/2031/2015/acp-15-2031-2015-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The revised CMAQ gives very similar OC and EC predictions as original CMAQ,
with large underpredictions in OC during the haze episodes but
overpredictions in EC throughout the simulation period for the reasons
discussed previously in Sect. 4.2.2. The percentage contributions for EC and
OIN are also slightly decreased especially in the polluted and heavily
polluted days. This is because the mode-averaging particle diameter is
larger due to the enhanced formation of SNA when the heterogeneous reactions
are included. The particle settling velocity is increased and thus dry
deposition rates are larger, which helps reduce the overpredictions of these
species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Domain-wide impact from the implementation of heterogeneous chemistry</title>
      <p>The simulation results with and without heterogeneous chemistry are compared
over the whole domain to evaluate the impact of heterogeneous reactions
during the January 2013 haze episode. Table 8 summarizes the statistical
performance for surface concentrations of CO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the simulation with original CMAQ and revised
CMAQ for 74 cities in China. The original CMAQ model can generally reproduce
the concentrations of aerosol and gaseous pollutants over the whole domain.
The model underpredicts the concentrations of CO and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with NMBs of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.6 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.2 %, respectively, and overpredicts those of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with NMBs of 51.2, 13.4  and
8.1 %, respectively. As expected, the overpredictions in SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are improved in the revised CMAQ model because the added
heterogeneous reactions enhance their conversions to sulfate and nitrate.
The positive biases of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are reduced from 51.2 to
38.5 % and 13.4 to 11.2 %. We further found that high NMB in
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> prediction is mainly contributed by provincial capital cities. As
the most developed cities within China, the provincial capital cities tend
to prohibit coal use in urban areas or use high-quality coal with low sulfur
content, which has not been accurately represented in regional emission
inventories which are compiled at the provincial level. As a result,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from those capital cities may have been overestimated.</p>
      <p>Figure 6 illustrates the concentration of SNA and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated by
the original and revised CMAQ and Fig. 7 further explores the difference in
heavily polluted regions. Heterogeneous chemistry enhances SNA
concentrations significantly in the most polluted regions in China (the
Northeast Plain (NP), NCP, Middle-Lower Yangtze Plain (MLYP), and Sichuan
Basin (SB)), leading to the increased PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration over those
regions. In southern China (e.g., the Pearl River Delta (PRD)), sulfate
concentration is still increased but nitrate concentration is decreased by
5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in a reduction of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
by 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The contrasting responses to heterogeneous
chemistry in different regions are because of the complex thermodynamic
processes of SNA formation, which differ greatly under NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-poor conditions. The polluted regions listed above (NP, NCP, MLYP,
and SB) are all NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich regions (Wang et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013a), as shown in Fig. 7a, which comprise 24.5 % land areas in China but
contribute to 47.4 % cultivated lands (National Bureau of Statistics,
2013) and 48.3 % NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (derived from the MEIC model). The
abundant NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions provide sufficient amounts of ammonium to
neutralize the increased amounts of sulfate and nitrate formed through
heterogeneous chemistry; therefore, the total amount of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in these
regions increases with enhancement of both sulfate and nitrate. This causes
the positive bias of simulated PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be larger in the NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich
regions, mainly contributed by the overpredictions of EC and OIN. In
southern China, which is an NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-poor region in January (Wang et al.,
2011), sulfate and nitrate compete for ammonium and the formation of
ammonium sulfate occurs first owing to its more thermodynamically stable
characteristics – increased levels of sulfate would thus lead to a decrease
of nitrate. This phenomenon could even lead to a decrease in the total
concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, because to neutralize with the same amount of
ammonium, the mass of sulfate required is smaller than that of nitrate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Impact of meteorology in 2013 on SNA production</title>
      <p>The haze episode in January 2013 was the most serious pollution event in
recent years. Why it should happen in 2013 but not in other years is an
intriguing question. Emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
stable during 2011–2013 (derived from the MEIC model), indicating that
emissions are not the critical driving force. The anomalous meteorological
conditions (low temperature, high RH, and low wind speed) in January 2013
are identified as the key influence factor of haze formation by affecting
radiation, horizontal transport, vertical mixing, and the atmospheric
reaction rates of air pollutants (Ding and Liu, 2014; Wang et al., 2014d). As described in Sect. 2.2, meteorological conditions (specifically
RH) can affect heterogeneous chemistry by increasing the uptake coefficients
of gases. In this section, the impact of the 2013 meteorological conditions
on the production of sulfate and nitrate is evaluated using the revised CMAQ
with heterogeneous chemistry.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Domain-wide performance statistics of the original and revised CMAQ.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Original</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Revised</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Original</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Revised</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Original</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Revised</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Original</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Revised</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Original</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Revised</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data pairs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9338</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9338</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9366</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9366</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9384</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9384</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9335</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9335</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9143</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9143</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MeanObs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">66.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">86.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">142.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">142.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">202.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">202.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MeanSim</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">75.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">131.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">120.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">154.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">180.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">179.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">203.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">37.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>22.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">119.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">110.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">86.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">111.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">116.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">122.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NMB (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">26.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NME (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">91.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">41.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">54.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">38.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">42.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The units of CO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are
mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The meteorological conditions of 2012 are selected to represent typical
weather conditions because they were very close to the 10-year average
climatology conditions with regard to temperature, RH, wind speed, and sea
level pressure (data derived from <uri>http://cdc.cma.gov.cn</uri>) in the
region of the NCP. Figure 8 illustrates the spatial distributions of the
monthly mean temperature, RH, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfate, and nitrate simulated by
the revised CMAQ with the meteorological fields of 2012 and 2013. The
simulated temperature of 2013 in North and East China is 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
lower than that in 2012 and the simulated RH is 5–25 % higher. High RH
promotes heterogeneous conversions to generate more sulfate and nitrate and
therefore, to increase the total concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Significant
differences in RH occur in the NCP region, where increases by 15–30 % in
RH correspond to increases of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration by 70–150 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Traditional chemistry mechanisms play a relatively small role during haze
formation because of the low solar radiation and low-temperature conditions,
and few precipitating clouds, whereas heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms are
enhanced by the extremely high RH, which leads to the significant production
of sulfate and nitrate aerosols. This provides a perspective to understand
how adverse meteorological conditions can affect air quality through
reaction pathways that are sensitive to specific meteorological variables.
The meteorological anomaly of 2013 occurred not only for temperature and RH,
but also for other variables – for example, the shallower PBL and lower wind
speed than a typical year. The abnormal changes in these variables also have
adverse effects on haze pollution. For example, the height of the PBL across
China in 2013 was about 200 m lower than in 2012, which could weaken and
confine the vertical mixing of pollutants and thus  aggravate surface
pollution. Researches on the impact of these factors have been reported in
other studies (e.g., Wang et al., 2014d; Zhang et al., 2014b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>In this work, the WRF/CMAQ has been applied to simulate the January 2013
haze episode in China and evaluate the role heterogeneous chemistry played
in the formation of sulfate and nitrate during this episode. The simulations
with the original and the revised CMAQ are performed and evaluated. In the
simulation by original CMAQ, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are underpredicted with NMBs of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.9, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54.2,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40.0  and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58.1 %, respectively, at the THU site. The
incorporation of additional heterogeneous chemistry into CMAQ v5.0.1
significantly improves the model's capability in reproducing sulfate and
nitrate concentrations, which are the most important PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compositions
on polluted haze days. The revised CMAQ shows better performances with NMBs
of 0.4, 6.3, 5.7  and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.1 %, for PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, at the
THU site. The MBs of sulfate and nitrate are reduced, changing from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.8
to 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.3 to 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The revised CMAQ with enhanced heterogeneous chemistry not
only captures the magnitude and temporal variation of SNA concentrations,
but also reproduces the enhancement of SNA compositions from clean air to
polluted haze days, both of which indicate the significantly improved
capability of the revised model for haze studies. The revised CMAQ model is
then used to evaluate the impact of both heterogeneous chemistry on haze
formation during January 2013 and of the meteorological anomaly in 2013 on
heterogeneous generation of sulfate and nitrate.</p>
      <p>Compared with previous studies focusing on the haze episode of January 2013,
this work provides a unique method to explore the formation mechanisms of
severe haze by evaluating initial application of the original CMAQ,
identifying missing heterogeneous chemistry based on model performance, and
then incorporating those missing reactions into CMAQ. It thus provides a
mechanistic level of understanding of the formation mechanism of the severe
regional haze pollution episode.</p>
      <p>This study has several limitations. First, heterogeneous chemistry is
implemented into CMAQ with several assumptions. For example, a
pseudo-first-order rate constant is assumed for those reactions and the gas
uptake coefficients are assumed to be linearly correlated with RH. Those
simplified treatments neglect the effects of complex aerosol compositions
and surface uptake, diffusion, and coating and reaction processes, which
could inevitably introduce errors and uncertainties in this work (Wei,
2010). As a consequence, for example, while the peak concentrations of
sulfate and nitrate during the haze pollution event were sharp and occurred
during a narrow time window, the revised CMAQ predicts lower and wider
spread concentrations. The RH-dependent parameterization of uptake
coefficients derived in this work can be refined to consider additional
factors, such as temperature, aerosol compositions, amounts of metal
catalyst  and surface conditions. In addition, some newly reported
heterogeneous reactions, such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation promoted by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (He
et al., 2014) and OH derived from heterogeneous ClNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production
(Sarwar et al., 2014), can enhance SNA but have not yet been included in this
work, but should be incorporated into CMAQ in the future.</p>
      <p>Second, there is a lack of sufficient site-specific hourly data for
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its composition, which are crucial to the model evaluation
and improvement. For example, we do not have observation data to evaluate
the predicted Fe and Mn in aerosols. The underprediction of Fe and Mn can
contribute to the underprediction of sulfate, because the metal catalysis
pathway is important for sulfate formation. Although this might not be a
critical issue as the model can well predict sulfate concentration in clean
days, more observed data for compositions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are needed to
comprehensively evaluate the model.</p>
      <p>Finally, the WRF/CMAQ system used in this work is not online-coupled, which
does not account for the feedbacks of chemistry and aerosol into
meteorology. Wang et al. (2014a) simulated the same episode using the
online-coupled CMAQ and found that including aerosol feedback can increase
total aerosol loadings during haze conditions and improve model performance,
but can lead to larger enhancement of primary aerosols than secondary aerosols,
which is opposite to the observations. Online-coupled models with improved
chemistry should be developed in the future. Addressing these uncertainties
requires an integration of field studies, laboratory experiments  and
modeling work by the entire community.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by China's National Basic Research Program
(2010CB951803 and 2014CB441301), the National Science Foundation of China
(41222036 and 21221004), the Japan International Cooperation Agency, and the
US DOE climate modeling programs (DESC0006695) at NCSU, USA. We thank
the constructive comments from Dr. Muller and two anonymous reviewers.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: H. Su<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?></p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>American Lung Association: 2005 research highlights: health effects of
particulate matter and ozone air pollution, <uri>http://www.northeastdiesel.org/pdf/ALA-05-health-studies-biblio.pdf</uri> (last
access: June 2014), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore,
A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global
modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model
description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23073–23095, doi:10.1029/2001jd000807, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P.,
Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J.: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid
deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 92, 14681–14700, doi:10.1029/JD092iD12p14681, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chang, W. L., Bhave, P. V., Brown, S. S., Riemer, N., Stutz, J., and Dabdub,
D.: Heterogeneous Atmospheric Chemistry, Ambient Measurements, and Model
Calculations of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: A Review, Aerosol. Sci. Tech., 45, 665–695,
doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.551672, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M.-D., Suarez, M. J., Ho, C.-H., Yan, M. M. H., and Lee, K.-T.:
Parameterizations for Cloud Overlapping and Shortwave Single-Scattering
Properties for Use in General Circulation and Cloud Ensemble Models, J.
Climate, 11, 202–214, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011&lt;0202:pfcoas&gt;2.0.co;2, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Crowley, J. N., Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E.,
Mellouki, A., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and Wallington, T. J.: Evaluated
kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume V –
heterogeneous reactions on solid substrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9059–9223, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9059-2010, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F. J., Carmichael, G. R., Zhang, Y., Lelieveld, J., and Crutzen,
P. J.: Role of mineral aerosol as a reactive surface in the global
troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 22869–22889, doi:10.1029/96jd01818, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, Y. H., and Liu, Y. J.: Analysis of long-term variations of fog and
haze in China in recent 50 years and their relations with atmospheric
humidity, Sci. China-Earth Sci., 57, 36–46, doi:10.1007/s11430-013-4792-1,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient
thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> – Ca<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> – Mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> -
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> – SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> -
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, doi:10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Wang, S. X., Cheng, Z., Xing, J., Zhao, B., Wang, J. D., and Hao, J.
M.: Source, transport and impacts of a heavy dust event in the Yangtze River
Delta, China, in 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1239–1254, doi:10.5194/acp-14-1239-2014, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, S. L.: A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub-
and super-micron particles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1097, doi:10.1029/2003gb002079, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T.,
Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols
from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for
modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, doi:10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>He, H., Wang, Y., Ma, Q., Ma, J., Chu, B., Ji, D., Tang, G., Liu, C., Zhang,
H., and Hao, J.: Mineral dust and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  promote the conversion of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to sulfate in heavy pollution days, Sci. Rep., 4, 4172, doi:10.1038/srep04172, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Henson, B. F., Wilson, K. R., and Robinson, J. M.: A physical adsorption
model of the dependence of ClONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> heterogeneous reactions on relative
humidity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1021–1024, doi:10.1029/96gl00871, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S. Y. and Lim, J. O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129–151,
<uri>http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/WSM6-hong_and_lim_JKMS.pdf</uri> (last access: June 2014),
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos.
Environ., 34, 2131–2159, doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ji, D., Li, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Cheng, M., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, L.,
Tang, G., Hu, B., Chao, N., Wen, T., and Miao, H.: The heaviest particulate
air-pollution episodes occurred in northern China in January, 2013: Insights
gained from observation, Atmos. Environ., 92, 546–556,
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.048, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043&lt;0170:tkcpau&gt;2.0.co;2, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kolb, C. E., Cox, R. A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ammann, M., Davis, E. J.,
Donaldson, D. J., Garrett, B. C., George, C., Griffiths, P. T.,
Hanson, D. R., Kulmala, M., McFiggans, G., Pöschl, U., Riipinen, I.,
Rossi, M. J., Rudich, Y., Wagner, P. E., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and
O' Dowd, C. D.: An overview of current issues in the uptake of atmospheric
trace gases by aerosols and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10561–10605,
doi:10.5194/acp-10-10561-2010, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lammel, G. and Leip, A.: Formation of Nitrate and Sulfate in the Plume of
Berlin, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 12, 213–220, doi:10.1065/espr2005.03.240, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lei, Y., Zhang, Q., He, K. B., and Streets, D. G.: Primary anthropogenic
aerosol emission trends for China, 1990–2005, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
931–954, doi:10.5194/acp-11-931-2011, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Lei, Y., Zhang, Q., Nielsen, C., and He, K.: An inventory of primary air
pollutants and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from cement production in China,
1990–2020, Atmos. Environ., 45, 147–154, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.034, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Li, M., Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., He, K. B., Cheng, Y. F., Emmons, L. K.,
Huo, H., Kang, S. C., Lu, Z., Shao, M., Su, H., Yu, X., and Zhang, Y.:
Mapping Asian anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic
compounds to multiple chemical mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
5617–5638, doi:10.5194/acp-14-5617-2014, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W., and Shao, L.: Transmission electron microscopy study of aerosol
particles from the brown hazes in northern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D09302, doi:10.1029/2008jd011285, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W., and Shao, L.: Characterization of mineral particles in winter fog of
Beijing analyzed by TEM and SEM, Environ. Monit. Assess., 161, 565–573,
doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0768-1, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W., Zhou, S., Wang, X., Xu, Z., Yuan, C., Yu, Y., Zhang, Q., and Wang,
W.: Integrated evaluation of aerosols from regional brown hazes over
northern China in winter: Concentrations, sources, transformation, and
mixing states, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D09301, doi:10.1029/2010jd015099, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Xia, X., Cribb, M., Mi, W., Holben, B., Wang, P., Chen, H., Tsay,
S.-C., Eck, T. F., Zhao, F., Dutton, E. G., and Dickerson, R. E.: Aerosol
optical properties and their radiative effects in northern China, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22S01, doi:10.1029/2006jd007382, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Gibson, E. R., Cain, J. P., Wang, H., Grassian, V. H., and Laskin, A.: Understanding of regional air
pollution over China using CMAQ, part I performance evaluation and seasonal
variation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2415–2426, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.035, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Gibson, Cain, Wang, H., Grassian, and Laskin, A.: Kinetics of
Heterogeneous Reaction of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Particles with Gaseous HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over a
Wide Range of Humidity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 1561–1571, doi:10.1021/jp076169h, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Mass, C. and Ovens, D.: WRF model physics: progress, problems, and perhaps
some solutions, in: The 11th WRF Users' Workshop, 21–25 June, NCAR Center
Green Campus,
<uri>http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2010/presentations/session</uri>
(last access: June 2014), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
McNaughton, C. S., Clarke, A. D., Kapustin, V., Shinozuka, Y., Howell, S.
G., Anderson, B. E., Winstead, E., Dibb, J., Scheuer, E., Cohen, R. C.,
Wooldridge, P., Perring, A., Huey, L. G., Kim, S., Jimenez, J. L., Dunlea,
E. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., Weinheimer, A. J.,
and Flocke, F.: Observations of heterogeneous reactions between Asian
pollution and mineral dust over the Eastern North Pacific during INTEX-B,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8283–8308, doi:10.5194/acp-9-8283-2009, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mercado, L. M., Bellouin, N., Sitch, S., Boucher, O., Huntingford, C., Wild,
M., and Cox, P. M.: Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global
land carbon sink, Nature, 458, 1014–1017, doi:10.1038/nature07949, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.
A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102,
16663–16682, doi:10.1029/97jd00237, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Mogili, P. K., Kleiber, P. D., Young, M. A., and Grassian, V. H.:
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis on the components of mineral dust and sea salt
aerosol: Comparison study in an environmental aerosol reaction chamber,
Atmos. Environ., 40, 7401–7408, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.048, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
National Bureau of Statistics: China Statistical Yearbook 2013, China
Statistics Press, Beijing, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Peckhaus, A., Grass, S., Treuel, L., and Zellner, R.: Deliquescence and
Efflorescence Behavior of Ternary Inorganic/Organic/Water Aerosol Particles,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6199–6210, doi:10.1021/jp211522t, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. E.: A Combined Local and Nonlocal Closure Model for the
Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part I: Model Description and Testing, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1383–1395, doi:10.1175/jam2539.1, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Quan, J., Tie, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Li, X., Gao, Y., and Zhao, D.:
Characteristics of heavy aerosol pollution during the 2012–2013 winter in
Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 88, 83–89, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.058, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ravishankara, A. R.: Heterogeneous and Multiphase Chemistry in the
Troposphere, Science, 276, 1058–1065, doi:10.1126/science.276.5315.1058,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. P. and Sayer, R. M.: Heterogeneous atmospheric aerosol chemistry:
laboratory studies of chemistry on water droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 32,
70–79, doi:10.1039/b204463n, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Sarwar, G., Simon, H., Xing, J., and Mathur, R.: Importance of tropospheric
ClNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry across the Northern Hemisphere, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 4050–4058, doi:10.1002/2014GL059962, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen
oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, doi:10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H., Carmichael, G. R., Arimoto, R., Conant, W. C., Brechtel, F.
J., Bates, T. S., Cahill, T. A., Clarke, A. D., Doherty, S. J., Flatau, P.
J., Huebert, B. J., Kim, J., Markowicz, K. M., Quinn, P. K., Russell, L. M.,
Russell, P. B., Shimizu, A., Shinozuka, Y., Song, C. H., Tang, Y., Uno, I.,
Vogelmann, A. M., Weber, R. J., Woo, J.-H., and Zhang, X. Y.: ACE-ASIA:
Regional Climatic and Atmospheric Chemical Effects of Asian Dust and
Pollution, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, 367–380, doi:10.1175/bams-85-3-367,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Shang, J., Li, J., and Zhu, T.: Heterogeneous reaction of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on
TiO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles, Sci. China Chem., 53, 2637–2643, doi:10.1007/s11426-010-4160-3, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C. H. and Carmichael, G. R.: A three-dimensional modeling
investigation of the evolution processes of dust and sea-salt particles in
east Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 18131–18154, doi:10.1029/2000jd900352, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Stutz, J., Alicke, B., Ackermann, R., Geyer, A., Wang, S., White, A. B.,
Williams, E. J., Spicer, C. W., and Fast, J. D.: Relative humidity
dependence of HONO chemistry in urban areas, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
D03307, doi:10.1029/2003jd004135, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Zhuang, G., Tang, A., Wang, Y., and An, Z.: Chemical
Characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Haze<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Fog Episodes in
Beijing, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3148–3155, doi:10.1021/es051533g,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge, X.: The
impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes
during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the Sources and Evolution Processes of Severe Haze
Pollution in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
4380–4398, doi:10.1002/2014jd021641, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., and Grassian, V. H.: Reactions on Mineral Dust,
Chem. Rev., 103, 4883–4940, doi:10.1021/cr020657y, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Walcek, C. J., and Taylor, G. R.: A Theoretical Method for Computing
Vertical Distributions of Acidity and Sulfate Production within Cumulus
Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 339–355, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043&lt;0339:atmfcv&gt;2.0.co;2, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L. T., Jang, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, Q., Streets, D., Fu, J.,
Lei, Y., Schreifels, J., He, K., Hao, J., Lam, Y.-F., Lin, J., Meskhidze,
N., Voorhees, S., Evarts, D., and Phillips, S.: Assessment of air quality
benefits from national air pollution control policies in China. Part I:
Background, emission scenarios and evaluation of meteorological predictions,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 3442–3448, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.051, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Nenes, A., and Fountoukis, C.: Implementation of dust
emission and chemistry into the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling
system and initial application to an Asian dust storm episode, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10209–10237, doi:10.5194/acp-12-10209-2012, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S. W., Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., He, K. B., Martin, R. V., Lamsal, L.
N., Chen, D., Lei, Y., and Lu, Z.: Growth in NOx emissions from power plants
in China: bottom-up estimates and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 4429–4447, doi:10.5194/acp-12-4429-2012, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Wang, W., Yang, L., Gao, X., Nie, W., Yu, Y., Xu, P., Zhou, Y.,
and Wang, Z.: The secondary formation of inorganic aerosols in the droplet
mode through heterogeneous aqueous reactions under haze conditions, Atmos.
Environ., 63, 68–76, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.029, 2012c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Wang, S., Jiang, J., Ding, A., Zheng, M., Zhao, B., Wong, D. C.,
Zhou, W., Zheng, G., Wang, L., Pleim, J. E., and Hao, J.: Impact of
aerosol–meteorology interactions on fine particle pollution during China's
severe haze episode in January 2013, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094002, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L. T., Wei, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F. F., Su, J., Meng, C.
C., and Zhang, Q.: The 2013 severe haze over southern Hebei, China: model
evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3151–3173, doi:10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. S., Yao, L., Wang, L. L., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Tang, G. Q.,
Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Hu, B., and Xin, J. Y.: Mechanism for the formation
of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern
China, Sci. China-Earth Sci., 57, 14–25, doi:10.1007/s11430-013-4773-4,
2014c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z. F., Li, J., Wang, Z., Yang, W. Y., Tang, X., Ge, B. Z., Yan, P. Z.,
Zhu, L. L., Chen, X. S., Chen, H. S., Wang, W., Li, J. J., Liu, B., Wang, X.
Y., Wand, W., Zhao, Y. L., Lu, N., and Su, D. B.: Modeling study of regional
severe hazes over mid-eastern China in January 2013 and its implications on
pollution prevention and control, Sci. China-Earth Sci., 57, 3–13, doi:10.1007/s11430-013-4793-0, 2014d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S., Xing, J., Jang, C., Zhu, Y., Fu, J. S., and Hao, J.: Impact
Assessment of Ammonia Emissions on Inorganic Aerosols in East China Using
Response Surface Modeling Technique, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 9293–9300,
doi:10.1021/es2022347, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Zhuang, G., Sun, Y., and An, Z.: The variation of characteristics
and formation mechanisms of aerosols in dust, haze, and clear days in
Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6579–6591, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.066, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wei, C.: Modeling the effects of heterogeneous reactions on atmospheric
chemistry and aerosol properties, PhD Diss., University of Iowa, <uri>http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/903</uri> (last access: June 2014), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Whitten, G. Z., Heo, G., Kimura, Y., McDonald-Buller, E., Allen, D. T.,
Carter, W. P. L., and Yarwood, G.: A new condensed toluene mechanism for
Carbon Bond: CB05-TU, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5346–5355, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.029, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, L. Y., Tong, S. R., Wang, W. G., and Ge, M. F.: Effects of temperature
on the heterogeneous oxidation of sulfur dioxide by ozone on calcium
carbonate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6593–6605, doi:10.5194/acp-11-6593-2011,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Xiu, A. and Pleim, J. E.: Development of a Land Surface Model. Part I:
Application in a Mesoscale Meteorological Model, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40,
192–209, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040&lt;0192:doalsm&gt;2.0.co;2, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Yang, F., Tan, J., Zhao, Q., Du, Z., He, K., Ma, Y., Duan, F., and Chen, G.:
Characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> speciation in representative megacities and across
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5207–5219, doi:10.5194/acp-11-5207-2011,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Yang, K., Dickerson, R. R., Carn, S. A., Ge, C., and Wang, J.: First
observations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the satellite Suomi NPP OMPS: Widespread air
pollution events over China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4957–4962, doi:10.1002/grl.50952, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Sunwoo, Y., Kotamarthi, V., and Carmichael, G. R.: Photochemical
Oxidant Processes in the Presence of Dust: An Evaluation of the Impact of
Dust on Particulate Nitrate and Ozone Formation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 33,
813–824, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033&lt;0813:popitp&gt;2.0.co;2, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. and Carmichael, G. R.: The Role of Mineral Aerosol in
Tropospheric Chemistry in East Asia—A Model Study, J. Appl. Meteorol., 38,
353–366, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038&lt;0353:tromai&gt;2.0.co;2, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Liu, P., Pun, B., and Seigneur, C.: A comprehensive performance
evaluation of MM5-CMAQ for the Summer 1999 Southern Oxidants Study
episode – Part I: Evaluation protocols, databases, and meteorological
predictions, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4825–4838, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.043, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., He, K., Wang, Y., Richter, A., Burrows, J. P.,
Uno, I., Jang, C. J., Chen, D., Yao, Z., and Lei, Y.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  emission
trends for China, 1995–2004: The view from the ground and the view from
space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22306, doi:10.1029/2007jd008684,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari,
A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei,
Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA
INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, doi:10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Cheng, S.-H., Chen, Y.-S., and Wang, W.-X.: Application of MM5 in
China: Model evaluation, seasonal variations, and sensitivity to horizontal
grid resolutions, Atmos. Environ., 45, 3454–3465, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.019, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Sarwar, G., and Schere, K.: Impact of gas-phase
mechanisms on Weather Research Forecasting Model with Chemistry (WRF/Chem)
predictions: Mechanism implementation and comparative evaluation, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D01301, doi:10.1029/2011jd015775, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang, Y.
S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious
pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903, doi:10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R. H., Li, Q., and Zhang, R. N.: Meteorological conditions for the
persistent severe fog and haze event over eastern China in January 2013,
Sci. China-Earth Sci., 57, 26–35, doi:10.1007/s11430-013-4774-3, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Duan, L., Xing, J., Larssen, T., Nielsen, C. P., and Hao, J.: Soil
Acidification in China: Is Controlling SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Emissions Enough?, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 8021–8026, doi:10.1021/es901430n, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, P., Zhang, X., Xu, X., and Zhao, X.: Long-term visibility trends and
characteristics in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China, Atmos.
Res., 101, 711–718, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.04.019, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Wang, S., Wang, J., Fu, J. S., Liu, T., Xu, J., Fu, X., and Hao,
J.: Impact of national <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control policies on particulate
matter pollution in China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 453–463, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.012, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696, doi:10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, B., Huo, H., Zhang, Q., Yao, Z. L., Wang, X. T., Yang, X. F., Liu,
H., and He, K. B.: High-resolution mapping of vehicle emissions in China in
2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9787–9805, doi:10.5194/acp-14-9787-2014,
2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., Cheng, Y., Zheng, B., Zhang, Q.,
Huang, T., Kimoto, T., Chang, D., Su, H., Pöschl, U., Cheng, Y. F., and
He, K. B.: Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., 14, 17907–17942, doi:10.5194/acpd-14-17907-2014, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
