<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-15-10127-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Quantitative assessment of atmospheric emissions of toxic heavy metals
from anthropogenic sources in China: historical trend, spatial distribution,
uncertainties, and control policies</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Atmospheric emissions of 12 heavy metals in China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Z. Tian et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name>
          <email>hztian@bnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-8495</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hua</surname><given-names>S. B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>J. R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation &amp; Pollution
Control, School of Environment,  <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>      Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Environment, Henan Normal University, Henan Key Laboratory
for Environmental Pollution Control, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Key Laboratory for Yellow River and
Huai River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education,
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Xinxiang 453007, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control
of Air Pollution Complex, School of Environment, Tsinghua University,
Beijing 10084, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">H. Z. Tian (hztian@bnu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>17</issue>
      <fpage>10127</fpage><lpage>10147</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Anthropogenic atmospheric emissions of typical toxic heavy
metals have caused worldwide concern due to their adverse effects on
human health and the ecosystem. By determining the best available
representation of time-varying emission factors with S-shape curves, we
establish the multiyear comprehensive atmospheric emission inventories of 12
typical toxic heavy metals (Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and
Zn) from primary anthropogenic activities in China for the period of
1949–2012 for the first time. Further, we allocate the annual emissions of
these heavy metals in 2010 at a high spatial resolution of 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid with ArcGIS methodology and surrogate
indexes, such as regional population and gross domestic product (GDP). Our
results show that the historical emissions of Hg, As, Se, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb,
Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn, during the period of 1949–2012, increased by
about 22–128 times at an annual average growth rate of 5.1–8.0 %,
reaching about 526.9–22 319.6 t in 2012. Nonferrous metal smelting, coal
combustion of industrial boilers, brake and tyre wear, and ferrous metal
smelting represent the dominant sources of heavy metal emissions. In terms of spatial variation, the
majority of emissions are concentrated in relatively developed regions,
especially for the northern, eastern, and southern coastal regions. In
addition, because of the flourishing nonferrous metal smelting industry,
several southwestern and central-southern provinces play a prominent role in
some specific toxic heavy metals emissions, like Hg in Guizhou and As in
Yunnan. Finally, integrated countermeasures are proposed to minimize the
final toxic heavy metals discharge on account of the current and future
demand of energy-saving and pollution reduction in China.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Heavy metals (HMs) is a general collective term which applies to the group
of metals (e.g., Hg, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn) and metalloids
(e.g., As, Se) with atomic density greater than 4.5 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Although these elements are present in only trace levels in feed coals and
raw materials, the huge coal consumption and enormous output of various
industrial products have resulted in significant emissions of HMs into the
atmosphere. As a result, the mean atmospheric concentrations of As, Cd, Ni,
and Mn are reported at 51.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67.0, 12.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.6, 29.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39.4, and 198.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 364.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in China respectively, which are
much higher than the limit ceilings of 6.6, 5, 25, and 150 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
WHO guidelines, respectively (Duan and Tan, 2013). Mukherjee et al. (1998)
and Song et al. (2003) indicate that various HMs can remain in the
atmosphere for 5–8 days and even for 30 days when discharged from elevated
stacks associated with fine particles. Therefore, these toxic substances can
be transported for long distances before they finally settle down through wet
and dry deposition into soil and aqueous systems, causing widespread adverse
effects and even trans-boundary environmental pollution disputes. In
particular, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has
assigned several HMs, like As and its inorganic compounds, Cd and its
compounds, Cr (VI) compounds and Ni compounds, to the group of substances
that are carcinogenic to humans. In addition, Pb and its compounds,
Sb<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Co along with its compounds are suspected of being
probable carcinogens (IARC, 2014).</p>
      <p>Since the 1980s, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and several
other developed countries have begun to compile their national emission
inventories of varied hazardous air pollutants (including HMs), such as the
US National Emission Inventory (NEI), the UK National Atmospheric Emission
Inventory (NAEI), and the Australian National Pollutant Inventory (NPI).
Further, the quantitative assessments of global contamination of air by HMs
from anthropogenic sources have been estimated in previous studies (Nriagu,
1979; Nriagu and Pacyna, 1988; Pacyna and Pacyna, 2001; Streets et al.,
2011; Tian et al., 2014b). With the increasing environmental pollution
associated with economic growth, some researchers have paid special
attention to estimating China's HM emission inventory, especially for Hg,
which is regarded as a global pollutant (Fang et al., 2002; Streets et al.,
2005; Wu et al., 2006). Streets et al. (2005) and Wu et al. (2006)
developed Hg emission inventories from anthropogenic activities of China for
the year 1999 and 1995 to 2003, respectively. A research group led by Tian
established the integrated emission inventories of eight HMs (Hg, As,
Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni and Sb) from coal combustion or primary anthropogenic
sources on the provincial level during 1980 to 2009 (Cheng et al., 2015;
Tian et al., 2010, 2012a–c, 2014a, b). However, comprehensive and detailed
studies on anthropogenic atmospheric emissions of 12 typical toxic HMs with
highly resolved temporal and spatial distribution information in China are
still quite limited. Moreover, we have little knowledge on what the past and
accelerated emission levels of HMs are like from anthropogenic sources
during the historical period since the founding of the People's Republic of
China in 1949, to the open-poor policy (1978).</p>
      <p>In this study, for the first time, we have evaluated the historical trend
and spatial distribution characteristics by source categories and provinces
of atmospheric emissions of 12 typical HMs (Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb,
Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn) from primary anthropogenic activities during the period
of 1949–2012. Particularly, we have attempted to determine the temporal
variation profiles of emission factors for several significant sources
categories (e.g., nonferrous metal smelting, ferrous metal smelting, cement
production, and municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration) during the long period of 1949 to 2012,
which includes the technological upgrade of the industrial process and the
progress of the application rate for various air pollutant control devices
(APCDs).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodologies, data sources and key assumptions</title>
      <p>We estimate the atmospheric emissions of the 12 target HMs (Hg, As, Se,
Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn) from primary anthropogenic sources by
combining the specific annual activities and dynamic emission factors by
source category in this study. Table S1 in the Supplement lists the target heavy metal species and the associated
emission sources. Generally, we classify all sources into two major
categories: coal combustion sources and non-coal combustion sources.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Methodology of HM emissions from coal combustion sources</title>
      <p>Currently, coal plays a dominant role in China's energy consumption, making
up about 70 percent of its total primary energy consumption (Tian et al.,
2007, 2012b). Consequently, tons of hazardous HM pollutants can
be released into the atmospheric environment, although the concentration of
heavy metals in Chinese coals is normally at parts per million (ppm) levels.</p>
      <p>Atmospheric emissions of varied HMs from coal combustion are calculated by
combining the provincial average concentration of each heavy metal in feed
coals, the detailed coal consumption data, and the specific emission
factors, which are further classified into subcategories with respect to
different boiler configurations and the application rates and removal
efficiencies of various APCDs. The basic formulas can be expressed as
follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="[" close=""><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="." close="]"><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric emissions of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn,
Co, Cu and Zn; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the averaged concentration of each HM in feed coals in
one province; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the amount of annual coal consumption; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction of
each heavy metal released with flue gas from varied coal combustion
facilities;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represent the averaged fraction of one heavy metal which is removed from
flue gas by the conventional PM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission control devices,
respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the province (autonomous region or municipality);
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the subcategory emission source which is classified by different
sectors of the economy and combustion facilities, as well as the installed
PM, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control devices (the detailed source
classification can be seen in the Supplement, Table S2); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the type of
coal as consumed (raw coal, cleaned coal, briquette, and coke); and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the calendar year.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Average concentrations of varied HMs in feed coals</title>
      <p>Previous studies have demonstrated that concentrations of HMs in Chinese
coals vary substantially depending on the type of the feed coals and their
origin, as well as the affinity of the particular element for pure coal and
mineral materials (Tang et al., 2002; Ren et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>In this study, we compile and summarize provincial-level test data of
HM content in coal from published literature to date: Hg (879 samples), As
(1018 samples), Se (472 samples), Pb (831 samples), Cd (616 samples), Cr
(956 samples), Ni (863 samples), Sb (1612 samples), Mn (545 samples), Co
(888 samples), Cu (765 samples), and Zn (828 samples), and then we calculate
the average concentration of each heavy metal in coal as produced and coal
as consumed on a provincial level by using bootstrap simulation and a coal
transmission matrix (Tian et al., 2011a, 2013,
2014a). More details about the algorithms to determine HM concentrations in
cleaned coals, briquettes and coke are given in our previous publications
(Tian et al., 2010, 2012a). The brief introduction of bootstrap
simulation as well as averaged concentration values of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd,
Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn in feed coals on the provincial level can be
seen in the Supplement, Sects. S1–S2 and Table S3–S9.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>HM emission factors from coal combustion sources</title>
      <p>In this study, various coal combustion facilities are separated into five
subcategories: pulverized-coal boilers, stoker-fired boilers, fluidized-bed
furnaces, coke furnaces, and domestic coal-fired stoves. Therein,
pulverized-coal boilers are predominant in coal-fired power plants in most of
the provinces in China, representing over 85.0 % of the total installed
capacities. The remaining share is divided between fluidized-bed furnaces and
stoker-fired boilers, which are mainly used in relatively small unit-size
coal-fired power plants. Different from the thermal power plants sector,
stoker-fired boilers make up a large proportion of the coal-fired industrial
sector and other commercial coal-fired sectors. The release rates of HMs in
flue gas from various boiler categories vary substantially due to the
different combustion patterns and operating conditions, as well as their
genetic physical and chemical characteristics (Reddy et al., 2005).
Therefore, it is necessary to develop a detailed specification of the methods
by which the coals are fed and burned in China. In this study, we have
compiled the release rates of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and
Zn for different combustion boilers from published literature (see Supplement Table S10). The arithmetic mean values of release rates of these
12 HMs from different combustion boilers reported in the literature are
adopted to calculate the final emissions (see Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Averaged release rates and removal efficiencies of various HMs from
coal-fired facilities and the installed APCDs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Category </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Hg</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">As</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Se</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Pb</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cd</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Cr</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Ni</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Sb</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Mn</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Co</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Cu</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Zn</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="4">Release rate (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pulverized-coal boiler</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">98.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">96.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">96.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">94.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">84.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">57.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">89.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">75.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">85.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">92.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">91.6</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stoker-fired boiler</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">83.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">53.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">16.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">25.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">25.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">16.3</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fluidized-bed furnace</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">98.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">75.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">98.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">77.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">91.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">81.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">74.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">51.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">62.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">60.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">61.2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coke furnace</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">85.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">24.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">53.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">28.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">31.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">22.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">44.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Residential stoves (mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.065</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.095</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.033</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.009</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.047</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.094</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.33</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="5">Removal efficiency (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ESP</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">86.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">73.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">95.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">95.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">91.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">83.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">95.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">97.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">95.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">94.5</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EF</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">99.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">65.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">99.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">97.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">95.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">94.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">94.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">96.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">98.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">98.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">98.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cyclone</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">39.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">40.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">67.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">72.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">60.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">64.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wet scrubber</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">96.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">85.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">70.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">70.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">96.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">99.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">99.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">99.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">99.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WFGD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">80.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">86.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">80.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">82.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">58.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">56.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">40.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">58.2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SCR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ESP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>WFGD</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">97.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">98.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">99.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">99.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">98.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">97.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">98.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">98.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">97.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">97.7</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Furthermore, the conventional APCDs used to reduce criteria air pollutants
(e.g., PM, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from boilers can be effective in reducing
the final HM discharge from the stack flue gas. By the end of 2012, the
application rate of dust collectors for removing fly ash in thermal power
plants of China has been dominated by electrostatic precipitators (ESPs),
with a share of approximately 94 % of the total, followed by about 6 %
for fabric filters (FFs) or FFs plus ESPs. Meanwhile, wet flue
gas desulfurization (WFGD) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) have been
increasingly used in coal-fired power plants to reduce SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions in recent years, and the installed capacity proportion of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) and
SCR have amounted to about 86.2 and 25.7 % of the total capacity,
respectively (MEP, 2014a, b). However, compared with coal-fired power plant
boilers, there are still many small- and medium-scale industrial boilers
which are equipped with cyclones and wet dust collectors to reduce fly ash
emissions, and fewer FGD and de-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> devices have been installed to
abate SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. In this study, we adopt the
arithmetic mean values of those reported in the available literature as the
average synergistic removal efficiencies by different APCD configurations,
as shown in Table 1 and Supplement Table S11.</p>
      <p>The residential sector is another important coal consumer in China. The
traditional cook stoves and improved cook stoves are major combustion
facilities for residential cooking and heating, both of which normally
do not have any PM and SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control devices. There is little information
about the real-world test results of HM emissions through residential coal
use of China. Hence, we choose to use the averaged emission factors for
coal/briquette combustion provided by AP42 (US EPA, 1993), NPI (DEA, 1999),
and NAEI (UK, 2012), and the assumed emission factors of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd,
Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn by residential coal use are also listed in
Table 1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Methodology of HM emissions from non-coal combustion sources</title>
      <p>HM emissions from non-coal categories are calculated as a product of annual
activity data (e.g., fuel consumption, industrial product yields) and
specific emission factors of varied HMs. The basic calculation can be
described by the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric emissions of each heavy metal; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the annual
production yield of industrial producing processes, volume of municipal
solid wastes incineration, or liquid fuel and biofuel consumption etc.;
EF is the assumed average emission factors; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emission source
classified by source subcategories (see Supplement Table S1).</p>
      <p>Notably, atmospheric emissions of Pb have significantly dropped in China, as
a result of unleaded gasoline introduction since the early 2000s. The
proportion of lead in leaded gasoline emitted to the air is estimated at
about 77 % (Biggins and Harrison, 1979) or 75 % (Hassel et al., 1987),
and thus this parameter is assumed to be at about 76 % for the period before
2000 in this study. Consequently, for leaded gasoline used by motor vehicles
in China, the total Pb emitted to the atmosphere is calculated according to
the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>is the emissions of Pb from motor vehicle gasoline combustion in
calendar year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average content of lead in gasoline; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
annual gasoline consumption in one province, autonomous region or
municipality <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>For brake and tyre wear, the atmospheric emissions of several HMs are
estimated by the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric emissions of As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co,
Cu or Zn in calendar year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the population of vehicles in
category <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (passenger car, bus and coach, light-duty truck, and heavy-duty
vehicle) in province, autonomous region or municipality <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
average annual mileage driven by vehicle in category <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; EF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
emission factor of TSP (total suspended particles) for brake lining or tyre
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by vehicle category <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the averaged concentration of each heavy
metal in brake lining or tyre <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Relevant parameters are summarized in the
Supplement Tables S12–S13.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Algorithm for determination of dynamic emission factors</title>
      <p>Because remarkable changes in products, devices, processes as well as
practices (technology improvement) have imposed positive effects on emission
reductions of pollutants with the growth of the economy and the increasing
awareness of environment protection, the resulting pollutant emission level
at any given time is a competition between technology improvement and
production growth. Consequently, one of the major challenges in this study
is to develop a reasonable representation of the time-varying dynamic
emission factors of HMs associated with each primary industrial activity.</p>
      <p>Taking into consideration the updated air pollutant control technologies,
and outdated enterprises that have shut down, the HM emission factors show a
gradually declining trend. Generally, the patterns of technologies' diffusion
across competitive markets are evident, and an S-shaped curve is a typical
result when plotting the proportion of a useful service or product supplied
by each major competing technology (Grübler et al., 1999). At the
earliest stage of industrialization, growth rates in the removal efficiency
of an air pollutant are slow as the advanced technology with high investment
and operation costs is only applied in specialized niche sectors.
Subsequently, along with the progress in technology and awareness of public
environmental protection, growth rates accelerate as early commercial
investments have resulted in standard-setting and compounding cost
reductions, which leads to the increased application of advanced technologies
for reduction in emissions of air pollutants in a wider array of settings.
Eventually, growth rate in the removal efficiency will gradually approach
near to zero as the potential market of optimal control technology of HM
emissions is saturated. By using an S-shaped curve, both historical and
future emissions of carbon aerosol and Hg to the atmosphere from human
activities have been evaluated by Bond et al. (2007) and Streets et al. (2004, 2011). Their results show that an S-shaped curve fits historical and
future trends better than polynomial or linear fits, even though it cannot
account for economic shocks because of the form of monotonous smooth
transitions. Therefore, S-shaped curves are applied to estimate the dynamic
HM emission factors from primary industrial process sources in this study.
The basic formulas can be expressed as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where EF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emission factor for process <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in calendar year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>represents the emission level for process <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> pre-1900;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the best emission factor achieved in China for process <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
present; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the shape parameter of the curve for process <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (like the
SD); and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time at which the technology transition begins
(pre-1900).</p>
      <p>Based on the above method, we build the dynamic representation of HM
emission factors to reflect the transition from uncontrolled processes
pre-1900 to the relatively high-efficiency abatement processes in 2012.
Parameters for some of these transitions are discussed throughout the paper,
and are summarized in the Supplement, Table S14. Actually, on the basis of Eq. (5), the specific values of the shape parameter of the curve (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
determined when we obtain the definite values of pre-1900 unabated emission
factors and the best emission factor achieved at present for each
industrial process in China. In addition, several values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are cited from
Street et al. (2011) if only limited information about the emission level
for certain processes can be gained.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Dynamic HM emission factors of nonferrous metal smelting</title>
      <p>By 2010, bath smelting (e.g., Ausmelt smelting, Isa smelting), flash
smelting, and imperial smelting process (ISP) represent the three most
commonly used techniques for copper smelting, for about 52, 34, and
10 % of Chinese copper production, respectively. For lead smelting,
sintering plus a blast furnace technique (traditional technique) and bath
smelting (e.g., oxygen side blowing, oxygen bottom blowing) plus a blast
furnace technique (advanced technique) are the two most commonly used
techniques in China, accounting for about 48 and 47 % of lead
production, respectively. With respect to zinc smelting, hydrometallurgy is
the predominant technique in China, for about 77 % of the zinc production
capacity. The remaining share is divided among vertical retort (VR)
pyrometallurgy (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %), imperial smelting process (ISP)
pyrometallurgy (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %), and other pyrometallurgy
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 %). Especially, VR pyrometallurgy is regarded as an
outdated technique which is mandated to be shut down gradually and will be
totally eliminated in the near future.</p>
      <p>Because of limited information and lack of field experimental tests on HM
emissions in these source categories in China, some emission factors for
this source category are cited from published literature, with only
nationally averaged levels. Streets et al. (2011) indicate that China,
eastern Europe and the former USSR can be regarded as a uniform region with
similar levels of technology development, whose emission factor trajectories
are identical. Therefore, we presume the emission factors of HMs with higher
abatement implementation in eastern Europe, Caucasus and central Asian
countries are equivalent to those in China for the same calendar year (see
Fig. 1a). Based on the above assumptions and default abatement efficiencies of
HMs in nonferrous metal smelting sectors (EEA, 2013), as well as other
specific emission factors of HMs from published literature to date (Nriagu,
1979; Pacyna, 1984; Pacyna and Pacyna, 2001), the unabated emission factors
are determined (see Supplement Tables S15–S16).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time variation of arsenic emission factors for copper
production and zinc emission factors for steel production in China (an example).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10127/2015/acp-15-10127-2015-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Presently, compared to primary smelting of Cu, Pb and Zn, there is
much less information about emission factors of HMs for secondary metal smelting of Cu, Pb and Zn and other nonferrous metals (Al, Ni and Sb) smelting
from the published literature. Hence, it is much more difficult to estimate
the time-varying dynamic emission factors of HMs from the above sectors by the use of
S-shaped curves due to a lack of necessary baseline information. We presume
that the average emission factors for secondary metal (Cu, Pb and Zn) smelting,
aluminum smelting, antimony smelting, and nickel smelting remain unchanged
before the year 1996, at which the Emission Standard of Pollutants for Industrial Kiln and Furnace was first issued in China. We also
presume that the average emission factors of HMs from secondary metal smelting
and other nonferrous metal smelting for developing countries, referred to in Pacyna
and Pacyna's report (2001) and eastern Europe, Caucasus and central Asian
countries with limited abatement referred to in  the EEA Guidebook (EEA, 2009; S. V.
Kakareka, personal communication, 2008), as well as the United Kingdom applied
in the NAEI emission factors database pre-1990 (UK, 1995), are reasonable for
China before the year 1996. Subsequently, atmospheric emission factors of
HMs from the industry of nonferrous metals in China decrease gradually with the
implementation of tightened emission limits regulated by the gradually
stricter Emission Standards of Pollutants from nonferrous metals industry (e.g., GB 9078–1996, GB 25465–2010, GB 25466–2010, GB
25467–2010).</p>
      <p>With respect to gold smelting (large-scale) and mercury mining industries,
the time-varying Hg emission factors from these two subcategories are
determined by referring to studies carried out by Feng (2005), Streets et
al. (2005, 2011), Pacyna and Pacyna (2006) and Pirrone et al. (2010).
Specific emission factors of HMs from nonferrous metal smelting sectors can
be seen in the Supplement, Table S16.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Dynamic HM emission factors of ferrous metal smelting</title>
      <p>Currently, the blast furnace is the primary technique for pig iron
production in China. For steel production, there are two main routes: (1) “ore BF-BOF steel-making
route” based on blast furnace (BF) and basic
oxygen furnace (BOF) techniques, and (2) “scrap-EAF steel-making route” based on an electric
arc furnace (EAF) technique, using steel scrap or sponge iron as basic raw materials
(Zhang and Wang, 2008). In spite of the environmental friendly nature of EAF and its flexibility
to produce a variety of value-added grades of steel, the share of
electric furnace steel in Chinese output of crude steel only accounts for
about 8.9 % in 2012, mainly due to the shortness of steel scrap resources
in China (CISA, 2013).</p>
      <p>Comparing the national emission standard of air pollutants for the iron
smelting industry in China with those in certain European Union countries
(e.g., United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, Austria), we choose to use
the emission factors of HMs for the iron smelting industry obtained from the
emission factors database of NAEI in 2000 as the national average emission
factors for iron smelting of China in 2015. This is mainly because the PM
emission limit of existing facilities for iron smelting of China in 2015
(20 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately comparable to that of European Union
countries in the early 2000s (IRIS, 2005; MEP, 2012). With respect to steel
smelting, the emission factors of HMs with higher abatement in eastern
Europe, Caucasus and central Asian countries are chosen as the national
average emission factors of this sector in China in the same calendar year
(see Fig. 1b). The unabated emission factors of HMs for pig iron and steel
production are determined by using a similar method to the one discussed above for
the nonferrous metal smelting industry. Please see the Supplement, Tables S16 and
S17 for more details about specific emission factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Dynamic HM emission factors of non-metallic mineral manufacturing</title>
      <p>Cement, glass, and brick manufacturing are the major mineral commodity
industries. During the manufacturing process, various HMs emitted from raw
materials as vapor and feed fuels associated with fine particulate matter are
emitted from the kiln system at high temperatures.</p>
      <p>Currently, the new dry rotary kiln process is the dominant technology in
cement manufacturing factories of China, representing over 92 % of the
total national cement output. The emission ceilings of air pollutants for
cement, glass or brick manufacturing specified in the present standards of
China (e.g., GB 4915–2013, GB 26453–2011, GB 29620–2013) are
less stringent compared with those of developed countries (see Supplement
Table S18). By contrasting the emission limits of air pollutants from
non-metallic minerals (cement, glass, and brick) manufacturing between China
and developed countries, we presume the best emission factors of air
pollutants achieved in China today are approximately identical to the
average emission factors of developed countries at the end of the 1990s. With
respect to cement production, the unabated emission factors of HMs can be
obtained from the Web Factor Information Retrieval System (WebFIRE) (US EPA,
2012). Moreover, the average emission factors for glass and brick
manufacturing are assumed to remain unchanged since pre-1996. Subsequently,
atmospheric emission factors of HMs from these two sub-source categories
decrease gradually with the implementation of gradually tightened emission
limits from the above-mentioned Emission Standards of Pollutants from the
non-metallic mineral manufacturing industry. Specific emission factors of
various HMs from non-metallic mineral manufacturing can be seen in the
Supplement, Table S16.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>HM emission factors of biomass burning</title>
      <p>China is the biggest developing country in the world. The rural population
still accounted for nearly 47.4 % of the total population in 2012 (NBS, 2013a),
and it has had a long history of using agricultural residues and firewood to
satisfy household energy demands for cooking and heating. Recently, crop
residues have become more commonly burned in open fields during the harvest
season. Abundant gaseous and particulate pollutants emitted by open biomass
burning have caused severe regional air pollution and contributed to
worsening of haze events in central and eastern China (Cheng et al.,
2014; Li et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>In this paper, a total mass of ten crop straws burned is calculated based
on the method discussed in previous studies by Tian et al. (2011b) and Lu et
al. (2011), including paddy, wheat, maize, other grains, legumes, tubers,
cotton, oil plants, fiber crops, and sugar crops. Because of quite limited
field test data about HM emission characteristics from crop straw for
household use and firewood for open burning, we presume HM emission factors
from biofuel for open burning are equal to those for household use. It is
acknowledged that this simple assumption may introduce additional
uncertainties, and thus relatively large uncertainty ranges for HM emission
factors of biofuel combustion are applied in the analysis, which merits
substantial investigation in the future. The average emission factors of HMs
from these ten crop straws and firewood are summarized in the Supplement, Table S16.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS6">
  <title>HM emission factors of liquid fuels combustion</title>
      <p>Besides major conventional pollutants (PM, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, liquid
fuel combustion generates emissions of potentially toxic HMs. Here, the
liquid fuels are sorted into crude oil, fuel oil, kerosene, diesel, and
gasoline.</p>
      <p>Historically, leaded gasoline combustion by vehicles has been recognized as
the most significant contributor for the increase in lead level in human blood
(Robbins et al., 2010). Leaded gasoline has been forced out of the market
place in China since 1 July 2000 due to the adverse health effects on the
neurologic and/or hematologic systems (Xu et al., 2012). Compared to the Pb
content limits of 0.64 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (GB 484–64, 1949–1990), and 0.35 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (GB 484–89, 1991–2000) in leaded gasoline, the average lead
content in unleaded gasoline is regulated at less than 0.005 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (GB
17930–1999, 2001–2012). Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (3) is
chosen to be 0.64, 0.35, and 0.005 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
three corresponding periods, respectively (Qin, 2010). All the other average
emission factors of HMs from each type of liquid fuel are summarized in the
Supplement, Table S16.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS7">
  <title>Dynamic HM emission factors of municipal solid waste incineration</title>
      <p>For municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration, emission characteristics of
HMs significantly depend on the concentration of metals in the feed wastes,
the performance of installed APCDs, combustion temperatures, as well as
composition of the gas stream (Chang et al., 2000).</p>
      <p>Presently, stoke grate and fluidized-bed combustion are the major MSW
incineration technologies being used in China. Because of relatively high
costs and the heat content requirement for the feed MSW (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6000–6500 kJ kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or supplementary fuel is necessary), stoke grate
incinerators are typically used in eastern coastal areas, especially in the
economically more developed cities (Nie, 2008), taking a share of over
58 % by the end of 2010 (Cheng and Hu, 2010; Tian et al., 2012d).
Fluidized-bed incinerators, in contrast, are mainly adopted in the eastern
small and mid-sized cities, as well as the large cities in the middle and
western parts of China, taking a relatively small proportion, mainly due to
the lower treatment capacities (Cheng and Hu, 2010).</p>
      <p>To estimate the hazardous air pollutant emission inventory from MSW
incineration in China, Tian et al. (2012d) have compiled and summarized the
comprehensive average emission factors of hazardous HMs (Hg, As, Pb, Cd, Cr,
Ni, and Sb) for MSW incineration from published literature. Additionally, the
emission ceiling of HMs for the existing incinerators in the newly issued
standard (GB 18485–2014) which will be conducted in 2016 is approximately
comparable to that in Directive 2000/76/EC (see Supplement, Table S18).
Here, we presume the best emission factors of HMs in China for MSW in 2016
are almost equivalent to those in developed EU countries in 2000. Based on
specific emission factors of HMs for MSW incineration from published
literature (Nriagu, 1979; Pacyna, 1984; Nriagu and Pacyna, 1988) and certain
emission factors of HMs with uncontrolled technology from AP42, Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 2: Solid Waste Disposal (US EPA, 1996),
the unabated emission factors of HMs from this source category are
determined. Specific emission factors of various HMs from MSW incineration
can be seen in the Supplement, Table S16.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS8">
  <title>HM emission factors of brake and tyre wear</title>
      <p>Brake linings as well as tyre wear of vehicles are known as one of the
important emission sources of particulate matter to the surrounding
environment, particularly in urban areas (Hjortenkrans et al., 2007).
Notably, not all of the worn materials of brake lining and tyre will be
emitted into the atmosphere as airborne particulate matter (Hulskotte et al.,
2006). Here, we adopt the average emission factors of TSP from brake wear
and tyre wear for passenger cars (0.0075 and 0.0107 g km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, light-duty trucks (0.0117  and
0.0169 g km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and heavy-duty vehicles (0.0365 and 0.0412 g km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
obtaining from the EEA Guidebook (EEA, 2013) as the average emission factors of
airborne particulate matter from brake and tyre wear.</p>
      <p>In addition to steel as brake pad support material, the agents present in
brake linings usually consist of Sb, Cu, Zn, Ba, Sn, and Mo (Bukowiecki et
al., 2009). Further, antimony is present in brake linings as
Sb<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that serves as a lubricant and filler to improve friction
stability and to reduce vibrations. Sb<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is oxidized to
Sb<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (possibly a carcinogenic substance) during the braking
process, which has been proved to be partially soluble in physiological
fluids (Gao et al., 2014; von Uexküll et al., 2005). Because of their
excellent characteristics of thermal conductivity, copper or brass are widely
used for automotive braking as a major component of friction materials
(Österle et al., 2010). Additionally, although zinc is a less specific
marker for brake wear than antimony and copper, it has also been reported to
be another important constituent of brake wear (Johansson et al., 2009).
Hence, the HMs (especially Sb and Cu) associated with particulate matter
are mainly emitted from brake wear due to relatively higher average contents
of HMs in brake lining, compared to those from tyre wear (EEA, 2013).</p>
      <p>Because of limited information and lack of field experimental tests on HM
contents in brake linings and tyres in Chinese vehicles, and the substantial
quantity of vehicles sold in China that are imported from foreign countries
or manufactured by foreign-invested transnational vehicle companies, we
presume the composition of worn materials from brake and tyre wear in terms
of HMs are consistent with foreign countries (see Supplement Table S13).
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Activity data</title>
      <p>Coal and liquid fuels consumption data by sectors at the provincial level (e.g.,
power plant, coal-fired industrial boiler, coal-fired residential sector,
other coal-fired sectors) are collected from China Energy Statistical Yearbooks. Industrial production
data by provinces (e.g., the output of ferrous/nonferrous metal products,
production of cement/glass/brick, amount of municipal waste incineration,
number of vehicles) are compiled from relevant statistical
yearbooks, such as China Statistical Yearbooks, the Yearbook of Nonferrous Metals
Industry of China, China Steel Yearbook etc. The detailed data sources for the main sectors
are listed in the Supplement, Table S19. Furthermore, trends of activity levels
by different sectors in China between 2000 and 2012 are summarized in the
Supplement, Figs. S1–S5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Evaluation of potential uncertainties</title>
      <p>It is necessary to examine the potential uncertainty in emissions by sources
and regions to quantify the reliability, and identify the direction and degree of improvement, of
emission inventories in the future. A detailed uncertainty analysis is
conducted by combining uncertainties of both activity levels and emission
factors, through adopting a Monte Carlo simulation (Zhao et al., 2011; Tian et
al., 2014a, b). Streets et al. (2003) indicate that there
is no way to judge the accuracy of activity data estimates. Furthermore,
uncertainties are still inevitable when representative values are selected
for specific emission sources, countries, and regions in spite of emission
factors adopted from detailed experiments.</p>
      <p>Most of the input parameters of specific activity levels and emission
factors, with corresponding statistical distributions, are specified on the
basis of the data fitting, or referred to the related published references
(Wu et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2011; Tian et al., 2012a, b). Additionally, for
parameters with limited observation data, the probability distributions such
as normal distribution and triangular distribution are assumed by the
authors for corresponding sources. Further details about the probability
distribution for each source discussed in this study are listed in Table S20. Finally, all of the input parameters are placed in a Monte Carlo
framework, and simulations are run 10 000 times to estimate the uncertainty
ranges of varied HM emissions with a 95 % confidence interval.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Temporal trend of HM emissions by source categories</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>HM emissions from primary anthropogenic sources in China,
1949–2012 (t year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hg</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">As</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Se</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Pb</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cr</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Ni</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Sb</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Co</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Cu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Zn</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1949</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">312.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">158.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">147.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">212.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">74.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">226.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1978</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">144.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">593.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">607.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7206.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1021.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">891.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">151.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3616.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">295.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1356.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3396.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1980</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">163.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">791.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">825.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9744.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">98.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1481.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1101.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">193.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4637.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">387.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1745.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4128.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1985</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">209.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1055.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1168.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12922.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">123.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2353.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1250.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">250.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5736.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">478.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2194.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4896.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">261.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1311.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1546.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17644.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">156.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3374.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1667.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">337.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7607.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">624.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2880.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6541.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1995</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">351.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1699.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2179.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17620.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">223.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5155.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2354.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">499.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9454.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">778.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4131.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">9564.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">316.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1673.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2113.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20 193.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">255.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4928.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2407.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">566.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10 034.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">842.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4733.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">10 788.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">492.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2454.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3058.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 887.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">378.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6828.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3246.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">797.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 195.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1075.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7101.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">15 987.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">509.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2501.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3146.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 250.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">398.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7179.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3356.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">826.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 181.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1042.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7201.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">16 895.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">533.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2407.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3067.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 729.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">420.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7445.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3369.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">822.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 528.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1064.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7600.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">18 147.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">564.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2489.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3136.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 213.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">442.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7755.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3248.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">962.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 499.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1056.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8208.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">18 337.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">589.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2325.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2936.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 519.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">453.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7810.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3250.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1006.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 195.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1010.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8428.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">19 035.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">672.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2322.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2880.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13 194.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">455.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7465.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3138.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1068.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 015.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">919.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8318.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">20 503.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">688.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2422.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3062.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14 032.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">493.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7733.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3440.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1172.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 657.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">981.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">9115.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">21 876.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">695.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2529.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3061.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14 397.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">526.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7834.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3395.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1251.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 006.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1004.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">9547.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">22 319.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Historical trends of atmospheric HMs (Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd,
Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn) emissions from primary anthropogenic sources
in China, 1949–2012. CCPP, coal consumption by power plants; CCIB, coal
consumption by industrial boilers; CCRS, coal consumption by residential
sectors; CCOS, coal consumption by other sectors; LFC, liquid fuels
combustion; NFMS, nonferrous metal smelting; FMS, ferrous metal smelting;
NMMM, non-metallic minerals manufacturing; B&amp;TW, brake and tyre wear;
ONCS, other non-coal sources (including BB, biomass burning; and MSWI, municipal
solid waste incineration).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10127/2015/acp-15-10127-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The historical trend of atmospheric emissions of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni,
Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn by different source categories from 1949 to 2012 are
illustrated in Fig. 2. The total emissions of HMs from primary anthropogenic
sources since 1949 have shown substantial shifts among varied source
categories that reflect technological and economic trends and transition
during this period of over 60 years. Within the year after the
establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the total emissions
of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn from anthropogenic
sources are estimated at about 11.5–312.6 t (see Table 2). The discharges
of HMs on a national scale increased by 3–20 times from 1949 to 1960
due to the increasing demands for energy consumption and industrial
production (especially for the period of the Great Leap Forward from 1958 to
1960, resulting in a remarkable increasing output of industrial products),
then, a substantial decrease in 1961 and 1962 of 27.6–55.7 % compared to
1960 on account of the serious imbalance of economic structure and the Great
Leap Forward famine caused by policy mistakes together with natural disasters
(Kung and Lin, 2003). In spite of the negative growth of heavy metal
emissions in individual years such as 1967, 1974, and 1976, the annually
averaged growth rates of national emissions of HMs from primary
anthropogenic sources were still as high as 0.2–8.4 % during the period of
1963 to 1977.</p>
      <p>Subsequently, the policy of openness and reformation was issued by the
Chinese central government. With the implementation of this policy from 1978
to 2012, China's GDP has been growing at an average annual growth rate of
about 9.8 %, resulting in tremendous energy consumption and enormous output
of industrial products. As can be seen from Fig. 2, historically there have
been two periods during which the total emissions of HMs (except Pb)
increased rapidly after 1978. The first one is the period of 1978 to 2000,
except for one remarkable fluctuation from 1998 to 1999, which reflects a
decrease in input of raw materials and output of industrial products mainly
owing to the influence of the Asian financial crisis (Hao et al., 2002). The
second one is the period of the 10th Five-Year Plan (10th FYP, from 2001 to
2005) in which a sharp increase in emissions of Hg, As, Se, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co,
Cu, and Zn occurred, with the emissions increasing from about
268.0–11 308.6 t in 2001 to about 378.9–15 987.9 t in 2005, at an annual
average growth rate of 4.8–12.0 % (see Table 2).</p>
      <p>In terms of the lead content requirement in gasoline, the past 64 years
since the foundation of the PR China (1949 to 2012) can be divided into two
phases: the leaded gasoline period (1949 to 1990: gasoline with high lead
content (0.64 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 1991–2000: gasoline with low lead content (0.35 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the unleaded gasoline period (2001 to 2012, 0.005 g L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
As a result, the discharge of Pb from primary anthropogenic
sources experienced two fluctuations over the 64 year period. The first
sharp emission decline occurred in 1991, and the total emissions
decreased by 26.2 % from 17 644.0 t in 1990 to 13 029.6 t in 1991, mainly
because the average Pb content in leaded gasoline regulated by GB 484–89
decreased about 45.3 % compared to that in GB 484–64. The other sharp
decline occurred in 2001, and the total Pb emissions from primary
anthropogenic sources reduced abruptly by about 61.6 % in 2001.
Subsequently, along with the rapid increase of vehicle volume and oil
consumption, a substantial increase was once again experienced from 7747.2 t
in 2001 to 14 397.6 t in 2012, at an annual average growth rate of about
5.8 %.</p>
      <p>Due to technological progress resulting in relatively low emission
factors of HMs, and economic development bringing about high coal consumption
and industrial products output, the trends of total atmospheric emissions
for different HMs in China are diverse during the period of 2006 to 2012
(Cheng et al., 2015). Generally speaking, the national atmospheric emissions
of Hg, Pb, Cd, Cr, Sb, Cu, and Zn increased at an annual average growth
rate of 1.5–7.2 % from 2006 to 2012. In spite of the remarkable growth in
coal consumption and gross industrial production, the national As, Se, Ni,
Mn, and Co emissions are well restrained in this period. These are mainly due
to the different volatility of these 12 elements during the high temperature
process resulting in diverse release rates of furnaces and synergistic
removal efficiencies of control measures (Xu et al., 2004).</p>
      <p>Due to limited information about historical ground-level concentrations of
12 HMs in different cities in China, the temporal characteristics of
atmospheric concentrations of four HMs (As, Pb, Cr, and Cu) in Beijing during
2000 to 2012 are used as valid index to verify whether or not the trend of
historical HM emissions is reasonable (see Supplement Fig. S6). The data
sources and specific values about atmospheric concentrations of As, Pb, Cr,
and Cu in Beijing during 2000 to 2012 are listed in the Supplement, Table S21. It
should be acknowledged that the verification method applied in this study
has certain limitations on account of sampling discrepancies, including
sampling time, sampling site, and detection method etc. Therefore, the
historical variation trends of HM emissions may be inconsistent with those
of ambient concentrations of HMs in some years.</p>
      <p>As can be seen from Fig. S6, minimum values of the atmospheric
concentrations of As, Pb, Cr, and Cu occur in 2008. This is mainly because
most of the aerosol samples compiled from published papers are collected during
August in that year, the time during which China hosted the Beijing Olympics
under which a series of strict measures about energy-saving and pollution
reduction were implemented, such as suspending production of high polluting
industries in the Beijing and neighboring municipalities, restricting
the driving of vehicles on alternate days under an even–odd license plate system,
limiting pollutant emissions from coal combustion facilities in Beijing and
the surrounding provinces etc. Consequently, the variation trends of
atmospheric concentrations of As, Pb, Cr, and Cu have some discrepancies with
those of historical emissions of the above four HMs in Beijing in 2008.
However, the historical emission trends of As, Pb, Cr, and Cu are consistent
with those of atmospheric concentrations of the above four HMs during 2000
to 2012 in general (see Fig. S6), which indicates that the historical trend
of HM emissions estimated by this study is reasonable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Estimate of annual Hg emissions from primary anthropogenic
sources among various studies (t yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10127/2015/acp-15-10127-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Until now, the comprehensive and special studies on various HM (except Hg)
emissions in China are quite limited. Therefore, only a detailed comparison
with Hg emission estimates from other studies is discussed in this study
(see Fig. 3). Specifically, limited data on China's Hg emissions can be cited
directly from the global Hg inventories estimated by Pacyna and Pacyna
(2001), Pacyna et al. (2006, 2010) and Streets et al. (2011). Consequently, here, we mainly focus on comparing our estimations with the
results from China's specialized Hg emission inventories estimated by
Streets et al. (2005) and Wu et al. (2006).</p>
      <p>Overall, the estimated Hg emissions from fuel combustion (except for the
subcategory of coal consumption by residential sectors) in this work are
substantially consistent with those reported by Streets et al. (2005) and Wu
et al. (2006), although the values calculated for the same year are somewhat
different. This may be mainly attributed to the difference in the averaged
provincial content of Hg in raw coal. In our study, according to a
comprehensive investigation of published literature, we determine the
national averaged Hg content in China to be 0.18 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by using a
bootstrap simulation method, a little lower than that used by the above two
studies (0.19 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Another important factor influencing the result
is the difference of removal effectiveness of Hg through traditional APCDs.
Nevertheless, the estimated Hg emissions from coal consumption by
residential sectors by Streets et al. (2005) and Wu et al. (2006) are higher
than our estimation in the same year. This is mainly because the emission
factor of Hg from coal consumption by residential sectors is cited from
Australia NPI in this paper, which is only approximately half of that which
EPA adopted in the above two studies. In terms of Hg emissions from
industrial processes, the estimated Hg emissions in this study are generally
lower than those in other Hg emission inventories in the same year. This may
be because we have adopted S-shaped curves to quantify the positive effects
on emission reduction of pollutants by technology improvement, so that the
emission factors adopted in this study are generally lower than those used
in studies of Streets et al. (2005), Wu et al. (2006), and Wu et al. (2012)
in the same year. In addition, some anthropogenic sources with high
uncertainties are not taken into account in this work due to the lack of
detailed activity data for the long period. Certain natural sources (e.g.,
forest burning, grassland burning) are also not included in this
study. Consequently, our estimated total Hg emissions are lower than those
in inventories estimated by Streets et al. (2005) and Wu et al. (2006).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>HM emissions from coal combustion by power plants</title>
      <p>The power plant sector represents the largest consumer of coal in China. The
thermal power generation increased from 3.6 TWh in 1949 to 3925.5 TWh in
2012 (NBS, 2013a). Meanwhile, coal burned by power plants has increased from
5.2 to 1785.3 Mt (NBS, 2013b), with an annual growth rate of 9.9 % and a
percentage share of the total coal consumption increasing from 22.7 to
50.6 %. For the period of 1949 to 2005, the emissions of HMs from coal
combustion by power plants increased in rough proportion to coal
consumption. However, this trend began to change after 2006 due to the
implementation of policies of energy-saving and pollution reduction,
especially the strengthening of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission control for coal-fired
power plants (Zhu et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Presently, the combination of pulverized-coal boilers plus ESPs plus WFGD is
the most common APCDs configuration in coal-fired power plants of China. By
the end of 2012, the installed capacities of FGD in power plants
increased by nearly 14 times compared with those in 2005, reaching about
706.4 GWe, accounting for approximately 86.2 % of the installed capacity
of total thermal power plants (MEP, 2014a). Of all of the units with FGD
installation, approximately 89.7 % adopt the limestone-gypsum WFGD process.
The discharges of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn from
coal combustion by power plants in 2012 are estimated at about 15.2–3038.9 t (see Fig. 2),
which have decreased by 1.7–11.8 % annually since 2006.
Moreover, the distinction of integrated co-benefit removal efficiencies of
these elements for the typical APCD configurations is the primary reason for
the obvious variations of the declining rates among varied HMs, as
illustrated in Table 1 and Fig. 2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>HM emissions from coal consumption by industrial boilers</title>
      <p>In general, coal combusted by industrial boilers is used to provide hot
water and heating for industrial production processes. With the development
of China's economy (GDP increased from CNY (Chinese Yuan) 46.6 billion in
1949 to CNY 51 894.2 billion in 2012), coal consumption by industrial
boilers increased at a relatively lower growth rate than the power
sector, from 11.5 Mt in 1949 to 1205.6 Mt in 2012 (NBS, 2013b). According to
the statistical data from China Machinery Industry Yearbook, the combination
of stoker-fired boiler plus wet scrubber and cyclone is the most common
configuration in coal-fired industrial sectors of China, especially for the
small- and medium-scale boilers (CMIF, 2013).</p>
      <p>As can be seen from Fig. 2, the emission trends of HMs from coal consumption
by industrial boilers are consistent with the total national emissions
trends between 1949 and 1997, and negative growth appears in 1998 and 1999
due to the decreased coal consumption resultant of the Asian financial
crisis (Hao et al., 2002; Tian et al., 2007, 2012b). Subsequently, the
emissions of different toxic HMs from coal consumption by industrial boilers
have distinct variation tendencies, mainly due to the different removal
efficiencies of HMs through typical APCDs. Generally, Hg and Pb emissions
from coal consumption by industrial boilers increased almost
monotonically from 85.1 and 3717.8 t in 2000 to 179.0 and 5770.0 t in 2012,
with an annual growth rate of about 6.4 and 3.7 %, respectively. However,
the discharges of Mn from coal consumption by industrial boilers
decreased about 1.2 times from 5866.0 to 4951.8 t during this period
(2000–2012). Moreover, the discharges of the other nine HMs (As, Se, Cd, Cr,
Ni, Sb, Co, Cu and Zn) from coal consumption by industrial boilers present a
trend of first an increase, and then a decrease overall, with the
implementation of policies of saving energy and pollution reduction in the
coal-fired industrial boilers sector, especially the growing application of
high-efficiency dust collectors and various types of combined dust and
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> removal devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>HM emissions from metal smelting and other primary sources</title>
      <p>Historically, a sharp fluctuation of Hg discharges from the nonferrous metal smelting
sector occurred in the period of the Great Leap Forward to the Great
Leap Forward famine (an increase from 92.6 t in 1957 to 221.7 t in 1959,
then a decrease rapidly to 104.0 t in 1963); this is mainly due to the rapid
increase or decline of mercury mining outputs in this period (an increase from
1060 t in 1957 to 2684 t in 1959, then a decrease rapidly to 1345 t in 1963).
Subsequently, a sharp increase of emissions of Hg occurred, with
emissions from about 60.6 t in 1998 increasing to about 218.6 t in 2012, at
an annually averaged growth rate of 9.6 %. Simultaneously, the primary
contributor of Hg emissions from the nonferrous metal smelting sector has
changed to the subsector of primary Zn smelting, which made up about
36.9–52.7 % of the sector during 1998 to 2012. Unlike Hg emissions, the
emissions of As, Se, Pb, Cd, Ni, Sb, Cu, and Zn from the nonferrous metal smelting sector increased by approximately 7–15 times to 442.3,
1856.4, 251.8, 412.7, 140.6, 1240.9, and 4025.6 t in 2012, respectively. This
is mainly because the reduced shares of HM emissions from the nonferrous metal smelting sector, caused by increasing advanced pollutants control devices
installation, were partly counteracted by the rapid growth of
nonferrous metals production.</p>
      <p>A steady increase of HM emissions from the pig iron and steel industry
accompanied by certain undulations occurred from 1949 to 1999 (see Fig. 2).
Specifically, because of the emphasis on the backyard furnaces for steel
production in the period of the Great Leap Forward Movement, a sharp
fluctuation of emissions occurred during the period of 1958 to 1963,
with the emissions of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Cu, and Zn almost
doubling (NBS, 2013b). Although emission factors gradually reduced between
2000 and 2012, the output of pig iron and steel has rapidly increased from
131.0 and 128.5 Mt in 2000 to 663.5 and 723.9 Mt in 2012 and, as a result,
the emissions of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Cu, and Zn from this
sector have quadrupled or quintupled in the past 12 years. Especially,
the share of Zn emissions from the ferrous metal smelting sector to the
national emissions has increased from 13.1 to 32.2 %. Therein, the steel
production industry represents the dominant contributor to Zn emissions,
accounting for about 60.9–62.9 % during this period.</p>
      <p>In order to facilitate understanding of historical HM emissions in China,
details about temporal variation trends of HM emissions from liquid fuel
combustion and brake and tyre wear are discussed in the Supplement Sect. S3.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Composition of HM emissions by province and source category in 2010</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Provincial HM emissions from anthropogenic sources and
national composition by source categories in 2010.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=\textwidth}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10127/2015/acp-15-10127-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The total emissions of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb, Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn
from primary anthropogenic sources by provinces in China for the year 2010
are estimated at about 72 955.1 t. As can be seen in Fig. 4, coal combustion
sources represent the major contributors of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cr, Ni, Mn, Co,
and Cu emissions and are responsible for about 50.6, 74.2, 64.6, 60.1, 90.4,
56.2, 80.9, 98.6, and 53.4 % of total emissions, respectively, while their
contribution to the total Cd, Sb, and Zn emissions are relatively lower, at
about 32.7, 39.3, and 39.8 %, respectively.</p>
      <p>Among all the coal-consuming sub-sectors, coal consumption by industrial
boilers ranks as the primary source of total national emissions of 12
HMs, with the average proportion about 57.7 % of the total emissions from
coal combustion. This may be attributed to the significant coal consumption
of industrial boilers (about 1117.3 Mt in 2010) and the relatively high
share of boilers with inadequate APCDs (Cheng et al., 2015; NBS, 2013b).</p>
      <p>As the largest coal consumer in China, coal consumption by power plants is
identified as the second largest contributor and accounts for about 14.0 %
in total national emissions of 12 HMs. In order to achieve the emission
reduction of PM, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for satisfying the national or local
emission reduction goals for the year 2010 (the end year of 11th FYP) (NBS,
2011; Tian et al., 2014a), control policies have been implemented, including
replacement of small coal-fired plant units with large and high-efficiency
units and the continuously increasing installation rate of advanced APCDs
systems (e.g., ESP, FFs, WFGD, SCR). Consequently, the final discharge
rates of HM from power plants have decreased obviously, even though the
volume of coal consumption has grown substantially (see Fig. 2 and Fig. S1).</p>
      <p>China has been the world's largest producer of pig iron and steel by a
rapidly growing margin. By the end of 2012, the output of steel has amounted
to 723.9 Mt, accounting for about 46 % of worldwide steel production
(CISA, 2013). Despite the enormous achievement by China's iron and steel
industry, China is still featured as a steel producer with low energy
efficiency and high pollutant emissions level, compared with other major
steel-producing countries (Guo and Fu, 2010). Because of limited application
of FGD and de-NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> devices and poor control of PM, the ferrous metal smelting sector ranks as the third largest contributor, responsible for
about 13.2 % of the total national emissions of 12 HMs. In terms of Zn
emissions, the share of this sector is dominant, accounting for about
32.2 % of the total.</p>
      <p>Regarding nonferrous metal smelting emissions, the primary smelting
processes resulting in HM emissions discharge far more pollution than those
emitted from the secondary smelting processes. Nonferrous metal smelting,
as the fourth largest contributor, accounting for about 11.0 % of total
emissions, represents the primary contributor to the discharges of Hg and
Cd. Therein, primary Cu smelting contributes the largest part of most of
these elements, including 89.5 % for As, 37.3 % for Pb, 74.8 % for Cd,
38.7 % for Ni and 76.6 % for Cu; primary Pb smelting is the major source
of Sb and Pb; primary Zn smelting accounts for the largest proportion of Hg
and Zn emissions among the nonferrous metal smelting category. In addition,
with respect to Hg emissions from the nonferrous metal smelting sector, the
mercury smelting industry is the other dominant subcategory source, with a
share of about 33.0 % of nonferrous metal smelting emission in 2010.</p>
      <p>It can be concluded that the emissions of HMs from brake wear are associated
with the vehicle population, vehicle mileage as well as the content of HMs
in brake linings and tyres. Currently, numerous studies have reported that
airborne HMs (e.g., Sb, Cu, Zn) in urban areas are associated with road
traffic and more definitely with emissions from brake wear (Gómez et
al., 2005; Hjortenkrans et al., 2007). As can be seen from Fig. 4h and k, the brake
and tyre wear sector is the largest source of national Sb and Cu emissions – 39.9 and 26.3 %, respectively. Brake wear is the dominant
sub-contributor, accounting for over 99.9 and 99.6 % for Sb and Cu
emissions from this sector in 2010, respectively. This is mainly due to the
high content of Sb and Cu in the brake linings (see Table S13, Hjortenkrans
et al., 2007) and the explosive expansion of the vehicle population in China
(see Fig. S5). Nevertheless, the adverse effects of airborne PM originating
from brake wear on human health and the ecosystem have still not received
sufficient attention from the policymakers as well as the public.</p>
      <p>Although the non-metallic mineral manufacturing sector is not the dominant
source of most HMs, the discharge of Se from this sector makes it the
largest contributor to the total. Within this category, the glass production
sector discharges about 92.9 % of the total Se emissions due to the
widespread application of selenium powder as a decolorizing agent in the glass
production process and the huge output of glass production (Kavlak and
Graedel, 2013).</p>
      <p>As can be seen from Fig. 4a–l, the source contributions on the provincial
scale in 2010 vary substantially due to the difference of industrial
conformations and energy structures (Cheng et al., 2015; NBS, 2013a, b).
Among the provinces with high HM emissions, Shandong ranks as the largest
province with As, Se, Cd, Ni, Mn, and Cu emissions; accounting for about
8.1–10.6 % of the national emissions; Hebei contributes the largest part
of about 9.3 and 11.3 % to national Pb and Zn emissions respectively;
Guizhou represents the primary province with Hg and Sb emissions; the key
provinces with Cr and Co emissions are found in Yunnan and Shanxi,
respectively. These can be mainly attributed to the follow reasons (NBS,
2013a, b; Wu et al., 2008): (1) the enormous coal consumption of industrial
boilers, the considerable electric power generation, a substantial increase
of vehicle population, and the huge output of industrial products in
Shandong, (2) the flourishing pig iron and steel production in Hebei, (3) the dominant outputs of mercury and obviously high average concentration of
Sb in feed coals in Guizhou (about 6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
approximately 4 times higher than the national averaged concentration of
Sb in coal as consumed in China, see Table S8), (4) the booming coke-making
industry in Shanxi, and (5) the relatively high concentration of Cr in feed
coals in Yunnan (about 71.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is 2 times higher
than the national averaged concentration of Cr in coal as consumed in China,
see Table S8).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Spatial variation characteristics of HM emissions</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Gridded HM emissions from anthropogenic sources for the year
2010 (0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution; units, kilograms
per year per grid cell).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10127/2015/acp-15-10127-2015-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The spatial distribution patterns of HM emissions from anthropogenic sources
are illustrated in Fig. 5. In this study, 1796 power plants with capacity
larger than 6000 kW, 566 copper/lead/zinc smelting plants, 33 large iron and
steel plants, and 101 MSW incineration plants are identified as large point
sources and their emissions are precisely allocated at their
latitude/longitude coordinates (the geographical distribution of 2496 point
sources in China is shown in the Supplement, Fig. S7). It should be noted here,
the emissions from point sources of nonferrous metal smelting industry and
ferrous metal smelting industry contain two parts: emissions originating
from fuel combustion and emissions emitted from industrial production
processes. Except for the emissions from point sources discussed above, the
remaining anthropogenic sources in the provincial level are all treated as
regional area sources. The specific method of geographical location for area
sources has been discussed in our previous studies (Tian et al., 2012b, c).</p>
      <p>The spatial variation is closely related with the unbalanced economic
development and population density in the Chinese mainland, so that these
12 typical HM emissions are distributed very unevenly from one area to
another, with the annual As emissions at the province level ranging from
0.009 kg km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Qinghai to 1.6 kg km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Shandong, for instance.
One notable characteristic of the spatial distribution of China's HM
emissions is that the HM emission intensities are much higher in central
and eastern China than those in western China, and the coastal regions
are classed as the most polluted areas of varied HMs. The emissions of HMs
from Hebei, Shandong, Henan, Jiangsu, Shanxi, and Liaoning provinces almost
account for about 39.4 % of the total emissions of these HMs. These
six provinces above are characterized by extensive economy growth mode, a large
volume of coal consumption and various industrial products output, as well
as a high population density. Therefore, more energy consumption and higher
travel demand characterize these six provinces, compared to other provinces
and districts, resulting in higher HM emission intensity.</p>
      <p>Moreover, several provinces in the southwestern and central-southern regions
also play a prominent role for these 12 HM emissions, especially for
Guizhou, Sichuan, Yunnan, Hubei, and Hunan provinces. In general, Guizhou
province starts out with high emissions of HMs from coal consumption by
other sectors, mainly owing to both the high HM contents in the feed coals
and the large magnitude of coal consumption by this sector. In addition, the
nonferrous industries of Hunan and Yunnan provinces are flourishing,
especially the copper and zinc smelting industries. Consequently, the
nonferrous metal smelting sector is seen as one of the major sources of Cu and
Zn emissions in these two provinces.</p>
      <p>The situations of atmospheric HM concentrations in the aerosols of 44 major
cities in China during the last 10 years have been reviewed comprehensively
by Duan and Tan (2013). Their results indicate that the ambient
concentrations of HMs (As, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Mn, Cu, and Zn) are high in some
cities, including Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Shenyang, Harbin, Jinan,
Zhengzhou, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Hefei, Xian, Yinchuan, Urumqi, Wuhan,
Changsha, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Shaoguan, and others. For
HM emissions on the urban scale in 2010, these 20 cities with high HMs
concentrations also represent the cities with the highest HM emissions in China
(see Fig. 5). In general, the spatial distribution characteristics of
gridded HM emissions from primary anthropogenic sources for the year 2010 in
this study are reasonable and representative of the real situation of this
HM pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Uncertainty analysis</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Uncertainties in the total emissions of HMs in China in 2010
(uncertainties in the emissions of HMs by source categories in China in 2010
can be seen in the Supplement, Table S22).
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/10127/2015/acp-15-10127-2015-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Emissions of varied HMs from primary anthropogenic sources with
uncertainties in 2010 are summarized in Fig. 6 and Supplement Table S22. As
can be seen, the overall uncertainties of the total emissions in our
inventories quantified by the Monte Carlo simulation are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39.1 to 50.8 %. Among
all the coal combustion sectors, uncertainties for thermal power plants
emissions are smallest, whereas those for coal-fired residential sectors and
other coal-fired sectors are considerable. These are mainly attributed to
the relatively poor resolution of coal burning technologies and emission
control devices in these two subcategories. In contrast, relatively higher
uncertainties are observed in the non-coal combustion categories, particular
for non-metallic mineral manufacturing and brake and tyre wear emissions.
These high uncertainties of HM emissions can be mainly attributed to
imprecise statistics information, poor source understanding, as well as the
absence of adequate field test data in China.</p>
      <p>The earlier statistical data for activity levels are considered to have high
uncertainty for developing countries (including China) with less developed
statistical systems. Unfortunately, we have to acknowledge that it is quite
difficult to accurately assess the specific uncertainty of activity data
from China's earlier official statistics. Akimoto et al. (2006) argue that
the data of energy consumption of China during 1996–2003 is not recommended
for use in the study of emission inventories due to the probable
underestimates. However, the discrepancies in coal consumption from the
power sector are considered to be less than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 %, which do not
dominate the emission uncertainties (Wu et al., 2010; Zhao, et al., 2008).
In order to approximately quantify the uncertainty of activity data, we
divide the whole period of 1949 to 2012 into three stages with respect to
economic development and emission control: before reform and opening
(1949–1978), intermediate stage (1979–2005), and the substantial control
stage of atmospheric pollutants (2006–2012). For the activity level of
anthropogenic sources obtained from official statistics after 2006, we assume
normal distributions with sector-dependent uncertainties (see Supplement
Table S20). On the basis of the discussion and considerations above, the
uncertainty of activity data from official statistics during the two early
periods of 1949–1978 and 1979–2005, is assumed to be about 2 and 1.5
times that in the period of 2006–2012.</p>
      <p>The combined uncertainty bounds for the national emissions of 12 HMs
during the historical period are shown in Fig. S8. In general, the range of
uncertainty has gradually diminished over time. For example, we calculate an
uncertainty level of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90.1 to 125.7 % (95 % confidence interval) in the
estimate of national Hg emissions in 1949, which is higher than that of the
other 11 HM emissions (between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90.0 and 119.3 %). This is mainly
attributed to remarkable emissions from several Hg sources that have the
largest uncertainty in both activity levels and emission factors, such as
gold smelting and mercury mining. Since then, the relative uncertainties
have gradually decreased from the beginning to the end of the period. This
is primarily because more reliable activity data with a smaller coefficient
of variation (CV) from related yearbooks and reports became available. The
uncertainty range of national Hg emissions is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40.6 to 55.8 %
by 2003, which compares well with estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44 % for China's Hg
emissions by Wu et al. (2006). By the end of 2012, the overall uncertainty
level was reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39.0 to 47.0 % for the national HM emissions.
Particularly, it should be acknowledged that emission trends of HMs are
probably more uncertain than indicated. This is mainly because dynamic
emission factor curves of certain sectors are set between two very distant
points (e.g., 1890 and 1990 in Fig. 1), which means that the timing and rate
of the decreased emission factors are really unconstrained. Nevertheless, no
data are available to improve the confidence presently, which merits further
investigation in the future.</p>
      <p>Generally speaking, emission inventories are never complete and perfect, and
most emissions estimates possess a significant associated uncertainty, mainly
owing to the lack of representativeness of specific emission factors and the
reliability of the source-specific activity data. In this study, we have
made great efforts to evaluate the historical trend of these HM emissions by
collecting detailed activity levels for various source categories, adopting
the best available dynamic emission factors for various anthropogenic
sources in China today, and integrating publication literature and reports
from developed countries and districts. Nevertheless, considerable
uncertainties are still present, and this may lead to under- or overestimation of
HM emissions from some source categories. Consequently, more
detailed investigations and long-term field tests for all kinds of coal-fired
facilities and industrial production processes are in great demand.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Proposals for future control policies</title>
      <p>Presently, control of atmospheric HM emissions still has not received
sufficient attention by the government and public in spite of the frequent
occurrence of HM pollution in China (especially for provinces with high
point sources of HM emissions). The implementation of more rigorous emission
standards on primary anthropogenic sources (thermal power plant, coal-fired
boiler, nonferrous metallurgy, pig iron and steel production etc.) and
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) are regarded as important
triggers to promote enterprises with diminished HM emissions. Therefore, the
MEP should speed up the revision of the system of hazardous air pollutant
(including HM) emission standards, and strengthen the amendment of NAAQS.
Especially brake wear has been confirmed to be the main source of HM
emissions from traffic, particularly in urban areas. However, there is no
related emission standard of air pollutants for brake wear. In the near
future, the promulgation of emission standards of brake wear should be
expected, which will further strengthen the control of atmospheric HM
emissions in China.</p>
      <p>In addition, some specific actions are suggested as follows: (1) lower or
stop mining and burning coal with high HM concentrations in certain
provinces where the coals are mainly mined from small coal mines such as
Zhejiang and Guangxi (or lower or stop using high-sulfur coal in
corresponding provinces due to the high affinity between HMs and pyrite in
coal) (Yuan et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2015); (2) promote coal washing before
combustion (the removal efficiencies of coal preparation to lower heavy
metals can reach as high as approximately 30.0–60.0 %, see Supplement
Table S9); (3) increase the application rate of advanced APCDs
configurations in newly built or retrofitted coal-fired boilers; (4) initiate pilot tests or demonstration projects for specified mercury control
(SMC) technologies in some sectors with high Hg emissions and develop
comprehensive HM control technologies capable of simultaneously removing
multiple heavy metals; (5) strengthen energy conservation and boost
electricity and/or heat generation using cleaned energy and renewable
energy, such as nuclear, wind and solar energy; (6) suspend small-scale
coal-fired boilers and industrial production plants with backward emission
control technologies (e.g., cement plants, ferrous smelting plants,
nonferrous smelting plants); (7) eliminate outdated production
technology, such as VR pyrometallurgy and ISP pyrometallurgy; and (8) improve
cyclic utilization rate of nonferrous metals and ferrous metals during the
period of 12th FYP etc.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We have calculated the historical emissions of 12 typical HMs from primary
man-made activities during the period of 1949–2012, based on the detailed
statistical data at a provincial level from various statistical yearbooks and
adopting comprehensive time-varying dynamic emission factors from relevant
research and literature. Undoubtedly, taking consideration of the economic
transition and emission control technology improvement, the dynamic emission
factors used in this study will enhance the accuracy and reliability of the
estimation of HM emissions.</p>
      <p>The total national atmospheric emissions of Hg, As, Se, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Sb,
Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn from anthropogenic sources increased by about
22–128 times during the period of 1949–2012, reaching about
526.9–22 319.6 t in 2012.</p>
      <p>In spite of the increasing coal consumption and gross industrial production,
the national emissions of certain HMs (e.g., As, Se, Ni, Mn, Co) have
been well restrained with the implementation of energy-saving and pollution
reduction policies during 2006 to 2012. Especially, the declining share of
HM emissions from industrial process sources (e.g., nonferrous metal smelting, ferrous metal smelting, non-metallic mineral manufacturing)
caused by increasing installation of advanced pollutants control devices,
has been partially counteracted by the added industrial production yields.
Additionally, both high contents of antimony and copper in brake lining and
the rapid growth of civilian vehicle population are thought to be the
primary reasons for continuous significant growth rate of Sb and Cu
emissions from brake and tyre wear during 2000 to 2012.</p>
      <p>The spatial distribution characteristics of HM emissions are closely related
with the unbalanced regional economic development and population density in
China. One notable characteristic is that HM emission intensities are
much higher in central and eastern China than those in western China,
and coastal regions are classed as the most polluted areas of HMs.
Notably, because of the flourishing of the nonferrous metal smelting industry,
the southwestern and central-southern provinces also play a prominent role
in HM emissions.</p>
      <p>The overall uncertainties in our bottom-up inventories are thought to be
reasonable and acceptable with the adequate data availability. Nevertheless,
to achieve more reliable estimations of HM emissions in China, much more
detailed investigations and long-term field tests for all kinds of coal-fired
facilities and industrial processes are still greatly needed in the future.
</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10127-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-15-10127-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(21177012, 21377012 and 40975061), the Special Program on Public Welfare of
the Ministry of Environmental Protection (201409022), Open fund of State
Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air
Pollution Complex (SCAPC201305), and the special fund of State Key Joint
Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control
(13L02ESPC). We thank   Tami Bond and  Freed Chuck for their help in improving the English writing in this paper.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: T. Bond</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Akimoto, H., Ohara, T., Kurokawa, J, and Horii, N.: Verification of energy
consumption in China during 1996–2003 by using satellite observational
data, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7664–7667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.052</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Annema, J. A.: SPIN document “Productie van secundair staal”, RIVM
rapportnr, the Netherlands, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Biggins, P. D.  and Harrison, R. M.: Atmospheric chemistry of automotive
lead, Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, 558–565, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es60153a017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es60153a017</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Bhardwaj, E., Dong, R., Jogani, R., Jung, S., Roden, C.,
Streets, D. G., and Trautmann, N. M.: Historical emissions of black and
organic carbon aerosol from energy related combustion, 1850–2000, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 21, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002840</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bukowiecki, N., Lienemann, P., Hill, M., Figi, R., Richard, A., Furger, M.,
Rickers, K., Falkenberg, G., Zhao, Y., and Cliff, S. S.: Real-world emission
factors for antimony and other brake wear related trace elements:
size-segregated values for light and heavy duty vehicles, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 8072–8078, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9006096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es9006096</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chang, M. B., Huang, C. K., Wu, H. T., Lin, J. J., and Chang, S. H.:
Characteristics of heavy metals on particles with different sizes from
municipal solid waste incineration, J. Hazard. Mater., 79, 229–239,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00277-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00277-6</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, H. F.  and Hu, Y. A.: Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable
source of energy: Current and future practices in China, Bioresour.
Technol., 101, 3816–3824, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.040</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, K., Wang, Y., Tian, H. Z., Gao, X., Zhang, Y. X., Wu, X. C., Zhu, C.
Y., and Gao, J. J.: Atmospheric emission characteristics and control policies of
five precedent-controlled toxic heavy metals from anthropogenic sources in
China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 1206–1214, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es5037332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5037332</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Wang, S., Fu, X., Watson, J. G., Jiang, J., Fu, Q., Chen, C., Xu,
B., Yu, J., Chow, J. C., and Hao, J.: Impact of biomass burning on haze
pollution in the Yangtze River delta, China: a case study in summer 2011,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4573–4585, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>China Iron and Steel Association (CISA), P. R. China: China Steel Yearbook,
China Steel Industry Press, Beijing, 2013 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>China Machinery Industry Federation (CMIF), P. R. China: China Machinery
Industry Yearbook, China Machine Press, Beijing, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Department of Environment of Australia (DEA): Emissions estimation technique
manual for aggregated emissions from domestic solid fuel burning, National
Pollutant Inventroy (NPI), 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Duan, J. C.  and Tan, J. H.: Atmospheric heavy metals and arsenic in China:
situation, sources and control policies, Atmos. Environ., 74, 93–101,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.031</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>European Commission (EC): Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control
(IPPC), Best available techniques reference document on the production of
iron and steel, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>European Environment Agency (EEA): EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory
guidebook 2009, available at:
<uri>http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-emission-inventory-guidebook-2009</uri>
(last access: 24 December 2013), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>European Environment Agency (EEA): EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory
guidebook 2013, available at:
<uri>http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2013</uri> (last
access: 12 November 2013), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fang, F. M., Wang, Q. C., Ma, Z. W., Liu, R. H., and Cao, Y. H.: Estimation
of atmospheric input of mercury to South Lake and Jingyue Pool, Chinese
Geog. Sci., 12, 86–89, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11769-002-0076-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11769-002-0076-y</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Feng, X.: Mercury pollution in China – an overview, Springer Publishers,
657–678, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24494-8_27" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/0-387-24494-8_27</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gao, J. J., Tian, H. Z., Cheng, K., Lu, L., Wang, Y. X., Wu, Y., Zhu, C. Y.,
Liu, K. Y., Zhou, J. J., Liu, X. G., Chen, J., and Hao, J. M.: Seasonal and
spatial variation of trace elements in multi-size airborne particulate
matters of Beijing, China: Mass concentration, enrichment characteristics,
source apportionment, chemical speciation and bioavailability, Atmos.
Environ., 99, 257–265, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.081</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Grübler, A., Nakićenović, N., and Victor, D. G.: Dynamics of
energy technologies and global change, Energy Policy, 27, 247–280,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00067-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00067-6</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hao, J. M., Tian, H. Z., and Lu, Y. Q.: Emission inventories of NOx from
commercial energy consumption in China, 1995–1998, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
36, 552–560, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es015601k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es015601k</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hassel, D., Jost, P., and Dursbeck, F.: Das Abgas-Emissionsverhalten von
Personenkraftwagen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Bezugsjahr, 1985,
UBA-Berichte, 7, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hjortenkrans, D. S., Bergbäck, B. G., and Häggerud, A. V.: Metal
emissions from brake linings and tires: case studies of Stockholm, Sweden
1995/1998 and 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5224–5230,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es070198o" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070198o</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hulskotte, J. H. J., Schaap, M., and Visschedijk, A. J. H.: Brake wear from
vehicles as an important source of diffuse copper pollution, 10th
International specialized conference on diffuse pollution and sustainable
basin management, 18–22, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Industrial emissions Reporting Information System (IRIS), European
Commission, available at:
<uri>http://iris.eionet.europa.eu/ippc/reporting-period-2003-2005/elv-reports/key-results/</uri>
(last access: 18 September 2014), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Agents classified by the
iarc monographs, volumes 1–111, available at:
<uri>http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/index.php</uri> (last access: 23
October 2014), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Jockel, W. and Hartje, J.: Datenerhebung Ÿber die emissionen
umweltgefŠhrdender schwermetalle, forschungsbericht 91-104 02 588, T V
Rheinland e.V. Köln, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Johansson, C., Norman, M., and Burman, L.: Road traffic emission factors for
heavy metals, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4681–4688,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.024</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kavlak, G.  and Graedel, T. E.: Global anthropogenic selenium cycles for
1949–2010, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 73, 17–22,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kung, J. K. S. and Lin, J. Y.: The Causes of China's Great Leap Famine,
1959–1961, Econ. Dev. Cultural Change, 52, 51–73, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/380584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/380584</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Li, J. F., Song, Y., Mao, Y., Mao, Z. C., Wu, Y. S., Li, M. M., Huang, X.,
He, Q. C., and Hu, M.: Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of
PM2.5 during the harvest season in eastern China's agricultural regions,
Atmos. Environ., 92, 442–448, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.058</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lu, B., Kong, S. F., Han, B., Wang, X. Y., and Bai, Z. P.: Inventory of
atmospheric pollutants discharged from biomass burning in China continent in
2007, Chin. Environ. Sci., 31, 186–194, 2011 (In Chinese with English
abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China
(MEP), P. R. China: Emission standard of air pollutants for iron smelt
industry, Beijing, 2012 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China
(MEP), P. R. China: The list of desulfurization facilities equipped by
coal-fired boiler in China, available at:
<uri>http://www.mep.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201407/W020140711581927228220.pdf</uri>
(last access: 8 July 2014), 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China
(MEP), P. R. China: The list of denitration facilities equipped by coal-fired
boiler in China, available at:
<uri>http://www.mep.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201407/W020140711581927393439.pdf</uri>
(last access: 8 July 2014), 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Mukherjee, A. B.: Nickel: a review of occurrence, uses, emissions, and
concentration in the environment in Finland, Environ. Rev., 6, 173–187,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/a99-001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/a99-001</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), P. R. China: Report on “12th Five-Year
Plan” of the electric power industry. National Bureau of Statistics of
China, Beijing, China, 2011 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), P. R. China: China Energy Statistical
Yearbook, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), P. R. China: China Statistical
Yearbook, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Nie, Y. F.: Development and prospects of municipal solid waste (MSW)
incineration in China, Front. Environ. Sci. Engin. China, 2, 1–7,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0028-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11783-008-0028-6</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Nriagu, J. O.: Global inventory of natural and anthropogenic emissions of
trace metals to the atmosphere, Nature, 279, 409–411,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/279409a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/279409a0</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Nriagu, J. O.  and Pacyna, J. M.: Quantitative assessment of worldwide
contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals, Nature, 333,
134–139, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/333134a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/333134a0</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Österle, W., Prietzel, C., Kloß, H., and Dmitriev, A. I.: On the
role of copper in brake friction materials, Tribol. Int., 43, 2317–2326,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.triboint.2010.08.005</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Pacyna, E. G., Pacyna, J. M., Steenhuisen, F., and Wilson, S.: Global
anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000, Atmos. Environ., 40,
4048–4063, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041</ext-link>,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Pacyna, J. M.: Estimation of the atmospheric emissoins of trace elements
from anthropogenic sources in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 18, 41–50,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(84)90227-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(84)90227-0</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pacyna, J. M.  and Pacyna, E. G.: An assessment of global and regional
emissions of trace metals to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources
worldwide, Environ. Rev., 9, 269–298, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/a01-012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/a01-012</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R.,
Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and
Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and
natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Qin, J. F.: Estimation of lead emission to atmospheric from gasoline
combustion, Guangdong Trace Ele. Sci., 17, 27–34, 2010 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Reddy, M. S., Basha, S., Joshi, H. V., and Jha, B.: Evaluation of the
emission characteristics of trace metals from coal and fuel oil fired power
plants and their fate during combustion, J. Hazard. Mater., 123, 242–249,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.008</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Ren, D. Y., Zhao, F. H., Dai, S., and Zhang, J.: Geochemistry of trace
elements in coal, Science Press, Beijing, 2006 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Robbins, N., Zhang, Z. F., Sun, J., Ketterer, M. E., Lalumandier, J. A., and
Shulze, R. A.: Childhood lead exposure and uptake in teeth in the Cleveland
area during the era of leaded gasoline, Sci. Total Environ., 408,
4118–4127, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.060</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Song, D. Y., Qin, Y., and Wang, W. F.: Burning and migration behavior of
trace elements of coal used in power plant, J. China Univ. Min. Technol.,
32, 316–320, 2003 (in Chinese with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Bond, T. C., Lee, T., and Jang, C.: On the future of
carbonaceous aerosol emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 109, 1–19,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004902</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Bond, T. C., Carmichael, G. R., Fernandes, S. D., and Fu,
Q.: An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year
2000, J. Geophys. Res. Policy, 108, 8809, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003093</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Hao, J. M., Wu, Y., Jiang, J. K., Chan, M., Tian, H. Z., and
Feng, X. B.: Anthropogenic mercury emissions in China, Atmos. Environ., 39,
7789–7806, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.029</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Devane, M. K., Lu, Z., Bond, T. C., Sunderland, E. M., and
Jacob, D. J.: All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human
activities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 10485–10491,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es202765m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202765m</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Tang, X. Y., Zhao, J. Y., and Huang, W. H.: Nine metal elements in coal of
China, Coal Geol. China, 14, 43–54, 2002 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Theloke, J., Kummer, U., Nitter, S., Geftler, T., and Friedrich, R.:
Überarbeitung der Schwermetallkapitel im CORINAIR Guidebook zur
Verbesserung der Emissionsinventare und der Berichterstattung im Rahmen der
Genfer Luftreinhaltekonvention. Report for Umweltbundesamt, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Hao, J. M., Hu, M. Y., and Nie, Y. F.: Recent trends of energy
consumption and air pollution in China, J. Energy Eng., 133, 4–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2007)133:1(4)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2007)133:1(4)</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Wang, Y., Xue, Z. G., Cheng, K., Qu, Y. P., Chai, F. H., and
Hao, J. M.: Trend and characteristics of atmospheric emissions of Hg, As, and
Se from coal combustion in China, 1980–2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11905–11919, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11905-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11905-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Cheng, K., Wang, Y., Zhao, D., Chai, F. H., Xue, Z. G., and
Hao, J. M.: Quantitative assessment of variability and uncertainty of
hazardous trace element (Cd, Cr, and Pb) contents in Chinese coals by using
bootstrap simulation, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 61, 755–763,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.7.755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3155/1047-3289.61.7.755</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Zhao, D., and Wang, Y.: Emission inventories of atmospheric
pollutants discharged from biom ass burning in China, Acta Sci.
Circumstantiae, 31, 349–357, 2011b (in Chinese with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Cheng, K., Wang, Y., Zhao, D., Lu, L., Jia, W. X., and Hao, J.
M.: Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of atmospheric emissions
of Cd, Cr, and Pb from coal in China, Atmos. Environ., 50, 157–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.045</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Lu, L., Cheng, K., Hao, J. M., Zhao, D., Wang, Y., Jia, W. X.,
and Qiu, P. P.: Anthropogenic atmospheric nickel emissions and its
distribution characteristics in China, Sci. Total Environ., 417, 148–157,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.069</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Zhao, D., Cheng, K., Lu, L., He, M. C., and Hao, J. M.:
Anthropogenic atmospheric emissions of antimony and its spatial distribution
characteristics in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 3973–3980,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es2041465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es2041465</ext-link>, 2012c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Gao, J. J., Lu, L., Zhao, D., Cheng, K., and Qiu, P. P.:
Temporal trends and spatial variation characteristics of hazardous air
pollutant emission inventory from municipal solid waste incineration in
China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 10364–10371, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es302343s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302343s</ext-link>,
2012d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H., Lu, L., Hao, J. M., Gao, J. J., Cheng, K., Liu, K. Y., Qiu, P. P.,
and Zhu, C. Y.: A review of key hazardous trace elements in Chinese coals:
Abundance, occurrence, behavior during coal combustion and their
environmental impacts, Energy Fuels, 27, 601–614, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef3017305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ef3017305</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H., Liu, K. Y., Zhou, J. J., Lu, L., Hao, J. M., Qiu, P. P., Gao, J.
J., Zhu, C. Y., Wang, K., and Hua, S. B.: Atmospheric emission inventory of
hazardous trace elements from China's coal-fired power plants–Temporal
trends and spatial variation characteristics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
3575–3582, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es404730j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es404730j</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Zhou, J. R., Zhu, C. Y., Zhao, D., Gao, J. J., Hao, J. M., He,
M. C., Liu, K. Y., Wang, K., and Hua, S. B.: A Comprehensive global
inventory of atmospheric antimony emissions from anthropogenic activities,
1995–2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10235–10241,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es405817u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es405817u</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>United Kingdom (UK): emission factor databases of NAEI, 1970–1995,
availiable at: <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/data/ef-all-resultsfiq=14774</uri>,
(last access: 10 August 2014), 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>United Kingdom (UK): emission factor databases of NAEI, available at:
<uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/data/ef-all-resultsfiq=15354</uri> (last access: 11
September 2014), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): AP 42, fifth edition, volume I,
chapter 1, section 1.1: bituminous and subbituminous coal combustion,
availabe at: <uri>http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/index.html</uri> (last
access: 12 October 2014), 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): AP 42, fifth edition, volume I,
chapter 2, section 2.1: refuese combustion, availiable at:
<uri>http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html</uri> (last access: 23 July
2014), 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Web Factor Information
Retrieval System (WebFIRE), availabe at:
<uri>http://cfpub.epa.gov/webfire/index.cfmfiaction=fire.FactorsBasedOnDetailedSearch</uri>
(last access: 21 September 2014), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Van der Most, P. F. J. and Veldt, C.: Emission factors Manual PARCOM-ATMOS,
TNO-MEP, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>von Uexküll, O., Skerfving, S., Doyle, R., and Braungart, M.: Antimony
in brake pads-a carcinogenic componentfi, J. Cleaner Prod., 13, 19–31,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.008</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Q. R., Wang, S. X., Zhang, L., Song, J. X., Yang, H., and Meng, Y.:
Update of mercury emissions from China's primary zinc, lead and copper
smelters, 2000–2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11153–11163,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11153-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11153-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Wang, S. X., Streets, D. G., Hao, J. M., Chan, M., and Jiang, J. K.:
Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5312–5318, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es060406x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es060406x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y. Y., Qin, Y., Yi, T. S., and Xia, X. H.: Enrichment and geochemical
origin of some trace elements in high-sulfur coal from Kaili, eastern Guizhou
Province, Geochimica, 37, 615–622, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Streets, D. G., Wang, S. X., and Hao, J. M.: Uncertainties in
estimating mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 2937–2946, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2937-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2937-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Xu, H. M., Cao, J. J., Ho, K. F., Ding, H., Han, Y. M., Wang, G. H., Chow,
J. C., Watson, J. G., Khol, S. D., Qiang, J., and Li, W. T.: Lead
concentrations in fine particulate matter after the phasing out of leaded
gasoline in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 46, 217–224,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.078</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Xu, M. H., Yan, R., Zheng, C. G., Qiao, Y., Han, J., and Sheng, C. D.: Status of
trace element emission in a coal combustion process: a review, Fuel Process.
Technol., 85, 215–223, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00174-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00174-7</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, X. L., Mi, M., Mu, R. M., and Zuo, J.: Strategic route map of sulphur
dioxide reduction in China, Energy Policy, 60, 844–851,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.072</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. L. and Wang, G. S.: Energy saving technologies and productive
efficiency in the Chinese iron and steel sector, Energy, 33, 525–537,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.11.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.energy.2007.11.002</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Nielsen, C. P., Lei, Y., McElroy, M. B., and Hao, J.: Quantifying
the uncertainties of a bottom-up emission inventory of anthropogenic
atmospheric pollutants in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2295–2308,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2295-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2295-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, C. Y., Tian, H. Z., Cheng, K., Liu, K. Y., Wang, K., Hua, S. B., Gao,
J. J., and Zhou, J. R.: Potentials of whole process control of heavy metals
emissions from coal-fired power plants in China, J. Cleaner Prod.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.008</ext-link>, in press, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
