<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-14-12479-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>Stratospheric lifetime ratio of CFC-11 and CFC-12 from
satellite and model climatologies</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Stratospheric lifetime ratio of CFC-11 and CFC-12}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Hoffmann et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          <email>l.hoffmann@fz-juelich.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-4377</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hoppe</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9740-8744</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-9977</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Dutton</surname><given-names>G. S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-9268</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Gille</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Griessbach</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-3573</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>C. I.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9271-6174</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Spang</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2483-5761</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Volk</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff8">
          <name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>K. A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3420-9454</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich,
Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut für Energie- und
Klimaforschung, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring
Division, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Center for
Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Center for Limb
Atmospheric Sounding, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto,
Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Fachbereich
Physik, Wuppertal, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Chemistry,
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">L. Hoffmann (l.hoffmann@fz-juelich.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>12479</fpage><lpage>12497</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014.html">This article is available from https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) play a key role in stratospheric ozone
loss and are strong infrared absorbers that contribute to global
warming.  The stratospheric lifetimes of CFCs are a measure of their
stratospheric loss rates that are needed to determine global warming
and ozone depletion potentials. We applied the tracer–tracer
correlation approach to zonal mean climatologies from satellite
measurements and model data to assess the lifetimes of CFCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(CFC-11) and CF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (CFC-12).  We present estimates of the
CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio and the absolute lifetime of CFC-12,
based on a reference lifetime of 52 years for CFC-11.  We analyzed
climatologies from three satellite missions, the Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment-Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), the
HIgh Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS), and the Michelson
Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS).  We found a
CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a CFC-12 lifetime
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>112</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(96–133) years for ACE-FTS, a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a
lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>113</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(97–134) years for HIRDLS, and a ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>114</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(98–136) years for MIPAS.  The
error-weighted, combined CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the CFC-12 lifetime estimate is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>113</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(103–124) years.  These results agree with the recent
Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC)
reassessment, which recommends lifetimes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>52</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(43–67) years and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>102</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(88–122) years, respectively.  Having smaller uncertainties than
the results from other recent studies, our estimates can help to
better constrain CFC-11 and CFC-12 lifetime recommendations in
future scientific studies and assessments.  Furthermore, the
satellite observations were used to validate first simulation
results from a new coupled model system, which integrates a
Lagrangian chemistry transport model into a climate model. For the
coupled model we found a CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a CFC-12 lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>110</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(95–129) years, based on a
10-year perpetual run.  Closely reproducing the satellite
observations, the new model system will likely become a useful tool
to assess the impact of advective transport, mixing, and
photochemistry as well as climatological variability on the
stratospheric lifetimes of long-lived tracers.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Monitoring the global distributions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) is
important for various reasons. The chlorine released by photolytic
decomposition of CFCs plays a key role in ozone depletion both in the
upper stratosphere and in the polar regions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.1"/>.  Furthermore, CFCs and most of their
replacements are strong infrared absorbers that contribute
significantly to the anthropogenic greenhouse effect
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.2"/>.  Tracer–tracer relations of long-lived
trace gases, such as CFCs, are frequently examined to study dynamical
processes in the stratosphere, in particular the mixing of air masses
near the subtropical and polar vortex transport barriers
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.3"/>.  The data are
also used to determine the age of air <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.4"/>.
Continuous, global measurements of CFCs are useful assets to validate
the representation of transport, mixing, and photochemistry in
atmospheric models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.5"/>. Here we focus on
CFCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (CFC-11) and CF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (CFC-12), which are the CFCs with
the largest atmospheric abundances.</p>
      <p>CFCs originate from anthropogenic emissions in the troposphere, where
they are well mixed and chemically stable. In the stratosphere they
are removed mainly by means of photolytic decomposition and reaction with
atomic oxygen.  Their trends are controlled by the balance of the
tropospheric sources and the stratospheric sinks. The lifetime <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(in years) is one particular measure of the global loss rate of a
long-lived trace gas. It is defined as the ratio
          <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        of the
atmospheric burden <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sink <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The burden <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the total mass of the gas (in Tg) integrated
over the atmospheric reservoir. The sink <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the
total loss of mass (in Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the CFCs we usually refer to the
lifetimes as “stratospheric lifetimes”, because the sinks are mostly located
in the stratosphere.
For CFC-11 it was recently recognized that there is a minor sink in the
tropical upper troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.6"/>, which is, however, neglected in our analysis.
The stratospheric lifetimes of CFCs are
crucial in determining their global warming potentials and ozone
depletion potentials; see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.7"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.8"/> for a more
detailed discussion.</p>
      <p>Based on various lifetime estimates derived from observations,
laboratory data, and a range of modeling approaches, the World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommended lifetimes of 45 years for
CFC-11 and 100 years for CFC-12 in the 1998 Scientific Assessment of
Ozone Depletion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.9"/>.  These recommendations were retained
unaltered during the following three assessments.  However, later
studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.10"/> and the WMO assessment in 2010
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.11"/> indicated problems with the lifetime estimates of some
halogen-containing species. As a consequence, the lifetimes of many
long-lived compounds, including CFC-11 and CFC-12, have been recently
reassessed within a Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role
in Climate (SPARC) project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.12"/>.  The aims of the SPARC
project were to provide new estimates of the lifetimes and associated
errors of many long-lived trace gases, to assess the influence of
different lifetime definitions, and to assess the effect of a changing
climate on lifetimes.  The project results will be used to update the
lifetime recommendations of the next WMO assessment.  The lifetime
recommendations from the SPARC project are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>52</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(43–67) years for CFC-11
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>102</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(88–122) years for CFC-12. The errors given here for the SPARC
data indicate “most likely” ranges and denote <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainties.
In this study we aimed at providing new estimates of the ratio of the
stratospheric lifetimes of CFC-11 and CFC-12 based on satellite
observations and model output, which can be helpful input for future
reassessments.</p>
      <p>Various methods have been developed to determine the lifetimes of
long-lived species from measurements or model output. In this study we
apply the tracer–tracer correlation approach
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.13"/> to estimate the ratio of the
stratospheric lifetimes of CFC-11 and CFC-12. Following a common
convention, we use the lifetime ratio to also estimate the absolute
lifetime of CFC-12, based on a given reference lifetime for CFC-11.
We here make use of the new SPARC recommendation of 52 years for CFC-11.
Note that all CFC-12 lifetime estimates presented in this paper will
change if the reference lifetime for CFC-11 changes.  We directly
apply the tracer–tracer analysis to multi-annual zonal mean
climatologies of CFC-11 and CFC-12 that are derived from satellite
measurements or atmospheric model output.  This is a simple and
efficient approach, as it separates the task of lifetime estimation
from the task of preparing a climatology, which typically requires the
processing of large satellite or model data sets.  An important
difference compared to previous studies using satellite data is that
we used in situ surface measurements rather than satellite data to
estimate the global burdens of CFC-11 and CFC-12. This yields more
accurate results because the in situ measurements are much less
affected by systematic errors or data gaps, which are typical for limb
and occultation satellite measurements in the troposphere.  The high
degree of consistency of the results for the different and, except for
use of the same lists of spectral lines, independent data sets
analyzed here provides confidence in the validity of our approach.</p>
      <p>In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> we introduce the tracer–tracer correlation
method used to estimate the CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio from zonal
mean climatologies. We also describe the different satellite
observations and the model data set.  In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> we
present estimates of the CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio and the CFC-12
lifetime for the different data sets.  Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>
shows a comparison with lifetime estimates from other studies and
provides a discussion of the results.  Appendix A illustrates the
influence of systematic measurement errors on lifetime analyses, based
on tests with idealized CFC profiles.  Appendix B describes the
electronic supplement of this paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods and data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Lifetime estimates from tracer--tracer correlations \hack{\\}}?><title>Lifetime estimates from tracer–tracer correlations <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?></title>
      <p>The tracer–tracer approach to estimate stratospheric lifetimes of
long-lived species is based on the theoretical work of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.14"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.15"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.16"/>.  In these
studies it is shown that any two species whose local lifetimes are
longer than quasi-horizontal transport timescales are in
climatological slope equilibrium. This means that they share surfaces
of constant volume mixing ratios so that a scatter plot of their
volume mixing ratios shows a compact curve.  If this surface is chosen
to lie below all sinks, the slope of the correlation curve can be
related to the ratio of the tracer lifetimes,
            <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the lifetimes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
the global burdens, and d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the correlation slope
under steady-state conditions.  For stratospheric tracers such as CFCs,
Eq. (2) holds at the tropopause.</p>
      <p>Before we discuss the estimation of the stratospheric lifetimes of
CFCs in more detail, we first summarize the arguments leading to the
conclusion that data from the lower stratosphere at midlatitudes are
best suited for that purpose. In general, the correlations of
long-lived tracers are affected by the rates and locations of their
sources and sinks as well as the typical characteristics of advective
and diffusive fluid dynamical transport.  Compact correlations are
found if the chemical sources and sinks are weak and if mixing on
isentropic surfaces is much faster than diabatic advection through
those surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.17"/>.  While the sources of the CFCs are
located at the Earth's surface, the decomposition takes place mostly
at low and midlatitudes in the middle and upper stratosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.18"/>. The tropical stratosphere is
dominated by large-scale upwelling and is relatively isolated from
midlatitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.19"/>.  Thus tropical correlation curves
are influenced by local tropical sinks rather than reflecting only
global sinks and are therefore generally not suited to derive global
stratospheric lifetimes.  At high latitudes the polar vortex causes
stratospheric air to subside in isolation from midlatitudes and
correlation curves within the vortex develop separately from those at
midlatitudes over the course of the winter
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.20"/>. Finally, in the
free troposphere, complex advection and mixing processes can cause the
breakdown of the compact, stratospheric correlations. In particular,
fast vertical transport by convection violates the assumption that
diabatic advection is slow compared with isentropic mixing
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p>Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) strictly applies only for steady-state
conditions for which sources and sinks are balanced and for which the
burdens do not change over time. In reality, depending on the
age of air, the surface trends affect the stratospheric volume mixing
ratios in different regions at different times.  As a consequence, the
observed transient correlation slopes d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
transient volume mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, typically do not match with
steady-state slopes d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with steady-state volume
mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.22"/> introduced correction factors
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each tracer, which depend on the correlations between the
age of air and the tracer volume mixing ratio, to correct for the
transience effect. Thereby the equation for the lifetime ratio becomes
            <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E3"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is used here to estimate the lifetime
ratio of CFC-11 and CFC-12 and to estimate the lifetime of CFC-12,
based on a given lifetime for CFC-11.  In the following we will
discuss the three factors in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) that determine
the lifetime ratio in more detail.</p>
      <p>The first factor in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is the ratio of the
burdens <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This factor could, in principle, be determined
directly from satellite or model climatologies. However, infrared limb
or occultation satellite measurements in the troposphere are often
affected by systematic errors, including, e.g., uncertainties in
radiometric and spectral calibration or pointing knowledge.  Forward
model parameters errors such as uncertainties of spectroscopic data
are another important error source in the CFC retrievals.
Furthermore, the total number of observations in the troposphere is
often limited due to the interference of clouds.  As a consequence,
zonal mean climatologies from satellite instruments typically have
limited data quality in the troposphere. At their lowermost altitudes
the climatologies often do not converge to surface values, which are
very accurately known from in situ measurements.  Therefore we
estimated the ratio of burdens based on global mean volume mixing
ratios at the surface, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
            <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E4"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This approach is motivated by the fact that more than 90 % of the mass
of CFC-11 and CFC-12 is located in the troposphere. In the
troposphere CFCs are well mixed and their concentrations are
well known from in situ measurements.  Differences between the ratio
of the burdens and the ratio of the surface volume mixing ratios arise
from the different stratospheric distributions of the CFCs.  To take
into account the stratospheric distributions, we apply a scaling
factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to convert the ratio of surface values to
the ratio of total atmospheric burdens.  This value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
specifically applies to the ratio of CFC-11 and CFC-12. It was
estimated from data reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.23"><named-content content-type="post">Table 3</named-content></xref> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.24"><named-content content-type="post">Table A4</named-content></xref>.  We also confirmed it independently with
the model data set described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> by comparing
pressure- and cosine latitude-weighted averages of the zonal mean
cross sections with the surface data of the model.  Although the
surface volume mixing ratios and burdens show significant trends,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be rather stable in time. The small uncertainty
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reported here covers the differences between the various
references and data sources.  Model results in the troposphere are
likely not affected by systematic errors as much as satellite
measurements.  However, we decided to apply the same approach of
transferred surface data also to the model output for consistency.</p>
      <p>Annual global mean surface data of CFC-11 and CFC-12 were obtained
from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth
System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL) halocarbons program
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.25"/>.<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p>The NOAA/ESRL data are accessible
at <uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/hats/</uri>.</p></fn>  Annual means are
derived from weighted and smoothed averages of monthly mean data,
which again are combined, interpolated, and smoothed for each sampling
location of the NOAA/ESRL measurement network.  Hemispheric and global
means are estimated by means of cosine weighting by latitude. The accuracy of
the data is better than 2 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.26"/>. A time series of the data
is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.  The ratio of the CFC-11 and CFC-12
surface volume mixing ratios slightly decreased from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2002 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2009, which is the time period of interest
for this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Annual global means of CFC-11 and CFC-12 volume mixing
ratios at the surface calculated from monthly data of the
NOAA/ESRL halocarbons program.  Error bars indicate the mean
standard deviations of the monthly data.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The second factor in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is the transient
tracer–tracer slope d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To estimate this factor we
followed the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.27"/>, which we applied directly to
the multi-annual satellite and model zonal mean climatologies of
CFC-11 and CFC-12. These climatologies usually consist of sets of
volume mixing ratio profiles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-11 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for CFC-12 at common altitudes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pressure levels <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or model
levels <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) for different latitude
bands.  As the actual vertical coordinates are not important for the
tracer–tracer analysis, we simply present all data sets on
approximated altitudes below.  For the satellite climatologies we
converted pressure levels <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to log-pressure altitudes,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a fixed scale height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km and surface
pressure <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1013.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa.  For the model we used geopotential
heights.  We will show vertical profiles and tracer–tracer
correlations for all latitudes for reference below, but it should be
noted that the lifetime analyses are based only on midlatitude data
(typically from 30 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N/S).</p>
      <p>To estimate the tracer–tracer slope, we first sorted all correlation
data points <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into different analysis windows,
covering specific ranges of CFC-11 volume mixing ratios.  Our analysis
windows had a width of 100 ppt and a nominal center shifting from 50
to 250 ppt in steps of 5 ppt.  For each window we determined the
tracer–tracer slope by means of a linear fit to the data points. As
the data points are unevenly distributed within the windows, we also
calculated the mean CFC-11 volume mixing ratio, to which the
corresponding slope from the linear fit was assigned. By shifting the
analysis window from lower to higher CFC-11 volume mixing ratios, the
change in the slopes from the lower stratosphere towards the
tropopause can be assessed. The tracer–tracer slope at the tropopause,
which is located at the CFC-11 surface volume mixing ratio, was
obtained by extrapolating a linear fit through the individual slopes
of the different analysis windows.  This fit through the slopes was
restricted to mean CFC-11 volume mixing ratios larger than
100 ppt. Smaller CFC-11 volume mixing ratios are related to data
points in the middle and upper stratosphere that cannot be used to
estimate lifetimes. Our error analysis takes the statistical errors of
the linear fits into account. However, the leading error of the
correlation slopes is due to systematic errors of the CFC data that we
assumed to be 10 % for each species (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> for a
discussion of measurement errors).</p>
      <p>Our method to estimate the tracer–tracer slope differs in some aspects
from the approach developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.28"/>: (i) our analysis is
directly based on zonal mean climatologies, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.29"/>
binned data from individual soundings in the specific analysis
windows. The latter allows for more careful filtering of data points
that are below the tropopause or outside the midlatitudes. Our method
assumes that the degrading effects of these outliers can be neglected
because a large number of soundings is statistically combined. The
method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.30"/> was originally developed to analyze a limited
number of in situ measurements from aircraft campaigns, while our
study focuses on multiyear satellite records that comprise on the
order of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical soundings each.  (ii)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.31"/> used slightly smaller analysis windows, i.e., 70 ppt
rather than 100 ppt. We performed a sensitivity test with window
widths between 50 and 150 ppt and found the most stable and
consistent results for 100 ppt. Differences to 70 ppt were
minor. (iii) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.32"/> used a quadratic fit rather than a linear
fit to extrapolate the slope at the tropopause.  However, we found
that a linear fit helps to avoid problems with increasing systematic
errors of the slopes towards the tropopause (see Appendix A).  The
linear fit is more tightly constrained by measurements at upper
altitudes.  Visual inspection of the slopes for the different
analysis windows helps to judge that the linear fit provides an
acceptable representation.</p>
      <p>The third factor in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is the ratio of
correction factors <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tracer transience.  We determined
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on data of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.33"/>. Data for different years from
that study are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The results of
a linear fit applied to the data are also presented.  We use the fit
to determine <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for any given reference year. In the time period from
2002 to 2009 the combined transience corrections for CFC-11 and CFC-12
range from 0.92 to 1.05.  When estimating the error of the lifetime
ratio we assumed that the correction factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has an uncertainty of
5 %. This uncertainty is much larger than the statistical uncertainty
of the linear fit, but takes into account the systematic errors of the
input data. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.34"/> found that the seasonal variability of
the correction factors is less than 3 % each year.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Combined transience correction factors <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
CFC-12 vs. CFC-11, which we calculated from data of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.35"/>. The red line shows a linear fit to the data; see
plot labels for fit parameters and statistical errors.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Satellite observations of CFC-11 and CFC-12</title>
      <p>In this study we make use of CFC-11 and CFC-12 data from three
infrared limb and occultation satellite instruments: the Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment-Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.36"/>, the HIgh Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder
(HIRDLS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.37"/>, and the Michelson
Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.38"/>.  There are other data sets available for CFC-11 and
CFC-12 from different satellites or from the same instruments, but
analyzed with different retrieval schemes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.39"/>.
However, these data sets have not been analyzed here.  We focus on
data sets covering reasonably long time periods, i. e., at least a
year or longer, to capture a significant part of atmospheric
variability.  We also focus on data sets measured after CFC-11 and
CFC-12 reached their peak burdens in the years 1994 and 2002,
respectively.  After the peak burdens have been reached, the trends of
CFC-11 and CFC-12 are slower such that the correction for transience
is smaller and thus introduces less uncertainty in this type of
analysis.  The ACE-FTS and MIPAS data were already used in other
studies to estimate the stratospheric lifetimes of CFC-11 and CFC-12
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.40"/>. The HIRDLS data are used here for the
first time for that purpose.</p>
      <p>ACE-FTS is the main instrument on the Canadian satellite SCISAT-1.
The satellite was launched into a high-inclination, circular low-Earth
orbit (74<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inclination, 650 km altitude, 97.7 min period) in
August 2003.  ACE-FTS measures infrared spectra from 2.2 to
13.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in solar occultation mode.  We make use of a
quality-controlled, validated climatology of ACE-FTS data provided by
the ACE Science Operations Centre at the University of Waterloo,
Canada <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.41"/>.<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p>The ACE-FTS climatology is accessible
at <uri>http://www.ace.uwaterloo.ca/climatology.html</uri>.</p></fn>  The
climatology covers the 14 baseline species for ACE-FTS, including
CFC-11 and CFC-12.  It is based on retrieval products obtained with
processing software version 2.2, including updates for O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The retrievals cover an altitude range of 5 to 22 km for
CFC-11 and 6 to 28 km for CFC-12. The vertical resolution is
typically 3 to 4 km.  The validation of the CFC data sets is
described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.42"/>.  It was found that ACE-FTS CFC-11 and
CFC-12 data are systematically lower than balloon-borne
measurements. For CFC-11 the difference is 10 % above 12 km and 20 %
below 12 km. For CFC-12 the maximum bias is 10 % between 12 and
28 km.  The precision of individual profiles is not relevant here
because of the large number of profiles we analyzed.  The ACE-FTS
climatology of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.43"/> covers the time period from January
2004 to February 2009. During that time about 19 000 occultation
measurements were performed.  The original climatological data are
provided on a 3-monthly basis at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude spacing and on
28 pressure levels. We averaged the 3-monthly data, giving them
equal weight, to obtain a multiyear annual mean climatology.  The
ACE-FTS data of CFC-11 and CFC-12 are presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, along with the other data sets used in this
study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Zonal mean climatologies of CFC-11 (left) and CFC-12
(right) volume mixing ratios from the satellite experiments
ACE-FTS, HIRDLS, and MIPAS, as well as the EMAC/CLaMS model. See
plot titles for time periods covered by the different
climatologies. Note that altitudes are log-pressure altitudes for
the satellite climatologies and geopotential heights for the
EMAC/CLaMS model.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>HIRDLS is an infrared limb-sounding radiometer aboard the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's Aura satellite.  Aura was
launched into a near-polar, Sun-synchronous orbit (98.2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
inclination, 705 km altitude, 98.5 min period) in July 2004.  Being
in operation until March 2008, HIRDLS measured thermal emissions from
the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>atmospheric<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> limb at various spectral intervals in the range from 6
to 17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, chosen to correspond to specific trace gases such as
CFC-11 and CFC-12.  We analyzed retrieval products obtained with the
processing software version 7 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.44"/>.<fn id="Ch1.Footn3"><p>The HIRDLS
data are accessible at
<uri>http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Aura/data-holdings/HIRDLS</uri>.</p></fn>  The
retrievals cover an altitude range of 8 to 26 km for CFC-11 and 8 to
32 km for CFC-12.  The vertical resolution is about 1 km. A
comparison of HIRDLS and ACE-FTS for August and September 2006 showed
good agreement for both CFC-11 and CFC-12 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.45"/>.  The bias
between both instruments is mostly below 10 %.  To derive zonal mean
climatologies from HIRDLS, we first averaged the data on the given
pressure levels in 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bins on a monthly basis. We
filtered individual measurements that are affected by significant
contributions of a priori data or for which the limb view is blocked
by clouds. We also removed outliers that we identified based on volume
mixing ratios exceeding the global mean surface values in 2006 by more
than 10 %.  The actual thresholds used for filtering are 275 ppt for
CFC-11 and 595 ppt for CFC-12.  The monthly means from January 2005
to March 2008 were averaged, giving them equal weight, to obtain a
multiyear annual mean climatology of CFC-11 and CFC-12.  The
climatology is based on more than 6 million individual limb soundings.
The data are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.</p>
      <p>MIPAS is one of ten instruments aboard the European Space Agency's
Envisat satellite. Envisat was launched in a nearly polar, Sun-synchronous orbit (98.6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inclination, 790 km altitude,
100.2 min period) in March 2002.  After losing contact with the
satellite, the end of Envisat's mission was announced in May 2012.
MIPAS measured infrared spectra from 4.1 to 15.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in the limb-viewing geometry. We focus on observations made in between September
2002 and March 2004. During that time period the MIPAS nominal limb
scans covered 6 to 68 km altitude with 3 km vertical sampling from
the troposphere to the middle stratosphere.  The retrieval,
validation, and preparation of climatologies of the CFC-11 and CFC-12
MIPAS data used here are described by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="text.46"/>.  Based on comparisons with
other satellite data sets and in situ measurements, it is shown that
the accuracy of the MIPAS data is about 10 %.  The MIPAS climatologies
of CFC-11 and CFC-12 are based on more than 400 000 vertical
soundings. The data are given on a 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude and 1 km
log-pressure altitude grid.  The zonal mean cross sections are shown
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.  For additional consistency tests we
prepared a second MIPAS climatology (not shown here) based on the new
European Space Agency (ESA) MIPAS level-2 processor version 6 data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.47"/>.  We found that the new ESA data agree well with
the data set of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="text.48"/>.  The
differences of the midlatitude climatological profiles were below
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 12 to 20 km altitude.  This indicates that the two
different forward models and retrieval schemes have only a minor impact
on the results.</p>
      <p>All three satellite instruments, ACE-FTS, HIRDLS, and MIPAS, show
reasonable zonal mean cross sections. We found the expected spatial
distributions due to upwelling of CFC-rich air in the tropics,
decomposition of CFCs at low and midlatitudes in the middle and upper
stratosphere, and downwelling of CFC-poor air in the polar
regions. Having more C–F bonds, CFC-12 is photochemically more stable
and propagates higher up in the tropical stratosphere.  Although the
satellite data sets are obtained during different time periods, there
is mostly good consistency of the zonal mean climatologies.  The only
significant difference found, based on visual inspection of the
cross sections, is a high bias of HIRDLS CFC-12 measurements at
southern midlatitudes around 20 to 30 km altitude.  This anomaly is
present in many, but not all, of the individual profiles and has
already been identified by the HIRDLS team (B. Nardi, personal
communication, 2013).  However, at the moment no further explanation
can be provided. We decided to restrict the analysis of the HIRDLS
data to the Northern Hemisphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Coupled chemistry climate model</title>
      <p>In this study we use the satellite observations to validate first
simulation results obtained from a new coupled model system
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.49"/>.  The model integrates a Lagrangian chemistry
transport model into a climate model. It was mainly developed to
assess the differences between Eulerian and Lagrangian transport
modeling with respect to climate predictions. However, we expect that
the new model will also help to improve long-term simulations of
long-lived trace gases such as CFCs in the stratosphere, due to the
very low numerical diffusion of the Lagrangian transport scheme. Here
we demonstrate, based on a comparison of the lifetime diagnostics, that
the new model system provides realistic global distributions of CFC-11
and CFC-12 with respect to transport, mixing, and photochemistry.</p>
      <p>One component of the coupled model is the Chemical Lagrangian Model of
the Stratosphere (CLaMS)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.50"/>.  CLaMS comprises
three main modules for chemistry, advection, and mixing, as well as
several submodules for the simulation of various other physical and
chemical processes in the atmosphere.  Due to its transport scheme,
which allows for a precise control of mixing intensity, CLaMS is
especially well suited for simulating transport barriers in the
atmosphere, e.g., at the subtropical and polar jets.  The
trajectory module of CLaMS calculates Lagrangian non-diffusive
transport of air parcels based on numerical integration with a
fourth-order Runge–Kutta scheme.  Trajectory calculations
are based on the hybrid vertical coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.51"/>. The original CLaMS version contains a
detailed stratospheric chemistry scheme that involves around 150
chemical species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.52"/>.  Here, we employed a
simplified chemistry scheme that is efficient for long-term
simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.53"/>. The simplified scheme uses daily-mean
photolysis rates and describes the first-order loss of long-lived
tracers, such as CFC-11 and CFC-12.  The photolysis rates were
calculated as diurnal averages using the CLaMS photolysis code
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.54"/>.  The simplified chemistry scheme does not simulate
chemical loss due to the reaction with excited-state atomic oxygen,
O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D). However, the contribution to global CFC loss due to the reaction
with O(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D) is below 10 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.55"/>.</p>
      <p>The second component of the coupled model system is the ECHAM/MESSy
Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model. EMAC is a chemistry climate model
that includes the climate model ECHAM5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.56"/> and the
interface structure Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.57"/>. MESSy provides a coupling interface structure to
develop Earth system models with the flexibility to vary between many
processes that are included as submodels.  MESSy includes a special
submodel for dealing with atmospheric tracers (submodel TRACER;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.58"/>).  In the standard EMAC setup, tracers are
transported using the flux-form semi-Lagrangian transport scheme of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.59"/>.  The CLaMS modules for trajectory transport, mixing,
simplified chemistry, and boundary conditions have been integrated
into the MESSy interface structure as submodels.  In the coupled
EMAC/CLaMS model, ECHAM5 provides meteorological input for the CLaMS
chemistry transport model.</p>
      <p>For this study we performed a 10-year perpetual run with 2005
boundary conditions with the coupled EMAC/CLaMS model.  The free-running simulation was not nudged to observations.  Sea surface
temperatures and sea ice concentrations were taken from the
Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP II) climatology
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.60"/>.  The EMAC spectral resolution was T42, which
corresponds to a quadratic Gaussian grid of approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and longitude, with 90 vertical
levels. For the CLaMS transport core, about 1 million air parcels
were distributed from the surface up to 2500 K potential temperature
(about 60 km altitude). Initial values as well as boundary conditions
for chemical species were taken from a climatological run with the
stand-alone CLaMS model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.61"/>.  As CFC-12 is not included
in the CLaMS climatological run, its initial values for the EMAC/CLaMS
simulation were obtained using three correlation functions of CFC-12
with N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O for the tropics (15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) and the
northern or southern extratropics.  To prepare a zonal mean
climatology, data from the years 6 to 10 of the 10-year perpetual run
with EMAC/CLaMS were averaged.  Years 1 to 5 were not taken into
account to minimize the influence of initialization. The EMAC/CLaMS
data were binned and averaged on a 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude grid for a set
of 33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels.  The vertical spacing of these levels varies
between 0.5 and 1.3 km in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere. The EMAC/CLaMS zonal mean climatologies of CFC-11 and
CFC-12 are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Good agreement is
found in comparison with the satellite measurements. Further
validation of the EMAC/CLaMS simulation results is provided by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.62"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>In this section we present our estimates of the stratospheric lifetime
ratio of CFC-11 and CFC-12 and the absolute lifetime of CFC-12 for the
three satellite missions and the model.  All climatologies cover
several years of data, i.e., about 5 years for ACE-FTS, 3
years for HIRDLS, 1.5 years for MIPAS, and 5 years for
EMAC/CLaMS.  The different time periods covered by the data sets make
it slightly more difficult to compare the results, but averaging over
long time periods helps to reduce the influence of atmospheric
variability and to constrain the results. We assigned a reference year
to each data set that is used to determine the ratios of the burdens
and the transience correction factors. As shown in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, these parameters vary only slowly over
time. By selecting the reference year in the middle of the time period
of each data set we made sure that the errors due to a constant
approximation are minor.  The uncertainties of all results are given
as standard deviations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values) and calculated based on
conventional error propagation principles.  Note that the CFC-12
lifetimes have asymmetric error bars because error propagation was
calculated for their inverse.  Following other studies, we here did
not take the uncertainty of the CFC-11 reference lifetime into account
when we estimated the error of the CFC-12 lifetime.  The input data
for the lifetime calculations according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)
and the CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratios for the four data sets used here
are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of input data for the calculation of CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratios.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data set</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACE-FTS (2004–2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.448</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.991</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.050</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.466</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.075</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HIRDLS (2005–2008)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.448</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.991</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.050</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.462</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.073</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIPAS (2002–2004)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.458</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.934</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.458</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.076</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EMAC/CLaMS (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>2005</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.451</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.000</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.475</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.071</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The data used for the ACE-FTS lifetime analysis are presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.  The analysis is based on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude bands at 60 to 35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 40 to 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.  For the
lifetime calculations we selected the year 2006 as the reference year.
The surface volume mixing ratios for the reference year are (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>249</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppt for CFC-11 and (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>540</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppt for CFC-12.  We calculated
a ratio of burdens of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.448</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-11 vs. CFC-12.  The
linear fits yielded a correlation slope of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-12
vs. CFC-11 at the tropopause.  The ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of transience
correction factors was estimated as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  These data lead
to a ratio of the steady-state lifetimes of CFC-11 and CFC-12 of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, assuming a lifetime of 52 years for CFC-11, an estimated
lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>112</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(96–133) years for CFC-12. A separate analysis for the
Northern Hemisphere only provided a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>113</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(97–135) years. For
the Southern Hemisphere we found <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>110</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(95–131) years.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Volume mixing ratio (vmr) profiles of CFC-11 (top, left)
and CFC-12 (top, right), tracer–tracer correlations (bottom,
left), and tracer–tracer slopes (bottom, right) used to estimate
lifetimes from ACE-FTS data. Black color indicates midlatitude
data.  Grey color indicates data from other latitudes. The red
line shows a linear fit used to extrapolate the tracer–tracer
slope at the tropopause (red dot).
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the data set used for the
HIRDLS lifetime analysis. The analysis is based on 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude
bands at 30 to 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Data from the Southern Hemisphere were not
used due to data quality issues (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>).  For the
lifetime calculations we selected the year 2006 as the reference year,
resulting in the same surface volume mixing ratios and ratio of
burdens as for ACE-FTS. The linear fits yielded a correlation slope of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-12 vs. CFC-11 at the tropopause.  With application of
the same combined transience correction factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as for ACE-FTS,
this leads to a ratio of the steady-state lifetimes of CFC-11 and
CFC-12 of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>112</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(97–134) years for
CFC-12.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, but for HIRDLS data.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The data used for the MIPAS lifetime analysis are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.  The analysis is based on 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude bands at 60 to 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 30 to 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.  For the
lifetime calculations we selected the year 2003 as the reference year.
The surface volume mixing ratios for the reference year are (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>256</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppt for CFC-11 and (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>543</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppt for CFC-12. We calculated
a ratio of burdens of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.458</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-11 vs. CFC-12.
Compared to ACE-FTS and HIRDLS, the ratio of burdens differs only by
2 %.  The linear fits yielded a correlation slope of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
CFC-12 vs. CFC-11.  The ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of transience correction factors
was estimated as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.934</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., a larger correction than
the one used for ACE-FTS and HIRDLS.  These data lead to a ratio of
the steady-state lifetimes of CFC-11 and CFC-12 of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>114</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(98–136) years for CFC-12.  A separate analysis
provided a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>111</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(95–134) years for the Northern Hemisphere
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>120</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(103–144) years for the Southern Hemisphere.  For the ESA data
the analysis gave a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>113</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(95–137) years globally,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>114</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(95–140) years for the Northern Hemisphere, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>113</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(97–135) years
for the Southern Hemisphere. While hemispheric data differ to some
extent, the global <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>results<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> for the ESA data agree well with the
results for the data of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="text.63"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, but for MIPAS data.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Finally, the data set used for the EMAC/CLaMS lifetime analysis is
presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.  The analysis is based on
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bands at 60 to 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 30 to
60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. For the lifetime calculations we selected the year 2005
as the reference year.  The surface volume mixing ratios for the
reference year are (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>252</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppt for CFC-11 and (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>542</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppt for CFC-12.  We calculated a ratio of burdens of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.451</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-11 vs. CFC-12.  The linear fits yielded a correlation
slope of 1.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15.  We did not apply a transience correction,
because we assume that the model approached steady-state conditions
during the last 5 years of the 10-year perpetual run.  The EMAC/CLaMS
model results lead to a ratio of the steady-state lifetimes of CFC-11
and CFC-12 of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a CFC-12 lifetime of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>110</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(95–129) years. We found a lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>108</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(94–127) years for the
Northern Hemisphere and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>111</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(97–131) years for the Southern Hemisphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, but for EMAC/CLaMS
data.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>We applied the tracer–tracer approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.64"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.65"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.66"/> to estimate the stratospheric
lifetime ratio of CFC-11 and CFC-12 from ACE-FTS, HIRDLS, and MIPAS
satellite observations as well as EMAC/CLaMS model output. We also
estimated the absolute lifetime of CFC-12, based on a reference
lifetime of 52 years for CFC-11. As discussed in Sect. 
<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, our approach is similar to, but differs in some
aspects from, the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.67"/>. An important difference
compared to other studies using satellite data is that we estimated
the ratio of burdens of CFC-11 and CFC-12 based on NOAA/ESRL in situ
surface measurements rather than using the satellite data for that
purpose. This avoids problems related to degraded data quality of limb
and occultation satellite measurements in the troposphere due to
systematic measurement errors and data gaps.  Another difference
between our study and the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.68"/> is that our
analysis is based on multi-annual zonal mean climatologies that are
prepared beforehand and independently from the estimation of
lifetimes.</p>
      <p>The lifetime estimates from our analysis are summarized and compared
to other recent studies in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.  Our estimates
for the three satellite data sets show a very high degree of
consistency and are in good agreement with the current WMO
recommendation, the new SPARC reassessment, and other work.  In
particular, the estimated lifetime ratios are in excellent agreement
with the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.69"/>, which is based on data from the
Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) and the NOAA/ESRL
ground-based networks, which are analyzed with a chemical transport
model and a statistical inversion method.  Compared to the study of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.70"/>, who applied the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.71"/> on ACE-FTS
data, we found a 17 % larger CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio for
measurements from the same instrument.  Part of the difference is due
to the fact that we applied a linear fit to extrapolate the
tracer–tracer slope at the tropopause, whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.72"/>
applied a quadratic fit.  If we replace the linear fit with a quadratic
fit in our analysis, the differences to the results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.73"/> are reduced to 10 %.  However, we also found that the
quadratic fit significantly increases the error of the extrapolated
tracer–tracer slope and thus decided to keep the linear fit in our
analysis.  The ratio of burdens from our analysis is in good agreement
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 %) with the data reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.74"/>. The data for
the transience correction are directly obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.75"/>
and therefore cannot explain any significant differences.  We think
that the remaining differences may be due to different data sets used
for the lifetime analysis. The study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.76"/> covers
ACE-FTS data version 3.0 for the years 2005 to 2010, whereas in our
study the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.77"/> climatology based on version 2.2 was used,
covering the years 2004 to 2009.  In addition, the median average
deviation filtering for each data set was applied using different
altitude, spatial and temporal bins.  Our CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio
for MIPAS is 39 % larger than the corresponding estimate of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.78"/>. Both analyses are based on the same
climatology. However, very different analysis techniques were
used. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.79"/> applied a photochemical model with
additional input parameters to determine the CFC global loss rates.
These are used to estimate absolute lifetimes rather than a lifetime
ratio. The results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.80"/> mostly depend on CFC data
in the middle and upper stratosphere at equatorial latitudes, whereas
our results depend on data from the midlatitude lower stratosphere.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of stratospheric lifetime estimates of CFC-11 and CFC-12 from different
studies. The table lists the data sources of the studies and if absolute (abs) or relative (rel)
lifetime estimates are provided. All relative lifetime estimates are normalized to a CFC-11
lifetime of 52 years. A sub- and superscript notation is used to report errors. Note that
error definitions vary between the studies (see individual references). In particular,
for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.81"/> the errors represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainties.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Method</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CFC-11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CFC-12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[years]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">[years]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This study</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ACE-FTS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>112</mml:mn><mml:mn>96</mml:mn><mml:mn>133</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.39</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.54</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HIRDLS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>113</mml:mn><mml:mn>97</mml:mn><mml:mn>134</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.39</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.54</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MIPAS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>114</mml:mn><mml:mn>98</mml:mn><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.38</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.53</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EMAC/CLaMS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>110</mml:mn><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mn>129</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.55</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.82"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">various</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">both</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>52</mml:mn><mml:mn>43</mml:mn><mml:mn>67</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>102</mml:mn><mml:mn>88</mml:mn><mml:mn>122</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.51</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.35</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.76</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.83"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ACE-FTS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>131</mml:mn><mml:mn>110</mml:mn><mml:mn>161</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.32</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.84"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">model results</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.58</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.85"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">aircraft data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mn>77</mml:mn><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.60</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.54</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.86"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">model results</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.87"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ACE-FTS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>46</mml:mn><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mn>65</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>105</mml:mn><mml:mn>84</mml:mn><mml:mn>139</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.44</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.77</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CLAES</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>108</mml:mn><mml:mn>88</mml:mn><mml:mn>140</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRISTA-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>53</mml:mn><mml:mn>41</mml:mn><mml:mn>75</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRISTA-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>61</mml:mn><mml:mn>47</mml:mn><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MIPAS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mn>28</mml:mn><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>108</mml:mn><mml:mn>83</mml:mn><mml:mn>151</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.33</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.19</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.60</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">combined</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>45</mml:mn><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mn>58</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>107</mml:mn><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mn>130</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.42</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.28</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.88"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AGAGE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>54</mml:mn><mml:mn>48</mml:mn><mml:mn>61</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>111</mml:mn><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mn>132</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.49</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.36</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NOAA/ESRL</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>52</mml:mn><mml:mn>45</mml:mn><mml:mn>61</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>112</mml:mn><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.33</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.89"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">various</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">both</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.45</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.90"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">model results</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:mn>56</mml:mn><mml:mn>64</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mn>101</mml:mn><mml:mn>110</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.57</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.51</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.63</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.91"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">aircraft data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">abs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>41</mml:mn><mml:mn>29</mml:mn><mml:mn>53</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>77</mml:mn><mml:mn>51</mml:mn><mml:mn>103</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.53</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.76</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">rel</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>52</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>99</mml:mn><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mn>112</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>0.52</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.45</mml:mn><mml:mn>0.59</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In our study the results for the three satellite missions show
excellent agreement among each other.  The <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> lifetime
ratios vary only by 1.7 % and the CFC-12 lifetime estimates vary only
by 2 years. Consequently, we combined the ACE-FTS, HIRDLS, and MIPAS
results to obtain error-weighted optimal estimates. This led to a
CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a CFC-12 lifetime of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>113</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>(103–124) years. The combined results are in very good agreement
with the current WMO recommendation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %) and in good agreement
with the new SPARC reassessment (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %).  The WMO assessment in
2010 showed a 60 % difference between 2005 and 2008 “bottom-up” and
“top-down” emission estimates for CFC-11, while good agreement was
found for CFC-12 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.92"/>.  As “top-down” estimates critically
depend on the lifetimes, whereas “bottom-up” estimates do not, it was
further demonstrated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.93"/> that a longer CFC-11 lifetime
(64 years rather than 45 years) and thus a larger CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime
ratio could resolve this discrepancy. Our study indicates that the
CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio is about 3 % larger than the current WMO
recommendation. This explains only some of the discrepancy identified
in the last WMO assessment. However, a larger ratio was found in the new SPARC
assessment. An important benefit of our study is that the
errors of the combined data are up to a factor of 2 smaller than the
error estimates of other recent studies. We conclude that our results
can contribute to further constraining the reference values for the
CFC-11 and CFC-12 lifetimes in future assessments and scientific
studies.</p>
      <p>The stratospheric lifetimes of long-lived tracers such as CFC-11 and
CFC-12 are important diagnostic quantities to evaluate the
representation of transport and mixing in <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>atmospheric<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> models.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.94"/> point out that models with faster circulation
produce younger age-of-air distributions and that increasing
circulation speed leads to shorter CFC lifetimes.  A comparison of CFC
lifetimes from a model and from observations therefore allows for a
judgement to be made regarding whether the model appropriately represents important
features of the stratospheric circulation.  We used the satellite
results to validate the new EMAC/CLaMS coupled model system.  As we
applied exactly the same method to estimate the lifetimes for the
satellite observations and the model, the results are indeed
indicative of differences in the underlying data and are not affected
by differences that could occur if different methods for lifetime
estimation were to be used. We found that the EMAC/CLaMS results are in excellent agreement (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %) with the
satellite observations after a spin-up phase of 5 years.  However, the CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio
found here is about 17 % smaller than the result of the recent
multi-model study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.95"/>.  On the one hand, it
should be noted that our simulations are based on a simplified
chemistry scheme that neglects CFC loss due to reaction with excited-state atomic oxygen (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). However, this is only a
minor loss mechanism.  On the other hand, we put forward that the
Lagrangian transport scheme of EMAC/CLaMS provides an improved
representation of advection and mixing in the stratosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.96"/>.  The Lagrangian transport scheme used by EMAC/CLaMS
is fundamentally different from the other schemes used by the models
discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.97"/>.  We conclude that the new
EMAC/CLaMS model will likely become a useful tool to assess the impact
of advective transport, mixing, and photochemistry as well as
climatological variability on the stratospheric lifetimes of
long-lived tracers.</p>
      <p>Another topic of interest is the spatial and temporal variability of
lifetime estimates. Rossby wave breaking and mixing in the
stratosphere are typically much stronger in the winter hemisphere than
in the summer hemisphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.98"/>.  Furthermore,
because of the larger continental land masses in the Northern
Hemisphere, the northern stratosphere has more frequent and intense
planetary wave activity than the southern stratosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.99"/>.  Stronger wave activity in Northern
Hemisphere winter leads to a faster Brewer–Dobson circulation in the
stratosphere.  Model calculations show that faster stratospheric
circulations produce younger distributions for the age of air, have
larger loss rates of long-lived stratospheric tracers, and therefore
yield shorter CFC lifetimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.100"/>.  The quasi-biennial
oscillation (QBO) also has a significant impact on the stratospheric
distributions of CFC-11 and CFC-12, in particular in the tropics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.101"/>.  These issues are of practical relevance for the
analysis of temporally and spatially limited data sets from aircraft
campaigns, for instance.  One example is the recent study of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.102"/>, which closely followed the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.103"/>
to estimate the CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio from measurements of two
aircraft campaigns in late 2009 and early 2010 in northern Europe.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.104"/> found a CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio which is 30 %
larger than our combined result from the satellite data and 18 %
larger than the new SPARC recommendation. This larger lifetime ratio
corresponds to model results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.105"/>, but
further study would be helpful to assess possible impacts of the
limited sampling characteristics of aircraft measurements.  Long-term
satellite data sets and model simulations bear the potential to study
variability of lifetimes in detail.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.106"/> studied the
hemispheric and seasonal differences based on ACE-FTS data from 2005
to 2010 and found substantial variations of the CFC-12 lifetime
estimates (from 94 to 173 years), but no clear correlations with either
hemisphere or season.  We also analyzed the hemispheric differences of
the CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 lifetime ratio, but found no significant
differences, when taking the error estimates of the results into
account.  Differences in CFC-12 lifetime estimates are 9 years for MIPAS
(only 1 year for the ESA data), 4 years for ACE-FTS, and 3 years for
EMAC/CLaMS.</p>
      <p>In this study we estimated the ratio of the stratospheric lifetimes of
CFC-11 and CFC-12 based on the tracer–tracer method directly from
zonal mean climatologies from satellite observations and atmospheric
model output. We took advantage of the fact that these climatologies
provide multiyear coverage, which allowed us to neglect the
statistical errors of individual measurements and take significant
parts of atmospheric variability into account. In contrast to other
studies using satellite measurements, we found highly consistent
lifetime estimates for CFC-11 and CFC-12 for the ACE-FTS, HIRDLS, and
MIPAS as well as the EMAC/CLaMS model.  We also found excellent
agreement with the current SPARC recommendations.  Nevertheless, new
infrared limb or occultation satellite measurements with high vertical
resolution would help to further improve CFC-11 and CFC-12 lifetime
recommendations and their error estimates in future studies.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Lifetime estimates for idealized CFC \hack{\\} profiles}?><title>Lifetime estimates for idealized CFC <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> profiles</title>
      <p>In order to analyze the influence of systematic measurement errors on
lifetime estimates we conducted a set of tests with idealized volume
mixing ratio profiles. For this purpose we constructed CFC-11 and
CFC-12 profiles with a constant volume mixing ratio in the troposphere
and a linear decrease towards zero in the stratosphere. The
tropospheric volume mixing ratios were set to 240 and 530 ppt
for CFC-11 and CFC-12, respectively. The stratospheric slopes were
adapted to obtain a tracer–tracer slope of
d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which yields <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to the new SPARC lifetime recommendations.
Obviously, real CFC profiles show more variability and structure in
the stratosphere than the idealized profiles.  Nevertheless, the
simple and idealized profiles were found suitable to qualitatively
study the impact of vertical resolution and measurement errors on
observed tracer–tracer correlations. For this purpose we convolved the
idealized profiles with Gaussian weighting functions with different
full width at half maximum. This vertical smoothing represents, on the
one hand, the limited vertical resolution of the satellite measurements
and, on the other hand, the degrading effect due to averaging of
profiles from different latitudes and different measurement times, for
which the tropopause height varies.  Different measurement errors were
imposed on the profiles to assess their influence on tracer–tracer
slopes.</p>
      <p>The results of four different test cases are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>.
Test case 1 is a reference case that was not
degraded by any assumed measurement error, but illustrates the impact
of vertical resolution.  It can be seen that vertical smoothing has
the largest effect around the tropopause and in the middle and upper
stratosphere, where curvature of the idealized CFC profiles is
largest.  Other parts of the profiles are not affected at all.  For
test case 1 we obtained the promising result that the tracer–tracer
correlations and the local slopes close to the tropopause are not
affected by degraded vertical resolution at all.  This might have been
expected, because both CFC profiles are influenced by vertical
smoothing in the same way. In reality, however, there may be
differences in vertical smoothing related to the signals and
constraints occurring in the CFC-11 or CFC-12 retrieval as well as
differences due to averaging if the CFC-11 and CFC-12 climatologies
are not derived from exactly the same subsets of data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Idealized CFC profiles (top, left), tracer–tracer
correlations (top, right), and local tracer–tracer slopes for
different test cases (other). Colored curves refer to different
vertical smoothing; see plot legend for full width at half maximum
of the Gaussian shape function used to convolve the profiles. In
test case 1 no errors are imposed on the CFC profiles.  In test
case 2 the CFC-11 profile has a constant 10 % bias. For test case
3 we imposed an altitude-dependent error of 1 % km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the CFC-11
profile. In test case 4 the CFC-11 profile is shifted upward by
1 km.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12479/2014/acp-14-12479-2014-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>To illustrate the influence of systematic measurement errors of the
experimental data we constructed the test cases 2 to 4.  For test case 2 we
added a 10 % positive bias to the CFC-11 profile.  This error
directly maps into the tracer–tracer slopes, which are reduced by
10 %.  In principle, such a bias would be compensated for in the lifetime
analysis if the same data were used to calculate the ratio of global
burdens.  However, we argue that surface data are much better suited
than satellite data to accurately calculate global burdens and
therefore considered a constant bias as an additional term in the
error analysis.  For test case 3 we distorted the CFC-11 profile with
an altitude-dependent bias of 1 % km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This error leads to strongly
decreasing slopes towards the tropopause.  For test case 4 we shifted
the CFC-11 profile 1 km upward.  Such altitude displacements between
the CFC profiles could arise if the climatologies are not prepared
from exactly the same subsets of data, for instance.  This vertical
displacement also leads to significant slope errors at the tropopause.
We do not expect such errors to be present in our data.  However, if
such errors are present it should be noted that the linear fit
approach will help to reduce their influence on slope estimation.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Electronic supplement</title>
      <p>We provide the zonal mean climatologies and the software used for the
lifetime analysis as an electronic supplement to this paper.  This
allows our results to be reproduced and extended in further work.  For
details please see the README file contained in the supplement.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12479-2014-supplement" xlink:title="zip">doi:10.5194/acp-14-12479-2014-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Combined CFC-11 and CFC-12 surface data sets were provided by the
NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring Division.  Development of the ACE-FTS
climatology was supported by grants from the Canadian Foundation for
Climate and Atmospheric Sciences and the Canadian Space Agency.  The
Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) is a Canadian-led mission
mainly supported by the Canadian Space Agency.  HIRDLS is a joint
project between the UK and the USA. HIRDLS data are processed at the
HIRDLS Science Investigator-led Processing System (SIPS) in Boulder,
Colorado.  John Gille was supported by NASA under contract
NAS5-97046.  Envisat MIPAS data were provided by the European Space
Agency.  We thank Patrick Jöckel and Nicole Thomas for support in
developing the EMAC/CLaMS model.  We acknowledge Jens-Uwe Grooß,
Paul Konopka, and Felix Ploeger for providing climatological and
initial data for the model runs. We thank Joan Alexander, Patrick Jöckel,
and Steve Montzka for constructive comments on earlier
drafts of this manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The service charges for this open access publication <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>have been covered by a Research Centre of the <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Helmholtz
Association.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by:  F. Khosrawi</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Becker et al.(2000)Becker, Grooss, McKenna, and
Müller</label><mixed-citation>Becker, G., Grooss, J.-U., McKenna, D., and Müller, R.: Stratospheric
Photolysis Frequencies: Impact of an Improved Numerical Solution of the
Radiative Transfer Equation, J. Atmos. Chem., 37, 217–229,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006468926530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006468926530</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bernath(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Bernath, P. F.: Atmospheric chemistry experiment (ACE): Analytical chemistry
from orbit, TRAC-Trend. Anal. Chem., 25, 647–654, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bernath et al.(2005)Bernath, McElroy, Abrams, Boone, Butler,
Camy-Peyret, Carleer, Clerbaux, Coheur, Colin, DeCola, DeMazière, Drummond,
Dufour, Evans, Fast, Fussen, Gilbert, Jennings, Llewellyn, Lowe, Mahieu,
McConnell, McHugh, McLeod, Michaud, Midwinter, Nassar, Nichitiu, Nowlan,
Rinsland, Rochon, Rowlands, Semeniuk, Simon, Skelton, Sloan, Soucy, Strong,
Tremblay, Turnbull, Walker, Walkty, Wardle, Wehrle, Zander, and
Zou</label><mixed-citation>Bernath, P. F., McElroy, C. T., Abrams, M. C., Boone, C. D., Butler, M.,
Camy-Peyret, C., Carleer, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P. ., Colin, R., DeCola,
P., DeMazière, M., Drummond, J. R., Dufour, D., Evans, W. F. J., Fast, H.,
Fussen, D., Gilbert, K., Jennings, D. E., Llewellyn, E. J., Lowe, R. P.,
Mahieu, E., McConnell, J. C., McHugh, M., McLeod, S. D., Michaud, R.,
Midwinter, C., Nassar, R., Nichitiu, F., Nowlan, C., Rinsland, C. P., Rochon,
Y. J., Rowlands, N., Semeniuk, K., Simon, P., Skelton, R., Sloan, J. J.,
Soucy, M., Strong, K., Tremblay, P., Turnbull, D., Walker, K. A., Walkty, I.,
Wardle, D. A., Wehrle, V., Zander, R., and Zou, J.: Atmospheric chemistry
experiment (ACE): Mission overview, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15S01,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022386</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bingham et al.(1997)Bingham, Zhou, Bartschi, Anderson, Smith,
Chetwynd, and Nadile</label><mixed-citation>Bingham, G. E., Zhou, D. K., Bartschi, B. Y., Anderson, G. P., Smith, D. R.,
Chetwynd, J. H., and Nadile, R. M.: Cryogenic Infrared Radiance
Instrumentation for Shuttle (CIRRIS 1A) Earth limb spectral
measurements, calibration, and atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CFC-12, and
CFC-11 profile retrieval, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 3547–3558, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Brown et al.(2013)Brown, Volk, Schoeberl, Boone, and
Bernath</label><mixed-citation>Brown, A. T., Volk, C. M., Schoeberl, M. R., Boone, C. D., and Bernath, P. F.:
Stratospheric lifetimes of CFC-12, CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O from measurements made
by the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment–Fourier Transform Spectrometer
(ACE-FTS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6921–6950, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6921-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6921-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Chipperfield et al.(2014)Chipperfield, Liang, Strahan, Morgenstern,
Dhomse, Abraham, Archibald, Bekki, Braesicke, Di Genova, Fleming, Hardiman,
Iachetti, Jackman, Kinnison, Marchand, Pitari, Pyle, Rozanov, Stenke, and
Tummon</label><mixed-citation>Chipperfield, M. P., Liang, Q., Strahan, S. E., Morgenstern, O., Dhomse, S. S.,
Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Braesicke, P., Di Genova, G.,
Fleming, E. L., Hardiman, S. C., Iachetti, D., Jackman, C. H., Kinnison,
D. E., Marchand, M., Pitari, G., Pyle, J. A., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., and
Tummon, F.: Multimodel estimates of atmospheric lifetimes of long-lived
ozone-depleting substances: Present and future, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
2555–2573, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021097</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Dinelli et al.(2010)Dinelli, Arnone, Brizzi, Carlotti, Castelli,
Magnani, Papandrea, Prevedelli, and Ridolfi</label><mixed-citation>Dinelli, B. M., Arnone, E., Brizzi, G., Carlotti, M., Castelli, E., Magnani, L.,
Papandrea, E., Prevedelli, M., and Ridolfi, M.: The MIPAS2D database of MIPAS/ENVISAT
measurements retrieved with a multi-target 2-dimensional tomographic approach,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 355–374, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-355-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-355-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Douglass et al.(2008)Douglass, Stolarski, Schoeberl, Jackman, Gupta,
Newman, Nielsen, and Fleming</label><mixed-citation>Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Schoeberl, M. R., Jackman, C. H., Gupta,
M. L., Newman, P. A., Nielsen, J. E., and Fleming, E. L.: Relationship of
loss, mean age of air and the distribution of CFCs to stratospheric
circulation and implications for atmospheric lifetimes, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D14309, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009575</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Elkins et al.(1993)Elkins, Thompson, Swanson, Butler, Hall, Cummings,
Fisher, and Raffo</label><mixed-citation>
Elkins, J. W., Thompson, T. M., Swanson, T. H., Butler, J. H., Hall, B. D.,
Cummings, S. O., Fisher, D. A., and Raffo, A. G.: Decrease of growth rates of
atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons 11 and 12, Nature, 364, 780–783, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Eyring et al.(2005)Eyring, Harris, Rex, Shepherd, Fahey, Amanatidis,
Austin, Chipperfield, Dameris, Forster, Gettelman, Graf, Nagashima, Newman,
Pawson, Prather, Pyle, Salawitch, Santer, and Waugh</label><mixed-citation>
Eyring, V., Harris, N. R. P., Rex, M., Shepherd, T. G., Fahey, D. W.,
Amanatidis, G. T., Austin, J., Chipperfield, M. P., Dameris, M., Forster, P.
M. D. F., Gettelman, A., Graf, H. F., Nagashima, T., Newman, P. A., Pawson,
S., Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Salawitch, R. J., Santer, B. D., and Waugh,
D. W.: A strategy for process-oriented validation of coupled
chemistry-climate models, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 1117–1133, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Fischer et al.(2008)Fischer, Birk, Blom, Carli, Carlotti, von
Clarmann, Delbouille, Dudhia, Ehhalt, Endemann, Flaud, Gessner, Kleinert,
Koopman, Langen, López-Puertas, Mosner, Nett, Oelhaf, Perron, Remedios,
Ridolfi, Stiller, and Zander</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, H., Birk, M., Blom, C., Carli, B., Carlotti, M., von Clarmann, T., Delbouille, L.,
Dudhia, A., Ehhalt, D., Endemann, M., Flaud, J. M., Gessner, R., Kleinert, A., Koopman, R.,
Langen, J., López-Puertas, M., Mosner, P., Nett, H., Oelhaf, H., Perron, G., Remedios, J.,
Ridolfi, M., Stiller, G., and Zander, R.: MIPAS: an instrument for atmospheric and
climate research, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2151–2188, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Gille et al.(2008)Gille, Barnett, Arter, Barker, Bernath, Boone,
Cavanaugh, Chow, Coffey, Craft, Craig, Dials, Dean, Eden, Edwards, Francis,
Halvorson, Harvey, Hepplewhite, Khosravi, Kinnison, Krinsky, Lambert, Lee,
Lyjak, Loh, Mankin, Massie, McInerney, Moorhouse, Nardi, Packman, Randall,
Reburn, Rudolf, Schwartz, Serafin, Stone, Torpy, Walker, Waterfall, Watkins,
Whitney, Woodard, and Young</label><mixed-citation>Gille, J., Barnett, J., Arter, P., Barker, M., Bernath, P., Boone, C.,
Cavanaugh, C., Chow, J., Coffey, M., Craft, J., Craig, C., Dials, M., Dean,
V., Eden, T., Edwards, D. P., Francis, G., Halvorson, C., Harvey, L.,
Hepplewhite, C., Khosravi, R., Kinnison, D., Krinsky, C., Lambert, A., Lee,
H., Lyjak, L., Loh, J., Mankin, W., Massie, S., McInerney, J., Moorhouse, J.,
Nardi, B., Packman, D., Randall, C., Reburn, J., Rudolf, W., Schwartz, M.,
Serafin, J., Stone, K., Torpy, B., Walker, K., Waterfall, A., Watkins, R.,
Whitney, J., Woodard, D., and Young, G.: High Resolution Dynamics Limb
Sounder: Experiment overview, recovery, and validation of initial temperature
data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16S43, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008824</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Gille et al.(2013)Gille, Gray, Cavanaugh, Coffey, Dean, Halvorson,
Karol, Khosravi, Kinnison, Massie, Nardi, Rivas, Smith, Torpy, Waterfall, and
Wright</label><mixed-citation>Gille, J., Gray, L., Cavanaugh, C., Coffey, M., Dean, V., Halvorson, C., Karol,
S., Khosravi, R., Kinnison, D., Massie, S., Nardi, B., Rivas, M. B., Smith,
L., Torpy, B., Waterfall, A., and Wright, C.: High Resolution Dynamics Limb
Sounder, Earth Observing System (EOS), Data Description and Quality, Version
7 (V7), Tech. rep., National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder,
Colorado, USA,
<uri>http://www.eos.ucar.edu/hirdls/data/products/HIRDLS-DQD_V7-1.pdf</uri> (last
access: 21 June 2014), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Gille et al.(2003)Gille, Barnett, Whitney, Dials, Woodard, Rudolf,
Lambert, and Mankin</label><mixed-citation>
Gille, J. C., Barnett, J. J., Whitney, J. G., Dials, M. A., Woodard, D.,
Rudolf, W. P., Lambert, A., and Mankin, W.: The High-Resolution Dynamics
Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) experiment on AURA, Proc. SPIE, 5152, 161–171,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Grooß et al.(2002)Grooß, Günther, Konopka, Müller,
McKenna, Stroh, Vogel, Engel, Müller, Hoppel, Bevilacqua, Richard,
Webster, Elkins, Hurst, Romashkin, and Baumgardner</label><mixed-citation>Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., McKenna, D. S.,
Stroh, F., Vogel, B., Engel, A., Müller, M., Hoppel, K., Bevilacqua, R.,
Richard, E., Webster, C. R., Elkins, J. W., Hurst, D. F., Romashkin, P. A.,
and Baumgardner, D. G.: Simulation of ozone depletion in spring 2000 with the
Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), J. Geophys. Res., 107,
8295, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000456</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Hodnebrog et al.(2013)Hodnebrog, Etminan, Fuglestvedt, Marston,
Myhre, Nielsen, Shine, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>
Hodnebrog, Ø., Etminan, M., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Marston, G., Myhre, G.,
Nielsen, C. J., Shine, K. P., and Wallington, T. J.: Global warming
potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and related compounds: A
comprehensive review, Rev. Geophys., 51, 300–378, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2004)Hoffmann, Spang, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, L., Spang, R., and Riese, M.: Retrieval of chlorofluorocarbon
distributions from Envisat MIPAS measurements, Proc. SPIE, 5571,
193–204, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2005)Hoffmann, Spang, Kaufmann, and
Riese</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, L., Spang, R., Kaufmann, M., and Riese, M.: Retrieval of CFC-11 and
CFC-12 from Envisat MIPAS observations by means of rapid radiative
transfer calculations, Adv. Space Res., 36, 915–921, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2008)Hoffmann, Kaufmann, Spang, Müller, Remedios,
Moore, Volk, von Clarmann, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, L., Kaufmann, M., Spang, R., Müller, R., Remedios, J. J., Moore, D. P.,
Volk, C. M., von Clarmann, T., and Riese, M.: Envisat MIPAS measurements of CFC-11:
retrieval, validation, and climatology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3671–3688, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3671-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3671-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Holton et al.(1995)Holton, Haynes, McIntyre, Douglass, Rood, and
Pfister</label><mixed-citation>
Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hoppe et al.(2014)Hoppe, Hoffmann, Konopka, Grooß, Ploeger,
Günther, Jöckel, and Müller</label><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. M., Hoffmann, L., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Jöckel, P.,
and Müller, R.: The implementation of the CLaMS Lagrangian transport core into the
chemistry climate model EMAC 2.40.1: application on age of air and transport of
long-lived trace species, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 7, 1759–1790, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-1759-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmdd-7-1759-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Hurrell et al.(2008)Hurrell, Hack, Shea, Caron, and
Rosinski</label><mixed-citation>
Hurrell, J. W., Hack, J. J., Shea, D., Caron, J. M., and Rosinski, J.: A New
Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Boundary Dataset for the Community
Atmosphere Model, J. Clim., 21, 5145–5153, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>IPCC(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New
York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Jöckel et al.(2008)Jöckel, Kerkweg, Buchholz-Dietsch, Tost,
Sander, and Pozzer</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Buchholz-Dietsch, J., Tost, H., Sander, R., and Pozzer, A.: Technical Note:
Coupling of chemical processes with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) submodel
TRACER, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1677–1687, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Jöckel et al.(2010)Jöckel, Kerkweg, Pozzer, Sander, Tost,
Riede, Baumgaertner, Gromov, and Kern</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H., Baumgaertner, A.,
Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2),
Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Jones et al.(2012)Jones, Walker, Jin, Taylor, Boone, Bernath,
Brohede, Manney, McLeod, Hughes, and Daffer</label><mixed-citation>Jones, A., Walker, K. A., Jin, J. J., Taylor, J. R., Boone, C. D., Bernath, P. F., Brohede, S.,
Manney, G. L., McLeod, S., Hughes, R., and Daffer, W. H.: Technical Note: A trace gas
climatology derived from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform
Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5207–5220, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kellmann et al.(2012)Kellmann, von Clarmann, Stiller, Eckert,
Glatthor, Höpfner, Kiefer, Orphal, Funke, Grabowski, Linden, Dutton, and
Elkins</label><mixed-citation>Kellmann, S., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G. P., Eckert, E., Glatthor, N., Höpfner, M.,
Kiefer, M., Orphal, J., Funke, B., Grabowski, U., Linden, A., Dutton, G. S., and Elkins, J. W.:
Global CFC-11 (CCl3F) and CFC-12 (CCl2F2) measurements with the Michelson Interferometer
for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS): retrieval, climatologies and trends,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11857–11875, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11857-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11857-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Khosrawi et al.(2004)Khosrawi, Müller, Irie, Engel, Toon, Sen,
Aoki, Nakazawa, Traub, Jucks, Johnson, Oelhaf, Wetzel, Sugita, Kanzawa,
Yokota, Nakajima, and Sasano</label><mixed-citation>Khosrawi, F., Müller, R., Irie, H., Engel, A., Toon, G. C., Sen, B., Aoki,
S., Nakazawa, T., Traub, W. A., Jucks, K. W., Johnson, D. G., Oelhaf, H.,
Wetzel, G., Sugita, T., Kanzawa, H., Yokota, T., Nakajima, H., and Sasano,
Y.: Validation of CFC-12 measurements from the Improved Limb Atmospheric
Spectrometer (ILAS) with the version 6.0 retrieval algorithm, J. Geophys.
Res., 109, D06311, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004325</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Konopka et al.(2004)Konopka, Steinhorst, Grooß, Günther,
Müller, Elkins, Jost, Richard, Schmidt, Toon, and McKenna</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Steinhorst, H.-M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R.,
Elkins, J. W., Jost, H.-J., Richard, E., Schmidt, U., Toon, G., and McKenna,
D. S.: Mixing and ozone loss in the 1999–2000 Arctic vortex: Simulations
with the three-dimensional Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere
(CLaMS), J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02315, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003792</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Konopka et al.(2007)Konopka, Günther, Müller, dos Santos,
Schiller, Ravegnani, Ulanovsky, Schlager, Volk, Viciani, Pan, McKenna, and
Riese</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Günther, G., Müller, R., dos Santos, F. H. S., Schiller, C., Ravegnani, F.,
Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Volk, C. M., Viciani, S., Pan, L. L., McKenna, D.-S., and Riese, M.:
Contribution of mixing to upward transport across the tropical tropopause layer (TTL),
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3285–3308, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kuell et al.(2005)Kuell, Offermann, Jarisch, Schaeler, Engel, Claude,
Smit, Ebel, and Feldmann</label><mixed-citation>Kuell, V., Offermann, D., Jarisch, M., Schaeler, B., Engel, A., Claude, G.,
Smit, H. G. J., Ebel, A., and Feldmann, H.: Tropopause region temperatures
and CFC 11 mixing ratios from CRISTA 2, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D16104,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005592</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Laube et al.(2013)Laube, Keil, Bönisch, Engel, Röckmann, Volk,
and Sturges</label><mixed-citation>Laube, J. C., Keil, A., Bönisch, H., Engel, A., Röckmann, T., Volk, C. M., and
Sturges, W. T.: Observation-based assessment of stratospheric fractional release,
lifetimes, and ozone depletion potentials of ten important source gases,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2779–2791, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2779-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2779-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Lin and Rood(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S. J. and Rood, R. B.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian
transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Mahieu et al.(2008)Mahieu, Duchatelet, Demoulin, Walker, Dupuy,
Froidevaux, Randall, Catoire, Strong, Boone, Bernath, Blavier, Blumenstock,
Coffey, De Mazière, Griffith, Hannigan, Hase, Jones, Jucks, Kagawa, Kasai,
Mebarki, Mikuteit, Nassar, Notholt, Rinsland, Robert, Schrems, Senten, Smale,
Taylor, Tétard, Toon, Warneke, Wood, Zander, and Servais</label><mixed-citation>Mahieu, E., Duchatelet, P., Demoulin, P., Walker, K. A., Dupuy, E., Froidevaux, L.,
Randall, C., Catoire, V., Strong, K., Boone, C. D., Bernath, P. F., Blavier, J.-F.,
Blumenstock, T., Coffey, M., De Mazière, M., Griffith, D., Hannigan, J., Hase, F.,
Jones, N., Jucks, K. W., Kagawa, A., Kasai, Y., Mebarki, Y., Mikuteit, S., Nassar, R.,
Notholt, J., Rinsland, C. P., Robert, C., Schrems, O., Senten, C., Smale, D., Taylor, J.,
Tétard, C., Toon, G. C., Warneke, T., Wood, S. W., Zander, R., and Servais, C.: Validation
of ACE-FTS v2.2 measurements of HCl, HF, CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F and CCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using space-, balloon-
and ground-based instrument observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6199–6221, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6199-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6199-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Mahowald et al.(2002)Mahowald, Plumb, Rasch, del Corral, Sassi, and
Heres</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Plumb, R. A., Rasch, P. J., del Corral, J., Sassi, F., and
Heres, W.: Stratospheric transport in a three-dimensional isentropic
coordinate model, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 3-1–ACH 3-14,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001313</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>McGillen et al.(2013)McGillen, Fleming, Jackman, and
Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>McGillen, M. R., Fleming, E. L., Jackman, C. H., and Burkholder, J. B.:
CFCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (CFC-11): UV absorption spectrum temperature dependence
measurements and the impact on its atmospheric lifetime and uncertainty,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4772–4776, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>McKenna et al.(2002a)McKenna, Grooß, Günther,
Konopka, Müller, Carver, and Sasano</label><mixed-citation>McKenna, D. S., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R.,
Carver, G., and Sasano, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the
Stratosphere (CLaMS) 2. Formulation of chemistry scheme and initialization,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 4-1–ACH 4-14, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000113</ext-link>,
2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>McKenna et al.(2002b)McKenna, Konopka, Grooß,
Günther, Müller, Spang, Offermann, and Orsolini</label><mixed-citation>McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R.,
Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model
of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 15-1–ACH 15-15, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000114</ext-link>,
2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Minschwaner et al.(2013)Minschwaner, Hoffmann, Brown, Riese,
Müller, and Bernath</label><mixed-citation>Minschwaner, K., Hoffmann, L., Brown, A., Riese, M., Müller, R., and Bernath, P. F.:
Stratospheric loss and atmospheric lifetimes of CFC-11 and CFC-12 derived
from satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4253–4263, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4253-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4253-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Molina and Rowland(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Molina, M. J. and Rowland, F. S.: Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes:
chlorine atom-catalyzed destruction of ozone, Nature, 249, 810–812, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Morgenstern et al.(2002)Morgenstern, Pyle, Iwi, Norton, Elkins,
Hurst, and Romashkin</label><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, O., Pyle, J. A., Iwi, A. M., Norton, W. A., Elkins, J. W., Hurst,
D. F., and Romashkin, P. A.: Diagnosis of mixing between middle latitudes and
the polar vortex from tracer-tracer correlations, J. Geophys. Res., 107,
4321, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001224</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Morgenstern et al.(2003)Morgenstern, Lee, and Pyle</label><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, O., Lee, A. M., and Pyle, J. A.: Cumulative mixing inferred from
stratospheric tracer relationships, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8321,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002098</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Müller et al.(1996)Müller, Crutzen, Grooß, Brühl,
Russell III, and Tuck</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, R., Crutzen, P. J., Grooß, J.-U., Brühl, C., Russell III,
J. M., and Tuck, A. F.: Chlorine activation and ozone depletion in the Arctic
vortex: Observations by the Halogen Occultation Experiment on the Upper
Atmosphere Research Satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 12531–12554, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Müller et al.(2001)Müller, McKenna, Schmidt, Engel, and
Proffitt</label><mixed-citation>Müller, R., McKenna, D. S., Schmidt, U., Engel, A., and Proffitt, M. H.:
The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O relationship from balloon-borne observations as a measure
of Arctic ozone loss in 1991/92, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
127,
1389–1412, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Müller et al.(2005)Müller, Tilmes, Konopka, Grooß, and
Jost</label><mixed-citation>Müller, R., Tilmes, S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., and Jost, H.-J.: Impact
of mixing and chemical change on ozone-tracer relations in the polar
vortex, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3139–3151, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3139-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3139-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Neu and Plumb(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Neu, J. L. and Plumb, R. A.: Age of air in a “leaky pipe” model of
stratospheric transport, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19243–19255, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Plumb(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Plumb, R. A.: A “tropical pipe” model of stratospheric transport, J. Geophys.
Res., 101, 3957–3972, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Plumb(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Plumb, R. A.: Stratospheric Transport, J. Met. Soc. Japan, 80, 793–809, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Plumb(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Plumb, R. A.: Tracer interrelationships in the stratosphere, Rev. Geophys., 45,
RG4005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005RG000179</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Plumb and Ko(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Plumb, R. A. and Ko, M. K. W.: Interrelationships between mixing ratios of
long-lived stratospheric constituents, J. Geophys. Res., 97,
10145–10156, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Plumb et al.(2000)Plumb, Waugh, and Chipperfield</label><mixed-citation>
Plumb, R. A., Waugh, D. W., and Chipperfield, M. P.: The effects of mixing on
tracer relationships in the polar vortices, J. Geophys. Res., 105,
10047–10062, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Pommrich et al.(2014)Pommrich, Müller, Grooß, Konopka, Ploeger,
Vogel, Tao, Hoppe, Günther, Spelten, Hoffmann, Pumphrey, Viciani, D'Amato,
Volk, Hoor, Schlager, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Pommrich, R., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Vogel, B., Tao, M.,
Hoppe, C. M., Günther, G., Spelten, N., Hoffmann, L., Pumphrey, H.-C., Viciani, S.,
D'Amato, F., Volk, C. M., Hoor, P., Schlager, H., and Riese, M.: Tropical troposphere
to stratosphere transport of carbon monoxide and long-lived trace species in the
Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS),
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 7, 5087–5139, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-5087-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmdd-7-5087-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Raspollini et al.(2013)Raspollini, Carli, Carlotti, Ceccherini, Dehn,
Dinelli, Dudhia, Flaud, López-Puertas, Niro, Remedios, Ridolfi, Sembhi,
Sgheri, and von Clarmann</label><mixed-citation>Raspollini, P., Carli, B., Carlotti, M., Ceccherini, S., Dehn, A., Dinelli, B. M.,
Dudhia, A., Flaud, J.-M., López-Puertas, M., Niro, F., Remedios, J. J., Ridolfi, M.,
Sembhi, H., Sgheri, L., and von Clarmann, T.: Ten years of MIPAS measurements with
ESA Level 2 processor V6 – Part 1: Retrieval algorithm and diagnostics of the
products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2419–2439, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2419-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2419-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Riese et al.(1999)Riese, Spang, Preusse, Ern, Jarisch, Offermann, and
Grossmann</label><mixed-citation>
Riese, M., Spang, R., Preusse, P., Ern, M., Jarisch, M., Offermann, D., and
Grossmann, K. U.: Cryogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the
Atmosphere (CRISTA) data processing and atmospheric temperature and trace
gas retrieval, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16349–16367, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Rigby et al.(2013)Rigby, Prinn, O'Doherty, Montzka, McCulloch, Harth,
Mühle, Salameh, Weiss, Young, Simmonds, Hall, Dutton, Nance, Mondeel,
Elkins, Krummel, Steele, and Fraser</label><mixed-citation>Rigby, M., Prinn, R. G., O'Doherty, S., Montzka, S. A., McCulloch, A., Harth, C. M.,
Mühle, J., Salameh, P. K., Weiss, R. F., Young, D., Simmonds, P. G., Hall, B. D.,
Dutton, G. S., Nance, D., Mondeel, D. J., Elkins, J. W., Krummel, P. B., Steele,
L. P., and Fraser, P. J.: Re-evaluation of the lifetimes of the major CFCs and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CCl3 using atmospheric trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2691–2702, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2691-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2691-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Rind et al.(2007)Rind, Lerner, Jonas, and McLinden</label><mixed-citation>Rind, D., Lerner, J., Jonas, J., and McLinden, C.: Effects of resolution and
model physics on tracer transports in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space
Studies general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09315,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007476</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Roeckner et al.(2006)Roeckner, Brokopf, Esch, Giorgetta, Hagemann,
Kornblueh, Manzini, Schlese, and Schulzweida</label><mixed-citation>
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh,
L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated
climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere
model, J. Clim., 19, 3771–3791, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Schoeberl et al.(2005)Schoeberl, Douglass, Polansky, Boone, Walker,
and Bernath</label><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Polansky, B., Boone, C., Walker, K. A., and
Bernath, P.: Estimation of stratospheric age spectrum from chemical tracers,
J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21303, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006125</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Solomon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,
Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>SPARC(2013)</label><mixed-citation>SPARC: SPARC report on the lifetimes of stratospheric ozone-depleting
substances, Their Replacements, and Related Species, SPARC Report No. 6,
WCRP-15/2013,
<uri>http://www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports/sparc-report-no6/</uri>
(last access: 21 June 2014), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Velders et al.(2007)Velders, Andersen, Daniel, Fahey, and
McFarland</label><mixed-citation>
Velders, G. J. M., Andersen, S. O., Daniel, J. S., Fahey, D. W., and McFarland,
M.: The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climate, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 4814–4819, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Volk et al.(1996)Volk, Elkins, Fahey, Salawitch, Dutton, Gilligan,
Proffitt, Loewenstein, Podolske, Minschwaner, Margitan, and Chan</label><mixed-citation>
Volk, C. M., Elkins, J. W., Fahey, D. W., Salawitch, R. J., Dutton, G. S.,
Gilligan, J. M., Proffitt, M. H., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R.,
Minschwaner, K., Margitan, J. J., and Chan, K. R.: Quantifying transport
between the tropical and mid-latitude lower stratosphere, Science, 272,
1763–1768, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Volk et al.(1997)Volk, Elkins, Fahey, Dutton, Gilligan, Loewenstein,
Podolske, Chan, and Gunson</label><mixed-citation>
Volk, C. M., Elkins, J. W., Fahey, D. W., Dutton, G. S., Gilligan, J. M.,
Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R., Chan, K. R., and Gunson, M. R.: Evaluation
of source gas lifetimes from stratospheric observations, J. Geophys. Res.,
102, 25543–25564, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Waugh(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Waugh, D. W.: Mixing of polar vortex air into middle latitudes as revealed by
tracer-tracer scatterplots, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 13119–13134, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Waugh et al.(2003)Waugh, Hall, and Haine</label><mixed-citation>Waugh, D. W., Hall, T. M., and Haine, T. W. N.: Relationships among tracer
ages, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3138, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JC001325</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>WMO(1999)</label><mixed-citation>WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, Global Ozone Research and
Monitoring Project, Report No. 44, Geneva, Switzerland,
1999.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>WMO(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and
Monitoring Project, Report No. 52, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Yokota et al.(2002)Yokota, Nakajima, Sugita, Tsubaki, Itou, Kaji,
Suzuki, Kanzawa, Park, and Sasano</label><mixed-citation>Yokota, T., Nakajima, H., Sugita, T., Tsubaki, H., Itou, Y., Kaji, M., Suzuki,
M., Kanzawa, H., Park, J. H., and Sasano, Y.: Improved Limb Atmospheric
Spectrometer (ILAS) data retrieval algorithm for Version 5.20 gas profile
products, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8216, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000628</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
