<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-14-12415-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chemistry and mineralogy of clay minerals in Asian and Saharan dusts and the
implications for iron supply to the oceans</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Chemistry and mineralogy of clay minerals in Asian and Saharan dusts}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G.~Y.~Jeong and E.~P.~Achterberg}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name>
          <email>jearth@anu.ac.kr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Achterberg</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Andong National
University, Andong 760-749, Republic of Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, 24148 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">G. Y. Jeong (jearth@anu.ac.kr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>12415</fpage><lpage>12428</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>June</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>Mineral dust supplied to remote ocean regions stimulates
phytoplankton growth through delivery of micronutrients, notably iron (Fe).
Although attention is usually paid to Fe (hydr)oxides as major sources of
available Fe, Fe-bearing clay minerals are typically the dominant phase in
mineral dust. The mineralogy and chemistry of clay minerals in dust
particles, however, are largely unknown. We conducted microscopic
identification and chemical analysis of the clay minerals in Asian and
Saharan dust particles. Cross-sectional slices of dust particles were
prepared by focused ion beam (FIB) techniques and analyzed by transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDXS). TEM images of FIB slices revealed that clay minerals occurred as
either nano-thin platelets or relatively thick plates. Chemical compositions
and lattice fringes of the nano-thin platelets suggested that they included
illite, smectite, illite–smectite mixed layers, and their nanoscale mixtures
(illite–smectite series clay minerals, ISCMs) which could not be resolved
with an electron microbeam. EDXS chemical analysis of the clay mineral
grains revealed that the average Fe content was 5.8 % in nano-thin ISCM
platelets assuming 14 % H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, while the Fe content of illite and
chlorite was 2.8 and 14.8 %, respectively. In addition, TEM and EDXS
analyses were performed on clay mineral grains dispersed and loaded on
micro-grids. The average Fe content of clay mineral grains was 6.7 and
5.4 % in Asian and Saharan dusts, respectively. A comparative X-ray
diffraction analysis of bulk dusts showed that Saharan dust was more
enriched in clay minerals than Asian dust, while Asian dust was more
enriched in chlorite. Clay minerals, in particular nanocrystalline ISCMs and
Fe-rich chlorite, are probably important sources of Fe to remote marine
ecosystems. Further detailed analyses of the mineralogy and chemistry of
clay minerals in global mineral dusts are required to evaluate the inputs of
Fe to surface ocean microbial communities.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Primary productivity in high-nitrate low-chlorophyll (HNLC)
regions of the world's ocean has been an important topic because of the roles
of this process in regulating atmospheric carbon dioxide levels over
glacial–interglacial timescales (Boyd et al., 2000, 2004; Bopp et al., 2003;
Jickells et al., 2005; Formenti et al., 2011). Iron (Fe) is a controlling
micronutrient for phytoplankton growth in HNLC regions, with deep winter
mixing (Tagliabue et al., 2010) and long-range transport of continental
aerosols (including mineral dust and anthropogenic aerosols) being key Fe
sources for surface water microbial communities. In addition, the
dust-derived Fe supply to low-nitrate low-chlorophyll (LNLC) regions of the
oceans has been shown to control dinitrogen fixation (Moore et al., 2009;
Schlosser et al., 2014). Therefore, interest has grown in recent years
regarding atmospheric aerosol transport, inputs to the surface ocean, and the
subsequent dissolution of Fe from aerosols (Desboeufs et al., 2001; Jickells
and Spokes, 2001; Hand et al., 2004; Guieu et al., 2005; Meskhidze et al.,
2005; Baker and Jickells, 2006; Buck et al., 2006, 2010; Cwiertny et al.,
2008; Journet et al., 2008; Mahowald et al., 2009; Shi et al., 2009, 2011;
Aguilar-Islas et al., 2010; Baker and Croot, 2010; Fu et al., 2010; Johnson
et al., 2010; Paris et al., 2010; Trapp et al., 2010; Formenti et al., 2011;
Rubin et al., 2011; Takahashi et al., 2011; Sholkovitz et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Iron dissolution from aerosols has been represented by fractional Fe
solubility ( %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and varies strongly depending on the aerosol
source (Mahowald et al., 2005; Sholkovitz et al., 2012). Sholkovitz et al. (2012) compiled total Fe loading (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for a
global-scale set of aerosol samples, and found a hyperbolic trend in the
%Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was explained by the mixing of
mineral dusts of high Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and low %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and anthropogenic
aerosols of low Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and high %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, mineral dust is an
important supply of bioavailable Fe to the remote ocean, particularly during
dust events originating from desert sources. Ito and Feng (2010)
demonstrated using model simulations that, compared to Asian dust, soluble
Fe from combustion sources contributed a relatively small amount to the
soluble Fe supply to the North Pacific Ocean during spring periods. An
enhancement of dust %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs during long-range transport. The
factors responsible for this increase in %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are not yet fully
understood, and include the type of Fe-bearing minerals of dust and their
reactivity (Cwiertny et al., 2008; Journet et al., 2008), the photoreduction
of Fe in dust particles (Siefert et al., 1994; Hand et al., 2004; Fu et al.,
2010), reactions between dust particles and water during cloud processing
(Desboeufs et al., 2001; Shi et al., 2009), reactions with acidic gases in
the atmosphere (Zhuang et al., 1992; Meskhidze et al., 2003), and changes in
particle size during long-range transport (Jickells et al., 2005; Baker and
Croot, 2010).</p>
      <p>Information regarding dust mineralogy enables the %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
mineral dust to be better understood, as highlighted by Cwiertny et
al. (2008) after an extensive literature review. The mineralogical factors
related to %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> include solubility, reactivity with atmospheric
acids, grain size, Fe content, and the Fe oxidation state of the minerals.
Despite numerous articles on the measurements of %Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sholkovitz et al., 2012, and references therein), the modeling of dust input
(Mahowald et al., 2005, 2009; Johnson and Meskhidze, 2013), and the
determinations of the aqueous geochemistry of Fe (Baker and Croot, 2010, and
references therein), basic data are still lacking on the properties of
Fe-bearing minerals in dust. Iron oxides/hydroxides are an important source
of available Fe. However, the quantities of Fe (hydr)oxides in mineral dust
are much lower than the quantity of Fe-bearing silicates. Mineralogical
analyses have shown that clay minerals are the most abundant phases followed
by quartz, feldspars, and calcite in the long-range transported dusts
(Glaccum and Prospero, 1980; Avila et al., 1997; Jeong 2008; Jeong et al.,
2014). The crystal structures of clay minerals can accommodate a significant
quantity of Fe in their octahedral sites. Thus, both the clay minerals and Fe
(hydr)oxides should be considered when investigating their roles in Fe
availability (Raiswell and Canfield, 2012). Journet et al. (2008) reported a
higher Fe solubility of clay minerals compared with Fe oxides, emphasizing
the significant role of clay minerals in Fe availability. However, in the
experiments performed by Journet et al. (2008), dissolution work was
conducted for a limited set of clay minerals and Fe (hydr)oxides obtained
from rocks. Clay minerals in atmospheric dust particles have diverse origins
and a wide range of chemical compositions and particle sizes, depending upon
the lithology, geological setting, and physical/chemical weathering process
in their source regions. The contribution of clay minerals to Fe availability
should be considered on the basis of the physical and chemical
characteristics of the different clay mineral types in the natural dust. For
example, the Fe content of clay minerals in dust for modeling and dissolution
experiments is typically not known. The separate determination of the Fe
content of each clay mineral species is almost impossible for bulk dust
because of the agglomeration of many silicate mineral grains (Falkovich et
al., 2001; Shi et al., 2005; Jeong, 2008; Jeong and Nousiainen, 2014; Jeong
et al., 2014). This is in contrast to the exact determination of Fe content
in the form of Fe (hydr)oxides using an established selective extraction
procedure, such as the method of Mehra and Jackson (1960). However, the
chemical composition of submicron grains of clay minerals can be determined
by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDXS) of fluorescent X-ray induced
by an electron microbeam. EDXS attached to a transmission electron microscope
(TEM) is an excellent technique for the chemical and physical
characterization of individual clay mineral grains.</p>
      <p>In this study, we report the mineral species, nanoscopic occurrence, and
chemical compositions of the clay mineral grains in individual Asian and
Saharan dust particles obtained by the combined application of TEM and EDXS.
Analyses of clay minerals mixed in particles were conducted on
cross-sectional slices of individual dust particles prepared by focused ion
beam (FIB) milling. Clay mineral grains loaded on micro-grids by a
conventional procedure were also analyzed by TEM and EDXS. We furthermore
present the mineral compositions of bulk dusts obtained by X-ray diffraction
(XRD) analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Dust samples and methods</title>
      <p>Asian dust events were observed on 17 March 2009, 20 March 2010, 31 March
2012, and 18 March 2014 in the Republic of Korea. The dust outbreaks and subsequent
migration of the Asian dusts were traced using dust index images derived
from satellite remote sensing, which indicated the source of the four dust
events in the Gobi desert of southern Mongolia and northern China
(30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–46<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and
their migration to the east across the Republic of Korea. Details of the synoptic conditions
during the dust outbreaks and migration of these events were provided in
Jeong et al. (2014). The peak concentrations of particulate matter less than
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in diameter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 428, 1788, 220, and
378 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2014 dust events, respectively
(Korea Meteorological Administration, 2014).</p>
      <p>The Asian dusts were sampled using a Thermo Scientific high-volume total
suspended particulate (TSP) sampler fitted with Pallflex teflon-coated
borosilicate glass-fiber filters (8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 in.) or
Whatman<sup>®</sup> No. 1441-866 cellulose filters. The
2012 dust was sampled on a mountain peak at Deokjeok Island (190 m a.s.l.,
37<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 126<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>08<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) off the western coast
of the Republic of Korea for 24 h (09:00, 31 March–08:00, 1 April) at a
flow rate of 250 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The 2009, 2010, and 2014 Asian dusts were
sampled using the same procedure on the roof of a four-story building at
Andong National University (36<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>34<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
128<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) over a 12 h period (09:00–21:00, 17 March 2009,
20:00–08:00, 19 March 2010, and 10:00–22:00, 18 March 2014).</p>
      <p>Saharan dust samples were collected at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory
on the island of São Vicente, Cabo Verde (16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
24<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) in the eastern North Atlantic Ocean. Dust was
sampled on Sterlitech polypropylene membrane filters (47 mm diameter,
0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size) using a low-volume aerosol sampler installed at
the top of a 30 m tower in the period from 7 November 2007 to 14 March 2008
(Carpenter et al., 2010). The total volume of samples for the individual
filters ranged from 50 to 100 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at flow rates of 20–30 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a period of 3–5 days.</p>
      <p>X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted to obtain information on the
mineral composition of bulk samples using a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer.
A portion of the filter was cut and immersed in methanol in a 10 mL glass
vial. The filter was agitated in an ultrasonic bath to remove dust particles
from the filter. During the agitation, dust particles were disaggregated
into clay minerals and other silicate grains. The suspension was sieved
through 270-mesh sieve to remove cellulose fibers and dried on the glass
plate. Then, dust was collected by razor blade. Several milligrams of dust
samples (2–10 mg) were loaded on the 3 mm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 mm cavity of an
aluminum plate. The analytical conditions were 60 s of counting per
0.03<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> step in the scan range of 3–65<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Cu K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> radiation, and 45 kV/35 mA. Because the quantity of the
samples was small, the patterns obtained were not suitable for precise
quantification. Thus, the compositional analysis was deemed
semi-quantitative. Mineral compositions were derived using a SIROQUANT
software package (version 4). Since intensity loss was significant in the
lower angle region due to the small sample size irradiated with X-rays, the
high angle region (24.5–65<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used for the
simulation of the observed XRD pattern. After the XRD analysis of the bulk
dusts, the samples were subjected to ethylene glycol and heat treatments for
detailed identification of clay minerals. The samples were wetted with
water, smeared, and dried on a glass slide, and subsequently treated with
ethylene glycol vapor at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a desiccator for 2 days followed
by heating at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 min.</p>
      <p>Electron-transparent thin slices of dust particles (2009, 2012, and 2014
Asian dusts; 28–31 December, 2007, 18–23 January, 23–26 February, 29
February–4 March, 12–14 March, 2008 Saharan dusts) were prepared for TEM
analysis of clay minerals. Hereafter, the term “particle” refers to
individual solid objects suspended in the atmosphere, while the term
“grain” refers to the constituents of the particles. Thin slices
(ca. 100 nm in thickness) of about
ca. 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size were cut from dust
particles using a SII NanoTechnology SMI3050TB and a JEOL JIB4601F FIB
instrument for the Asian and Saharan dusts. Prior to using the FIB, the dust
particles were transferred onto adhesive carbon film and characterized using
a JEOL JSM 6700F field emission gun scanning electron microscope (SEM)
equipped with an Oxford EDXS system at 5 kV acceleration voltage and 8 mm
working distance after being coated with platinum for electrical
conductivity. Dust particles were selected for FIB work on the basis of
mineralogical characteristics identified by SEM-EDXS analysis as reported in
Jeong (2008) and Jeong et al. (2014). Individual Asian dust particles could
be selected and prepared as thin slices by FIB milling because the particles
were sufficiently separated from each other on the filters. However, the
Saharan dusts considered in this study were highly concentrated and
aggregated on the filters. Thus, the original atmospheric particles for FIB
milling could not be identified with confidence. However, the purpose of the
TEM analysis undertaken in this study was not to reveal the structures of
individual original dust particles as reported by Jeong and Nousiainen
(2014), but to analyze the chemistry and mineralogy of clay mineral grains.
Thus, we prepared thin slices using FIB milling from the Saharan dust
samples.</p>
      <p>Clay-mineral grains loaded on micro-grids were also prepared for
investigation of Asian (2009, 2010, 2012, and 2014) and Saharan (7–9 November,
13–14 December, 28–31 December 2007, 18–23 January, 29 February–4 March, 12–14 March 2008)
dust. The clay mineral grains suspended in methanol were loaded on to
200-mesh Cu micro-grids covered with a carbon-coated lacey formvar support
film by immersing the micro-grids in the suspension with tweezers and
subsequent drying on filter paper. Every electron-transparent grain
encountered during the movement of stage was analyzed by EDXS.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Occurrence of clay minerals in three Asian dust particles
<bold>(a, b, c)</bold>. Panel 1 in each particle consists of two SEM images of
the original particle (low and high magnifications). Panels 2 and 3 are TEM
images of the cross-sectional FIB slice prepared from the particle in
panel 1.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12415/2014/acp-14-12415-2014-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The TEM instruments used in this study were a JEOL JEM 2100F field emission
gun STEM at 200 kV, a JEOL JEM 3010 TEM for high-resolution imaging, and a
JEOL JEM 2010 TEM equipped with an Oxford ISIS EDXS system. Minerals in the
FIB slices were identified on the basis of lattice fringe images, electron
diffraction, and EDXS. General chemical formulas of minerals identified in
this study are given in the Supplement Table 1. Digital images of the
microstructures and lattice fringes were recorded using a Gatan digital
camera and processed with a Gatan
DigitalMicrograph<sup>®</sup>. To obtain the elemental
compositions of clay minerals, the X-ray counts of Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Ti, K, and
Ca were converted to weight % (wt %) of the elements using the
quantification procedures given by Cliff and Lorimer (1975). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-factors
of the elements for the conversion were obtained from an analysis of
the FIB slices prepared from biotite and plagioclase of known composition
occurring in the Palgongsan granite (Jeong, 2000).</p>
      <p>TEM-EDXS analysis often requires a small beam size down to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 nm
to determine the chemical composition of clay minerals that are mixed
with other minerals. The X-ray generation volume is small due to the thin
nature of the FIB slices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 nm) and small analysis area.
High-quality quantitative analysis requires at least 10 000 counts of each
peak for the ideal specimens of large thin and resistant phases (Williams
and Carter, 2009). However, such an ideal analytical condition was not
obtained for the clay mineral grains, which were very sensitive to the
electron beam because of their structural water, disorder, and
nanocrystallinity. To minimize electron beam damage of the clay mineral
grains, the electron dose was reduced by setting the spot size to four.
X-rays of Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Ti, K, and Ca were counted for 100 s. For clay
grains loaded on the micro-grids, 0.5–2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m grains produced sufficient
X-ray photons for analysis, while submicron thin clay grains (ca. &lt; 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
did not. The total X-ray counts of those elements in ISIS EDXS
system were ca. 30 000 for the analysis of clay mineral grains loaded on the
grid, and ca. 15 000 for the analysis of FIB specimens. The detection limits
for these elements were ca. 0.1 wt %. For Asian dust samples, we conducted
206 analyses of clay minerals in the 50 FIB slices prepared from 50 dust
particles, and 514 analyses of clay mineral grains loaded on the micro-grids.
For Saharan dust, we conducted 116 analyses in the 10 FIB slices prepared
from 10 particles, and 356 analyses of clay mineral grains loaded on
micro-grids. In the calculation of elemental wt %, the total H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
content of clay minerals was assumed to be 14 wt %, which is the average
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O content of illite and smectite provided in Table II and Table XXVII
of Weaver and Pollard (1975).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Occurrence of clay minerals in dust particles</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Asian dust</title>
      <p>SEM images reveal micron-size platy grains of clay minerals on the surface of
Asian dust particles (Fig. 1a-1, b-1, and c-1). TEM images of cross-sectional
FIB slices show that clay mineral plates coat the surface of quartz
(Fig. 1a-2, a-3, b-2, and b-3), or are agglomerated (Figs. 1c-2 and 3). Clay
mineral grains were classified into two groups: (1) rather thick, compact
grains of illite (Fig. 1a-2, a-3, and b-2), chlorite (Fig. 1b-2), and
kaolinites (not shown here); and (2) loose chaotic, sub-parallel nano-thin
platelets (Fig. 1a-2, a-3, b-2, b-3, c-2, and c-3), which display lattice
fringes of ca. 1.0 nm (Figs. 1b-3 and 1c-3) and contained the interlayer
cations K and Ca. The nano-thin platelets were arranged in sub-parallel
patterns to form a fine matrix with the inclusions of thick and compact clay
minerals (Fig. 1a-2, a-3, and b-2). The loose, curved lattices (Fig. 1b-3 and
c-3) of nano-thin plates are in contrast to the compact, straight lattices of
larger plates of illite (Fig. 2a), chlorite (Fig. 2b), and kaolinite
(Fig. 2c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Straight and coherent lattice fringe images of larger compact grains
of illite <bold>(a)</bold>, chlorite <bold>(b)</bold>, and kaolinite <bold>(c)</bold> in
Asian dust particles. TEM images of FIB slices.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12415/2014/acp-14-12415-2014-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Larger compact grains of smectite were not found in the TEM observations of
FIB slices in this study. However, smectite has previously been identified by
the XRD analysis of Asian dust treated with ethylene glycol (Jeong, 2008).
Thus, smectite is expected to be present in the form of nano-thin platelets
of smectite or illite–smectite mixed layers. Nano-thin clay mineral
platelets displaying 10 Å lattice fringes were the major form of the
clay minerals in the Asian dusts. Their varying K and Ca contents suggest a
close mixture and mixed-layering of illite and smectite because K is
predominantly assigned to the cation fixed in the interlayer of illite, while
Ca is assigned to the exchangeable cation of smectite (Jeong et al., 2004).
The mixtures and mixed-layering of illite and smectite unit layers are common
in natural geological environments as a result of chemical weathering in
soils and the low temperature diagenesis of sediments (Weaver, 1989;
Środoń, 1999). However, even using the lattice-fringe imaging,
unambiguous distinction was not possible between illite and smectite unit
layers mixed at the nano scale because hydrated smectite (unit layer
thickness of 1.4–1.6 nm) had become dehydrated and had contracted to a unit
layer of ca. 1.0 nm thickness under the high vacuum in the TEM chamber.
Thus, the nanoscale mixtures of nano-thin platelets with ca. 1.0 nm lattice
fringes and containing K and Ca in varying ratios are collectively referred
to here as illite–smectite series clay minerals (ISCMs) which are probably
mixtures/mixed-layers of illite and smectite in varying ratios. Although
thick smectite grains were not observed, illite occurred as thick compact
grains (Fig. 1a-2, a-3, and b-2) as well as nano-thin ISCMs. Chlorite also
occurred as nano-thin plates (Fig. 1b-3) in a close association with ISCMs.</p>
      <p>TEM images of the clay mineral grains dispersed on the micro-grids are
presented in Fig. 3. Micron-size ISCM plates have diffuse outlines and
granular micro-textures due to nano-size subgrains (Fig. 3a-1 and a-2), which
are compared to the sub-parallel group of nano-thin ISCM plates observed in
the cross-sectional FIB slices (Fig. 1). The electron diffraction pattern
shows turbostratic stacking of nano-size subgrains (Fig. 3a-3). However, the
discrete illite grain in Fig. 2a-4 has a platy morphology with a clear grain
boundary similar to the large compact grains of discrete illite in Fig. 1a-2,
a-3, and b-2. The morphology and micro-textures of kaolinite grains
(Fig. 3a-5) are similar to those of ISCM grains, with diffuse outlines and
granular micro-textures due to the nano-size subgrains. Weathered chlorite
plates consist partly of subgrains (Fig. 3b-6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>TEM images of clay mineral grains loaded on the micro-grid.
Clay mineral grains from Asian dusts, showing ISCM (panel 1),
discrete illite (panel 4), kaolinite (panel 5), and chlorite (panel 6)
grains. Panel 2 was magnified from Panel 1. Panel 3 is an electron
diffraction pattern of the circled area in panel 2 <bold>(a)</bold>. Clay mineral
grains from Saharan dusts showing illite (panel 1), ISCM (panels 1 and 2),
hexagonal kaolinite (panel 3) and elongated palygorskite (panel 3) grains <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12415/2014/acp-14-12415-2014-f03.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Saharan dust</title>
      <p>The TEM images of FIB slices prepared from three clay-rich particles are
presented in Fig. 4. The particles are dense (Figs. 4a-1) or porous
(Figs. 4b-1 and c-1) agglomerates of nano-thin platelets that are arranged in
sub-parallel anastomosing patterns (Fig. 4a-2, b-2, and c-2). Lattice fringes
of ca. 1 nm indicate the common occurrence of ISCMs (Fig. 4a-3, b-3, and
c-3). Larger compact grains of illite and chlorite are found in the ISCM
matrix (Figs. 5a). Compact dense biotite grain grades to kaolinite as shown
in Fig. 5b and c. Biotite kaolinitization is a common process in the
weathering environment (Dong et al., 1998; Jeong, 2000; Jeong and Kim, 2003).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Occurrence of clay minerals in three clay-rich Saharan dust
particles <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>. Panel 1 in each particle is a low magnification
TEM image of the cross-sectional FIB slice prepared from the original
particle. Panel 2 is a TEM image magnified from the TEM image in panel 1.
Panel 3 is the lattice fringe image.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12415/2014/acp-14-12415-2014-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>TEM images of the clay mineral grains dispersed on the micro-grids show
illite plates with clear outlines (Fig. 3b-1) and ISCMs with diffuse
outlines (Fig. 3b-2). The kaolinite plates have a hexagonal shape (Fig. 3b-3),
indicating the higher crystallinity of kaolinite in Saharan dust,
which is in contrast to the irregular kaolinite plate with a diffuse outline
identified in Asian dust (Fig. 3a-5). Another feature of the Saharan dust
distinguishing it from the Asian dust is the occurrence of elongated grains
of palygorskite (inset in Fig. 3b-3).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Fe content of the clay minerals</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Asian dust</title>
      <p>EDXS analyses were carried out for two types of clay minerals identified from
the TEM analysis of FIB slices: sub-parallel groups of thin platelets and
individual thick grains. Undertaking EDXS analysis in a selective manner for
each nano-thin plate was impossible due to the limit of the minimum
beam size (ca. 50 nm) and the low X-ray counts from the reduced electron
dose used to minimize damage by the beam. The Fe content, assuming
14 wt % of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, was plotted against K content (Fig. 6). The data
points could be categorized into three groups. Group A is clustered in the
region bound by ca. 0.5–4.5 wt % K and ca. 2.5–10 wt % Fe. Group
A data were obtained mostly from the sub-parallel groups of thin plates.
Groups B and C contained data for thick grains: (B) high K
(ca. 4.5–8.5 wt %)–low Fe (ca. 0–6 wt %) and (C) low K (ca. 0–3
wt %)–high Fe (ca. 10–26 wt %). The TEM-EDXS data from the FIB
slices of Asian dust particles are summarized in Table 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Occurrence of larger compact grains of illite <bold>(a)</bold>, chlorite
<bold>(a)</bold>, kaolinite <bold>(b, c)</bold>, and biotite <bold>(b, c)</bold> in
Saharan dust particles.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12415/2014/acp-14-12415-2014-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of average chemical compositions of clay mineral grains
(wt %) analyzed by TEM EDXS. H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O content of the clay minerals was
assumed to be 14 %.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Asian dust </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">Saharan dust </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Micro-grid</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FIB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FIB (group</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">FIB (group</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">FIB (group</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Micro-grid</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FIB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(whole)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">A, ISCMs)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">B, illite)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">C, chlorite)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">514</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">206</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">356</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">116</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Si</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Al</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ti</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup>

</oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Plots of Fe vs. K from the TEM-EDXS analyses of clay minerals in the
cross-sectional FIB slices of dust particles and clay mineral grains loaded
on the micro-grids. The boxes indicating groups A, B, and C are drawn on the
basis of TEM micro-textures and EDXS data for FIB slices of Asian dust
particles.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/12415/2014/acp-14-12415-2014-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Group A was considered to represent ISCMs whose intermediate K content
indicates a mixture of nano-thin platelets of illite, smectite, and their
mixed-layers. The average ISCM composition of group A is
K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.45</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ti<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>3.50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The characterization of the
nanoscale mixing and mixed layering of the ISCMs can be undertaken by TEM
analysis of ISCMs treated with alkyl ammonium ions, which selectively expand
smectite layers even under the high vacuum of the TEM chamber (Lagaly, 1994;
Jeong et al., 2004). However, the method will require further development
before it can be applied to dust particles. The group B was considered to
represent discrete illite. The average structural formula of discrete illite
in dust particles is
K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.61</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.22</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ti<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.66</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>3.34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This formula of group B is consistent with values for the reference illites
retrieved from the literature (mean of 24 illite analyses in Table III,
Weaver and Pollard, 1975; Table 1.7, Meunier and Velde, 2004) (Fig. 6). The
representative formula of reference illites reported in the literature is
K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.77</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.64</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ti<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.00</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>0.64</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>3.36</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relative proportions of
illite and smectite components could be estimated from the K contents,
because K exists mostly as a fixed cation in the interlayer of illite (Jeong
et al., 2004). The relative proportion of illite and smectite components in
ISCMs is ca. 35 : 65 based on the K contents of the reference illite
(0.77 K) and ISCMs (0.25 K). The proportion of smectite components is
higher than that of the illite component in ISCMs. Group C could be assigned
to the chlorite or K-depleted biotite (vermiculite or biotite–vermiculite
mixed-layer) formed during the weathering in the source soils. The average Fe
contents of the ISCMs (5.8 wt %, group A) are higher than those of illite
(2.8 wt %, group B) and lower than those of chlorite (14.8 wt %,
group C) (Table 1). One data point plotted near the origin (0 wt % of K
and Fe) indicates the presence of kaolinite. Only three kaolinites were
analyzed by EDXS, detecting no Fe.</p>
      <p>The EDXS data for the clay mineral grains loaded on the micro-grids, assuming
14 wt % of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, are presented in Fig. 6 and Table 1. Unlike the
grains in the FIB slices, the EDXS analyses of the clay mineral grains on the
micro-grids could not distinguish between mineralogical types in the mixture.
However, the distribution pattern of the data is consistent with that of the
FIB slices (Fig. 6). The data indicate a slightly higher K and Fe contents
compared to the data for FIB slice specimens. This was likely to have
originated
from the mixture of several clay mineral types in the clay grains loaded on
the micro-grids, while clay mineral types could be identified in the FIB slice
and separately analyzed by EDXS. In addition, this analysis cannot avoid the
ultrafine grains of iron (hydr)oxide phases mixed in the clay grain. Many
data points were plotted on the regions of ISCMs (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 266, 52 %) and
discrete illite (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 132, 26 %), indicating that the clay minerals
(&lt; 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in the dusts were dominated by ISCMs and discrete
illite with a minor presence of chlorite. The average Fe content of Asian
dusts was 7.3 wt % in 2009 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 159), 6.7 wt % in 2010 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 100), 6.5 wt % in 2012 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 105), and 6.1 wt % in 2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 150). The average Fe content of all the analyzed grains (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 514) was
6.7 wt %. The average chemical composition of the whole data set (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 514) was Si 21.4, Al 10.7, Fe 6.7, Mg 2.7, Ti 0.2, K 3.9, and
Ca 0.7 wt % (Table 1). Clay mineral grains from Chinese loess samples,
which formed the deposits of ancient Asian dust, were analyzed by the
TEM-EDXS of grains loaded on micro-grids (Jeong et al., 2008, 2011). The
average chemical composition of the clay minerals in loess samples was
Si 21.3, Al 12.3, Fe 6.1, Mg 2.7, Ti 0.1, K 2.6, and Ca 0.5 wt %, which
is remarkably consistent with the composition of our Asian dust samples. Fe
that is not incorporated in clay minerals is hosted in Fe (hydr)oxides such
as magnetite, goethite, and hematite, and coarse Fe-rich silicate mineral
grains such as amphibole, epidote, chlorite, and biotite. Clay-size chlorite
can be distinguished from coarse-grained chlorite, as large flakes of
chlorite exceeding 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in length are commonly found in Asian
dust.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Saharan dust</title>
      <p>EDXS data of clay mineral grains on the micro-grids (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 356) and FIB
slices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 116) are presented in Fig. 6 and summarized in Table 1. The
distribution patterns of data show similarity to those of the Asian dust,
indicating the presence of ISCMs, discrete illite, and chlorite/biotite. A
remarkable feature of the Saharan dust that differs from Asian dust is
that kaolinitic clay mineral grains are more abundant in Saharan dust
particles than in Asian dust particles, while chloritic grains are more
abundant in Asian dust (Fig. 6). Thus, compared with the chemical composition
of Asian dust, Al was slightly enriched in Saharan dust, while Fe and K were
slightly depleted. 63 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 225) of the clay mineral grains on the
micro-grid were ISCMs. The average chemical composition of clay mineral
grains from the whole data set of micro-grid samples assuming 14 wt % of
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O is Si 22.4, Al 11.9, Fe 5.4, Mg 2.5, Ti 0.2, K 2.2, and
Ca 0.5 wt % (Table 1). The average chemical composition of clay minerals
in Saharan dust is not very different from that in Asian dust. The typical
chemical composition of kaolinite is Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but
with some Fe replacing Al in octahedral sites. The average Fe content from
the analyses of 14 kaolinite grains is 1.7 wt % in Saharan dust.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Mineralogical properties of bulk dust</title>
      <p>Mineral compositions determined by XRD analysis are presented in Table 2.
Due to the small quantity of samples and low X-ray counts, the data in Table 2
are at best semi-quantitative. However, mineralogical differences are
evident between Asian and Saharan dusts. Although the quantity of each
mineral has a large uncertainty, the sum of the mineral groups is more
reliable. The mineral compositions of three Asian dusts were compared to the
compositions determined by single particle analysis using SEM and EDXS
(Table 2). Despite the differences in analytical methods and their
semi-quantitative nature, the mineral compositions determined by both
methods were well matched, supporting the reliability of the mineral
composition data for small bulk dust samples presented in this study. ISCMs
and discrete thick illite grains could not be distinguished in the XRD
method adopted in this study. Thus, sum of ISCMs and discrete illite is
presented in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Semi-quantitative mineral compositions (wt %) of Asian and
Saharan dusts determined by XRD analysis with mineral compositions of Asian
dusts determined by SEM single particle analysis for comparison.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Asian dust XRD </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col9" align="center">Saharan dust XRD </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18 Mar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31 Mar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20 Mar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16–17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18–23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28–31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mar 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Jan 2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Dec  2007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISCMs/illite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kaolinite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chlorite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total clay</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quartz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plagioclase</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K-feldspar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amphibole</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Calcite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gypsum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">SEM single particle analysis  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">(Jeong et al., 2014, and this study)* </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISCMs/illite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kaolinite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chlorite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total clay</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quartz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plagioclase</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K-feldspar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amphibole</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Calcite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gypsum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup>

</oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>* Mineral compositions were recalculated to include nine minerals
and mineral groups. The contents of biotite and muscovite in Jeong et
al. (2014) were merged with that of ISCMs/illite.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>A common mineralogical feature in both Asian and Saharan dusts is for the
clay minerals to be dominated by ISCMs and illite. This is consistent with
TEM-EDXS analysis of clay mineral grains on the micro-grids (Fig. 6). A
higher total clay mineral content is a strong mineralogical feature of
Saharan dusts, while the quartz and feldspar contents are higher in Asian
dust. Of the clay minerals, chlorite contents were higher in Asian dusts,
while kaolinite contents were higher in Saharan dusts. XRD analysis of the
preferentially oriented specimens of both the Asian and Saharan dusts showed
17 Å peaks of smectite. Although we did not undertake a quantitative
analysis, the shoulder near the 10.4 Å peak on the high angle side of
the illite (001) peak, which did not disappear following heat treatment at
350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, indicated the occurrence of palygorskite as reported by
Avila et al. (1997).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Clay minerals as iron carrier</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>ISCMs</title>
      <p>The TEM-EDXS analyses of FIB slices showed that the Fe contents of ISCMs,
illite, and chlorite in Asian dust particles are 5.8, 2.8, and 14.8 %, respectively. Although the average Fe content of ISCMs is lower than
chlorite, it is much higher than illite. The contribution of ISCMs to the Fe
released by dust is important compared with other clay minerals because they
are abundant clay minerals in both the Asian (52 %) and Saharan (63 %)
dusts, as shown in Table 1 and Fig. 6.</p>
      <p>The dissolution of Fe from silicate minerals depends largely upon physical
and chemical factors such as the crystal structure, Fe content,
crystallinity, and the surface area of the minerals (Lasaga, 1995; Nagy,
1995). ISCMs are nano-thin illite, smectite, and mixed-layered
illite–smectite. Thus, the large surface area of Fe-rich ISCMs may lead to
an enhanced release of Fe. Baker and Jickells (2006) suggested that the
primary control on Fe solubility is the ratio of surface area to volume of dust
particles, which decreases during long-range transport due to the
preferential removal of larger particles. Our observations confirm the
importance of smaller particles, and in particular probably the higher ISCM
content of long-range transported particles, which may make a large
contribution to Fe release.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Chlorite</title>
      <p>Chlorite has received little attention in previous studies. Fe-rich chlorite
is easily decomposed by acids (Ross, 1969; Kodama and Schnitzer, 1973; Brandt
et al., 2003; Lowson et al., 2005). In Chinese loess, chlorite is weathered
much faster than other silicate minerals (Jeong et al., 2011). Chlorite
should be considered in studies of Fe dissolution from mineral dust. Chlorite
content of Asian dusts was ca. 4–6 % as determined using single particle
analysis (Jeong et al., 2014) and 5–7 % in XRD analysis (this study). In
Saharan dusts, the chlorite content was lower at ca. 3 % as determined by
XRD analysis (this study). Although the chlorite content in dust is much
lower in comparison to ISCMs, the release of Fe from chlorite is likely to be
significant because its Fe content is 3–6 times higher than in the ISCMs and
illite. Takahashi et al. (2011) suggested that chlorite could possibly be
transformed into soluble ferrihydrite after cloud processing during
long-range atmospheric transport. Although we did not determine the oxidation
state of Fe, the structural Fe present in chlorite is known to be dominated
by Fe(II) (Newman, 1987). In contrast, the structural Fe in the fine ISCMs
(dioctahedral illite, smectite, and their mixed layers) is dominated by
Fe(III) (Weaver and Pollard, 1975; Newman, 1987). Thus, trioctahedral clay
minerals including chlorite may be an important source of soluble Fe(II).
Whilst Fe(II) is a bioavailable form of Fe for microbial organisms (Shaked et
al., 2005; Baker and Croot, 2010), its concentration is low due to rapid
oxidation to Fe(III) and low supply rates. Microorganisms therefore have a
range of alternative Fe uptake strategies (e.g., Rubin et al., 2011). Fe(II)
dissolved from dust is commonly considered to be derived from the
photochemical reduction of Fe(III). However, Cwiertny et al. (2008) suggested
that Fe(II)-substituted aluminosilicates may be an important alternative
source of soluble Fe(II), particularly after the reaction of dust with
atmospheric acids. Chlorite grains occur in a diverse size range, from
individual large flaky particles of several micrometers (Jeong, 2008; Jeong
and Nousiainen, 2014) to nano-thin platelets mixed with nano-thin ISCMs (Fig.
2b-3). Nano-thin chlorite plates are probably most effective in releasing Fe
from dust particles following reaction with atmospheric acids.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Implications to the evaluation of iron supply to oceans</title>
      <p>Global dust distributions and oceanic Fe deposition are modeled assuming the
Fe content of bulk dust being equivalent to the average Fe content of the
Earth crust (3.5 %) (Mahowald et al., 2005, 2009). A recent modeling study
on Fe supply to the oceans progressed to include dust mineralogy and Fe
content of clay minerals (Johnson and Meskhidze, 2013). Mineral compositions
were predicted from available soil data (Claquin et al., 1999; Nikovic et
al., 2012; Journet et al., 2014). However, mineralogical and chemical
compositions of world soils are certainly variable and poorly constrained.
In particular, the analytical data on the chemical composition (including Fe)
of fine clay minerals in local soils are hard to find in literature because
the analytical measurements are as difficult as the analysis of clay
minerals in dust. The modeling study on the Fe supply to global oceans by
Johnson and Meskhidze (2013) highlighted the importance of mineralogical
data of dust in the deposition of dissolved Fe to the global oceans. They
adopted mineral compositions of dust derived from a soil database of Nikovic
et al. (2012) and Fe content of a commercial illite reported by Paris et al. (2011). However, their model sensitivity analysis showed large variations of
dissolved Fe fluxes to the oceans, associated with the uncertainty in the
dust mineralogy and Fe content of constituent minerals. They emphasized that
realistic data of dust mineralogy and Fe content within individual
Fe-containing minerals are essential for the improvement of the description
of the Fe biogeochemical cycles in climate models. Although the chemical
analysis of clay minerals in individual dust particles as carried out in
this study is challenging, detailed analysis of representative global dust
samples is likely an efficient approach for obtaining information on Fe
mineralogy in dust. Long-range transported dust has the average
mineralogical and chemical properties of fine soil particles lifted from the
wide source regions of varying soil mineralogy. In addition, the mineral
composition and chemistry in dust from the major source regions do not show
significant inter-event and annual changes (Jeong, 2008). Further analytical
works for dust samples transported over long distances from major source
regions will allow the establishment of realistic mineralogical database for
the evaluation of Fe inputs to the remote ocean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>Mineral composition of bulk dust samples, Fe content of constituent
minerals, and their grain sizes form essential data for the evaluation of Fe
supply to remote surface oceans. Particularly, the properties of clay
minerals are important because of their abundance in mineral dust and high
Fe contents, relative to other silicates. We presented for the first time
mineralogical and chemical data of clay minerals in individual dust
particles from several Asian and Saharan dust samples, following analyses by
TEM and EDXS. The total clay content of Asian dusts determined by XRD
analysis was lower than that of Saharan dusts. TEM analysis of thin
cross-sectional slices of the dust particles revealed that nano-thin
platelets of ISCMs (illite, smectite, and illite–smectite mixed layers)
were most abundant in association with illite, chlorite, and kaolinite
occurring as thicker plates. Asian dusts were enriched with chlorite
relative to Saharan dust, while Saharan dusts were relatively enriched with
kaolinite. Kaolinite in Saharan dust occurred as hexagonal plates that were
better crystallized than in Asian dust. The average Fe content of the ISCMs
in Asian dusts as determined by EDXS was 5.8 % assuming 14 % H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
while the contents of illite and chlorite were 2.8 and 14.8 %,
respectively. The average Fe content of the EDXS data of the clay mineral
grains dispersed and loaded on the micro-grids was 6.7 and 5.4 % in
Asian and Saharan dusts, respectively. The Fe dissolution from clay minerals
is thought to be enhanced by the nanocrystallinity of ISCMs; furthermore, Fe-rich chlorite susceptible to acids may enhance dissolution
of Fe. The establishment of realistic mineralogical data sets from global
dust samples is important to reduce the uncertainty in the prediction of
iron inputs to oceans using geochemical and meteorological models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12415-2014-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-14-12415-2014-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant
NRF-2011-0028597. We thank the anonymous referees for constructive comments
that improved the manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:
Y. Rudich</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aguilar-Islas, A. M., Wu, J., and Rember, R.: Dissolution of aerosol-derived
iron in seawater: leach solution chemistry, aerosol type, and colloidal iron
fraction, Mar. Chem., 120, 25–33, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.01.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2009.01.011</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Avila, A., Queralt-Mitjans, I., and Alacón, M.: Mineralogical composition
of African dust delivered by red rains over northeastern Spain, J. Geophys.
Res., 102, 21977–21996, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Baker, A. R. and Croot, P. L.: Atmospheric and marine controls on aerosol
iron solubility in seawater, Mar. Chem., 120, 4–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2008.09.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Baker, A. R. and Jickells, T. D.: Mineral particle size as a control on
aerosol iron solubility, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17608,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026557</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Kohfeld, K. E., and Quere, C. L.: Dust impact on marine biota and
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during glacial periods, Paleoceanography, 18, 1046,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002PA000810</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W., Watson, A. J., Law, C. S., Abraham, E. R., Trull, T., Murdoch,
R., Bakker, D. C. E., Bowie, A. R., Buesseler, K. O., Chang, H., Charette,
M., Croot, P., Downing, K., Frew, R., Gall, M., Hadfield, M., Hall, J.,
Harvey, M., Jameson, G., LaRoche, J., Liddicoat, M., Ling, R., Maldonado, M.
T., McKay, R. M., Nodder, S., Pickmere, S., Pridmore, R., Rintoul, S., Safi,
K., Sutton, P., Strzepek, R., Tanneberger, K., Turner, S., Waite, A., and
Zeldis, J.: A mesoscale phytoplankton bloom in the polar Southern Ocean
stimulated by iron fertilization, Nature, 407, 695–702, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Boyd, P. W., Law, C. S., Wong, C. S., Nojiri, Y., Tsuda, A., Levasseur, M.,
Takeda, S., Rivkin, R., Harrison, P. J., Strzepek, R., Gower, J., McKay, R.
M., Abraham, E., Arychuk, M., Barwell-Clarke, J., Crawford, W., Hale, M.,
Harada, K., Johnson, K., Kiyosawa, H., Kudo, I., Marchetti, A., Miller, W.,
Needoba, J., Nishioka, J., Ogawa, H., Page, J., Robert, M., Saito, H.,
Sastri, A., Sherry, N., Soutar, T., Sutherland, N., Taira, Y., Whitney, F.,
Wong, S.-K. E., and Yoshimura, T.: The decline and fate of an iron-induced
subarctic phytoplankton bloom, Nature, 428, 549–553,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature02437</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brandt, F., Bosbach, D., Krawczyk-Bärsch, E., Arnold, T., and Bernhard,
G.: Chlorite dissolution in the acid pH-range: A combined microscopic and
macroscopic approach, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 67, 1451–1461, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Buck, C. S., Landing, W. M., Resing, J. A., and Lebon, G. T.: Aerosol iron
and aluminum solubility in the northwest Pacific Ocean: results from the 2002
IOC cruise, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 7, Q04M07, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC000977</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Buck, C. S., Landing, W. M., and Resing, J. A.: Particle size and aerosol
iron solubility: A high-resolution analysis of Atlantic aerosols, Mar.
Chem., 120, 14–24, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Carpenter, L. J., Fleming, Z. L., Read, K. A., Lee, J. D., Moller, S. J.,
Hopkins, J. R., Purvis, R. M., Lewis, A. C., Müller, K., Heinold, B.,
Herrmann, H., Wadinga Fomba, K., van Pinxteren, D., Müller, C., Tegen,
I., Wiedensohler, A., Müller, T., Niedermeier, N., Achterberg, E. P.,
Patey, M. D., Kozlova, E. A., Heimann, M., Heard, D. E., Plane, J. M. C.,
Mahajan, A., Oetjen, H., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., Evans, M. J.,
Pilling, M. J., Leigh, R. J., Monks, P. S., Karunaharan, A., Vaughan, S.,
Arnold, S. R., Tschritter, J., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Holla, R.,
Mendes, L. M., Lopez, H., Faria, B., Manning, A. J., and Wallace, D. W. R.:
Seasonal characteristics of tropical marine boundary layer air measured at
the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory, J. Atmos. Chem., 67, 87–140,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-011-9206-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-011-9206-1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y.: Modeling the mineralogy of
atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22243–22256, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cliff, G. and Lorimer, G. W.: The quantitative analysis of thin specimens, J.
Microsc., 103, 203–207, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cwiertny, D. M., Young, M. A., and Grassian, V. H.: Chemistry and
photochemistry of mineral dust aerosol, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 59, 27–51,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Desboeufs, K. V., Lonso, R., and Colin, J. L.: Factors influencing aerosol
solubility during cloud processes, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3529–3537, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dong, H., Peacor, D. R., and Murphy, S. F.: TEM study of progressive
alteration of igneous biotite to kaolinite throughout a weathered soil
profile, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 1881–1888, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Falkovich, A. H., Ganor, E., Levin, Z., Formenti, P., and Rudich, Y.:
Chemical and mineralogical analysis of individual mineral dust particles, J.
Geophys. Res., 106, 18029–18036, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Formenti, P., Schütz, L., Balkanski, Y., Desboeufs, K., Ebert, M.,
Kandler, K., Petzold, A., Scheuvens, D., Weinbruch, S., and Zhang, D.: Recent
progress in understanding physical and chemical properties of African and
Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8231–8256,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fu, H., Cwiertny, D. M., Carmichael, G. R., Scherer, M. M., and Grassian, V.
H.: Photoreductive dissolution of Fe-containing mineral dust particles in
acidic media, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D11304, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012702</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Glaccum, R. A. and Prospero, J. M.: Saharan aerosols over the tropical north
Atlantic–Mineralogy, Mar. Geol., 37, 295–321, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Guieu, C., Bonnet, S., and Wagener, T.: Biomass burning as a source of
dissolved iron to the ocean?, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L19608,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022962</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Mahowald, N. M., Chen, Y., Siefert, R. L., Luo, C.,
Subramaniam, A., and Fung, I.: Estimates of atmospheric-processed soluble
iron from observations and a global mineral aerosol model: Biogeochemical
implications, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D17205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004574</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Ito, A. and Feng, Y.: Role of dust alkalinity in acid mobilization of iron,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9237–9250, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9237-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9237-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y.: The dependence of localized crystallization of halloysite and
kaolinite on primary minerals in the weathering profile of granite, Clay.
Clay Miner., 48, 196–203, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, G. Y.: Bulk and single-particle mineralogy of Asian dust and a
comparison with its source soils, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D02208,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008606</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y. and Kim, H. B.: Mineralogy, chemistry, and formation of
oxidized biotite in the weathering profile of granitic rocks, Am. Mineral.,
88, 352–364, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, G. Y. and Nousiainen, T.: TEM analysis of the internal structures and
mineralogy of Asian dust particles and the implications for optical modeling,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7233–7254, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7233-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7233-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y., Yoon, H. I., and Lee, S. Y.: Chemistry and microstructures of
clay particles in smectite-rich shelf sediments, South Shetland Islands,
Antarctica, Mar. Geol., 209, 19–30, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y., Hillier, S., and Kemp, R. A.: Quantitative bulk and
single-particle mineralogy of a thick Chinese loess–paleosol section:
implications for loess provenance and weathering, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 37,
1271–1287, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G.Y., Hillier, S., and Kemp, R. A.: Changes in mineralogy of
loess–paleosol sections across the Chinese Loess Plateau, Quaternary Res.,
75, 245–255, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, G. Y., Kim, J. Y., Seo, J., Kim, G. M., Jin, H. C., and Chun, Y.:
Long-range transport of giant particles in Asian dust identified by physical,
mineralogical, and meteorological analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 505–521,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-505-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-505-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T. D. and Spokes, L. J.: Atmospheric iron inputs to the ocean, in:
Biogeochemistry of Iron in Seawater, edited by: Turner, D. and Hunter, K. A.,
John Wiley, Hoboken, N. J., 85–121, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T. D., An, Z. S., Andersen, K. K., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G.,
Brooks, N., Cao, J. J., Boyd, P. W., Duce, R. A., Hunter, K. A., Kawahata,
H., Kubilay, N., laRoche, J., Liss, P. S., Mahowald, N., Prospero, J. M.,
Ridgwell, A. J., Tegen, I., and Torres, R.: Global Iron Connections Between
Desert, Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate, Science, 308, 67–71,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, M. S. and Meskhidze, N.: Atmospheric dissolved iron deposition to
the global oceans: effects of oxalate-promoted Fe dissolution, photochemical
redox cycling, and dust mineralogy, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1137–1155,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1137-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-1137-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, M. S., Meskhidze, N., Solmon, F., Gassó, S., Chuang,P. Y.,
Gaiero, D. M., Yantosca, R. M., Wu, S., Wang, Y., and Carouge, C.: Modeling
dust and soluble iron deposition to the South Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, D15202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013311</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Journet, E., Desboeufs, K. V., Caquineau, S., and Colin, J.-L.: Mineralogy as
a critical factor of dust iron solubility, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L07805,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031589</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Journet, E., Balkanski, Y., and Harrison, S. P.: A new data set of soil
mineralogy for dust-cycle modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3801–3816,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3801-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3801-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kodama, H. and Schnitzer, M.: Dissolution of chlorite minerals by fulvic
acid, Can. J. Soil Sci., 53, 240–243, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA), available at:
<uri>http://web.kma.go.kr/eng/weather/asiandust/timeseries.jsp</uri>, last access:
30 March 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lagaly, G.: Layer charge determination by alkylammonium ions, in: Layer
Charge Characteristics of 2:1 Silicate Clay Minerals, edited by: Mermut, A.
R., The Clay Minerals Society, Boulder, CO, 80–103, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lasaga, A. C.: Fundamental approaches in describing mineral dissolution and
precipitation rates, Rev. Mineral., 31, 23–86, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lowson, R. T., Comarmond, J., Rajaratnam, G., and Brown, P. L.: The kinetics
of the dissolution of chlorite of pH and at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 69, 1687–1699, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A.,
Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., and Tegen, I.: The atmospheric
global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19,
GB4025, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002402</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N. M., Engelstaedter, S., Luo, C., Sealy, A., Artaxo, P.,
Benitez-Nelson, C., Bonnet, S., Chen, Y., Chuang, P. Y., Cohen, D. D.,
Dulac, F., Herut, B., Johansen, A. M., Kubilay, N., Losno, R., Maenhaut, W.,
Paytan, A., Prospero, J. M., Shank, L. M., and Siefert, R. L.: Atmospheric
iron deposition: global distribution, variability, and human perturbations.
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 245–278, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mehra, O. P. and Jackson, M. J.: Iron oxide from soils and clays by a
dithionite system buffered with sodium bicarbonate, Clay. Clay Miner., 7,
317–327, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Meskhidze, N., Chameides, W. L., Nenes, A., and Chen, G.: Iron mobilization
in mineral dust: Can anthropogenic SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions affect ocean
productivity?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2085, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018035</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Meskhidze, N., Chameides, W. L., and Nenes, A.: Dust and pollution: a recipe
for enhanced ocean fertilization, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D03301,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005082</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Meunier, A. and Velde, B.: Illite, Springer, Berlin, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, C. M., Mills, M. M., Achterberg, E. P., Geider, R. J., LaRoche, J.,
Lucas, M. I., McDonagh, E. L., Pan, X., Poulton, A. J., Rijkenberg, M. J.
A., Suggett, D. J., Ussher, S. J., and Woodward, E. M. S.: Large-scale
distribution of Atlantic nitrogen fixation controlled by iron availability,
Nat. Geosci., 2, 867–871, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Nagy, K. L.: Dissolution and precipitation kinetics of sheet silicates, Rev.
Mineral., 31, 173–273, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Newman, A. C. D.: The chemical constitution of clays, in: Chemistry of Clays
and Clay Minerals, edited by: Newman, A. C. D., Mineralogical Society,
London, 1–128, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nickovic, S., Vukovic, A., Vujadinovic, M., Djurdjevic, V., and Pejanovic,
G.: Technical Note: High-resolution mineralogical database of dust-productive
soils for atmospheric dust modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 845–855,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-845-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-845-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V., Formenti, P., Nava, S., and Chou, C.: Chemical
characterisation of iron in dust and biomass burning aerosols during
AMMA-SOP0/DABEX: implication for iron solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
4273–4282, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4273-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4273-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V., and Journet, E.: Variability of dust iron
solubility in atmospheric waters: investigation of the role of oxalate
organic complexation, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6510–6517, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Raiswell, R. and Canfield, D. E.: The iron biogeochemical cycle past and
present, Geochemical Perspectives, 1, 1–220, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, G. J.: Acid dissolution of chlorites: release of magnesium, iron and
aluminium and mode of acid attack, Clay. Clay Miner., 17, 347–354, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Rubin, M., Berman-Frank, I., and Shaked, Y.: Dust- and mineral-iron
utilization by the marine dinitrogen-fixer <italic>Trichodesmium</italic>, Nat. Geosci.,
4, 529–534, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1181</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Schlosser, C., Klar, J. K., Wake, B. D., Snow, J. T., Honey, D. J.,
Woodward, E. M. S., Lohan, M. C., Achterberg, E. P., and Moore, C. M.:
Seasonal ITCZ migration dynamically controls the location of the
(sub)tropical Atlantic biogeochemical divide, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
1438–1442, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318670111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1318670111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Shaked, Y., Kustka, A. B., and Morel, F. M. M.: A general kinetic model for
iron acquisition by eukaryotic phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50,
872–882, 2005. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Z., Shao, L., Jones, T. P., and Lu, S.: Microscopy and mineralogy of
airborne particles collected during severe dust storm episodes in Beijing,
China, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D01303, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005073</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Z. B., Krom, M. D., Bonneville, S., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., and
Benning, L. G.: Formation of iron nanoparticles and increase in iron
reactivity in mineral dust during simulated cloud processing, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 6592–6596, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es901294g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es901294g</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Z. B., Woodhouse, M. T., Carslaw, K. S., Krom, M. D., Mann, G. W.,
Baker, A. R., Savov, I., Fones, G. R., Brooks, B., Drake, N., Jickells, T.
D., and Benning, L. G.: Minor effect of physical size sorting on iron
solubility of transported mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8459–8469,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8459-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8459-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., Church, T. M., Baker, A. R., and Powell,
C. F.: Fractional solubility of aerosol iron: Synthesis of a global-scale
data set, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 89, 173–189, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Siefert, R. L., Pehkonen, S. O., Erel, Y., and Hoffmann, M. R.: Iron
photochemistry of aqueous suspensions of ambient aerosol with added organic
acids, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 3271–3279, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Środoń, J.: Nature of mixed-layer clays and mechanisms of their
formation and alteration, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 27, 19–53, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., Dutay, J. -C., Bowie, A. R., Chever, F.,
Jean-Baptiste, P., Bucciarelli, E., Lannuzel, D., Remenyi, T., Sarthou, G.,
Aumont, O., Gehlen, M., and Jeandel, C.: Hydrothermal contribution to the
oceanic dissolved iron inventory, Nat. Geosci., 3, 252–256, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, Y., Higashi, M., Furukawa, T., and Mitsunobu, S.: Change of iron
species and iron solubility in Asian dust during the long-range transport
from western China to Japan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11237–11252,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11237-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11237-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Trapp, J. M., Millero, F. J., and Prospero, J. M.: Trends in the solubility
of iron in dust-dominated aerosols in the equatorial Atlantic trade winds:
importance of iron speciation and sources, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 11,
Q03014, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GC002651</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Weaver, C. E.: Clays, muds, and shales, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Weaver, C. E. and Pollard, L. D.: The chemistry of clay minerals, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, D. B. and Carter, C. B.: Transmission electron microscopy,
Springer, New York, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Zhuang, G., Yi, Z., Duce, R. A., and Brown, P. R.: Chemistry of iron in
marine aerosols, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 6, 161–173, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
