<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-11885-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Black carbon surface oxidation and organic composition of beech-wood soot aerosols</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~C.~Corbin et al.}?><?xmltex \runningtitle{Beech-wood soot OM and BC composition}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Corbin</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name>
          <email>joel.corbin@psi.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2584-9137</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lohmann</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8885-3785</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sierau</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Keller</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6880-043X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Burtscher</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mensah</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
          <email>amewu.mensah@env.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-171X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>ETH Zurich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zurich,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Aerosol and Sensor Technology, University
of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Windisch,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Laboratory for Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul
Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. C. Corbin (joel.corbin@psi.ch) and A. A. Mensah (amewu.mensah@env.ethz.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>11885</fpage><lpage>11907</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Soot particles are the most strongly light-absorbing particles
commonly found in the atmosphere. They are major contributors
to the radiative budget of the Earth and to the toxicity of
atmospheric pollution.  Atmospheric aging of soot may change
its health- and climate-relevant properties by oxidizing the
primary black carbon (BC) or organic particulate matter (OM)
which, together with ash, comprise soot. This atmospheric
aging, which entails the condensation of secondary particulate
matter as well as the oxidation of the primary OM and BC
emissions, is currently poorly understood.</p>
    <p>In this study, atmospheric aging of wood-stove soot aerosols
was simulated in a continuous-flow reactor. The composition of
fresh and aged soot particles was measured in real time by a
dual-vaporizer aerosol-particle mass spectrometer (SP-AMS).
The dual-vaporizer SP-AMS provided information on the OM and BC components
of the soot as well as on refractory components internally mixed with BC.
By switching the
SP-AMS laser vaporizer off and using only the AMS thermal vaporizer (at
600 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), information on the OM component only was obtained.
In both modes, OM appeared to be generated
largely by cellulose and/or hemicellulose pyrolysis and was
only present in large amounts when new wood was added to the
stove.
In SP-AMS mode, BC signals otherwise dominated  the mass spectrum. These
signals consisted of ions related to refractory BC (rBC, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
oxygenated carbonaceous ions
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and water
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and related fragments).  The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, but not the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, was consistent with the
BC-structure trends of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.1"/>.  The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals likely originated from BC surface
groups: upon aging, both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased relative to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simultaneously increased relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Factor analysis (positive matrix factorization) of SP-AMS and AMS data,
using a modified error model to address peak-integration
uncertainties, indicated that the surface composition of the BC
was approximately constant across all stages of combustion for
both fresh and aged samples.  These results represent the first
time-resolved measurements of in situ BC surface aging and
suggest that the surface of beech-wood BC may be modelled as a
single chemical species.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Soot particles formed during the combustion of organic fuels
are a major source of particulate matter (PM) from diesel engines,
open burning, and biofuel heating and cooking
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.2"/>. The black carbon (BC) in soot particles is
highly light absorbing, with a radiative forcing potentially
comparable to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.3"/>.
However, the magnitude of the radiative absorption remains highly
uncertain due to uncertainties related to the role of
atmospheric coatings of non-refractory PM (NR-PM) on
BC-containing particles. Such coatings may enhance light
absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx98" id="paren.4"/>, cloud interactions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx89" id="paren.5"/>, and/or alter the
deposition rates and thus atmospheric distribution
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.6"/> of BC-containing particles.  The
formation and composition of coatings on soot particles is
therefore a topic of major current interest
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx89" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p>In addition to their role in climate, freshly formed soot
particles have been associated with negative impacts on vascular,
cardiopulmonary, and respiratory health
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.8"/> as well as lung cancer
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx120" id="paren.9"/>. Multiple studies have shown
that ozonolysis enhances the apparent toxicity of soot or BC
particles
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.10"/>.
However, the mechanisms behind these effects remain
unclear. While the organic PM component (OM) may play a role
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.11"/>, BC toxicity generally persists after
washing in both polar and non-polar solvents
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx96" id="paren.12"/>. This suggests that
the responsible species are either very strongly adsorbed or
chemically contiguous with the BC surface
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.13"/>; we refer to these species as “BC
surface groups”. The composition of such surface groups is
expected to vary widely between samples, fuel type, and
combustion conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.14"/>.</p>
      <p>BC surface groups are formed during in-flame oxidation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx128 bib1.bibx135 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.15"/> or
reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or other oxidants soon after
emission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx128 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.16"/>.
Offline analyses have measured oxygenated BC surface groups on BC
from diesel engines, aircraft turbines, wood combustion,
diffusion flames, and even particles formed after the
spark vaporization of graphite in argon
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx125 bib1.bibx140 bib1.bibx147 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.17"/>.
These surface groups have been identified as containing
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and/or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups using
FTIR
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx125 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.18"/>
and NEXAFS
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx140 bib1.bibx147" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p>The ubiquity of oxygenated surface groups on fresh BC surfaces
does not mean that fresh soot particles will appear hydrophilic
on a macroscopic scale. For example, fresh soot particles do not
generally activate as cloud-condensation nuclei (CCN) under
atmospherically relevant conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx136" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  Instead, BC surface groups may
present sites for molecular adsorption, with consequences for the
heterogeneous chemistry of soot particles
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.21"/>.  This heterogeneous chemistry includes
the health effects discussed above, as well as the reaction of
soot particles with trace gases in the atmosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.22"/>.  In particular, the heterogeneous
reaction of photoactivated BC surface species with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and surface-adsorbed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may produce enough
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to contribute significantly to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the urban atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p>In addition to BC, aerosols emitted by combustion commonly
contain OM and inorganic ash <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx134" id="paren.24"/>.
Combustion-emitted organics are a major global source of primary
OM from both natural and anthropogenic sources
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.25"/> and may vary widely in composition
depending on the fuel and combustion process.  For biomass
combustion in particular, the composition of OM varies
considerably between fuels and combustion conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx121 bib1.bibx115 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx142 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.26"/>.
For example, the same fuel burnt in the same stove may emit
organics of different composition and in different amounts,
depending on factors such as air flow and stove temperature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
      <p>The organics emitted during biomass combustion are typically
semivolatile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.28"/> and partition
dynamically between the gas and particle phases of an aerosol.
Atmospheric oxidation of these organics may increase their degree
of oxygenation, altering the ability of aerosol particles to take
up water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx147" id="paren.29"/> and/or act as CCN
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.30"/>.  Oxidation may also lower the vapour
pressures of primary organic emissions, decrease their vapour
pressure, and lead to their condensation as OM within hours of
emission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx139" id="paren.31"/>.
Such OM enhancement has been consistently observed for aged
wood-stove emissions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.32"/>.  For
open-biomass-burning emissions, OM enhancements are much more
variable and often negligible
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.33"/>.</p>
      <p>Residential biomass combustion is a significant component of
global anthropogenic combustion emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.34"/> and
has been named the largest OM source in Europe
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.35"/>.  This OM, together with co-emitted BC,
may dominate other wintertime pollution sources outside of cities
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx131 bib1.bibx132 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.36"/>.
Residential biomass combustion is commonly performed using
logwood stoves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.37"/>, which may produce
particles with a toxicity comparable to or worse than that of
diesel-exhaust particles for normal or poor combustion,
respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.38"/>.  An understanding of the
initial and aged composition of these pollutants is therefore
essential for the understanding and regulation of their emission
with regard to their health and climate effects.</p>
      <p>This study evaluates the composition of BC and OM in soot formed
by combustion in a modern wood stove both before and after
simulated atmospheric aging. The stove was operated under optimal
conditions using beech wood as the fuel. Beech is one of the
major forest trees in Europe
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.39"/>, and its wood is
commonly purchased or gathered for combustion as a heating or
cooking fuel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="paren.40"/>.</p>
      <p>An online, dual-vaporizer soot-particle mass spectrometer was
used to characterize the fresh and aged soot. As described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>, the Soot-Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (SP-AMS) vaporizer allowed
entire soot particle to be examined whereas the AMS vaporizer
detected only the NR-PM component (mostly OM). Thus the coatings
and composition of the soot could be studied. Data with the
SP-AMS laser on are referred to as “SP-AMS measurements” below;
with the laser off data are referred to as “AMS measurements”.</p>
      <p>The data were analyzed using two approaches. First, selected ions
and representative mass spectra were investigated. Second, factor
analysis was used to obtain 3–4 representative factors to
allow the entire SP-AMS and AMS data sets to be succinctly
described and compared. The results are then discussed in terms
of BC surface oxidation, OM composition, potassium content, and
particulate water content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Experimental</title>
      <p>The experimental setup used here has been detailed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.41"/>. Beech-wood logs (<italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic>)
were burnt in a modern logwood stove (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kW</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Rüegg Mars,
Switzerland) according to official Swiss type-approval protocols
at the officially certified testing facility of the University of
Northwestern Switzerland (Swiss register STS 396, European
register NB 2113). The stove was operated by facility personnel
resulting in burns that were, relative to household usage, extremely reproducible.</p>
      <p>Wood logs were added to the stove in batches of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see inset of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The first
batch of each measurement day was ignited using a small amount of
tinder (a commercial product containing paraffin wax with the
appearance of wood wool) and kindling (small pieces of wood). The
tinder and kindling were placed on top of the first batch of wood
logs, which therefore burnt top-down.  Subsequent batches were
allowed to self-ignite upon the embers of the previous batch,
burning bottom-up.  In both cases, the stove operator increased
the airflow into the stove at the beginning of each burn to
facilitate the onset of flaming combustion. The consequential
increase in dilution was corrected for in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.42"/>
but not herein, for reasons discussed below.</p>
      <p>Wood-combustion emissions were directed through an indoor chimney
where a heated sampling line (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>433</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) extracted samples
for analysis. After eightfold dilution, samples were either
measured as is, oxidized (see below), or
filtered and oxidized
for a given burn.
The discussion below focusses on the first
case (fresh emissions) and oxidized case (aged
emissions).</p>
      <p>Aging was performed using the Micro-Smog Chamber
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.43"><named-content content-type="pre">MSC,</named-content></xref>.  The MSC is described in detail
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.44"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.45"/>, so only a brief
description is given here.  The reactor consists of three
UV-grade quartz tubes totalling only <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 225 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
volume.  Losses of particles and low-volatility gases to the
UV-heated MSC walls are expected to be negligible
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.46"/>.  Aerosols entering the MSC are exposed to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of UVC irradiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>254</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>185</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission lines) generated by five low-pressure
mercury lamps (Heraeus, type GPH212T5VH/2), forming
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and subsequently
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from background water vapour. In the second tube,
30 W of UVA radiates from a high-pressure halogen lamp
(Panacol-Elosol, type UV-H 255) to drive further <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
chemistry. Some NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> + <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry
is also possible depending on the combustion emissions. The last
MSC tube allows the aerosol to cool slightly while reaction
continues. Some experiments were performed with the intermediate
UVA tube removed, resulting in no observed differences in this
study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.47"/>.  For this study, OH exposures were
estimated at roughly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
based on follow-up experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.48"/>.
This represents an extreme upper limit for atmospheric OH exposure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Soot-Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer</title>
      <p>The SP-AMS used in this study is an HR-ToF-AMS (hereafter
shortened to AMS) equipped with a switchable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1064</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
continuous-wave soot-particle vaporization module
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.49"/>. The SP module was switched on and off
periodically, whereas the AMS vaporizer (described below)
remained on continuously. Thus the data reported here represent
either standard AMS measurements or dual-vaporizer
SP-AMS measurements. Here, we use these terms to indicate
the laser state where relevant, also referring to the
instrument itself as the SP-AMS.</p>
      <p>The design of the SP-AMS has been described in detail elsewhere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.50"/>.  In brief, the instrument samples
aerosol through an aerodynamic lens, which efficiently focusses
particles with aerodynamic diameters between
approximately 60 and 600 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into a narrow beam. The lens opens
into a vacuum-pumped chamber, where gas expansion accelerates
particles to their size-dependent terminal velocity. Particles
then transit a sizing chamber to be vaporized within an
ionization chamber. Vaporization is achieved by a switchable
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1064</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continuous-wave laser (SP-AMS mode) or
by impaction upon a porous-tungsten thermal vaporizer held at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>873</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>600</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; AMS mode).</p>
      <p>In SP-AMS mode, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1064</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> light-absorbing refractory PM
(LR-PM) is
heated to vaporization by the continuous-wave laser.
Due to this heating, any internally mixed material which is refractory below
the LR-PM vaporization temperature may also be vaporized. In this study, the
LR-PM was rBC, which vaporizes at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx100" id="paren.51"/>, so that NR-PM (here mostly
OM; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.52"/>), ash, or BC surface functionalities
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.53"/> are vaporized when internally mixed with rBC. NR-PM
that is not internally mixed with rBC will pass through the SP-AMS laser and
be vaporized on the AMS thermal vaporizer.
In AMS mode, only NR-PM is vaporized.
In both cases, the vapour is ionized by electron
impact. The resulting ions are mass analyzed by pulsed
extraction into an ion-time-of-flight chamber.</p>
      <p>The SP-AMS can provide free-molecular-regime aerodynamic-size
measurements by modulating the sampled particle beam with a
mechanical “chopper” and monitoring the time taken for
signals to be
observed (particle time-of-flight, or PToF,
mode). In this study, PToF data were accumulated over
15–20 s min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  and were further averaged before
analysis. For the remainder of each minute, mass spectrum
(MS) mode data were acquired by removing the chopper entirely
(“open” position) for 5 s of particle-beam
measurements, then replacing it entirely (“closed” position)
for 5 s of background measurements. The closed signals
were subtracted from the corresponding open signals after data
analysis (described below).
Using a camera, the laser was observed to stabilize after roughly
5 s when switching on (going from AMS to SP-AMS mode) and almost
instantly when switching off (vice versa). So, since each chopper cycle began
with a closed measurement (no rBC), no additional wait time was specified
when switching the laser on or off.
The ion-time-of-flight chamber was
operated in single-reflectron “V” mode with a resolution of
4200 at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91. This mode was sufficient for the unambiguous
distinction and determination of elemental composition for
virtually all ions, with exceptions discussed below.  In SP-AMS
mode, the instrument was operated in two separate mass-spectral
configurations, one of which extended to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to monitor
for the fullerene-ion signals that have been previously
observed
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.54"/>.
No fullerenic signals were observed, so these data are not
presented.
Therefore, in the data presented below, one SP-AMS measurement is available
for every two AMS measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>SP-AMS and AMS data analysis</title>
      <p>Ion signals in the SP-AMS/AMS were identified and integrated
using a modified version of the open-source PIKA software
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx129" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">version 1.10H;</named-content></xref> as well as custom code
written in Igor Pro (version 6.2 and 6.3; WaveMetrics, OR,
USA).  Two major modifications were made to PIKA.  First, the
robustness of the peak-shape and peak-width-calibration
determinations were improved as described in the Supplement.
Second, peak-integration uncertainties were estimated as
discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.56"/> and described briefly in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{$\chem{CO^{{+}}}$} signals}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals</title>
      <p>Special attention was given to the ions
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are
sensitive to interferences from background <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and are normally estimated from the
signal at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.57"/>.</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were directly quantified in PIKA as
described in detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.58"/>.
That is, the height of an empirically defined pseudo-Gaussian peak was
fitted simultaneously to each of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
fitted pseudo-Gaussians were constrained in position by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration
and in width by a peak-width calibration.
While these signals
normally suffer from poor resolution from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the current mass spectrometer was able to resolve the two peaks when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were very high <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre">above 1000 counts per second;
</named-content></xref>. As shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and in more detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.60"/>, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fits resulted in reproducible
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for each experiment. In the aged
experiment, this ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.22</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the AMS; in the
filtered-and-aged experiment not discussed herein <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">see
</named-content></xref>, this ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.86</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the AMS. These values
are consistent with literature-observed ratios of 0.9–1.25
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.62"/> and are discussed further in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.63"/>.
The
possibility that other unidentified ions remained
poorly resolved from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very unlikely, as
also described in that publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Gas-phase interferences at ${\chem{CO^{{+}}}}$ and at ${\chem{CO_{2}^{{+}}}}$}?><title>Gas-phase interferences at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Gas-phase interferences at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were corrected for using
filtered-aerosol measurements taken periodically throughout each experiment.
This method has been detailed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.64"/>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
correction was smaller than that needed for atmospheric measurements due to
the factor-of-200 dilution by synthetic air (80 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
20 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 99.999 % purity), and the correction factor was
dynamically scaled by continuous gas-phase carbon-dioxide measurements. The
resulting correction factor was 7–15 % of the measured
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals (interquartile range, both experiments) and
depended on the stage of combustion.</p>
      <p>Gas-phase interferences at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were not corrected for. The high
modified combustion efficiency (MCE) during these experiments meant that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were much
smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, especially during the periods when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be quantified. In particular, for the periods when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were high enough to be quantified (due to the
peak-fitting limitations described above) the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correction
factor was 0.6–2 % (interquartile range, both experiments). These
periods corresponded to MCE values greater than 0.97, so the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correction
factor would have been less than &lt; 3 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
correction factor (note that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were generally higher
than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when quantifiable). This correction would be
negligible relative to the uncertainty in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the fit
described above.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Time series for the fresh beech-wood-combustion experiment. Selected
SP-AMS (solid lines with circles) and AMS (dashed lines) data are
shown in nitrate-equivalent mass (proportional to ion counts). Error
bars are smaller than the data symbols. The uppermost panel shows
gas-phase <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the chimney (proportional
to combustion rate), shaded by the modified combustion efficiency (MCE). The second-from-top
panel shows the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio (green: AMS; red: SP-AMS), which was constant for the AMS (dashed line shows the result of a linear regression of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Shaded regions exemplify “starting” (green shading) and “flaming”
(red shading) phases, defined using the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/11885/2015/acp-15-11885-2015-f01.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Time series for the aged beech-wood-combustion experiment. All
traces
are analogous to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> but are scaled differently.
Note especially the change of scale for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In this experiment, the second batch of wood failed to start (grey
shading), causing OM concentrations tenfold greater than normal.
This
especially increased the signal at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (a
tracer ion for holocellulose pyrolysis), which has been plotted off-scale
during that period to allow features at other times to be visible.
The MCE during this period was also off-scale, with mean
0.82.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/11885/2015/acp-15-11885-2015-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Water signals</title>
      <p>The ions H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were not quantifiable
in MS mode due to interferences from background water. That
these three ions originated from water, and not from the
fragmentation of other molecules, was confirmed with the ratios
of particulate (PToF) signals at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.65"/>,
which was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both AMS and SP-AMS.  The proportion of
this water signal originating from the thermal decomposition of
OM was estimated in proportion to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
assuming a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,
based on laboratory measurements of fulvic acid
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.66"/> and smog-chamber secondary OM
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx130 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.67"/>.  However, the
molecular composition of fresh wood-smoke aerosols is
considerably different from such OM, containing an abundance of
aldehydic, phenolic, and alcoholic functional groups from
lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx121 bib1.bibx122 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.68"/>.
This chemical composition and the high
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of the present sample
(discussed below) suggest that this <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is likely to
be biased low.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>Potassium signals</title>
      <p>SP-AMS and AMS signals are generally proportional to vaporized
particulate mass due to the two-step vaporization/ionization
process in the instrument.  However, species with especially
lower ionization potentials such as potassium may undergo
one-step thermal ionization during the vaporization process
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.69"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  Due to this unique
ionization mechanism, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions are normally observed
with a unique distribution of kinetic energies, i.e., a
uniquely broad peak shape in the mass spectrum.  This means
that the peak-integration routines programmed into PIKA are not
applicable to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Potassium-ion signals were
therefore estimated as the total, baseline-subtracted signal at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn> 39</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minus the PIKA-fitted
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) signal for the two ions
which fell within that range, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The closed background
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>) obtained in this way was
subtracted from the analogous open signal.  The unique
behaviour of potassium ions in this study provides validation
that all other ions, including those from BC, underwent
two-step vaporization/ionization in the SP-AMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5">
  <title>Particle collection efficiencies (CEs)</title>
      <p>For SP-AMS and AMS signals to be quantified, the
efficiency by which particles of different size, composition, and morphology
are vaporized must be known. This efficiency relies on (i) the transmission
of particles from sample to vaporizer, and (ii) the successful vaporization
of transmitted particles.</p>
      <p>The geometry of the AMS and its thermal vaporizer has been designed such that
point (i) above is negligible for particles of aerodynamic diameter between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>600</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.70"/>. For such particles, the CE of the AMS is governed by the
probability of particle bounce at the thermal-vaporizer surface
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.71"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
As discussed extensively in a separate publication <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.72"/>, we
evaluated the available literature on wood-combustion OM to arrive at a CE of
1.0 for both fresh and aged emissions.</p>
      <p>Point (ii) above is negligible for BC-containing particles as the laser power
is normally operated in a regime of excess power <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.73"/>.
However, point (i) above is not negligible <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="text.74"/>, because
the SP-AMS laser vaporizer is physically smaller than the AMS thermal
vaporizer (with an estimated 40 % less effective area;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.75"/>).</p>
      <p>Thus, point (i) may lead to a negative SP-AMS bias if particles are too
small to be adequately focussed into the SP-AMS laser beam. In this context,
small refers to the aerodynamic size of the particles, which is a function of
particle volume, morphology, and density. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="text.76"/> demonstrated
that particle focussing is an issue for the SP-AMS for nebulized carbon-black
particles of mobility diameter 200 nm. Although the aerodynamic diameter of
those particles was not reported, this is a relatively large size when
considering freshly formed soot <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx127" id="paren.77"/>, and so the effects
observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="text.78"/> also apply to this study. Moreover,
nebulized carbon black is likely to have a significantly smaller dynamic
shape factor than the freshly formed fractal-like soot <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.79"/>
emitted by flames and combustion engines and likely emitted during the
present experiments.</p>
      <p>We thus expect that particle focussing lends a significant bias to the
SP-AMS signals in this study, corresponding to a CE less than unity for the
SP-AMS. However, the present particles were generally small relative to the
lower limit of the SP-AMS aerodynamic lens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">as discussed further for
this data set in</named-content></xref>, so that coating of these particles by
secondary OM would likely change their ability to be focussed into the SP-AMS
laser. In addition, particle morphology is expected to change significantly
within burns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.81"/>. A single collection efficiency based
on an external rBC mass reference, as has been applied in previous SP-AMS
studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.82"/>,
would therefore not be possible. A time-resolved collection efficiency would
require the assumption of internal mixing, and a reference instrument was in
any case not available. Below, we focus instead on the changing SP-AMS
signals and their relationship to AMS signals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS6">
  <title>Relative ionization efficiencies (RIEs)</title>
      <p>RIEs were applied to the
SP-AMS and AMS data to represent variations in the instrumental
sensitivity to different species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.83"/>. The RIE
is the efficiency with which a given gas molecule is ionized
relative to the AMS calibration standard, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in ammonium nitrate.</p>
      <p>The RIE(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was set to 0.2 based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="text.84"/>. This is
likely an underestimate as it was derived without accounting for the SP-AMS
CE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="paren.85"/> and because it did not account for refractory
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species (rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.86"/>). However, in
the absence of additional information on the SP-AMS CE (see above), we have
used this RIE to provide an estimate of the relative intensity of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
signals in the mass spectra shown below.</p>
      <p>The RIE(OM) was set to 1.4 based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.87"/>. This
value was extrapolated to RIE(rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) because
both OM and rBC yield molecular <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon thermal decomposition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.88"/>.  Although the SP-AMS sensitivity to BC
surface groups has not been established experimentally, it
appears to be higher than that of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on
the fact that the raw signals of rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were much
higher than those of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study.  These
high signals indicate that RIE(rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) &gt; RIE(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),  since rBC is, by definition,
composed primarily of graphitic carbon
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx110" id="paren.89"/> and since rBC
particles are completely vaporized in the SP-AMS
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.90"/>.  In addition, the assumed
RIE(rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 1.4 implies an elemental
composition of about 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> oxygen in the BC,
consistent with elemental analyses from the literature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.91"/>.  However, this
value should be carefully validated before being used for mass
quantification.</p>
      <p>The SP-AMS and AMS RIE(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are likely different
given that potassium was thermally ionized and that the
temperatures experienced by potassium in the SP-AMS and AMS
vaporizers are different.  For the AMS, an RIE(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
of 2.9 has been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.92"/>,
while no data are available for the SP-AMS. To reflect a lack
of information, RIE(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was simply set to unity.</p>
      <p>All other ions discussed below are considered organic and
therefore assigned an RIE of 1.4 in PIKA. SP-AMS signals were
not calibrated to mass in this study because the fraction of
rBC focussed into the laser is dependent on soot-particle shape
and coating
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx144" id="paren.93"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>SP-AMS and AMS uncertainty
analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Application of new positive matrix factorization (PMF) error model</title>
      <p>Independent of peak-overlap uncertainties, peak integration in PIKA leads to
a constant relative imprecision (fractional imprecision) which is expected to
be approximately constant for a given peak in a given data set
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.94"/>. Peak-integration imprecisions arise from (i)
peak-width-calibration imprecision and (ii) peak-fitting imprecisions that
arise due to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-calibration biases (i.e., the finite mass <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>accuracy<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>
of the instrument) and  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-calibration imprecisions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.95"/>.</p>
      <p>Although peak-fitting imprecisions may become much larger for overlapping
peaks relative to isolated peaks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.96"/>, peak
overlap was not addressed quantitatively here (the final details of the
method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.97"/>, were not yet available). We have applied a simplified
approach by assuming an approximately constant value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 % for
(ii) above, which was estimated from the Monte-Carlo-estimated fitting
imprecision for isolated peaks in the present data set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.98"/>.</p>
      <p>For (i) above, we used the measured imprecision of in our peak-width
calibration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.99"/>.  The quadratic sum of these
fractional uncertainties,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>4.7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %, gave the peak-integration uncertainty, as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.100"/>.</p>
      <p>This percentage peak-integration uncertainties were combined in
quadrature with a Poisson uncertainty term to yield an
uncertainty model which is dominated by ion-counting
uncertainty for low signals and by peak-integration
uncertainties for high signals
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.101"><named-content content-type="pre">for this data set, those greater than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 counts per second
for a given peak; </named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Additional uncertainties</title>
      <p>In addition to the error model discussed above, additional
uncertainties were assigned to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for various physical reasons, as shown
in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.  These additional uncertainties
were only calculated for ions which were of significant signal
in the mass spectrum.  Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> also shows the
default uncertainties for above-detection-limit
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.102"/> and below-detection-limit
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx137" id="paren.103"/> signals.</p>
      <p>The increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit accounts for the
failure of the PIKA peak-integration algorithm to integrate
peaks below a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> “detection limit” caused
by the neighbouring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal.  This behaviour
is expected for peaks with a very small intensity relative to
an overlapping peak <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.104"/>.  The validity of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above this DL was confirmed by their linear
variation with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the AMS, with slopes
fully consistent with the literature as detailed elsewhere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.105"/>. To address this detection limit,
backgrounds were subtracted prior to fitting (“Diff” mode in
PIKA) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reversing the normal procedure
(i.e., “OminusC” mode in PIKA). An uncertainty of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was assigned to below-DL values according
to common practice in the PMF community
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.106"/>, although the
results were not sensitive to the chosen value. Below-DL values
were not replaced since this was not a detection limit in the
conventional sense.  The additional uncertainty in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals due to their overlapping with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.107"/> was
not modelled.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>AMS and SP-AMS uncertainties <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> used in this study and their detection
limits (DLs). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate of counts of
ion <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
normalized to its maximum value; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
abundance of an ion <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to its most abundant isotopologue;
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant determined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as discussed
in the text.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.93}[.93]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Signal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Uncertainty</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rationale</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Default</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>counting</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Combined poisson and peak-integration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>counting</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> ion.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">uncertainties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.108"/>.</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Higher-than-normal DL due to poor</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">resolution from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fit to the overlapping <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">constrained by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fit to the overlapping <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">constrained by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Interference by tailing of extremely</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">high SP-AMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals from rBC.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 29) was increased to
reflect the fact that the signal intensity of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 29) was constrained by the signal
intensity at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 28) in PIKA using a
relative abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predicted according to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.109"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx129" id="paren.110"/>. In contrast to the
majority of isotopically constrained fits, the actual
uncertainty of the signal assigned to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
therefore very large relative to the initially estimated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty. To account for this,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was added in quadrature
to the original uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 
<xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).  This procedure provides only a rough
estimate of the true uncertainty, as it assumes that the
uncertainty <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent
of the constrained-fit procedure, which is generally not true
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.111"/>.</p>
      <p>The uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suffered from a
constrained <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fit, similarly to the case
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and was treated
similarly.</p>
      <p>The final ion in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was overestimated in the presence of
high SP-AMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals.  This overestimation was
made apparent by examining background mass
spectra (chopper blocking the particle beam), in which
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were negligible
but <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals remained.
These background
spectra were used to estimate a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was highest. This simple estimate was
represented numerically as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
scaled by the time series of SP-AMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
subtracted from the SP-AMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals.
The corresponding uncertainty was estimated according to this
subtraction, which is considered a reasonable estimate since
the influence of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> background on the peak
shape appeared to be negligible, by inspection.  No
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>41</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interference was observed so no changes
were made at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 41. Similarly, AMS potassium signals (i.e.,
when the SP laser was off) were too low for interference from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be an issue.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization</title>
      <p>PMF assumes that a matrix of data can be explained by a linear
combination of factors with characteristic profiles and varying
temporal contributions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx137" id="paren.112"/>. The
PMF model has been widely and successfully applied to AMS data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx149" id="paren.113"/>.  Applying PMF to
AMS or SP-AMS data entails the assumption that the overall mass
spectrum can be described by a small number of characteristic
mass spectra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx149" id="paren.114"/>,
which is evaluated during PMF analysis by inspection of the
model residuals
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx149" id="paren.115"/>.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>PMF analysis was conducted using the PMF Evaluation Tool
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx149" id="paren.116"/>.  Before analysis, signals
were integrated and exported using the peak-integration
approach and new uncertainty model described in the Supplement
and in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>.  Ash signals, defined as
ions containing Cl, Si, K, or other metals, were excluded from
the model.  The number of PMF factors used, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, was chosen
based on the degree to which the model improved with increased
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as evaluated by the structure of model residuals in
temporal and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> space. In general, increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> beyond the
values presented herein only served to better explain spikes in
OM concentration at the start of each burn. Therefore, the
conclusions discussed below are insensitive to the chosen <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The large number of zeroes in this data set meant that
ambiguity due to possible linear transformations of the PMF
solution (“rotational ambiguity”) was negligible in this data
set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx108" id="paren.117"/>.  Similarly, there was no
evidence for local minima (see Supplement).</p>
      <p>The large range of signals observed in the present study led
PMF to report “unique factors” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="paren.118"/> containing
a single ion such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when using the old
uncertainty model. This was corrected by the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.119"/> uncertainty model
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>), which provides a more even
weighting for high and low signals.  We note that the linear
uncertainty term in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.120"/> model is similar
to the ad hoc “C3” parameter of PMF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.121"><named-content content-type="post">labelled “model
error” in PET</named-content></xref>.  The difference is that
the value of the linear uncertainty term was estimated from the
data, and that it was added in quadrature rather than linearly
to the pre-existing Poisson uncertainties, since its physical
origin is independent of counting uncertainties
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.122"/>.</p>
      <p>The new uncertainty model also generally reduced
signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) such that previous outliers (in
weighted-residual space) from major ions such as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became more comparable
to other species.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.123"/> show that such
outliers may arise purely from the omission of a linear
uncertainty term when such an uncertainty exists. The outliers
therefore do not indicate measurement errors, peak-integration
errors, or transient signals.  The new uncertainty model also
increased the number of “weak” variables, defined as having
SNR below 2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106 bib1.bibx137" id="paren.124"/>, which were
downweighted by a factor of 2. No variables were “bad” in
the sense of having SNR &lt; 0.2
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.125"/>. Additional details on the PMF
analysis, including residual plots, are available in the
Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Temporal evolution of burns</title>
      <p>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> illustrate
the temporal evolution of the fresh and aged emissions using
selected SP-AMS and AMS marker ions. Also shown in the figure
is the pre-dilution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, which is
proportional to the combustion rate. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
also indicates the airflow into the chimney, which implicitly
dilutes the emissions to a varying degree. Following the
addition of a batch of wood (black arrows along the abscissa),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases rapidly (“starting phase”)
before reaching a relatively stable level (“flaming phase”)
and finally dying off (“smouldering phase” with negligible
emissions).</p>
      <p>During the starting phase, the wood was only partially aflame,
typically in only one region. Both fresh
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) and aged (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>)
OM emissions were highest during this phase.  The degree of
oxidation and emission factors of this OM has been reported in
detail elsewhere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.126"/>.</p>
      <p>The starting-phase OM emissions are illustrated by the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. This ion is correlated with
cellulose/hemicellulose pyrolysis products such as levoglucosan
and other anhydrosugars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.127"/> and its signal spiked
when each batch of wood was added (black arrows on the
abscissa) and died away thereafter. Similar trends were seen
for the oxidized emissions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), although
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal was much lower in that
case. The SP-AMS and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were
not always well correlated, as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>.</p>
      <p>The starting phase ended once flames had completely engulfed
the wood.  In this “flaming phase” most volatilized organics
were destroyed in the flames such that emissions were comprised
of little OM but significant amounts of refractory black carbon. This is illustrated in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion, which in the
SP-AMS represents rBC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.128"/>.</p>
      <p>Black carbon was not the only SP-AMS species observed during
the flaming phase. Signals from two other species,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), remained extremely high
during this phase (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).  These signals dropped to negligible
levels in the AMS (dashed lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>),
confirming that they were generated from LR-PM particles.
Although high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were only observed in the SP-AMS,
relatively high CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were observed in both AMS and SP-AMS.
These signals therefore appear to have originated from both OM and rBC.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for these signals provided
a useful metric of comparison between SP-AMS and AMS across
burn periods. In the AMS, this ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
fresh emissions but <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aged emissions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.129"/>. This latter ratio is in good agreement
with observations of atmospherically oxidized OM
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.130"><named-content content-type="pre">0.9–1.25,</named-content></xref>, indicating a relative increase
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the thermal degradation of
oxidation-formed carboxylic acids or peroxides on the AMS
vaporizer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.131"/>. In contrast, the phenols, alcohols,
and aldehydes that are abundant in fresh wood
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx121 bib1.bibx122" id="paren.132"/> are more
likely to yield <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when
vaporized, giving the high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>3.92</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The SP-AMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was not different
from the AMS ratio during the starting phases
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) nor during
the filtered and oxidized experiment (not shown). This suggests
that OM fragmentation in the SP-AMS and AMS was comparable, at
least in terms of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments.</p>
      <p>In contrast to the OM-dominated starting phase, the SP-AMS
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increased significantly during
the flaming phase, increasing from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
fresh case and from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the oxidized case.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Fresh-emissions SP-AMS and AMS mass spectra for the starting-phase
(highest OM emissions) and flaming-phase (lowest OM emissions, high
BC emissions, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) beech-combustion experiments.
All signals have been scaled by representative RIEs.
The estimated signals at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
have been estimated from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) and therefore plotted with thinner bars.
The insets show photographs of a typical burn.
The mean and standard deviation of the MCE over the averaged period of time
is included. Note the changes of
scale in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>.
In panel <bold>(d)</bold>, no <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is shown as that species was
below its detection limit (2.4 units).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/11885/2015/acp-15-11885-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>SP-AMS and AMS mass spectra</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Fresh emissions</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows SP-AMS and AMS carbonaceous-ion
mass spectra for the starting- and flaming-phase periods of the
fresh-emissions experiment that are highlighted in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Ions are coloured according to
their oxygen content, and signals at integer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are stacked
for clarity. Ash species such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the most
intense ion), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zn</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (all
low intensity) were excluded since these species are not
susceptible to oxidation in the MSC.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Aged-emissions SP-AMS and AMS mass spectra for the starting-phase
(highest OM emissions) and flaming-phase (lowest OM emissions, high
BC emissions) beech-combustion experiments, in analogy to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.
Note the change of scale in panel <bold>(d)</bold>.
The estimated signals at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
have been estimated from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) and therefore plotted with thinner
bars. In panel <bold>(d)</bold>, no <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is shown as that species
was below its detection limit (2.4 units).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/11885/2015/acp-15-11885-2015-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>PMF factors for fresh-emissions data. The left column shows SP-AMS
factor time series (black) together with AMS time series (blue) and
selected SP-AMS tracer ions (symbols). The right column and insets shows
the corresponding SP-AMS factor mass spectra using the same colour
scheme as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>: black ions are carbon clusters,
green ions are hydrocarbon fragments, and pink/purple are more- or
less-oxygenated carbon-containing ions. The right-column blue symbols
show the AMS mass spectra for data <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.1 %)
of the spectrum in the main panel (or inset). Signals for <bold>(c)</bold> POM–Start
are drawn off-scale to show key structural features.
In the mass spectra of <bold>(b)</bold>, no <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is shown as that
species was below its detection limit (see text).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/11885/2015/acp-15-11885-2015-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The SP-AMS and AMS mass spectra in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b are similar during the starting phase when
OM was highest. This explains why the SP-AMS
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in
Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> are similar
to the AMS ratios.</p>
      <p>In contrast to the starting phase, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c and d show that the flaming-phase PM consisted
mostly of refractory PM.  The AMS signals during this phase
were negligible. (Note that the ordinate maximum of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d is 2 orders of magnitude smaller than
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c.) Thus the SP-AMS mass spectrum shows
that the rBC particles yielded C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from refractory
species.</p>
      <p>The other major signals in the flaming-phase SP-AMS mass
spectrum are the carbon-cluster ions C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Another study by our group
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.133"/> found that the ratios between these ions
was indicative of the underlying structure of the rBC, with rBC
particles that generated fullerenic ions having
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios close to and other
samples having <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios below
0.8. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio observed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, where AMS signals are negligible, is
close to unity. This is an exception to the trends observed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.134"/> and others
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.135"/>.  In contrast,
the more robust but lower-sensitivity ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was well within the
0.01–0.07 range reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.136"/>, for
both fresh and aged emissions.  The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and not the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should therefore be used in
source apportionment studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Aged emissions</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows mass spectra from the third
burn of the aged-emissions experiment. The overall trends
between SP-AMS and AMS are similar to those discussed in the
previous subsection.  However, both SP-AMS and AMS
starting-phase mass spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a and b, respectively) show relatively lower
signals from hydrocarbon fragments (green bars) and
relatively higher signals from CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions due to
oxidative functionalization of the OM.</p>
      <p>Similarly to the fresh-emissions case, flaming-phase
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were of comparable magnitude to
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals in the SP-AMS
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c). However, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased relative to both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating oxidation of the species which
generated CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  We note that surface oxidation
is not expected to significantly influence SP-AMS
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals, since these signals represent the
bulk composition of the solid rBC.  The chemical species
generating C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals
remained largely refractory after oxidation as indicated by
the AMS data, which are plotted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d with
an order-of-magnitude-smaller ordinate maximum.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization</title>
      <p>The discussion in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> highlighted
selected ions and mass spectra from selected time periods in
the burn cycle.  To generalize this discussion to the entire
mass spectrum and the entire burn cycle, PMF was performed on
the fresh and aged data. The utility of PMF was to reduce <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>399</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured ions in over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> mass spectra to 3–4 “factors”
with mass spectra and time series describing &gt; 92 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of the variance in the data. (Over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
variance would have been explained had the failed-start burn
been excluded.) These PMF factors are discussed below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Fresh emissions</title>
      <p>With the exception of BC factors, each fresh SP-AMS PMF factor
had an analogous factor in the AMS data. This is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a–c.  Each panel in the figure shows
the time series for each PMF factor in black (SP-AMS) or blue
(AMS). The smoothness of each factor time series should not be
compared because only half as many SP-AMS data were available
as for the AMS (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). The time series
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> also include arbitrarily scaled raw
signals of selected ions.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a shows the first PMF factor,
“Fresh–BC”, with a mass spectrum similar to the SP-AMS
flaming-phase mass spectrum (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The mass
spectrum is plotted following the scheme introduced in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. The time series of this factor closely
followed that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> except during spikes in
concentration.  These exceptions may reflect a change in
instrument response, for example due to detector
saturation. Alternatively, they may reflect a change in PM
composition, for example due to the wood logs shifting position
during combustion (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a, inset) and
causing a transient change in rBC composition.</p>
      <p>The observation of both CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals in the Fresh–BC factor suggests that the
two species originated from the same physical source
(see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).
To test
whether the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might have been attributed to a
separate factor from C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with more PMF factors,
we increased the number of PMF factors as high as 10. The
result was two separate C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing factors,
both of which remained associated with CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a
similar manner to Fresh–BC. This suggests that these two
species were physically related, possibly originating from a
single process in the combustion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>PMF factors for aged-emissions data. Panels are analogous to
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>.
Signals for <bold>(c)</bold> OOM–Start are drawn off-scale to show key structural
features. Time series <bold>(d)</bold> is plotted on a log-scale due to its low
intensity, with an axis minimum of the OM limit of detection <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In the mass spectra of <bold>(d)</bold>, no <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is shown as that
species was below its detection limit (see text).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/11885/2015/acp-15-11885-2015-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The next factor in the figure is “POM–Flame”
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b).  This primary OM factor is
named for its sustained signal during the flaming phase
discussed above, though it is important to note that the other
OM factor (“POM–Start”) was simultaneously present at
comparable intensity.</p>
      <p>POM–Flame was better correlated with the alkyl ion
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) than with
the pyrolysis tracer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The SP-AMS
mass spectrum for this factor is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b.  An analogous AMS factor, with
similar temporal trend and mass spectrum, was also identified
and is included in the figure. The AMS mass spectrum is
included as the summed signal at integer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since one ion
typically dominated this sum, as shown by the coloured SP-AMS
signals. For simplicity, AMS data are only shown for signals
contributing &gt; 1 % (or &gt; 0.1 %) of the total in the
main panel (or inset) mass spectrum.</p>
      <p>The AMS and SP-AMS POM–Flame mass spectra were virtually
identical.  Both showed considerable amounts of large
hydrocarbon fragments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b,
inset). Neither POM–Flame spectra included <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
because the low concentrations of POM–Flame meant that this
ion was below its detection limit.</p>
      <p>The final factor in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, POM–Start,
contributed more to overall OM signals than POM–Flame and made
most of its contribution during the starting phase of each burn
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c).</p>
      <p>POM–Start was absent for the first burn, along with the
anhydrosugar tracer <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is most
likely because in the first burn combustion was initiated by
tinder placed atop the wood, whereas in subsequent burns
combustion was initiated from below by the hot embers of the
previous burn (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>).  Using
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a wood-combustion tracer in an
atmospheric context may therefore underestimate wood-combustion
emissions in some cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Aged emissions</title>
      <p>The aged-emissions PMF factors could be viewed as analogous to
the fresh-emissions results. The lesser signals at higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were reduced in each analogous aged mass spectrum, as expected
since highly oxidized species fragment during
vaporization/ionization to a much greater extent than reduced
ones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.137"/>.</p>
      <p>An Aged–BC factor was well correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a).  The Aged–BC mass spectrum was
dominated by the same C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions as the Fresh–BC but in different
relative intensities. The ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreased from 3.5 to 2.4 after aging, while the ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased from 5.4 to 3.5. The
source of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> therefore both increased and
became more oxidized following aging.
The absence of an analogous AMS factor suggested that the source of this
BC-associated CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained refractory after aging.</p>
      <p>An OOM–Flame (oxidized OM, flaming phase) factor analogous to
POM–Flame was also observed. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b shows that
this factor was well correlated with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer is much lower in intensity
than for the fresh-emissions case
(cf. Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) due to
its susceptibility to oxidative aging
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx124" id="paren.138"/>. However,
this reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intensity does
not invalidate its use as a pyrolysis tracer. The more-common
oxidized-OM tracer, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx148 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.139"/>,
was inappropriate in this case due to its confounding
refractory source in Aged–BC. The resulting ambiguity in the
interpretation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in BC-rich aerosols is
likely to be significant in atmospheric SP-AMS studies.</p>
      <p>The OOM–Start factor corresponded to higher OM loadings than,
and followed similar trends to, POM–Start. This factor was
present at extremely high loadings during the failed-start case
(off-scale in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c; re-plotted in
Fig. S2 in the Supplement).  Its signals at higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c, inset) were relatively higher than for
OOM–Flame, possibly because oxidation in the MSC was less
extensive when organic vapour concentrations were higher.</p>
      <p>The fourth aged-emissions factor was the tinder factor,
corresponding to the paraffin-soaked wood shavings used to
start the fire (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>) and to re-ignite
the failed-start burn (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>01</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
(Prior to this re-ignition, the air flow into the stove was
changed and the door was afterwards opened briefly.) The tinder
mass spectrum was dominated by hydrocarbon fragments
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  It also contained some
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and probably below-detection-limit
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to oxidation in the MSC.</p>
      <p>Note that tinder was also used at the beginning of the
fresh-emissions experiment, and an analogous PMF factor did initially
result for that experiment.
However, only the first two measurements of the fresh-emissions experiment
were strongly impacted by this contaminant.
To simplify the PMF model needed to describe the data, the first two
measurements of that experiment were downweighted threefold (see Supplement) for the fresh emissions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The measurements presented above provide evidence for the
presence and oxidative enhancement of refractory rBC surface
groups and for a pyrolytic origin of the OM in beech-wood
soot. These and other compositional features of the soot are
discussed below. A detailed discussion of the oxidized OM can
be found elsewhere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.140"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{rCO${}_{{x}}{}^{{+}}$ from BC surface groups}?><title>rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from BC surface groups</title>
      <p>The combination of non-refractory AMS and refractory SP-AMS
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c–d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c–d) clearly
showed that the majority of these signals originated from
refractory species (rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  These
refractory <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals became more intense after
oxidative aging, indicating that they originated from
incompletely oxidized species. The change in the ratio of
the rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals after aging
indicated a change in the chemical species producing these signals.</p>
      <p>These two observations reduce the likelihood of confounding
sources of rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generating the majority of the
signal. Carbonates such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx143" id="paren.141"/> cannot be oxidized as observed. Refractory
organics such as large, oxidized polyaromatic hydrocarbons may
generate CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but would also produce other,
hydrogen-containing,
ions in the mass spectrum.  Additionally, if the refractory organics had not
contained hydrogen, the observed increase in
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after aging would be impossible.</p>
      <p>This increase in CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with soot formation mechanisms:
soot only forms in oxygen-deprived environments
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.142"/> and initially condenses as PAH-like
nanoparticles before graphitizing via loss of hydrogen
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.143"/>. Oxygen
is normally gained during later oxidation, before exiting
the flame, for example by flame-produced radicals like
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx135 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.144"/>.</p>
      <p>Since well over 90 % of soot produced in a flame is destroyed
the abovementioned in-flame oxidation, all soot is expected to
contain oxygenated surface groups
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx140" id="paren.145"/>.
The BC surface functional groups are observed as
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and not, say, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because
BC surface groups thermally decompose at much lower
temperatures than the vaporization temperature of BC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.146"/>.</p>
      <p>We cannot completely rule out the role of adsorbed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in forming rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is
an inherent weakness of the destructive SP-AMS technique
relative to FTIR and NEXAFS. However, the significant change in
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon oxidation indicates that such a role
was not dominant. Additionally, if the thermal stability of
covalently bonded or adsorbed species at the BC is similar,
reaction mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126 bib1.bibx99" id="paren.147"/> may
be also be similar in both cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Atmospheric implications of BC surface groups</title>
      <p>Two atmospherically relevant observations can be made regarding
BC surface groups. First, the PMF results show that the
relative amount of these surface groups can be regarded as
constant throughout the burn. Regardless of burn stage, stove
temperature (cf. first burn in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), or the
concentration of emitted BC, a single PMF factor adequately
represented these signals. It may therefore be possible to
model the surface of beech-wood BC as a single chemical
species. This single chemical species is likely to undergo
complex chemistry given that laboratory-generated alkane soot samples
display different regimes of reactivity and are sensitive to
photochemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126 bib1.bibx99" id="paren.148"/>. Soot
surrogates such as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-hexane soot recommended by the
International Steering Committee on Black Carbon Reference
Materials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.149"/> may therefore not
provide an accurate representation of wood-combustion soot.</p>
      <p>Second, the raw data, supported by PMF, show that the
BC surface functionality changed considerably after aging. This
is demonstrated by the change of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio after aging. Based on
the PMF factors, this ratio decreased from 5.4 to 3.5 (a 54 %
decrease).
As mentioned above, these rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
signals originate from the thermally driven desorption of
different functional groups on the BC surface as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.150"/>.  Whether
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorbs is governed by the
nature of the functional groups themselves. The mass of
desorbed gases can be directly related to the mass of the
initial functional groups
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.151"/>. Although the exact path
of decomposition is sensitive to the heating rate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx150" id="paren.152"/>, the decrease of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio after aging indicates
an increased average oxidation of the BC surface groups. For
example, the decreased ratio may have corresponded to the
oxidation of phenolic or carbonyl groups at the BC surface
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.153"/>.  In addition to the increased average
oxidation of the BC surface upon aging, the absolute quantity
of BC surface groups changed. This can be considered in terms
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, which
decreased from 3.5 to 2.4 (a 46 % decrease). This corresponds
to an increase in the amount of functionalized carbon and
indicates that the BC surface became more oxidized upon
exposure to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the
data cannot be used to estimate the absolute oxygen content of
the BC until the SP-AMS sensitivity to rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
established by future studies (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>).</p>
      <p>Our data represent the first time-resolved measurements of
in situ BC surface aging. The SP-AMS may therefore be useful in
the online measurement of BC surface groups in atmospheric
studies.  This would allow the competition between BC oxidation
and organic oxidation to be investigated, although oxidant
concentrations in this study were higher than would be expected
in the atmosphere (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>).</p>
      <p>The majority of BC emissions always occurred in the flaming
phase, during which organic concentrations were at their lowest
in both the particle phase (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) and the gas phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.154"/>. This
is because on the one hand large amounts of organic vapours are
yielded by pyrolysis (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>) at
temperatures lower than the ignition point of the fire, while
on the other hand ignition triggers the flaming combustion
which simultaneously generates soot and converts the emitted
organics to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.155"/>.  The organic vapours which are
emitted by flaming-phase combustion appear may have followed
trajectories that avoid the flames, given that their mass
spectra resemble the aliphatic products of lignin pyrolysis
(<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>).</p>
      <p>Given that most BC is emitted when little organics are emitted,
and that BC was overall the major species emitted by this fire
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.156"/>, the BC surface may represent
a significant oxidant sink during the initial aging of a similar combustion plume. The actual significance of
the BC in this case would depend on the degree of mixing
between starting and flaming phases after emission and on the
fate of co-emitted nitrogen and sulfur oxides.</p>
      <p>It might be hypothesized that a functionalized BC particle
would become more hygroscopic and therefore more likely to act
as a CCN or ice nucleus. However, while our measurements are the first to directly
observe the BC functionalizations in a wood-combustion aerosol,
they do not directly affect the observations of previous
studies on beech-wood soot which suggest a minor role in this
regard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.157"/>. In the case of CCN, these
and other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.158"/> have indicated
that mixing of beech-combustion soot with other aerosols via
condensation or coagulation is the most likely pathway for
their becoming CCN active.</p>
      <p>In general, our conclusions apply only to a well-operated stove
and, moreover, only to wood stoves. Under different operating
conditions, stove emissions may change considerably
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.159"/>. Less-efficient combustion
systems such as open burning may produce more primary as well
as secondary OM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.160"/>. These higher
organic emissions lead to a greater role of secondary OM in the
evolution of particle hygroscopicity, which is also strongly
dependent on the fuel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.161"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Pyrolysis-formed OM</title>
      <p>In general, the SP-AMS and AMS mass spectra were highly
similar. Excluding C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the uncentred
correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>UC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the two
POM–Start and POM–Flame mass spectra were 0.99 and 0.93,
respectively. Excluding all ions below <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (to account for
refractory CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals and to reduce the
influence of the highest signals) increased this
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>UC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.993 and 0.997 for POM–Start and
POM–Flame, respectively.</p>
      <p>The mass spectrum of POM–Start was similar to that of pure
levoglucosan
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx138" id="paren.162"/>, as shown
in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. This is consistent with the fact
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60), commonly
used as a tracer for biomass-burning pyrolysis products like
levoglucosan
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.163"/>,
were almost entirely explained by POM–Start in the PMF
model. POM–Start is thus interpreted as reflecting wood
pyrolysis, in particular the pyrolysis of cellulose,
hemicellulose, and other carbohydrates (“holocellulose”).
Holocellulose pyrolysis produces levoglucosan and other
anhydrosugars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx122" id="paren.164"/> and occurs at
appreciably lower temperatures than pyrolysis of the other
major polymer in wood, lignin
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx133 bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx146 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.165"/>.
This thermal instability, together with the fact that
holocellulose comprises about 70 % of beech wood
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx133" id="paren.166"/>, explains why
POM–Start was the more-abundant POM factor. The high
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals associated with POM–Start
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c) may therefore be explained as
originating from the polyalcoholic sugars such as glucose and
xylose which comprise holocellulose. The relatively low signal
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from POM–Start may be related to
decarboxylation reactions within the stove during pyrolysis
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.167"/>, similarly to the decarboxylation which
produces <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the AMS and SP-AMS during
vaporization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.168"/>.</p>
      <p>An interesting feature of the POM–Start mass spectrum was the
presence of aromatic ions such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(phenyl) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (benzyl). The fact that
these ions originated from aromatic molecules was confirmed by
their persistence in the OOM–Start mass spectrum due to the
unusual stability of oxygenated aromatic molecules against
fragmentation upon electron impact
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.169"/>.  These aromatics may have
formed during pyrolysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121 bib1.bibx122" id="paren.170"/>
or from the flame itself
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx141" id="paren.171"/>.  Higher
starting-phase signals of aromatics, including PAHs, have been
observed by previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.172"/>.</p>
      <p>Since POM–Start was ascribed to holocellulose pyrolysis, it
was hypothesized that POM–Flame may have been more
closely associated
with lignin pyrolysis, which generally requires higher
temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.173"/>.  The alkyl fragments
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seen
in the POM–Flame mass spectrum (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) may
be related to the cyclic aliphatic molecules, phytosterols,
emitted together with substituted phenols during lignin
pyrolysis
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx121 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.174"/>.</p>
      <p>The uncentred correlation coefficient between the mass spectra
of pure burnt lignin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx138" id="paren.175"/>
and POM–Flame for the SP-AMS and AMS was relatively high
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), suggesting that this association was
reasonable. However, the POM–Flame mass spectra were also
well correlated with levoglucosan (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>),
suggesting that either POM–Flame was not clearly separated
from POM–Start during factor analysis or that POM–Start
contained contributions from both lignin and
holocellulose. Both are likely to be true to some degree (the
factor separation issue is further discussed in the
Supplement).  In particular, although holocellulose pyrolyzes
at lower temperatures, both holocellulose and lignin pyrolyze
across a range of overlapping temperatures
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx146 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.176"/>,
which would have led to a range of mass spectra being observed.
Moreover, ash species such as potassium catalyze the pyrolysis
process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.177"/>, so the
pure-lignin mass spectrum used here is not an ideal reference.</p>
      <p>A second, distinct hypothesis for the origin of POM–Flame is
the in-flame synthesis of aliphatic functionalities, as has
recently been observed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="text.178"/>. This hypothesis
is considered unlikely given the degree of oxygenation of
POM–Flame.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Uncentred correlations, excluding <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
of the OM mass spectra from PMF with literature AMS spectra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx138" id="paren.179"/>.
Correlations over 0.75 are highlighted.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4">SP-AMS </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col6">AMS </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">POM–Start</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">POM–Flame</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POM–Start</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">POM–Flame</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Levoglucosan</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.78</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.84</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.84</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lignin-c.<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.80</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.79</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Lignin-c.: OM from the
combustion of pure lignin; lignin in wood may pyrolyze differently
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.180"/>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Comparison of AMS and SP-AMS OM signals</title>
      <p>The interpretation of the POM mass spectra as dominated by
pyrolysis products provides insight into the relationship
between the SP-AMS and AMS data, in particular the excellent
correlation between the two sets of mass spectra
in spite of the SP-AMS signals being frequently higher
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b–c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b–d).</p>
      <p>The
excellent mass-spectral correlation is much better than
expected given the possibility of different vaporization
temperatures in SP-AMS and AMS
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). Differences in vaporization
temperature have previously been invoked to explain
fragmentation differences in the SP-AMS relative to the AMS
for OM coatings of diesel-exhaust soot and of a branched-chain
laboratory diester <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.181"/>. Since fresh
diesel-exhaust-soot coatings consist mostly of lubricating oil
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx145" id="paren.182"/>,
both of these samples are chemically distinct from
pyrolysis-generated OM. The similarity in AMS and SP-AMS
pyrolysis-OM mass spectra may be due to fact that pyrolysis
products have already undergone thermal bond rearrangement and
dehydration reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.183"/> and are thus
less likely to do so when heated in the AMS or SP-AMS.</p>
      <p>The higher SP-AMS signals in
the OM time series in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b–c
might be hypothesized to reflect a difference in the SP-AMS sensitivity to
OM when it is internally mixed with BC due to a change in either
vaporization temperature or physical position of the vaporized particle
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="altparen.184"/>). However, this difference was
observed even in the absence of rBC, as shown
by the second fresh-emissions burn.
In addition, the difference between SP-AMS and AMS was smaller for the
aged-emissions experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b–c) than the
fresh-emissions experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b–c). The apparent
influence of aging is unlikely to be related to a change in mixing state:
both aerodynamic- and mobility-size distributions were unimodal. A
difference in particle focussing efficiency (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5"/>) also does not explain the
difference, as aging would have increased the size of the particles and
therefore focussed a larger fraction of them into the SP-AMS laser. The
difference between fresh and aged samples may therefore reflect an influence
of the chemical composition of the OM.</p>
      <p>It is therefore hypothesized that the observed discrepancy was caused by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1064</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> light-absorbing carbonaceous species other
than rBC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.185"><named-content content-type="pre">brown carbon;</named-content></xref>.  Brown-carbon absorption
would explain why the SP-AMS/AMS discrepancy was reduced after
aging (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b–c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b–c),
since oxidation may reduce the conjugated or aromatic bonds
required for light absorption. Lignin
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.186"/> and its pyrolysis products
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="paren.187"/> contain the majority of the aromatic
species from wood and is itself brown
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.188"/>. The water-soluble
component of aerosol from inefficient beech-wood combustion is
also brown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.189"/>.  Brown carbon would explain why
the SP-AMS/AMS discrepancy in the aged experiment was highest
for the anomalously high emissions of the second, failed-start
burn (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b and Fig. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Refractory sources of potassium</title>
      <p>Potassium ions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were observed as a dominant
species in the SP-AMS mass spectrum but were negligible in the
AMS. The SP-AMS therefore provides the possibility to
specifically measure rBC-bound <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with high
sensitivity, allowing its use as an atmospheric tracer for
biomass-combustion aerosols. The requirement of internal mixing
with rBC would avoid interference from other atmospheric
sources of potassium like dust, vegetative debris, and sea salt
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.190"/>, although a minor
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from vehicular emissions may be
expected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.191"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <title>Refractory sources of water</title>
      <p>As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantification in the SP-AMS is routinely
confounded by background signals from water vapour and
particulate water. The size-resolving PToF mode of the SP-AMS
was used to separate these background signals from particulate
signals, which was only possible when mass loadings were
sufficiently high
(Fig. S8).
The particulate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals
were virtually negligible in the AMS but extremely high in the
SP-AMS: a factor of 40 higher than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (even
after including the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> RIE;
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>)
during the flaming phase. 
Unlike CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intensity did not change after aging
and was constant (when normalized to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
within 10 % between fresh and aged experiments.</p>
      <p>The fact that the relative amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did
not change after aging suggests that the dominant source was
not surface functional groups
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126" id="paren.192"/>. Rather, the large amount of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed and its thermal stability in the
AMS point towards an origin of liquid water adsorbed in pores
on the BC itself <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.193"/>.
Such water may have been produced during combustion or evaporated from the
logs, which had a moisture content of 12–20 % according to Swiss testing
standards. Such adsorbed
water is known to be
thermally stable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.194"/> and does
not evaporate easily due to the inverse Kelvin effect
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.195"/>.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.196"/> has proposed that the nucleation of
ice on soot particles which are not immersed in water droplets
(deposition-mode nucleation) is governed by such in-pore water.
In a study of deposition-mode ice nucleation on beech-wood soot
produced by a stove similar to ours, as well as diesel soot,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.197"/> found that oxidative aging did not influence
the ice-nucleating activity of the soot particles, although the
activity of the diesel and wood soot particles was different.
Our observation that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal was
unchanged upon aging is consistent with those results and
suggests that the SP-AMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals may relate
to the ice-nucleating potential of a given soot sample.  More
work is needed to explore this hypothesis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>Dual-vaporizer aerosol-particle mass spectrometry was used to
investigate the composition of beech-wood soot as a function of
combustion time and simulated atmospheric aging. Vaporization
via contact with an 873 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vaporizer (AMS) or via
radiative heating by a 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> continuous-wave laser
(SP-AMS) allowed either the OM component of the particles or
the entire soot particles to be probed, respectively.</p>
      <p>The repeated addition of new logs to the wood stove led to a
natural definition of a “starting” and “flaming” phase of
combustion.  The starting phase of combustion generated large
amounts of OM with a similar mass spectrum in both AMS and
SP-AMS. Analysis of the starting-phase mass spectrum showed
that it was very similar to levoglucosan, indicating that the
OM was dominated by the products of holocellulose pyrolysis.
The corresponding flaming-phase OM appeared to consist of a
mixture of holocellulose and lignin pyrolysis. These
flaming-phase OM signals were virtually negligible relative to
signals from refractory black carbon.</p>
      <p>The near-absence of AMS signals during flaming combustion
allowed refractory sources of signals in the SP-AMS to be
distinguished. These signals were dominated by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was within the range reported by previous studies for
mass-spectrally similar rBC samples.</p>
      <p>Factor analysis showed that the refractory, oxygenated
carbonaceous ions, rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were strongly
associated with the rBC ions (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover,
rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals increased upon oxidation relative
to C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased
relative to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It was thus inferred that BC
surface groups were the source of the rCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
signals.  The degree of BC surface oxidation did not vary for
different stages of the burn in either the fresh or aged
aerosols and did not appear to be dependent on the
concentration of co-emitted organics.  For slightly or
moderately aged aerosols, these conclusions may not hold and
should be explored in future work.  To our knowledge, these are
the first measurements to address the surface oxidation of BC
in the presence of co-emitted gases.</p>
      <p>Significant signals from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were generated by soot particles in the SP-AMS only. The
potassium signals would allow the SP-AMS to differentiate
biomass-combustion soot from other sources in the
atmosphere. The water signals did not change with oxidation, as
would be expected had they originated from
thermal-decomposition reactions and were much higher in signal
than CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  They were therefore inferred to have
originated from pores in the BC itself
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.198"/>, which have been implicated
in the heterogeneous ice-nucleating activity of soot
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.199"/>.</p>
      <p>These results indicate that wood-combustion soot is
significantly oxygenated and contains OM impurities of similar
chemical composition to the wood itself. The hygroscopicity,
CCN activity, heterogeneous chemistry, and ice-nucleating behaviour
of this soot (when either fresh or aged) are therefore likely
to be different than that of laboratory surrogates. However, as
only one fuel has been studied under controlled conditions in
this work, more data are needed to constrain the compositional
properties of biomass-combustion soot.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11885-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-11885-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to Josef Wüest, Erich Wildhaber, and Martin Büchler
for their support during the measurement campaign.
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss
Federal Offices for Energy (SFOE) and Environment (FOEN), and the
OPTIWARES project of the Competence Centers for Environment and Sustainability
(CCES) and Energy and Mobility (CCEM) of the ETH Zürich.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: D. Knopf</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aiken et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental analysis
of organic species with electron ionization high-resolution mass
spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w">10.1021/ac071150w</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Aiken et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman,
J. A., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., and
Sueper, D.: O/C and OM/OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient
organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478–4485,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es703009q">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Aiken et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., de Foy, B., Wiedinmyer, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Wehrli, M. N., Szidat, S., Prevot, A. S. H., Noda, J., Wacker, L., Volkamer,
R., Fortner, E., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J., Zhang,
R., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., Querol, X.,
and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico city aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high
resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 2:
Analysis of the biomass burning contribution and the non-fossil carbon
fraction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5315–5341, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5315-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5315-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Akagi et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Akagi, S. K., Craven, J. S., Taylor, J. W., McMeeking, G. R., Yokelson, R.
J., Burling, I. R., Urbanski, S. P., Wold, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Coe, H.,
Alvarado, M. J., and Weise, D. R.: Evolution of trace gases and particles
emitted by a chaparral fire in California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
1397–1421, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1397-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1397-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Akhter et al.(1985a)</label><mixed-citation>
Akhter, M. S., Chughtai, A. R., and Smith, D. M.: The structure of
hexane soot II: extraction studies, Appl. Spectrosc., 39, 154–167,
1985a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Akhter et al.(1985b)</label><mixed-citation>
Akhter, M. S., Chughtai, A. R., and Smith, D. M.: The structure of
hexane soot I: spectroscopic studies, Appl. Spectrosc., 39, 143–153,
1985b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Alcala-Jornod and Rossi(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Alcala-Jornod, C. and Rossi, M. J.: Chemical kinetics of the
interaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vapor with soot in the range 190 K <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 K: a diffusion tube study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108,
10667–10680,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp040365w">10.1021/jp040365w</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Alfarra et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Boudries, H.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Garforth, A. A., and
Li, S.-M.: Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate in
the lower Fraser valley using two aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometers,
Atmos. Environ., 38, 5745–5758,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.054">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.054</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Allan et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M. R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., and
Canagaratna, M. R.: A generalised method for the extraction of
chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Andreae(1983)</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: Soot carbon and excess fine potassium: long-range
transport of combustion-derived aerosols, Science, 220, 1148–1151,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4602.1148">10.1126/science.220.4602.1148</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Andreae and Gelencsér(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The
nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3131–3148, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Attfield et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Attfield, M. D., Schleiff, P. L., Lubin, J. H., Blair, A., Stewart,
P. A., Vermeulen, R., Coble, J. B., and Silverman, D. T.: The diesel
exhaust in miners study: a cohort mortality study with emphasis on
lung cancer, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 104, 869–883,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs035">10.1093/jnci/djs035</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bond et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M.,
Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S.,
Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K.,
Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C.,
Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K.,
Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and
Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate
system: a scientific assessment, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118,
5380–5552,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Bond et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J.-H.,
and Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and
organic carbon emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.,
109, D14203,,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697">10.1029/2003JD003697</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Brook et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Brook, R. D., Rajagopalan, S., Pope, C. A., Brook, J. R.,
Bhatnagar, A., Diez-Roux, A. V., Holguin, F., Hong, Y., Luepker,
R. V., and Mittleman, M. A.: Particulate matter air pollution and
cardiovascular disease an update to the scientific statement from the
American heart association, Circulation, 121, 2331–2378,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1">10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Brunet and Richnau(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Brunet, J., Fritz, Ö., and Richnau, G.: Biodiversity in European
beech forests–a review with recommendations for sustainable forest
management, Ecol. Bull, 53, 77–94, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Bruns et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Keller, A., Klein, F., Kumar, N. K., Pieber, S.
M., Corbin, J. C., Slowik, J. G., Brune, W. H., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Inter-comparison of laboratory smog chamber and
flow reactor systems on organic aerosol yield and composition, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 8, 2315–2332, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2315-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2315-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cain et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Cain, J. P., Gassman, P. L., Wang, H., and Laskin, A.: Micro-FTIR study of soot chemical
composition–evidence of aliphatic hydrocarbons on nascent soot surfaces, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 5206,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b924344e">10.1039/b924344e</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Cain et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Cain, J. P., Camacho, J., Phares, D. J, Wang, H., and Laskin, A.:
Evidence of aliphatics in nascent soot particles in premixed ethylene
flames, Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 533–540,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.164">10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.164</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M., Jayne, J., Jimenez, J., Allan, J., Alfarra, M., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B.,
Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L., Trimborn, A., Northway, M.,
DeCarlo, P., Kolb, C., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D.: Chemical and microphysical characterization
of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115">10.1002/mas.20115</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Ghertner, D. A., Herndon, S., Shi, Q., Jimenez, J. L.,
Silva, P. J., Williams, P., Lanni, T., Drewnick, F., Demerjian, K. L., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Chase studies of particulate emissions from in-use New York City vehicles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 555–573,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820490465504">10.1080/02786820490465504</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Massoli, P., Browne, E. C., Franklin, J. P., Wilson, K. R., Onasch, T. B.,
Kirchstetter, T. W., Fortner, E. C., Kolb, C. E, Jayne, J. T., Kroll, J. H., and Worsnop D. R.:
Chemical compositions of black carbon particle cores and coatings via soot particle aerosol mass
spectrometry with photoionization and electron ionization, J. Phys. Chem. A,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp510711u">10.1021/jp510711u</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Cappa et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P.,
Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., and Jobson, B. T.: Radiative absorption enhancements due to the mixing
state of atmospheric black carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447">10.1126/science.1223447</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Cappa et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates,
Timothy S and Cross, Eben S and Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden,
K. L., and Jobson, B. T.: Response to comment on “Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the
Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon”, Science, 339, 393–393, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Cappa et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Williams, E. J., Lack, D. A., Buffaloe, G. M., Coffman, D.,
Hayden, K. L., Herndon, S. C., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Massoli, P.,
McLaren, R., Nuaaman, I., Onasch, T. B., and Quinn, P. K.: A case study into
the measurement of ship emissions from plume intercepts of the NOAA ship
<italic>Miller Freeman</italic>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1337–1352,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1337-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1337-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Chen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Liu, Y., Donahue, N. M., Shilling, J. E., Martin, S. T.: Particle-phase chemistry of
secondary organic material: modeled compared to measured O : C and H : C elemental ratios
provide constraints, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 4763–4770,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es104398s">10.1021/es104398s</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Chou et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Chou, C., Kanji, Z. A., Stetzer, O., Tritscher, T., Chirico, R., Heringa, M.
F., Weingartner, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., and
Lohmann, U.: Effect of photochemical ageing on the ice nucleation properties
of diesel and wood burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 761–772,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-761-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-761-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Corbin et al.(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>Corbin, J. C., Keller, A., Sierau, B., Lohmann, U., and Mensah, A. A.:
Organic emissions from a wood stove and a pellet stove before and after
simulated atmospheric aging, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49, 1037–1050,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1079586">10.1080/02786826.2015.1079586</ext-link>,
2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Corbin et al.(2015b)</label><mixed-citation>Corbin, J. C., Othman, A., Haskins, J. D., Mensah, A. A., Sierau, B., and Lohmann, U.: Peak fitting
and integration uncertainties of the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 8, 3523–3523,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-3471-2015">10.5194/amtd-8-3471-2015</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Corbin et al.(2015c)</label><mixed-citation>Corbin, J. C., Sierau, B., Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Keller, A., Kim, J., Petzold, A., Onasch, T. B.,
Lohmann, U., and Mensah, A. A.: Mass spectrometry of refractory black carbon particles from six sources:
carbon-cluster and oxygenated ions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2591–2603,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2591-2014">10.5194/acp-14-2591-2014</ext-link>, 2015c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Collier and Zhang(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Collier, S. and Zhang, Q.: Gas-Phase CO2 Subtraction for Improved Measurements
of the Organic Aerosol Mass Concentration and Oxidation Degree by an Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 14324–14331,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es404024h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es404024h</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Cubison et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner, M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E.,
Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft
and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Cubison et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J. and Jimenez, J. L.: Statistical precision of the intensities
retrieved from constrained fitting of overlapping peaks in high-resolution
mass spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2333–2345,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2333-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2333-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>D'Anna(2009)</label><mixed-citation>D'Anna, A.: Combustion-formed nanoparticles, Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, 593–613,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.09.005">10.1016/j.proci.2008.09.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Dallmann et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Dallmann, T. R., Onasch, T. B., Kirchstetter, T. W., Worton, D. R., Fortner,
E. C., Herndon, S. C., Wood, E. C., Franklin, J. P., Worsnop, D. R.,
Goldstein, A. H., and Harley, R. A.: Characterization of particulate matter
emissions from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles using a soot particle
aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7585–7599,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7585-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7585-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Daly and Horn(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Daly, H. M. and Horn, A. B.: Heterogeneous chemistry of toluene, kerosene and diesel soots, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 1069–1076,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B815400G">10.1039/B815400G</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Denier van der Gon(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Bergström, R., Fountoukis, C., Johansson,
C., Pandis, S. N., Simpson, D., and Visschedijk, A.: Particulate emissions
from residential wood combustion in Europe – revised estimates and an
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 31719–31765,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-31719-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acpd-14-31719-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Di Blasi(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Di Blasi, C.: Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 34, 47–90,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001">10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Dobbins(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Dobbins, R. A.: Soot inception temperature and the carbonization rate of precursor particles, Combust. Flame, 130, 204–214,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00374-7">10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00374-7</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Docherty et al.(2013)Docherty, Jaoui, Corse, Jimenez, Offenberg,
Lewandowski, and Kleindienst</label><mixed-citation>Docherty, K. S., Jaoui, M., Corse, E., Jimenez, J. L., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., and Kleindienst, T. E.: Collection Efficiency of the Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer for Chamber-Generated Secondary Organic Aerosols, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 47, 294–309, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.752572">10.1080/02786826.2012.752572</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Donahue et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A
two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of
organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Drewnick et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., Curtius, J., Eerdekens, G., and Williams, J.: Measurement of fine particulate and
gas-phase species during the New Year's fireworks 2005 in Mainz, Germany, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4316–4327,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.040">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.040</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Duplissy et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A.,
Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M.,
Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D.
R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and
composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1155–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Elsasser et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Elsasser, M., Busch, C., Orasche, J., Schön, C., Hartmann, H., Schnelle-Kreis, J., and Zimmermann, R.:
Dynamic changes of the aerosol composition and concentration during different burning phases of wood
combustion, Energ. Fuels, 27, 4959–4968,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef400684f">10.1021/ef400684f</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Engelhart et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and
Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged
biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Eriksson et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Eriksson, A. C., Nordin, E. Z., Nyström, R., Pettersson, E., Swietlicki, E., Bergvall, C.,
Westerholm, R., Boman, C., and Pagels, J. H.: Particulate PAH emissions from residential biomass
combustion: time-resolved analysis with aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 7143–7150,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es500486j">10.1021/es500486j</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Figueiredo et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Figueiredo, J. L., Pereira, M. F. R, Freitas, M. M. A., and Órfão, J. J. M.: Modification of the
surface chemistry of activated carbons, Carbon, 37, 1379–1389,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00333-9">10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00333-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Figueiredo et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Figueiredo, J. L., Pereira, M. F. R, Freitas, M. M. A., and
Órfão, J. J. M.: Characterization of active sites on carbon
catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, 4110–4115,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie061071v">10.1021/ie061071v</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Fine et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Fine, P. M., Cass, G. R., and Simoneit, B. R. T.: Chemical characterization of fine particle
emissions from fireplace combustion of woods grown in the northeastern US, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2665–2675,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es001466k">10.1021/es001466k</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Fortner et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Fortner, E. C., Brooks, W. A., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Massoli, P., Jayne, J. T.,
Franklin, J. P., Knighton, W. B., Wormhoudt, J.,
and Worsnop, D. R., Kolb, C. E., and Herndon, S. C.: Particulate emissions measured during the
TCEQ comprehensive flare emission study, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 12586–12592,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie202692y">10.1021/ie202692y</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Fountoukis et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C., Butler, T., Lawrence, M. G., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Visschedijk, A. J. H.,
Charalampidis, P., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S. N.: Impacts of controlling biomass burning emissions
on wintertime carbonaceous aerosol in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 175–182,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.016">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Frenklach(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Frenklach, M.: Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 4, 2028–2037, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Genuit et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Genuit, W., Boon, J. J., and Faix, O.: Characterization of beech milled wood lignin by pyrolysis-gas
chromatography-photoionization mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 59, 508–513,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00130a029">10.1021/ac00130a029</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Glassman and Yetter(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Glassman, I. and Yetter, R. A.: Combustion, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Grieshop et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Gysel et al.(2012)Gysel, Laborde, Mensah, Corbin, Keller, Kim,
Petzold, and Sierau</label><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Mensah, A. A., Corbin, J. C., Keller, A., Kim, J.,
Petzold, A., and Sierau, B.: Technical Note: The single particle soot
photometer fails to reliably detect PALAS soot nanoparticles, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 5, 3099–3107, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-3099-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-3099-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Han et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Han, C., Liu, Y., and He, H.: Role of organic carbon in heterogeneous reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
soot, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 3174–3181,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es304468n">10.1021/es304468n</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Han et al.(2012a)</label><mixed-citation>Han, C., Liu, Y., Ma, J., and He, H.: Effect of soot microstructure
on its ozonization reactivity, J. Chem. Phys., 137, 084507,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4747190">10.1063/1.4747190</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Han et al.(2012b)</label><mixed-citation>Han, C., Liu, Y., Ma, J., and He, H.: Key role of organic carbon in the sunlight-enhanced atmospheric
aging of soot by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 21250–21255,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212690110">10.1073/pnas.1212690110</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Heal et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Heal, M. R, Kumar, P., and Harrison, R. M.: Particles, air quality, policy and health, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6606–6630,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35076a">10.1039/c2cs35076a</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Heidenreich et al.(1968)</label><mixed-citation>Heidenreich, R. D., Hess, W. M., and Ban, L. L.: A test object and criteria for high resolution electron microscopy, J. Appl. Cryst., 1, 1–19,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s0021889868004930">10.1107/s0021889868004930</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Hennigan et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Engelhart, G. J., May, A. A., Presto, A.
A., Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., McMeeking, G. R., Coe, H., Wold, C. E., Hao,
W.-M., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J., Schichtel, B. A., Collett
Jr., J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical and physical
transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass
burning emissions in an environmental chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7669–7686, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Hennigan et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Collett, J. L., and Robinson, A. L.: Levoglucosan stability in biomass
burning particles exposed to hydroxyl radicals, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
37, L09806,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010gl043088">10.1029/2010gl043088</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Heringa et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Heringa, M. F., DeCarlo, P. F., Chirico, R., Tritscher, T., Dommen, J.,
Weingartner, E., Richter, R., Wehrle, G., Prévôt, A. S. H., and
Baltensperger, U.: Investigations of primary and secondary particulate matter
of different wood combustion appliances with a high-resolution time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5945–5957,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5945-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5945-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Holder et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Holder, A. L., Carter, B. J., Goth-Goldstein, R., Lucas, D., and Koshland, C. P.: Increased cytotoxicity of
oxidized flame soot, Atmos. Polut. Res.,
3, 25–31,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5094/APR.2012.001">10.5094/APR.2012.001</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Hopke(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Hopke, P. K.: A guide to positive matrix factorization, Workshop on UNMIX and PMF as Applied to PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,  Research Triangle Park, NC, USA,
edited by:  Willis, R. D., available  at: <uri>http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/workshop/laymen.pdf</uri> (last access: March
2015), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Hopkins et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Hopkins, R. J., Tivanski, A. V., Marten, B. D., and Gilles, M. K.: Chemical bonding and structure of black
carbon reference materials and individual carbonaceous atmospheric aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 573–591,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.03.009">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.03.009</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Huffman et al.(2005)Huffman, Jayne, Drewnick, Aiken, Onasch, Worsnop,
and Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T. B.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, modeling, optimization, and
experimental tests of a particle beam width probe for the Aerodyne aerosol
mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 1143–1163, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500423782">10.1080/02786820500423782</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Jacobson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols, Nature, 409, 695–697,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35055518">10.1038/35055518</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Jacobson(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Comment on “Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black
Carbon”, Science, 339, 393–393, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Jimenez et al.(2003)Jimenez, Jayne, Shi, Kolb, Worsnop, Yourshaw,
Seinfeld, Flagan, Zhang, Smith, Morris, and Davidovits</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Shi, Q., Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Yourshaw,
I., Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Zhang, X., Smith, K. A., Morris, J. W.,
and Davidovits, P.: Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8425,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213">10.1029/2001JD001213</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prévôt, A. S. H., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T.,
Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J. E., Dunlea, J.,
Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F.,
Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T.,
Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T.,
Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Jolleys et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Jolleys, M. D., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Capes, G., Allan, J. D., Crosier, J., Williams, P. I., Allen, G.,
Bower, K. N., Jimenez, J. L., Russell, L. M., Grutter, M., and Baumgardner, D.: Characterizing the aging of biomass
burning organic aerosol by use of mixing ratios: a meta-analysis of four regions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 13093–13102,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es302386v">10.1021/es302386v</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Keller and Burtscher(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Keller, A. and Burtscher, H.: A continuous photo-oxidation flow reactor for a defined measurement of the SOA formation
potential of wood burning emissions, J. Aerosol Sci., 49, 9–20,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.02.007">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.02.007</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Kiendler-Scharr et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Kiendler-Scharr, A., Zhang, Q., Hohaus, T., Kleist, E., Mensah, A., Mentel, T. F., Spindler, C., Uerlings, R.,
Tillmann, R., and Wildt, J.: Aerosol mass spectrometric features of biogenic SOA.: observations from a plant
chamber and in rural atmospheric environments, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 8166–8172,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es901420b">10.1021/es901420b</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Klippel and Nussbaumer(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Klippel, N. and Nussbaumer, T.: Wirkung von Verbrennungspartikeln – Vergleich der Unweltrelevanz von Holzfeuerungen
und Dieselmotoren, Bundesamt für Energie und Bundesamt für Umwelt: Switzerland,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Knopf et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Knopf, D. A., Forrester, S. M., and Slade, J. H.: Heterogeneous oxidation kinetics of organic biomass burning
aerosol surrogates by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 21050–21062, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Kolb et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Kolb, C. E., Cox, R. A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ammann, M., Davis, E. J.,
Donaldson, D. J., Garrett, B. C., George, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hanson, D.
R., Kulmala, M., McFiggans, G., Pöschl, U., Riipinen, I., Rossi, M. J.,
Rudich, Y., Wagner, P. E., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and O' Dowd, C.
D.: An overview of current issues in the uptake of atmospheric trace gases by
aerosols and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10561–10605,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10561-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10561-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Kuwata et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., and Takegawa, N.: Critical condensed mass for activation of black carbon as cloud
condensation nuclei in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 114,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012086">10.1029/2009JD012086</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>de Laeter et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>de Laeter, J. R., Böhlke, J. K., De Bièvre, P., Hidaka, H., Peiser, H. S., Rosman, K. J. R, and Taylor,
P. D. P.: Atomic weights of the elements, review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem., 75, 683–800,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683">10.1351/pac200375060683</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Lamberg et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lamberg, H., Nuutinen, K., Tissari, J., Ruusunen, J., Yli-Pirilä, P., Sippula, O., Tapanainen, M.,
Jalava, P., Makkonen, U., and Teinilä, K.: Physicochemical characterization of fine particles from
small-scale wood combustion, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7635–7643,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.072">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.072</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Lanz et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic
aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass
spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Lee et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., Mack, L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., Onasch, T. B.,
Worsnop, D. R., Malm, W., Wold, C. E, and Hao, W. M.: Chemical smoke marker emissions during flaming
and
smoldering phases of laboratory open burning of wildland fuels, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44,
i–v, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.499884">10.1080/02786826.2010.499884</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Leskinen et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Leskinen, J., Ihalainen, M., Torvela, T., Kortelainen, M., Lamberg, H., Tiitta, P., Jakobi, G., Grigonyte, J., Joutsensaari, J.,
Sippula, O. and Tissari, J., and Virtanen, A., and Zimmermann, R., and Jokiniemi, J.: Effective density
and morphology of particles emitted from small-scale combustion of various wood fuels, Environ. Sci.
Technol.,  48, 13298–13306,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502214a">10.1021/es502214a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Li et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q., Shang, J., and Zhu, T.: Physicochemical characteristics and toxic effects of ozone-oxidized
black carbon particles, Atmos. Environ., 81, 68–75,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.043">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.043</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Lighty et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Lighty, J. S., Veranth, J. M., and Sarofim, A. F.: Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size
and composition and implications to human health, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 50, 1565–1618, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Lipsky and Robinson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Lipsky, E. M. and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of dilution on fine particle mass and partitioning of
semivolatile organics in diesel exhaust and wood smoke, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 155–162,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es050319p">10.1021/es050319p</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Liu et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Fan, S., Horowitz, L. W., and Levy, H.: Evaluation of factors controlling
long-range transport of black carbon to the Arctic, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D04307,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015145">10.1029/2010JD015145</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Liu et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans,
G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic
properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
13, 2015–2029, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Marcolli(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion
freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Martin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Martin, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Heringa, M. F., Sierau, B., Weingartner, E., Chirico, R.,
Gysel, M., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Hygroscopic properties of fresh and aged wood burning particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 56, 15–29,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Massoli et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Canagaratna, M. R., Williams, L. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Schwab, J. J.,
Trimborn, A., Onasch, T. B., and Demerjian, K. L.: Pollution gradients and chemical characterization
of particulate matter from vehicular traffic near major roadways: results from the 2009 Queens College Air Quality study in NYC, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 1201–1218,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.701784">10.1080/02786826.2012.701784</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Matthew et al.(2008)Matthew, Middlebrook, and Onasch</label><mixed-citation>Matthew, B. M., Middlebrook, A. M., and Onasch, T. B.: Collection
efficiencies
in an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer as a function of particle phase for
laboratory generated aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 42, 884–898,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802356797">10.1080/02786820802356797</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>McLafferty and Tureček(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
McLafferty, F. W. and Tureček, F.: Interpretation of Mass Spectra, 1993, University Science Books,
Sausalito, California, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>McWhinney et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>McWhinney, R. D., Gao, S. S., Zhou, S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Evaluation of the effects of ozone
oxidation on redox-cycling activity of two-stroke engine exhaust particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 2131–2136,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es102874d">10.1021/es102874d</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>McWhinney et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>McWhinney, R. D., Badali, K., Liggio, J., Li, S.-M., and Abbatt,
J. P. D.: Filterable redox cycling activity: a comparison between
diesel exhaust particles and secondary organic aerosol constituents,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 3362–3369,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es304676x">10.1021/es304676x</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Middlebrook et al.(2012)Middlebrook, Bahreini, Jimenez, and
Canagaratna</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the Aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Mikhailov et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Mikhailov, E. F., Vlasenko, S. S., Podgorny, I. A., Ramanathan, V., and Corrigan, C. E.: Optical
properties of soot–water drop agglomerates: an experimental study, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07209,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006389">10.1029/2005JD006389</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Monge et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Monge, M. E., D'Anna, B., Mazri, L., Giroir-Fendler, A., Ammann, M., Donaldson, D. J., and George, C.:
Light changes the atmospheric reactivity of soot, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6605–6609,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908341107">10.1073/pnas.0908341107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Moteki and Kondo(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Dependence of laser-induced incandescence on physical properties of black
carbon aerosols: measurements and theoretical interpretation, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 663–675,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.484450">10.1080/02786826.2010.484450</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Mul et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Mul, G., Neeft, J. P. A., Kapteijn, F., and Moulijn, J. A.: The formation of carbon surface oxygen
complexes by oxygen and ozone, the effect of transition metal oxides, Carbon, 36, 1269–1276,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00209-1">10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00209-1</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Ng et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Onasch et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Onasch, T. B., Trimborn, A., Fortner, E. C., Jayne, J. T., Kok, G. L., Williams, L. R., Davidovits, P.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer: development, validation, and initial application, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 804–817,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.663948">10.1080/02786826.2012.663948</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Ortega et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Cubison, M. J., Brune, W. H., Bon, D., de Gouw, J.
A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation and primary
organic aerosol oxidation from biomass-burning smoke in a flow reactor during
FLAME-3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11551–11571, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Paatero(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P.: PMF User's Guide, University of Helsinki, Helsinki,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Paatero and Hopke(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Hopke, P. K.: Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models, Anal. Chim. Acta, 490, 277–289,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01643-4">10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01643-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Paatero and Tapper(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal
utilization of error estimates of data values, Environmetrics, 5, 111–126,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203">10.1002/env.3170050203</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Paatero et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P., Hopke, P. K., Song, X.-H., and Ramadan, Z.:
Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic models,
Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 60, 253–264,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00200-3">10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00200-3</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Pan et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Pan, C.-J. G., Schmitz, D. A., Cho, A. K., Froines, J., and Fukuto, J. M.: Inherent redox properties of
diesel exhaust particles: catalysis of the generation of reactive oxygen species by biological reductants, Toxicol. Sci., 81, 225–232,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh199">10.1093/toxsci/kfh199</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Petzold et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U.,
Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black
carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Polissar et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., Paatero, P., Malm, W. C., and Sisler, J. F.: Atmospheric aerosol over
Alaska, 2, elemental composition and sources, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 19045–19057,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JD01212">10.1029/98JD01212</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Popovitcheva et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Popovitcheva, O. B., Persiantseva, N. M., Trukhin, M. E., Rulev, G. B., Shonija, N. K., Buriko, Y. Y.,
Starik, A. M., Demirdjian, B., Ferry, D., and Suzanne, J.: Experimental characterization of aircraft
combustor soot: microstructure, surface area, porosity and water adsorption, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2, 4421–4426,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B004345L">10.1039/B004345L</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Ramanathan and Carmichael(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon, Nat. Geosci., 1, 221–227,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156">10.1038/ngeo156</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Reff et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Reff, A., Eberly, S. I., and Bhave, P. V.: Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using
positive matrix factorization: review of existing methods, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 57, 146–154, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Rogge et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Rogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., Cass, G. R., and Simoneit, B. R. T.: Sources of fine
organic aerosol, 9, pine, oak, and synthetic log combustion in residential fireplaces, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 13–22,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es960930b">10.1021/es960930b</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Schmidl et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Schmidl, C., Marr, I. L., Caseiro, A., Kotianová, P., Berner, A., Bauer, H., Kasper-Giebl, A.,
and Puxbaum, H.: Chemical characterisation of fine particle emissions from wood stove combustion of
common woods growing in mid-European Alpine regions, Atmos. Environ., 42, 126–141,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.028">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.028</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Schmidl et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, M. W. I., Masiello, C. A., and Skjemstad, J. O.: Final recommendations for reference
materials in black carbon analysis, Eos Trans. AGU, 84, 582–582,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003eo520006">10.1029/2003eo520006</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Schwarz et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M.,
Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G. L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A.,
Kärcher, B., Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O., Loewenstein, M., Aikin, K. C.:
Single-particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to
the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16207,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076">10.1029/2006JD007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Shafizadeh(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Shafizadeh, F.: The chemistry of pyrolysis and combustion, in: The Chemistry
of Solid Wood, edited by: Rowell, R., Advances in Chemistry, American
Chemical Society. Chem., Washington DC, USA, 489–529,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ba-1984-0207.ch013">10.1021/ba-1984-0207.ch013</ext-link>,
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>Silverman et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Silverman, D. T., Samanic, C. M., Lubin, J. H., Blair, A. E., Stewart, P. A. Vermeulen, R., Coble, J. B.,
Rothman, N., Schleiff, P. L., and Travis, W. D.: The diesel exhaust in miners study: a nested case-control
study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 104, 855–868,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs034">10.1093/jnci/djs034</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx121"><label>Simoneit et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Simoneit, B. R. T., Rogge, W. F., Mazurek, M. A., Standley, L. J., Hildemann, L. M., and Cass, G. R.:
Lignin pyrolysis products, lignans, and resin acids as specific tracers of plant classes in emissions from
biomass combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 2533–2541,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00048a034">10.1021/es00048a034</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx122"><label>Simoneit et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias,
V. O., Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.,: Levoglucosan, a
tracer for cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 173–182,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(98)00145-9">10.1016/s1352-2310(98)00145-9</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx123"><label>Simpson et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, D., Winiwarter, W., Börjesson, G., Cinderby, S., Ferreiro, A., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N.,
Janson, R., Khalil, M. A. K., Owen, S., Pierce, T. E., Puxbaum, H., Shearer, M., Skiba, U., Steinbrecher, R.,
Tarrasón, L., and Öquist, M. G.: Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 8113–8152,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jd02747">10.1029/98jd02747</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx124"><label>Slade and Knopf(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of biomass burning organic aerosol surrogate
compounds: assessment of volatilisation products and the role of OH concentration on the reactive uptake kinetics, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 5898–5915, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx125"><label>Smith and Chughtai (1995)</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. M. and Chughtai, A. R.: The surface structure and reactivity of black carbon, Colloid. Surface. A., 105, 47–77,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-7757(95)03337-1">10.1016/0927-7757(95)03337-1</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx126"><label>Smith and Chughtai(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. M. and Chughtai, A. R.: Photochemical effects in the heterogeneous reaction of soot with ozone
at low concentrations, J. Atmos. Chem., 26, 77–91,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1005702818675">10.1023/a:1005702818675</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx127"><label>Sorensen(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Sorensen, C. M.: The mobility of fractal aggregates: a review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 765–779,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909">10.1080/02786826.2011.560909</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx128"><label>Stanmore et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Stanmore, B. R., Brilhac, J. F., and Gilot, P.: The oxidation of soot: a review of experiments, mechanisms and models, Carbon, 39, 2247–2268,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00109-9">10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00109-9</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx129"><label>Sueper et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Sueper, D., Jimenez, J. L., Aiken, A., and DeCarlo, P.: PIKA ToF-AMS High Resolution Analysis
Software, available at: <uri>http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/wiki/index.php/ToF-AMS_Analysis_Software</uri> (last access: October 2015),,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx130"><label>Sun et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Zhang, Q., Anastasio, C., and Sun, J.: Insights into secondary
organic aerosol formed via aqueous-phase reactions of phenolic compounds
based on high resolution mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
4809–4822, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4809-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4809-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx131"><label>Szidat et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Szidat, S., Jenk, T. M., Synal, H.-A., Kalberer, M., Wacker, L., Hajdas, I., Kasper-Giebl, A., and Baltensperger, U.:
Contributions of fossil fuel, biomass-burning, and biogenic emissions to carbonaceous aerosols in Zurich as traced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.,
111, doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006590">10.1029/2005JD006590</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx132"><label>Szidat et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Szidat, S., Prévôt, A. S. H., Sandradewi, J., Alfarra, M R., Synal, H.-A., Wacker, L., and Baltensperger, U.: Dominant impact
of residential wood burning on particulate matter in Alpine valleys during winter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L05820,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028325">10.1029/2006GL028325</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx133"><label>Timell(1967)</label><mixed-citation>Timell, T. E.: Recent progress in the chemistry of wood hemicelluloses, Wood Sci. Technol., 1, 45–70,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00592255">10.1007/BF00592255</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx134"><label>Torvela et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Torvela, T., Tissari, J., Sippula, O., Kaivosoja, T., Leskinen, J., Virén, A., Lähde, A., and Jokiniemi, J.: Effect of
wood combustion conditions on the morphology of freshly emitted fine particles, Atmos. Environ., 87, 65–76,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.028">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.028</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx135"><label>Tree and Svensson(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Tree, D. R. and Svensson, K. I.: Soot processes in compression ignition engines, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 33, 272–309,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.03.002">10.1016/j.pecs.2006.03.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx136"><label>Tritscher et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Martin, M., Chirico, R., Gysel, M., Heringa, M. F., DeCarlo, P. F., Sierau, B.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., and Weingartner, E.: Changes of hygroscopicity and morphology during ageing of diesel soot, Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 034026,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034026">10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034026</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx137"><label>Ulbrich et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx138"><label>Ulbrich et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Lechner, M., and Jimenez, J. L.: AMS Spectral Database, available at: <uri>http://cires.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/AMSsd/</uri> last access: August 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx139"><label>Vakkari et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Vakkari, V., Kerminen, V.-M., Beukes, J. P., Tiitta, P., Zyl, P. G., Josipovic, M., Venter, A. D., Jaars, K.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M. and, Laakso, L.: Rapid changes in biomass burning aerosols by atmospheric oxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2644–2651,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059396">10.1002/2014GL059396</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx140"><label>Vernooij et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Vernooij, M. G. C., Mohr, M., Tzvetkov, G., Zelenay, V., Huthwelker, T., Kaegi, R., Gehrig, R., and Grobéty, B.:
On source identification and alteration of single diesel and wood smoke soot particles in the atmosphere; an X-ray
microspectroscopy study, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5339–5344,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es800773h">10.1021/es800773h</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx141"><label>Wang(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Wang H.: Formation of nascent soot and other condensed-phase materials in flames, Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 41–67,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.09.009">10.1016/j.proci.2010.09.009</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx142"><label>Weimer et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Weimer, S., Alfarra, M. R., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Organic aerosol
mass spectral signatures from wood-burning emissions: influence of burning conditions and wood type, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113, D10,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009309">10.1029/2007JD009309</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx143"><label>Westberg et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Westberg, H. M., Byström, M., and Leckner, B.: Distribution of potassium, chlorine, and sulfur between solid
and vapor phases during combustion of wood chips and coal, Energy Fuels, 17, 18–28,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef020060l">10.1021/ef020060l</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx144"><label>Willis et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Willis, M. D., Lee, A. K. Y., Onasch, T. B., Fortner, E. C., Williams, L. R.,
Lambe, A. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Collection efficiency of
the soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) for internally mixed
particulate black carbon, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4507–4516,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4507-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-4507-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx145"><label>Worton et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Worton, D. R., Isaacman, G., Gentner, D. R., Dallmann, T. R., Chan, A. W. H., Ruehl, C. R,
Kirchstetter, T., Wilson, K. R., Harley, R. A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Lubricating oil dominates primary organic
aerosol emissions from motor vehicles, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 48, 3698–3706,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es405375j">10.1021/es405375j</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx146"><label>Yang et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., and Zheng, C.: Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin
pyrolysis, Fuel, 86, 1781–1788,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013">10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx147"><label>Zelenay et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Zelenay, V., Mooser, R., Tritscher, T., Krepelová, A., Heringa, M. F.,
Chirico, R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Dommen,
J., Watts, B., Raabe, J., Huthwelker, T., and Ammann, M.: Aging induced
changes on NEXAFS fingerprints in individual combustion particles, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 11777–11791, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11777-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11777-2011</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx148"><label>Zhang et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and
quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es048568l">10.1021/es048568l</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx149"><label>Zhang et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R, Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding
atmospheric organic aerosols via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401, 3045–3067,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y">10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx150"><label>Zielke(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Zielke, U., Hüttinger, K. J., and Hoffman, W. P.: Surface-oxidized carbon fibers, I, surface structure and
chemistry, Carbon, 34, 983–998,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(96)00032-2">10.1016/0008-6223(96)00032-2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
