<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-1435-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ultraviolet and visible complex refractive indices of secondary
organic material produced by photooxidation of the aromatic compounds
toluene and <italic>m</italic>-xylene</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ultraviolet and visible complex refractive indices of secondary
organic material}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~F.~Liu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>P. F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7280-9720</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Abdelmalki</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hung</surname><given-names>H.-M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6755-6359</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Brune</surname><given-names>W. H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>S. T.</given-names></name>
          <email>scot_martin@harvard.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">S. T. Martin (scot_martin@harvard.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1435</fpage><lpage>1446</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>July</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>August</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Secondary organic material (SOM) produced by the oxidation of anthropogenic
volatile organic compounds can be light-absorbing (i.e., brown carbon).
Spectral data of the optical properties, however, are scarce. The present
study obtained the continuous spectra of the real and imaginary refractive
indices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ultraviolet (UV)-to-visible region using
spectroscopic ellipsometry for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and UV–visible spectrometry for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Several
different types of SOM were produced in an oxidation flow reactor by
photooxidation of toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene for variable concentrations of
nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results show that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the
anthropogenically derived material were at least 10 times greater than
those of the biogenically derived material. The presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
associated with the production of organonitrogen compounds, such as
nitro-aromatics and organonitrates, which enhanced light absorption.
Compared with the SOM derived from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene, the toluene-derived SOM had
larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, as well as a greater NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced enhancement,
suggesting different brown-carbon-forming potentials of different aromatic
precursor compounds. The results imply that anthropogenic SOM produced
around urban environments can have an important influence on ultraviolet
irradiance, which might consequently influence photochemical cycles of urban
pollution.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Aerosol particles affect many atmospheric processes. Globally, aerosol
particles influence Earth's radiative balance both directly by scattering
and absorbing solar radiation and indirectly by acting as cloud nuclei. At
the urban and regional scale, aerosol particles contribute to the
degradation of visibility (Chen et al., 2012) and adversely influence human health (Dockery
et al., 1993). A major fraction of the ambient particle population is
secondary organic material (SOM) produced by oxidation of anthropogenic and
biogenic gaseous precursors (Kanakidou et al., 2005; Hallquist et al.,
2009). The magnitude and properties of SOM, however, are still poorly
represented in models (Heald et al., 2005; Volkamer et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>Ultraviolet-absorbing components in atmospheric particles can significantly
reduce ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, thus affecting photochemistry in the
atmospheric boundary layer (Jacobson, 1999; Barnard et al., 2008).
Modeling the optical properties and radiative effects, however, requires
spectral data of complex refractive indices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including both the
refractory index <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the absorptive index <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lack of this information,
especially in the UV region (300–400 nm), hampers an understanding of the
photochemical effect of anthropogenic SOM.</p>
      <p>In highly polluted urban regions, anthropogenic aromatic compounds constitute
up to 70 % of the non-methane hydrocarbons (Ran et al., 2012). Among the
anthropogenic aromatics, toluene and xylenes are the most abundant compounds,
and the yields for the production of SOM from these compounds are high (Odum
et al., 1996, 1997; Ng et al., 2007; Hildebrandt et al., 2009; Zhang et al.,
2014). Quantitative estimates of the climate effects of anthropogenic SOM,
however, remain limited for several different reasons, including the
incomplete knowledge of chemical composition and optical properties.</p>
      <p>The gas- and particle-phase chemistry of aromatic oxidation is complex, and
a broad spectrum of products is produced from the oxidation of a single
precursor (Forstner et al., 1997; Jang and Kamens, 2001a). The
concentration of nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> further influences the product
distribution (Sato et al., 2007). Some of the molecular products
resulting from the oxidation of aromatic precursors have been identified and
quantified (Forstner et al., 1997; Cocker III et al., 2001; Jang and
Kamens, 2001a; Hamilton et al., 2005; Sato et al., 2007). These products,
however, typically constitute less than 50 % of the reacted carbon
(Forstner et al., 1997; Hamilton et al., 2005; Sato et al., 2007).
Particle-phase reactions have been proposed as an important mechanism of SOM
production from aromatic precursors, which may explain the uncharacterized
components of aromatic-derived SOM (Jang and Kamens, 2001a; Jang et al.,
2002; Kalberer et al., 2004).</p>
      <p>The chemical complexity of SOM propagates into the optical properties.
Recent studies have shown that different types of SOM have varying
light-absorbing properties in the ultraviolet (UV) and visible regions of
the electromagnetic spectrum (Nakayama et al., 2010; Lambe et al.,
2013; Liu et al., 2013). Some types of SOM absorb light significantly in the
UV–visible region and are then considered constituents of so-called “brown
carbon” (Shapiro et al., 2009; Laskin et al., 2010; Updyke et al.,
2012; Zarzana et al., 2012). In particular, several studies have pointed out
that aromatic-derived SOM is an important class of UV absorbers. The
investigated precursors have included phenolic catechol and guaiacol
(Ofner et al., 2011; Lambe et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013), polycyclic
aromatic naphthalene (Lambe et al., 2013), and
monocyclic toluene (Nakayama et al., 2010, 2013; Zhong and Jang, 2011; Zhong et
al., 2012; Li et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>In the present work, the spectroscopic complex refractive indices of several
types of aromatic-derived SOM are measured using spectroscopic ellipsometry
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2013) and UV–visible spectroscopy for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
SOMs were produced from the photooxidation of toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene in an
oxidation flow reactor, both in the absence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (hereafter “low
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>”; &lt; 70 ppt) and in the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at different
levels (hereafter “high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>”). For the high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments, the
initial NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration varied from 2.5 to 10 ppm, corresponding to
initial hydrocarbon: NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of 3.5 to 16 ppbC ppbN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
complement to the optical measurements, the chemical composition was
characterized by the infrared spectroscopy. The paper concludes with a case
study of light-absorbing particles in an urban plume. Based on the
calculations using a Mie-theory-based optical model, possible radiative
effects of brown carbon from anthropogenically derived SOMs are discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Production of secondary organic material</title>
      <p>Toluene (EMD Chemicals, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.8 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene (Sigma Aldrich,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 %) were continuously injected by a syringe pump (Chemyx, Fusion 200)
into a glass round-bottom flask (Ace glass, 100 mL). The flask was held at
310 K, and the organic liquids vaporized at the tip of a syringe prior to
the formation of a falling drop. The resulting gas-phase molecules were
swept in a flow of pure air (Aadco 737 Pure Air Generator; 1.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into an oxidation flow reactor (OFR). The injected
precursor concentration was 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ppm, which was calculated from
the injection rate of the liquid into the flow rate of the reactor.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experimental conditions, infrared band areas of organonitrogen
groups normalized by the area of alkane bands, and complex refractive indices
of the studied SOMs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.80}[.80]?><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Precursor</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Particle mass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col8">Infrared band </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11">320 nm </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col13" nameend="col14">405 nm </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(ppm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ppm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(ppbC ppbN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8">area ratio<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col14"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">toluene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(2.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.567 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.546 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">toluene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(1.84 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.570 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.552 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">toluene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.585 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.562 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">toluene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.591 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.571 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">15.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(2.75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.554 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.531 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(2.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.558 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.535 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.578 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.549 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.589 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.565 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.80}[.80]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Values are shown as (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation)
during the sampling periods. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> band at 1558 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> band at 1647 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands from 2790 to
2980 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>Aerosol particles composed of secondary organic material were produced in
the oxidation flow reactor (Kang et al., 2007; Lambe
et al., 2011). Aromatic precursors were oxidized by hydroxyl radicals (OH) (Fig. 1),
and some of the resulting low-volatility products contributed to
new particle production in the OFR. The experimental conditions are listed
in Table 1. The OFR was operated at a temperature of 293 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 K, a flow
rate of 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a residence time of 110 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 s.
Hydroxyl radicals were produced by photochemical reactions involving
ozone and water inside the OFR as follows: (i) O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (254 nm)
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) followed by (ii) O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 OH. Ozone was generated outside the reactor by irradiating pure air with
the ultraviolet emissions of a mercury lamp (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>185</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). The
injected ozone concentration was 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ppm. Water vapor was
introduced by bubbling ultrapure water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cm) with air. The
relative humidity inside the reactor was 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Schematic diagram of experimental apparatus. (I) Production
of secondary organic material in aerosol form. (II) Sampling of
particles onto a Teflon filter and growth of a thin film by electrostatic
precipitation of particles onto a silicon substrate. (III) Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy
(UV–VIS), and spectroscopic ellipsometry of collected secondary organic
material.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The experiments were conducted for several different concentrations of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For “low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” experiments, no NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was added, and the
nitric oxide (NO) concentration in the pure air was below the detection
limit of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer (Eco Physics CLD 899 Y; &lt; 70 ppt
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For “high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” experiments, NO of 2.5 to 10 ppm was
injected using a mass flow controller (Table 1). In a control experiment to
assess the possible importance of ozonolysis, in the dark the produced
particle mass concentration was 0.1 % of that obtained when the
ultraviolet lamps were illuminated, indicating that photooxidation was the
major pathway of SOM production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Spectroscopic ellipsometry</title>
      <p>Spectroscopic ellipsometry of SOM films followed the procedures introduced
in Liu et al. (2013). Thin, continuous, mirror-like films of SOM
were synthesized by electrostatic deposition of aerosol particles onto
silicon substrates. Information about film preparation and characterization
was provided in Liu et al. (2013). Spectroscopic ellipsometry was carried
out across 280 to 1200 nm at different incident angles using a
variable-angle spectroscopic ellipsometer (J.A. Woollam VASE). From the data
sets, film thickness, film non-uniformity, and wavelength-dependent real
refractive indices, represented by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, were retrieved using the WVASE32 software package (J.A.
Woollam VASE). Individual film thickness ranged from 100 to 350 nm. The
non-uniformity in film thickness was 5 to 10 % over the ellipsometric
sampling spot. An absence of systematic error in retrieved refractive
indices, as related to film thickness or film non-uniformity, was confirmed
previously (Liu et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>For each thin film sample, duplicate measurements were conducted at two or
more different spots. The retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values agreed with each other within an
absolute difference of 0.015. An overall uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, taking both the
reproducibility and the fitting error into account, was within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.015
(10 and 90 % confidence interval) across the studied wavelength range from
280 to 1200 nm. As a confirmation of the overall approach, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
retrieved for squalane, a non-absorbing standard, and nigrosin dye, a
light-absorbing standard, were consistent with literature values (cf.
supporting information in Liu et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy</title>
      <p>Particles were collected onto Teflon filters (Millipore FGLP, 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
pore size). The collected SOM mass was determined by weighing the filter
before and after sample collection using an analytical balance (Sartorius,
LA120S; 2.0 to 10.0 mg, with an uncertainty of 0.1 mg). The filters were
extracted in methanol (40.0 to 100.0 mL) while ultrasonicating (Branson
2510; 20 min). The concentration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated from the measured SOM mass
and the volume of the solvent. An extraction efficiency of 100 % was assumed
(Updyke et al., 2012). The extract was pipetted into a quartz cuvette having
an optical length of 10 mm. Absorbance spectra were recording using an
ultraviolet–visible spectrometer (Agilent Model 8453). The spectrum of neat
methanol was used as baseline. Analysis of blank filters showed no
absorbance across the studied region of 240 to 800 nm.</p>
      <p>The imaginary refractive indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated from the data sets as
follows (Sun et al., 2007):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          for an absorbance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, an optical path length <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m), a material density
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a concentration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A material
density of (1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used in the
analysis for toluene- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs (Ng et al., 2007). For
Suwannee River fulvic acid (International Humic Substances Society, 2S101F),
a material density of 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used. For the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values derived from UV–visible spectroscopy, propagation of uncertainties
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to an overall uncertainty of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 % (10 and 90 % confidence interval) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 420 nm.</p>
      <p>In an alternative to the UV–visible spectroscopy, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are also
retrieved by ellipsometry (Liu et al., 2013). A comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
derived from UV–visible spectroscopy and to those from ellipsometry is
provided in the supporting information (cf. Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Overall agreement is
good. For the smallest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (&lt; 0.005), the ellipsometry
retrievals have uncertainties approaching &gt; 50 %. The
uncertainties for UV–visible spectroscopy are considerably smaller
(&lt; 15 %). Even so, this method requires sample extraction, and
artifacts associated with extraction efficiency, material density, and
solvent effect can be introduced. All factors considered, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
derived from UV–visible spectroscopy were adopted in this study for further
analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Absorptive component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the refractive indices of (column 1)
toluene-derived SOMs and (column 2) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs for several
different initial NO concentrations. Row 1 shows the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and row 2
shows <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
are derived from UV–Vis measurements (see main text). The shaded regions show
confidence intervals of 10 to 90 %, as calculated by propagation of
individual uncertainties for the parameters of Eq. (1).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Infrared spectroscopy</title>
      <p>Aerosol particles were collected on Teflon filters (Sartorius Stem,
0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) at a flow rate of 2 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for up to 24 h. The
collected mass on the filters ranged from 0.8 to 2.0 mg. The Teflon filter
was cut to the shape of the germanium element of an attenuated total
reflectance (ATR) accessory (Pike Technologies). The assembly was then
screw-pressed to the crystal surface, the holder was opened, and the filter
was peeled off. A thin layer of secondary organic material remained on the
surface of the crystal (Hung et al., 2012). An experiment using a blank
filter showed no residual signal from the Teflon filter after peeling. This
preparation method avoided interference from Teflon filters across
900–1250 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Russell et al., 2009b, 2011; Takahama et al., 2012),
which otherwise obscured the absorption bands of C–O stretching.</p>
      <p>After preparation, the filter samples were taken for spectroscopy analysis.
Infrared spectra were recorded using the ATR accessory in a Fourier
transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Nicolet 670). The spectral resolution
was 0.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The number of scans was 16. Additional information about
the ATR-FTIR protocols is provided in Hung et al. (2012). A
band fitting algorithm, implemented in MATLAB, was used to analyze the
infrared spectra. The algorithm was adopted from Russell et al. (2009a) and Takahama et al. (2012). The
absorption bands of alkanes (C–H), carboxylic hydroxyls (O–H), alcoholic
hydroxyls (O–H), and carbonyls (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O) were identified using the
literature-described algorithm. The algorithm was further developed in the
present study to characterize nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitro (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
ether (C–O–C) groups.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Optical properties of aromatic-derived SOMs and the effect of
NO${}_{\mathrm{x}}$}?><title>Optical properties of aromatic-derived SOMs and the effect of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>The wavelength-dependent absorptive component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the refractive index is
plotted in Fig. 2a for toluene- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs prepared at several
different initial NO concentrations (cf. Table S1 in the Supplement for tabulated data). The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values increase with increasing initial NO concentration. For
toluene-derived SOMs, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 405 nm range from 0.0017 to 0.0153.
These values compare to a range of 0.0018 to 0.0072 reported by Nakayama et
al. (2013) for SOMs produced by toluene photooxidation
in an environmental chamber.</p>
      <p>The increase of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can in part be explained by the
production of light-absorptive organonitrogen compounds, mostly
nitro-aromatic compounds, such as nitrophenols, nitrocatechols, and
dinitrophenols (cf. Sect. 3.2). These compounds have been identified as
products from toluene photooxidation under high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions
(Forstner et al., 1997; Jang and Kamens, 2001b; Sato et al., 2007; Zhong et
al., 2012; Nakayama et al., 2013). Nitro-aromatic compounds have also been
identified in brown carbon sampled in urban plumes dominated by
anthropogenic SOM (Zhang et al., 2011, 2013). The spectra
for several methyl-nitrophenol isomers were measured (cf. Sect. S1 in the Supplement), and
the results confirm that these compounds are strong UV absorbers. In
particular, the aromatic compounds having hydroxyl and nitro groups in
<italic>para</italic> substitution, such as 2-methyl-4-nitrophenol (a major product of aromatic
photooxidation), have a strong absorption band at 320 nm. Compounds having
this configuration are good candidates for contribution to the main peak in
the difference spectra <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2b).</p>
      <p>For similar reaction conditions, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs are less
absorptive than the toluene-derived SOMs (Fig. 3a; Table 1). The filter
samples of toluene-derived SOMs have a yellowish to light brownish color,
even for samples collected in low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments. For comparison,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene samples have a light yellowish color only for high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
experiments and are visually white otherwise.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Imaginary refractive indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 320 nm,
<bold>(b)</bold> real refractive indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 320 and 550 nm, <bold>(c)</bold> the
areas of nitro and nitrate absorption bands normalized by the area of alkane
bands, all as a function of initial NO concentration. Shown in <bold>(d)</bold>
is the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the
normalized area of nitro band
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as drawn from
<bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>. See also note b for Table 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Comparison of wavelength-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for different types of
atmospherically relevant light-absorbing materials. This study: anthropogenic
SOMs (A-SOM) derived from reacting toluene or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene at low
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm) and high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 ppm; HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
4.0 ppbC ppbN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene, respectively), and a brown
carbon (BrC) surrogate (Suwannee River fulvic acid). Literature: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene- and limonene-derived biogenic SOMs (B-SOM), various atmospheric BrC
in both biomass burning (BB) and urban plumes, and black carbon (BC).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the aromatic-derived SOMs can be compared to those of other
light-absorbing material relevant to atmospheric aerosol particles (Fig. 4).
The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values decrease for increasing wavelength for the aromatic-derived
SOMs. Similar wavelength-dependent behavior is observed for light-absorbing
carbonaceous materials referred to as “brown carbon” in literature
(Kirchstetter et al., 2004; Andreae and Gelencser, 2006; Hoffer et al.,
2006; Alexander et al., 2008; Dinar et al., 2008; Chakrabarty et al.,
2010; Cappa et al., 2012; Lack et al., 2013). In contradistinction, the value
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for black carbon is independent of wavelength
(Kirchstetter et al., 2004). Compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of SOMs
derived from examples of biogenic precursors (B-SOM), such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and limonene SOM (Liu et al., 2013), the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the studied
anthropogenic SOMs (A-SOM) are 1 order of magnitude more absorptive in the
UV–visible region, even for those produced at low NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. These higher
values suggest that conjugated double bonds are retained in some oxidation
products, which have absorption transitions in the ultraviolet to near
visible (Lambe et al., 2013). Even so, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the
low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments are smaller than those of a reference compound like
Suwannee River fulvic acid, which is often cited as a surrogate of
atmospheric humic-like substances (HULIS)
(Gelencsér et al., 2003; Dinar et al., 2006).
In the high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments, however, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are within the range
of atmospheric brown carbon (cf. shaded region in Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Real refractive indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <bold>(a)</bold> toluene-derived SOMs and
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs for several different initial NO
concentrations. The shaded regions represent confidence intervals of 10 to
90 % for the ellipsometry analysis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The real refractive indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of toluene- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs are shown
in Fig. 5 for several different initial NO concentrations. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
decrease for increasing wavelength. The curves can be parameterized by the
three-term form of Cauchy's equation (cf. Table S2). The Cauchy-form of the
curves for the studied anthropogenic SOMs also holds for the biogenic SOMs
reported previously (Liu et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The refractive indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shift <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 for both toluene- and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs for an increase of the initial NO concentration from 0
to 10 ppm (Fig. 5). This upward shift of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for increasing initial NO
concentration is possibly attributed to an increasing abundance of nitrogen
in the SOM produced at higher initial NO concentrations. Nitrogen has a
higher atomic polarizability (1.03 Å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than both oxygen
(0.57 Å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hydrogen (0.17 Å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bosque and
Sales, 2002). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of a material is related to its polarizability by
the Lorentz–Lorenz equation (Bosque and Sales, 2002). Within
the tolerance of the measurement uncertainty, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values do not differ
between SOMs derived from the two different aromatic precursors at the same
initial NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The implication could be that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
SOMs are mainly determined by bulk chemical properties, such as the
elemental ratios or functional groups (cf. Sects. 3.2 and 3.3). Detailed
chemical properties, such as the molecular structure, might play a minor
role in determining the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case, upscaling of the laboratory
parameterizations to large-scale models of the effects of different types of
SOMs on radiative forcing and climate is simplified (Lambe et al.,
2013; Flores et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2014). As a caveat, the SOMs of this
study were produced at mass concentrations much higher than typical
atmospheric concentrations. Both elemental composition and refractive index
can depend on mass concentration (Shilling et al., 2009;  Kim et al., 2012;
Kim and Paulson, 2013), and further investigations are needed to quantify
this possible effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Production of organonitrogen compounds and\hack{\break} light absorption }?><title>Production of organonitrogen compounds and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> light absorption </title>
      <p>The infrared spectra in the presence and absence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar,
except for organonitrogen groups, such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 6). This similarity suggests that the oxygen-containing functional groups,
excluding nitrogen-containing groups, are substantially similar for SOMs
produced at the different NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. SOMs derived from toluene
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene also have similar overall compositions.</p>
      <p>Organonitrogen compounds are detected in SOM collected in high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
experiments. The bands at 846, 1281, and 1647 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to
organonitrate groups (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are present in both toluene- and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs (Roberts, 1990; Liu et al., 2012). The area of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> band from 1610 to 1690 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, when normalized by the alkane
C–H bands from 2790 to 2980 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for different masses on
the filters, increases for greater initial NO concentrations (Fig. 3c).
Comparison of the spectrum of the toluene-derived SOM to that of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOM for fixed initial NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration shows that the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions are approximately equal for both types of SOMs
produced. The dominant mechanism for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, which is the
reaction of peroxy radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with NO (Roberts, 1990),
can explain why the fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases for greater NO
concentrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Infrared spectra of <bold>(a)</bold> toluene-derived SOMs and
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs for several different initial NO
concentrations. Individual curves are offset from each other so that
differences can be seen. Spectra are normalized to the peak height at
1100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a C–O stretch, to compensate for different
masses on the filter samples.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Ternary diagram representing the relative areas of O–H, C–O, and
C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O bands for aromatic-derived SOMs. Data for reference compounds in
the NIST database, as well as of individual products reported in the
literature for toluene-derived SOM, are also shown for comparison. The arrow
illustrates the direction of particle-phase reactions. See Sect. S2 in
the Supplement for further explanation of this diagram.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In the high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> groups are produced. For
the toluene-derived SOM, the production of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> groups is indicated by
a strong band at 1558 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a weak band at 1342 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6a).
For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOM, only the strong band at 1558 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
observed (Fig. 6b). Based on an analysis of area ratios, the mole fraction of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> groups in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOM is 35 to 50 % lower than
that in the toluene-derived SOM for fixed initial NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (Fig. 3c). The production mechanism of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> group has
been proposed as the adduction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to phenoxy radicals to produce
nitrophenols (Forstner et al., 1997; Jang and Kamens, 2001b; Nakayama et al.,
2013). Compared to toluene, the alkyl substitution at a metasite of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene can inhibit the production of stable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> adducts of
phenoxy radicals (Nakayama et al., 2013), which can explain the lower
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction observed for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOM.</p>
      <p>The difference in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction explains in part but not entirely the
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for toluene- compared to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs (cf.
Sect. 3.1). When normalized by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions and for similar
reaction conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 320 nm for toluene-derived SOM is 50 %
higher than that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOM. The implication is that the
compounds in toluene-derived SOM are more UV-absorptive than those in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOM. Differences in the extent of conjugation of the
oxygenated products can be important. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the UV region at low
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provide a baseline to quantify this influence. When
normalized by both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction, the two types of SOM
are similarly absorptive (Fig. 3d). Organonitrogen groups attached to a
conjugated chain can have increased light absorption as well as shifts in
absorption to longer wavelengths.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Oxygenated groups and the importance of particle-phase reactions</title>
      <p>The infrared spectra show that several different types of oxygenated
functional groups are present in the SOMs (Fig. 6). The groups include
alcoholic hydroxyls (O–H) at 3100–3700 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, carboxylic hydroxyls
(O–H) at 2400–3300 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, carboxylic carbonyls (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O), and mixed
ketones <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> aldehydes (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O) at 1640–1850 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spectra of
aromatic-derived SOMs are similar to those reported in the literature for
related SOMs (Jang and Kamens, 2001a; Liu et al., 2012). The new finding of
the present study is the presence of a strong C–O stretch at
1000–1260 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (cf. Table S3). This band was obscured in previous
studies by ammonium sulfate or Teflon filter. As explained for Fig. 7, this
C–O band cannot be explained by alcohols, phenols, cyclic anhydrides,
carboxylic acids, or other carbonyls that have been identified as major
products from oxidation reactions of aromatic precursors.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Parameters describing the different particle populations used in the
case study of Sect. 3.4.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3">Particle number- </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Material</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type of particles</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3">diameter distribution<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Complex refractive indices</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">gmd (nm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">gsd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Brown carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">toluene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">wavelength dependent</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(this study)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">wavelength dependent</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(this study)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Black carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.85–0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1770</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.53–0.00 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Parameters describing a single-mode log-normal
number–diameter distribution for the governing equation:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gsd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gmd</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gsd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the total number concentration (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents
the particle diameter (nm). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Values taken from Exp. A4 (cf.
Table 1). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Values taken from Exp. B4 (cf.
Table 1).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Value recommended by Bond and
Bergstrom (2006). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Value taken from Toon et al. (1976).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Figure 7 shows a ternary diagram representing the relative areas of O–H,
C–O, and C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O bands for toluene- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs (cf. Sect. S2). Reference compounds having different types of oxygenated functional
group are also plotted. The ternary diagram groups different types of
oxygenated compounds into clusters. The individual products from
photooxidation of toluene identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
(GC/MS) are plotted for comparison (Forstner et al., 1997).
The cluster representing the toluene- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene-derived SOMs is uniquely
situated and differentiated from the reference compounds because of the C–O
stretch at 1000–1260 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>This absorption band at 1000–1260 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is plausibly contributed by an
ether group (C–O–C) of acetals and hemiacetals produced via particle-phase
reactions (Jang et al., 2002; Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008; Lim et al., 2010).
These reactions tend to drive product distribution toward the C–O vertex of
the composition diagram (cf. arrow in Fig. 7). The gas-phase oxidation of
aromatic precursors produces dialdehydes in high yields, including glyoxal
and methylglyoxal. These dialdehydes readily oligomerize along hemiacetal and
acetal pathways, with associated changes in the C–O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O stretch
band ratio (Loeffler et al., 2006). Hemiacetal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> acetal production
reactions leading to oligomerization can occur in SOM produced by
photooxidation of trimethylbenzene (TMB), even in the absence of catalysis by
sulfuric acid (Kalberer et al., 2004).</p>
      <p>The mole fraction of each functional group is estimated using the
absorptivity of Russell et al. (2009b) and Takahama et
al. (2012), along with the area ratios of ether (C–O–C) to
alkane (C–H) bands for 19 ether and acetal compounds appearing in the
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology)
database. The analysis concludes that ether groups constitute up to 50 %
of the SOM mass. This result agrees with a modeling study suggesting that
20–80 % of the SOM derived from toluene is produced by particle-phase
reactions (Cao and Jang, 2009). These particle-phase reactions can
produce oligomers having conjugated structures that contribute to the light
absorption even in the absence of nitrogen moieties (Zhong et
al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Atmospheric implications</title>
      <p>For the obtained spectral data sets of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. 3.1), the optical
effects of brown carbon (BrC) from anthropogenic SOM can be assessed. A
model case study is formulated to represent light-absorbing particles in a
fresh urban plume close to the anthropogenic sources. Parameters defining
the case study are listed in Table 2. The case study considers a population
of brown carbon particles produced by photooxidation of anthropogenic
aromatic precursors in the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This population is compared
with populations of black carbon (BC) particles (representing emissions from
fossil fuel combustion) and externally mixed at variable ratios with
ammonium sulfate particles (representing the regional background atmospheric
aerosol). The number–diameter distributions of the BrC and sulfate particle
populations are representative of polluted urban regions (Wu et al., 2008).
The BC particle population having a relatively smaller mode diameter is
typical for fresh soot particles emitted from motor vehicles (Kleeman et
al., 2000). The investigated ratios of BC and ammonium sulfate are
representative of Asian outflows (Ramana et al., 2010).
The external mixing assumption is consistent with the small absorption
enhancement of BC in urban regions (Cappa et al.,
2012). The single-scattering albedo <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the ratio of
scattering to total extinction, is calculated for each population and their
mixtures using a Mie-theory-based optical model (Bohren and Huffman, 1983;
Liu et al., 2013) (Fig. 8a). The relative contribution of BrC absorption to
total light absorption (i.e., BrC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (BrC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC)) is calculated as a function
of the mass ratio of organic matter to BC. The calculated results for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 405, and 550 nm are plotted in Fig. 8b. These three
wavelengths are selected because solar radiation in these bands respectively
regulates O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis, and energy balance (cf.
Fig. 8a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Calculated single-scattering albedo of light absorbing
particles for a scenario of an urban plume. Cumulative distributions for
solar irradiance (orange) and photolysis rate coefficients (light blue) are
also shown. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of BrC were bounded by the cases for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbC ppbN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
toluene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (HC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbC ppbN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
as shown in Fig. 4. The cases for “BC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate” represent
a BC population externally mixed with an ammonium sulfate population at
variable mixing ratios representative of typical ambient values in a
pollution plume (Ramana et al., 2010). Table 2 lists the physical parameters
used for modeling the several different particle populations. The cumulative
distributions were calculated for a standard solar spectrum of <italic>Air Mass</italic> 1.5 (<uri>http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/</uri>). <bold>(b)</bold>
Contribution of BrC absorption to total absorption as a function of the mass
ratio of organic matter to black carbon. The BrC cases were the same as those
shown in <bold>(a)</bold>. External mixing of BrC and BC populations was
assumed in the calculation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/1435/2015/acp-15-1435-2015-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Results of the case study have several implications for climate and
atmospheric chemistry modeling. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the BrC particle
populations are close to unity for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 500 nm
(Fig. 8a). When externally mixed with BC, the studied BrC has a negligible
contribution to light absorption at 550 nm (Fig. 8b). These results indicate
that these BrC populations have a net cooling effect. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
however, decrease below unity for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 400 nm, meaning
that the particle population becomes absorptive in the UV region. Although
the solar irradiance in the UV region contributes only 10 % of the total
solar irradiation, meaning a small heating effect by brown carbon for the
conditions of the case study, the effect can still be important because UV
irradiance determines the photolysis rates of many chemical species
(Fig. 8a). For example, reduced UV irradiance for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 320 nm slows ozone photolysis, thus suppressing the production
of OH radicals (Martin et al., 2003; Tie et al., 2003). The case study
suggests that BrC populations can have a substantial contribution for light
absorption in this band (Fig. 8b). For a mass ratio of organic matter to BC
in a range of 2 to 20, which is typical for urban atmosphere (Turpin et al.,
1991), BrC accounts for 15–80 % of the UV absorption at 320 nm. The
photolysis of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is similarly suppressed by reduced UV irradiance for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 405 nm, thus inhibiting the production of ozone
(Dickerson et al., 1997; Martin et al., 2003). The implication is that, as an
effective UV absorber, BrC influences the production of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH by
reducing UV irradiance and consequently affects the oxidation capacity of the
regional atmosphere.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, photooxidation of toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene in the presence of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can produce SOMs having <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values similar to those reported
for brown carbon in biomass burning and urban plumes (Kirchstetter et al.,
2004; Hoffer et al., 2006; Alexander et al., 2008; Dinar et al., 2008;
Chakrabarty et al., 2010; Cappa et al., 2012; Lack et al., 2013). The
implication is that the photooxidation of anthropogenic precursors can be a
significant source of atmospheric brown carbon. These findings are consistent
with atmospheric observations in urban regions, such as the Los Angeles basin
(Zhang et al., 2011, 2013; Cappa et al., 2012), Mexico City (Barnard et al.,
2008), and Beijing (Cheng et al., 2011). The case studies considered in the
present study suggest that anthropogenic brown carbon, along with brown
carbon from biomass burning, can have a major influence on light absorption
at wavelengths that drive photochemical reactions. This effect needs to be
evaluated in the future modeling studies of atmospheric chemistry.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1435-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1435-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded under NASA grant #NNX12AG95G through the Radiation
Science Program and NSF grant #AGS-1244995. This work was performed in
part at the Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the NSF
National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN). Pengfei Liu
acknowledges support from the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship
Program. We thank the Vecitis Lab from Harvard University for providing a
sample of the Suwannee River fulvic acid.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Laskin</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, D. T. L., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown carbon
spheres in East Asian outflow and their optical properties, Science, 321,
833–836, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1155296</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The
nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3131–3148, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barnard, J. C., Volkamer, R., and Kassianov, E. I.: Estimation of the mass
absorption cross section of the organic carbon component of aerosols in the
Mexico City Metropolitan Area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6665–6679,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6665-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and scattering of light by small
particles, Wiley, New York, 530 pp., 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous particles:
an investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bosque, R. and Sales, J.: Polarizabilities of solvents from the chemical
composition, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 42, 1154–1163, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci025528x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ci025528x</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cao, G. and Jang, M.: An SOA model for toluene oxidation in the presence of
inorganic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 727–733,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es901682r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es901682r</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S.,
Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T.,
Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman,
I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian,
R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative absorption enhancements due
to the mixing state of atmospheric black carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1223447</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott, W.
P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Kreidenweis, S.
M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Liu, P. F., Göbel, T., Hallbauer, E.,
Deng, Z. Z., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Liang, Z., Liu, H. J., Yan, P., Zhou, X. J.,
and Wiedensohler, A.: A parameterization of low visibilities for hazy days in
the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4935–4950,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4935-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4935-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan,
J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H.,
and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and
water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
11497–11510, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cocker III, D. R., Mader, B. T., Kalberer, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: The effect of water on gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic
aerosol: II. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene photooxidation systems,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 6073–6085, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00405-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00405-8</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Dickerson, R. R., Kondragunta, S., Stenchikov, G., Civerolo, K. L.,
Doddridge, B. G., and Holben, B. N.: The impact of aerosols on solar
ultraviolet radiation and photochemical smog, Science, 278, 827–830,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5339.827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.278.5339.827</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Dinar, E., Abo Riziq, A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich, Y.:
The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances
(HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS),
Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b703111d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b703111d</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Dinar, E., Mentel, T. F., and Rudich, Y.: The density of humic acids and
humic like substances (HULIS) from fresh and aged wood burning and pollution
aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5213–5224,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5213-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5213-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M.
E., Ferris, B. G., and Speizer, F. E.: An association between air pollution
and mortality in six U.S. cities, New. Engl. J. Med., 329, 1753–1759,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1056/NEJM199312093292401</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Zhao, D. F., Segev, L., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A.,
Fuchs, H., Watne, Å. K., Bluvshtein, N., Mentel, Th. F., Hallquist, M.,
and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index in the UV spectral
region in ageing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
5793–5806, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Forstner, H. J. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic
aerosol from the photooxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons: molecular composition, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
31, 1345–1358, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9605376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es9605376</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gelencsér, A., Hoffer, A., Kiss, G., Tombácz, E., Kurdi, R., and
Bencze, L.: In-situ formation of light-absorbing organic matter in cloud
water, J. Atmos. Chem., 45, 25–33, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1024060428172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1024060428172</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hamilton, J. F., Webb, P. J., Lewis, A. C., and Reviejo, M. M.: Quantifying
small molecules in secondary organic aerosol formed during the
photo-oxidation of toluene with hydroxyl radicals, Atmos. Environ., 39,
7263–7275, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Russell, L. M., Huebert, B. J.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Liao, H., and Weber, R. J.: A large organic aerosol source
in the free troposphere missing from current models, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, L18809, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023831</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: High formation of
secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2973–2986, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P.,
Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances
(HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hung, H.-M., Chen, Y.-Q., and Martin, S. T.: Reactive aging of films of
secondary organic material studied by infrared spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 117, 108–116, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp309470z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp309470z</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Isolating nitrated and aromatic aerosols and nitrated
aromatic gases as sources of ultraviolet light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 3527–3542, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998JD100054</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Jang, M. S. and Kamens, R. M.: Characterization of secondary aerosol from the
photooxidation of toluene in the presence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1-propene,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 3626–3639, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es010676+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es010676+</ext-link>, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Jang, M. S. and Kamens, R. M.: Atmospheric secondary aerosol formation by
heterogeneous reactions of aldehydes in the presence of a sulfuric acid
aerosol catalyst, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4758–4766,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es010790s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es010790s</ext-link>, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jang, M. S., Czoschke, N. M., Lee, S., and Kamens, R. M.: Heterogeneous
atmospheric aerosol production by acid-catalyzed particle-phase reactions,
Science, 298, 814–817, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1075798</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R., and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of
atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092185</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the
concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H. and Paulson, S. E.: Real refractive indices and volatility of
secondary organic aerosol generated from photooxidation and ozonolysis of
limonene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and toluene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7711–7723,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7711-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7711-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Barkey, B., and Paulson, S. E.: Real refractive indices and
formation yields of secondary organic aerosol generated from photooxidation
of limonene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene: the effect of the HC/NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6059–6067, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp301302z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp301302z</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Liu, S., Russell, L. M., and Paulson, S. E.: Dependence of real
refractive indices on O:C, H:C and mass fragments of secondary organic
aerosol generated from ozonolysis and photooxidation of limonene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 498–507, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.893278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.893278</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21208, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kleeman, M. J., Schauer, J. J., and Cass, G. R.: Size and composition
distribution of fine particulate matter emitted from motor vehicles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 34, 1132–1142, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es981276y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es981276y</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Bahreini, R., Langridge, J. M., Gilman, J. B., and Middlebrook,
A. M.: Brown carbon absorption linked to organic mass tracers in biomass
burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2415–2422,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S.,
Abbatt, J. P. D., Brune, W. H., Ng, N. L., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D. R.,
Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Characterization of
aerosol photooxidation flow reactors: heterogeneous oxidation, secondary
organic aerosol formation and cloud condensation nuclei activity
measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 445–461, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-445-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es401043j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401043j</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, J., Laskin, A., Roach, P. J., Slysz, G. W., Anderson, G. A.,
Nizkorodov, S. A., Bones, D. L., and Nguyen, L. Q.: High-resolution
desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for chemical
characterization of organic aerosols, Anal. Chem., 82, 2048–2058,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac902801f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac902801f</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Li, K., Wang, W., Ge, M., Li, J., and Wang, D.: Optical properties of
secondary organic aerosols generated by photooxidation of aromatic
hydrocarbons, Sci. Rep., 4, 4922, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04922" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep04922</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P. F., Zhang, Y., and Martin, S. T.: Complex refractive indices of thin
films of secondary organic materials by spectroscopic ellipsometry from 220
to 1200 nm, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 13594–13601, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es403411e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es403411e</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Shilling, J. E., Song, C., Hiranuma, N., Zaveri, R. A., and Russell,
L. M.: Hydrolysis of organonitrate functional groups in aerosol particles,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 1359–1369, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.716175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.716175</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Loeffler, K. W., Koehler, C. A., Paul, N. M., and De Haan, D. O.: Oligomer
formation in evaporating aqueous glyoxal and methyl glyoxal solutions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6318–6323, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es060810w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es060810w</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Martin, R. V., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Chin, M., and Ginoux, P.:
Global and regional decreases in tropospheric oxidants from photochemical
effects of aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.- Atmos., 108, 4097,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002622" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002622</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and Uchiyama,
A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic aerosols
generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014387</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Nakayama, T., Sato, K., Matsumi, Y., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and Uchiyama,
A.: Wavelength and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependent complex refractive index of SOAs
generated from the photooxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
531–545, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-531-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-531-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene,
toluene, and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/particle partitioning and secondary organic aerosol
yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es950943+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es950943+</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Jungkamp, T. P. W., Griffin, R. J., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: The atmospheric aerosol-forming potential of whole gasoline vapor,
Science, 276, 96–99, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.96" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.276.5309.96</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Ofner, J., Krüger, H.-U., Grothe, H., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Whitmore, K.,
and Zetzsch, C.: Physico-chemical characterization of SOA derived from
catechol and guaiacol – a model substance for the aromatic fraction of
atmospheric HULIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Ramana, M. V., Ramanathan, V., Feng, Y., Yoon, S. C., Kim, S. W., Carmichael,
G. R., and Schauer, J. J.: Warming influenced by the ratio of black carbon to
sulphate and the black-carbon source, Nat. Geosci., 3, 542–545,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo918</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Ran, L., Zhao, C. S., Xu, W. Y., Han, M., Lu, X. Q., Han, S. Q., Lin, W. L.,
Xu, X. B., Gao, W., Yu, Q., Geng, F. H., Ma, N., Deng, Z. Z., and Chen, J.:
Ozone production in summer in the megacities of Tianjin and Shanghai, China:
a comparative study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7531–7542,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7531-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7531-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, J. M.: The atmospheric chemistry of organic nitrates, Atmos.
Environ., 24, 243–287, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90108-Y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(90)90108-Y</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Bahadur, R., Hawkins, L. N., Allan, J., Baumgardner, D.,
Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Organic aerosol characterization by
complementary measurements of chemical bonds and molecular fragments, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 6100–6105, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.036</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Takahama, S., Liu, S., Hawkins, L. N., Covert, D. S., Quinn,
P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Oxygenated fraction and mass of organic aerosol from
direct emission and atmospheric processing measured on the R/V Ronald Brown
during TEXAQS/GoMACCS 2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00F05,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011275" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd011275</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Bahadur, R., and Ziemann, P. J.: Identifying organic aerosol
sources by comparing functional group composition in chamber and atmospheric
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 3516–3521,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006461108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1006461108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Sato, K., Hatakeyama, S., and Imamura, T.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation during the photooxidation of toluene: NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence of chemical composition, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 111, 9796–9808, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp071419f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp071419f</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and
McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal
in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Shilling, J. E., Chen, Q., King, S. M., Rosenoern, T., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop,
D. R., DeCarlo, P. F., Aiken, A. C., Sueper, D., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin,
S. T.: Loading-dependent elemental composition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA
particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 771–782, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-771-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-771-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Sun, H., Biedermann, L., and Bond, T. C.: Color of brown carbon: A model for
ultraviolet and visible light absorption by organic carbon aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L17813, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl029797</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Takahama, S., Johnson, A., and Russell, L. M.: Quantification of carboxylic
and carbonyl functional groups in organic aerosol infrared absorbance
spectra, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 310–325, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.752065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.752065</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tie, X., Madronich, S., Walters, S., Zhang, R., Rasch, P., and Collins, W.:
Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 4642, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003659</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Toon, O. B., Pollack, J. B., and Khare, B. N.: The optical constants of
several atmospheric aerosol species: Ammonium sulfate, aluminum oxide, and
sodium chloride, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5733–5748,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC081i033p05733" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC081i033p05733</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J., Huntzicker, J. J., Larson, S. M., and Cass, G. R.: Los Angeles
summer midday particulate carbon: primary and secondary aerosol, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 25, 1788–1793, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00022a017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00022a017</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Updyke, K. M., Nguyen, T. B., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Formation of brown
carbon via reactions of ammonia with secondary organic aerosols from biogenic
and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Environ., 63, 22–31,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Dzepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026899</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z., Hu, M., Lin, P., Liu, S., Wehner, B., and Wiedensohler, A.: Particle
number size distribution in the urban atmosphere of Beijing, China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 7967–7980, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.022</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Zarzana, K. J., De Haan, D. O., Freedman, M. A., Hasenkopf, C. A., and
Tolbert, M. A.: Optical properties of the products of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyl
and amine reactions in simulated cloud droplets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
4845–4851, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es2040152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es2040152</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S. H., and
Weber, R. J.: Light-absorbing soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles and
Atlanta: A contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L21810, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049385</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources, composition
and absorption Ångström exponent of light-absorbing organic
components in aerosol extracts from the Los Angeles basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es305047b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman, M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in
laboratory chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA., 111, 5802–5807, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1404727111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, M. and Jang, M.: Light absorption coefficient measurement of SOA using
a UV-Visible spectrometer connected with an integrating sphere, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 4263–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.082</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, M., Jang, M., Oliferenko, A., Pillai, G. G., and Katritzky, A. R.: The
SOA formation model combined with semiempirical quantum chemistry for
predicting UV-Vis absorption of secondary organic aerosols, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 14, 9058–9066, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cp23906j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cp23906j</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
