ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP Atmos. Chem. Phys. 1680-7324 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-10-3561-2010 Assessment of parameters describing representativeness of air quality in-situ measurement sites Henne S. 1 Brunner D. 1 Folini D. 2 Solberg S. 3 Klausen J. 1 Buchmann B. 1 Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Dübendorf, Switzerland Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland NILU, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway 16 04 2010 10 8 3561 3581 Copyright: © 2010 S. Henne et al. 2010 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/10/3561/2010/acp-10-3561-2010.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/10/3561/2010/acp-10-3561-2010.pdf

The atmospheric layer closest to the ground is strongly influenced by variable surface fluxes (emissions, surface deposition) and can therefore be very heterogeneous. In order to perform air quality measurements that are representative of a larger domain or a certain degree of pollution, observatories are placed away from population centres or within areas of specific population density. Sites are often categorised based on subjective criteria that are not uniformly applied by the atmospheric community within different administrative domains yielding an inconsistent global air quality picture. A novel approach for the assessment of parameters reflecting site representativeness is presented here, taking emissions, deposition and transport towards 34 sites covering Western and Central Europe into account. These parameters are directly inter-comparable among the sites and can be used to select sites that are, on average, more or less suitable for data assimilation and comparison with satellite and model data. Advection towards these sites was simulated by backward Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Modelling (LPDM) to determine the sites' average catchment areas for the year 2005 and advection times of 12, 24 and 48 h. Only variations caused by emissions and transport during these periods were considered assuming that these dominate the short-term variability of most but especially short lived trace gases. The derived parameters describing representativeness were compared between sites and a novel, uniform and observation-independent categorisation of the sites based on a clustering approach was established. Six groups of European background sites were identified ranging from <i>generally remote</i> to more polluted <i>agglomeration</i> sites. These six categories explained 50 to 80% of the inter-site variability of median mixing ratios and their standard deviation for NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>, while differences between group means of the longer-lived trace gas CO were insignificant. The derived annual catchment areas strongly depended on the applied LPDM and input wind fields, the catchment settings and the year of analysis. Nevertheless, the parameters describing representativeness showed considerably less variability than the catchment geometry, supporting the applicability of the derived station categorisation.

 References Blanchard, C.&nbsp;L., Carr, E.&nbsp;L., Collins, J.&nbsp;F., Smith, T.&nbsp;B., Lehrman, D.&nbsp;E., and Michaels, H.&nbsp;M.: Spatial representativeness and scales of transport during the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study in California's San Joaquin Valley, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4775–4786, 1999. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) – Columbia University and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT): Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3), available online at: \urlprefix<a href="http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/">http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/</a>, 2005. Dalgaard, P.: Introductory statistics with R, Springer, New York, USA, 267 pp., 2002. Derwent, R.&nbsp;G. and Davies, T.&nbsp;J.: Modeling the Impact of Nox or Hydrocarbon Control on Photochemical Ozone in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 28, 2039–2052, 1994. European Commission – Joint Research Centre: Global Land Cover 2000 database, available online at: \urlprefix<a href="http://www-tem.jrc.it/glc2000/">http://www-tem.jrc.it/glc2000/</a>, 2003. European Council: Exchange on Information decision (EoI) on Air, Tech. rep., European Council, 1997. Flemming, J., Stern, R., and Yamartino, R.&nbsp;J.: A new air quality regime classification scheme for O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> observations sites, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6121–6129, 2005. Folini, D., Ubl, S., and Kaufmann, P.: Lagrangian particle dispersion modeling for the high Alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18111, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009558">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009558</a>, 2008. Folini, D., Kaufmann, P., Ubl, S., and Henne, S.: Region of infuence of 13 remote European measurement sites based on modeled CO mixing ratios, J. Geophys. Res., D08307, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011125">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011125</a>, 2009. Galassi, M., Davies, J., Theiler, J., Gough, B., Jungman, G., Alken, P., Booth, M., and Rossi, F.: GNU scientific library reference manual, Third edition, for Vers. 1.12, Network Theory, Bristol, UK, third edition edn., 2009. Glaab, H., Fay, B., and Jacobsen, I.: Evaluation of the emergency dispersion model at the deutscher wetterdienst using ETEX data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4359–4366, 1998. Henne, S., Klausen, J., Junkermann, W., Kariuki, J.&nbsp;M., Aseyo, J.&nbsp;O., and Buchmann, B.: Representativeness and Climatology of Carbon Monoxide and Ozone at the Global GAW Station Mt. Kenya in Equatorial Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3119–3139, 2008. Kljun, N., Rotach, M.&nbsp;W., and Schmid, H.&nbsp;P.: A three-dimensional backward lagrangian footprint model for a wide range of boundary-layer stratifications, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 103, 205–226, 2002. Kuhlbusch, T., John, A., Hugo, A., Peters, A., von Klot, S., Cyrys, J., Wichmann, H.-E., Quass, U., and Bruckmann, P.: Analysis and design of local air quality measurements, Tech. rep., European Comission, 2006. Larssen, S., Sluyter, R., and Helmis, C.: Criteria for EUROAIRNET – The EEA Air Quality Monitoring and Information Network, Tech. rep., European Environment Agency, 1999. Memmesheimer, M., Ebel, A., and Roemer, M: Budget calculations for ozone and its precursors: Seasonal and episodic features based on model simulations, J. Atmos. Chem., 28(1–3), 283–317, 1997. Mol, W., Hooydonk, P., and de&nbsp;Leeuw, F.: European exchange of monitoring information and state of the air quality in 2006, Tech. rep., ETC/ACC, 2008. Nappo, C.&nbsp;J., Caneill, J.&nbsp;Y., Furman, R.&nbsp;W., Gifford, F.&nbsp;A., Kaimal, J.&nbsp;C., Kramer, M.&nbsp;L., Lockhart, T.&nbsp;J., Pendergast, M.&nbsp;M., Pielke, R.&nbsp;A., Randerson, D., Shreffler, J.&nbsp;H., and Wyngaard, J.&nbsp;C.: The Workshop on the Representativeness of Meteorological-Observations, June 1981, Boulder, Colorado, USA, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 63, 761–764, 1982. Scaperdas, A. and Colvile, R.&nbsp;N.: Assessing the representativeness of monitoring data from an urban intersection site in central London, UK, Atmos. Environ., 33, 661–674, 1999. Schmid, H.&nbsp;P.: Experimental design for flux measurements: matching scales of observations and fluxes, Agr. For. Meteorol., 87, 179–200, 1997. Schmid, H.&nbsp;P.: Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective, Agr. For. Meteorol., 113, 159–183, 2002. Schär, C., Vidale, P.&nbsp;L., Luthi, D., Frei, C., Haberli, C., Liniger, M.&nbsp;A., and Appenzeller, C.: The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves, Nature, 427, 332–336, 2004. Seibert, P. and Frank, A.: Source-receptor matrix calculation with a Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 51–63, 2004. Snel, S.: Improvement of classifications European monitoring stations for AirBase, Tech. rep., ETC/ACC, 2004. Spangl, W., Schneider, J., Moosmann, L., and Nagl, C.: Representativeness and classification of air quality monitoring stations, Tech. rep., Umweltbundesamt, 2007. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, 2005. Tarasova, O.&nbsp;A., Brenninkmeijer, C. A.&nbsp;M., Jockel, P., Zvyagintsev, A.&nbsp;M., and Kuznetsov, G.&nbsp;I.: A climatology of surface ozone in the extra tropics: cluster analysis of observations and model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6099–6117, 2007. von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M.&nbsp;G., Crutzen, P.&nbsp;J., and Rasch, P.&nbsp;J.: A model for studies of tropospheric ozone and nonmethane hydrocarbons: Model description and ozone results, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4294, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002893">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002893</a>, 2003. Ward, J.&nbsp;H.: Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 58, 236–244, 1963. Weissmann, M., Braun, F.&nbsp;J., Gantner, L., Mayr, G.&nbsp;J., Rahm, S., and Reitebuch, O.: The Alpine mountain-plain circulation: Airborne Doppler lidar measurements and numerical simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 3095–3109, 2005. Wesely, M.&nbsp;L.: Parameterization of Surface Resistances to Gaseous Dry Deposition in Regional-Scale Numerical-Models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, 1989. Wild, O.: Modelling the global tropospheric ozone budget: exploring the variability in current models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2643–2660, 2007.