<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-10723-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): overview of pilot
measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>trace gases, and aerosols </article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Overview: The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO)}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. O. Andreae et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Andreae</surname><given-names>M. O.</given-names></name>
          <email>m.andreae@mpic.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-7925</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Acevedo</surname><given-names>O. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Araùjo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Artaxo</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-3036</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Barbosa</surname><given-names>C. G. G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4027-1855</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Barbosa</surname><given-names>H. M. J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-8749</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Brito</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-9442</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Carbone</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chi</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Cintra</surname><given-names>B. B. L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>da Silva</surname><given-names>N. F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Dias</surname><given-names>N. L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9770-8595</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8 aff11">
          <name><surname>Dias-Júnior</surname><given-names>C. Q.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4783-4689</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ditas</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-9373</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ditz</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Godoi</surname><given-names>A. F. L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Godoi</surname><given-names>R. H. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Heimann</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-5113</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Kesselmeier</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-534X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Könemann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Krüger</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Lavric</surname><given-names>J. V.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-9078</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Manzi</surname><given-names>A. O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff15">
          <name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff15">
          <name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>D. L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff20">
          <name><surname>Mikhailov</surname><given-names>E. F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-0996</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Moran-Zuloaga</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff15">
          <name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>B. W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nölscher</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7864-4020</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12 aff22">
          <name><surname>Santos Nogueira</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Piedade</surname><given-names>M. T. F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pöhlker</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-425X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pöschl</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-3557</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff15">
          <name><surname>Quesada</surname><given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Rizzo</surname><given-names>L. V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff13">
          <name><surname>Ro</surname><given-names>C.-U.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ruckteschler</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff14">
          <name><surname>Sá</surname><given-names>L. D. A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff15">
          <name><surname>de Oliveira Sá</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11 aff16">
          <name><surname>Sales</surname><given-names>C. B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff17">
          <name><surname>dos Santos</surname><given-names>R. M. N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Saturno</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-3957</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Schöngart</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sörgel</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1745-8221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11 aff18">
          <name><surname>de Souza</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff17">
          <name><surname>de Souza</surname><given-names>R. A. F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-1669</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Targhetta</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff17 aff19">
          <name><surname>Tóta</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff21">
          <name><surname>Trebs</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Trumbore</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-6202</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>van Eijck</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Walter</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-5007</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-3967</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff9">
          <name><surname>Winderlich</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wittmann</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff11">
          <name><surname>Wolff</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0103-4889</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff11">
          <name><surname>Yáñez-Serrano</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6408-5961</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Biogeochemistry, Multiphase Chemistry, and Air Chemistry Departments, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry,  <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>P.O. Box 3060, 55020, Mainz,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Universidade Federal Santa Maria, Dept. Fisica, 97119900 Santa
Maria, RS, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA), Trav. Dr.
Enéas Pinheiro, Belém-PA, CEP 66095-100, Brasil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Rua do
Matão, Travessa R, 187, CEP 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brasil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Environmental Engineering, Federal University of
Paraná UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), MAUA group,
Av. André Araújo 2936, Manaus-AM, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>CEP 69067-375, Brasil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Instituto Nacional de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do
Pará (IFPA/Bragança), Pará, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Straße
10, 07745 Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Clima e
Ambiente (CLIAMB), Av. André Araújo 2936, Manaus-AM, CEP 69083-000,
Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Centro Gestor e Operacional do Sistema de Proteção da
Amazônia (CENSIPAM), Belém, Pará</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff14"><label>14</label><institution>Centro Regional da Amazônia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE), Belém, Pará, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff15"><label>15</label><institution>Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), LBA, Av.
André Araújo 2936, Manaus-AM, CEP 69067-375, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff16"><label>16</label><institution>Centro de Estudos Superiores de Parintins (CESP/UEA), Parintins,
Amazonas, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff17"><label>17</label><institution>Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (UEA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff18"><label>18</label><institution>Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM/ICSEZ-Parintins), Parintins,
Amazonas, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff19"><label>19</label><institution>Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará – UFOPA, Santarém,
Pará, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff20"><label>20</label><institution>Atmospheric Physics Department, Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg
State University, St. Petersburg, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff21"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Environmental
Research and Innovation (ERIN) Department,  4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff22"><label>b</label><institution>on leave from: Amazon Regional
Center, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Belém, Pará</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. O. Andreae (m.andreae@mpic.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>10723</fpage><lpage>10776</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The Amazon Basin plays key roles in the carbon and water cycles, climate
change, atmospheric chemistry, and biodiversity. It has already been changed
significantly by human activities, and more pervasive change is expected to
occur in the coming decades. It is therefore essential to establish long-term
measurement sites that provide a baseline record of present-day climatic,
biogeochemical, and atmospheric conditions and that will be operated over
coming decades to monitor change in the Amazon region, as human
perturbations increase in the future.</p>
    <p>The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) has been set up in a pristine rain
forest region in the central Amazon Basin, about 150 km northeast of the
city of Manaus. Two 80 m towers have been operated at the site since 2012,
and a 325 m tower is nearing completion in mid-2015. An ecological survey
including a biodiversity assessment has been conducted in the forest region
surrounding the site. Measurements of micrometeorological and atmospheric
chemical variables were initiated in 2012, and their range has continued to
broaden over the last few years. The meteorological and micrometeorological
measurements include temperature and wind profiles, precipitation, water and
energy fluxes, turbulence components, soil temperature profiles and soil
heat fluxes, radiation fluxes, and visibility. A tree has been instrumented
to measure stem profiles of temperature, light intensity, and water content
in cryptogamic covers. The trace gas measurements comprise continuous
monitoring of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, and ozone at five to
eight different heights, complemented by a variety of additional species measured
during intensive campaigns (e.g., VOC, NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OH reactivity).
Aerosol optical, microphysical, and chemical measurements are being made
above the canopy as well as in the canopy space. They include aerosol light
scattering and absorption, fluorescence, number and volume size
distributions, chemical composition, cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
concentrations, and hygroscopicity. In this paper, we discuss the scientific
context of the ATTO observatory and present an overview of results from
ecological, meteorological, and chemical pilot studies at the ATTO site.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>A little over 30 years ago, Eneas Salati and Peter Vose published a
landmark paper entitled <italic>Amazon Basin: A System in Equilibrium</italic>
(Salati and Vose, 1984). Since then, a paradigm shift has occurred
in the minds of the public at large as well as the scientific community,
which is reflected in the title of a recent synthesis paper by a group of
prominent Amazon researchers, <italic>The Amazon Basin in transition</italic>
(Davidson et al., 2012). Despite its
reassuring title, Salati and Vose's paper had already pointed at growing
threats to the integrity of the Amazon ecosystem, mostly resulting from
ongoing large-scale deforestation. Since then, deforestation has indeed
continued and has only begun to abate in recent years  (Lapola et al.,
2014; Tollefson, 2015). It goes hand in hand with road construction and
urbanization   (Fraser, 2014), affecting ecosystems and air quality in
many parts of the basin. And, whereas Salati and Vose were concerned with
climate change as a regional phenomenon driven by deforestation and its
impact on the hydrological cycle, the focus now is on the interactions of
global climate change with the functioning of the Amazon forest ecosystem
(Keller et al., 2009). In the following sections, we will present the
key roles the Amazon is playing in the global ecosystem, which form the
rationale for setting up a long-term measuring station, including a tall
tower, for monitoring its functioning and health.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>Carbon cycle</title>
      <p>The Amazon Basin covers about one-third of the South American continent and
extends over about 6.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, of which about 80 %
is covered with rain forest    (Goulding et al., 2003). It contains
90–120 Pg C in living biomass, representing about 84 % of the aboveground
biomass in Latin America and ca. 40 % of all tropical forests worldwide
(Baccini et al., 2012; Gloor et al., 2012). Another 160 Pg C are stored
in the Amazon Basin's soils; putting this in perspective, the Amazon
holds about half as much carbon as was in the Earth's atmosphere before the
industrial revolution   (Gloor et al., 2012).
Given the magnitude of this carbon reservoir, it is clear that tropical
forests in general, and the Amazon forest in particular, have the potential
to play a crucial role in climate change because of their potential to gain
or lose large amounts of carbon as a result of land use and climate change.
A recent study shows a strong correlation between climate change on the
tropical continents and the rate at which CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the
atmosphere, and indicates that the strength of this feedback has doubled
since the 1970s   (Wang et al., 2014). The interaction between
physical climate and the biosphere represents one of the largest
uncertainties in the assessment of the response of the climate system to
human emissions of greenhouse gases.</p>
      <p>Depending on the path land use change takes and the interactions between the
forest biota and the changing climate, the Amazon can act as a net source
<italic>or</italic> sink of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The most recent global carbon
budget estimates indicate that in the decade of 2004–2013 land use change
worldwide resulted in a net carbon release of 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Pg a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or
about 9 % of all anthropogenic carbon emissions  (Le Quéré et
al., 2015). This represents a significant decrease since the 1960s, when
land-use carbon emissions of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Pg a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> accounted for 38 %
of anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Part of this decrease in the relative
contribution from land use change is of course due to the increase in fossil
fuel emissions, but there has also been a significant decrease in
deforestation in recent years, particularly in the Brazilian Amazon
(Nepstad et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The “net” land use emissions, as presented above, are the sum of “gross”
release and uptake fluxes, where deforestation represents the dominant gross
source, whereas afforestation, regrowth, and uptake by intact vegetation are
the main gross sinks. Using an approach based on forest inventories and land
use budgeting, Pan et al. (2011)
estimated that tropical land use change represented a net carbon source of
1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 Pg a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 1990s and early 2000s, consisting of a
gross tropical deforestation carbon emission of 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Pg a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
partially compensated for by a carbon sink in tropical forest regrowth of
1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Pg a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A more recent comprehensive analysis of the role
of land vegetation in the global carbon cycle concluded that carbon sources
and sinks in the tropics are approximately balanced, with regrowth and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-driven carbon uptake compensating the large deforestation source
(Schimel et al., 2015). For the South American continent, a
detailed budgeting study also concluded that, at present, carbon uptake by
the biosphere approximately compensates the emissions from deforestation and
fossil fuel burning, with a slight trend of the continent becoming a carbon
source in the most recent period   (Gloor et
al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Attempts to verify these carbon budgets with measurements have remained
inconclusive so far. The largest spatial scale is represented by global
inversion models, which derive fluxes from concentration measurements and
global transport models. An early attempt deduced a large tropical sink from
inverse modeling   (Stephens et al., 2007),
whereas a more recent analysis suggests a net tropical carbon source of
1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 Pg a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Steinkamp and Gruber, 2013). Gloor et
al. (2012) have reviewed the numerous
attempts to deduce the South American carbon budgets from inverse modeling
and came to the conclusion that they are not adequately constrained to
produce meaningful results, a conclusion that they extend to the application
of digital global vegetation models for larger time and space scales. Molina
et al. (2015) also show that application of
inversion models to Amazonia is critically limited by model uncertainties
and sparseness of observational data.</p>
      <p>Efforts to upscale local measurements to larger scales have also led to
inconclusive and often contradictory results. Flux measurements using the
eddy covariance technique initially suggested a fairly large carbon sink
(1–8 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in intact Amazon forests  (e.g., Grace et
al., 1995; Carswell et al., 2002; de Araújo et al., 2002). But as more
studies were conducted, this uncertainty range expanded, reaching from a
sink of 8 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to a source of 1.4 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. It thus became clear that issues related to nighttime fluxes
and terrain effects make upscaling of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from eddy covariance
measurements difficult to impossible  (de
Araujo et al., 2010, and references therein). Nevertheless, such flux
measurements are essential for understanding micrometeorological and
ecological processes and for monitoring changes in the functioning of the
forest ecosystem.</p>
      <p>An alternative approach to upscaling from local to regional carbon balances
is followed in the RAINFOR project, where initially some 140 forest plots
have been monitored over decades for standing biomass  (Phillips et al.,
2009). This study suggested substantial carbon uptake by intact forest,
interrupted by biomass loss during drought years. It has been proposed that
a large fraction of the uptake extrapolated from the RAINFOR sites is
compensated by carbon losses due to rare disturbance events, such as forest
blow-downs resulting from severe thunderstorms (Chambers
et al., 2013, and references therein). The latest analysis from the RAINFOR
project, now based on 321 plots and 25 years of data, indicates that the
Amazon carbon sink in intact forest has declined by one-third during the
past decade compared to the 1990s. This appears to be driven by increased
biomass mortality, possibly caused by greater climate variability and
feedbacks of faster growth on mortality  (Brienen et al., 2015). Like
flux-tower measurements, biomass inventories also miss the contributions of
wetlands and water bodies to the carbon flux, which may make a substantial
contribution to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> outgassing  (Richey et al., 2002; Abril et al.,
2014).</p>
      <p>An intermediate scale between global inverse modeling and plot-size flux and
inventory studies is captured by aircraft CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> soundings through the
lowest few km of the troposphere. This method averages regional fluxes on
scales of tens to hundreds of kilometers. Early measurements made during the 1987
ABLE-2 experiment were reanalyzed by Chou et al. (2002)
and suggested a near-neutral carbon balance for their study region near
Manaus. A series of flights north of Manaus during the 2001 wet-to-dry
transition season also revealed that daytime carbon uptake and nighttime
release were in approximate balance   (Lloyd et al., 2007). A
10-year aircraft profiling study conducted near Santarem in the eastern
Amazon concluded that the fetch region was a small net carbon source (0.15 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mostly as a result of biomass burning, with no
significant net flux to or from the forest biosphere
(Gatti et al., 2010). In 2010, this study was
extended to include the southern and western parts of the Amazon Basin
(Gatti et al., 2014). The results from
2010, an unusually dry year, show the Amazon forest biosphere to be
sensitive to drought, resulting in net carbon emission from the vegetation.
The following year, 2011, was wetter than average, and the basin returned to
an approximately neutral carbon balance, with a modest biospheric sink
compensating the biomass burning source. A detailed study on the carbon
dynamics over the years 2009 to 2011 showed a complex response of the forest
ecosystem to the drought episode, which not only affected net primary
production (NPP) and tree mortality, but also the allocation of carbon to
the canopy, wood, and root compartments
(Doughty et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Seen together, these studies suggest that the Amazon Basin teeters on a
precarious balance between being a source or sink of carbon to the world's
atmosphere, with its future depending on the extent and form of climate
change as well as on human actions. The region has already warmed by 0.5–0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and warming is expected to
continue  (Malhi and
Wright, 2004). Together with the increased frequency of drought episodes
(Saatchi et al., 2013), the occurrence of periods of net
biospheric carbon emissions will be enhanced and the likelihood of
destructive understory fires will increase  (Gloor et al., 2013; Balch,
2014; Zeri et al., 2014; van der Laan-Luijkx et al., 2015). On the other
hand, the observed 20 % increase in Amazon River discharge may reflect
increasing water availability to the vegetation
(Gloor et al., 2013), which together with
increasing atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may lead to more net carbon uptake by the
intact forest vegetation   (Schimel et al., 2015). While remote
sensing can provide important information on the response of the Amazon
forest to changing climate and ecological factors, the recent controversy
about the effects of seasonal change and drought on the “greenness” of the
forest illustrates how important long-term ground based observations are to
our understanding of the Amazon system  (Morton et al., 2014; Soudani and
Francois, 2014; Zeri et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Ultimately, the fate of the carbon stored in the Amazon Basin will depend on
the interacting and often opposing effects of human actions, especially
deforestation, global and regional climate change, and changing atmospheric
composition  (Soares-Filho et al., 2006; Poulter et al., 2010; Rammig et
al., 2010; Davidson et al., 2012; Cirino et al., 2014; Lapola et al., 2014;
Nepstad et al., 2014; Schimel et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015).
Interactions of the carbon cycle with the cycles of other key biospheric
elements, especially nitrogen and phosphorus, are also likely to play
important roles   (Ciais et al., 2013). This
applies equally to two other greenhouse gases, methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
nitrous oxide (N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O), both of which have important sources in the
wetlands or soils of the Amazon  (Miller et al., 2007; D'Amelio et al.,
2009; Beck et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <title>Water and energy cycle</title>
      <p>The Amazon River has by far the greatest discharge of all the world's rivers
– about 20 % of the world's freshwater discharge – and 5 times that of
the Congo, the next largest river in discharge. This reflects the immense
amount of water that is cycling through the water bodies, soils, plants, and
atmosphere of the Amazon Basin. As a result, the hydrological cycle of the
Amazon Basin is crucial for providing the water that supports life within
the Basin and even beyond its borders. Most moisture enters the basin from
the Atlantic Ocean with the trade wind circulation, but recirculation of
water through evapotranspiration maintains a flux of precipitation that
becomes increasingly more important as air masses move into the western part
of the basin  (Spracklen et al., 2012). When reaching the Andes,
moisture becomes deflected southward, with the result that Amazonian
evaporation even supports the rain-fed agriculture in Argentina
(Gimeno et al., 2012). As a result, perturbations of the
Amazonian moisture flux and the effects of smoke aerosols from fires in
Amazonia on cloud processes can affect rainfall even over the distant La
Plata Basin  (Camponogara et al., 2014; Zemp et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Evaporation of water from the Earth's surface also supports a huge energy
flux in the form of latent heat, which is converted to sensible heat and
atmospheric buoyancy when the water vapor condenses to cloud droplets. This
heat transfer represents one of the major forces that drive atmospheric
circulation at all scales   (Nobre et al., 2009). Changes in land
cover, e.g., conversion of forest to pasture, alter the amount and type of
clouds over the region     (e.g., Heiblum et al., 2014) and
shift the proportion of rain that flows away as runoff vs. the fraction
that is transformed to water vapor by evapotranspiration  (Silva Dias et
al., 2002; Davidson et al., 2012; Gloor et al., 2013, and references
therein). This in turn changes local and regional circulation and rainfall
patterns, and consequently deforestation has been predicted to reduce the
potential for hydropower generation in Amazonia (Stickler
et al., 2013). When the scale of deforestation exceeds some 40 % of the
basin, these perturbations of the water cycle may change the functioning of
the entire Amazon climate and ecosystem  (Coe et al., 2009; Nobre and
Borma, 2009; Lawrence and Vandecar, 2015).</p>
      <p>Our ability to prognosticate the possible outcomes for the Amazon ecosystem
in the coming decades is severely curtailed by limitations in the
representation of key processes in climate/vegetation models, including the
role of the Andes and the teleconnections between the Amazon and the
Atlantic and Pacific oceans   (Boisier et al., 2015). In addition, the
biophysical response of the vegetation to changing water supply and
increasing CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature remains very poorly understood
(Davidson et al., 2012). Long-term
measurements and process studies at key locations are urgently needed to
improve our understanding of these interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <title>Biodiversity</title>
      <p>The Amazon Basin contains the most species-rich terrestrial and freshwater
ecosystems in the world  (Hoorn et al., 2010; Wittmann et al., 2013). It
houses at least 40 000 plant species, over 400 mammal species, about 1300
bird species, and countless numbers of invertebrate and microbe species
(Da Silva et al., 2005), accounting for about 10–20 % of
all the world's species diversity. Of these, the great majority have not yet
been described scientifically, and possibly never will be. The variety of
species in the Amazon Basin is directly related to the variety of habitats,
and consequently is threatened by any form of exploitation that is
accompanied by habitat destruction, particularly land clearing and
deforestation. The genetic information stored in these ecosystems and their
biodiversity is beyond measure and may be of enormous economic significance.
This diversity is now under great threat, mostly as a result of habitat loss
due to deforestation and other land use changes   (Vieira et al.,
2008).</p>
      <p>Much of the Amazon's aboveground biomass is in its trees, and a single
hectare of the forest can be home to over 100 different tree species.
Scientists still do not know how many tree species occur in the Amazon, and
the current estimate of about 16 000 tree species is the result of an
extrapolation from the existing scattered census data. Surprisingly, a
relatively small number (227 species, or 1.4 %) account for half of all
individual trees  (ter Steege et al., 2013), which therefore account for a
large fraction of the Amazon's ecosystem services. This fact may greatly
facilitate research in Amazonian biogeochemistry, for example studies on the
trace gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS4">
  <title>Atmospheric composition and self-cleansing</title>
      <p>The tropical atmosphere has been referred to as the “washing machine of the
atmosphere” by P. Crutzen (personal communication, 2013). Both, human activities and
the biosphere, release huge amounts of substances such as nitrogen oxides
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, carbon monoxide (CO), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into
the atmosphere, which must be constantly removed again to prevent
accumulation to toxic levels. Most such gases are poorly soluble in water,
and are thus not effectively washed out by rain. The self-purification of
the atmosphere therefore requires chemical reactions by which the trace
substances are brought into water-soluble form. These reaction chains
normally begin with an initial oxidation step in which the trace gas is
attacked by a highly reactive molecule, such as ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the
hydroxyl radical (OH). Production of these atmospheric detergents requires
UV radiation and water vapor, both of which are present in generous
quantities in the tropics. It comes thus as no surprise, that the tropics
are the region in which large fractions of many atmospheric trace gases,
including CO and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, are eliminated   (Crutzen, 1987). Recent
discoveries indicate that the atmospheric oxidant cycles in the boundary
layer are even much more active than had been previously assumed, yet the
mechanisms of these reactions are still a matter of active research
(Lelieveld et al., 2008; Martinez et al., 2010; Taraborrelli et al.,
2012; Nölscher et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The functioning of this self-cleansing mechanism is challenged by human
activities that change the emissions from the biosphere and add pollutants
from biomass burning and industrial activities. This may convert the
“washing machine” into a reactor producing photochemical smog with high
concentrations of ozone and other atmospheric pollutants, and large
quantities of fine aerosols – which in turn influence the formation of
clouds and precipitation and thus modify the water and chemical cycles
(Andreae, 2001; Pöschl et al., 2010). Increased ozone concentrations
over Amazonia, resulting from biomass burning emissions, have also been
implicated in plant damage, which may substantially decrease the carbon
uptake by the Amazon forest   (Pacifico et al., 2015).
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
The concentrations and types of aerosol particles over the Amazon Basin
exhibit huge variations in time and space. In the absence of pollution from
regional or distant sources, and especially in the rainy season, the Amazon
has among the lowest aerosol concentrations of any continental region
(Roberts et al., 2001; Andreae, 2009; Martin et al., 2010b; Pöschl et
al., 2010; Andreae et al., 2012; Artaxo et al., 2013; Rizzo et al., 2013).
Biogenic aerosols, either emitted directly by the biota or produced
photochemically from biogenic organic vapors, make up most of this
“clean-period” aerosol   (Martin et
al., 2010a). At the other extreme, during the biomass burning season in the
southern Amazon, aerosol concentrations over large regions are as high as in
the most polluted urban areas worldwide  (Artaxo et al., 2002; Eck et al.,
2003; Andreae et al., 2004). These changes in the atmospheric aerosol
burdens have strong impacts on the radiation budget, cloud physics,
precipitation, and plant photosynthesis  (Schafer et al., 2002; Williams
et al., 2002; Andreae et al., 2004; Lin et al., 2006; Oliveira et al., 2007;
Freud et al., 2008; Bevan et al., 2009; Martins et al., 2009; Vendrasco et
al., 2009; Sena et al., 2013; Cirino et al., 2014; Rap et al., 2015).
Episodic inputs of Saharan dust, biomass smoke from Africa, and marine
aerosols transported over long distances with the trade winds further
complicate the picture  (Formenti et al., 2001; Ansmann et al., 2009;
Ben-Ami et al., 2010; Baars et al., 2011). This complexity of aerosol
sources is one important reason why the mechanisms that lead to the
production of biogenic aerosols in Amazonia are still enigmatic
(Pöhlker et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS5">
  <title>The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO)</title>
      <p>The foregoing sections have cast some spotlights on the key roles of the
Amazon Basin in the earth system and on the important ecosystem services it
provides. It is evident that to avoid irreversible damage to this complex
system we need a better understanding of the interactions between biosphere
and atmosphere in this important region. While considerable knowledge has
been gained from campaign-style studies, it is clear that the full picture
will not emerge from these “snapshots,” but rather that continuous,
long-term studies are required at key locations  (Hari et al., 2009; Zeri
et al., 2014). This is true especially in view of the fact that the Amazon
and its global environment are rapidly changing, and that continuing
observations are essential to keep track of these changes. It is
particularly urgent to obtain baseline data now, to document the present
atmospheric and ecological conditions before upcoming changes, especially in
the eastern part of the basin, will forever change the face of Amazonia.</p>
      <p>Observations from tall towers are especially useful for this purpose,
because they allow measurements at several heights throughout the planetary
boundary layer and thereby can reflect both local processes at the lower
levels and regional influences at the upper levels  (Bakwin et al., 1998;
Andrews et al., 2014). The effects of emission and uptake by local
vegetation and soil are much reduced at 300 m as compared to 50 m
(Winderlich et al., 2010), and the analysis of the
diurnal variation of the vertical concentration profile provides an estimate
of the flux of trace gases such as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Winderlich et al., 2014). The influence footprint of typical
flux tower measurements made at a few tens of meters above the canopy is of
the order of a few kilometers  (e.g., de Araújo et al., 2002; Chen et
al., 2012), whereas the concentration footprint of a tall tower is of the
order of 1000 km, and measurements at the top of the tower are therefore
representative of regional processes  (Gloor et al., 2001; Heimann et al.,
2014). For micrometeorological investigations, a tall tower provides the
unique ability to obtain continuous measurements at a series of heights
throughout the lower part of the planetary boundary layer. This makes
possible investigations of phenomena such as the formation and dissolution
of nocturnal stable boundary layers, the production and behavior of
intermittent turbulent structures, gravity waves, boundary layer rolls, etc.
A summary of the characteristics of the Amazon planetary boundary layer can
be found in Fisch et al. (2004).</p>
      <p>The need for tall tower observatories at mid-continental locations,
especially in Eurasia, Africa, and South America, was recognized in the late
1990s   (Gloor et al., 2000) and the establishment of sites in
Siberia and Amazonia was proposed to the Max Planck Society. This lead to
the construction of the Zotino Tall Tower Observatory (ZOTTO) as a joint
Russian-German project, with measurements beginning in 2006  (Heimann
et al., 2014), and to the concept of the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory
(ATTO).</p>
      <p>The ATTO project was initiated in 2008 as a Brazilian-German partnership. A
site was selected 150 km northeast of Manaus which fulfilled the following
criteria: (1) large fetch with minimal current human perturbation, but with
potential future land use change at a large scale, (2) relatively flat
topography with no large wetlands in the fetch region, (3) stable and
protected land ownership and controlled access, and (4) the possibility to
reach the site in a reasonable time to facilitate research and educational
activities.</p>
      <p>In order to characterize the site and begin research activities, the site
was set up initially with two measurement towers of intermediate height (80 m). Atmospheric measurements from these towers and ecological studies of the
surrounding forest ecosystems were initiated in 2012. The construction of
the 325 m tall tower began in September 2014 and is currently nearing
completion. The tall tower will serve as a basis for continuous monitoring
of long-lived biogeochemically important trace gases such as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and a multitude of reactive gases, including
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOC, as well as a broad range of aerosol
characteristics. The chemical measurements are complemented by a full suite
of micrometeorological measurements. Furthermore, the observing system will
also include a component directed at the underlying vegetation canopy, such
as phenological observations from the tower by automated cameras,
potentially a canopy lidar, as well as an array of in situ sensors of
critical physical and biological variables in the ecosystems near the tower
and at the ground.</p>
      <p>The continuous long-term data collected at ATTO will also serve to evaluate
airborne and satellite observations. Expected to operate for an
indeterminate length of time, this unique observatory in South America will
provide long-term observations of the tropical Amazonian ecosystem affected
by climate change.</p>
      <p>Specific research objectives at the ATTO observatory are the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>to obtain regionally representative measurements of carbon gas
concentrations (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and VOC), in order to improve our
understanding of the carbon budget of the Amazonian rain forest under
changing climate, land use, and other anthropogenic influences in the fetch
region of ATTO;</p></list-item><list-item><p>to continuously observe anthropogenic and biogenic greenhouse gases in
the lower troposphere, within the planetary boundary layer by day and
outside it at night, in order to help constrain inverse methods for deriving
continental source and sink strengths and their changes over time.</p></list-item><list-item><p>to continuously measure trace gases and aerosols for improvement of our
understanding of atmospheric chemistry and physics in the Amazon, with
emphasis on the atmospheric oxidant cycle and the life cycle of the
Amazonian aerosol, and to identify the effects of anthropogenic
perturbations, e.g., land use change and pollution, on these processes.
Measurements of isotopic composition will be made to help distinguish
anthropogenic and biogenic fluxes;</p></list-item><list-item><p>to determine vertical trace gas and aerosol fluxes and gradients from the
tower top to the ground to estimate biosphere–atmosphere exchange rates;</p></list-item><list-item><p>to study turbulence and transport processes in the lower atmospheric
boundary layer, as well as to understand the extent and characteristics of
the roughness sublayer over the forest;</p></list-item><list-item><p>to develop and validate dynamic vegetation models, atmospheric boundary
layer models, and inverse models for the description of heat, moisture,
aerosol, and trace gas fluxes;</p></list-item><list-item><p>to evaluate satellite estimates of greenhouse gas concentrations and
temperature and humidity profiles by providing a ground truth site.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>This paper is intended as an overview paper for a special issue on research
at the ATTO observatory. Here we discuss the scientific background and
context of the observatory and describe the site characteristics,
infrastructure, and measurement methodologies. We present initial results
from studies in the ecosystem surrounding ATTO and from measurements at the
two 80 m towers. Future papers in the special issue will provide a detailed
discussion of the tall tower and present the results of the various
scientific investigations at ATTO.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Site description and infrastructure</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Site characteristics</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Location of the ATTO site. The main map shows the access to
the site via the road and riverboat connections (background map from Google
Earth). <bold>(b)</bold> Topography in the region around the ATTO site. The Balbina
Reservoir is in the northwestern corner of the map.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The ATTO site is located 150 km northeast of Manaus in the Uatumã
Sustainable Development Reserve (USDR) in the central Amazon (Fig. 1a). This
conservation unit is under the control and administration of the Department
of Environment and Sustainable Development of Amazonas State (SDS/CEUC). The
USDR is bisected by the Uatumã River through its entire NE–SW extension.
The climate is tropical humid, characterized by a pronounced rainy season
from February to May and a drier season from June to October (IDESAM,
2009).</p>
      <p>The tower site is located approximately 12 km NE of the Uatumã River
(Fig. 1b). As is typical for this region in the central Amazon Basin, there
is little large-scale relief, but at smaller scales a dense drainage network
has produced a pattern of plateaus and valleys with a maximum relief height
of about 100 m (Planalto Dissecado do Rio Trombetas – Rio Negro). The ATTO
site is located at 120 m a.s.l. on a plateau that measures about 1.5 km in
the NW–SE direction and about 5 km along the NE–SW axis. The topography
surrounding ATTO resembles that around the Manaus LBA (Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia) site (ZF2, also
referred to as k34 site) in the Cuieiras Reserve, where the influence of
topography on the micrometeorology and the fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have been
studied in detail by  Tota et al. (2012). From the perspective of
micrometeorological flux measurements, this is not an ideal type of terrain
because it induces significant upslope and downslope circulations. The
effects of local topography on the local flux measurements from the small
towers are the subject of ongoing investigations.</p>
      <p>It must be pointed out, however, that the main objective of the tall tower
with respect to greenhouse gas and aerosol monitoring is the measurement of
concentrations above the level of local circulations. For this purpose,
measurements from tall towers, such as ATTO, have the advantage of being less
influenced by the surface layer variability due to diurnal changes in
photosynthesis and respiration, as well as by ecosystem and terrain
heterogeneity. This results in smoothening of the large daily cycles of
near-surface signals and efficient integration over daily cycles and
small-scale heterogeneities, which facilitates the detection of long-term
changes in the background atmospheric composition. <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p>The
plateaus in this region are covered by yellow clayey ferralsols (latosols,
oxisols) overlying the Miocene sedimentary Barreiras formation
(Chauvel et al., 1987). In the valleys, alisols and sandy podzols
are the dominant soil types.</p>
      <p>The USDR consists of several different forested ecosystems. Dense,
non-flooded upland forests (terra firme) prevail on plateaus at a maximum
altitude of approximately 130 m above sea level (a.s.l.). Seasonally flooded
black-water (igapó) forest dominates along the main river channel, oxbow
lakes, and the several smaller tributaries of the Uatumã River
(approximately 25 m a.s.l.). Interspersed with these formations are non-flooded
terra firme forests on ancient river terraces (35–45 m a.s.l.), and campinas
(savanna on white-sand soils) and campinaranas (white-sand forest), which
are predominantly located between the river terraces and the slope to the
plateaus.</p>
      <p>Upwind of the site in the main wind direction (northeast to east), large
areas covered by mostly undisturbed terra firme forests extend over hundreds
of kilometers. To the northeast, the nearest region with dense human
activity is in the coastal regions of the Guyanas and of Amapá State,
about 1100 km away. In the easterly direction, the main stem of the Amazon
is in the fetch region of ATTO, with scattered smaller towns and the cities
of Santarém and Belém at distances of about 500 and 900 km,
respectively. To the southeast, the densely populated states of the
Brazilian Nordeste lie at distances greater than 1000 km. Figure 2 presents
on overview of the population density and the dominant land cover in
northern South America.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Land cover and population density map of northern South America.
The land cover map (GlobCover 2009, downloaded from
<uri>http://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/</uri>, 11 July 2014, ESA and UCLouvain) highlights
vegetated areas in green tones (deciduous forest, broadleaf forest,
evergreen forest, and mixed broadleaf and needleleaf forest) and water
bodies in blue tones (regularly flooded and permanently flooded areas).
Populated areas (given as population density map) span a range from 1 (light
red) to 1000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (dark red) persons per km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (from Gridded Population of
the World, Version 3 (GPWv3) provided by the Center for International Earth
Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University). The ATTO site is
marked by a star.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The origins of the predominant air masses at ATTO change throughout the year,
as the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) undergoes large seasonal shifts
over the Amazon Basin, resulting in pronounced differences in meteorological
conditions and atmospheric composition  (Andreae et al.,
2012). This is illustrated in Fig. 3, which shows monthly trajectory
frequency plots for 9-day back trajectories arriving at ATTO at an elevation
of 1000 m. During boreal winter, the ITCZ can lie as far south as
20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S so that a large part of the basin, including ATTO, is in
the meteorologically Northern Hemisphere (NH). Air masses then arrive
predominantly from the northeast over a clean fetch region covered with rain
forest. During this period, long-range transport from the Atlantic and
Africa brings episodes of marine aerosol, Saharan dust, smoke from fires in
West Africa, and possibly even pollution from North America and Europe. This
flow pattern shifts abruptly at the end of May, when the ITCZ moves to the
north of ATTO. This shift marks the beginning of the dry season at ATTO, a
period of time during which the site is exposed to air masses from the
easterly and southeasterly fetch regions, which receive considerable
pollution from biomass burning and other human activities in northeastern
Brazil. In July almost the entire basin is south of the ITCZ, and thus lies
in the meteorologically Southern Hemisphere (SH). The transition to the
northeasterly flow pattern is more gradual, beginning in September and
becoming complete only in March.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Back trajectory frequency plots and satellite fire maps for the
ATTO site in 2014. Back trajectories (9 days) have been calculated with
HYSPLIT (NOAA-ARL, GDAS1, start height 1000 m) (Draxler and
Rolph, 2015). Four back trajectories have been initiated per day (0:00,
06:00, 12:00, 18:00 UTC); frequency plots are based on monthly trajectory
ensembles. Color coding of frequency plots: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % (green),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % (blue), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 % (cyan). Monthly fire map
derived from GFAS (Global Fire Assimilation System) and averaged to
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
grid resolution    (Kaiser et al., 2012).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Access</title>
      <p>The ATTO site is reached from Manaus by the paved highway BR-174 for 101 km
northward, then 70 km to the E on highway AM-240 towards Balbina. From
there, a 38 km dirt road along the Uatumã River, Ramal de Morena, leads
to the small community of Porto Morena, where the road ends. After a 61 km
motor-boat ride on the Rio Uatumã towards the SE one reaches the
landing, Porto ATTO. The access road from the landing to the ATTO site on
the plateau follows an old trail used in the 1980s to extract Pau Rosa wood
from the forest. This trail was re-opened in 2010 and widened to an ATV and
tractor trafficable path that was used during the initial years of the
development of the ATTO site. In 2012/13 a 6 m wide dirt road was
constructed between the Uatumã River and the ATTO tower site, which
accommodates pickups and trucks. The overall distance along this road, Ramal
ATTO, is 13.7 km, rising from 25 to 130 m a.s.l. Total travel time from
Manaus to the site is about 5 h. For the delivery of large and heavy
equipment to Porto ATTO, fluvial transportation by ship or pontoon is
possible from Manaus by going down the Amazonas River and up its tributary,
Rio Uatumã, a distance of ca. 550 km and travel time of 2 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Camp</title>
      <p>The base camp on the ATTO plateau was built in 2011/12 and has electrical
power and water. Facilities include toilets and a dormitory with hammocks
that can accommodate ca. 20 people. Another camp is planned by INPA at the
Uatumã River landing, which will serve also as a base station for
ecological research in the area. A helicopter landing site is intended
adjacent to this camp.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Towers</title>
      <p>The measurement facilities on the ATTO plateau consist of two towers of ca.
80 m height, already implemented, and the 325 m tall tower, whose
construction began in September 2014 and is now nearing completion. In 2010,
an 81 m triangular mast was established for pilot measurements, which is
currently used for a wide set of aerosol measurements, followed in 2011 by
an 80 m heavy-duty guy-wired walk-up tower (Instant UpRight, Dublin,
Ireland). The walk-up tower can carry a total payload of 900 kg, with
outboard platforms on five levels. It is currently used for meteorological
and trace gas measurements. The measurements at the top level, at 79.3 m,
are the highest ground based measurements within the Amazonian rain forest
performed so far. The tower coordinates (WGS 84) are given in Table 1. The
measuring instruments are accommodated in three air-conditioned containers,
the trace gas lab and the greenhouse gas lab at the base of the walk-up
tower, and the aerosol lab at the base of the mast; each lab has inside
dimensions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>292</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>420</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm (W <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> L <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H) and is supplied by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>230</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>135</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> V
electrical power.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Location and specifications of the towers and masts at the ATTO
site.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="71.13189pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="71.13189pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="42.679134pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Towers/masts</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coordinates <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(WGS 84)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Base elevation <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Height <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Walk-up tower</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S 02<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 08.647<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>W 58<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 59.992<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">130</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Triangular mast</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S 02<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 08.602<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>W 59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 00.033<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">130</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATTO Tall Tower</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S 02<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 08.752<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>W 59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 00.335<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">130</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">325</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Communications</title>
      <p>Since the end of 2013, the ATTO site has been connected to the internet by
satellite. The uplink is realized by the mobile satellite terminal Cobham
EXPLORER 700 using the INMARSAT/BGAN broadband network, providing a data
bandwidth of up to 492 kbps. Operating in the L band, its active antenna
performance allows up to 20 dB compensation of signal attenuation due to bad
weather. The antenna is mounted at the height of 50 m on the walk-up tower, aligned
by 43.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> elevation and 273.1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> azimuth towards the
geostationary satellite INMARSAT 4-F3 Americas.</p>
      <p>A cluster of two redundant routers manages the internet traffic and provides
direct access from the internet to the various computers and networkable
instruments at the ATTO site. The routers provide additional features like
centralized data storage, remote server access, optimized file transfer,
monitoring systems, updating clients, VoIP telephony between the local
infrastructure sites, etc. Internal data communication between the various
sites on the ATTO plateau (towers, labs, camp) is realized via a wireless
LAN bridge, operating in the 5 GHz mode, featured by access points with
directed-beam antennas.</p>
      <p>Data communication within each site occurs via wired LAN with data rates of
up to 1000 kbps. In addition, at the camp there is WLAN available in the 2.4 GHz
mode. The communication system allows monitoring and controlling of
networkable instruments in all three lab containers, as well as internet
e-mailing, locally and globally. For oral communication with the remote ATTO
site and for safety matters, satellite phones (IsatPhonePro) are available
operating in the INMARSAT net.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Electrical power supply</title>
      <p>Electrical power is provided by a system of diesel generators. Currently, the
scientific sites (lab containers and towers) are supplied by two 60 Hz
generators with 45 and 40 kVA, operating alternately by weekly switching.
They are located ca. 800 m downwind from the measuring sites to avoid
contamination. Due to the long distance between power generation and
consumption, power is transmitted via two 600 V transformers, using two
parallel cables, each <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The voltage provided to the
labs is 230 and 135 V, and UPSs are being used to stabilize energy. Power to
the camp is provided separately to avoid power fluctuations at the
measurement sites. When the tall tower is established, it is planned to
upgrade the power generation to a new system of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kVA
generators at a distance of 2–3 km downwind of the tower. <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Measurement methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Ecological studies</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Floristic composition and biomass characterization</title>
      <p>Forest plots of three ha each were inventoried in the igapó, the
campinarana, the terra firme on ancient river terraces, and the terra firme
on the plateau in order to provide a preliminarily description of the
floristic composition and turnover as well as the aboveground wood biomass
(AGWB). All trees with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm DBH (diameter at breast height) were
numbered, tagged with aluminum plates, and, when possible, identified in the
field. Fertile and sterile vouchers were collected for later identification
in the INPA herbarium. The AGWB was estimated by a pantropical allometric
model  (Feldpausch et al., 2012) considering DBH, tree height, and wood
specific gravity. We measured tree height with a trigonometric measuring
device (Blume-Leiss) and determined wood specific gravity by sampling cores
from the tree trunk and calculating the ratio between dry mass (after drying
the wood samples at 105 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 72 h) and fresh volume.
Additionally we used data from the Global Wood Density Database DRYAD
(Chave et al., 2009) for tree species in the terra firme
forests and from Targhetta (2012) for tree species in the campina and
igapó forests.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Leaf phenology</title>
      <p>An RGB camera (StarDot NetCam XL 3MP) was installed in June 2013 at the top
of the walk-up tower. The wide-angle view with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2048</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>1536</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixel resolution
includes over 250 separable tree crowns within an area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 ha
of the forest plateau. The camera aim is steeply oblique and toward the
west so that the sun is behind the camera when images are recorded from
mid-morning until noon. Illumination artifacts are minimized by selecting
images with homogeneous overcast sky and a fixed narrow range of incident
radiance, and by post-selection radiometric normalization. Leaf phenology
change is most evident in individual crowns, so timelines of the green
chromatic coordinate, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,   (Richardson et al., 2007) were made
for each crown. A steep and sustained increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a crown can
only be caused by the flushing of a new leaf cohort. The number of crowns
reaching a flush-caused peak of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in their individual timelines were
counted each month.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Soil characterization</title>
      <p>Soil sampling was performed on the ancient terraces (old floodplains) and
terra firme plateaus at the ATTO site according to a standard protocol
(Quesada et al., 2010).
Five samples up to 2 m in depth were taken in each forest plot and one 2 m
depth pit was dug close to each plot. We used the World Reference Base for
soil resources to classify soil types  (IUSS (International Union of
Soil Science) Working Group WRB, 2006). Soil exchangeable cations were
determined with the silver thiourea method  (Pleysier and Juo, 1980),
and soil carbon and nitrogen were analyzed using an automated elemental
analyzer     (Pella, 1990; Nelson and Sommers, 1996). Particle size
was analyzed using the pipette method    (Gee and Bauder, 1986). Soil
physical properties were calculated for each plot using the “Quesada
Index”     (Quesada et al., 2010). This index is based on measurements of effective soil depth, soil
structure, topography, and anoxia. To investigate the current soil
weathering levels, a chemically based weathering index, total reserve bases
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>RB), was calculated. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>RB is based on total soil cation
concentration and is considered to give a chemical estimation of weatherable
minerals     (Quesada et al.,
2010).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Meteorology</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Overview of (micro)-meteorological sensors, trace gas and aerosol
instrumentation installed at the walk-up tower.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.78}[.78]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="227.622047pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="113.811024pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quantity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Instrument</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Height a.g.l./depth (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Institution</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil heat flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Heat flux sensor (HFP01, Hukseflux, Netherlands)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA, MPIC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Water content reflectometer (CS615, Campbell Scientific Inc., USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Thermistor (108, Campbell Scientific Inc., USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1, 0.2, 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA, MPIC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shortwave radiation (incoming and reflected)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pyranometer (CMP21,Kipp &amp; Zonen, Netherlands)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longwave radiation (atmospheric and terrestrial)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pyrgeometer (CGR4, Kipp &amp; Zonen, Netherlands)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAR (incoming and reflected)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quantum sensor (PAR LITE, Kipp &amp; Zonen, Netherlands)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">USP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Net radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Net radiometer (NR-LITE2, Kipp &amp; Zonen, Netherlands)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ultra violet radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">UV radiometer (CUV5, Kipp &amp; Zonen, Netherlands)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rainfall</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rain gauge (TB4, Hydrological Services Pty. Ltd., Australia)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Air temperature and relative humidity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Termohygrometer (CS215, Rotronic Measurement Solutions, UK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81.0, 73.0, 55.0, 40.0, 36.0, 26.0, 12.0, 4.0, 1.5, 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atmospheric pressure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Barometer (PTB101B, Vaisala, Finnland)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind speed and direction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2-D sonic anemometer (WindSonic, Gill Instruments Ltd., UK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">73.0, 65.0, 50.0, 42.0, 26.0, 19.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind vector components (u, v, w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3D sonic anemometer (WindMaster, Gill Instruments Ltd., UK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81.0, 46.0, 36.0, 4.0, 1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O molar density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">IRGA (LI-7500A, LI-COR Inc., USA) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>IRGA (LI-7200, LI-COR Inc., USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81.0, 46.0 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, EMBRAPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical profile of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO mixing ratios</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">G1301 (CFADS-109) and G1302 (CKADS-018, both Picarro Inc., USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0, 24.0, 38.0, 53.0, 79.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-BGC, MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical profile of NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O mixing ratios</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CLD 780TR (Eco Physics, Switzerland), BLC (Droplet Measurement Technologies Inc., USA), TEI 49i (Thermo Electron Corp, USA), IRGA 7000 (LI-COR Inc., USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05, 0.5, 4.0, 12.0, 24.0, 38.3, 53.0, 79.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">INPA, MPI-C, UEA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical profile of VOCs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Proton transfer mass spectrometer (PTR-QMS 500, Ionicon, Austria)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05, 0.5, 4.0, 12.0, 24.0, 38.3, 53.0, 79.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C, USP, INPA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical profile of total reactivity to OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Comparative reaction method, proton transfer mass spectrometer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05, 0.5, 4.0, 12.0, 24.0, 38.3, 53.0, 79.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Black carbon equivalent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Multiangle Absorption Photometer (model 5012, Thermo-Scientific, USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Refractory black carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP-2, Droplet Measurement Technologies, USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Black carbon equivalent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aethalometer (model AE31 or AE33, Magee Scientific Corporation, USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">USP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol scattering</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nephelometer (model 3563, TSI, USA) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Ecotech Aurora 3000; wavelengths 450, 525, and 635 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">USP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol number concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Condensation particle counter (model 3022A,TSI, USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol size distribution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (Droplet Measurement Technologies, USA) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS, TSI model 3080, St. Paul, MN, USA; size range: 10-430 nm) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Optical Particle Sizer (OPS, TSI model 3330; size range: 0.3-10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Wide Range Aerosol Spectrometer (WRAS, Grimm Aerosol Technik, Ainring, Germany; size range: 6 nm - 32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>60.0 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>60.0 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Primary biological aerosol particles (PBAP)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wideband Integrated Bioaerosol Spectrometer (WIBS-4, DMT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPI-C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol chemical composition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM, Aerodyne, USA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">USP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The walk-up tower is equipped with a suite of standard meteorological
sensors (Table 2). The following quantities are continuously recorded: (a) soil heat flux, soil moisture, and soil temperature (10 min time
resolution), (b) incoming and outgoing short and long wave radiation,
photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), net radiation, ultraviolet radiation,
rainfall, relative humidity (RH), air temperature, atmospheric pressure, and
wind speed and direction (1 min time resolution). Data acquisition is
performed by several data loggers (CR3000 and CR1000, Campbell Scientific
Inc., USA). Visibility is measured with an optical fog sensor (OFS,
Eigenbrodt GmbH, Königsmoor, Germany), which detects the backscattered
light intensity from a 650 nm laser.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Turbulence and flux measurements</title>
      <p>Turbulent exchange fluxes of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as surface
boundary layer stability are measured within and above the canopy using the
eddy covariance (EC) technique. The method is well documented in the
literature (e.g., Baldocchi, 2003; Foken et al., 2012) and will not be
described here. Three-dimensional wind and temperature fluctuations were
measured by sonic anemometers at 81, 46 and 1.0 m a.g.l. (see Table 2).
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluctuations are detected by three fast response
open-path CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O infrared gas analyzers installed at a
lateral distance of about 10 cm from the sonic path. The high-frequency
signals are recorded at 10 Hz by CR1000 data loggers. The raw data are
processed applying state-of-the-art correction methods using the software
Alteddy (version 3.9; <uri>www.climatexchange.nl/projects/alteddy/</uri>) based on
Aubinet et al. (2000). Fluxes, means and variances are calculated for
half-hourly intervals (de Araújo et al., 2002, 2008, 2010). Continuous
micrometeorological measurements have been made since September 2012, with
some interruptions due to technical problems. The raw data are archived and
are made available under the LBA data policy
(<uri>https://daac.ornl.gov/LBA/lba_data_policy.html</uri>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Vertical profiles of reactive trace gases and total OH reactivity</title>
      <p>Ozone is measured by a UV-absorption technique (Thermo Scientific 49i,
Franklin, MA, USA), using Nafion dryers to minimize the effects of changing
water vapor concentrations     (Wilson and Birks, 2006). Mixing ratios
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O are measured by non-dispersive infrared absorption
techniques (Licor-7000, LI-COR, Lincoln, USA). The detection limits are 0.5 ppb for ozone, 1 ppm
for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.2 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O.
Instrumental noise for 60-s averages is 0.25 ppb for ozone, 6 ppb for
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (at 370 ppm), and 0.4 ppm for H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (at 10 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>During intensive campaigns, measurements of mixing ratios of Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC), total OH reactivity, nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen
dioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and water vapor (H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) were carried
out at 8 heights in and above the rain forest canopy, using a reactive trace
gas profile system similar to that described by Rummel et al. (2007). The lower part of the vertical profile (0.05, 0.5,
and 4 m above the forest floor) was set up at an undisturbed location near
the walk-up tower (distance 12 m). The upper part of the vertical profile
(12, 24, 38, 53, and 79 m above forest floor) was mounted on the northwest
corner of the walk-up tower. Heated and insulated intake lines (PTFE) were
fed to the analyzers, which were housed in the air conditioned lab container
10 m west of the walk-up tower.</p>
      <p>The NO mixing ratio was determined by a gas-phase chemiluminescence
technique (CLD TR-780, Ecophysics, Switzerland). NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by
the same analyzer after specific conversion to NO by a photolytic converter
(Solid-state Photolytic NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Converter (BLC); DMT, Boulder/USA).
Detection limits are 0.05 ppb for NO and 0.1 ppb for NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The signal
noise is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 % of signal, limited by the zero point noise.</p>
      <p>Measurements of VOC were performed using a proton transfer reaction mass
spectrometer (PTR-MS, Ionicon, Austria) operated under standard conditions
(2.2 hPa, 600 V, 127 Td; 1 Td <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> V m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.). The instrument is
capable of continuously monitoring VOCs with proton affinities higher than
water and at low mixing ratios (several ppt with a time resolution of about
1–20 s)  (Lindinger et al., 1998). One entire VOC vertical
profile (from 0.05 to 80 m, 8 heights in total) can be determined every 16 min using the same inlet system as the NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> instruments.</p>
      <p>Calibration was performed using a gravimetrically prepared multicomponent
standard (Ionimed, Apel&amp;Riemer). Occasionally, samples were collected in
absorbent packed tubes (130 mg of Carbograph 1 [90 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]
followed by 130 mg of Carbograph 5 [560 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]; Lara s.r.l.,
Rome, Italy)  (Kesselmeier et al., 2002) and
analyzed by GC-FID (gas chromatography – flame ionization detection) in order to cross-validate the measurements by PTR-MS and
to determine the monoterpene speciation for the total OH reactivity
measurement.</p>
      <p>In addition to the measurement of individual reactive inorganic trace gases
and the VOCs, the total OH reactivity was determined. Total OH reactivity is
the summed loss rate of all OH-reactive molecules (mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction
rate coefficient) present in the atmosphere. Direct measurements of
total OH reactivity were conducted by the Comparative Reactivity Method (CRM, Sinha et al., 2008) using a PTR-MS as a detector. The PTR-MS
monitored the mixing ratio of a reagent (pyrrole) after mixing and reaction
in a Teflon-coated glass reactor. Pyrrole alternatingly reacts with OH alone
and with OH in the presence of ambient air containing many more OH reactive
compounds. The competitive reactions of the reagent and the ambient OH
reactive molecules cause a change in the detected levels of pyrrole. This
can be equated to the atmospheric total OH reactivity provided the
instrument is well calibrated and appropriate corrections are applied
(Nölscher et al., 2012). The total
OH reactivity instrument was regularly tested for linearity of response using
an isoprene gas standard (Air Liquide). VOC and total OH reactivity
measurements were performed simultaneously with two separate PTR-MS systems
measuring from the same inlet so that the results may be directly compared
over time, height, and season. The CRM was able to measure OH
reactivity down to 3 s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, estimated by the minimum observable
modulation above two times the standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the noise
(measured in zero air). The overall uncertainty in the measurement was
16 %, including errors in detector (5 %), rate coefficient (14 %), gas
standard (5 %) and flow dilution (2 %).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Vertical profiles of long-lived trace gases (CO, CO${}_{{\mathbf{2}}}$, and
CH${}_{{\mathbf{4}}})$}?><title>Vertical profiles of long-lived trace gases (CO, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>In March 2012, continuous and high precision CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CO
measurements were established in an air-conditioned container at the foot of
the 80 m-tall walk-up tower. The sample air inlets are installed at five
levels: 79, 53, 38, 24, and 4 m above ground. The inlet tubes are
constantly flushed at a flow rate of several liters per minute to avoid wall
interaction within the tubing. A portion of the sample air is sub-sampled
from the high flow lines at a lower flow rate for analysis with instruments
based on the cavity ring-down spectroscopy technique (G1301 and G1302
analyzers [Picarro Inc., USA] for measuring CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively).</p>
      <p>The G1301 analyzer (Serial CFADS-109) provides data with a standard deviation
of the raw data below 0.05 ppm for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.5 ppb for CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
long-term drift is below 2 ppm and 1 ppb per year for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. For the G1302 (Serial CKADS-018), tests with a stable
gas tank show a standard deviation of the raw data of 0.04 ppm for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 7 ppb for CO. The long-term drift of the analyzer is below 2 ppm and
4 ppb per year for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, respectively. Both analyzers agree well
with a CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> difference below 0.02 ppm. When the G1301 analyzer broke
down in 2012, it was replaced from December 2012 until October 2013 with a
Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer (FGGA) based on off-axis integrated cavity
output spectroscopy (OA-ICOS; Los Gatos Research Inc., USA) as an emergency
solution. This CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O analyzer is designed for
measuring at rates of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 Hz and is primarily used for eddy covariance
and chamber flux measurements, where a low drift rate is less vital than for
highly precise and stable long-term measurements. The FGGA operates with a
raw standard deviation of 0.6 ppm for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2 ppb for CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; the
drift is quite large with 1 ppm and 3 ppb per day for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. For the time when the FGGA was used, the calibration
and drift correction routines were adopted accordingly. The detailed
description of the whole measurement system, including measurement,
calibration, and correction routines will be presented elsewhere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Aerosol measurements</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6.SSS1">
  <title>Size distributions and optical measurements</title>
      <p>Aerosols are sampled above the canopy at 60 m height, without size cut-off,
and transported in a laminar flow through a 2.5 cm diameter stainless steel
tube into an air-conditioned container (aerosol lab at mast, see Sect. 2.4).
The sample humidity is kept below 40 % using silica diffusion driers.
Since January 2015, the aerosol sample air is being dried using a fully
automatic silica diffusion dryer, developed by the Institute for
Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany   (Tuch et al., 2009).
Aerosol size distributions at 60 m are currently measured from 10 nm up to
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m using three instruments: a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer
(SMPS, TSI model 3080, St. Paul, MN, USA; size range: 10–430 nm), an
Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS, DMT, Boulder, CO, USA;
size range: 60–1000 nm), and an Optical Particle Sizer (OPS, TSI model 3330;
size range: 0.3–10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). The SMPS provides an electromobility size
distribution, whereas the UHSAS and OPS measure aerosol light scattering and
derive the size distributions from the particle scattering intensity
(Cai et al., 2008). In addition to these continuous
above-canopy measurements, aerosol size distributions are measured with a
Wide Range Aerosol Spectrometer (WRAS, Grimm Aerosol Technik, Ainring,
Germany; size range: 6 nm–32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) from a separate inlet line below
the canopy at 3 m height. The WRAS provides electromobility size
distributions in the size range of 6–350 nm and uses particle light
scattering for the size range above 300 nm. Details of the instrumentation
setup are given in Table 2.</p>
      <p>For measuring aerosol light scattering, we use a three-wavelength
integrating nephelometer (until February 2014: TSI model 3563, wavelengths 450,
550, and 700 nm; after February 2014: Ecotech Aurora 3000, wavelengths 450, 525,
and 635 nm)  (Anderson et al., 1996; Anderson and Ogren, 1998).
Calibration is carried out using CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as the high span gas and filtered
air as the low span gas. The zero signals are measured once every 12 h using filtered ambient air. For the 300 s averages applied here,
the detection limits, defined as a signal to noise ratio of 2, for
scattering coefficients are 0.45, 0.17, and 0.26 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 450, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>550</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>635</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, respectively. Since sub-micrometer particles predominate in
the particle number size distribution at our remote continental site, the
sub-micron corrections given in Table 4 of Anderson and Ogren (1998) were used for the truncation corrections. Bond et al. (2009) suggested that this correction is accurate to within 2 %
for a wide range of atmospheric particles, but that the error could be as
high as 5 % for highly absorbing particles.</p>
      <p>A Multi-Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP, Model 5012, Thermo Electron
Group, USA, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>670</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) and a 7-wavelength Aethalometer (until
January 2015 model AE-31, since then model AE-33) (Magee Scientific Company,
Berkeley, CA, USA, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 470, 520, 590, 660, 880, and 950 nm)
are used for measuring the light absorption by particles. The MAAP and
aethalometer have been deployed at ATTO since March 2012. In the MAAP
instrument, the optical absorption coefficient of aerosol collected on a
filter is determined by radiative transfer calculations, which include
multiple scattering effects and absorption enhancement due to reflections
from the filter. A mass absorption efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>abs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
6.6 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to convert the MAAP absorption data to
equivalent BC (BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the Aethalometer, an empirical correction
method described by Rizzo et al. (2011) was used to correct
the data for the scattering artifact.</p>
      <p>Refractory black carbon (rBC) is measured by a four-channel Single Particle
Soot Photometer (SP2). The instrument is calibrated every 6 months using
monodisperse fullerene aerosol particles for rBC calibration, and
polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres for scattering calibration. The instrument
is sensitive to rBC in the size range between 70 and 280 nm. A recent
instrumental upgrade provides a broader rBC dynamic range (70–480 nm).</p>
      <p>Regular quality checks are performed with all aerosol sizing instruments and
CPCs, including flow checks, zero tests, and intercomparisons with ambient
aerosol and monodisperse PSL cells. Exemplary plots are already included in
the manuscript (Fig. 26). The MAAP and aethalometer are subject to frequent
intercomparisons with the other optical instruments. For example, two
aethalometers and the MAAP were operated side-by-side during an intensive
campaign in November/December 2014. The BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the individual
instruments agreed well. The SP2 instrument was carefully intercalibrated
with another SP2 during the GoAmazon-2014 campaign.</p>
      <p>Fluorescent biological aerosol particles (FBAPs) are measured with the
Wideband Integrated Bioaerosol Spectrometer (WIBS-4A, DMT). The WIBS
utilizes light-induced fluorescence technology to detect biological
materials in real-time based on the presence of fluorophores in the ambient
particles    (Kaye et al., 2005). A <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> excitation (280 and 370 nm) – emission (310–400 and 420–650 nm) matrix is recorded along
with the particle optical size and shape factor. The FBAP concentrations
reported in this study correspond to the FL3 channel (excitation at 370 nm
and emission in the waveband of 420–650 nm) of the WIBS instrument
(Healy et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6.SSS2">
  <title>Chemical measurements and hygroscopicity</title>
      <p>The submicron non-refractory aerosol composition at a height of 60 m is
measured using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM, Aerodyne, USA)
as described by Ng et al. (2011). The ACSM
samples aerosol particles in the 75–650 nm size range. The non-refractory
fraction flash vaporizes on a hot surface (600 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), the evaporated
gas phase compounds are ionized by 70 eV electron impact, and their spectra
determined using a quadrupole mass spectrometer. The chemical speciation is
determined via deconvolution of the mass spectra according to Allan et al. (2004). Mass concentrations of particulate
organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride are obtained with
detection limits <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 30 min of signal
averaging. Mass calibration of the system is performed using size-selected
ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate aerosol following the procedure
described by Ng et al. (2011). A collection
efficiency (CE) of 1.0 is applied    (similar to
Chen et al., 2015), yielding good agreement with other instruments.</p>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling was carried out from 7 March to 21 April 2012 on
Nuclepore<sup>®</sup> polycarbonate filters at 80 m on the walk-up tower
using a Harvard Impactor; samples were collected over 48 hour periods. They
were analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) (MiniPal 4,
PANalytical) at 1 mA and 9 kV for low-Z (Na to Cl) elements, and 0.3 mA, 30 kV, and internal Al filter for the other elements. Soluble species were
determined by ion chromatography (Dionex, ICS-5000) using conductivity
detection for cations and anions and UV-VIS for soluble transition metals.
For cation separation, a capillary column CS12A was used, for anions, an
AS19 column, and for transition metals, a CS5A column (calibrated to
quantify traces of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Size-resolved cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) measurements are performed
using a continuous-flow streamwise thermal gradient CCN counter (CCNC; model
CCN-100, DMT, Boulder, CO, USA), a differential mobility analyzer (DMA,
Grimm Aerosol Technik, Ainring, Germany) and a condensation particle counter
(CPC model 5412, Grimm Aerosol Technik). By changing the temperature
gradient, the supersaturation of the CCNC is set to values between 0.1
and 1.1 %. The completion of a full measurement cycle comprising CCN
efficiency spectra at 10 different supersaturation levels takes
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 h. The CCNC is calibrated frequently as part of the
maintenance routines with size selected monodisperse ammonium sulfate
particles  (Rose et al., 2008; Gunthe et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6.SSS3">
  <title>Microspectroscopic analysis of single aerosol particles</title>
      <p>Aerosol samples for scanning electron microscopy with electron probe
micro-analysis (EPMA) were collected on top of the 80 m tower in April 2012.
For the collection of size-segregated samples for single particle analysis,
we used a Battelle impactor with aerodynamic diameter cut-offs at 4, 2, 1
and 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The particles were collected on TEM (transmission electron microscope) grids covered with a
thin carbon film (15–25 nm). Aerosol samples for x-ray microspectroscopy
were collected using a single stage impactor, operated at a flow rate of
1-1.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a corresponding 50 % size cut-off of about 500 nm.
Particles below this nominal cut-off are not deposited quantitatively;
however, a certain fraction is still collected via diffusive deposition.
Aerosol particles were collected onto silicon nitride substrates (membrane
width 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, membrane thickness 100 nm, Silson Ltd., Northampton,
UK) for short sampling periods (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 min), which ensures a thin particle coverage on the substrate appropriate for single particle
analysis.</p>
      <p>Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy with near-edge X-ray absorption fine
structure analysis (STXM-NEXAFS) measurements were made at the Advanced
Light Source (ALS, Berkeley, CA, USA) and the Berliner
Elektronenspeicherring-Gesellschaft für Synchrotronstrahlung (BESSY II,
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB), Germany). A
detailed description of the instrumentation and techniques can be found
elsewhere  (Kilcoyne et al., 2003; Follath et al., 2010; Pöhlker et
al., 2012, 2014). Scanning Electron Microscopy with
Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX) analysis was carried out
using a Jeol JSM-6390 SEM equipped with an Oxford Link SATW ultrathin window
EDX detector. For EPMA, quantitative and qualitative calculations of the
particle composition were performed using iterative Monte Carlo simulations
and hierarchical cluster analysis   (Ro et al., 2003) to obtain
average relative concentrations for each different cluster of similar
particle types.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6.SSS4">
  <title>Chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol</title>
      <p>Filter sampling for secondary organic aerosol (SOA) analysis was performed
on the walk-up tower at a height of 42 m above ground level. Fine aerosol
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was sampled at a flow rate of 2.3 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on TFE-coated
borosilicate glass fiber filters (Pallflex, T60A20, Pall Life Science, USA).
The sampling times were 6, 12, or 24 h. After sampling the filters were
stored at 255 K until extraction.</p>
      <p>The extraction of the filters was performed with acetonitrile (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.9 %; Sigma Aldrich) in a sonication bath at room temperature. The
filter extracts were evaporated with a gentle nitrogen flow at room
temperature in an evaporation unit (Reacti Vap 1; Fisher Scientific), and
the residue was re-dissolved in 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L HPLC grade water (Milli-Q
water system, Millipore, Bedford, USA) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> acetonitrile (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.9 %;
Sigma Aldrich) mixture (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The separation and analysis was performed with an UHPLC (ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography) system (Dionex
UltiMate 3000) coupled to a Q Exactive electrospray ionization Orbitrap mass
spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). A Hypersil Gold column
(50 mm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 mm, 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size, 175 Å pore
size; Thermo Scientific) was used. The eluents were HPLC grade water (Milli-Q
water system, Millipore, Bedford, USA) with 0.01 % formic acid and 2 %
acetonitrile (eluent A) and acetonitrile with 2 % HPLC grade water (eluent
B). The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.5 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The column was
held at a constant temperature of 298 K in the column oven. The MS was
operated with an auxiliary gas flow rate of 15 (instrument specific arbitrary
units, AU), a sheath gas flow rate of 30 AU, a capillary temperature of
623 K, and a spray voltage of 3000 V. The MS was operated in the negative
ion mode, the resolution was 70 000, and the measured mass range was
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 80–350.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Ongoing research and initial results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Ecological studies</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Tree species richness, composition, turnover, and aboveground wood biomass</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Tree species richness, forest structure, above-ground wood biomass
(AGWB) and carbon stocks of the inventoried forest plots.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DBH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Tree height</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Species richness</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">AGWB<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Carbon stock<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (max)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (max)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">AGWB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Trees ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(spp. ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Floodplain (igapó)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">695</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 (136)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 (27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">126</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">540</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.0 (78)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2 (29)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">146</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">928</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.4 (117)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 (18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">173</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">721 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 195</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">148 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Campina/campinarana</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">560</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.1 (90)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7 (34)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">503</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.4 (83)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 (26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">786</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.7 (162)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0 (33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">185</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">616 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">158 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ancient fluvial terrace</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">516</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.2 (100)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 (30)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">135</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">181</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">483</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.7 (117)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3 (32)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">194</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">492</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.6 (177)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 (38)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">126</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">232</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">116</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">497 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">127 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">202 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">101 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Terra firme</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">522</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.9 (152)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 (40)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">132</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">318</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">159</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">644</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.0 (120)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3 (38)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">142</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">335</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">168</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">plot 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">624</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 (96)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4 (36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">137</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">368</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">184</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">597 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">137 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">340 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">170 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Mean flood height in the igapó floodplains:
plot 1: 3.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.06 m; plot 2: 3.12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.62 m; plot 3:
1.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64 m.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Aboveground wood biomass (AGWB) was calculated using a pantropical
allometric equation considering diameter (DBH in cm), tree height (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in m) and
wood specific gravity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in gċm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as independent parameters
(Feldpausch et al., 2012): AGWB <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9205</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9894</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>DBH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The carbon stock was estimated by 50 % of the AGWB
(Clark et al., 2001).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>In total, 7293 trees <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm DBH were recorded in the 12 1-ha
inventoried plots, which included 60 families, 206 genera, and 417 species.
Tree species richness was highest in the terra firme forest on the plateau,
followed by the terra firme forest on the fluvial terrace, the campinarana,
and the seasonally flooded igapó (Table 3). Floristic similarity
(Bray–Curtis index) within plots of the same forest types ranged from
45–65 %, but was highly variable between different forest types
(2–54 %). Accordingly, the species turnover across the investigated forest
types was high, especially when seasonally inundated forest plots were
compared to their non-flooded counterparts (Fig. 4). AGWB varied
considerably between the studied forest ecosystems as a result of varying
tree heights, DBH, and basal area (Table 3). Carbon stocks in the AGWB
increased from 74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the igapó forest to
79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the campina/campinarana, and 101 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>on the ancient fluvial terrace, reaching maximum values of
170 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the terra firme forests. Tree species richness
correlated significantly with carbon stocks in AGWB (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.61; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Species turnover of the four inventoried forest types at the ATTO
site. Turnover is expressed as Shmida and Wilson's (1985) index: SMI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are gained and lost species from site 1 to
site 2; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the numbers of species in site 1 and site 2. TF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
terra firme forest upon plateau, Terr <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> terra firme forest upon fluvial
terrace, Camp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> campinarana, and IG <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonally flooded black-water
forest (igapó).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The floristic data indicate that the rain forests at the ATTO site combine
high alpha diversity with high beta diversity at a small geographic scale,
where tree species segregate mainly due to contrasting local edaphic
conditions  (e.g., Tuomisto et al., 2003; ter Steege et al., 2013;
Wittmann et al., 2013). Biomass and carbon stocks vary considerably between
habitats, and show low values on flooded and nutrient-poor soils and high
values on well-drained upland soils, as previously reported elsewhere for
other Amazonian regions  (e.g., Chave et al., 2005; Malhi et al., 2006;
Schöngart et al., 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Portion of camera view, contrast enhanced. Spatial and temporal
crown color differences are most evident in the five driest months (July to
November) when crowns present rapidly changing phenostages associated with
leaf flush, briefly deciduous pre-flush abscission, young red unexpanded
leaves, or bright green recently expanded leaves.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f05.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Cryptogamic covers</title>
      <p>We are investigating the potential of cryptogamic covers to serve as a
source of bioaerosol particles and chemical compounds. Cryptogamic covers
comprise photoautotrophic communities of cyanobacteria, algae, lichens, and
bryophytes in varying proportions, which may also host fungi, other
bacteria, and archaea  (Elbert et al., 2012). A common feature of all
these organism groups is their poikilohydric nature, meaning that their
moisture status follows the external water conditions. Thus the organisms
dry out under dry conditions, being reactivated again upon rain, fog, or
condensation.</p>
      <p>Since September 2014, we have been conducting long-term measurements to
monitor the activity patterns of cryptogamic covers at four different canopy
heights at 10 min intervals, during which we measure temperature and water
content within and light intensities directly on top of bio-crusts growing
on the trunk of a tree. First analyses of the microclimate data indicate
that microorganisms in the upper stem region of the trees are activated by
fog or dewfall in the early morning hours, often coinciding with an aerosol
particle burst in the accumulation mode. Particle measurements conducted on
isolated organisms also show a significant release of accumulation mode
particles by wet and thus active organisms, e.g., fungi belonging to the
phylum of Basidiomycota. Thus, we have the first clear indications that
cryptogamic covers may play a key role in the enigmatic bioaerosol
occurrence frequently observed at the ATTO site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Upper canopy leaf phenology</title>
      <p>A single annual leaf flush was seen in most upper canopy crowns,
concentrated in the five driest months (July to November) (Fig. 5).
Consequently, mature leaves with high light-use efficiency will be most
abundant in the late dry season and early wet season. Massive leaf renewal
in the dry season on the ATTO plateau may drive seasonality of
photosynthesis and of photosynthetic capacity at the landscape scale, as has
been indicated at the Santarém and the LBA km34 eddy flux tower sites in
the central Amazon (Doughty and Goulden, 2008; Restrepo-Coupe et al.,
2013).</p>
      <p>The lack of a near-infrared (NIR) band in our camera precludes the direct
measurement of leaf amount, but the RGB band space discriminates crown
phenostages whose relative NIR reflectances are known. Gradual leaf
attrition over the wet season, when leaf replacement is low, followed by
early dry season pre-flush abscission and the emergence of young unexpanded
leaves, should all lead to a lower landscape-scale amount of fully expanded
leaves around June or July. Completion of leaf flushing in most crowns by
the late dry season should lead to a maximum amount of fully expanded leaves
in the late dry and early wet seasons. This is consistent with the seasonal
pattern of central Amazon leaf amount detected with the Enhanced Vegetation
Index from the MODIS orbital sensor        (e.g., Huete
et al., 2006) and counters recent critiques of detectability of seasonal
change in Amazon forest greenness  (Galvão et al., 2011; Morton et
al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Soil characterization</title>
      <p>Soils in the terra firme plateaus were classified as ferralsols, which are
ancient, highly weathered, and well-drained soils frequently occurring in
geologically ancient surfaces  (Chauvel et al., 1987). Soils at the
fluvial terraces were classified as alisol, which show a more recent
pedogenetic status when compared to the highly weathered Ferralsols at the
plateaus. Due to their lower weathering degree, soils from the terrace have
a greater capacity to supply nutrients, with higher total P and higher total
reserve bases. The soil carbon stocks varied from 129 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the terrace to 164 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the plateau,
indicating that belowground C stocks are of similar magnitude to the
aboveground carbon stocks in the forest (Table 4). Differences of
belowground carbon stocks between terrace and plateau are mainly associated
with a higher clay content of the plateau soils.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Carbon stocks, soil bulk density, concentrations of K, Mg, Ca, P;
total reserve bases (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RB</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, clay, silt, and sand; and Quesada's
index of the forest plots.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C stock</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bulk density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mg <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ca <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">P <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RB</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Clay <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Silt <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Sand <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Quesada's</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(mmol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(mmol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(mmol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(mmol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> clay)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Index<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PLATEAUS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">143.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">85.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">160.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">125.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">86.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">164.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">121.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">12.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Means</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">156.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">85.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TERRACES</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">140.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">92.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">52.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">34.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">129.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">181.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">70.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">24.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">140.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">129.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">25.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Means</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">136.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">161.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">19.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Total cumulative C stock up to 2 m depth.
Mean per plot and their
respective standard deviations.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Mean nutrient concentration up to 30 cm depth.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Quesada's Index indicating soil physical constraints in which
higher values of the index show stronger physical constraint. It is a
semi-quantitative index and does not show intermediate values, therefore the
value shown in the “means” line is the median value of the three plots.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Plot of bulk density (g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbon stocks (Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against soil depth. Pronounced differences of belowground carbon
stocks between terrace and plateau occur in deeper layers (Depth <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 cm).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Soil physical constraints are more frequent on the terraces, which show
higher bulk density values (Fig. 6) and therefore increased soil compaction.
Some of these terrace soils also show signs of anoxia (mottling) in deeper
layers. Such impeditive conditions may have an influence on forest structure
(Quesada et al., 2012; Emilio et al., 2014) and dynamics
(Cintra et al., 2013), thereby possibly restricting tree
height or even tree individual biomass storage    (Martins et
al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Meteorological conditions and fluxes</title>
      <p>An overview of the climatic characteristics of the Amazon Basin has been
presented by Nobre et al. (2009). The meteorological setting of the ATTO site
has been described in Sect. 2.1, and the basic meteorological measurements
(wind, temperature, humidity, radiation, etc.) at the site reflect the
regional climate and micrometeorological conditions influenced by local
topography and vegetation. In the following sections we present overviews of
meteorological observations that characterize the site and initial results of
micrometeorological investigations at ATTO. Since the quantification of the
exchange of trace gases and aerosols between the rain forest and the
atmosphere is a key objective of the ATTO program, the study of the structure
and behavior of the atmospheric boundary layer is a central focus here.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Wind roses for <bold>(a)</bold> dry season (15 June–30 November) and
<bold>(b)</bold> wet season (1 December–14 June) based on half-hourly averages
of wind speed and direction measured at 81 m a.g.l. for the period from
18 October 2012 to 23 July 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Wind speed and direction above the forest canopy</title>
      <p>The wind roses for the dry season (15 June–30 November) and the wet season
(1 December–14 June) (based on half-hourly averages of wind speed and
direction measured at 81 m a.g.l. for the period from 18 October 2012 to
23 July 2014; Fig. 7) indicate the dominance of easterly trade wind flows at
the measurement site. A slight shift of the major wind direction towards ENE
is observed during the wet season, whereas flows are mainly from the east
during the dry season. This seasonality can be explained by the inter-annual
north–south migration of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), which
also governs the amount of rainfall (see Poveda et al., 2006). The wind roses
show a slight diurnal variation with small contributions from the north, west
and south during nighttime, when the nocturnal boundary layer is decoupled,
in both seasons. In contrast, during daytime the wind blows nearly all the
time from the east (dry season) and northeast (wet season), with much higher
wind speeds. Maximal wind speeds observed at the site are about
9 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The influence of river and/or lake breeze systems caused by
the Rio Uatumã (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 km distance) is of minor importance and an
effect from Lake Balbina (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 km distance) or other thermally driven
mesoscale circulations could not be detected. This shows that the sampled air
masses mainly have their origin within the fetch of the green ocean extending
several hundred kilometers to the east of the site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Temperature, precipitation, and radiation</title>
      <p>As is typical for the central Amazon Basin, the mean air temperature does
not show strong variations at seasonal timescales due to the high incident
solar radiation throughout the year   (Nobre et al., 2009).
Climatologically in the Manaus region, the highest temperatures are observed
during the dry season, with a September monthly mean of 27.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
whereas the lowest temperatures prevail in the rainy season, with a monthly
mean of 25.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in March.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Diurnal profiles of temperature for <bold>(a)</bold> wet season (March 2014) and
<bold>(b)</bold> dry season (September 2013). Contour plots interpolated from measurements
at 0.4, 1.5, 4, 12, 26, 36, 40, 55, 73, and 81 m.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Vertical profiles of temperature show clear diurnal cycles driven by
radiative heating of the canopy during the day and cooling of the canopy and
the forest floor during the night (Fig. 8). Therefore, both temperature
minima and maxima are observed at the canopy top during both seasons. A
second temperature minimum during night can be observed at the forest floor
during the dry and wet season. During the day warm air from above the canopy
is transported into the forest. Minimum temperatures at the canopy top are
around 22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during both seasons, whereas daytime maxima are
around 28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the wet season and may reach slightly above
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the dry season.</p>
      <p>Rainfall in the Manaus region shows a pronounced seasonal variation,
reaching the highest amounts in March (335.4 mm) and the lowest amounts in
August (47.3 mm), for an average annual total of 2307.4 mm at the INMET
station in Manaus for the standard reference period 1961 to 1990
(<uri>www.inmet.gov.br</uri>). Precipitation at the ATTO site follows this seasonal
cycle with maximum values around March and minimum values in August and
September (Fig. 9). The interannual variability appears to be high at all
times of the year, but especially in the transition to the rainy season, a
fact that has also been evident in the data from the years 1981 to 2010 at
the Manaus station  (Fernandes, 2014). Therefore, the large deviations
from the regional mean during October to January and also in April, when the
ATTO values from the years 2012–2014 differ substantially from the long term
mean of Manaus, are likely the result of interannual variability.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Monthly sums of precipitation at the ATTO site for the years 2012
to 2014. For comparison the data from the Manaus INMET-station
(<uri>www.inmet.gov.br</uri>) for the standard reference period (1961–1990) are shown.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Overall, however, the precipitation patterns at the ATTO site are in good
agreement with its position in the central Amazon, where the months between
February and May are the wettest ones. In this period, the ITCZ reaches its
southernmost position and acts as a strong driver of convective cloud
formation at the equatorial trough. Due to the interaction of trade winds
and sea breeze at the northeast Brazilian coastline, the ITCZ also takes
part in the formation of instability lines that enter the continent and
regenerate during their westerly propagation   (Greco et al., 1990).
In this way, they account for substantial amounts of precipitation. After
this period, the ITCZ shifts to the Northern Hemisphere, accompanying the
movement of the zenith position of the sun. This leads to less precipitation
at the ATTO site, with the driest months being between July and September,
when precipitation is formed mostly by local convection. In the following
months, the amount of precipitation increases again, which coincides with
the formation of a cloud band in a NW/SE direction that is linked to
convection in the Amazon due to the South Atlantic Convergence Zone (SACZ)
(Figueroa and Nobre, 1990; Rocha et al., 2009; Santos and Buchmann,
2010).</p>
      <p>The radiation balance at ATTO as well as the albedo presents a clear
difference between the wet and the dry seasons. Some episodes when the
incident solar radiation exceeds the top-of-atmosphere radiation have been
observed for the ATTO data. They were more frequent during the wet season,
probably due to the effect of cloud gap modulation that intensifies the
radiation received at the surface by reflection and scattering.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Roughness sublayer measurements</title>
      <p>The measurement of turbulent fluxes over tall forest canopies very often
implies that these measurements are made in the so-called <italic>roughness sublayer</italic> (RSL). It is
usually assumed that the RSL extends to 2 or 3 times the height of the
roughness obstacles, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Williams et al., 2007). The
roughness sublayer is considered to be a part of the surface sublayer of the
atmospheric boundary layer, but it is too close to the roughness elements
for Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) to hold. Some progress in the
parameterization of the RSL has been made in terms of applying correction
factors to the traditional similarity functions of the surface layer
(see for example, Mölder et al., 1999, and references
therein). However, the universality of such procedures remains unknown.</p>
      <p>In this section, we briefly show strong evidence that a simple adjustment
factor that depends on the factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the height of
measurement and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the height of the RSL), as employed by
Mölder et al. (1999), is not able to collapse the “variance
method” dimensionless variables
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation of the vertical velocity,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the friction velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard
deviation of a scalar, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is its turbulent scale (see Eqs. 3 and
4 below). In Eqs. (1) and (2), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Obukhov length with a zero-plane
displacement height calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p>
      <p>We analyzed measurements collected during April 2012 at the 39.5 m level,
which is right at the height of the tree tops, in terms of the turbulent
scales
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>We only analyzed measurements under unstable conditions, and considered only
cases where the sensible and latent heat fluxes are both positive (directed
upwards) and the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux is negative (directed downwards). In Eq. (4), the
absolute value is used so that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always positive. The scalar
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents virtual temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (measured by the sonic
anemometer), specific humidity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The analysis is made in terms of the dimensionless standard deviation
functions, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined above. The
overall results for vertical velocity, virtual temperature, and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration are shown in Fig. 10. The solid lines in the figure give
representative functions found in the literature for the surface layer well
above the roughness sublayer    (see, for example, Dias et al.,
2009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>The dimensionless standard deviation function for <bold>(a)</bold> vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> virtual temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the ATTO site from measurements at
39.5 m.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Similar figures were drawn for specific times of day, namely 07:00–09:00,
09:00–11:00, 11:00–13:00, 13:00–15:00 and 15:00–17:00 LT, in an attempt to identify
periods of the day when better agreement (or even a systematic departure,
for example by a constant vertical shift) with the surface-layer curves
could be identified. Temperature and humidity are somewhat better behaved in
this case, but not CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, for reasons that are not clear. Because no
conclusive explanation can be found, we do not show these analyses here.</p>
      <p>Finally, we tried to apply some concepts recently developed by Cancelli et
al. (2012) to relate the applicability of MOST to the strength of
the surface forcing. Cancelli et al. (2012) found that the
applicability of MOST can be well predicted by their “surface flux
number”,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sf</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molecular diffusivity of scalar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the air, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gradient of its mean concentration between the
surface and the measurement height.</p>
      <p>In our case, there is no
easy way to obtain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, so instead we use
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sf</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>As a measure of the applicability of MOST, we use the absolute value of the
difference between the observed value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its
reference value for the surface layer, as used by Dias et al.
(2009), and shown by the solid lines in Fig. 10. The results
are shown in Fig. 11. A relatively stronger forcing is clearly related to a
behavior that is closer to that expected by MOST for both temperature and
humidity,   but not for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests that CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> presents even greater
challenges for our proper understanding of its turbulent transport in the
roughness sublayer over the Amazon Forest.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>From top to bottom, the departure of the dimensionless standard
deviation function, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from its
surface-layer behavior for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f11.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Ultimately, the lack of conformity to MOST found in these investigations (a
fact that has been generally observed in the roughness sublayer over other
forests) implies that scalar fluxes over the Amazon forest derived from
standard models, which use MOST, are bound to have larger errors here than
over lower vegetation, such as grass or crops. We can expect this to affect
any chemical species, and therefore the implications for ATTO are quite
wide-ranging. On the other hand, once the 325 m tall tower is instrumented
and operational, a much better picture will emerge on the extent of the
roughness sublayer and the best strategies to model scalar fluxes over the
forest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Nighttime vertical coupling mechanisms between the canopy and the atmosphere</title>
      <p>During daytime, intense turbulent activity provides an effective and
vigorous coupling between the canopy layer and the atmosphere above it. As a
consequence, vertical profiles of chemical species do not commonly show
abrupt variations induced by episodes of intense vertical flux divergence.
Accordingly, scalar fluxes between the canopy and the atmosphere are
relatively well-behaved during daytime so that their inference from the
vertical profiles of mean quantities can be achieved using established
similarity relationships. At night, on the other hand, the reduced
turbulence intensity often causes the canopy to decouple from the air above
it  (Fitzjarrald and Moore, 1990; Betts et al., 2009; van Gorsel et al.,
2011; Oliveira et al., 2013). In these circumstances, vertical fluxes
converge to shallow layers in which the scalars may accumulate intensely
over short time periods. In the absence of convective turbulence, which is
the main factor for daytime transport, other physical processes become
relevant in the stable boundary layer (SBL), such as drainage flow  (Sun
et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2015), vertical divergence of radiation
(Drüe and Heinemann, 2007; Hoch et al., 2007), global intermittency
(Mahrt, 1999), atmosphere-surface interactions
(Steeneveld et al., 2008), and gravity waves  (Nappo, 1991;
Brown and Wood, 2003; Zeri and Sa, 2011).</p>
      <p>In this section, we discuss the role of intermittent turbulent events of
variable intensity and periodicity, which provide episodic connection
between the canopy and the atmosphere and can induce oscillatory behavior in
the nocturnal boundary layer  (Van de Wiel et al.,
2002). They are characterized by brief episodes of turbulence with
intervening periods of relatively weak or unmeasurably small fluctuations
(Mahrt, 1999). In some cases, such events may comprise almost the
entirety of the scalar fluxes during a given night. The effects of gravity
waves are discussed in the next section.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Upper panels: temporal evolution of the three wind components for
the night of 27 April 2012 at each of the ATTO observation levels. The lower
panel shows the corresponding eddy covariance CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Nocturnal decoupling occurs rather frequently at the ATTO site, usually
punctuated by intermittent mixing episodes, in agreement with previous
studies made over the Amazon forest  (Fitzjarrald and Moore, 1990; Ramos
et al., 2004). During a typical decoupled, intermittent night, the
horizontal wind components are weak in magnitude and highly variable
temporally, often switching signs in an unpredictable manner (Fig. 12). As a
consequence, it is common that winds from all possible directions occur in
such a night. The example from the ATTO site indicates that despite such a
large variability, both horizontal wind components are generally in phase
above the canopy, from the 42 m to the 80 m level. Vertical velocity at the
42 m level is highly intermittent, with various turbulent events of variable
intensity scattered throughout the night. While being less turbulent, the
80 m level is also less intermittent, presenting a more continuous behavior.
The relevance of the intermittent events to characterize canopy-atmosphere
exchange becomes clear when one looks at the fluxes of the scalars, such as
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12, bottom panel). During this night, the majority of the
exchange just above the canopy (42 m) happened during two specific events,
at around 02:00 and 03:30 LT.</p>
      <p>A proper understanding of nocturnal vertical profiles and fluxes of scalars
above any forest canopy depends, therefore, on explaining the atmospheric
controls on intermittent turbulence at canopy level. In the Amazon forest,
this necessity is enhanced, as there are indications that turbulence is more
intermittent here, possibly as a consequence of flow instabilities generated
by the wind profile at canopy level (Ramos et al., 2004).
This is corroborated by early observations at the ATTO site, which indicated
decoupling and intermittency occurring during more than half of the nights.</p>
      <p>It is not yet clear what triggers these intermittent events. In general,
previous studies indicate that the more intense events are generated above
the nocturnal boundary layer, propagating from above  (Sun et al., 2002, 2004). On the other hand, less intense events that occur in the
decoupled state have been characterized as natural modes of turbulence
variability generated near the surface    (Costa et al.,
2011). At ATTO, the occurrence of the highest intensity at 42 m indicates
that intermittency is generated at the canopy level. Is it possible, then,
to identify the mechanisms that trigger their occurrence?</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>Mean multi-resolution turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) spectra at
the three observation levels.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f13.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Some evidence can be gathered from a spectral decomposition of the turbulent
flow at the different observation levels. Although the horizontal velocities
in Fig. 12 are highly in phase between 42 and 80 m, it is clear from this
plot that the wind speed is generally higher at 80 m, while there are more
turbulent fluctuations at 42 m. When these signals are decomposed in terms
of their time scale to provide a turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) spectrum
(Acevedo et al., 2014), the more intense turbulence at
42 m appears as a peak at time scales just greater than 10 s (Fig. 13). At
longer time scales, on the other hand, there is a sharp energy increase at
80 m, making this the most energetic level for scales larger than 100 s.
This low-frequency flow at 80 m is characterized by the large wind direction
variability apparent in Fig. 12. These are non-turbulent flow patterns that
have been recently classified as “submeso”   (Mahrt, 2009). Submeso
flow has low intensity, with large and apparently unpredictable temporal
variability. It is usually present in the atmospheric boundary layer,
becoming dominant in conditions when the turbulent scales are highly
reduced, such as in the decoupled nocturnal boundary layer.</p>
      <p>Evidence from ATTO indicates that it is possible to associate the
intermittent events at canopy level with the mean wind shear above the
canopy. In Fig. 14, it is evident that the two intense events at 42 m,
around 21:30 and 02:00 LT, are triggered by episodes of intense wind shear
between 42 and 80 m. In conditions where the 80 m wind field is dominated by
submeso processes, such as in the examples in Figs. 12 and 14, it is this
portion of the flow that determines the occurrence of intense wind shear
episodes. Furthermore, it is clear from these examples that flow patterns at
levels as high as 80 m exert important controls on the exchange of scalars
at canopy level. Questions such as the height variation of submeso flow have
yet to be answered. Tall tower observations, such as those planned to be
carried on at ATTO, are very important to provide the data for this kind of
analysis and to deepen the understanding of exchange processes between the
canopy and the atmosphere during the calm nights that are common in the
Amazon forest.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><caption><p>Upper panel: multi-resolution 42 m vertical velocity spectra for
the night of 4 May 2012 (colors and contours), and mean wind difference
between the 80 and 42 m levels (red line, scale at the right side). Lower
panel: temporal evolution of vertical velocity at the 42 m level for the
same night.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f14.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Orographically induced gravity waves in the stable boundary layer above the
Amazon forest</title>
      <p>Gravity waves (GWs) may occur in the forest boundary layer during relatively
calm nights. Depending on the magnitude of the turbulent drag, they
influence the exchange processes that take place in the stable boundary
layer of the atmosphere  (Steeneveld et al., 2009). Internal
gravity waves can be generated by several forcing mechanisms, including
sudden changes of surface roughness, topography, convection, terrain
undulations, etc.  (Nappo, 2002). These features can reallocate energy
and momentum and are significant in determining atmospheric vertical
structure and the coupling of mesoscale to microscale phenomena
(Steeneveld et al., 2008, 2009). Chimonas and Nappo
(1989) showed that under typical conditions of the planetary boundary
layer, GWs can interact with the mean flow resulting in turbulence at
unexpected altitudes.</p>
      <p>Fast response data of vertical wind velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
measured in the nocturnal boundary layer (NBL) at the ATTO site were
analyzed to detect the occurrence of GWs, and to identify under which
situations they would be generated by terrain undulations, using the
methodology proposed by Steeneveld et al. (2009). One of the
goals of this study is to investigate the structure of turbulence associated
with the conditions under which GWs would be forced by ground undulations
(class I) in contrast to those under which GWs would be expected to be
forced by other mechanisms (class II). To reach this goal, the methodology
of Steeneveld et al. (2009), based on Chimonas and Nappo
(1989), has been used to define whether a specific measurement
belongs to class I or class II, based on the condition:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wave number associated with the ground undulations, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
Scorer parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean wind speed, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is second derivative of
the wind speed in relation to the height, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, computed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded style="vphantom" width="0pt"><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Brunt–Väisälä frequency, defined as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravity acceleration and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
dimensionless gradient of the virtual potential temperature.</p>
      <p>Two kinds of data were used: topographic and meteorological. A digital
topographic image of the region surrounding the experimental site (Fig. 15a)
was used to analyze the features of surface undulations and their scales of
occurrence, as well as the space-scale analysis by complex Morlet wavelet
transforms  (Farge, 1992; Thomas and Foken, 2005). Local geomorphometric
variables were derived from the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM)
data   (Valeriano, 2008). These data were refined to 1 arcsecond
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m) from the original spatial resolution of 3 arcsecond
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 m) and are available on the site
<uri>www.dsr.inpe.br/topodata/dados.php</uri>.</p>
      <p>Time series of the vertical wind velocity and of the fast response
temperature data provided by a sonic anemometer and thermometer were used to
detect GW events at a height of 81 m above the ground. The sampling rate of
the measured turbulence data was 10 Hz. Wind speed and temperature vertical
profiles were provided by cup anemometer and thermometer measurements,
respectively, with a sampling rate of 60 Hz for both, making it possible to
compute the Brunt–Väisälä frequency, the vertical gradients of
wind velocity, and the Scorer parameter for GW classification
(Steeneveld et al., 2009). Data from five nights were analyzed,
consisting of 120 files of 30 min each between Julian days 42 and 46 of
the year 2012, representing the first observational data available from the
ATTO site. The analyses were carried out for the time between 18:00 and
06:00 LT for each night with available data (Fig. 15).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Area of approximately 900 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> surrounding the ATTO site.
The axes represent the directions (0, 5, 10, 15,  175, 180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from
the ATTO tower. The color scale represents terrain elevation in meters above
sea level. <bold>(b)</bold> Schematic with axes corresponding to <bold>(a)</bold>; the black dots
indicate gravity wave events induced by terrain undulations and the gray
points represent gravity wave events not induced by terrain effects.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f15.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The black points on the arrows in Fig. 15b represent the GW events that were
induced by the topography of the terrain, whereas the gray points represent
GW events that were not generated by terrain orography. The results show
that a considerable fraction of the analyzed situations represent GWs
induced by terrain undulations. This finding is very important for the
environmental studies that are being carried out at the ATTO site, as it
indicates that some mixing characteristics of the nocturnal boundary layer
depend on the characteristics of terrain undulations and therefore change
with the wind direction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS6">
  <title>Coherent structure time scale above the ATTO site</title>
      <p>Coherent structures (CSs) are a ubiquitous phenomenon in the turbulent
atmospheric flow, particularly over forests  (Hussain, 1986). They
occur in the roughness sub-layer immediately above the plant canopy, where
the CSs of the scalar signals show a “ramp-like” shape associated with the
two-phase movement of sweep and ejection of the flow interacting with the
canopy. Coherent structures play an important role in biosphere–atmosphere
exchange processes  (Gao and Li, 1993; Serafimovich et al., 2011). There
is some consensus that CSs are associated with turbulent flows, although
there is no full agreement on the percentage of the turbulent fluxes
associated with them  (Lu and Fitzjarrald, 1994; Thomas and Foken, 2007;
Foken et al., 2012). There has been much research on the dominant scale of
occurrence of CSs  (Collineau and Brunet, 1993; Thomas and Foken, 2005)
and the physical mechanisms responsible for their generation  (Paw U et
al., 1992; Raupach et al., 1996; McNaughton and Brunet, 2002; Campanharo et
al., 2008; Dias Júnior et al., 2013). Considerable research has also
been devoted to the detection of CSs     (Collineau and Brunet,
1993; Krusche and Oliveira, 2004) and the dissimilarity between CSs
associated with the transport of momentum and scalars  (Li and
Bou-Zeid, 2011). However, many aspects of their occurrence are still poorly
known, particularly: (i) their vertical variability  (Lohou et al.,
2000); (ii) the manifestations of their interaction with gravity waves
(Sorbjan and Czerwinska, 2013); (iii) the influence of surface
heterogeneity on their features; (iv) aspects of their numerical simulation
(Patton, 1997; Bou-Zeid et al., 2004; Dupont and Brunet, 2009; Wan and
Porte-Agel, 2011), particularly in the nocturnal boundary layer  (Durden
et al., 2013; Zilitinkevich et al., 2013), and (v) implications of the
existence of CSs for the chemistry of the atmosphere  (Steiner et al.,
2011; Foken et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>A study on the structure of atmospheric turbulence was performed at the ATTO
site under daytime conditions, with the aim of contributing to the detection
of CSs and developing a better understanding of their vertical and temporal
variability over a very uneven terrain covered by primary forest in central
Amazonia. Wind, temperature, and humidity data were obtained using sonic
anemometers and gas analyzers, installed at 42 and 81 m above ground, as
specified in the methods section. The scales of coherent structures were
determined following the methodology proposed by Thomas and Foken
(2005). Figure 16 shows the average duration of CSs for horizontal and
vertical wind velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the
data at 81 m height, the CS of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit temporal scales around 46 s
and 29 s, respectively. For the two scalars, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the time scales of the
CS are about 44 and 55 s, respectively. For the height of 42 m the
coherent structure time scales of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were approximately equal to
33, 26, 30, and 31 s, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Coherent structures time scale of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, recorded at
heights of 42 and 81 m at the ATTO site.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f16.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The results revealed that the CS time scale of the vertical wind velocity is
often smaller than the scales of the horizontal velocity and the scalar
properties, for both levels. This can be explained by the fact that the
scalar spectra exhibit greater similarity to the spectra of the horizontal
velocity than to the vertical velocity for low frequencies. Another
interesting feature is that the temporal scale of the CSs for both the wind
velocity and scalars are considerably shorter for the data measured at 81 m
compared with those at 42 m, i.e., the region immediately above the forest
canopy appears to be under the influence of a high-pass filter that removes
the lower frequency oscillations of the turbulent signals  (Krusche and
Oliveira, 2004; Thomas and Foken, 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS7">
  <title>Characteristics of the nocturnal boundary layer </title>
      <p>The characteristics of the nocturnal boundary layer (NBL) at the ATTO site
near the Uatumã River were analyzed for the wet and the dry seasons,
based on two methodologies: (i) the thermodynamic classes of the NBL proposed
by Cava et al.  (2004) and (ii) the turbulence regimes proposed by
Sun et al. (2012).</p>
      <p>Cava et al.'s (2004) classification of nocturnal time series is
based on the existence of a dominant pattern in scalar data, such as
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, temperature, or specific humidity. It also takes
into account the variability of nocturnal net radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured
at a sufficiently high sampling rate, which allows cloud detection (with
passage of clouds being identified by rapid <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes greater than 10 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Classes (I), (II), (III), are defined by atmospheric conditions
free of the influence of clouds, which can disturb the stable boundary layer
above the forest. The classes are defined as followed by Cava et al.
(2004): (I) the occurrence of coherent structures in the form of
“ramps” in scalar time series; (II) the presence of sinusoidal signals
(“ripples”) that simultaneously occur in the time series of scalars above
the canopy and that are typical for gravity waves; (III) the existence of
turbulence fine structure (i.e., according to Cava et al. (2004),
“periods that lack any geometric structure or periodicity in the time
series data”). The last two categories, (IV) and (V), of Cava et al.'s
classification refer to the simultaneous occurrence of clouds and organized
movements with variations in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. They are (IV) cases where the net radiation induces organized movements, and (V)
those where the change in net radiation is not correlated with changes in
organized movements.</p>
      <p>The search of parameters to characterize the turbulence regimes of the
nocturnal boundary layer is based on Sun et al. (2012). The
three turbulence regimes in the NBL are defined as follows: Regime 1 shows
weak turbulence generated by local shear instability and modulated by the
vertical gradient of potential temperature. Regime 2 shows strong turbulence
and wind speed exceeding a threshold value (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, above which
turbulence increases systematically with increasing wind speed. This
describes the turbulence generated by bulk shear instability, defined as the
mean wind speed divided by the measuring height. In Regime 3, the turbulence
occurs at wind speeds lower than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but is associated with
occasional bursts of top-down turbulence. In Regimes 1 and 2, the scale of
turbulent velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TKE</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is related to the mean wind velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> The
turbulent velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TKE</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is defined as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TKE</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the components of the zonal, meridional and vertical winds,
respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the standard deviation of each
variable.</p>
      <p>We analyzed 53 data files from the wet season and 79 data files collected
during the dry season at the ATTO site. Our results show that the prevailing
conditions in the NBL are represented by Cava's classes I, II, and V for
both wet and dry seasons (Table 5). Furthermore, during the wet season the
classes I and V show their highest percentage of occurrence associated with
turbulence Regime 3. Class IV is more frequent when turbulence Regime 1
prevails. For the dry season we observe that turbulence classes I, IV and V
occur most frequently in situations associated with Regime 1 (Table 6).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><caption><p>Percentage of occurrence of Cava's classes for dry and wet season
obtained at the ATTO site and a comparison with the results found by Cava
for the Duke Forest, North Carolina, USA.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">ATTO </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Duke</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Avg.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Avg.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46.8 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.1 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.9 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">45.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.0 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.3 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.2 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">III</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.6 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.6 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.6 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.8 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.75 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">V</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27.8 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.3 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.6 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Distribution of Cava's classes associated with the turbulence
regimes for the ATTO site nocturnal boundary layer.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">Regime 1 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Regime 2 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">Regime 3 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Wet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Dry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Wet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.2 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38.5 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">42.3 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">35 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class IV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">33 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class V</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">50 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">23 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Measurements of atmospheric composition</title>
      <p>In March 2012, a basic set of measurements (CO, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
equivalent black carbon, BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was initiated at the site, which
has been running almost continuously up to the present. As CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured with multiple instruments in parallel (see
Table 2) an almost complete time series since March 2012 is available for
these quantities. In November 2012, the long-term measurement setup was
upgraded to include measurements of ozone, aerosol scattering, aerosol size
distribution, and aerosol number concentration. Due to the complex logistics
at this remote site, there are a few large data gaps in some of these time
series, but the data sets are almost complete from the middle of May to
November 2013 and from February 2014 to now. Continuous measurements of
aerosol chemical composition by an aerosol mass spectrometer were also
initiated in February 2014. Furthermore, several intensive campaigns were
conducted with additional measurements of aerosol properties, VOC, OH
reactivity, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{CO${}_{{2}}$, CH${}_{{4}}$, and CO}?><title>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Diurnal cycle of <bold>(a)</bold> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> CO. The
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plot is computed from the measurements in January 2013, the
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO plots from all available measurements until the end of 2014.
Time is given in UT, with the first 12 h repeated for clarity. The white
vertical lines indicate the times of local sunrise (10:00 UT) and sunset
(22:00 UT), respectively. Black dashed horizontal lines show the heights of the five inlets.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=\textwidth}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f17.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Figure 17a–c shows the diurnal cycles of the vertical distributions of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO at the ATTO site. CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO show a
nighttime accumulation in the sub-canopy space and a corresponding
steepening of the vertical concentration gradient, which is greatly reduced
during daytime due to the enhanced vertical mixing throughout the canopy. In
addition, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits a clear minimum during daytime at mid-canopy
level induced by photosynthesis. Interestingly, the build-up of the
nighttime maximum of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proceeds from above the canopy (Fig. 17b). The
origin of this behavior, which seems to be linked to multiple processes, is
under investigation. During daytime, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO still
exhibit a small vertical gradient below the canopy, indicating a local
source near the ground.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Examples of sporadic concurrent increases in CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO
recorded at the lowermost (4 m) inlet in 2012.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f18.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Additional evidence for local surface sources are sporadic concurrent
increases of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, predominantly at the lowest measurement level.
Examples are shown in Fig. 18. The origin of this local CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO
source is not known. A remote source (e.g., from the large water reservoir
behind the Balbina Dam, 60 km northwest of ATTO) seems unlikely, as such a
signal would be vertically diluted before reaching the ATTO site. A
combustion source also appears unlikely, as the observed CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CO ratios
are several orders of magnitude higher than the values typical of combustion
emissions.</p>
      <p>Apart from these CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO peaks, we occasionally observe, mostly
during nighttime, short CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks of up to more than 100 ppb
amplitude. These peaks last a few hours, they do not always concur with
increases in CO concentrations, and often coincide with “bursts” of
particles with a diameter of a few tens of nanometers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F19" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Statistics of monthly daytime (17:00–20:00 UT) 30 min measurements
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the 80 m walk-up tower. Shown are whisker plots indicating
min/max and quartiles of the monthly measurements. The white line in the box
indicates the median. Brown: 4 m level, green: 38 m level, blue: 79 m level.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f19.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Figure 19 shows the statistics of monthly daytime (defined as between
13:00–16:00 LT, or 17:00–20:00 UT) 30 min measurements of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from three
levels (4, 38, and 79 m). The values at the 4 m level are consistently
higher than at the upper levels, while the 38 m level consistently shows
lower values during daytime than the top level (79 m). This indicates that
photosynthesis is active throughout the year. The record is still too short
to reveal a clear seasonality. Nevertheless, it appears that CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
June to August is about 5 ppm above the values during the months from
December to February.</p>
      <p>Statistics of monthly daytime 30 min measurements of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO are
shown in Fig. 20 (from the 79 m level only). Because of a large data gap due
to a malfunctioning of the analyzer, a seasonal cycle is not discernible in
the present CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> record. CO does show a seasonal cycle at ATTO with
concentrations higher by about 50 ppb during the dry months with a
significant fraction of air coming from the southeast (see Fig. 3), where
vegetation fires are very active at this time.</p>
      <p>Monthly daytime concentrations of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO are compared in
Fig. 21 with measurements upstream of ATTO: Cape Verde (green symbols)
reflecting the subtropics of the Northern Hemisphere, and Ascension Island
(brown symbols) representing conditions in the Southern Hemisphere. At least
during the period of July to December, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations clearly reach
lower values than at both upstream locations, reflecting the regional carbon
sink in the Amazon domain. In contrast, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels at ATTO lie almost
on Northern Hemisphere levels throughout the year, even when the ITCZ is
north of ATTO in austral winter, and the site is in the atmospheric Southern
Hemisphere with its lower background CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. This suggests
the presence of regional CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the airshed of ATTO. The CO
concentrations at ATTO during the wet season are close to those at Cape
Verde, reflecting the absence of significant combustion sources in the South
American part of the fetch during this season. In contrast, dry-season CO
mixing ratios at ATTO are about 80 ppb higher than those at Ascension
Island, reflecting biomass burning emissions in the southeastern Amazon
(Andreae et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F20" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Statistics of monthly daytime (17:00–20:00 UT) 30 min measurements
of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO at the 79 m level of the 80 m walk-up tower. Shown are
whisker plots indicating min/max and quartiles of the monthly measurements.
The white line in the box indicates the median.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f20.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Biogenic volatile organic compounds and OH reactivity</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F21" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Monthly averaged daytime (17:00–20:00 UT) measurements of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO at the 79 m level of the ATTO tower (blue line, standard
deviation indicated by shading) in comparison with monthly averaged
concentration measurements from Ascension Island    (brown; data for 2014 are preliminary; Dlugokencky
et al., 2014; Novelli and Masarie, 2014) and Cape Verde  (green: Carpenter
et al., 2010, updated).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f21.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F22" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Profiles of isoprene derived from measurements at three different
heights (0.05, 24, and 79.3 m) below, within, and above the
canopy, respectively, in November 2012 (transition period from dry to wet
season).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f22.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The first successful vertical gradients of biogenic VOCs and total OH
reactivity were measured in November 2012 at the walk-up tower using the
gradient system as described in Sect. 3.4. Diurnal fluctuations of
isoprene are apparent at all heights (Fig. 22). Under daylight conditions,
isoprene mixing ratios were always highest at the 24 m level, reaching up to
19.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 ppb (average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) and indicating a
source at the canopy top. During nighttime, the light-driven emissions of
isoprene cease and the in-canopy mixing ratio fell to 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ppb,
which was lower than observed above the forest at 79 m (2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ppb).
Measurements in the canopy (24 m) vary by a factor of 10 from day to night,
while measurements close to the ground (0.05 m) vary only by a factor of
two. This clearly demonstrates a canopy emission of isoprene, with a peak
around noon, when light and temperature are at their maximum. Isoprene
mixing ratios at the ground level were always the lowest, indicating a
potential sink at the soil/litter level or relatively slow downward mixing.
A detailed discussion of measurements of isoprene and other biogenic VOC at
ATTO was published recently   (Yáñez-Serrano et
al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F23"><caption><p>Isoprene and total OH reactivity measurements during November 2012 at the highest point above the canopy (79 m), binned as 60 min
medians for all periods when both data were available (about 4 days). The
isoprene mixing ratio scale (left axis) was set to match its contribution to
the total OH reactivity (1 ppb isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.46 s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> isoprene OH
reactivity), which is presented on the right axis. The upper panel shows the
diel variation of temperature (measured at 81 m) and the net radiation.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f23.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In November 2012, the high levels of isoprene measured above the canopy
contributed significantly (on average about 85 %) to the total OH
reactivity. From Fig. 23, it can be seen that median isoprene mixing ratios
of between 0.5 ppb at 06:00 LT and 8 ppb in the late afternoon above the
canopy give an OH reactivity of about 1–20 s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The gap between the two
curves is the fraction of total OH reactivity that is not due to isoprene.
For most of the time this gap is small and within the uncertainty of the
measurements. On two occasions, however, the total OH reactivity was
significantly higher than the isoprene contribution, these being in the
early morning (09:00 LT) coincident with a drop in light levels, and in the
afternoon just after sunset (17:00 LT). For all other times in the course of
the day, isoprene was the major sink for OH above the canopy. Overall, a
distinct diel variability in total OH reactivity can be observed, similar to
that of its major contributor, isoprene. The median lifetime of OH radicals
during the dry-to-wet transition season above the forest canopy at 80 m
varied from about 50 ms by day to 100 ms at night. Ongoing measurements will
determine the seasonal variability in total OH reactivity and the relative
contribution of isoprene.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Ozone profiles</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F24" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean diurnal profiles of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios measured on the
walk-up tower during the dry season (left panel, 15 August to 14 September 2013)
and the wet season (right panel, 1 February to 3 March 2014).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f24.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios (Fig. 24) show typical diurnal cycles for both
seasons, with values increasing from the morning to the afternoon and
subsequently decreasing due to deposition and chemical reactions. The
afternoon O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima at the uppermost height (79 m) are about a factor
of 1.4 higher during the dry season than during the wet season, averaging
about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 ppb, respectively. As
found in previous studies, its deposition to surfaces causes O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
exhibit pronounced vertical gradients (Fig. 24), which makes a direct
intercomparison to measurements at other sites difficult. However, the
mixing ratios above the canopy from different studies in the Amazonian rain
forest during the wet season are within a narrow range of 7 to 12 ppb, and
the value measured at ATTO falls near the lower end of this range
(Kirchhoff et al., 1990; Andreae et al., 2002; Rummel et al., 2007;
Artaxo et al., 2013). A budget study by Jacob and Wofsy (1990)
revealed that downward transport of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mainly controlled the losses
near the surface, with only a minor contribution from photochemical
formation above the canopy. This may explain the similar mixing ratios in
the different studies. Furthermore, only small O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> differences were
measured between 38 m (just above the canopy) and the top of the tower at 79 m during the wet season.</p>
      <p>A different picture is observed during the dry season, with much higher
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at more polluted sites  (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 ppb in
Rondônia: Kirchhoff et al., 1989; Andreae et al., 2002; Rummel et al.,
2007; Artaxo et al., 2013), which can be related to biomass burning
emissions causing photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation  (Crutzen and Andreae,
1990). A site comparable to the ATTO site is the ZF2 site, located about 60 km northwest of Manaus, which has been used extensively in the past
(Artaxo et al., 2013), but which is occasionally affected by
the Manaus urban plume  (Kuhn et al., 2010; Trebs et al., 2012). At the
ZF2 site, mean maximum O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios measured at 39 m from
2009–2012   (Artaxo et al., 2013) match exactly those measured at
the ATTO site for the wet season, but are about a factor of 1.5 higher
during the dry season. This may be attributed to the more pristine character
of the ATTO site, but could also be related to the different measurement
periods or different biogenic emissions at the sites. In order to
distinguish these different influences, high-quality long-term measurements
are required, which are now being generated within the ATTO project.</p>
      <p>During the wet season, the amplitude of the mean diurnal cycle at 79 m is
only about 2 ppb, whereas it is 3–4 ppb during the dry season. The highest
amplitudes are observed within the canopy and the understory with up to 5 ppb (24 m) in the dry season. These variations can be attributed to downward
mixing of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is “stored” within the canopy
(so called storage flux, see Rummel et al., 2007). It is
subsequently depleted by chemical reactions, mostly with soil biogenic NO,
and deposition after the forest canopy becomes decoupled from the atmosphere
above at nighttime. During the wet season, the largest decrease in O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios occurs at the canopy top. This might be attributed to a lower
canopy resistance to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition due to enhanced stomatal aperture
during the wet season as proposed by Rummel et al.    (2007)
and will be the subject of future work. Further investigations will also
focus on the interactions between turbulence (supply of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and trace
gases that react with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially nitric oxide (NO).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>Aerosol optical properties</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F25" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of scattering and absorption coefficients and
particle number concentration (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 nm).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f25.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The aerosol optical properties measured at the ATTO site are shown as a time
series in Fig. 25 and summarized in Table 7. The averages were calculated for
the dry season, August–October, and the wet season, February–May
(2012–2013 for the absorption measurements and 2013 for the scattering
measurements). The transition periods between these two seasons are not
included in the summary, in order to show the contrast between the cleanest
and “more polluted” periods. The scattering coefficients are similar to
those reported by Rizzo et al. (2013) from measurements performed at the ZF2
site (60 km N of Manaus). The regional transport of biomass burning
emissions and fossil-fuel derived pollution is the main source of particles
during the dry season. Its influence is pronounced, as can be seen by
comparing the scattering and absorption coefficients from both seasons, which
average about 3–6 times higher during the dry than during the wet season.
During the wet season, ATTO is meteorologically located in the NH and the
scattering and absorption coefficients reach their minimum values; however,
episodes of long-range transport of aerosols from the Atlantic Ocean and
Africa still lead to episodically elevated values.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p>The
contrast between the wet and dry seasons can be attributed to a combination
of higher removal rates by wet deposition during the wet season and the
dominant influence from biomass burning and fossil fuel emissions during the
dry season, which are the main sources of submicron particles at that time.
The scattering Ångström exponent (å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averages 1.25
during the wet season, lower than the 1.62 obtained for the dry season. This
behavior results from the high relative proportion of larger particles
(mostly primary biogenic particles, but also dust and seaspray) during the
wet season, because in contrast to the large seasonal variability of the
submicron particles, the supermicron fraction shows less intense seasonal
changes.</p>
      <p>The seasonality of the absorption coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
comparable to that of the scattering coefficient. The regional transport of
biomass burning emissions, most important between August and October,
produces a rise in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, reaching an average of 3.46 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during this period. In contrast, during the wet season, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very low, around 0.52 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average.</p>
      <p>The absorption Ångström exponent (å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often used
to estimate the composition of light absorbing aerosols. An
å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 indicates the aerosol is in the Rayleigh
regime, and the absorption is dominated by soot-like carbon and is therefore
wavelength independent (Moosmüller et al., 2011). Higher
å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate the presence of additional light absorbing
material, like brown carbon (BrC) (Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006). This
kind of yellowish or brown organic material, abundant in biomass burning
aerosols, usually has an å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 or greater
(Bond et al., 1999). Our measurements show only relatively
minor seasonal differences in å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with somewhat higher values
during the wet season (1.53) than in the dry season (1.40), suggesting that
soot carbon is the most important contributor to aerosol light absorption
throughout the year. The contribution of the different light absorbing
components of the aerosol to the total observed aerosol absorption is
currently being investigated.</p>
      <p>We conducted the first long-term refractory black carbon (rBC) measurements
by an SP2 instrument at a remote Amazonian site. The mass absorption cross
section (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been calculated by applying an orthogonal
regression to the MAAP absorption coefficient measurements at 637 nm vs. the
rBC mass concentrations measured by the SP2. The average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
obtained for the 2013–2014 wet season measurements was
13.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is much higher than the 4.7 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
reported previously for another Amazonian forest site (Gilardoni et al.,
2011), who used a thermal–optical method to determine the apparent elemental
carbon content. The high apparent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be partly
explained by the fact that the SP2 size dynamic range was 70–280 nm and
thus the technique did not account for rBC particles larger than 280 nm.
However, it is also likely related to an enhancement of light absorption by
coatings on the rBC particles, or to the presence of additional
light-absorbing substances besides rBC (Bueno et al., 2011; McMeeking et al.,
2014). Single-particle studies (Sect. 4.3.7) on aerosols from the ATTO site
consistently show thick coatings on the soot carbon particles. Our
preliminary results indicate that the constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(6.6 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implemented by the MAAP in order to retrieve the BC
mass concentration, is not representative of the true optical properties of
Amazonian aerosol particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS5">
  <title>Aerosol number concentrations and size distributions</title>
      <p>Continuous measurements of aerosol particle size and concentration have been
conducted at the ATTO site since March 2012. Over the last years, the extent
of the sizing instrumentation has been increased stepwise to provide
uninterrupted and redundant aerosol size and concentration time series.
Figure 26 shows one of the frequent instrument intercomparisons, including
four different instruments that are based on optical and electromobility
sizing. It confirms the overall consistency and comparability of the
different sizing techniques. Integrated particle number concentrations agree
within 15 % with measurements of total particle number concentrations by a
CPC. The sample air for this intercomparison was collected through the main
aerosol inlet at 60 m height, which is also used for instruments measuring
aerosol scattering, absorptivity, hygroscopicity, and chemical composition.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F26"><caption><p>Intercomparison of the median particle number size distributions
from the SMPS, OPS, WRAS, and UHSAS instruments. Instruments were operated
for 6 h using the same inlet line during clean rainy-season conditions (26 January 2015).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f26.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F27"><caption><p>Median particle number <bold>(a)</bold> and volume <bold>(b)</bold> size distributions from
the SMPS and OPS instruments, representative for conditions during the wet
(dashed lines) and dry (solid lines) seasons. Plotted data sets comprise
continuous SMPS and OPS data covering 7-day periods for wet (6–13 May 2014)
and dry (13–20 September 2014) season conditions. Integrated number and volume
concentrations for the selected wet season period:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ait,wet</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>141</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Acc,wet</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>130</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Total,wet</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>282</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wet</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">super</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wet</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Total,wet</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Integrated number and
volume concentrations for the selected dry season period:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ait,dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>395</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Acc,dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>967</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Total,dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1398</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">super</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Total,dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f27.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>At the ATTO site, the atmospheric aerosol burden shows remarkable
differences in terms of size distribution and concentration depending on the
seasons. Figure 27 displays the average particle number and volume size
distributions for typical wet (6–13 May 2014) and dry season
(13–20 September 2014) conditions, covering an aerosol size range from 10 nm to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.
The wet season is characterized by clean air masses from NE directions (Fig. 3), which result in a near-pristine atmospheric state at the ATTO site.
Total particle concentrations typically range from 100–400 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
aerosol size spectra reveal the characteristic “wet season shape”. A
representative example is shown in Fig. 27. The size spectrum is
characterized by a three-modal shape with pronounced Aitken and accumulation
modes as well as a noticeable coarse mode. Aitken (maximum at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 nm) and accumulation (maximum at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 nm)
modes are separated by the so called Hoppel minimum (at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 nm), which is thought to be caused by cloud processing  (e.g., Zhou et
al., 2002; Rissler et al., 2004; Artaxo et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The near-pristine conditions that prevail at the ATTO site during the wet
season, when the aerosol concentrations are remarkably low and dominated by
local and/or regional biogenic sources, are episodically interrupted by
long-range transport of sea spray, Saharan dust, and/or African biomass
burning and fossil fuel combustion aerosol  (e.g., Talbot et al., 1990;
Martin et al., 2010a; Martin et al., 2010b; Baars et al., 2011). Figure 28
displays characteristic changes in the wet season size distribution during
selected episodes with long-range transport intrusions. Typically, the
aerosol abundance in the accumulation and coarse mode size range is
substantially increased, and the Hoppel minimum almost completely disappears.
The aerosol volume distribution clearly indicates a pronounced enhancement
of coarse particles, which increases the integrated particle volume
concentration by almost 1 order of magnitude (Fig. 28b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F28"><caption><p>Median particle number <bold>(a)</bold> and volume <bold>(b)</bold> size distributions from
the SMPS and OPS instruments, showing the contrast between pristine wet
season conditions and episodes with long-range transport influence (i.e.,
Saharan dust, African biomass burning, and sea salt). Wet season number and
volume size spectra are taken from Fig. 27. The long-range transport size
spectrum is averaged from three selected episodes in Feb and Mar 2014.
Integrated number and volume concentrations for the long-range transport
episodes: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ait,long</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Acc,long</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>308</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Total,long</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>09 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">long</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">super</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">long</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Total,long</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f28.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>During the dry season, the dominant wind direction is E to SE (Fig. 3),
which brings polluted air from urban sources and deforestation and pasture
fires in the southeastern Amazon and the Brazilian Nordeste to the ATTO
site. Dry season aerosol number concentrations typically range from 500–2000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A characteristic dry season size spectrum is illustrated in Fig. 27,
which shows increased particle concentrations across the entire size
range. Typically, the accumulation mode (maximum at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 140 nm)
shows the highest relative increase and therefore partly “swamps” the Aitken
mode (shoulder at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 nm).</p>
      <p>Besides the Aitken and accumulation modes, which dominate the total aerosol
number concentration, a persistent coarse mode is observed at about
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which accounts for a significant fraction of the total aerosol
mass (Fig. 27). The coarse mode peak occurs throughout the year, with higher
abundance in the dry season. In the absence of long-range transport, primary
biological aerosol particles (PBAP) are assumed to dominate the coarse mode
(Pöschl et al., 2010; Huffman et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F29"><caption><p>Average number <bold>(a)</bold> and volume <bold>(b)</bold> size distributions of the total
and fluorescent aerosol particles measured by WIBS. Orange lines refer to
the size-resolved fraction of FBAP.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f29.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Autofluorescence-based techniques such as the Wideband Integrated Bioaerosol
Sensor, WIBS-4A) are an efficient approach to probe fluorescent biological
aerosol particles (FBAP) in online measurements  (Kaye et al., 2005; Healy
et al., 2014). Figure 29 shows the first measurements of the FBAP number and
volume size distributions from the WIBS instrument at the ATTO site. The
FBAP size distributions are dominated in number by a narrow peak at 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> m
and in volume by a broad peak from 2 to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Fig. 29). For
particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, the mean integral FBAP number
concentration is 0.22 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (40 % of the concentration of supermicron
particles), and the corresponding volume concentration is calculated to be
3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (62 %). The ratio of FBAP to total particles
(number concentration) shows a clear size dependence, starting from 10 %
at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and rising to a peak value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70–80 % in the
size range of 3–10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. These observations are consistent with FBAP
measurements made with an alternative instrument (UVAPS) during the AMAZE-08
campaign at the ZF2 rainforest site north of Manaus  (Pöschl et al.,
2010; Huffman et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>CCN size/supersaturation spectra have been measured since 2014 and are being
continued. The long-term data set provides unique information on the size
dependent hygroscopicity of Amazonian aerosol particles throughout the
seasons. The results will complement and extend the results from previous
campaigns  (e.g., Gunthe et al., 2009; Rose et al., 2011; Levin et al.,
2014). The measurements of CCN and other aerosol properties at the ATTO site
will also be an important reference for the analysis of the results from the
ACRIDICON-CHUVA aircraft campaign, which took place in central Amazonia in
September 2014  (Wendisch et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS6">
  <title>Aerosol chemical composition</title>
      <p>For the continuous determination of aerosol composition, an Aerosol Chemical
Speciation Monitor (ACSM) was installed at the ATTO site in February 2014
with the objective of making long-term measurements. The data reported here
summarize the annual cycle of aerosol concentrations and composition from
May 2014 to April 2015 (Fig. 30).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F30" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of monthly mean aerosol mass concentrations and
chemical speciation at the ATTO site, measured by ACSM from May 2014 to
April 2015.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f30.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>During the middle of the rainy season (March to May), the aerosol
concentrations at ATTO reach their annual minimum and are in relatively good
agreement with previous wet season studies, including those conducted at the
ZF2 site, ca. 140 km SW of ATTO  (Chen et al., 2009; Pöschl et al.,
2010; Artaxo et al., 2013). With the onset of the dry season, the shift of
air mass origins to the southeast, and the transition of ATTO into the
atmospheric Southern Hemisphere (Fig. 3), aerosol concentrations increase
sharply and remain high until the end of December, well into the rainy
season. Trajectory analyses suggest that burning in Africa may contribute
significantly to pollution levels at ATTO during this part of the year. Only
when the rainy conditions in the Amazon combine again with dominant air mass
origins in the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic and with the waning
of biomass burning in West Africa can aerosol concentrations at ATTO drop
again to their seasonal lows.</p>
      <p>The composition of the aerosol at ATTO shows surprisingly little variation
throughout the year in spite of the huge change in total concentrations
between seasons. Organic aerosol is always the dominant mass fraction at
about 70 %, sulfate comprises about 10–15 %, followed by BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(5–11 %), ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %) and chloride. Elevated concentrations of chloride were observed
during a few episodes, when this species represented up to 13 % of the
total submicron particulate mass, which is consistent with earlier
observations of long-range transport of sea salt, going back to the ABLE-2B
campaign  (Talbot et al., 1990).</p>
      <p>The ionic mass balance indicates that the aerosol was approximately
acid-base neutral. While sulfate is mostly in the form of ammonium sulfate,
there is some indication that part of the nitrate could be present in the
form of organic nitrate. This is because the ratio between the fragments
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (main nitrate fragments measured by the ACSM at
mass-to-charge ratios 30 and 46) is expected to be large (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10) when this ion is in organic forms,
and low (2–3) when in inorganic
forms, such as ammonium nitrate  (Alfarra et al., 2006; Fry et al., 2009).
Large values for this ratio were often observed during this period and may
indicate the presence of organic nitrate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F31"><caption><p>Average bulk elemental concentrations (in weight-percent) of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
aerosols collected at 80 m height between 7 March and 21 April 2012.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f31.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The bulk composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured for up to 10 elements by
EDXRF analysis on a set of samples obtained in March/April 2012. The
analysis showed a high abundance of crustal elements, illustrating one
exemplary episode of long-range dust transport from Africa (Fig. 31). Back
trajectories indicate that this period was indeed influenced by dust
transport from Africa, which is a phenomenon observed annually and
particularly pronounced in February, March, and April  (Prospero et al.,
1981; Swap et al., 1992; Ben-Ami et al., 2012). Local sources of mineral
dust aerosol can be excluded, especially during the wet season, because of
the wetness of the soils. The prevalence of mineral dust aerosols during the
wet season, when airmass trajectories reach from the North African deserts
to the Amazon Basin, in combination with observations of transatlantic dust
plumes by lidar, is strong evidence for the long-range origin of the
observed crustal elements.</p>
      <p>To explore the bioavailability of important trace elements, the oxidation
state and solubility of iron (Fe) in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols were analyzed.
The soluble (and therefore bioavailable) fraction of Fe is an important
parameter in the overall biogeochemical cycles, with impact on the
phosphorus cycle and biomass production (Liptzin and Silver, 2009). A
soluble fraction of only 1.5 % (1.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III) of 120 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
of total Fe) was found, suggesting that aeolian transport of Fe is not
likely to make a significant contribution of bioavailable Fe to the
ecosystem at ATTO.</p>
      <p>The extended measurements of aerosol composition at the ATTO site, now
reaching well over a full year, suggest the need for a reassessment of the
relative contributions of biogenic and anthropogenic sources even in this
very remote region. Black carbon, a unique tracer of combustion, is present
in a roughly equal fraction throughout the year. Sulfate, which has a more
complex mixture of sources, also contributes a fairly constant fraction. In
the rainy season, much of this sulfate could come from biogenic or marine
sources (Andreae et al., 1990), but the high
concentrations during the August to December period suggest substantial
contributions from fossil fuel burning. Periods with aerosol compositions
suggesting pristine conditions (low BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfate, dominant organic
matter) occur more as episodes at ATTO than as seasonal characteristics,
similar to what is observed at the remote ZOTTO site in Siberia
(Chi et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS7">
  <title>Microspectroscopic analysis of single aerosol particles</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F32" specific-use="star"><caption><p>STXM images and elemental maps with corresponding NEXAFS spectra
of aerosol particles collected at the ATTO site during a period with
anthropogenic pollution. <bold>(a)</bold> Carbon post-edge image (293 eV) of a
characteristic region showing internally mixed droplet-like particles with
cores (black arrows) and coatings of variable thickness (green boxes). <bold>(b)</bold>
Carbon elemental map (pre-edge 280 eV, post-edge 293 eV) showing the
distribution of carbonaceous material. <bold>(c)</bold> NEXAFS spectra showing high
abundance of pi- (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C) and keto (O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C) functional groups in cores.
Coating reveals high abundance of carboxylic acid groups (CCOH) and weaker
signals for keto and pi groups.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=\textwidth}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f32.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The microspectroscopic analysis of aerosol samples can be seen as a
“snapshot” of the aerosol population at a given time. In combination with
the long-term aerosol measurements at the ATTO site, single particle
characterization provides detailed insights into the highly variable aerosol
cycling in the rain forest ecosystem. In the soft X-ray regime, STXM-NEXAFS
is a powerful microscopic tool with high spectroscopic sensitivity for the
light elements carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O) as well as a variety
of other atmospherically relevant elements (e.g., K, Ca, Fe, S, and Na). The
technique allows analyzing the microstructure, mixing state, and the
chemical composition of individual aerosol particles. As an example, Fig. 32
displays the STXM-NEXAFS analysis of an aerosol sample with substantial
anthropogenic pollution, collected at the ATTO site during the dry season.
X-ray microspectroscopy reveals a substantial fraction of internally mixed
particles with soot cores (strong <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-bond signals) and organic coatings
of variable thickness. The spectral signature of the organic coating is
characteristic for secondary organic material (SOM)
(Pöhlker et al., 2014). These observations
underline the dominance of aged pyrogenic aerosols at the ATTO site during
the dry season. During the rainy season, when biomass burning is absent and
undisturbed biosphere-atmosphere interactions prevail in the region, the
aerosol population is dominated by biogenic aerosol, such as primary
biological aerosol particles (PBAP), biogenic SOA, and biogenic salts
(Pöhlker et al., 2012). Figure 33 displays STXM elemental maps
of this typical rainy season aerosol population.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F33" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Microscopic images of aerosol particles during rainy season. <bold>(a)</bold>
SEM images of representative region. <bold>(b)</bold> STXM carbon post-edge image
(293  eV) and <bold>(c–f)</bold> STXM elemental maps of same region. The particle types
are indicated in panel <bold>(b)</bold>: primary biological aerosol particles (region i),
droplet-like SOA particles (region ii), and potassium-rich biogenic salts
(region iii).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f33.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of aerosol optical parameters for the dry and wet seasons.
Average and standard deviations are calculated from 60 min data.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="199.169291pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Dry season </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Wet season </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scattering coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">450 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">550 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">700 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scattering Ångström exponent (å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">450/700</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Absorption coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">637 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Absorption Ångström exponent (å<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">470/960</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.53<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mass absorption cross-section (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">637 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Calculated by a log-log linear fit including the
last six wavelengths measured by the Aethalometer (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.99).
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Obtained by orthogonal regression (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.92).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relative abundance of single particle types obtained at top of the
walk-up tower in April 2012 (in percent).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Size fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Organic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Organic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mineral</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Biogenic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Salts</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Soot</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">April 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">with S, K</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2–0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5–1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.0–2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25–0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5–1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.0–2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25–0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5–1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.0–2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25–0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5–1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.0–2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>As mentioned in the previous section, the biogenic background aerosol in the
wet season (i.e., February to April) is episodically superimposed by
transatlantic dust and smoke events. Statistical analysis of the electron
microscope (EPMA) results by hierarchical clustering reveals the abundance
of the various particle types observed at the ATTO tower in this season
(Table 8). In order to determine the sources and possible chemical
interactions, particles were classified into representative groups according
to their chemical composition. They are classified as “mineral” when Al,
Si, O, and Ca are dominant, and also contain minor elements like K, Na, Mg,
and Fe. Particles are identified as being “organic”, when the
concentrations of C and O in the particles are similar and when they also
contain some P and S (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 wt %). “Biogenic” particles
occur in the larger size classes; they have smooth boundaries and always
contain C, O, S, N, P, and K. Irregular crystallized particles with Na, Mg,
S, O and C are classified as “salt” particles. Soot particles can be
distinguished by their morphology, and always contain the elements C and O.</p>
      <p>With single particle analysis, important information was obtained concerning
the contribution from organic aerosol particles and the agglomeration of
various types of particles. The majority of particles in the fine fraction
consist of organic matter with traces of S and K. This observation
corroborates that small biogenic potassium and sulfur-containing particles
from primary emissions can act as seeds for the condensation of organic
material    (Pöhlker et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS8">
  <title>Chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol</title>
      <p>Measurements of the organic chemical composition of the aerosol over the
Amazon rainforest are rare. Levoglucosan, several mono- di- and
polycarboxylic acids, as well as isoprene tracer compounds have been
identified in the aerosol phase  (Mayol-Bracero et al., 2002; Claeys et
al., 2004, 2010; Schkolnik et al., 2005), whereas the
contribution of highly reactive compounds, such as monoterpenes and
sesquiterpenes, to SOA in this region is still largely unknown.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F34"><caption><p>Concentration of monoterpene and sesquiterpene oxidation products
in ambient aerosol collected in November 2012 over the Amazon rain forest.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10723/2015/acp-15-10723-2015-f34.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The concentrations of monoterpene and sesquiterpene oxidation products in
ambient aerosol collected in November 2012 at the ATTO research site are
shown in Fig. 34. A median concentration of 102 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured for
the sum of terpene oxidation products in the aerosol sampled over the Amazon
rain forest. As can be seen in Fig. 34, monoterpene oxidation products
accounted for the major part of the terpene oxidation products. Their
concentration showed a high variance during November ranging between 23 and
146 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The oxidation products derived from the pinene skeleton
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene) were most abundant in the sampled aerosols,
followed by limonene oxidation products. Among the pinene derived oxidation
products, MBTCA (3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid) was observed to be
the most abundant individual monoterpene oxidation product, with
concentrations of up to 73 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by pinonic acid with a
maximum concentration of 46 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>   (van Eijck, 2013).
Interestingly, these concentrations are in the same range as monoterpene
oxidation products measured during summertime in boreal forest environments
(Vestenius et al., 2014), ecosystems which are known to
strongly emit monoterpenes. However, these observations of high monoterpene
product concentrations match with the high monoterpene mixing ratios
measured at the same site   (Yáñez-Serrano et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>The products from sesquiterpene oxidation showed much lower concentrations
(Fig. 34). On average the sesquiterpene oxidation products reached about
10 % of the monoterpene oxidation product concentration; however, on some
days they were as high as 26 % of the total monoterpene oxidation product
concentration. Overall, 23 individual oxidation products of
sesquiterpenes were identified in the aerosol collected in the Amazonian
rainforest. The total concentration of these sesquiterpene oxidation
products ranged from 6 to 12 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The oxidation products could be
assigned to four sesquiterpene precursors: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene,
aromadendrene, cedrene, and isolongifolene. Among them, the products from
the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene were the most abundant    (van
Eijck, 2013). Very few measurements exist of sesquiterpene oxidation product
concentrations and actually none in tropical forests, which complicates a
comparison. Measurements in boreal ecosystems    (Vestenius et
al., 2014) showed mean summertime concentrations of caryophyllinic acid (one
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene oxidation products) of about 8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is a high concentration for a single compound compared to the
concentrations measured at ATTO, where the measured concentration range of
caryophyllinic acid is 0.26–1.38 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In summary, the contribution of monoterpene oxidation products to SOA at
ATTO is relatively high and essentially comparable with their contribution
to boreal forest SOA, whereas the contribution of sesquiterpene products is
much less (about 1/10) than in boreal forest ecosystems.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and future outlook</title>
      <p>Our initial ecological studies have shown the ATTO site to be located in an
area of high biodiversity, containing forest and wetland ecosystems that are
representative of many regions in the central Amazon Basin. The
meteorological measurements reflect rainfall, temperature, and wind
conditions typical of the region, with pronounced seasonality in rainfall
and airmass origins, but they also show substantial interannual variability.
Early micrometeorological studies have characterized the nocturnal boundary
layer and its coupling with the overlying atmosphere, the properties of
turbulence structures in the boundary layer, and the formation of
orographically induced gravity waves.</p>
      <p>Continuous measurements of the carbon gases CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
five heights reveal the effects of photosynthesis and respiration on the
vertical distribution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the presence of a source of CO at the
forest floor, and yet unidentified intensive and episodic sources of
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ozone, VOC, and OH reactivity measurements indicate an active
photochemical cycle in the tropical boundary layer and a strong forest sink
for ozone.</p>
      <p>The Amazonian aerosol is strongly influenced by seasonal variations in
airmass origins. In the rainy season, when air masses come from the northeast
across almost undisturbed rain forest, there are long periods when natural,
biogenic aerosols prevail, characterized by low particle number
concentrations and a very large fraction of organic matter. In spite of
considerable research efforts, the mode of formation of these aerosols
remains enigmatic. Nucleation and new particle formation events are almost
never observed in clean air over Amazonia. The deployment of instrumentation
that explores the size range at the border between gases and particles, and
the measurement of species that are involved in the formation and growth of
aerosol particles, such as H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, extremely low volatility organic
compounds (ELVOCs), ammonia, and amines may shed light on the processes
responsible for the formation of biogenic aerosols over the tropical forest
(Kulmala et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>During the rainy season, the biogenic aerosol over Amazonia is overprinted
periodically by episodes of intense transatlantic transport, which bring
Saharan dust, smoke from fires in West Africa, Atlantic marine aerosols, and
possibly pollution from fossil fuel burning in Africa, Europe, and North
America to the site. In contrast, during the dry season the dominant airmass
source regions lie to the east and southeast, where biomass and fossil fuel
combustion result in persistent and substantial production of pollution
aerosols.</p>
      <p>Overall, our measurements at ATTO support the view that there is no longer
any place on Earth that can be considered truly pristine. Even at this
remote site, trace gas and aerosol concentrations show the impact of
anthropogenic emissions. For long-lived species, like CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
this reflects the secular increase in concentrations as a result of global
emissions. For shorter-lived trace gases and aerosols, the effects of
regional sources and long range transport can be detected almost at all
times, even though they may be very small during the cleanest periods.</p>
      <p>During 2015, we expect that many measurements will be relocated from the
80 m towers to the 325 m tall tower. This will significantly enlarge the
footprint of the measurements of long-lived trace gases, especially
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Integration of ATTO into networks for the study of carbon cycling,
such as the proposed long-term, pantropical network that assesses NPP using
multiple approaches   (Cleveland et al., 2015) could
significantly increase the knowledge that can be gained from this site. The
challenge for the future will be to maintain these measurements over the
coming decades so that they can reveal secular trends in atmospheric
composition and the health of the Amazonian ecosystem.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the Max Planck Society and the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da
Amazonia for continuous support. We acknowledge the support by the German
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF contract 01LB1001A) and the
Brazilian Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
(MCTI/FINEP contract 01.11.01248.00) as well as the Amazon State University
(UEA), FAPEAM, LBA/INPA and SDS/CEUC/RDS-Uatumã. Leonardo Sá thanks
CNPq for his Productivity in Research Grant, Process 303728/2010-8. Cléo
Dias-Júnior thanks CAPES for his Ph.D. grant. Maria Teresa F. Piedade
thanks CNPq and FAPEAM for research grants (PELD-Project, Process
403792/2012-6). The ALS is supported by the Director, Office of Science,
Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under
Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. We thank the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for the
allocation of synchrotron radiation beamtime at BESSY II. We also thank M.
Weigand, M. Bechtel, and A. L. D. Kilcoyne for their constant support during
the beamtime sessions. We would like to especially thank all the people
involved in the technical and logistical support of the ATTO project, in
particular Thomas Disper, Andrew Crozier, Uwe Schulz, Steffen Schmidt,
Alcides Camargo Ribeiro, Hermes Braga Xavier, Elton Mendes da Silva, Nagib
Alberto de Castro Souza, Adi Vasconcelos Brandão, Amauri Rodriguês
Perreira, Thiago de Lima Xavier, Josué Ferreira de Souza, Roberta
Pereira de Souza, and Wallace Rabelo Costa. We acknowledge the
micrometeorological group of INPA/LBA for their collaboration concerning the
meteorological parameters, with special thanks to Antonio Huxley Melo
Nascimento and Leonardo Ramos de Oliveira. The aerosol team thanks Isabella
Hrabe de Angelis and Sachin S. Gunthe for their help with instrument
maintenance and I. Lieberwirth and G. Glaßer (Max Planck Institute for
Polymer Research, Mainz, Germany) for kind support with SEM imaging. We
thank Tracey W. Andreae for help with copy-editing the manuscript. This paper
contains results of research conducted under the Technical/Scientific
Cooperation Agreement between the National Institute for Amazonian Research,
the State University of Amazonas, and the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft e.V.; the
opinions expressed are the entire responsibility of the authors and not of
the participating institutions.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:  M. Kulmala</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abril, G., Martinez, J. M., Artigas, L. F., Moreira-Turcq, P., Benedetti,
M. F., Vidal, L., Meziane, T., Kim, J. H., Bernardes, M. C., Savoye, N.,
Deborde, J., Souza, E. L., Alberic, P., de Souza, M. F. L., and Roland, F.:
Amazon River carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands, Nature, 505,
395–398, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12797</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Acevedo, O. C., Costa, F. D., Oliveira, P. E. S., Puhales, F. S., Degrazia,
G. A., and Roberti, D. R.: The influence of submeso processes on stable
boundary layer similarity relationships, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 207–225,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-13-0131.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas-d-13-0131.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Paulsen, D., Gysel, M., Garforth, A. A., Dommen, J.,
Prévôt,
A. S. H., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Coe, H.: A mass
spectrometric study of secondary organic aerosols formed from the
photooxidation of anthropogenic and biogenic precursors in a reaction
chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5279–5293, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5279-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5279-2006</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M. R., Jimenez,
J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: A generalised method for the extraction of
chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer
data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R.
J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R.,
Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance
characteristics of a high-sensitivity, three- wavelength, total
scatter/backscatter nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 967–986,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: The Biosphere: Pilot or Passenger on Spaceship Earth?,
in: Contributions to Global Change Research, edited by: Heinen, D., Hoch, S.,
Krafft, T.,  Moss, C.,  Scheidt, P., and  Welschhoff, A.,   German
National Committee on Global Change Research, Bonn, 59–66, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration
and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 543–556, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-543-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature
of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Berresheim, H., Bingemer, H., Jacob, D. J., Lewis, B. L.,
Li, S.-M., and Talbot, R. W.: The atmospheric sulfur cycle over the Amazon
Basin, 2. Wet Season, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16813–16824, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Brandão, C., Carswell, F. E., Ciccioli, P.,
da Costa, A. L., Culf, A. D., Esteves, J. L., Gash, J. H. C., Grace, J.,
Kabat, P., Lelieveld, J., Malhi, Y., Manzi, A. O., Meixner, F. X., Nobre, A.
D., Nobre, C., Ruivo, M. d. L. P., Silva-Dias, M. A., Stefani, P., Valentini,
R., von Jouanne, J., and Waterloo, M. J.: Biogeochemical cycling of carbon,
water, energy, trace gases and aerosols in Amazonia: The LBA-EUSTACH
experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8066, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000524</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P.,
Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking rain clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Beck, V., Bela, M., Freitas, S., Gerbig, C.,
Longo, K., Munger, J. W., Wiedemann, K. T., and Wofsy, S. C.: Carbon monoxide
and related trace gases and aerosols over the Amazon Basin during the wet and
dry seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6041–6065,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6041-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6041-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J. D., Trudeau, M. E., Williams, J. C., Neff, D. H.,
Masarie, K. A., Chao, D. Y., Kitzis, D. R., Novelli, P. C., Zhao, C. L.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M., Crotwell, M. J., Fischer, M. L., Parker, M.
J., Lee, J. T., Baumann, D. D., Desai, A. R., Stanier, C. O., De Wekker, S.
F. J., Wolfe, D. E., Munger, J. W., and Tans, P. P.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's
Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty
analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas
monitoring efforts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 647–687,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-647-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-647-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Tesche, M., Muller, D., Althausen, D., Engelmann,
R., Pauliquevis, T., and Artaxo, P.: Dust and smoke transport from Africa to
South America: Lidar profiling over Cape Verde and the Amazon rainforest,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11802, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL037923</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Artaxo, P., Martins, J. V., Yamasoe, M. A., Procópio, A. S.,
Pauliquevis, T. M., Andreae, M. O., Guyon, P., Gatti, L. V., and Leal, A. M.
C.: Physical and chemical properties of aerosols in the wet and dry season in
Rondonia, Amazonia, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8081, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000666</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Brito, J. F., Barbosa, H. M. J., Arana, A., Sena,
E. T., Cirino, G. G., Bastos, W., Martin, S. T., and Andreae, M. O.:
Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic
to biomass burning conditions, Faraday Discuss., 165, 203–235,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00052D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3FD00052D</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Rannik, U., Moncrieff, J., Foken, T.,
Kowalski, A. S., Martin, P. H., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Clement, R.,
Elbers, J., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Morgenstern, K., Pilegaard, K.,
Rebmann, C., Snijders, W., Valentini, R., and Vesala, T.: Estimates of the
annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: The EUROFLUX methodology,
Adv. Ecol. Res., 30, 113–175, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Althausen, D., Engelmann, R., Artaxo, P.,
Pauliquevis, T., and Souza, R.: Further evidence for significant smoke
transport from Africa to Amazonia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L20802,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049200</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Baccini, A., Goetz, S. J., Walker, W. S., Laporte, N. T., Sun, M.,
Sulla-Menashe, D., Hackler, J., Beck, P. S. A., Dubayah, R., Friedl, M. A.,
Samanta, S., and Houghton, R. A.: Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from
tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps, Nature Climate
Change, 2, 182–185, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1354</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Bakwin, P. S., Tans, P. P., Hurst, D. F., and Zhao, C. L., Measurements of
carbon dioxide on very tall towers: results of the NOAA/CMDL program: Tellus
Ser. B, 50, 401–415, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Balch, J. K.: Drought and fire change sink to source, Nature, 506, 41–42,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/506041a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/506041a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Baldocchi, D. D.: Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating
carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future, Global
Change Biol., 9, 479–492, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Beck, V., Chen, H., Gerbig, C., Bergamaschi, P., Bruhwiler, L., Houweling,
S., Röckmann, T., Kolle, O., Steinbach, J., Koch, T., Sapart, C. J., van
der Veen, C., Frankenberg, C., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Longo, K. M., and
Wofsy, S. C.: Methane airborne measurements and comparison to global models
during BARCA, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D15310, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017345</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ben-Ami, Y., Koren, I., Rudich, Y., Artaxo, P., Martin, S. T., and Andreae,
M. O.: Transport of North African dust from the Bodélé depression to the
Amazon Basin: a case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7533–7544,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7533-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7533-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Ben-Ami, Y., Koren, I., Altaratz, O., Kostinski, A., and Lehahn, Y.:
Discernible rhythm in the spatio/temporal distributions of transatlantic
dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2253–2262, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2253-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2253-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Betts, A. K., Fisch, G., von Randow, C., Dias, M. A. F. S., Cohen, J. C. P.,
da Silva, R., and Fitzjarrald, D. R.: The Amazonian boundary layer and
mesoscale circulations, in: t Amazonia and Global Change, edited by: Keller,
M., Bustamante, M., Gash, J., and Dias, P., American Geophysical Union,
Washington, DC, 163–181, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Bevan, S. L., North, P. R. J., Grey, W. M. F., Los, S. O., and Plummer, S.
E.: Impact of atmospheric aerosol from biomass burning on Amazon dry-season
drought, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D09204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd011112</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Boisier, J. P., Ciais, P., Ducharne, A., and Guimberteau, M.: Projected
strengthening of Amazonian dry season by constrained climate model
simulations, Nature Climate Change, 5, 656–660, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2658</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Bussemer, M., Wehner, B., Keller, S., Charlson, R. J., and
Heintzenberg, J.: Light absorption by primary particle emissions from a
lignite burning plant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 3887–3891, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Covert, D. S., and Müller, T.: Truncation and
angular-scattering corrections for absorbing aerosol in the TSI 3563
nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 866–871,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820902998373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820902998373</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Bou-Zeid, E., Meneveau, C., and Parlange, M. B.: Large-eddy simulation of
neutral atmospheric boundary layer flow over heterogeneous surfaces: Blending
height and effective surface roughness, Water Resour. Res., 40, W02505,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003wr002475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003wr002475</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Brienen, R. J. W., Phillips, O. L., Feldpausch, T. R., Gloor, E., Baker, T.
R., Lloyd, J., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Monteagudo-Mendoza, A., Malhi, Y., Lewis,
S. L., Vasquez Martinez, R., Alexiades, M., Alvarez Davila, E.,
Alvarez-Loayza, P., Andrade, A., Aragao, L. E. O. C., Araujo-Murakami, A.,
Arets, E. J. M. M., Arroyo, L., Aymard C., G. A., Banki, O. S., Baraloto, C.,
Barroso, J., Bonal, D., Boot, R. G. A., Camargo, J. L. C., Castilho, C. V.,
Chama, V., Chao, K. J., Chave, J., Comiskey, J. A., Cornejo Valverde, F., da
Costa, L., de Oliveira, E. A., Di Fiore, A., Erwin, T. L., Fauset, S.,
Forsthofer, M., Galbraith, D. R., Grahame, E. S., Groot, N., Herault, B.,
Higuchi, N., Honorio Coronado, E. N., Keeling, H., Killeen, T. J., Laurance,
W. F., Laurance, S., Licona, J., Magnussen, W. E., Marimon, B. S.,
Marimon-Junior, B. H., Mendoza, C., Neill, D. A., Nogueira, E. M., Nunez, P.,
Pallqui Camacho, N. C., Parada, A., Pardo-Molina, G., Peacock, J.,
Pena-Claros, M., Pickavance, G. C., Pitman, N. C. A., Poorter, L., Prieto,
A., Quesada, C. A., Ramirez, F., Ramirez-Angulo, H., Restrepo, Z., Roopsind,
A., Rudas, A., Salomao, R. P., Schwarz, M., Silva, N., Silva-Espejo, J. E.,
Silveira, M., Stropp, J., Talbot, J., ter Steege, H., Teran-Aguilar, J.,
Terborgh, J., Thomas-Caesar, R., Toledo, M., Torello-Raventos, M., Umetsu, R.
K., van der Heijden, G. M. F., van der Hout, P., Guimaraes Vieira, I. C.,
Vieira, S. A., Vilanova, E., Vos, V. A., and Zagt, R. J.: Long-term decline
of the Amazon carbon sink, Nature, 519, 344–348, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14283" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14283</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Brown, A. R. and Wood, N.: Properties and parameterization of the stable
boundary layer over moderate topography, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2797–2808,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Bueno, P. A., Havey, D. K., Mulholland, G. W., Hodges, J. T., Gillis, K. A.,
Dickerson, R. R., and Zachariah, M. R.: Photoacoustic measurements of
amplification of the absorption cross section for coated soot aerosols,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 1217–1230, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.587477" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.587477</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Cai, Y., Montague, D. C., Mooiweer-Bryan, W., and Deshler, T.: Performance
characteristics of the ultra high sensitivity aerosol spectrometer for
particles between 55 and 800 nm: Laboratory and field studies, J. Aerosol
Sci., 39, 759–769, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.04.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.04.007</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Campanharo, A., Ramos, F. M., Macau, E. E. N., Rosa, R. R., Bolzan, M. J.
A., and Sa, L. D. A.: Searching chaos and coherent structures in the
atmospheric turbulence above the Amazon forest, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 366,
579–589, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2007.2118</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Camponogara, G., Silva Dias, M. A. F., and Carrió, G. G.: Relationship
between Amazon biomass burning aerosols and rainfall over the La Plata Basin,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4397–4407, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4397-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4397-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Cancelli, D. M., Dias, N. L., and Chamecki, M.: Dimensionless criteria for
the production-dissipation equilibrium of scalar fluctuations and their
implications for scalar similarity, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10522,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012wr012127</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Carpenter, L. J., Fleming, Z. L., Read, K. A., Lee, J. D., Moller, S. J.,
Hopkins, J. R., Purvis, R. M., Lewis, A. C., Mueller, K., Heinold, B.,
Herrmann, H., Fomba, K. W., van Pinxteren, D., Mueller, C., Tegen, I.,
Wiedensohler, A., Mueller, T., Niedermeier, N., Achterberg, E. P., Patey, M.
D., Kozlova, E. A., Heimann, M., Heard, D. E., Plane, J. M. C., Mahajan, A.,
Oetjen, H., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., Evans, M. J., Pilling, M.
J., Leigh, R. J., Monks, P. S., Karunaharan, A., Vaughan, S., Arnold, S. R.,
Tschritter, J., Poehler, D., Friess, U., Holla, R., Mendes, L. M., Lopez, H.,
Faria, B., Manning, A. J., and Wallace, D. W. R.: Seasonal characteristics of
tropical marine boundary layer air measured at the Cape Verde Atmospheric
Observatory, J. Atmos. Chem., 67, 87–140, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-011-9206-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-011-9206-1</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Carswell, F. E., Costa, A. L., Palheta, M., Malhi, Y., Meir, P., Costa, J.
d. P. R., Ruivo, M. D. L., Leal, L. D. S. M., Costa, J. M. N., Clement, R.
J., and Grace, J.: Seasonality in CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O flux at an eastern
Amazonian rain forest, J. Geophys. Res., 107, LBA 43-1–LBA 43-15,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000284</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Cava, D., Giostra, U., Siqueira, M., and Katul, G.: Organised motion and
radiative perturbations in the nocturnal canopy sublayer above an even-aged
pine forest, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 112, 129–157,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020160.28184.a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020160.28184.a0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Chambers, J. Q., Negron-Juarez, R. I., Marra, D. M., Di Vittorio, A., Tews,
J., Roberts, D., Ribeiro, G. H. P. M., Trumbore, S. E., and Higuchi, N.: The
steady-state mosaic of disturbance and succession across an old-growth
Central Amazon forest landscape, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 3949–3954,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202894110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1202894110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Chauvel, A., Lucas, Y., and Boulet, R.: On the genesis of the soil mantle of
the region of Manaus, Central Amazonia, Brazil, Experientia, 43, 234–241,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01945546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf01945546</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D.,
Folster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., Lescure, J. P., Nelson, B.
W., Ogawa, H., Puig, H., Riera, B., and Yamakura, T.: Tree allometry and
improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests,
Oecologia, 145, 87–99, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Swenson, N. G., and Zanne,
A. E.: Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum, Ecol. Lett., 12,
351–366, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Chen, B., Coops, N. C., Fu, D., Margolis, H. A., Amiro, B. D., Black, T. A.,
Arain, M. A., Barr, A. G., Bourque, C. P. A., Flanagan, L. B., Lafleur, P.
M., McCaughey, J. H., and Wofsy, S. C.: Characterizing spatial
representativeness of flux tower eddy-covariance measurements across the
Canadian Carbon Program Network using remote sensing and footprint analysis:
Remote Sens. Environ., 124, 742–755, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.007</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Farmer, D. K., Schneider, J., Zorn, S. R., Heald, C. L., Karl, T.,
Guenther, A., Allan, J. D., Robinson, N., Coe, H., Kimmel, J. R.,
Pauliquevis, T., Borrmann, S., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P.,
Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Mass spectral characterization of
submicron biogenic organic particles in the Amazon Basin, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 36, L20806, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL039880</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Farmer, D. K., Rizzo, L. V., Pauliquevis, T., Kuwata, M., Karl, T.
G., Guenther, A., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U.,
Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., and Martin, S. T.: Submicron particle mass
concentrations and sources in the Amazonian wet season (AMAZE-08), Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 3687–3701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3687-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3687-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Chi, X., Winderlich, J., Mayer, J.-C., Panov, A. V., Heimann, M., Birmili,
W., Heintzenberg, J., Cheng, Y., and Andreae, M. O.: Long-term measurements
of aerosol and carbon monoxide at the ZOTTO tall tower to characterize
polluted and pristine air in the Siberian taiga, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
12271–12298, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12271-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12271-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Chimonas, G. and Nappo, C. J.: Wave drag in the planetary boundary layer
over complex terrain, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 47, 217–232,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00122330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00122330</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Chou, W. W., Wofsy, S. C., Harriss, R. C., Lin, J. C., Gerbig, C., and
Sachse, G. W.: Net fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Amazonia derived from aircraft
observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4614, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001295" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001295</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C.,
Quéré, C. L., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Chapter 6:
Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 465–570,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Cintra, B. B. L., Schietti, J., Emillio, T., Martins, D., Moulatlet, G.,
Souza, P., Levis, C., Quesada, C. A., and Schöngart, J.: Soil physical
restrictions and hydrology regulate stand age and wood biomass turnover rates
of Purus–Madeira interfluvial wetlands in Amazonia, Biogeosciences, 10,
7759–7774, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7759-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-7759-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Cirino, G. G., Souza, R. A. F., Adams, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: The effect of
atmospheric aerosol particles and clouds on net ecosystem exchange in the
Amazon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6523–6543, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6523-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6523-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.,
Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173–1176, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Claeys, M., Kourtchev, I., Pashynska, V., Vas, G., Vermeylen, R., Wang, W.,
Cafmeyer, J., Chi, X., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., and Maenhaut, W.: Polar
organic marker compounds in atmospheric aerosols during the LBA-SMOCC 2002
biomass burning experiment in Rondônia, Brazil: sources and source
processes, time series, diel variations and size distributions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 9319–9331, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9319-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9319-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Clark, D. A., Brown, S., Kicklighter, D. W., Chambers, J. Q., Thomlinson, J.
R., Ni, J., and Holland, E. A.: Net primary production in tropical forests:
An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data, Ecol. Appl., 11,
371–384, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3060895" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/3060895</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Cleveland, C. C., Taylor, P., Chadwick, K. D., Dahlin, K., Doughty, C. E.,
Malhi, Y., Smith, W. K., Sullivan, B. W., Wieder, W. R., and Townsend, A. R.:
A comparison of plot-based satellite and Earth system model estimates of
tropical forest net primary production, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 626–644,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB005022</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Coe, M. T., Costa, M. H., and Soares-Filhoc, B. S.: The influence of
historical and potential future deforestation on the stream flow of the
Amazon River – Land surface processes and atmospheric feedbacks, J. Hydrol.,
369, 165–174, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.043</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Collineau, S.  and Brunet, Y.: Detection of turbulent coherent motions in a
forest canopy. 2. Time-scales and conditional averages, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 66, 49–73, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00705459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00705459</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Costa, F. D., Acevedo, O. C., Mombach, J. C. M., and Degrazia, G. A.: A
simplified model for intermittent turbulence in the nocturnal boundary layer,
J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1714–1729, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2011jas3655.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2011jas3655.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: The role of the tropics in atmospheric chemistry, in:  The Geophysiology of Amazonia,
edited by: Dickinson, R. E., John Wiley, New York, 107–130, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Biomass burning in the tropics: Impact
on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles, Science, 250, 1669–1678,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>D'Amelio, M. T. S., Gatti, L. V., Miller, J. B., and Tans, P.: Regional
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in Amazonia derived from aircraft vertical profiles, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 8785–8797, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8785-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8785-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Da Silva, J. M. C., Rylands, A. B., and Da Fonseca, G. A. B.: The fate of
the Amazonian areas of endemism, Conservation Biology, 19, 689–694,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00705.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00705.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Davidson, E. A., de Araujo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Balch, J. K., Brown, I. F.,
Bustamante, M. M. C., Coe, M. T., DeFries, R. S., Keller, M., Longo, M.,
Munger, J. W., Schroeder, W., Soares, B. S., Souza, C. M., and Wofsy, S. C.:
The Amazon basin in transition, Nature, 481, 321–328,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10717" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10717</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>de Araújo, A. C., Nobre, A. D., Kruijt, B., Elbers, J. A., Dallarosa,
R., Stefani, P., von Randow, C., Manzi, A. O., Culf, A. D., Gash, J. H. C.,
Valentini, R., and Kabat, P.: Comparative measurements of carbon dioxide
fluxes from two nearby towers in a central Amazonian rainforest: The Manaus
LBA site, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8090, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000676" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000676</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>de Araujo, A. C., Kruijt, B., Nobre, A. D., Dolman, A. J., Waterloo, M. J.,
Moors, E. J., and de Souza, J. S.: Nocturnal accumulation of CO(2) underneath
a tropical forest canopy along a topographical gradient, Ecol. Appl., 18,
1406–1419, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>de Araujo, A. C., Dolman, A. J., Waterloo, M. J., Gash, J. H. C., Kruijt,
B., Zanchi, F. B., de Lange, J. M. E., Stoevelaar, R., Manzi, A. O., Nobre,
A. D., Lootens, R. N., and Backer, J.: The spatial variability of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
storage and the interpretation of eddy covariance fluxes in central Amazonia,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 226–237, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.005</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Dias, N. L., Hong, J., Leclerc, M. Y., Black, T. A., Nesic, Z., and
Krishnan, P.: A simple method of estimating scalar fluxes over forests,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 132, 401–414, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9408-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-009-9408-0</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Dias Júnior, C. Q., Sa, L. D. A., Pacheco, V. B., and de Souza, C.
M.: Coherent structures detected in the unstable atmospheric surface layer
above the Amazon forest, J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodynam., 115, 1–8,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Crotwell, A. M., and
Crotwell, M. J.: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole Fractions from the
NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling Network, 1968–2013,
Version: 2014-06-27, available at:
<uri>ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/trace_gases/co2/flask/surface/</uri> (last
access: 1 July 2015), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Doughty, C. E. and Goulden, M. L.: Seasonal patterns of tropical forest
leaf area index and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 113,
G00B06, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jg000590" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jg000590</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Doughty, C. E., Metcalfe, D. B., Girardin, C. A. J., Amezquita, F. F.,
Cabrera, D. G., Huasco, W. H., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Araujo-Murakami, A., da
Costa, M. C., Rocha, W., Feldpausch, T. R., Mendoza, A. L. M., da Costa, A.
C. L., Meir, P., Phillips, O. L., and Malhi, Y.: Drought impact on forest
carbon dynamics and fluxes in Amazonia, Nature, 519, 78–82,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14213</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website, available at:
<uri>http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html</uri> (last access: 1 July 2015),
NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD., 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Drüe, C. and Heinemann, G.: Characteristics of intermittent turbulence
in the upper stable boundary layer over Greenland, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
124, 361–381, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9175-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-007-9175-8</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Dupont, S. and Brunet, Y.: Coherent structures in canopy edge flow: a
large-eddy simulation study, J. Fluid Mech., 630, 93–128,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022112009006739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/s0022112009006739</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Durden, D. J., Nappo, C. J., Leclerc, M. Y., Duarte, H. F., Zhang, G.,
Parker, M. J., and Kurzeja, R. J.: On the impact of wave-like disturbances on
turbulent fluxes and turbulence statistics in nighttime conditions: a case
study, Biogeosciences, 10, 8433–8443, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8433-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-8433-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., O'Neill, N. T., Schafer, J. S.,
Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Yamasoe, M. A., and Artaxo, P.: High aerosol
optical depth biomass burning events: A comparison of optical properties for
different source regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2035,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017861</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Elbert, W., Weber, B., Burrows, S., Steinkamp, J., Büdel, B., Andreae,
M. O., and Pöschl, U., Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global
cycles of carbon and nitrogen, Nat. Geosci., 5, 459–462, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Emilio, T., Quesada, C. A., Costa, F. R. C., Magnusson, W. E., Schietti, J.,
Feldpausch, T. R., Brienen, R. J. W., Baker, T. R., Chave, J., Alvarez, E.,
Araujo, A., Banki, O., Castilho, C. V., Honorio C., E. N., Killeen, T. J.,
Malhi, Y., Mendoza, E. M. O., Monteagudo, A., Neill, D., Alexander Parada,
G., Pena-Cruz, A., Ramirez-Angulo, H., Schwarz, M., Silveira, M., ter Steege,
H., Terborgh, J. W., Thomas, R., Torres-Lezama, A., Vilanova, E., and
Phillips, O. L.: Soil physical conditions limit palm and tree basal area in
Amazonian forests, Plant Ecol. Diversity, 7, 215–229,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.772257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17550874.2013.772257</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Farge, M.: Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence,
Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 395–457, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.24.1.395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fluid.24.1.395</ext-link>,
1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Feldpausch, T. R., Lloyd, J., Lewis, S. L., Brienen, R. J. W., Gloor, M.,
Monteagudo Mendoza, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Banin, L., Abu Salim, K.,
Affum-Baffoe, K., Alexiades, M., Almeida, S., Amaral, I., Andrade, A.,
Aragão, L. E. O. C., Araujo Murakami, A., Arets, E. J. M. M., Arroyo, L.,
Aymard C., G. A., Baker, T. R., Bánki, O. S., Berry, N. J., Cardozo, N.,
Chave, J., Comiskey, J. A., Alvarez, E., de Oliveira, A., Di Fiore, A.,
Djagbletey, G., Domingues, T. F., Erwin, T. L., Fearnside, P. M., França, M.
B., Freitas, M. A., Higuchi, N., E. Honorio C., Iida, Y., Jiménez, E.,
Kassim, A. R., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, W. F., Lovett, J. C., Malhi, Y.,
Marimon, B. S., Marimon-Junior, B. H., Lenza, E., Marshall, A. R., Mendoza,
C., Metcalfe, D. J., Mitchard, E. T. A., Neill, D. A., Nelson, B. W., Nilus,
R., Nogueira, E. M., Parada, A., Peh, K. S.-H., Pena Cruz, A., Peñuela, M.
C., Pitman, N. C. A., Prieto, A., Quesada, C. A., Ramírez, F.,
Ramírez-Angulo, H., Reitsma, J. M., Rudas, A., Saiz, G., Salomão, R. P.,
Schwarz, M., Silva, N., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Silveira, M., Sonké, B., Stropp,
J., Taedoumg, H. E., Tan, S., ter Steege, H., Terborgh, J., Torello-Raventos,
M., van der Heijden, G. M. F., Vásquez, R., Vilanova, E., Vos, V. A.,
White, L., Willcock, S., Woell, H., and Phillips, O. L.: Tree height
integrated into pantropical forest biomass estimates, Biogeosciences, 9,
3381–3403, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Fernandes, M. J. S.: Índice de erosividade da chuva média anual para
Manaus/AM de 1981 a 2010, Revista Geonorte, 10, 46–49, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Figueroa, S. N. and Nobre, C. A.: Precipitions distribution over Central
and Western Tropical South America, Climanálise, 5, 36–44, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Fisch, G., Tota, J., Machado, L. A. T., Dias, M., Lyra, R. F. D., Nobre, C.
A., Dolman, A. J., and Gash, J. H. C.: The convective boundary layer over
pasture and forest in Amazonia, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 78, 47–59, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Fitzjarrald, D. R. and Moore, K. E.: Mechanisms of nocturnal exchange
between the rain-forest and the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 95,
16839–16850, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16839" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD095iD10p16839</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Foken, T., Meixner, F. X., Falge, E., Zetzsch, C., Serafimovich, A.,
Bargsten, A., Behrendt, T., Biermann, T., Breuninger, C., Dix, S., Gerken,
T., Hunner, M., Lehmann-Pape, L., Hens, K., Jocher, G., Kesselmeier, J.,
Lüers, J., Mayer, J.-C., Moravek, A., Plake, D., Riederer, M., Rütz, F.,
Scheibe, M., Siebicke, L., Sörgel, M., Staudt, K., Trebs, I., Tsokankunku,
A., Welling, M., Wolff, V., and Zhu, Z.: Coupling processes and exchange of
energy and reactive and non-reactive trace gases at a forest site – results
of the EGER experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1923–1950,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1923-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1923-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Follath, R., Schmidt, J. S., Weigand, M., and Fauth, K.: The Xray microscopy
beamline UE46-PGM2 at BESSY: AIP Conf. Proc., 1234, 323–326,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3463201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.3463201</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Formenti, P., Andreae, M. O., Lange, L., Roberts, G., Cafmeyer, J., Rajta,
I., Maenhaut, W., Holben, B. N., Artaxo, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Saharan dust
in Brazil and Suriname during the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment
in Amazonia (LBA)-Cooperative LBA Regional Experiment (CLAIRE) in March 1998,
J. Geophys. Res., 106, 14919–14934, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Fraser, B.: Carving up the Amazon, Nature, 509, 418–419, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Freud, E., Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Costa, A. A., and Artaxo, P.:
Robust relations between CCN and the vertical evolution of cloud drop size
distribution in deep convective clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1661–1675,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1661-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1661-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Rollins, A. W., Wooldridge, P. J., Brown, S.
S., Fuchs, H., Dubé, W., Mensah, A., dal Maso, M., Tillmann, R., Dorn,
H.-P., Brauers, T., and Cohen, R. C.: Organic nitrate and secondary organic
aerosol yield from NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene evaluated using a
gas-phase kinetics/aerosol partitioning model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1431–1449, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Galvão, L. S., dos Santos, J. R., Roberts, D. A., Breunig, F. M.,
Toomey, M., and de Moura, Y. M.: On intra-annual EVI variability in the dry
season of tropical forest: A case study with MODIS and hyperspectral data,
Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 2350–2359, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.035</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Gao, W. and Li, B. L.: Wavelet analysis of coherent structures at the
atmosphere forest interface, J. Appl. Meteor., 32, 1717–1725, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Gatti, L. V., Miller, J. B., D'Amelio, M. T. S., Martinewski, A., Basso, L.
S., Gloor, M. E., Wofsy, S., and Tans, P.: Vertical profiles of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
above eastern Amazonia suggest a net carbon flux to the atmosphere and
balanced biosphere between 2000 and 2009, Tellus Ser. B, 62, 581–594,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00484.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00484.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Gatti, L. V., Gloor, M., Miller, J. B., Doughty, C. E., Malhi, Y.,
Domingues, L. G., Basso, L. S., Martinewski, A., Correia, C. S. C., Borges,
V. F., Freitas, S., Braz, R., Anderson, L. O., Rocha, H., Grace, J.,
Phillips, O. L., and Lloyd, J.: Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon
balance revealed by atmospheric measurements, Nature, 506, 76–80,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12957</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W.: Particle size analysis, in:  Methods in Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, edited by:
Klute, A., American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America,
Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 383–409, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Gilardoni, S., Vignati, E., Marmer, E., Cavalli, F., Belis, C., Gianelle, V.,
Loureiro, A., and Artaxo, P.: Sources of carbonaceous aerosol in the Amazon
basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2747–2764, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2747-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2747-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Gimeno, L., Stohl, A., Trigo, R. M., Dominguez, F., Yoshimura, K., Yu, L.
S., Drumond, A., Duran-Quesada, A. M., and Nieto, R.: Oceanic and terrestrial
sources of continental precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG4003,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012rg000389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012rg000389</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Gloor, M., Fan, S. M., Pacala, S., and Sarmiento, J., Optimal sampling of
the atmosphere for purpose of inverse modeling: A model study, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 407–428, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Gloor, M., Bakwin, P., Hurst, D., Lock, L., Draxler, R., and Tans, P.: What
is the concentration footprint of a tall tower?, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
17831–17840, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Gloor, M., Gatti, L., Brienen, R., Feldpausch, T. R., Phillips, O. L.,
Miller, J., Ometto, J. P., Rocha, H., Baker, T., de Jong, B., Houghton, R.
A., Malhi, Y., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Guyot, J.-L., Zhao, K., Jackson, R.,
Peylin, P., Sitch, S., Poulter, B., Lomas, M., Zaehle, S., Huntingford, C.,
Levy, P., and Lloyd, J.: The carbon balance of South America: a review of the
status, decadal trends and main determinants, Biogeosciences, 9, 5407–5430,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5407-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-5407-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Gloor, M., Brienen, R. J. W., Galbraith, D., Feldpausch, T. R.,
Schöngart, J., Guyot, J. L., Espinoza, J. C., Lloyd, J., and Phillips, O.
L.: Intensification of the Amazon hydrological cycle over the last two
decades, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1729–1733, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50377</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Goulding, M., Barthem, R. B., and Duenas, R.: The Smithsonian Atlas of the
Amazon. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Books, 253 pp., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Grace, J., Lloyd, J., McIntyre, J., Miranda, A. C., Meir, P., Miranda, H.
S., Nobre, C., Moncrieff, J., Massheder, J., Malhi, Y., Wright, I., and Gash,
J.: Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in southwest
Amazonia, 1992 to 1993, Science, 270, 778–780, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Greco, S., Swap, R., Garstang, M., Ulanski, S., Shipman, M., Harriss, R. C.,
Talbot, R., Andreae, M. O., and Artaxo, P.: Rainfall and surface kinematic
conditions over Central Amazonia during ABLE 2B, J. Geophys. Res., 95,
17001–17014, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Gunthe, S. S., King, S. M., Rose, D., Chen, Q., Roldin, P., Farmer, D. K.,
Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Martin, S. T., and Pöschl, U.:
Cloud condensation nuclei in pristine tropical rainforest air of Amazonia:
size-resolved measurements and modeling of atmospheric aerosol composition
and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7551–7575,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Hari, P., Andreae, M. O., Kabat, P., and Kulmala, M.: A comprehensive
network of measuring stations to monitor climate change, Boreal Environ.
Res., 14, 442–446, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Healy, D. A., Huffman, J. A., O'Connor, D. J., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U.,
and Sodeau, J. R.: Ambient measurements of biological aerosol particles near
Killarney, Ireland: a comparison between real-time fluorescence and
microscopy techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8055–8069,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8055-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8055-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Heiblum, R. H., Koren, I., and Feingold, G.: On the link between Amazonian
forest properties and shallow cumulus cloud fields, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
6063–6074, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6063-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6063-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Heimann, M., Schulze, E.-D., Winderlich, J., Andreae, M. O., Chi, X.,
Gerbig, C., Kolle, O., Kübler, K., Lavric, J., Mikhailov, E., Panov, A.,
Park, S., Rödenbeck, C., and Skorochod, A.: The Zotino Tall Tower
Observatory (ZOTTO): Quantifying large scale biogeochemical changes in
Central Siberia, Nova Acta Leopoldina, 117, 51–64, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Hoch, S. W., Calanca, P., Philipona, R., and Ohmura, A.: Year-round
observation of longwave radiative flux divergence in Greenland, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 46, 1469–1479, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jam2542.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jam2542.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Hoorn, C., Wesselingh, F. P., ter Steege, H., Bermudez, M. A., Mora, A.,
Sevink, J., Sanmartin, I., Sanchez-Meseguer, A., Anderson, C. L., Figueiredo,
J. P., Jaramillo, C., Riff, D., Negri, F. R., Hooghiemstra, H., Lundberg, J.,
Stadler, T., Sarkinen, T., and Antonelli, A.: Amazonia through time: Andean
uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity, Science, 330,
927–931, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1194585" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1194585</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Huete, A. R., Didan, K., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Ratana, P., Saleska, S. R.,
Hutyra, L. R., Yang, W. Z., Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R.: Amazon rainforests
green-up with sunlight in dry season, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06405,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025583</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Sinha, B., Garland, R. M., Snee-Pollmann, A., Gunthe, S. S.,
Artaxo, P., Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size
distributions and temporal variations of biological aerosol particles in the
Amazon rainforest characterized by microscopy and real-time UV-APS
fluorescence techniques during AMAZE-08, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
11997–12019, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Hussain, A. K. M. F.: Coherent structures and turbulence, J. Fluid
Mech., 173, 303–356, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022112086001192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/s0022112086001192</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>IDESAM: Plano de Gestão da Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável do
Uatumã, Versão para consulta pública. Instituto de
Conservação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Amazonas, Manaus,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>IUSS (International Union of Soil Science): Working Group WRB, World
reference base for soil resources 2006: A framework for international
classification, correlation and communication, World Soil Resources Report
103, FAO, Rome, 145 pp., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J. and Wofsy, S. C.: Budgets of reactive nitrogen, hydrocarbons,
and ozone over the Amazon forest during the wet season, J. Geophys. Res., 95,
16737–16754, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones,
L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and van der
Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire
assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences,
9, 527–554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Kaye, P. H., Stanley, W. R., Hirst, E., Foot, E. V., Baxter, K. L., and
Barrington, S. J.: Single particle multichannel bio-aerosol fluorescence
sensor, Optics Express, 13, 3583–3593, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/opex.13.003583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/opex.13.003583</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Keller, M., Bustamante, M., Gash, J., and Dias, P.: Amazonia and Global
Change, Washington, DC, American Geophysical Union, 565 pp., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Kesselmeier, J., Kuhn, U., Rottenberger, S., Biesenthal, T., Wolf, A.,
Schebeske, G., Andreae, M. O., Ciccioli, P., Brancaleoni, E., Frattoni, M.,
Oliva, S. T., Botelho, M. L., Silva, C. M. A., and Tavares, T. M.:
Concentrations and species composition of atmospheric volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) as observed during the wet and dry season in Rondonia
(Amazonia), J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8053, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000267</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Tyliszczak, T., Steele, W. F., Fakra, S., Hitchcock, P.,
Franck, K., Anderson, E., Harteneck, B., Rightor, E. G., Mitchell, G. E.,
Hitchcock, A. P., Yang, L., Warwick, T., and Ade, H.:
Interferometer-controlled scanning transmission X-ray microscopes at the
Advanced Light Source, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 10, 125–136,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s0909049502017739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1107/s0909049502017739</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Kirchhoff, V. W. J. H., Setzer, A. W., and Pereira, M. C.: Biomass burning
in Amazonia: Seasonal effects on atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 16, 469–472, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>Kirchhoff, V. W. J. H., daSilva, I. M. O., and Browell, E. V.: Ozone
measurements in Amazonia: Dry season versus wet season, J. Geophys. Res., 95,
16913–16926, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>Krusche, N. and Oliveira, A. P.: Characterization of coherent structures in
the atmospheric surface layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 110, 191–211,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1026096805679" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1026096805679</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>Kuhn, U., Ganzeveld, L., Thielmann, A., Dindorf, T., Schebeske, G., Welling,
M., Sciare, J., Roberts, G., Meixner, F. X., Kesselmeier, J., Lelieveld, J.,
Kolle, O., Ciccioli, P., Lloyd, J., Trentmann, J., Artaxo, P., and Andreae,
M. O.: Impact of Manaus City on the Amazon Green Ocean atmosphere: ozone
production, precursor sensitivity and aerosol load, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9251–9282, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9251-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9251-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Ehn, M., Thornton, J., Sipilä, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Kerminen, V. M.: Chemistry of atmospheric nucleation: On
the recent advances on precursor characterization and atmospheric cluster
composition in connection with atmospheric new particle formation, Annu. Rev.
Phys. Chem., 65, 21–37, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>Lapola, D. M., Martinelli, L. A., Peres, C. A., Ometto, J. P. H. B.,
Ferreira, M. E., Nobre, C. A., Aguiar, A. P. D., Bustamante, M. M. C.,
Cardoso, M. F., Costa, M. H., Joly, C. A., Leite, C. C., Moutinho, P.,
Sampaio, G., Strassburg, B. B. N., and Vieira, I. C. G.: Pervasive transition
of the Brazilian land-use system, Nature Clim. Change, 4, 27–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2056</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. and Vandecar, K.: Effects of tropical deforestation on climate
and agriculture, Nature Clim. Change, 5, 27–36, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2430" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2430</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Moriarty, R., Andrew, R. M., Peters, G. P., Ciais, P.,
Friedlingstein, P., Jones, S. D., Sitch, S., Tans, P., Arneth, A., Boden, T.
A., Bopp, L., Bozec, Y., Canadell, J. G., Chini, L. P., Chevallier, F.,
Cosca, C. E., Harris, I., Hoppema, M., Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Jain,
A. K., Johannessen, T., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Kitidis, V., Klein
Goldewijk, K., Koven, C., Landa, C. S., Landschützer, P., Lenton, A., Lima,
I. D., Marland, G., Mathis, J. T., Metzl, N., Nojiri, Y., Olsen, A., Ono, T.,
Peng, S., Peters, W., Pfeil, B., Poulter, B., Raupach, M. R., Regnier, P.,
Rödenbeck, C., Saito, S., Salisbury, J. E., Schuster, U., Schwinger, J.,
Séférian, R., Segschneider, J., Steinhoff, T., Stocker, B. D., Sutton, A.
J., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook, B., van der Werf, G. R., Viovy, N., Wang, Y.-P.,
Wanninkhof, R., Wiltshire, A., and Zeng, N.: Global carbon budget 2014, Earth
Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 47–85, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-7-47-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H.,
Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D.,
and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical
forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06870</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>Levin, E. J. T., Prenni, A. J., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Campuzano-Jost, P.,
Winkler, P. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P. J., Jimenez, J. L., and Smith,
J. N.: Size-resolved aerosol composition and its link to hygroscopicity at a
forested site in Colorado, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2657–2667,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2657-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2657-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>Li, D. and Bou-Zeid, E.: Coherent Structures and the Dissimilarity of
Turbulent Transport of Momentum and Scalars in the Unstable Atmospheric
Surface Layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 140, 243–262,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9613-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-011-9613-5</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J. C., Matsui, T., Pielke, R. A., Sr., and Kummerow, C.: Effects of
biomass burning-derived aerosols on precipitation and clouds in the Amazon
basin: a satellite-based empirical study, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006884</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>Lindinger, W., Hansel, A., and Jordan, A.: Proton-transfer-reaction mass
spectrometry (PTR-MS): on-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at
pptv levels, Chem. Soc. Rev., 27, 347–354, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>Liptzin, D. and Silver, W. L.: Effects of carbon additions on iron
reduction and phosphorus availability in a humid tropical forest soil, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 41, 1696–1702, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>Lloyd, J., Kolle, O., Fritsch, H., de Freitas, S. R., Silva Dias, M. A. F.,
Artaxo, P., Nobre, A. D., de Araújo, A. C., Kruijt, B., Sogacheva, L.,
Fisch, G., Thielmann, A., Kuhn, U., and Andreae, M. O.: An airborne regional
carbon balance for Central Amazonia, Biogeosciences, 4, 759–768,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-759-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-759-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>Lohou, F., Druilhet, A., Campistron, B., Redelspergers, J. L., and Said,
F.: Numerical study of the impact of coherent structures on vertical
transfers in the atmospheric boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 97,
361–383, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1002641728075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1002641728075</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>Lu, C. H. and Fitzjarrald, D. R.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of
coherent structures over a deciduous forest, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 69,
43–69, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00713294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00713294</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>Mahrt, L.: Stratified atmospheric boundary layers, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 90, 375–396, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1001765727956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1001765727956</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>Mahrt, L.: Characteristics of submeso winds in the stable boundary
layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 130, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-008-9336-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-008-9336-4</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>Malhi, Y. and Wright, J.: Spatial patterns and recent trends in the climate
of tropical rainforest regions, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B, 359,
311–329, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1433" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2003.1433</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>Malhi, Y., Wood, D., Baker, T. R., Wright, J., Phillips, O. L., Cochrane,
T., Meir, P., Chave, J., Almeida, S., Arroyo, L., Higuchi, N., Killeen, T.
J., Laurance, S. G., Laurance, W. F., Lewis, S. L., Monteagudo, A., Neill,
D. A., Vargas, P. N., Pitman, N. C. A., Quesada, C. A., Salomao, R., Silva,
J. N. M., Lezama, A. T., Terborgh, J., Martinez, R. V., and Vinceti, B., The
regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian
forests: Global Change Biology, 12, 1107-1138,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01120.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01120.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., Althausen, D., Artaxo, P., Baars, H.,
Borrmann, S., Chen, Q., Farmer, D. K., Guenther, A., Gunthe, S. S., Jimenez,
J. L., Karl, T., Longo, K., Manzi, A., Müller, T., Pauliquevis, T.,
Petters, M. D., Prenni, A. J., Pöschl, U., Rizzo, L. V., Schneider, J.,
Smith, J. N., Swietlicki, E., Tota, J., Wang, J., Wiedensohler, A., and Zorn,
S. R.: An overview of the Amazonian Aerosol Characterization Experiment 2008
(AMAZE-08), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11415–11438,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11415-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11415-2010</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Baumgardner, D., Chen, Q.,
Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A., Heald, C. L., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., McMurry,
P. H., Pauliquevis, T., Pöschl, U., Prather, K. A., Roberts, G. C.,
Saleska, S. R., Dias, M. A. S., Spracklen, D., Swietlicki, E., and Trebs,
I.: Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles, Rev. Geophys.,
48, RG2002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008RG000280</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>Martinez, M., Harder, H., Kubistin, D., Rudolf, M., Bozem, H., Eerdekens, G.,
Fischer, H., Klüpfel, T., Gurk, C., Königstedt, R., Parchatka, U.,
Schiller, C. L., Stickler, A., Williams, J., and Lelieveld, J.: Hydroxyl
radicals in the tropical troposphere over the Suriname rainforest: airborne
measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3759–3773,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3759-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3759-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>Martins, D. L., Schietti, J., Feldpausch, T. R., Luizao, F. J., Phillips, O.
L., Andrade, A., Castilho, C. V., Laurance, S. G., Oliveira, A., Amaral, I.
L., Toledo, J. J., Lugli, L. F., Purri Veiga Pinto, J. L., Oblitas Mendoza,
E. M., and Quesada, C. A.: Soil-induced impacts on forest structure drive
coarse woody debris stocks across central Amazonia, Plant Ecol. Divers., 8,
229–241, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.879942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17550874.2013.879942</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>Martins, J. A., Dias, M., and Goncalves, F. L. T.: Impact of biomass burning
aerosols on precipitation in the Amazon: A modeling case study, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, D02207, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009587</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Gabriel, R., Andreae, M. O., Kirchstetter, T. W.,
Novakov, T., Ogren, J., Sheridan, P., and Streets, D. G.: Carbonaceous
aerosols over the Indian Ocean during the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX):
Chemical characterization, optical properties and probable sources, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 8030, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000039</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Fortner, E., Onasch, T. B., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M., Coe,
H., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Impacts of nonrefractory material on light
absorption by aerosols emitted from biomass burning, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
12272–12286, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021750</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>McNaughton, K. G. and Brunet, Y.: Townsend's hypothesis, coherent
structures and Monin-Obukhov similarity: Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 102,
161–175, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1013171312407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1013171312407</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., d'Amelio, M. T. S., Crotwell, A. M.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Bakwin, P., Artaxo, P., and Tans, P. P.: Airborne
measurements indicate large methane emissions from the eastern Amazon basin,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L10809, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL029213</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>Mölder, M., Grelle, A., Lindroth, A., and Halldin, S.: Flux-profile
relationships over a boreal forest – roughness sublayer corrections, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 98/99, 645–658, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00131-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00131-8</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>Molina, L., Broquet, G., Imbach, P., Chevallier, F., Poulter, B., Bonal, D.,
Burban, B., Ramonet, M., Gatti, L. V., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W.,
Dlugokencky, E., and Ciais, P.: On the ability of a global atmospheric
inversion to constrain variations of CO2 fluxes over Amazonia, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 8423–8438, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8423-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8423-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., Ehlers, K. M., and Arnott, W. P.:
Absorption Ångström coefficient, brown carbon, and aerosols: basic
concepts, bulk matter, and spherical particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1217–1225, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1217-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1217-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>Morton, D. C., Nagol, J., Carabajal, C. C., Rosette, J., Palace, M., Cook,
B. D., Vermote, E. F., Harding, D. J., and North, P. R. J.: Amazon forests
maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season,
Nature, 506, 221–224, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13006</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>Nappo, C. J.: Sporadic breakdowns of stability in the PBL over simple and
complex terrain, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 54, 69–87, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00119413" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00119413</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>Nappo, C. J.: An Introduction to Atmospheric Gravity Waves,
Amsterdam, Academic Press, 276 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E.: Total carbon and total nitrogen,
in: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 – Chemical Methods, edited by:
Sparks, D. L., American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of
America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 961–1010, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette,
B., Bezerra, T., DiGiano, M., Shimada, J., Seroa da Motta, R., Armijo, E.,
Castello, L., Brando, P., Hansen, M. C., McGrath-Horn, M., Carvalho, O., and
Hess, L.: Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and
interventions in beef and soy supply chains, Science, 344, 1118–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1248525</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring
of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 780–794, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>Nobre, C. A. and Borma, L. D.: “Tipping points” for the Amazon forest:
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust., 1, 28–36, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.003</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>Nobre, C. A., Obregón, G. O., Marengo, J. A., Fu, R., and Poveda,
G.: Characteristics of Amazonian climate: Main Features, in: Amazonia and
Global Change, edited by: Keller, M., Bustamante, M., Gash, J., and Dias, P.,
American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 149–162, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Sinha, V., Custer, T., Song, W., Johnson, A.
M., Axinte, R., Bozem, H., Fischer, H., Pouvesle, N., Phillips, G., Crowley,
J. N., Rantala, P., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., Gonzales, D., Valverde-Canossa,
J., Vogel, A., Hoffmann, T., Ouwersloot, H. G., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano,
J., and Lelieveld, J.: Summertime total OH reactivity measurements from
boreal forest during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8257–8270,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8257-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8257-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>Nölscher, A. C., Butler, T., Auld, J., Veres, P., Muñoz, A.,
Taraborrelli, D., Vereecken, L., Lelieveld, J., and Williams, J.: Using total
OH reactivity to assess isoprene photooxidation via measurement and model,
Atmos. Environ., 89, 453–463, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.024</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>Novelli, P. C. and Masarie, K. A.: Atmospheric Carbon Monoxide Dry Air Mole
Fractions from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling
Network, 1988–2013, Version: 2014-07-02, availablat at:
<uri>ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/trace_gases/co/flask/surface/</uri> (last
access: 1 July 2015), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>Oliveira, P. E. S., Acevedo, O. C., Moraes, O. L. L., Zimermann, H. R., and
Teichrieb, C.: Nocturnal intermittent coupling between the interior of a pine
forest and the air above it, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 146, 45–64,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9756-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-012-9756-z</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>Oliveira, P. H. F., Artaxo, P., Pires, C., De Lucca, S., Procopio, A.,
Holben, B., Schafer, J., Cardoso, L. F., Wofsy, S. C., and Rocha, H. R.: The
effects of biomass burning aerosols and clouds on the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in
Amazonia, Tellus, 59B, 338–349, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00270.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00270.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>Pacifico, F., Folberth, G. A., Sitch, S., Haywood, J. M., Rizzo, L. V.,
Malavelle, F. F., and Artaxo, P.: Biomass burning related ozone damage on
vegetation over the Amazon forest: a model sensitivity study, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 2791–2804, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2791-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2791-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>Pan, Y. D., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J. Y., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz,
W. A., Phillips, O. L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S. L., Canadell, J. G., Ciais,
P., Jackson, R. B., Pacala, S. W., McGuire, A. D., Piao, S. L., Rautiainen,
A., Sitch, S., and Hayes, D.: A large and persistent carbon sink in the
World's forests, Science, 333, 988–993, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1201609</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation> Patton, E. G.: Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Above
and Within a Plant Canopy, University of California at Davis, 132 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation>Paw U, K. T., Brunet, Y., Collineau, S., Shaw, R. H., Maitani, T., Qiu, J.,
and Hipps, L.: On coherent structures in turbulence above and within
agricultural plant canopies, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 61, 55–68, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation>Pella, E.: Elemental organic analysis. 2. State of the art, American
Laboratory, 22, 28–32, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib178"><label>178</label><mixed-citation>Phillips, O. L., Aragao, L., Lewis, S. L., Fisher, J. B., Lloyd, J.,
Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Malhi, Y., Monteagudo, A., Peacock, J., Quesada, C. A.,
van der Heijden, G., Almeida, S., Amaral, I., Arroyo, L., Aymard, G., Baker,
T. R., Banki, O., Blanc, L., Bonal, D., Brando, P., Chave, J., de Oliveira,
A. C. A., Cardozo, N. D., Czimczik, C. I., Feldpausch, T. R., Freitas, M. A.,
Gloor, E., Higuchi, N., Jimenez, E., Lloyd, G., Meir, P., Mendoza, C., Morel,
A., Neill, D. A., Nepstad, D., Patino, S., Penuela, M. C., Prieto, A.,
Ramirez, F., Schwarz, M., Silva, J., Silveira, M., Thomas, A. S., ter Steege,
H., Stropp, J., Vasquez, R., Zelazowski, P., Davila, E. A., Andelman, S.,
Andrade, A., Chao, K. J., Erwin, T., Di Fiore, A., Honorio, E., Keeling, H.,
Killeen, T. J., Laurance, W. F., Cruz, A. P., Pitman, N. C. A., Vargas, P.
N., Ramirez-Angulo, H., Rudas, A., Salamao, R., Silva, N., Terborgh, J., and
Torres-Lezama, A.: Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest, Science,
323, 1344–1347, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1164033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1164033</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib179"><label>179</label><mixed-citation>Pleysier, J. L. and Juo, A. S. R.: A single-extraction method using
silver-thiourea for measuring exchangeable cations and effective CEC in soils
with variable charges, Soil Science, 129, 205–211, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib180"><label>180</label><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, C., Wiedemann, K., Sinha, B., Shiraiwa, M., Gunthe, S., Smith,
M., Su, H., Artaxo, P., Chen, Q., Cheng, Y., Elbert, W., Gilles, M. K.,
Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Moffet, R. C., Weigand, M., Martin, S. T., Pöschl,
U., and Andreae, M. O.: Biogenic potassium salt particles as seeds for
secondary organic aerosol in the Amazon, Science, 337, 1075–1078, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib181"><label>181</label><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, C., Saturno, J., Krüger, M. L., Förster, J.-D.,
Weigand, M., Wiedemann, K. T., Bechtel, M., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.:
Efflorescence upon humidification? X-ray microspectroscopic in-situ
observation of changes in aerosol microstructure and phase state upon
hydration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3681–3689, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL059409</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib182"><label>182</label><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U., Martin, S. T., Sinha, B., Chen, Q., Gunthe, S. S., Huffman,
J. A., Borrmann, S., Farmer, D. K., Garland, R. M., Helas, G., Jimenez, J.
L., King, S. M., Manzi, A., Mikhailov, E., Pauliquevis, T., Petters, M. D.,
Prenni, A. J., Roldin, P., Rose, D., Schneider, J., Su, H., Zorn, S. R.,
Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Rainforest aerosols as biogenic nuclei of
clouds and precipitation in the Amazon, Science, 329, 1513–1516, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib183"><label>183</label><mixed-citation>Poulter, B., Aragao, L., Heyder, U., Gumpenberger, M., Heinke, J.,
Langerwisch, F., Rammig, A., Thonicke, K., and Cramer, W.: Net biome
production of the Amazon Basin in the 21st century, Global Change Biol., 16,
2062–2075, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02064.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02064.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib184"><label>184</label><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M., Glaccum, R. A., and Nees, R. T.: Atmospheric transport of
soil dust from Africa to South America, Nature, 289, 570–572, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib185"><label>185</label><mixed-citation>Quesada, C. A., Lloyd, J., Schwarz, M., Patiño, S., Baker, T. R., Czimczik,
C., Fyllas, N. M., Martinelli, L., Nardoto, G. B., Schmerler, J., Santos, A.
J. B., Hodnett, M. G., Herrera, R., Luizão, F. J., Arneth, A., Lloyd, G.,
Dezzeo, N., Hilke, I., Kuhlmann, I., Raessler, M., Brand, W. A., Geilmann,
H., Moraes Filho, J. O., Carvalho, F. P., Araujo Filho, R. N., Chaves, J. E.,
Cruz Junior, O. F., Pimentel, T. P., and Paiva, R.: Variations in chemical
and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis,
Biogeosciences, 7, 1515–1541, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1515-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1515-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib186"><label>186</label><mixed-citation>Quesada, C. A., Phillips, O. L., Schwarz, M., Czimczik, C. I., Baker, T. R.,
Patiño, S., Fyllas, N. M., Hodnett, M. G., Herrera, R., Almeida, S.,
Alvarez Dávila, E., Arneth, A., Arroyo, L., Chao, K. J., Dezzeo, N., Erwin,
T., di Fiore, A., Higuchi, N., Honorio Coronado, E., Jimenez, E. M., Killeen,
T., Lezama, A. T., Lloyd, G., López-González, G., Luizão, F. J., Malhi,
Y., Monteagudo, A., Neill, D. A., Núñez Vargas, P., Paiva, R., Peacock,
J., Peñuela, M. C., Peña Cruz, A., Pitman, N., Priante Filho, N., Prieto,
A., Ramírez, H., Rudas, A., Salomão, R., Santos, A. J. B., Schmerler, J.,
Silva, N., Silveira, M., Vásquez, R., Vieira, I., Terborgh, J., and Lloyd,
J.: Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are
mediated by both soils and climate, Biogeosciences, 9, 2203–2246,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2203-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-2203-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib187"><label>187</label><mixed-citation>Rammig, A., Jupp, T., Thonicke, K., Tietjen, B., Heinke, J., Ostberg, S.,
Lucht, W., Cramer, W., and Cox, P.: Estimating the risk of Amazonian forest
dieback, New Phytol., 187, 694–706, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03318.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03318.x</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib188"><label>188</label><mixed-citation>Ramos, F. M., Bolzan, M. J. A., Sa, L. D. A., and Rosa, R. R.: Atmospheric
turbulence within and above an Amazon forest, Physica D – Nonlinear
Phenomena, 193, 278–291, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2004.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physd.2004.01.026</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib189"><label>189</label><mixed-citation>Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Mercado, L., Reddington, C. L., Haywood, J. M.,
Ellis, R. J., Phillips, O. L., Artaxo, P., Bonal, D., Coupe, N. R., and Butt,
N.: Fires increase Amazon forest productivity through increases in diffuse
radiation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4654–4662, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063719</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib190"><label>190</label><mixed-citation>Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J., and Brunet, Y.: Coherent eddies and
turbulence in vegetation canopies: The mixing-layer analogy, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 78, 351–382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00120941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00120941</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib191"><label>191</label><mixed-citation>Restrepo-Coupe, N., da Rocha, H. R., Hutyra, L. R., da Araujo, A. C., Borma,
L. S., Christoffersen, B., Cabral, O. M. R., de Camargo, P. B., Cardoso, F.
L., Lola da Costa, A. C., Fitzjarrald, D. R., Goulden, M. L., Kruijt, B.,
Maia, J. M. F., Malhi, Y. S., Manzi, A. O., Miller, S. D., Nobre, A. D., von
Randow, C., Abreu Sa, L. D., Sakai, R. K., Tota, J., Wofsy, S. C., Zanchi, F.
B., and Saleska, S. R.: What drives the seasonality of photosynthesis across
the Amazon basin? A cross-site analysis of eddy flux tower measurements from
the Brasil flux network, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 182, 128–144,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.031</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib192"><label>192</label><mixed-citation>Richardson, A. D., Jenkins, J. P., Braswell, B. H., Hollinger, D. Y.,
Ollinger, S. V., and Smith, M.-L.: Use of digital webcam images to track
spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest, Oecologia, 152, 323–334,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0657-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-006-0657-z</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib193"><label>193</label><mixed-citation>Richey, J. E., Melack, J. M., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Ballester, V. M., and
Hess, L. L.: Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large
tropical source of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 416, 617–620, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib194"><label>194</label><mixed-citation>Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Zhou, J., Roberts, G., Andreae, M. O., Gatti, L.
V., and Artaxo, P.: Physical properties of the sub-micrometer aerosol over
the Amazon rain forest during the wet-to-dry season transition – comparison
of modeled and measured CCN concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
2119–2143, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2119-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2119-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib195"><label>195</label><mixed-citation>Rizzo, L. V., Correia, A. L., Artaxo, P., Procópio, A. S., and Andreae, M.
O.: Spectral dependence of aerosol light absorption over the Amazon Basin,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8899–8912, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib196"><label>196</label><mixed-citation>Rizzo, L. V., Artaxo, P., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., Paixão, M.,
Cirino, G. G., Arana, A., Swietlicki, E., Roldin, P., Fors, E. O., Wiedemann,
K. T., Leal, L. S. M., and Kulmala, M.: Long term measurements of aerosol
optical properties at a primary forest site in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
13, 2391–2413, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2391-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2391-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib197"><label>197</label><mixed-citation>Ro, C.-U., Osan, J., Szaloki, I., De Hoog, J., Worobiec, A., and Van
Grieken, R. A.: Monte Carlo program for quantitative electron-induced X-ray
analysis of individual particles, Anal. Chem., 75, 851–859, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib198"><label>198</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, G. C., Andreae, M. O., Zhou, J., and Artaxo, P.: Cloud condensation
nuclei in the Amazon Basin: “Marine” conditions over a continent?, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 28, 2807–2810, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib199"><label>199</label><mixed-citation>Rocha, R. P., Morales, C. A., Cuadra, S. V., and Ambrizzi, T.: Precipitation
diurnal cycle and summer climatology assessment over South America: An
evaluation of Regional Climate Model version 3 simulations, J. Geophys. Res.,
114, D10108, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010212" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010212</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib200"><label>200</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Mikhailov, E., Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., Andreae, M.
O., and Pöschl, U.: Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a
continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation
of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and
experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1153–1179, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib201"><label>201</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M.,
Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Takegawa,
N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud
condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the
mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol chemical
composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot
particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib202"><label>202</label><mixed-citation>Rummel, U., Ammann, C., Kirkman, G. A., Moura, M. A. L., Foken, T., Andreae,
M. O., and Meixner, F. X.: Seasonal variation of ozone deposition to a
tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
5415–5435, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5415-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5415-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib203"><label>203</label><mixed-citation>Saatchi, S., Asefi-Najafabady, S., Malhi, Y., Aragão, L. E. O. C.,
Anderson, L. O., Myneni, R. B., and Nemani, R.: Persistent effects of a
severe drought on Amazonian forest canopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110,
565–570, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204651110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1204651110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib204"><label>204</label><mixed-citation>Salati, E. and Vose, P. B.: Amazon Basin – A system in
equilibrium, Science, 225, 129–138, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.225.4658.129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.225.4658.129</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib205"><label>205</label><mixed-citation>Santos, I. A. and Buchmann, J.: A qualitative review emphasizing climatic
aspects of the Amazon and Northeast Brazil, Anu. Inst. Geocienc., 33, 9–23,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib206"><label>206</label><mixed-citation>Schafer, J. S., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Yamasoe, M. A., and Artaxo,
P.: Atmospheric effects on insolation in the Brazilian Amazon: Observed
modification of solar radiation by clouds and smoke and derived single
scattering albedo of fire aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8074,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000428</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib207"><label>207</label><mixed-citation>Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B., and Fisher, J. B.: Effect of increasing
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the terrestrial carbon cycle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112,
436–441, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407302112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1407302112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib208"><label>208</label><mixed-citation>Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A. H., Rudich, Y., Maenhaut, W., and Artaxo,
P.: New analytical method for the determination of levoglucosan, polyhydroxy
compounds, and 2-methylerythritol and its application to smoke and rainwater
samples, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 2744–2752, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib209"><label>209</label><mixed-citation>Schöngart, J., Wittmann, F., and Worbes, M.: Biomass and net primary
production of Central Amazonian floodplains forests, in: Amazonian
floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management,
edited by: Junk, W., Piedade, M. T. F., Wittmann, F., Schöngart, J., and
Parolin, P.,   Springer New York, 347–388, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib210"><label>210</label><mixed-citation>Sena, E. T., Artaxo, P., and Correia, A. L.: Spatial variability of the
direct radiative forcing of biomass burning aerosols and the effects of land
use change in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1261–1275,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1261-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1261-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib211"><label>211</label><mixed-citation>Serafimovich, A., Thomas, C., and Foken, T.: Vertical and horizontal
transport of energy and matter by coherent motions in a tall spruce canopy,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 140, 429–451, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9619-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-011-9619-z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib212"><label>212</label><mixed-citation>Silva Dias, M. A., Rutledge, S., Kabat, P., Silva Dias, P. L., Nobre, C.,
Fisch, G., Dolman, A. J., Zipser, E., Garstang, M., Manzi, A. O., Fuentes, J.
D., Rocha, H. R., Marengo, J., Plana-Fattori, A., Sá, L. D. A.,
Alvalá, R. C. S., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Gielow, R., and Gatti, L.:
Clouds and rain processes in a biosphere-atmosphere interaction context in
the Amazon Region, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8072, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000335</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib213"><label>213</label><mixed-citation>Sinha, V., Williams, J., Crowley, J. N., and Lelieveld, J.: The Comparative
Reactivity Method – a new tool to measure total OH Reactivity in ambient
air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2213–2227, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib214"><label>214</label><mixed-citation>Soares-Filho, B. S., Nepstad, D. C., Curran, L. M., Cerqueira, G. C.,
Garcia, R. A., Ramos, C. A., Voll, E., McDonald, A., Lefebvre, P., and
Schlesinger, P.: Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin, Nature, 440,
520–523, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib215"><label>215</label><mixed-citation>Sorbjan, Z. and Czerwinska, A.: Statistics of turbulence in the stable
boundary layer affected by gravity waves, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 148, 73–91,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9809-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-013-9809-y</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib216"><label>216</label><mixed-citation>Soudani, K. and Francois, C.: Remote sensing: A green illusion, Nature,
506, 165–166, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13052</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib217"><label>217</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Arnold, S. R., and Taylor, C. M.: Observations of
increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests, Nature,
489, 282–285, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11390</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib218"><label>218</label><mixed-citation>Steeneveld, G. J., Holtslag, A. A. M., Nappo, C. J., de Wiel, B., and Mahrt,
L.: Exploring the possible role of small-scale terrain drag on stable
boundary layers over land, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47, 2518–2530,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jamc1816.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008jamc1816.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib219"><label>219</label><mixed-citation>Steeneveld, G. J., Nappo, C. J., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Estimation of
orographically induced wave drag in the stable boundary layer during the
CASES-99 experimental campaign, Acta Geophys., 57, 857–881,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11600-009-0028-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2478/s11600-009-0028-3</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib220"><label>220</label><mixed-citation>Steiner, A. L., Pressley, S. N., Botros, A., Jones, E., Chung, S. H., and
Edburg, S. L.: Analysis of coherent structures and atmosphere-canopy coupling
strength during the CABINEX field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
11921–11936, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11921-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11921-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib221"><label>221</label><mixed-citation>Steinkamp, K. and Gruber, N.: A joint atmosphere-ocean inversion for the
estimation of seasonal carbon sources and sinks, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27,
732–745, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/gbc.20064</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib222"><label>222</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, B. B., Gurney, K. R., Tans, P. P., Sweeney, C., Peters, W.,
Bruhwiler, L., Ciais, P., Ramonet, M., Bousquet, P., Nakazawa, T., Aoki, S.,
Machida, T., Inoue, G., Vinnichenko, N., Lloyd, J., Jordan, A., Heimann, M.,
Shibistova, O., Langenfelds, R. L., Steele, L. P., Francey, R. J., and
Denning, A. S.: Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from
vertical profiles of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Science, 316, 1732–1735,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1137004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1137004</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib223"><label>223</label><mixed-citation>Stickler, C. M., Coe, M. T., Costa, M. H., Nepstad, D. C., McGrath, D. G.,
Dias, L. C. P., Rodrigues, H. O., and Soares-Filho, B. S.: Dependence of
hydropower energy generation on forests in the Amazon Basin at local and
regional scales, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 9601–9606,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215331110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1215331110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib224"><label>224</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J. L., Burns, S. P., Lenschow, D. H., Banta, R., Newsom, R., Coulter,
R., Frasier, S., Ince, T., Nappo, C., Cuxart, J., Blumen, W., Lee, X., and
Hu, X. Z.: Intermittent turbulence associated with a density current passage
in the stable boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 105, 199–219,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1019969131774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1019969131774</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib225"><label>225</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J. L., Lenschow, D. H., Burns, S. P., Banta, R. M., Newsom, R. K.,
Coulter, R., Frasier, S., Ince, T., Nappo, C., Balsley, B. B., Jensen, M.,
Mahrt, L., Miller, D., and Skelly, B.: Atmospheric disturbances that generate
intermittent turbulence in nocturnal boundary layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
110, 255–279, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1026097926169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1026097926169</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib226"><label>226</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J. L., Mahrt, L., Banta, R. M., and Pichugina, Y. L.: Turbulence
regimes and turbulence intermittency in the stable boundary layer during
CASES-99, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 338–351, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-11-082.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas-d-11-082.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib227"><label>227</label><mixed-citation>Swap, R., Garstang, M., Greco, S., Talbot, R., and Kållberg, P.: Saharan
dust in the Amazon Basin, Tellus, 44B, 133–149, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib228"><label>228</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, R. W., Andreae, M. O., Berresheim, H., Artaxo, P., Garstang, M.,
Harriss, R. C., Beecher, K. M., and Li, S. M.: Aerosol chemistry during the
wet season in Central Amazonia: The influence of long-range transport, J.
Geophys. Res., 95, 16955–16969, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib229"><label>229</label><mixed-citation>Taraborrelli, D., Lawrence, M. G., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Gromov,
S., Gross, C. B. M., Vereecken, L., and Lelieveld, J.: Hydroxyl radical
buffered by isoprene oxidation over tropical forests, Nature Geosci., 5,
190–193, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1405</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib230"><label>230</label><mixed-citation>Targhetta, N.: Comparação florística e
estrutural entre florestas de igapó e campinarana ao longo de gradientes
hidroedáficos na Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável do
Uatumã, Amazônia Central, MSc Thesis, INPA, Manaus, 96 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib231"><label>231</label><mixed-citation>ter Steege, H., Nigel, C. A., Sabatier, D., Baraloto, C., Salomao, R. P.,
Guevara, J. E., Phillips, O. L., Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., Molino,
J. F., Monteagudo, A., Vargas, P. N., Montero, J. C., Feldpausch, T. R.,
Coronado, E. N. H., Killeen, T. J., Mostacedo, B., Vasquez, R., Assis, R. L.,
Terborgh, J., Wittmann, F., Andrade, A., Laurance, W. F., Laurance, S. G. W.,
Marimon, B. S., Marimon, B. H., Vieira, I. C. G., Amaral, I. L., Brienen, R.,
Castellanos, H., Lopez, D. C., Duivenvoorden, J. F., Mogollon, H. F., Matos,
F. D. D., Davila, N., Garcia-Villacorta, R., Diaz, P. R. S., Costa, F.,
Emilio, T., Levis, C., Schietti, J., Souza, P., Alonso, A., Dallmeier, F.,
Montoya, A. J. D., Piedade, M. T. F., Araujo-Murakami, A., Arroyo, L.,
Gribel, R., Fine, P. V. A., Peres, C. A., Toledo, M., Gerardo, A. A. C.,
Baker, T. R., Ceron, C., Engel, J., Henkel, T. W., Maas, P., Petronelli, P.,
Stropp, J., Zartman, C. E., Daly, D., Neill, D., Silveira, M., Paredes, M.
R., Chave, J., Lima, D. D., Jorgensen, P. M., Fuentes, A., Schongart, J.,
Valverde, F. C., Di Fiore, A., Jimenez, E. M., Mora, M. C. P., Phillips, J.
F., Rivas, G., van Andel, T. R., von Hildebrand, P., Hoffman, B., Zent, E.
L., Malhi, Y., Prieto, A., Rudas, A., Ruschell, A. R., Silva, N., Vos, V.,
Zent, S., Oliveira, A. A., Schutz, A. C., Gonzales, T., Nascimento, M. T.,
Ramirez-Angulo, H., Sierra, R., Tirado, M., Medina, M. N. U., van der
Heijden, G., Vela, C. I. A., Torre, E. V., Vriesendorp, C., Wang, O., Young,
K. R., Baider, C., Balslev, H., Ferreira, C., Mesones, I., Torres-Lezama, A.,
Giraldo, L. E. U., Zagt, R., Alexiades, M. N., Hernandez, L.,
Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, I., Milliken, W., Cuenca, W. P., Pauletto, D.,
Sandoval, E. V., Gamarra, L. V., Dexter, K. G., Feeley, K., Lopez-Gonzalez,
G., and Silman, M. R.: Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora, Science,
342, 325, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1243092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1243092</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib232"><label>232</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, C. and Foken, T.: Detection of long-term coherent exchange over
spruce forest using wavelet analysis, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 80, 91–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0093-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-004-0093-0</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib233"><label>233</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, C. and Foken, T.: Flux contribution of coherent structures and its
implications for the exchange of energy and matter in a tall spruce canopy,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 123, 317–337, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9144-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-006-9144-7</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib234"><label>234</label><mixed-citation>Tollefson, J.: Battle for the Amazon, Nature, 520, 20–23, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib235"><label>235</label><mixed-citation>Tota, J., Fitzjarrald, D. R., and da Silva Dias, M. A. F.: Amazon rainforest
exchange of carbon and subcanopy air flow: Manaus LBA Site – A complex
terrain condition, Scientific World J., 2012, 165067,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/165067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1100/2012/165067</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib236"><label>236</label><mixed-citation>Trebs, I., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Pauliquevis, T., Kuhn, U., Sander, R.,
Ganzeveld, L., Meixner, F. X., Kesselmeier, J., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M.
O.: Impact of the Manaus urban plume on trace gas mixing ratios near the
surface in the Amazon Basin: Implications for the NO-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
photo-stationary state and peroxy radical levels, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D05307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016386</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib237"><label>237</label><mixed-citation>Tuch, T. M., Haudek, A., Müller, T., Nowak, A., Wex, H., and Wiedensohler,
A.: Design and performance of an automatic regenerating adsorption aerosol
dryer for continuous operation at monitoring sites, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2,
417–422, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-417-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-417-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib238"><label>238</label><mixed-citation>Tuomisto, H., Ruokolainen, K., Aguilar, M., and Sarmiento, A.: Floristic
patterns along a 43-km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest, J. Ecol.,
91, 743–756, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00802.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00802.x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib239"><label>239</label><mixed-citation>Valeriano, M. M.: Topodata: Guia para utilização de dados
geomorfológicos locais do projeto de produtividade em pesquisa modelagem
de dados topográficos SRTM, INPE Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib240"><label>240</label><mixed-citation>Van de Wiel, B. J. H., Ronda, R. J., Moene, A. F., De Bruin, H. A. R., and
Holtslag, A. A. M.: Intermittent turbulence and oscillations in the stable
boundary layer over land. Part I: A bulk model, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 942–958,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib241"><label>241</label><mixed-citation>van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Velde, I. R., Krol, M. C., Gatti, L. V.,
Domingues, L. G., Correia, C. S. C., Miller, J. B., Gloor, M., van Leeuwen,
T. T., Kaiser, J. W., Wiedinmyer, C., Basu, S., Clerbaux, C., and Peters, W.:
Response of the Amazon carbon balance to the 2010 drought derived with
CarbonTracker South America, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1092–1108,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB005082</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib242"><label>242</label><mixed-citation>van Eijck, A.:
Atmospheric degradation of reactive biogenic VOCs and their role in aerosol
formation: Modeling activities, laboratory experiments and field studies in
different vegetation zones, PhD Diss., University of Mainz, Germany, 113 pp.,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib243"><label>243</label><mixed-citation>van Gorsel, E., Harman, I. N., Finnigan, J. J., and Leuning, R.: Decoupling
of air flow above and in plant canopies and gravity waves affect
micrometeorological estimates of net scalar exchange, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
151, 927–933, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.02.012</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib244"><label>244</label><mixed-citation>Vendrasco, E. P., Dias, P. L. S., and Freitas, E. D.: A case study of the
direct radiative effect of biomass burning aerosols on precipitation in the
Eastern Amazon, Atmos. Res., 94, 409–421,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.06.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.06.016</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib245"><label>245</label><mixed-citation>Vestenius, M., Hellén, H., Levula, J., Kuronen, P., Helminen, K. J.,
Nieminen, T., Kulmala, M., and Hakola, H.: Acidic reaction products of
monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes in atmospheric fine particles in a boreal
forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7883–7893, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7883-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7883-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib246"><label>246</label><mixed-citation>Vieira, I. C. G., Toledo, P. M., Silva, J. M. C., and Higuchi, H.:
Deforestation and threats to the biodiversity of Amazonia, Brazilian J.
Biology, 68, 949–956, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib247"><label>247</label><mixed-citation>Wan, F. and Porte-Agel, F.: A large-eddy simulation study of turbulent flow
over multiscale topography, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 141, 201–217,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9648-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-011-9648-7</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib248"><label>248</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Piao, S., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein, P., Myneni, R. B., Cox, P.,
Heimann, M., Miller, J., Peng, S., Wang, T., Yang, H., and Chen, A.: A
two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature
variations, Nature, 506, 212–215, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12915</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib249"><label>249</label><mixed-citation>Wendisch, M., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Machado, L. A. T., Albrecht,
R., Schlager, H., Rosenfeld, D., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Fisch, G., Curtius,
J., Frank, F., Kohl, R., Rose, D., Hüneke, T., Knecht, M., Pfeilsticker,
K., Longo, K., Afchine, A., Costa, A., Krämer, M., Jaervinen, E.,
Schnaiter, M., Ehrlich, A., Jäkel, E., Krisna, T. C., Kanter, S.,
Rosenow, D., Werner, F., Mertes, S., Kästner, U., Dorf, M., Klimach, T.,
Krüger, M., Nillius, B., Pöhlker, C., Schneider, J., Schulz, C.,
Borrmann, S., Mahnke, C., Molleker, S., Weigel, R., Ewald, F., Kölling,
T., Mayer, B., Zinner, T., Fix, A., Fütterer, D., Jurkat, T., Kenntner,
M., Sauer, D., Paul Stock, Voigt, C., Weinzierl, B., Ziereis, H., Barbosa,
H., Artaxo, P., Souza, R. A. F. d., and Yamasoe, M. A.: The ACRIDICON–CHUVA
observational study of tropical convective clouds and precipitation using the
new German research aircraft HALO, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., in review, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib250"><label>250</label><mixed-citation>Williams, C. A., Scanlon, T. M., and Albertson, J. D.: Influence of surface
heterogeneity on scalar dissimilarity in the roughness sublayer: Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 122, 149–165, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9097-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-006-9097-x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib251"><label>251</label><mixed-citation>Williams, E., Rosenfeld, D., Madden, N., Gerlach, J., Gears, N., Atkinson,
L., Dunnemann, N., Frostrom, G., Antonio, M., Biazon, B., Camargo, R.,
Franca, H., Gomes, A., Lima, M., Machado, R., Manhaes, S., Nachtigall, L.,
Piva, H., Quintiliano, W., Machado, L., Artaxo, P., Roberts, G., Renno, N.,
Blakeslee, R., Bailey, J., Boccippio, D., Betts, A., Wolff, D., Roy, D.,
Halverson, J., Rickenbach, T., Fuentes, J., and Avelino, E.: Contrasting
convective regimes over the Amazon: Implications for cloud electrification,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8082, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000380</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib252"><label>252</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, K. L. and Birks, J. W.: Mechanism and elimination of a water vapor
interference in the measurement of ozone by UV absorbance, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40, 6361–6367, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib253"><label>253</label><mixed-citation>Winderlich, J., Chen, H., Gerbig, C., Seifert, T., Kolle, O., Lavric, J. V.,
Kaiser, C., Höfer, A., and Heimann, M.: Continuous low-maintenance
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O measurements at the Zotino Tall Tower Observatory
(ZOTTO) in Central Siberia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1113–1128,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1113-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-1113-2010</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib254"><label>254</label><mixed-citation>Winderlich, J., Gerbig, C., Kolle, O., and Heimann, M.: Inferences from
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration profiles at the Zotino Tall Tower Observatory
(ZOTTO) on regional summertime ecosystem fluxes, Biogeosciences, 11,
2055–2068, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2055-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-2055-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib255"><label>255</label><mixed-citation>Wittmann, F., Householder, E., Piedade, M. T. F., de Assis, R. L.,
Schöngart, J., Parolin, P., and Junk, W. J.: Habitat specifity, endemism
and the Neotropical distribution of Amazonian white-water floodplain trees,
Ecography, 36, 690–707, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib256"><label>256</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Yi, C., and Kutter, E.: Stably stratified canopy flow in complex
terrain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7457–7470, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7457-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7457-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib257"><label>257</label><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Wolff, S., Alves,
E., Martins, G. A., Bourtsoukidis, E., Brito, J., Jardine, K., Artaxo, P.,
and Kesselmeier, J.: Diel and seasonal changes of biogenic volatile organic
compounds within and above an Amazonian rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
3359–3378, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib258"><label>258</label><mixed-citation>Zemp, D. C., Schleussner, C.-F., Barbosa, H. M. J., van der Ent, R. J.,
Donges, J. F., Heinke, J., Sampaio, G., and Rammig, A.: On the importance of
cascading moisture recycling in South America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
13337–13359, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13337-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13337-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib259"><label>259</label><mixed-citation>Zeri, M. and Sa, L. D. A.: Horizontal and vertical turbulent fluxes forced
by a gravity wave event in the nocturnal atmospheric surface layer over the
Amazon forest, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 138, 413–431,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9563-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-010-9563-3</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib260"><label>260</label><mixed-citation>Zeri, M., Sa, L. D. A., Manzi, A. O., Araujo, A. C., Aguiar, R. G., von
Randow, C., Sampaio, G., Cardoso, F. L., and Nobre, C. A.: Variability of
carbon and water fluxes following climate extremes over a tropical forest in
southwestern Amazonia, Plos One, 9, e88130, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0088130</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib261"><label>261</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Castanho, A. D. d. A., Galbraith, D. R., Moghim, S., Levine, N.,
Bras, R. L., Coe, M., Costa, M. H., Malhi, Y., Longo, M., Knox, R. G.,
McKnight, S., Wang, J., and Moorcroft, P. R.: The fate of Amazonian
ecosystems over the coming century arising from changes in climate,
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and land-use, Global Change Biol., 21, 2569–2587,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12903</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib262"><label>262</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, J., Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H.-C., and Artaxo, P.: Submicrometer
aerosol particle size distribution and hygroscopic growth measured in the
Amazon rain forest during the wet season, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8055,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.129/2000JD000203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.129/2000JD000203</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib263"><label>263</label><mixed-citation>Zilitinkevich, S. S., Elperin, T., Kleeorin, N., Rogachevskii, I., and Esau,
I.: A hierarchy of energy- and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure models
for stably-stratified geophysical flows, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 146,
341–373, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9768-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-012-9768-8</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
