<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>A multi-year study of lower tropospheric aerosol variability
and systematic relationships from four North American regions</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A multi-year study of lower tropospheric aerosol variability}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~P.~Sherman et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sherman</surname><given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
          <email>shermanjp@appstate.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sheridan</surname><given-names>P. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ogren</surname><given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7895-9583</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Andrews</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-024X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hageman</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Schmeisser</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-7834</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Jefferson</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Dept. Physics and Astronomy, Appalachian State University, 525 Rivers St,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> CAP Building, Room 231, Boone, NC 28608, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>NOAA, Earth Systems Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division/GMD-1,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Environment Canada, 4905 Dufferin St, Toronto, ON, M3H 5T4 Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Dept. Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. P. Sherman (shermanjp@appstate.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>12487</fpage><lpage>12517</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015.html">This article is available from https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Hourly averaged aerosol optical properties (AOPs) measured over the years
2010–2013 at four continental North American NOAA Earth System Research
Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL) cooperative aerosol network sites – Southern Great
Plains near Lamont, OK (SGP), Bondville, IL (BND), Appalachian State
University in Boone, NC (APP), and Egbert, Ontario, Canada (EGB) are
analyzed. Aerosol optical properties measured over 1996–2009 at BND and
1997–2009 at SGP are also presented. The aerosol sources and types in the
four regions differ enough so as to collectively represent rural,
anthropogenically perturbed air conditions over much of eastern continental
North America. Temporal AOP variability on monthly, weekly, and diurnal
timescales is presented for each site. Differences in annually averaged AOPs
and those for individual months at the four sites are used to examine
regional AOP variability. Temporal and regional variability are placed in
the context of reported aerosol chemistry at the sites, meteorological
measurements (wind direction, temperature), and reported regional mixing
layer heights. Basic trend analysis is conducted for selected AOPs at the
long-term sites (BND and SGP). Systematic relationships among AOPs are also
presented.</p>
    <p>Seasonal variability in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (sub-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particulate matter) scattering and
absorption coefficients at 550 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively) and most of the other PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs is much larger than day of week
and diurnal variability at all sites. All sites demonstrate summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks. Scattering coefficient decreases by a
factor of 2–4 in September–October and coincides with minimum
single-scattering albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum hemispheric
backscatter fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The co-variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lead to
insignificant annual cycles in top-of-atmosphere direct radiative forcing
efficiency (DRFE) at APP and SGP. Much larger annual DRFE cycle amplitudes
are observed at EGB (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) and BND (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %), with least negative DRFE in September–October at both sites.
Secondary winter peaks in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed at all sites except
APP. Amplitudes of diurnal and weekly cycles in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
sites are larger for all seasons than those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
the largest differences occurring in summer. The weekly and diurnal cycle
amplitudes of most intensive AOPs (e.g., those derived from ratios of
measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are minimal in most cases,
especially those related to parameterizations of aerosol size distribution.</p>
    <p>Statistically significant trends in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (decreasing), PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
scattering fraction (decreasing), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (increasing) are found at BND from
1996 to 2013 and at SGP from 1997 to 2013. A statistically significant decreasing
trend in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering Ångström exponent is also observed for SGP
but not BND. Most systematic relationships among AOPs are similar for the
four sites and are adequately described for individual seasons by
annually averaged relationships, although <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>relationships<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> involving absorption
Ångström exponent vary with site and season.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Predictions of future climate change resulting from projected increases in
carbon dioxide are limited by large uncertainties in the direct and indirect
radiative forcing due to aerosols (Andreae et al., 2005). Measurement-based
estimates of globally averaged aerosol direct radiative forcing (DRF) are
55–80 % greater than the model-based estimates (Yu et al., 2009). The
measurement–model differences are even larger on regional scales and for the
anthropogenic component (Yu et al., 2009). Such measurement–model
discrepancies are the result of a combination of differences in aerosol
amount, single-scattering albedo, surface albedo, and radiative transfer
schemes (Yu et al., 2006). One of the high-priority tasks recommended to
reduce the uncertainty in aerosol radiative effects is to “maintain, enhance, and expand the surface observation networks measuring aerosol optical
properties for satellite retrieval validation, model evaluation, and climate change assessments” (Kahn et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p>Studies based on long-term measurements made by global surface-based aerosol
monitoring networks such as NASA's Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and
NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL) have contributed to
improved understanding of mean values of aerosol optical properties (AOPs),
spatial and temporal AOP variability, and relationships among some AOPs
(Dubovik et al., 2005; Delene and Ogren, 2002; hereafter referred to as
D&amp;O2002). The US-based Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual
Environments (IMPROVE) network (Malm et al., 2004) has conducted similar
studies using speciated aerosol mass concentrations, aerosol light
scattering coefficient (at some sites), and reconstructed aerosol light
extinction coefficient measurements in remote areas of the US. Recent
long-term trend studies based on data from surface networks indicated that
aerosol optical depth (Li et al., 2014; Yoon et al., 2012) and lower tropospheric
aerosol light scattering coefficient (Collaud-Coen et al., 2013; hereafter
referred to as CC2013) decreased at a majority of North American aerosol
monitoring sites. Hand et al. (2014) reported large reductions of up to
50 % in reconstructed aerosol visible light extinction for the 20 %
haziest days annually at IMPROVE sites in the US from 2002 to 2011, with the
largest decreases in the eastern US. Through trend analysis of speciated
aerosol mass concentrations and emissions inventories, Hand et al. (2014)
showed that reductions in US SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions have likely played a major
role in the reduced aerosol light extinction, particularly in the eastern
US. Murphy et al. (2011) applied trend analysis to data from IMPROVE sites
across the US to show that elemental carbon aerosol mass concentrations
decreased by over 25 % between 1990 and 2004, with reductions during winter
months close to 50 %. Region- and season-dependent changes in emissions of
aerosols and precursor gases may result in changes in mean values and
variability of aerosol optical and microphysical properties. However, few
long-term studies of aerosol intensive properties (e.g., properties that are
independent of aerosol loading, such as single scattering albedo, asymmetry
parameter, and direct radiative forcing efficiency) have been conducted in
or over multiple North American regions.</p>
      <p>Surface-based networks employing in situ measurements of aerosol optical
properties, such as the WMO Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) and NOAA/ESRL
aerosol networks are particularly well-suited for studies of aerosol
variability on a variety of temporal scales under both clear and cloudy
conditions. An additional advantage of the in situ measurements is the
ability to derive single-scattering albedo under low aerosol loading
conditions. Column-averaged single scattering albedo derived from sky
radiance measurements made by Cimel sun/sky radiometers as part of AERONET
possess high uncertainties at the lower aerosol optical depths (AOD) typical
of most rural North American sites (Dubovik et al., 2000). A weakness of
many in situ surface aerosol measurement systems is the inability to
determine the hygroscopic dependence of aerosol light scattering. Many
aerosol monitoring stations in the NOAA/ESRL and GAW networks follow similar
sampling protocols where the aerosols are dried to decouple the aerosol
properties from local variations in relative humidity (RH). Another concern
is the uncertainty as to when and under what conditions the near-surface
measurements are representative of the atmospheric column at each site. The
first problem can be addressed through the use of humidified light
scattering measurements (e.g., Sheridan et al., 2001), which are or have
been made at a few ESRL network sites, including three of the four sites
reported in this paper. The second issue has been investigated through
multi-year aircraft measurement programs over instrumented surface sites. At
the Southern Great Plains (near Lamont, OK) and Bondville, IL sites
respectively, Andrews et al. (2004) and Sheridan et al. (2012) reported that
median values of key low-RH intensive AOPs exhibited little statistical
variability up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km altitude and that long-term median
values could be well-approximated by the near-surface values. Instantaneous
measurements of the near-surface properties were often poorly correlated
with those of the column at these sites. (Andrews et al., 2004; Sheridan et
al., 2012).</p>
      <p>D&amp;O2002 reported multi-year measurements of AOPs at four North American
sites that were used to (1) highlight the need to quantify both aerosol
extensive properties (e.g., properties that depend on aerosol amount) and
aerosol intensive properties on regional scales over at least a 1-year
period; and (2) conclude that global AOD measurements made daily by
satellites, combined with in situ measurements of regionally representative
intensive AOPs, are likely sufficient to determine aerosol DRF with a
relatively small amount of uncertainty. One limitation of their study was
the then lack of NOAA/ ESRL network sites in the more populous eastern
continental North America. D&amp;O2002 also studied systematic relationships
between aerosol loading (using scattering coefficient as a proxy) and other
AOPs. D&amp;O2002 argued the importance of such relationships for
applications including inversion of remote sensing data, whereby a dynamic
model could be used to specify the constraining AOPs as a function of
aerosol loading.</p>
      <p>The study described here utilizes 4 years (2010–2013) of continuous
measurements of aerosol light absorption, scattering, and hemispheric
backscattering coefficients made at four continental North American sites
(Fig. 1; Table 1) in the NOAA/ESRL cooperative aerosol network: (i) the
Appalachian Atmospheric Interdisciplinary Research facility at Appalachian
State University (APP) in Boone, NC, located in the southern Appalachian
mountain region of the southeastern US; (ii) the Bondville Environmental
and Atmospheric Research Site (BND), located in the agricultural midwestern
US near Champaign, IL; (iii) the Environment Canada monitoring station at
Egbert, Ontario (EGB), located in the agricultural and forested rural
region N/NW of Toronto; and (iv) the Southern Great Plains
Central Facility (SGP) of the US Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation
Measurement program (DOE ARM), located in the southern plains of the US in rural
Oklahoma. We use these measurements to calculate several key AOPs relevant
to aerosol radiative forcing (Table 2). Hourly averaged AOPs are binned by
month, day of week, and hour of day to study annual, weekly, and diurnal AOP
cycles at each site. AOPs are also binned by wind sector for each season to
study the role of known regional aerosol sources on AOPs and their
variability at each site. Published aerosol chemistry for each site and its
seasonal variability are used along with published mixing layer heights for
each region and monthly median temperatures at the sites to help explain the
AOP cycles at each site and differences among sites. Basic trend analysis is
conducted for selected AOPs at the long-term sites (BND and SGP). Systematic
relationships among AOPs are also presented. The objectives are to</p>
      <p><list list-type="order">
          <list-item>

      <p>provide an explanation of temporal and regional AOP variability that is
consistent with meteorology, regional aerosol sources, and reported aerosol
chemistry at the sites;</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>identify possible AOP trends at the long-term sites (SGP and BND);</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>determine whether systematic relationships exist for key aerosol
properties relevant to aerosol DRF calculations.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Locations of the four NOAA-ESRL sites in this study: Southern
Great Plains, OK, (SGP); Bondville, IL (BND); Appalachian State (APP) in
Boone, NC; and Egbert, Ontario, Canada (EGB).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In addition to our use of meteorology and published aerosol chemistry to
interpret the AOP variability, this study differs from the D&amp;O2002 paper
in three respects.</p>
      <p><list list-type="order">
          <list-item>

      <p>The time period of the study is different, which allows us to
compare (at least for BND and SGP) how the AOPs have changed in the
intervening years.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>This paper has a focus on continental sites, whereas D&amp;O2002's four
sites included an Arctic site and a marine site.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>We report the following for individual seasons: (a) diurnal and weekly
AOP variability, and (b) some systematic relationships involving aerosol
absorption Ångström exponent. D&amp;O2002 reported select AOPs for
full years.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sites, instruments and data period included in the study, listed
from west to east. Aerosol sampling size cuts and the instrument used to
measure absorption are also included. All sites use a TSI 3563 3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
nephelometer<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to measure total scattering and hemispheric
backscattering.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lat/Long</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elev.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Years data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"># hours used</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Size cut</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Absorption instrument</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(deg.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">used</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2010–2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(dates used mm/yy)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SGP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.6 N, 97.5 W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">315</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1997–2013<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32 971(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (01/10–12/13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25 140(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BND</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40.0 N, 88.4 W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">230</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1996–2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33 449(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (09/96–02/06)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32 040(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP (03/06–02/12)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> CLAP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (03/12–12/13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EGB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.2 N, 79.8 W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">253</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2010–2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32 448(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP (01/10–12/13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26 304(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">APP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.2 N, 81.7 W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1080</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2010–2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34 220(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP (01/10–12/13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34 178(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> TSI nephelometer measures at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 450, 550, 700 nm;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 1-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP measures at 565 nm, adjusted
to 550 nm using Bond et al. (1999) correction;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PSAP
measures at 467, 530, 660 nm;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> CLAP measures at 467, 529,
653 nm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> SGP aerosol light scattering data from 1997 to 2013 are used, but
absorption data are only used from 2010 to 2013.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Parameters and equations used to calculate aerosol optical
properties. Constants and parameters used in the formula to calculate
globally averaged top-of-atmosphere direct radiative forcing (DRFE) for each
site are also included and are denoted with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Equation (or value)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Extinction coefficient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ep</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Single-scattering albedo</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ep</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hemispheric backscatter fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scattering Ångström exponent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Absorption Ångström exponent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sub-micron scattering fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sub-micron absorption fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Direct radiative forcing efficiency</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DRFE <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DRF/AOD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Upscatter fraction<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0817</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.8495</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9682</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fractional day length<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (globally averaged)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Solar constant<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1370 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atmospheric transmission<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.76 (globally averaged)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cloud fraction<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 (globally averaged)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spectrally averaged surface albedo<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 (globally averaged)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Air sampling infrastructure at the sites</title>
      <p>The APP, BND, EGB, and SGP sites are all designed with similar inlet systems
following established NOAA/ESRL and GAW aerosol sampling protocols (e.g.,
Sheridan et al., 2001; WMO, 2003). To minimize contamination from local
activities around the stations, ambient aerosols are sampled from the top of
sampling stacks that are well above the surrounding terrain. The top of the
stack is 10 m above the ground at BND, EGB, and SGP. The sampling inlet at
APP is located at the top of a 34 m tall tower in order to sample aerosols
at a height &gt; 5 m above the surrounding tree canopy. To reduce
the confounding effects of relative humidity (RH) on the aerosol
measurements, the sample air is gently heated when needed at all sites
except EGB to achieve sample line and instrument RH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % (Sheridan
et al., 2001). Nephelometer instrument RH at EGB exceeds 40 % for a
majority of hours in July–September, but the moderately elevated instrument
RH during these months is not believed to have any substantial impact on the
results presented in this paper (Sect. S3 of the Supplement).</p>
      <p>All of the sites except EGB use a switched impactor system (e.g., Sheridan
et al., 2001) to alternate between sub-10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and sub-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) aerodynamic diameter
particle size ranges. We refer to the sub-10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and sub-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
particle size cut ranges using the common convention PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, where PM is the acronym for particulate matter. APP and SGP size-cut switching
occurs every 15 and 30 min, respectively, in order to facilitate ramping
of the RH in the humidograph system that is used to measure the hygroscopic
dependence of light scattering (Sheridan et al., 2001). Humidograph data are
not reported in this study. Size-cut switching at BND, where there is
currently no humidograph system, occurs every 6 minutes. Aerosol
concentrations and optical properties typically demonstrate little change on
timescales less than 1 h at APP, BND, and SGP so it is assumed that the
same aerosols are sampled for both size cuts at these switching rates over a
large majority of hours. The EGB system uses a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m cyclone to
achieve a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size cut so PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol
properties are not available for EGB. Descriptions of the basic inlet design
and sampling strategy, including flow rates, tubing sizes and estimated
aerosol losses are provided elsewhere (Sheridan et al., 2001; D&amp;O2002).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Measurements and instruments</title>
      <p>This study reports on several primary aerosol measurements, including
aerosol light scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), hemispheric backscattering
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) coefficients (Table 2). Each of these parameters is measured for both the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size
ranges (only PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for EGB) and used to calculate the radiative effects of
sub-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particles (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Variability of AOPs measured at the APP,
BND, and SGP sites over the 2010–2013 time period is similar for the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cuts so this paper focuses primarily on PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs (Sect. 2.5)
for consistency with EGB measurements. Annually averaged PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs and their
annual cycles are included in the Supplement that accompanies
this paper (Table S5 and Fig. S8).</p>
      <p>A three-wavelength (3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) integrating nephelometer (Model 3563, TSI
Inc., St. Paul, MN) is used at all sites for measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(angular range of 7–170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (angular
range of 90–170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Aerosol light absorption coefficients are
determined by filter-based instruments that make measurements at wavelengths
close to those of the TSI nephelometer (Table 1). A 3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle
soot absorption photometer (PSAP, Radiance Research, Seattle, WA) is used at
APP and SGP for the entire data set and at BND for a majority of the study
period. A single wavelength (1-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) PSAP is used at EGB. The PSAPs
are modified by placing a small (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 W) heater on their
internal inlet lines at the connection with the optical block. The
temperature of the metal optical block is kept a few degrees higher than the
incoming sample air temperature so the RH of the air stream at the sample
and reference filters remains relatively low. The heater is not actively
controlled to maintain a specific RH, but RH variability at low RH is not
believed to influence the measurements as strongly as RH variability at high
RH (Anderson et al., 2003). Laboratory tests indicate that the heater keeps
the RH at the filters below 40 % most of the time. An RH of 50 % at the
filter is exceeded only during sampling of very humid air (Sheridan et al.,
2012). A new light absorption instrument (Continuous Light Absorption
Photometer, CLAP) was recently developed by NOAA/ESRL to eventually replace
the PSAP at all stations in the NOAA/ESRL network (Ogren et al., 2013). The
CLAP is similar to the PSAP in that particles are collected on a filter of
the same material as used in the PSAP and light transmission through the
filter is monitored continuously. A major difference between CLAP and PSAP
is that instead of a single sample spot, the CLAP has eight sample spots.
CLAP filter spots are selected by solenoids that switch to the next sample
spot once the filter transmittance drops below a desired limit (typically
0.7). Thus, the CLAP can run 8 times as long as the PSAP before
requiring a filter change. The similarity in the CLAP and PSAP instrument
designs facilitate the same corrections to the measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The CLAP replaced the PSAP at BND in March 2012, after a 13-month instrument
inter-comparison period. The PSAP/CLAP comparisons made during the overlap
period at BND indicate that the CLAP-measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, when
adjusted to common wavelengths, is approximately 2 % lower than
PSAP-measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each of the three measurement wavelengths
(Table 1). The CLAP comes with a small heater built into the optics block
and is controlled to a set temperature, typically 39 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to minimize RH
effects during sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Data processing, quality assurance, and calculated AOPs</title>
      <p>Software developed at NOAA is used to log the data at the sites,
automatically transmit the data to NOAA, and ingest the data into the NOAA
database. The database is accessible to the individual site mentors via
virtual machine software. The virtual machine software includes a graphical
user interface for reviewing and editing data as well as tools for extracting
the data in a variety of formats and for desired averaging times. The data
acquisition, processing and virtual machine software, along with
documentation, are open-source and freely available from NOAA
(<uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aero/sw.html</uri>). Quality-assured data
products for each site in the NOAA/ESRL network are uploaded to the World
Data Centre for Aerosols and made available at
<uri>http://ebas.nilu.no/Default.aspx</uri>. The data products available include
hourly averaged aerosol number concentrations (not presented in this paper),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cuts.</p>
      <p>Data quality assurance review for each site is typically performed by the
site mentor on a weekly basis. Data during periods of instrument or sampling
problems and during times of instrument maintenance are invalidated.
Absorption data are flagged for periods when the PSAP or CLAP filter
transmission drops to less than 0.7 and invalidated when the filter
transmission drops below 0.5 because high filter loading increases the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement uncertainty (Bond et al., 1999). The lack of
PSAP filter changes on weekends at SGP leads to an under-representation of
quality-assured Sunday (all day) and Monday (early morning) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
hours over the period of this study. Quality-assured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data
at SGP are only available for 38 % of Sunday through Monday morning hours
during 2010–2013, vs. 70–80 % of the hours for the rest of the week.
Weekend days with low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are thus well-represented at SGP,
while weekend days with high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (leading to over-loaded PSAP
filters) are under-represented. PSAP filters are changed on weekends at the
other sites.</p>
      <p>Light absorption coefficient measurements at SGP are particularly sensitive
to ambient RH fluctuations due to air conditioning cycles, particularly
during hot, humid summers. CC2013 did not use SGP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in
their trend analysis for this reason. Excessively high temperatures during
the summer months of June–August (and the early part of September) 2010–2012
resulted in high daytime dew points that often were as high as 20 to 22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the late afternoon. The high sample humidity
coincided with unusually high noise in the PSAP. The hours with noisy
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data were removed. On average this resulted in a 15 %
loss or 3.6 h per day in the data. Since this time, effort was made to
lower the sample RH through insulation of the optics block, use of a Nafion
drier on the instrument inlet and rerouting the trailer ventilation. Despite
the data loss, the SGP summertime <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data do not exhibit a
remarkable difference compared to the other sites nor does the 2010–2012
time period vary significantly from 2013, when the noise was not as
apparent. We include the SGP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in this paper for the
2010–2013 seasonal, weekly and diurnal cycle studies and the systematic
relationships among AOPs. We do not include <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or AOPs
calculated using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as part of the long term trend analysis.</p>
      <p>The four NOAA-ESRL network sites discussed in this paper are located such
that there are no major local aerosol sources in the predominant upwind
directions, although there are some aerosol sources that are typically
downwind that may occasionally be sampled. Brief spikes in aerosol
number concentrations, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and/or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are flagged as local contamination by the site mentor. These spikes
are usually 15–20 min or less in duration and often coincide with
vehicular traffic near the sites or times of peak morning commuter traffic.
Broader aerosol peaks are typically retained, as they are characteristic of
the sampling environment of the station. One example of a broader aerosol
peak not marked as contaminated is elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which often
persists for hours during mornings with surface inversions or during periods
with humid, stagnant air masses.</p>
      <p>Hourly averages of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are generated after the data have passed the quality assurance tests. The
hourly averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are adjusted to
conditions of standard temperature and pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>273.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1013.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa) to facilitate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comparisons among
the sites. TSI nephelometer measurements are corrected for nephelometer
angular non-idealities including truncation effects (Anderson and Ogren,
1998). PSAP- and CLAP-measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are corrected for
sample area, flow rate, and non-idealities in the manufacturer's calibration
as described in Bond et al. (1999) and Ogren (2010). Absorption
Ångström exponent values are used to adjust the spectral <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to those at the nephelometer wavelengths so that intensive
AOPs involving both instruments (Table 2) can be calculated.</p>
      <p>The primary measurements <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used to derive several aerosol properties (Table 2) used in
radiative transfer calculations (Haywood and Shine, 1995). These properties
have been described in many previous papers (e.g., Sheridan et al., 2001;
D&amp;O2002) so only a brief discussion follows. The light extinction
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the sum of the scattering and absorption
coefficients. The single-scattering albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the fraction
of extinction due to scattering, with lower values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponding to stronger aerosol light absorption. The hemispheric
backscatter fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) represents the fraction of light scattered into the
backward hemisphere in the nephelometer and provides qualitative information
on aerosol size, with larger values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to optically active
particles with smaller diameters. The scattering and absorption
Ångström exponents (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) describe
the wavelength dependence of light scattering and absorption, respectively.
The scattering Ångström exponent (typically in the range 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) provides semi-quantitative information about the
aerosol size distribution, with larger values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponding to size distributions dominated by smaller particles (van de
Hulst, 1957). The absorption Ångström exponent can provide
information on aerosol type for certain aerosols (e.g., Cazorla et al.,
2013; Bergstrom et al., 2007). For example, dust and some types of organic
carbon (OC) absorb light strongly in the near-UV and blue-violet regions of
the electromagnetic spectrum (the so-called “brown carbon”), corresponding
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 1 (Cazorla et al., 2013; Costabile et al.,
2013). Absorption by black carbon (BC) decreases as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
near-UV through near-IR, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bergstrom
et al., 2002). The sub-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m scattering and absorption fractions
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, indicate the fractions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> light
scattering and absorption due to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles and serve as a rough proxy
for the “fine-mode” fraction of scattering and absorption coefficients.</p>
      <p>Haywood and Shine (1995) presented simple equations (Table 2) for
calculating top-of-atmosphere (TOA) aerosol DRF and direct radiative forcing
efficiency (DRFE) for an optically thin, partially absorbing atmosphere.
DRFE represents the DRF per unit AOD and is to first-order independent of
AOD. If globally averaged values for all non-aerosol parameters are used
(Table 2), the simple equation for DRFE provides a means for comparing the
intrinsic forcing efficiency of the aerosols measured at different sites and
times through DRFE dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and on up-scatter fraction
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The DRFE values themselves are only approximations when
globally averaged values are used. Up-scatter fraction represents the
fraction of incoming solar radiation that is scattered by atmospheric
aerosols back to space. Up-scatter fraction has been related to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by the
approximation of Wiscombe and Grams (1976). A second-order curve fit of the
points in their Fig. 3 as reported in Sheridan and Ogren (1999) provides the
parameterization shown in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Total and precision fractional uncertainties (%) of measured
aerosol optical properties (AOPs) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and calculated AOPs (e.g., the intensive AOPs) for 1 h
averaging time. Uncertainties are expressed as 95 % confidence intervals.
All calculated uncertainties are for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 550 nm except for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are calculated for the 450/700 nm
wavelength pair. All AOPs are PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> except for PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering and absorption fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). The uncertainties in columns 3 and 4 differ only by inclusion
of the PSAP unit-to-unit variability term (Eq. S3) in column 3. All
uncertainties except <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depend nonlinearly on the measured value, and
cannot rigorously be represented as a percentage<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For these intensive
AOP uncertainties, we use approximate annual-mean values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,0.80, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 to calculate fractional
uncertainties. The intensive AOP fractional uncertainties apply for the
average conditions listed above, and the equations in the Supplement should be used to calculate uncertainties at
different sites or for different conditions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total uncertainty %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Precision uncertainty %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Precision uncertainty %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">for comparisons among sites</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">for comparisons at single site</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>DRFE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The uncertainties <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depend very weakly on measured
values through the noise term. This term represents a negligible
contribution to the uncertainty for averaging times of 1 h or more.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Measurement uncertainties</title>
      <p>Detailed measurement uncertainty calculations and discussions are provided
in Sect. S1 of the Supplement and are briefly summarized here.
The major sources of uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by
the TSI 3563 nephelometer are the following: (1) instrumental noise; (2) uncertainty in the
nephelometer calibration using filtered air and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gases; (3) nephelometer
calibration variability; (4) uncertainties in the correction for
nephelometer angular non-idealities, which result in under-estimation (e.g.,
truncation) of light scattered in the near-forward direction; (5) uncertainty in correcting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to standard
temperature and pressure (STP) conditions; and (6) uncertainties in
correcting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 40 % RH during humid
conditions. Detailed accounts of uncertainty sources (1)–(5) are given in
Anderson and Ogren (1998), Anderson et al. (1999), and Sheridan et al. (2002). The major sources of uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by the PSAP
are the following: (1) instrumental noise; (2) unit-to-unit instrumental variability; and
(3) uncertainty in the calibration of PSAP-measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using
extinction minus scattering as a reference method (Bond et al., 1999).
Uncertainties in the PSAP spot size and flow rate corrections are often
incorporated into the unit-to-unit variability term (Müller et al.,
2011; Anderson et al., 1999). The total measurement uncertainties <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are calculated by adding the major source contributions in quadrature
(Anderson and Ogren, 1998). Standard error propagation techniques are
applied (Sect. S1 of the Supplement) to calculate uncertainties in
intensive AOPs, once <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are estimated and adjustments made for correlations
among <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tables 3, S1, S2). Our
reported uncertainties are 95 % confidence intervals.</p>
      <p>Identical nephelometers, PSAPs, calibration and correction methods are used
at the four sites reported in this paper, with the exception of the late
replacement of PSAP with the nearly identical CLAP at BND. As a result, some contributions to the measurement uncertainties approximately cancel when comparing AOPs between different sites and times, as noted by Anderson et al. (1999).
Examples include the nephelometer calibration and STP correction
uncertainties. The nephelometer truncation correction uncertainties are also
nearly the same, due to the fact that the scattering Ångström
exponent used to correct for nephelometer truncation of forward-scattered
light (Anderson and Ogren, 1998) exhibits little temporal variability at
each of the four sites and is of similar magnitude for each site (Fig. 2g).
The PSAP unit-to-unit variability term can be neglected when comparing
measurements made at the same site but cannot be neglected when comparing
measurements made at different sites. The other uncertainty sources
described above must be considered both for intra-site and inter-site AOP
comparisons. We follow a similar methodology to that employed by Anderson et
al. (1999). We consider the combined effect of all uncertainty sources which
would not be expected to cancel or nearly cancel when comparing AOPs
measured at different sites or times. We refer to their combined effect as
measurement precision uncertainty, using the same notation as Anderson et
al. (1999). We note that Anderson et al. (1999) did not include the
nephelometer RH correction uncertainty nor the PSAP calibration uncertainty
in their reported measurement precision uncertainties so our reported
measurement precision uncertainties may represent upper bounds. We use the
measurement precision uncertainties(Table 3) for comparing AOPs measured at
different sites and times. Differences in AOPs between sites/seasons are
assessed by comparison with the measurement precision uncertainty ranges
(Sect. 2.5). The uncertainties are reported for 1 h averages, but the
values differ negligibly for averaging times larger than this (Sect. S1 of
the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual cycle of <bold>(a)</bold> geometric mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<bold>(b)</bold> geometric mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(c)</bold> mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ; <bold>(d)</bold> mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<bold>(e)</bold> mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ; <bold>(f)</bold> mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> DRFE; <bold>(g)</bold> mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (450/700 nm); and <bold>(h)</bold> mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 450/700 nm) at APP,
BND, EGB, and SGP over the 2010–2013 period. The values corresponding to
“ALL” are geometric mean or mean values for the entire 2010–2013 period (all
months). Error bars represent 95 % confidence intervals of the mean
values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Data analysis methods</title>
      <p>All statistics reported in this paper are based on hourly averaged,
quality-assured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements made continuously or near-continuously at APP, BND, EGB, and
SGP over the 2010–2013 period. We report only the results for the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size
cut at APP, BND, and SGP so as to minimize redundancy and to simplify
comparisons with PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs measured at EGB. The only exceptions are the use
of the more-relevant PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering Ångström exponent and the
sub-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m scattering and absorption fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), calculated
as the ratios of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively (Table 2). PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOP variability at APP, BND, and SGP is
reported in the Supplement (Fig. S8 and Table S5). The intensive
AOPs (Table 2) are calculated for each hour, using the hourly averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. For
brevity, only AOPs at 550 nm are presented with the exception of the
wavelength dependent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Scattering and
absorption Ångström exponents are calculated based on the 450 nm and
700 nm wavelength. We follow a similar approach to that taken by
D&amp;02002 and Andrews et al. (2011) and only use hours for which PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm is at least 1.0 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to calculate the
intensive AOP statistics, so as to reduce noise resulting from taking ratios
of two small quantities (Table 2). Filtering the intensive AOPs for
low-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hours discards 1.4 % of the hours at APP, 0.1 % at
BND, 1.8 % at EGB, and 0.5 % at SGP. These percentages are uniform
across seasons, except for slightly higher percentages during fall at EGB
and SGP (Table S3). We use all hours in calculating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistics, to avoid a bias toward
`less clean' conditions. Lack of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements and use of a
single-wavelength PSAP preclude calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at EGB.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Temporal cycle analysis</title>
      <p>Hourly averaged and quality-assured AOPs are binned by month, day of week,
and hour of day to study their annual, weekly, and diurnal cycles,
respectively (Sect. 4.1). Geometric means and 95 % confidence intervals of
the geometric means are calculated for the binned <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whose distributions are closer to log-normal than normal.
Arithmetic means and 95 % confidence intervals of the means are calculated
for the binned intensive AOPs, whose distributions are suitably approximated
as normal. Atmospheric variability for each month, day of week, or hour of
day is quantified by the 95 % confidence intervals of the mean value,
which are represented as error bars on the plots. Differences in the mean
AOPs are termed “significant” in this paper if they are larger than both (1) atmospheric variability
(e.g., if the error bars do not overlap); and (2) twice the precision measurement uncertainty (Table 3). We define the
magnitude of temporal variability on each of the timescales as the amplitude
of the cycle of mean values (difference between maximum and minimum values).
Cycle amplitudes are also expressed as percentages by dividing this
difference by the midpoint between maximum and minimum values.</p>
      <p>Aerosol optical properties at the four sites vary primarily on seasonal
timescales. Day of week variability in AOPs can be used as a tool for
distinguishing anthropogenic from natural aerosol sources, since natural
sources would not be expected to have AOPs that vary on weekly scales
(Murphy et al., 2008). Diurnal variability is used along with co-located
meteorological data to infer the influence of local pollution sources and
mixing layer height on measured AOPs. Due to the dependence of most AOPs on
season, their weekly and diurnal cycles are reported for both full years and
individual seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Meteorological analysis</title>
      <p>Data from co-located surface meteorological stations at the four sites are
used to develop proxies to help explain some features of the AOP cycles at
each station. Pollution-rose diagrams showing the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and some calculated AOPs on wind direction are
shown for individual seasons to examine the influences of wind sectors and
known regional pollution sources on measured AOPs (Figs. 5–8 and S16–S22).
We compare the temperature dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. S5 and
S7) with reported temperature dependence of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol (SOA) (Leaitch et al., 2011; Goldstein et al., 2009) and ammonium
nitrate partitioning (Parworth et al., 2015; Rupakheti et al., 2005). We
also use temperature dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along with
monthly median temperatures at the sites (Fig. S23) and monthly averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2a) to hypothesize the role of photochemistry on the
seasonality of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mixing layer height climatologies have been
reported for locations at or within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 km of the sites. We
use the seasonal dependence of the reported mixing layer heights to assess
the effect of convection (or lack thereof) on the annual and diurnal cycles
of measured near-surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the four
sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <title>Significance and trend analysis</title>
      <p>Mean values of AOPs over the entire 2010–2013 period are calculated for each
site and the differences in mean AOPs among the sites are used as a measure
of regional variability (Sect. 4.2). Seasonal differences of most AOPs at
individual sites are often much larger than the regional differences of
annual-mean AOPs so the seasonality of regional AOP differences must also be
taken into account. The differences in mean AOPs among the sites are termed
“significant” if they satisfy the same two criteria stated in Sect. 2.5.1
for temporal differences. Of the four sites, only BND and SGP have long
enough time series (&gt; 10 years) to evaluate trends in AOPs (Sect. 4.3). Slopes and significance are obtained using the function “TheilSen” in
the R package “openair” (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012; Carslaw, 2015). Data are
de-seasonalized and autocorrelation is accounted for using options supplied
with the TheilSen function. Decadal slopes (%/10 year) are calculated by
multiplying the yearly slope by 10. Trends are not reported for SGP AOPs
requiring absorption due to PSAP data quality issues over most of the
1997–2009 period. Absorption Ångström exponent trends are not
calculated for BND because the available time series is less than 10 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS4">
  <title>Systematic relationships</title>
      <p>Systematic relationships among intensive AOPs and aerosol loading are
explored on an annual basis at the four North American sites for the
2010–2013 (Sect. 4.4). Relationships involving <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vary with
season at some sites, so these relationships are also presented for
individual seasons. D&amp;O2002 suggested systematic relationships would be
useful for constraining model parameterization of AOPs and for reducing
uncertainties in satellite-based retrievals of AOD, which make assumptions
regarding aerosol size distributions and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Levy et al.,
2010). Systematic relationships can also provide information regarding
aerosol source types and processes. Relationships between mean intensive
AOPs and aerosol loading, represented by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm, are
investigated for each season at each site by separating hourly averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values into bins of 10 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> width and then
calculating the mean AOPs for each <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for
the data points on each plot correspond to the bin center. Only bins with a
number of data points exceeding 0.1 % of all data points are plotted. The
relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at all sites justifies the use of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a proxy for loading.
Relationships among a few select intensive AOPs are also included to provide
more insight into aerosol sources and/or processes influencing the
properties measured at the sites.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Site descriptions</title>
      <p>All four sites in this study are mid-latitude (35–45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) locations in
North America with elevations ranging from 230 to 1080 m above sea level
(a.s.l.), placing them firmly in the boundary layer. These sites can be
categorized as anthropogenically perturbed, rural continental locations.
Published aerosol chemistry research at the sites (Link et al., 2015; Buzcu-Guven et
al., 2007; Rupakheti,et al., 2005; Parworth et al., 2015) indicates that the
sites are regionally influenced.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA (APP)</title>
      <p>The APP site is situated at the highest point on the Appalachian State
University campus (1080 m), located in the southern Appalachian mountain
town of Boone, NC (pop. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 000). In situ aerosol
measurements were initiated at APP in June 2009. APP is also home to a Cimel
sun photometer as part of AERONET, a micro-pulse lidar, an aerosol mass
spectrometer, a solar pyranometer as part of the NASA SolRad-Net, and a
suite of meteorological and trace gas measurements. The region surrounding
Boone is heavily forested in all directions. The APP site is not located
near any major highways or major industry but is located 1–3 km from local
commuter traffic sources during weekday mornings and late afternoons. The
APP site is located 40–60 km from the following towns: (1) Lenoir/Hickory
(population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 000) to the SE; and (2) Wilkesboro
(population 3500) to the east. The Charlotte metropolitan area (population
2.5 million) is located approximately 160 km SE of APP and the Piedmont
Triangle metropolitan area (population 1.6 million) is located 200–230 km
ESE of APP. However, winds are from the SE only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % of the
time for all seasons (Fig. 5) so the influence of these towns/cities on the
APP site is generally small.</p>
      <p>Summer AOD in the warm, heavily forested SE US is influenced by highly
temperature-dependent isoprene-derived SOA (Goldstein et al., 2009). The
Appalachian mountain region is also home to some of the highest rural
ammonium sulfate concentrations in the US, with maximum concentrations in
summer and minimum concentrations in fall/winter (Hand et al., 2012b). Link
et al. (2015) reported in the Supplement to their paper that non-refractory
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol mass at APP during summers (winter) of 2012–2013 was
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66 % (49 %) organic aerosol, 24 % (31 %) sulfate,
7 % (10 %) ammonium, and 3 % (10 %) nitrate. Approximately 77 % of
the summer organic aerosol (OA) mass was comprised of low-volatility
oxygenated SOA (LV-OOA) and isoprene-derived SOA, while the winter OA was
comprised of LV-OOA and biomass-burning OA (Link et al., 2015).
Wood-burning stoves serve as the primary heating source for 6.2 % of
occupied housing units in Watauga County (US Census Bureau, 2010) and likely
a larger percentage of housing units in the surrounding rural mountain
communities. The highly oxidized, “aged” LV-OOA factor present in nearly
equal concentrations during both summer and winter at APP suggests that it
is representative of regional background SOA (Link et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Weather patterns affecting the southern Appalachian mountain region are
highly diverse due to a variety of factors, including complex topography,
mid-latitude location, and proximity to the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
Ocean. Common weather regimes include winter storms, convective cells, dying
tropical cyclones, and stagnant summertime episodes. Wind directions are
predominately from the west for all seasons (Fig. 5). Wind speeds are
highest in November–March and lowest in May–September. The annual
temperature cycle in Boone, NC is relatively small, with average daily high
temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24–26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in June–August and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January. The annual cycle in average monthly
precipitation is also small, with a maximum in summer (12–13 cm) and minimum
in October (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 cm). Relative humidity (RH) is highest during
the summer at APP. Planetary boundary layer (PBL) heights calculated from
vertical aerosol backscatter profiles measured with a micro-pulse lidar at
APP from February 2013 to August 2014 reveal a relatively weak diurnal and seasonal
dependence of PBL heights. Median afternoon (morning) PBL heights are 920 m
(820 m) in winter, 1200 m (880 m) in spring, 1100 m (850 m) in summer, and
1050 m (680 m) in fall (unpublished result).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Bondville, Illinois, USA (BND)</title>
      <p>The BND aerosol monitoring station is located on farmland at the Bondville
Environmental and Atmospheric Research Site (BEARS) in rural east-central
Illinois. In situ aerosol measurements at BND began in 1994. Additional
measurements made at BND include a Cimel sun <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>photometer<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> as part of AERONET, a
comprehensive set of meteorological measurements, an IMPROVE aerosol
chemistry system, and a full suite of solar radiation measurements made by
NOAA/ESRL. The BND station is situated approximately 6.5 km south of
Bondville (population 450), 16 km southwest of Champaign–Urbana (population
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 000), and is surrounded in all directions by corn,
soybean and hay fields. A regional airport (Willard Airport) is situated
approximately 10 km east of the BND site. The town of Decatur (population
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 000) lies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 km to the SW, and three large
metropolitan areas are within 250 km of the site: (1) Chicago (population
9.6 million), located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240 km to the N/NE; (2) Indianapolis,
IN (population 1.8 million), located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 210 km to the east; and
(3) St. Louis, MO (population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7 million) is located
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 km to the SW. The area is crisscrossed by a network of
interstate highways, including I-57 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 km to the east), I-72
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km north), I-74 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 km northeast), and
I-70 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km south).</p>
      <p>Buzcu-Guven et al. (2007) applied positive matrix factorization techniques
to apportion the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol mass at BND into the following
annually averaged factors: (1) secondary sulfate (27 %); (2) secondary
nitrate (24 %); (3) mobile/SOA factor (17 %), largely due to gasoline
and diesel vehicle emissions; (4) biomass-burning OA (12 %); (5) soil
(6 %); (6) copper smelter (2 %); (7) chromium and nickel from metal
plating (5 %); and (8) mixed industrial (7 %). The largest contributors
to organic matter (OM) were biomass burning (38 % of OM) and mobile/SOA
(24 % of OM) factors, followed by factors associated with industrial
sources (&lt; 20 % of OM). Buzcu-Guven et al. (2007) could not
resolve the mobile source aerosol factor into the two fuel combustion types
(gasoline vehicle and diesel) because the BND site is affected by
transported urban emissions rather than local emissions. They reported
strong seasonality in secondary sulfate (maxima in summer) and nitrate
(maxima in winter) at BND. Similar regional sulfate and nitrate seasonality
was reported for the region by Hand et al. (2012b) and by Spak and Holloway (2009). The highest sulfate concentrations at BND were associated with
transport from the Ohio River valley, western Ohio, and southern Illinois,
where large numbers of coal-fired power plants are located (Buzcu-Guven et
al., 2007). Winter ammonium nitrate concentrations in the Midwest US are
among the highest in the country, due to significant sources of agricultural
ammonia and combustion-generated NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, in addition to
meteorological conditions (low temperature and high humidity) favorable for
gas-to-particle partitioning (Hand et al., 2012b; Spak and Holloway, 2009).</p>
      <p>Polluted air at BND is generally associated with southerly wind sectors
(120–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind directions), and cleaner air
is typically associated with NW wind sectors (Fig. 6). Winds reaching BND
from the SW also pass over regions with high summer biogenic isoprene
emissions (Fig. 3 of Parworth et al., 2015). Wind speeds are higher in
November–May and lower in June–September (not shown). Higher wind speeds are
more common for S/SW wind sectors for all seasons except winter, when higher
wind speeds are more common for NW wind sectors. Lowest wind speeds are
associated with easterly wind sectors. Average high temperatures are highest
in July (29.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and lowest in January (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Average monthly
precipitation is highest in May–July (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 cm) and lowest in
January–February (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm). Holzworth (1964) used daily soundings at
Joliet, IL (located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 130 km N/NE of BND) to calculate monthly
mean maximum mixing layer heights: DJF (480, 480, 480 m); MAM (980, 950,
1040 m); JJA (1090, 1380, 1310 m); SON (860, 790, 600 m). Climatologies of
surface aerosol optical properties observed at BND have been reported by
Koloutsou-Vakakis et al. (2001) and D&amp;O2002. Sheridan et al. (2012) also
reported BND surface aerosol properties for comparison with airborne aerosol
measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Egbert, Ontario, Canada (EGB)</title>
      <p>The EGB station at the Centre for Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE),
is situated near the town of Egbert, in Ontario, Canada. In situ aerosol
optical measurements at EGB began in 2009. The CARE facility is also home to
complementary measurements of greenhouse gases such as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well
as meteorological instrumentation and measurements of aerosol chemistry and
aerosol size distributions. Egbert is a rural location consisting of mixed
deciduous/coniferous forest and agricultural land. The population of Egbert
and the surrounding communities is approximately 20 000. Egbert is located 70 km
N/NE of Toronto, Ontario and the heavily populated southern Ontario region,
with a population of approximately 8 million. A major highway (HWY 400) is
located approximately 8 km to the east of the EGB site. The highway
experiences commuter traffic during early morning and late afternoon. The
town of Barrie (population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 128 000) is located
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 km N/NE of the EGB site, but the wind comes from this
direction only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3 % of the time for all seasons, and the
associated air masses are relatively clean (Fig. 7). Forest density is
highest to the north of EGB.</p>
      <p>Southerly winds (120–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind directions)
typically bring more polluted air masses (Fig. 7) associated with outflow
from the heavily populated Toronto area, southern Ontario, and eastern US
(Yang et al., 2011; Liggio et al., 2010). Southerly air masses contain
higher levels of elemental carbon (EC), sulfates, nitrates, and OM and
higher EC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios than cleaner air masses from the north (Chan et al.,
2010; Rupakheti et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2011). Organic carbon (OC) and EC
are highly correlated (poorly correlated) during cold (warm) months,
implicating primary aerosol sources during cold months and a large influence
of transported warm-season SOA from urban areas south of EGB (Yang et al.,
2011). Northerly winds (300–60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind
directions) typically bring air masses from sparsely populated,
heavily forested regions (Slowik et al., 2010), with high <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>concentrations<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> of
temperature-dependent biogenic SOA during summer months (Leaitch et al.,
2011; Slowik et al., 2010). Long-distance transport of smoke from the
northwest is also observed during the summer forest fire season in northwest
Canada. Wind speeds at EGB are higher in November–April and lowest in
July–August. Average daily maximum temperatures are highest in July (26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and lowest in January (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Holzworth (1964) used daily
soundings at Buffalo, NY (located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 km SE of EGB) to
calculate monthly mean maximum mixing layer heights: DJF (510, 480, 530 m);
MAM (780, 600, 810, 1070 m); JJA (1180, 1440, 1360 m); SON (1190, 530, 700 m).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Lamont, Oklahoma, USA (SGP)</title>
      <p>The DOE Southern Great Plains (SGP) Cloud, Aerosol and Radiation
Testbed (CART) Central Facility site is located in north central Oklahoma near the
town of Lamont (pop. 417) in a rural, agricultural region surrounded mostly
by wheat, corn and hay fields. Measurements of in situ aerosol optical
properties began in 1996. The site is also equipped with a Cimel
sun photometer (as part of AERONET), cloud radars, lidars, meteorological
instruments and many remote-sensing radiometers, making it the largest
climate research facility in the world. The SGP site is situated 100–150 km
from the following metropolitan areas: (1) Wichita, KS (population
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 638 000), located 112 km to the north; (2) Oklahoma City
(population 1.3 million), located 136 km to the south; and (3) Tulsa, OK
(population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 000), located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 km to the
southeast. The SGP site experiences infrequent local traffic but is situated
approximately 15 km to the west of an interstate highway (I-35). There are
no major aerosol sources within several hundred km to the northwest, west or
southwest of the site.</p>
      <p>Parworth et al. (2015) reported an average total non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol
mass concentration at SGP (from November 2010–June 2012) of 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Their reported total aerosol mass concentration was broken down
into (1) OA (57 %); (2) nitrate (21 %); (3) sulfate (12 %); (4) ammonium (9.4 %); and (5) chloride (0.24 %). Organic aerosol constituted
a larger and nearly constant mass fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) from
April to October. Sulfate mass fraction also exhibited little seasonality. Both
OA and sulfate mass concentrations demonstrated fall minima, with mass
concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3 times lower than during summer.
Approximately 90 % of the OA was highly oxidized aged aerosol, with
biomass-burning OA comprising the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %. The
aged, oxidized OA peaked in June–July. Biomass-burning OA was highest in
late winter and spring and was likely due to local agricultural burning in
preparation for crop season (Parworth et al., 2015). Ammonium nitrate was
the largest PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol component in winter, followed by OA. Rural EC
concentrations in northern Oklahoma are low and peak in autumn (Fig. 3 of
Hand et al., 2013). The super-micron aerosol was primarily soil dust, which
exhibits a summer maxima in the region (Hand et al., 2012b).</p>
      <p>The typical annual weather cycle at SGP involves a cold, shallow inversion
layer in the winter with relatively stagnant winds and a hot, humid summer
with strong convection, high daytime boundary layer, and southerly winds.
Prevailing winds at the SGP site are from the S/SE for all seasons except
winter (Fig. 8). Average high temperatures are highest in July–August (33–34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and lowest in January (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Average monthly precipitation
is highest in May–June (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11–12 cm) and lowest in January–February
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0–3.5 cm). Median mixing layer heights are less than 100 m (above ground level) from 20:30 central standard
time (CST) through 05:30 CST for all seasons and median afternoon mixing layer heights are 752 m in
winter, 1260 m in spring, 1640 m in summer, and 1390 m in fall (Delle Monache
et al., 2004). The SW US and southern Great Plains experienced exceptionally
hot and dry conditions during 2010–2012, coinciding with La Niña years.
Extensive fires raged across the SW US during 2011–2012, particularly Texas,
Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Oklahoma. The hot, dry conditions during
2010–2012 also created conditions favorable for airborne dust production and
transport. Climatologies of surface and aerosol optical properties observed
at SGP have been reported by Sheridan et al. (2001) and D&amp;O2002.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>Several broad features of AOP temporal variability are common to all or most
of the four sites. For the sake of brevity, these features are first discussed
collectively before moving on to a more detailed analysis of AOP variability
at each site and then to comparisons among the sites. Much of the seasonal
AOP variability at each site can be explained using the following: (1) published results of
seasonally dependent aerosol chemistry at the sites; (2) pollution-rose
diagrams, which simultaneously display percentage of hours with winds
arriving from each wind sector and the distribution of AOP values for each
sector; (3) known regional pollution sources; and (4) published seasonality
of PBL height and monthly median temperature and relative humidity at the
sites. Temperature dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also helpful. Diurnal
and weekly cycles of select AOPs and the seasonal dependence of these cycles
are used to estimate the relative influences of some local and regional
sources (mainly traffic) and PBL heights. Regional variability in AOPs is
discussed in the context of the annual AOP cycles and the above-listed
sources of seasonal variability at each site. Trends in AOPs at BND and SGP
are used to place results for the current period in a long-term context.
Systematic relationships among select AOPs at each site are used to help
interpret the temporal and regional AOP variability and to hypothesize
aerosol sources or processes at the sites. Numerous pieces of supporting
materials for the presented results are included as part of the Supplement. We reference those figures and tables with the
letter “S” (e.g., Fig. S13, Table S2) to distinguish them from figures
appearing in this paper.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Temporal variability of aerosol optical properties</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Temporal variability common to all sites</title>
      <p>The annual AOP cycle amplitudes are larger than the weekly and diurnal AOP
cycle amplitudes at all sites. Nearly all annual AOP cycles are significant,
with cycle amplitudes larger than the 95 % confidence intervals of both
the monthly mean AOPs (Fig. 2) and the measurement uncertainties (Table 3).
July and/or August <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima are observed at all sites (Fig. 2a), with steeper <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases from summer to fall than from
summer to spring. Summer-to-spring and summer-to-fall <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreases at EGB and APP are approximately twice the magnitude of those
observed at BND and SGP. Scattering coefficient reaches a minimum during
October at all sites except APP, where it is lowest in December. Absorption
coefficient is highest in summer and lowest in winter at all sites (Fig. 2b), although the differences between summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima and the
surrounding months are only significant at BND and EGB. Summer-to-autumn
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases are larger than those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
leading to minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in October at all sites (Fig. 2e).
Hemispheric backscatter fraction is highest in October at all sites (Fig. 2d). The confluence of early autumn decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is indicative of less production and/or
more efficient removal of large, highly scattering particles during early
autumn, relative to summer. This effect is most noticeable at EGB and APP
(Fig. 2) and also is seen in the summer–spring differences at APP. October
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minima contribute to DRFE maxima (least negative) at EGB and
BND, but no significant autumn DRFE changes are seen at APP and SGP (Fig. 2f). Photochemistry likely influences the summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that are larger in spring than in fall at all sites. The
temperature dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S5) and differences in
monthly median temperatures (Fig. S23) combine to yield predicted
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that are of similar magnitude to the large
observed summer–spring (July–April) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences at EGB and
APP and to the observed summer–autumn (July–October) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
differences at EGB, BND, and SGP (Fig. 2a). The summer–autumn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference based on temperature considerations is less at APP than
the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference, leading us to hypothesize an
additional contributor to the autumn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease. Cloud and
fog scavenging of large, highly reflecting particles would be consistent
with cooler September temperatures (Fig. S23a), higher RH (Fig. S23b), and
cloud cover in September at APP. The inverse relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> seen in the annual cycles at all sites (Fig. 2a and d) is
indicative of the influence of particle growth (and possibly cloud or fog
scavenging) on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Wet deposition likely impacts <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> most in summer and least in spring and fall, given the seasonality
of precipitation at the sites. Secondary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima are
observed during winter at all sites except APP (Fig. 2a). When combined with
winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minima, the result is a winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
maxima at these sites (Fig. 2e).</p>
      <p>In contrast to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 2c and
g) at APP, BND, and SGP (the sites where these AOPs are calculated) do not
demonstrate an obvious relationship with the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles.
Collaud Coen et al. (2007) conducted simulations based on Mie theory to show
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm is most sensitive to particle size changes for diameters
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100–300 nm (their Fig. 7 and accompanying discussion).
Schuster et al. (2006) combined simulations based on Mie theory with volume
size distributions and AOD from AERONET to show that extinction
Ångström exponent is relatively insensitive to fine mode effective
radius for bi-modal aerosol size distributions and that extinction
Ångström exponent may serve as a better indicator of fine-mode
aerosol volume fraction than mean particle size. The stronger relationship
between the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (relative to relationships
between the cycles of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with either <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) suggests
that the major seasonal changes in the aerosol size distributions at APP,
BND, and SGP may lie at the smaller end of the range of optically relevant
accumulation mode particles (100–300 nm), with shifts toward larger
particles in summer and smaller particles in fall. Photochemistry likely
plays a role in the observed seasonal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially at APP and EGB.
Gas-to-particle conversion onto existing particles is most efficient for the
100–500 nm diameter range, since this is where most of the aerosol surface
area typically lies (Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998). Reduced gas to particle
conversion in fall (when photochemistry and precursor levels are lower)
would impact <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> more than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Absorption Ångström exponent is lowest during summer months and
highest during winter months (Fig. 2h) at APP, BND and SGP (the three sites
where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated). The summer-to-winter difference
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is clearly larger at APP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9) than at
BND and SGP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5). Absorption Ångström exponent
values near and below 1 during May–September suggest that black carbon (BC)
contributes most to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during these months (Gyawali et al.,
2009; Cazorla et al., 2013). Gyawali et al. (2009) performed simulations
using Mie theory to show that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values much less than 1 are
possible (their Figs. 8 and 9) when absorbing particles are coated with
non-absorbing substances. Clarke et al. (2007) also reported a large number
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (470/660 nm) values clustered between 0.7 and 1.1 for
pollution plumes during extensive flights over North America as part the of
the INTEX/ICARTT experiment in summer 2004.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Weekly and diurnal cycles of geometric mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
over full years (ANN traces) and for winter (DJF), spring (MAM), summer
(JJA), and fall (SON) at APP, BND, EGB, and SGP over the 2010–2013 period.
The value corresponding to the “ALL” data point of each trace is the mean
value over all days of the week or over all hours of the day. Error bars represent
95 % confidence intervals of mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Weekly and diurnal cycle amplitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3) and
nearly all intensive AOPs observed at the four sites are much smaller than
the corresponding annual cycle amplitudes. Weekly and diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes (Fig. 4) are larger than those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at all sites and are largest in summer. Weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at
all sites are marginally significant in fall with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle
amplitudes approximately twice the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>measurement<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> precision
uncertainty (Table 3). All sites demonstrate small and/or insignificant
weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % or less)
and a lack of weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns across seasons (Fig. 3). This
suggests that weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are driven by regional-scale
phenomena, where any weekend effects are smoothed out by mixing. The weekly
cycles of intensive AOPs are nearly always minimal at all sites (Figs. S9–S15).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Weekly and diurnal cycles of geometric mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
over full years (ANN traces) and for individual seasons at APP, BND, EGB,
and SGP over the 2010–2013 period. The value corresponding to the “ALL” data
point is the mean value over all days of the week or over all hours of the day.
Error bars represent 95 % confidence intervals of the mean values.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Similar to the weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles, the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are also much larger than diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at all
sites. However, the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability is only significant
during summer and (at all sites except APP) fall. Diurnal cycles of nearly
all intensive AOPs are minimal and/or insignificant. Notable exceptions are
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DRFE during summer and fall. The amplitudes of the diurnal
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03–0.04 during summer and fall
at all sites (Fig. S12). In most of these cases, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lowest during
late evening and/or early morning and highest during afternoon. At APP, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak extends from around noon to the early morning hours.
Diurnal DRFE cycles (Fig. S13) in turn follow the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles,
due to the lack of diurnal variability in b. Summer and fall DRFE is more
negative by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the afternoon
than during the surrounding hours (Fig. S13). The lack of diurnal and weekly
variability in mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that particle size
distributions at APP, BND, and SGP likely demonstrate little variability on
weekly or daily timescales. D&amp;O2002 reported similar or slightly smaller
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal cycle amplitudes for BND and SGP, but they did not
consider the diurnal cycles for individual seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Temporal variability at APP</title>
      <p>Aerosol light scattering and absorption coefficients at APP are dominated by
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for all seasons and the relative influence of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varies little with
season, as seen by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.80–0.88 (Fig. 2c), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
1.9–2.2 (Fig. 2g), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.90–0.95 (Fig. S8c). Both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are moderately elevated for NE wind sectors, with
0–90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind directions (Fig. 5). Median
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20–30 % higher for NE wind sectors than for
the prevalent westerly wind sectors for all seasons except winter, when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the NE wind sectors is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 times higher than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for westerly wind sectors (not shown). Median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
less elevated for the NE wind sectors (typically <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–15 %).
Wind sector does not strongly influence median or mean values of most
intensive AOPs, although low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (&lt; 0.80) is more frequently
associated with NE wind sectors (Fig. S17a). It should be noted that the
prevalent westerly wind sectors represent the confluence of 3–4
(seasonally dependent) different average air mass back-trajectories, which
all typically arrive at APP from the west. Link et al. (2015) reported that
aerosol and gas phase chemistry measured at APP displayed a generally
homogeneous distribution across source regions. One exception was elevated
levels of urban, oil and natural gas, combustion tracers, and OA mass
concentrations associated with air mass back-trajectories passing over the
polluted Ohio River valley and Appalachian mountain region before arriving
at APP with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0–90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind directions
(Link et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP and its seasonality (Fig. 2a) are largely
influenced by regional background SOA and sulfate. Biogenic SOA and sulfate
both exhibit summer maxima and winter minima in the SE US (Goldstein et al.,
2009; Hidy et al., 2014) and both summer and winter non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
aerosol mass at APP are dominated by SOA and sulfate (Supplement of Link et al., 2015). Summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP is
correlated with both OA and sulfate mass concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). The temperature dependence of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at APP during April–October (Fig. S7) also agrees well with the expected
temperature dependence of biogenic emissions (Guenther et al., 2006) and
with the temperature dependence of AOD over the SE US (Goldstein et al.,
2009). The summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak coincides with a distinct minima in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (30–40 % lower than all other seasons) and maxima in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 higher than during winter). Aerosol number
concentrations measured at APP are also lower in summer than during spring
and fall (unpublished result). The confluence of lower concentrations of
larger, highly reflective PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles during months with high regional
temperatures, solar irradiance, and RH is consistent with gas-to-particle
conversion onto existing particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Pollution rose diagrams of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual seasons at APP over the 2010–2013 period. The
percentages at a given radius represent the percentage of hourly profiles
for a given wind sector.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle at APP (Fig. 2b) is out of phase with the
annual cycle of EC concentrations reported for rural eastern US IMPROVE
sites (Hand et al., 2012b). Hand et al. (2012b) cited sources such as
residential heating for the fall and winter EC concentration maxima.
Absorption coefficient at APP exhibits a summer maximum and a winter
minimum, though the summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum is not significantly
different from early fall and spring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (to 95 % confidence).
Absorption Ångström exponents of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3–1.4 (Fig. 2h)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 2 during colder months (Fig. 2h) suggest a
mixture of EC and light-absorbing OC (Fig. 2 of Cazorla et al., 2013). A
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from OC is also consistent with a
biomass-burning OA factor in the winter aerosol mass spectra measured at APP
(Fig. S2 of Link et al., 2015) and may result from winter residential
wood-burning (US Census Bureau, 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). However, the
diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4b) suggest an influence from local traffic
during all seasons and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 1 or less for non-winter months
suggest that BC is the major contributor to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during these months.</p>
      <p>APP is the only site to demonstrate consistent weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles across seasons, with the exception of winter. Local
commuter traffic likely exerts the largest influence on the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4b) and possibly the weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles
(Fig. 4a). Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are only significant at 95 %
confidence during summer, but a similar bi-modal structure is seen for all
seasons (Fig. 4b), with morning and late afternoon/early evening commuter
peaks. The only sign of weekend local traffic influence is an insignificant
Saturday morning peak <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1–0.2 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> present during most seasons (unpublished result), confirming the
primary influence of local commuter traffic. The absence of any influence of
diurnal PBL height variation on the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at APP
is consistent with the relatively small afternoon/morning PBL height
differences measured at the heavily forested APP site (unpublished result).
PBL height is often poorly defined at APP and may be related to the fact
that the APP site is situated on a ridge. The PBL and free troposphere do
not fully decouple during the evening. As a result, pronounced late-evening
through early morning <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima that are
characteristic of a PBL height influence are not a regular feature of the
diurnal cycles at APP (Figs. 3b and 4b). Diurnal variability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and intensive AOPs is insignificant and/or minimal for all seasons
(Figs. S9–S15), with the exceptions of (1) morning <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreases (by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02–0.03) DRFE increases (by 2–3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during all seasons, coinciding with the commuter traffic; and
(2) a small summer daytime decrease (0.6 to 0.4) in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
possibly due to coating of absorbing particles (Gyawali et al., 2009) or an
artifact associated with filter-based <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements (Lack et
al., 2008, 2009).</p>
      <p>The spring, summer, and fall weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at
APP (Figs. 3a and 4a) are characterized by early week increases leading to
broad Wednesday–Friday maxima. Both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> begin to
increase near the time of the Monday morning traffic peak (unpublished
result) and decrease over the weekend, coinciding with less weekend traffic.
The weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are likely the result of a
build-up of scattering and absorbing aerosols in the PBL during the first
half of the week. Sunday <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minima and weekly cycle amplitudes of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–35 % during spring and fall are consistent with the
timing and amplitudes of weekly EC concentration cycles reported for the
rural US (Murphy et al., 2008) and with weekday–weekend EC concentration
differences in the urban US (Bae et al., 2004; Blanchard et al., 2008).
Smaller but significant weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15–20 % during spring, summer, and fall are larger than
weekly cycles in OC and sulfate reported by Murphy et al. (2008). Absorption
coefficient exhibits a larger summer weekly cycle amplitude of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % (Fig. 4a) than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a). Local traffic
is less during summer, but construction activity and road repairs on the
Appalachian State University campus and in town are higher so a larger
influence from diesel emissions could be a source for the larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycle during summer. Local traffic influences on the weekly and diurnal
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles during winter may be masked by other sources of EC, such
as wood-burning. Small weekly cycles in several intensive AOPs are
consistent with the above-discussed local traffic influence.
Single-scattering albedo decreases by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 from Sunday to Wednesday
during fall/winter (Fig. S12) with smaller decreases during spring/summer.
DRFE increases by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from Sunday to Wednesday
during fall/winter, with smaller insignificant increases in spring/summer
(Fig. S13). Absorption Ångström exponent increases during the week
by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 (0.4 to 0.6) during summer, with smaller,
insignificant increases (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) during fall and winter (Fig. S15).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Temporal variability at BND</title>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles contribute <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 76 % (72 %) to the summer
(winter) PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 88 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %) to the
summer (winter) PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND (Figs. 2c and S8c). The
annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are similar
for all seasons (Figs. 2 and S8) so the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOP cycles at BND are
representative of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol. Many of the same general features of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> annual cycle at BND (Fig. 2a) have been reported by others
(D&amp;O2002; Koloutsou-Vakakis et al., 2001), including the July–August
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum and early autumn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum.
D&amp;O2002 reported similar summer–autumn and summer–spring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
differences, with median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in July approximately 2 times larger than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in October–November and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 times larger than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in April–May. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
annual cycle reported by D&amp;O2002 was also very similar to that shown in
Fig. 2b, except for an October <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima in their study.
Planetary boundary layer heights reported for nearby Joliet, IL by Holzworth (1964) were approximately 3 times higher in summer than in winter,
suggesting that summer aerosol production must be much higher (and/or sinks
be much lower) to maintain the observed higher summer aerosol loading in the
mixed layer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Pollution rose diagrams of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual seasons at BND over the 2010–2013 period. The
percentages at a given radius represent the percentage of hourly profiles
for a given wind sector.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Regional aerosol transport associated with southerly wind sectors (SE to SW
wind directions) exerts a large influence on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during all
seasons (Fig. 6a). Northerly wind sectors (NW to NE wind directions) exert a
comparable or larger influence on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during winter months. Much of
the light-scattering aerosol arriving from the south is likely secondary
sulfate associated with the high-density of coal-burning power plants in
southern Illinois and the Ohio River valley region (Buzcu-Guven et al.,
2007). Summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may also be influenced by biogenic SOA. Median
summer temperatures are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C higher for SW winds at BND
than for SE winds and the forests over SW Illinois and SE Missouri emit high
amounts of isoprene during summer (Fig. 3 of Parworth et al., 2015).
Scattering coefficient for SW wind directions exhibits a sharp July peak and
the temperature dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND during April–October
demonstrates modest agreement (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Fig. S7) with the
exponential temperature dependence of biogenic volatile organic compound
emissions (Guenther et al., 2006). The secondary PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak during
winter months at BND (Fig. 2a) may be influenced by temperature dependent
gas-to-particle partitioning of regional ammonia and nitric acid into
ammonium nitrate. Rupakheti et al. (2005) reported that gas-phase ammonia
correlated positively with particulate ammonium and nitrate mass
concentrations for temperatures below 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and that more ammonia
remained in the gas phase for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The temperature
dependence of median PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND changes sign (positive to
negative) for temperatures less than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, nearly
doubling as temperature decreases from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. S5). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase is
accompanied by an increase in median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.89 to 0.96 (Fig. S6); and a decrease in median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.15 to 0.13. Addition of large,
highly scattering PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles at low temperatures is consistent with high
winter ammonium nitrate concentrations reported for BND (Buzcu-Guven et al.,
2007). Much of the winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase is likely due to
regional transport from the north. Winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits the
largest increase for northerly wind sectors (Fig. 6a) with winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5–3 larger than spring and fall
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are highest for the northerly
wind directions, with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.15 for a
majority of the arriving air masses (Fig. S19). Northerly wind sectors are
typically associated with colder air mass traveling over regions with high
concentrations of ammonium and nitrate precursor gases (Hand et al., 2012b).
Temperature-dependent ammonium nitrate production is also consistent with
the highly variable timing and magnitude of the winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak
for individual years (Fig. S2). Lower winter PBL heights during winter
(Holzworth, 1964) likely also contribute to elevated winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Variability in winter PBL heights could conceivably contribute to
winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability.</p>
      <p>Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are insignificant for all seasons except for a
marginally significant fall amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % (Fig. 3d).
Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes (Fig. 4d) are much larger than those of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during all seasons except winter. Differences between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal cycle amplitudes are largest in summer
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 vs. 10 %) and are also non-negligible in fall
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %) and spring
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %). Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are both smallest during winter, with cycle
amplitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %. The influence of diurnal PBL height
cycle is clearly seen in the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4d) and a
smaller PBL height influence is seen in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles. The
differences between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes during
summer and (to a lesser degree) fall and spring suggests a large additional
source of scattering aerosols during summer daytime hours. Photochemical
aerosol processing is the only source of scattering particles whose diurnal
and seasonal dependence can explain the seasonality of differences between
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes. It is also consistent with
the seasonality of sulfate mass concentrations reported for BND (Buzcu-Guven
et al., 2007). Weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are statistically significant for
all seasons, but the cycle amplitudes are less than 15 % for all seasons
except fall. Our weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitude for the entire year
(Fig. 3c) is similar to that of Murphy et al. (2008).</p>
      <p>Regional pollution transport associated with southerly wind sectors also
influences the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle at BND over all seasons (Fig. 6b). Highest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the southerly wind sectors occurs during
summer and fall and southerly winds are most common in summer (Fig. 6a),
leading to the summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima (Fig. 2b). Lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the southerly wind sectors occurs during winter and air masses
from the less anthropogenically perturbed W/NW reach the site most
frequently in winter (Fig. 6b), leading to the winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
minima. The difference between the month of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(August) and that reported by D&amp;O2002 (October) could be due to
differences in the seasonality of wind directions between the two periods.
It could also arise due to differences in the seasonality of removal
mechanisms such as precipitation between the periods, but this would have
likely also shifted the month of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The weekly and diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles during summer and autumn
(Fig. 4c, d) are consistent with a large influence from regional diesel
emissions during these seasons and possibly during other seasons, although
the weekly and diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are only significant in
summer and autumn. Maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extends from sunset to sunrise
for all seasons (Fig. 4d), with a broad minimum extending from just after
sunrise to just before sunset. Large seasonality of PBL heights is obvious
in the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4d), consistent with large
(factor of 3) summer-to-winter PBL height differences reported for the
region by Holzworth (1964). The absence of early morning and late afternoon
local commuter peaks at BND is not surprising, since emissions from
interstate highway traffic and agricultural activity represent the largest
local sources of absorbing aerosols. Long-distance trucking comprises a
large portion of interstate highway traffic in the region and both this and
farming activities typically persist throughout the day. The diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles for individual days of the week show the same broad features
as the corresponding weekly integrated diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4d) for all seasons, with the exception of differences between post-dusk and
pre-dawn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual days of the week (unpublished
result). During summer, post-dusk <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is slightly larger than
pre-dawn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each day during Monday–Friday, leading to a
gradual build-up of absorbing aerosols in the PBL. Post-dusk <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than pre-dawn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on Saturday and Sunday. The
resulting weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle (Fig. 4c) and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycles for individual days suggest a nearly constant source of absorbing
aerosols from sunrise to sunset, with the largest emissions from Monday to Friday.
Both interstate truck traffic and farming activities are consistent with the
observed diurnal and weekly patterns during summer, but truck traffic is
likely the source more capable of contributing to the large summer diurnal
and weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes (60 and 40 %,
respectively), given the higher summer PBL heights in the region. The fall
weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle (Fig. 4c) also exhibits a build-up of
absorbing aerosols from Monday to Tuesday, followed by lower aerosol loading
during the remainder of the week. This cycle is not consistent with known
weekly cycles in truck traffic or agricultural practices near the site.
Scattering coefficient exhibits a similar weekly cycle as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during autumn (Fig. 3c) and the weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycle amplitudes are similar (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %) during fall.
Similarities in the autumn weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles could simply be the result of a smaller compensating effect on
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from daytime secondary aerosol production during autumn
(e.g., less photochemistry) or it could be due to sources of scattering and
absorbing aerosols that are more similar in autumn than in summer. Diesel
emissions from agricultural activity would seem more capable of contributing
to the weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle during autumn, when PBL heights are
lower. Biomass burning is a less likely source, even though Buzcu-Guven et
al. (2007) reported a significant biomass-burning influence on OM mass
(38 %) at BND. Absorption Ångström exponent demonstrates minimal
day of week variability during autumn (Fig. S15) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 1.1–1.2 are not statistically different from the theoretical
value of 1 for BC (Bergstrom et al., 2002).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Pollution rose diagrams of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual seasons at EGB over the 2010–2013 period. The
percentages at a given radius represent the percentage of hourly profiles
for a given wind sector.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Temporal variability at EGB</title>
      <p>Annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at EGB (Fig. 2a
and b) are influenced by more polluted southerly air masses
(120–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind directions) during all
seasons, along with comparable contributions from less
anthropogenically perturbed W/NW wind sectors during summer months (Fig. 7).
Liggio et al. (2010) reported that S/SE wind directions were generally
associated with transport from the greater Toronto area and that SW wind
directions were often associated with more aged aerosol transported from the
Ohio River valley region or other urban areas. Wind speeds are lower in
May–October and polluted air masses from the south are typically associated
with stagnant air masses ahead of fronts (Yang et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>Scattering coefficient is elevated for all wind sectors during summer (Fig. 7a). Warm-season aerosol chemistry at EGB is influenced by
temperature-dependent biogenic SOA from forests to the north (Leaitch et
al., 2011; Slowik et al., 2010) and by photo-oxidation of anthropogenic
pollutants from the south (Chan et al., 2010; Liggio et al., 2010).
Scattering coefficients exhibit larger summer increases for the less
anthropogenically perturbed wind sectors (all except 120–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind directions) than for the southerly wind sectors
(Fig. 7a). Monthly median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the southerly wind sectors
are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 times higher in summer than in spring and autumn,
with larger summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (factor of 2–5) for the other
wind sectors (unpublished result). The largest summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases are for NW wind sectors (Fig. 7a). In addition to biogenic SOA,
the NW wind sectors are influenced in summer by regional tourist traffic and
by episodic long-range transport of smoke during peak fire season in
northwest Canada. However, it is not possible to distinguish the effects of
aged smoke from biogenic SOA from forests, based on the available aerosol
optical measurements during the 2010–2013 period at EGB. The secondary
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak in winter is influenced by higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
associated with air masses from the S/SW (Fig. 7a), relative to spring and
autumn. Winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind directions 150–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 times higher than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from other wind sectors (not shown). Single-scattering albedo is
also highest for the 150–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind sectors
in winter, with values often 0.95 or above (Fig. S20a). Rupakheti et al. (2007) reported episodic high nitrate concentrations associated with air
masses transported from urban areas south of EGB, mostly occurring during
cold, humid conditions. Scattering coefficient does not exhibit a noticeable
increase with decreasing winter temperatures at EGB during the 2010–2013
period (Fig. S5). Meteorology likely plays a role in the elevated winter
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as PBL heights in the region are lowest in winter at EGB
(Horzworth, 1964).</p>
      <p>The annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle (Fig. 2b) is qualitatively similar to
annual EC mass concentration cycles reported for EGB (Yang et al., 2011) and
for rural IMPROVE sites in the Great Lakes region (Spak and Holloway, 2009).
Yang et al. (2011) reported mean EC concentrations (in units of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at EGB of 0.83 for summer, 0.71 for fall, 0.49 for winter, and
0.36 for spring. Spak and Holloway (2009) reported highest regional EC mass
concentrations in summer and lowest in winter, with the June EC maxima
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 times higher than the February EC minima. Our reported
summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima in August is 2–2.5 times larger than the
broad November–April minima (Fig. 2b).</p>
      <p>Urban-influenced SE/S wind sectors are associated with highest
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all seasons (Figs. 7b and
S20a). Chan et al. (2010) attributed higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, higher EC
concentrations, and lower OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios in air masses arriving at EGB from
the south to diesel emissions. Absorption coefficients are lowest in winter
for all wind sectors and are largest for southerly wind sectors during
summer and autumn (Fig. 7b), with monthly median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 times higher in summer/autumn than in spring for these
wind sectors. Much larger summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (factors of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–7) are seen for westerly and northwesterly wind sectors
(wind directions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240–360<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Episodic long-distance NW transport during the Canadian wildfire season
may contribute to summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but local/regional tourism traffic
is more consistent with the observed summer weekly and diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles.</p>
      <p>Weekly and diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at EGB are significant in summer,
marginally significant in autumn, and insignificant in winter and spring
(Fig. 4e and f). Summer and autumn diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle
amplitudes are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % and summer and autumn weakly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %. The diurnal and weekly
cycles in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during summer and autumn at EGB are more
complicated than those at the other sites and are likely influenced to
varying degrees by several sources, including (1) high volume of regional
traffic during summer, largest on weekends; (2) transport of
urban-influenced aerosol from the south; (3) diurnal PBL height evolution;
and (4) local commuter traffic. Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles for
individual days of the week reveal morning commuter peaks from Monday to Friday
(unpublished result). Daytime <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases due to lifting of
the PBL height are dampened on each of these days by a large source of
absorbing aerosol. Larger summer increases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for westerly
wind sectors suggests a source in addition to transport from the south. The
large additional source is likely regional tourism traffic. Differences
between post-dusk and pre-dawn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are small on Monday–Thursday
(not shown) but are much larger on Friday (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
Saturday (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to high volumes of weekend
traffic. Post-dusk <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on Sunday is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than pre-dawn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The composite effect of
these sources is the weekend <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima and Monday minima
during summer (Fig. 4e). The weekend <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase gives rise to
a small decrease (0.02 to 0.03) in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a small increase
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in DRFE (Figs. S12, S13)
Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles for individual days of the week during
summer reveal some of the same features as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (unpublished
result) but are further complicated by an additional large source of daytime
scattering aerosol, likely photochemical production and transport of SOA.</p>
      <p>The autumn diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle (Fig. 4e) appears to be more
influenced by frequent transport from the south (Fig. 7b), along with less
regional traffic than during summer. Monthly averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during September–October (Fig. 2b) remains near summer levels (except for
August), but <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much lower for all wind sectors except the
urban-influenced southerly wind sectors, for which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
similar in value to summer (Fig. 7b). The diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles exhibit very little structure during fall so lower
fall PBL heights may be partially offset by lower production of scattering
and <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>absorbing<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> aerosol and/or more efficient removal mechanisms. Some
additional source may be responsible for the early week increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to that observed during autumn at BND (Fig. 4c). The
source of absorbing aerosol persists throughout the day and into the evening
(not shown) and may be local agricultural activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS5">
  <title>Temporal variability at SGP</title>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles contribute <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66 % (78 %) to the summer
(winter) PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 % to both summer and
winter PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP (Figs. 2c and S8c). The annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles are similar (Figs. 2a
and S8a) so the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOP cycles at SGP are representative of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
aerosol. The annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle (Fig. 2b) demonstrates good
overall agreement with the annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle reported by
D&amp;O2002 for 1997–2000, with the exception that their winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minima extends from November to February, while our <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
minima extends from January to February. The annual PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle
during 2010–2013 (Fig. 2a) also agrees well with that reported by D&amp;O2002
for most non-winter months. D&amp;O2002 reported a broad summer maxima, with
monthly median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values lying <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30–40 % above
spring and autumn months. Our <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle during non-winter
months differs only by a larger summer-to-autumn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease
of close to factor of 2. Agreement is worse for winter months. Both
D&amp;O2002 and Sheridan et al. (2001) reported minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
December and maximum in February, with median February <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a
factor of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 higher than December. Box plots of
monthly binned <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual 2010–2013 years (Fig. S4)
show that median February <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP varies by up to a factor
of 4 for different years, with somewhat smaller differences between
individual January months (factor of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2) and between
individual March months (factor of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3). Much of the
inter-annual variability is smoothed out in the monthly binned <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> box plot for the entire period (Fig. S3), giving rise to relatively
constant monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during winter for the current period
(Fig. 2a). Lower December <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and much higher February <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred during the period reported by D&amp;O2002 and Sheridan et
al. (2001), compared to the period reported here.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Pollution rose diagrams of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual seasons at SGP over the 2010–2013 period. The
percentages at a given radius represent the percentage of hourly profiles
for a given wind sector.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Pollution transport from the S/SE impacts PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the year (Fig. 8). Wind directions are primarily from
the S/SE for non-winter months (especially summer). Air mass
back-trajectories show that air masses arriving at SGP from the S/SE often
travel over or near large regional populations centers, including Oklahoma
City, Tulsa, and (in summer) Dallas/Fort Worth (Parworth et al., 2015).
Single-scattering albedo is generally lower for S/SE wind sectors than for
the less anthropogenically influenced westerly and northerly wind sectors,
except during summer (Fig. S22a). A large fraction of non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
aerosol mass (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) is aged SOA during April–October
(Parworth et al., 2015). Many SE trajectories pass over regions of high
summer isoprene emissions (Parworth et al., 2015), but the
temperature dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. S5 and S7) is less than
for the sites with known biogenic SOA influence (EGB and APP). Absorption
Ångström exponent values close to 1 for all seasons (Fig. 2h)
suggest that despite high organic composition, light-absorbing OC exerts a
minimal influence on the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle and that most of
the absorbing aerosol is BC. Daily averages of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can have
values that extend to as high as 2.5 (unpublished result), which is
consistent with observed plumes of biomass-burning aerosol reported by
Parworth et al. (2015). Other than lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during autumn,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the S/SE wind sectors do not
demonstrate much seasonality (Fig. 8). The lack of seasonal variability in
mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during non-winter months
(relative to the other sites) may be due to a longer distance from the
population centers (increased aerosol dispersion) and higher PBL heights at
SGP during spring, summer, and autumn. Removal processes may also be more
efficient in late spring and summer, when monthly averaged rainfall at SGP
is highest.</p>
      <p>The frequency of episodic transport of ammonium nitrate to SGP likely exerts
some influence on winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its variability. Parworth et
al. (2015) reported that ammonium nitrate comprised approximately half of
the non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass at SGP during the 2010–2011 and 2011–2012
winters and early springs (e.g., March) (their Figs. 2 and 6). Ammonia and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations near SGP are relatively small and high nitrate
episodes (mass concentrations &gt; 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were nearly
always associated with temperatures &lt; 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and long-distance
transport from agricultural states in the central Great Plains region.
Colder temperatures and more frequent long-distance transport passing over
these states likely contributed to nearly a factor of 2 higher average
ammonium nitrate concentrations during the 2010–2011 winter than the
2011–2012 winter (Parworth et al., 2015). Average OA concentrations were
similar between the two winters so variability in ammonium nitrate likely
exerted an influence on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % higher average PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentration during the 2010–2011 winter. Lower relative humidity during
the 2010–2011 winter indicates that less wet deposition could also have
contributed to higher PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol mass during that winter (Parworth et al.,
2015). The frequency of episodically transported biomass-burning aerosol
also influences <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP. Biomass-burning aerosol is most prevalent in the spring, when prescribed crop
burning in preparation of planting is more common. Parworth et.al. (2015)
reported a much larger biomass-burning aerosol influence in spring 2011 than
spring 2012, primarily in March–April. Differences are observed in the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two springs, in addition
to differences in the 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles
between the two springs (Fig. S4). Differences between the 2 years are
more noticeable for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes (Fig. 4h) are near 40 % for all
seasons except spring (25 %). Only the summer and autumn cycles are
statistically significant. Diurnal PBL height effects are clearly visible in
the diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4h), as is a lack of commuter
influence. Similar to BND, there is no local commuter traffic that would be
expected to influence AOP cycles at SGP. No obvious features are seen in the
individual day of week <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (unpublished result) to
indicate a possible role of interstate traffic or agricultural influences in
the weekly or diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4g, h). This is
complicated by biased SGP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations during the weekends.
The diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle is insignificant for all seasons (Fig. 3h), which may reflect increased daytime photochemical processing that is
somewhat less in the winter months. Larger mid-day decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lead to increases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03. The hemispheric backscatter fraction varies negligibly
during the day. The midday increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to more
negative midday DRFE, by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in all
and 2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer. The aerosol parameters related to
size show contrasting trends. No visible diurnal or weekly trend is apparent
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a decline with larger aerosol in the early
evening. The trend in declining afternoon <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values starts
earlier in the day during the winter and is weakest during the summer and
spring.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Regional variability of aerosol optical properties</title>
      <p>Regional differences in some annually averaged AOPs (Fig. 2; Table S5) are
unbiased by single months or seasons. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highest at BND
and lowest at EGB, with annual-mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % higher at BND
than at EGB (Fig. 2a). The regional differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflect
the fact that the upper midwestern US is more anthropogenically influenced
than the other three regions, with more large population centers, high
concentrations of coal-burning power plants, higher volumes of traffic, and
more agricultural activity. Spak and Holloway (2009) concluded that “PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a year-round air quality problem in the upper midwestern
US and southern Canada, driven by nitrate in the winter, sulfate in the summer, and ammonium, OA, EC, and other components year-round”. The
largest winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak at BND may be due to higher levels of
regional ammonium nitrate precursors and cold, humid winter conditions
favorable for ammonium nitrate production in the upper midwestern US, where
winter ammonium nitrate concentrations are higher than almost all other
regions in the US (Hand et al., 2012b). The annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle at
APP (Fig. 2a) is driven almost completely by the seasonality of regional SOA
and sulfate production (Goldstein et al., 2009; Hidy et al., 2014) due to
the lack of urban influence on AOPs at APP. Both SGP and EGB are located
downwind at times from large urban centers, but both sites receive only a
small anthropogenic contribution from all but southerly wind sectors. More
frequent polluted air masses from the south may be the reason for higher
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP than at EGB for all but summer months (Figs. 7a
and 8a).</p>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol contributes a larger fraction to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP than at BND and SGP, as evidenced by higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 2c) and higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S8c). Both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
highest at APP for all months. The regional differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
significant for all months (Fig. 2c). Differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between APP
and BND are only significant for November–March (Fig. S8c). The regional
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are likely due to a larger influence
of soil dust to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs at SGP and BND. Sea salt concentrations are
minimal in all three regions, and soil dust concentrations are higher in the
agriculturally influenced midwestern US and southern Great Plains than in
the Appalachian mountain region (Hand et al., 2012b). Given the higher
density of forests near EGB than near BND and SGP, it is likely that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be higher at EGB (if measured there) than at
SGP and BND. A larger regional agricultural influence near EGB than near APP
may give rise to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that are slightly lower than those at
APP. Other indicators of aerosol size distribution (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) also follow similar seasonal cycles at BND and SGP (Fig. 2d and
g). One notable difference is lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP (by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3) for nearly all months. Similar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
but different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be indicative of differences in the
larger part of the accumulation mode (particle diameters close to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). APP and EGB have very similar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for warm-season months
(May–October), which is likely due to large biogenic SOA influences during
the warm season in both regions (Goldstein et al., 2009; Link et al., 2015;
Leaitch et al., 2011; Slowik et al., 2010). The highest annually averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP amongst the sites (Fig. 2d) is influenced by cold-season months
(November–April). EGB is influenced by large, highly scattering PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
particles from the south during winter months (Fig. S20). Winter PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol
at APP is largely regional SOA and sulfate, with some influence from
biomass-burning aerosol (Supplement to Link et al., 2015).
Higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP during winter and the surrounding months could be due to
less particle growth (photochemistry).</p>
      <p>The differences between annually averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among the sites
is insignificant (Fig. 2b), based on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precision measurement
uncertainties (Table 3). Differences in monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among
the sites are insignificant for most months. The only exceptions are that (1) EGB
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than APP in April and lower than APP and BND in
November and (2) that SGP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than BND in August. The annual
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes are larger at BND and EGB than at APP and
SGP. Larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases during summer and the surrounding
months at BND and EGB are consistent with higher levels of regional traffic
during these months. The smaller annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes at
APP and SGP may be influenced by their further proximity from large urban
centers. Biomass-burning aerosols also influence <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to some
degree at APP during winter (Supplement to Link et al., 2015)
and at SGP during winter and spring (Parworth et al., 2015) and may also
dampen the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at APP and SGP. Absorption
Ångström exponents (Fig. 2h) support the assertion that biomass-burning aerosol may influence winter monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP in
November–February (Cazorla et al., 2013). Monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
however, is not significantly greater than 1 during any other months at SGP,
BND, and APP, given the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement precision uncertainty
(Table 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Time series of monthly averaged PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm for BND (1996–2013) and SGP (1997–2013). Trend lines,
representing least-squared fits of the data, are also shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Annually averaged PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DRFE are statistically similar for
APP, BND, and SGP. Lower annually averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2e) and
higher (less-negative) annually averaged DRFE (Fig. 2f) at EGB are
marginally significant (at 95 % confidence), and these differences are
heavily biased by September and October. The simple use of annually averaged
values to discuss regional <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability (Fig. 2e) is a bit
misleading, given the large seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability at BND and
EGB (and to a lesser degree-APP and SGP). Monthly averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at EGB is close to 0.10 lower than that at APP and SGP during
September–October and is also 0.08 lower than annually averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at EGB. Single-scattering albedo differences between APP and BND are
nearly this large in winter, despite the fact that annually averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is statistically indistinguishable at the two sites. The
regional <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences are at least as large as reported
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences among BND, SGP, and two North American coastal
sites – Barrow, Alaska and Sable Island, Nova Scotia (D&amp;O2002). In spite
of the high seasonality in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the co-variation of these
two intensive properties lead to insignificant annual DRFE cycles at APP and
SGP. Larger DRFE cycle amplitudes are observed at EGB (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and BND (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> AOD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
with September–October DRFE maxima (least negative DRFE) at both sites
(Fig. 2f).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mann–Kendall slopes (%/decade) and trend significance<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
long-term trends in several PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol optical properties measured
at BND and SGP. Monthly averaged data are used for the calculations. BND data
for the time period 1996–2013 are used; SGP data for the time period
1997–2013 are used. Trends that are significant at or above the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05 level are in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BND slope (%/10 yr), significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SGP  Slope (%/10 yr), significance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">16.3</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">19.6</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">23.1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">24.0</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.2, not significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.5, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.9, not significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">11.2</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">11.8</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">15.1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">8.1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">9.1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5, not significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1.55</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Slopes and significance were obtained using the function “TheilSen” in
the R package “openair” (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012, Carslaw, 2015). Data were
de-seasonalized and autocorrelation was accounted for using options supplied
with the TheilSen function. Decadal slopes (%/10 year) were calculated by
multiplying the yearly slope by 10, i.e., 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> %/year.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Long-term aerosol optical property trends at BND and SGP</title>
      <p>Trends in AOPs are calculated for the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> size cuts at BND and SGP.
In general, the sign of the AOP trends are the same for both size cuts,
although the magnitudes of the trends differ. With the exception of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value is more meaningful, we focus on the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOP
trends for consistency with the rest of the paper. Statistically significant
trends in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (decreasing), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (decreasing), and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (increasing) are found at BND from 1996 to 2013 and at SGP from 1997 to 2013
(Table 4). Visual examination of Fig. 9 reveals that the trends in these
AOPs since <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2009 are somewhat more pronounced than in earlier
years, pointing out the pitfalls associated with trend analysis on
short-term time series. Additionally, there is a statistically significant
decreasing trend in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP (Table 4; Fig. S24); the
BND trend in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negative but not statistically significant.
BND also demonstrates a slight, but statistically significant negative trend
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 4; Fig. S25). The significant decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at both sites is consistent with other studies (CC2013; Hand et
al., 2014) that reported large decreases in near-surface aerosol light
scattering and light extinction coefficients in North America during the
past decade. The concurrent decreasing trend in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that
scattering by PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is decreasing at a faster rate than scattering by
super-1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particles (which may or may not be decreasing) at both BND
and SGP. One possible source for reductions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND
and SGP could be decreasing SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by regional power plants.
Annual US SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from power plants decreased at a rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 % per year from 2001 to 2010, with similar reductions in
sulfate concentrations at rural US sites (Hand et al., 2012a).</p>
      <p>CC2013, performed trend analyses on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND and SGP as part of a larger study looking at
long term changes in in situ aerosol properties measured around the globe.
There are several key differences between our analysis and that of CC2013 so
the magnitudes of the trends should not be directly compared, but the signs
of the trends (positive/negative) can be compared. Differences between the
two studies include the following: (1) monthly data are used in our analysis (CC2013 used
daily); (2) our trend analysis extends the data sets 3 more years past
that of CC2013; (3) we report trends for both PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs (CC2013 used
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs); and (4) we reference the percent slope to the first year value,
while CC2013 referenced their slope to the median value of the parameter for
the entire data set.</p>
      <p>For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the direction (positive/negative)
of the trends in CC2013 and this study are the same. CC2013 reported larger
trends for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than are found here, likely
due to a combination of the differences between the two analyses noted
above. One noticeable difference between CC2013 and this study is that
CC2013 found a statistically significant decrease in BND PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05 level, while the decreasing trend for PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated here is not statistically significant. CC2013's
analysis also included <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends at BND and SGP.
Unlike the analysis performed here, they found no statistically significant
trends in either <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when using the Mann–Kendall test with
Sen's slope (MK), although the signs of their MK slopes match what is
reported in Table 4 for this study. CC2013 found significant positive trends
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at both sites and a negative trend in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP when
they applied the generalized least square trend test with autoregressive
bootstrap confidence intervals (GLS/ARB). CC2013 hypothesized that this
discrepancy could be the result of lower sensitivity of the MK method for
trends in normally distributed data. Most intensive AOPs are closer to
normally distributed than are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a point
noted by C2013 and confirmed by the authors using data at the four sites
reported in our study. CC2013's trend slope in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using the GLS/ARB method
was nearly identical in magnitude (7.7 %/10 year) to our slope for BND
(Table 4), while their trend slope in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP was smaller (7.8 %/10 year) than our slope. The trend slope in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by CC2013
for SGP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2 % at SGP) is very similar to our trend slope (Table 4).
CC2013 did not analyze trends in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Systematic relationships among aerosol optical properties</title>
      <p>Most systematic relationships amongst AOPs are qualitatively similar for all
seasons at each site and are suitably represented by the annual
relationships. Several of these annual relationships have also been reported
for BND and SGP by others (D&amp;O2002; Andrews et al., 2011) and most are
similar to the relationships reported here for BND and SGP. We briefly
summarize these relationships (Sect. 4.4.1) and highlight any differences in
the BND and SGP relationships for our study period (compared to D&amp;O2002
and Andrews et al., 2011), in addition to any differences in the
relationships at BND and SGP and those at APP and EGB, which have not been
studied. Relationships involving <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are seasonally dependent
(especially at APP) and are hence presented for individual seasons at APP,
BND, and SGP in Sect. 4.4.2.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Annual systematic relationships among AOPs</title>
      <p>Single scattering albedo increases and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all sites (Fig. 10a, b). Hemispheric backscatter fraction
demonstrates an inverse relationship with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the entire
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range at EGB and for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.85 at
the other sites (Fig. 10c), a condition representative of all months
(Fig. 2d, e). The co-variability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to a DRFE
dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is statistically insignificant for all
sites, with the exception of the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions at APP
(Fig. 10d). Greater influences by smaller, darker particles under
low-loading conditions and by larger, brighter particles under high-loading
conditions are seen in the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycles for the four sites in this paper (Fig. 2a, d, and e) and have
been reported for SGP and BND by D&amp;O2002. The tendency toward lower
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>o and higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for low-loading conditions is consistent with
preferential removal of large, less-absorbing particles by cloud scavenging
and/or wet deposition. It can also be the result of new particle formation
with growth by condensation and/or coagulation to optically active sizes
(Andrews et al., 2011). Scattering Ångström exponent and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are both relatively insensitive to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP over
the entire <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range (Fig. 10e, f). Scattering
Ångström exponent is insensitive to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
all but the lowest aerosol loading levels at BND and SGP (Fig. 10e). PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
scattering fraction shows a modest decrease with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 20 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND and SGP (Fig. 10f).
A similar lack of sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP and BND was reported by D&amp;O2002. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering fraction
increases proportionally with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP, BND, and SGP (Fig. 10g). D&amp;O2002 reported similar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationships for SGP and BND. The fact that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship is much stronger than either of their relationships
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a better indicator
of the relative contributions of coarse and fine mode aerosol to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than an indicator of average particle size-at least for
APP, BND, and SGP. Based on the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured at SGP,
BND, and APP (Fig. 2c), the aerosol size distributions are on average
bi-modal (with higher coarse mode fractions at SGP and BND than at APP) and
care must be exercised when using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to infer average particle
size or aerosol type. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship (Fig. 10g) is consistent with decreasing trends in both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP (Table 4) but seems inconsistent with the lack of change in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND, despite reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> similar in
magnitude to those at SGP.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Systematic relationships among mean AOPs over full annual cycles
of the 2010–2013 period at APP, BND, EGB, and SGP: <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(c)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> DRFE vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<bold>(e)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ; and <bold>(g)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>AOPs at the rural continental sites reported here have similar relationships
(Fig. 10) as those at a majority of mountain sites reported on by Andrews et
al. (2011). Andrews et al. (2011) also reported relationships amongst AOPs
based on long-term aircraft measurements made over BND and SGP, although
their free tropospheric AOP relationships for BND and SGP only extended up
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most of the free
troposphere AOP relationships reported for SGP (Andrews et al., 2011) are
similar to the corresponding near-surface AOP relationships (Fig. 10), but
there are some noticeable differences for BND. Andrews et al. (2011)
reported the following AOP relationships as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from
zero to 25 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND: (1) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased slightly (0.12 to 0.13); (2) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained nearly constant
(less than 0.01 increase); and (3) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by a larger amount (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 to 0.17)
than in our study (Fig. 10e). The differences between these relationships
and those in Fig. 10a, b, and e could be due to smaller particles
that undergo less atmospheric processing (particle growth, cloud scavenging,
and deposition) in the free troposphere above BND, relative to particles
near the surface.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Seasonal relationships involving absorption {\AA}ngstr\"{o}m
exponent}?><title>Seasonal relationships involving absorption Ångström
exponent</title>
      <p>The relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
individual seasons and the annual relationship are most different at APP
(Fig. 11a) and least different at BND (Fig. 11b). Absorption
Ångström exponent at APP is statistically higher than 1 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2) for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins during winter and is
statistically lower than 1 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8) for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins during summer and for higher-loading conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during spring and autumn (Fig. 11a).
Absorption Ångström exponent at BND (Fig. 11b) and SGP (Fig. 11c) is
not statistically different from 1 for any <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins except for
(1) summer loading <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; and (2) spring and
autumn loading <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (SGP only).
Relationships among <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and intensive AOPs (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be used to identify contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by sources other than BC, such as dust, OC, and coated BC (Cazorla,
et al., 2013; Costabile et al., 2013; Gyawali et al., 2009). Absorption
Ångström exponent exhibits a systematic decrease with increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all seasons at SGP (Fig. 11f) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreases in a step-wise manner for all seasons except summer at BND (Fig. 11e). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship is more
complicated at APP (Fig. 11d), where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> demonstrates a
similar decrease with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during summer to that
observed at BND but a marginally significant increase with increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during winter. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that are
statistically higher than 1 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2) tend to be
associated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 at APP (Fig. 11d), suggesting a
mix of EC and OC (Fig. 2 of Cazorla, et al., 2013). Values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 at BND and SGP are most often associated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 1 (Fig. 11e, f), suggesting a mix of EC and dust
(Fig. 2 of Cazorla et al., 2013). Dust influences <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP
during all seasons and also influences BND <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during autumn,
as seen by the number of data points with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 1 in Fig. 11e, f. Episodic biomass burning that
impacts SGP during spring (Parworth et al., 2015) also contributes to high
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, which can reach <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 for individual
days (unpublished result). Summer values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are lower than
those of other seasons for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins at BND and APP and for
all but the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins at SGP (where dust likely
influenced absorption). The slopes of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values significantly lower
than 1 during summer coincide with higher fractions of fine-mode aerosol
(higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Systematic relationships among mean AOPs involving PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption
Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for individual seasons of the
2010–2013 period at APP, BND, and SGP: <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP; <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND;
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP; <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP; <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
BND; <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP; <bold>(g)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP; <bold>(h)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BND; <bold>(i)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at SGP.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/12487/2015/acp-15-12487-2015-f11.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships for all individual
seasons are also most similar at BND (Fig. 11h) and least similar at APP
(Fig. 11g), where the summer and winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationships are noticeably different. Absorption Ångström exponent
is lowest over the entire <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range during summer at all sites.
All of the individual season <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves are
similar in that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains constant or slightly increasing
with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches 0.90
(specifically the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin centered at 0.875). This is followed
by sharp decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with further increases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Absorption Ångström exponents significantly less than 1
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8) during summer months coincide with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.85 at APP, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90 at BND, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.95 at SGP. Absorption Ångström exponent at APP is
also significantly less than 1 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.95 during
autumn. From the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships (Fig. 10c), the lower
mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at all sites during summer also coincide with
lower mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. When combined, these relationships indicate that lower
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with larger, less-absorbing,
fine-mode particles. Gyawali et al. (2009) reported a similar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship for summer months with no biomass-burning influence in Reno, NV. Single-scattering albedo was near constant
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1–1.2) up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values mostly below one
for higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Gyawali et al. (2009) attributed this wavelength
dependence of absorption to EC particles coated with non-absorbing organic
and inorganic matter. It should be noted that Gyawali et al. (2009) used a
photo-acoustic spectrometer, as compared to the filter-based techniques that
are employed at the sites in this study. Gyawali et al. (2009) also used
different wavelengths (405 and 870 nm) so the results are not directly
comparable. The summer values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at APP are also much lower
for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those reported by Gyawali et al. (2009).
Possible biases in filter-based absorption measurements made in high-OA
environments could in principle contribute to this result (e.g., Lack et
al., 2008, 2009). A detailed analysis of the effects, both real
and artifact, of absorbing and non-absorbing coatings on the
wavelength dependence of light absorption by black carbon is beyond the
scope of this paper.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>Seasonal variability of nearly all PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AOPs is generally much larger than
weekly and diurnal AOP variability at the APP, BND, EGB, and SGP surface
aerosol monitoring stations. All sites exhibit summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
maxima (Fig. 2a) and broader summer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima (Fig. 2b).
Secondary winter peaks in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed at all sites except
APP and coincide with minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Scattering coefficient is
lowest at all sites except APP during autumn. Low autumn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
coincides with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minima (Fig. 2e) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima (Fig. 2d) at
all sites. In spite of the high seasonality in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
co-variation of these two intensive properties lead to insignificant annual
DRFE cycles at APP and SGP. Larger DRFE cycle amplitudes are observed at EGB
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) and BND (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %), with
September–October DRFE maxima (least negative DRFE) at both sites (Fig. 2f). Regional differences in annual mean AOPs are in general much less than
their seasonal variability at individual sites (Fig. 2), requiring that
studies of regional AOP variability be conducted on a seasonal basis.
Amplitudes of diurnal and weekly cycles in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the sites
(Fig. 4) are larger for all seasons than those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3),
with the largest differences occurring in summer. The weekly and diurnal
cycle amplitudes of most intensive AOPs are minimal in most cases,
especially those related to parameterizations of aerosol size distribution.
Statistically significant trends in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (decreasing), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(decreasing), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (increasing) are found at BND from 1996 from 2013 and at SGP
from 1997 to 2013 (Table 4). A statistically significant decreasing trend in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also observed for SGP but not BND.</p>
      <p>Systematic relationships among <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10a–d) show that high aerosol loading conditions are associated
with larger, less-absorbing particles and that low aerosol loading
conditions are associated with smaller, more-absorbing particles for all
sites and seasons. These relationships are consistent with other studies
(D&amp;O2002; Andrews et al., 2011) and suggest the influences of particle
growth, wet deposition, and cloud/fog scavenging of larger, less-absorbing
particles on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Andrews et al., 2011). Systematic
relationships among <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 11a–f) suggest that aerosol light absorption is largely due to EC
for all sites and seasons, with the exception of a mixture of EC and
light-absorbing OC during winter at APP. Dust and OC likely influence
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> episodically at SGP (Fig. 11c and f). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships for SGP (Fig. 11f) and BND (Fig. 11e) are consistent with a mixture of EC and dust for the majority of higher
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2) at SGP during all
seasons and BND during autumn. The relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate that values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly
less than 1 are associated with weakly absorbing particles. When combined
with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships (Fig. 10c), the confluence of low
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may suggest an influence
of coated EC on low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during summer (Gyawali et al., 2009).
More detailed studies involving aerosol chemistry and size distributions are
clearly needed to state this more definitively.</p>
      <p>Many general features of the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycles and the weekly and diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at the sites are
explained (Sect. 4.1.1–4.1.5) in a self-consistent manner using the following: (1) pollution-rose diagrams showing the seasonality of pollution transport
(Figs. 5–8); (2) published aerosol chemistry at the sites (Link et al.,
2015; Parworth et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2011 and references therein;
Buzcu-Guven et al., 2007); (3) temperature dependence of some known regional
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources; and (4) reported seasonality of PBL heights for
the regions. One exception deals with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles at APP.
The influence of local traffic is seen in the APP diurnal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycles (Fig. 4b) and possibly the weekly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles (Fig. 4a).
Local and regional wood-burning influence during winter is also consistent
with reported aerosol chemistry at APP (Supplement to Link et
al., 2015) and with winter-month <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. 2h) and their
relationship with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 11d). However, neither of these
sources nor the seasonality of transport of moderately elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the northeast (Fig. 5b) adequately explain the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle at APP. More studies are also needed to better understand the
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle amplitudes on
weekly and diurnal timescales, especially in summer. The potential influence
of photochemistry on the annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles is consistent with
published aerosol chemistry at the sites. We hypothesize that local
photochemical aerosol production could also provide the large daytime source
of scattering aerosols during summer and surrounding months that counteracts
diurnal PBL height variation, leading to much smaller diurnal cycles in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the available data sets in
this study are not sufficient to test this hypothesis. Relationships between
AOPs and meteorology are also necessary to better understand the effects of
atmospheric processing on AOPs at the four sites and their annual and
diurnal cycles.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Funding for obtaining and evaluating the data came from the DOE ARM program,
NOAA Climate Program Office, Appalachian State University College of Arts
and Sciences, and Environment Canada, Atmospheric Science and Technology
Directorate. We thank the technicians, students, and support staff at all
the sites for the dedication and diligence, 24/7/365, required to produce
the data sets reported here. The authors also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their many helpful suggestions for improving the manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: P. Laj</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 1400 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 29,
57–69, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Wheeler, J. D., Harris, J. M., Perry, K. D.,
Trost, B. E., Jaffe, D. J., and Ogren, J. A.: Aerosol backscatter fraction and
single-scattering albedo: Measured values and uncertainties at a coastal
station in the Pacific Northwest, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26793–26807,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900172</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Masonis, S. J. Covert, D. S., Ahlquist, N. C., Howell, S.
G., Clarke, A. D., and McNaughton, C. S.: Variability of aerosol optical
properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8647, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003247</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D., and Cox, P. M.: Strong present-day aerosol
cooling implies a hot future, Nature, 435, 1187–1190, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Andrews, E., Sheridan, P. J., Ogren, J. A., and Ferrare, R.: In situ aerosol
profiles over the Southern Great Plains cloud and radiation test bed site: 1.
Aerosol optical properties, J. Geophys. Res. 109, D06208,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004025</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., Cuevas, E., Rodriguez,
S., Sun, J. Y., Jaffe, D. A., Fischer, E. V., Baltensperger, U., Weingartner,
E., Collaud Coen, M., Sharma, S., Macdonald, A. M., Leaitch, W. R., Lin,
N.-H., Laj, P., Arsov, T., Kalapov, I., Jefferson, A., and Sheridan, P.:
Climatology of aerosol radiative properties in the free troposphere, Atmos.
Res., 102, 365–393, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bae, M., Schaur, J. J., DeMinter J. T., and Turner, J. R.: Hourly and daily
patterns of particulate- phase organic and elemental carbon concentrations in
the urban atmosphere, J. Air Waste Manage., 54, 823–833,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.2004.10470957</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bergstrom, R. W., Russell, P. B., and Hignett, P. B.: The Wavelength
Dependence of Black Carbon Particles: Predictions and Results from the
TARFOX experiment and Implications forthe Aerosol Single Scattering Albedo,
J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 567–577, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bergstrom, R. W., Pilewskie, P., Russell, P. B., Redemann, J., Bond, T. C.,
Quinn, P. K., and Sierau, B.: Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5937–5943, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Blanchard, C. L., Tanenbaum, S., and Lawson, D. R.: Differences between
weekday and weekend air pollution levels in Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago,
Dallas-Fort Worth, Denver, Houston, New York, Phoenix, Washington, DC, and
surrounding areas, J. Air Waste Manage., 58, 1598–1615,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.58.12.1598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3155/1047-3289.58.12.1598</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
inter-comparison of filter- based measurements of visible light absorption by
aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 30, 582–600, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868299304435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868299304435</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buzcu-Guven, B., Brown, S. G., Frankel, A., Hafner, H. J., and Roberts P. T.:
Analysis and apportionment of organic carbon and fine particulate matter
sources at multiple sites in the midwestern United States, J. Air Waste
Manage., 57, 606–619, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, D. C.: The openair manual – open-source tools for analysing air
pollution data, Manual version 1.1-4, King's College London, UK, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: openair – an R package for air quality data
analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cazorla, A., Bahadur, R., Suski, K. J., Cahill, J. F., Chand, D., Schmid, B.,
Ramanathan, V., and Prather, K. A.: Relating aerosol absorption due to soot,
organic carbon, and dust to emission sources determined from in-situ chemical
measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9337–9350,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9337-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9337-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Chan, T. W., Huang, L., Leaitch, W. R., Sharma, S., Brook, J. R., Slowik, J.
G., Abbatt, J. P. D., Brickell, P. C., Liggio, J., Li, S.-M., and
Moosmüller, H.: Observations of OM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC and specific attenuation
coefficients (SAC) in ambient fine PM at a rural site in central Ontario,
Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2393–2411, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2393-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2393-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A., McNaughton C., Kapustin,V., Shinozuka,V., Howell, S., Dibb, J.,
Zhou, J., Anderson, B., Brekhovskikh, V., Turner, H., and Pinkerton, M.:
Biomass burning and pollution aerosol over North America: Organic components
and their influence on spectral optical properties and humidification
response, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12S18, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007777" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007777</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., Cozic, J., Henning, S.,
Verheggen, B., Gehrig, R., and Baltensperger, U.: Long-term trend analysis
of aerosol variables at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D13213, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007995</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Asmi, A., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N.,
Day, D., Fiebig, M., Fjaeraa, A. M., Flentje, H., Hyvärinen, A.,
Jefferson, A., Jennings, S. G., Kouvarakis, G., Lihavainen, H., Lund Myhre,
C., Malm, W. C., Mihapopoulos, N., Molenar, J. V., O'Dowd, C., Ogren, J. A.,
Schichtel, B. A., Sheridan, P., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Weller, R.,
and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 1: In-situ optical measurements
at GAW and IMPROVE stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 869–894,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-869-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-869-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Costabile, F., Barnaba, F., Angelini, F., and Gobbi, G. P.: Identification of
key aerosol populations through their size and composition resolved spectral
scattering and absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2455–2470,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2455-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2455-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Delene, D. J. and Ogren, J. A.: Variability of aerosol optical properties at
four North American surface monitoring sites, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1135–1150,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Delle Monache, L., Perry, K. D., Cederwall, R. T., and Ogren, J. A.:
In Situ Aerosol Profiles Over the Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation
Test Bed Site: 2. Effects of Mixing Height on Aerosol Properties, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06209, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004024</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck,
T. F., and Slutsker, I.: Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties
retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 9791–9806, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M.
D., Tanre, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of absorption and optical
properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 59, 590–607, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Goldstein, A. H., Koven, C. D., Heald, C. L., and Fung, I. Y.: Biogenic
carbon and anthropogenic pollutants combine to form a cooling haze over the
southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 8835–8840,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904128106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0904128106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Gyawali, M., Arnott, W. P., Lewis, K., and Moosmüller, H.: In situ
aerosol optics in Reno, NV, USA during and after the summer 2008 California
wildfires and the influence of absorbing and non-absorbing organic coatings
on spectral light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8007–8015,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8007-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8007-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., and Pitchford, M. L.: Particulate
sulfate ion concentration and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission trends in the United States
from the early 1990s through 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10353–10365,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Pitchford, M. L., Malm, W. C., and Frank, N.
H.: Seasonal composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the
United States, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D05209, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017122</ext-link>,
2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Pitchford, M. L., Malm, W. C., and Frank, N.
H.: Spatial and temporal trends in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> organic and elemental carbon
across the United States, Advances in Meteorology, 2003, 367674,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/367674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2013/367674</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., Copeland, S., Molenar, J. V.,
Frank, N., and Pitchford, M.: Widespread reductions in haze across the United
States from the early 1990s through 2011, Atmos. Environ., 94, 671–679,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.062</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M. and Shine, K. P.: The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot
aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22,
603–606, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00075</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hidy, G. M., Blanchard, C. L., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E., Tanenbaum, S.,
Shaw, S., Knipping, E., Tombach, I., Jansen, J., and Walters, J.: Chemical
climatology of the southeastern United States, 1999–2013, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 11893–11914, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11893-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11893-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Holzworth, G. C.: Estimates of mean maximum mixing depths in the contiguous
United States, Mon. Weather. Rev., 92 235–242, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kahn, R. A., Yu, H., Schwartz, S. E., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A.,
Rind, D., Halthore, R., and DeCola, P.: Introduction, in: Atmospheric Aerosol
Properties and Climate Impacts, A Report by the US Climate Change Science
Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, edited by: Chin, M.,
Kahn, R. A., and Schwartz, S. E., National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Washington, D.C., USA, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Koloutsou-Vakakis, S., Carrico, C. M., Kus, P., Rood, M. J., Li, Z.,
Shrestha, R., Ogren, J. A., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Aerosol
properties at a midlatitude Northern Hemisphere continental site, J. Geophys.
Res., 106, 3019–3032, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900126</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Covert, D. S., Baynard, T., Massoli, P., Sierau,
B., Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Lovejoy, E. R., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Bias
in Filter-Based Aerosol Light Absorption Measurements Due to Organic Aerosol
Loading: Evidence from Ambient Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol, 42,
1033–1041, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802389277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802389277</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Cross, E. S., Massoli, P., Ahern, A. T.,
Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Absorption Enhancement of Coated Absorbing
Aerosols: Validation of the Photo-Acoustic Technique for Measuring the
Enhancement, Aerosol Sci. Technol, 43, 1006–1012,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820903117932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820903117932</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Leaitch, W. R., Macdonald, A. M., Brickell, P. C., Liggio, J., Siostedt, S.
L., Vlasenko, A., Bottenheim, J. W., Huang, L., Li, S., Liu, S. K.,
Toom-Sauntry, D., Hayden, K. A., Sharma, S., Shantz, N. C., Wiebe, H. A.,
Zhang, W., Abbatt, J., Slowik, J. G., Chang, R., Russell, L. M., Schwartz, R.
E., Takahama, S., Jayne, J. T., and Ng, N.: Temperature response of the
submicron organic aerosol from temperate forests, Atmos. Environ., 45,
6696–6704, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Mattoo, S., Ichoku, C., Kahn, R.,
and Eck, T. F.: Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target
aerosol products over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10399–10420,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10399-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Dubovik, O., and Lacis, A. A.: Recent trends in
aerosol optical properties derived from AERONET measurements, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 12271–12289, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12271-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12271-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Liggio, J., Li, S.,Vlasenko, A., Siostedt, S. L.,Chang, R., Shantz, N.,
Abbatt, J., Slowik, J. G., Bottenheim, J. W., Brickell, P. C., Stroud, C.,
and Leaitch, R. R.: Primary and secondary organic aerosols in urban air
masses intercepted at a rural site, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D21305,
doi:12010JD0144260.1029, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Link, M. F., Zhou, Y., Taubman,  B. F.,  Sherman,  J. P.,  Sive,  B. C.,
Morrow, H.,  Krintz,  I., Robertson, L., Cook, R., Stocks, J., and West, M.:
A characterization of volatile organic compounds and secondary organic aerosol
at a mountain site in the southeastern United States Estimating background
secondary organic aerosol in the southeastern United States from a
regionally representative site, J. Atmos. Chem, 72, 81–104, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9305-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-015-9305-5</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Malm, W. C., Schichtel, B. A., Pitchford, M. L., Ashbaugh, L. L., and Eldred,
R. A.: Spatial and monthly trends in speciated fine particle concentration in
the United States, J. Geophys. Res, 109, D03306, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003739</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A.,
Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C.,
Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y.,
Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C.,
Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A.,
Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J.,
Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm,
R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol
absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 245–268, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Capps, S. L., Daniel, J. S., Frost, G. J., and White, W. H.:
Weekly patterns of aerosol in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
2729–2739, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2729-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2729-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Chow, J. C., Leibensperger, E. M., Malm, W. C., Pitchford, M.,
Schichtel, B. A., Watson, J. G., and White, W. H.: Decreases in elemental
carbon and fine particle mass in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
4679–4686, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4679-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4679-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A.: Comment on “Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based
Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols”, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 44, 589–591, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.482111</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A., Wendell, J. Sheridan, P. J., Hageman, D., and Jefferson, A.:
Continuous light absorption photometer performance, ASR Science Team Meeting,
Potomac, Md, USA, 18–21 March 2013, available at:
<uri>http://asr.science.energy.gov/meetings/stm/posters/view?id=781</uri> (last
access: 26 October 2014), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Parworth C., Fast, J, Mei, F., Shippert, T., Sivaraman, C., Tilp, A., Watson,
T., and Zhang, Q.: Long-term measurements of sub-micrometer aerosol chemistry
at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) using an aerosol chemical speciation
monitor (ACSM), Atmos. Environ., 106, 43–55, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Rupakheti, M., Leaitch, R., Lohmann, U., Hayden, K., Brickell, P., Lu, G.,
Li, S., Toom-Sauntry, D., Bottenheim, J. W., Brook, J. R., Vet, R., Jayne, J.
T., and Worsnop, D. R.: An Intensive Study of the Size and Composition of
Submicron Atmospheric Aerosols at a Rural Site in Ontario, Canada, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 39, 722–736, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500182420</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and
bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006328</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, 2nd edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York,
USA, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Sheridan, P. J. and Ogren, J. A.: Observations of the vertical and regional
variability of aerosol optical properties over central and eastern North
America, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16793–16805, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900241</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sheridan, P. J., Delene, D. J., and Ogren, J. A.: Four years of continuous
surface aerosol measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric
Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation
Testbed site, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20735–20747, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000785</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Sheridan, P. J., Jefferson, A., and Ogren, J. A.: Spatial variability of
submicrometer aerosol radiative properties over the Indian Ocean during
INDOEX, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8011, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000166</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Sheridan, P. J., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Tackett, J. L., and Winker, D.
M.: Vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties over central Illinois and
comparison with surface and satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
11695–11721, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11695-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11695-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Slowik, J. G., Stroud, C., Bottenheim, J. W., Brickell, P. C., Chang, R.
Y.-W., Liggio, J., Makar, P. A., Martin, R. V., Moran, M. D., Shantz, N. C.,
Sjostedt, S. J., van Donkelaar, A., Vlasenko, A., Wiebe, H. A., Xia, A. G.,
Zhang, J., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Characterization of a large
biogenic secondary organic aerosol event from eastern Canadian forests,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2825–2845, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2825-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2825-2010</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Spak, S. N. and Holloway, T.: Seasonality of speciated aerosol transport over
the Great Lakes region, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08302,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010598</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>US Census Bureau: 2006–2010 American Community Survey, available at:
<uri>http://www.census.gov/acs/www/</uri> (last access: 3 January 2012), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
van de Hulst, H. C.: Light scattering by small particles, John Wiley and
Sons, New York, USA, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wiscombe, W. J. and Grams, G. W.: The backscattered fraction in two-stream
approximations, J. Atmos. Sciences, 33, 2440–2451, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
WMO: WMO/GAW Aerosol Measurement procedures guidelines and recommendations,
World Meteorological Organization, Technical Document No. 1178, GAW Report
No. 153, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, F., Huang, L., Sharma, S., Brook, J. R., Zhang, W., Li, S., and Tan,
J.: Two-year observations of fine carbonaceous particles in variable sampling
intervals, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2418–2426, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Yoon, J., von Hoyningen-Huene, W., Kokhanovsky, A. A., Vountas, M., and
Burrows, J. P.: Trend analysis of aerosol optical thickness and
Ångström exponent derived from the global AERONET spectral
observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1271–1299, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1271-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-1271-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Kaufman, Y. J., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Anderson, T.
L., Balkanski, Y., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Christopher, S., DeCola, P.,
Kahn, R., Koch, D., Loeb, N., Reddy, M. S., Schulz, M., Takemura, T., and
Zhou, M.: A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct
radiative effect and forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 613–666,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-613-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-613-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Quinn, P. K., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Kahn, R. A., Chin, M., and
Schwartz, S. E.: Remote Sensing and In Situ Measurements of Aerosol
Properties, Burdens, and Radiative Forcing, in Atmospheric Aerosol Properties
and Climate Impacts, A Report by the US Climate Change Science Program and
the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, edited by: Chin, M., Kahn, R. A.,
and Schwartz, S. E., National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Washington, D.C., USA, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Hecobian, A., Zheng, M., Frank, N. H., and Weber, R. J.: Biomass
burning impact on PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the southeastern US during 2007:
integrating chemically speciated FRM filter measurements, MODIS fire counts
and PMF analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6839–6853,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6839-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6839-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
