Corrigendum to “ Atmospheric column-averaged mole fractions of carbo dioxide at 53 aircraft measurement sites ” published in Atmos . Chem . Phys . 13 , 5265 – 5275 , 2013

Y. Miyamoto1,*, M. Inoue1, I. Morino 1, O. Uchino1, T. Yokota1, T. Machida1, Y. Sawa2, H. Matsueda2, C. Sweeney 3, P. P. Tans3, A. E. Andrews3, S. C. Biraud4, and P. K. Patra5 1National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan 2Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan 3National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Boulder, Colorado, USA 4Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA 5Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan * now at: Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan


Introduction
In the first sentence of the last paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "In this study, we report the results of XCO 2 calculations carried out with data provided by CONTRAIL, measurements made by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Energy (DOE) and Japan's National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) at 53 sites between 2007 and 2009." In the third sentence of the last paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "Section 2 briefly describes the measurements by CON-TRAIL, NOAA, DOE, and NIES."

Observations
In the first sentence of the first paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "Aircraft measurements obtained by CONTRAIL, NOAA, DOE, andNIES between 2007 and2009 were used in this study." In the third sentence of the first paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "The locations of the CONTRAIL, NOAA, DOE, and NIES observations are shown in Fig. 1, and they are listed along with their three-letter site codes in Table 1." In the fourth sentence of the second paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "These profiles differ from those obtained by the NOAA, DOE, and NIES aircraft because the commercial aircraft moves horizontally over a few hundred kilometers during their takeoff and landing." After the third paragraph, the following paragraph should be added: "The US DOE supports an aircraft-based observation program in the Southern Great Plains (SGP) as part of a joint effort between the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program, NOAA/ESRL, and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ARM Carbon project (Biraud et al., 2013).Flasks are collected approximately twice per week by Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
small aircraft (Cessna 172 initially, then Cessna 206) on a series of horizontal legs ranging in altitude from 460 m to 5.5 km and analyzed by NOAA/ESRL for a suite of carbon cycle gases and isotopes, thereby linking all flights to the global cooperative air-sampling network."

Results and discussion
In the sixth sentence of the sixth paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "The uncertainties at NOAA, DOE and NIES sites were basically uniform with values less than 1 ppm." In seventh sentence of the sixth paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "At the NOAA and DOE sites with the largest uncertainties (AAO, LEF, SGP, and WGC), the uncertainties were nearly 1 ppm."

Conclusions
In the first sentence of the first paragraph, the corrected sentence is as follows: "XCO 2 at 53 sites in the world was calculated from aircraft measurement data obtained by CONTRAIL, NOAA, DOE, and NIES between 2007 and 2009 along with tower data obtained at the surface and the ACTM simulated age of air to estimate profiles in the stratosphere."

Supplement
The authors would like to correct the author list as follows: "Y.Miyamoto, M. Inoue, I. Morino, O. Uchino, T. Yokota, T. Machida, Y. Sawa, H. Matsueda, C. Sweeney, P. P. Tans, A. E. Andrews, S. C. Biraud, P. K. Patra." In the second sentence, the corrected sentence is as follows: "Here, results for all the 53 sites are shown in A reference should be added as follows: The corrected Table 1

Fig. 1 .
Figure 1.Observation sites used in this study.Open triangles, open squares, an open circle, and asterisks indicate CONTRAIL, NOAA, DOE, and NIES sites, respectively.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Frequency distributions of the estimated uncertainties at five sites.The size of each frequency class is 0.1 ppm.

Fig. 5 .
Fig. 5. Frequency distributions of the estimated uncertainties at five sites.The size of each frequency class is 0.1 ppm.

Table 1 .
is as follows: Locations of the sites where aircraft measurements were made.